■I--* j ipiHJtk i-l:U'.:; WY 100 S734t 1920 NLM D5E6SM5T fi NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE SURGEON GENERAL'S OFFICE LIBRARY. ANHEX ----- INBBX Section--------------------------- No. 113, W.D.S.G.O. 3-513 NLM052854598 TALKS TO NURSES Talks to Nurses THE ETHICS OF NURSING BY HENRY S. SPALDING, SJ. Professor of Ethics in St. Xavier College, Cincinnati, Ohio; formerly Lecturer on Social Science in Loyola University, Chicago, Illinois. New York, Cincinnati, Chicago BENZIGER BROTHERS PRINTERS TO THE I PUBLISHERS OF HOLY APOSTOLIC SEE I BENZIGER's MAGAZINE 1920 wv S73'fi 19 2,0 Smprtmi potest, FRANCIS X. McMENAMY, S.J., Praep. Prov. Missourianae. Jitijtl #b*tat. ARTHUR J. SCANLAN, S.T.D., Censor Librorwm. Smprtmatur. 4-PATRICK J. HAYES, D.D., Archbishop of New York. New Yore, March 22, 1920. COPYRIGHT, 1920, BY BENZIGER BROTHERS ©CLA571277 ' CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE I Guiding Principles ................... 7 Ethics and Other Sciences. Four Truths Which are taken for Granted. A Right. A Duty. Rights and Duties Compared. Animals Have no Rights. Rights not the Outgrowth of Customs. The False Theory of Dewey, Aikens and Robb. In- alienable Rights. Life is from God. Necessity of these Principles. II Guiding Principles (continued)......... 19 Direct and Indirect Killing. Killing as an End or a Means. It is never Allowed to Kill an Innocent Person Directly either as an End or a Means. Killing an Un- just Aggressor. Killing Child to Save Parent—Czar of Russia. An Example from English Law. Principles Re- stated. Ethics Denned. Human Acts. Moral Law and Ten Commandments. Ill Euthanasia .......................... 33 Meaning of Euthanasia. Application to the Hopelessly Sick. Not Kindness. The Committee on Euthanasia. Advocates of Euthanasia. Werner's "American Chari- ties" Quoted. Mistakes of Werner. Ap- plication in Public Hospitals. Baby Bol- linger Case. The Nurse and Euthana- sia. Application to the Hopelessly In- sane. The Insane in the Past. The Rights of the Insane. Is It Mercy to Kill the Insane? Application to the Hopelessly Criminal. Results of this Terrible Doctrine. Vasectomy is Illicit. iii iv Contents chapter page IV Rights of the Unborn Child........... 51 The Physician and Craniotomy. Crani- otomy Always Wrong. The Church's Teaching on Craniotomy Upheld. Abor- tion Always Wrong. The Physician and Abortion. Nurse Cannot Assist Physi- cian in Abortion. Sympathy in the Above Difficulties. Pernicious Vomiting or Eclampsia. When Life Begins. Diffi- cult Cases. Mistakes of Physicians. Twi- light Sleep Morally Wrong. V Birth Control ....................... 65 The Teaching of Malthus. The Right Use of the Appetites. Convincing Argu- ments. Why the Old Puritan is no longer with Us. Bird Coler Quoted. Compli- ment of Dr. Knopf. How the Theory Worked in France and Germany. The Empty Cradle in England. Conclusions of Dr. Hamilton Contradicted. Survey at the Guardian Angel Settlement. Study of Alexander Graham Bell. Domestic Relations Court in Chicago. The Prob- lem and the Nurse. VI The Nurse Herself................... 87 Trials and Hardships. Dangers of Drink and the Drug Habit. Consult your own Physician. Willingness to Work. Source of Temptations. Prudence with Interns and Physicians. The Private Home and the Office. The Nurse as a Student. What Kind of Books to Have and Read. Personality and Development of Charac- ter. Gossip and Gruesome Talk. Friend- liness but not Fellowship. Patience in Sickness. Suffering with Christ. Contents v CHAPTER page VII Professional Duties.................. 103 Choosing One's Cases. Special Cases. Giving the very best Service. Experi- menting with Patient. Withdrawing from a Case. Limitations of Psychic Powers. Professional Secrets. Self- Pity. The Nurse and the Attending Physician. Holding Physicians in Re- spect. When the Physician is at Fault. Inspiring Confidence in regard to the Physician. Assisting the Patient Spirit- ually. Administering Baptism. "The Correct Thing for Catholics." "The Way of Interior Peace." VIII Practical Tests: In the Training- School......................... 125 Borrowing. Obeying the Rules. Deceiv- ing One's Parents. Tardiness. Fault- finding. Discouragement. Studying Hypnotism. Seances. Helping to Steal. Restitution. Helping to Steal (No. 2). Imitating Thieves. A Bad Temper. Keeping a Promise. A Practical Case in Euthanasia. Stealing a Formula. Duty of Reporting. Temptation. The Head Nurse. Colored Patient. Falsifying Records. Intern and Physician. Ex- perimenting. IX Practical Tests: The Graduate-Nurse 151 Professional Secret. Professional Eti- quette. Careless Doctor. Other Work with Nursing. More Prudence. The Bor- rowing Habit. Who was Careless? Using Hypnotic Power. Conditional Baptism. Abortion. Carelessness. Illicit Opera- tion. Illicit Operation and the Hospital vi Contents CHAPTER PAGE Authorities. Reporting a Case of Syphi- lis. Abortion—Parents of the Girl. Advice about Surgeons. Illicit Opera- tion. Secrecy. A Superintendent's Dif- ficulty. Dangerous Drugs. Dying Pa- tient. Eugenics. Teaching Sex Hy- giene in the Schools. Your Patient is a Child of God. X The Church and Nursing in the Past. . 175 Nursing in Pagan Countries. Care of Sick in Pagan Countries. Nursing and Christianity. Early Rise of Hospitals. Nursing a Life Work. Testimony of Dr. Cabot. Receiving the Patient. Archi- tecture of Ancient Hospitals. Works of Art in Ancient Hospitals. Pope Inno- cent III the Founder of a Model Hospital. Testimony of Luther. Destruction of An- cient Hospitals. Dark Period of Nursing. Miss Nightingale and Modern Nur- sing. Catholic Hospitals and Modern Movements. Alphabetical Index 191 TALKS TO NURSES CHAPTER I GUIDING PRINCIPLES TJIT'hen you began the study of geography * * you did not prove the existence of cer- tain rivers, mountains and cities. You had not seen the Congo or the Amazon, and yet you studied about these rivers; you had not crossed the Rocky Mountains, the Andes, or the Alps, and yet you talked about them and described them; you had not visited Paris, Rome, or Constantinople, and yet they seemed as real to you as your own native town or city. Were you foolish when you believed in the reality of these rivers, mountains and cities, although you had never seen them? No, you were not foolish. You took the testimony of others who had seen them; for human testimony, under the proper conditions, can give us certainty, not only in regard to things of the present but also of the past. Again, when you studied algebra you took certain things for granted. You did not prove that the shortest distance between two points is a straight line, or that the whole 7 8 Guiding Principles is larger than a part, or that a part is smaller than the whole. You took these things for granted and called them axioms. In fact, every study and every science takes a number of things for granted, either because they have already been proved, or they are so evident that they do not need a proof. In these talks I must take certain things for granted. I could prove them, but I have not time to do so; the proofs belong to other treat- ises—to works on philosophy and revealed re- ligion. These proofs have stood the test of time; I am just as sure of them as I am of the existence of Rome, the Congo or the Rocky Mountains. The truths which I here take for granted are: (1) God exists. He is the creator of man, and his final arbiter. He will reward the good works of man and punish his evil deeds. (2) Every human being is in this world for a definite purpose, namely to know and serve God, and thus to work out his eternal des- tiny. The soul of man is immortal. (3) Each of us is endowed with a free will. We are free beings; we have it in our power to do good or do evil. Guiding Principles 9 (4) By nature man tends to live in society, in interrelation with his fellow man. All men have certain rights and certain duties. I have here introduced two words which are all-important for our future con- sideration. In fact, we cannot come to any conclusion in regard to the ethics of the nurs- ing profession until we agree on the definition and application of these two words—rights and duties. What is a right ? A right is a moral power belonging to one person which all other per- sons have to respect. You notice that we call it a moral power; that is, we distinguish it from a physical power. One may have the physical power or the strength to hold up a man and take his money. But this physical strength does not give him the moral right to rob. Again, one may have the right to certain property; this requires that others do not tres- pass upon the property. The mere fact that one owns a piece of property keeps all others from using it. If I have a right to a watch or a sum of money, does not this imply that no other may take this watch or money? Would it not be a contradiction to say that I owned a watch or had a right to it, and at the same time 10 Guiding Principles that any other person was free to take it from me? This brings us to the second word—duty. What is a duty? A duty is a moral obliga- tion or bond by which one person is obliged to respect the rights of others. You will notice that wherever there is a right there is a duty on the part of others to respect that right. As soon as you can claim a right to any object, all others must have the duty of not interfer- ing with the right by taking the object from you. If you have established the right to a piece of property, immediately there is the duty of others not to build upon that property. When you graduate from school you get your diploma. You have a right to it. Does not this impose upon others the duty of not taking it from you? These ideas are so simple that you may wonder why I insist upon them. I reply that if you agree with me upon these and a few other fundamental principles, we shall have little difficulty in our ethical teaching or practice. From what I said, it follows that rights and duties are correlative and inseparable. Of their very nature they refer to each other and are related to each other. They cannot be sep- arated. You cannot have a right without im- Guiding Principles 11 posing a duty on others; and you cannot have a duty unless it in some way refers to a right. "Of duties, some are positive, which bind always, not for always, as the duty of adoring God. We are always bound to adore, we are not bound to be always adoring. Other duties are negative, and bind always, for always, as the duties of sobriety and chastity. The for- mer class of duties we may more easily be ex- cused from, because they can be deferred, and it is at times morally impossible to take them up. But negative duty, as Mr. Gladstone has finely said, 'rises with us in the morning, and goes to rest with us at night: it is the shadow that follows us wheresoever we go, and only leaves us when we leave the light of life.' "Only a person has rights, as appears by the definition of a right. Again, only persons have duties, for they only have free will. No one has duties without rights, and no man has rights without duties. Infants and idiots, in whom the use of reason is impeded, having not- withstanding rights, are said to have duties also radically. Hence it is wrong to make an idiot commit what is in him a material breach of some negative duty, as of temperance. Posi- 12 Guiding Principles tive duties he is excused from." (Moral Phi- losophy, by Rickaby, p. 247.) "Brute beasts, not having understanding and therefore not being persons, cannot have any rights. They are of the number of things, which are another's: they are chattels, or cat- tle. . . . We have, then, no duties of charity, nor duties of any kind, to the lower animals, as neither to stocks and stones. "Still we have duties about stones, not to fling them through our neighbor's windows, and we have duties about brute beasts. We must not harm them, when they are our neigh- bor's property. We must not break out into paroxysms of rage and impatience in dealing with them. It is a miserable way of showing off human pre-eminence, to torture poor brutes in malevolent glee at their pain and helpless- ness. Such wanton cruelty is especially de- plorable, because it disposes the perpetrators to be cruel also to men. "Brutes are as things in our regard: so far as they are useful to us, they exist for us, not for themselves; and we do right in using them unsparingly for our need and convenience, though not for our wantonness. If then any special case of pain to a brute creature be a Guiding1 Principles IS fact of considerable value for observation in biological science or the medical art, no rea- soned considerations of morality can stand in the way of man making the experiment, yet so that even in the quest of science he be mind- ful of mercy. "Altogether it will be found that a sedulous observance of the rights and claims of other men, a mastery over one's own passions, and a reverence for the Creator, give the best assur- ance of a wise and humane treatment of the lower animals." (Op. cit., p. 248.) In the above explanation of rights and duties I disagree with the theory of Professor Dewey and others who consider that rights and duties are the outgrowth of customs. According to them there was a time when men considered it right to kill each other; but it was found by experience that it was better not to kill. It was more pleasant to feel safe; to live and let others live. Men agreed, therefore, not to kill each other. Such a practice became a custom and finally developed into a law. But I have a serious objection to such an explanation. If killing has its foundation only in a custom, it cannot bind me. Customs change with the pass- ing years; they are different in New York, 14 Guiding Principles Paris and Berlin. It was formerly customary for men to rise and give their seats co ladies in street cars; such a custom has been all but abol- ished. In this country we decry the Spaniards for their bull-fights; but we permit prize-fight- ing, which is far more brutal and repulsive. Rights and duties, then, must be grounded on something more solid than mere customs. They do not change with time; they are the same in every country and in every age. I opened a recent book on the ethics of nursing (Studies in Ethics for Nurses, by Aikens) and read the following: "The mean- ing of the word ethics covers custom, usage, habits, and its application commonly refers to personal characteristics or to the traditions of a community. As related to nursing, ethics has to do with the ideals, customs and habits which the members of the profession are ac- cumulating around the name and character of the trained nurse." The author is but repeat- ing the definition given by Dewey. I am not condemning the whole book; in fact, it seems to be the work of a teacher. I am sure that nurses will profit much by reading these pages. However, very little in the book can be clas- sified under ethics. The writer deals with Guiding Principles 15 hints, suggestions, advice; she talks from ex- perience. Occasionally duty and religion are mentioned, but no fundamental reason is given why the nurse should be guided by eth- ical principles. I took up an older book (Nursing Ethics, by Elizabeth Hampton Robb) which is still used as a text in some training-schools. This little volume, too, abounds in practical advice and common sense. It gives most wholesome admonitions to the young nurse in regard to her duties to her profession, the patient, the doctor and the public. Every nurse who reads this book will profit by the lessons which it contains. The writer insists on the necessity of ethical principles. "Even when the ethical traditions of her school have been good and the teaching of ethical principles has not been neglected, I have known nurses—thoroughly well trained in other respects —to go out into private practice and commit the most flagrant breaches in the ethics and etiquette of their work." But when we seek for the underlying principles of right and duty the author dis- appoints us. Rights are alienable and inalienable: that is, some rights belong to our very nature and 16 Guiding Principles some do not. I can give away my watch or sell my property. They belong to me as alienable rights, they are not a part of my nature, they can be separated from me, or they can be given away, sold or exchanged. At one time they were not mine; they came into my possession. I can use them or dispose of them in any way I wish. But inalienable rights are different. They cannot be separated from me. They are a part of my nature. A real injus- tice is done me if I am deprived of any in- alienable right. In fact, since these rights are a part of our nature, we cannot deprive our- selves of them. We cannot give them away or sell them or exchange them for other rights. We get these inalienable rights from God. The first of these rights is the right to life. When the framers of the Constitution of the United States assembled to draw up that memorable document they wrote in the pre- amble: "We hold these truths as self-evident —that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalien- able rights; that among these are fife, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." I wish to call your attention to this fact: that the founders of the Constitution were men of different re- Guiding Principles 17 ligious beliefs, and yet they took it for granted that all men would agree on the fundamental principle that every man had a right to fife, that this right came from the Creator, and that it is inalienable. Again you will say that all this is so very easy and simple that you wonder why I insist on it. Yes, these truths are simple. I do not see how any thinking person can deny them. In these talks I must frequently refer to the first of all rights—the right to life. Life is God's first gift. It is an inalienable right; no one may presume to deprive another of life. "Thou shalt not kill" is not only one of the commandments of God, but reason tells us that we cannot usurp the place of God and take away that inalienable gift of life. Throughout your course you nurses are warned that you are to follow the directions of the physician. If the doctor should tell you to administer a drug the object of which is to kill a suffering patient, must you obey the order? Has the physician the right to kill? He has not. His profession does not give him any special right over life; he is not to decide who is to live and who is to die. He became a physician with the intention of saving life and not of taking or 18 Guiding Principles destroying it. I shall treat of this later and am simply referring to it now to impress upon your minds this one fact, that neither the doc- tor nor the nurse has any right over human life. That life is sacred; it comes from God, and only He has power over life. CHAPTER II guiding principles (continued) T wish to repeat here what I have said about * one's right to life. Life comes from God, who places us in this world to work out our final destiny. Neither the physician nor any other person is justified in depriving one of the inalienable possession which we call life. He is not to decide who is to live or who is to die. His profession requires him to lessen hu- man misery and to save life. There his power ends. The same applies to the nursing pro- fession. Its object is to lessen human suffer- ing and to save life. It can go no further, and to do so is to infringe upon the God-given rights of humanity. To bring out this important teaching it will be necessary to explain something about the ethics of killing. When I use the word ethics of killing I mean that killing which is prohib- ited by the law of reason. My reason tells me that I have no right to kill. Here, as in every other teaching, reason and revealed religion give us the same answer: Thou shalt not kill. Let me explain direct and indirect killing. 19 20 Guiding Principles Direct killing is the taking of the life of an- other either as an end or a means. Killing as an end is had when only the life of the person is sought. For instance, I know of a case of enmity which sprang up between two farmers. They quarreled about the stock getting into each other's fields and about the fences which separated their estates. Bitter feeling grew into enmity and hatred. One of the farmers brooded over his true or imaginary wrongs until in his anger, without any seeming provo- cation, he shot his neighbor. That was an instance of direct killing as an end. The mur- derer sought the death of his enemy and noth- ing more. He did not wish the man's money or his fields. He was satisfied to know that his rival was dead. Killing as a means is causing the death of another to get possession of some desired good. For instance, a miser is known to have in his possession a tempting sum of money. A rob- ber enters the house to get the hoarded wealth. He has nothing against the miserly man; he would prefer not to kill him; but he fears that the miser will recognize him or that he will later report the deed. He, therefore, first kills the miser and then takes the money. He re- Guiding Principles 21 grets the killing, still he does it as a means of getting the coveted wealth. This is an ex- ample of direct killing as a means. Indirect killing is the taking of the life of an innocent person neither as an end or a means, but the kilhng is a circumstance connected with some other lawful act. Again let us illustrate this definition by an example. No one will deny that during war one of the belligerent parties has a right to destroy the ammunition supplies of the enemy. Let us suppose that an aviator is sent to drop an explosive bomb upon a supply station. He succeeds in passing the opposing aeroplanes and gains his objective just above the desired place. Below are hun- dreds of soldiers guarding the ammunition. Just as he is about to release the deadly bomb, he observes a dozen women and children, who have for some reason come to visit the soldiers. In killing the guards and destroying the ammunition the aviator realizes that he will also kill the women and children. His mission is all important for the success of his army. He cannot wait; he must act instantly. He lets go the deadly missive, the ammunition is exploded, the soldiers on guard are killed, but the innocent women and children also perish. 22 Guiding Principles Is this allowed? Certainly it is. It is a case of indirect killing. It is an unfortunate cir- cumstance. The innocent lives were in no way sought. Killing them was only a circumstance connected with an act which was lawful in war. But I hear you ask: What has this to do with my profession as a nurse? I am not en- gaged in warfare and I do not intend to kill. I must ask you to be patient, for later I shall come to the practical application; but, before doing so, I must ask you to listen to a further explanation of principles. It is never allowed to kill an innocent person directly either as an end or a means. You will notice that I have used the word innocent per- son; for it is allowable to kill one who is seek- ing to take your life. Such a one is called an unjust aggressor. He is not innocent; he is guilty. He seeks to kill. The right to life supposes the right to defend that life against an assailant. Even if the assailant is not in the act of kilhng, but does something that ex- poses my life to peril I can kill in self-defense. For instance, a sleeping man is awakened at night by some noise in his room. He looks toward the dresser and sees a robber taking his watch and pocket book. He reaches under his Guiding Principles 23 pillow, seizes a revolver and shoots the robber. Is he justified in his action? I answer in the affirmative. That robber is an unjust ag- gressor; by coming into the house at night he has exposed the sleeper to the danger of losing his life. Robbers are generally danger- ous men; they usually come armed and kill if thwarted in their evil designs. The innocent sleeper is not required to take a risk. If he moves, or calls out or makes any noise he will probably be shot by the intruder. In self- protection he is justified in killing the man who has broken into his house. Let us modify the circumstances somewhat. Let us suppose that the robber takes the watch and money, raises the window, leaps to the porch and escapes. But, in doing so, he awak- ens the sleeper, who seizes his weapon and rushes to the window. He sees the robber run- ning across the yard. Can he shoot at him with the intention of killing him? The answer in this case is in the negative. Circumstances have changed and the life of the innocent sleeper is now no longer in danger. I take it for granted that the robber is running away. It is true that the innocent sleeper has lost his watch and money. But you cannot weigh 24 Guiding Principles human life against watches and money. You can kill an unjust aggressor only when your own life is endangered. There are some things, however, that are commensurable with life; for instance, a woman may kill one who is seeking to violate her chastity, when there is no other means of escape from her pursuer. One Innocent Person May Not Be Killed to Save Another Innocent Person After defining rights and duties and ex- plaining the difference between direct and in- direct killing, I now approach another ques- tion. I must get a definite answer to it. The question is this: Is it ever lawful to kill one innocent person to save the life of another in- nocent person? A writer on this subject has made use of the following example, although the illustrious personage referred to is no longer living. The Czar of Russia goes sleigh riding and with him his three sons, the elder being heir to the throne. Far out in a lonely forest the party is attacked by wolves. Closer and closer comes the hungry, howling pack. His imperial high- ness is convinced that all four will perish. What is he to do? Would it not be better to sacrifice Guiding Principles 25 one of the sons by throwing him to the wolves? While they are devouring him, the others may escape. Is it not better for one to die, than that all four should perish; and is not the life of the Czar more valuable than that of one of his sons ? It is a terrible sacrifice. The young- est of the sons is hurled from the sleigh. The beasts devour the child, then start in pursuit of the others. A second and a third son is cast to the wolves, which stop to feed upon them, and the Czar rides in safety into the imperial castle. Has he done wrong? Is he guilty of murder? Was it better to save one life, and that a valuable one, rather than to sacrifice all four lives? What is your answer? Will you dare to justify the action of the Czar? I have given this example to hundreds of students of every nationahty and every form of religious belief. I have not found one who would coun- tenance the action of sacrificing the three chil- dren to save the father. Let us go further and seek for the reason for our conclusion. Why was not the Czar justified in saving his life by deliberately sac- rificing his sons? Because he had no right over their fives, those lives which came from God, those fives which were inalienable rights. When 26 Guiding Principles two innocent persons are in danger, one cannot be sacrificed to save the other. This principle admits of no exception of time, place or cir- cumstance. It was true before the advent of Christianity, it is confirmed by Christian teach- ing; it is true in New York, Paris or Pekin; it holds not only in the profession of medicine and nursing, but wherever human life meets human life. Moreover, the conclusions which I have just pointed out find their confirmation in legal practice. I have heard it said that England has the best criminal laws in the world; for that reason she has not one-sixth of the mur- ders committed in the United States. English law recognizes that one innocent person cannot be killed to save another, as will be seen from the following example :* Some years ago an English sailing vessel was wrecked off the coast of Good Hope. Three of the crew drifted for many days in an open life-boat without food or water. Certain star- vation seemed to await them. Two of the sail- ors were married men and had families in Eng- • This incident is taken from Moral Principles and Medical Practice, by Rev. Charles Coppens, S.J. If your physician friends ask you for a book in which the ethics of medical practice is well explained, refer them to the above volume., Guiding Principles 27 land; the third was a boy of seventeen. The two men held a consultation and argued that it was better for one to die than for all three to perish; and, furthermore, that their lives were more valuable than the fife of the boy, since they had dependent families. If they killed him and lived upon his flesh, they might possibly be saved. If they did not do so, all three would die. In either case the boy could not be saved. Acting upon this manner of rea- soning, they killed the lad, ate his flesh, and after some days were rescued by a passing ship. The two sailors were taken to England and tried for murder. They pleaded that their ac- tion was necessary to prevent all three from perishing of starvation, that their lives were more valuable than that of the boy, that it was simply a matter of expediency. What was the decision of the court? The two men were con- victed of murder and sentenced to death. [Lord Hale, who presided over this court, denied ab- solutely that one innocent life could be sacri- ficed to save another innocent life, or that a married person had a greater right to life than one who is single. An inalienable right does not change with conditions and circumstances of age or position. The child has the same 28 Guiding Principles right as the parent, and youth has the same right as old age. I wish to pause here and ask whether we are agreed on this all-important principle. If not, it is useless for us to proceed. Without guid- ing principles we can reach no conclusions. Moreover, when we come to the application of principles we must not begin to question them. In algebra, for instance, when you came to make use of the maxim that: If from equals, unequals are taken, unequals remain, you do not go back to question the maxim. You may recall it or reconsider it, but it is one of the accepted maxims in algebra and must remain throughout the treatise. It would be impos- sible to complete a course in any subject if one were required to prove everything over and over again. With principles, as with maxims, once they are established and accepted it is un- necessary to prove them again. I take it for granted then that you accept this principle: that one innocent person cannot be killed to save the life of another innocent person. You are safe in admitting it, for reason teaches it. You may meet, and prob- ably will meet, physicians who do not accept these conclusions—physicians who have no re- Guiding Principles 29 gard for the sacredness of human life. Whom are you to follow? It is for you to take your choice. Recently I read the address of a famous sur- geon, given to his fellow physicians. The speaker, who was rounding out a long and suc- cessful scientific career, claimed that there was one thing which, above all else, gave him peace and consolation at the close of life. It was not the fortune that he had accumulated, it was not the honor bestowed by the public, it was not his standing in the professional world; it was the fact that he had lived up to the stand- ards of his profession, that he had never stained his hands with the blood of an innocent person. May you be ever guided by the same high ideals; may you ever respect the sacred rights of others; may you say, at the termination of your career as a nurse, that you have never knowingly assisted at an operation the object of which was to destroy innocent life. Permit me at the close of this second talk to give you a definition of ethics and to sum- marize what I have said in regard to the guid- ing principles of your profession. Ethics is the science of right and wrong of human acts. By human acts we mean those 30 Guiding Principles which one performs of his own free will and with full knowledge. Suppose, for instance, that you should by a mistake administer the wrong medicine to a patient. You have in no way been careless; but another party, unknown to you, has changed the bottle containing the drugs. You are not responsible; you did not perform a human act. No court would con- demn you for such an act, nor would you be guilty in the sight of God. Let us briefly reconsider the origin of rights and duties. In this world there must be law and order. The heavenly planets move by the laws of attraction and repulsion, which the Maker of the universe ordained for them. Plant and animal life is subject to laws. Con- sider the delicate plumage of the egret or the wondrous forms and tints of the orchids. Man, like every other creature, is in need of laws; but as a free being he must have laws suited to his nature. These laws are moral and not physical; that is, man is commanded to do cer- tain things, but he is left free to do them or not to do them. These moral laws are summarized in the ten commandments; and hence it is said that the commandments are at the bottom of all moral order. Guiding Principles 31 From these moral laws arise our essential rights and duties. When God gives to one man the right to fife, He at the same time lays upon all other men the duty of respecting that life. Rights and duties, then, come from the very nature of things. They are not the out- growth of customs; they belonged to man be- fore any customs arose. They do not change with customs; they are a part of our nature. These rights existed before any treatise on ethics was written or any medical or nursing code was framed; they will exist when the writers on ethics and framers of codes have passed away. CHAPTER III EUTHANASIA \7ou may have read the poem of William ■*■ Cullen Bryant entitled Thanatopsis. It is derived from a Greek word meaning a vision of death; and the poem consists of a series of reflections on this subject. Euthanasia is de- rived from two Greek words, the first of which means well, and the latter, death. You will admit that it is a harmonious word; it is de- fined as a good death, a painless death or a peaceful death. I regret to say that its ap- plication in medicine has a far different mean- ing. Sometimes when a person takes a small amount, the act is called stealing; but when a man by unfair methods succeeds in robbing the public of thousands of dollars, the dishonesty is referred to as a successful business specula- tion. We cover the evil of the deed by the ap- plication of a rather large word, wrongly used. The same can be said of this harmonious word, euthanasia It is used to hide and conceal acts that are in reality killing. Let me say frankly that euthanasia is only a new word for murder. 33 34 Euthanasia The advocates of euthanasia would apply it to three classes of persons: (1) The hopelessly sick, (2) the hopelessly insane, and (3) the hopelessly criminal. Let us begin with the first class: the hope- lessly sick. In our country, and in every country of the world, there are thousands of sick people who have no possible hope of recov- ery. Some are maimed and mutilated, some suffer from internal complications of the most severe nature. Take, for instance, the syphil- itics. I know of no sight more disgusting and revolting than a syphilitic ward, where men and women are literally rotting away. Re- covery is impossible in the advanced stages of this terrible affliction. Many sufferers may be innocent; they may have caught the disease by coming into contact with others who were af- flicted. I need not explain the many possible ways by which this scourge can be passed from the guilty to the pure and chaste. What a dreadful outlook these poor victims have! Not a day or night can they ever hope to be with- out suffering. There are other forms of sickness, too, that leave no ray of hope. There is the tubercular patient; day after day he feels his strength Euthanasia 35 slipping. He can almost count the number of days he is to live. As the sun rises each morning he mutters to himself that it will rise for him only a few times; when it sets, it re- minds him of the darkness of the grave which will soon embrace him. The advocates of euthanasia say that it is useless for these poor sufferers to live. They have no hope of recovery, they are in continual pain, they are a useless expense and a source of worry and suffering to their relatives and friends. Why let them five? Is it not mercy to close their lives of suffering? Why not give them some merciful opiate, which will not only end their agony, but which will end life as well? Is this not kindness? Is this not mercy? How would this be done? Committees of physicians would be appointed to visit hospital wards and pronounce on the fate of those who were to die. Let us suppose a ward with twenty beds. The committee begins with bed number one. The patient is found in intense suffering, and there is no possibility of recov- ery. The sentence is pronounced; and a drug is given to number one, who dies in a few hours. Number two is resting quietly, there is no suf- fering and at least some faint prospects. Num- 36 Euthanasia ber two is given a chance. Numbers three and four are drugged. Number five's case is re- ferred to the meeting next week. Numbers six, seven, eight and nine are condemned to die by the visiting physicians. Some of the others are spared and some are doomed. This is euthanasia in its application to the hope- lessly sick. Its advocates are men who have a materialistic view of life. They do not be- lieve that rights come from God. You will ob- serve that they are opposed to the essential teaching contained in the preamble of the Con- stitution of the United States. They have set themselves up as the arbiters of life. They are to decide who are to live and who are to die. But you will ask me: Are there any physi- cians who teach euthanasia? Can a doctrine so revolting be seriously advocated by men of reason? I regret to say that there are physi- cians who have publicly advocated the uni- versal application of euthanasia. "Euthanasia is just now being made the sub- ject of nation-wide discussion among physi- cians, ministers, philanthropists and criminol- ogists. Efforts are being made in New York, Massachusetts, Ohio and Missouri, to have it legalized by law. Many physicians favor it. Euthanasia 37 Many lawyers believe that as a legal issue the state possesses the moral and constitutional right to practise euthanasia." (Chicago Inter- Ocean, March 16, 1913.) Several well-known physicians and writers, among the latter be- ing John Burroughs and Jack London, are quoted in the above article as favoring eutha- nasia. Dr. Frank Lydston, of Chicago, who at one time advocated euthanasia, later de- nounced it, "on the grounds of religion, the fal- libility of science, and the possible erring judg- ment of the men who should determine those who should die." You will find out by experience that physi- cians frequently err in regard to the possibility of the recovery of a patient. Only a few years ago, prominent physicians of Philadelphia pro- nounced that a certain woman had no chance of recovering from an intestinal tumor from which she was suffering. The fact that the decision was reached on a Christmas Eve and that the papers gave notoriety to the case aroused the pity and interest of many. A noted surgeon interested himself in the matter and set to work. When the following Christmas came the lady was entirely cured. This woman tti her despair had asked for some one to end 38 Euthanasia her suffering. Many sick people make like re- quests ; and if euthanasia were permitted hun- dreds would perish who, under ordinary cir- cumstances, would recover. I could quote other physicians and social workers who favor euthanasia, but I shall con- tent myself with the following rather long ex- tract from a recent book. (Werner's Ameri- can Charities, revised edition, p. 26.) "As the author has stood by the beds of con- sumptive or syphilitic children, he has won- dered if it were kindness to keep fife in the pain-racked body. Cure was out of the ques- tion so far as medical science now knows, and one wonders why days of pain should be added to days of pain. The same questions recur as one passes through the incurable wards of an almshouse, especially as one studies the cases of the cancer patients. The answer of religion to such questions is easy. It seems very sure that without religious incentive we should not have entertained our present views regarding $xe sanctity of human fife. "But now that this feeling is developed, even science can explain in some sort how it is expedient that it should exist. We cannot ex- tinguish or in any way connive at the extinc- Euthanasia 39 tion of human life without injury to all the in- stincts and sensibilities that render it possible for us to live together with our fellows in civil- ized society. . . . Frequently physicians and matrons and superintendents of institutions be- come so callous to suffering, and so worn out by overstrain, that they almost connive at the extinction of human life. In one instance, in the case of a child suffering from hydro- cephalus and beyond hope of cure, only the most constant attention could keep him alive; the matron finally somewhat relaxed her vigi- lance in seeing that he was cared for, and in- digestion carried him off. This failure to do all that is possible to combat disease is common in many institutions, usually without any con- sciousness of a willingness to facilitate death, but none the less with a latent feeling that pos- sibly those that die are happier than those that five. "All such neglect of duty is coming short of the highest ideal of philanthropy, no less than that of religion. While physicians may be jus- tified in chloroforming a monstrous birth, and while far-off philosophers think they see the coming of a day when we may have legal suicide, and when we can take human 40 Euthanasia life because we are pitiful, and not because we are selfish, yet for the present it is safest not to judge—the risks are too many. Science justifies and philanthropy corroborates Chris- tianity in holding that each spark of human fife must be conserved in all tenderness and with all care." Permit me to make some remarks in regard to this quotation from Mr. Werner's book. Any one who reads the volume carefully will be convinced that the writer was thoroughly acquainted with the workings of hospitals in the United States. Yet, this able authority in- forms us that euthanasia is common in these hospitals. He does not use the word eutha- nasia and he explains that death is brought on by neglect rather than by administering a drug; but in either case the guilt is the same. While he dissents from the practice he seems to think that it is more a matter of religion and sentimental civilization than of reason. We have already pointed out that in these matters reason and revealed religion reach the same conclusions. But the conclusions in the last paragraph are absolutely false. He claims that it is wiser not to kill the helplessly sick and suffering; but Euthanasia 41 he grants that a later and more scientific ethics may find a reason for the opposite practice. Again I wish to remind you that the principles of ethics do not change. What is essentially wrong now was ever wrong and must ever be wrong. No development of science will ever make it lawful to kill an innocent person, and if laws should be enacted legalizing such ac- tions, the laws would be wrong and should be disregarded. He is strangely inconsistent when he advocates chloroforming a monster birth and would not justify killing the help- lessly crippled and suffering. The so-called monster child is a real child, a living being with the same rights to life as a grown man. It is just as wrong to kill it as it would be to shoot down a pedestrian. Because it is a weak, little helpless creature and its little body can be hid away and no one will know of the deed, these things in no way justify taking its life. You may remember the instance of the Bol- linger baby in Chicago a few years ago. A physician permitted it to die on the plea that it would be grown up a deformed monster. I listened to three physicians who examined the body of the infant and heard them say that it would have grown up a normal child. 42 Euthanasia While I was writing this chapter 1 saw on the first page of a Cincinnati paper (The Commercial Tribune, July 3, 1919) the fol- lowing headlines: Living infant cast into pit by physician. The baby Bollinger case outdone. The physician who delivered this child claimed that it was a monstrosity and at the request of the mother offered to dispose of it. Wrapping the little body in an old newspaper he threw the package into a rubbish dump. When the package was found and opened the child was still alive, although it had rolled some fifty feet to the bottom of the dump. The physician, who was guilty of this act of cruelty or attempted murder, showed no remorse when interviewed. He simply re- marked : "It is a very deplorable case, but one that I have come in contact with several times, and during my term as County Health Officer I often advised other physicians to dispose of these monstrosities in a similar manner." You may meet men of this type, men who have no regard for weak human life. Will you be a party to their crimes ? About the only thing the physician regretted in the above case was that he had been caught in the act. He Euthanasia 43 had done away with other helpless infants. Unfortunately for him, but fortunately for the public, he was at last brought before the civil court. Have I convinced you that you can take no part in kilhng the helplessly sick and suffer- ing? Let me point out where this revolting doctrine would lead. There are tens of thou- sands of soldiers in the world today who are so horribly maimed that they are objects of pity to the members of their own families. Many of these soldiers will remain a useless expense to the country. Many of them will be subject to pains of a lifetime. Now, apply to them the teaching of the materialistic philan- thropists. According to such men these sol- diers should be killed. Yes, they fought for you and me, for their country, and is this the price physicians would pay them? Is this the gratitude they would show? No doubt these physicians would cry out at once and disclaim any intention of applying this teaching to the maimed and suffering soldiers. Then why ap- ply it to the little innocent child, to the aged parent? Do you not see how revolting this euthanasia is when put to the test? Finally, you may ask whether in practice 44 Euthanasia you will meet this question. I reply that you will probably be confronted with it many times. Even when physicians wish to make use of euthanasia they shirk the responsibility which may follow. They leave it to the nurse to minister the fatal drug. They explain that it is to quiet the patient: and yet, from their words and actions, it may be evident to the nurse that the dose is intended to hasten death. In this case the nurse cannot follow the di- rections of the physician. I hear you object at once that you are always to follow directions, and that there is a special emphasis on the word always. But if the doctor told you to cut the throat of a patient would you do it? You would not. To cut a child's throat with a knife or to give it a drug to kill it is murder. The crime is the same, only the methods differ. In neither case can you obey the physician. You will notice that the nurse cannot administer the drug when it is evidently intended to shorten life. In extreme cases, if the medicine is given to relieve the sufferings of the patient, even if there is danger of death coming sooner, it may be administered. I said that the advocates of euthanasia would Euthanasia 45 apply it to the hopelessly sick, insane and crim- inal. I have treated it in reference to the for- mer, and must now examine this teaching in the latter cases. However, since the same principles apply to the insane and criminal as apply to the sick, I need not make this explanation long. Moreover, as nurses you will meet with fewer cases of the insane and criminal. There is something pathetic indeed in re- gard to the insane. In past ages, when most charitable work was under the direction of the Church, the insane were objects of spe- cial care. Dr. James Walsh has pointed out that the .very best methods of modern times in the treatment of the insane were anticipated by more than six hundred years. (Popes and Science, p. 363.) The great English institu- tion for the insane at Bethlehem, later called Bedlam, in England, was in many respects a model of its kind; although there was an abuse of allowing visitors to amuse themselves at the expense of the inmates. When, under Henry VIII, it was turned over to the secular authori- ties, official investigations proved that it soon became a neglected and filthy place. For the 46 Euthanasia next two hundred years the treatment of the insane was most pitiable. The poor inmates of asylums were kept in dungeons and were loaded with chains. C. W. Page, in his book, "Care of the Insane," writes: "It is not more than a century since satisfactory re- sults were obtained by managing the insane without restraining their actions through the use of mechanical apparatus." The author evidently knew little of the treatment of the insane during the Middle Ages, and concluded that the terrible suffering inflicted on them during the seventeenth and eighteenth cen- turies had ever been their lot. Advocates of euthanasia in applying it to the insane seem to regard these unfortunate persons as without any rights. They would appoint a commission to examine all the in- mates of the various institutions and kill those who have no hope of recovery. I know an in- stance of a mother of a large family who, from overwork and anxiety, lost her mind. She was a victim of devotion and sacrifice; and these advocates of euthanasia would kill her. What a terrible doctrine! And there are thousands of soldiers who lost their minds under the strain of the trench work. As a reward of their hero- Euthanasia 47 ism they, too, would be killed! What has be- come of the hearts and consciences of men when they advocate such a practice? They claim that it is mercy to kill these poor sufferers. It is well known that the insane have lost their reasoning powers only in regard to one or more subjects. Very few of them are totally bereft of reason. It would be im- possible to keep it secret if this brutal practice were once accepted and adopted. What an- guish it would bring to the mentally afflicted! The thought of being killed would ever be before them. They would suspect every vis- itor to the asylum. Day and night the dread of death would be before them. This practice, then, instead of being a means of relieving the sufferers would only add anguish and fear to their already pitiful lot. But the principal reason for not killing them is that they are innocent persons. They have done no harm; they are simply afflicted. They have not lost their rights to fife and no one has the right to deprive them of life. To do so is murder. Finally, there are some who would apply the principles of euthanasia to confirmed criminals. I shall quote but one authority. George Ives, 48 Euthanasia in his "History of Penal Methods," concludes that: "All (criminals) who cannot ultimately lead useful,human, tolerably happy lives should be destroyed as soon as their condition has been determined." What a terrible and re- volting doctrine this is. Remember that these inmates of prisons are not to be killed on ac- count of their crimes, for the state has a right to execute those who are guilty of murder. They are to die because they cannot become useful members of society or because they are unhappy; and, in the mind of certain self- styled experts, have no chance of becoming either useful or happy. How these tests of utility and happiness are to be made is not explained; but this much is evident, that a certain number of men appointed by the state will have the right to enter prisons and con- demn to death inmates of the institution. With such a practice prisons would become places of unceasing mental anguish, for no one would know when his time would come. Doubt, dis- trust and uncertainty would make the lives of these poor wretches one long agony. While speaking here of the application of euthanasia to criminals, we wish to add a few words in regard to sterilization of the criminal Euthanasia 49 class through vasectomy and fallosectomy. Several states have passed laws authorizing these operations on confirmed criminals, idiots, and weak-minded. While the state has the right to punish crim- inals, it has no authority to mutilate them by means of vasectomy. "The operation is not a punishment to the men upon whom it is done, but it is an unnecessary deprivation of an es- sential right of these men, an excessive, ill- ordered attack on a primary right of man, and an act of violence against human nature and its Author without adequate reason. . . . Vasec- tomy does not remove venereal desires, but gives opportunity to lust; it turns the conjugal relation into mere onanism and degrades mar- riage into a crime." (The Ethics of Medical Homicide and Mutilation, by Dr. Austin O'Malley, p. 265.) Physicians may not sterilize women who ask for the operation simply because these latter may not wish to bear children. If any parts of the human system become diseased, such parts may be removed by surgical operations, even if sterilization follows. "The removal of the uterus or ovaries for sterilization is not only 50 Euthanasia immoral, but altogether unjustifiable scientific- ally." (Op. cit.,p. 252.) Nurses should refuse to take part in these operations. It is sufficient for them to know that the operations are immoral. CHAPTER IV RIGHTS OF THE UNBORN CHILD Qome day one of you may receive an urgent ^ call from a physician, who asks for a nurse. You go to a home or hospital, not knowing the nature of the work awaiting you; but on arriving at the place you are told that an operation in craniotomy is to be performed. Either the head of the child is abnormally large or the pelvis of the mother is too small, or for some other reason the child cannot be delivered in the natural way. You are given directions to assist at the operation and to take care of the case. What are you to do? You are to tell the physician, or the members of the family, or the hospital staff that you did not become a nurse to assist in murdering innocent and helpless babies. The physician may urge that if you do not take the case some one else will; that he will report you to the nurses' association; and that he will see to it that your name is dropped from the list; he may explain, too, that this is the only method of saving the life of the expectant mother. You have but one answer—you will not be 51 52 Rights of the Unborn Child a party to an act which is murder. That child is a human being, with a fife given it by the Creator. It has just as much right to five be- fore birth as it has after birth. Even human laws recognize this, for the unborn child can inherit property. It is through no fault of the child that its head is too large or the pelvis of the mother too small; nor can it be held re- sponsible for any other defect of itself or its mother. It has just as much right to life as has any man or woman. The physician may turn to you and ask you what you would do. But you are not a physician. Neither can he require you to give an answer to some complicated physiological case. It is his duty and not yours to know what operation or process to follow which will have for its object the saving of both child and mother. All that you have to know is that it is morally wrong to kill this unborn child. Tell the physician this plainly and leave the house. If the physician carries out his threat and re- ports you to the nurses' association, and you lose your standing in the association, you have suffered for a good cause. But the probability is that the physician will think all the more of you for the stand that you have taken and Rights of the Unborn Child 53 for your courage in living up to what you know is right. Once the mother has under- stood that the operation is illicit, she may side with you, and in that case you have gained a great moral victory. The Catholic Church has stood out as the one great champion of the right of life of the unborn child, and the unceasing denouncer of those who teach or practise craniotomy. This criminal operation was much more com- mon twenty years ago than it is at present; for not only has medical science and surgery found other means of saving the child, but there has been a revulsion of feeling against this terrible killing of helpless, innocent chil- dren. Many physicians say that it is no longer permissible, since the child can be delivered by the Csesarian or some other operation. I wish to call your attention, however, to this fact, that the principal reason for not performing craniotomy is that it is an act essentially wrong. It is murder. Your duty in regard to this operation is evident. There may be many different cir- cumstances in which you are called to take part in the operation; but your answer to any such request or demand is always the 54 Rights of the Unborn Child same: Craniotomy is murder and I can have no connection whatever with it. I have al- ready given the reasons against this operation in one of the previous chapters, wherein it was explained that one innocent person cannot be killed to save another innocent person. I wish to suggest that you read this chapter again. In the work of your profession you will have more difficulties in regard to abortion than craniotomy. You will probably never be asked to perform craniotomy, as it is a surgical operation; but you will no doubt be requested many times to administer drugs which will cause abortion. The inexperienced physician and the nurse are frequently approached in this regard. Here, too, you will meet with many sad cases which appeal to your sympathy. It may be the case of a young girl who has been se- duced. In her innocence she may not have known of the results of her fall. She pleads that her family will be disgraced; that her parents will cast her from the home; she threatens to commit suicide; every appeal is made to your feehngs. She is fully convinced that a trained nurse knows the drugs that will bring about abortion. Although the case is sad Rights of the Unborn Child 55 indeed, there is but one answer: To administer a drug or perform such an operation is mur- der, it is the kilhng of an innocent being. However, you are not to turn the suffering creature away in a heartless manner. Many a girl is helpless on such occasions. You must be able to direct her to some home where she can remain until the child is born. Keep in touch with this suffering sister. Take an inter- est in her case. Visit her and show that you are interested in her and that you do not de- spise her for her fall. This is the nurse's chance to do good to others. Do not let such an opportunity go by. Some day you may be visited by a married woman. She may say that she has several children and cannot afford to have another baby in the house. She is in the family way, and wishes to know how she may be rid of this unwelcome burden. Do not show her the door, but sit down and explain her duties to this un- born child. Tell her that it is a real human being, that it has a right to five and be born, that it is just as great a crime to kill it now as it would be to murder it after its birth. It is altogether probable that you can dissuade her from carrying out her resolve. Later when 56 Rights of the Unborn Child this child is born the grateful mother will come to you and with tears in her eyes thank you for preventing her from committing such a crime. But she may be obstinate and may in- sist that, if you do not help her, others will. Then tell her that you, too, have heard of mur- derers, but that you do not wish to be clas- sified with them; that you are not a criminal, that because others do wrong is no reason why you should imitate them. It is well for you to know when the soul enters the body and when therefore the fetus is a real, living, human being with all the rights of other human beings. In the old English law it was considered murder to kill the child after quickening, that is after the mother could feel the living child within her womb. But biology has been able to assign an earlier date to the living child. I wish here to quote the words of an eminent physician on this subject. "When we began to vegetate," writes Dr. Austin O'Malley, "our life began; we were human beings; we had a soul; and this as soon as the pronucleus of the spermatozoon fused with the pronucleus of the ovum, and made the first segmentation-nucleus. Before the first fission of that segmentation-nucleus was com- Rights of the Unborn Child 57 pleted into two distinct cells the soul was present, for that fission was independent life; and any life is impossible without a soul, or what is the same thing, a vital principle. Since, moreover, the soul with the body is the man, and the process in our present state is identical with the first cell-fission, this splitting pri- mordial cell is a human being. . . . This split- ting cell has an absolutely independent life; it is feeding itself from the ovum, as later it will feed itself from placental blood, and later still from the parental milk, and yet later with a knife and a fork. "We are to bear in mind that the human embryo in the womb, no matter how young it may be, is as much a child as the week-old babe; and because it is a human being it has all the rights of a human being to its fife." Often when women and girls approach you for help in procuring abortion they are doubt- ing in their own minds about the nature of the crime which they contemplate. A word of advice will in most cases be followed. I recall an instance where a young physician was sent for and on his arrival the husband, a very prominent member of society, explained that he and his wife had arranged for a long sum- 58 Rights of the Unborn Child mer trip and that quite unexpectedly she had become pregnant. The physician was asked to relieve her so that she could accompany the husband on the tour. The young doctor not only refused to perform the operation, but ex- plained the guilt of the action which the two contemplated, and pleaded with them so ear- nestly that they abandoned their sinful design. Later the wife gave birth to a fine boy who proved to be the joy of the parents. The physician was ever afterward held in high es- teem by those who had solicited his co-opera- tion in murdering their own child. Often with tears of gratitude they have thanked him for having the courage of his conviction and for saving them from such a disgraceful act. But you may ask: Will these parties come to a nurse? Will they not rather go to a phy- sician or druggist? Rightly or wrongly, most people think that a trained nurse is famihar with the methods of procuring an abortion, and that she will be able and willing to look after the patient and safeguard her from the evil consequences which may follow. Be as- sured that you will be approached often, very often, about this delicate and important mat- ter. Talk to the unfortunate people, be kind Rights of the Unborn Child 59 to them, advise them; if necessary, even threaten to report them to the civil authorities, if they dare become murderers of their own offspring. Thus far we have referred to abortion when the operation is in no way connected with the health of the pregnant woman. We shall now consider the question in relation to the health or life of the prospective mother. Pregnant women at times suffer from pernicious vomit- ing or eclampsia. In many of these cases phy- sicians hold that the only way to save the mother's life is to empty the womb. They argue that if the fetus is not expelled both the mother and child will die, and that it is better to save one fife. We have already pointed out that you cannot kill one innocent person to save another. This living fetus is a human being; it has as much right to life in its present condition as it would have after birth or ma- turity. No one is justified in administering a drug or performing an operation the object of which is to kill the living fetus or eject it from the womb. In cases of this nature if a very strong and dangerous drug is needed to counteract the poison which is proving fatal to the mother, such a drug may be given, even 60 Rights of the Unborn Child if there is danger of killing or expelling the fetus. You will readily see the distinction here. To administer a drug, the object of which is to kill the fetus, is wrong; to admin- ister a drug, the object of which is to save the mother, although there is danger to the fetus, is allowable. If death came to the fetus in this last case it is indirect killing; that is, the kill- ing follows as an accident or circumstance, but was not intended or sought for in itself. I wish to point out to you that physicians are often too hasty in emptying the womb where there is pernicious vomiting. The writer had an experience in this matter which he will never forget. He was called to a sick-room one day and found a young married woman in a state of complete exhaustion. The mother of the sufferer explained that the family physi- cian had decided that an operation was neces- sary to save the daughter's life. The latter had not been able to retain any food for a week and was suffering from violent vomiting attacks. She was in the early stages of preg- nancy. The only way to save her life, in the opinion of the doctor, was to expel the fetus. I explained to the mother and daughter that Rights of the Unborn Child 61 the operation was sinful, in fact, that it was murder. "What am I to do," asked the mother; "must I let my daughter die?" While we were discussing the matter the physician with a companion entered the room and began to unpack his grip in preparation for the operation. I went up to him and re- peated what I had already explained to the mother. He wanted to know whether I was a physician and what I knew about these matters. I replied that I knew that the operation was taking the life of an innocent being, that it was murder. Leaving me he went over to the mother and asked her whose advice she was to follow— the physician's, who had a scientific knowl- edge, or the priest's, who knew nothing of these things. The mother replied that she would not permit anything to be done against the ad- vice of the priest. The physician was furious. He predicted that the patient would be dead before morning and that I would be respon- sible. I can see him now as he paced the room nervously rubbing his hands. I can see him as he tossed his instruments into his case. I can see the look of contempt as he took his hat 62 Rights of the Unborn Child and left the room. When he was gone I turned to the sick daughter and exhorted her to have confidence in God, who was the author of fife and who would not forsake those who trusted in Him. That night the patient called for some chicken broth. The following day she was decidedly improved and in a few days she was out of all danger. Later she gave birth to a fine boy, and has since become the mother of a large family. I am well aware of the fact that some die of the effect of the toxic poisoning when preg- nant; but it is better to die and be a martyr of duty than to live with the guilt of murder on one's soul. The soldier on the battle-field dies for a principle; and the mother who re- fuses to allow a sinful operation and gives up her life rather than be a party to a crime, also dies for a principle. She is a real heroine. If you should meet with any of these cases your duty is plain. You can have no part in them. You can in no way encourage them. "Thou shalt not kill" is true not only for the human being who has been born into this world, but also for the human being yet unborn. I wish to add a few words about a medical practice which was highly lauded some years Rights of the Unborn Child 63 ago. I mean childbirth in twilight sleep, in- duced by means of morphine and other drugs. It was heralded in popular magazines as a new and wonderful discovery; it was to contradict the words of Scripture: "I will multiply thy sorrows, and thy conceptions: in sorrow shalt thou bring forth children." Many professors advocated it, among them Dr. Charles M. Green, of Harvard; but the latter soon with- drew his approbation, as did many other men of undoubted ability. While there are physi- cians who still favor this practice, it has been largely abandoned by men of any standing in the medical profession. It is absolutely wrong, since it risks the life of the mother to avoid the pains of childbirth. It also jeopardizes the life of the child. (The Ethics of Medical Homi- cide and Mutilation, by Dr. Austin O'Malley, c. 22.) CHAPTER V BIRTH CONTROL "VTou may have heard of the English socio- ■■■ logical writer Malthus (born 1766), who advocated birth limitation on the plea that if the human race continued to develop in the same proportion as it was then developing, the earth would not be able to support the teem- ing millions who would soon swarm upon its surface. He was ignorant both of human in- genuity and of the earth's productivity. Look- ing back at the question calmly and scientifi- cally, it is strange indeed to see how his false teachings were snatched up and propagated by the leading social and economic writers of the day. Men were frightened into the be- lief that the gaunt specter of hunger was al- ready at the door. Catholic social thought was never drawn into the vortex of Malthus' teach- ings. It has long since lived to see its own vindication. But the teaching of Malthus has again ap- peared—neo-Malthusianism. Again it advo- Note—A part of this chapter appeared in The American Journal of Sociology, Vol. xxii, No. 5, March, 1917, under the title of: Ethics and Neo-Malthusianism. 65 66 Birth Control cates the limitation of the birth-rate, not be- cause the earth cannot support a more numer- ous human race, but because it seeks for a healthier race, a more perfect race, a more fit race. When families reproduce many of their kind, the children do not reach full physi- cal development. Fewer children and stronger children is its claim. Reduce the family to three or four and let these three or four be better cared for, better educated. This is neo- Malthusianism. It agrees with the old Mal- thusianism in the restrictions of the family, but it holds out different motives. We might approach this question from many viewpoints. What are the obligations of men and women to assume the duties of married life? Once married, is there any obligation to raise a family? Do economic conditions or ill-health excuse them from these obligations? However, we shall here consider one phase of the subject: When husband and wife make use of their marital rights, is it morally wrong by any means whatever to prevent conception or the birth of children? The Creator has put within human beings certain tendencies and appetities for their good and preservation. The cravings of the Birth Control 67 appetite for food have their normal place. If properly satisfied, they give strength and health to the body; if abused, they injure the body. Will anyone hold that gluttony is in no way a moral question, or, being a moral question, that it is right? Will anyone assert that the old Romans were right when, at their oigies, they went from the banquet and vom- ited what they had eaten and returned to gorge themselves with peacock flesh and other dain- ties? Such a practice had become a custom with the wealthy patrician families. Its very recital is disgusting. Was it simply a matter of health or a revolting practice ? No, it went deeper. It was wrong because it was an abuse of nature. Nature intends hunger and appe- tite to rebuild the ever-weakening system; the glutton makes use of the satisfaction of the appetite for mere sensual enjoyment. Glut- tony may be wrong for secondary reasons. It destroys health and brings on bodily pains and hastens death. All these things it does; but it is wrong and morally wrong because it is a misuse of nature. It takes the appetite which nature has put there for a wholesome purpose and abuses the appetite for sensual enjoyment. Nature, too, has implanted the feeling of 68 Birth Control thirst. Like that of hunger, it is intended for the rebuilding of the body. Is it wrong to make it a means of sensual pleasure? Will anyone say that drunkenness is not an evil? Will any- one say that it is perfectly licit for a man to shut himself up within his own home and get beastly drunk, and remain so for days, provided that he does not come forth and interfere with others? Will anyone say that he has a right over his own body and may abuse it as he wishes, and that it is no one's business? Does not the drunken man do something that is in- trinsically wrong—wrong whether he is alone or with others, wrong whether he is seen by others or not, wrong in itself? He is acting against nature, abusing nature, taking the thing which nature intended for one purpose and using it for another. Why is self-abuse wrong? Why is prostitu- tion wrong? Is it simply a custom to call them wrong? Can they ever be right? We dissent entirely from those pragmatists who hold that there is no intrinsic evil, that morality and goodness are matters of custom, that what is wrong today may be right fifty years from now. Self-abuse and prostitution have always been wrong, are wrong, and always will be Birth Control 69 wrong. They are wrong from their very na- ture. Why? For the same reason that glut- tony and drunkenness are wrong. They are against nature. They take those feehngs or passions which nature has implanted in the human species for a good and holy purpose, namely, the procreation of the race, and they debase these passions to mere sensual pleasure. Herein lies the fundamental wrong in these two curses of humanity—self-abuse and pros- titution. It is true that they bring on sickness, insanity, and mental sufferings, they propa- gate the most horrible and loathsome diseases; but these are secondary consequences of the evils. Primarily and fundamentally they are wrong because they are a misuse of nature. Why is an artificial restriction of birth a moral wrong? For the same reason that drunk- enness is wrong, and gluttony is wrong, and self-abuse and prostitution are wrong. It is the same kind of evil, but it is a greater evil, for its relationship is more sacred. It is an abuse of nature, it is taking an action which nature meant for the propagation of the hu- man race and degrading it to an action below the brute; for the brute never makes use of such an action except for producing its kind. 70 Birth Control This artificial restriction happens between those who should have only the holiest respect for each other's person. Dire indeed are the consequences which nature demands of those who thus abuse her gifts and blessings. These consequences are moral and physical. The moral outcome is the loss of conjugal love, the breaking of family ties, want of respect for each other in the consciousness that they are the willing participants in a heinous crime. The physical consequences fall hardest upon the female sex, leading gradually to a com- plication of evils and ending in sterility. Advocates of neo-Malthusianism cannot es- cape these arguments. In fact, they do not attempt to meet them. The reasons which they bring forward are based upon selfishness; and their assertions are untried and unproved. We hear of mothers of fourteen or more mis- erable children of whom only one or two sur- vive. There are no doubt such instances, and there are just as many instances of weaklings in famihes of the rich. Reference is often made to the foreign-born. But let me ask: Who are doing the manual labor in our coun- try? Are there any signs of degeneration among these foreigners? Their ways may not Birth Control 71 be our ways—many of them are aliens among us—but they are strong of limb and muscle. Hughes, in his "Tom Brown at Rugby," turns aside from his interesting story to tell the Eng- lish people that they need the Browns. So do we need the Italians, the Poles, the Russian Jews—we need all those who have come from large families. Why is the old Puritan no longer with us? Because he practised birth restriction and disappeared from the land which should have been his. In that thoughtful book, "Two and Two Make Four," Bird Coler writes: "A century and a half of eugenics would leave the Catholic Church alone in the field." (Preface, p. 12.) He might have added that a century and a half of birth restriction has left the Cathohcs in possession of the larger part of the New England colonies. In referring to the Catholic Church in con- nection with birth control, I wish to point out again that I have not made use'of any dog- matic teachings, although they are convincing and in harmony with sound deductions of reason. Others have given the Catholic Church the credit for being the chief opponent of this social movement. Writing in the "Sur- vey" (November 18, 1916, p. 165), Dr. 72 Birth Control Adolphus Knopf says: "I must not fail to say a word about our Catholic friends and those of other faiths who are so strongly opposed to any teaching or making public the means of contraception and limiting family increase. Let us have no word of reproach because mil- lions of Catholics hold these views." We accept the compliment from Dr. Knopf; and it is a real compliment. We Cathohcs are opposed to this social movement of birth restriction. We believe that it is against the natural law, and, being so, has no further claim. Not only will it not give us a healthier, a bet- ter generation, but it will be a slow suicide for the generation that advocates it. What would you think of the man who sought to build up the name of his family and its position in so- ciety by stealing an immense fortune. He succeeds; he is honored; his family is honored! Would you praise his success? And will you praise those who seek to elevate the human race by doing violence to the sacred instincts of nature? Woe to the nation that attempts it; for strangers will come in and fill the empty houses. Australia and New Zealand are pointed out as countries where the experiment of birth re- Birth Control 73 striction is successful. But the practice there is far from being universal; moreover, they are comparatively new countries, and the warm blood of other lands is flowing into them. It is too soon to pronounce upon the experiment there, and the same must be said of Holland. Better examples are France and Germany. Fifty years ago the two countries had about the same population. Birth restriction has been practised in France, but not, at least to the same extent, in Germany. The latter country has about twenty-five million more people than France. Have the Germans de- teriorated in physical strength? Are there any marked changes for the better in the moral or physical status of the French? Had other nations not rushed to the aid of France, the Germans would long ago have been masters of Paris. No one can deny that if birth restric- tion is practised in France for another half- century, the nation will take its place as a second-class power. Has it a single definite gain? Are not its losses such as to bring a curse upon it? In an article in the "North American Re- view" (March, 1918, p. 392), Emile Boutroux, of the French Academy, made the following 74 Birth Control specific statement: "A decreasing birth-rate, the stagnation of the French population, is ex- tremely serious. 'How can France,' wrote a German, 'continue to play a part in the world? She is committing suicide; within a measur- able time she will be non-existent. Nature abhors a vacuum. It is but natural and right that the four sons of Germany should seize upon the place usurped by the one son of a Frenchman.' "The problem is as difficult to solve as it is important. The evil is profound; a low birth- rate springs from that egotism and love of pleasure which causes children to be regarded as an encumbrance. A child, it is urged, is desirable as an heir, but one only that the for- tune may not be split up; so that the future is gaily sacrificed to the present, the race to the individual, the country to money." Such terrible havoc has birth control wrought in France that Dr. Edward Toulouse has pro- posed to make all childless women work two years for the state, those with one child to work a year, those with two children to work six months, and those with three children to be excused. The object of this legislation would be to drive women to maternity; a sad com- Birth Control 75 ment, indeed, upon the effects of race suicide. (Journal of Heredity, Oct., 1919.) England, too, is facing the danger of a low birth-rate. Father Bernard Vaughan, the great English preacher, put this matter vividly before his people in an article (Nineteenth Century Magazine, Oct., 1916) entitled "The Menace of the Empty Cradle." "Unless the English nation," writes Father Vaughan, "wakes up to the menace of the empty cradle and resolves to do its duty, there awaits in the near future a calamity irreparably worse than utter defeat by land and sea—the calam- ity of self-extinction through race suicide." But not only does race suicide bring a curse to a nation; it also brings untold suffering and anguish to the individual who practises it. "I have no doubt that the prevention of maternity by artificial methods invariably produces physi- cal, mental and, I think, moral harm to those who resort to it . . . the nervous system suffers enormously from it if the habit is continued long." (Dr. Routh in the article by Father Vaughan.) I could give you many more opinions from physicians to show the effects of the crime against nature. When women come to you 76 Birth Control for advice on this matter you should be able to point out to them that it is morally wrong and to show them that the practice will bring end- less suffering and sickness. After giving authorities who favor birth con- trol, Dr. Knopf concludes his article as fol- lows: "If we but use our God-given sense to regulate the affairs of the government and family wisely and economically, this great world of ours will be one of plenty and beauty, where the good will predominate over the evil and women only a little lower than the angels —i images of their creator." Let us not confuse the issue. This neo-Mal- thusianism advocates artificial prevention of and the children born of it will become men conception while man and wife are making use of marital rights. Married people can refrain from the use of these rights, and in that sense there is no ethical objection to family regula- tion; in that sense they may decide when to have a child. They should restrain themselves in conjugal relations.1 This is in keeping with 1 Thomas J. Gerrard, Marriage and Parenthood—the Catholic Ideal. Chapter vii, on "Conjugal Restraint," deserves careful reading. Also: Marriage and the Sex Problem, by Dr. F. W. Foester, of the University of Vienna. Although not a Catholic, he holds the Catholic view on matters of sex. I consider this one of the very best books on the sex problem. Birth Control 77 the mandates of nature and the Creator. In this way children born to them will be little less than angels. But if these same parents make use of their marital rights, and, at the same time, by contraception prevent conception or bring about an abortion, they are sinning against nature. The husband is no better than the man who frequents the brothel to satisfy his lower appetite, and the wife is no better than the prostitute who sells her body for im- moral purposes. Man and wife are here imi- tating the most degraded actions of depraved society. Wedlock in no way gives them the privilege of abusing nature and frustrating the essential end of matrimony. In his paper Dr. Knopf refers to the infant mortality among children of the poor at Johns- town, Pennsylvania. To the disgrace of our civilization be it said that the toiling classes of Johnstown and elsewhere in the United States have been overworked and underfed. And they have been underfed because they have been underpaid. We do need a propa- ganda for the poor man, but it is not a propa- ganda to restrict his offspring, but a propa- ganda to give him a decent wage—a wage that will enable him to have a home, to clothe and 78 Birth Control feed his family; we need social insurance in its best forms; we need co-operation and profit- sharing—all these things we need to give the toiler the just reward of his labor. Then will infant mortality, tuberculosis, and poor hous- ing disappear. Neo-Malthusianism has no solution for the complex social evils of the poor man. It is a doctrine that is ethically wrong and will come as a curse to the nation that adopts its false and misleading principles. Birth restriction will never meet the ap- proval of the Catholic Church. Individuals in that Church may be misled by those who advocate it, but it can never become general within the Church. If then those who are without the Church should adopt this ethical code, and if it should become general with them, they will be the losers. Their progeny will gradually disappear from the face of the earth, while other and more fruitful nations will possess the land. I wish to add a few words about the statis- tics quoted in Dr. Knopf's article. He refers to a study, made by Dr. Alice Hamilton, of the child mortality among the families in the neighborhood of the Hull House, Chicago. In fact, these statistics of Dr. Hamilton have Birth Control 79 been published all over the country as an evi- dent plea for birth control. They are as fol- lows: Deaths per thousand births in: Famihes of four children and less.. 118 Famihes of six children........... 267 Famihes of seven children......... 280 Families of eight children......... 291 Famihes of nine children and more.. 303 For the last two years the Guardian Angel Settlement, which is quite close to the Hull House, has been making a survey, and has col- lected data that absolutely contradict the fig- ures given by Dr. Hamilton. The Guardian Angel Survey is as follows: Deaths per thousand births in: Famihes of two children........... 250 Families of three children......... 28 Families of four children.......... 49 Famihes of five children........... 43 Famihes of six children........... 125 Families of seven children......... 137 Families of eight children......... 120 Families of nine children.......... 238 Families of ten children........... 134 It will be noticed here that the highest death- 80 Birth Control rate occurs in families of two children, and that families of ten children have a lower death- rate than those of seven children. No doubt if another survey were made these figures would change considerably. While they are not conclusive, they absolutely destroy the claims of Dr. Hamilton that the death-rate is in proportion to the size of the family. But I am not the first to call in question the conclusions of Dr. Hamilton. Writing in the "Journal of Heredity" (July, 1917, p. 391), Alexander Graham Bell, after studying two thousand nine hundred and sixty-four cases, concludes: "The child with nine brothers and sisters (statistically speaking) has just about twice as good a chance of living to old age as has the child with only a single brother or sister in a normal healthy population. . . . If child mortality is eliminated and only those individuals are studied who live to the age of twenty or longer, the small families are still found to be handicapped; but, in general, it may be said that the larger the family, the longer a member of it has to five." The principal argument of the so-called re- formers in regard to birth control and birth restriction is that the working classes cannot Birth Control 81 support a large family. They absolutely ig- nore the providence of God, who will provide for those who keep His commandments. Theirs is a doctrine not only of irreligion but of selfishness. "Avoid the trouble of big fami- hes," they say. "Have one or two children and your means will enable you to raise these children and educate them to be worthy mem- bers of society." Such is the theory. Let us consult some facts. Is it true that there is less trouble in families of one or two or three children? Is it true that large famihes face the question of non- support? On March 15, 1917, the daily press of Chi- cago printed some figures from the court of domestic relations. We wish to note in pass- ing that the papers have given ample space and heavy headlines to discussions favoring birth control, but that the telling figures quoted below received but scant notice. Yet these figures throw more light upon the question than all the sensational speeches and articles yet given in its favor. We wish to add further that we have writ- ten to the Chief Clerk of the Court of Do- 82 Birth Control mestic Relations, who informs us that the fig- ures are authentic and correct. Wife and no children ........... 130 Wife and one child ............. 147 Wife and two children .......... 118 Wife and three children —...... 50 Wife and four children.......... 23 Wife and five children .......... 15 Wife and six children........... 8 Wife and seven children......... 3 Wife and eight children......... 2 Wife and nine children.......... 1 Wife and ten children........... 1 Wife and twelve children........ 1 Wife and thirteen children....... 1 If the theory of the birth control propa- gandists were true, mothers of large families would troop to court in numbers. But the figures show that it is the childless wife, or the mother of one or two children, who comes to the state for aid. Domestic troubles de- crease in proportion to the number of chil- dren. Those who keep the commandments of God and rely on the providence of God will be Birth Control 83 blessed with contentment and with ample means of a livelihood. We Catholics are not surprised at such figures; we would be sur- prised at the opposite. We know that the doctrine of birth control is essentially wrong and that it is opposed to the teach- ing of the Church. But it is well for us to know that the scientific investigation of con- ditions in American families bears out the con- clusions. A large family is a blessing of God. This family becomes a school where love and char- ity are taught and practised by both parents and children. Where there are only one or two children they are apt to become selfish. In cases where it is not the fault of the parents, and where they would welcome more children if God sent them, love, sacrifice and resignation will reign in a family; but, where birth control is practised, selfishness will fol- low and the ties of love will be gradually broken. Children then are the bonds which unite parents. These advocates of birth control are the unknowing agents who would wreck homes and separate wives and husbands. Parents should have faith and trust in God, 84 Birth Control and believe that He who clothes the lily of the field and cares for the sparrow will look with a benign providence upon the children of large families. ILet us not be disturbed or misled by the false teachings of those who have little or no religion, and who would govern this universe as if God were not the author of life. But I hear you object: What has the nurse to do with this matter of birth control? Does it not pertain rather to the field of the clergy or the social worker? In reply I wish to re- mind you that you are a social worker and that your duty calls you in many cases to assist the clergy. It is all important for you to know that birth control is wrong and why it is wrong. I have not only given you the teaching of the Church in this matter, but I have pointed out the arguments from reason. I wish you to know, too, that there are physicians and uni- versity professors and social workers who have openly advocated birth control. The sub- ject received considerable notoriety through the arrest of Mrs. Sanger, who attempted to teach the methods of birth control in a public clinic in New York. Many people, then, have heard of this new teaching. As many women may approach you for ad- Birth Control 85 vice in regard to abortion, they will also come to you for directions about contraception. They will wish to know how they may safe- guard themselves against becoming pregnant. They will ask you about the physical instru- ments used for this purpose or about drugs and douches. As in the case of abortion, they will appeal to your sympathy; they have too many children already; the husband's salary is not sufficient to support a larger family, or the physician has warned them that they will as- sume the duties of childbirth only at the risk of their lives. You should not only refuse to co-operate with them but be able to point out the evil of the act. Let them know that you are a nurse and not a vile practitioner in things that are wrong. But again be kind and pa- tient. Try to win the unfortunate person to see the wrong of her action. Later she will return to thank and bless you for your advice. CHAPTER VI THE NURSE HERSELF HP he object of these talks has been to help ■*■ you in your chosen profession. What could be more appropriate than some kindly words'of advice? One day, when I mentioned to a physician that I was preparing these talks, he became interested at once. "There is a great need of such a book," he said, "and do not fail to give them some advice, for they are exposed to many temptations of soul and many trials and hardships." Nursing is a great strain upon the physical strength of the body. The long, irregular hours soon begin to make inroads upon one's natural powers of endurance. Want of suffi- cient exercise and relaxation add to the evil, from which often follows a loss of appetite, and consequently an additional loss of strength. Here comes the source of tempta- tion to make use of artificial stimulants. Al- cohol is near at hand for medicinal purposes; and there is a tendency to take it to bolster up one's state of lassitude. There may even be the suggestion to take morphine or some other 87 88 The Nurse Herself drug to bring rest and sleep, which refuse to come when hours of relaxation are offered. Do not say that for you there is no danger, that you have sufficient strength of will and character to use these stimulants with modera- tion, that you can discard them at any time. Such self-confidence has been the cause of the ruin of many a nurse. Your hope lies in self- distrust and fear of your own weakness and inability to break off a habit if it should un- fortunately be formed. Do not imagine that the use of alcoholic drinks or drugs will never become a habit. I simply ask you to heed the advice of physicians who have had long ex- perience in this matter. Ask some of the oldest among them whether they think there is much danger, and you will find that they will be the first to warn you against danger of this nature. My advice to you is never under any condi- tion to touch alcoholic drink or strong wine, and, above all, never to take morphine or any other narcotic drug. If you are not feeling well you have the physician to consult any day. Let him prescribe for you, and do not take any medicine of any kind without his advice and direction. If it is always wiser for physicians to consult their co-workers in case The Nurse Herself 89 of sickness and not to prescribe for themselves, much more is it advisable for a nurse not to treat her own case. I cannot insist too much upon the importance of this advice. Your knowledge of drugs and medicine will always be a temptation for you. Do not reply that I am wasting my time giving such advice, that nurses have no weakness in this regard, that there is no danger for them. There is danger, great danger, frequent danger. "When one leaves the training-school and new conditions have to be met, habits are more or less disturbed and discipline is relaxed. This is a time in which a nurse especially needs to be on her guard, lest the good habits she has formed slip away and bad habits take their place. "One of the essentials to success in any branch of nursing is industry—willingness to work. It makes little difference how capable and skilled a nurse may have become during her training, if she is not wilhng to work; if she is continually looking out for the easiest cases and places and refusing those which would probably mean serious or hard work, she can never be a successful nurse. Quite frequently a nurse who is a habitual shirker 90 The Nurse Herself may be able to get through a training-school because some one constantly supervised her and kept her up to the mark, but when she be- comes an independent worker, her habitually lazy habits reassert themselves. This type of nurse does more to create prejudice against trained nurses than any other type. A train of complaints follow such nurses wherever they go. They are unaccommodating in private homes, and always fearful lest they will be im- posed on by being asked to do something which is not directly connected with the patient. They apply for hospital positions and often secure them, but fail to measure up to the opportun- ity that is theirs. They make frequent changes and usually have nothing good to say of those who have employed them. Their habitual un- willingness to work shows up more plainly in private homes than anywhere else, for under those conditions there is no one whose duty it is to keep them up to the mark." (Aikens, p. 225.) Many serious temptations of a moral char- acter arise from too much familiarity with physicians and interns. In every profession there are men unworthy of their high calling, and medicine is no exception to the rule. There The Nurse Herself 91 are men who prey upon the innocent fives of nurses who have taken up the profession with the highest and holiest of motives. Of very necessity nurses must be with doctors in pri- vate offices and must meet them in private homes. Avoid the beginning of any undue familiarity when alone with them! Take any unbecoming word or suggestion as an insult! Do this at the outset of any approach on their part! Do this and they will respect you as a young woman of honor, as one above all re- proach! If you yield to anything that has even the appearance of wrong, they will press the matter further and will make insinuating remarks about you to their companions. Your good name and your honor are at once tar- nished. I do not wish to horrify you by the rehearsal of morbid tales; but I know whereof I speak. I know that there is danger, especially for the nurse who trusts herself in such a way as to begin anything which has the appearance of wrong, and believes that she has the strength of character to turn back whenever she wishes. The only safeguard in the matter of morality is prudent conduct from the very beginning. Immorality begets distrust and a loss of all 92 The Nurse Herself respect. I know of an intern who boasted of his disgusting conduct and held up the com- panion of his guilt to scorn and ridicule; and yet she—poor, deluded thing—believed that he loved her and would eventually marry her. One of the saddest incidents in the life of Florence Nightingale was the immorality which she witnessed while serving in Crimea. She saw young women who had gone into serv- ice with high ideals only to be deceived and dragged to the level and beneath the level of the woman of the street. Be prudent; do be prudent. If I must say it: Be over-prudent in your dealing with physicians and especially with interns. Again you must nurse married men and young men. You must be with them alone through the long hours of the day and night. Your kindness and attention will of their very nature cause a certain attachment. In the be- ginning it may be only a natural gratitude and perfectly proper. Here comes the danger, for this feehng grows and, before either party is fully aware, there has sprung up an affection. This, too, in the beginning seems perfectly harmless and proper, and may in reality be so. Either of you would be insulted if there was The Nurse Herself 93 any suggestion of impropriety from a third party. Familiar words are exchanged, gifts are bestowed for acts of kindness and atten- tion; familiarity follows. When the patient has recovered, presents are sent to the nurse, invitations also come. No one will deny that it takes extreme prudence on the part of a nurse to distinguish between good and evil and to safeguard herself from serious deception. When you are nursing mothers and children, the father of the house or the grown son is often in the sick-room. You must converse with them and meet them under circumstances of unusual familiarity. In this respect the nurse is in greater moral danger than the young woman in an office or factory, for in these buildings the great safeguard is publicity. Doors are opened, crowds come and go. If a young lady wishes, she can easily safeguard herself in most of our modern offices. But the nurse is in a private home, doors are closed, and observation by the public is impossible. Do not resent my putting this matter so bluntly! If you think that such advice is not needed, then I am convinced that you, in your goodness and simplicity, need the very sugges- tions that I am offering. Be sedate, be pru- 94 The Nurse Herself dent, be a lady; and above all rely on prayer and the sacraments. Those who would succeed in any profession must be students; this applies to the teacher, the lawyer, the physician; it also applies to the nurse. Professional studies extend over a few years; they give only the groundwork of knowledge, but they do not form the rounded or perfect scholar. Those years of study must be followed by many more years of private endeavor. If after leaving college the physi- cian gave up his books he could never hope to attain eminence. To his practice he should join hours of theoretical work, he should fre- quently refer to his books, should consult other books, should keep in touch with the latest in medical magazines, should attend medical meetings and discuss difficulties with his co- laborers. The nurse, too, should be a student. So much was required of her in the three years of her training that but little time was left to her for study. She was able to hear but few lectures and these in the evening, when she was tired after the day's work. But once she has entered upon private cases she has ample time for further self-improvement. In The Nurse Herself 95 fact, during long hours of watching, time may hang heavy on her hands. There is only one escape from this situation: let her cultivate studious habits. Text-books and hterature on nursing are now extensive. One American firm has a list of some twenty-five books for nurses. In every hospital there will be a choice selection of such books. During the training-school, the nurse will probably have time to read and study only a few of these volumes; but she should in- quire about those of most value, and should make herself acquainted with the titles and authors, and, as far as possible, with the con- tents. A few dollars spent on books will be a wise and sensible investment. Whenever you go out for a private case take one or more of these books with you, and make a careful study of them. See whether there is not something in them that will apply to the present case. In this way you will form habits of careful study which will repay you many times. If you are not interested in serious reading you will dissipate your energy by reading the light hterature which you find handy. A few years of this desultory reading will incapaci- tate you for all future work as a real student. 96 The Nurse Herself This practice of study must be begun immedi- ately after you leave school; if it is not ac- quired then it will not come in later years. You can become just as interested in such reading as others become in devouring pages of fiction. Do not misunderstand me; I would have you enjoy good fiction, good poetry and good literature of any kind; but with them there will be time for self-improvement in the knowledge that is part of your profession. Take pride then in having a number of books, read them, study them; they will be- come your friends, friends in many a long and lonesome hour; they will enable you to become a more scientific and efficient nurse. "A nurse's personality is a factor that can never be disregarded, owing to its influence upon the patient. Moreover, the possession of the attributes that make up our personality— rendering it pleasant or the reverse—depends largely upon ourselves. Certain quahties of mind and body may be born in us, but it is al- ways in our power to modify or increase their significance. For all of us it is desirable to improve our natural gifts, but in the case of a nurse it is absolutely necessary that she should have under her control such character- The Nurse Herself 97 istics of body and mind as may affect or in- fluence for good or bad her patient's condition. This is particularly true in reference to the expression of the face, the quality of the voice, the character of the touch or footstep, and to the carriage of the body in general. There is always a spiritual,, or mental development or change taking place within us that is shown to the outside world through the medium of the body, the inward workings of the mind being rendered visible through the various mo- tions consciously or unconsciously employed. It is difficult to realize at first how susceptible a patient is to the various expressions which may appear in the faces of the physician and nurse; how closely he watches their every ac- tion, in the hope that he may gain a clue as to what they really think of his condition, and how much he is encouraged or cast down by what he thinks he reads there. Hence, it is all important, from the very outset, to study to keep well in hand one's various modes of ex- pression and to watch them with unceasing diligence, until the habit of self-control becomes second nature and the chances of being caught off one's guard are reduced to a minimum." (Robb, p. 72.) 98 The Nurse Herself "Beware of being egoistic; do not talk about your own private affairs. Here, again, tact will often be necessary to parry many curious inquiries, although at other times the nurse may be filled with the desire to impress the patient with the importance of her family, as regards social distinction or intellectual quali- ties. I know of nothing more wearisome, even to a well person, than to have to sit and listen to eulogies on people she has never seen and in whom she has no possible interest. Better to be left in peace to die of one's disease than to be driven insane by thoughtless chatter. "But although the ethics of the sick-room, as well as common sense, are opposed to any form of gruesome talk and to all gossip, it is very necessary that a nurse should be able to talk pleasantly and intelligently at the proper time, and in this connection she will find a broad general knowledge and education of the greatest value. Friendliness and good- fellowship between patient and nurse should never be allowed to degenerate into a familiar- ity that allows of jokes which are not con- venient, or crude personal criticisms, that soon do away with the mutual respect which should exist between them. It is rarely, if ever, ad- The Nurse Herself 99 visable for the nurse to try to control her pa- tients by means of sarcasm, or holding them up to ridicule in the eyes of their friends. Children in particular are very sensitive and are very liable to resent such treatment by sul- lenness and obstinacy." (Robb, p. 234.) Finally, I wish to offer you some considera- tions from the little book of Father Deshon, entitled "Guide for Young Women": "Sickness, like everything else which God allows to befall us, is intended for our good. If we take it in the right spirit it will prove an immense advantage to us. "Sickness affords us an opportunity to prac- tise many virtues in a high degree, particularly those most excellent ones of humihty and pa- tience. When stretched upon the bed of sick- ness, we feel how helpless we are of ourselves, and how completely we depend on God for health and strength, and every breath we draw. We cry to Him and He hears us, and helps us. Sickness is a time of grace. "What an opportunity it gives us for pa- tience amid so many pains and privations and wants. "If we did but know, it is just the time to be like Our Lord Jesus Christ as He was hang- 100 The Nurse Herself ing, so racked with torment and so afflicted, upon His cross for our redemption. "Now is the time for patience, to keep down all murmuring and dissatisfaction. No doubt there will be temptation to murmur, but put it all aside, for God is as good now as ever, and it is wrong now as ever to complain of what you cannot help and He has allowed. "Some people, when they get sick, particu- larly if they are not used to it, show a deal of impatience; they give a great deal of unneces- sary trouble, and show an unthankful spirit in regard to what is done for them. This is cer- tainly quite the wrong spirit, and one that ren- ders such a girl very unhappy herself and dis- pleasing to God. "But, on the contrary, I must say the ex- ample of holy patience and peace under af- fliction, on the part of others, is oftentimes most beautiful; all who witness it are charmed and edified by it. What stores of merit such a girl lays up for herself and for others! "She really preaches the Gospel of Our Lord Jesus Christ, and does much to save souls; for her example is more effectual than perhaps the words of the most eloquent preacher can be. "You cannot do much in sickness in the The Nurse Herself 101 way of set prayers and devotions, but you can do a great deal in the way of patience and resignation. You can do a great deal in the way of short, fervent ejaculations, such as, 'Thy holy will be done'; 'Grant me patience'; 'Praise God for His goodness,' or many others of the same sort. "You can offer yourself to God entirely, giving up your life, if it be God's will, cheer- fully into His hands. For the rest, keep as quiet and cheerful as possible, putting away all temptations and troubles of whatever sort they may be, and trusting entirely to God and Our Lord Jesus Christ, just as an infant reposes with confidence in the arms of its mother. "So, if it be God's will, this blessed time of sickness will land you safe on the shore of eternity, to enjoy forever, and with joy un- speakable, the sight of God, the society of Jesus Christ, of the Blessed Virgin Mary, and of all holy saints who have 'fought the good fight of faith* and received the immortal crown of victory." CHAPTER VII PROFESSIONAL DUTIES Tn the preceding talks I have already ex- A plained many of the duties of your profes- sion; still, there remain some very important topics upon which I wish to insist. I shall here treat of your duties to the patient and to the physician. After you have graduated from the train- ing-school and are "on call" for service, do not be too particular in choosing your cases. In fact, you should make it a rule not to refuse a call. Perhaps it would be better not to ask any questions when a call comes. If you be- gin to inquire about the nature of the case, the conditions and circumstances of the fam- ily, the locality, the name of the physician, the probable fee or the possibility of no fee, all this will leave the impression that you are look- ing for the easiest and the best-paid work. If, after you have had considerable experience, you wish to hmit your work to special cases, you are perfectly free to do so. You can then leave the proper directions with the nursing agency or the hospital or the physicians for 103 104 Professional Duties whom you have handled cases. But you should enter upon this special service only after suf- ficient experience and after consultation with those who have observed your work. Once you have undertaken a case, it is your duty to give the best service of which you are capable. There is at least a tacit agreement between you and the patient. You promise on your part to render the service of your profes- sional calling, and the patient promises to give you a certain fee or remuneration. While your primary object may not be the remuneration, it is yours by right; and, in accepting it or agreeing to it, you assume the duties and re- sponsibilities connected with the case. If you are remiss in the performance of your duties you do a real injustice to the patient. Again, you are not permitted to experiment with your patient. If there are two or more methods of carrying out the directions of the attending physician, you are bound in con- science to use the one which in your opinion is the safest. Experimentation should be left to experts and schools, and should be carried on under the proper safeguards. All people have rights, even sick people. One may experiment upon an animal to discover the effects of drugs Professional Duties 105 or operations, but never upon human beings. There may be exceptions to this rule, as when all known remedies have failed in an extreme case and when a chance is taken as a last re- source. All such experiments pertain to the work of scientists. You will probably not meet a case in which you are justified in making ex- periments with your private patients. How long does your obligation exist, or, in other words, is the nurse ever justified in giv- ing up a case? Certainly she is. Both physi- cians and nurses are allowed to withdraw from cases under certain conditions. I have known an instance where a patient refused to take the medicines prescribed and to follow dietetic reg- ulations, and where the attending physician simply informed the party that he would not return. He was justified in so doing, for he felt that the patient could not improve under the unfavorable circumstances, and that he would later be held responsible. In the same way a nurse may withdraw from a case where the patient stubbornly refuses to do what she knows are the directions of the physician. In all such cases, however, the greatest tact and patience should be exercised. There should be private consultations between the physician 106 Professional Duties and the nurse; members of the family, too, should be instructed in regard to their duty and their co-operation with nurse and physi- cian. Troubles of this nature often arise from the meddlesome interference of relatives and visitors, who make the work of the nurse if not unbearable at least ineffective. They should be kept from the sick-room when their presence is injurious to the sufferer. If after patient action and warning on her part, the nurse is so hampered that her ministrations are fruit- less, she may give due notice and withdraw from the case. But let me repeat that she should first exercise every reasonable duty of patience and forbearance. Again, the nurse should understand the lim- itations of psychic effects. She should not be deceived by the vagaries of Christian Science, nor should she participate in spiritism or oc- cultism of any kind. Whatever may be their claims, they have no part in the nursing pro- fession. While the will is a potent factor in regaining health, there are numerous occasions where the exaggeration of its power may do much harm. "It should be well understood from the be- ginning just what the will can do in the mat- ^Professional Duties 107 ter of the cure or, to use a much better word, the relief of disease, not forgetting that dis- ease means etymologically and also literally discomfort rather than anything else. The will cannot cure organic disease in the ordi- nary sense of that term. It is just as absurd to say that the will can bring about the cure of Bright's disease as it is to suggest that one can by will-power replace a finger that has been lost. "There are, however, a great many organic diseases in which the will may serve an ex- tremely useful purpose in the rehef of symp- toms and sometimes in producing such a re- lease of vital energy previously hampered by, discouragement as will enable the patient to react properly against the disease. This is typically exemplified in tuberculosis of the lungs. Nothing is so important in this dis- ease as the patient's attitude of mind and his will to get well. Without that there is very little hope. With that strongly aroused, all sorts of remedies, many of them even harmful in themselves, have enabled patients to get better merely because the taking of them adds suggestion after suggestion of assurance of cure." (Health Through Will-Power, by Dr. James Walsh, p. 102.) 108 Professional Duties No doubt you have often been reminded of the necessity of keeping professional secrets. When sickness comes into a family there is at once introduced an abnormal condition. Some are frightened and some are perturbed. The nurse becomes the confidant of all. She learns secrets of that family which are known to no other living being. She hears of infidelities, of discriminations, of suspicions, of mis judg- ments. Even under ordinary circumstances one is not allowed to tale-bear in regard to a neighbor; but the nurse has an added obliga- tion to remain silent. She has obtained her in- formation in connection with her professional duty; like the priest or the lawyer, she must keep that information as a sacred charge. There may be exceptions to this, as, for instance, pub- lic good may require the nurse to reveal a case of contagious disease which a family has suc- ceeded in concealing. "Too great intimacy between patient and nurse is inadvisable and should never be en- couraged. But when it happens that a patient, in her weakened state of health, that has left her nerves beyond her control, has confided to the nurse secrets of her own or of others, these confidences should always be held sacred and Professional Duties 109 inviolable; furthermore, the whole conduct of the nurse should be such as to assure the pa- tient that her moments of weakness will never be blazoned abroad. Nor does this obhgation to secrecy end with the period of professional services; none of the privacies of personal or domestic hfe, no infirmity of disposition or little flaw of character, observed while caring for a patient, should ever be divulged by the nurse, unless circumstances arise which render such a course an imperative duty. The same rule holds good also with respect to the actual bodily or mental ailments. Patients and their affairs should not be made a subject for con- versation or discussion between nurses; silence is even more binding upon the nurse than upon the physician, inasmuch as the oppor- tunities of the former for knowing her pa- tient's affairs are generally far greater than those of the latter." (Robb, p. 234.) Much has been written of late about the in- fluence of the mind on the body. No one can deny the interdependence of the physical and spiritual parts of man. You should under- stand well how much you can accomplish by inspiring patients with confidence. Do not let them become despondent, or even brood 110 Professional Duties over their ailments, or imagine that they are carrying more than their share of human suf- fering. Self-pity is never to be encouraged or even tolerated. "The worst brake on the will to be well is undoubtedly the habit that some people have of pitying themselves and feeling that they are eminently deserving of the pity of others be- cause of the trials, real or supposed, which they have to undergo. Instead of realizing how much better off they are than the great major- ity of people—for most of the typical self- pitiers are not real subjects for pity—they keep looking at those whom they fondly sup- pose to be happier than themselves and then proceed to get into a mood of commiseration with themselves because of their ill-health— real or imaginary—or uncomfortable sur- roundings. Just as soon as men or women as- sume this state of mind, it becomes extremely difficult for them to stand any real trials that appear, and above all, it becomes even more difficult for them to react properly against the affections of one kind or another that are al- most sure to come. Self-pity is ever a serious hamperer of resistive vitality." (Health Through Will-Power, by Dr. James Walsh, Professional Duties 111 p. £9. Nurses will find this a most useful book; it explains in a simple yet scientific way the influence of the mind over the body.) Let us now briefly consider the relation of the nurse to the attending physician. In most of our American medical schools there are bright young women with the laudable ambi- tion to become doctors. The medical profes- sion offers a wide field for women physicians. If you so desire you can get your diploma and license, and enter upon the work with all the rights of those of the other sex. But if you become a trained nurse you must recognize the fact that you are not a physician, that, it mat- ters not what knowledge of the healing art you may possess, you have no right to practise medicine. You are to assist the physicians. You will not be held responsible for the fail- ure of any particular case as long as you have strictly hmited yourself to the work assigned you. If you overstep your position and as- sume responsibilities which do not belong to your profession, you will get but little credit for any success which may follow, but will, at the same time, be the object of criticism for failures that may ensue. In the first place, you must hold the physi- 112 Professional Duties cian in respect. If you should meet one of the profession for whom you have no respect, or in whom you have no confidence, do not allow yourself to be associated with him. To do so would be to court certain failure. There may be members of the profession who have slight defects in methods and manners, and who, nevertheless, are men of real worth. In this case, it is your duty to overlook the defects. There are physicians who are punctilious in prescribing the most minute details, who insist that their cases be handled in strict accordance with their wishes. It is your duty to carry out the wishes of such doctors. Even if you should think that you are capable of improving on their methods, it is not for you to decide. You may be mistaken in your judgment about the matter; but even if you are right and the physician is wrong, he is to be the judge in the case. There may be occasions when it is the duty of a nurse to report a physician for want of attention or skill in his treating a case. Such occasion will rarely occur. Before taking any action, the nurse should consult with some companion of her profession on whose tact she relies or should lay the case before a physi- Professional Duties 113 cian. She should not act in haste Let her weigh every circumstance and look at the mat- ter from every angle. Let her consider that her action will seriously injure the professional standing of the physician in the community. It may bring a relapse to the patient, owing to the information and the change of doctors. It is impossible to set down any definite regula- tions for action under such circumstances; but I know of no more difficult problem for a nurse than that of bringing a complaint in regard to the attending physician. This general rule should be followed: she should not take any action unless there is certainty about the mat- ter. As long as there is doubt, the doctor should have the benefit of it; and in the mean- while the nurse should keep a respectful si- lence, but should use tact and observation in arriving at a conclusion. The medical profession is made up, as a whole, of thoughtful and tactful men; but, like every other calling, it has among its members those who are wanting in that delicate feeling and right interpretation of what is proper. Hence, at times, we find a physician boldly and loudly reprimanding a nurse in the pres- ence of patients and visitors. Such an action 114 Professional Duties on the part of the doctor is absolutely unwar- ranted unless, indeed, he has already spoken to the nurse about evident defects in her work, and she has shown no improvement or, what is worse, no inclination to improve. Certainly, the proper mode of procedure would be to talk things over in private with the nurse. In case, then, the attending physician so far forgets himself as to deal out criticism in public and before a patient, the nurse is justified in re- senting any such conduct. I am not referring to minor matters, nor is it my wish to, in any way, encourage insubordination. I am only referring to those extreme occasions where a physician goes clearly beyond his power in giving public reprimands. Under these cir- cumstances the nurse is justified in dropping the case; not, however, until she has given the physician and patient time to get a substitute. While she remains, she should exercise the utmost care, and should make it plain to all that it was a sense of honor and professional duty that moved her to take such an action. "But it is not so much through any actual words of the nurse that she inspires the patient and friends with confidence in the physician; her manner, the way in which she receives his Professional Duties 115 orders and her readiness in cariying them out, her professional attitude to him, always most respectful and attentive, never showing by the least sign any doubt in his ability, will be readily interpreted by anxious watchers. No matter how trying the occasion, a nurse should never show by her manner toward the doctor any shadow of rudeness, even although she may have but little respect for him or his ways. If for any cause she is obliged to oppose him, she should guard against doing so in the pres- ence of a third person, but make her oppor- tunity away from the patient's room. "If an opinion is asked the nurse regarding the relative merits of two physicians, she should frankly decline to pass judgment; she should never compare one physician's treatment with that of another; in fact, she should remember that all such discussions are out of her prov- ince, except at such times as she is receiving instruction. Physicians are naturally irritated when they find that the nurse has been telling the patient or friends of the wonderful sayings and doings of her own pet doctor. Nor is it for the nurse even to make any suggestion as to the calling in of any particular physician, when a consultation has been decided upon. 116 Professional Duties This is to be left entirely in the hands of the attending physician and the friends. "Again, not infrequently the patient or friends are so impressed by the nurse's skill and wisdom, that instead of consulting the doctor, they may come to her for advice about the ailments of some member of the family who may be feehng unwell. This insidious form of temptation, to assume the doctor's duties and to make a display of her knowledge, is constantly occurring, but any yielding to it constitutes a grave ethical offence committed against the doctor and society at large. Ajna- teur doctors, as well as amateur nurses, some- times do more harm than good. She should be most careful not to talk about or show off her technical knowledge before the patient or the friends, while, as regards the physician, she will best deserve his confidence by keeping strictly within her own limits, by watching for symptoms of any complications that may arise, by sending for him only when necessary, by her discretion in interpreting his orders with regard to medicines to be given in an emer- gency, and by keeping him in touch with all the facts relating to his patient." (Robb, p. 253.) Professional Duties 117 Your profession requires you to assist your patients spiritually. As these talks were orig- inally given in hospitals under the care of Cath- olic sisterhoods, suggestions have dealt largely with Catholic practices. But I would not have you give a narrow interpretation of your ob- ligations to the sick. Into whatever homes you are called, always respect the religion of the patients. Try to ascertain what they want in this matter, and consider it your duty to deal with people of every religious denomina- tion, as you would wish them to deal with you under similar circumstances. You should know how to administer bap- tism, for most Christian mothers wish their children to receive this sacrament. The cere- mony is extremely simple. Take a glass of water, it may be either cold or lukewarm, and while pouring it over the child's head, pro- nounce the words: "I baptize thee in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost." To baptize means to wash, and there- fore the words "I baptize" should be pro- nounced while the water is being poured. If it should happen that a child is in danger of dying before being delivered, baptism should be performed by causing water to reach the 118 Professional Duties little body by means of some instrument. It will not do to simply have the water touch the cyst which encloses the body, but it must touch the body itself. While baptism is adminis- tered by pouring water upon the head of the child, still if the water reaches an arm or leg it is probably sufficient. If afterward the child is born and an occasion arises, the priest should be informed of what has been done. In case of abortion, or the death of a preg- nant woman, the fetus should be carefully re- moved from the sack and baptized. If the fetus is very small, the sack containing it should be opened and the whole sack with the fetus immersed in water while at the same time the words are repeated: "I baptize thee in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost." On the death of a pregnant woman, where there is reason to believe that the fetus is still alive, the attending physician should be asked to perform laparotomy and to remove the fetus. Baptism should then be per- formed as indicated above. An author of considerable experience has put down the following suggestions in regard to the sick-room. It is the correct thing: Professional Duties 119 To send for the parish priest as soon as a person becomes dangerously ill. For the nurse or some member of the pa- tient's family to place a chair for the priest by the side of the bed, raise the patient to a comfortable posture, inquire of the priest if he desires anything, and then withdraw whilst the confession is being heard. To keep everybody from intruding in the sick-room whilst the priest is hearing the con- fession and giving spiritual consolation. When the priest is expected with the holy communion, to have the room put in order and everything made ready. To have a table prepared, covered with a clean white cloth, and upon it at least one candlestick holding a blessed wax candle lighted, a crucifix, two small glasses, one con- taining holy water and the other pure fresh water (for the ablution after communion), and a tablespoon. For some one holding a hghted candle to meet the priest at the door when he arrives with the Blessed Sacrament, and to precede him to the place prepared. For all in the room to kneel when the priest enters with the Sacred Host. 120 Professional Duties After the priest has sprinkled the bed with holy water, repeated the antiphon, "Asperges me," "Thou shalt sprinkle me," etc., and said the prayer, "Exaudi nos, Domine," for an at- tendant to recite the Confiteor, if the patient is too weak to do so. To have the hair combed, the face washed, the mouth rinsed out, and the bed of the sick person made tidy before the priest arrives. For one who suffers a prolonged illness to receive holy communion frequently, even though not in danger of death. To know that the receiving of holy com- munion, even as Viaticum, will not hasten death. To know that a sick person need not be fasting in order to receive the Holy Viaticum. For a person who is dangerously ill to at- tend to all worldly matters the first thing, so that there will be nothing to distract the mind from spiritual concerns. To receive Extreme Unction whilst the pa- tient still has the use of his senses. To sponge off the parts to be anointed—the eyes, the ears, the nostrils, the mouth, the hands, the feet—before the arrival of the priest. To know that Extreme Unction can be re- Professional Duties 121 ceived only once in the same sickness, unless there is a partial recovery and then a serious relapse, in which case it may be received again. To know that only those in danger of death by sickness can receive this sacrament; that sol- diers going into battle, persons in a storm at sea, criminals about to be executed, cannot receive Extreme Unction. To know, however, that soldiers who have been wounded, persons dying from an accident, those washed ashore in whom life is not yet extinct, can and should be anointed. To know that infants and born idiots can- not be anointed, since they cannot commit sin. To know that those dying impenitent, or in a state of mortal sin—as a drunkard in his drunkenness, or in the commission of a crime— as a man shot in a duel—cannot receive this sacrament unless there is some reason to think that at the moment of death there is sincere penitence. For all present at the administration of the last sacraments to join in the prayers for the dying. If the patient be a woman, for another woman to make the sign of the cross upon her forehead, mouth, and breast, if she is unable to 122 Professional Duties do so herself at the proper time in the prayers for the dying. For a patient to accept the illness as com- ing from God, and to bear the suffering in union with the sufferings and death of Our Lord. To be patient and resigned. To take the medicine and nourishment prescribed. To have a crucifix, a rosary, and some holy water constantly within reach. For relatives and friends to be as calm and composed as possible. To exclude all worldly considerations from the chamber of the dying. For some one of those in attendance on a dying person to keep reciting suitable prayers until the soul has left the body. To have one or more blessed candles lighted near the bedside. To press the crucifix to the dying lips and to sprinkle the bed repeatedly with holy water. To know that candles are blessed in all churches on Candlemasday, and that every Catholic should provide himself with some. To know that the candles should be wax. To know that all members of a parish, whether they go to the parish church or not, can only be attended in case of sickness by the Professional Duties 128 priests belonging to the parish, unless in spe- cial cases permission is obtained from the par- ish rector to have a priest from another parish who may have been the confessor or the life- long friend of the person who is ill. To always provide a companion or attend- ant when sending for a priest after dark. To abstain from conversation if the priest is carrying the Blessed Sacrament, and to ac- company with prayer. (The Correct Thing for Cathohcs, by Lelia Hardin Bugg.) I am tempted to quote at length from a book entitled "The Way of Interior Peace," by Rev. Father de Lehen, S.J., but I shall not give any extracts, as I wish you to secure the volume and to read every chapter. You will find in it many wholesome reflections, which will be a great help to you and will suggest words of advice to patients. CHAPTER VIII PRACTICAL TESTS: IN THE TRAINING-SCHOOL "T^OR eight years I have been giving these talks A to nurses in several of the large training- schools of the Middle West. At the close of each lecture a few practical cases would be as- signed for discussion; each of the topics would then be considered and explained in the next class. Many of the tests used here were pro- posed to the author by directors of training- schools. In studying these tests or cases it is sug- gested that the student first read over the statement and try to reach a conclusion. After she has determined on the answer, let her con- sult the book for verification of method and fact. Case I—Borrowing Too Much Statement: Miss Agnes, a prospective nurse for a training-school in New York, is from a small town in Pennsylvania. She talks to her friends of the amount of money that a nurse makes, and explains to them that she will have an income of thirty or forty dollars a week, and that her board and lodging will 125 126 Practical Tests: cost her nothing. She figures out that her in- come will be equivalent to about seventy-five dollars a week. A merchant in the town, hearing of the won- derful prospects of the future nurse, gives Miss Agnes unlimited credit. She buys foolishly and extravagantly, until her account at the store is four hundred dollars. She has been in the school for only a few weeks when she receives a letter from the mer- chant demanding part payment on the bill. She writes to explain that she does not receive any fee during the three years of training. The merchant sends a letter to the hospital authorities, who reply that they can do nothing in the matter. Then the merchant tries through the courts to force Agnes' father to pay the bill. The court decides that the father is not responsible for the debt, as his daughter is of legal age. After leaving the training-school Miss Agnes is most successful and in a short time accumulates six hundred dollars. What are her obhgations ? Reply: Miss Agnes is held responsible for the debt. Her obligation was simply sus- pended while she was in school. If she re- quires some of the money for immediate needs, In the Training-School 127 she should send at least a part of the payment to the merchant, promising to remit the re- mainder as soon as she can earn it. Case II—Obeying the Rules in a Training- School Statement: Miss Isabel, a pupil in a nurses' training-school, has but little regard for the school's regulations. She invites another nurse, Miss Esther, to slip away in the evening, and explains that they are not bound by the rules of the institution. For some weeks Miss Es- ther yields to the solicitations of her compan- robbing her of her ideals, her respect for the institution and her interest in the work. What is she to do? Reply: Miss Esther has been deceived by Miss Isabel. It is not true that pupils in an institution are not bound to follow the rules. As long as they remain in the school there is at least a tacit agreement between the authori- ties and pupils, and the latter are under the obhgation of carrying out local regulations. If these regulations are too difficult or are un- reasonable, the nurse has the right to leave the place, but as long as she remains she is subject to the disciphne of the house. Moreover, if a 128 Practical Tests: nurse will not follow the regulations, which must of necessity be made for every training- school, she has not the strength of character necessary for success in her profession. I would not exaggerate the matter of small fail- ures in keeping rules; but if in her heart a nurse despises regulations, breaks them with- out remorse, and inculcates in the hearts of others that all such rules are foolish and not to be obeyed, she should get out of the training- school. Such an individual should go into the office of some large business concern, where she will soon learn that rules and regulations are necessary. Case III—Deceiving One's Parents Statement: A pupil nurse, who is anxious to have a new dress, knows that her parents will not send her the money for this purpose, as they provided liberally for her. To deceive her parents she sends for money to buy books and medical instruments, explaining that she will need these later for her private cases after her graduation. The parents send on a hun- dred dollars for the books and equipment. What must be thought of the action of the nurse? Reply: She is certainly getting a bad start In the Training-School 129 in practising such deception with her parents. If she is untrue to them, can she later be trusted when dealing with others? Her conduct, then, is altogether reprehensible. The question arises about the obhgation of returning the hundred dollars to the parents. Is the nurse obliged in conscience to return the money? If, later on, the nurse gets the hundred dollars and can afford to make payment to her parents, will she be obliged in conscience to do so? In answering this we must look at the matter from the point of view of the parents. They would certainly be grieved if they knew of the action of their daughter; still, it is not probable that they would wish to insist on res- titution from their own child. Viewing the matter in this way and interpreting the will of the parents, the nurse is not obliged in con- science to return the money, even if she could easily do so. Case IV—Tardiness Statement: Miss Julia, a pupil nurse, is frequently tardy for the various exercises. Above all, she does not rise promptly and gives much trouble to the cook when she comes late for breakfast. The cook has strict orders not to serve breakfast after nine o'clock. Miss 130 Practical Tests: Julia becomes furious one morning when the cook insists on the school regulations and re- fuses breakfast to the nurse after the assigned time. In retaliation Miss Julia brings false charges against her and thus causes her to be discharged. After some weeks Miss Julia rec- ognizes the evil of her action and wishes to know what are her obhgations toward the cook. Reply: Miss Julia is bound in conscience to undo the wrong. It is her duty to lay the whole matter before the authorities and to seek to have the cook reinstated. She is also obliged, as far as in her hes, to make up for any finan- cial loss which the cook may have incurred. Suppose, for instance, the cook has been unable to secure work for two weeks and has lost fifty dollars on that account. Miss Julia is bound in conscience to give her fifty dollars. The loss of this money on the part of Miss Julia will be the best lesson that she could get. It will probably be the means of bringing to her mind, in a forcible way, the evil results of her habits of tardiness, and will in the end make of her a more efficient nurse. Case V—Faultfinding Statement: Miss Emily, a pupil in a nurses' training-school, is continually finding fault In the Training-School 131 with the local regulations. She cannot see the reason for so many rules; she calls the school a reformatory, and the head nurse the prison warden. Above all, she is very outspoken with her companions, among whom, unknown to the authorities, she is spreading a spirit of discon- tent. Should she remain in the school? Reply: It is difficult to give a brief answer to this question. Miss Emily is certainly inex- perienced; she is probably wanting in judg- ment. The question is: Will she improve? Can she be made to see things in their proper light? She may have enjoyed unusual free- dom at home; she may have been pampered and partly spoiled. This spirit of criticism may be the result of a sudden change of life. Some young people fret and chafe under dis- cipline, and yet they have qualities which will in the end win success for them. What Miss Emily needs is a sincere friend; one who is older and more mature, and who in- stead of being influenced by such thoughtless criticism, will do her part to correct the fault- finding. It may be that the pupil has many excellent qualities; she may be quick in learn- ing, eager to succeed, and winning in manners. There should be someone to understand her 132 Practical Tests: difficulties; to point out that order and dis- ciphne are necessary parts of one's training; that, where a number of people are working together, there must be authority and enforce- ment of rules. It will all depend, then, on the other characteristics of the pupil. The proba- bility is that the faultfinding is only a tempo- rary mood and can be corrected. Case VI-—Discouragement Statement: Miss Margaret, a pupil nurse, has been deprived of her free day for the third consecutive time. She has violated some rule each week and must pay the penalty. Feeling that she needs the day of rest and change, she remonstrates with the directrix and head nurse. She does not object to rules and regulations, but she pleads that the authorities are too severe. They should be more tolerant and should overlook an occasional fault. Reply: To be the directrix or head nurse of a school is a responsible position. It is not easy to keep the golden mean—to be just strict enough and not too strict; to enforce disciphne and yet to know where to relax when regulations become too irksome; to train the young pupil and yet to keep her friendship and esteem. Probably it is better for the authori- In the Training-School 133 ties to err in being too strict rather than in being lax. As the period of training is not long, even if it is over strict, it can be borne for a while; whereas laxity in rules and want of order will leave traces which will work un- told harm. The directrix in a training-school should be a woman of unusual experience and capability; she should be one who quickly discerns char- acter; she should be esteemed rather than feared; she should rule by example rather than by commands; she should be firm, but her firmness should be tempered with sympathy and love. She must gain the confidence of the pupils, for without it there can be but little co- operation and direction. Every pupil in the school must feel that she can go to the office at any time, and that she will be welcomed; that the directrix has a personal interest in her and her success. When mutual trust and af- fection exist, if it should be necessary to give a reprimand, the pupil will be in a frame of mind to take it in the right spirit. Case VII—Studying Hypnotism Statement: Miss Mary, a pupil in a train- ing-school, induces Miss Nora, another nurse, to go with her to a private family where 134 Practical Tests: hypnotic exhibitions are frequently given. Miss Mary explains that nurses should know all about this matter as it is a part of their professional education. After several ex- periences Miss Nora doubts whether she should continue the visits with her friend. What is she to do? Reply: It will depend largely on the na- ture of these hypnotic exercises. If they are conducted by unscientific persons and merely for entertainment they should not be en- couraged, and both nurses should remain away. The reason for this advice is that hypnotic states bring many evils upon those who sub- ject themselves to such influences. If the ex- ercises are conducted by scientific men there would be less objection; but even here it would probably be more prudent for nurses not to dabble in hypnotism. Experts may for science's sake practise hypnotism, and for the same reason a person may subject himself to the hypnotic state. Under no condition what- ever should hypnotism be used as a means of amusement. Case VIII—Seances Statement: Miss Maria, a pupil in a nurses' training-school, is frequently invited In the Training-School 135 by another pupil, Miss Agnes, to attend seances, in which crystal gazing is the principal method of trying to learn about future events or absent friends. Miss Agnes explains that nurses should be acquainted with all such mat- ters; in fact, she insists that it is a necessary part of a nurse's education. Miss Maria is not altogether convinced by her friend's explana- tions and doubts about attending the seances. What is she to do? Reply: In the first place, we may regard these seances as foolish amusements in which the participants do not believe in any pre- ternatural power to assist them in obtaining secret knowledge. However, such meetings should not be encouraged. Many weak- minded people are injured by these experi- ences ; others are gradually led on by curiosity until they take the affair seriously. Even in jest we should not be seeking to know the fu- ture. Future events are known to God alone. We should trust in His providence and leave ourselves in His loving hands. No good what- ever can come from these crystal gazings, while much harm both for ourselves and friends may result. Keep away from all clairvoyants and fortune tellers. Even if they do not de- 136 Practical Tests: ceive you, they are encouraged and partly en- abled to live by your contribution, and are aided in deceiving others. In the second place, these seances and crystal gazings may be of a serious character, and those who take part in them may be really seeking information through occult powers. As such they are dis- pleasing to God, for they are acts of divina- tion forbidden by the first commandment. It is not true that such exercises are necessary for a nurse's training. They will be of no use to her. Miss Maria should not be deceived by her friend and should refuse to accompany her to the seances. Case IX—Helping To Steal Statement: An intern comes to a nurse, a few days before he finishes his course in a hospital, and asks her to help him to supply himself with material for his new office. He explains that other interns on leaving the hos- pital have taken drugs, bandages, etc., and that he intends to do the same. The nurse assists him in getting the things from the stock room, although she realizes that she is acting wrongly in the matter. Afterward she figures out that the intern through her co-operation has taken fifty dollars worth of materials. She In the Training-School 137 is unable to locate the intern. Is she obliged to reimburse the hospital for the loss? Reply: The nurse is a real partner or co- operator in the theft; and, since the other party cannot be found, she is obliged to pay back to the hospital the full amount. Case X—Restitution Statement: A modification of case nine. Let us suppose, in case nine, that the nurse has no money to pay for the stolen articles. About five years later she accumulates several hundred dollars and can well afford to reim- burse the hospital for its loss. Is she obliged to do so? Reply: The nurse is certainly obliged to pay for the stolen articles. Her duty in this regard was only suspended because she had not the means to pay. Once she comes into possession of sufficient means the obligation returns. At least she is bound to inform the hospital authorities and if they insist on her paying she must do so. Case XI—Helping To Steal Statement: Miss Agnes, the head nurse in a training-school, is dishonest. Having charge of the books, she puts down certain items for supplies, which are not ordered, and the 138 Practical Tests: amount for them she takes in money. Miss Ruth, a pupil in the school and an assistant to the head nurse becomes aware of the stealing. The pupil has been keeping company with a young man, and in so doing has violated the rules of the school. Although there has been nothing morally wrong in this company, it is of such a nature that it could easily be made to appear wrong. The head nurse, who knows these delinquencies, threatens to accuse the pupil of immoral conduct in case she reports the stealing. Seeing her power over the pupil, Miss Agnes forces her to sign receipts for supplies, which have never been ordered, and the amount for which she keeps. In this way Miss Ruth assists the head nurse in steahng three hundred dollars worth of supplies. On leaving the training-school Miss Ruth is wor- ried about her obhgation to the authorities, since she co-operated with the head nurse in steahng the money. She is well able to pay the entire amount. What are her obligations? Reply: Miss Ruth did wrong in assisting the head nurse to steal. But since she did so under threats, it is to be supposed that the hospital authorities would not demand restitu- tion from her. If she wishes she may make a In the Training-School 139 donation to the hospital to this amount; but she is not obliged in conscience to do so. Case XII—Imitating Thieves Statement: Miss Bessie, who is finishing the last year of her course in a nurses' train- ing-school, hears it whispered around that the nurses are accustomed to appropriate to them- selves certain little articles which will be serv- iceable for private practice. She consequently takes bandages, drugs, etc., to the amount of forty dollars. After leaving the school she doubts whether she has a right to these articles. What should she do? Reply: The duty of Miss Bessie is plain; she must return the stolen articles or pay for them. We say stolen articles, for even if other nurses took things from the hospital, that did not excuse Miss Bessie. Some people make it a custom to rob banks, but that does not give others the right to imitate them. In this as in other cases of restitution the nurse is not required to do anything which would injure her good name. If she knows the authorities well, she would be justified in writing to them or calling on them and ask- ing them to remit a part or all of the theft. Or she is free to write to them, at the same 140 Practical Tests: time using an assumed name, asking their pardon and offering to pay a part or the whole of the amount. Let us compare this case with cases nine and eleven. In case nine a nurse helps an intern to steal and is held responsible for the theft. In case eleven she helps the head nurse to steal but does so under pressure. This does not excuse her from the wrong that she has done, but it does lessen the guilt. When we come to restitution we must look at the case from the point of view of the hospital authori- ties. In case nine, we have no reason to think that the hospital authorities would condone the act of the nurse; whereas in case eleven we believe that the authorities would not wish to force their rights, and hence that the nurse is not bound in conscience to make good the loss. Case XIII—A Bad Temper Statement: Miss Mary, a student nurse, has a violent temper. One day when she was reprimanded by the head nurse, and shortly afterward by a physician for whom she had a strong dislike, she was so angry and irritated that she deliberately dashed a microscope to the floor and injured it so much that it was In the Training-School 141 useless. No one saw Miss Mary break the instrument, which was valued at a hundred dollars. On the following day she felt very much humihated, and wanted to know whether she was obliged to pay the hospital for the microscope. Reply: Miss Mary is certainly obliged to pay for the broken instrument. She did the act freely and had every reason to believe that a dehcate instrument, like a microscope, would be damaged beyond repair. Probably the loss of the hundred dollars will be the most ef- fectual means of taming the violent temper. Case XIV—Keeping a Promise Statement: A nurse hastily contracts mar- riage with a young army officer of a medical corps, who has come to the hospital for a short term as an intern. He leaves her a few days after the ceremony; but before going gets from her a promise that she will turn over to him five thousand dollars, as soon as he completes his service in the army. During his stay in the army the officer unfortunately contracts the habit of drink. After returning home he insists on his wife giving him the money as she had promised. What is she to do? Reply: Although the nurse made the 142 Practical Tests: promise to her husband in good faith and was bound by such a promise, still, owing to the changed conditions, the husband has forfeited his right to the money. Evidently it was originally intended that the money should be used by the physician to start his business; as things now stand, the money will be squan- dered. Under these circumstances the wife is released from her promise. Case XV—A Practical Case in Euthanasia Statement: A patient, who is dying, is in severe physical suffering. The physician arrives and orders the nurse to administer mor- phine in such quantity as to cause entire stupe- faction and to keep the patient in this condi- tion until the end comes. May the nurse fol- low the directions? Reply: The nurse is not allowed to ad- minister the morphine under these conditions. The patient has the right to the use of the normal faculties at the approach of death; no one may deprive the patient of such a right. If it were intended to produce temporary re- freshing sleep it could be given. Case XVI—Stealing a Formula Statement: Miss May, a trained nurse who In the Training-School 143 possesses exceptional laboratory technique, is employed for six months in the office of a drug firm which specializes in cough medicines. While working there in her official capacity she learns the formula for the medicine and sells it to a rival firm for a thousand dollars. The rival firm by the use of this new formula makes five thousand dollars. What are the obligations of the nurse in the matter? Reply: It is as wrong to steal a patent as it is to steal a watch or an amount of money. If the nurse has or ever should have the means she is obhged to restitution. Through a third party, who does not reveal her name, she may offer a compromise to the first firm. She should do all in her power to prevent the second firm from continuing the use of the formula. Case XVII—Duty of Reporting Statement: On entering a training-school for nurses Miss Florence is horrified to find among the pupils a girl of evil habits. Miss Florence discovers that the girl is not only consorting with certain interns, but that she is acting as an agent to lure others of the school into the same immoral life. Miss Flor- ence is simply a student with no official con- 144 Practical Tests: nection with the school. Is she obliged to re- port the matter to the school authorities? Reply: The common good and the protec- tion of innocent pupils require Miss Florence to report the matter. If she is afraid of having her name connected with the affair she may send a letter to the authorities with the proper proofs. Case XVIII—Temptation Statement: Miss Lillian, a virtuous young lady and pupil, is wholly without experience and knowledge of sex questions. In the nurses' training-school, while listening to the lectures of physicians and attending upon male patients, she finds that she is harassed by evil temptations and imaginations. Since the work is a cause of uneasiness and a temptation to her, she doubts whether she should give up the nursing course. What is she to do? Reply: A normally constituted person is subject to such evil suggestions. While it is sinful to place oneself in the way of tempta- tion without a proportionate cause, in the pres- ent case Miss Lillian may remain in her place in the training-school. She should rely on prudent conduct, and especially on prayer and In the Training-School 145 the reception of the sacraments, to offset the temptations. Case XIX—-The Head Nurse Statement: A pupil nurse learns from her patient that she has deceived the attending physician and in consequence is not receiving the proper treatment. Should the pupil in- form the hospital authorities or the head nurse? Reply: It must be remembered that the head nurse is a real official and as such should be reverenced and obeyed. She, on her part, should be careful not to go beyond the powers delegated to her by the hospital authorities. Tact and patience in dealing with pupils will do much to preserve harmony in the institu- tion. If it has been explained to the pupil that all matters are to be reported to the head nurse, who in turn is to confer with the phy- sician and the authorities, then the pupil has simply to carry out instructions. If there is any doubt in the pupil's mind, it would prob- ably be wiser to bring the matter to the head of the hospital. It would then be the higher official's duty to instruct the pupil how to act in the future. 146 Practical Tests: Head nurses should not resent any action on the part of pupils in going to authorities. It is a principle of government that a subject may always consult a superior, and appeal from a lower to a higher official. Case XX—Colored Patient Statement: A colored female patient was admitted to a hospital and, owing to the seri- ousness of an operation, was assigned a private room and a special nurse. Three nurses re- fused to take the case because the patient was colored. Were they justified in their action? Reply: The nurses were not justified in their action. After their graduation they would be free to hmit their services; but while in the hospital they should have carried out the assignments of the authorities. Case XXI—Falsifying Records Statement: Two nurses from the same school had charge of a patient on twenty-four hour duty. It was known to the day nurse that the night nurse falsified the records, in important matters, in regard to medicine and treatment; but she failed to report this to the proper authorities. Were both nurses equally culpable? How should they be dealt with? Reply: The nurse who falsified the records In the Training-School 147 was far more culpable than the nurse who failed to report the matter. The first nurse should be discharged by the physician or the hospital authorities. An investigation should be made in regard to the action of the second nurse. As the facts are presented here she appears guilty of serious neglect of duty; but there may have been extenuating circumstances which would lessen her guilt. For instance, the falsification of the records, although in- excusable, may not have been such as to really alter the nature of the nursing, or may not have brought any danger to the patient. Case XXII—Intern and Physician Statement: A newly arrived intern gives orders to a nurse in the presence of a patient. The treatment ordered by him conflicted with the directions of the surgeon on the case. In this instance the nurse carried out the orders of the surgeon. What are the obligations of the nurse in this matter to both patient and in- tern? Reply: The intern goes altogether beyond his power and his position. His orders under the circumstances should be entirely ignored. The nurse should act with prudence; she might appear to hsten to the order, and then quietly 148 Practical Tests: carry out the wishes of the surgeon. Later she should report the matter to the surgeon. Case XXIII—Experimenting Statement: A nurse has an overpowering desire to assist at operations. She informs a surgeon that she is an expert in giving anaes- thetics : whereas, in fact, she has had but little practice. Owing to her action a patient dies on the operating-table. What is she to do? Reply: Of course the nurse has committed a grave offence. There may be nothing for her to do except to be careful about the future. If she is not detected she is not obhged to con- fess her guilt in the matter. Many a time, in your profession, you will fight with death and lose the battle. If you have done your duty, and have made use of the most approved methods as you learned them in the training-school, you will have no remorse. You did your best; and no one can do more. But if you have experimented; if, as in the case above, you have taken chances when there was no real call for a risk of any kind, then you can never undo the wrong and the injustice. You may weep tears of bitter remorse, but such tears will not recall the dead In the Training-School 149 or bring back the missing one to the home that is desolate. Remember this lesson! You have no right to experiment with human beings, it matters not how poor or sick they may be. You owe it to every patient to use the most approved methods. There was absolutely no excuse in this instance for the nurse's taking a chance in administering the anaesthetic. If she de- sired to work in an operating-room she should have applied herself to become an adept in giving an anaesthetic. Only after her instruc- tors told her that she was proficient should she have undertaken the work. Again, I say, remember this advice! Do not go on making mistakes, only to bring re- morse when it is too late I CHAPTER IX PRACTICAL TESTS: THE GRADUATE NURSE T t will not be possible in the solution of each •*■ of the following cases to point out all the duties of the nurse. I wish, therefore, to call attention to the fact that in giving an answer I suppose that the nurse will, in almost all instances, consult with the attending physician before she takes any action. The reason for such a supposition is evident. The nurse is working for the doctor and, since she is his assistant, he has the right to know what is done. Let the nurse remember her relation to the physician and she will be spared many mistakes and troubles. Case I—Professional Secret Statement: A nurse learns that a con- valescent patient has for years held a respon- sible position as signalman at a railroad cross- ing. During this time he has been subject to fits and swooning. Should he be in one of these unconscious states at a critical time it might lead to a serious accident and loss of fife. As he has a large family to support he 151 152 Practical Tests: is anxious to return to work. What should the nurse do? Reply: The railroad officials must be in- formed of the condition of the patient. The fact that he has a large family and is anxious to work should not enter into the solution of the question. Probably the railroad will be able to find a less responsible position for him. It may not be necessary for the nurse per- sonally to take up this matter with the rail- road officials. She may be timid or may not know how to reach the parties. Again, if the patient is in a hospital, the nurse will satisfy her obligations by informing the authorities. If it is a private case the nurse should certainly consult with the attending physician. If he promises to bring the information to the rail- road managers, the nurse need not worry longer about the affair. She may talk with the physician, and then send a letter to the rail- road headquarters with the request that some representative come to the hospital or house to consult about an important matter; or she may write the full information in a letter, adding that she is most willing to give further evidence should such be needed. The Graduate Nurse 153 Case II—Professional Etiquette Statement: A nurse is called in on a case by Dr. Jones who is a stranger to her. She has no complaint whatever in regard to this physician; but she is under obligation to Dr. Smith, for whom she has worked. She talks so much to the patient about the splendid quah- ties of Dr. Smith that he is called in on the case and Dr. Jones is dismissed. Is the nurse justified in thus showing her loyalty to Dr. Smith? Reply: The nurse certainly deserves a re- buke for her lack of prudence; she is equally blameworthy for her thoughtless loquacity. Probably such a nurse has missed her vocation; she should have been a salesclerk with ample opportunity to chatter away with customers to her heart's content. However, since she did not intend to injure the reputation of Dr. Jones and did not foresee that her talkative- ness would cause him to lose the case, she has not committed an act of injustice; nor is she bound to repay him for the fee which he lost in the case. The nurse is certainly in a dilemma. By rights she should apologize to both Dr. Smith and the patient; but as this will embarrass Dr. 154 Practical Tests: Jones, it will probably be best to let the matter go with a resolution to be more discreet in the future. Case III—Careless Doctor Statement: Dr. Jones has a practice in a very large city. It is absolutely impossible for him to attend to all his patients. A nurse, who is assisting him, notices this, and is sure that the want of attention is endangering the fife of the patient. She feels that it is useless to speak to Dr. Jones; and, furthermore, that he has power to have her dismissed. What should the nurse do? Reply: The nurse should inform the patient of the actual state of affairs, and ad- vise the family to call in another physician. She may suffer from the wrath of Dr. Jones; but her duty requires her to report the matter to the family even though she should suffer. Case IV—Other Work With Nursing Statement: Miss Regina, after entering upon a case of nursing a sick mother, finds that she is expected to do cooking for two children, to keep the house clean and perform other household duties. Should she continue on the case? Reply: This is an occasion that requires The Graduate Nurse 155 great prudence and patience. It is certainly within the strict rights of the nurse to inform the family that she has not come for house- hold duties. But, if she has the strength for the extra work, it would be better for her to remain upon the case. Above all, she should not act in haste. She should weigh the matter carefully. It certainly will not injure her to do this extra work for a few days, and it is a great work of charity. If she feels that the work is too much for her to bear, she should quietly inform the family and give them ample time to get a substitute. Case V—More Prudence Statement: This is a continuation of case four. The nurse, under the circumstances, goes at once to the sick woman, informs her that she is not a servant and leaves the house immediately. Reply: The nurse here is guilty of great imprudence and also offends against charity. She should bring the matter before the mother and give her ample time to secure an- other nurse or to get help from the neighbors. Case VI—The Borrowing Habit Statement: Miss May is repeatedly bor- 156 Practical Tests: rowing things from her friends and patients. She got the bad habit of borrowing when she was in the training-school and took it with her into professional life. While nursing a rich lady she is captivated by a beautiful electric car belonging to her patient. As the lady is under special obligation to the nurse for her excellent service she feels that she cannot re- fuse when Miss May asks her for the use of the car. Miss May meets with an accident which practically demolishes the machine. What is the obhgation of Miss May in paying for the car? Reply: Miss May does wrong in making use of her professional work as an excuse to borrow the car from her patient. In giving excellent service she has only done what her profession demands of her. She has no ex- cuse for imposing upon her patient. How- ever, once the car is loaned to her, the owner cannot claim any payment for the damage. A car in use is always in danger; an accident may happen at any time. The patient should have thought of this contingency when she al- lowed her private car to be used by another party. Miss May, therefore, while she is to be reprehended for her action in making such The Graduate Nurse 157 a request of the patient, is under no obligation to pay for the loss of the car. Case VII—Who Was Careless? Statement: A nurse is asked to substitute for half a day and to administer medicine to a patient every hour. When she comes into the room she notices that there are two bottles on a table. The nurse, whose place she takes, carried away with her one of the bottles. At the assigned time the second nurse gives medicine from the bottle which has been left. It proves to be the wrong bottle, the right one having been removed by mistake. Is the nurse who gives the medicine responsible? Reply: The first nurse, who took away the bottle by mistake, is probably more to blame than the latter one who really administered the drug. But this latter should have looked at the label and should have been sure that she was giving the right dose; she is also to blame for the accident. Case VIII—Using Hypnotic Power Statement: A nurse finds that she possesses hypnotic power. In dealing with her patients, especially with those subject to nervous trouble and drink, she has had some wonder- ful results and has brought about cures which 158 Practical Tests: she was unable to obtain by any other treat- ment. May she continue the use of hypnotism ? Reply: In deahng with patients of this kind the nurse should at first make use of all known and tried methods of the profession. She should not have recourse to hypnotism without the express permission of the physician for whom she is taking care of the case. In ex- traordinary cases and with the consent of the physician she may put the patient in a hypnotic state. She should not lose sight of the fact, however, that she is using a power that has dangers both for herself and for the patient. Once she feels any debilitating or nervous effect from the application of hypno- tism she should desist from it at once. Case IX—Conditional Baptism Statement: A nurse is taking care of a mother and baby three days old. The baby, which seems to be in a normal condition, is suddenly taken with convulsions and dies. The nurse knows that the baby has not been bap- tized and that its parents would desire it to receive the sacrament. She has also heard that it is very doubtful just when real death comes, and that the soul may be in the body some time after apparent death. Although the baby The Graduate Nurse 159 seems to be already dead, the nurse pours some water on its forehead and pronounces the words: I baptize thee in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. Was the nurse justified in baptizing the baby under these conditions? Reply: Yes, the nurse did what was right, even if some few minutes had elapsed since the child's death. There has been considerable study in this matter of late; and some eminent physicians are of the opinion that the soul remains in the body for an hour after apparent death. The nurse was justified, therefore, in giving the doubt to the baby, which had the right to baptism. Since there was reason to doubt about the fife of the baby, it would have been better for the nurse to have administered conditional baptism. That is, she should have said: If thou art still ahve, I baptize thee in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. Case X—Abortion Statement: A young girl who has been led astray by a man who promised to marry her, comes to a nurse to ask assistance in procuring abortion. The nurse points out the evil which the girl contemplates, but cannot induce her 160 Practical Tests: to desist from her design. After trying in vain to find any relatives of the girl, the nurse informs the health department of the girl's evil design. The girl is arrested and taken to the city hospital where she is guarded until the child is born. Did the nurse act rightly in reporting the case ? Reply: Of course it was the duty of the nurse to keep the matter as secret as possible, since she knew of it through her professional work. She also acted prudently in first try- ing to find members of the family or friends of the girl. As a last resort she was justified in bringing in public authority to prevent the girl from committing abortion. Those of the medical or nursing profession who do not ac- cept the writer's explanation of the origin of rights and duties and responsibility to God may not agree with this explanation; however, it is the only correct one. The unborn child had a right to life, and the nurse was justified in protecting that life. However, the nurse need not give her own name; she could send the information through a third party. Case XI—Carelessness Statement: After an operation, a nurse by carelessness permits a water-bag seriously to The Graduate Nurse 161 burn a patient, who on that account is obliged to remain in a hospital for two weeks extra. The patient, who is a poor laboring man and a father of a family, must pay fifty dollars extra at the hospital. Is the nurse obliged to refund the fifty dollars to the patient? Reply: Although this was owing to the carelessness of the nurse she is not obliged in justice to pay for the extra two weeks. If the nurse has the money, charity should prompt her to pay the hospital bill. Case XII—Illicit Operation Statement: A nurse is called to assist at an operation. It was explained to her, before coming to the operating-room, that the patient, a married woman, was suffering from an in- ternal infection, which made it necessary to re- move the ovaries. Before the operation the nurse learns that there is no infection of any kind. The woman is having the ovaries re- moved because she does not wish to bear chil- dren. May the nurse assist at the operation? Reply: The nurse cannot, in conscience, assist at such an operation. It is illicit, for it is a mutilation of the human body, and that in a serious manner without a sufficient reason. 162 Practical Tests: Case XIII—Illicit Operation and the Hospital Authorities Statement: This is only a modification of case twelve. A physician sends a patient to a hospital and explains that infectious ovaries are to be removed. Later the authorities learn that there is no infection, but that the woman is having the operation to avoid the troubles of motherhood. May the authorities permit the operation? Reply: The authorities cannot allow the operation to take place; for, while the surgeon is primarily responsible for the act, the authori- ties in this case are co-operators in what is wrong. Case XIV—Reporting a Case of Syphilis Statement: Miss Agnes, a trained nurse, learns that her patient, a young man, has a severe case of syphilis, and moreover that he is soon to be married. She speaks to the par- ents of the young man and explains that they are doing a great injustice to the young lady by permitting the marriage. She is severely reprimanded by the parents and is given to understand that they will tolerate no inter- ference from a nurse. The date of the wed- ding draws near. What is the nurse to do? The Graduate Nurse 163 Reply: This is a difficult case. The laws of countries differ and writers are not unani- mous. However, the most reliable authorities insist that the nurse may not only tell, but that she is bound in duty to do so. This is my opinion. The nurse should inform the future bride or her parents of the nature of the disease from which the young man is suffering. We are supposing here that the nurse has a private case. If she has been called in by a physician it is her duty to inform him of the facts. It then devolves upon the doctor to bring the information to the prospective bride. If he refuses to do his duty, she is obliged to act as directed above. Case XV—Abortion—Parents of the Girl Statement: A nurse is called in on a case, and finds that a young girl of seventeen has been deceived by a soldier friend, who had promised to marry her. The parents urge the nurse to perform abortion so as to protect the good name of the family. After vainly plead- ing with the nurse the parents ask her at least to give them the name of some drug which will bring about the desired effect. The girl threatens to commit suicide. What is the nurse to do? 164 Practical Tests: Reply: This whole matter was thoroughly discussed in the chapter on: The Rights of the Unborn Child. The principles which should guide you were explained in the first two chapters. If you have any doubts about this matter, read these chapters carefully. The duty of the nurse is plain; she cannot perform the operation nor recommend any drug. In the latter case, by assisting the parents in securing a drug, she would be responsible for the death of the fetus. She should put the whole affair clearly before the parents. If she cannot bring them to a sense of duty, she should threaten to report them to the public authorities to prevent the death of an innocent being. Case XVI—Advice About Surgeons Statement: A patient asked a nurse her opinion of the ability of the surgeon who was to operate. In the nurse's judgment the sur- geon was not capable of doing this special work. Should the nurse have given this in- formation to the patient? Reply: How did the nurse know that the surgeon in question was not capable of per- forming this special operation? Is she certain about the matter, or is it simply her opinion? The Graduate Nurse 165 If there is any doubt in her mind, she should give the surgeon the full benefit of the doubt and remain silent. But if from undoubted evidence she knows that the surgeon is incom- petent she should inform the patient. Case XVII—Illicit Operation Statement: The only nurse available in a rural district is called to attend a patient on whom an operation of an illegal nature is about to be performed. Following the operation the patient will need a nurse. Is the nurse justi- fied in attending the case? Reply: No, the nurse is not justified in at- tending upon this case simply because there is no other to help. The operation is wrong, and one can never assist another to do a wrong action. However, if the surgeon persists and performs the operation, and if later he or the patient should send for the nurse the latter may go. She has done all in her power to prevent the evil deed. She is now free to help one who needs nursing. Case XVIII—Secrecy Statement: A nurse is called to care for a young woman with septicemia following self- inflicted abortion. The patient deceives the doctor, so that he has not made a correct 166 Practical Tests: diagnosis, and is not giving the proper treat- ment. The patient has made a confidant of the nurse and told her the true conditions of the case. What is the nurse's duty? Reply: The nurse is not bound by secrecy in this case. In fact, the good of the patient requires that the attending physician be in- formed at once about the real nature of the trouble. However, the nurse should first en- deavor to persuade the patient to confide the secret to the doctor. Case XIX—A Superintendent's Difficulty Statement: At the request of a patient the superintendent in a hospital promises to secure a certain graduate nurse for special duty. It is later learned that the physician in attendance has found fault with the nurse's work and has requested that she never be put on duty with any of his patients. What is the duty of the superintendent in this matter? Reply: The superintendent should deal frankly with both the physician and patient. If the matter cannot be adjusted harmoniously the wish of the physician should be followed, as he is responsible for the treatment and has the right to choose those who are to assist him. If the patient insists on having this special The Graduate Nurse 167 nurse, the physician may either yield or with- draw from the case. Case XX—Dangerous Drugs Statement: As a neurotic patient cannot sleep without the aid of drugs, a nurse admin- isters a placebo tablet which produces the de- sired effect. The doctor does not express any disapproval of same. Is it wrong for the nurse to continue such medicine, since its use may lead to the drug habit? Reply: The nurse should not have given the tablets without consulting the attending physician. If with his consent she continues to administer the drug, the patient need not know what is being given, and will thus be safeguarded against any use of the tablets in the future. Case XXI—Dying Patient Statement: A nurse knowing that her patient will not recover from a serious opera- tion, wishes to tell him so; but, fearing this information might hasten his death, hesitates to do so. What would be the proper course to take in this case? Reply: There are many ways of bringing information to a patient who is very sick. In 168 Practical Tests: the first place the immediate relatives should be informed, or a consultation about the matter should be arranged with the attending phy- sician and friends of the patient. The religion of the patient should enter into the decision. As Catholics wish to know about the approach of death, it is wrong to deceive them by with- holding the information. We beheve that in most cases the information should be given; the manner of giving it will depend on the prudence and judgment of the nurse and the physician. It would be well for the nurse on such an oc- casion to ask the relatives whether the sick person had made a will. Justice to the family requires that a will be made. Case XXII—Eugenics Statement: Miss Ruth, a graduate nurse, has been elected secretary of the local Eugenic Society. The president of the society is a certain Mrs. Lonely, who, having no children of her own, has taken it upon herself to direct those who have or may have children. Great results are foretold ot che work of the eugenists. Miss Ruth, as secretary, is re- quested to get as many names as possible for the association. She approaches two of her The Graduate Nurse 169 friends, Miss Agnes, a pupil in a training- school, and Miss Julia, a graduate nurse, and urges many reasons why they should be mem- bers of the society. What action should they take in the matter? Reply: Miss Agnes should certainly not become a member of the society. It should be her endeavor first to learn the essentials of her chosen profession. If later she wishes to join scientific associations let her connect her name with those which are thoroughly es- tablished. Our advice to Miss Julia would be to re- fuse the request of the secretary; for so little is known of the laws of eugenics that it were wiser to leave investigations to a few experts. "Eugenics" means good breeding. As a science it is defined by the Eugenics Educa- tion Society to be "the study of agencies under social control that may improve or impair the racial qualities of future generations either physically or mentally." The analogy of the racehorse is freely used to illustrate the end proposed and the means of attaining it. Just as the animal can be improved by attention to heredity and environment, so also can man be improved. This is an accurate statement of 170 Practical Tests: the views of most eugenists. They entirely ignore the higher and spiritual part of man. They would have him propagated as an animal. Nor should Miss Ruth be deceived by the vague theories of such women as Mrs. Lonely, who, while probably knowing little of the science of eugenics, is simply using the society as a means of cheap notoriety. Case XXIII—Teaching Sex Hygiene in the Schools Statement: Miss Julia, a graduate nurse, is approached by Mrs. Lonely, a society leader, and asked to join an association to promote the teaching of sex hygiene in the schools. Mrs. Lonely explains that people have made a mis- take these hundreds of years by being silent upon matters of sex, that the remedy for moral evil is information. "Teach sex relationship in the schools and vice will disappear." Should Miss Julia become a member of the associa- tion? Reply: The teaching of sex hygiene was attempted in the schools of Chicago some years ago and was abandoned after a few weeks. The stenographic copies taken were The Graduate Nurse 171 so vile that they were excluded by law from the United States mail. Even an elementary knowledge of psy- chology should be enough to deter the advo- cates of sex hygiene from bringing this delicate subject before the minds of children. Psy- chology is a study of the nature of the soul. It explains the inter-relation of the soul and the senses—the ministers or instruments of which the mind makes use in acquiring knowl- edge. The mind is simply one of the faculties of the soul in operation. Once we have understood this dependence of the soul upon the senses for its knowledge we are in a position to study sex hygiene from the psychological viewpoint, and from this viewpoint we have a most serious objection to the teaching of sex hygiene to the young. For in so doing we must necessarily fill the minds of the young with sensuous objects. We im- press upon the mind these pictures which re- present the physiology of the sexes, and these pictures, by their very nature, reacting upon the soul, must inflame the passions and be a cause of temptation. Miss Julia should not join the Sex Hygiene Society. 172 Practical Tests: Case XXIV—Your Patient Is a Child of Gal Statement: It is very difficult to pick a flaw in regard to the work of Miss Julia, a graduate nurse. She is tactful, sympathetic, careful; she never tires or relaxes in adminis- tering to all the wants of her patients. If her record were tabulated point for point, it would seem to approach one hundred per cent in pro- ficiency. And yet there is something want- ing—something that cannot be measured or weighed or tabulated. It is the soul of the work. Her patients are just sick people to he cured and there the matter ends. Is the experience of Miss Julia exceptional in the nursing profession? Reply: Miss Julia represents a type. There are nurses carefully trained, exact and all but perfect in the art of administering things that are external. But do they look upon their patients as suffering children of God? If they do not beheve in the higher na- ture and destiny of man, they can never bring to the profession that love and devotion that has ever characterized nursing in the history of the Church. Why was it that St. Francis bent down and kissed the leper? Why did Queen Maud of England live among lepers, The Graduate Nurse 173 washing their wounds and kissing their feet? She washed, dried and kissed their feet, be- cause in so doing she was kissing the feet of the eternal King. St. Hugh, of Lincoln, would dwell among the lepers eating with them and administering to them, saying that he was inspired by the example of the Saviour, and by His teaching concerning the beggar, Lazarus. On one occasion, in reply to a re- monstrance from a friend, he said that those afflicted ones were the flowers of paradise, pearls in the coronet of the eternal King. But I need not go back to medieval times for examples of heroism. One of the brightest hghts is that of Father Damien and his labor among the lepers of Molokai. But there are tens of thousands of other heroes who have striven with the high ideals of Queen Maud and St. Hugh. Men and women of this type, inspired by the teachings of Christianity, have been the great social workers of the past. They succeeded because their whole souls and hearts were in the work. They were not ministering to men and women only, but to children of God. If Miss Julia failed, it was because she did not understand this high ideal, did not realize that she was ministering to children of 174 Practical Tests God, and that her reward would be, not the fee for her services, but the beatitude promised by Him who would repay even a glass of cold water given in His name. CHAPTER X THE CHURCH AND NURSING IN THE PAST A mong a quantity of papyri recently un- ***■ earthed at Fayum, in the Lybian Desert east of the Nile, were a number of nurses' re- ceipts. The discovery has added another proof to the long contended theory that the profession of nursing is very ancient. It may be of interest to you to learn that the nurses of those days were paid for their services, as were the store- keepers and court officials. These special nurses not only performed their allotments, but were remunerated and gave receipts. By a strange coincidence these receipts were left in a stone house, were covered by the warm, dry sand and were recently dug out and deciph- ered. Even if other evidence were wanting, these recent discoveries would give ample proof that nursing was a profession centuries ago in Egypt. There are evidences of the care of the sick among all ancient people. However, we must not conclude that this solicitude was as uni- versal as it is today. By far the greater num- ber of the human race in pagan times, even 175 176 The Church and Nursing among the most civilized, were in slavery. The slave had absolutely no rights. The master had complete control over him, and could put him to a cruel death for the merest trifle. If he was fed and clothed it was because the slave was useful; he was treated like the master's dog or ox. He could not work unless he were fed and clothed, therefore the master fed and clothed him. In sickness he was cared for as a matter of business. But when he became old or useless he was cast aside and left to die as were the animals. No doubt there were ex- ceptions to these terrible customs. In ancient times, then, and under pagan civilization nurs- ing was a luxury reserved for the few. The universal care of the sick is a Christian institution. It came as a result of the teach- ing of Christ, that all men are children of God and heirs of heaven; that He would reward a cup of cold water given in His name; that He would accept as done to Himself whatever was done to the least of His brethren. In this teaching of Christ we find the principles which have guided mankind for twenty centuries in the care of suffering humanity. Christ did not lay down any set program or method in regard to the treatment of the sick; had He In the Past 177 done so His teaching would have soon grown antiquated. But once He taught the brother- hood of man and the equality of man, of very necessity came the application which included tender solicitude for all who were in suffering. Hence we find that hospitals and care of the sick progressed wherever Christianity was in- troduced. As early as the fourth century there were large hospitals in Caesarea, Con- stantinople, Rome and other cities. It was at this time that Fabiola, a Roman matron con- verted to Christianity, turned her house into a hospital and sent her servants throughout the city to bring in the sick that she might nurse them. With the conquest of Christianity went the building of hospitals, until literally thou- sands of these institutions dotted the countries of Europe. Let me tell you briefly something about those who did the nursing, something about the patients, and then something about the hospital buildings. For centuries all charitable work was under the direction of the Church. Those who wished to dedicate their lives to the care of the sick entered a religious association especially devoted to this work. After an examination 178 The Church and Nursing by the hospital authorities as to their physical and mental fitness, they were received with a religious ceremony. For years they served under experienced nurses of the association until finally they could be entrusted with separate work. If the remedies were simple and methods far from scientific, the nurse brought that skill that comes only with life service, and that love that prompts one to regard the sick as the suffering child of God. In a very recent work, "Doctor and Social Worker," by R. C. Cabot, the author makes this rather candid statement. "With the ad- vancement of modern medical science there are left now but very few physicians who believe that disease can often be cured by a drug. It is recognized by the better element of the pro- fession all over the world that only in seven or eight, out of about one hundred and fifty diseases clearly distinguished in our text- books of medicine, have we a drug with any pretension to cure. * * * * At present the best that we can do for most patients is to explain what the trouble is, let them know what is going to happen, to preach some good hygiene, and above all to make them realize that we care and suffer with them. This is the In the Past 179 essence of medical work and of the social as- sistant's work in the dispensary and in the home." I have read of no outcry against this work of Dr. Cabot, who is a physician of long and varied experience in this country and in the hospitals of France. Yet he tells us that we can do little more for the sick than to love them and suffer with them. This is what the medieval nurses did; they loved and suffered. Many of them like St. Catherine of Sienna and St. Odile so loved the suffering lepers that they reverently stooped and kissed their ulcers. The patient was received with every mark of tender solicitude. Often the superior or chaplain went to the door accompanied by acolytes with lighted tapers. An invoice was taken of his clothes and other belongings, just as is done in a modern hospital. He was then given an outfit—a robe and slippers. If he recovered all that he brought was returned to him. If he died in the hospital, and no one claimed what he had brought, it became the property of the institution. He was required to hsten to the rules. Everything was free. Sometimes the hospitals were endowed by the nobility and sometimes by the municipality. It may surprise you to know that many of 180 The Church and Nursing these hospitals were of wonderful architectural beauty. In fact, some of them rivaled the Gothic churches of medieval times. Moreover, the greatest artists were called to embellish these hospitals. For instance, in Spain seven of the finest paintings of Rubens were in a hos- pital in Toledo, and eleven of the works of art of Murillo were in the Hospital of Charity in Seville. A special hospital for women in that city possessed Murillo's classical picture of the Immaculate Conception. The Hospital of the Five Wounds had a frontage of six hundred feet and a depth of five hundred and fifty feet. In Genoa the vast hospital was like a royal palace. There were the sublimest paintings and imagery in marble and one of the masterpieces of Michael Angelo. Hundreds of the most wonderful paintings of Venice were in her hospitals. Writing in the "Mail and Express," May 7, 1904, Mr. Arthur Dillon, an architect, thus described the hospital built in the thirteenth century by Marguerite, the sister of St. Louis: "It was an admirable hospital in every way, and it is doubtful if we today surpass it. It was isolated, the ward was separated from the other buildings, and it had the advantage we In the Past 181 so often lose of being but one story high, and more space was given to each patient than we can now afford. "The ventilation by the great windows and ventilators in the ceiling was excellent; it was cheerfully hghted, and the arrangement of the gallery shielded the patients from the daz- zling light and from draughts from the win- dows, and afforded an easy means of super- vision, while the division by the roofless, low partitions isolated the sick and obviated the depression that comes from the sight of others in pain. "It was, moreover, in great contrast to the cheerless white wards of today. The vaulted ceiling was very beautiful; the woodwork was richly carved, and the great windows over the altars were filled with colored glass. Alto- gether it was one of the best examples of the best period of Gothic architecture." The above extract is taken from a book by Dr. James Walsh, entitled "Popes and Science." I wish to recommend this book to you. Fully half of it is devoted to an account of the care of the sick in the Middle Ages. The writer does not deal in vague generalities but gives the names and work, the physicians 182 The Church and Nursing and surgeons of those times. For several centuries Italy had the greatest medical schools of Europe, and no physician considered his education complete until he had studied under the masters in southern Europe. Pope In- nocent III did more than any other individual for the foundation of hospitals—his own insti- tution in Rome, the Hospital of the Holy Spirit, being a model for others. When Luther went to Rome he found fault with many things, but he had only words of praise for the hospitals. He wrote: "The hos- pitals are well provided and well built, the best food is given, there are attentive servants and skilled physicians, the beds are very clean and the interior of the buildings are adorned with fine pictures. When a sick man is brought in his clothes are taken from him before a notary, who writes down an exact description that they might be restored to him. He is then given a white dress, and is placed in a well- made bed in white sheets. Two physicians visit him. He is also visited and served by ladies of honor, who come wearing veils that they may not be recognized." In Italy, as in many other Catholic coun- tries, ladies of high rank considered it an honor In the Past 183 to wait upon the sick. They did not wear veils because they were ashamed of the work, but because they did not wish to attract atten- tion. In this they were in strange contrast to many of the social workers of our day who make use of such work to gain prominence in society. You will ask: What became of these won- derful institutions for the sick? They were swept away in that religious upheaval of the sixteenth century, commonly known as the Reformation. A recent Protestant writer of note has called it the "Grand Pillage," and pillage it was. What he says of the religious institutions of England can justly be said of the hospitals of central and western Europe. He writes: "When I talk about the Great Pillage, I mean that horrible and outrageous looting of our churches other than conventual, and the robbing of the people of this country of prop- erty in land and movables, which property has actually been inherited by them as members of those organized religious communities known as parishes. It is necessary to empha- size the fact that in the general scramble of the Terror under Henry VIII, and of the anarchy 184 The Church and Nursing in the days of Edward VI, there was only one class that was permitted to retain any large portion of its endowments. The monasteries were plundered even to their very pots and pans. Almshouses, in which old men and women were fed and clothed, were robbed to the last pound, the poor almsfolk were being turned out in the cold at an hour's warning to beg their bread. Hospitals for the sick and needy, sometimes magnificently provided with nurses and chaplains, whose very raison d'etre was that they were to look after and care for those who were past caring for themselves, these were stripped of all their belongings, the inmates sent out to hobble into some conven- ient dry place to lie down and die in, or to crawl into some barn or hovel, there to be tended not without fear of consequences by some kindly man or woman who could not bear to see a suffering fellow creature drop down and die at their own doorposts." (Parish Life in England Before the Great Pillage, by A. Jessopp, D.D.) Luther bore the same testimony in regard to the evils that befell the hospitals. He be- moaned the fact that those who had followed him in his religious teaching no longer con- In the Past 185 tributed to hospitals as they did in Catholic times. From the middle of the sixteenth cen- tury there was a general deterioration in hos- pital service in England and Germany, while in those countries which remained Catholic, especially in Spain, France and Italy, there was a gradual improvement over past methods. This statement about the deterioration of hospitals is borne out by Nutting and Dock in their recent work, "The History of Nurs- ing," and also by Miss Minnie Goodnow in "Outlines of Nursing History." "The dark period of nursing began about 1675 and continued until recent times. There was a complete and lasting stagnation, and it was forgotten that a refined woman could be a nurse except perhaps in her own family. Nursing in any real sense of the term prac- tically ceased to exist. Solely among the re- ligious Orders did nursing remain an interest and some remnants of technique survive." Space will not permit me to enter into an account of the hospitals which are at present conducted by the Catholic Sisterhoods. Their popularity with the people and with the lead- ers of the medical profession is a sufficient proof of their excellence. 186 The Church and Nursing You may remember that in the Crimean War the wounded of the French army were far better provided for than those of the Eng- lish, because in the former the Catholic Sister- hoods did so much of the nursing. In fact, it was the accounts of the terrible suffering and neglect among the English soldiers that first awoke the sympathy of Florence Nightingale, and the call for volunteer nurses gave her the opportunity which she had long sought of de- voting her life to suffering humanity. Florence Nightingale has left us her impres- sions of the effective methods of the Sisters of Charity in Paris, where she sojourned for some months previous to her departure for Crimea, and where she had every opportunity of studying the efficiency of the work. "If any one," she writes, "has ever been behind the scenes, living in the interior of the Maison Mere of the Sisters of Charity at Paris as I have— and seen their counting-house and office, all worked by women, an office that has twelve thousand officials (all women) scattered all over the known world, an office to compare with which in business habits I have neyer seen any, either Government or private, in England —they will think like me that it is the mere In the Past 187 business power which keeps these enormous re- ligious Orders going." (Life of Florence Nightingale, by E. T. Cook, vol. i.) However, Miss Nightingale did not fail to appreciate the strength of religion in this work for the sick, for among her letters to a friend we find the following statement: "I do entirely believe that the religious motive is essential for the highest kind of nurse. There are such disappointments, such sickenings of the heart, that they can only be borne by the feeling that one is called to the work by God, that it is a part of His work, that one is a fel- low worker of God." (Cook, vol. ii.) Listen to another quotation from the same pen: "The Catholic Orders offered me work, training for that work, sympathy and help in it such as I had in vain sought in the Church of England." (Cook, vol. i.) Finally, she attributed the larger part of her success in the Crimean campaign to the help rendered by the Sisters of Mercy, "without whom," she writes, "it would have been a failure." (Cook, vol. i.) You will no doubt read with interest "The History of Nursing," by Nutting and Dock, and the "Outlines of Nursing History," by Miss Minnie Goodnow. These authors have 188 The Church and Nursing endeavored to be fair in their treatment of nursing under Catholic auspices. However, I do not think that the former have given due credit to the Catholic Sisterhoods and their in- fluence upon the life of Florence Nightingale. Miss Goodnow is inaccurate when she states that the Ursulines and other nursing Sisterhoods were founded in the sixth century. Her pity for the nursing Orders banished from France is misdirected. The good nuns were not driven from their institutions for any incompetency on their part; they were simply victims of a persecution of everything connected with re- ligion. It is with hesitation that I refer to such persecution here, for there is at present a broad and unselfish co-operation between the various religious denominations in this coun- try. Protestant physicians have been valued patrons and generous benefactors of hospitals under the Catholic Sisterhoods. We should be thankful that such a spirit does exist, we should do all in our power to encourage it; but on the other hand, we should not be blind to the fact that Catholic hospitals and other charitable institutions of the Church have suffered undeserved persecutions and even suppression at the hands of religious fanatics, In the Past 189 acting under the egis of so-called progress and liberty. It is well for you to remem- ber this when reading the histories of nurs- ing referred to above. From this talk on "The Church and Nurs- ing in the Past" I would have you carry away one thought: The work of your profession has been closely connected with Christianity from its foundation, and its Divine Founder by word and work taught us kindness and sym- pathy toward the sick. Model your lives upon the life of Christ and you will be in every re- spect model nurses. INDEX A Abortion, a case in, 163. duty of nurse in, 57. practical case in, 159. reporting, 163. Accident, restitution in case of, 156. Acts, human, 30. Administering baptism, 118. Advice, accepting, 93. Affection, danger of, 92. Alcoholic drinks, danger of, 88. Alienable rights, 16. Anaesthetic, experimenting with, 149. Animals have no rights, 12, 104. instinct of, 69. our duty in regard to, 12. Architecture in early hospi- tals, 180. Authority, deal with public, 160. in training-school, 127. Authorities, 133. hospital, and illicit opera- tion, 162. B Baptism, administering, 118. after apparent death, 158. conditional, 158. Bell, Alexander Graham, on birth control, 80. Birth control, 64. and Dr. Knopf, 76. and family support, 82. and wages, 77. Australia and New Zea- land, 72. Bell on, 80. Birth control, church oh, 72. Coler on, 71. Dr. Knopf on, 72. England, 75. France and Germany, 73. Malthus on, 65. misleading figures, 79. Mrs. Sanger, 84. New England colonies, 77. physical and mental effects, 76. why wrong, 69. Body, influence of mind on, 109. Bollinger baby, 42. Books and reading, 94. Borrowing, 125. habit, 155- Breaking rules, 128. C Candles, blessed, 122. Careless doctor, 154. Carelessness after operation, 160. responsibility, and, 157. Case, giving up a, 105, 114, 155- Cases, choosing, 103. method of sttjdying, 125. special, 103. Catholic Church and birth control, 71. and craniotomy, 53. Chance, taking a, 149. Character, 91. Charges, false, 130. Children, bond of unity, 83. Clairvoyants, 135. Commandments, 81. Communion, Holy, and the sick, 119. 192 Index Companion, reporting evil, 143- Conduct, prudent, 91. Confidence, 109. inspiring, 114. in the physician, 114. Conjugal relations, 76. Constitution of the U. S., 16. Contagious disease, conceal- ing, 108. Correct thing in helping the sick, 118. Cradle, empty, 75. Craniotomy and Catholic Church, 53. and the nurse, 54. Creator, the right to life from the, 52. Criminals and euthanasia, 34. Crucifix, 122. Crystal gazing, dangers of, 135- Customs and morality, 68. and rights, 14, 31. D Danger of artificial stimu- lants, 88. of narcotic drugs, 167. Death, baptism after apparent, 158. Debts, 126. Deceiving, 128. Destruction of early hospitals, 183, 184. Direct and indirect killing, 19. Direct killing, 60. of innocent never allowed, 22. Directrix, quality of, 133. Discouragement, 132. Disease, will-power over, 107. Dishonesty, 137. Doctor, see physician. Domestic relations, Court of, 82. Domestic troubles, 82. Drug habit, danger of, 88. Drugs, use of dangerous, 167. Drunkenness, why it is wrong, 68. Duties, Aikens on, 14. arid rights inseparable, 10. Gladstone on, 11. idiots have no, 11. laws governing, 30. origin of, 30. positive and negative, 11. Robb on, 15. Duty, definition of, 10. in abortion cases, 57. Dying patient, informing, 167. rights of, 167. E Eclampsia, see pernicious vomiting, 60. Egotism, 97. Ethics, definition of, 29. its relation to other sci- ences, 7. Etiquette, professional, 153. Eugenics, and nurse, 168. should not encourage, 169. Euthanasia, and Bollinger baby, 42. and crirriinals, 47. and syphilis, 34. and the insane, 45. and the nurse, 43. and the physician, 36. anguish caused by, 47. a pathetic case, 38. a revolting custom, 43. application to hopelessly sick, hopelessly insane, hopelessly criminal, 34. as practised, 39. definition, 33. George Ives on, 47. impractical, 36. opinion of Werner, 38. principles cannot change, 40. Index 193 Euthanasia, the committee on, 35. the physician and, 142. where introduced, 37. who advocate, 38. Example of direct killing, 20. of indirect killing, 20. Experimenting, results of, 148. with patient, 104. Experts and experiments, 104. Extreme Unction, 120. F Failure in nursing, 90. Fallosectomy unlawful, 49. False charges, 130. Falsifying records, 146. Familiarity, 93. danger of, 90. Families, large, 70. large, and mortality, 80. Family, support and birth control, 82. the large, 83. united by children, 83. Faultfinding, 130. Fortune telling, 135. Free will, 8. Friend, need of a gobd, 131. G Gluttony, why it is wrong, 67. God, existence of, 8. Good habits, 89. Goodnow's "Outlines of Nur- sing History," 185. Gossip, 98. Guardian Angel Settlement survey and birth control, 79- H Habits, studious, 95. Hamilton, Dr., and birth con- trol, 79. Hardships of nursing, 87. Head nurse, 132, 137- Head nurse, informing, 145. qualities of, 145. Health department, inform- ing, 160. Helping to steal, 136, 137. History of nursing, 185. Honor, 91. Hospital authorities, 145. and illicit operation, 162. Hospitals, claims of, 140. destruction of, after the Reformation, 183. early, 177-180. nursing in early, 178. in Rome, Luther's account, 182. Human acts, 30. Hypnotism, dangers of, 134. evil effects of, 158. power in using, 157. I Illicit operation, 161, 162. Inalienable rights, 16. Indirect killing, 60. when allowable, 21. Indirect and direct killing, 10. Industry, necessity of, 89. Insane, and euthanasia, 34, 45. bedlam, 45. killing the, revolting doc- trine, 46. Page on, 46. treatment in the past, 45. under Henry VIII, 45. Intern, and nurse, 92, 147. and patient, 147. and physician, 147. J Judgment, good, 131. Justice, 130. K Keeping a promise, 141. Kill, physician has not the right to, 19. 194 Index Killing, a robber, 23. as a means and an end, 20. companions, 26. direct, 26. direct and indirect, 19. direct as end or means never allowable, 22. English law on, 26. his own sons, Czar, 24. indirect, when allowable, 21. in war, 21. of innocent never allowed, 22. one to save another, 24. by the state, 48. the innocent, no exception to, 26. to protect one's life, 23. to recover property, 23. unjust aggressor, 22. Kindness, 85, L Laxity, 133. Lepers, Fr. Damien nursing, 173- kindness to, in the past, 173- Life from God, 17-19- Light in early hospitals, 181. Limiting services, 146. Love, conjugal, destroying, 70. in large family, 83. M Malthus, 78. and birth control, 65. Man, a social being, 8. end of, in this world, 8. Method of studying cases, 125. Mind and body, 109. Misjudging physician, 112. Morphine, danger of, 87. Mortality, 80. N Name, good, 91. New England and birth con- trol, 71. Nightingale, Florence, on re- ligious motives in nurs- ing, 187. , testimony to the efficiency of Catholic Sisterhood, 186. Nurse, and abortion cases, 57. and birth control, 84. and craniotomy, 51-54- and industry, 89. and patient, 90. and pernicious vomiting, 62. and physician, 44, 52, 91, 104, in, 147- and social work, 55. and superintendent, 166. attending an illicit opera- tion, 165. consulting the, 116. duty to colored patient, 146. graduate, and the doctor, head, responsibility of, 132. prescribing, 116. professional duties of, 103. pupil, and school regula- tions, 127. reprimanding, 113. should consult physician, 88. spiritual help of, 117. the, as a student, 94. the graduate, 151. the, herself, 87. use of artificial stimulants, 87. Nurse's, advice about sur- geons, 164. personality, 96. Nurses, are not physicians, in. duty toward each other, 146. Index 195 Nursing, and Christianity, 176. Catholic Sisterhoods and, 186. dark period of, 185. history of, 185. in ancient times, 175. in the Crimean War, 186. its religious import, 172. without a heart, 172. Nutting and Dock, "History of Nursing," 185. O Operation, attending a patient in illicit, 165. illicit, 162. Ovaries, removing, illicit, 161. P Patience, 106. during sickness, 100. in handling cases, 155. Patient, colored, duty to, 146. deceiving physician, 145. duty to, 104, 105. experimenting with, 104. friendliness with, 98. in illicit operation, 165. kindness to, in early hospi- tals, 179. prudence with, 97. religious duty toward, 119- 122. rights of, at the approach of death, 167. your, child of God, 172. Patients, secrecy with, 109. Paying in case of careless- ness, 161. Peace, interior, 123. Pernicious vomiting, 60. Personality, nurse's, 96. Physician, and craniotomy, 51. and intern, 147. and hursd, 44. 88, 91. m. 147, 151. Physician and nurse, diffi- culties between, 114. and priest, 61. and social work, 178. and twilight sleep, 62. duty toward, 105. has not the right to kill, 17. inspiring confidence in, 114. misjudging, 112. mistake of, in pernicious vomiting, 61. nurse's respect for, 112. overlooking small defects in, 112. professional standing, 113. recommending, 115. reporting, 112. Pictures in early hospitals, 180. Pity, self, 110. Pope, and early hospitals, 182. and nursing in the past, 176. Prayer, during temptation, 144- in the sick-room, 121. Priest and the physician, 61. parish, and sickness, 122. preparing for, 119. sending for, 119. Professional attitude, 115. Promise, keeping a, 141. Prostitution, 68. Prudence, 108, 153. in giving up case, 155. in handling cases, 155. Principles, necessity of, 28. Psychic powers, 106. Psychology and sex hygiene, 171. Pupil nurse, 127. duty to parents, 128. R Reading, 94. serious, 95. Receiving the sick in early hospitals, 182. 196 Index Records, falsifying, 146. Reformation, the, and ^ de- struction of hospitals, 183, 184. Regulations and faultfinding, 131. Relatives, consulting with, 160. of patients, 106, 115. Religion and nursing, 187. respecting one's, 117. Reporting careless doctor, x54- case of syphilis, 162. evil companion, 143. physician, 112. Responsibility for debts, 126. Restitution, 129, 130, I37i 139, 141, 143- for broken car, 156. Rights, Aikens on, 14. and customs, 31. and duties inseparable, 10, brute beasts have no, 12. definition of, 9. inalienable and alienable, 16. laws governing, 30. not outgrowth of customs, 14- of the unborn child, 51. origin of, 30. origin as explained in the Constitution, 14. positive and negative, 11. Professor Dewey on, 13. Robb on, 15. Rudeness, 115. Rules, 132. in early hospitals, 179. in training-school, obeying, 127. Sacrifice, in large families, School of training, 125. Seances, dangers of, 135- Secrecy, professional, and pa- tient, 165. Secret, manner of revealing, 152. professional, in case or syphilis, 162. professional, revealing, 151. Secrets, professional, 108. professional, and conta- gious diseases, 108. professional, reporting, 166. Self pity, 110. Services, limiting, 146. Sex hygiene, and psychology, 171. teaching in the schools, 170. Shirker, the, 89. Sick, and euthanasia, 34. -room, 119. suggestions for the, 99. Sickness from God, 101. sanctificatiori of, 99. seeking God during, 100. Sisterhoods, expelling Catho- lic, 187. Sleep, twilight, 62. Social work, and the doctor, 178. and the nurse, 55. Social worker, 84. Soul, when it enters body, 56. when it enters body, Dr. O'Malley quoted, 56. Spiritual help, 117. State, the, and killing, 48. Stealing, 136. a formula, 143. Sterility, 70. Sterilization not licit, 49. Studious habits, 95. Studying, necessity of, 94. Surgeon, and illicit operation, 165. deceiving, 148. duty of nurse to, 148. Surgeons, advice about, 164. Index 197 Superintendent, and nuree, 166. difficulty of a, 166. Sympathy, 85. and the nurse, 55. Syphilis, and euthanasia, 34. reporting case of, 162. T Tact, 98. of head nurse, 145. Tardiness, 129. Temper, a bad, 140. Temptation, 90, 144. to" use artificial stimulants, 87. Thieves, imitating, 139. Threats, stealing under, 138. Talking, indiscreet, 98. imprudent, 153. Training-school, 89, 125. obeying rules in, 128. temptations in, 144. Trials of nursing, 87. Tuberculosis, will-power over, 107. Twilight sleep, 62. V Vasectomy, Dr. O'Malley on, 49- not a punishment, 49. unlawful, 49. Ventilation in early hospitals, 181. Viaticum, 120. Visitors of patients, 106. Vomiting, pernicious, 60. W Wages and birth control, 77. Wards in early hospitals, 181. Will-power over disease, 106. Work, too much demanded, 154- Working class and birth con- trol, 81. Y Young physician and abor- tion, 38. PRINTED BY BENZlGER BROTHERS, NEW YORK BOOKS OF DOCTRINE, INSTRUCTION, DEVOTION, MEDITATION, BIOG- RAPHY, NOVELS, JUVENILES, ETC. PUBLISHED BY BENZlGER BROTHERS Cincinnati: NEW YORK: Chicago: 343 Main St. 36-38 Barclay St. 214-216 W. Monroe St. Books not marked net will be sent postpaid on receipt of the advertised price. Books marked net are such where ten per cent must be added for postage. Thus a book advertised at net $1.00 will be sent postpaid on receipt of $1.10. DOCTRINE, INSTRUCTION, MEDITATION, ETC. ABANDONMENT; or Absolute Surrender of Self to Divine Providence. Caussade, S.J. net, 0 75 ALL FOR JESUS. (See our Prayer-Book Catalogue.) ADORATION OF THE BLESSED SACRAMENT, THE. Tes- niere. net, 1 00 AMERICAN PRIEST. Schmidt. net 1 25 ANECDOTES AND EXAMPLES ILLUSTRATING THE CATHOLIC CATECHISM. Spirago. net 2 25 ANGELS OF THE SANCTUARY. Musser. net, 0 25 ART OF PROFITING BY OUR FAULTS. St. Francis de Sales. net, 0 75 AUTOBIOGRAPHY OF ST. IGNATIUS LOYOLA. O'Conor. BEGINNINGS OF CHRISTIANITY. Shahan. Vet. 2 50 BLESSED SACRAMENT BOOK. Lasance. 2 00 BLOSSOMS OF THE CROSS. Giehrl. 12mo. net, 1 50 BOOK OF THE PROFESSED. 3 volumes, each net, 1 00 BOY-SAVERS' GUIDE. Quin, S.J. net, 2 00 BREAD OF ANGELS. (See our Prayer-Book Catalogue.) BREAD OF LIFE. Willam. net, 1 00 CAMILLUS DE LELLIS. By A Sister of Mercy. »w l 25 CASES OF CONSCIENCE. Slater, S.J. 2 vols. net, 5 00 CATECHISM EXPLAINED, THE. Spirago-Clarke. net, 3 50 CATHOLIC BELIEF. FaX di Bruno. 16mo, paper, net, 0 26, cloth, net, 0 75 CATHOLIC CEREMONIES. Durand. Paper, *0 40; cloth, 0 75 CATHOLIC GIRLS' GUIDE. Lasance. 1 25 CATHOLIC HOME ANNUAL. 0 25 CATHOLIC PRACTICE AT CHURCH AND AT HOME. Klauder. Paper, *0 40: cloth net, 0 60 CATHOLIC'S READY ANSWER. Hill, S.J. net, 2 00 CATHOLIC'S WORK IN THE WORLD. Husslein, S.J. net, 1 25 CEREMONIAL FOR ALTAR BOYS. Britt, O.S.B. net, 0 50 CHARACTERISTICS AND RELIGION OF MODERN SOCIAL- ISM. Ming, SJ. net, 2 00 CHARACTERISTICS OF TRUE DEVOTION. Grou, S.J. net, 1 00 CHARITY THE ORIGIN OF EVERY BLESSING. net. 0 75 CHILD OF MARY. (See our Prayer-Book Catalogue.) CHILD'S PRAYER-BOOK. (See our Prayer-Book Catalogue.) CHILD PREPARED FOR FIRST COMMUNION. Zulueta, S.J. Paper, *0 08 CHRIST'S TEACHING CONCERNING DIVORCE IN THE NEW TESTAMENT. Gigot, D.D. net, H2 25 CHRISTIAN APOLOGETICS. Devivier-Messmer. net, 3 00 CHRISTIAN EDUCATION. O'Connell. net, 0 76 net, 0 60 net, 0 60 net, 3 00 net, 1 00 net, I) 35 net, 1 75 net, 1 50 CHRISTIAN FATHER. Cramer-Lambert. CHRISTIAN MOTHER. Cramer. COMMENTARY ON THE PSALMS. (Ps. I—L.) Berry. CORRECT THING FOR CATHOLICS. Bugg. COUNSELS OF ST. ANGELA. DEVOTION TO THE SACRED HEART OF JESUS. Noldin- Kent. DEVOTIONS AND PRAYERS BY ST. ALPHONSUS. Ward. DEVOTIONS AND PRAYERS FOR THE SICK-ROOM. Krebs, C.SS.R. net, 1 00 DEVOTIONS TO THE SACRED HEART FOR THE FIRST FRIDAY OF EVERY MONTH. Huguet. net. 0 50 DEVOUT CHILD. (See our Prayer-Book Catalogue.) DIVINE GRACE. Wirth. net, 1 00 DOMINICAN MISSION BOOK. By a Dominican Father. 0 75 ECCLESIASTICAL DICTIONARY. Thein. net, 6 50 EDUCATION OF OUR GIRLS. Shields. net, 1 25 EUCHARISTIC CHRIST. Tesniere. net, 1 75 EUCHARISTIC LILIES. Maery. net, fll 00 EUCHARISTIC SOUL ELEVATIONS. Stadelman, C.S.Sp. net, 0 60 EXPLANATION OF BIBLE HISTORY. Nash. net, 2 00 EXPLANATION OF CATHOLIC MORALS. Stapleton. net, 1 00 EXPLANATION OF BALTIMORE CATECHISM. Kinkead. net, Hi 25 EXPLANATION OF THE COMMANDMENTS. Rolfus. 0 75 EXPLANATION OF THE CREED. Rolfus. 0 75 EXPLANATION OF GOSPELS AND OF CATHOLIC WOR- SHIP. Lambert-Brennan. Paper, *0 40; cloth, 0 75 EXPLANATION OF THE HOLY SACRAMENTS. Rolfus. 0 75 EXPLANATION OF THE MASS. Cochem. net, 1 00 EXPLANATION OF THE PRAYERS AND CEREMONIES OF THE MASS. Lanslots, O.S.B. net. 1 00 EXPLANATION OF THE SALVE REGINA. St. Alphonsus Liguori. net, 0 76 EXTREME UNCTION. Phillips. Paper, *0 12 FIRST SPIRITUAL AID TO THE SICK. McGrath. net, 0 60 FIVE O'CLOCK STORIES. By a Religious. net, 0 60 FLOWERS OF THE PASSION. 32rno. net, 0 60 FLOWERS OF PIETY. (See our Prayer-Book Catalogue.) FOLLOWING OF CHRIST. Thomas a Kempis. Edition de Luxe. Leather, net, 1 50 FOLLOWING OF CHRIST. Thomas a Kempis. Plain Edition. 0 55 FOR FREQUENT COMMUNICANTS. Roche. Paper, *0 12 FUNDAMENTALS OF THE RELIGIOUS LIFE. Schleuter, S.J. net, 0 75 FUTURE LIFE, THE. Sasia, S.J. net, 2 50 GARLAND OF PRAYER, THE. 32mo. American seal, 2 00 GENERAL CONFESSION MADE EASY. Konings, C.SS.R *0 20 GENERAL INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY OF THE HOLY SCRIPTURES. Gigot. net, 113 50 GENERAL INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY OF THE HOLY SCRIPTURES. ABRIDGED EDITION. Gigot. net, 112 25 GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF RELIGIOUS LIFE. Verheyen, O.S.B. net3 0 60 GENTLEMAN, A. Egan. net 1 00 GIFT OF THE KING. Religious H. C. J. net 0 50 GLORIES AND TRIUMPHS OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH, net, 3 09 GLORIES OF MARY. St. Alphonsus Liguori. net 1 00 GLORIES OF THE SACRED HEART. Hausherr, S.J. net, 1 00 GOD, CHRIST, AND THE CHURCH. Hammer, O.F.M. net, 3 00 GOFFINE'S DEVOUT INSTRUCTIONS. net, 1 35 GOLDEN KEY TO HEAVEN. (See our Prayer-Book Catalogue.) GREAT ENCYCLICAL LETTERS OF POPE LEO XIII. net, 3 00 GREETINGS TO THE CHRIST-CHILD. net, 1 00 GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE CATHOLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM IN THE UNITED STATES. Burns, C.S.C. net, 2 00 GUIDE FOR SACRISTANS. net, 1 25 HANDBOOK OF THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION. Wilmers. S.J. net, 12 00 HARMONY OF THE RELIGIOUS LIFE. Heuser. net, 1 50 HEAVEN OPEN TO SOULS. Semple, SJ. net, 2 50 HELP FOR THE POOR SOULS. Ackermann. 0 75 HELPS TO A SPIRITUAL LIFE. Schneider. net, 1 00 HIDDEN TREASURE. St. Leonard. net, 0 60 HISTORY OF ECONOMICS. Dewe. net, 1 50 HISTORY OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE IN ROME. Brann. net, ||2 00 HISTORY OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH. Alzog. 3 vols, net, 12 00 HISTORY OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH. Businger-Brennan. 8vo., net, 3 00 HISTORY OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH. Businger-Brennan. 12mo. net, JO 75 HISTORY OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH. Brueck. 2 vols, net, 1t* 50 HISTORY OF THE MASS. O'Brien. net. 1 75 HISTORY OF THE PROTESTANT REFORMATION. Gasquet. net. 1 00 HOLINESS OF THE CHURCH IN THE NINETEENTH CENTURY. Kempf-Breymann. net. 2 50 HOLY BIBLE, THE. Large type, handy size. 12mo. cloth, 1 50 HOLY HOUR, THE. Keiley. *0 12 HOLY HOUR OF ADORATION. Stang. 0 60 HOLY MASS. St. Alphonsus Liguori. net, 1 50 HOLY VIATICUM OF LIFE AS OF DEATH. Devkr. Cloth, net, 0 75 HOW TO COMFORT THE SICK. Krebs, C.SS.R. net. 1 00 HOW TO MAKE THE MISSION. Dominican Father. Paper, *0 12 IMITATION OF CHRIST. See "Following of Christ." IMITATION OF THE SACRED HEART. Arnoudt. net, 1 50 INCARNATION, BIRTH, AND INFANCY OF JESUS CHRIST. St. Alphonsus Liguori. net, 1 50 IN HEAVEN WE KNOW OUR OWN. Blot. S.J. net, 0 75 INDEX TO WORKS OF ST. ALPHONSUS LIGUORI. Geier- mann, C.SS.R. Paper, net, 0 10 INSTRUCTIONS ON THE COMMANDMENTS. St. Alphonsus Liguori. Cloth, net, 0 60 INTERIOR OF JESUS AND MARY. Grou, S.J. 2 vols. net, 2 50 INTRODUCTION TO A DEVOUT LIFE. St. Francis de Sales net 0 75 KEY OF HEAVEN. (See our Prayer-Book Catalogue.) LADY, A. Bugg. net, 1 00 LAWS OF THE KING. Religious H. C. J. net, 0 50 LEGENDS AND STORIES OF THE HOLY CHILD JESUS. Lutz. net, 0 60 LESSONS OF THE SAVIOUR. Religious H. C. J. net, 0 50 LETTERS OF ST. ALPHONSUS LIGUORI. Grimm, C.SS.R. 5 vols., each, net, 1 60 LIFE OF MOTHER GUERIN. net, ||2 00 LIFE OF BLESSED MARGARET MARY ALACOQUE. Bougaud. net, 1 00 LIFE OF THE BLESSED VIRGIN. Rohner-Brennan. net, 1 00 LIFE OF CHRIST. Businger-Brennan. Half morocco, gilt side, gilt edges; profusely illustrated. net, 12 00 LIFE OF CHRIST. Cochem-Hammer. net, 1 00 LIFE OF CHRIST. Businger-Mullett. net, 3 00 LIFE OF HIS HOLINESS POPE PIUS X. net. 3 00 LIFE OF MADEMOISELLE LE GRAS. net, 1 00 LIFE OF ST. CATHARINE OF SIENNA. AymI. * 111 00 LIFE OF ST. IGNATIUS LOYOLA. Genelli, S.J. net, 1 00 3 LIFE OF SISTER ANNE KATHARINE EMMERICH. Wegener-McGowan. net, 2 50 LITTLE ALTAR BOY'S MANUAL. 0 40 LITTLE COMMUNICANT'S PRAYER-BOOK. Sloan. 0 25 LITTLE LIVES OF THE SAINTS. Berthold. net, 0 75 LITTLE MANUAL OF ST. ANTHONY. 0 20 LITTLE MANUAL OF ST. JOSEPH. Lings. 0 20 LITTLE MANUAL OF ST. RITA. McGrath. Cloth, 0 60 LITTLE MASS BOOK. Lynch. Paper, *0 08 LITTLE MONTH OF MAY. net, 0 50 LITTLE MONTH OF THE SOULS IN PURGATORY. net, 0 50 LITTLE OFFICE OF THE BLESSED VIRGIN MARY. Edi- tion in Latin and English. Cloth, net, 1.00. Edition in Latin only, cloth, net, 0 80 LITTLE OFFICE OF THE IMMACULATE CONCEPTION. Paper, *0 08 LITTLE PICTORIAL LIVES OF THE SAINTS. net. 1 50 LIVES OF THE SAINTS. Butler. net. 1 00 LOURDES. Clarke, S.T. net, 1 00 MANNA OF THE SOUL. Lasance. Thin Edition. Im. leather, 1 00 MANNA OF THE SOUL. Lasance. Thin Edition, with Epistles and Gospels. Im. leather, 1 25 MANNA OF THE SOUL. Lasance. Vest Pocket Edition. 0 45 MANNA OF THE SOUL. Lasance. Extra Large Type Edition. 1 25 MANUAL OF MORAL THEOLOGY, A. Slater, S.J. 2 vols, net, 7 00 MANUAL OF SELF-KNOWLEDGE AND CHRISTIAN PER- FECTION, A. Henry, C.SS.R. net, 0 60 MANUAL OF THEOLOGY FOR THE LAITY. Geiermann, C.SS.R. Paper, *0.40; cloth, net, 0 60 MANUAL OF THE HOLY EUCHARIST. Lasance. net, 1 00 MANUAL OF THE HOLY NAME. o 60 MANUAL OF THE SACRED HEART. 0 55 MANUAL OF ST. ANTHONY, NEW. 0 75 MARIAE COROLLA. (Poems). Hill. net, 1 26 MARY HELP OF CHRISTIANS. Hammer, O.F.M. net, 3 00 MARY THE QUEEN. Religious H. C. ]. net, 0 60 MASS AND VESTMENTS OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH. Walsh. net, 2 25 MASS DEVOTIONS AND READINGS ON THE MASS. Lasance. net, 1 00 MEANS OF GRACE. Brennan. net, 4 00 MEDITATIONS FOR ALL THE DAYS OF THE YEAR. Hamon, S.S. 5 vols. net, 7 50 MEDITATIONS FOR EVERY DAY IN THE YEAR. Baxter. S.J. net, 1 75 MEDITATIONS FOR EVERY DAY IN THE YEAR. Ver- cruysse, S.J. 2 vols. net, 4 00 MEDITATIONS FOR EVERY DAY IN THE MONTH. Nepveu- Ryan. net, 1 00 MEDITATIONS FOR MONTHLY RETREATS. Semple, S.J. net, 0 75 MEDITATIONS FOR THE USE OF SEMINARIANS AND PRIESTS. Branchereau, S.S. 5 vols., each, net, ||1 00 MEDITATIONS FOR THE USE OF THE SECULAR CLERGY. Chaignon, S.J. 2 vols. net, 6 00 MEDITATIONS ON THE LAST WORDS FROM THE CROSS. Perraud. net, ||0 50 MEDITATIONS ON THE LIFE, THE TEACHING, AND THE PASSION OF JESUS CHRIST. Ilg-Clarke. 2 vols. net, 4 50 MEDITATIONS ON THE MYSTERIES OF OUR HOLY FAITH. Barraud, S.J. 2 vols. net, 4 00 MEDITATIONS ON THE PASSION OF OUR LORD. net, 0 60 MEDITATIONS ON THE SUFFERINGS OF JESUS CHRIST. Pminaldo. net, 1 00 MIDDLE AGES. Shahan. net, 2 60 4 0 60 0 60 0 60 net, 0 60 0 60 net, net, net, 1 25 2 00 0 60 net, net, 1 00 1 00 1 25 net, net, 1 00 0 75 1 75 MISCELLANEOUS WRITINGS OF ST. ALPHONSUS LIGUORI. net, 1 50 MISSALS. (See New Missal for Every Day, Sunday Missal.) MISSION BOOK FOR THE MARRIED. Girardey C.SS.R. MISSION BOOK FOR THE SINGLE. Girardey, C.SS.R. MISSION BOOK OF THE REDEMPTORIST FATHERS. MISSION REMEMBRANCE OF THE REDEMPTORIST FATHERS. Geiermann, C.SS.R. MOMENTS BEFORE THE TABERNACLE. Russell, S.J. MORAL PRINCIPLES AND MEDICAL PRACTICE. Coppens, S.J. l2mo. MORALITY OF MODERN SOCIALISM. Ming, S.J. MORE FIVE O'CLOCK STORIES By a Religious. MORE SHORT SPIRITUAL READINGS FOR MARY'S CHILDREN. Madame Cecilia. MOST BELOVED WOMAN, THE. Garesche, S.J. MY PRAYER-BOOK. Lasance. Imitation leather, (For finer bindings see our Prayer-Book Catalogue.) NAMES THAT LIVE IN CATHOLIC HEARTS. Sadlier. NARROW WAY. Geiermann, C.SS.R. NEW MISSAL FOR EVERY DAY. Lasance. Imitation leather, (For finer bindings see our Prayer-Book Catalogue.) NEW TESTAMENT. 12mo. Edition. Large Type. Cloth, net, 1 00 32mo. Edition. Flexible cloth. net, 0 35 32mo. Edition. Stiff cloth. net, 0 60 32mo. Edition. American seal, gold edges. net, 1 25 (For finer bindings see our Prayer-Book Catalogue.) NEW TESTAMENT AND CATHOLIC PRAYER-BOOK COM- BINED. Cloth, net, 0.45; Imitation leather, khaki or black, net, 0 90 OFFICE OF HOLY WEEK. Cut flush, net, 0.35; Silk cloth, net, 0 50 OUR FAVORITE DEVOTIONS. Lings. net, 0 85 OUR FAVORITE NOVENAS. Lings. net, 0 85 OUR OWN ST. RITA. Corcoran, O.S.A. net, 1 00 OUTLINES OF DOGMATIC THEOLOGY. Hunter, S.J. 3 vols. net, 6 75 OUTLINES OF JEWISH HISTORY, from Abraham to Our Lord. Gigot. 8vo. net, II2 25 OUTLINES OF NEW TESTAMENT HISTORY. Gigot. net, 1J2 25 OUTLINE MEDITATIONS. Cecilia. Imitation leather, 8vo. net, 1 50 OUT TO WIN. Conroy, S.J. net, 1 25 PARADISE ON EARTH OPENED TO ALL. Natale, S.J. net, 0 60 PASTORAL LETTERS. McFaul. net, 2 00 PATRON SAINTS FOR CATHOLIC YOUTH. Mannix. 3 vols., each, net, 0 90 PICTORIAL LIVES OF THE SAINTS. net, 4 50 PIOUS CHILD. (See our Prayer-Book Catalogue.) POCKET COMPANION. A Prayer-Book. Cloth. 0 12 POCKET MANUAL. (See our Prayer-Book Catalogue.) POCKET PRAYER-BOOK WITH EPISTLES AND GOSPELS. Cloth, red edges, 0 35 POLICEMEN'S AND FIREMEN'S COMPANION. McGrath. Cloth, 0 35 POLITICAL AND MORAL ESSAYS. Rickaby, S.J. net, 2 00 POPULAR LIFE OF ST. TERESA. Porter. net, 1 00 PRAYER-BOOK FOR RELIGIOUS. Lasance. Im. leather, net. 2 00 PRAYERS FOR OUR DEAD. McGrath. Cloth, 0.86; Imita- tion leather, 0 60 PRINCIPLES, ORIGIN, AND ESTABLISHMENT OF THE CATHOLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM. Burns. net. 2 00 PRISONER OF LOVE, THE. Lasance. Imitation leather, 1 25 PRIVATE RETREAT FOR RELIGIOUS. Geiermann, C.SS.R. net, 2 00 PRODIGAL SON, THE. Muller, C.SS.R. 12mo. net, 111 60 8UEEN'S FESTIVALS, THE. Religious H. C. J. net, 0 60 UESTIONS OF MORAL THEOLOGY. Slater, S.J. net, 2 50 S RAMBLES IN CATHOLIC LANDS. Barrett, O.S.B. net, 3 00 REASONABLENESS OF CATHOLIC CEREMONIES AND PRACTICES. Burke. Cloth, net, 0 50 RELIGIOUS STATE. St. Alphonsus Liguori. net, 0 60 ROMA. Pagan, Subterranean, and Modern Rome in Word and Picture. Kuhn. Cloth, net. 12 00 ROMAN CURIA AS IT NOW EXISTS. Martin. S.J. net, 2 00 ROSARY, THE, THE CROWN OF MARY. Dominican Father. Paper, *0 12 RULES OF LIFE FOR THE PASTOR OF SOULS. Slater- Rauch. net, 1 60 SACRAMENTALS OF THE CHURCH. Lambing. Paper, *0.40; cloth, 0 76 SACRED HEART BOOK. Lasance. Im. leather, net, 1 00 SACRED HEART STUDIED IN THE SCRIPTURES. Sain- train, C.SS.R. net, 1 00 SACRIFICE OF THE MASS WORTHILY CELEBRATED. Chaignon-Goesbriand. net, 2 50 ST. ANTHONY. Keller. net, 1 00 ST. ANTHONY. Ward. net. 1 00 ST. JOAN OF ARC. The Life Story of the Maid of Orleans. "By Rev. Denis Lynch, S.J. Illustrated net, 2 50 SAINT FRANCIS OF ASS1SL Dubois, S.M. net, 1 00 SAINTS AND PLACES. Ayscough. net, 2 50 SANCTUARY BOYS' ILLUSTRATED MANUAL. McCallen. net, II0 75 SCAPULAR MEDAL. Geiermann, C.SS.R. Paper, *0 08 SECRET OF SANCTITY. Crasset, S.J. net, 1 00 SERAPHIC GUIDE. 0 75 SHORT CONFERENCES ON THE SACRED HEART. Brink- MEYER net 1 00 SHORT COURSE IN CATHOLIC DOCTRINE. Paper, '*0 12 SHORT HISTORY OF MORAL THEOLOGY. Slater, net, 0 75 SHORT LIVES OF THE SAINTS. Donnelly. 0 75 SHORT MEDITATIONS FOR EVERY DAY. Lasausse. net, 1 00 SHORT STORIES ON CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE. McMahon. net, 1 50 SHORT VISITS TO THE BLESSED SACRAMENT. Lasance. Cloth, 0 20 SOCIALISM AND CHRISTIANITY. Stang. net, 1 25 SOCIALISM: ITS THEORETICAL BASIS AND PRACTICAL APPLICATION. Cathrein-Gettelmann. net, 2 25 SODALIST'S VADE MECUM. 0 65 SOLDIERS' AND SAILORS' COMPANION. McGrath. Silk Cloth or Khaki, 0 35 SOUVENIR OF THE NOVITIATE. Taylor. net, 0 60 SPECIAL INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY OF THE OLD TESTAMENT. Gigot. Part I, net, H2.25. Part II, net, «]2 75 SPIRAGO'S METHOD OF CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE. Mess- mer yiet 2 00 SPIRIT' OF SACRIFICE, THE, AND THE LIFE OF SACRI- FICE IN THE RELIGIOUS STATE. Giraud-Thurston. net, 2 50 SPIRITUAL CONSIDERATIONS. Buckler, O.P. net, 1 00 SPIRITUAL DESPONDENCY AND TEMPTATIONS. Michel- Garesch£. net, 1 50 SPIRITUAL EXERCISES FOR A TEN DAYS' RETREAT. Smetana, C.SS.R. net, 1 00 SPIRITUAL PEPPER AND SALT. Stang. Paper, *0.40, cloth, net, 0 75 SPOILING THE DIVINE FEAST. Zulueta, S.J. Paper, *0 08 STORIES OF THE MIRACLES OF OUR LORD. Religious H. C. J. net, 0 60 STORIES FOR FIRST COMMUNICANTS. Keller. net, 0 60 STORY OF JESUS SIMPLY TOLD FOR THE YOUNG. Mul- holland. net, 0 75 STORY OF THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES. Lynch, S.J. net, 2 50 6 STORY OF THE DIVINE CHILD. Lings. net, 0 51 STORY OF THE FRIENDS OF JESUS. Religious H. C. J. net, 0 50 SUNDAY MISSAL, THE. Lasance. Imitation leather, 1 25 SUNDAY-SCHOOL DIRECTOR'S GUIDE. Sloan. net, 1 25 SUNDAY-SCHOOL TEACHER'S GUIDE. Sloan. net, 1 00 SURE WAY TO A HAPPY MARRIAGE. Taylor. net, 0 60 TALES AND LEGENDS OF THE MIDDLE AGES. net, 0 60 TALKS TO PARENTS. Conroy, SJ. net, 1 25 TALKS WITH THE LITTLE ONES ABOUT THE APOSTLES' CREED. Religious H. C. J. net, 0 50 TEXTUAL CONCORDANCE OF THE HOLY SCRIPTURES. Williams. net, 5 00 THINGS, IMMORTAL, THE. Garesche, S.J. net. 1 00 THOUGHTS AND AFFECTIONS ON THE PASSION OF JESUS CHRIST FOR EVERY DAY IN THE YEAR. Bergamo, O.M.Cap. net, 2 50 THOUGHTS ON THE RELIGIOUS LIFE. Lasance. net, 2 00 TRAINING OF CHILDREN AND OF GIRLS IN THEIR TEENS. Madame Cecilia. Cloth, net, 0 75 TRUE POLITENESS. Demore. net, 1 00 TRUE SPOUSE OF CHRIST. St. Alphonsus Liguori. 1 vol. edition, net, 1 00 TWO SPIRITUAL RETREATS FOR SISTERS. Wirth. net 111 25 VENERATION OF THE BLESSED VIRGIN. Rohner-Brennan. net, 1 00 VEST-POCKET GEMS OF DEVOTION. (See our Prayer-Book Catalogue.) VICTORIES OF THE MARTYRS. St. Alphonsus Liguori. net, 1 50 VIGIL HOUR. Ryan, S.J. Paper, *0 12 VISITS TO JESUS IN THE TABERNACLE. Lasance. 1 75 VISITS TO THE MOST HOLY SACRAMENT. St. Alphonsus Liguori. net 0 50 VOCATION. Van Tricht-Conniff. Paper, 0 12 VOCATIONS EXPLAINED. Cut flush, *0 12 WAY OF INTERIOR PEACE. De Lehen, S.J. net, 2 00 WAY OF SALVATION AND OF PERFECTION. St. Alphonsus Liguori ftct, l ou WAY OF THE CROSS. Illustrated. Paper, *0 08 WAY OF THE CROSS, THE. Large-type edition. Method of St. Alphonsus Liguori. Illustrated. ,,-„,.,, .*? |° WAY OF THE CROSS. Euchanstic Method. Illustrated. 0