7161. Misbranding of Septicide. TJ. S. * * * v. Septicide Co., a corpora tion. Plea of guilty. Fine, $300. (F. & D. No. 98G4. I. S. Nos. 11748-p, 11843-p.) On August 20, 1919, the United States attorney for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in the District Court of the United States for said district an information against the Septicide Co., a corporation, Milwaukee, Wis., alleging shipment by said company, in violation of the Food and Drugs Act, as amended, on or about March 28, 1918, and June 10, 1918, from the State of Wisconsin into the States of Michigan and Illinois, respectively, of quantities of an article, labeled in part " Septicide," which was misbranded. Analyses of samples of the article by the Bureau of Chemistry of this de- partment showed that the preparation consisted essentially of a dilute aqueous solution containing respectively 0.17 gram and 0.26 gram of sulphur dioxid in 100 cc. It was ' alleged in substance in the information that the article was mis- branded for the reason that certain statements regarding the therapeutic and curative effects thereof, appearing on the labels of the bottles, falsely and fraudulently represented it as a preventive, treatment, remedy, and cure for old sores, scald head, sore nipples, milk leg, erysipelas, scrofula, face eruptions, eczema, and all skin diseases, cancer, wounds, burns and bruises, sore eyes, catarrh of the head, dyspepsia, catarrh of stomach, disorders of digestion, leucorrhoea, hemorrhoids, diphtheria, croup, bronchitis, coughs, quinsy and all throat diseases, la grippe and colds, diarrhoea, colic, dysentery or cholera morbus, and poison by ivy, diseases of the mouth, canker, dandruff and falling- out of hair, when, in truth and in fact, it was not. On November 7, 1919, the defendant company entered a plea of guilty to the information, and the court imposed a fine of $300. E. D. BALL, Acting Secretary of Agriculture.