NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE Washington Founded 1836 U. S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare Public Health Service \ '**■%, #-» *-^ *.-«** ■*•%«%*£ %*■*■».'.%. v-tjJpfV.. FOUR 5 •J J LECTURES ON THE J THOWISONIAN PRACTICE OF MEDICINE. BY DAVID TOWER, PHmCIAK AT AVOW MINERAL SPRING? "Truthg would you teacti (0 $ave a sigking laou, "All fear, none aid you, and few understand.*7. CANANDAIGUA: PRIMTED BT BEMI3, HORSE Al*D WARP, (FOR THE author.) 1828. I % LECTURES. ON THE THOMSON-IAN PRACTICE OF IttEEIClME BY DAVID TOWER, 1'HVSICIAK AT AVON MINERAL SPRINGS Truths tvould you teach to save a sinking lann All fear, none aid you, and few understand," CANANDAIGUA: PRINTED BY BEMIS, MORSE AND WARD, (FOR THE AUTHOR.) 10.28. ,*N- » V-^A^"' .', V-*. ,-. ,-, ,',.w.*\ v n v- *'»<\ < v ^ *V .*•'* . '..' Jl % TO DR. SAMUEL THOMSON. WHOSE DISINTERESTED LABORS AND IMPORTANT DISCOVERIES IN MEL IC15E, WHILE THEY HAVE BROUGHT DOWN UPON HISI THE ailPLACABLE DISPLEASURE OF THE FACULTY, HAVE SE- CURED TO HIM THE GRATEFUL ESTEEM OF ALL WHO ARE ACQUAINTED WITH HIS PRACTICE: HIE FOLLOWIXG LECTURES ARE RESPECTFULLY INSCRIBED, BY THE AUTHOR. PREFACE TI1 is customary for authors to make some apology when tiiev > 'tug any thing before the public. My apology, I hope, will be •ound in the importance of the ideas hinted at in the following lee ■uies. That they are free from all inaccuracies of style, the author Sias not the vanity to flatter himself. But the matter they contain. Oe hopes, will be such as to meet the approbation of all unprejudiced oien. Whatever inaccuracies either may contain, the author has one apology to plead, which on all occasions should be heard, viz. (hat he is a young man. He can truly say to the public, that he has much to say to them on this important subject—and should his Ufe and health be spared him, he will at some future time resume the subief?. &HOTWIBI1 LECTURE I. ♦ — I HAVE purposed, fellow-citizens, to address you upon at. important and interesting subject. The investigation of am proposition, which has for its object the multiplication and enlargement of the sources of happiness, must be of import- ance to us all:—and that which relates to the nature and cure of disease, must rank itself in importance among the first. J' is the duty of every individual, whatever his profession mav be, so to employ his physical and intellectual powers that this world maybe wiser and better for his having lived'in it. Ler the truth of the preceding sentiment be acknowledged, and the only inquiry is, how is that power to be exerted for the accomplishment of the desired end ? According to our views of this subject, the proper answer to the above question is, it is to be exerted in learning the extent of its own ability, it< relations and tendencies; or, in the language of the poet, " The proper study of mankind is man.'" If human happiness be the object of our reflections and de- sires, would we in any small degree effect the desired end. we must obtain an accurate knowledge of human nature. For, if it be true that this earth is a vale of tears, and if it be true also, that an imputation of malevolence cannot be made to bear upon the character of the great First Cause in man'? primeval creation, the conciusion is clear and irresistible, that there must be some obstructions to man's happiness—that things are driven from that channel in which the kind hand of nature designed them to flow. Would we qualify ourselves to be able to assist nature in her kind operations in restoring things to their primeval regularity, we must acquaint ourselve? intimately with the original structure of things. This we mus< do, in order to ascertain how far, and in what particulars na- 6 iure has been diverted in its courses. That things are thu* diverted, is evident: for if the case be otherwise, why are oui cars saluted with that dolorous voice of discontent, which ai fimes is heard from almost every individual of the whole spe- cies to which we belong? And if we actually possess certain knowledge of the causes of this disquietude, and of the remedy also, why then is not the healing balm applied ? why then is not nature's assistant administered and the voice of discontent hushed to peaceful repose ?—The reason is obvious : we arc, in too great a degree, ignorant of both cause and remedy. One thing, however, is very clear, that this unhappiness arises from some supernatural cause—that nature is prevented, by some barrier or other, from discharging those kind offices for which she was intended by her God. As it respects the amount of happiness which man, in hi* present state of existence, is capable of enjoying, or how much his Creator intended he should enjoy, I have nothing to say. It is a truth, however, that anatomy has never taught us that the body of man is designedly shaped for disease : we can discover no disproportion in its organization indicating that it was thrown together by a malevolent hand. On the contrary, all its elemental parts are so organized, as to afford ample proof to us, that it is the intention of nature that an equal and healthful action should animate the whole system. Nor have we any evidence to believe the faculties of the mind were given us for any other purpose than to advance our happiness. Since the wonder-working hand of nature has worked favorable to our happiness, why then, it may be asked, are men so unhappy? Because man has fallen from that state of rectitude, in which he was made. As is respects the degree of unhappiness brought upon mankind by the fall, I have no question to raise. If it can be proved, however, that the mind always produces the first effects upon the body, and not the body upon the mind, then undoubtedly some evil state of the mental faculties gives origin to all the misery of which our species are the subjects. But it is certain when the body is diseased, the mind will be effected as well as the body —and when the disease is removed, the disquietude of the mind and body will both subside together. It is taken nearly for granted, I believe, that spirit always acts first upon matter, and not matter first upon spirit. This unquestionably is true, as it respects the great Creator, who is a spirit exclusively. And it is undoubtedly the mind or im- i mortal part of man, that acts upon the mortal or material part —for the body, without the mind, is dead. But while the mind is confined to the body, it may be, that the wants and pains of the body suggest to* the mind the necessity of action; and although the body does not in realty act on the mind first, still the mind does not act without some object, and the ob- ject which the mind has in acting is to satisfy want or remove some obstruction in the body. But the connection between body and mind, I am free to say, is to me perfectly inexplicable; nor have I made these remarks thinking to explain it; neither have I made them to disprove the sentiment, that our unhappiness is the conse- quence of our disobedience, or of the fall of man:—For there need not be a doubt in the minds of any, but that all the mis- ery of which we are the subjects, has been brought upon us by disobedience to God's laws:—And these laws not only ex- tend to a few particulars, but to every thing that can have any influence in the proper management of all the concerns of human life; and these laws are as clearly revealed to us in that happy adaptation we behold in a great variety of means to the accomplishment of an equal variety of ends, as they could be in a written code: hence a man may as directly, and perhaps as criminally, violate the laws of his Maker, by endeavoring to destroy the connection between cause and effect, as by violating any revealed command. Whenever we use any thing different from what it was intended, we disobey the command of God. Hence, fellow-citizens, permit me to remark, that perver- sion of things has been the most fruitful source of misery to mankind. By perversion of things, I mean the using them for the accomplishment of different ends from those for which they were designed. The Creator has given to man a mora! sense, intellectual strength, and physical power. The first of these enables him to judge of what is right and wrong, with respect to moral conduct; the second enables him to reason accurately and to form just conceptions on moral and natural subjects; the third enables him to obtain those things from the earth necessary to sustain animal life. We see that the Creator has assigned distinct offices to each of these differem gifts:—The first, to save us from criminality; the second, from imposition, and the third, from starvation. Now, if the moral and intellectual powers of men were employed only in the investigation of thoae subjects which Ire 8 Nearly within the atmosphere of our mental vision—thasr only which have a direct tendency to increase the sum ol human happiness, and to decrease the sum of human misery; and if the natural power of the body were employed in obtain- ing those things for which the voice of nature calls—and if men were uniformly to pursue that judicious course of conduct in the concerns of human life, for which their reason and judgment were given, to enable them to pursue—human hap- piness, unquestionably, would be augmented beyond what, at present, has entered the mind of man to conceive. Then would human nature arise from the degradation of misery into which it has been cast by a perversion of its blessings, and begin to assume her dignity, and ascend towards her native - have been carried through a certain round of medicine taking, and because that has not cured them, they are pronounced 1G nfcurable, and no more exertion is made in a systematic form for their recovery. How long has it been since doctors have attempted with any degree of success, the cure of epilepsy? (and it is a disease, for aught that we can discover, curable in its nature.) We ought never to be discouraged in the least degree," where a cure is possible in the nature of the case. What has been said respecting medicine, may be said with equal truth respecting most of the arts. If a man once be- comes convinced that an object cannot be attained, he never will make any further exertions to attain it. 4th. The fourth barrier to our obtaining useful knowledge. is established institutions. These may be established in two ways, by legal authority and by custom and prejudice. That the well-being of mankind requires societies and institutions, is evident. We are, however, to have a special regard to it, that the formation and continuation of them be in reality for the good of mankind, and not for the misery and degradation of the multitude for the aggrandizement of a few. In an age .ee, a powerful tendency to simplify the theory of disease. Where physicians and philosophers before supposed, and ■mdeavored to show, that there were multitudes of causes producing disease, Thomson has shown, and pretty clearly demonstrated, that there is but one approximate cause of all disorders ; and that is, as I have already remarked, a diminu- tion of free caloric in the system. It must, I think, occur to «-ou, fellow-citizens, that if this theory be correct, and its prac- tice nature's assistant, that of the popular and legalised insti- tutions, must be in a high degree erroneous, and its practice deleterious. If we are diametrically opposite to one another, concerning the same proposition, we cannot surely both be right. Such is the fact, however, respecting the sentiments of mineral and vegetable physicians, in regard to the causes of disease. If a disagreement be attended with no injurious practical re- sults, it is of but little importance whether we think exactly alike or not; but in this case it is not so. Here, any radical disagreement is to be regarded in a momentous point of light: it is fraught with all the importance of human suffering and human life. If free caloric actually be the cause of life and vigor in animal bodies, then, surely, the physician who, by his prac- tice, endeavors to destroy it—however good his intentions— may be, in reality, destroying human life. If heat, according to Hyppocrates, be nature, it is nature in sickness as well as in health, and the doctor who endeavors to destroy it, destroys the nature of the patient. It requires an acquaintance with the works of medical men to form an accurate opinion of Dr. Thomson's discoveries. We must acquaint ourselves with the endless jargon of the common practice, before we can fully appreciate his discove- ries : we must grope in its darkness for a-while, and try by its dim twilight to penetrate and explore the dark caverns of the animal economy, before we can appreciate the transcendent light which Dr. Thomson's discovery is destined to shed upon the philosophical world. We must contemplate every com- plaint to which doctors have given different names, to be dif- ferent diseases, and produced by different causes, and possess- ing distinct natures; and that a knowledge of those invisible 53 agents is placed beyond our investigation, only that they arc distinct in their nature, because their effects on the system are different. Now, we must imagine that all those agents are so many different enemies to human life, and the destruc- tion of each requires different means, because their nature,is different, judging, however, only from their effects; whereas one cause may and does produce many effects, different in their appearance and nature. You must perceive, fellow-citizens, that this theory would introduce u very doubtful and dangerous practice of medicine —for, it would be impossible for any man to discriminate so nicely as not to be frequently deceived, and any mistake here would be fatal in its consequences. These inexplicable agents, producing disease, must all of them be conquered by different weapons—some of them must be starved, others fed to death; some must be drowned, while others must die with thirst; some must be burned, others frozen; some must be thrown off by emetics, others by cathartics, and some few may be sweat to death. Some of those enemies to human life may be slain by arsenic, others by mercury ; some may be hurled from the system by the stimulating effects of cantharides— others must be precipitated from it by blood-letting. Now. you must all perceive, that this is a dangerous way to practice medicine; for, if the doctor should undertake to starve one that ought to be fed, or should he undertake to draw one out by blood-letting, which ought to be poisoned, the life of the pa- tient would undoubtedly be in danger. When, I say, we are made acquainted with all the darkness,, difficulty and danger of the popular practice of medicine, we certainly shall, when we understand them both, hail with joy the superior light of Dr. Thomson's discovery! He has taught us, that a diminution of free caloric produces all those difficulties. Fire is the life of the animal and vege- table economy. It causes every spear of grass, every ear of coin, all the herbage of the field, every leaf upon the trees. and all the fruit of autumn, to grow—and it is no less the cause of life and animation in the animal kingdom. By its influence the reptile creeps upon the earth, and the insect flies in the air: in a word, it supplies life and vigor to all ra- tional and irrational beings, and is emphatically the cause of life and action throughout the material world:—And this ele- ment is at the disposal of the Deity. ou LECTURE IV. HAVING in a preceding Lecture called your attention to she outlines of our Theory of Disease, (not altogether in vain, I have the vanity to believe,) it was judged it might be useful to you, by your humble servant, the speaker, and by his and your friends, that you, fellow-citizens, this evening be addres- sed upon the following subjects:— 1st. On the nature and tendency of what physicians term stimulants. 2d. On the nature and tendency of blood-letting. 3d. On the nature and tendency of steaming, as a medicine in disease. Isi. On the nature and tendency of what physicians tern; stimulants. These are medicines so termed, which possess a power of exciting the animal energy. The above is the ex- planation given by learned doctors of the word stimulant. You will perceive, fellow-citizens, according to this definition, that every thing is a stimulant which produces action, wheth- er it be in the mind or body. Hence, a very ingenious writer speaks of sentiments and objects as stimulating the minds and the sensorial power. It may be said that a sublime prospect stimulates the imagination, and indeed the whole intellect to lively action. All the inducements to virtue and morality, such as the unlimited goodness of the Creator, act as stimu- lations on the mind. But none, perhaps, acts so powerfully as opposition : when we are opposed in our favotite notions, or when indeed we meet with barriers in the way to the enjoy- ment of our liberties, then the mind is stimulated to the extent of its power. But it is not so important for us, at this time, to notice the mental, as the bodily stimuli. We are told by Dr. Hooper, that stimulants are medicines which possess power to excite the animal energy. His mean- ing is, I think, only this—They produce action" in the animal system. What he or other physicians mean by "animal en- ergy," more than muscular and nervous action, neither he nor they have seen proper to inform us. We know the word energy, means power or force, and stimulants arouse that power or energy to action. But what notions can we form of 57 power in an animal body without any action? It appears to me, it would be quite contrary to truth were we to say, that an animal possesses power, when at the same time it was des- titute of action; and it seems to me, also equally destitute of truth, should we affirm that medicines could excite the ani- mal energy, without exciting the system to action :—for, how- can we obtain knowledge of powerfulness or activity of things, unless they are in action or producing action ? In no way, surely. It appears to me clearly, that we can get no cor- rect ideas of power, force, energy, (words nearly of the same meaning,) without action;—and it is very necessary that a distinction should be made between that which produces the action, and the action itself. In medical writings, when the terms power, energy, &c. are used, it should be distinctly known whether we refer to the action, or the cause of action —whether the agent producing action, or the action produc- ed, is meant:—for, when it is said that the animal energy is excited, we must remember that an effect is produced upon the active power of the system, for the energy and the active power, I think, are the same agent; or, what Dr. Hooper calls animal energy, I shall term active power. Our ignorance of the first causes of action in the animal economy, has induced us to name the action and the efficient cause of action, both one. Thus we apply the terms hot and cold, to the substances themselves, calling those bodies hot which produce in us the sensation of heat, and those cold which communicate the contrary sensation. This ambiguity, though of little consequence in the common affairs of life, has una- voidably led to confusion and perplexity in philosophical dis- cussion. It was to prevent this, that the framers of the new nomenclature adopted the word "caloric," which denotes thai which produces the sensation of heat. To prevent a worse perplexity, and at the same time pro- ductive of more good, I shall adopt the term free caloric, as. the cause of animal action, instead of" active power," " animal energy," and the like. You will remember I attempted to prove in the last Lec- ture, that free caloric is the cause of life and energy in the v egetable and animal kingdoms; and this free caloric, or ani- mal heat, instead of animal energy, is what is excited by stimulants. The energy or power of the animal system must be predicated upon the existence of free caloric in the system- Power, and other words of a similar meaning, are relative 5S terms. If a thing is powerful, something must render it so; and if an animal is active, it is by the agency of something that possesses active power within itself:—And there is no- thing hitherto discovered, which appears to possess that, but , free caloric. This is surely true with respect to animal and vegetable life: and the power and energy of the system will be in proportion to the increase or diminution of the free ca- loric in the whole system If the preceding remarks be true, we see that accurate dis- crimination, however unimportant on other subjects, is, on this, of vital consequence. We should surely, in order to think correctly, make a distinction between the animal ener- gy and that which causes the energy. When a learned doc- tor says, that "stimulants excite the animal energy," and if we remove the ambiguity of his words, he in reality says only this, "stimulants excite the animal action of the actions"— because energy or power, as we have remarked, are relative terms. Fire, to be sure, has energy and power—or, in other words, fire is powerful and active. But still we are to make a distinction between the action, and the agent which produ- ces the action. A man may write, but his writings are not the man himself—they are only the actions of the man. It is exactly so with fire: it possesses energy or power, but neith- er of these are fire—they are only the effects or properties of lire. So the animal energy must have a cause, and let that cause be what it may, the animal energy cannot be excited without affecting the cause of the animal energy or action. Hence, it is evident, that it would be much more proper to say that "stimulants excite the cause of energy," than "the energy of the animal." It is well known by all men of reading, that mankind have, from the earliest ages of the world, whenever the; Tiave beeu ignorant of remote causes of phenomena, they ' ave termed tiie cause and effect one. We see it is so in the subject under consideration. Who does not know, that if Dr. Hooper had known that free caloric is the cause of action in animal bo- dies, instead of saying that "stimulants excite the animal en- ergy," he would have said " they affect the free caloric, and in that way produce energy in the system"? His very ex- < pressions induce us to believe he knew nothing of the cause of animal life, for he uses a word which indicates an effect rather *han a cause—for energy, as I have remarked, is a relative term, and in my view of the subject, it would be very impro- 59 per to say that the actions of the agent are excited to action. Now, it appears to me, and 1 think it will to every impartial observer, that it is very necessary for the physician to have an accurate perception of the first causes of animal life and action. It will not do, and he must be deemed a quack, if he does content himself by saying it is "animal energy," and the like. I do insist upon it, that a man is not qualified to prac- tice medicine, until he shall have acquired a thorough knowl- edge of the great principle of organic life. For a man to go into the practice of medicine, without one correct view of the first and great cause of animal life, and so ignorant of physi- ology as to be unable to define the substantial difference be- tween a live animal and a dead one, is truly lamentable. Such a state of medical knowledge surely does not correspond to the progress our fellow-citizens have made in the other arts. But, as lamentable as it may appear, such is the condition of medical knowledge in the legalised institutions throughout Christendom. Think not, fellow-citizens, that I am not in earnest, for I speak the sentiments of my heart. There is not, I will not say a remaining doubt, for I have never had any since 1 formed an acquaintance with Dr. Thomson's the- ory and practice of medicine, but that the people throughout Christendom, within a few years, will be convinced of the truth of the sentiments I have expressed. But, to return to our subject: if we possess no certain knowledge of the cause of action in the human system, we shall have no sure guide to direct us in the administration of any medicine, in any disease. If a physician should be directed to excite the animal energy by one of his authors, how could he accomplish that without endangering the life of the patient, while destitute of any cor- rect view. ->f the nature of the animal energy. For what he would tern.,animal energy, might be excited by destroying. as well as by assisting it. In the remaining part of my remarks upon the nature of stimulants, I shall proceed upon the theory which I advocated in my other Lecture, viz : that free caloric is the cause of life and motion in the animal kingdom. According to our views of this subject, any thing which tends to maintain a proper portion of free caloric in the system, is a stimulant. Our dai- ly food operates, undoubtedly, as a stimulant. When taken into the stomach, it may be considered as the fuel to keep up that heat in the system necessary to life. For, without it, the fire would go out, and the animal would die. Some kinds of 60 food in particular diseases, if properly taken, will effect a cure. The heat which it affords to the system, will remove the ob- structions. But when that is not sufficiently stimulating to remove them, more powerful means, but of the same nature, should be resorted to. Medicine should affect the system in the same manner as our food does, only more powerfully. And we never ought to take any kind of medicine, or in oth- er words, we never ought to take any thing for medicine, the effects of which on the system would not be congenial to out- living on the most nutritious food. In removing disease, medicine may, with sufficient accuracy, be compared to the lever which we use in raising the edifice, but food must be the blocking. There are, it must be acknowledged, a great vari- ety of stimuli in the vegetable kingdom. All these stimulate the system by increasing the free caloric, and those are what I term direct stimulants. They possess a power of exciting not the animal energy, but the "fire in the system ; not by wa- ging war with it, or by diminishing it, but by increasing it. 1 am not willing to acknowledge any thing as a stimulant, but what has a direct tendency to increase the free caloric. Such medicines may with propriety be termed stimulants. What the innate nature of these kinds of articles are, we do not undertake to describe, but it is such, we know, as to in- crease the heat of the system. And this is a part of that great system of nature, so well adapted to advance human happiness. We know by experience that by far the greater number of vegetables found in our country are stimulants. Why may we not regard this as an evidence in favor of Dr. Thomson's theory. If heat be life, have we not reason to believe that nature would provide mauy articles to sustain it ? I would remark, here, lest I should forget it, that our system of practice does not embrace ardent spirits as a stimulant. That is, we do not use it for a stimulant. Neither do we make use of it, except in one or two preparations. It may, to be sure, raise the heat of the body when first taken into the stomach, but its influ- ence is ultimately to diminish it. And here, fellow-citizens, permit me to remark, that of all the plans hitherto conceived by philanthropists, to stop the growing and threatening evil of intoxication, the vegetable practice of medicine will bear away the palm. I will give you my reasons for believing the above remark. Men who are accustomed to hard labor, and exposed to over action, or sudden heats and colds, will, o*' 61 eourse at times feel the need of something stimulating. Thev have lost heat, and inaction and dulness will prevail through- out the system—over the mind as well as over the body. Uu- der thesecircumstances the perspiration ;s checked, and great soreness in the bones and flesh, attended Ith uncommon thirst, and a total loss of appetite. The eff s are the same in the decline of life, when the system is gn iy debilitated with age. and many years of hard labor. N. ., the system in both of the above cases loses that heat nee. ;sary to both mental and bodily activity. We have remarked in such cases, that some- thing stimulating is needed, and accordingto thepresent views of such men, spirituous liquors is the remedy. They have used that before, and it answered the purpose, and therefore it is resorted to again. It does, as we have already said, raise the heat of the system when first received into the stomach. and consequently the mental and bodily dulness subsides' The soreness in the bones and flesh is destroyed. The per spiration is free, and sometimes the appetite is restored and the thirst allayed. But those good effects continue only for a short time, for while it stimulates the system by the heat it contains, it destroys it by its narcotic quality. Could the hea it contains be separated from the narcotic poison, it would surely become a useful medicine. But this has not to my knowledge hitherto been accomplished. Whether it ever can be or not, I am not at present prepared to say. I shoulcf hope, however, that it might be achieved. To have ardent spirits so cleansed and purified from all poison, of every des cription, so that it would be as harmless, and at the same time as salutary and powerful on the system as capsicum, is what I should greatly rejoice to see. To rectify spirituous liquors so as to prevent it from producing intoxication, would be ;i curiosity indeed. But I must leave this subject, and return to the one under consideration. It is, then, the heat, which spirituous liquor possesses, thaf; renders it in any degree salutary and desirable. Take from its stimulating quality, and no one would think of using it in the manner they now do. Now, if something could be intro duced into common use, in the room of ardent spirits, contain- ing as much or more heat than that does, without producing any narcotic effects, it would, I have the fullest confidence to believe, be attended with the very best of consequences. To say it would eradicate drunkenness from the earth, is more than I am willing to affirm. But that it would have a more 62 powerful influence to do it than any thing else hitherto dis- covered, I feel safe in affirming. For if the system could be stimulated by other means, the same end would be accom- plished without intoxication. I do not say that this or any thing else would reclaim the confirmed drunkard. But I be- lieve it would have a powerful tendency to prevent drunken- ness. This subject, fellow-citizens, is worthy of your notice. It is worthy, too, of the notice of those well-meaning people, who are extending the knowledge of and circulating the med- icine to prevent drunkenness, contrived by Chambers. How- ever useful his medicine may be in reclaiming confirmed drunkards, I shall not attempt to say, although I never knew any good effect attending its administration in such cases; but it is quite certain that his medicine must fail in the most im- portant point. For it has no tendency to prevent those from becoming drunkards who are not so at the present. It has no influence to supply that stimulus to the system which is ne- cessary, and all the way it prevents intoxication, is, it prevents a fondness for it. It creates a disrelish, or loathing, in the individual against it. Therefore it can have no influence to save those from becoming drunkards, who have not at present an uncommon fondness for it, and who are not at the present drunkards. But the great point to be gained, is, to rescue the rising generation from this growing evil. It is much easier to prevent this case than to cure it. We may work to much greater advantage in saving a nation from destruction, by pre- venting the evil which threatens to destroy it, than by rescu- ing it from its influence when it has once overtaken it. Now, the vegetable practice of medicine, as taught by Dr. Thom- son, would have a powerful influence to prevent this evil, by supplying that stimuli at all times with pure vegetable stimu- lants. When men are getting up from a fit of sickness, when they have been exposed to cold, or any thing which debilitates the system, there is nothing more common than to resort to ardent spirits. In this way I have no doubt hundreds and thousands have become drunkards. But we use no such stim- ulants. We supply the system with heat by other means. The prevalence of our system of practice would teach every man, to use in all cases, stimulants which would not produce intoxication. But I have pursued this subject much longer than I intended. We will therefore return to that undw; consideration. Physicians have applied the term stimulant, to all those ar- 63 tides which produce action in the animal system. This I think is surely, if not unphilosophical in theory, dangerous in its practical results. There are two ways by which the system may be excited to action. One is by directly increasing the free caloric. This is accomplished with pure vegetable stim- ulus. The other is, by administering such articles as have a direct tendency to destroy the free caloric, so that when they are received into the stomach and come in contact with the heat, they produce action, by arousing all the energy of the fire to resist their deleterious effects. The articles which produce these effects are mercury and antimony, or indeed the whole catalogue of mineral poisons. The former are our ideas of stimulus—the latter those of mineral physicians. We stimulate the system only by augmenting the sum of fire it contains. They stimulate it, not by increasing the fire, but by arousing it into action to conquer an enemy. And to gain a victory over a powerful foe it generally requires the loss of blood. We stimulate nature by assisting it. They try to- assist nature by destroying it. Free caloric is the cause of life and motion, throughout animated nature—is the great govern- ing principle in our system. This enables us to proceed with safety and accuracy in the administration of medicine. It is evident both from their theory and practice, that the present tribe of legalized doctors possess no knowledge on this point. This is clearly the case from their views of stimulants. For stimulating the system is only producing action in the system. And no healthy action can be produced in the system but by increasing the cause of action. But the cause of action is free caloric, therefore no healthy action can be produced but by increasing the free caloric. Because if the system is excited to action by any other means but such as have a direct influ- ence to increase the free caloric, it must be by what I have termed indirect stimuli. And if so, it produces action not by increasing the cause of action, but by destroying it. In order to stimulate the system directly, medicine must be given, the effects of which will correspond to the first cause of action in the animal system. That is, it must agree with it and tend to augment it. But the first cause of action in the animal system \%fire. Any medicine, therefore, which has no tendency to increase the fire, is not in reality a stimulant, or it is not a di- rect stimulant. Now, I would ask, to what else does the whole refrigerant course of treatment amount, but to what I have termed indirect stimulants. What influence has mercury, 04 and a host of other cold, mineral poisons, to increase the free aloric, which has been clearly proved to be the cause of ani- mal life? When these are taken into the stomach, being cold dead minerals, their first and natural tendency is to paralyze the action of the absorbent system. But to prevent this, tin free caloric in the system is immediately aroused to action, and if there be a sufficient quantity of it in the system, and the constitution of the patient good, they will be prevented from destroying immediately the life of the patient. But they generally lay the foundation for a chronic disease. It is no difficult matter to see how such means exhaust the strength of the patient. For although heat may be created in the conflict between poison and life by the increased action, but still that increased heat is more than overbalanced by an in- creased disease produced by the poison. It is a clear case that those means are active only, as they are acted upon by the heat of the system. They of them- selves tend to death, and would and do produce it, when not expelled from the system by the active influence of free calo- ric. It is this which conveys them, or especially mercury, to every part of the body. They are not thus conveyed by their own activity, for they are not active on the system only by destroying it. And when mercury produces an increased se- cretion of saliva, or what is more commonly termed salivation, it is expelled from the interior to the glandular system, in an effort of nature to free the system of its deadly effects. But, it being a very cold, heavy mineral, it is lodged in the glands ; nature is not sufficiently powerful to throw it off, and it remains there for years, or at least its effects do, producing scrofula, and innumerable other difficulties. It is said by calomel doc- tors in certain diseases, if salivation cannot be effected, the patient must die. This generally is the case, though not al- ways. I regard this mercurial process altogether in the light of an experiment. The truth is this—if the patient be not so far gone, and the free caloric so far exhausted as to prevent action when it is taken into the stomach, the patient had be- fore taking it, life enough to get well, and so salivation will 'take place. But if the heat be so diminished when the mer- cury is taken, as to prevent any conflict between the poison and the fire, between the deleterious effects of calomel and nature, the patient of course will immediately sink—when, perhaps, without it he would get up. It has no tendency to cure the patient. But we learn whether he can live or not, G5 And if he have free caloric sufficient in the system, to over- come the cold, it would do it much sooner, and the patient would be much better when done without, than with the dire- ful effects of mercury. This is surely a dangerous way of learning whether a sick man can get well or not. What has been said of mercury will apply to the whole refrigerant course of treatment. Such, fellow-citizens, is the nature and ten- dency of what learned doctors term stimulants. I am well aware, fellow-citizens, that I have not done justice to this subject. At present, neither my time or circumstances will admit of it; should my life and health be spared, I may at some future period resume this subject again, as I intend to. all the other medical subjects upon which I have written. But it is time to notice my second proposition, which is the nature and tendency of blood-letting. There is a right way to do every thing respecting human happiness and human life. When they are brought about in that way, the desired end will always be accomplished. But how are we to be directed in obtaining a knowledge of that way ? The answer is at hand. By examining with critical at- tention the way that nature directs. It is by tracing the chan- nels in which the great architect of nature designed things to flow, that we are to get the most important instruction res- pecting the proper uses of things, and the way to produce effects connected with which is human happiness. In doing this it requires an accurate discrimination between art and nature, between truth and what appears to be truth—the work of man and the work of God. Our eyes are frequently daz- zled with the work of art, so that those channels which nature has provided, and through which good is continually flowing to the human race, are not discovered. This is especially so in regard to the science of medicine. Theories of disease are built in art and not in nature, and then a course of treatment is fabricated in art and not in nature to remove it. 1 o affirm that there is nothing in the appearance or nature of things indicating to us their use, would be to affirm that the earth was made without design, and that its Creator has no wisdom. We know and can clearly see great designs in many things, such as the uses of our hands, and feet, and the like. Now, since this design is so apparent in the more important things, why may we not expect it in al others? No one is qualified to answer in the negative, until he has penetrattd the dark cloud of conjecture, and examined, oneby one, tne 6* 66 whole arcanum of nature. It is of great importance, in regard to our food and medicine, that we pursue the way that nature points out. We will now be a little more particular in our remarks. When disease is introduced into the human system, it must, by some means and by some avenues or other, be thrown off, to save the life of the patient and restore health to man. In disease it is a clear point, that there is something which must be eradicated from the system: but how is this to be effected ? What way does nature point out? The natural evacuations of the animal economy, surely; by emetics, cathartics, diuretics and diaphoretics—or, in other words, by purging, vomiting and sweating. These are, undoubtedly, the natural outlets to disease. But where has nature made any provision for blood-letting? You will say, perhaps, in the veins of the arm, and in other parts of the system. Nature has given men necks too> and sharpened steel will sever them from the body; but no one will imagine that nature has given men necks to show Us that our heads should be cut off. Not only so, the arteries and veins of the body have another and important use, besides being placed there for us to cut; but the pores and other evacuations have no other use, but to throw off disease, and what would create it, if not emitted from the system. Hence we conclude, that blood-letting is contrary to nature, and must of course, be injurious. Its nature is to destroy life. When a patient has taken violent cold, and the pulse is hard and quick, attended with a great suspension of action in the stom- ach and bowels, a hot surface and perhaps local inflamation— under such circumstances, physicians, in the present daj% imagine blood-letting necessary. It is true, in such cases the arterial action is greatly excited, and the larger veins and arteries appear distended. But what is the cause of this? Is it because the patient has too much blood? or, is it because there is not an equal circulation, and because the perspiration is checked, and the action thereby thrown upon the arterial system, and the water retained which should be emitted? When a man is in good health, it is well known by critical observers, that water is continually thrown off by insensible perspiration; but when the system is diseas- ed, those particles are retained, and conspire with other causes to produce distension in the vessels and hardness of pulse— which induces the physician to believe that the patient has 100 much blood; whereas he has not too much blood, but too G7 much water and diseased fluid, which ought to pass off .by some of the natural evacuations. Now, in the above case, nature must be assisted. But how ? By taking blood? Yes, say learned doctors. But what ten- dency has that to remove the cold ? None, surely. It certain- ly can have no influence to remove the cause of disease; be- sides, it has a direct tendency to weaken the patient, because the best blood is taken. This, perhaps, may be, by some, disputed—but a little reflection will teach us that is the fact: for, nature in the animal economy, has made provision to resist the effects of disease, and efforts are always made to clear the system of disease. Those particles which produce distension in the arteries and disease in the system, nature or free caloric uniformly makes efforts to throw off. When an incision is made into an artery or vein, those particles are on their way to the skin; hence the good blood is drawn from the body, and those particles are excited back againj and thus perspira- tion is checked and the disease increased by this retrograde action. This course of treatment is evidently contrary to na- ture. In such cases those means should be used which would excite an equal and healthful action, in every part of the sys- tem. Then the disease would pass off by the natural evacua- tions. But that bleeding might be of some use in falls and the like, I shall not attempt to deny, although I think other means might be used in by far the greater number of such cases, to more advantage. I have only time now, fellow-citizens, to give you a few hints on this important subject—for, should I think to satisfy my own mind on this point, the present limits I have setto my remarks would be too much extended. My 3d proposition remains to be noticed—which is, the nature and tendency of steaming, as a medicine in disease. This application has given character more than any other, to the Thomsonian practice of medicine. Although it is quite a subordinate part of his practice, still the community have been so misinformed as to be induced to believe it is all the means he uses. It is true, steaming is the only remedy mentioned in his book, which imprudence can wield to the injury of the patient; but it is nevertheless useful, as doctors of all descrip- tions have long since acknowledged. The tendency it has in removing disease, has been perhaps already suggested to you in the preceding Lectures. You need not be informed again, that it is our sentiment that heat fs the cause of animal life 68 uid its diminution the cause of all diseases. This point 1 un- dertook to prove to you, in my last Lecture. Any means, therefore, which will increase the free caloric, without injuring the constitution, must, according to our theory, be salutary. But, it has often been remarked, that sweating by steaming, is very dangerous and injurious to the constitution. That n man can be killed with steam, no one denies. Concerning its tendency to injure the constitution, we shall make some re- marks. What bad effects can sweating, by a proper applica- tion of steam, together with pure vegetable stimulants, taken into the stomach, produce, that sweating by exercise will not produce ? for, surely, it is not believed that sweating in a warm day, when a man is at work, injures his constitution. In the first place, the perspiration is excited by taking stimulants to raise the internal heat, and then by applying the steam-bath to rarify the surrounding atmosphere—and this treatment is pursued until the water becomes volatile. In the second place, the perspiration is produced by exercise, the heat is increased by friction and frequent oxidations of the blood in the lungs. In one case, the free caloric is increased without exercise; in the other, with it. In one case, the sweating is effected with- out muscular action; in the other, it is produced by it. Hence we conclude, that perspiration produced by labor, would be more likely to injure the constitution. For the sake of illustrating the effects of steam, as a medi- cine in disease, we will take for example an inflamation of the brain. We will proceed and show the cause and nature of that disease, and what tendency steaming has, with other things, to remove it. Inflamation of the brain is characteriz- ed by strong fever, hard and frequent pulse, vomiting, griping pains of the bowels, a sudden check of perspiration, and indeed a want of action in all the secretory and excretory vessels of the system. But this inactivity exists more in the stomach and bowels and extremities of the system—in consequence of which, the blood and heat is in a very powerful degree impel- led to the head. Now, that free caloric which produced an equal action before in the whole body, is propelled to the ar- teries, and especially the vessels of the head. This change is brought about by cold, producing a spasm or contraction in the absorbent vessels. Now, we must remember that the in- creased heat, and of course action in the head, is not the dis- ease, but the effects of the disease. The cause is not in the head, but in the stomach and bowels—and it is nothing tin- 60 common when phremtis terminates fatally, to see first appear- ances of gangrene in the region of the stomach and bowels. In this disease our legalized doctors bleed most copiously, to reduce the action and to allay the heat. Permit me, fellow- citizens, to make one remark here with respect to such treat- ment, in this and in all similar cases. It is the object of the doctor, to be sure, to produce an equilibrium in the circula- tion, but he endeavors to do it by reducing the action in the part where the sympathetic disease is located, down to an equilibrium with the action in the part where the primary dis- ease is seated. But there is but little action in the part where the radical disease is situated, and when the action in the head, or wherever the increased action is located, is reduced to an equilibrium with the action in the part where the radical dis- ease is, the patient is either dead or so reduced that a cure is impossible. This is taking the patient away from the disease, and not the disease away from the patient.—This, fellow-citi- zens, is a great error in the practice of medicine. Its conse- quences are, in numerous cases, I have no doubt, fatal. Such are the sentiments of those doctors which the laws of this state compel you to employ. In such cases they pay no attention to the cold, which is the cause of the complaint; they scarce- ly ever give any medicine to excite perspiration, or to arouse the absorbent system, or to equalize the circulation. In the case of phrenitis which I have mentioned, I should in the first place, clear the stomach and bowels, and raise the internal heat, and then apply the steam-bath to throw open the pores. By this process, a cure can generally be effected. Sweating has a tendency to excite the determining powers to the surface, by producing action in the external absorbents. By this, I mean it has an influence to maintain insensible per- spiration. This, besides its tendency to prevent many dis- eases, or indeed all diseases, causes our food to nourish the system much more than it otherwise would ; for, without it, it would pass directly through the system without imparting any strength to it. Hence, sweating is necessary in all chronic diseases. But it is important that the internal heat should be raised before steaming. We might make many more remarks upon this important process to remove disease; but my present limits will not ad- mit of it. What I have written was done in great haste, for I have not at present, time to be either more diffuse or more critical in my obsesvations. I cannot dismiss this subject. 70 however, without answering one objection, that is frequently raised against the Thomsonian theory of disease. The ob- jection is this—When the fever is the highest the patient is the most thirsty, and that this must arise from an accumula- tion of heat in the stomach and in the region of the stomach; and so it is said, that, in fevers, the heat is not driven from the centre to the surface, but that the system is too highly charg- ed with it throughout;—whereas, our sentiment is, that the heat has left the centre for the surface, being driven therefrom by the cold—and that the thirst is caused by a want of heat, rather than by an excess of it. You will perceive that our sentiments and those of the le- galized physicians, are very different on this, as well as on all other subjects of a medical description—and if they are in the right, we are in the wrong; and on the other hand, if we are tight, they must be wrong, and their practice very injurious. We believe then, that the cold in the stomach occasions the thirst; the calomel doctor believes it is heat in the surface of the mouth, fauces and stomach. In order to understand this subject, we must resort to experience; we must learn what substances, taken into the stomach, are the most likely to allay the thirst, and what the most likely to produce it. In high fever, according to Dr. Currie, the cold bath immediately al- layed the thirst, not, it cannot surely be believed, by absorp- tion of water, but by impelling the heat from the surface to the centre, and thereby causing action in the exhalents. It is known from experience, that vegetable stimulants will quench thirst; the applications then, which will allaythe thirst,favors our theory. Now, let us in the second place, see what will produce thirst;—it is well known from experience, that salt lias a great influence to increase thirst, and it is equally as well known too, that it is a very cold substance. After a man has been travelling during a very cold day, he is very apt to be thirsty; and in short, when a man has taken cold, and it terminates in a fever, he is very thirsty. I conclude, that what has been said on this subject, will be sufficient to con- vince every reflecting man, that thirst is caused by cold in the stomach, and not by heat. In view of all that has been said on this subject, I would ask does Dr. Thomson deserve imprisonment and all the persecu- tion he has received from regular physicians? Dr. Thomson's practice is rational, and in a high degree salutary in its effects; 71 and his discovery shows as many absurdities and transubstan- tiations in the common theory of diseases, as the reformation and a more enlightened philosophy have in the religion of catholics, or in the legends of monkish superstition. Some remarks on the recent act of the Legislature of this state, in respect to the practice of medicine, shall conclude this Lecture. The act to which I refer, is in substance this: No man shall practice medicine without a diploma from the present medical establishment—if he does, he shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and punished by fine and imprisonment, or both, at the discretion of the court.—I know of men, who have been in the habit of attending upon the sick, and have made themselves acquainted with many useful medicines, and who have very frequently cured diseases, which those doctors, whom you are now compelled to employ or none, could not— and indeed, in almost every neighborhood, such a man can be found.—Fellow-citizens, will you suffer such an act to be, in point of law, a misdemeanor, punishable by fine or imprison- ment, or both ? Will you permit the man in your neighbor- hood to be taken to prison, for doing you good ? for, it is the good which vegetable physicians have done, and not the evil, which has induced the doctors to seek their destruction. Be- lieve me, fellow-citizens, this new act has been brought about by the faculty, to rob you of your rights. It is not going to injure vegetable physicians, for they have never received but little compensation for their services. This is not our object: that is to teach you to be your own physicians, and so ulti- mately throw off that grievous burden that you now have to bear. The fear the faculty have that we shall effect this, have induced them to pursue the measures they have taken, li will be in vain for them to tell you, that they have acted for vour good, for they are never better suited than when they have full employ—and if steam-doctors do so much injury as is pretended, it will only increase their business. It is the success with which the vegetable practice has been crowned, that has carried dismay into the ranks of their enemies. We do not make these remarks, fellow-citizens, because we are in fear that the vegetable practice is in danger of being destroyed, or that Dr. Thomson's fame is not safe—for we believe they are both placed beyond the influence of profes- sional malice. Tfce malignity of the faculty has been such, as to convince us, that if they do not totally eradicate the vege- table practice, it will to because they cannot. Yet the measures flie,y 72 have taken are as indicative of their stupidity, as their theory am: practice of medicine is of their ignorance. They might have known that this movement would have shown their evil designs;—they ought to have known that the people of this state are too enlighten- ed, too zealous of their rights, to suffer this offspring of despotism to exist for any length of time. According to this law, people are compelled to employ such physicians, and such only, as the medical establishment shall send among them. They are not left to choose for themselves: the faculty has, they would fain have you believe, kindly provided for the safety and well-being of your bodies. This law is productive of evil on many accounts. And first, it i:; an effectual barrier against improvement in the healing art. I have elsewhere remarked, that from the fact that knowledge is pi ogres ■ sive, knowledge ought not to assume the form of a perpetual en- campment. Its tendency is to remove all exciting causes to emu- lation. The law now prohibits any opposition line whatever. This is giving them privileges which no class of men, whatever, has en- joyed since the inquisition. They have a right to give what they please for medicine, and then charge what they please for it, and no tribunal but one made up of themselves, can call them to an account. We are in no greater need of a medical establishment, than of a religions establishment, and one is equally as contrary to free government as the other ; and the only reason why the former is not as much detested as the latter, is because we have been more accustomed to it. When community is once awakened to the im- portance of this subject, justice will undoubtedly take place. Then it will be seen how they have endeavored to keep the people in ignorance, and how they have attempted'to extinguish the trans- cendent light which Thomson's theory sheds upon the healing art. Were it a fact that their views of disease are correct, and llieir practice nature's assistant, it would besome palliation, but the most stupid ignorance is conspicuous in all, or nearly all their notions of disease. Their whole system is a jargon of contradictions, which will be regarded by future ages in the same point of light as explo- ded systems in philosophy and religion are by the present age. Truth, fellow-citizens, needs not law to support it. In an enlight- ened country like our own, the ever watchful eye of self-preserva- tion, is the safeguard to our freedom. Our liheity is in imminent danger when it is intrusted to any set of men over which we have no control. The notion that we must trust the soul to the priest, the body to the doctor, and our liberties to the lawyer, is an erro- neous one. These, fellow-citizens, may be all useful, but still they are to act under the inspection of the community. The people / are to be the judges of their honesty and merits. But according to the recent act respecting the practice of medicine, the people are excluded from the privilege of exercising any authority over tho medical establishment. '■1 1 ERRATA.—In perusing these Lectures, the reader will please notice the following corrections:— In page 6,14 lines from bottom, for " is," read it. ------• 7, 26 lines from top, for "different," read differently. -----IS, fl lines from top, for "that nature," read that the nature. -----24, 22 lines from top, for " lengthy," read long. 24, last line, foriCexist," read excel. 41,16 lines from bottom, for "era," read fire. 52, 3 lines from top, for " so," read too. Meet • W lib. lit) Tim \U1