^1-vfXa. '-' T\ "CWCSSr ( '--■"•'wSifcWBbWl ' '•'"• ^-^-SWWtfSJE ^ ' ■ r—it. nkjisaaftap ' ,A t^. V ^flVHff '*■.-:• ""* u' -V., .*■■:. ■"-.■''.'^^: :'-^.WW . * .." '. . - *£"■ S ca»t»:v: •„ T,JC , ..^.. ^ \-" " "V ,.' 'S ■ • * •• • T^yX*:-"■'■*■ £;» d>^vL^S^-iS- .-.'•-'.V' ' ~ ■l4> ' .*iJ> "-''•'-•■-■' ',■•■ •« -*' ': iir-;^-_: .i'v»;~,:^."'-r.. i' NLfl OOSSTMTT fl NLM005594998 « / A Zl ^L^*~--i-'£ / cnvf- OHIO STATE MEDICAL SOCIETY TOLEDO, ()., Jink 16-17-18 1874. REPORT General Paralysis, « I). A. MORSE, M. I)., OK LONDON, O FT I O. N\884r I8t4 St r REPORT ON GENERAL PARALYSIS, BY D. A. MORSE, M. D., LONDON, OHIO, Report on Monomania, —BY— I). A. MORSE, M. I)., OF LONDON, OHIO. Is there a Monomania? Is there a mania 'wit/tout delirium? withou* delusion.? f An Instinct ice Mania ? Is there a Reasoning Mania; the mo?-- al insanity of Prichard ? How are instinct and intellect related? Can a man be insane as to one idea, or fact, and sane as to all others? Can a a man be insane as to instinct and remain sane in intellect? Is delusion a test of insanity? Is "Knowledge, of right and wrong" a just and sufficient test of responsibility ? (Jchtlanai of the Ohio State Medical Society: Last year I directed your attention to a condition, or disease. alleged by many writers to be entitled to rank as a form of in- sanity, and which is, viewing it from their standpoint, of suffi- cient importance and distinctive characteristics to be designated a monomania, by name: Dipsomania. The views of any one writer upon the subject are brief, scattered, yet I collected them; presented my theory; and awaited the verdict of those who had given the subject special attention. The reception it met with is sufficient evidence that m}? labor was not fruitless. The subject of Dipsomania involved many questions not con- sidered in that Report;^questions that are of great importance and upon which many views there entertained must rest. These questions are the foundation of all theories that attempt to maintain the existence of a monomania, <>r to explain it. GENERAL PARALYSIS. A Critical Review of the literature op the Subject ; to which is Appended an Analysis of the case of John S. Blackburn, in which Insanity was Alleged as a means of Defense. BY D. A. MORSE, M. D, LONDON, OHIO. " Medical testimony when of any value, can be little else than a reference to authority."—Prof. Chas. A. Lee, Notes to Guy's Forensic Medicine. Gentlemen : The application of Medical Science to serve the ends of Jus- tice, to the interpretation of Criminal Law and Procedure, i. e., to the "tests" of responsibility for crime; and to determine crime itself, requires a special knowledge—a special training— an extended experience in all that pertains to the subjects considered by writers upon Medico-Legal Science. No one sitting in the quiet of his study, with the multitude of the works upon insanity before him, versed in their contents however well he may be, no one in the whirl and commotion of busy every-day life, as a medical man, however great his experience; no one familiar with the great institutions where the management and treatment of the insane calls for a thorough knowledge of the symptoms, progress, pathology and therapeu- tics of insanity; no one, to go even further, who may add to all these attainments a theoretical knowledge of Medico-Legal Science, can fully appreciate, until he has been called upon to i GENERAL PARALYSIS. assume the duties of such position, the wants of one who attempts to work up the details, in evidence, analyze the facts, fit and adjust them to a proper conclusion, crystalize them into an " opinion," if you please, in a case where alleged insanity, although actually existing, must be shown by a "preponderance of evidence," or " beyond a reasonable doubt," or as sometimes held, " must be clearly shown" to exist, which opinion will ex- tend to and embrace all the ingredients of homicide, relieve from responsibility, and thereby excuse apparent crime. To any of the aforementioned purposes, or relations of the medical man, aside from the last, the question of responsibility does not arise; the mental capacity to conduct a rational defense, to form a deliberate purpose, to commit an act with intent, mal- ice and premeditation, are not questions of feet that one in the situations named will be likely to be called upon to determine; nor will one in the simple capacity of a medical man, with the same degree of mathematical precision, be required to make as thorough analysis, as critical an examination of symptoms, as exact a classification as to the form of insanity, as when the life of an individual, the character, reputation and social interests of a family are thereby imperiled. For all purposes, to the medical man, insanity is a physical disease. He looks upon it as he would any other disease that he may be called upon to treat; he does not shroud it with mys- terious obscurities, inquire whether the man is h free moral agent, whether he has will power sufficient to enable him to re- sist temptation, but regards the mental phenomena only as in- dices of existing pathological conditions; his brain is not confused with what may be said, pro or con "irresistible impulse," "insanity without delirium f or what Lord Coke, Hale Black- stone, or any one else may have said or thought of the "tests" of responsibility, civil or criminal; he does not consult authors to OHIO STATE MEDICAL SOCIETY. •"> determine whether the action of jalap is modified by the ina- bility of the patient to distinguish by his moral sense, " right from wrong," or to determine how much hydrate of chloral will outweigh an illusion or hallucination, before it produces sleep; but the necessity for therapeutical knowledge, medical skill, a clear diagnosis and rational prognosis, are rested upon the same foundations in pathology, whether mental phenomena are or are not interpreted by a predetermined, despotic legal criterion. The medical expert, or skilled witness, is called upon to hear facts stated by common witnesses, whose expressions are colored by passion, by prejudice, by sympathy, by public opinion, by family relationship and self-interest; or what is much more em- barrassing to him, well knowing that seldom are all the facts included, nor can they be as they would be viewed by a medi- cal man unless all the evidence be included, in many cases; the superficial knowledge of the medical witnesses having led to superficial examinations, all the essential facts not being drawn out, yet upon these is he required, a hypothetical case being pre- sented, the expert confined to the case constructed, without the evidence before him, without an examination of the defendant, to explain to a jury facts thus submitted, and is expected to sys- tematize and organize the chaos, however incomprehensible, im- perfect, or disjointed the hypothesis. The expert who has a well digested, well arranged knowledge of the subject, readily forms what to him is a satisfactory opin- ion, and if opportunity has been afforded him to examine the defendant, has his opinion fully confirmed, not only by an ob- servation of conditions stated in evidence, but by seeing in the appearance, expression, demeanor or action of the patient what no witness can describe; yet however firmly he may be convinced of the correctness of his views, however clearly he may express them before the jury, however plausible they may seem to the 6 GENERAL PARALYSIS. counsel upon either side, they may be questioned, and counsel ask that they be confirmed by a reference to authority. The witness is asked to "name some authors who entertain similar views," or if certain authors mentioned are not good authority, the counsel intending afterwards to read from them. The expert declares them good authority, but is mortified when the case is argued to hear read from these very books statements that con- tradict every view he has expressed. He has declared them to be good authority and in the main they are, but the expert ex- periences only when too late to remedy it, the fact, that no matter what the view taken, unless qualified in some manner, it can be contradicted, and he thrown into confusion by a reference to the books. Counsel have no right to read boohs that have not been submitted under the oath of medical experts as authority, other- wise why should experts be called, or why should not counsel read conflicting opinions from authors and have the jury to de- termine what is and what is not authority. The expert is called to declare what is accepted by his profession as authority, and when called upon to cite authority should not state as authority that which has been exploded, but the most recent views and developments of the subject. One expert bases an opinion up- on those early teachings imbibed when medical science was as yet in its infancy, yet presents it with all the force and weight of more extended modern research. Another who feels the full responsibility and difficulty arising from the position,who feels that he must echo truly authority, is cautious, deliberate, more reserved, if not embarrassed; and although he incurs the risk of be- ing considered unqualified, by the ignorant, is more correct, and although he may not argue the case, as I have seen frequently done by experts, who evidently were called to make a case rath- er than tell the truth, he is for science the best champion and in competency and reliability, the best witness. With a clear OHIO STATE MEDICAL SOCIETY. 7 knowledge of what authors state he feels the full force of the responsibilities resting upon him, and is the much more reserved as he feels that authorities conflict and the difficulty of showing what is authority gradually forces itself upon him. His knowl- edge has been the steady growth of time, the result of long years of patient study and reflection, of perfect digestion and assimilation of what he has read and observed; and it is as it were by intuition he forms his opinion. He flies from author to author to find that while one confirms his pathology it ignores his classification; that while others approve his classification many others perhaps deny as a special form of insanity that which he has designated, and perhaps others de- clare it a disease but not insanity at all. One must experience much of this, if not all, who after hav- ing made a thorough examination of John S. Blackburn, attempts to work up the details of evidence, from it alone to gather all the facts, before he has concluded an elaborate opinion that shall exhaust such facts and gjve them due significance and place in the structure he erects; and he will feel that much is wanting that he would desire expressed. To my mind no duty a medical man may be called upon to perform equals in degree of responsibility that of the expert, and in no one thing are our medical institutions, in many in- stances, more remiss than in their failure to teach medical students how to apply their knowledge to practical purposes, and in the manner they ignore this essential branch of a col- lege curriculum. No man can be a thorough student of Medical Jurisprudence without receiving new impetus—new motives, a higher sense of duty, a higher appreciation of medicine as a science. Without further consideration of this at the present time, I desire to end the already too lengthy introduction to this Report s GENERAL PARALYSIS. by an extract from one of my lectures, delivered January 3d, 1870, as an introductory to a course in Indiana Medical College, Indianapolis, Indiana, upon Medical Jurisprudence and Insanity, entitled: "The Duties of the Medical Witness and his Privileges." After enumerating the objects and end of this Branch, the various duties of the medical witness and his privileges, the lecture concludes as follows:— " You have, gentlemen, by this time concluded, that the du- ties devolving upon you as a medical witness are not such that you should ardently desire to perform them; but as sooner or later you will be called upon, if found qualified to fill them, I hope and trust that you will bear in mind their importance, and the fact that without a thorough acquaintance of all the author- ities a witness is not fully qualified to give an opinion upon questions involving scientific knowledge. I frequently see men called into court to give evidence in cases of insanity, who never possessed or ever read a single volume upon insanity during all their lives; they could not under any circumstances give you a classification of insanity, yet courts admit their evi- dence unquestioned. It is a question, whether one half who testify in county courts, could give a list of different works up- on medical jurisprudence or insanity, to say nothing of what these works contain. The masses judge the expert by his presumed experience. The counsel select untnesses rather for their influence upon a jury, than the development of truth. Experience teaches, but experience alone teaches little that is valuable; for the mind of man is so constituted that passion and prejudice blind his judgment, and resting alone upon his own observa- tions he is as liable to err as he is to conclude correctly. "Smith in his Analysis of Medical Evidence, says, 'It is very possible, therefore, that he who depends upon his experience may be inferior, as to his knowledge and experience, to the dili- OHIO STATE MEDICAL SOCIETY. 9 gent student; for an accidental observer may be unqualified to make use of his opportunities while the other may acquire much information, without going beyond the labors of others. The man of experience has to labor single-handed, as much as all the others put together, ere he can equal them in pretension ; while the student again may have opportunities of experience to a minor extent, but will make a vastly better use of a few than the uninformed can of many. Presumed experience, for that is certainly what the word in its ordinary use must be re- stricted to, is in a great measure accidental; it must fall to the share of different individuals in different forms and degrees. I believe that no small portion of that odious discrepancy which has prevailed among medical witnesses whereby the luster of medicine itself has been so much tarnished, is chargeable to the prevalent affectation of being men of experience rather than men of learning, to the over anxious wish of being extensively em- ployed rather than solidly instructed and properly qualified." " Prof. Chas. A. Lee, to whom we have so often referred, presents in few words the true feature of the subject. He says, (page 20, notes to Grey): " How often do we see medical men of scanty experience priding themselves upon their experience, and disparaging all knowledge derived from books, and by so doing demonstrate alike their ignorance and want of sense; for what is individual experience at the best when compared with all the vast stores accumulated by the sages of the profession of all ages. It is but a drop of water compared with the ocean, a moment of time with eternity. Personal experience un- less ENLARGED, IMPROVED AND CORRECTED BY THAT OF OTHERS IS OF LITTLE VALUE. MEDICAL TESTIMONY, WHEN OF ANY VALUE, IS BUT LITTLE ELSE THAN A REFERENCE TO AUTHORITY." In presenting a review of the Literature of General Paraly- 10 GENERAL PARALYSIS. sis, I am conscious that I have no ordinary task to perform, of my own inability to perform it as justice to writers and to the subject requires. To follow the multitude of writers upon the disease through the expensive and almost inaccessible works containing their views, to seek out these views often under the vague and obscure names with which they have seen fit to des- ignate the disease, concealed many times in works bearing no relation to the disease, and in treatises upon other subjects, as Heredite, SuicidM, &c, but few of which works are found in the English language—to bring all these together—express them correctly—and in one continuous article reflect them as it were in a mirror, is a labor from which I shrink; yet when I consid- er that if well performed no work can be more desirable, will be more acceptable to those versed in the subject, or who have made it a special study, I force myself to proceed, and will en- deavor to present in as brief a manner as will be consistent with the faithful performance of this duty, the merits of the Review, the interests of the reader, and a true expression ol those authors' views herein represented, the present Knowledge of General Paralysis. Before entering upon a consideration of the various details of symptoms, duration, progress, pathology, &c, I shall briefly notice the views of those writers who described the disease prior to 1826, for this reason: they had no well defined knowl- edge of the subject, regarded general paralysis as a complication of insanity, as something superadded or as a special form of paralysis, having no connection with the mental phenomena. The views of these writers are of the highest value and ut- most importance, in inducing a thorough consideration of the disease under every possible aspect, in viewing it from many different standpoints; they also attest the fact that although a common condition in public asylums, yet like many other dis- OHIO STATE MEDICAL SOCfETY. II eases when first noticed by authors, it was but imperfectly de- scribed, the aeeounts of it being crude and very brief; but also, that each succeeding writer carried the study one step in ad- vance of those who preceded him—the present knowledge be- ing a gradual, progressive development of the subject, the first being as the early, faint, glimmering rays of the rising sun which in due season will come forth in full splendor. HISTORY OF GENERAL PA KA LYSIS. Marce informs us, and also other writers, that the first writer who called attention to general paralysis was Haslam, in 1798. He spoke of the frequency of insanity as a cause of paralytic affections. He remarked that these persons have exalted ideas of pride, that they are incurable, that they fall into imbecility and marasmus, and die suddenly of apoplexy. Esquirol, in 1805, characterized the affection as an incurable form of insanity complicated with paralysis. He uses in differ- ent works the same language. In Des maladies mentales, T. ii, 46, and Dirt, dex sciences medicate*, T. xvi, p. 211, he speaks as follows concerning the relation of paralysis to dementia: " When paralysis complicates dementia all the paralytic symp- toms appear in succession; first the articulation of sounds is difficult, soon after locomotion is executed with difficulty, the arms are moved with labor; at length the dejections are invol- untary, etc. All these epiphenomena ought not to be taken as symptoms of demency, more than the signs of scorbutus which often complicates this disease." Thus the dementia he regards as expressed in the intellectual phenomena, and all physical symptoms as complications, or as he terms them: epipenomenes, or additions not essential to the VI GENERAL PARALYSIS. existence of dementia. This we fully discuss when we consider the nature and pathology of the disease. Esquirol divides demency into acute, or chronic, simple or complicated, continued, remittent or intermittent. On page 66, vol. ii, maladies mentales, he says: "demency may co-exist with lypemania, mania, epilepsy, convulsions, scorbutus, and above all with paralysis. Complicated demency is incurable. * * * The complication of mental diseases, with lesions of movement, resists all curative means and leaves no hope of long duration of life. These facts I declare, which we also read in the works of Calmeil, Bayle, Guislain, &c, confirm too well this mournful truth. The first I called attention to this phenomena, 1805, I showed the incurability of insanity com- plicated with paralysis. This paralysis is often the sign of a chronic inflammation of the meninges, and ought not to be con- founded with paralysis, consecutive to cerebral hemorrhages, cancers, tubercles, softening of the brain. It shows itself some times with the first symptoms of delirium, during the acute period so remarkable at the onset (debut) of almost all forms of insan- ity. Sometimes it precedes the delirium, sometimes it comes as a kind of adjunct to it. At first it is partial, then it invades a great number of muscles and becomes general." Esquirol seems to have overlooked the fact that the patho- logical changes induced both the mental and physical phenomena. The study of insanity from a physiological, and anatomico- pathological standpoint, as well as metaphysical, guards against these errors so common with early writers who regarded only mental phenomena in studying insanity, and based their classi- fications upon the predominant features of these phenomena, leaving pathological conditions and physical symptoms uncon- sidered, or to be explained on separate principles. That Esquirol thus erred, no one can, with the light of the OHIO STATE MEDICAL SOCIETY. 13 present day, dispute. In a controversy with Dr. Burrows he defines his views so clearly no one need mistake them. He says: " Dr. Burrows appears to believe that I regard the pa- ralysis of the insane as the effect and not as the cause of the in- sanity. I said nothing of the kind; I am satisfied to designate the paralysis as a frequent complication of insanity, and as ren- dering more unfavorable the prognosis." Georget, a pupil of Esquirol, conforms to a considerable ex- tent in his views to those of Esquirol. He does not, however, consider the physical symptoms as complications, but regards the lesion of motion as constituting a special species of paralysis, and gives it the name of paralysie musculaire chronique. Georget regards demency and the paralysis as two distinct af- fections. Esquirol says that paralysis may complicate all forms of insanity ; thus Ave have mania with paralysis, melancholy with paralysis, dementia with paralysis, &c. We prefer to say that there are two features that may pre- dominate, or characterize the mental phenomena in general pa- ralysis : exaltation and depression, and that dementia may be the termination or result in either of these. These writers say dementia may complicate all forms of insanity. It is for this reason that such endless confusion arises in the literature of insanity: cause, phenomena, effect, pathology, are all confounded, all mingled and commingled until no man can comprehend what is the view of the writer upon any given point; and ren- ders it much more probable that the writer cannot himself. The obliteration of the mental faculties from whatever cause, constitutes dementia—no matter whether from shock, nervous exhaustion, cerebral disease or other cause. When there has been mental development and loss of the intellectual faculties is consecutive to disease, there is dementia. Idiocy is the congeni- tal want of mental capacity; imbecility is the arrest of devel- 3 14 GENERAL PARALYSIS. opment at some period during infancy or childhood. If these distinctions were preserved there need be no confusion; but when one writer says an aged man has by disease been reduced to imbecility, another to dementia, another to- idiocy, what are we to understand by the terms ? Simply that he does not com- prehend their signification and use. Dementia is not a real mental state, but the absence of men- tal power, a negative condition, the lifeless body that remains when mind has expired, "the ashes that remiain in the socket when the candle has burned out," "the tomb of the mind," "the last infirmity of noble minds." Dementia may follow all forms of mental disease, but compli- cates nothing; it' exists to such extent and degree as" loss of mind is manifest. AVe might with equal propriety say that in a given case there is pneumonia complicated with death, as to sav that melancholy or mania is complicated with dementia. True, you may say there is partial dementia, that dementia begins long before it is fully manifest, that it may never be complete. Is this not true of the body, of physical death ? Georget says: "Demency terminates all forms of insanity which become incurable, provided that the patient lives long enough for this transformation to take place, which almost al- ways is the case. The disorganization which produces this mental state causes at the same time in more than half of the cases, another nervous disease, muscular paralysix, either general or partial." In other words two diseases are the result of the same disor- ganization of structure : loss of mental and loss of physical power; the intellectual death he calls dementia; the physical general paralysis. He is the first writer who fully described the essential symp- toms, and divides the disease, in its progress, into three decrees OHIO STATE MEDICAL SOCIETY. 15 FIRST DEGREE. "The paralysis commences almost always by declaring itself in the muscles of the tongue; very often it remains confined there a long time before extending elsewhere. The patient shows difficulty of speech, pronounces badly, or slowly the words, stammers more or less; the tongue thrust from the mouth is not drawn more to one side than the other, and seems generally affected. Other phenomena are soon joined to this. If the patient can give an account of his condition, he com- plains, may be of one side only, or of both sides at the same time, of numbness in the extremities, a feeling of pricking, of formication in the hands, the feet and along the tracts of nerves; pains in the head more or less general, sometimes more or less circumscribed, and ordinarily upon the opposite side from the paralysis, sometimes nevertheless the same side ; movement be- comes less easy, slower; the patient ends by being able to serve himself no longer with but the members of one side. All the other'functions may be regular, digestion above all very good, fat is not diminished. This first degree may last a long time, many years, without the general health appearing to suffer. SECOND DEGREE. "The patient is entirely paralyzed upon one half of the body, or both; he can neither walk or hold himself erect. He is forced to confine himself to the bed continually; he can pro- nounce but few words; intelligence is annihilated. Fat does not yet disappear; digestion is good. The signs which indicate chronic irritation present themselves ordinarily at this period; the pulse shows frequency, hardness; in the afternoon the cheeks color up; there is thirst. This second degree may last some months, a year or more. 36 GENERAL PARALYSIS. THIRD DEGREE. "This degree comprises all the last months of existence of the patient. It is characterized by increase of the paralysis to such an extent that these patients are but inert masses. They are deprived of color, pale and lean. The appetite is lost, there is either flux or obstinate constipation, and at length death ends the troubles. The intelligence is abolished early; paralytics remain sometimes a year or more without uttering a word, without asking that their wants be satisfied." Delaye, in 1824, Considerations surune espece de paralysie qui , -J;5 Ohio State Report. Blackburn was tried as to the question of his sanitv, was de- clared insane, and sent to Athens where he now is, in the Asylum. The question to he determined at that trial was not the guilt of the defendant as alleged in the indictment, but under the act of March 31. 1*74, O. L., whether the defendant had sufficient mental capacity to enable him to conduct a reasonable defense ; to determine the question of his sanitv at that time. April 14, 1S74, and not whether sane or insane March 20, 1K71, the time of the alleged murder. He having been declared incompetent to conduct a rational defense and the evidence extending the condition back four years, or 8 months beyond the time of the alleged murder, would any Prosecuting Attorney, if the prisoner did recover, ever be willing to prosecute the ease further? We think not. If a prisoner is incapacitated by reason of mental disease from conducting a defense to an indictment, such disease having ex- isted previous to the commission of the crime alleged, will he 62 1-n <;exeuae paralysis. be held responsible for the act? Will a man whose brain has- undergone the degenerations expressed by the mental and physical phenomena in Blackburn's case, be responsible for any act, civil or criminal—the act the result of delusion op not? We think not—for who can decide whether delusion is a motive to induce the act, when the prisoner can not explain his mo- tives. Extra copies of the reports of Dr. I). A. Morse, published by the Ohio State Medical Society, for the years 1S73-4, may be obtained of the Au- thor. They are: Dipsomania.................................................................. .">:> paires. Gkxekal, Paralysis....................................................120 " Monomania,..............................................................tyi t/UrM^ • ,0^*017 MAR 2 2 1960 H& NLM005594998