•l^'-JWi1- '*■ tip**. *,Vw-«' >•• '*>;'" s !-m*-i! SJfr .'"..rv ?t mm ft*!' .<;.♦- .arc J !§?r*:*^£'**■• \r^4i--i"^~^-*:*:. ■■•■ ■ .'■ '■ ^:$if U :*.•'-Ai'l." '»■• r. .^ v?3/ 3NHI03W jo Aavaan ivnouvn NLM001410306 Contributions to the Transactions of the Medical Asso- ciation of the State of Alabama—Session of 1874. 2 V THE YELLOAV FEVER EPIDEMIC OF 1873. n. The White Blood-Corpuscle. By Jerome Cochran, M. D., Professor of Pnhlic llyijiene and Meilicm Jurisprudence in the Medical College, of . Uabtima. f ■ OR/- 'O MONTGOMERY, ALA.: BARRETT A BROWN, BOOK AND JOB PRINTERS AND BINDERS. 1874. CG< 2. a ^ c coils'*; 5 2.2j^r 00 poppp^pppop w "«. a b b 'x a^o b - J ~ -^ ^ ()M^ Q -1« CO t>>0 W o> o o o o o p (i -1 « o o - o>opppo ^.OwisJ o A. M observation. oooppo o -b o - M M » ~J mi o o 0 o o p tJ - - o o - N w H -f^*- O O O P-^ w -~1 00 poop oi OS"? oin ~ in cow oooppp Cn *■ *■ '■" '^ w O 4*. 00*J w m O O O O p O 0 Ow owO 00 OOw 00 000 0<)^^*0 c* O H O O ^ W H x 0 H -t- -J >0 sO *b "O *p ^j "o co~j o. 00 o 00 o o o 1 .£. m -^ O ~J CO 0Q\O^ 000 L^J Mui^ ** 00 P. M observation. Night observation. Highest. Difference. ISl^J^^lNjV OO OC^t O-J CO CO ^j .b-~j '<>< ** b bo k O Q. O O' > w w b» J . i. bo*. < , 0^4 o ► ^J ~J OOsO vO^OO OC-~J *-4 O ^.^j O* C*vi A. * IO* - o>o Q ^%Q ^j yg . en go Co en • O OOw <] -~J 00* ^* H M^WH o ». ^ w fc.^i c>oq. A. M. observation, P. M. observation. Night observation. Noon to 6 P. M. 6 P. M. to mid- night. Midnight to 6 A. M. 1 ^4 ni eoojvi 6 A. M. to noon. Prevailing Direction. Maximum velocity during month pel hour. Amount in inches. Number of days on which rain or snow fell. 8?> „ 3 PAET SECOND. THE LESSONS OF THE EPIDEMIC. Having thus given a general history of the Epidemic in several of the cities and towns, which it has visited during the year, we proceed now to the discussion of such special ques- tions connected with the general theory of yellow fever as we are able to illustrate by the facts which we have collected. In regard to the general management and medical treat- ment of the malady, no progress of any sort has been made, and we are still under the necessity of using the same empiri- cal and expectant modes of medication as heretofore. But without further preface, there are three special ques- tions to which I shall invite attention, namely : The propagation of yellow fever. The prevention of yellow fever. The relations of yellow fever and dengue. Upon all of which questions it is perhaps possible to say something new. THE PROPAGATION OF YELLOW FEVER. Of all the problems connected with the study of the natural history of yellow fever, as it presents itself in the Gulf States, none is of greater practical importance than this : Whether this fever is ever indigenous amongst us; or whether it is always of exotic origin, and finds its way to our shores only through the agency of direct importation ? That as a matter of possibility it can be transported from place to place ; that as a matter of fact it has been transported across wide spaces, both of land and of water ; that it has in- deed been very frequently brought from foreign countries into 45 our own seaports, and from these disseminated to many of our interior towns and cities; are propositions as well estab- lished as any others in the whole range of medical knowledge. But whether it also sometimes originates on our own soil, is a matter about which there is much difference of opinion. Only a few years ago, and very specially during the decade that followed the publication of the very voluminous and very erudite, but in my judgment not very able work of LaBoche, I think it is safe to say that the decided preponderance of opinion amongst the physicians of New Orleans and Mobile was in favor of the doctrine, that in these cities it was always indigenous; that it was never imported; that, in a word, it was the legitimate offspring of telluric and climatic condi- tions, and not susceptible of transportation at all. There were some influential physicians who were the advo- cates of an other doctrine, namely: That while it was not of indigenous production, not the offspring of local conditions, that still it was not susceptible of transportation through the agencies of human travel and commercial intercourse, but was mysteriously disseminated over certain zones by atmospheric or telluric waves of some unexplained character. There existed also a general disposition to identify yellow fever, as to its etiology and its essential nature, with our fa- miliar paludal endemic, and to regard it as only a more ma- lignant variety of malarial fever. But within the last twenty years, and very noticeably within the last ten years, the tendency of opinion on all these points has undergone considerable change. The doctrine of the affiliation between malarial fever and yellow fever has been completely overthrown, never any more to be revived. The doctrine of the transmission of yellow fever, from continent to continent, and from city to city, by telluric or atmospheric waves, has been pushed into the background of speculation, And the doctrine of direct importation has been so thoroughly established by the concurrence of multitudes of facts as to admit no longer of controversy. But while it is now generally conceded that this pestilential 46 fever may be imported from abroad, and that it may be prop- agated along the lines of commercial intercourse, it is still contended by some that it also sometimes arises amongst us independently of foreign sources of infection. And there are two hypotheses as to how these domestic "epidemics are to be accounted for. The first is, that they are strictly autoctho- nous—the malignant but legitimate offspring of local endemic conditions. The second is, that they are derived from the germs that have remained over from some previous epidemic —germs that have been able to maintain their vitality from one season to another, because of mild winters and other cir- cumstances favorable to their preservation and development. In the present state of our knowledge we are not able to say with certainty, whether either or both of these hypotheses may be either true or false. We are able to say, however, that the presumptions of contemporary writers are entirely opposed to the first; and if the second is true at all, it is true only of one or two of our Gulf cities, and only occasionally even of them. The problem of the propagation of yellow fever is closely associated with another problem, namely : the problem of the specific nature of the yellow fever poison. I call this poison specific, because it always produces yellow fever and never any other disease; and I call yellow fever a specific disease, be- cause it is always produced by the yellow fever poison and never results from any other cause. The doctrine of morbid poisons has undergone great devel- opment during the last ten years. In 1864 Dr. Beale an- nounced the microscopic demonstration in vaccine lymph of minute glistening soft-solid albuminous particles, which he as- sumed to be the true contagion of vaccinnia. In 1866 he found similar microscopic particles in the infectious fluids of the cattle plague, and made the assertion that it was throuo-h their agency that this bovine pestilence was disseminated. About the same time Dr. Burden-Saunderson proved experi- mentally that the infectious principle of the poison fluids of the cattle plague is not dialyzable; and it follows from this 47 that it must be composed of colloidal matter. He did not determine whether the infectious colloid was particulate or r not, but his experiments, as far as they go, are confirmatory t of Beale's hypothes/s. A Httle later Dr. Chauveau, of Lyons, conducted a very elaborate series of experiments, which are considered as having definitely established the particulate character of the contagia of small-pox, sheep-pox, cow-pox, and farcy. Subsequently Coze and Feltz, of Strasburg, made the announcement that they had been able to demonstrate also, the particulate nature of the several contagia of measles, scarlet fever, typhoid fever, and septicaemia. And later still Klebs, in a remarkable account of some observations made by him in the military hospitals at Carlesrue in 1870-71, as- cribes pyaemia and septicaemia to the presence of small glis- tening particles of solid matter. Similar conclusions have been reached by various other observers, so that there is now a very general agreement amongst medical authorities, that the morbid poisons of the zymotic family of diseases, are al- buminous, colloidal, solid and particulate. But with reference to the specific nature of these infectious particles there is some difference of opinion. Klebs believes that in pyaemia they are the spores of a spe- cial fungus which he names microsporon septicum. Coze and Feltz, and Ferdinand Cohn, and many others, teach that in all these diseases the poisonous particles are bacteroid; and they even distinguish specific forms among them, as bacterium sphero, and bacterium catenula. Beale, on the contrary, holds that they are particles of the Uving protoplasm of the diseased organisms—particles which have undergone organic degredation and functional perver- sion, according to the character of the pathological move- ment, which serves to invest them with specific poisonous properties. To sum up this part of the argument, without; going into any detailed discussion of the intimate pathology of contagion, we may accept, as sustained by a reasonable amount of proof, the general doctrine, that the specific poisons of the zymotic 48 diseases exist as a rule in the shape of solid colloidal particles of extremely small size, say less than the twenty thousandth of an inch in diameter; solid, and therefore ponderable ; col- loidal, and therefore presumably organic/*. While in many directions our knowledge of these infectious particles or disease germs is exceedingly imperfect, it is well established that they increase very rapidly in numbers ; some- times certainly within the diseased organism; sometimes, also perhaps, outside of the diseased organism. This multi- plication must be accomplished in one of two ways. Either the disease germs themselves must pass through the various vital stages of growth, development, and reproduction, and so multiply their pestiferous generations under the sun after the ordinary fashion of living creatures; or else they must through some mysterious catalytic influence transform the normal protoplasm of the organisms which they invade into germs abnormal and malignant like themselves. The first hypothesis is the simplest, the easiest of appre- hension, and was the first to present itself in the history of pathological speculation. It may turn out, however, that the second hypothesis makes the nearest approach to the truth. Of one thing, in the meantime there can be no doubt, and that is the rapid and abundant multiplication of the disease germs. While there is good reason to believe that the infectious germs of small-pox, cow-pox, and several other eruptive dis- eases have been actually demonstrated under the microscope, it can not be claimed with any confidence that anybody has ever really seen the germs of yellow fever. Nevertheless we do not hesitate upon analogical grounds to affirm that such germs do exist. There is no other theory capable of explain- ing the phenomena of the disease. It being admitted that the yellow fever poison is a particu- late, ponderable, material thing, endowed with a certain tenacity of life, and an indefinite faculty of reproduction, it is easy enough to understand its transportation from place to place—how it can be wafted for short distances by the wind, 49 and how it can be carried for long distances in ships, and steamboats, and railroad cars, along with dry goods, and groceries, and in the persons or the clothing of men and women. That the pestilence in its migrations follows the usual routes of commerce and travel is certainly true. That it has never been known to make its way over any other routes than those which have been opened by human enterprise I think is also certain. In our recent epidemic, the agents by whom the infection was introduced have been definitely determined in almost every locality which was visited by the disease. There has been some question as to its origin in New Orleans; but it is at least a significant fact that the first case should occur on a vessel from Havana where the fever was epidemic at the time of her departure. It was brought to Memphis by the steamboat Bee, no matter whether the agent of infec- tion was the boat itself, or the poor anonymous wretch who died in Riley's shanty. It was brought to Pensacola from Havana by the Golden Dream. It was brought to Mobile by Edward Dixon. It was brought to Montgomery by Mollie Jackson and Mr. Cram. It was brought to Calvert by Mr. Hughes. It was brought into the neighborhood of Greenwood by Harris F. and his brother Voss. Who can doubt that kman agency is equally responsible for its introduction into those other cities where its mode of entrance has not been so clearly traced ? These facts are of very grave importance. They show be- yond all peradventure of doubt that yellow fever is a trans- portable malady. But they show much more than this. They show that yellow fever is to be no longer confined to the sea- board, but that along all our routes of river and railroad travel every city and almost every village is annually in dan- ger of invasion. And the more populous our country becomes and the more our facilities of rapid intercommunication are multiphed, the greater becomes the danger of pestilential visitations, and the more dreadful the consequences that fol- low in their train. 50 THE PREVENTION OF YELLOW FEVER. In view of this state of things it becomes a question of very great importance, whether there is any way by which our people can protect themselves against these dreadful epidemics? Or whether, in spite of all our science, against the pestilence which walketh in the darkness and which wasteth at noonday, beneficient Providence has left us absolutely without defence? There are two measures of public prophylaxis which have recently attracted much attention, namely, Quarantine and Disinfection. Let us briefly consider these. QUARANTINE. If yellow fever is really an exotic it is then certain that ab- solute quarantine will guarantee absolute protection. But in this age of steamships and railroads and feverish commercial activity, and with such a spirit of reckless enterprise and ad- venture to deal with as is now abroad in all civilized countries, an absolute quarantine may be regarded as practically im- possible. Must we, therefore, because quarantines are neces- sarily imperfect abandon them altogether ? I think not. I think that quarantines may be so conducted that, while the}' would not be absolutely prohibitory of commerce and travel, they would still afford an amount of protection which would be of very great value. Such quarantines might sometimes keep the fever away altogether. Upon other occasions they might simply delay its advent for a longer or a shorter time. It might be said on these occasions that the quarantine had failed to be of any use. But it is a familiar maxim, that half a loaf is better than no bread at all; and I do not hesitate to say that if the quarantine delayed the entrance of the pesti- lence into any city for only a single week it would be worth many times over the amount of money it would cost to main- tain it. The difficulties that stand in the way of efficient quarantine are many and great. There are difficulties of local adminis- tration ; and there are other difficulties growing out of the 51 imperfections of our scientific knowledge. Some of these diffi- culties find illustration in the history of the recent epidemic. There was quarantine at New Orleans. The Valparaiso was detained at the quarantine and was disinfected. There was no fever on board and had been none. She anchored at the wharves of the city, and in a few days her mate sickened and died. There was quarantine at Pensacola. Nevertheless, the pestilence broke through and devastated the city. But the Golden Dream was detained at quarantine nearly a month. Who shall say how much worse the epidemic might have been if she had been allowed to approach the city immediately upon her arrival ? Many difficulties of local administration might be consider- ably diminished by the concurrent action of all the Gulf States and the establishment of an unbroken line of quarantine stations along the entire Gulf coast. But for many reasons it would be better if quarantine against foreign countries were under the control of the general government. It is through the various channels of commercial intercourse that foreign epidemics are brought to our ports; and it would seem to be evidently expedient that the power which regulates commerce should also have the regulation of quarantine. Something in this direction has been done already. In June, 1872, under a joint resolution of Congress, Assistant Surgeon Harvey E. Brown, of the United States army, was detailed by the Secretary of War to make investigations with a view to "providing for a more efficient system of quarantine on the Southern and Gulf coasts." He made his report, con- sisting of 117 printed pages, and containing a great deal of important information, on the 2d of December. In further- ance of the same movement, a bill "to prevent the introduc- tion of infectious and contagious diseases into the United States," has been presented to Congress during its present session, by Mr. Bromberg, of Mobile. It is well adapted to secure the end in view, and it is to be hoped that it will be passed into a law. As to domestic quarantine, that is to say, quaratine estab- 52 lished by one of our own communities against another, al- though it is of much intrinsic interest, I must omit the discus- sion of it from this essay. DISINFECTION. If I were writing a general treatise on the theory and prac- tice of disinfection, I should have much to say that is more or less new, and I think important. But inasmuch as the prophylactic power of carbolic acid has been very emphati- cally asserted by the Boards of Health of New Orleans and Mobile, my account of the epidemic would not be complete without some examination of the question of disinfection in so far as the use of this particular agent is concerned. I cannot discuss here with any fullness of detail the various theories of infection and disinfection, which have received the support of scientific writers; but it is necessary to call atten- tion to a few preliminary principles such as these that follow: That all infectious maladies are grouped together in a com- mon class under the name of zymotic diseases, and that this class includes both yellow fever and dengue. That these zymotic diseases are supposed to be connected in some way with an obscure pathological process, which is analogous to the ordinary processes of fermentation and putre- faction. That low forms of living creatures are always associated with fermentative and putrefactive processes; it being impos- sible, however, in the present state of our knowledge, to say whether these creatures are the factors or the products of the processes in question. Take as examples here, the associa- tion of Torula cerevisia with the vinous fermentation, and of Micoderma aceti with the acetic fermentation. That in much the same way as that which is found to ob- tain in these familiar cases of fermentation, living organic germs are also associated with the analogous pathological process of zymosis, the specific character of the germs differ- ing with the specific character of the disease in connection with which it occurs. 53 That these organic germs, specific and malignant, miscros- copic and inscrutable, are the active agents engaged in the propagation of epidemic pestilences. They first establish them- selves in colonies of inconceivable numbers in the impalpable kingdoms of the air, whence, through the mediation of the great physiological function of respiration, they invade the living bodies of men and women, in which, when the vital powers are not sufficiently strong to resist the invasion, they set up the same sort of diseased action as that with which they were originally associated, and so establish epidemics. That inasmuch as carbolic acid and several other chemical agents, which together may be conveniently designated as an- tiseptics or disinfectants, are known to have the property of holding in check the ordinary processes of putrefaction and fermentation, it is reasonable to presume that they are also competent to hold in check the allied process of zymosis, and thus to prevent the multiplication of infectious organic disease germs. That further, inasmuch as these antiseptics and disinfectants are known to have the property of destroying the vitality of many animal and vegetal organisms, it is reasonable to pre- sume that they are also competent to destroy the organic germs which propagate epidemic diseases. That in order to accomplish this destruction of disease germs, it is necessary that the germs in question should be brought into actual contact with the disinfecting agent, so that when the epidemic poison is disseminated through the air it is necessary in like manner to disseminate the antiseptic anti- dote. The principal agents employed for atmospheric disin- fection are carbolic acid, chlorine and sulphur. Such is a brief statement of the doctrines upon which the practice of disinfection is based. It cannot fail to be a mat- ter of surprise to all thoughtful persons that these doctrines include so much that is merely probable and presumptive, and so httle of positive knowledge; and it is hardly necessary for me to insist that inductions derived from such uncertain data must be received with a great deal of caution; nay, more, 54 that they must be regarded as of very questionable validity until they have been verified by the test of experience. Let us see, then, precisely what has been done in the way of disinfection as a prophylactic against yellow fever, and with what results. The example of New Orleans is that which is principally relied upon. It was first employed there on a large scale in 1870, when there occurred five hundred and eighty-seven yellow fever deaths. How many there might have been without the carbolic acid, it is of course impossible to say. Yellow fever again visited New Orleans in 1871,—a memor- able year in the history of disinfection. It was in this epi- demic that Dr. Albers, the champion disinfectionist, put forth all his energy and exhausted all the resources of disinfection and fumigation in his contest with the fever in the Fourth District. There were one hundred and fourteen cases, and fifty-four deaths. Sixty-six cases occurred within a circular area of about fourteen hundred feet in diameter, in the center of which stood the house of Mr. Bawlings, a member of the Board of Health, and of these sixty-six cases, forty-five died. This region of infection Dr. Albers had under his own special charge. It seems to me that the result could hardly have been worse. In 1872, in New Orleans, disinfection was again resorted to. There occurred eighty-three cases of yellow fever, and thirty- nine deaths. Of these cases sixty-one originated in the Fourth District, where carbolic acid was used with a thorough- ness and pertinacity that deserved the reward of better suc- cess. Still again, in 1873, and on a still larger scale, the aid of car- bolic acid was invoked to oppose the progress of yellow fever in New Orleans. We have seen how signally it failed at every point of the line along which the conflict was waged,—how it failed in the case of the Valparaiso, in the case of the infec- ted vessels at the wharves in the Third District, and in the case of the infected region between Chippewa street and the river in the Fourth District,—and how, in spite of sixteen 55 thousand dollars' worth of carbolic acid, the epidemic pur- sued the even tenor of its way until it was met and conquered by the invincible armies of the Frost. In Memphis, the failure of disinfection by lime, and street gas, and carbolic acid was so complete, that no attempt has been made to claim for them that in that epidemic they were of any advantage at all. In Mobile, the account which I have given shows clearly that all the claims which have been advanced in favor of the beneficent influence of carbolic acid during our recent epi- demic, are preposterous and absurd. It failed at the City Hospital. It failed on the Spring Hill Road. It failed on the Shell Road. It failed in the McCann neighborhood. It failed everywhere, and it failed completely. In not one single instance, then—and I make the declara- tion with the utmost deliberation and emphasis—in not one single instance in which carbolic acid disinfection has been opposed to the progress of yellow fever, do the plain unvar- nished facts furnish any solid foundation for the presumption that its influence has been prophylactic, or in any other way of an advantageous character. Very certain it is, that it has never driven away the fever from any region in which it has once obtained a footing. In New Orleans, in Memphis, and in Mobile, in spite of all the puny chemical weapons of our Boards of Health, the pestilence has successfully maintained the conflict, and continued to claim its daily tribute of human lives until deliverance has been vouchsafed to the stricken people along with the frosts of November. But perhaps it has at least robbed the pestilence of some part of its malignant energy ? Or diminished the number of cases ? I think not so; and the facts which have been de- tailed furnish but scant reason for any such flattering conclu- sion. Or shall we say, that if the disinfection failed to check the progress of the fever, or to modify its type in the infected districts, that peradventure it may have restricted the limits of the infection and protected adjacent neighborhoods from invasion ? This is what has been specially claimed for it both 56 in New Orleans and in Mobile. But this claim also is utterly un- tenable. The argument in support of it is this : That in Mobile this last year, and in New Orleans for three successive seasons the disease was confined to certain localities, and did not on any one of these occasions extend its ravages over the whole population of either one of these cities. But we may admit the fact, and still it does not follow that the localization and limitation was the result of the disinfec- tion. The history of yellow fever shows that its restriction within narrow limits and quite definite boundaries, is not at all an uncommon occurrence, even when the aid of disinfec- tion has not been invoked to account for it. In Mobile in 1843, the epidemic confined its ravages to that section of the city south of Dauphin street; while in 1844, as if to vindicate its impartial malice, it reaped its harvest of death from the northern section of the city, the portion that had suffered the year before remaining exempt. In Memphis, in 1855, the dis- ease was epidemic south of Union street, only a few cases oc- curring in the far more populous portion of the city north of Union street. In New Orleans, in 1868, the fever made its appearance in a few cases with only three deaths; and again in 1869, there were also a few cases with three deaths. In Mobile, in 1873, as we have seen, the fever invaded forty-one different house in which no disinfection was used, to the ex- tent of only one case in each house, no subsequent cases oc- curring in any of them. Illustrations of this sort might be indefinitely multiplied. I have taken only a few of those which were nearest at hand. It is manifest, therefore, that we are not warranted in estimating at any very high rate the protective virtues of carbolic acid disinfection until we have better evi- dence in its favor than any that has yet been adduced. This is a question on which it is very desirable that correct and definite views should be speedily reached. For carbolic acid disinfection is certainly costly ; is certainly also exceed- ingly disagreeable; and in view of the appalhng mortahty which has on several occasions occurred in connection with it, there is room for the suspicion that some part of the mor- 57 tality may be due to the carbolic acid itself. It will be well for us, at any rate, to pause in our indiscriminate praise and practice of disinfection until we are able to show beyond all reasonable doubt, that in endeavoring to suppress yellow fever we are not contributing something towards the suppression of the hves of our fellow-citizens. I would not have it understood that I am making war upon sanitary disinfection, or upon carbolic acid. Far from it. But I do insist that the results of our costly experiments shall be correctly estimated, and truthfully reported, so that when we are hereafter threatened with pestilence we may know how much benefit is to be expected from it; and in view of all the facts which have been obtained up to the present time, I am obliged to add that the prospect of benefit in this direction is not very promising. There is a certain restricted use of disinfection by which we may hope to accomplish some good; but all attempts to destroy the multitudinous germs of pesti- lence which in epidemic seasons are scattered broadcast through the illimitable kingdoms of the air must be abandoned as altogether hopeless. To disinfect all out-of-doors is a problem of more embar- rassment and difficulty than seems to be generally appre- ciated. The immense extent expressed in any of the denom- inations of cubic measure, of the aerial space which it would be necessary to fill with the disinfectant in the form of vapor or of gas—this is one part of the difficulty. But this space being once filled would not remain filled. Its aerial contents, and along with them the vapors of disinfection would be swept away continually by the invisible swift winds and the tides and currents of the atmospheric ocean. This is another part of the difficulty. The vast amount, in pounds avoirdu- pois, or in gallons of wine measure, of the disinfecting mate- rial which would be necessary to supply this immense and continuous demand, day after day and week after week; and the large expense of it in dollars and cents of federal cur- rency—this is another part of the difficulty. But suppose all these obstacles to be overcome ; and that the air should 58 be kept sufficiently saturated with the disinfectant to assure the destruction of the disease germs. It then remains to be considered whether air so laden with destructive chemical vapors would still be competent to serve the purposes of respiration—whether the same poison which proves fatal to the disease germs would not also prove fatal to human beings and domestic animals. This is another part of the difficulty,— a consideration too which is at once seen to be of cardinal importance. I venture to hope that these brief suggestions will serve to indicate the real nature of^he problem of atmos- pheric disinfection, and what sort of an enterprise it is that we have upon our hands when we undertake the purification of the great atmospheric ocean. As I have intimated there are some more restricted appli- cations of the practice of disinfection from which we may still hope to derive some hygienic advantage. The disinfec- tion of all solid articles and textile fabrics—of floors, and walls, and furniture and bedding, and all sorts of clothing, and the excretions of the sick, can certainly be effectually accomplished. This may be done by heating such things to two hundred, or to two hundred and fifty degrees Fahrenheit. Or else by the direct application of some chemical disinfectant in a solution of adequate strength. Of these chemical agents there may be mentioned the bichromate of potash, the sulphate of cop- per, and the chlorides of zinc and iron. Among these also there can be no question of the power of carbolic acid. In the suburbs of Mobile it killed the grass on the sidewalks and the frogs in the gutters. The disinfection of such small portions of air as can be confined in the rooms of houses, or in the hulls of ships would also seem to be entirely practicable. We have only to fill the designated space with the fumes of burning sulphur or of chlorine, or of nitrous acid, or of superheated steam, and the work is done. No living creature can withstand the des- tructive energy of any of these agents when they are used in a sufficient degree of concentration, and with sufficient per- sistence. •59 YELLOW FEVER AND DENGUE. It has happened upon several occasions that epidemics of yellow fever and of dengue have prevailed together in the same city at the same time, as in Mobile and New Orleans in the year just passed. The question, whether there is some generic relationship between them, has therefore assumed a a certain amount of interest. It is a question which I cannot discuss in, exteuso. I can only give very briefly the opinions I have formed in regard to it; and I must add, in all candor, these opinions are based, so far as the nature of dengue is concerned, almost entirely on observations made in the epi- demic of 1873. I know of no other disease which has a literature in every way so perplexing and unsatisfactory as dengue. Copland has well said, that the descriptions which 'have been given of it are httle creditable to their authors. Dr. Faget, a most competent authority, is inclined to asso- ciate the New Orleans dengue of 1873, with paludal mucus fevers. In this, however, I must believe that he is mistaken. It is indeed a mucus fever, but not a paludal fever. Paludal fever, of whatever special type, is always endemic ; is always associated with paludal localities; and is never infectious. But the dengue of 1873 presented aU the characters of a true epidemic and infectious fever. As we have seen it was of very general prevalence in New Orleans. From New Orleans it spread along the coast and along the line of the railroad until it got to Mobile. Hardly a single coast village or rail- road viUage escaped a visit from it; and in all it was epidemic. In Mobile it was more decidedly infectious than yellow fever. It did not particularly affect malarial localities, but raged most fiercely in parts of the city where malarial fever is hardly ever known to occur. Last of all it did not exhibit malarial symptoms, and was not amenable to the ordinary treatment of malarial maladies. I do not pretend to have made any exhaustive study of this disease, but it presented certain salient points which it was 601 impossible to overlook. It is infectious and epidemic to be- gin with. It is a mucus or catarrhal fever, in the next place. Any of the mucus membranes may be involved in the pathol- ogical aberration, but very specially those of the alimentary canal, the secretions of which are dark, acrid, depraved and abundant. 1 do not regard it as a true exanthem. There is commonly more or less erythema. Less frequently the erup- tion is herpetic. I think it is clear that the skin symptoms are of secondary consequence, are indeed neuroses reflected from the alimentary mucus membranes—such as we see for example in herpes zoster. The condition of the mucus membranes which I have indi- cated gives rise to copious, dark, and often offensive alvine evacuations ; and sometimes to the vomiting of dark-colored matters, which, although entirely distinct from the black vomit of yellow fever, might by possibility be mistaken for it. The pains have one very marked feature, namely, diffusive- ness. They are not confined to the head and the small of the back as is so much the fashion in yellow fever; but there is pain everywhere, in all the muscles, and in all the joints, and sometimes in the very bones themselves; and they are singularly persistent. From the very beginning and through all the subsequent stages of the malady, there is a condition of extreme nervous prostration—an invincible feehng of debility and languor. I know of no other acute fever, in which, while there is so little of real danger, the apparent severity is so remarkable, and the accompanying debility so decided and so persistent. The debility indeed continues frequently for weeks, and after all the other symptoms have subsided, and makes the convales- cence notably slow. It has been said that relapses are frequent in dengue. I do not think so. I doubt, indeed, if genuine relapses ever occur in specific diseases. But however this may be, I have never seen a relapse in dengue. The type of dengue is peculiar. When fully developed it is a fever of three paroxysms. But it may be imperfectly developed, so that sometimes one, and some- '61 times two of the paroxysms of the normal type, may be either absent altogether, or may be so slight and transient as to es- cape recognition. If the attack is very slight, only one par- oxysm may attract attention ; if it is moderately severe two paroxysms will be noticed ; if quite severe, there will be three paroxysms of well marked character. The first paroxysm is always most intense ; the last is always the mildest. I think the intervals are not perfectly regular. Between the first and second paroxysms, there is an interval of from one to two days; between the second and third paroxysms there is an interval of from two to three days, From this sketch of the natural history of dengue, it is easy to see that it is widely different from yellow fever. How any difficulty should ever have arisen as to the diagnosis of the one from the other, is something that I cannot very well under- stand. It is attended with much less difficulty than the diag- nosis between yeUow fever and certain forms of malarial fever, about which there has heretofore been so much contro- versy, but which is now so definitely settled. The whole physiognomy of the two maladies is different. The patient who has yellow fever is in the grasp of a giant, and he feels it and shows it. But in dengue, while the actual suffering may be greater, as it frequently is, all organic trepidation is absent. The patient feels that he is stronger than the enemy which has fastened itself upon him. I agree entirely with Dr. Faget, when he says: " It is true, that during the first twenty- four hours there is some analogy between dengue and yellow fever, but not much; less, indeed, than there is between yel- low fever at the beginning and the beginning of the initial fe- ver of small pox." At a later period, Faget's law of the re- lations between the pulse and the temperature in yellow fever, becomes available as a diagnostic; and later still, albuminous urine and black vomit, when they occur, cut all the gordian knots of doubtful diagnosis, and reveal in unmistakable lan- guage the true nature of the attack. But, indeed, there is no need to wait for these later developments. From the initial chill to the last hour of convalescence, the two diseases are 62 entirely distinct. It is hard to describe the features of a dis- ease in words, just as it is hard to describe the features of a a man ; but when either the fever or the man has been once seen face to face, either ought afterwards to be easy of recognition. With reference to the effects of remedies, there are also many points of contrast between the two fevers. Of all the fevers I have ever seen, yellow fever in its initial stages is the most tolerant of large doses of quinine. I do not stop now to discuss the question as to whether these large doses of quinine exercise a favorable influence over the subsequent progress of the disease ; but rest on the simple fact of the tolerance, which cannot be gainsayed. On the other hand, I am confident that every large dose of qui- nine that is taken by a patient with dengue does him harm; and this at every stage of the disease. Even small doses dur- ing convalescence are of doubtful value. In yellow fever, while it is considered to be desirable to un- load the prima via by a brisk purgative at the beginning of an attack, I believe that it is generally agreed that continuous purgation is bad practice. But in dengue, continuous purga- tion is the best thing that can be done—purgation here, first, last and all the time, is the golden rule. The alimentary mu- cus membranes must be disgorged, and just as long as dark and offensive dejecta are obtained, the purgatives ought to be kept up In yellow fever, the patient invariably and universally has a craving for cold drinks. Even ice itself seems often not to be cold enough to cool the intolerable burning. In dengue, on the contrary, there is but little thirst as a rule, and the pa- tient is quite indifferent whether his drink is cold or warm, and not infrequently prefers to have it warm. For this ob- servation I am indebted to Dr. F. A. Ross; my own expe- rience has completely verified it. From what I have said, it is easy to see that in my own opin- ion dengue is a disease sui generis ; and entirely distinct both from yellow fever and paludal fever,—distinct as to its etiology, its pathology, and its symptoms; and not less distinct, also, 63 in the character of the response which it makes to the action of several important remedies. Whether there is any such antagonism between yellow fever and dengue, as to cause the prevalence of dengue to oppose an obstacle against the progress of yellow fever, I am entirely unable to say. Such an opinion has been suggested, but I am not aware that it has received any definite support from observed facts. Certain it is, that an attack of one of these fevers does not afford to the patient any subsequent immunity against the other. As to the extraordinary doctrine that dengue is a " spurious yellow fever," and the equally extraordinary doctrine that yel- low fever may be modified into dengue " by the protective virtues of carbohc acid ;" both of which doctrines have been asserted in Mobile during the prevalence of the recent epidemic, it is not worth while to waste time in any formal refutation of them. I imagine that after my exposure of them in the Mo- bile Register; and still more specially after Dr. Faget's tre- mendous criticism in the January number of the New Orleans Medical and Surgical Journal, neither of them is very likely to be heard of hereafter. \ THE WHITE BLOOD-COEPUSCLE, IN HEALTH AND IN DISEASE. BY JEROME COCHRAN, M. D., Professor of Public Hygiene and Medical Jurisprudence in the Medical College of Alabama. CONTENTS: What is a White Blood-Corpuscle—Chemical Analysis—Physical Analysis— Protoplasm—The Doctrine of Cells—Digression on Amoeba—The Origin of the White Corpuscle—The Movements of Leucocytes—The Physiological Relations of the White Blood-Corpuscle—The Metamorphoses of Leucocytes— The Mystery of Reproduction—The Development of the Ovum—Develop- ment of the Blood-Corpuscles in the Foetus—Explanatory Note. WHAT IS A WHITE BLOOD-CORPUSCLE ? This is the first question that presents itself for solution in the course of our investigation ; and I may say of it that there is no more important question than this in the whole of the broad realm of philosophical biology. As its name indicates, the White Blood-Corpuscle is a common constituent of the blood of animals. It will be well, therefore, if we inquire briefly into the composition of the blood ; and we may make this inquisition with reference either to its chemical, or to its physical, or to its vital constituents and properties. CHEMICAL ANALYSIS. In ultimate chemical analysis we know that we must find in the blood all the elementary substances which enter into 66 tfie composition of all the tissues and organs of the animal body; and this for the reason that the blood is the common source whence all the tissues and organs of the animal body derive the materials upon which they live and grow. Some sixty-five elementary substances are now known to science ; and of these eighteen have been found in the human body ; only ten or twelve of which seem to be essential to the integrity of the organism, so that the remaining six or eight may be regarded as accidental impurities. Since elementary chemistry is only incidentally useful in the study of the phe- nomena of living things, it is not necessary to my purp )se to make any special mention of these elementary constituents. In proximate chemical analysis we find that the blood con- sists chiefly and essentially of complex compounds belonging to the class of albuminous colloids. I have made use here of a very important formula of words, namely, the expression " al- buminous colloids." Let us pause for a moment, until the full meaning of it has time to find its way into our minds. What is albumen ? and what is meant by colloid ? There are two principal and correlative classes of chemical substances—the class of colloids and the class of chrystal- loids. You must know in a general way, that the matter which is destitute of life—the matter out of which inorganic nature is made,—is chrystalloid; that its forms are simple and definite, admitting of easy geometric measurement; that its molecules are comparatively incomplex combinations into comparatively stable aggregations of comparatively small numbers of atoms,—two or three or four, or at most a dozen or a score. You must know also that the matter which lives —the matter which moves, and grows, and thinks, and out of which is builded the bodies, fearfully and wonderfully made, of all the tribes and families of living creatures, is albuminous and colloid ; that its forms of aggregation are not obedient to geometric laws; that its molecules are composed of compara- tively large numbers of atoms, to be counted by scores, by hundreds, and by thousands, moulded into complex and un- stable collocations; and that by virtue of their coinplexitv 67 and instability these colloid combinations are prone to trans- mutation and metamorphosis, are hence fluent and capable of living. Of the organic colloids we may take albumen as the most familiar representative. It is found in almost perfect chemi- cal purity in the white of the hen's egg. One of the simplest formulae for albumen, that of Lieberkuhn, gives its composi- tion as C72 H112 022 N18 SI. This would give 225 as the number of atoms in the molecule ; and 1612 as the molecular weight; but there are reasons for believing that the true for- mula is some multiple of that proposed by Lieberkuhn ; and that the true molecular complexity is therefore far greater than that which I have indicated. PHYSICAL ANALYSIS. The albuminous colloids are present in the blood both as soft solids and as viscous fluids, as is evident from physical analysis. Take the blood of a human creature, or of any of the higher animals, and to the unassisted sight it presents the appearance of a red, viscous, homogeneous liquid. But mi- croscopic examination shows that it may be divided into two parts—the one liquid and the other solid ; and that these are very nearly equal, each to each, in quantity. The liquid por- tion consists of water and soluble albumen. The solid por- tion consists of granules, red corpuscles, and white corpuscles, all albuminous colloids. The granules have not been adequately studied. They vary greatly in size, ranging from the one hundred thousandth of an inch, to the twenty thousandth of an inch, or even more, in diameter. Some observers have regarded them as particles of fat, some as protoplasmic masses forming the initial stages in the development of the larger corpuscles. There can be httle doubt that both opinions are correct; that some of them are of the one character, and some of the other. The red corpuscles are very numerous, there being in human blood, according to the common estimate of physiologists, from three hundred to five hundred times as many of these as 68 of the white corpuscles. Vierodt estimates 5,000,000 of red corpuscles in one cubic millimeter of the blood of a healthy man, which is equivalent to 8,000,000,000 in a cubic inch of the same blood. What unimaginable multitudes then must swarm in the fifteen or twenty pounds of blood which circulates through an adult human organism ! In shape, the red cor- puscles of man are flat, circular discs, with a longer diame- ter averaging about one-3500th of an inch, and as horter diame- ter averaging about one-seventh of this extent. Functionally, they are organs of respiration. They carry the life-giving and life-destroying oxygen from the lungs to the tissues. A summary account of the natural history of the red blood- corpuscles—of their origin and destiny*, and of their behavior under different circumstances, would be full of interest; but it is too large a theme for incidental treatment, and I must pass on to the proper subject of my essay, namely, the White Blood-Corpuscle, which is the last of the morphological ele- ments of the blood in the order in which I have named them, but perhaps the first of all in real philosophic interest and importance. The white corpuscles of human blood were first definitely distinguished from the red corpuscles by Hewson in 1777, that is to say about one hundred years ago. They are ordinarily described as spherical and granular masses, albuminous and colloidal in composition, and of somewhat greater size than the red corpuscles, being of an average diameter of about one-2500th of an inch. You will have observed that the morphological elements of the blood have been described as of definite and geometrical shapes,—the red corpuscles as circular discs of peculiar con- tour, and the white corpuscles as granular spheroids. They are so described and so figured in almost all of the physiolog- ical text-books of which I have any knowledge. But such description is very far from giving expression to the whole truth; for the red corpuscles often exhibit themselves as mulberry or stellate masses ; and the white corpuscles durino- their career of vital activity can not properly be said to have 69 any shape at all, distinguishable in member, joint, or limb. Only when they are dead, or when they are quiescent under the influence of circumstances that interfere with the dis- charge of their normal functions, do their soft bodies become globular, and correspondent to the common descriptions and figures. As the result of recent investigations the white corpuscles have been invested with properties and powers of such unex- pected and comprehensive character as to necessitate the re- vision, and even the en the reconstruction, of many of the most important of physiological and pathological doctrines. We know now that the white corpuscle is not simply a geometrical solid, granular and spheroidal, except when it is dead or dormant; that it is not a comparatively unimportant constituent of the animal body, without any definite physio- logical history, and without any special work to do in the economy of animal life. On the contrary, in current biologi- cal speculation, it has risen not simply to a pos tion of com- parative importance, but to a position in which it overshadows all other anatomical and physiological elements. The stone so long rejected of the builders has become, indeed, the chief of the corner,—the foundation stone upon which must be con- structed the whole edifice of the physiology of the future. Let us see, then, if we can get some adequate conception of what this marvellous physiological factor is. In composition it is albuminous and colloidal. This much we have already settled. It is a mass of hving protoplasm—a lump of animated-jelly, colorless, translucent, homogeneous, without shape, and without ascertainable structure. It is the typical animal ceU in its highest and freest development. It eats and drinks and grows. It breathes and lives and moves. It is obedient to the primal mandate, and multiplies its gen- erations under the sun. In very truth it is a living creature. It belongs to Haeckel's kingdom of the Protistae. It is allied to the aniu'bae. Yea, verily, it is an amoeba ; but an amoeba of marked characteristics, one of which is that it has its habitat in the fluids of hving bodies, another, that it hves not 70 for itself but for the service of the bodies in which it is found. In order that this summary description of the white cor- puscle of the blood may be adequately understood, I must give some account of the modern doctrine of protoplasm ; some account of the modern doctrine of cells; and some ac- count of the natural history of the amoeba. PROTOPLASM. Protoplasm has been defined by Mr. Huxley, as the physi- cal basis of life. It is the living matter of living creatures ; the matter through whose agency all their tissues and organs are constructed; the matter through whose marvellous en- dowments all their vital functions, such as growth, develop- ment, movement, metamorphosis, and reproduction, are ac- complished. This thanmaturgic matter of life is always and everywhere of the same nature. The most refined methods of chemical, physical, and physiological analysis have not enabled us to distinguish the protoplasm of animals from the protoplasm of plants. It is soft, transparent, colorless, homogeneous, and without any of that differentiation of parts which constitutes structure. It is the same living matter that I have already described as alfjuminous and colloidal. But it mast be remembered that some colloids are not albuminous ; and that although 'all of the albuminous colloids are closely allied to living matter, and for the most part the product of vital processes, it cannot be claimed that the}T are all endowed with life. It must also be remembered that not all of the matter found in living creatures is in any rigorous sense, living matter. In all those parts of the organism wljich ex- hibit recognizable structure some of the protoplasm has been transformed into something else; something which still serves the uses and the ends of life, but which has in itself no power of motion,—no power of growth,—no power of reproduction; and which therefore can hardly be called living. The two kinds of matter here indicated have been distin- guished by Dr. Beale, the first as germinal matter, and the second as formed material; the germinal matter, which he 71 also calls bioplasm, corresponding to the living protoplasm, and the formed material to the protoplasm which has passed into thte structural elements of the tissues and ceased to be truly living. The demonstration of protoplasm as the one sole form of living matter in all the kingdoms of organic nature, and the origin of all the tissues and organs of plants and of ani- mals in the multiform metamorphoses of protoplasm, is the most important achievement of contemporary physiology. It is indeed to physiology what the law of gravitation is to astronomy ; and furnishes the key to all thepuzzhng problems of organization and development. The discovery has been delayed for a very long time because the investigations lead- ing to it have been attended with many difficulties. Of these, two may be specially mentioned here : first, that living proto- plasm presents itself only in microscopic masses of extreme minuteness, so that the study of it is necessarily restricted to microscopic experts; secondly, that in the bodies of all living creatures, except the very lowest, it is intermingled in every variety of complex combination with the formed material of the tissues which it animates, so that it is not easy to disen- tangle the two sorts of matter for separate examination. The current doctrine of protoplasm has consequently been of slow growth. The naSae was first applied to the soft semi- fluid contents of the vegetal cell, and especially to that por- tion of the contents of the most highly organized type of the vegetal cell which lies between the neucleus and the primor- dial utricle of Von Mohl. Afterwards the neucleus and the utricle were shown to be of the same nature with the rest of the contents of the cell, and were included under the same designation. In 1835, Dujardin applied to the simple contrac- tile substance of those infusorial creatures which are found at the bottom of the animal scale, the name of Sarcode. In 1861, Max Schultze asserted the close correspondence of this sarcode with the contents of the cells of the higher animals; and his subsequent researches, together with those of Unger, Brucke, Haeckel, Kuhne, Huxley, Beale, and other work- 72 ers in the same field, very soon resulted in the complete iden- tification of the sarcode of animals and the protoplasm of plants; and in the scientific demonstration of that most pro- lific of biological conceptions,—that living matter is always and everywhere of the same identical nature,—the same in.its chemical constitution, the same in its physical properties, the same in its vital endowments. THE DOCTRINE OF CELLS. Concurrently with the elaboration of the modern doctrine of protoplasm, and indeed as a subsection of the protoplasmic theory, has been elaborated also the modern doctrine of cells, and of the cellular composition of. all living structures. The doctrine that animals and plants, however complex their organization, are still really composed of a small num- ber of elementary parts constantly recurring, dates back to very ancient times, and was expounded with more or less clearness by Aristotle, by Galen, by Fallopius and by many others of the older anatomists. But the "simple parts" of the ancients, such as bone, flesh, cartilage, ligament, mem- brane, etc., do not correspond to the cells of the present day. The older observers regarded them as simple, not because they had really arrived at parts no linger analyzable, but be- cause the imperfections of their instruments made further an- alysis impossible to them. It was not until the introduction of the compound microscope into the investigations of phys- iology that it became possible to add to the analysis of the organs into tissues, the analysis of the tissues themselves into cells. The exact date of the invention of the compoand mi- croscope is uncertain. It may, however, be stated with suffi- cient accuracy to have been made about the year 1600. For full two hundred years the microscope continued to be a very imperfect instrument, compared with what it has become dur- ing the present century. Nevertheless, during this time many facts were added to our knowledge of minute anatomy; and many observations were recorded which are singularly sug- gestive, when viewed in the light reflected upon them from 73 the results of recent researches. For example, Borellus, of Pisa, in 1656, described pus-corpuscles as animalcules, and even asserted that he had seen them delivering their eggs! Can it be doubted, that despite the feeble powers of his glasses, there had been revealed to his earnest inquisition the same phenomena of the rapid movement and the rapid multiplica- tion of these organisms that Dr. Beale has so graphically de- monstrated by means of his one-fiftieth of an itfch objective and his carmine fluid ? In 1658, Swammerdam recognized the blood-corpuscles. In 1667, Robert Hooke pointed out the cellular structure of plants. In 1670, Malpighi elaborated this subject still further. He asserted that the cells or vesicles, which he called utricles, were separable from one another, that each had its own proper boundary, and was in fact an independent entity. In 1687, Leeuwenhcek described with considerable accuracy, the blood corpuscles not only of man, but of the lower animals. He it was also who made the discovery of the spermatozoids, which he believed to be animals of different sexes; and who first announced the globular structure of the primitive tissues of the body. This globular theory was still further elucidated by Milne Edwards, Baumgartner and others, about the year 1825, and paved the way for the cell-theory of Schleiden and Schwann, which was given to the world in 1838 and 1839. Already both the vegetable cell and the animal cell, as iso- lated structures, were sufficiently well known, and their im- portance as factors of organization had also been in some degree recognized. Schleiden was a botanist, and his re- seaches are confined to the cellular anatomy and physiology of plants. Schwann applied the same doctrine to the explanation of the anatomy and physiology of animals, and proclaimed the neucleated cell as the " fundamental expression of organ- ic forms;" that is to say, that all the tissues of all animals and plants are built up out of neucleated cells. On account of its intrinsic interest, as well as on account of its great importance in the history of biological speculation, I add here Schwann's own statement of the theory of the spon- 74 taneous generation of cells, which is maintained by himself and by Schleiden. I quote from the Sydenham edition of his Researches: In a cytoblastema either structureless or minutely granu- lous, " a nucleolus is first formed. Around this a stratum of substance is deposited, usually minutely granulous, but not yet sharply defined on the outside. As new molecules are constantly being deposited in this stratum between those al- ready present, and as this takes place within a precise dis- tance of the nucleolus only, the stratum becomes defined ex- ternally, and a cell-nucleus having a more or less sharp con- tour, is formed. The nucleus grows by a continuous deposi- tion of new molecules between those already existing, that is by intussusception. If this goes on equally throughout the entire thickness of the stratum, the nucleus may remain solid ; but if it goes on more vigorously in the external part, the lat- ter will become more dense, and may be hardened into a membrane, and such are the hollow nuclei." When the nucleus has reached a certain stage of development, the cell is formed around it. " A stratum of substance, which differs from the cytoblastema, is deposited upon the exterior of the nucleus. In the first instance, this stratum is not sharply defined ex- ternally, but becomes so in consequence of the progressive deposition of new molecules. The stratum is more or less thick, sometimes homogeneous, sometimes granulous ; the lat- ter is most frequently the case in the thick strata which occur in the formation of the majority of animal cells. We cannot at this period distinguish a cell-cavity and a cell-wall. The deposition of new molecules between those already existing proceeds, however, and is so effected that when the stratum is thin, the entire layer, and when it is thick, only the external portion becomes consolidated into a membrane. Immediate- ly that the cell-membrane has become consolidated, its ex- pansion proceeds as the result of the progressive reception of new molecules between the existing ones, that is to say, by virtue of a growth by intussusception, while at the same time it becomes separated from the cell-nucleus. The interspace 75 between the cell-membrane and the cell-nucleus is at the same time filled with fluid, and this constitutes the cell-con- tents. During this expansion the nucleus remains attached to a spot on the internal surface of the cell-membrane." The publication of the researches of Schleiden and Schwann marks an era in the progress of physiology. In the words of Mr. Huxley, " whatever cavillers may say, it is cer- tain that histology before 1838, and histology since then, are two different sciences—in scope, in purpose, and in dignity,— and the eminent men to whom we allude, may safely answer all detraction by a proud ' circumspice.' " Nevertheless, there is hardly a single point of their description of the genesis and structure of cells which has not been either altogether over- thrown or else largely modified by the results of later inves- tigations. Already, in 1854, Pringsheim had called in question the necessity of the cell-wall to the constitution of a perfect cell; and Leydig, in 1856, followed by Max Schultze in 1861, de- fined the cell as a mass of protoplasm inclosing a nucleus, the cell-wall being nothing more than the hardened periphery of the substance of the ceU. Bruke, also in 1861, went still fur- ther, and denied that the nucleus was an essential element of the cell, adducing in support of his opinion the non-nucleated cells of cryptogams. Shultze had discovered a non-nucleated amoeba in the Adriatic in 1854; and in 1865 a non-nucleated protozoon was discovered by Haeckel in the Mediterranean, and two non-nucleated monads by Cienkowsky. Altogether, therefore, the proof is overwhelming, that cells capable of life, motion, growth and reproduction may exist without a nucleus as well as without a cell wall; and the universal conception of the simple cell as the unit of organization is now that it is an individualized particle of protoplasm, entirely homogeneous, without a nucleus, without an investing membrance, and with- out any recognizable structure whatever. The cells which exhibit the nucleus and the cell-wall, one or both,—and they are very numerous indeed,—are not primitive and simple cells, but cells that have already passed through a process of differ- 76 entiation and development. It is only to these higher cells that the anatomical details of Schleiden and Schwann are still in some measure applicable ; and at wide variance with the doctrines under examination, it is now held with reference to these higher cells, that their investing wall is caused by the consolidation of their most external portion, while the nucleus is due to a new growth of younger protoplasm within the origi- nal mass. But no other part of this theory has been so vigorously as- sailed as the doctrine that cells arise spontaneously, and with- out the intervention of parent cells, in a structureless blaste- ma. Already of great interest as a problem in special phys- iology, it has become invested with still greater importance since it has been clearly appreciated that it is really only a special phase of the great question of the commencement of life and the development of living things. Among those who have made themselves memorable on ac- count of the ability with which they have opposed the doc- trine of spontaneous origin, or of archebiosis, to borrow Bastian's technical designation, I shall mention only two— Virchow and Beale. In Virchow's great work on Cellular Pathology, which was published in 1858, he maintains : that the ceU is the true bio- logical unit; and that every cell is derived from a pre-existing cell, all the cells of any individual organism being the lineal descendants of the original germ-cell of the ovum ; so that with him the maxim of Harvey, omne vivum ex ovo, becomes in its special application to histology, omnis cettula e cellula. Another of his fundamental doctrines is that by far the larger portion of the organism is made up out of cells derived by proliferation and differentiation from the corpuscles of the connective tissue. Still another is his doctrine of cell-terri- tories, which I can do no more than allude to here—a doc- trine which he borrowed from Goodsir. It was in 1861 that Dr. Beale gave to the world the first definite statement of his doctrine of cells and cell-metamor- phosis. He is one of the ablest of the expounders of the 77 protoplasmic theory, and has presented some important con- tributions to it, which are now very generally accepted. In the nomenclature of the theory, also, he has made some in- novations. The living matter he prefers to call bioplasm, and he designates the cell as a bioplast. He holds with the school of Virchow, that hving matter, and hving matter only, can generate living matter ; and that, therefore, every cell must originate in the proliferation of some pre-existing cell. He holds further, that all cells, or bioplasts are in the beginning simply extremely minute, solid, homoge- neous, and individualized masses of living matter or bioplasm; and that all bioplasts grow, not by the superposition of addi- tional bioplasm upon their external surfaces, but by the gen- esis and integration of bioplasm in their central parts; so that in every bioplast the central parts are always the youngest and most vigorous; while the peripheral parts, being older and feebler, grow continually less and less active in the discharge of vital functions, and at last cease in any proper sense of the word, to live at all. But it must not be hastily concluded that this dead matter, or formed material of the tissues, has become excrementitial and useless to the organism. Far from it, indeed. For it is out of this material which has ceased to grow, and which has lost the power of transforming the elements of nutrition into living bioplasm, that all the wheels and levers and pulleys,— all the complicated scaffolding and machinery of the organ- ism, are constructed. DIGRESSION ON THE AM03BA. Many of the vital characteristics of cells or bioplasts, and many of the fundamental phenomena of living matter may be studied to much advantage as they present themselves in amoebae. Under this general name of amoeba have been classified some of the simplest of living creatures. They have usually been regarded as denizens of the animal king- dom ; but have been transferred by Hseckel into his new kingdom of the protistae,—a kingdom which has been erected 78 to include all those living creatures which have not undergone a sufficient amount of differentiation of parts to display the essential characters of either animals or'plants. There are many tribes and families of these creatures; and amongst them the amoeba is one of the lowest. Yet these creatures also, so great is the variety of nature, present themselves under many different forms. In their simpler forms they exhibit no structural differentia- tion whatever, not even a contained nucleus nor an investing membrane, but are homogeneous throughout. They can hardly be called organisms, because they are entirely desti- tute of organs. In brief, they are extremely minute masses of protoplasm,—little microscopic lumps of living jelly. Still they manifest all the essential phenomena of life. They move; they eat; they grow ; they reproduce their kind. They are sprawling things, without any definite or abiding shape, and go crawling about, in no particular direction, and with no obvious purpose. They thrust out any portion of their jelly like bodies into an improvised arm or foot; and this may be immediately retracted, and another thrust out in some other direction, or its extremity may become fixed and drag the whole body after it. If they come in contact with a particle of food, mouth and stomach are improvised for its appropriation, the soft body of the creature opens to receive it, and flows slowly around it so as to inclose it com- pletely ; and when all the nutritive material has been ex- tracted from it, opens again, and the indigestible debris is rejected through an improvised vent which immediately dis- appears. If one of them is separated into any number of fragments, each fragment becomes a complete amoeba*__lives and grows, and pursues an entirely independent career. Like Milton's angels, they are vital in every part, and cannot but by annihilating die. Per contra, if two or more of them come together they immediately fuse into one, and neither joint nor seam remains to mark the place of union. A large number thus fused together into a considerable mass consti- tutes what is called a plasmodium. After leading an active' 79 predatory life, for a longer or shorter time, their activity ceases and they become torpid. Under the influence of the same physical laws which mould the rain-drop, their sprawl- ing, shapeless bodies become globular, and the external pro- toplasmic layer of the globe hardens into an investing mem- brane. Then the soft homogeneous protoplasm inside of the investing membrane undergoes a process of segmentation exactly analogous with the segmentation of the mammalian ovum during the initial stages of foetal development. But the subsequent history of the segments is different. In the mammahan ovum all the segments concur towards the forma- tion of a single complex organism ; while every separate seg- ment of the encysted amoeba develops into an individual living creature. The segments, appearing at first in the form of simple cells, gradually assume the form of monads, and, rupturing the investing membrane, swarm out into the cir- cumjacent water, where they soon lose their definite outlines, and pass into the sprawhng amoeboid type of their ancestors. There is good reason to believe that the amoeba may arise in still another way,—that it may arise spontaneously in fluids holding organic matter in solution. Take, for example, a per- fectly transparent and homogeneous infusion of hay. Expose it to the heat and light of the sun, and in a few days it be- comes milky and opake. The explanation of this change is that the organic matter of the solution has gathered itself into fine granular masses,—masses too small for separate ex- amination, many of them less than the 100,000th of an inch in diameter. These granules gradually increase in size, and rise to the surface of the infusion in the shape of a granular pellicle,—the proligerous pellicle of Pouchet,—the primordial mucus of Burdach. Under the microscope irregularly shaped portions of this pellicle are soon found to undergo a process of differentiation, and these portions are then called embryonal areas. Within these areas the granules aggregate themselves into groups, which are at first of irregular outline, then be- come globular, and then encysted, and are ultimately devel- oped into hving amoebae. What I have said applies chiefly to 80 the lower amoebae, such as the amoeba porrecta, of Max Schultze ; the protamoeba primitiva, of Haeckel; and the pro- tomyxa aurantiaca, of the same author. In the higher amoebae, such as the amoeba nuclearia, and the amoeba Umax, there are some rudimentary evidences of struc- ture,—namely, a nucleus, an investing membrane, and some approximation to definite shape. It seems to be well estab- lished that the lower forms of amoebae some times undergo differential development into the higher forms of amoebae, as, also, into the closely allied forms of gregarina and aetinophrys. But into this tempting field of the transmutation of species I must not allow myself to enter. I hope that I have said enough to indicate the true character, and the biological rela- tions of these creatures,—enough at least to show that there is ample warrant for the statement which I made a little while ago to the effect that the white blood-corpuscle is an amoeba. They are composed of the same protoplasmic matter aggre- gated into the same elementary forms. The simple amoeba is a simple cell like the white blood-corpuscle during the most active period of its existence. The nucleated and encysted amoeba is a neucleated and encysted cell, such as the white blood-corpuscle becomes towards the close of its busy life. Under the microscope some forms of the amoeba and some forms of the white blood-corpuscle resemble each other so nearly as to be absolutely indistinguishable. THE ORIGIN OF THE WHITE CORPUSCLE. Having given, as I hope, something like an adequate con- ception of what the white blood-corpuscle is, the next problem that presents itself for consideration is, the problem of its origin. Here it is better to widen the scope of the inquiry ; and this because in discussing the origin of the white blood- corpuscle it becomes necessary to consider also the origin of certain other white corpuscles of a similar nature, namely, the lymph-corpuscle and the pus-corpuscle. Since the fact has been recognized by physiologists, that these several kinds of corpuscles are indistinguishable from one another by anv 81 analysis we are able to make, the want has been felt of a des- ignation alike applicable to them aU. For this purpose the most convenient name is that suggested by Robin, who calls them all leucocytes. The word bioplast, introduced by Dr. Beale, is of still wider application, comprehending all hving ceUs whatsoever. There are several different hypotheses with reference to the origin of leucocytes. 1. Those who endorse the doctrine of Virchow, that cells are always the offspring of other cells, hold that the leuco- cytes which inhabit the blood are the products of the prolif- eration of other leucocytes—of other white blood-corpuscles or of lymph-corpuscles. 2. It was also held by Virchow and his school, that the leucocytes which constitute the characteristic corpuscles of pus result from the proliferation of the corpuscles of the con- nective tissue. 3. Dr. Beale and his followers teach that pus-leucocytes are also developed by the abnormal growth and proliferation of the bioplasm of epithelial cells, such as are found covering the external integument of the body, and lining the mucous membranes of the alimentary and respiratory passages. 4. In harmony with the doctrines of Schleiden and Schwann, in relation to exogenous cell formation, it has been a very common opinion among physiologists, that the several varie- ties of leucocytes arise spontaneously in the vital fluids by the coalescence of albuminous molecules. In this way the lymph-corpuscles are believed to originate from fluid protoplasm in the lymphatic vessels and glands. In this way also it has been believed, by at least a few authorities, Dr. Bastian among the number, that white blood-corpuscles are formed within the blood vessels themselves, from the albuminous ma- terials of the serum of the blood. In this way it has been believed that pus-corpuscles are developed in inflammatory effusions. And Robin has recently described with much cir- cumstantiality, the formation of leucocytes, which beoome ao- 82 tive agents in the process of reparation, in the organizable lymph which covers the surface of wounds. 5. It is a favorite speculation of many physiologists, that leucocytes are formed exclusively in the glands and follicles of the lymphatic system; and that cell-formation is the spe- cial function of these organs. Of the fact of the abundant formation of leucocytes in the lymphatic glands, there can be no question; because it has been shown that the lymph which passes from them is much richer in cells than that which they receive through their afferent vessels. But whether the process of cell-formation within the lym- phatic glands is by the proliferation of existing cells, or by the direct morphological transformation of the elements of the lymph, is entirely unknown. And while we may freely admit that these glands are important agents in the genera- tion of cells in the higher animals, we have no warrant for the conclusion that this is the only method of cell-genesis; and this for the reason that leucocytes are even more abundant in those lower orders of animals in which no lymphatic glands have been found, as, for example, in the amphibiae. It has been asserted, first I believe by His, and subse- quently by several other observers, that in a very early stage of foetal development, before the vascular circulation has been established, leucocytes are formed from the protoplasm lining the walls of the developing vessels; and Dr. Beale has sug- gested that a similar process of cell-genesis continues to occur during adult life. 6. In the midst of this multitude of opinions it is easy to see that the really important issue always remains the same, namely, this: Whether the genesis of leucocytes is entirely dependent on the process of proliferation; or whether it may also be accomplished by direct development out of amor- phous blastemata. The process by endogenous division or proliferation, is very generally admitted. But it must be re- membered that the admission rests upon purely analogical grounds, and not upon the evidence of direct observation. The proliferation has never been seen to take place. The 83 process by direct exogenous development, on the other hand, has met with considerable opposition, especially within the last few years, since it has been appreciated that in this con- troversy is involved all the principles of that larger contro- versy as to the spontaneous origination of living things. For myself, I have learned that nature is in the habit of using many and complex methods and agencies for the accomplishment of her purposes ; and I do not hesitate to avow my belief that leucocytes may originate by any and all of the methods which have been indicated ; and very specially I do not hesitate to endorse the method of formation which excludes the agency of cellular parentage. This theory, indeed, stands upon quite as secure a founda- tion of facts and analysis as any other. It finds apt illustra- tion, for example, in the account which I have given of the origin of amoebae in the embryonal areas of the proligerous pellicle of organic infusions; and it would be easy to multi- ply illustrations of similar character. Take the following from the vegetable kingdom : There are several species of Algae, such as Chara, NiteUa, and Spirogyra, which consist of cyllindrical filaments, with transparent walls, inclosing liquid protoplasm. Now, under the microscope, this protoplasm may be seen to become granular; the granules may be seen to aggregate into spherical masses ; and these spherical masses may be seen to become encysted, by the condensation of the outer layer of the protoplasm, thus constituting fully devel- oped cells. If we follow the subsequent history of these cells, thus spontaneously developed in the internodes of Chara, we might find them giving issue to monads, or to amaebae, or even to creatures of far higher type than these ; thus repeating the strange drama of archebiosis already enacted in the proligerous pellicle. a THE MOVEMENT.OF LEUCOCYTES. J^- The movements of leucocytes, as are those of all amoeba- form creatures, are of two sorts; first, those resulting simply in change of shape; and secondly, those resulting also in change of place. S4 As long ago as 1835 the amoeboid protrusion of portions of its soft protoplasmic body by the blood-leucocyte, was ob- served by Wharton Jones ; and similar movements were soon afterwards noted by Davaine and several other observers. The passage of the blood-leucocytes from the blood-current through the walls of the blood-vessels was affirmed by Dr. Addison in 1841. The same fact was again described, with much minuteness of detail, in 1846, by Dr. Augustus Waller- And both of these observers declared that the extruded white blood-corpuscles were in all respects identical with the cor- puscles found in pus. They failed, however, to grasp the conception that the leu- cocytes were endowed with independent amoeboid vitality and the faculty of spontaneous locomotion. They were conse- quently unable to give a rational explanation of the phenomena of which they were the first witnesses. They stood upon the threshold of the discovery which has revolutionized both physiology and pathology ; but with the doors of the temple of life wide open before them, they saw nothing but shadows. Their observations bore no fruit, and very soon fell into oblivion. I have shown how one revolution in histology followed the application of the compound microscope to physiological re- search. The new revolution of which I am now speaking followed also upon the introduction of improved methods of investigation. Of these by far the most important is the sub- stitution which has been so largely made of the living tissues and fluids in the place of their dead remains as the objects of physiological and pathological study. The living elements of the tissues, and especially those in which the vital func- tions are most active undergo great changes in the very act of dying, and are still further altered by immersion in water and aceticlftjid and other fluids, and by the various manipu- lations that have been employed as the preliminaries of mi- croscopic examination; so that it is easy to see that if we would know organic forms in their organic integrity we must study them while they are. still living. So The importance of making the living tissues themselves, under the various conditions and circumstances of real life, the basis of histological study was never indeed entirely over- looked, nor greatly underrated. But the difficulties attend- ing this sort of study were almost insuperable, until within quite recent times they have been in some measure overcome by the employment of curare and chloroform. The first of these agents enables us to paralyze the nerves of voluntary motion; the second enables us to paralyze the nerves of sen- sation ; while both of them leave untouched all the great func- tions of organic life, such for example, as respiration, circula- tion and nutrition. In this way by abolishing at the same time the power of motion and the sense of pain in the crea- tures subjected to examination, some of the cardinal obstacles which stood in the way of histological discovery have been removed, and many things have been seen face to face which before were visible only as through a glass darkly. The complete and final demonstration of the amoeboid en- dowments of leucocytes was made by Professor Von Reck- linghausen, and was published by him in a paper on suppura- tion which appeared in 1863. In this memoir Von Reck- linghausen estabhshed on a firm basis the following proposi- tions : 1. That leucocytes exhibit rapid amoeboid changes of form. 2. That leucocytes possess the power of moving from place to place through the meshes of the soft tissues. 3. That leucocytes are capable of flowing around minute solid particles of any kind so as to imprison them completely or partially in the soft protoplasm of their amoeboid bodies. The amoeboid changes of form were established by obser- vations made on pus-corpuscles which were found in the aqueous humor of the anterior chamber of the eye of a frog a few days after keratitis had been excited by irritation of the cornea. I add here the account of what he saw in his own words: "The corpuscles differ very strikingly in their form from those from which the ordinary descriptions are taken. * * * 86 No globular forms present themselves,—only jagged ones, and the prongs vary both in length and number. But what strikes one even after very brief examination is, that each corpuscle is constantly changing its shape. While one prong withdraws itself into the body of the corpuscle, another juts out. Each prong is at first a delicate, homogeneous, somewhat slimy thread; but it soon thickens at the base, lengthening at the same time. Then gradually the substance of the corpuscle tends more and more towards it, becoming smaller as the pro- cess gets larger, the whole thus assuming an oblong or pro- tracted form. During this transformation the tip of the pro- cess is rounded off and subsides into the contour of the cor- puscle ; or new thread-like processes shoot out and again un- dergo the same changes." The ingestive power of the leucocytes was proved by a variety of experiments. One method was by the introduction of milk into the lymph-cavities of frogs, the result being that the corpuscles of the lymph or white blood of these creatures became choked with milk-globules. Another method was the injection of finely divided vermilion into these cavities. The vermilion was speedily absorbed by the leucocytes with the effect of course of imparting to them a red color. This method of feeding the leucocytes with insoluble pigments in- jected into the circulating fluid affords a ready means of marking the blood-leucocytes, so that they may be distin- guished from those which are indigenous to the tissues. The proof of the faculty of locomotion in the leucocytes was derived from such experiments as these : The lymph-cavity of a frog was injected with vermilion so as to color the leucocytes. The cornea of a rabbit, or of a dog, was then introduced into it, and allowed to remain for two or three days. The lymph-sac of course became inflamed, and the fragment of cornea was found to have grown turbid in its superficial portions, the central parts still retaining their natural transparency. Microscopic examination showed that the turbidity was due to the presence of amoeboid leucocytes in the dead tissue; and that these leucocytes were derived by 87 immigration from the purulent lymph in which the cornea had been immersed was evident from the fact, that they were hving and moving, that they contained particles of vermilion, and that they agreed in size and other characters with the leu- cocytes of the frog. In this little historical sketch it is important to remember that Von Recklinghausen's researches were confined to the leucocytes of pus. His experiments were repeated and varied by many observers, with the result that abundant confirma- tion was brought to sustain his conclusions. For example, LorteJ> of Lyons, found that if any porous substance is introduced into a suppurating cavity, the leuco- cytes penetrate into it in the same way as they do into the dead cornea; and that if the swimming bladder of a small fish, filled with water, is introduced into an abscess, the en- closed fluid soon becomes peopled with leucocytes. The next important step in this investigation was made by Cohnheim, who in 1867 announced the migration of blood-leu- cocytes, during the earlier stages of inflammation, through the walls of the bloodvessels into the adjacent tissues. I proceed "to give some account of the experiment by which this immigration was demonstrated. A male frog, which has been paralyzed by the injection un- der the skin, of about the one-2000th of a grain of curare, is se- cured on a plate of glass. A vertical incision is then made through the abdominal wall, extending from the lower edge of the liver downwards to the extent of half an inch; and so much of the small intestine is drawn out of the visceral cavity as is necessary, in order that the mesentery may be evenly spread on a disc of glass, which is fixed in a convenient po- sition for the purpose. After an interval of some hours the exposed peritoneum begins to inflame. First there is increased activity of the capiUary circulation. Then follows the stage of the retardation or slowing of the blood-current; and si- multaneously with this the leucocytes begin to crowd against the vascular walls, until the veins become lined with a con- tinuous pavement of these bodies, which remain almost mo- 88 tionless, notwithstanding that the axial current still sweeps along. Now is the time when the migration is likely to commence, and it is necessary to select some particular vessel for observation. Upon the outer contour of this vessel spring out minute, colorless, button-shaped elevations, just as if they were produced by the budding out of the wall of the vessel itself. The buds increase gradually and slowly in size, until each assumes the form of a hemispherical projection of a width corresponding to that of a leucocyte. Eventually the hemisphere is converted into a pear-shaped body, the stalk-end of which is still attached to the surface of the vein. Grad- ually the little mass of protoplasm removes itself further and further away, and as it does -so, begins to shoot out delicate prongs of transparent protoplasm from its surface, in no wise differing in appearance from the slender thread by which it is stiU moored to the vessel. Finally this thread itself is sev- ered and the process is complete. The observer has before him an emigrant leucocyte in all respects similar to those which have been already described in the aqueous humor of the inflamed eye. This description of the migration of the white blood-cor- puscles through the walls of the bloodvessels, which is given almost in the very words of Cohnheim's account of his obser- vations on the frog's mesentery, is almost identical, even in its details, with that of Waller, twenty years before, of his ob- servations on the frog's tongue. And yet the fame of Cohn- heim's discovery has resounded to the ends of the earth, while Waller's never attracted any serious attention and was at once forgotten. The explanation is easy. Waller was ahead of his time. The verification of the fact which he announced was difficult; it could not be put to use; there was no place for it in any of the current schemes of physio- logical speculation. No wonder then that the discovery fell stillborn. When Cohnheim's investigations were made all the circumstances had been changed. The announcement har- monized with many established opinions, and met with com- paratively easy and abundant verification. 89 Accepting, then, the amoeboid character and the extravascular migrations of the white blood-corpuscles as definitely estab- lished, we proceed next to inquire into the nature and extent of their agency in physiological and pathological processes. As to the migration of the blood-leucocytes, it will be ob- served that it has been seen to occur only in the initial stages of inflammation, that is to say, as a pathological process. Does it also occur as a physiological process under the ordi- nary conditions of growth and development ? This question must be answered in the affirmative ; because there are many facts to warrant the affirmation, and because it is a well es- tablished principle that pathology is only abnormal physiolo- gy,—that the condition of disease is not a radically different condition from that of health, but simply a prolongation higher or lower of the actions proper to the normal organism. THE PHYSIOLOGICAL RELATIONS OF THE WHITE BLOOD-CORPUSCLE/. Here again we have reached a station at which it becomes expedient to widen the field of discussion. We have learned already that blood-leucocytes are individ- ualized particles of living bioplasm ; that in very truth they are quasi independent living creatures, endowed with all the vital faculties of the simpler amoebae, including the faculty of spontaneous locomotion; that on account of their frequent community of origin and of destiny, and of their invariable community of character, the study of them cannot be sepa- rated from the study of the leucocytes of lymph and of pus. Let us now learn that they are also of the same identical nature with the germinal vesicle, with the segmentation- spheres of the developing ovum, and with the so-called cells of the blastodemic layers of the embryo, out of which are de- veloped aU the tissues and organs of all the higher orders of animal creatures, and it will be seen that I had ample warrant for the assertion that the stone so long rejected of the build- ers, was become the chief of the corner,—that it was upon the foundation of the white blood-corpuscle that the physiol- ogy of the future was to be constructed. 90 The problems involved in this division of our subject can be presented to the greatest advantage in a general discussion of the metamorphoses of leucocytes. To this we will ac- cordingly proceed. THE METAMORPHOSES OF LEUCOCYTES. At a previous stage of this inquiry, we found it expedient to substitute for the term " white blood-corpuscle," the more compact and comprehensive term, "leucocyte." Now that we have reached a still higher generalization, it becomes again convenient to change our nomenclature. Hereafter, there- fore, we will use in place of the wTord " leucocyte," the more general expression introduced by Dr. Beale, namely, " bio- plast." We have, then, to designate the science of living creatures, the term Biology; to designate living matter, the t^rm Bioplasm; and to designate any individualized particle of hving matter, the term Bioplast,—a nomenclature which is at once consistent, convenient, comprehensive and suggestive. We are now ready for the discussion of the metamorphoses of bioplasts,—that is' to say, for the discussion of the genesis, the growth and development of living tissues, and of living creatures, for all these questions will be found to be involved in the metamorphoses of white blood-corpuscles, or of their biological equivalents. By the growth of a living creature we mean that there is an increase in its size, that is to say, in the quantity of living matter which it contains. In analyzing the processes- of growth there are three things to be considered, namely : 1. The living creature itself which grows. This may be a creature whose whole body consists of a single microscopic mass of bioplasm—a single bioplast without organs or tissues. Or it may be a creature compounded of many millions of bioplasts or cells arranged into many complex tissues and or- gans. But in all cases the act of growth is essentially the same. Each individual bioplast, whether living alone or colonized in a complex organism, appropriates for itself, by 91 the exercise of its own vital powers, the food upon which it lives and grows. 2. The food or pabulum which is appropriated in the pro- cess of gro.wth,—the materials out of which the bioplast con- structs the very substance of its own body. The cardinal fact of the process of growth is this, that the act of appro- priation of food is an act of transformation. The bioplasm is always of a different nature from the food out of which it was made. The elementary constituents of the food,—the carbon, the hydrogen, the oxygen, the nitrogen, the sulphur, these indeed are not changed; but their molecular arrange- ment is changed and the amount and character of the change is not always the same. Plants, which contain chlorophyll, are able to transform into biaplasm the inorganic gasses of the atmosphere ; while the highest feat of constructive chem- istry of which animals, which contain no chlorophyll, are capa- ble, is the transformation into bioplasm of the albuminous colloids. In either case matter which is not living is metamor- phosed into matter which lives. 3. The products and sequences of the process of growth. The bioplast which grows increases in size ; and this increase of size results from the addition to its mass of new bioplasm. It is important to remember, what has been stated before, that the new bioplasm is not added to the surface of the grow- ing bioplast by superposition ; but it is added to the central parts by intussusception ; so that the outside parts of the bio- plast are always oldest,—are always growing senescent, while the central parts exhibit the plasticity and energy of youth; Again, as the food passes by metamorphosis into bioplasm, so the bioplasm in its turn passes by another metamorphosis into the formed material—the structural elements of the tissues and organs. This formed material which first appears on the periphery of the bioplast does not itself grow, but in- creases by the superposition on its internal surface of other formed material derived from the metamorphosis of other bioplasm. Last of all, the formed material itself undergoes H2 metamorphosis,—disintegrates and passes back into the realm of inorganic nature. THE MYSTERY OF REPRODUCTION. The most fundamental metamorphosis then of a bioplast is its metamorphosis into formed material—into histogenetic elements. But this metamorphosis is not universal. There are many bioplasts which pursue an entirely different career,— which undergo metamorphosis by the division of their bodies, and thus become instrumental to the process of genesis, gen- eration, reproduction,—the process by which the multiplica- tion of bioplasts is accomplished. The whole mystery of reproduction, in all the kingdoms of organic nature is found here in the division of a bioplast,— in the separation of one microscopic mass of hving matter into two microscopic masses of living matter, for this is, in very fact, the separation of one living creature into two hving creatures. The relations existing between growth and genesis are of the most intimate kind. Indeed, in ultimate analysis they are but two phases of the same vital process. Growth is continuous development. Genesis is discontinuous devel- opment. We have seen that the multipljcation of the lower amoebae is accomplished by two apparently different processes. But a little examination shows that the two processes are really of the same essential character, taking place under the influ- ence of different circumstances, and differing only in nones- sential details. Both are processes of segmentation—that is to say, of single division. When the amoeba is young, and its entire mass is composed of growing bioplasm without any peripheral envelop of formed material, the segmentation in- volves the outside as well as the inside of the mass. But when the amoeba is older, and has become enveloped in a layer of matter which has ceased to live, then the segmenta- tion is confined to the living bioplasm within the envelop. Here, in the primitive type of the reproductive process, there is no such relation between successive generations as 93 that of parent and offspring. The young amoeba has neither father nor mother. One living creature has not produced another living creature, retaining at the same time its own in- dividuality unimpaired ; but one individual has passed entire with all its parts and powers, into several segments, each of which is a new individual. When we get a little higher up in the organic hierarchy, among creatures of larger size and more complex construction, the genesis of new individuals is still accomplished by seg- mentation ; but in these the segmentation is partial instead of general,—that is to say, the division does not destroy the individual identity of the creature which is divided. Here we might in some intelligible sense speak of parent and off- spring. But at first, and through primitive types innumera- ble, the parent is neither father nor mother, and the offspring are neither sons nor daughters. As yet there is no sex. Reproductive segmentation may be either external or in- ternal. In the case of external segmentation a bud grows out from some part of the external membrane which envelops the body of the parent, and in due time is thrown off and left to shift for itself. In most of these cases the segmenta- tion is necessarily external, because most of these creatures have no cavities in their bodies, and consequently no internal membranes which can give origin to internal segments. But as soon as, in the ascending scale of living things, we arrive at creatures containing cavities in their bodies, it is within these cavities, and upon their lining membranes, that the segmentation occurs. The change from external segmentation to internal segmen- tation, is not of so radical a nature as at first it appears to be. The internal membranes are only infolded portions of the ex- ternal membranes,—are, in other words, only portions of skin which have dipped down into the visceral cavities. These membranes, both internal and external, are covered with epi- thelium,—with epithelium variously modified and differentia- ted according to circumstances, that is to say, according to the action of incident forces. And this rule holds good down 1)4 to the smallest glands and follicles which open upon the skin, or upon any of the mucous surfaces. The mucous membranes, being thus mere involutions of the skin, are, in all essential particulars, of the same character with it. But inasmuch as they are softer than the skin, more permeable to the elements of nutrition, and more protected from adverse influences, they present more favorable conditions for the outgrowth of the reproductive buds or segments. It is for this reason that na- ture, always parsimonious and wisely frugal of her resources, selects these internal membranes as the instruments and agents of reproduction. And this stage of animal develop- ment being once reached, internal gemmation, internal seg- mentation, internal reproduction becomes henceforth the in- variable rule. And this little bud or segment, which is the beginning of a new creature, what is it ? and whence is it derived ? It is a little mass of bioplasm ; and it is developed from one of the epithelial elements. In other words, it is a bioplast resulting from the metamorphosis of an epithelial cell. But what then is an epithelial cell ? This also is a bioplast which has under- gone a special metamorphosis. And whence this marvelous bioplast, which is the common germ alike of epithelial cells and of living animals? In the present state of physiology, its genealogy cannot be very confidently given. But more and more there is a disposition to accept the doctrine propounded long ago by Dollinger, and more recently by Biesiadecki,— the doctrine, namely, that the epithelial cell is derived by sim- ple metamorphosis from the wandering white blood-corpus- cle. And if the epithelial cell is derived in this way from the white blood-corpuscle, why then it is plain that the white blood-corpuscle is the immediate ancestor of every living creature; yea, verily! that man himself, fearfully and won- derfully made, is but an infinitely developed migrating leuco- cyte. If it should be objected that Biesiadecki's doctrine of the ori- gin of epithelium is not yet definitely established, this much at least remains oertain, namely : That the epithelial cell and 95 the migratory leucocyte are of the same essential character, —are both microscopic masses of individualized bioplasm,— are, in a word, biological homologues. In the meantime, the doctrine that every living creature begins in an epithelial cell,—in a bud springing from an epithelial surface, is no longer open to question. And why should this be considered an in- credible theory,—an absurd and fanciful physiological dream ? It has the support not only of observed facts, buV-aL all the *> a priori presumptions of biological science. The bioplast is the biological unit, the fundamental element of organization. It is therefore the natural and inevitable starting point of every hving organ and of every living organism. It is in the sub-kingdom Coelenterata that permanent cavi- ties first appear, and it is here, consequently, that internal segmentation is first manifested. The permanent cavity of ccelenterate animals is known as the gastro-vascular cavity. Let us understand clearly what is meant by this. In these animals but little progress has been made in the differentia- tion of organs and functions. They have no vessels for the circulation of the blood; indeed, they have no blood to circu- late ; but they have a many-chambered, branching cavity which serves at the same time for the ingestion and the di- gestion of food, and for the distribution of the nutritive fluid. This is the gastro-vascular cavity. It is lined, of course, with epithelium. Now, in the lower Coelenterata, the entire repro- ductive apparatus consists of a few spots on the surface of the walls of this cavity. These spots are covered with a sort of epithelium, which is known as germ-epithelium, the cells of which, by simple growth, become developed into eggs. In the higher Coelenterata the process of differentiation has taken another step in advance. The germinal spots sink down into the thickness of the walls of the cavity, so as to form epithelial follicles or sacks. Within these folhcles the eggs are developed as before, by the simple growth of the epi- thelial elements. When mature they are discharged into the gastric cavity, and thence find their way into the external world. 96 We have thus traced the process of reproductive gemma- tion, or segmentation, or ovulation, as far as is necessary for the purpose which we have in view. It is true, that we have only reached the borders of the animal kingdom, the Coelen- terata being the first creatures in the ascending scale of de- velopment, which are distinctly and unmistakably animals. But the type of ovarian development which they present,— «^*"**c that of^eWepithelial follicleagland, is substantially repeated ^7"~ througn all the higher classes and orders up to man. There are variations almost innumerable, of special form and loca- tion, and of accessory and supplemental organs and appenda- ges ; but the type of the epithelial sack is never changed. Away up among the higher orders of Vertebrata, the open epithelial sack of Coelenterata, Annulosa and Molluska is re- placed by a closed sack. But as this is still lined with epi- thelium, and is occasionally opened for the discharge of eggs or germs, it is really only a modification and not a change of the type. In the human female the ovaries are developed in connec- tion with the corpora Wolfiance. They are the homologues and the analogues of the testes of the male which are also developed in connection with the corpora Wolfiance. In the beginning of their development, they consist of a mass of fi- brous stroma, which is well supplied with bloodvessels and covered over with a layer of cylindrical epithelium. This epithelium is also called ovarian epithelium, and germ-epi- thelium. As the development goes on, some of these epithe- lial cells are seen to be larger than others, and it is these which are to pass by metamorphosis into the future eggs. Very soon processes of the fibrous stroma shoot up above the general level, while the epithelial membrane sinks down into the depressions between them. The processes continu- ing to grow, we have presently deep, open follicles lined with the germ-epithelium, such as we have already seen in Coelen- terata. Each of these open sacks sinks continuaUy deeper and deeper into the underlying stroma, while the uprising processes approximate more and more until at length they 97 touch and adhere together, and the mouth of the sack is closed by their adhesion. This closed sack is the follicle of Von Graafe. Within it the development of the ovum and its en- velops gradually proceeds to completion, all of its various parts being derived from epithelial elements. Inasmuch as we have found the typical ovarium fully de- veloped in creatures like the Coelenterata, which stand at the very beginning of the animal hierarchy, we would expect, in accordance with the principles of transcendental physiology, to find this organ in the higher animals presenting itself at a very early period of foetal development. And such is really the case. While the foetus as yet exhibits no signs of human structure, but is still of the soft, larval, and quasi coelenterate type, the ovaries, with the Graafian folhcles and the ova are all to be found in a state virtually complete. The female in- fant comes into the world with her ovaries full of eggs,—that is to say, full of the germs of future human creatures. Nature, usually so parsimonious, makes prodigal preparation for the continuance of the race. The number of ova in the ovaries of a single human female is immense. It has been estimated at as high a rate as four hundred thousand. Of these myriads very few comparatively, perhaps not more than from three hundred to five hundred, ever escape from the follicles in which they were formed; and of those that do escape very * few are ever developed into Hving human beings. I shall not pause to describe the minute anatomy of the human ovum. The truly essential portion of it is the so-called germinal vesicle. This is a particle of living matter,—a mi- croscopic bioplast, and therefore entirely analogous to the white blood-corpuscle. When mature it contains a nucleus and therefore is a bioplast which has reached a comparatively high stage of development. As we have already seen the testes of the male are both homologous and analogous with the ovaries of the female,— that is to say, their structural relations are the same, and they are appropriated to the discharge of corresponding functions. The spermatazoon is both homologous and analogous with the 98 ovum. It is a metamorphosed cell,—the product of the metamorphosis of an epithelial cell, or at any rate of a cell which under other circumstances would have assumed epithel- ial characters. It is called a seminal cell, and is neucleated like the germinal vesicle. The nucleus forms the head of the fuUy developed spermatozoon, while the rest of the bioplasm of the cell sprouts out to form the tail; so that the whole substance of the seminal cell is to be found in the spermato- zoon. There has been a change of form, and with this the acquisition of new functions. The spermatozoon is therefore very closely related to the white blood-corpuscle. I cannot enter here into any adequate discussion of the transcendental mystery of sex ; but it will not be amiss, per- haps, if I make two or three summary suggestions towards the reduction of the problem to its simplest terms. What is it that takes place in the act of sexual impregna- tion ? Simply this : Two bioplasts, endowed with different faculties, although closely allied in their physiological history, are fused into one. Everywhere the process of sexual con- jugation, When stripped of the glamour of mystery and cere- monial with which Nature for wise purposes loves to invest it, has this for its object,—this fusion of two microscopic cells into one. I said, just now, sexual conjugation ! But the conjugation and fusion of cells, as occasional stages in the drama of re- ' production, occur very frequently in creatures in which no distinction of sex can be recognized. Take an example or two. In Desmids and Diatoms, which are unicellular aquatic plants, multiplication usually takes place, by simple duplex subdivision. But occasionally a different plan of reproduc- tion is invoked. Two of these single-celled creatures come together so as to touch one another, it may be by accident or it may be, as I believe that it is, as the result of some mys- terious and reciprocal organic attraction. The walls of the two ceUs first grow together at the point of contact; and then the partition thus formed is broken down, and the contents 99 of the two cells become commingled into a single homogene- ous mass of biaplasm. Around this there is soon formed a cellulose envelop, and we have a spore which serves as the starting point of a new series of proliferating cells. In Spirogyra, a genus of fresh water algae, we find another illustration of cell-conjugation of essentially the same char- acter, but differing a little in some of the details. These plants consist of slender green filaments formed of single rows of cylindrical and elongated ceUs. Between the cells of two adjacent filaments a wonderful attraction is sometimes seen to manifest itself. In their eagerness to embrace one another the wall of a cell in one filament bulges out to meet a corresponding protrusion of the wall of a cell in another filament; the two protrusions come into contact; the inter- vening walls are absorbed; the whole of the bioplasmic con- tents of the two conjugating cells are gathered into one of them ; and a spore is thus formed, which in due time germi- nates into a new plant. Again. We have seen how several previously independent non-nucleated amoebae may become associated together in a Plasmodium, which in time may become encysted and by seg- mentation give rise to new generations of amoebae. Is this, also, an example of reproductive conjugation? Now here among the lowly creatures which have furnished these examples of conjugation, there is neither male nor female. The conjugating ceUs are exactly alike. And yet we have here substantially the same physiological results as those that follow the sexual conjugation of the higher plants and animals. We have the mysterious fusion of twro cells into one cell,—of two bioplasts into one bioplast, to form the germ out of which a new creature is to be evolved. In other words, we have manifested here among creatures in which no sexual differentiation has been established, that very same process of conjugal reproduction for which the agency of sex is or- dinarily invoked as the only possible explanation. It is easy enough to say that this is practically the same thing as the assertion of the real existence of sex in creatures which ex- 100 hibit no recognizable sexual characters. And I have no doubt that this is frequently the case. But I beheve that in those first and simplest conjugations which occur in the very lowest ranks of organic life, there is no intervention of sex at all,— either of sex actual, or of sex potential; but that the con- jugating cells are really, as they seem to be, of the same na- ture, or, to speak paradoxically, of the same sex,—that is to say, of no sex at all. On this presumption, sex, like all the other faculties of living things, arises by imperceptible grada- tions out of a common basis of homogeneous bioplasm, in obedience to the general law of organic evolution, through the ordinary processes of growth, development, and differen- tiation. The diversity, which at length becomes so great, is developed out of a unity which is well nigh absolute. Let us see, if we can, what it is that really takes place in that wonderful conjugation of bioplasts which is instru- mental in reproduction. In the first place, it is evident that conjugation does not belong to the essence of the act of re- production ; and this for the quite sufficient reason that we have found reproduction to take place abundantly without it. Clearly, then, conjugation is not a primitive factor in the pro- cess of reproduction. It is only a secondary, an accessory, a supplemental factor. But what, then, is its special purpose ? In what way does it reinforce and supplement the fundamental forces of repro- duction ? In order that we may find the answers to these questions, we must study the special circumstances under which its agency is invoked. We have seen already that re- production, in its simplest, in its most primitive, in its truly essential forms, is nothing more than an incident of growth. When growth is continuous we have increase of size,—part is added to part. But growth is sometimes discontinuous ; the individuality of the growing mass is destroyed, so that it falls asunder, part from part, and each part becomes a new indi- vidual and leads an independent life. Now this falling asunder of the growing mass,—this curious phenomenon of discontinuous development, occurs during the 101 larvel condition of the creature that divides,—that is to say, while the processes of growth are specially vigorous and ac- tive. But when the growing mass has reached maturity, and the activities of nutritive life are diminished or suspended, then also, this sort of multiplication is diminished or suspended, and the act of reproduction can be accomplished only through the supplemental agency of conjugation. This supplemental agency of conjugation, then, restores the reproductive or pro- liferative energy which has been lost through the waning of the powers of growth—of development—of evolution. It al- ways does this. But as we ascend the scale of organic life it is found to do almost infinitely more than this. Its office is mag- nified more and more the higher we get,—is, indeed, at length so immensely magnified and so variously differentiated, that it is not strange that its original character should be over- looked. It restores to the senescent and languishing creature, or to some of its segments, its waning power of growth and devel- opment. Restores it, but how ? The answer to this question even, is not beyond all conjecture. The subsidence of the power of growth and development is concurrent with the es- tablishment of equilibrium among the forces that minister to nutrition. All motion, of whatever character, depends upon some disturbance of equilibrium. In mechanics the complete equilibrium of all the mechanical forces is equivalent to com- plete rest. In physiology the complete equilibrium of all the vital forces is equivalent to death. Now the fusion of two bioplasts into one in the act of conjugation, breaks up, in the most thorough manner, the paralysis of equilibrium which is stealing over them both, and in the complex mass which re- sults from this union, sets all the wheels of life into active motion. One of the most curious questions connected with sexual generation, is this : Which is physiologically the real parent of the child, the father or the mother ? There can be no hesitation as to the answer. Beyond all question the child is, in a very special sense, the offspring of the mother. Swedenborg tells 102 us that the body and animal life of the human child are de- rived from the mother, but that the soul is furnished by the father. The doctrine of the natural generation of the soul has been condemned by the church ; but there is a sense in which this conception of the Sweedish seer becomes exceed- ingly suggestive. I cannot dwell upon it, however, now. Sometimes, very frequently, indeed, even among creatures that are truly sexual, the new individual has but one parent; and invariably this solitary parent is of the female sex. Hence this sort of reproduction has been called Parthenogen- esis. In the common plant-louse—the aphis, for example— when the weather is pleasant and food abundant, a very rapid process of multiplication goes on without any assistance from the male insect. During this time, indeed, the offspring as well as the parents are all females. For generation after gen- eration no males are to be found. But when the conditions of existence become more stringent, when food is hard to get and the weather is unpropitious, and life really becomes a struggle, then the male animal makes his appearance, and the aphide mothers are no longer virgins. We have seen how the ovum makes its appearance in the female foetus of the hu- man race while the foetus itself is still within the womb of its mother. The same thing takes place in all the higher ani- mals ; perhaps, also, in all the lower animals. At any rate, it has been observed in the organic reproduction of aphides, which I have just described. The mother's body incloses the daughter's body, imperfect and immature ; and the daughter's body at the same time incloses the still more imperfect and immature body of the grand-daughter; so that we have three generations mysteriously folded up together. It is necessary to add here, that while these rapidly multiplying aphides are females, they are not perfect females. The young broods are not developed in a true ovarium, nor from perfect ova; buk the process seems to be one of internal gemmation in the simplest sense of the word. We have, however, examples of parthenogenesis amongst Hymenoptera and Lepidoptera, in which perfect females, with 103 all the generative organs normally developed, prove prolific without any conjugal intercourse with males. Dzierzon, a Catholic priest in Prussian Silesia, announced in 1845, that the eggs from which the male bees or drorfes originate are produced and developed by the sole inherent power of the mother bee, without the action of the male seed. In 1863 this doctrine of Dzierzon was fully confirmed by the microscopic investigations of Von Siebold and Lenkhart. The queen bee, as is well known, receives the embraces of the male only during the hymeneal flight. If her wings are crippled so that this flight cannot be taken, she lays eggs which produce only male bees. The workers again, with whom no nuptial rites are possible, sometimes lay eggs, and these always produce drones. It is a curious fact, that in the agamic reproduc.ion of Aphididce the offspring is almost ex- clusively female ; while in the agamic reproduction of Apkidos the offspring consist entirely of males. A still more curious illustration of agamic reproduction is presented by the Psyclddce, a family of butterflies. Here the female is in every way perfect, and endowed with seed-vessel and with copulating pouch. But no copulation is accom- plished and no spermatozoa take part in the process of reproduc- tion. The eggs, also, are perfect and with perfect micropyles, but they undergo development without any preliminary fertiliza- tion. Amongst these creatures, indeed, reproduction seems to be permanently agamic, without even the occasional occurence of gamogenesis. The search for the male insect has now been continued for many years, but no males have been found. In a word, these wonderful Psychidie are all females and all virgins, with no fierce masculine mates to annoy them with conjugal importunities, and no tempests of sexual passion to disturb the serenity of their hves. Many other examples of agamogenesis, including also many examples of true parthenogenesis, might be mentioned here. They are so numerous, indeed, that it would hardly be rash to assert that non-sexual reproduction is of quite as common oc- currence in the animal kingdom as sexual reproduction; and 104 that one-half of the living creatures that are born into the world are born without the instrumentality of male ancestors. But the examples which I have given are sufficient for my pirrpose,—are sufficient, that is to say, to sustain my asser- tion that in the process of reproduction sex is not a primitive and fundamental factor, but that it is in reality only a secondary and complemental factor. It is, indeed, in the reproduction of the higher animals an indispensable factor, but it is not primitive and fundamental inasmuch as its agency is not in- voked at the beginning of the development of the new crea- ture. Contrariwise, the development of the new creature amongst the higher animals is always commenced by the mother alone ; is always commenced during the mother's foetal and larval life ; and is always in the beginning a process of gemmation or segmentation,—an outgrowth of a portion of the mother's own body. When the development has reached a certain stage of progression,—a stage as high and as complex as can be attained by the unaided action of the maternal forces, and when without some additional energy the development would be arrested and the effort to produce a new creature prove abortive, then it is that the mysterious agency of sex is in- voked, and that the masculine energy becomes a factor of the advancing development. New conditions, both static and dynamic, are incorporated into the developing ovum, a more active evolution is established and a higher development be- comes possible of accomplishment. THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE OVUM. Let us return now to the fertilized human ovum, and mark the stages of evolution through which it passes, until it stands before us a fully developed human creature. The transition is surely astounding,—from a microscopic speck of homo- geneous bioplasm to a man fearfully and wonderfully made. The most daring imagination might very well be staggered in the effort to grasp the tremendous conception. 105 And yet the agencies at work are of the simplest possible character. They are these four: 1. The enlargement of cells. 2. The segmentation of cells. 3. The arrangement of cells. 4. The differentiation of cells. In their last analysis enlargement, segmentation, and differ- entiation, are resolved into modifications of growth ; so that the fundamental processes of organization might be reduced * to two, namely, the growth of cells, and their arrangement. If we had commenced with the unfertilized ovum, the first stage would have been that of the conjugation of cells. But this has been sufficiently considered already. We found that the germinal vesicle is a nucleated bioplast; and that the spermatozoon is also a nucleated bioplast. But the fertilized ovum which is the product of their conjugation, is destitute of a nucleus,—is homogeneous and structureless. It finds its way into the uterine cavity, and attaches itself to the mem- brana decidva, by which it becomes invested just as did the original germ-cell in the ovarian stroma. But of these in- vestments we have nothing to say. Our business is with the developing ovum. The first metamorphosis which this exhibits is the meta- morphosis of growth, enlargement, continuous development— the metamorphosis of addition. The second metamorphosis which it exhibits is the metam- orphosis of segmentation, of discontinuous development— the metamorphosis of division. The single mass of bioplasm of the fecundated ovum is separated into many masses of bioplasm. But still, for a time, there is no differentiation among them. As far as we are able to judge, the segments, or segmentation spheres as they are called, are all exactly alike. They are all composed of unmixed bioplasm, of ger- minal matter, and as yet there is no formed material—no signs of structure to be seen. Let it be understood without further mention that the two metamorphic processes already described, the process of 106 growth, and the process of segmentation, continue indefinitely, and we will turn our attention to the next stage of the evolu- tion. This next stage, the third, is a process of simple arrange- ment. It is metamorphic of the whole mass of the ovum, not of its separate segments. The segmentation-spheres march like soldiers to their appropriate places, and arrange themselves into three ranks—the three germinal plates, or blastodermic la}Ters of the embryo. The first of these layers, the external layer, is called by Remak the sensational layer ; the second or middle layer, the motorial layer; the third or internal layer, the intestinal or glandular layer. The process of arrangement does not stop with the formation of these primitive blastodermic layers; but other arrangements arise successively within the layers, secondary, tertiary, etc.—ar- rangements of continually increasing speciality and complexity, and out of these are developed the various tissues and organs of the completed organism. How these arrangements are accomplished, whether as the result of spontaneous impulse and the faculty of amaeboid motion on the part of the bioplasts concerned ; whether under the influence of external incident forces; or whether through the concurrent action of both of these classes of causes, we will not stop to inquire. The in- dications of the antecedent causes are vague and shadowy ; but the fact itself, of arrangement, is clear and demonstrable. This brings us to the fourth and last of the metamorphic processes which are concerned in the development of the foetus, namely, the metamorphosis of differentiation. The ar- rangement of the bioplasts into rudimentary organs is already in a certain sense, a process of differentiation ; it is differen- tiation of the mass of the developing ovum. But the differ- entiation now to be discussed, is the differentiation of the separate and individual bioplasts constituting that mass. Biological analysis shows that the organism is composed of organs, these organs of tissues, and these tissues of histologi- cal elements. Now it is to be specially noted here, that every separate histological element—every muscle-fiber, every nerve- 107 fiber, every epithelial cell, every constituent structural element of bone, of cartilage, of connective tissue, and of all the tissues, is the product of the differential metamorphosis of a separate and individual bioplast. And inasmuch as in a fully developed human organism there are many millions of struc- tural anatomical elements, so, for the formation of these, many millions of living bioplasts must have suffered metam- orphosis and differentiation. The natural history of every histological element involves these three problems: 1. The derivation of the germinal bioplast, out of which it is developed. 2. The character of the transformation to which it is sub- jected. 3. The cause of the special transformation, which is in each case accomplished. In the earlier stages of foetal development, the germinal bioplasts which pass by differential metamorphosis into the elements of tissues, are the segmentation-spheres of the ovum. In the later stages of foetal development, and during all the varying periods of life subsequent to birth, the original store of segmentation-spheres having been exhausted, the germinal bioplasts must be derived from some other source. But from what other source can they be derived? There is but one possible answer. They are derived from the blood in the shape of white blood-corpuscles. I have already indicated, again and again, that the segmen- tation-spheres and the white blood-corpuscles are of the same nature,—are homologues and analogues of one another. But is there any genetic connection between them ? Most assuredly there is. The white blood-corpuscles are the lineal descendants of the original undifferentiated segments of the ovum, the inher- itors of their features, their faculties and their functions. The process of segmentation, commenced in the microscopic ovum, continues through the entire period of foetal evolution, continues also through all the stages of infant and adult life, never ceases, indeed, until the organism which it has built up ceases to live. 108 Nature never abandons a process which she has once adopted. She may, indeed, under the influence of changing circum- stances, modify it in many ingenious ways, and even to such an extent that its identity is difficult of recognition. She may also supplement it with secondary and auxiliary processes; and these, in the progress of development, may gradually in- crease in importance until the original process is overshadowed by them. Nevertheless it is true, that Nature never changes her mind, and never repudiates anything that she has once indorsed. While, then, it may be true that white blood-corpuscles arise by other methods than by segmentation of pre-existing bioplasts, as has been suggested in the section of this paper which treats of the origin of leucocytes, it is still not to be doubted that many of them may claim hereditary descent, through perhaps a thousand intervening generations, from the aboriginal unique cell of the impregnated ovum. DEVELOPMENT OF THE BLOOD-CORPUSCLES IN THE F03TUS. Very early in the history of the foetus, bloodvessels begin to be developed; and at the same time the primary corpuscles of the blood make their appearance. It seems to be a general rule that this development commences in that part of the organism where the heart is ultimately to be found. In certain definite spaces some of the bioplasmic masses,— the segmentation-spheres become fluid or semi-fluid; and the bioplasts enveloping these spaces are condensed into definite walls, the coats of the future vessels. In the meantime other segmentation-spheres inside of these walled spaces retain their cellular individuality. These are the primitive white corpuscles. Other white corpuscles proceed from these by proliferation. Others still, bud out from the soft bioplasm lining the vessels, from which they gradually separate and drop into the vascular cavities. As yet, however, there is no circulation. The vessels do not form a continuous system. But other vessels are formed, communications are opened 109 up between them, at length a general anastomosis is established, and the circulation begins. Hence, as we have said, the white blood-corpuscles are the lineal descendants of the segmenta- tion-spheres of the ovum, and endowed with the same essential characters and functions,—their permanent representatives through all the subsequent stages of the life of the organism. The passage of the segmentation-spheres into the white blood- corpuscle can hardly be called a metamorphosis or a differen- tiation. The change which occurs is rather in the surroundings of the segmentation-corpuscles, than in the corpuscles themselves. But aU the other morphological elements of the organism are the products of differential metamorphosis,—are derived from segmentation-spheres, or from white blood-corpuscles, by the transformation already explained of some portion of their bioplasm into some of the varieties of formed material. The first of these morphological products of differentiation to be mentioned is the red blood-corpuscle. It was for a long time the prevalent opinion among physiologists, that in the gradual ascent by progressive metamorphosis of the elements of the food into the substance of the tissues, the white corpuscle was first formed, that this passed into the red corpuscle, and that the red corpuscle then passing through a still higher transforma- tion became incorporated into the substance of the tissues, and . specially of the higher tissues, as the muscles and nerves. But for several years this doctrine has been falling into disrepute ; and in several recent works on physiology the supposed histo- genetic functions of the red corpuscle, and its derivation from the white corpuscle are both denied. After the red corpuscle has finished its career of vital activity, it may be that the materials of which it is composed, passing by liquefaction and disintegration into the blood- plasma, are then appropriated by parsimonious Nature, un- willing that anything should be wasted, to the nutrition of the blood and of the tissues. But it is certain that it cannot subserve any purpose of nutrition while it maintains its organic integrity. It is also certain that its primary and special 110 function is not nutritive, but respiratory. As to its derivation it is certain, that in the foetus it first appears as the offspring of the proliferating segmentation-spheres; and upon analogical grounds it would be reasonable to conclude that in later life it springs from the white blood-corpuscles which have suc- ceeded to the functions of the segmentation-spheres. That this presumption is also warranted by facts, seems to be no longer doubtful since the observations of Von Recklinghausen and Golubew on the blood of the frog, in which they were able to detect the intermediate and transitional forms which bridge over the interval between the two types. As the next example of differential metamorphosis let us see how a blood-bioplast passes into an epithelial cell. The transformation is sufficiently simple. The peripheral layers of the bioplast cease to grow, harden, and are gradually changed from living bioplasm into formed material,—from matter that is homogeneous to matter that exhibits structure. This pro- cess of transformation extends deeper and deeper into the bio- plasm until we have a central nucleus of living bioplasm en- veloped in a shell of formed material; and this is the type of the epithelial cell. A sufficient number of these agglutinated into a sheet-like expansion makes an epithelial membrane. The varieties of epithelium, as pavement-epithelium and columnar- epithelium, depend on the pressure and other incident in- fluences to which the individual cells are subjected. The muscle-fiber is formed essentially in the same way, by the metamorphosis of a bioplast. The structural material which results is of a different character, and assumes an elongated, spindle-shaped form. It has been suggested that during its formation the bioplast which is undergoing differ- entiation, moves forward leaving a string of formed material along the path it has travelled. Cartilage is formed by a strictly analogous method; the only difference worthy of note being that fusion of the separ- ate cells occurs in an earlier stage of the metamorphosis, and is so complete, forming a sort of plasmodium, that their special boundaries are entirely obscured. But each little mass of Ill bioplasm still marks the central part of a constituent cell, and the so-called intercellular substance is formed material as before. After the same general fashion are formed all the structural elements of the body, but it is not necessary to our purpose to pursue this part of the subject further. In the development of every tissue there are two processes which must be carefully discriminated from one another, namely, the process by which the morphological elements of the tissue increase in size, and the process by which they in- crease in number. How the individual structural element in- creases in magnitude is easily understood,—how, for example, a muscle-fiber grows. But by what process is it that the number of fibers in a muscle is augmented, that a new muscle- fiber is added to those already in existence ? This is a ques- tion not so readily answered. Does some growing muscle- fiber subdivide into two ? Or is some new germ introduced from without which developes into a new muscle-fiber ? The more we consider the problem, the more it is seen to be evident that if the division of a muscle-fiber is possible at all, it is only possible during its inchoate and, so to speak, larval condition. The fully developed muscle-fiber could be divided only by a process of considerable violence. And if the living bioplasm within the fiber were to undergo division the separated segments would remain imprisoned so that de- velopment would not be possible unless the enclosing walls were torn assunder to allow them exit. It is not easy to be- lieve, then, that muscle-fibers originate in the proliferation of muscle fibers. And, inasmuch as the same reasoning is ap- plicable to all the other structural elements of the tissues, it would seem to foUow as a necessary generalization, that struc- tural elements such as muscle-fibers, nerve-fibers, epithelial cells, and the hke, are never derived directly from pre-existing structural elements of the same kind ; but rather that each must spring from a germinal bioplast, introduced from with- out, through the process of differential metamorphosis. We know that this is the rule in the earlier stages of foetal devel- 112 opment; and we have no proof that a different plan is adopted in infancy, or in youth, or in adult age. This is not altogether a new doctrine. Dollinger announced, in 1828, that all the tissues were built out of blood-corpuscles, which had penetrated the walls of the bloodvessels and found then' way into the interspaces of the tissue-elements. I have not seen Dollinger's book, and know nothing of the details of his scheme. Whatever these may have been, it seems to have exerted little or no influence on the development of physiology, and was very soon forgotten. The difficulties that must have opposed its reception at that time, have been dissipated by the discovery of the amoeboid character, and migratory habits of the white blood-corpuscles. It has, indeed, been recognized for a long time that such highly ,organized tissue-elements as muscle-fibers and nerve- fibers, for example, do not themselves undergo physiological proliferation. Of late years the prevalent opinion as to histo- genesis has been that of Virchow, namely, that all the other tissues are derived from the connective tissue,—that the germs of the structural elements of all the tissues, normal and abnormal, except perhaps the epithelial, are furnished by the connective tissue-corpuscles. But the connective tissue- corpuscles of Virchow are simply masses of living bioplasm which have not yet undergone differentiation into formed ma- terial, but which are themselves everywhere surrounded by the formed material constituting this tissue, so that even if the proliferation of these corpuscles really occurred the libera- tion of the segments would be attended with some difficulty. This difficulty surmounted, however, these liberated segments would be of the same character as the white blood-corpuscles, and in the last analysis the two theories would amount to very much the same thing. This problem as to whether the bioplasm of the structural elements of the tissues undergoes proliferation, is one of very great importance both in physiology and in pathology, and must be examined a httle more thoroughly. We have seen that, in some examples at least of inflammation, the first generation of 113 pus-bioplasts are emigrants from the blood. But how about the subsequent generations of pus-bioplasts which present themselves during the subsequent stages of the inflammation? Are these also derived from the blood,—later colonies but of the same origin? Are some of them natural offspring of these adventurous emigrants, native as it were and to the man- ner born? And among these teeming myriads are there others still which have been derived by proliferation from the living bioplasm of the inflamed tissues themselves ? When the discovery was made of the facility with which blood-bioplasts pass through the walls of the vessels and the meshes of the softer tissues, and of the fact that vast num- bers of bioplasts are engaged in these inflammatory migra- tions, there was a very general disposition indulged to con- sider all the bioplasts of pus to be emigrants from the blood. But there is good reason to believe that bioplasts which have emigrated from the blood continue to undergo prolifera- tion in then- new habitats; and the origin of other bioplasts by proliferation of connective tissue-corpuscles, and by pro- liferation of inflamed epithelium has been so clearly demon- strated by thoroughly competent observers, as to be no longer doubtful. The rationale of these last processes is easily un- derstood. In consequence of the inflammatory irritation there is an increased flow of nutritive material to the inflamed part, and an increased activity of nutritive appropriation on the part of the bioplasm of its structural elements. This bioplasm consequently grows rapidly, and instead of passing through its normal physiological transformation into formed material, undergoes rapid proliferation. The result is that the formed material which envelopes the bioplasm is rent into fragments and destroyed, while the newly formed bioplasts are set free to devour, to grow, to proliferate, and to wander without re- straint, no longer conserving.the natural functions of the or- ganism, but quasi parasitic and destructive. As a pathological phenomenon, then, we must admit the proliferation of the bioplasmic nuclei of the elements of the tissues. But it must be borne in mind that the proliferation 114 extends only to the nuclear bioplasm, and not to the whole substance of the tissue-elements ; that it is a pathological and not a physiological process; and that the products of the pro- cess are not tissue-elements but pus-bioplasts. For the most part, as has been said, they are parasitic and destructive. Whether they ever become naturalized in the organism, and subservient to the purposes of life has not as yet been specially investigated. A question which has occurred to many is this, how is it that the blood-bioplast can be developed into so many differ- ent varieties of tissue-elements ? How can the same sort of seed produce so many different sorts of fruit ? There is only one answer, namely, this : That the special development of the germinal bioplast is determined by the action of incident forces, by the nature and nutrition of the part in which it takes place,—that is to say, that the character of the fruit depends very much on the soil in which the seed is sown and the in- fluence of surrounding conditions. Here, also, out of the study of phenomena such as these, rises into view the great law of infection; a law which has heretofore been recognized only as a law of pathology, but which, in accordance with the definition wThich has been given of pathology, as simply abnormal physiology, must manifest itself, also, as a law of physiology. In obedience to this law, a bioplastic germ developing among muscle-fibers becomes a muscle-fiber ; developing among nerve-fibers it becomes a nerve-fiber, and so on. We see a sort of mixed example of the influence of this law of infection bj contact in the influ- ence which is exerted when a few scales of epithelium have been engrafted on the granulating surface of an ulcer. By the mere contact of the transplanted cells the adjacent bio- plasm is transformed into epithelium, which soon extends so as to cover the ulcerated surface. EXPLANATORY NOTE. Here, for the present, this paper must close. 1 am fully aware how incomplete and defective it is, and would gladly 115 make it better if circumstances were more auspicious. It has been written hurriedly, in the midst of many pressing engage- ments, and, worst of all, with but scanty access to books and authorities. Nevertheless, I am satisfied that the statements of facts will be found to accord very generally with the latest obser- vations. For the scientific or speculative use which I have made of the facts, I am, of course, responsible. If my spec- ulations are sometimes a little startling, I am not the less sat- isfied that in the main they will turn out to be the true inter- pretations of many recondite problems in physiology. It may be that sometime the opportunity will be afforded me of returning to the subject; and of filling up several gaps which occur in the physiological sketch which I have at- tempted ; and, what is still more needed, to discuss in a way more nearly commensurate with their importance, the pathol- ogical relations of the white blood-bioplast, which so far have only been incidentally touched upon. April, 1874. NLM001410306