SYPHILIS SYPHILIS A collection of articles reprinted, with permission, from the American Journal of The Medical Sciences, \ The Journal of the American Medical Association and The War Department Technical Bulletin by The United States,Office of War Information 1945 SYPHILIS THE TREATMENT OF EARLY AND LATENT SYPHILIS 1 John H. Stokes, M.D., Herman Beerman, M.D. and Virgene Scherer Wammock, M.D. The American Journal of the Medical Sciences, Vol. 206, No. 4, October 1943. THE TREATMENT OF EARLY SYPHILIS WITH PENICILLIN 26 A Preliminary Report of 1,418 Cases Joseph Earle Moore, M.D., Baltimore, J. F. Mahoney, M.D., Medical Director, U. S. Public Health SeiVice, Stapleton, Staten Island, N. Y., Commander Walter Schwartz (MCI, U.S.N., Lieutenant Colonel Thomas Sternberg, Medical Corps, Army of the United States and W. Barry Wood, M.D., St. Louis. The Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 126, No. 2, September 9, 1944. PENICILLIN TREATMENT OF SYPHILIS 32 War Department Technical Bulletin 106, 11 October 1944. THE ACTION OF PENICILLIN IN LATE SYPHILIS 37 Including Neurosyphilis, Benign Late Syphilis and Late Congenital Syphilis: Preliminary Report John H. Stokes, M.D., Philadelphia, Lieutenant Colonel Thomas H. Sternberg, Medical Corps, Army of the United States, Com- mander Walter H. Schwartz (MC), U.S.N., John F. Mahoney, M.D., Senior Surgeon, U. S. Public Health Service, Stapleton, Staten Island, N. Y., J. E. Moore, M.D., Baltimore and W. Barry Wood, Jr., M.D., St. Louis. The Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 126, No. 2, September 9, 1944 PENICILLIN IN THE PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF CONGENITAL SYPHILIS 45 Report on Experience with the Treatment of Fourteen Pregnant Women with Early Syphilis and Nine Infants with Congenital Syphilis J. W. Lentz, M.D., Norman R. Ingraham, Jr., M.D., Herman Beerman, M.D. and John H. Stokes, M.D., Philadelphia. The Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 126, No. 7, October 14. 1944. SYPHILIS THE TREATMENT OF EARLY AND LATENT SYPHILIS Bv John H. Storks, M.D. Herman Beerman, M.D. AND I Virgene Scherer Wammock, M.D. The best approach to the modern treatment of early syphilis is a series of short, and to some extent disputable statements indicating landmarks in the progress of the past 35 years. This summary is substituted for the narrative type of historical perspective in this review. The Mercurial Era. Syphilis therapy up to 1912 left the disease to pursue its physiopathologic course comparatively little influenced at least by the milder and hence most popular forms of medication—the therapy per on of the widely copied French school. PAen mercury intramuscularly except as the water-soluble salts, and the violently reaction-producing calomel veneered the surface of a syphilitic infection rather than attacked its roots. The Early Arsphenamine Era. The “therapia sterilisans” period oi- l-dose cure era promised by Ehrlich’s theorization slowly changed under the impact of criticism from older observers of the course of syphilis under treatment. The belief that something radical, time-saving and treatment- shortening had been accomplished by “606” died hard. One dose was succeeded by successive doses as experience grew. Relatively new con- ceptions of “cure by stage” came into existence with curious incompre- hensible offshoots such as the doctrine of chancre-excision. “Abortive cure,” essentially the systematic speculative underestimation of the amount of treatment required by the seronegative primary stage, dates back to this era. From 1916 to 1919 the “course” conceptions of syphilis treat- ment established themselves, together with a combined theoretical and speculative discussion of the necessity for and the appropriate use of arsphenamine and heavy metal. The Early Evaluative Period. From 1919 to 1922, an extensive litera- ture, unfortunately not too familiar to some claimants for priorities, con- stituted the initial “shake-down” of an accumulating experiential tradi- 1 tiom While limited to the serologic effects of treatment and the occur- rence of grossly visible forms of relapse as criteria for determining effects, many of the outlines along which the new era has developed were fore- shadowed by the reports of Gennerich,17 the German Dermatological Society (Rost, 1921,40 Almkvist,1 Bering,4 Boas,7 Hoffmann,21 Bruck,9 Jadassohn,24 Ullmann,47 Eicke,15 Hoffmann-Mergelsberg,22 Miillern-Aspe- gren,33 Haxthausen,20 Rasch,38 Scholtz[Silberstein42], Satke,41 Mutschler,34 Zieler,50 Bruns,10 Riecke,39 Bernard,5 Harrison19 and others). The stage- of-beginning treatment conception received more or less precise delinea- tion towards the latter part of 1922. A type of foreshortened intensified therapy, that of Scholtz, was reported by Silberstein42 in 1923, before any American contributions were in the field. When American studies did appear, however, they rapidly established a series of important con- ceptions, beginning with Moore and Kemp’s31 demonstration based on Keidel’s30 foresighted Johns Hopkins system, of the importance of con- tinuity in treatment, and S. WT. Becker’s2 demonstration at the Mayo Clinic of the value of massing or intensification of arsenical therapy at the moment treatment is begun. Familiar to Americans during this period are the Pollitzer-Ormsby35,37 variation on the Scholtz technic and other types of intermittent systems which lost ground after the League of Nations confirmation28 46 of the substantial superiority of continuous treatment. The League of Nations Syphilis Commission Evaluations.* Begun on a massive scale in 1928 with conclusions and recommendations stated in 1935, this world-wide survey of technical methods in the treatment of early syphilis provides the basis for what may now be spoken of as the conservative or prolonged method for the treatment of early and latent syphilis. Under the terms of the cooperative agreement among the nations participating, each was individually encouraged to make the most of his own material in addition to contributing to the general pool. This rapidly brought American material into the foreground, and the contribu- tions of the Cooperative Clinical Group13 working under the aegis and with the statistical cooperation of the United States Public Health Service, express today what might be called the basic formula of American practice. From the League of Nations evaluation for which Martenstein supervised the interpretations,28 two general systems of treating early syphilis emerged —the British-Scandinavian intermittent and the American continuous systems. A certain amount of argument has inevitably arisen over the suitability of the material for deciding the question of intermittence versus continuity, but on the whole the Commission’s findings seemed to justify the belief that the intermittence of the recommended intermittent system is more'formal than actual and that its intensity especially in simultaneous arsenical and heavy metal administration, causes its effects to be sub- stantially those of a somewhat less intensive but continuous technic. Enthusiasm for the newer foreshortened procedures (see below) should not be allowed to dim the significance of this great evaluative accomplish- ment, and the syphilologist of today may without hesitation subscribe to either of the announced conservative systems as the equal in curative * Under the direction of the League of Nations Health Organization, the following countries participated: Denmark, France, Germany, Great Britain, United States of America. The membership in 1928 included Jadassohn (Breslau), Chairman, Madsen (Copenhagen), Colonel Harrison (London), Queyrat (Paris), Stokes (Philadelphia), Rasch (Copenhagen); Gougerot replaced Queyrat, Lomholt replaced Rasch in 1935. Statistical consultant, Westergaard (Copenhagen). Evaluation and report by Marten- stein (Dresden). 2 effect of the more recent “ hurry-up” systems of procedure with a sub- stantially greater margin of safety. Since the League of Nations evaluation has established such substantial landmarks, it may wrell be used as a milestone at which to summarize the high points of the progress of syphilotherapy since the close of the mer- curial age. The following fundamental principles have emerged from a quarter century of revolutionary progress: 1. Early and not late syphilis is the domain of systems. Bad effects follow' haphazardness, short courses, low dosage and lapse from treatment in early syphilis. 2. The “stage at which treatment is begun” principle is established with trustworthy evidence that seronegative primary syphilis is the most easily cured of all stages of the disease, seropositive primary syphilis the most uncertain or resistant and secondary syphilis midw'ay between the two. 3. Relapse follows short treatment, especially arsenical, producing delayed secondaries, neurorecurrence, infectious mucosal lesions, serologic relapse and fastness. 4. Single drug treatment is inferior to combined treatment and a heavy metal improves arsenical results and compensates shortcomings. 5. Prolongation—more injections, longer courses—gives superior results in systems dominated by the calendar interval of 1 week. Prolongation and increased mass through individual and total dosage were, of course, attempts to meet the resistance of the 30% relapsing group among early syphilitics at large. 6. Dosage theory was spotted with empiricism. The concept of lower drug tolerance of the female as compared wdth the male; the large versus small dose school; the crowding or time-dose problems represented by the so-called intensive method; the toxicity fears (simultaneous versus alternate administration of arsenical and heavy metal); the idiosyncrasy and tech- nical error factors in reaction interpretation which held down dosage, while reports of relapse and resistance raised it. 7. Calendar servitude or the domination of the 7-day interval on a purely empirical unevaluated basis was general. Few ventured to think in terms of shorter intervals or would admit their practicality or desirability. 8. Rising appreciation of scheduling. It became clear that schedules or systems critically examined by large syphilologic centers and expert experience were the sound basis for treatment methods rather than the results of blood serologic tests, thus slowly displacing the serologism of the 1920’s. 9. The vital comprehension of toxicity and therapeutic efficiency relations was dominated by the laboratory and rested on the insecure foundation of trypanosomiasis in mice rather than syphilis in man or animals. This group of conceptions, though expressed by impressive numerical indices was essentially vague and inadequate. A true experimental basis for syphilotherapeusis did not yet exist. 10. Despite these strictures on the knowledge of the day, the work of indi- vidual investigators plus the League of Nations evaluations established the following facts: (а) An arsphenamine alone can “ cure ” early syphilis in a large percentage of cases.27 (б) Heavy metal is a potent augmenting force, particularly true of bismuth; a fact recently “re-discovered” by recent workers with intensive methods. (c) Arsenical therapy can be “crowded” or “foreshortened” without fatal effect and with good results (Scholtz-Silberstein massive divided dose system). 3 (d) Continuity and calendar regularity are vitally important to the con- servative or prolonged systems evaluated by the League of Nations. “ A little treatment continuously given is twice as effective as the same amount of treatment intermittently given.” (e) Prolongation of treatment (in the weekly calendar or conservative systems) irons out most complications, relapse and resistance.3 (/) Some important League of Nations and Cooperative Clinical Group principles: (1) The curative outlook is one-third better when treatment is begun in the seronegative primary stage than in other stages of early and and latent syphilis. (2) The good results obtained by prolonging continuous treatment longer than 1 year more than double those obtained by the same kind of treatment carried through less than a year. (3) Intermittent and irregular treatment are the principal sources of delayed reversal of the blood serologic reaction. (4) Prolongation and intensification of treatment, using much arsphenamine and heavy metal, but especially much arsphena- mine in the first 3 months promotes good results. (5) Satisfactory results may occur with little treatment, but much treatment and over prolonged periods is twice as effective as little treatment if continuously applied, and 5 times as effective as treatment intermittently applied. (6) Arsphenamine is the chief factor in relapse prevention, and this applies specifically to the incidence of neurosyphilis (note impor- tance of this principle in foreshortened intensive methods). (7) Serologic irreversibility becomes the more marked the later in early syphilis treatment is begun, and the more frequently lapse from continuity occurs whether in the form of rest intervals or otherwise. (8) A weak positive serologic reaction interrupting a series of nega- tives in early syphilis is a distinct warning of the possibility of relapse. Much of the effectiveness of the foreshortened intensive treatment methods was predicted by Martenstein’s conclusions from the general League of Nations material that the employment of a comparatively heavy individual dosage of the arsenical and of bismuth or mercury with administration in rapid succession at the outset of treatment, leads to superior results. Furthermore, approximately the same amount of treat- ment should be administered to primary as to secondary cases. (g) Large dosage is preferable to small; should follow a weight standard, and be without sex differentiation. (h) Many of the most serious complications of treatment are due to back- ground causes (idiosyncratic-allergic, intercurrent infections, and technical factors rather than the drugs as such alone). In particular, the combina- tion of arsenic and bismuth is as safe as arsenic alone. (i) To date, no claims for the use of a heavy metal alone in the treatment of early syphilis have withstood critical evaluation. An arsenical is essen- tial as a controller of infectiousness. The effect is augmented by bismuth, and also though probably less so, by mercury. Twenty full doses each of arsenical and heavy metal approximate a minimal amount of treatment for infection control (so-called 20-20 standard). (j) The controversies over the individual merits of arsenicals (606, 914 and so forth) have been largely submerged by the overwhelming popularity of 4 mapharsen in American practice, due largely to its low toxicity, combined with high spirillicidal value. This has been overwhelmingly demonstrated in the 5-day massive dose arsenotherapy (5-day drip) and its therapeutic efficacy when intensively employed has also been demonstrated by the Eagle-Hogan animal experiments. Additional Basic Principles for Present and Future Emphasis. 1. The Boeck11 material underlies the principle that syphilis “cures” itself in 40% of cases. 2. A little treatment in early syphilis36 raises the percentage of cure another 20 % to 30 %. 3. Intensification and prolongation (or repetition in the case of intensive foreshortened methods) directed at the resistant 30% bags another 15% to 25%, depending on stage-of-beginning-treatment, for cure. 4. The remaining 5% to 15% represents the irreducible residue of resistance (deficient defense, special strains and so forth) that nothing save time, therapeutic repetition and variation, and fever, if anything, will cure. 5. Non-specific agents (fever) have important re-enforcing and curative effects in early as well as late syphilis—chiefly by enhancing the effective- ness of arsenicals faster than it increases their toxicity.6 6. The spinal fluid examination is an indispensable evaluative and cura- tive check procedure more important ultimately than blood serology. 7. As to observation and discharge as cured, all patients who have had an entirely non-relapsing course while receiving ideal treatment should be informed that a cardiovascular reexamination in the 5- to 10-year period is necessary. 8. The syphilitic pregnant woman or the woman who has had syphilis and is believed to be cured should have her status reviewed with every pregnancy and safety-first requires her treatment for protection of the child during each pregnancy whether seronegative or seropositive. 9. Unsatisfactory results (non-cure) are usually reviewed by the 5th year of observation and Padget found no less satisfactory results in any case after 10 or more years of observation. Principles Established by the Clinical and Experimental Study of Fore- shortened Intensive Methods. The past decade of work with intensive treatment methods has contributed a number of additional important principles to our understanding of syphilotherapy. 1. Hyman, and his co-workers16 have demonstrated that an approxima- tion to the total curative dose of an arsenical can he administered to a human being by an intravenous infusion method (drip) without necessarily dis- astrous effects with a controllable though increased toxicity and with satisfactory results. 2. A toxicity-therapeutic efficacy relationship has been worked out by Eagle and Hogan1416 on the basis of animal, and more recently human clinical results. Syphilis can be cured in 80% to 100% of cases (stage- of-beginning-treatment factor) by a total dose of 20 to 30 mg. per kilo body weight of an arsenoxide (mapharsen) alone. 3. The toxicity of such a dose is inversely proportional to the time in which this dose is given. 4. Any combination of toxicity and time relationship (that is, any margin of safety) that practical considerations may dictate is theoretically possible, the mortality rising with the shortening of the time in which the total dose is delivered. 5. The addition of bismuth (“re-discovery”) greatly enhances the effect of 5 all foreshortened intensive arsenotherapy (informally estimated by Eagle as 8 times better effect with bismuth than without). 6. Serologic signs and symptoms under foreshortened procedure disappear gradually on a now well-recognized gradient to which a quantitative serologic procedure is essential in interpretation. 7. A wide variety of time and technical variations (5-day intravenous drip versus 10-day multiple injection, versus 10 to 12 weeks of 2 to 3 injections weekly, versus 26-week schedules) with graded morbidity and mortality but substantially identical therapeutic outcome can be employed as forms of “foreshortened intensive” systems in the name of various types of exigency or expediency. 8. The mortality of the 5-day drip is currently estimated at 1:200 to 1:300. Any schedule completed in 20 days or less will have a mortality greater than 1:1000 (Eagle-Hogan); 10- to 12-week systems have a mor- tality of approximately 1:1500. The mortality of 20- and 26-week sys- tems is not yet definitely known. That of reasonably good performance of the standard conservative prolonged systems is estimated by Hahn18 (Johns Hopkins Hospital) at 1:1950; with optimum experience at 1:2800. It must be recalled that the mortality of conservative treatment is com- puted from arsphenamine and not mapharsen-treated cases. The toxicity of mapharsen is so low (1 death in 3938 patients16), that a material drop in mortality should follow its use in the conservative systems. Levine and Keddie estimate the mapharsen death rate to be \ that from neo- arsphenamine. 9. The foreshortened intensive procedures (up to 12 weeks) greatly reduce the incidence of neurosyphilis. 10. The justification of the foreshortened procedures except for their apparent efficacy in the prevention of neurosyphilis (spinal fluid abnor- mality) is in the main still one of emergency and expediency. The ultimate results are obtainable by the older slower methods with less risk of life. What effect this will have on their post-war use remains to be seen. In a discussion of the basic principles of system evaluation applicable to foreshortened intensive methods, Stokes436 wrote as follows: “ Any new systems proposed should be judged basically by their ability (a) to equal or surpass the ‘curative’ expectancy of the old ones; (6) to lead to less infectious relapse; (c) to reduce the incidence of cardiovascular and neurosyphilis, and (d) by their relative risks to the patient. “For the evaluation of a system, time and observation are necessary to establish reduction of, or absence of relapse and progression. For the former, 2 to 4 years; for the latter, up to 10 years is a reasonable observa- tional requirement. For decision on relapse the patient must be repeat- edly and frequently observed, for it is a come and go affair. For the evaluation of ‘ cure,’ from a decade to a lifetime, the longer the better, is required. ■ “A system which under such scrutiny has shown itself at least equal to its predecessors may then proceed to claim additional advantage and support for a variety of reasons, including cheapness, rapidity, controlla- bility of the lapse factor because the whole job is finished in a short time, aid in the widening of availability of treatment by making possible the treatment of more persons*per unit of time, personnel and equipment. Such considerations are in the main secondary to those of control of infec- tiousness and real curative power. “ If the new system equals the old or surpasses it in all these particulars it has but one more hurdle to make before achieving priority. While 6 yrimum non nocere is losing some of its meaning in a war-torn world, there are still arch conservatives who are inclined to examine critically the bad effects, the complications of a system. Of real importance to the victim are the risks involved, the chances of damage or of death from treatment in the case of a disease which with none or very little treatment gives the victim at the outset a 40 to 70% chance of escape from serious conse- quences. If an equal chance of escape with an older method offering less risk exists, only the most cogent reasons and a free choice by the patient of the more dangerous method justify its election.” The Conservative or Prolonged Standards of Treatment for Early, Early Latent and Late Latent Syphilis. It is now in order to summarize wrhat may be called the “official” or most widely authenticated and accepted systems for use in that phase of the disease which permits of systematiza- tion in procedure. While it is impossible, with the rapid changes taking place in syphiiotherapy, to predict how long such systems will have a following, it should be clearly understood that they are effective, and will do all that the foreshortened systems will, with a very much greater margin of safety. To the British-Scandinavian intermittent system8 (which must be exactly followed, diagram in hand) and a slight but now', for American practice, “official” modification of the American continuous (League of Nations) system, the “ 30-60-03,1,43 is added the as yet un- proved and unevaluated but rational “Army Plan” recommended to the Surgeons General by the National Research Council and publicized in Circular Letter No. 74. The conservative systems are still, we believe, the backbone of modern practice, the basis of much of our present knowl- edge of mechanism and effects, and likely to be displaced completely only by certain radical changes in the whole chemotherapeutic attack on the disease such as are affecting the pyogenic infections, gonorrhea, etc. (the sulfonamides, penicillin). The British-Scandinavian {League of Nations) System: Plan of Courses of Inject ion. A course consists of 8 weekly injections of neoarsphenamine (0.6 to 0.75 gin. each) or arsphenamine (0.4 to 0.5 gm. each) given simultaneously with 8 weekly injections of an insoluble bismuth compound (0.2 to 0.24 gm. bismuth metal each) and followed by 2 more weekly injections of bismuth compound. An equivalent amount of a mercury preparation may be substituted for the bismuth (inunctions for 40 days at 3 gm. of unguentum hydrargyri or injections of 70 mg. of mild mercurous chloride or 120 mg. of mercuric salicylate, etc., suspended in a suitable base). It is recommended that: (а) In cases wdiich remain or become serologically negative during or by the end of the first course, 4 such courses be administered, with intervals of 3 to 5 weeks between any 2 courses. (б) In cases which have not become seronegative by the end of the first course, in addition to the amount of treatment showm in (o), further courses should be administered until the patient has received as a minimum 3 beyond that which has ended with negative serum reactions. At the option of the individual clinician, this treatment may be prolonged as may be considered necessary. (c) Cases presenting signs of clinical relapse of an early type should be dealt with on principles similar to those enunciated in (b). For non-pregnant females, treatment should be administered on the plan out- lined for men, with the exception that the single dose of neoarsphenamine should be reduced by 0.15 gm. and that of arsphenamine by 0.1 gm. In the event of any reduction in the amount of treatment being indicated, it is recommended that this be effected by reducing the number of arsenical injections rather than by reducing the individual dose or increasing the intervals. 7 The American Continuous System: The “30-60-03” “Official” Modifi- cation, Circular Letter No. 18 of the Surgeon General’s Office, U. S. Army. The published work of the United States Public Health Service and the Cooperative Clinical Group in the United States has indicated that con- tinuous treatment with an effective arsenical alternating with bismuth on a definitely defined schedule with calendar regularity and without rest periods during the arsenical phase is the optimum conservative technic for the treatment of seronegative and seropositive primary syphilis, secondary syphilis, and early latency (within the first 4 years of the infection when the duration is known). An essentially similar standard of treatment employing 606, parallel with an acceptable intermittent (British-Scandinavian) system of treatment employing neoarsphenamine, has been recommended by the Commission on Syphilis and Cognate Sub- jects of the League of Nations as a result of an extended study of an inter- national statistical material. It may therefore, it is believed, be accepted as having the support of authority. For mnemonic convenience, the designation, “30-60-03” is suggested, for the standard system for early and early latent syphilis;43 the “30” representing the number of arsenical injections; the “60” representing the number of weeks of bismuth therapy, equivalent to 60 injections of bismuth subsalicylate, and the “0” and “3” representing respectively, no rest periods, and 3 years of combined treatment observation. By “treatment observation” is meant the total elapsed time from the institu- tion of treatment in accordance with this schedule until the patient is discharged from observation as presumptively cured. Since the sequence of various types of treatment in this system, the pre- vention of relapse by overlapping of heavy metal and arsenical therapy, the serologic controls, the spinal fluid examination, all are integral parts of the treatment system, the following diagram is offered as presenting these various relationships. The “30-60-03" for Early Syphilis. 30 neoarsphenamine or mapharsen injections, 60 weeks of bismuth injections. NO rest intervals in the arsenical phase, 3 years of treatment observation. 0 = neoarsphenamine or mapharsen; x = bismuth subsalicylate; weekly intervals. xxxxxxxxxx 8 weeks rest (and continue this intermittently to a total of 60 bismuth injections). A = first 3 injections compressible into 10 to 14 days. Some risk of increased re- activity. B = average case seronegative, 16th week. C = Examine spinal fluid if blood is still positive, 24th week. D = Always insist on spinal fluid examination before rest period. 1 = if blood test has become negative, suspect low resistance. 2, 3,4,5 = if weak positives appear among negatives, suspect relapse, neurosyphilis. The “30-60-03” schedule as thus presented can be drawn up in “vertical” as distinguished from the above “horizontal” arrangement, week by week, for printing directly on record forms. The published observation of the USPHS-CCG group on the treatment of early syphilis indicated that the “30 60-03” schedule could be most effectively applied to seronegative primary syphilis and fully developed secondary syphilis. In the case of seropositive primary syphilis, whose status should be confirmed in the seronegative cases by a repetition of the blood test on the day following the first 8 arsenical injection, there were definite indications that the seropositive primary phase of the disease, lacking the development of a full-fledged immunity reaction on the part of the body was the most resistant to cure, and the most prone to relapse of the 3 groups of cases included under the designation, “early syphilis.” It has accordingly been proposed that in seropositive primary syphilis and initially negative primary syphilis which becomes seropositive on the blood immediately following the institution of treatment, a “40-80-04” system be employed, meaning thereby an additional 10 arsenical injections and 20 bismuth injections and another year of observation over and above the standards proposed as generally applicable to early and early latent syphilis. This extension of the arsenical phase of treat- ment can take the form of 5 courses of the arsenical of 8 injections each, in place of the 3 courses of 8 and 1 course of 6 injections in the “30-60-03” system. The bismuth therapy may follow the usual 2-injection overlap, plus 4 additional injec- tions in the arsenical intermission that is employed in the “30-60-03”; the remain- ing bismuth injections to complete the 80-week standard, being continued in 10-injection intermittent courses after the completion of the arsenical phase of treatment. The 26-Week Army System. The diagram is adapted from Circular Letter No. 74, Surgeon General’s Office, U. S. Army. Week Arsenoxide Week Bismuth 2 1 ' 2 2 Bismuth subsalicylate 3 3 intramuscularly once 4 Arsenoxide intravenously 4 a week, 5 injections 5 twice a week; total 20 5 6 injections 6 Omit bismuth subsalicyl- 7 7 ate 5 weeks 8 8 9 9 10 10 11 11 12 12 13 Omit arsenoxide 6 weeks 13 Bismuth subsalicylate 14 14 once a week, 6 injec- 15 15 tions 16 16 17 17 18 18 Omit bismuth subsalicyl- 19 19 ate 5 weeks 20 Arsenoxide as in first 20 21 course twice a week; 21 22 total, 20 injections 22 23 23 Bismuth subsalicylate 24 24 once a week, 5 injec- 25 25 tions 26 26 Dosage. Arsenoxide, 0.05 to 0.07 gm., based on patient’s weight. Bismuth subsalicylate, 0.2 gm. (Forty injections arsenoxide—16 bismuth subsalicylate.) Serologic Control of Treatment. In patients with early syphilis treated with the Army system, a serologic test will be done at the beginning and end of the schedule of treatment outlined but treatment may be stopped whether the serologic reac- tion for syphilis is positive or negative. After the completion of treatment the serologic tests should be repeated 3 and 6 months later. If the reaction is negative after 6 months, the case may be classified as “result satisfactory” and the Syphilis Register may be closed. If the test is positive after 6 months, the patient should be referred to a station or general hospital. In patients with latent syphilis the serologic tests should be repeated at the completion of the treatment outlined, but the Syphilis Register may be closed when this treatment is completed, regardless of the result of the serologic test. Spinal fluid examination should be performed In a hospital in patients with early syphilis at the end of the course of treatment outlined, or as soon as possible there- 9 after, but in any event before the Syphilis Register is closed. In apparent latent syphilis, spinal fluid examination should be performed in a hospital before treat- ment or as soon as possible thereafter, but in any event before the Syphilis Register is closed. A System of Treatment for Latency—“ plus." Before defining a system by which adequate treatment of latency may be judged, it must be reemphasized here that the latency implied is “ monosymptomatic seropositive latency” in which absolutely no clinical evidence of syphilis can be identified on complete physical examination except the positive and confirmed—and confirmable—blood-serologic reaction for the disease. An adequate examination of the spinal fluid is necessary to establish the fact that a seeming latency is not complicated by asymptomatic neuro- syphilis. A patient who has been adequately treated for an early syph- ilitic infection but who still remains seropositive on the blood in order to be considered as in monosymptomatic seropositive latency (serologically fast) should have had a negative spinal fluid 1 year after the close of his treatment for early syphilis, and if more than a year has elapsed since the cessation of such treatment, a repetition of the spinal fluid examination is desirable. A long series of negative spinal fluids is not necessary to the establishment of the status of monosymptomatic seropositive latency, for according to USPHS-CCG observation, more than 1 or 2 repetitions of a negative fluid in the absence of any developing clinical signs is unnecessary. The latency of a syphilitic infection is divided arbitrarily into an early and a late period, partly because of the greater risk of infectious relapse and other types of recurrence in early latency, and partly because of the presumed better outlook for complete arrest if not cure in the earlier years of the latent period. The dividing line between early and late latency has tended in American practice to be the fourth year of the disease. This is an arbitrary setting which may in the judgment of an expert, be varied one way or the other. A young and robust person whose infection is of 5 or even 6 years presumed duration may be advised to accept the standard for an early infection in his treatment. On the other hand most genuine latency, after the 4th year, shows relatively little tendency to progression, and may be treated by a standard substantially lower than that proposed for the radical cure of early infection. The treatment of early latency (first 4 years of the disease) is that of early syphilis—the “30-60-03” system. The Cooperative Clinical Group’s13 experience has indicated that for the treatment of late latency (after the 4th year) 3 courses of 8 injections each of an effective arsenical given in continuity and alternation with 10 injections of bismuth subsalicylate, without overlap and with con- tinuity extending only through the arsenical phase, constitute an adequate beginning. The continuous treatment with arsenical and heavy metal is then followed by an intermittent and prolonged treatment with bismuth alone which should total, including the three 10-injection bismuth courses given with the arsenical phase, not less than 60 weeks of bismuth therapy. Further treatment with bismuth to the extent of 80 weeks, or even 100 weeks, or on the basis of 80 weeks, plus “ a course a year” for several years, was found to increase appreciably the good results by the criteria em- ployed. It is not necessary, however, in judging candidates for admission to the services, to insist on prolongation of the heavy metal phase beyond the 60th week. Approximately 70% of monosymptomatic seropositive latency may be expected to reverse to negative on the blood for an indefi- 10 nite period following a 24-60 course, and the failure of the remaining 30 % to reverse may be regarded as no bar to eligibility. As a general principle, late latent cases remaining seropositive after a 24-60 course should be observed at intervals of a year or two with physical examination and appropriate tests for evidence of cardiovascular progres- sion and ultimate neurosyphilitic involvement. It should be emphasized that late latency is usually much overtreated on the basis of fluctuating positive blood serologic reactions alone, or be- cause of conflicts between the results of various laboratories (“serologic discord”). Massive Dose, Foreshortened Chemotherapy of Eealy Syphilis, Description of Procedure, Indications and Contraindications. All methods of intensive therapy are intended for patients with early syphilis (primary, secondary, relapsing secondary, and early latency) who have received little or no previous therapy, who are robust young people, especially men, reason- ably free from serious visceral disease, particularly hepatitis, myocarditis, severe hypertension, nephritis, excessive alcoholism, blood dyscrasias, active pulmonary tuberculosis, and history of previous serious arsenical reaction. Although it is safe to administer sulfonamides simultaneously with conservative prolonged therapy and even with the 12-week system, it is unsafe to give sulfonamide therapy for gonorrhea or other conditions to patients receiving 5- to 10-day intensive therapy. Pre-treatment Routine (All Methods of Intensive Chemotherapy) (after Leifer, 194016). The routine examination consists of the following: 1. Daily urinalysis, including determination of urobilin. 2. Determination of the urea nitrogen content of the blood and the icterus index. 3. Complete blood count, including that of the platelets. 4. Complete physical examination on admission. 5. Serologic examinations made in 3 different laboratories (these include the Kolmer, Kline diagnostic, Kline exclusion, Kahn standard and titered Wassermann tests). 6. Dark-field examination of material from all open sores. 7. Estimation of renal function by determination of the specific gravity of the urine. 8. Special tests of hepatic function by the bilirubin method. 9. Studies of the excretion of arsenic in the urine and in the stool and its con- centration in the blood (optional; for study purposes). Technic of 5-Day Intravenous Drip (Chargin, Hyman, Leifer16) (after Committee on Massive Drip Intravenous Therapy, 1940). Materials* 1. Needle—deep injec- tion type, No. 20, 1$ inch length. 2. Diluent—5% dextrose solution. 3. Drug—mapharsen (arsenoxide), ampoules 0.04, 0.06, and 0.06 gm. 4. Glass gravity cylinder, 300 cc. capacity with attached rubber tubing, glass drip chamber, adapter for needle. Vacoliter or similar container may be used instead of apparatus described (L. W. Shaffer). 5. Adhesive or Scotch tape (5 inch width). Dosage of Mapharsen: 1. Total dosage for the 5-day treatment period is deter- mined by the stripped weight of the patient. In patients weighing less than 70 kg. (155 pounds) the total dose is 1000 mg. (1 gm.); in those weighing 70 kg. or more, the total dose of mapharsen is 1200 mg. (1.2 gm.). 2. The daily dose is 200 mg. (0.2 gm.) for patients receiving a total of 1000 mg. (1 gm.). 3. The daily dose is 240 mg. (0.24 gm.) for patients receiving a total of 1200 mg. (1.2 gm.). 4. If a patient receives less than the intended daily dose (this will most often occur on the first day of therapy), the deficiency in dosage may then be spread over the remaining days of treatment. Thus, if the patient receives 120 mg. (0.12 gm.) 11 the first day instead of the intended total daily dosage of 240 mg. (0.24 gm.) he may be given 30 mg. (0.03 gm.) additional on each of the succeeding 4 days of treat- ment. Procedure: Site of Election for Insertion of Needle. After cleansing of forearm and application of a tourniquet above the elbow to distend the veins, the needle is attached to a 2 cc. Luer type syringe and inserted in a vein on the forearm, usually anterior or outer aspect, between elbow and wrist, to allow movement at these articulations. Needle should be inserted Into vein up to the hub, a gauze sponge placed beneath the needle hub, and the needle fixed in place with adhesive (or Scotch) tape. Alternate arms used on succeeding days. The adapter of the intravenous set is attached to the needle (after the adapter has been freed of air bubbles) after the removal of the tourniquet, and the solution is allowed to flow rapidly until 10 to 15 cc. have entered. Should any swelling or infiltration be noted about the needle point, the flow should be stopped; the needle removed, and reintroduced into a different vein in the same or opposite forearm. The rate of flow is regulated by the fine adjustment clamp so that solu- tion enters at a speed of about 50 to 60 drops per minute; thus, the entire quantity of 2000 cc. will require 8 to 12 hours for introduction. Addition of Bismuth to Massive Dose Technic. Since July, 1941, L. W. Shaffer has been using bismuth concurrently with the arsenical. It may be used as follows: Dosage of Bismuth With Intravenous Drip Method: 1. Suspension of bismuth subsalicylate in oil is employed. 2. The patient should receive 0.2 gm. bismuth subsalicylate (0.13 gm. bismuth metal) intramuscularly as soon as the diagnosis of early syphilis has been confirmed. 3. The second dose of 0.2 gm, should be given on the 3d day of treatment, the third dose of 0.2 gm. on the 6th day and a fourth dose of 0.2 gm. on the 9th day, before discharge. Method of Preparing Arsenoxide Solutions. Mapharsen (arsenoxide), 0.01 gm., is dissolved in 100 cc. of 5% dextrose solution. Usual procedure is to prepare 500 cc. of such solution, containing 0.06 gm. mapharsen—this is enough for 3 hours of treatment. When the Vacoliter containing 2000 cc. of 5% dextrose is used, the total daily dose of 0.24 gm. mapharsen (arsenoxide) is prepared the first thing in the morning and the solution allowed to run in, in the 10 to 12 hour treatment period. This has been the practice in one institution. The preparation of the drug for the 10 to 12 hour period all at once has simplified the technic to a great extent. Variants in Usual Procedure: 1. Primary fever on the 1st day (Herxheimer) — therapy is stopped if temperature reaches 101.4° F. or more. This usually happens between the 6th and 8th hour; by the time patient may only have received from 0.12 to 0.16 gm. mapharsen. The practice has been to compensate for this insuffi- cient dose in the following manner: 1st day—0.12 gm. mapharsen (arsenoxide); 2d day—0.28 gm. mapharsen (arsenoxide); 3d day—0.28 gm. mapharsen (arsen- oxide); 4th day—0.28 gm. mapharsen (arsenoxide); 5th day—0.24 gm. mapharsen (arsenoxide). 2. Clinical jaundice—when this appears in the course of treatment, the procedure should be interrupted. It has only been seen once in all cases studied (Com- mittee report). General Medical Care During 5-Day Intravenous Drip. Routine soapsuds enema should be given the night before treatment is begun, to obviate the need for bedpan, and whenever thereafter indicated. According to Leifer’s (1940) description: “The nursing problem during the period of treatment consists of the preparation of fresh solution for each patient at the end of 2 or 3 hours and the refilling of the gravity flask. Meals are served on the ordinary bed tray. Patients can feed themselves. They are also capable of handling the urinal but, naturally, must be assisted somewhat in the use of the bedpan. The latter disturbance may be prevented by having the patient evacuate or have an enema during the evening, when treatment has been discontinued. “The patients are given a high calory diet, rich in starches and carbohydrates. The majority of the patients read, listen to the radio, or play cards during the day In the evening, after discontinuance of therapy, they may get out of bed. They 12 suffer little or no discomfort. Many of them register a gain in weight of as much as 10 pounds (4.5 kg.). This gain in weight is not due to any appreciable edema but may be explained by the fact that most of these patients otherwise under- nourished, are so well treated with regard to food and nursing care.” Technic of 10-Day Multiple Injection Intensive Therapy for Syphilis.16 With this treatment system patients need not be confined to bed, but they should be treated in the hospital and observed for at least 2 days after the last injection of mapharsen (arsenoxide). Routine ward diet may be employed. Two injections of mapharsen (arsenoxide) are given daily for a 10-day period. The injections are given in the morning and evening of each day, 10, or preferably, 12, hours apart. Schoch, however, has given single injections of 100 to 120 mg. daily as an ambulatory procedure. Dosage is governed roughly by weight. Patients weighing 50-70 kg. (110 to 154 pounds) should receive 0.05 gm. of maphar- sen twice daily for 10 days. Patients weighing between 70 and 90 kg. (155 to 200 pounds) should receive 0.06 gm. of mapharsen twice daily for 10 days. The dosage may be increased to 0.070 gm. in each injection for patients weighing over 90 kg. (200 pounds). Each dose of mapharsen (arsenoxide) should be dissolved in from 8 to 10 cc. of distilled water. The solution should he aerated and rapidly injected, intravenously, promptly after preparation. In cases where solutions are made in bulk, individual doses should be given within at least a 2-hour period after preparation. On the 1st, Jfh, 8th and 12th days, 0.2 gm. of bismuth subsalicylate in oil should be injected deeply into alternate gluteal muscles. Thomas and his associates of Bellevue Hospital combine fever therapy with the intensive multiple syringe technic (1941, 1943). The risk of serious cerebral accidents with this method increases with the amount of arsenoxide (mapharsen) given. The addition of fever does not prevent cerebral reactions but lessens their frequency by necessitating a lower dosage of arsenical. Reactions from 5- to 10-Day Intensive Therapy and Their Management. Minor Reactions: 1. Pain in the arm: cold wet dressings, ice-bag, aspirin, codeine only if pain is severe. 2. Mild headache: aspirin or codeine usually gives prompt relief. If headache is severe, increasing and persistent, consider this as possible prodrome of toxic encephalopathy. 3. Nausea and vomiting: give only fluids by mouth, and sedation if necessary. If persistent, discontinue treatment temporarily. May give 5% or 10% dextrose solution alone intravenously. 4. Primary fever: sharp rise in temperature occurs on the 1st day of treatment especially with intravenous drip. It is usually almost normal by evening, and normal by the next day. If the temperature goes above 101.4° F. discontinue drip for the day.' Next day, drip may be rein- stituted, practically always without recurrence of fever; this early fever need not cause omission of the second dose when multiple syringe method is used. Primary fever is usually accompanied by a flare-up of the syph- ilitic lesions (Herxheimer reaction, therapeutic shock). Symptomatic treatment may be used if necessary. 5. Secondary fever: secondary rises of temperature in excess of 101 ° F. at any time after the first day of treatment are an indication for interrupt- ing therapy because secondary fever is sometimes associated with a mild toxicoderma- Most often in the 5-day treatment the fever occurs on the last evening of therapy. Mapharsen should not be given again until the temperature is normal. If fever recurs when treatment is reinstituted, efforts at intensive therapy should be abandoned entirely. If the patient has received at least a total of 800 mg. (0.8 gm.) of maphar- sen (arsenoxide) before the appearance of fever, intensive arsenotherapy by any system should not be reinstituted. In this case all further arsenical 13 therapy may be omitted, but the patient should receive a total of at least 12 weekly intramuscular injections of bismuth subsalicylate before all treatment is stopped. Symptomatic treatment for this reaction may be used, if necessary. 6. Toxicoderma: usually appears in the post-treatment period on the 7th day, and is often preceded by and accompanied with fever. The type is most commonly morbilliform, scarlatiniform, or urticarial, and there is no exfoliation. This is not arsenical exfoliative dermatitis, and is not a serious sensitizing reaction. The rash usually fades in 1 to 4 days without therapy. Symptomatic treatment may be used, when indicated. Since this reaction does not usually occur with the intravenous drip method until all treatment has been completed, it has no bearing on inter- ruption of such treatment. When the 10-day multiple injection system is used, the occurrence of this “9th-day erythema” is an indication for interrupting treatment. This reaction may be associated (rarely) with toxic encephalopathy, and continued treatment may increase the risk. 7. Renal damage: usually insignificant, consisting of minor traces of albumin, occasional red and white blood cells. No treatment is needed. Marked albuminuria or hematuria is a signal for discontinuing treatment. 8. Peripheral neuritis: rarely encountered, and only in the post-treat- ment period. Usually manifested only by subjective symptoms, most often paresthesias. Objective changes are rarely encountered, and only sensory in type, never motor. The process disappears spontaneously. This reaction was common in the cases treated early by the 5-day method, probably because of immobility of the arm and the use of a drug too toxic (neoarsphenamine) for such a method. 9. Nitritoid reaction: rarely observed with multiple injections or with the intravenous drip procedure, unless the rate of flow of the latter is inordinately fast (mapharsen [arsenoxide] is well known to produce this reaction only rarely). 10. Precordial oppression (Falk and Rattner, 1942; Prats, Veras and Haraszti, 1942): this occurs occasionally with 5-day treatment. Discon- certing but not frequent or serious. Major Reactions: 1. Severe headache: especially towards the 4th or 5th day of treatment, the occurrence of severe, persistent and increasing headache not readily relieved by aspirin or codeine should be viewed as of possible serious import (prodrome of toxic encephalopathy). It is best to discontinue intensive therapy and after a rest interval from all arsenical therapy of at least 4 weeks (this rest period to be occupied with weekly bismuth injections) to place the patient on the standard or 26-week treat- ment schedule, the duration of which may be shortened to the extent of the mapharsen dosage before the reaction occurred (e. g., if the patient received a total of 400 mg. mapharsen before the reaction, 1200 mg. additional should be given by injections twice weekly with bismuth added as in the standard schedule). 2. Jaundice: this is an uncommon complication and calls for discon- tinuance of intensive therapy. No instance of acute yellow atrophy has occurred although Rattner and Falk (1942) observed a case of severe hepatitis with other visceral damage (see below). For the treatment of this reaction, the patient may be given intravenous 10% dextrose solution, high carbohydrate-low fat diet, and injections of liver extract therapeuti- cally. Intestinal elimination should be encouraged with saline catharsis. 14 3. Blood dyscrasias (especially purpura or bleeding from any part of the body): rarely encountered, but necessitating permanent discontinuance of all arsenotherapy, Treatment usually consists in blood transfusions. 4. Exfoliative dermatitis: rarely, if ever, encountered. Requires per- manent discontinuance of all arsenotherapy. Symptomatic treatment, dextrose intravenously, and liver extract. 5. Encephalopathy: women are especially susceptible. This reaction may be manifested by severe headache, vertigo, tremor, fever, unusually severe nausea and vomiting, mental confusion, disorientation, and apathy; by single or repeated convulsive seizures, and by prolonged chorea. In serious instances hyperthermia usually supervenes and death may result. Mpy occur on the 3th to 5th day of treatment, or not until the 6th or 7th day; rarely thereafter. Often preceded by headache of increasing severity (see above). There is no means of anticipating this reaction (Thomas, Wexler and Dattner, 1942). In mild cases, the suspicion of toxic encephalopathy should be checked by examination of the spinal fluid for cells, globulin or increased protein. If such tests are positive, further treatment with arsenical drugs should be abandoned. If the spinal fluid is normal, treatment may be resumed if the symptoms have com- pletely disappeared and the temperature is normal. Treatment of this serious reaction is of uncertain value but the prog- nosis is not as bad as is usually assumed (Chargin, 1940). Suggested procedures include (1) repeated drainage of spinal fluid (20 to 40 cc.) in repeated taps daily; (2) dehydration by use of intravenous 50% sucrose solution, 50 to 200 cc.; (3) sedation is of value in all cases. Where symp- toms are mild, any of the barbiturates may be used by mouth. If convul- sions occur, sodium amytal 0.24 grn. (3f gr.) may be given intravenously or intramuscularly (this dose may be repeated every 2 to 3 hours for several doses if convulsions occur or the patient is restless; (4) adrenalin. Oxygen inhalations may also be given. Sodium thiosulfate is of no value (Chargin, 1940). 6. Severe renal injury (rare); Thomas and his colleagues (1943) have reported acute nephrosis in patients receiving short arsenical and pro- longed fever treatment but no particular renal damage occurs in their patients treated with the multiple injection method (10- or 6-day). Ratt- ner and Falk (1942) reported a severe case with acute glomerulonephritis, anuria, uremia, hepatitis, ileus and pericarditis in a patient treated by the 5-day method. This is rare. Post-treatment Routine After 5 to 10 Day Intensive Therapy (to be carried out before discharge from hospital). (1) Complete physical examination. (2) Labora- tory studies, (a) Titered blood serologic test for syphilis. (6) Complete urine analysis, (c) Complete blood count (hemoglobin, red blood cell and white blood cell count and differential), (d) Other laboratory procedures (icterus index,'serum bilirubin, urobilinogen, non-protein nitrogen where indicated). Outline of Proposed 12-Week Schedule of Modified Intensive Treatment (Eagle, 1943). Patients are to be treated with mapharsen (arsenoxide) 3 times weekly (Monday, Wednesday, and Friday; or Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday) at the following dosage scale: less than 120 pounds (55 kg.), 50 mg.; 120 to 155 pounds (55 to 70 kg.), 60 mg.; greater than 155 pounds, 70 mg. Treatment is to continue for 12 weeks or to a total of 36 injections. Hospitalization is not necessary, and patients are to be treated on “duty status.” Patients are to receive intramuscular injections of bismuth 15 subsalicylate (0.2 gm., equivalent to 0.13 gm. of metallic bismuth) once weekly throughout the course of mapharsen (arsenoxide) treatment, to a total of 12 injections. Follow-up Observation After All Methods of Intensive Chemotherapy. 1. Patient should be reexamined at monthly intervals for 6 months. 2. This reexamination should include a complete physical examination with special attention to the mucous membranes of the mouth and throat, the genitals and the perianal region for easily overlooked evidences of infectious relapse. 3. Quantitative blood serologic tests for syphilis should be performed monthly for 6 months, and then at the 9th and 12th month. (The blood serologic reactions usually become negative at the 12th to 16th week after the start of treatment). 4. Examination of the spinal fluid should be done, if feasible, sometime between the 6th and 12th month. 5. The patient should not receive any further anti-syphilitic therapy, except as specifically set forth under “management of the unsatisfactory case.” Management of the Unsatisfactory Case. A patient who has become clinically “cured” and- serologically negative and remained so until the 12th month of observation, and in whom the spinal fluid is negative, may be discharged from observation as a “satisfactory result.” Should such a person return at a later date with a new dark-field positive lesion, this may be considered as a new infec- tion and the patient may be re-treated in the original manner (Schoch, 1943; Moore, 1943; L. W. Shaffer, 1943). A case must be considered as unsatisfactory or a treatment failure, if: (a) There is definite objective evidence of infectious relapse, corroborated by a positive blood serologic reaction- for syphilis, and if possible by positive dark-field examination. (6) There is incontrovertible evidence of serologic relapse without clinical relapse, i. e., the patient’s blood serologic reaction has dropped to negative or near negative and then to persistently strongly positive (this is best interpreted by a quantitative procedure), (c) Reagin fast- ness, i. e., where the blood serologic reaction for syphilis has never reverted to negative but remains persistently positive (preferably determined by a constant titer of quantitative tests) for a 6 months period after treatment. The unsatisfactory case (infectious relapse, serologic relapse, seroresistance, and the new infection) may be re-treated by intensive therapy except in the event of serious reaction from the original treatment. The results of intensive re-treatment of the unsatisfactory case have not been fully evaluated, but appear to be less satisfactory than original treatment. Special Considerations Concerning Early Syphilis Treatment. Criteria of Adequacy of Treatment for Syphilis. The answer to this question depends fundamentally upon the definition of “adequacy.” If by ade- quacy is meant the securing of a condition of non-infectiousness in an infectious case, one kind of answer will be appropriate; if adequacy is to be interpreted in terms of clinical or of radical cure, another answer will be appropriate; if adequacy means the placing of an infected individual at one or another type or stage of involvement in syphilis on asymptomatic status that will permit of full or limited service in the armed forces, still another answer is necessary. The subject is dealt with under each of these three heads briefly as follows: Treatment of Non-infectiousness. The immediate infectiousness of sur- face lesions of syphilis is controlled in all but the rare treatment-resistant or arsenic-fast case, it will be recalled, by the first one, or at most two, injections of an effective trivalent arsenical, provided the dose is adequate (0.3 to 0.5 gm. arsphenamine 606; 0.4 to 0.6 gm. neoarsphenamine; 40 to 60 mg. mapharsen). The duration of this effect of 1 or 2 injections is not precisely known, but is estimated roughly as approximately 30 to 90 days. Failure to continue treatment does not necessarily, but may in a percentage of cases ranging from 0% to 64%, lead to infectious relapse. 16 A useful tabulation from the Cooperative Clinical Group and the Uni- versity of Pennsylvania material is herewith presented: Arsenical treatment Infectious Additional Infectious alone, number of relapse (%) heavy metal relapse injections injections (%) 1- 4 64 20| 45 0 5- 9 14 20 9.0 10-19 20 4.0 20-29 20 3.6 28.8* 30-40 28.2 or more “appropriate” 0 1.2 From this tabulation it will be apparent that the critical point at which sharp reduction in the probability of recurrent infectiousness takes place is between the 5th and 9th injections of the arsenical (14% relapse without and 9 % with heavy metal); and that the so-called 20-20 standard, often quoted as adequate for treatment to non-infectiousness, reduces the risk of infectious relapse to 4%, beyond which a slow reduction to 0% to 1.2% is secured by prolonging treatment beyond 20 arsenical injections with 30 or more injections of heavy metal. Heavy metal, in the statistical table presented above, is taken to repre- sent 0.2 gm. of an insoluble bismuth salt of not less than 57 % metallic content, or 1 week of mercurial inunctions, or its intramuscular equivalent in a water-soluble or insoluble mercurial salt. It will presently be apparent therefore that the best treatment to secure non-infectiousness is practically identical with the optimum treatment for the securing of “satisfactory results” or “cure.” The Influence of the Development of Secondaries on Relapse. An interesting and seemingly paradoxical situation was revealed in the com- parison of serological with clinical relapse under treatment—a relation of particular importance because it might well form the basis for polemic discussion. The stage of syphilis at which treatment is begun influences the incidence of mucocutaneous relapse in a different way from that in which it affects all other forms of relapse. The first Cooperative Clinical Group survey of mucocutaneous relapse as such44 indicated that it occurs in 10% of patients beginning treatment in the seronegative primary stage; 8.6% of those beginning treatment in the seropositive primary stage; and only 4.2 % in those who began treatment after their secondaries had fully developed, t Relapse incidence of the mucocutaneous type was therefore markedly less if the patient was allowed to develop his full cutaneous secondary reaction to the disease, the difference amounting to as much as 58% reduction in probability as the patient passed from a seronegative primary to the florid secondary phase. On the other hand, the existence of a distinct relapsing type was foreshadowed by the fact that patients who began treatment with late or recurrent secondaries relapsed in 22.3 % of cases. Serologic relapse, on the other hand, occurred in 12 % of patients whose treatment was begun in seronegative primary syphilis; 15.1 % under the same circumstances in early secondary syphilis (1st year); and 20% if treatment was not begun until delayed secondaries after the 1st year. It appears, therefore, that to begin the treatment of a patient in the sero- * University of Pennsylvania figures; all others are C. C. G. f One week of mercurial inunctions equals 1 injection. J The percentages estimated on the basis of 3244 cases observed and treated for six months or over were seronegative primary 16.4%, seropositive primary 20.2%, secon- dary (first year) 9.5%, secondary delayed 9.2%. The principle illustrated is the same in both. 17 negative stage of primary syphilis, while it has already been shown defi- nitely to increase the prospect of complete cure, nonetheless subjects him to a definite slight risk of mucocutaneous recurrence and therefore of more prolonged infectiousness. The probable explanation, of course, is that the skin and mucous membranes have never been given the opportunity to develop what might be thought of as a local tissue immunity by full reaction to the disease. It must, of course, be appreciated that the reduced incidence of relapse and progression in patients who have had secondaries arises simply from the fact that in reaching that stage they have automatically, so to speak, set behind them that much of the life history of the disease. It must, too, remain for further study to decide whether the increased risk of infec- tious recurrence after early treatment justifies postponement until the patient has developed secondaries. At the present time the higher pro- portion of curative results seems to justify immediate treatment rather than postponement. The increased risk of infectiousness through recur- rence can hardly be greater than the risk of infectiousness represented by a patient who is allowed to live at large in the community without benefit of the arsphenamines until his secondary eruption has fully developed. In any event, the application of such a principle demands universal hospi- talization for the patient between the primary stage and the full develop- ment of secondaries, an obvious impracticability at this time. Until the proponents of postponement (as for example, Bernard) can advance in- dubitable evidence that there is other than merely mucocutaneous protec- tive value in permitting a patient to go on to secondaries, the postponement of treatment until secondaries develop is not only against the interests of the public health but against that of the individual patient who above all things, desires the greatest possibility of personal cure. Jadassohn, from an international questionnaire,24 has reported that the effect of arsphenamine in controlling the infectiousness of syphilis had led to an estimated reduction in incidence of new cases of the disease of 75 % to 80% in Belgium, Sweden, and Holland; 60% in Finland; 50% in Den- mark; 50% to 80% in Switzerland; 30% to 60% in Italy and Czecho- slovakia; and 25% in Norway . Rules for Preventing Infectious Relapse. The prevention of infectious recurrence and the reduction of relapse to the lowest possible terms requires of the practitioner, then, an unhesitating acceptance of the follow- ing rules: (1) The concept of abortive cure by short courses should be abandoned, no matter how early the patient may come under treatment. (2) Not less than 20 injections of an arsphenamine, and more if possible, preferably in 1 or 2 courses, and an equivalent amount of heavy metal without rest intervals, should be given in an early case to control infec- tiousness. (3) Treatment should be continuous rather than intermittent or intensive, there being no time, at least within the first year or more, that the patient is not under the influence of one or another effective mode of treatment for syphilis with an arsphenamine or heavy metal. (4) Treatment should be massed well to the fore—that is, within the first 3 months, for this is the period in which mass as distinguished from pro- longation, reaches its greatest effectiveness in preventing relapse. (Cf. Massive dose arsenotherapy.) Stokes, Miller and Beerman46 in their study of bismuth arsphenamine sulfonate observed a similar phenomenon. The proportion of relapse in continuous treated eases was 9.1% and in those allowed rest intervals 14.3%. Of the continuously treated cases 60% had comparatively little treatment (20 injections or less) while 18 86% of the intermittently treated patients who had the higher incidence of relapse had had comparatively heavy courses of 21 injections or more (40% had over 40 injections). It appeared that a small amount of treatment continuously applied yielded fewer relapses of all kinds than a larger amount with rest periods or lapses. With so much emphasis placed on the seriousness of lapse in the promo- tion of infectious recurrence, it is proper to emphasize as the 5th rule for the physician, his responsibility in educating his patient and in holding him to a sufficiently prolonged course and in utilizing follow-up assistance if and when it is available. (6) He should understand, too, that infectious relapse is detected by actual physical examination with special emphasis on the mouth, anus, and genitalia rather than by serologic tests. One should examine especially the lips, penis, scrotum and vulva. (7) Positive serologic tests may warn of infectious relapse and confirm the diagnosis, but since they cannot be frequently applied, physical examination and instruction of the patient himself in the recognition of infectious lesions are the more important approaches. (8) Serologic tests and stripped physical examinations, to be of value in detecting relapse, should, if any- thing, be more frequently made after treatment is completed and the patient is put on observation than during treatment itself. The opposite is corhmon practice, and this applies especially to the first 2 or 3 years of the disease. (9) Negative serologic reactions, as has been repeatedly emphasized, are not proof of non-infectiousness, immediate or future. A negative serologic reaction should not deceive the physician or patient into relaxing precautions. (10) Treatment and time are the chief preventives of infectiousness. (11) Since potentially infectious relapses occur over- whelmingly in the first 2 years of early syphilis, sexual relations and inti- mate contact without absolute protection should be allowed only while the patient is under actual arsenical treatment. The duration of non-infectious- ness when treatment is stopped before the 12th injection of arsphenamine may not, apparently, exceed 1 month. Adequacy With Respect to “Cure” or “Satisfactory Results.” Infor- mation on this subject is based on case material observed for not less than 2, and upward to 20, years since the onset of the infection or the institution of treatment. Material of less than 2 years of observational control is fundamentally weak in its demonstration of the possibility of relapse, since the first 2 years of infection are overwhelmingly those of relapse predisposition. On adequacy in the sense of “satisfactory results,” 5 groups of data will be quoted; (a) Cooperative Clinical Group results in the treatment of early syphilis by a continuous alternating use of arsenical and heavy metal without rest period, through 65 weeks of treatment observation; (6) Padget’s36 Johns Hopkins Hospital Syphilis Clinic report on 551 patients completely reexamined 5 years or more after the termination of their original treatment for early syphilis; (c) optimal treatment for early syphilis, 1 to 20 years observation;12 (d) a shortened 20-week system, Hood23 reporting on Johns Hopkins Hospital material; (e) the 5-day intensive intravenous drip arsenotherapy of syphilis (without the use of heavy metal), Leifer, Chargin and Hyman (1941) and Elliott, Baehr, Shaffer, Usher and Lough (1941).16 It is not possible at this time to offer more than speculative estimates on 10-day multiple syringe and 10- to 12-week intensive mapharsen- bismuth16 systems which are under study. The Cooperative Clinical Group’s standard treatment system experience indi- cates that for satisfactory results, treatment must be continuous and not inter- 19 mittent or irregular, and must combine the alternate use of an effective arsenical (mapharsen is not represented in this material) and a bismuth. Striking reductions in effectiveness with occurrence of infectious relapse, progression of syphilitic manifestations, serologic relapse and seroresistance occur in all phases of early syphilis in which intermittence or irregularity is allowed to occur. Disregarding the precise system of administration, the highest proportion of satisfactory results in seronegative primary syphilis was obtained with 10 to 19 injections of arsphena- mine with accompanying heavy metal; in seropositive primary syphilis, with 25 to 35 injections; in early secondary syphilis (seen in the 1st year) 20 to 29 injections. Higher rather than lower dosage of the arsphenamine is recommended. Failure to secure a satisfactory result by 20 injections or less may be met by 10 additional injections, plus heavy metal, which may double the proportion of unsatisfactory outcomes reclaimed. The irreducible margin of failure in the treatment of early syphilis by older standards ranges from 4% to 27%, depending on method, stage at which treatment is begun, adequacy of treatment during the first 2 years of infection. The Johns Hopkins Syphilis Clinic material36 is particularly valuable because of the length of observation (over 10 years in half of the patients), and shows clearly the importance to adequacy of the treatment results of the stage at which treatment is begun (82% cure in seronegative primary syphilis, 68.8% in secondary syphilis, 58.7% in early latent syphilis). The poorest results, as in the Cooperative Clinical Group series were observed among patients whose treatment was begun in the sero- positive primary stage. Cure was obtained by 83.4% of the patients whose treat- ment during the first 6 months was by a continuous system, and is increased to 90.4% if treatment during the next 6 months was likewise continuous. It was shown that the final or “adequate outcome” depended in a directly quantitative fashion not only on the number of doses of the arsphenamine received, but also inversely, upon the time span during which it was given. In other words, the more injections in the shorter time, the better the results. The development of early or intermediate relapse was found to be of grave prognostic significance. Cannon found in a series of some 600 patients treated with 3 standard arsphena- mines, that arsphenamine 606 was incontestably superior to neoarsphenamine or silver arsphenamine, and that 1 year of regular and continuous treatment with the arsenical injections closely spaced (2- and 3-day intervals in the first 3 to 5 weeks and at intervals of not less than 1 week thereafter) gave the highest proportion of satisfactory results. The difference between seronegative primary, seropositive primary and secondary syphilis was not more than 6%. The 20-20 Arsenical-Bismuth Simultaneous Injection Course (Hood). This shortened system, not comparable because of longer intervals (weekly) with the 26-week system of Circular Letter No. 74, utilizes weekly injections of mapharsen and simultaneous weekly intramuscular injections of an oil-suspended bismuth salt. The maximum period of observation (33 months) was only sufficient to indicate that the proportion of unsatisfactory results in the form of seroresistance, sero- relapse, clinical relapse and involvement of the central nervous system, amounting to 13.6% of the observed series, was approximately that of unsatisfactory results obtained in early syphilis treated with other arsenical drugs and treatment systems. If confirmed by longer observation, such a treatment system should show how little rather than how much treatment is necessary to produce the average or so-called “standard” results which are so strikingly uniform throughout the entire range from 5-day intravenous drip to 65-week continuous combined therapy. Massive Dose Arsenotherapy {“5-Day Drip”). The 2 series, Leifer et al., and Elliott et al., the former with of course the longer series of observed cases, illustrates the following principles regarding adequacy: (a) Curative results can be obtained with a trivalent arsenical alone (neoarsphenamine, mapharsen). (b) Of the two, mapharsen because of its low reactivity is the drug of choice, and 1200 mg. admin- istered in 5 days, the optimum dose, (c) In seronegative primary syphilis, 90 to 100% pursue a satisfactory and uneventful course; without reference to type of drug or stage of disease, an aggregate of 81% secured a satisfactory result in one 5-day course, and one re-treatment in 15 cases raised the result to approximately 20 88% for the entire series (Leifer et al.). Elliott and co-workers estimated their curative results at at least 85% of all cases with early syphilis. Adequacy of Treatment From the Standpoint of Service in the Armed Forces. A tentative basis for evaluation proposed for admission of registrants with syphilis to the United States Army is as follows: Registrants with (1) confirmed positive serologic tests for syphilis and no clinical manifestations of the disease; or (2) with convincing histories of a trustworthy diagnosis of syphilis; or (3) of treatment for the disease on serologic or clinical grounds even though such evidence may possibly have been inadequate, may be considered for unlimited military service: (a) Provided that a negative spinal fluid since treatment was begun has been reported from a trustworthy source; and (b) provided that in infections estimated to be of less than 4 years duration, at least 30 to 40 arsenical and 40 to 60 insoluble bismuth injections or its equivalent with a minimum total of 75 injections have been given, with approximate con- tinuity (no rest periods or lapses) during the first 30 weeks of treatment; and (c) provided that except as further qualified below in infections estimated to be over 4 years duration, at least 20 arsenical injections or its equivalent with a minimum total of 60 injections have been given in alternating courses; rest periods between consecutive courses not exceeding 8 weeks, being allowable. Evidence of duration of the infection shall be weighed by the examiner with due regard for the age, general venereal history and medical guidance of the registrant. In infections of unknown duration it shall be presumed for classification purposes that those of registrants under 26 years of age are of less than 4 years duration, and over 26 years of age, of more than 4 years duration. In congenital infections and in acquired infections of more than 10 years known duration, in which no clinical progression occurred since treatment was begun; and in which a normal spinal fluid has been recorded at some time after treatment was begun and negative physical examination is recorded not less than 2 years after treatment was terminated, the infection shall be regarded as “quiescent,” and the registrant eligible for unlimited military service; provided the treatment in question shall have included 20 arsenical and 20 heavy metal injections. For the determination of treatment, the signed statements of acceptable treat- ment sources administering it with total number of doses of each drug and approxi- mate calendar dates of administration and available laboratory and clinical data shall be required as evidence. The Prognostic Significance of Secondary and Serologic Relapse. The follow- ing principles, based in the main upon the groups of material cited in connection with the criteria of adequacy of treatment for syphilis, are widely accepted. Early evidence of potentially unfavorable or relapsing course in an early syphilitic infec- tion can be found in (a) failure of the primary or secondary lesions to heal under an arsenical therapy; (b) continued presence of Sp. pallida in the lesions after the employment of a known effective trivalent arsenical (these 2 groups constitute treatment resistance in syphilis;30 (c) prematurely early reversal of a positive serologic reaction on the blood to negative (4th to 7th week in seropositive primary or secondary syphilis); (d) failure of a positive serologic reaction on the blood to reverse to negative after the 16th week (in the intensive or 5-day drip system reversal is ordinarily expected by quantitative tests between the 10th and 18th weeks after the institution of treatment but late secondaries may not reverse for many months even though “cured”). Cooperative Clinical Group results13 (observation period too short) showed a relapse expectancy of 19.7% including all forms, of which, when observed for more than 6 months, 12.1% was mucocutaneous, 3.4% asymptomatic neurosyphilis, 4.1% symptomatic neurosyphilis, and 0.9% cardiovascular syphilis. The unfavorable prognostic significance of early and intermediate relapse was well brought out in Padget’s series in which “cure” was achieved in 73.2% of 456 patients in whom no relapse was observed, whereas only 28.2% of those sus- taining an intermediate relapse achieved “cure”. Persistent seropositive reactions on the blood, however, occurred in 16% of those who sustained no relapse, and in 10.3% of those who underwent intermediate relapse. Late benign syphilis devel- oped 8 times as frequently in relapsers as in non-relapsers, cardiovascular syphilis 3.5 times as frequently; neurosyphilis 6 times as frequently; multiple late manifes- tations 7.5 times as frequently in relapsers as in non-relapsers. The occurrence of weak positive serologic reactions on the blood appearing in the course of a series of negatives in treated early syphilis have been emphasized as of relapse significance by certain authors. Significance of Seropositivity After Treatment Which Was Begun During Early Syphilis. Broadly speaking, Padget’s experience indicated that a residue 6f 14.9% persistent serologic positiveness would appear in a series of early syphilitics on whom the satisfactory results he described had been secured. In these cases there would be no manifestations such as abnor- mal spinal fluid, cardiovascular disease, visceral disease and so forth to accompany the persistent seropositiveness. The inclination would be, therefore, to rate it in these cases as without significance. In general, however, persistence of a positive serologic reaction on the blood of early syphilitics under treatment by the older standard continuous systems was an indication of presence of asymptomatic neurosyphilis, and called for an examination of the spinal fluid immediately.26,48 The more inten- sive foreshortened treatment systems seem so materially to have reduced the likelihood of the occurrence of asymptomatic neurosyphilis that the neurosyphilitic significance of persistent seropositivity will probably be greatly reduced by their use. In addition, to asymptomatic neurosyphilis, syphilis of the cardiovascular system, often coming to recognition 5 or more years after the cessation of treatment, may be included in the prog- nostic significance of seropositiveness of a persistent type in early syphilis. The Prevention of Cardiovascular Syphilis. This is still the terra incog- nita of modern syphilology and the studies thus far summarized have thrown relatively little light upon it. Langer26 and others have attributed the increase in the incidence of aortitis since 1912 to the use of arsphena- mine in the treatment of syphilis, but our experience with this drug in early syphilis fails to substantiate this belief, the incidence of recognizable aortic lesions not increasing materially in the period studied. It is, of course, true that our study does not extend forward into the period of maximum recognition of this form of syphilis. Moore, Danglade and Reisinger29 in considering Langer’s contention, believed that the apparent increase coincident with the use of arsphenamine in treatment is due rather to more accurate pathologic study with increasing knowledge of microscopic appearance of aortic syphilis. Progression of cardiovascular syphilis in spite of various methods of treatment occurred in 0.8% to 1.2% of our patients. Warthin’s49 observation, which placed the inci- dence of aortic syphilis in syphilitic adults between 1909 and 1919 at 97.6%, and between 1919 and 1929 at 86.3%, further supports the view that arsphenamine is not responsible for the apparently increasing inci- dence observed by Langer. Moore and Padget32 in their analysis of seroresistant syphilis (early) emphasize the seriousness of seroresistance in early syphilis and its rela- tively lesser significance in late syphilis. Twenty-three per cent of their seroresistant group sustained infectious relapse as against 5 % who secured prompt serologic reversal. Neurosyphilis occurs in 31% of the sero- resistant cases, but in only 18 % of those who sustain prompt reversal. REFERENCES (1.) Almkvist, J.: (a) Acta dermato-venereol., 1, 97, 1920; (b) Arch. f. dermat. u. syph., 150, 179, 1926. (2.) Becker, S. W. (cited by Stokes, J. H.): Modern Clinical Syphilology, 1st ed., Philadelphia, W. B. Saunders Company, 1926. (3.) Beennan, H. 22 cl al. (o) Am. J. Syph., Gonor. and Ven. Dis., 20, 165 and 296, 1936; (6) Publication No. 6, Am. Assn, for Advancement of Science, p. 77, 1938; (c) Beerman, H., and Severac, M.: J. Invest. Dermat., 5, 269, 1942; (d) Beerman, H., Ingraham, N. R., Jr., and Pariser, H.: Am. J. Syph., Conor, and Ven. Dis., 27, 460, 1943. (4.) Bering, F.: Dermat. Wchnschr., 73, 900, 1921. (5.) Bernard, E.: Bruxelles m6d., 8, 1602, 1928. (6.) Boak, R. A., Carpenter, C. M., and Warren, S. L. (cited by Simpson, W. M., Kendeil, H. W., and Rose, D. L.): Supplement No. 16 to Ven. Dis. Inform., 1942. (7.) Boas, H.: (a) Acta dermato-venereol., 3, 559, 1922; (h) Hospitalstid., 65, 153, 1923. (8.) British Scandinavian (League of Nations) System): J. Am. Med. Assn., 104, 1329, 1935. (9.) Brack, W.: Mlinchen. med. Wchnschr., 69, 1624, 1922. (10.) Brans, A.: Dermat. Wchnschr., 78 , 661, 1924. (11.) Brausgaard, E.: Norsk. Mag. f. Lsegevidensk., 89, 1222, 1928. (12.) Cannon, A. B.: Am. J. Syph., Gonor. and Ven. Dis., 21, 155, 1937. (13) Cooperative Clinical Group: Stokes, J. H., Cole, H. N., Moore, J. E., O’Leary, P. A., Parran, T., Jr., and Wile, U. J.: Ven. Dis. Inform., 12. 55, 1931. Clark, T., Parran, T., Jr., Cole, H N., Moore, J. E., O’Leary, P. A., Stokes, J. H., and Wile, U. J.: Ven- Dis. Inform., 13, 135, 165, 207, 253, 1932. Moore, J. E., Cole, H. N., O’Leary, P. A., Stokes, J. H., Wile, U. J., Clark, T, Parran, T., Jr., and Usilton, L. J.: Ven. Dis. Inform., 13, 317, 351, 371, 389, 407, 1932; and 14, 1, 1933. Stokes, J. H., Usilton, L. J., Cole, H. N., Moore, J. E., O’Leary, P. A., Wile, U. J., Parran, T., Jr., and McMullen, J.; Am. J. Med. Sci., 188, 660, 669, 678, 1934. O’Leary, P. A., Cole, H. N., Moore, J. E., Stokes, J. H., Wile, U. J., Parran, T., Jr., Vonderlehr, R. A., and Usilton, L. J.: Ven. Dis. Inform., 18, 45, 1937. (14.) Eagle, H., and Hogan, R. B.: J. Clin. Invest., 21, 634, 1942. (15) Eicke, H : Deutsch. med. Wchnschr., 47, 412, 1921. (16.) Foreshortened Intensive Methods. (These references are arranged chronologically.) i Hirshfeld, S., Hyman, H. T., and Wanger, J. J.: Arch. Int. Med., 47, 259, 1931. Hyman, H. T., and Hirshfeld, S : (a) J. Am. Med. Assn., ICO, 305, 1933; (5) Ibid., 96, 1221, 1931. Hyman, H. T., and Touroff, A. S. W.: Ibid., 104, 446, 1935. Chargin, L., Leifer, W., and Hyman, H. T.: J. Am. Med. Assn., 104, 878, 1935. Tzanck, A., Duperrat, and Lewi, S : Bull, et m(m. Soc. m6d. d. hop. de Paris, 54, 268, 1938; Bull. Soc. franc, de dermat. et syph., 45, 404, 1938, also 44, 2028, 1937. Tzanck, A.: Bull. Acad, de mdd., 119, 257, 1938; Bull. Soc. franc, de dermat. et syph., 45, 587, 1938. Hyman, H. T., Chargin, L., and Leifer, W.: Am. J. Med. Sci., 197, 480, 1939. Editorial: Am. J. Syph., Gonor. and Ven. Dis., 23, 797, 1939. Hyman, H. T., Chargin, L., and Leifer, W.: Am. J. Syph., Gonor. and Ven. Dis., 23, 685, 1939. Hyman, H. T., Chargin, L , Rice, J. L., and Leifer, W.: J. Am. Med. Assn., 113, 1208, 1939. Clark, R. E.: J. Wayne Univ. College of Med., 3, 19, 1940. Queries and Minor Notes: Jour. Am. Med. Assn., 114, 345, 1940. Cones.; Lancet, 1, 896, 1940. Editorial; Med. Rec., 151, 297, 1940. Cones.: Canad. Med. Assn. J., 43, 184, 1940. Raulston, B. O., and Magnuson, H. J.: Trans. Assn. Am. Phys., 55, 255, 1940. Brayton, J. R., and Winebrenner, J. D.: J. Indiana Med. Assn., 33, 368, 1940. Baehr, G.: Arch. Dermat. and Syph., 42, 1940. Leifer, W.: Arch. Dermat. and Syph., 42, 245, 1940. Chargin, L.: Arch. Dermat. and Syph., 42, 248, 1940. Hyman, H. T.: Arch. Dermat. and Syph., 42, 253, 1940. Webster, B.: Arch. Dermat. and Syph., 42, 264, 1940. Thomas, E. W.: Arch. Dermat. and Syph., 42, 267, 1940. Sobotka, H., Mann, W., and Feldbau, E.: Arch. Dermat. and Syph., 42, 270, 1940. Current Comment: J. Am. Med. Assn., 115, 863, 1940. Simons, R. D. G. P.: Geneesk. tijdschr. v. Nederl.-Indi?, 80, 2245, 1940. Mahoney, J. R.: Arch. Dermat. and Syph., 42, 262, 1940- Discussion: Discussion of papers by Drs. Baehr, Leifer, Chargin, Hyman, Mahoney, Webster, Thomas and Sobotka, Mann and Feldbau, Arch. Dermat. and Syph., 42, 276, 1940. Rice, J. L.: Arch. Dermat. and Syph., 42, 283, 1940. Editorial: Internal. Med. Digest., 37, 310, 1940- Hoffmann, E.: Mimchen. med. Wchnschr., 87, 1264, 1940; comment by Stiihmer, 87, 1450, 1940. 23 Takesita, S.: Hihuto-Hitunyo (Abst. Sect.), 8, 40, 1940. Clarke, W.: Bull. Vancouver Med. Assn., 16, 323, 1940. Howkins, J. S.: J* Med. Assn. Georgia, 29, 452, 1940. Council Report: J. Am. Med. Assn., 115, 857, 1940. Editorial: Massive Arsenotherapy in Syphilis, Brit. Med. J., 2 , 911, 1940. Nelson, L. M.: Staff Meet. Bull., Hospitalsof the Univ. of Minnesota, 12, 268, 1941 Chargin, L., and Leifer, W.: Arch. Dermat. and Syph., 43, 419, 1941. Baehr, G.: Am. J. Pub. Health, 31, 176, 1941. Cabrera, E.: Rev. Fac. de med., Bogota, 9, 481, 1941. Hyman, H. T.: Bull. New York Acad. Med., 17, 135, 1941. Magnuson, H. J., and Raulston, B. O.: Ven. Dis. Inform., 22, 157, 1941. Gordon, H.: South African Med. J., 15, 165, 1941. Gabby, W. H., Neilson, A. A., and Maxwell, R. W.: Proc., J. Bact., 41, 785, 1941, Rattner, H.: Illinois Health Messenger, 13, 44, 1941. Magnuson, H. J., and Raulston, B. O.: Ann. Int. Med., 14, 2199, 1941. Thomas, E. W., and Wexler, G.: Am. J. Pub. Health, 31, 545, 1941. Shaffer, L. W.: J. Michigan Med. Soc., 40, 529, 1941. Schoch, A., and Alexander, L. J.: Am. J. Syph., 25, 607, 1941. Elliott, D. C., Baehr, G., Shaffer, L. W., Usher, G. S , and Lough, S. A.: J. Am Med. Assn., 117, 1160, 1941. Leifer, W., Chargin, L., and Hyman, H. T.: J. Am. Med. Assn., 117, 1154, 1941. Epstein, N. N.: California and Western Med., 55, 248, 1941. Scholtz, J. R.: Ven. Dis. Bull. I, California Dept. Pub. Health, No. 7, p. 3, 1941. Morales Beltrami, R.: Rev. med. de Chile, 69, 140, 1941. Leifer, W.: Med. Clin. North America, 25, 775, 1941. Axelrod, S. J.: Am. J. Nursing, 41, 1039, 1941. Weinstein, M., and Barria, C.: Rev. med. de Chile, 69, 562, 1941. O’Malley, C. K.: South African Med. J., 15, 343, 1941. Trautman, J. A.: Hosp. News, 8, 12, 1941. Barletta, J. L.: Dia. med., 13, 1193, 1941. Bowman, G. W., and Sheehan, F. G.: J. Indiana Med. Assn., 34, 665, 1941. Eolmer, J. A., and Rule, A. M.: Arch. Dermat. and Syph., 44, 1055, 1941. Magnuson, H. J., and Raulston, B. D.: Ven. Dis. Inform., 22, 431, 1941. Prats, G. F., Infante Varas, L., and Haraszti, E.: Rev. med. de Chile, 69, 733, 1941, Infante Varas, L.: Rev. med. de Chile, 69, 729, 1941. Dussert, E.: Rev. med. de Chile, 69, 743, 1941. Bryan, J.: Geneesk. tijdschr. v. Nederl.-Indie, 81, 2350, 1941. Levin, I. M., Hoffman, S. J., and Koransky, D.: Am. J. Dis. Child., 63, 201, 1942 Rattner, H.: Illinois Med. J., 81, 29, 1942. Berry, N. E.: Am. J. Syph., 26, 204, 1942. Young, W. A., and Gordon, S : East African"Med. J., 19, 123, 1942. Eagle, H., and Hogan, R. B.: Science, 95, 360, 1942. Usher, B., and Hill, A. E.: Canad. Med. Assn. J., 46, 342, 1942. Rattner, H., and Falk, A. B.: J. Am. Med. Assn., 118, 1368, 1942. Prunes, L., and Hevia, P. H.: Arch. Dermat. and Syph., 45, 894, 1942. Editorial; J. Am. Med. Assn., 120, 48, 1942. Simpson, W. M., Kendell, H. W., and Rose, D. L.: Ven. Dis. Inform. (Suppl. 16) p. 41, 1942. Avery, W. H.: Canad. Pub. Health J., 33, 1, 1942. Stephenson, C. S., Chambers, W. M., and Anderson, L. T.: U. S. Naval Med Bull., 40, 215, 1942. Hoffmann, E.: Dia. med., 14, 102, 1942. King, A. C.: Texas State J. Med., 37, 726, 1942. Sadusk, J. F., Jr., and Shaffer, T. E.: Yale J. Biol, and Med., 14, 365, 1942. Marin, A.: Canad. Med. Assn. J., 46, 334, 1942. Kaplan, B. I.: Arch. Dermat. and Syph., 45, 941, 1942. Prats, G. F., Infante Varas, L., and Haraszti, E.: Arch. Dermat. and Syph., 45, 885 1942. Prats, G. F., Infante Varas, L., Simon, K. T., and Harazsti, E.: Rev. Argent, der matosif., 26, 65, 1942. Body, E. F., Haraszti, E., and Giacamon, J.: Rev. Argent, dermatosif., 26, 92, 1942 Brun, J. F., Ramirez, D., and Roman, A.: Rev. med. veracruzana, 22, 3691, 1942 Goodman, H.: Urol, and Cutan. Rev., 46, 379, 1942. Sadusk, J. F., Jr., Craige, B., Jr., Brookens, N., Poole, A. K., and Strauss, M. J. Yale J. Biol, and Med., 14, 333, 1942. Marin, A.: L’Union med. du Canada, 71, 342, 1942. Schoch, A. G., and Alexander, L. J.: Arch. Dermat. and Syph., 46, 128, 1942. 24 Wallis, S. R.: Hawaii Med. J., 1, 363, 1942. Editorial: Am. J. Syph., Gonor. and Yen. Dis., 26, 510, 1942. Geiger, A. J., Craige, B., Jr., and Sadusk, J. F., Jr.: Yale J. Biol, and Med., 14, 357, 1942. Falk, A. B., and Rattner, H.: Arch. Dermat. and Syph., 46, 283, 1942. Thomas, E. W., Wexler, G., and Dattner, B.: Am. J. Syph., Gonor. and Yen. Dis., 26, 529, 1942. Pelzman, I. A., and Greenwald, E.: Am. J. Syph., Gonor. and Yen. Dis., 26, 637, 1942. Nelson, E. E.: Internal. Med. Digest., 41, 182, 1942. Levin, E. A., and Keddie, F.: J. Am. Med. Assn., 118, 368, 1942. Roemer, M. I.: J. Med. Soc. New Jersey, 39, 498, 1942. Siegel, J , Goldstein, D. H., and Goldwater, L. J.: Arch. Dermat. and Syph., 46, 783, 1942. Levin, I. M., Hoffman, S. J., Koransky, D. S , Richter, I. B., and Gumbiner; J. Am. Med. Assn., 120, 1373, 1942. Kvittingen, J.: Brit. Med. J., 1, 69, 1943. Arnold, H. L., Jr.: Proc. Staff Meet. Clinic Honolulu, 9, 1, 1943. Eagle, H., and Hogan, R. B.: Yen. Dis. Inform., 24, 33, 69 and 159, 1943. Schoch, A. G., and Alexander, L. J.: Am. J. Syph., Gonor. and Yen. Dis., 27,15,1943. Editorial: (J. E. M.) Ibid., p. 108. Shaffer, L. W.: Yen. Dis. Inform., 24, 108, 1943; Ibid., p. 113. Schwind, J. L.: Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol, and Med., 52, 128, 1943. Thomas, E. W., and Wexler, G.: Arch. Dermat. and Syph., 47, 563, 1943. Hood, B. J.: Am. J. Syph., Gonor. and Yen. Dis., 27, 267, 1943. Thomas, E. W., Wexler, G., Schur, M., and Goldring, W., with technical assistance of Eggleston, N.: J. Am. Med. Assn., 122, 807, 1943. Bowman, G. W., and Huber, C. P.: Monthly Bull. Indiana State Board of Health, 46, 86, 1943. Rattner, H.: J. Am. Med. Assn., 122, 986, 1943. Harris, H. L., and Sorensen, R. M.: Iowa State Med. J., 33, 254, 1943. (17.) Gennerich, W.: Die Syphilis des Zentralnervensystems, Berlin, Julius Springer, 1922. (18.) Hahn, R. D.: Am. J. Syph., Gonor. and Yen. Dis., 25, 659, 1941. (19.) Harrison, L. W.: (a) Practitioner, 126, 193, 1931; (5) Med. Research Council, Spec. Report, No. 132, 1929; (c) The Diagnosis and Treatment of Venereal Diseases in General Practice, Oxford, p. 427, 1931. (20.) Haxthausen, H.; Ugesk. f. Lseger, 81, 217, 1919. (21.) Hoffmann, E.: Therap. d. Gegenw., 63,11,1922. (22.) Hoffmann, E., and Mergels- berg, O.: Dermat. Ztschr., 35, 1, 1921. (23.) Hood, B.: Am. J. Syph., Gonor. and Yen. Dis., 27, 267, 1943. (24.) Jadassohn, J.: (a) Ztschr. f. arztl. Fortbild., 23, 749, 1926; (6) KJin. Wchnschr., 1, 1193, 1243, 1922; (c) Ibid., 5, 2248, 1926. (25.) Kemp, J. E., and Menninger, W. C.: Bull. Johns Hopkins Hosp., 58, 24, 1936. (26.) Langer, E.: Mlinchen. med. Wchnschr., 73, 1782, 1926. (27.) Leredde, E.: (a) La sterilisation de la syphilis, Paris, A. Maloine, 1912; (b) Paris med., 7, 153, 1917. (28.) Martenstein, H.: Quart. Bull. Health Organ, League of Nations, 4, 129, 1935; see also J. Am. Med. Assn., 104, 1329, 1935. (29.) Moore, J. E., Danglade, J. H., and Reisinger, J. C.: Arch. Int. Med., 49, 753, 1932. (30.) Moore, J. E., and Keidel, A.: Bull. Johns Hopkins Hospital, 39, 1, 1926. (31.) Moore, J. E., and Kemp, J. E.: Bull. Johns Hopkins Hosp., 39, 16, 36, 1926. (32.) Moore, J. E., and Padget, P.: J. Am. Med. Assn., 110, 96, 1938. (33.) Miillern-Aspegren: Acta Dermat-Vener., 3, 572, 1922. (34.) Mutschler, R.: Arch. f. derm. u. syph., 147, 107, 1924. (35.) Ormsby, C. S.: J. Am. Med. Assn., 56, 504, 1911, and 75, 1, 1920. (36.) Padget, P.: Am. J. Syph., Gonor. and Yen. Dis., 24, 692, 1940. (37.) Pollitzer, S.: J. Cutan. Dis., 34, 633, 1916. (33.) Rasch, C.: Nordisk. Bibliotek for Therapi, pr 10, 1922. (39.) Riecke: Miinchen. med. Wchnschr., 66, 969, 1919. (40.) Rost: Arch. f. Derm, u. Syph., 138,89,1922. (41.) Satke, V.: Dermat. Ztschr., 39, 349,1923. (42.) Silberstein, S.: Arch. f. derm. u. syph., 143, 334, 1923. (43.) Stokes, J. H.: (a) Yen. Dis. Inform., 17, 315, 1936; (b) J. Connecticut State Med., 2, 172, 1938; (c) J. Am. Med. Assn., 120, 1093, 1942. (44.) Stokes, J. E., Besancon, J. H., and Schoch, A. G.: J. Am. Med. Assn., 96, 344, 1931. (45.) Stokes, J. H., Miller, T. H., and Beerman, H.: Arch. Derm, and Syph., 23, 624, 1931. (46.) Stokes, J. H., and Usilton, L. J.: Yen. Dis. Inform., 18, 66, 1937; Arch. Dermat. and Syph., 35, 377, 1937. (47.) Ullmann, K,: Wien. Klin. Wchnschr., 35, 455, 479, 502, 951, 1922. (48.) Vonderlehr, R. A., and Usilton, L. J.: Reprint No. 99, from Yen. Dis. Inform., 19, 396, 1938. (49.) Warthin, A. S.: South. Med. J., 24, 273, 1931. (50.) Zieler, K.: Deutsch. med. Wchnschr., 52, 49, 1926. 25 SYPHILIS THE TREATMENT OF EARLY SYPHILIS WITH PENICILLIN A PRELIMINARY REPORT OF 1,418 CASES JOSEPH EARLE MOORE, M.D. BALTIMORE J. F. MAHONEY, M.D. Medical Director, U. S. Public Health Service STAPLETON, STATEN ISLAND, N. Y. COMMANDER WALTER SCHWARTZ (MC), U.S.N. LIEUTENANT COLONEL THOMAS STERNBERG MEDICAL CORPS, ARMY OF THE UNITED STATES AND W. BARRY WOOD, M.D. ST. LOUIS In December 1943 Mahoney, Arnold and Harris 1 reported briefly on the effect of pencillin in experimental syphilis of rabbits and in 4 human patients wflth sero- positive primary syphilis. As a result of these obser- vations and of further experimental studies carried out in the laboratories of Mahoney 2 and Eagle 3 there was organized, about Sept. 1, 1943, under the general auspices of the Committee on Medical Research of the Office of Scientific Research and Development and under the specific direction of the Subcommittee on Venereal Diseases, National Research Council, a cooperative study of the effect of penicillin in syphilis in human beings. A Penicillin Panel was appointed by this subcommittee, with membership including the authors of this paper.4 Because of the special problems confronting the armed forces, particular emphasis has been laid on early syphilis and on neurosyphilis, though other forms of late syphilis have also been studied. The preliminary results obtained to date are here pre- sented in two papers, this dealing with early syphilis; the other, with Stokes as spokesman for the group, with late syphilis. The penicillin employed has been derived from Army, Navy, Public Health Service, and Office of Scientific Research and Development sources. Only the sodium salt has been employed in these studies. Penicillin allocated to the Office of Scientific Research and Devel- opment for research purposes has been distributed by the Committee on Chemotherapeutic and Other Agents, National Research Council, Dr. Chester Keefer, chair- man. This committee has allocated gradually increas- ing amounts of the drug to the Subcommittee on Venereal Diseases, which in turn has apportioned it among those civilian clinics selected for participation in the study. Early syphilis is at present under investigation in twenty-three clinics or research centers. These, with the names of the responsible investigators, are as follows: U. S. Army (Fort Bragg, North Carolina, Capt. William Leifer, Camp Howze, Texas, Major Franklin Grauer), U. S. Navy (Naval Medical Center, Bethesda, Md., Lieut. Comdr. E. C. Barksdale), United The authors are members of the Penicillin Panel of the Subcom- mittee on Venereal Diseases, National Research Council. The work described in this paper was done under several contracts recommended by the Committee on Medical Research of the Office of Scientific Research and Development. Read in a panel discussion on “Penicillin in the Treatment of Syphilis” before the Section on Dermatology and Syphilology at the Ninety-Fourth Annual Session of the American Medical Association, Chicago, June 15, 1944. 1. Mahoney, J. F.; Arnold, D. C., and Harris, A.: Penicillin Treat- ment of Early Syphilis; A Preliminary Report, Yen. Dis. Inform. 34: 355, 1943. 2. Mahoney, J. F., and others: Unpublished data. 3. Eagle, H.: Unpublished data. 4. Dr. J. R. Heller Jr., medical director in charge Venereal Disease Division, United States Public Health Service, was later added to the membership of the panel. 26 States Public Health Service (Marine Hospital, Staple- ton, S. I., Dr. J. F. Mahoney), Massachusetts Memorial Hospital, Boston (Dr. Oscar Cox), Bellevue Hospital, New York (Dr. Evan Thomas), Chicago Intensive Treatment Center (Dr. S. W. Becker), Cleveland City Hospital and University Hospitals (Dr. Harold Cole), University of Pennsylvania Hospital (Dr. J. H. Stokes), University of Texas (Dr. Chester Frazier), Washington University, St. Louis (Dr. W. Barry Wood Jr.), Yale University (Dr. Francis Blake), Dallas Venereal Disease Clinic (Dr. Arthur Schoch), Leland Stanford Jr. University Hospital (Dr. C. W. Barnett), Duke University Hospital (Dr. C. L. Callo- way), Vanderbilt University Hospital (Dr. R. H. Kampmeier), Johns Hopkins Hospital (Drs. J. E. uniform manner. The immediate results of treatment were to be reported to the Penicillin Panel on specially devised forms (figs. 1 and 2), susceptible of coding, punch carding and machine statistical analysis. Table 1.—Four Treatment Schedules Duration Interval Route of No. of of Treat- Between Adminis- Single Injec- Total ment Injections tration Dose tions Dose ?!/& days 3 hours Intramuscular 1,000 units 60 60,000 units 7hi days 3 hours Intramuscular 5,000 units 60 300,000 units 7% days 3 hours Intramuscular 10,000 units 60 600,000 units 7% days 3 hours Intramuscular 20,000 units 60 1,200,000 units On the basis of the very preliminary studies of Mahoney and his associates, there appeared to be five variables requiring study. These were (1) the route of administration, originally chosen 1 as intramuscular for the sake of slightly delayed absorption and excre- tion as compared to the intravenous route; (2) the interval between injections, at first selected 1 as every three hours day and night on the basis of known data as to the rate of absorption and excretion; (3) the duration of treatment, originally arbitrarily selected as eight days;1 (4) the total dosage, again arbitrarily selected as 1,200,000 units,1 and (5) possible combina- tions of penicillin with other drugs, e. g. mapharsen. At the outset it was decided by the Penicillin Panel to hold the first three of these variables constant; i. e., all cases were to be treated by the intramuscular route every three hours day and night to a total of sixty injections given in seven and one-half days. The first effort was to be to define the minimum effective dose so given within this time period. Four treatment schedules were accordingly drawn up (table 1). These covered a twenty fold dosage range up to and including the original maximum arbitrarily chosen by Mahoney and his co-workers. In addition there were originally planned (but subsequently temporarily dropped) two other groups, to test the combined effect of penicillin plus mapharsen. These two groups com- prised a total penicillin dosage of 60,000 and 300,000 units respectively plus a total of 320 mg. of mapharsen given in eight divided doses of 40 mg. each daily for eight days. This mapharsen dosage was deliberately selected as a relatively safe and known subcurative dose from which a high rate of relapse might be expected. Later, as material accumulated, the variable of time was brought under study, and three additional treat- ment groups were established with a total dosage of penicillin of 300,000, 600,000 and 1,200,000 units respectively given in thirty intramuscular injections every three hours day and night over a four day period. The latter groups have been so recently started as not Fig. 1.—Obverse of form for reporting early syphilis by participating clinics. Moore and C. F. Mohr), Tulane University (Dr. R. V. Platon), Presbyterian Hospital, New York (Dr. A. B. Cannon), University of Virginia Hospital (Dr. D. C. Smith), New York Hospital (Dr. Walsh McDermott) and the Detroit Health Department (Dr. Loren Shaffer). This report is based on the work of these investigators and of many of their associates and assis- tants, too numerous to name.5 These clinics and centers agreed (1) to treat patients with early syphilis on assigned treatment schedules in an effort to define as promptly as possible the all impor- tant time-dose relationship and (2) to pool their results under the Penicillin Panel of the Subcommittee on Venereal Diseases. Only those patients in whom the diagnosis of early syphilis was indubitable, on the basis of actual demonstration of treponemes, were to be acceptable. All patients were to be originally examined and subsequently followed in as nearly as possible a Table 2.—Duration of Follow-Up from Start of Treatment in 1,418 Patients with Early Syphilis (June 1, 1944) Duration of Follow-Up, No. of Patients Weeks Followed 1 to 4 671 5 to 8 307 9 to 16 327 17 to 24 25 to 48 6 to justify consideration in this paper, which is devoted entirely to the eight day treatment schedule. The only exception to the statement lies in 25 cases treated by the intravenous route before the present organized study began; in them the dosage was variable and the duration of treatment four to eight days. 5. The statistical data have been prepared by Miss Gwendolyn Futcher. 27 For the purposes of this report, the books of the Penicillin Panel have been temporarily closed as of May 25, 1944. To that date there had been received 1,587 case reports of early syphilis, of which 1,418 were suitable for analysis as to various points. Of these 177 had seronegative primary, 379 seropositive primary, 698 uncomplicated and 67 complicated 6 early secondary syphilis and 97 various types of recurrent (usually previously treated) secondary syphilis. Of the patients 461 were white, 950 Negro and 7 of other races; 791 were male and 627 female, of whom 58 were pregnant at the time of treatment. The preliminary nature of this report is indicated by table 2, in which the duration of follow-up after treat- ment is shown. The majority of patients have so far been observed for less than two months; only 113 of the entire number for four months or longer. This fact must be repeatedly emphasized as a matter of caution; the results here presented are subject to major revision after further observation. It is planned to report further information as it devel- ops at three to six month intervals. THE IMMEDIATE RESULTS OF TREATMENT Disappearance Time of Treponema Pallidum from Open Lesions.—Data are available on this point from 663 cases treated with penicillin alone (excluding those cases treated with penicillin plus mapharsen). Regardless of the single or total dose of penicillin, organisms have promptly disappeared from open lesions in every case within a range of six to sixty hours. At the two extremes of dosage, 1,000 and 40,000 units, the average disappear- ance time varied only from twenty-one to fourteen hours. Whether the apparent trend toward shortening of disappear- ance time is significant is open to ques- tion because of the varying intervals at which dark field examinations were done in the several clinics. Not shown in the table is the fact that the intravenous holds no advantage over the intramuscular route in this respect. Healing of Lesions.—This is difficult to measure in statistical terms. There has been no observed instance of failure of lesions to heal, regardless of the single or total dose. With a total dosage of 60,000 units in eight days, healing is less prompt than with arsenical therapy; with larger total dosage, 300,000 units and up, it is as' rapid as with standard chemotherapy or more so. Serologic Response.—In figure 3 is shown the median blood serologic response,7 in terms of quantitative titer, of four groups of patients treated with penicillin alone (excluding those treated with penicillin plus maphar- sen). Included are both seropositive primary and secondary syphilis. Regardless of the total dosage, whether 60,000, 300,000, 600,000 or 1,200,000 units, there is apparent a trend toward serologic reversal within a period of about twenty days after the start of treatment. Within the range of 300,000 to 1,200,000 units this trend is approximately uniform, regardless of dosage; with 60,000 units it is a little slower and less pronounced. Parenthetically, this rate of serologic reversal is identical with that observed after arsenical chemotherapy, whether with an arsphenamine at weekly Table 3.—Average Disappearance Time of Treponema Pallidum from Open Lesions of Early Syphilis After Varying Treatment Schedules (June 1, 1944) Size of Individual Dose Given Every Three Hours, Units Cases Average Disappearance Time of Treponema Pallidum, Hours 1,000 52 21 5,000 201 20 10,000 237 19 20,000 135 13 40,000 38 14 intervals or mapharsen given by various intensive methods. Further data are shown in tables 4 and 5. In table 4 is summarized the blood serologic response of 48 NAME.. ObtPerjod STS Uniu No. Days after Clinical Status (technique Quant, titer start of Rx employed) 1 0-7 IZIIIIZ^IZIIIZZIIIIZZZZZZIZIZZIIIZZIIZI'ZZZIIIZI 2 8-14 3 15-21 _ 4 22-28 • 5 29-42 6__ 43-56 • ’ 7 57-84 8 85-112 9 113-140 10 141-168 11 169-224 * 12 225-280 13 281-336 14 337-392 15. 393-476 16 477-560 17 I 560 I || Time required from ortset of treatment to seronegativity (first) (permanent) Final Classi- fication Follow-up Observation (not to be filled in by clinic) Final outcome pregnancy: Cerebro-spinal Fluid (Follow-up examination) Delivery (days after start Dale Celia Tot. Prut. fixaDon (amallest Colloidal olh^ 0f ' mgm. amt, giving pos. result) • JL Clinical and serologic 2. i status child:— 3. | 4. i _5. • 6. , Fig. 2.—Reverse of form. for reporting early syphilis by participating clinics. patients with seronegative primary syphilis observed for nine or more weeks after the start of treatment. These are not broken down by total dosage since, regardless of the range of 60,000 to 1,200,000 units, the response was identical. In 28 patients the sero- logic test for syphilis, originally negative, remained so Table 4.—Blood Serologic Response in Seronegative Primary Syphilis, Patients Followed More Than Nine Weeks from Start of Treatment, All Treatment Schedules Combined (June 1, 1944) Serologic Test for Syphilis Negative, Remained Negative 28 Negative, Became Positive, Later Negative 18 Serologic Relapse 2 Oases Followed '48 throughout the period of observation; in 18 it became temporarily positive, then reverted to negative, and in 2 only there was a subsequent serologic relapse. From the serologic standpoint, therefore, and during the very brief observation period so far available, the results may be said to be satisfactory in 95.8 per cent of the cases. 6. Complicated by asymptomatic neurosyphilis, syphilitic meningitis or ocular, osseous or visceral lesions. 7. This has been determined by a statistical device which assign® to the initial quantitative titer, regardless of the actual number of units, the numerical value of 100. All subsequent observations are expressed in terms of per cent of the original titer. 28 In seropositive early syphilis (combining seropositive primary and secondary syphilis) the results, now broken down by treatment schedule, are shown in table 5 (limited to patients observed for nine or more weeks after the start of treatment). Here there is a direct relationship between “satisfactory” and “unsatisfactory” immediate serologic results and total dosage of peni- cillin ; the larger the dose, the better the result. The only and perhaps a major exception to this is in the group of patients who received 300,000 units of peni- cillin plus 320 mg. of mapharsen in seven and one-half days. This group shows as good initial results as were shown by patients receiving four times as much peni- cillin without mapharsen. So far it is clear that the minimum effective dose of penicillin in early syphilis in man cannot be determined on the bases of disappearance time of surface organisms, healing of lesions or (except very roughly) serologic relapse or apparently reinfection, has been classified as clinical relapse. Serologic relapse includes not only those who, originally seronegative or rendered so by treatment, subsequently became seropositive but also those who, still seropositive in low titer, subsequently develop high titer tests.8 An effort has been made to Table 6.—Incidence of Relapse in Seronegative Primary Syphi- lis Treated by Varying Schedules in Eight Days, Patients Observed for More Than Thirty-Eight Days (June 1, 1944) Treatment Schedule, Oases f Relapse Total Total Dose, Units Followed Clinical Serologic Number % 60,000 1 200,000 600,000 14 i i 7.2 600,000 i 1 2 9.5 1,200,000 52 ... Intravenous (see text) 4 .. Total 92 2 1 3 3.2 observe all patients clinically and serologically at weekly intervals for the first two months, every two weeks for another two to three months and at least monthly thereafter. The number of relapses reported in this paper is minimal and less than the number which have actually occurred. This is due to (1) an inevitable lag in report- ing from the individual clinic to the Penicillin Panel and (2) delay in defining apparent serologic relapse on the basis of a single observation until confirmed by subsequent tests (for the sake of avoiding laboratory error). Days of observation after start of treatment Fig. 3.—Median serologic response of seropositive early syphilis to penicillin with four treatment schedules ranging from 60,000 to 1,200,000 units total dose in eight days; June 1, 1944. response since, regardless of total dose, within the range employed the drug is effective in all of these respects. The only available criterion lies, therefore, in the inci- dence of relapse. The method of statistical reporting here adopted is recognizedly inaccurate in that the incidence of relapse is related to the total number of patients observed for a period of time greater than that of the earliest observed relapse. In the tables to follow all patients are included who were observed for thirty-eight days or longer after the start of treatment, since this was the shortest interval at which relapse was observed. The brief interval available for study prevents the adop- tion of the statistical method used by Eagle,9 which will, however, be utilized in later more definitive analyses. Preliminary rough test of this method of appraisal suggests that the eventual incidence of relapse will probably be from four to five times as great as that reported here. In table 6 is shown the incidence of relapse, clinical and serologic, in 92 patients with sero- Table 5.—Blood Serologic Response in Seropositive Early Syphilis According to Treatment Schedule, Patients Fol- loived More Than Nine Weeks from Start of Treatment (June 1, 1944) Serologic Test for Syphilis Response' r Satisfactory Unsatisfactory (Reversed, or (No Significant Treatment Schedule, Cases Titer Falling), Change, or Units Followed % Relapse), % 60,000 38 57.8 42.1 60,000 + mapharsen 26 76.9 23.0 300,000 79 82.1 17.7 300,000 + mapharsen 24 91.0 8.3 600,000 109 88.0 12.0 1,200,000 02 90.3 9.0 Relapse After Penicillin Treatment.—In this mate- rial, relapse has been rigidly defined. Any subsequent clinical manifestation of the disease, whether obviously 8. Not yet classified as relapse or “unsatisfactory result” are those patients whose serologic tests have shown no improvement. Twelve months after treatment will be allowed to elapse before such patients are classified as seroresistant. 9. Eagle, H.; The Treatment of Early and Latent Syphilis in Nine to Twelve Weeks with Triweekly Injections of Mapharsen; A Pre- liminary Analysis of the First 4,823 Cases, to be published. 29 negative primary syphilis. The numbers, broken down by treatment schedule, are too small to be significant, though the total observed relapse rate, 3.2 per cent, is low. Similar data for seropositive primary syphilis are shown in table 7 and for secondary syphilis in table 8. the time of starting treatment and the incidence of relapse. The proportions in patients treated with peni- cillin alone are 3.2 per cent for seronegative primary, 5.0 per cent for seropositive primary and nearly 10 per cent for early secondary syphilis. Table 11 shows the average and extreme intervals between the start of treatment and observed relapse. Here there is no direct correlation as to total dose. Relapses have occurred as early as thirty-eight days and as late as two hundred and ninety-four days after the start of treatment. Considering the short periods of observation so far available for all groups treated, further relapses in all may be confidently anticipated. The Optimum Time-Dose Relationship for Penicillin in Early Syphilis.—The available data indicate that within the twentyfold dosage range employed in a period of seven and one-half days penicillin has a pro- found immediate effect in terms of disappearance of surface organisms, healing of lesions and serologic reversal. In seronegative primary syphilis no state- ments as to minimum effective dose are as yet justi- fiable. In seropositive primary and early secondary syphilis any dose less than 600,000 units in seven and one-half days is clearly ineffective. A total dose of 600.000 units provides a minimum relapse rate of nearly 5 per cent, of 1,200,000 units a rate of 2 per cent, within the short period for which such patients have so far been followed. The intravenous route appears to be less effective, even in large doses, than the intra- muscular. The possibility that even 1,200,000 units in a four to eight day period will prove to be inefficacious after further observation has led the Penicillin Panel to inaugurate the study of two additional treatment groups Table 7.—Incidence of Relapse in Seropositive Primary Syphi- lis, Treated by Varying Schedules in Eight Days, Patients Observed for More Than Thirty-Eight Days (June 1, 1944) Relapse Treatment Schedule, Cases ' Total Total Dose, Units Followed Clinical Serologic Number % 60,000 8 2 2 25.0 200,000 3 300,000 30 2 i 3 10.0 600,000 37 1,200,000 75 i i 2 2.6 Intravenous (see text)— 5 1 -• 1 20.0 Total 6 2 8 5.0 Table 8.—Incidence of Relapse in Secondary Syphilis Treated by Varying Schedides in Eight Days, Patients Followed for More Than Thirty-Eight Days (June 1, 1944) Treatment Schedule, Total Dose, Units Cases Followed Clinical Relapse X Total Serologic Number % 60,000 37 9 2 11 29.6 200,000 3 2 37.5 300,000 6 4 10 10.6 600,000 4 3 7 5.0 1,200,000 64 2 2 3.1 Intravenous (see text).... .. , 16 i 1 a 12.5 Total .. 355 23 12 35 9.8 These relate to patients treated with penicillin alone (excluding the combined penicillin with mapharsen groups). Here there is obvious a direct correlation between total dose and relapse incidence. The data of tables 6, 7 and 8 are combined in table 9 for all patients with early syphilis; and here is added information concerning the patients treated with penicil- lin plus 320 mg. of mapharsen (two groups, 60,000 and 300.000 units respectively) and also concerning a small group of patients (25 in number) treated by the intra- venous route before the present organized study was begun. In patients treated with penicillin by the intra- muscular route the incidence of relapse, even in the brief observation period available, is in direct proportion to total dosage (nearly 30 per cent with 60,000 units, only 2 per cent with 1,200,000 units). In the small group who received large doses intravenously, ranging from 600.000 to 1,200,000 units, and whether by multiple injections or continuous drip, the observed relapses are five to six times as great as in patients treated with comparable doses by the intramuscular route, suggest- ing that the intravenous route not only holds no advan- tage over the intramuscular route but is actually less effective. In table 10 the incidence of relapse is related to the stage of disease at the start of treatment in patients treated with penicillin alone (omitting the groups com- bined with mapharsen, among which only 1 relapse has so far occurred) and without regard to total dosage. In conformity with Eagle’s report9 as to semi-intensive arsenotherapy, and in contrast to the older Cooperative Clinical Group and other data 10 as to “standard” pro- longed arsenical chemotherapy, there seems to be here a direct relationship between the stage of the disease at Table 9.—Incidence of Relapse in All Types of Early Syphilis Treated by Varying Schedules, Patients Observed for More Than Thirty-Eight Days (June 1, 1944) Treatment Schedule, Relapse Total Dose, Units Cases -A (Route Intramuscular Fol- Clin- Sero- Total Unless Specified) lowed ical logic Number % 60,000 46 11 2 13 28.2 60,000 + 320 mg. mapharsen 26 200,000 11 3 3 27.2 300,000 138 9 5 14 10.1 300,000 + 320 mg. mapharsen 68 1 1 1.4 600,000 194 6 4 9 4.6 1,200,000 191 1 3 4 2.0 Various intravenous schedules *... 25 2 1 3 12.0 * Dosage range 600,000 to 1,200,000 (all but 3 eases 1 million +), , single intravenous injections, intravenous drip or both. in 4 to 8 days. Table 10.—Incidence of Relapse by Stage of Disease, All Treat- ment Schedules * Combined, Patients Followed More Than Thirty-Eight Days (June 1, 1944) Relapse ! K Cases Total Stage of Disease Followed Clinical Serologic Number % Primary seronegative 92 2 1 3 3.2 Primary seropositive .. 158 6 2 8 5.0 Secondary .. 355 23 12 35 9.8 * Omitting 94 patients treated with penicillin + mapharsen. given a total of 2,400,000 units in thirty and sixty intramuscular injections in four and seven and one-half days respectively. These patients are being treated in the United States Army and eight selected United States Public Health Service rapid treatment centers. The results obtained to date in the two small groups of patients given 60,000 and 300,000 units of penicillin respectively, in each case plus the known subcurative 10. Stokes, J.- H., and others: Cooperative Clinical Studies in the Treatment of Syphilis: Early Syphilis, Ven. Dis. Inform. 13; 165, 207 and 253, 1932. 30 total dose of 320 mg. of mapharsen in eight days, are worth emphasizing. In 94 such patients followed for thirty-eight days or more only one relapse has occurred. It is perhaps to be expected that certain patients with early syphilis will prove to be resistant to penicillin exactly as a relatively standard proportion of 5 to 15 per cent of patients has proved to be resistant to arsenic heavy metal chemotherapy. But, in view of what is already known concerning the probable modes of action of penicillin and of arsenic and bismuth in syphilis (con- siderations too lengthy for discussion here) it is possible that those patients resistant to penicillin will not be the same ones resistant to metal chemotherapy and that a combination of the two forms of treatment will eventu- ally prove to be more effective than any method of use of either one alone. It should also be emphasized that penicillin, as so far employed in early syphilis, is not suitable for mass application. Injections every three hours day and night over whatever period of time demand hospitalization and trained nursing or professional care. However available these may be for the armed forces, facilities are inadequate in civilian practice to meet the enormous demand. The eventual general use of the drug depends Treatment Resistant Early Syphilis.—Eight patients, most of them with dark field positive psoriasiform syph- ilids, persisting in spite of or recurring during metal chemotherapy, have been treated with penicillin, with prompt healing in all and with subsequent serologic behavior similar to that of previously untreated early syphilis. Infantile Congenital Syphilis.—Not included in the tabular presentations are some 20 infants with early congenital syphilis. The majority of them have been treated with a total dose of penicillin of 20,000 units per kilogram of body weight, corresponding to a total dose of 1,200,000 units in the adult. Their behavior in terms of symptomatic improvement and serologic response is analogous to that of early acquired syphilis in the adult. The Outcome of Pregnancy.—Though 58 pregnant women with early syphilis have so far been treated, it is too early to speak of any results as to the outcome in the child. REACTIONS TO PENICILLIN Herxheirner Reactions.—Of 1,418 patients treated. 846 (59 per cent) have had Herxheirner reactions within the first twenty-four hours. This consists usually of fever alone (685 cases) ; in the others, exacerbation of secondary skin lesions with or without fever. The fever is usually mild (less than 102 F.), though in 174 cases (12 per cent) the febrile rise has been higher than this level. In no case has the reaction been alarming, nor has it interfered with subsequent treatment. Other Reactions.—Only 59 patients (41 per cent of the total treated) have had other reactions attributable to penicillin. In 15 there were cutaneous eruptions (8 urticaria, 7 other types of skin rashes, none severe). Seven had mild gastrointestinal reactions, 33 secondary fever. 2 abscessed buttocks and 2 miscellaneous mild disturbances. In no case has penicillin treatment had to be suspended because of reactions from the drug. SUMMARY 1. An organized study of the effect of penicillin in early syphilis is in progress in an effort to determine the optimum method of use of the drug. The results so far available are preliminary. 2. Penicillin has a profound immediate effect in early syphilis in terms of (a) disappearance of surface organ- isms from open lesions, (b) healing of lesions and (c) a trend toward serologic reversal. 3. These immediate effects are in general identical within a twentyfold dosage range of 60,000 to 1,200,000 units administered by the intramuscular route every three hours day and night to a total of sixty injections in seven and one-half days. 4. The same immediate effects are apparent within the dosage range of 300,000 to 1,200,000 units given by the intramuscular route every three hours day and night to a total of thirty injections in four days. 5. These immediate effects cannot be utilized to deter- mine the optimum time-dose relationship, which, in man, depends on the incidence of relapse. 6. The incidence of relapse, when penicillin is admin- istered alone, is in direct relationship to the total dosage given by the intramuscular route in a seven and one-half day period, greatest with 60,000 units and least with 1,200,000 units. 7. Relapse appears to be more frequent after intra- venous than after intramuscular administration of com- parable doses. Table 11.—Average and Extreme Intervals from Start of Treatment to Relapse According to Treatment Schedule (June 1, 1944) Average Interval, Extreme Intervals, Treatment Schedule, Units Days Days 60,000 104 64 to 154 60,000 + mapharseu No relapses observed 200,000 116 83 to 135 300,000 90 38 to 166 300,000 + mapharsen 53* 600,000 98 73 to 113 1,200,000 132 63 to 294 Intravenous 74 56 to 126 * One relapse only. on the development of methods which will permit its administration on an ambulatory basis. As with arsenical chemotherapy, it is probable that the optimum time-dose relationship for the treatment of early syphilis in man with penicillin alone and its relative efficacy when administered alone or in combi- nation with other forms of treatment will be guided by data from the experimental laboratory not as yet avail- able but shortly to be expected. In man, further immediate studies should be directed to (1) determination of the relative effectiveness of 1,200,000 units versus much larger doses in four and eight days respectively, (2) variation of the time inter- val between individual dosage within the range of three to twenty-four hours, (3) more exact definition of the merits of intravenous versus intramuscular administra- tion and (4) an expansion of the combinations peni- cillin plus arsenic and penicillin plus bismuth. Results of Treatment of Special Forms of Early Syphilis.—Thirteen patients with early syphilis in this series had positive spinal fluids before treatment (11 of them group 2, 2 group 3). Of these, the fluid abnor- malities disappeared or improved under penicillin treat- ment alone in 10 within time period ranging from ten to fifty days; 3 were unimproved. Acute Syphilitic Meningitis.—Ten patients with this complication of early syphilis have been treated, the majority with 1,200,000 units in seven and one-half days. Symptomatic relief has been dramatically prompt in all and, in the majority, spinal fluid abnormalities have disappeared or are rapidly improving. 31 8. The lowest incidence of relapse—and the most favorable serologic response—was in small groups of patients treated with 60,000 and 300,000 units respec- tively of penicillin plus a known subcurative dose of mapharsen. 9. Penicillin has a favorable effect in early asymp- tomatic neurosyphilis, acute syphilitic meningitis, early syphilis treatment resistant to arsenic and bismuth and infantile congenital syphilis. 10. No opinion can be as yet expressed as to the effect of penicillin in the prevention of prenatal syphilis. 11. The optimum time-dose relationship of penicillin in early syphilis is not yet established. Certainly the minimum dose, especially in secondary syphilis, should not be less than 1,200,000 units; probably it should be more. 12. Herxheimer reactions after the penicillin treat- ment of early syphilis are frequent but not serious; other reactions, due to penicillin itself, are negligible. 13. Further avenues of study are suggested. SYPHILIS PENICILLIN TREATMENT OF SYPHILIS. 1. PURPOSE. The purpose of this bulletin is to introduce penicillin treatment of syphilis in the Army and to outline the administrative and professional details involved. When penicillin is not obtainable through normal supply chan- nels the system of treatment recommended in S. G. O. Circular Letter No. 74, 25 July 1942, subject, “Diagnosis and treatment of the ve- nereal diseases,” will be used. 2. INDICATIONS FOR PENICILLIN TREATMENT OF SYPHILIS. Penicillin will be used in the treatment of the following types of syphilis: a. Untreated primary and secondary syphilis. (Mapharsen-bismuth treatment has not been initiated.) b. Untreated latent syphilis. (Mapharsen- bismuth treatment has not been initiated.) It is essential that a preliminary spinal fluid exami- nation be made in all cases of presumed latent syphilis. If the spinal fluid is abnormal as de- fined in paragraph 4a (2), TB MED 48, 31 May 1944, the case must be classified as asymptoma- tic neurosyphilis and be managed according to that directive. c. Treated primary and secondary syphilis which has failed to respond to mapharsen-his- muth therapy, This includes— (1) Clinical relapse, such as mucocutaneous, ocular, osseous, or visceral. (2) Treatment-resistance, a rare condition manifested by failure of the primary and secondary lesions to respond to adequate ma- pharsen-bismuth therapy, usually accompanied by the presence of living treponemes in the lesions. (3) Serologic relapse as evidenced by reversal of a negative STS (serologic test for syphilis) at the conclusion of mapharsen-bismuth therapy to positive during the 6 months post- treatment observation period. Criteria of sero- logic relapse are discussed in paragraph 7b. (4) Serum-fastness as evidenced by a per- sistent positive STS at the end of mapharsen- bismuth therapy. d. Treated primary secondary, and latent syphilis intolerant or sensitive to mapharsen- 32 bisrrmth therapy. This group includes indivi- duals who have had a serious reaction to arsenic that contraindicates its further use. Jaundice, exfoliative dermatitis, a blood dyscrasia (thrombocytopenic purpura, agranulocytosis, aplastic anemia) and encephalopathy are ex- amples of such reactions. Patients who mani- fest persistent intolerance of less serious char- acter, such as severe headaches, nausea, vomit- ing, and diarrhea, even with reduced doses of mapharsen, may also be included. 3. TECHNIC OF PENICILLIN TREAT- MENT OF SYPHILIS, a. Facilities and per- sonnel. Penicillin therapy requires hospitaliza- tion of approximately 10 days, including 7y2 days of therapy, and time consumed for pre- therapeutic diagnostic procedures and adminis- trative details. It is the responsibility of the medical officer in charge to see that adequate supplies of the drug are on hand before actual treatment of the patient is started. b. Dosage and technic of administration of penicillin. Uniform dosage and technic will be used in all cases. The total dosage will be 2,400,000 units of penicillin, given in 60 con- secutive intramuscular injections of 40,000 units (2 cc of penicillin solution) at 3-hour intervals day and night for 7y2 days. Any convenient time schedule may be adopted, but in most Army hospitals the most suitable schedule is 0200, 0500, 0800, 1100, 1400, 1700, 2000, and 2300. The solution should be injected intra- muscularly into the upper outer quadrant of alternate buttocks. The needle should be 2 inches to %y2 inches in length, preferably 20- gauge, in order to insure intramuscular injec- tion rather than injection into fat. No addi- tional antisyphilitic therapy is to be given during or after the completion of the course of penicillin except in the ccLse of penicillin treatment failures discussed in paragraphs 7 and 8 below. c. Noninterruption of penicillin treatment. Treatment should continue without interrup- tion after its initiation. On the first day of treatment, commonly, and during the course of treatment less frequently, minor reactions may be encountered. None of these is indica- tion for the discontinuance or interruption of therapy. There have been no instances so far in which it has been necessary to discontinue or interrupt the treatment schedule. 4. REACTIONS OBSERVED IN PENICIL- LIN TREATMENT OF SYPHILIS, a. Herxheimer reactions. These occur frequently in cases of primary and secondary syphilis, less commonly in cases of latent syphilis, and rarely in cases that have already received some anti- syphilitic therapy. The manifestations may be focal or systemic and are ascribed to the massive destruction of treponemes in the syphilitic lesions and in the blood stream. These reactions may therefore be considered of favorable significance. Both the focal and systemic Herxheimer reactions are encountered on the first day of treatment only. They begin usually some 3 to 6 hours after the first peni- cillin injection, gradually become worse and reach a peak, after which they slowly and progressively subside, disappearing within an average of 24 hours. No specific therapy is required although such drugs as aspirin and codeine may be given for relief of symptoms. It must be emphasized that these symptoms disappear spontaneously in spite of the con- tinued, regular administration of penicillin, and are not justification for discontinuance of therapy. (1) The focal Herxheimer reaction consists of an aggravation of the existing syphilitic lesions. There may be increased swelling of the chancre, further enlargement of already enlarged re- gional lymph nodes accompanied by pain, and exaggeration of the secondary eruption. A pallid, sparse, macular eruption often becomes extremely profuse and vividly red, and may re- semble measles or scarlet fever. (2) The systemic Herxheimer reaction may be manifested by a variety of symptoms, such as headache, malaise, nausea, occasionally vomit- ing, abdominal cramps, and weakness, but its most characteristic features are chilly sensa- tions and fever. Peak temperatures of 105.4° F. have been recorded, although generally lower grades of fever prevail. b. Other reactions due to 'penicillin. Other reactions caused by penicillin have been ex- tremely rare and trivial in the dosages recom- 33 mended in this bulletin. Most patients will complain of more or less local muscle soreness at the site of the injections, but usually this has not been objectionable. The most common late systemic reactions have been secondary fever occurring toward the end of treatment and terminating immediately on its cessation; urticaria or other minor skin eruptions; gener- alized pruritus; herpes labialis and progeni- talis; and mild gastro-intestinal symptoms such as abdominal cramps, nausea, and occasionally vomiting. 5. POST-TREATMENT OBSERVATION OF PATIENTS TREATED FOR SYPH- ILIS WITH PENICILLIN, a. Serologic and clinical follow-up, All syphilis cases treated with penicillin will have a monthly inspection and quantitative STS for a period of 12 months. In theaters of operation suitable alterations of this plan may be adopted. (!) Laboratory technic. In patients treated for syphilis with penicillin laboratory procedures will be performed in the local Army laboratory wherever possible. In those situations where no Army serologic laboratory is locally available, blood serum and spinal fluid will be shipped to a service command laboratory. The service com- mand laboratory will provide on request special merthiolated tubes for the shipment of speci- mens of blood serum and spinal fluid. (2) Quantitative serologic tests for syphilis. On each specimen of blood the laboratory should be requested by the medical officer to perform the authorized quantitative STS, described in TM 8-227, and to report the result in units. b. Spinal fluid. (1) In primary and second- ary syphilis the spinal fluid will be examined as soon after the completion of 6 months of obser- vation as feasible. In no case will the syphilis register be closed until this examination has been accomplished. (2) Spinal fluid tests to be performed. Cell count; Pandy or Nonne-Apelt qualitative tests for protein; quantitative estimation of total protein; complement fixation (Wassermann) test, or, if this is not feasible, a flocculation test; and colloidal gold test. The cell count and Pan- dy or Nonne-Apelt test should be performed at the local laboratory within 30 minutes after the spinal fluid is withdrawn. c. Special administrative features of penicil- lin treatment. (1) Preparation of the Syphilis Register (W. D., A. G. O. Form No. 8-114) (formerly W. D., M. D. Form No. 78). This will be filled in completely in the usual manner and a brief note describing the treatment pro- cedure will be made in the register. A sample note reads as follows: Soldier received intensive penicillin ther- apy from 20 June 1944 to 27 June 1944 consisting of 60 consecutive intramuscu- lar injections of 40,000 units at 3-hour in- tervals for a total dose of 2,400,000 units. There was a febrile Herxheimer reaction the first day with peak fever of 102.4° F. Lesions were healed when therapy was completed. Notation will also be made in the register that patient is to be managed in accordance with TB MED 106. (2) Preparation of W. D., M. D. Form No. 78a (Patient’s Record of Syphilis Treatment). This will be prepared as a personal record for the soldier. A brief account of the treatment status of the patient will be entered. This can be done simply by repeating the note made in the syphilis register, described in (1) above. An additional statement will be made to the effect that no further treatment is required, ex- cept in the event of clinical or serological re- lapse, but that the patient will have a regular monthly physical examination and blood test. This form can be used as a record of follow-up and a reminder for the soldier by inscribing at each visit the date set for the next examination. (3) Closure of the syphilis register. (a) Pri- mary and secondary syphilis. The syphilis reg- ister will be closed in primary and secondary syphilis and transmitted to The Surgeon Gen- eral after 12 months of observation in all pa- tients who have become and remained serolog- ically negative; who have had no evidence of clinical relapse; and who have had a negative spinal fluid between the completion of 6 months of observation and the time of closing of the register. (b) Latent syphilis. The syphilis register will be closed in latent syphilis and transmitted to The Surgeon General after 12 months of observation if there has been no clinical or sero- 34 logic relapse even though the serologic tests have remained persistently positive. It is anticipated that serum-fastness will not be un- common in cases that receive penicillin therapy in the latent stage of syphilis. 6. CLINICAL AND SEROLOGIC POST- TREATMENT COURSE OF FAVORABLY RESPONDING PENICILLIN TREATED SYPHILIS, a. Primary and secondary syph- ilis. (1) Clinical course. The rate of healing of primary and secondary syphilitic lesions var- ies, depending principally upon the type of le- sion. Ordinarily, simple nonulcerated chancres of small size, mucous patches, and macular erup- tions are healed by the time the treatment course is completed. Large ulcerated chancres, deeply infiltrated papular eruptions, and large condy- lomata lata may not heal completely for 1 to 3 weeks after treatment is concluded. Presence of such lesions, unless physically incapacitating, or requiring extensive local treatment, will not be cause for prolonged hospitalization. (2) Serologic course. The titre of the STS de- clines gradually from positive to negative in the post-treatment period, the negative phase being achieved in a variable time. The majority of cases become negative between the second and fourth post-treatment months, although earlier and later reversals occur. In general, the high- er the initial titre of the quantitative STS the longer the test will take to become negative, and the lower the initial titre the sooner the test will become negative. (3) Critical relapse period. The critical period for relapse, both clinical and serologic, appears on the basis of present information to lie be- tween the third and sixth post-treatment months, although relapses have occasionally been observed at earlier and later periods. h. Latent syphilis. (1) Clinical course. Since these patients have no visible syphilitic lesions, no observations as to healing can be made. (2) Serologic course. The serologic curve may take the same course as that observed in primary and secondary syphilis. This is especially true of cases of very early latent syphilis, notably those which have only recently passed from the secondary phase into the phase of latency. On the other hand, individuals with older latent syphilis are likely to exhibit serologic refractor- iness, the STS showing either no tendency or little tendency to lose strength. This results in the case having to be classified eventually as serum-fast. 7. DEFINITION OF PENICILLIN FAIL- URE. Care should be exercised in the determi- nation of failure since patients may develop intercurrent skin eruptions of nonsyphilitic character. Intercurrent infections and smallpox vaccination may produce a temporary elevation of the titre of the quantitative STS. All forms of clinical relapse are generally accompanied by serologic relapse, or by persistently high sero- logic titres. Treatment failures may be divided into nine categories. a. Mucous