234 MEAN DIMENSIONS OF BODY- the proper size for soldiers' clothing, for which he had undertaken a considerable contract with the military authorities. Ballingall has given1 some account, as well as a representation of it; and states that the instrument is deposited in the Museum of the Edin- burgh University. It enables the total height, breadth of neck, of shoulders, and of pelvis, the length of legs and height to the knee to be measured with greater accuracy and rapidity than oth- erwise would be possible, since when the man to be measured has taken his position, gauges are quickly set for the measures of all these dimensions, and the numerical values read off after the man has left the instrument. Instruments of this kind were con- structed for the Sanitary Commission in 1863, at the office of the U. S. Coast Survey, under the special supervision of the late Pro- fessor Bache, the lamented Superintendent of the Sur- vey, and Vice President of the Commission. These contained some improve- ments upon the original in- strument, especially such as permitted more accu- rate adjustment to the per- son, as well as an addition- al gauge for measuring the height of the body proper, of which the seventh cer- vical vertebra was taken as the limit. When in Au- gust and September, 1864, the new instruments were ordered, Dr. Douglas kind- ly charged himself with the supervision of the work, which was executed with great care and fidelity by Mr. William Belcher of New York. In the new instruments many addi- 1 Outlines of Military Surgery, 1855, pp. 35, 36. MEAN DIMENSIONS OF BODY. 235 tional improvements were introduced, a considerable part of them being suggested by the experience obtained by the use of the two former ones, which were themselves correspondingly modified as soon as they could be spared for the purpose. The annexed figures will indicate the general construction of the andrometer, and the manner of use. The graduations of this instrument, and of all our implements for linear measure, are in inches and tenths, all danger of error from the use of divisions not decimal being thus avoided. It is a source of regret to the author that he did not employ the met- ric system for all these measurements, not only as attended with less uncertainty on account of the smaller unit employed when centi-