UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOUNDED 1836 WASHINGTON, D.C. B19574 ■f-'v*, WiVw U.'-fr** ,w 1 Bosjon MEDib^L Library Asso^tion,^^ 19 BOYLSTOI^PMCE sr* Rece^red Wed by (fa.C.jgfk V. • •> -v PKE1TM4.TIC CI.STERy whom they are suppofed to be made. Of this fault the author is fully aware. But in order to avoid it, it would have been necefsary either to omit a variety of ufeful illuftra- tions, qr to fubmit to fuch minute explanations and frequent repe- titions, as would have rendered the work much lefs fuited to its purpofe. In writing thefe pages, the author was more than once checked in her progrefs by the apprehenfion, that fuch an attempt might be confidered by fome, either as unfuited to the ordinary purfuitsof her fex, or ill j jftified by her own recent and imperfect knowledge of the fubjedl. But, on the one hard, fhe felt encouraged by the eftablifhment of thofe public inftltutions, open to both fexes, for the diffemination of philosophical knowledge, which clearly prove, that the general opinion no longer excludes women from an ac- quaintance with the elements of fcience; and, on the other, flatter- ed herfelf, that whilft the imprtffions made upon her mind, by the wonders of Nature ftudied in this, new point of view, were ftill frefh and ftrong, fhe might perhaps fucceed the better in communicating to others the fentiments fhe htrfclf experienced. It wiil be obferved, that, from the beginning of the work it is ta- ken for granted, that the reader has previoufly acquired fome flight knowledge of natural philofophy, .a circumftance, indeed, which appears very defirable. The author's original intention wai to commence this work by a ftnall tract, explaining, on a plan ana- logous to this, the moft effential rudiments of that fcience Thii idea fhe has fince abandoned ; but the manufcript was ready, and might perhaps have been printed at fome future period, had n< t an elementary work of a fimilar defcription, under the title of '■ Scien- tific Dialogues,'' been lately pointed out t* her, which, on a rapid perufa!,fhe thought very ingenious, and well calculated to anfwer its intended object. COXTENTS. VOL I.---ON SIMPLE BODIES. CONVERSATION I. i. On the general primiples of Chymhtry. Connection between Chymistry and Natural Philosophy. Im- proved State of modern Chymistry. Its Use in the Art5. The general Objects of Chymibtry. Definition of Elementary Bo- dies. Definition of Decompofition. Integrant and Constituent Particles. Distinction between Simple and Compound Bodies. Of Chymical Affinity, or Attraction of Compofition. Exam- ples of Compofition and Decompofition. CONVERSATION II. 10 On Light and Heat. Light and Heat capable of being feparated. Dr Herfchel's Expe- riments. Of Caloric. Its four Modifications. Free Caloric. Of the three different States of Bodies, folid, fluid, and seriform. Dilation of Solid Badies. Pyrometer. Dilation of Fluids. Ther- mometer. Dilation of Elaftic Fluids. Air Thermometer. Cold, a Negative Quality. Profeffor Pictet's Experiments on the Reflec- tion of Heat. Proftflor Prevoft's Theory of the Radiation of Heat. CONVERSATION III. - - 26 Continuation of the Subjetl, Of the different Power of Bodies to conduct Heat. Attempt to account for this Power. Count Rumford's Theory of the Non- conducting Power of Fluids. Phenomena of Boiling. Of So- lution in general. Solvent Power of Water. Difference be- tween Solution and Mixture. Solvent Power of Caloric. Of Clouds, Rain, Dew, Evaporation, &c. Influence of Atmof- pherical Prtffure on Evaporation. CONVERS VTIONIV. 46 On Specific Heat, Latent Heat, and Chymual Heat. Of Specific Heat. Of the Different Capacities of Bodies for Heat. Specific Heat not Perceptible b;- the Senfes How tC be afcertained. Of Latent Heat. The Difference between La- tent and Specific Heat. Phenomena attending the Melting of Ice and the Formation ot Vapour. Phenomena attending the Formation of Ice, and the Condensation of Elaftic Fluids In- ftances of Condenfation and confequent Difengagemcnt of Heat, produced by Mixtures, viz. by the mixture of Sulphuric \cid and Water, by the Mixture of Alcohol and Water ; by the Slakeing of Lime. General Remarks on Latent Heat. Ex- planation of the Phenomena of Ether boiling and Water freez- ing, at the fame Temperature. Calorimeter. Meteorolog- ical Remarks. Of Chymical Heat. A 2 CONTENTS. CONVERSATION V. 6-'- On Oxygen and Nitrogen. The Atmosphere composed oFOxygen and Nitrogen in the State of Gas. Definition of Gas. Difference between Gas and Va- pour. Oxygen essential to Combuftioo and Respiration. De- compofition of the Atmofphere by Combuftion. Nitrogen Gas obtained by this Procefs. Of Oxygenation in general. Of the Oxydation of Metals. Oxygen Gas obtained from Oxyd of Man- ganefe. Defcription of a Water-Bath for collecting and prefer- ving Gasses. Combuftion of Iron Wire in Oxygen Gas. Fixed and volatile products of Combuftion. Patent Lamps. Decom- pofition of the Atmosphere by Refpiration. Recompofition of the atmofphere. CONVERSATION VI. 8a On Hydrogen. Of Hydrogen. Of the Formation of Water by the Combuftion of Hydrogen. Of the Decompofition of Water. Detonation of Hy- drogen Gas. Description of Lavoisier's Apparatus for the For- mation of Water. Hydrogen Gas essential to the production of Flame. Mufical Tones produced by the Combuftion of Hydro- gen Gas within a glafs Tube. Combuftion of Candles explained. Detonation of Hydrogen Gas in Soap Bubbles. Air Balloons. Meteorological Phenomena afcribed to Hydrogen Gas. CONVERSATION VII. 98 On Sulphur and Phosphorus. Natural Hiftory cf Sulphur. Sublimation. Alembic. Combust- ion of Sulphur in Atmospheric/* ir. Of Acidification in general. Nomenclature of the ..cids. Combuftion of Sulphur in Oxygen , Gas, Sulphuric .-.cid. Sulphurous ^ cid. Sulphurated Hydro- gen Gas. Harrowgate, or Kydro-sulphurated Waters. Phos- phorus. Hiftory of its Difcovery. Its Combuftion in Oxygen ♦ Gas. Phofphoric Acid Phofphorus /•cid. Eudiometer. Combination of Phosphorus with Sulphur. Phosphorated Hy- drogen Ga». Nomenclature of Binary Compounds. Phofphor- tt of Lime burning under Water. CON VERS VTION VIII. m On Car Lone. Method of obtaining pure Charcoal Method of making common Charcoal. Pure Carbone not to be obtained by Art. Diamond is Carbone in a State of perfect purity. Properties of Carbone, Combuftion of Carbone. Production of Carbonic Acid Gas. Carbone fusceptible of only one Degree of Acidification. Gas- eous Oxyd of Carbone. Of Seltzer Water and other Mineral Waters. Effervescence- Decompofition of Water by Carbone. Of Fixed and essential Oils. Of the combuftion of Lamps and Candles. Vegetable Acids. Of the power of Carbone to revive Metals. CONTENTS. vil CON VERS ATIONIX. 129 On Metals. Natural History of Metals. Of Roafting, Smelting, &c___ Oxydation of Metals by the Atmosphere- Change of Col- ours produced by different degrees of Oxydation. Combus- tion of Metals Perfect Metals burnt by the Galvanic Fluid on- ly. Some Metals revived by Carbone and other Combuftibles. Perfect Metals revived by Heat alone- Of the Oxydation of certain Metals by the Decomposition of Water. Power of Acids to promote this effect. Oxydation of Metals by Acids. Metallic Neutral Salts. Previous Oxydation of the Metal re- qusite. Crystallization. Solution distinguifhed from Diffolu- tion. Five Metals fufceptible of Acidification Falling Stones. Alloys, Soldering, Plating, &c. uf Arfenic, and of the Cauftic Effects of Oxygen. Of Verdegris, Sympathetic Ink, &c. CONVERSATION X- 150 On Alkalies. Analogy between Earths and Alkalies. Ammonia proved to be a Compound : other Alkalies Suppose i to be fuch. Their Combi- nation with Acids. Nomenclature of the Compound Salts. Potafh; its Natural Hiftory. Woodafh. Pearlafh. Combina- tion of Potafh with Oils. Soap. Potafh contained likewise in the Mineral and Animal Kingdoms. Carbonat of Potafh. Heat produced by the folution of Potafh in Water Of Glafs. Of Nitre or Saltpetre. Change of Colours produced by Alkalies on Vegetable Blues. Soda ; its Refemblance to Potafh ; obtained from Sea Salt, or from Marine Plants, \mmonia obtained from Sal Ammoniac. Ammoniacal Gas readily abforbed by Witer, Compofition of Ammonia. Liquid Ammonia or Hartshorn. Heat produced by the condenfation of Ammoniacal Gas in Wa- ter ; and Cold produced by the Solution of this Gas in Ice. Car- bonat of Ammonia. CONVERSATION XL 164 On E.irths. Nomenclature of the Earths. Their Incombustibility- Form the Bafis of all Mir.era's Earths fufpected to be oxydated Metals, Probability of their being Compounds. Their Alkaline Proper- ties. Silex; its properties and Uses in nature and in the • rts. Alumine ; its U*es in Pottery, &c. Alkaline Earths Barytcs. Lime ; its extenfivc Chymical Properties and Ufes in the Arts. Magnesia. Strontian. VOL.11. ON COMPOUND BODIES. CONVERSATION XII. 1S1 On the Attraction of Compofition. Of the Laws which regulate the Phenomena of the Attraction of Compofition. 1. It takes Place only between Bodies of a differ- ent Nature, a. Betwten the moft minute Particles only- 3. ▼ill, *ONTENTS. Between a, 3,4, or more Bodies. 4. Produces a Change oi Temperature. 5. The Properties that characterize Bodies in their feparate State, deftroyed by Combination. 6. The Force of Attraction estimated by that which is required by the Separ- ation of the Conftituents. 7. Bodies have amongft themfelves different Degrees of Attraction. Of fimple elective and double elective Attractions, Of quiefcent and divellent Forces. CONVERSATION XIII, 188 On Compound Bodies. Of the fimpleft clafs of Compounds. Of the various Combinations of Oxygen. Of the undecompounded Acids. Of the Classifi- cation of Acids, ift Clafs, Acids of fimple and known Radi- cals, zd Clafs, Acids of unknown Radicals. 3d Clafs, Acids of double Radicals. Of the Decompofition of Acids of the firft Clafs by combuftible Bodies. CONVERSATION XIV. 195 Qn the Combinations rf Oxygen •with Sulphur and ivith Pbosphot us ; and of the Sulphats and Pbosphats. Of the Sulphuric Acid. Combuftion of Animal or Vegetable Bo- dies by this Acid. Method of preparing it The Sulphurous Acid obtained in the form of Gas. May be obtained from Sul- phuric Acid. May be reduced to Sulphur. Is abforbable by Water. Dellroys Vegetable Colours—Oxyd of Sulphur. Of Salts in general. Sulphats, Sulphat of Potafh or Sal Polychreft. Cold produced by the melting of Salts, Sulphat of Soda, or Glauber s Salt. Heat evolved during the Formation of Sales. Crystallization of Salts. Water of Crystallization Efflores- cence and Deliquifcence of Salts. Sulphat of Lime. Gypfum or Plaifter ot Paris- Sulphat of Magnefia. Sulphat of Alu- mir.e, or Allum. Sulphat of Iron. Of Ink. Of the Phosphor- ic and Phosphorus Acids. Phosphorus obtained from Bones. Phosphat of Lime. CONVERSATION XV. 205 On the Combinations of Oxygen ivith Nitrogen and -with Carbone ; and of the Nit rats and Carb nats. Nitrogen fucceptible of various Degrees of Aiidification. Of the Nitric Acid Its Nature and Compofitjon discovered by Mr. Cavendifh. Obtained from Nitrat of Potafh. Aqua Fortis- Nitric Acid may be converted into Nitrous Acid. Nitric Oxyd Gas Its conversion into Nurous -.cid Gas- Used as an Eudiometrical left. Gaseous Oxyd of Nitrogen, or txhil- irating Gas obtained from Nitrat of Ammonia. Its Singular Effects on being respired. Nitiats. Of Nitrat ol Potafh Nitre or Saltpetre Of Gunpowder.—Cau<,es of D. tonation- D*-com- pofkion of Nitie. Deflagration- Nitrat of Ammonia. Nitrat of Silver. Of the Carbonic Acid. pormtd by the combuftion of Carbone. Constitutes a component part of the Atmofphere, Ex- CONTENTS. lx haled in fome Caverns. Grotto del Cane. Great Weight of this Gas. Procured from calcareous Stones by Sulphuric Acid. Dele- terious effects of this Gas when respired. Sources which keep up a fupply of this Gas in the Atmosphere Its effects on Vege- tation. Of the Carbonats of Lime, Marble, Chalk, Shells, Spars, and calcareous Stones. CONVERSATION. XVI. aai On the Muriatic and Oxygenated Muriatic Acids ; and on Mu- riats. Of the Muriatic Acid. Obtained from Mnriats. Its gaseous Form- Is absorbable by Water. Is fusceptible of a Stronger Degree of Oxygenation. Oxygenated Muriatic Acid- Its gaseous Form and other Properties. Combuftion of Bodies in this Gas. It dis- solves Gold. Compofition of Aqua Regia. Oxygenated Muriatic Acid deftroys all colours. Used for Bleaching and for Fumiga- tions. Its offenfive Smell &c, Muriats. Muriat of Soda, or common Salt. Muriat of Ammonia. Oxygenated Muriat of Potafh. Detonates with Sulphur, Phosphorus, &c Experiment of burning Phosphorus under Water by means of this Salt and of Sulphuric Acid. CONVERSATION XVII- 230 On the Nature and Compcfition f Vegetables. Of Organized Bodies. Of the Functions of Vegetables. Of the El- ements of Vegetables. Of the Materials of Vegetables. Analyfis of Vegetables. Of Sap. Mucilage, or Gum. Sugar. Manna.and Honey. Gluten. Vegetable Oils. Fixed Oils. Linseed, Nut, and Olive Oils. Volatile Oils, forming Essences and Perfumes. Cam- phor, Refins and Varnifhes. Pitch, Tar, Copal, Maftic, &c. Gum Resins- Myrrh, Assafcetida, &c. Caoutchouc, or Gum- Elastic. Extractive colouring Matter; its ufe in the Arts of Dye- ing and Painting- Tanning ; its ufe in the art of preparing Lea- ther. Woody Fibre. Vegetable Acids. The Alkalies of Salts contained in Vegetables. CONVERSATION XVIII. 250 On the Deccmpofition of Vegetables. Of Fermentation in general. Ol the Saccharine Fermentation, the Product of which is Sugar. Of the Vinous Fermentation, the Product of which is Wine. Alcohol, or Spirit of Wine. Analy- sis of Wine by Distillation. Of Brandy. Rum, Arack, Gin, &c. Tartrit of Potafh, or Cream of Tartar. Liqueurs Chymical Prop- erties of Alcohol. Its Combustion. Of Ether, Of the Acetous Fermentation, the Product < f which is Vinegar. Fermentation of Bread Of the Putrid Fermentation, which reduces Vegeta- ble' to their Elements Spontareous succession of thefe Fermen- tations Of Vegetables laid to be petrified. Of Bitumens ; Naphtha. Afphaltum. Jet, Coal, Succin, or Yellow Amber, Of Fossil Wood, Peat, and Turf. * contents- CONVERSATION XIX. 47* Hijlary of Vegetation. Connexion between the Vegetable and Animal Kingdoms. Of Manures. Of Agriculture. Inexhauftible Sources of Materials for the purposes of Agriculture. Of Sowing Seed- Germination of the Seed. Function of the Leaves of Plants. Effects of light and Air on Vegetation Effects of Water on Vegetation. Ef- fects of Vegetation on the Atmofphere. Formation of Vegeta- ble Materials by the Organs of Plants. Vegetable heat. Of the Organs of Plants. Of the Bark, consifting of Epidermis, Par- enchyma, and Cortical Layers. Of Alburnum or Wood.—— Leaves, Flowers, and Seeds. Effects of the Seasons on Vegeta- tion. Vegetation of Evergreens in Winter. CONVERS ATION XX, 290 On the Compufition of Animals. Elements of Animals. Of the Three principal Materials of Ani- mals, viz. Gelatine, Albumen, Fibrine. Of Animal cids. Of Animal Colours, Prussian Blue, Carmine, and Ivory Black, CONVERSATION XXI. 301 On the Animal Economy. Of the principal *nimal Organs. Of Bones, Teeth, Horns, Liga- ments, and Cartilage. Of the Muscles, conftituting the organs of Motion Of the Vafcular System for the conveyance of fluids Of the Glands for the Secretion of Fluids. Of the Nerves, conftituting the organs of Scnfation. Of the Cellular Subftancs which connects the feveral Organs- Of the Skin. CONVERS TION XXII. 311 On Animalization, Nutrition, and Respiration. D'geftion- Solvent power of the Ga-rric Juice. Formation of Chyle. Its ssimilation, or Converfion into Blood- Of Respir- ation. Mechanical Process of Respiration. Chymical Process of Respiration. Of the circulation of the Blood. Of the Func- tions of the A rteries the Veins and the Heart. Of the Lungs. Effects of Refpiration on the Blood- CONVERS STION XXIII. 323 On Animal Heat; and of various Animal Products. Of the Analogy of Combuftion and Respiration. Animal Heate- volvedin the Lungs Animal Heat evolved in the Circulation. Heat produced by Fever. Perspiration. Heat produced by ex- ercise. Equal Temperature of \nimals at all Seasons. Power of the * nimal Body to resift the efivcts of Heat. Cold produced by Perfpiration. Refpiration of Fifh, and of Birds. Effects of refpiration on Muscular Strength Of feveral Animal Products, viz, Milk, Butter, and Cheefe ; Spermaceti; Ambergris; Wax 5 contents; a *L* ConkLU.Sk; ^^ ^^ °f ^putHdFer»e„ta. DaV7Uef,tcrian LeCtUrCj0n th^ Decompofition of the Fixed Alka- Defcription of the Pneumatic Ciftern of Yale College, f e r Account of Mineral Waters s* 353 APPENDIX. 35 I -on Currying, - . . . . I'l -on Tanning, CONVERSATIONS ON CHEMISTRY. ON SIMPLE BODIES. Con&eraation i. On the General Principles of Chemiftry. Mrs. B. HAVING now acquired some elementary notions of Natural Philosophy, I am going to propose to vou another branch of science to which I am particularly anxious that you should devote a share of your atten- tion. This is Chemistry, which is so closely con- nected with Natural Philosophy, that the study of the one must be incomplete without some knowledge of the other ; for it is obvious that we can derive but a very imperfect idea of bodies from the study of the general laws by which they are governed, if we remain totally ignorant of»heir intimate nature. Caroline. To confess the truth, Mrs. B. I am not disposed to form a very favourable idea of Chemistry, nor do I expect to derive much entertainment from it. I prefer those sciences that exhibit nature on a grand scale, to those which are confined to the mi- nutiae of petty details. Can the studies which we have 2 lately pursued, the general properties of matter, or the revolutions of the heavenly bodies, be compared to the mixing up of a few insignificant drugs ? Airs. B. I rather imagine that your want of taste for chemistry proceeds from the very limited idea you entertain of its object You confine the chemist's lab- oratory to the narrow precints of the apothecary's shop, whilst it is subsefvient to an immense variety of other ustful pin poses. Besides, my dear, chemistry is by no means confined to works of art. Nature also has her laboratory, which is the universe, and there she is incessantly employed in chemical operations. You are surprised, Caroline ; butl assure you that the most wondeiful and the most interesting phenomena of nature are almost all of them produced by chemical powers. Without entering therefore into the minute details of practial chemistry, a woman may obtain such a knowledge of the science, as will not only throw an interest on the common occurrences of life, but will enlarge the sphere of her ideas, and render the con- templation of Nature a source of delightful instruc- tion. Caroline. If this is the ca?e, I have certainly been much mistaken in the notion I had formed of chemistry. I own that 1 thought it was chiefly confined to the knowledge and preparation of medicines. Mrs. B. That is only a branch of chemistry, which is called Pharmacy ; and though the study of it is cer- ;ainly of very great importance to the world at large, it properly belongs to professional men, and is therefore the last that I should advise you to study. Emily. But did not the chemists formerly employ saemselvesin search (;f the Philosopher's Stone, or the secret of making gold ? Mrs. B. Thcte were a particular set of misguided philosophers, who dignified themselves with the name of Alchymists, to distinguish thcii puihiiits from those of the common chemists, whose studies were confined to the know ledge of medicines. But, since that period, chemistry has undergone so complete a revolution, that from an obscure and mys- 3 terious art, it is now become a regular and beautiful science, to which art is entirely subservient. It is true, however, that we are indebted to the alchy mists for many very useful discoveries, which sprung from their fruitless attempts to make gold, and which undoubtedly have proved of infinitely greater advantage to mankind than all their chimerical pursuits. The modern chymists, far from directing their am- bition to the imitation of one of the least useful produc- tions of inanimate nature, aim at copying almost all her operations, and sometimes even form combinations, the model of which is not to be found in her own pro- ductions. They have little reason to regret their ina- bility to make gold (which is often but a false represen- tation of riches,) whilst by their innumerable inventions and discoveries, they have so greatly stimulated indus- try, and facilitated labour, as prodigiously to increase the luxuries as well as the necessaries of life. Emilxj. But I do not understand by what means chemistry can facilitate labour ; is not that rather the province of the mechanic ? Mrs. B. There are many ways by which labour may be rendered more easy, independently of mechan- ics ; but even the machine the most wonderful in its effects, the steam engine, cannot be understood with- out the assistence of chemistry. In agriculture, a chemical knowledge of the nature of soils, and of veg- etation, is highly useful; and in those arts which re- late to the comforts and conveniencies of life it would be endless to enumerate the advantages which result from the study of this science. Caroline. But, pray, tell us more precisely in what manner the discoveries of chemists have proved so ben- eficial to society. ... Mrs. B. That would be an unfair anticipation ; for you would not comprehend the nature of such discov- eries and useful applications, so Veil as you will do hereafter. Without a due regard to method, we can- not expect to make any progress in chemistry. I wish to direct your observation chiefly to the chemical oper- ations of Nature ; but those of Art are certainly of too. 4 high importance to pass unnoticed. We shall there- fore allow them also some share of our attention. Emily. Well then, let us now set to work regularly, I am very anxious to begin. Mrs. B. The object of chemistry is to obtain a knowledge of the intimate nature of bodies and of their mutual action on each other. You find therefore, Ca- roline, that this is no narrow or confined science, which comprehends every thing material within our sphere. Caroline. On the contrary, it must be inexhaustible ; and I am at a loss to conceive how any proficiency can be made in a science whose objects are so numerous. Mrs. B. If every individual substance was formed of different material's, the study of chemistry would in- deed be endless ; but you must observe, that the vari- ous bodies in nature are composed of certain elementary principles, which are not very numerous. Caroline. Yes ; I know that all bodies are com- posed of fire, air, earth, and water; I learnt that many years ago. Mrs. B. But you must now endeavour to forget it. I have already informed you what a great change chem- istry has under-one since it has become a regular sci- ence. Within tfrese thirty years especially, it has ex- perienced an entire revolution, and it is now proved that neither fire, air, earth nor water, can be cahed ele- mentary bodies. For an elementary body is one that cannot be decomposed, that is to say, separated into other substances ; and fire, air, earth, and water, are all of them susceptible of decomposition. Emily. I thought that decomposing a body was di- viding it into its minutest parts. And if so, I do not un- derstand why an elementary substance is not capable of being decomposed, as well as any other. Mrs. B. You have misconceived the idea of De- composition ; it is very different from mere divhion : the latter simply re/J0ices a body into parts, but the for iner separates it into the various ingredients, or mate- rials, of which it is composed. If we were to take a loaf of bread, and separate the several ingredients of which it is made, the flour, the yeast, the salt, and the 3 water, it would be very different from cutting the loaf into pieces, or crumbling it into atoms. Emily. I understand you now very Avell. To de- compose a body is to separate from each other the va- rious elementary substances of which it consists. Caroline. But flour, water, and the other materials of bread, according to youi definition, are not elementary substances ? Mrs. B. No my dear; I mentioned bread rather as a familiar comparison to illustrate the idea, than as an example. The elementary substances of which a body is com- posed, are called the constituent parts of that body ; in decomposing it, therefore, we separate its constituent parts. If, on the contrary, we divide a body by chop- ping it to pieces, or even by giiading or pounding it to the finest powder, each of these small particles vvili still consist of a portion of the several constituent parts of the whole body : these we call the integrant parts ; do you understand the difference ? Emily. Yes, I think, perfectly. We decompose a body into its constituent parts ; and divide it into its inte- grant parts. Mrs. B. Exactly so. If therefore a body consists of only one kind of substance, though we may divide it into its integrant parts, it is not possible to decompose it. Such bodies are therefore called simfile or elementary, as they are the elements of which all other bodies are composed. Comfiound bodies are such as consist of more than one of these elementary principles. Caroline. But do not fire, air, earth and water, con- sist, each of them, but of one kind of substance ? Mrs. B. No, my dear : they are every one of them susceptible of being separated into various simple bo- dies. Instead of four, chemists now reckon upwards of forty elementary substances. Thase we shall first ex- amine separately, and aftervvardyconsid«r in their com- binations with each other. B2 6 Their names are as follow : LIGHT, SILEX, ZINC, CALORIC, ALLUMINE, BISMUTH, OXYGEN,/^" YTTI'.IA, ANTIMONY, NITROGEN, GLUCINA, ARSENIC, HYDROGEN, ZIECON1A, COBALT, SULPHUR, AGUSTINA, MANGANESE, PHOSPHORUS, (25 Metals ■) TUNGSTEN, CARBONE, GOLD. MOLYBDNUM, (2 Alkalies.) PLATINA, URANIUM, POTASH, SILVER, TELLURIUM, ^ODA, MERCURY, TITANIUM, (\0 Earths.) COPPER, CHROME, LIME, IRON, OSMIUM, MAGNESIA, TIN, IRIDIUM, STRONT1TES, LEAD, PALLADIUM, BARYTES, NICKLE, RHODIUM. Caroline. This is indeed a formidable list ! Mrs. B. Not so much as you imagine ; many of the names you are already acquainted with, and the others will soon become familiar to you. But, before we proceed farther it will be necessary to give you some idea of chemical attraction, a power on which the whole science depends. Chemical Attraction, or the Attraction of Composition, consists in the peculiar tendency which bodies of a dif- ferent nature have to unite with each other. It is by this force that all the compositions, and decompositions, are effected Emily. What is the difference between chemical at- traction, and the attraction of cohesion, or of aggrega- tion, which you often mentioned to us in former conver- sations ? Mrs. B. The attraction of cohesion exists only be- tween particles of the same nature, whether simple or compound; thus it uaites the particles of a piece of metal which is a simple substance, and likewise the particles of a loaf of bread which is a compound. The attraction of composition, on the contrary unites and maintains in a st.-.te of combination particles of a dis- similar nature ; it is this power that forms each of the compound particles of which bread consists ; and it is by the attraction of cohesion that all these particles are connected into a single mass. Emily. The attraction of cohesion, then, is the pow- er which unites the integrant particles of a body ; the attraction of composition that which combines the con- stituent particles. Is it not so. ? Mrs. B. Precisely : and observe that the attraction of cohesion unites particles of a similar nature, without changing their original properties; the result of such an union, therefore, is a body of the same kind as the particles of which it is formed ; whilst the attraction of composition, by combining particles of a dissimilar na- ture, produces new bodies, quite different from any of their constituent particles. If, for instance, I pour on the piece of copper, contained in this glass, some of this liquid (which is called nitric acid) for which it has a strong attraction, every particle of the copper will com- bine with a particle of acid, and together they will form a new body, totally different either from the copper or acid. Do you observe the internal commotion that already begins to take place ? It is produced by the combina- tion of these two substances; and yet the acid has in this case to overcome, not only the resistance which the strong cohesion of the particles of copper oppose to its combination with them, but also the weight of the cop- per which makes it sink to the bottom of the glass, and prevents the acid from having such free access to it as it would if the metal were suspended in the liquid, Emily. The acid seems, however, to overcome both these obstacles without difficulty, and appears to be very rapidly dissolving the copper Mrs B. By this means it reduces the copper into more minute parts, than could possibly be done by any mechanical power. But as the acid can act only on the surface, of the metal, it will be sometime before the un- ion of these two bodies will be compleated. You m..y, however, already see how totally different this compound is from either of its ingredients. It is neither colourless like the acid, nor hard, heavy, and 8 yellow, like the copper. If you tasted it, you would no- longer perceive the sourness of the acid. It has at present the appearance of a blue liquid ; but when the union is completed, and the water with which the acid is diluted is evaporated, it will assume the form of regu- lar chrystals, of a fine blue colour, and perfectly trans- parent. Of these I can shew you a specimen, as I have prepared some for that purpose. Caroline. How very beautiful they are, in colour, form and transparency ' Emily. Nothing can be more striking than this ex- ample of chemical attraction. Mrs. B. The term attraction has been lately intro- duced into chemistry as a substitute for the word affin- ity, to which some chemists have objected, because it originated in the vague notion that chemical combina- tions depend upon a certain resemblance, or relationships between particles that are disposed to unite ; and this idea is not only imperfect, but erroneous, as it is generally particles of the most dissimilar nature, that have the greatest tendency to combine. Caroline Besides, there seems to be no advantage in using a variety of terms to express the same mean- ing : on the contrary it creates confusion : and as we are well acquainted with the term of attraction in natu- ral philosophy, we had better adopt it in chemistry like- wise. Mrs. B. If you have a clear idea of the meanings I shall leave you at liberty to express it in the terms you prefer. For myself, I confess that I think the word attraction best suited to the general law that unites the integrant particles of bodies ; and affinity better adapted to that which combines the constituent particles, as it may convey an idea of the preference which some bod- ies have for others, which the term attraction of composi- tion does not so well express. Emily. So I think ; forjthough that preference may not result from any relationship or similitude, between the particles (as you say was once supposed), yet, as it really exists, it ought to be expressed. Mrs. B. Well, let it be agreed that you may use 9 the terms affinity, chemical attraction, and attraction of composition, indifferently, provided you recollect that they all have the same meaning. Emily. I do not conceive how bodies can be decom- posed by chemical attraction. That this power should be the means of composing them, is very obvious ; but how it can at the same time produce exactly the contra- ry effect, appears to me very singular. Mrs. B. To decompose a body, is, you know, to separate its constituent parts, which, as we have just ob- served, can never be done by mechanical means. Emily. No ; because mechanical means separate only the integrant particles ; they act merely against the attraction of cohesion. Mrs. B. The decomposition of a body, therefore, can only be performed by chemical powers. If you present to a bodv composed only of two principles, a third, which has a greater affinity for one of them than the two first have lor each other, it will be decomposed, that is, its two principles will be separated by means of the third body. Let us call two ingredients, of which a body is composed, A, and B. If we present to it another ingredient C, which has a greater affinity forB, than that which unites A and B, it necessarily follows that B will quit A to combine with C. The new ingredient, therefore, has effected a decomposition of the original body A B; A has been left alone, and a new compound, B C, has been formed. Emily. We might, I think, use the comparison of two friends, who wore very happy in each other's soci- ety, till a third disunited them by the preference which one of them gave to the new comer. Mrs. B. Very well, I shall no\i show you how this takes place in chemistry. Let us suppose that we wish to decompose the com- pound we have just formed by the combination of the two ingrelieuts, copper and nitric acid : we may do this by presenting to it a piece of iron, for which the acid h.s a stronger attraction than for copper ; the acid will consequently quit the copper to combine with toe iron, and the copper will be what the chemist calls to precipitated, that is to say, it will return to its separate state, and reappear in its simple form. In order to produce this effect, I shall dip the blade of this knife into the fluid, and when 1 U.ke it out, you will observe that instead of being wetted with a blueish liquid like that contained in the glass, it will be covered with a very thin pellicle of copper. Caroline. So it is really ! But then is it not the cop- per instead of the acid, that has combined with the iron blade I Mrs. B. No ; you are d2ceived by appearances : it is the acid which combines with the iron, and in so doing deposiles the copper on the surface of the blade. Emily. But cannot three or more substances com- bine together, without any of them being precipitated ? Mrs. B. That is sometimes the case ; but in gene- ral, the stronger affinity destroys the weaker : and it sel- dom happens that the attraction of several substances for each other is so equally balanced as to produce such complicated compounds. It is now time to conclude our conversation for this morning. But before we part, I must recommend you to fix in your memory the names of the simple bodies^ against our next interview. Conservation n. On Light and Heat. Caroline. We have learned by heart the names of all the sim- ple bodies, which you have enumerated, and we are now ready to enter on the examination of each of them successively. You will begin I suppose with light ? Mrs. B. That will not detain us long : the nature of 11 light, independent of heat, is so imperfectly knoWttj that we have little more than conjectures respecting it. Emily. But is it possible to separate light from heat; I thought that they were only different degrees of the same thing ? Mrs* B. They are certainly very intimately connect- ed : yet it appears they are distinct substances, as they can, under certain circumstances, be in a great mea- sure separated : the most striking instance of this was pointed out by Dr. Herschel. This philosopher discovered that heat was less re- frangible than light; for in separating the different coloured rays of light by a prism (as we did some time ago), he found that the greatest heat was beyond the spectrum, at a little distance from the red rays, which you may recollect are the least refrangible. Emily. I should like so try that experiment. Mrs. B. It is by no means an easy one : the heat of a ray of light, refracted by a prism, is so small that it requires a very delicate thermometer to distinguish the difference of the degree of heat within and without the spectrum. For in this experiment the heat is not to- tally separated from the light, each coloured ray re- taining a certain portion of it, though the greatest part is not sufficiently refracted to fall within the spec- trum. Emily. I suppose, then, that those coloured rays which are the least refrangible, retain the greatest quantity of heat ? Mrs. B. They do so. Caroline. Perhaps the different degrees of heat which the seven rays possess, may in some unknown manner occasion their variety of colour. I have heard that melted metals change colour according to the different degrees of heat to which they are exposed ; might not the colours of the spectrum be produced by a cause of the same kind ? Do let us try if we cannot ascertain this, Mrs. B ? I should like extremely to make some dis- covery in chemisty. Mrs. B Had we not better learn first what is already known ? Surely you cannot seriously imagine that be- 12 fore you have acquired a single clear idea on chemistry, you can have any chance of discovering secrets that have eluded the penetration of those who have spent their whole lives in the study of that science. Caroline. Not much, to be sure in the regu^r course of events ; but a lucky chance sometimes hap- pens. Did not a child lead the way to the discovery of telescopes ? Mrs. B. There are certainly a few instances of this kind. But believe me, it is infinitely wiser to follow up a pursuit regularly, than to trust to chance for your success. Emily But to return to your subject. Though I no longer doubt that light and heat can be separated. Dr. Hercheil's experiment does not appear to me to afford sufficient proof that they are essentially different ; for light, which you call a simple body, may likewise be divided into the various coloured rays ; is it not there- fore possible that heat may only be a modification of light ? Mrs. B That is a supposition which, in the pre- sent state of natural philosophy, can neither be posi- tively affirmed nor denied : it is generally thought that light and heat are connected with each other as cause and effect, but which is the cause, and which the effect, it is extremely difficult to determine. But it would be useless to detain you any longer on this intricate sub- ject. Let us now pass on to that of heat, with which we are much better acquainted. Caroline. Heat is not, I believe, amongst the number of the simple bodies ? Mrs. B. Yes, it is: but under another name—that of caloric, which is nothing more than the principle, or matter of heat.—We suppose caloric to be a very subtiie fluid, originally derived from the sun, and com- posed of very minute particles, constantly in agitation, and moving in a .manner similar to light, as long as they meet with no obstacle.- But when these rays come in contact with the earth and the various bodies belong- ing to it,pait of them are reflected from their surfaces according to certain laws, and part enters into them. 13 Carroline. These rays of heat, or caloric, proceed- ing from the same source, and following the same di- rection, as the rays of light, bear a very strong resem- blance to them. Mrs. B. So much so that it often requires great at- tention not to confound them. Emily. I think there is no danger of that, if we re- collect one great distinction—light is visible, and calor- ic is not. Mr*. B. Very right. Light affects the sense of Sight ; Caloric that of Feeling : the one produces Visiont the other the peculiar sensation of Heat. Caloric is found to exist in a variety of forms, and to be susceptible of certain modifications, all of which may be comprehended under the four following heads ; 1. FREE CALORIC. 2 SPECIFIC HEAf. 3 LAtMNf HEAT. 4. CHEMICAL HEAf. The first, or free caloric, is also called heat of temperature ; it comprehends all heat which is per- ceptible to the senses, and affects the thermometer. Emily. You mean such as the heat of the sun, of fire, of candles, of stoves ; in short of every thing that burns ? Mrs. B. And likewise of things that do not burn, as for instance, the warmth of the body ; in a word, all heat that is sensible, whatever may be its degree, or the source from which it is derived. Caroline. What then are the other modifications of caloric ? It must be a strange kind of heat that cannot be perceived by our senses ? Mrs. B. None of the modifications of caloric should properly be called heal ; for heat, strictly speaking, is the sensation, produced by caloric, on animated bodies, and this word therefore should be confined to express the sensation. But custom has adapted it likewise to inanimate matter, and we say the heat of an oven, the heat of the sun, without any reference to the sensation which they are capable of exciting. G 14 it was in order to avoid the confusion which arose from thus confounding the cause and effect, that mod- ern chemists adopted the new word Caloric, to express the principle which produces heat; but they do not yet limit the word heat (as they should do) to the ex- pression of the sensation, since they still retain the hab- it of connecting this word with the three other modifi- cations of caloric. Caroline. But you have not yet explained to us what these other modifications of caloric are. Mr*. B. Because you are not yet acquainted with the properties of free caloric, and you know we have agreed to proceed with regularity. One of the most remarkable properties of free calor- ic is its power of dilating bodies. This fluid is so ex- tremely subtile, that it enters and pervades all bodies whatever, forces itself between their particles, and not only separates them, but, by its repulsive power, drives them asunder, frequently to a considerable distance from each other. It is thus that caloric dilates or ex- pands a body so as to make it occupy a greater space than it did before. Emily. The effect of caloric on bodies therefore, is directly contrary to that of the attraction of cohesion ; the one draws the particles together, the other drives them asunder. Mrs. B Precisely. There is a kind of continual warfare between the attraction of aggregation and the repulsive power of caloric : and from the action of these two opposite forces, result all the various forms of matter, or degrees of consistence from the solid to the liquid and aeriform state. And accordingly, we find that .nost bodies are capable of passing from one of these forms to the other, merely in consequence of their receiving different quantities of caloric. Caroline. This is very curious ; but I think I under- stand the reason of it. If a great quantity of caloric is added to a solid body, it introduces it elf between the particles in such a manner as to overcome in a consid- erable degree, the attraction of cohesion ; and the body from a solid, is then converted into a fluid. 15 Mrs. B. This is the case whenever a body is melt- ed ; but if you add caloric to a liquid, can you tell ma what is the consequence ? Caroline. The caloric forces itself in greater abun- dance between the particles of the fluid, and drives them to such a distance from each other, that their attraction of aggregation is wholly destroyed ; the li- quid is then transformed into vapour. Airs. B. Very well ; and this is precisely the case with boiling water, when it is converted into steam or va- pour. But each of these various states, solid, liquid, and aeriform, admit of many different degrees of density, or consistence, still arising v partly at least) from the different quantities of caloric the bodies contain. Solids are of various degrees of density, from that of gold, to that ol a thin jelly. Liquids from the consistence of melted glue, or melted metals, to that of^ ether, whreh-is.the lightest of all liquids. The different elas- tic fluids (with'which you are nof acquainted) admit of no less variety in their degrees of density. Emily. But does not every individual body also ad- mit of different degrees ol consistence, without chang- ing its state ? Airs. B. Undoubtedly ; and this I can immediately show you by a very simple experiment. This piece of iron now exactly fits the frame or ring, made to re- ceive it, but if heated red hot, it will no longer do so, for its dimensions will be so much increased by the caloric that has penetrated into it, that it will be much too large for the frame. The iron is now red hot ; by applying it to the frame, we shall see how much it is dilated. Emily. Considerably so indeed! I knew that heat had this effect on bodies, but I did not imagine that it could be made so conspicuous. Mrs. B. By means of this instrument (called a Py- rometer) we may estimate, in the most exact manner, the various dilatations of any solid body by heat. The body we are now going to submit to trial is this small- iron bar ; I fix it to this apparatus, (Plate 1. Fig. \.) and then heat it by lighting three lamps beneath it : when the bar dilates, it increases in length as well as thickness ; and, as one end communicates Avith this wheel-work, whilst the other end is fixed and immove- able, no sooner does it begin to dilate than it presses against the wheel-work; and sets in motion the index, which points out the degrees of dilation on the dial- plate. Emily. This is indeed a very curious instrument j but I do not understand the use of the wheels ; would it not be more simple, and answer the purpose equally well, if the bar pressed against the index, and put it in motion without the intervention of the wheels ? Mrs. B. The use of the wheels is merely to mul- tiply the motion, and therefore render the effect of the caloric more obvious : for if the index moved no more than the bar increased in length, its motion would scarcely be perceptible : but by means of the wheels it moves in a much greater proportion which therefore renders the variations much more conspicuous. By submitting different bodies to the test of the py- rometer, it is found that they are far from dilating in the same proportion. Different metals expand in dif- ferent degrees, and other kinds of solid bodies vary still more in this respect. But this different susceptibility of dilation is still more remarkable in fluids than in solid bodies, as I shall show you. I have here two glass tubes, terminated at one end by large bulbs. We shall fill the bulbs, the one with spirit of wine, the oth- er with water. I have coloured both liquids, that the effect may be more conspicuous. The spirit of wine, you see, dilates merely by the warmth of my hand, as I hold the bulb. Emily. It certainly dilates, for I see it is rising into Plat* I. Fig. i. A A. Bar of metal. 143. Lamps burning. B B. Wheel work* C' Index. Fig; a A Ai Glas9 tubes with bulbs. B B. Glasses of wa- ter in which they are immersed- 'late I. Page-10 Jiravm try Uu Author fingruved fyr Increase CtsoSsstcC*'New Haven DovEttieJa 1 tr the tube. But water, it seems, is not so easily affected by the heat ; for no apparent change is produced on it by the warmth of the hand. Mrs. B. True ; we shall now plunge the bulbs into hot water, (Plate 1. Fig. 2.) and you will see both li- quids rise in the tubes ; but the spirit of wine will begin to ascend first. Caroline. How rapidly it dilates ! Now it has nearly reached the top of the tube, though the water has not yet began to rise. Emily. The water now begins to dilate. Are not these glass tubes, with liquids rising within them, very like thermometers ? Mrs. B. A Thermometer is constructed exactly on the same principle, and these tubes require only a scale to answer the purpose of thermometers : but they would be rather awkward in their dimensions. The tubes and bulbs of thermometers, though of various sizes, are in general much smaller than these ; the tube too is hermetically closed, and the air excluded from it. The fluid most generally used in thermome- ters is mercury, commonly called quicksilver, the di- lations and contractions of which correspond more exactly to the additions, and substractions, of caloric, than those of any other fluid. Caroline. Yet I have often seen coloured spirits of wine used in thermometers. Mr*. B. The dilations and contractions of that t liquid are not quite so uniform as those of mercury ; but in cases in which it is not requisite to ascertain the temperature with great precision, spirit of wine will answer the purpose equally well, and indeed in some respects better, as the expansion of the latter is great- er and therefore more conspicuous. This fluid is used likewise in situations and experiments in which mercu- ry would be frozen ; for mercury becomes a solid body, like a piece of lead or any other metal, at a certain de- gree of cold : but no degree of cold has ever been known to freeze spirits of wine. A thermometer therefore consists of a tube with a • C 2 18 bulb, such as you see here, containing a fluid whose degrees of dilation and contraction are indicated by a scale to which the tube is fixed. The degree which indicates the boiling point, simply means that, when the fluid is sufficiently dilated to rise to this point, the heat is such, that water exposed to the same tempera- ture will boil. When on the other hand, the fluid is so much condensed as to sink to the freezing point, we know that water will freeze at that temperature. The extreme points of the scales are not the same in all thermometers, nor are the degrees always divided in the same manner. In different countries philosophers have chosen to adopt different scales and divisions. The two thermometers most used are those of Fahrenheit, and of Reaumur ; the first is generally preferred by the English, the latter by the French. Emily. The variety of scales must be very inconven- ient, and I should think liable to occasion confusion, when French and English experiments are compared. Mrs. B. This inconvenience is but very trifling, be- cause the different graduations of the scales do not af- fect the principle upon which thermometers are con- structed. When we know, for instance, that Fahren- heit's scale is divided into 212 c-grees in which 32* correspond with the freezing point, and 212° with the point of boiling water; and that Reaumer's is divided only into 80 degrees, in which 0Q denotes the freezing point, and 80° that, of boiling water, it is easy to com- pare the two scaies together, and reduce the one into the other. But for greater convenience, thermome- ters are sometimes constructed with both these scales, one on either side of the tube ; so that the correspon- dence of the different degrees of the two scales, is thus instantly seen. Here is one of these scales (Plate II. Fig. 3.) by which you can at once perceive that each degree of Reaumer's corresponds to 2 1-4 of Fahren- heit's division. Emily. Are spirits of wine, and mercury, the only fluids used in the construction of thermometers ? Mrs. B. ' I believe they are the only liquids now in use, though some others, such as linseed oil, would ri*e It 20 Caroline. Now I comprehend it very well ? nothing- explains a thing so clearly as a comparison. Emi'y. But will thermometers bear any degree of heat ? Mr*. B. No ; for if the temperature be much above the highest degree marked on the scale of the ther- mometer, the mercury would burst the tube in an at- tempt to ascend. And at any rate, no thermometer can be applied to temperatures higher than the boiling point of the liquid used in its construction. In furnaces, or whenever any very high temperature is to be measu- red, a pyrometer, invented by Wedgewood, is used for that purpose. It is made of a certain composition of baked clay, which has the peculiar property of con- tracting by heat, so that the degree of contraction of this substance indicates the temperature to which it has been exposed. Emily. But is it possible for a body to contract by heat ? I thought that heat dilated all bodies whatever. Mrs. B. That is, I believe, true. Yet heat, fre- quently diminishes the bulk of a body by evaporating some of its particles ; thus, if you dry a wet sponge before the fire, the heat, though it must, according to the general law of nature, dilate the particles of the sponge, will very considerably contract its bulk by evap- orating its moisture. Caroline. And how do you ascertain the degrees of contraction by this pyrometer ? Mr*. B. The dimensions of a piece of clay are measured by the bore of a graduated jconical tube in which it is placed ; the more it is contracted by the heat, the lower it descends into the narrow part of the tube. Let us now proceed to examine the other properties ■ of free caloric. Free caloric always tends to an equilibrium ; that is to say, when two bodies are of different tempera- tures, the warmer gradually parts with its heat to the colder, till they are both brought to the same tempera- - ture. Emily. Is cold then nothing but a negative quality, simply implying the absense of heat ? Mrs. B. Not the total absence, but a diminution of heat ; for we know of no body in which some caloric may not be discovered. Caroline. But when I lay my hand on this marble table, I feel it positively cold, and cannot conceive that there is any caloric in it. Mrs. B. The cold you experience consists in the loss of caloric that your hand sustains in an attempt to bring its temperature to an equilibrium with the mar- ble. If you lay a piece of ice upon it, you will find that the contrary effect will take place ; the ice will be melted by the heat which it abstracts from the mar- ble. Caroline. Is it not in this case the air of the room, which being warmer than the marble, melts the ice ? Airs. B. The air certainly acts on the surface ex- posed to it, but the table melts that part which is in con- tact with it. Caroline. But why does caloric tend to an equilibri- um ? It cannot be on the same principle as other fluids, since it has no weight ? Mrs. B. Very true, Caroline, that is an excellent remark. The tendency of caloric to an equilibrium is best explained by a supposed repulsive force of its par- ticles, which having a constant tendency to fly from each other, diffuse themselves wherever there is a de- ficiency of that fluid, and thus gradually restore an equilibrium of temperature. But it is not only bodies which contain a greater proportion of caloric that part with it to those that contain less : in order to explain all the phenomena of heat and cold, we must suppose that a mutual exchange of caloric takes place between all bodies, of whatever temperature, and that the rays of caloric, in passing from one body to another, are sub- ject to all the laws of reflection and refraction, the same as those of light. This theory was first suggested by Professor Prevost, of Geneva, and is now, I believe, pretty generally adopted. Thus you may suppose all bodies whatever constantly radiating caloric : those that 23' are of the same temperature give out and reciye equal' quantities, so that no change of temperature is produ- ced in.them ; but when one'body contains more free ca- loric than another, the exchange is always in favour of the colder body, until an equilibrium is effected ; this you found to be the case when the marble table cooled your hand, and when it melted the ice. Caroline. This surprises me extremely : I thought from what you first said, that the hotter bodies alone emitted rays of caloric which were absorbed by the cold- er, for it seems unfair that a hot body should receive any caloric from a cold one, even though it should re- turn a greater quantity. Mr*. B. It may at first appear so, but it is no more extraordinary than that a candle should send forth rays of light to the sun, or that a stone in falling, should at- tract the earth, as you know it does from the law of grav- itation. Caroline. Well, Mrs. B since you have all nature to oppose me, 1 believe that I must give up the point. But I wish I could see these rays of caloric, I should then have greater faith in them. Mr*. B. Will you give no crec'it to any sense but that of sight ? You may feel the rays of caloric which you receive from any body of a temperature higher than your own : the loss of the caloric you part with in return, it is true is not perceptible ; for as you gain more than you lose, instead of suffering a diminution, you are really making an acquisition of caloric. It is therefore only when you are parting with it to a body of a lower temperature, that you are sensible of the sen- sation of cold, because you then sustain an absolute loss of caloric. Emily. And in this case we cannot be sensible of the small quantity of heat we receive in enchange from the colder body, because it serves only to diminish the. loss. Mr*. B Very well, indeed, Emily. Professor Pic- tet of Geneva, has made some very interesting experi- ments to prove that caloric radiates from ail bodies whatever, and that these rays may be reflected, ac- Plate II f Pn of the vessel, become specifically lighter than the rest of the liquid, and consequently ascend to the surface where, parting with some of their heat to the colder atmosphere, they are condensed, and give way to a fresh succession of heated particles ascending from the bottom, which having thrown off* their heat at the surface, are in their turn displaced. Thus every particle is successively heated av the bottom, and cool- ed at the surface of the liquid ; but as the fire commu- nicates heat more rapidly han the atmosphere cools the succession of surface, the whole of the liquid in time be- comes heated. Caroline. This accounts most ingeniously for the propagation of heat upwards. But suppose you were to heat the upper surface of a liquid, the particles being specifically lighter than those below, could not des- cend : how therefore would the heat be communicated downwards ? Msr. B. Count Rum ford assures us, that if there was no agitation to force the heated surface dowdward, the heat would not descend. In proof of this, he suc- ceeded in making the upper surface of a vessel of wa- ter boil and evaporate, whilst a cake of ice remained frozen at the bottom. Caroline. That is very extraordinary indeed ! Mrs. B. It appears so, because we are not accus- tomed to heat liquors by their upper surface, but you will understand this theory better if I shew you the in- ternal motion that takes place in liquids when they ex- perience a change of temperature. The motion of the liquid itself is indeed invisible from the extreme minute- ness of its particles : but if you mix with it any colour- ed dust, or powder,* of nearly the same specific gravity as the liquid, you may judge of the internal motion of the latter by that of the coloured dust it contains. Do you see the small pieces of amber moving about in the liquid contained in this phial. :;♦ Caroline. Yes, perfectly. Mrs. B. We shall now immerse the phial in a glass •f hot water, and the motion of the liquid will be shown, by that which it communicates to the amber. Emily. I see two currents, the one rising along the sides of the phial, the other descending into the centre j but I do not understand the reason of this. Mrs. B. The hot water communicates its caloric, through the medium of the phial, to the particles of the fluid nearest to the glass ; these dilate and ascend late- rally to the surface, where, in parting with their heat, they are condensed, and in descending, form the cen- tral current. Caroline. This is indeed a very clear and satisfactory experiment ; but how much slower the currents now move than they did at first ? Airs. B. It is because the circulation of particles hat nearly produced an equilibrium of temperature between the liquid in the glass and. that in the phial. Caroline. But these communicate laterally, and t thought that heat in liquids could be propagated only upwards ? Mrs. B. You do not take notice that the heat is im- parted from one liquid to the other, through the med- ium of the phial itself, the external surface of which re- ceivesj the heat from the water in the glass, whilst its internal surface transmits it to the liquid it contains.-— Now take the phial out of the hot water, and observe the effects of its cooling. Emily. The currents are reversed : the external current now descends, and the internal one rises. I guess the reason of this change :—the phial being in contact with cold air instead of hot water, the external particles are cooled instead of being heated ; they there- fore descend and force up the central particles, which being warmer are consequently lighter. Mrs. B. It is just so. Count Rumford infers from hence, that no alteration of temperature can take place in a fluid, without an internal motion of its particles, and as this motion is produced only by the comparative kvity of the heated particles, heat cannot be propagatedi downwards. 35 This theory explains the reason of the cold that is found to prevail at the bottom of the lakes in Switzer- land, which are fed by rivers issuing from the snowy Alps. The water of these rivers being colder and therefore more dense than that of the lakes, subsides to the bottom, where it connot be affected by the warmer temperature of the surface ; the motion of the waves may communicate this temperature to some little depth, but it can descend no farther than the agitation extends. Emily. But when the atmosphere is colder than the lake, the colder surface of the water will descend for tlie very reason that the warmer will not ? Mrs. B. Certainly; and it is on this account that neither a lake nor any body of water whatever, can be frozen until every particle of the water has risen to the surface to give off its caloric to the colder atmosphere ; therefore the deeper a body of water is, the longer will be the time it requires to be frozen. Emily. But if the temperature of the whole body of water is brought clown to the freezing point, why is only the surface frozen ? Mrs. B. The temperature of the whole body is low- ered, but not to the freezing point. The dimunition of heat as you know, produces a contraction in the bulk of fluids, as well as of solids. This effect however does not take place in water below the temperature of forty degrees, which is eight degrees above the freezing point. At that temperature, therefore, the internal motion, occasioned by the increased specific gravity of the condensed particles, ceases ; for when the water at the surface no longer condences, it will no longer de- scend, and leave a fresh surface exposed to the atmos- phere : this surface alone, therefore, will be further exposed to its severity, and will soon be brought down to the freezing point, when it becomes ice, which being a bad conductor of heat, preserves the water beneath a long time from being affixed by the external cold. Caroline. And the sea does not freeze, I suppose, because its depth is so great, that a frost never lasts long enough to bring down the temperature of such a great b.ody of water to forty degrees ? 34 Mrs. B. No, that is not the case; for salt water is m exception to this law, as it condenses even many de- grees below the freezing point. When the caloric of fresh water therefore is imprisoned by the ice, the ocean •till continues throwing off heat into the atmosphere, which is a most signal dispensation of Providence to mo- derate the intensity of the cold in winter. Emily. I admire this theory extremely ;* but allow me to ask you one more question relative to it. You •aid that when water was heated over the fire, the par- ticles at the bottom of the vessel ascended as soon as heated, in consequence of their specific levity ; why does not the same effect continue when the water boils, and is converted into steam ? and why does the steam, rise from the surface instead of the bottom of the liquid? Airs. B. The steam or vapour does ascend from the bottom, though it seems to arise from the surface of the liquid. We shall boil some water in this Florence flask j. (Plate IV. Fig, V.) you will then see through the glass, that the vapour rises in bubbles from the bottom. We •hall make it boil by means of a lamp, whiclvis more convenient for this purpose than the chimney fire.-—— Emily. I see some small bubbles ascend, and a great many appear all over the inside of the flask ; does the water begin to boil already ? Mrs. B. No ; what you now see are bubbles of air which were either enclosed in the water, or attached to the inner surface of the flask, and which, being rarefied by the heat, ascend in the water. PLATE IV. Fig. 5. Boiling water in a flask over a patent lamp. Fig. 6. Ether evaporated and water frozen in the air pump. A. A phial of ether. B, Glafs vessel containing water. C. C. Thermometers, one in the ether, the other in the water. * This theory of the non-conducting power of fluids, notwith- standing all its plaufibility, has been found, by a variety of fubse- qucnt experiments, to have been carried by Count Rumford, ra- ther too far; and it is now generally admitted that fluids are not entirely deftitute of conductibility, though they propagate heat chiefly by motion, in the manner juft explained, and possess the conducting power but in a very imperfect degree. f ft. 5 1 =SH $ 15 Emily But the heat which rarefies the air enclosed •n the water, must rarefy the water at the same time ; therefore, if it could remain stationary in the water when both were cold, I do not understand why it should not when both are equally heated ? Mrs. B. Air being much less dense than water, it more easily rarefied ; the former therefore expands to a greater extent, whilst the latter continues to occupy nearly the same space; for water dilates comparatively but very little without changing its state and becoming vapour. Now that the water in the flask begins to boil, observe what large bubbles rise from the bottom of it. Emily. I see them perfectly ; but I wonder that they have sufficient power to force themselves through the water. Caroline. They must rise, you know, from their spe- cific levity. Mrs. B. You are right, Caroline; but vapour has not in all liquids (when brought to.the degree of vapor- ization) the power of overcoming the pressure of the less heated surface ; therefore no vapour will ascend from them till the degree of heat which is necessary to form it has reached the surface ; that is to say till the whole of the liquid is brought to the boiling point. This is the case with all metals, mercury alone excep- ted. Emily. I have observed that steam, immediately is- suing from the spout of a tea-kettle, is less visible than at a further distance from it; yet it must be more dense when it first evaporates than when it begins to diffuse it- self in the air. Mrs. B. Your objection is a very natural one ; and in order to answer it, it will be necessary for me to en- ter into some explanation respecting the nature of solu- tion. Solution takes place whenever a body is melted in a fluid. In this operation the body is reduced to such a minute state of division by the fluid, as to become invisible in it, and to partake of its fluidity : but this happens without any decomposition, the body being on- 36 ly divided into its integrant particles by the fluid in which it is melted. Caroline. Is it then a mode of destroying the a1 trac- tion of aggregation ? Airs. B. Undoubtedly—The two principal solvent fluids are water and caloric. You may have observed that if you melt salt in water, it totally disappears, and the water remains clear and transparent as before ; yet though the union of these two bodies appears so per- fect, it is not produced by any chemical combination ; both the salt and the water remain unchanged ; and if you were to separate them by evaporating the latter, you would find the salt in tne same state as before. Emily. I suppose that water is a solvent for solid boi dies, and caloric for liquids ? Mrs. B. Liquids of course can only be converted into vapour by caloric. But the solvent power of this agent is not at all confined to that class of bodies ; a great variety of solid substunces are dissolved by heat: thus metals, which are insoluble in water, can be dis- solved by intense heat, being first fused or converted into a liquid, and then rarefied into an invisible vapour. Many other bodies, such as salts, gums, kc. yield to either of these solvents. Caroline. And that, no doubt, is the reason why hot ?,ater will melt them so much better than cold water ? Airs. B. It is so. Caloric may indeed be consider- ed as having, in every instance, some share in the so- lution of a body by water, since all water, however low its temperature may be, always contains more or less caloric. Emily. Then perhaps water owes its solvent power merely to the caloric it contains ? Mrs. B. That probably would be carrying the spec- ulation tro far; I should rather think that water and caloric unite their efforts to dissolve a body, and that the difficulty or facility ol effecting this, depends both on the degree of attraction of aggregation to be over- come and on the arrangement of the panicles which are more or less disposed to be divided and penetrated by the solvent. 37 Emily. But have not all liquids the same solvent pow- ' er as water ? Mr*. B. The solvent power of other liquids varies accord.ng to their nature, and that of the substance submitted to their action. Most of these solvents, in- deed differ essentially from water, as they do not merely separate the intregrant particles of the bodies, which they dissolve, but attack their constituent princi- ples by the power of chemical attraction, thus produ- cing a true decomposition These more complicated operations, which may be distinguished by the name of chemical solutions, we must consider in another place, and confine our attention at present to the simple solu- tions by water and caloric. Caroline. But there are a variety of substances which, when dissolved in water, make it thick and muddy, and destroy its transparency. Airs. B. In this case it is not a solution, but simply a mixture. I shall show you the difference between a solution and a mixture, by putting some common salt into one glass of water, and some powder of chalk into : nother ; both these substances are white, but their ef- fect on the water will be very different. Caroline. Very different indeed ! the salt entirely disappears and leaves the water transparent, whilst the chalk changes it into an opake liquid like milk. Emily. And would lumps of chalk and salt pro similar effects on water ? c]uoe Mr*. B. Yes, but not so rapidly ; salt is indeed soon melted though in a lump, but chalk which does not mix so readily with water, would require a much greater length of time ; I therefore preferred showing you the experiment with both substances reduced to powder, which does not in any respect alter their na- ture, but fecilitates the operation merely by presenting a greater quantity of surface to the water. I must not forget to mention a very curious circum- stance respecting solutions, which is, that a fluid is not increased in bulk by holding a body in solution. Caroline. That seems impossible ; for two bodies cannot exist together in the same space. E 38 Mr*. B. That is true, my dear ; but two bodies may, by condension, occupy the same space which one of them filled before. It is supposed that there are pores or interstices, in which the salt lodges, be- tween the minute particles of the water. And these 6paccs are so small that the body to be dissolved must be divided into very minute particles in order to be con- tained in them ; and it is this state of very great division that renders them invisible. Caroline. I can try this experiment immediately. —It is exactly so—the water in this glass, which I fill- ed to the brim, is melting a considerable quantity of salt without overflowing. I shall try to add a little more.—But now, you see, Mrs. B. the water runs over. Mrs. B. Yes; but observe that the last quantity of salt you put in remains solid at the bottom, and displaces the water ; for it has already melted all the salt it is capable of holding in solution. This is called the point of saturation ; and the water is now said to be saturated with salt. Emily. This happens, I suppose, when the inter- stices between the particles of the liquid are completely filled ? Mr*. B. Probably. But these remarks, you must observe, do not apply to a mixture ; for any substance which does not dissolve, increases the bulk of the li- quid. Emily. I think I now understand the solution of a solid body by water perfectly : but I have not so clear an idea of the solution of a liquid by caloric. Mr*. B. It is precisely of the same nature ; but as caloric is an invisible fluid, its action as a solvent is not so obvious as that of water. Caloric dissolves water, and converts it into vapour by the same process as wa- ter dissolves salt; that is to say, the particles of water aie so minutely divided by the caloric as to become in- visible Tims you are now enabled to understand why the vapour of boiling water, when it first issues from the spout of a kettle, is invisible ; it \z so. because it is then completely dissolved by caloric. But the air w with which it comes in contact, being much colder than the vapour, the latter yields to it a quantity of its ca- loric. The particles of vapour being thus in a great measure deprived of their solvent, gradually collect and become visible in the form of steam, which is water in a state of imperfect solution ; and if you were fur- ther to deprive it of its caloric, it would return to its o- riginal liquid state. Caroline. That I understand very well; but in what state is the steam, when it again becomes invisible by being diffused in the air ? Mrs. B. It is carried off* and again dissolved by the air. Emily. The air then has a solvent power, like water and caloric ? Mrs. B. Its solvent power proceeds chiefly, if not entirely, from the caloric contained in it, the atmos- phere acting only as a vehicle. Sometimes the watery vapour diffused in the atmosphere is but imperfectly dissolved, as is the case in the formation of clouds and fogs ; but if it gets into a region of air sufficiently warm, it becomes perfectly invisible. Einily. Does the air ever dissolve water, without its being previously converted into vapour by boiling. Mrs. B. Yes, it does. Water when heated to the boiling point, can no longer exist in the form of water, and must necessarily be converted into vapour, what- ever may be the state and temperature of the surround- ing medium ; but the air (by means probably of the caloric it contains) can take up a certain portion of water at any temperature, and hold it in a state of so- lution. Thus the atmosphere is continually carrying off moisture from the earth, until it is saturated with it. The tendency of free caloric to an equilibrium, to- gether with its solvent power, are likewise connected with the phenomena of rain, of dew, &c. When a cloud of a certain temperature happens to pass through a colder region of the atmosphere, it parts with a por- tion of its heat to the surrounding air ; the quantity of caloric therefore, which served to keep the cloud in a state of vapour, being diminished, the watery particles 40 approach each other, and form themselves into drops of water, which being heavier than the atmosphere, descend to the earth. There are also other circum- stances, and particularly the variation in the weight ot the atmosphere, which may contribute to the formation of rain. This however, is an intricate subject, into which we cannot more fully enter at present. Emily. But in what manner do you account for the formation of dew ? Airs. B. During the heat of the day the air is able to retain a greater quantity of vapour in a sta~e of so- lution, than either in the morning or evening. As soon, therefore, as a diminution of heat takes place to- wards sun-set, a quantity of vapour condenses, and falls to the ground in form of dew. The morning dew, on the contrary, rises from the earth ; but when the sun has emitted a sufficient quantity of caloric to dissolve it, it becomes invisible in the atmosphere. When once the dew, or any liquid whatever, is per- fectly dissolved by the air, it occasions no humidity ; it is only when in a state of imperfect solution, and float- . ing in the form of watery vapour in the atmosphere, that it produces dampness. Caroline. I have often observed, Mrs. B. that when I walk out in frosty weather, with a veil over my face, my breath freezes upon it. Pray what is the reason of that ? Mrs. B It is because the cold air immediately seizes on the caloric of your breath, and reduces it, by rob- bing it of its solvent, to a denser fluid, which is the watery vapour that settles on your veil, and there it continues parting with its caloric till it is brought down to the temperature of the atmosphere, and assumes the form of ice. You may, perhaps, have observed that the breath of animals, or rather the moisture contained in it, is visi- ble during a frost, but not in warm weather.* In the latter case, the air is capable of retaining it in a state * Unless in very damp weather, when the atmosphere is al- ready saturated with moisture- 4! of solution, whilst in the former, the cold condenses it into visible vapour; and for the same reason, the steam arising from water that is warmer than the atmosphere, is visible. Have you never taken notice of the vapour rising from your hands after having dipped them into warm water ? Caroline. Often, especially in frosty weather ? Mr*. B. When a bottle of wine is taken fresh from the cellar (in summer particularly), it will soon be cov- ered with dew ; and even the glasses in which the wine is poured will be moistened with a similar vapour. Let me hear if you can account for this ? Emily. The bottle is colder than the surrounding air, therefore it must absorb caloric from it ; the moisture which that air held in solution must become visible, and form the dew which is deposited on the bottle. Mr*. B. Very well, Emily. Now, Caroline, can you tell me why, in a warm room, or close carriage, the contrary effect takes place ; that is to say, that the inside of the windows are covered with vapour ? Caroline. I have heard that it proceeds from the breath of those within the carriage : and I suppose it is occasioned by the windows which, being colder than the breath, deprive it of part of its caloric, and by this means convert it into a watery vapour. Mrs. B. Very well, my dear : I am extremely glad to find that you both understand the subject so well. We have already observed that pressure is an obsta- cle to evaporation : there are liquids that contain so gveat a quantity of caloric, and whose particles conse- quently adhere so slightly together, that they may be converted into vapour without any elevation of tempera- ture, merely by taking off the weight of the atmos- phere. In such liquids, you perceive, it is the pres- sure of the atmosphere alone that connects their parti- cles and keeps them in a liquid state. Caroline. I do not well understand why the particles of such fluids should be disunited and converted into vapour, without any addition of heat, in spite of the attraction of cohesion ? E 2 42 Mrs. B. It is because the quantity of calouc which enters into the formation of these fluids is sufficient to overcome their attraction of cohesion. Ether is of this description ; it will boil and be converted into va- pour, without any application of heat, if the pressure of the atmosphere be taken off. Emily. I thought that ether would evaporate with- out either taking away the pressure of the atmosphere, or applying heat, and that it was for that reason so necessary to keep it carefully corked up. Mr*. B. That is true ; but in this case it will evap- orate but very slowly. I am going to show you how suddenly the ether in this phial will be converted into vapour, by means of the air pump.—Observe with what rapidity the bubbles ascend, as I take off the pressure of the atmosphere. Caroline. It positively boils : how singular to see a liquid boil without heat! Airs. B. Now I shall place the phial of ether in this glass, which it nearly fits, so as to leave only a small space, which I fill with water : and in this state I put it again under the receiver. (Plate IV. Fig. q.)" —You will observe, as I exhaust the air from it, that whilst the ether boils, the water freezes. Caroline. It is indeed wonderful to see water freeze by means of a boiling fluid ! Emily. There is another circumstance which I am unable to account for. How can the ether change to a stats of vapour, without an addition of caloric ; for it must contain more caloric in a state of vapour, than in a state of liquidity ; and though you say that it is the * Two pieces of thin glafs tubes, fealed at one end, might answer this purpose better- The experiment however, as here described, is difficult, and requires a very nice apparatus. But if instead of phials or tubes, two watch-glasses be uftd, water may be frozen almost instantly in the same manner. The two glasses are placed over one another, with a few drops of water interposed between them, and the uppermost glass is filled with ether. After working the pump for a minute or two, the glasses are found to adhere flrongly together, and a thin layer of ic e is teen between them. '■ 43 ; ressure of the atmosphere which condenses it into a liquid, it must be, I suppose, by forcing out part of the caloric that belongs to it when in an aeriform state ? Mr*. B. You are right Ether, in a liquid state, does not contain a sufficient quantity of caloric to become vapour. I have therefore, two difficulties to explain ; first, from whence the ether obtains the caloric neces- sary to convert it into vapour when it is relieved from the pressure of the atmosphere; and, secondly, what is the reason that the water, in which the bottle of ether stands, is frozen ? ^ Caroline. Now I think I can ansv/er both these ques- tions. The ether obtains the addition of caloric requir- ed from the water in the glass ; and the loss of caloric, which the latter sustains, is the occasion of its freezing. Mrs B. You are perfectly right ; and if you look at the thermometer which I have placed in the water, whilst I am working the pump, you will see that every time bubbles of vapour are produced, the mercury de- scends ; which proves that the heat of the water dimin-. ishes in equal proportion as the ether boils. Emily. This I understand now very well; but if the water freezes in consequence of yielding its caloric to the ether, the equilibrium of heat must in this case, be totally destroyed. Yet you have told us, that bodies of a different temperature aie always communicating their heat to each other, till it becomes every where equal ; and besides, I do not see why the water, though origi- nally of the same temperature as the ether, gives out caloric to it, till the water is frozen and the ether made to boil. Mr*. B. I suspected that you would make these ob- jections ; and in order to remove them, I enclosed two thermometers in the air-pump ; one of which stands in the glass of water, the other in the phial of ether; and you may see that the equilibrium of temperature is not destroyed ; for as the thermometer descends in the wa- ter, that in the ether sinks in the same manner ; so that both thermometers indicate the same temperature, though one of them is in a boiling, the other in a freez- ing liquid. 44 Emily. The ether then becomes colder as it boils i This is so contrary to common experience, that I con- fess it astonishes me exceedingly. Caroline. It is indeed, a most extraordinary circum- stance. But pray how do you account for it ? Mrs. B. I cannot satisfy your curiosity at present ; for before we can attempt to explain this apparent par- adox, we must become acquainted with the subject of latent heat ; and that I think we must defer till our next interview. Caroline. I believe Mrs. B. that you are glad to put off the explanation ; for it must be a very difficult point to account for. Mr*. B. I hope however, that I shall do it to your complete satisfaction. Emily. But before we part give me leave to ask you one question. Would not water, as well as etheri boil with less heat, if the pressure of the atmosphere were taken off ? Mr*. B. Undoubtedly. You must always recollect that there are two forces to overcome, in order to make a liquid boil, or evaporate ; the attraction of aggrega- tion, and ihe weight of the atmosphere. On the sum- mit of a high mountain (as Mr. De Sausure ascertained on Mount Blanc) less heat is required to make water boil than in the plain, where the weight of the atmos- phere is greater. But I can show you a very pretty ex- periment, which proves the effect of the pressure of the atmosphere in this respect. Observe, that this Florence flask is about half full of water, and the upper half of invisible vapour, the water being in the act of boiling.—I take it from the lamp and cork it carefully—the water you see, immediately ceases boiling.—I shall now wrap a cold wet cloth round the upper part of the flask*----- Caroline. But look, Mrs. B. the water begins to boil • Or the whole flask may be dipped in a basin of cold water. In order to (how how much the water cools whilst it is boiling, a thermometer, graduated on the tube itself, may be introduced in- to the bottle through the cork. again, although the wet cloth must rob it more and more of its caloric ! What can be the reason of that ? Mr*. B. Let us examine its temperature. You see the thermometer immersed in it remains stationary at 180 degrees, which is about 30 degrees below the boil- ing point. When I took the flask from the lamp, I ob- served to you that the upper part^of it was filled with vapour ; this being compelled to yield its caloric to the wet cloth, was again converted into water—What then filled the upper part of the flask ? Emily. Nothing ; for it was.too well corked for the air to gain admittance, and therefore the upper part of the flask must be a vacuum. Mr*. B. If the upper part of the flask be a vacuum, the water below no longer sustains the pressure of the atmosphere, and will boil at a much lower temperature., Thus, you see, though it has lost many degrees of heat, it began boiling again the instant the vacuum was formed above it. The boiling has now ceased ; if it had been ether, instead of water, it would have continued boiling much longer ; but water being a more dense fluid, requires a more considerable quantity of caloric to make it evaporate, even when the pressure of the at-. mosphere is removed.' Emily. But if the pressure of the atmosphere keeps the particles of ether together, why does it evaporate when exposed to the air ? Nay, does not even water, the particles of which adhere so strongly together, slow- ly evaporate in the atmosphere ? Mr*. I',. I have already told you that air has the power of keeping a certain quantity of vapour in solu- . tion at any known temperature; and being constantly in a state of motion, and incessantly renewing itself on the surface of the liquid, it skims off, and gradually dissolves new r uantities of vapour. Water also has the power of absorbing a certain quantity of air, so that their action on each other is reciprocal ; the air thus enclosed in water is that which you see evaporate in bubbles when water is heated previous to its boiling. Emily. What proportion of vapour can air contain . in a state of solution. 46 Mr*. B. I do not know whether it has been exactly ascertained by experiment; but at any rate this pro- portion must varv, both according to the temperature and the weight of the atmosphere; for the lower the •temperature, and the greater the pressure, the small- er must be the proportion of vapour that air can con- tain in a state of solution. But we have dwelt so long on the subject of free caloric, that we must reserve the other modifications of that fluid to our next meeting, when we shall endeavour to proceed more rapidly. Contoergation iv. On Specific Heat, Latent Heat, and Chemical Heat. Mrs. B. We are now to examine the three other modifica- tions of caloric. Caroline. I am very curious to know of what nature they can be ; for I have no notion of any kind of heat that is not perceptible to the senses. Mr*. B. In order to enable you to understand them it will be necessary to enter into some previous expla- nations. It has been discovered by modern chemists, that bodies of a different nature, heated to the same tempe- rature, do not contain the same quantity of caloric. Caroline. How could that be ascertained ? Mr*. B. It was found that, in order to raise the temperature of different bodies the same number of de- grees, different quantities of caloric were required for each of them. If, for instance, you place a pound of 47 had, a pound of chalk, and a pound of milk, in a hot oven, they will be gradually heated to the temperature of the oven ; but the lead will attain it first, the chalk next, and the milk last. Emily. As they were all of the same weight, and exposed to the same heat, I should have thought that they would have attained the temperature of the oven at the same time. Caroline. And how is it that they do not ? Airs. B. It is supposed to be on account of the differ- ent capacities of these bodies for caloric. Caroline. What do you mean by the capacity of a body for caloric ? Mrs. B. I mean a certain disposition of bodies to ad- mit more or less caloric between their minute particles. Let us put as many marbles into this glass as it will con- tain, and pour some sand over them—observe how the sand penetrates and lodges between them. We shall now fill another glass with pebbles of various forms —you see that they arrange themselves in a more com- pact manner than the marbles, which being globular, can touch each other by a single point only. The peb- bles, therefore, will not admit so much sand between them ; and consequently one of these glasses will ne- cessarily contain more sand than the other, though both of them be equally full. Caroline. This I understand perfectly. The mar- bles and the pebbles represent two bodies of different kinds, and the sand the caloric contained in them : and it appears very plain, from this comparison, that one body may admit of more caloric between its particles than another. Mrs. B. If you understand this; you can no longer be surprised that bodies of a different capacity for calor- ic should require different proportions of that fluid to raise their temperatures equally. Emily. But I do not understand why the body that contains the most caloric should not be of the highest temperature ; that is to say, feel hot in proportion to the quantity of caloric it contains ? 48 *Mrs. B. The caloric that is employed in filling the capacity of a body, is not free caloric : but it is impri- soned as it were in the body, and is therefore impercep- tible ; for we can feel only the free radiating caloric which the body parts with, and not that which it re- tains. Caroline. It appears to me very extraordinary that heat should be confined in a body in such a manner as to be imperceptible. Mrs. B. If you lay your hand on a hot body, you feel only the caloric which leaves it, and enters your hand ; for it is impossible that you should be sensible of that which remains'in the body. The thermometer in the same manner, is affected only by the free caloric which a body transmits to it, and not at all by that which it does not part with. You see therefore, that the tern- perature of bodies can be raised only by free ridiating caloric. Caroline. I begin to understand it : but I confess that the idea of insensible heat is so new and strange to me, that it requires some time to render it familiar. Airs. B. Call it-insensible caloric, and the difficulty will appear much less formidable. It is indeed a sort of contradiction to call it heat, when it is so situated as to be incapable of producing that sensation. Emily. Yet is it not this modification of caloric which is called specific heat ? Mr* B. It is so ; but it certainly would have been more correct to have calicd it specific caloric. Emily. I do not understand how the term specific ap- plies to this modification of caloric ? Mr* B. It expresses the relative quantity of calor- ic which different bodies of the same weight and tem- perature are capable of containing. This modification is also frequently called heat of capacity, a term perhaps preferable, as it explains better its own meaning. You now understand, I suppose, why the milk and chalk required a longer time than the lead to raise their temperature to that of the oven ? Emily. Yes ; the milk and chalk having a greater 49 capacity for caloric than the lead, a greater proportion of that fluid became insensible to those bodies ; and the more slowly, therefore, their temperature was rai- sed. Mrs. B. You are quile right. And could we mea- sure the heat communicated by tlie oven to these three bodies, we should find that though they have all ulti- mately reached the same temperature, yet they have absorbed different quantities of heat according to their respective capacities for caloric ; that is to say, the milk most, the chalk next, and the lead least. Emily. But supposing that these three bodies were made much hotter, would heat continue to become in- sensible in the in., or is there any point beyond which the capacity of bodies for caloric is so completely filled, that their heat of temperature can alone be increased ? Airs. B. No: there is no such point; for the capa- city jf bodies for caloric always increases or diminishes in proportion to their temperature ; so that whenever a body is exposed to an elevation of temperature, part of the caloric it receives is detained in an insensible state, in order to fill up its increased capacity. Emily. The more dense a bjdy is, I suppose, the less is its capacity for caloric. Mr*. B. That is the case with every individual body ; its capacity is least when solid, greater when melted and most considerable when converted into va- pour. But this does not always hold good with respect to bodies of different nature ; iron, for instance, con- tains more specific heat than ashes, though it is cer- tainly much more dense. This seems to show that specific heat does not merely depend upon the inter- stices between the particles; but, probably, also upon some peculiar power of attraction for caloric. The word capacity therefore, which is generally used,' is not perhaps strictly correct ; but until we are better acquainted with the nature and cause of specific heat, we cannot adopt a more appropriate term. Emily. But, Mrs. B. it would appear to me more proper to compare bodies by measure, rather than by weighty in order to estimate their specific heat. Why, 50 *. for instance, should we not compare pints of milk, of chalk and of lead, rather than pounds of those substan- ces ; for equd weights may be composed of veryditler- cnt quantities ? Mrs. B. You are mistaken, my dear : equal weights must contain equal quantities of matter ; and when we wish to know what is the relative quantity of caloric, which substances of various kinds are capable of con- taining, under the same temperature, we must com- pare equal weights, and not equal bulks of those sub- stances. Bodies of the same weight may undoubtedly be of very different dimensions ; but that does not change the real quantity of matter. A pound of feath- ers does not contain one atom more than a pound of load. Caroline. I have another difficulty to propose. It appears to me, that if the temperature of the three bodies in the oven did not rise equally, they would nev- er reach the same degree ; the lead would always keep its advantage over the chalk, and milk, and would perhaps be boiling before the others had attained the temperature of the oven. I think you might as well say that, in the course of time, you and I should be of the same age ? Mrs. B. Your comparison is not correct, my dear. As soon as the lead reached the temperature of the oven, it would remain stationary ; for it would then give out as much heat as it would receive. You should le- collect that the exchange of radiating heat, between two bodies of equal temperature, is equal ; it would be impossible, therefore, for the lead to accumulate heat after having attained the temperature of the oven ; and that of the chalk and milk therefore would ultimate- ly arrive at the same standard. Now I fear that this will not hold good with respect to our ages, and that, as long as I live, I shall never cease to keep my advan- tage over you. Emily. I think that I have found a comparison for specific heat, which is very applicable. Suppose that two men of equal weight and bulk, but who required Afferent quantities of food to satisfy their appetites, sit down to dinner, both equally hungry ; the* one would consume a much greater quantity of provisions than the other, in order to be equally satisfied. Mr*. B. Yes, that is very fair; for the quantity of food necessary to satisfy their respective appetites, varies in the same manner as the quantity of caloric requisite to raise equally the temperature of different bodies. Emily. The thermometer, then, affords no indication^ of the specific heat of bodies ? Mr*. B. None at all : no more than satiety is a test of the quantity of food eaten. The thermometer, as I have repeatedly said, can be affected only by free or radiating caloric, which alone raises the temperature of bodies. Emily. And is there no method of measuring the comparative quantities of caloric absorbed in the oven by the lead, the chalk, and the milk ? Mr*. B. It may be done by cooling them to the same degree in an apparatus adapted to receive and measure the caloric which they give out. Thus, if you plunge them into three equal quantities of water, each at the same temperature, you will be able to judge of the relative quantity of caloric which the three bodies contained, by that, which, in cooling, they communi- cated to their respective portions of water ; for the same quantity of caloric which they each absorbed to raise their temperature, will abandon them in lower- ing it ; and on examining the three vessels of water, yon will find the one in which you immersed the lead to be the least healed ; ciple, the specific heat of bodies in a more perfect manner ; but I cannot explain it to you, till you are ac- quainted vv'-w'i the next modification of caloric, which is called latent heat, Caroline. And pray what kind of heat is that ? Airs. R. It is so analogous to specific heat, that most chemists make no distinction between them ; but Mv. Si Pictet, in his essay on fire, has so judiciously discrimi- nated them, that I think his view of the subject may contribute to render it clearer. We therefore call latent heat (a name that was first used by Dr. Black) that por- tion of insensible caloric which is employed in chang- ing the stxte of bodies ; that is to say, in converting solids into liquids, or liquids irto vapour. The heat which performs these changes becomes fixed in the body which it has transformed, and, as it is perfectly concealed from our senses, it has obtained the name of latent heat. Caroline. I think it would be much more correct to. call this modification latent caloric, instead of latent heat, since it does not excite the sensation of heat. Mrs. B. The remaik is equally applicable to both the modifications of specific and latent heat; but we must not presume (unless amongst ourselves in order to explain the subject) to alter terms which are still used by much better chemists than ourselves. And, besides, you must not suppose that the nature of heat is altered by being variously modified : tor if latent heat, and specific heat, do not excite the same sensations as free caloric, it is owing to their being in a state of con- finement, which prevents them from acting upon our organs : and consequently, as soon as they are extrica- ted from the body in which they are imprisoned, they return to their state of free caloric. Emily. But I do not yet clearly see in what respect latent heat diners from specific heat; for they arc both of them imprisoned and concealed in bodies ? Airs. B. Specific heat is that which is employed in filling the capacity of a body for caloric, in the state in which this body actually exists ; while latent beat is that which is employed only in eflecting a change of state, that is, in converting bodies from a solid to a liquid, or from a liquid to an aeriform state. But I think that, in a general point of view, both these modifica- tions might be comprehended under the n.ime of heat of capacity, as in both cases the caloric is equally enga- ged in filling the capacities of bodies. I shall now show you an experiment which I hope wfi1 give you a clear idea of what is understood by latent' heat. The snow which yon see in this phial, has been cool- ed by a certain chemical means (which I cannot well explain to you at present), to 5 degrees below the freez* ing point, i s you wil' find indicated by the thermometer, which is placed i.i it. We shall expose it to the heat of a lamp, and you will see the thermometer gradually rise, till it reaches the freezing point----- Emily. But there the thermometer stops, Mrs. B. and yet the lamp burns just as well as before. Why is not its heat communicated to the thermometer ? Caroline. And the snow begins to melt, therefore it must be rising above the freezing point ? Mr*. B.- The heat no longer affects the thermome- ter, because it is wholly employed in converting: the ice into water. As the ice melts, the caloric becomes latent in the new formed liquid, and therefore cannot raise its temperature ; and the thermometer will con- sequently remain stationary, till the whole of the ice be melted. Caroline. Now it is all melted, and the thermometer begins to rise again. Mr*. B. Because the conversion of the ice into water being completed, the caloric no longer becomes latent ; and therefore the heat which the water now receives raises its temperature, as you find the ther- mometer indicates. • Emily. But I do not think that the thermometer rises so quickly in the water, as it did in the ice, pre- vious to its beginning to melt, though the lamp burns equally well ? '■ Mrs. B. That is owing to the different specific heat of ice and water. The capacity of water for caloric being greater than tint of ice, more heat is required to raise its temperature, and therefore the thermometer rises slower in the water than in ice. Emily. True ; you said that a solid body always in- creased its capacity for heat by becoming fluid ; and this is an instance of it. F 2 54 Mr*. B. But be careful not to confound this with latent heat. Emily. On the contrary, I think that this example distinguishes them extremely well; for though they both go into an insensible state, yet they differ in this respect, that the specific heat fills the capacity ol the body in the state in which it exists, while latent heat changes that Ftate, and is afterwards employed in main- taining the body in its new form Caroline. Now, Mrs B. the water begins to boil, and the thermometer is again stationary. Mrs. B. Well, Caroline, it is your turn to explain the phenomenon. Caroline. It is wonderfully curious. The caloric is now busy in changing the water into steam, in which it hides itself and becomes insensible. This is another example of latent heat, producing a change of form. At first it converted a solid body into a liquid, and now it turns the liquid into vapour ! Mrs. B. You see, my dear, how easily you have become acquainted with these modifications of insensi- ble heat, which at first oppeared so unintelligible. If, now, we were to reverse these changes, and con- dense the vapour into water, and the water into ice, the latent heat would re-appear entirely, in the form of free caloric, Emily. Pray do let us see the effect of latent heat returning to its natural form. Mrs. B. For the purpose of shewing this, we need simply conduct the vapour through this tube into this vessel of cold water, where it will part with its latent heat and return to its liquid form. Emily. How rapidly the steam heats the water ! Mrs. B. That is because it does not merely impart its free caloric to the water, but likewise its latent heat. This method of heating liquids has been turned to ad- vantage, in several economical establishments. At Leeds, for instance, there is a large dye-house, in which a great number of coppers are kept boilir.g by means of a single one, which is situated without the building, and which alone is heated by fire. The steam of this ss last is conveyed through pipes into the bottom of each of the other coppers, and it appears extremely singular to see all these coppers boiling, though there is not a particle of fire in the place. Caroline. This is an admirable contrivance, and I wonder that it is not in common use. Airs. B. The steam kitchens, which are getting into such general use, are upon the same principle. The steam is conveyed through a pipe in a similar manner, into the vessels which contain the provisions to be dressed, where it communicates to them its*latent caloric, and returns to the state of water. Count Rum- ford makes great use of this principle in many of his fire-places : his great maxim is to avoid all unnecessary waste of caloric, for which purpose he confines the heat in such a manner, that not a particle of it shall un- necessarily escape ; and while he economises the free caloric, he takes care also to turn the latent heat to ad- vantage. It is thus that he is enabled to produce a de- gree of heat superior to that which is obtained in com- mon fire-places, though he employs but half the quan. tity of fuel, Emily. When the advantages of such contrivances are so clear and plain, I cannot understand why they are not universally used. Mrs. B. A long time is always required before in- novations, however useful, can be reconciled with the prejudices of the vulgar. Emily. What a pitv it is that there should be a pre- judice against new inventions ; how much more rapid- ly the world would improve, if such useful discoveries were immediately, and universally adopted! Mrs. B. 1 believe, my dear, that there are as manv novelties attempted to be introduced, the adoption of which would be prejudicial to societies, as there are of those which would be beneficial to it The well inform- ed, though by no means exempt from error, have an unquestionable advantage over the illiterate, in judging what is likely or not to prove servicable ; and therefore vye find the former more ready to adopt such discove- ries as promise to be really advantageous, than the lat- 56T ter, who having no other test of the value of a noveitjr but time and experience, at first oppose its introduc- tion The well informed are. however, frequently dis- appointed in their most sanguine expectations, and the prejudices of the vulgar though they often retard the progress of knowledge, yet sometimes, it must be ad- mitted, prevent the propagation of error.—But we are deviating from our subject. We have converted steam into water, and are now to change water into ice, in cr- der to render the latent heat sensible, as it escapes from the water on its becoming solid. For this purpose We must produce a degree of cold that will make water freeze. Caroline. That must be very difficult to accomplish in this warm room. Mrs. B. Not so much so as you think. There are certain chemical mixtures which produce a rapid change from the solid to the fluid state, or the reverse, in the substances combined, in consequence of which change latent heat is eicher extricated or absorbed. Emily. I do not qtnte understand you. Mrs. B. This snow and salt, which you see me mix together, are melting rapidily ; heat, therefore, must be absorbed by the mixture, and cold produced. Caroline. It feels even colder than ice, and yet the snow is melted. This is very extraordinary. Mrs. B. The cause of the intense cold of the mix- ture is to be attributed to the change from a solid to a fluid state. The union of the snow and salt produces a new arrangement of their partieles, in consequence of which they become liquid, and the quantity of caloric required to effect this change is seized upon by the mix- ture wherever it can be obtained. I his eagerness of the mixture for caloric, during its liquefaction, is such, that it converts part of its own free caloric into latent heat, and it is thus that its temperature is lowered Emily. Whatever you put into this mixture there- fore, would freeze ? Mrs. B. Yes; at least any fluid that is succeptible of freezing at that temperature ; for the exchange of radient heat would always be in favour of the cold mix- - 57 ture, until an equilibrium of temperature was ertablish- ed; therefore unless the body immersed contained more free caloric than would become latent in the mix- ture during its conversion into a liquid, the former must ultimately give out its latent heat till it cools down to the temperature of the latter. I have prepared this mixture of salt and snow for the purpose of freezing the water from which you are desirous of seeing the latent heat escape. I have put a thermometer in the glass of water that is to be frozen, in order that you may observe how it cools----- Caroline. The thermometer descends,, but the heat which the water is now losing, is its free, not its latent heat? Mr*. B. Certainly ; it does not part with its latent heat till it changes its state and is converted into ice. Emily. But here is a very extraordinary circum- stance 1 The thermometer is fallen below the freezing point, and yet the water is not frozen. Mrs. B. That is always the case previous to the freezing of water when it is in a state of rest. Now it begins to congeal, and you may observe that the ther- mometer again rises to the freezing point. Caroline. It appears to me very strange that the thermometer should rise the very moment that the wa- ter freezes ; for it seems to imply that the water was * colder before it froze than when in the act of freezing. Mrs. B. It is so ; and after our long dissertation on this circumstance, I did not think that it would appear so surprising to you. Reflect a little, and I think you will discover the reason of it. Caroline. It must be, no doubt, the extrication of latent heat, at the instant the water freezes, that raises the temperature. Mrs. B. Certainly ; and if you now examine the thermometer, you will find that its rise was but tempo- rary, and lasted only during the disengagement of the latent heat; it has since fallen and will continue to fall till the ice and mixture are of an equal temperature. 5J8 Emily. And can you show us any experiments in which liquids, by being mixed, become solid, and disen- gage latent heat ? Airs B. I could show you several ; but you are not yet sufficiently advanced to understand them well. I shall, however, try one which will afford you a striking instance of the fact. The fluid which you see in this phial consists of a quantity of a certain salt called muriat of lime, dissolved in water. Now if I pour into it a few drops of this other fluid, called sulphuric acid, the whole or very nearly the whole, will be instantaneously con- verted into a solid mass. Emily. How white it turns ! I feel the latent heat escaping, for the bottle is warm, and the fluid is chan* ged to a solid white substance like chalk ! Caroline This is indeed the most curious experi- ment we have seen yet. But pray what is that white vapour that ascends from the mixture ? Mrs. B You are not yet enough of a chemist to understand that. But, take care, Caroline do not ap' proach too near it, for it smells extremely strong. The mixture of spirit of wine and water affords another striking example of the extrication of latent heat. The particles of these liquids, by penetrating each other, change their arrangement, so as to become more dense, and vif I may use the expression), less fluid, in consequence of which they part with a quanti- ty of latent heat. Sulphuric acid and water produce the same effect and even in a much greater degree. We shall try both these experiments, and you will feel how much heat which was in a latent state, is set at liberty.—Now each of you take hold of one of these glasses.----- Caroline. 1 cannot hold mine ; I am sure it is as hot as boiling water Airs. B. Your glass, which contains the sulphuric acid and water, is indeed, of as high a tempen.'ure as boiling water ; but you do not find yours so hot Emily ? Emily. Not qu're. Hut why are not these liquids converted into solids by the extrication of their latent. heat ? ST9 Mr*. B. Because they part only with a portion of that heat, and therefore they suffer only a diminution of their liquidity. Emily. Yet they appear as perfectly liquid as they did before they were mixed. Mr* B. They arc however considerably condens- ed. I shall repeat the experiment in a graduated tube, and you will see that the two liquids, when mix- ed, occupy less space than they did separately. This tube is graduated by cubit inches, and this little mea- sure contains exactly one cubit inch ; therefore, if I fill it twice, and pour its contents into the tube, they should fill it up to the second mark. Caroline. And so they do exactly. M?-*. B. Because I put two measures of the same liquid into the tube ? but we shall now try it with one of water and one of sulphuric acid ; observe the differ- ence— YLmily The two measures, this time, evidently lake up less space, though the fluid does not appear to have suffered any change in its liquidity. Mrs. B. The two liquids, however, have undergone some degree of condensation from the new arrange- ment of their particles ; they have penetrated each other, so as to form a closer substance, and have thus, as it were, squeazed out a portion of their latent heat. But this change ot state is certainly much less striking, and less complete, than when liquids are converted into solids. The slakeing of lime is another curious instance of the extrication of latent heat. Have you never obser- ved how quick-lime smokes when water is poured upon it, and how much heat it produces ? Carroline. Yes ; but I do not understand what change of state takes place in the lime that ocoasions its giving out latent heal; for the quick-lime, which is solid, is (if I recollect right) reduced to powder by this opera- tion, and is therefore rather expanded than condensed. Mrs. B. It is from the water, not the lime, that the latent heat is set free. The water incorporates with, and becomes solid in the lime; in consequence 60 of which the heat, which kept it in a liquid state, is disengaged and escapes into a sensible form. Caroline. 1 always thought that the heat originated in the lime. It seems very strange that water, and cold water too, should contain so much heat. Emily. After this extrication of caloric, the water must exist in a state of ice in the lime, since it parts with the heat which kept it liquid ? Airs. B. It cannot properly be called ice, since ice implies a degree of cold, at least equal to the freezing point. Yet as water, in cotqbining with lime, gives out more heat than in freezing, it must be in a state of still greater solidity in the lime, than it is in the form of ice ; and you may have observed that it does not moisten or liquefy the lime in the smallest degree. Emily But, Mrs. B. the smoke that rises is white ; if it was only pure caloric which escaped, we might feel, but could not see it. Mrs. B. This white vapour is formed by some of the particles of lime, in a state of fine dust, which are carried off by the caloric. Emily. In all changes of state, then, a body either absorbs or disengages latent heat ? Airs. B. You cannot exactly say absorbs latent heat, as the heat becomes latent only on being confined in the body ; but you may say that bodies, in passing from a solid to a liquid form, or from the liquid state to that of vapour, absorbs heat; ami that when the reverse takes place heat is disengaged.* We have seen like- wise, that a body may part with some of its latent heat without completely changing its form, as was the case with the mixtures of sulphuric acid and water, and spirit of wine and water ; but here you must observe, that the condensation which forces out a portion of their latent heat, is occasioned by a new arrangement of the particles, produced by mixing the liquids, they therefore undergo a change of state, though no very sensible difference takes place in their form. * This rule, if not univerfal, admits of very few exceptional 61 Caroline. All solid bodies, I suppose, must have parted with the whole of their latent heat ? Mr*. B We cannot precisely say that; for solid bodies are most of them susceptible of being brought to different degrees of density, during which opera- tion a qu.ntity of heat is disengaged ; as it happens in the hamnieringof metals, the boring of cannon, and in s^eneral whenever bodies are exposed to considerable friction or violent presrtue. It has been much disputed, however, to what modi- fication of heat caloric thus extricated belongs, though in general it has been considered as latent heat; but it dees not seem strictly entitled to that name, as its ex- trication produces no other change in the body than an increase of density. . Emily. And may not the same objection be made to the heat extricated from the mixtures we have just witnessed ? for the only alteration that is produced by it is a greater density. Mrs. B. But F observed to you, that the density was produced by a new arrangement of the particles, owing to the mixing of two different substances ; this cannot be the case, whenjflkat is extricated from solid bodies by mere mechanical force, such as hammering me- tals ; no foreign particles are introduced, and ex- cept a closer union, no change of arrangement can take place. The*caloric, thus extricated, seems there- fore to have a still more dubious title to the modification of latent heat, than that produced by mixtures. I know no other way of settling this difficulty than by calling them both heat of capacity, a title to which we have agreed that specific heat, and latent heat, have an equal claim Emily. We can now, I think, account for the ether boiling, and the water freezing in vacuo, at the same temperature Mr*. B. Let me hear how you explain it ? Emily. The latent heat, which the water gave out in freezing, was immediately absorbed by the ether, during its conversion into vapour; and therefore, from G 62 alalcnt state in one liquid, it passed into a latent state in the other. Mr*. B. But this only partly accounts for the ex- periment ; it remains to be explained why the tempe- rature of the ether, while in a state of ebullition, is brought down to the freezing temperature of the water. It is because the ether, during its evaporation, reduces its own temperature, in the same proportion as that of the water, by converting its free caloric into latent heat; so that, though one liquid boils, and the other freezes, their temperatures remain in a state of equilibrium. Having advanced so far on the subject of heat, I may now give you an account of the calorimeter, an in- strument invented by Lavoisier, upon the principles just explained, for the purpose of estimating the spe- cific heat of bodies. It consists of a vessel, the inner surface of which is lined with ice, so as to form a sort of hollow globe of ice, in the midst of which the body, whose specific heat is to be ascertained, is placed. The ice absorbs caloric from this body, till it has brought it down to the freezing point: this caloric converts in- to water a certain portion of the ice which runs out through an aperture at the bottom of the machine ; and the quantity of ice changed to water is a test of the quantity of caloric which the body has given out in descending from a certain temperature to the freez- ing point. Caroline. In this apparatus, I suppose, the milk, chalk, and lead, would melt different quantities of ice, in proportion to their diff'eient capacities for caloric ? All's. B. Certainly ; and thence we are able to as- certain, with precision, their respective capacities for heat. But the calorimeter affords us no more idea ■of the absolute quantity of heat contained in a body, than the thermometer ; for though by means of it we extricate both the free and confined caloric, yet we ex- tricate them only to a certain degree, which is the freezing point .* and we know not how much they con- tain of either below that point. Emily. According to this theory of latent heat, it appears to me the weather should be warm when it & freezes, and cold in a thaw ; for latent heat is liberated from every substance that freezes, and such a large supply of heat must warm the atmosphere ; whilst, during a thaw, that very quantity of free heat must be taken from the atmosphere, and return to a latent state in the bodies which it thaws. Mr*. B. Your observation is very natural ; but con- sider, that in a frost the atmosphere is so much colder than the earth, that all the caloric which it takes from the freezing bodies is insufficient to raise its tempera- ture above the freezing point ; otherwise the frost must cease. But if the quantity of latent heat extricated does not destroy the frost, it serves to moderate the suddenness of the change of temperature of the atmos- phere, at the commencement both of a frost, and of a thaw. In the first instance, its extrication diminishes the severity of the cold ; and, in the latter, its absorb* tion moderates the warmth occasioned by a thaw: it even sometimes produces a discernable chill, at the breaking up of a frost. Caroline. But what are the general causes that pro- duce those sudden changes in the weather, especially from hot to cold, which we often experience ? Mrs. B. This question would lead us into meteoro- logical discussions, to which I am by no means com- petent One cii cumstance, however, we can easily un- derstand. When the air has passed over cold coun- tries, it will probably arrive here, at a temperature much below our own, and then it must absorb lieat from every object it meets with which will produce a general fall of temperature. But I think we have now sufficiently dwelt on the subject of latent heat ; we may therefore proceed to the last modification, which is chemical heat. In this state we consider caloric as one of the constituent parts of bodies. Like any other substance, it is sub- ject to the attraction of composition, and is thus capa- ble of being chemically combined. Emily. In this case, then, it neither affects the th< r- mometer, nor the calorimeter, since principles united 64 by the attraction of composition can be separated only by the decomposition of a body. Mrs. B. You are perfectly right. We may consid- er free caloric as moving constantly through the inte- grant particles of a body ; specific and latent heat, as lodging between them, and being there detained by a mere mechanical union; but it is chemical heat alone that actually combines, in consequence of a true chemi- cal affinity, with the constituent particles of bodies ; and this union cannot be dissolved without a decomposi- tion produced by superior attractions. Caroline. But it this kind of heat is so perfectly con- cealed in the body, pray how is it known to exist ? Mr*. B. By being freed from its imprisonment; for when the body in which it exists is decomposed, it then returns to the state of free caloric. This caloric, how- ever, seldom shews itself entirely, as part of it gene- rally enters into new combinations with some of the constituent parts of the decomposed body, and is thus again concealed under the form of latent heat. But it will be better to defer saying any thing further of this modification of heat at present. When we come to analyse compound bodies, and resolve them in- to their continent parts, we shall have many opportu- nities of becoming better acquainted with it. Caroline. Caloric appears to me a most wonderful element : but 1 cannot reconcile myself to the idea of its being a substance ; for il seems to be constantly ac- ting in opposition, both to the attraction of aggregation and the laws of gravity ; and yet you decidedly class it amongst the simple bodies. Mrs. B. You are not at all singular in the doubts you entertain, my dear, on this point ; for although ca- loric is now generally believed to be a real substance, yet there are certainly some strong circumstances which seem to militate against this doctrine. Caroline. But do you, Mrs. B. believe it to be a sub- stance ? Mrs. B Yes, I do : but I am inclined to think, that its levity is, in all probability, only reLtive, like 6o that of vapour which ascends through the heavier me- dium, air. Caroline. If that be the case, it would not ascend in a vacuum. • Mr*. B In an absolute vacuum, perhaps it would not. But as the most complete cacuum we can obtain is never perfect, we may always imagine the existence of some unknown invisible fluid, which however light and subtile, may be heavier than caloric, -and will grav- itate in it. The fact has not, I believe, been yet de- termined by very decisive experiments ; but it appears from some made by Professor Pictet, mentioned in his' Essay on Fire,' that heat has a tendency to as- cend in the most complete vacuum which we are able to obtain. Emily. But if there exists such a subtile fluid as you imagine, do you not think that chemists would have dis- covered it by some of its properties? Mr*. B. It has been conjectured that light might be such a fluid ; but I confess that I do not think it prob- able : for as it appears by Dr. HerchelPs experiment that heat is less refrangible than light, I should be rath- er inclined to think it the heavier of the two. But, while you have so many well ascertained facts to learn, I shall not perplex you with conjectures. We have dwelt on the subject of caloric much longer than I in- tended, and I fear you will find it difficult to remember so long a lesson. At our next meeting we shall examine the nature of oxygen and nitrogen, two substances with ' which you must now be made acquainted. Con&ergation v/ Oh Oxygen and Mtrogen,' Mr*. B. To-day we shall examine the chemical properties of the atmosphere. ©2 66 Caroline. I thought you said that we were to learn the nature of oxygen and nitrogen, which come next in our table of simpic bodies ? Airs. B. And so you shall : ihe atmosphere is com- posed of these two principles : we shall therefore ana- lyse it, and consider its component parts separately. Emily. I always thought that the atmosphere had been a very complicated fluid, composed of all the vari- ety of exhalations from the earth. Mrs. B. In a general point of view, it may be said to consist of all the substances capable of existing, in an aeriform state, at the common temperature of our globe. But, laying aside these heterogi nous and ac- cidental substances (which rather float in the atmos- phere than form any ot i's component parts , it con- sists of an elastic fluid called atmospherical air, which is composed of two gasses, kiov n by the names Of OXYGEN GAS and NITKOGKN 01' AZOTIC GAS. Emily. Pray what is a gas ? Mrs. B. The name ol 'gas is given to any'neriform fluid, which consists of some substances rhemia i!y combined with caloric, and capable of existing con- stantly in an aeriform state, under the pressure, and at the temperature of the atmosphere Every individual gas is the re foe composed of two parts : 1st, the par- ticular substance tb.it i> converted into a gas, by calor- ic ; this is called the busis of the gas. as it is horn it that the gas derives all iti specific and characteristic properties: and 2dly, the caloric, winch, by its chem- ical combination with the basis, constitutes it a gas, or permanently eh.siic fluid. Emily. When you speak then of the simple sub- stances, oxygou and nitro^ei, you mean to express, those substances which are tue basis of the two gasses, independently of caloric ? Mrs. B. Yes, in strict propriety ; and they should be culled gasses, only when brought, by their combina- tion with caloric, to an aeriform state. Caroline. Is not water, or any other substance, when evaporated by heat, called also a gas ? 67 Mrs. B. No, my dear; vapour is indeed, an elas- tic fluid, and bears so strong a resemblance to a gas, that there is some danger of confounding them ; there are however, several points in which they es->en'ial!y differ, and by which you may always distinguish them. Vapour is nothing more than the solution, or me- chanical divi ion, of any substance whatevei in caloric. Thj c-tloric, in this case, becomes latent in the vapour ; but its union with it is very slight, and as we have seen in a variety ofinstanc.es. it is necessary only to lower the tempeiatme in order to separate them. But, to foi m a gas or permanently elastic fluid, a chemical com- bination must take place between the caloric and the substance, at the ti it of its being converted into a gase- ous state ; it is necessary therefore, that there should be an afli.'ity between them, and hence their combina- tion can..ot be destroyed by a mere chimge of tempera- ture, or Uy any chemical agents, except such as have a stronger affiniy. for either of the constituents of the gas, an.1 oy that . ens effect its decomposition. Caroline. Indeed, I ought not to have forgotton that caforic, in vapour, is only latent, and not chemically com';iiicd. But pray, Mrs. B. what kinds of sub- stances aie oxygen and nitrogen, when not in a gaseous State ? Mr*. B. We have never been able to obtain these substances in their pure simple st.ite, because we can- lui separate them entirely eitier iroin caloric or from theoti.cr bocies witli which we end them united ; it is therefore ouiy by their elVecls in combining with other substance- tha we are acquainted with them. Caroline. How much more satisfactory it would be if we could see tliein ! Emily In what proportions are they combined in the al.uosphere ? Airs. B. The oxygen gas constitutes about one fourth, and the nitrogen gas three-fourths. When sep- arated thty are found to possess qualities tot. i.y differ- ent from eicii other. Pure oxygen gas is essential both to respiration and combustion, while neither ol these processes can be performed in nitrogen gas. 68 Caroline. But since nitrogen gas is unfit for respira' tion, how does it happen that the three fourths of this gas, which enter into the composition of the atmos- phere, are not a great impediment to breathing ? Mr*. B. We should breathe more freely than our lungs could bear, if we respired oxygen gas alone. The nitrogen is no impediment either to respiration, or combustion; it appears to be merely passive in those functions ; but it serves as it were, to dilate and weaken the oxygen while we breathe, as you would weaken the wine that you drink, by diluting it with water. Emily. And by what means can the two gasses, • which composed the atmospheric air, be separated ? Airs. B. There are many ways of analysing the at- mosphere ; the two gasses can be separated first by combustion. Emily. How is it possible that rombustion should separate them ? Mr*. B. I must first tell you, that all bodies, ex- cepting the earth and alkalies, have so strong an affini- ty for oxygen, that they will, in certain circumstances, attract and absorb it from the atmosphere ; in this case the nitrogen gas remains alone, and we thus obtain it in • its simple gaseous state. Caroline. I do not understand how a gas can be ab- sorbed ? Mr*. B. The gas is not absorbed, but decomposed ; and it is oxygen only, that is to say, the basis of the gas, which is absorbed.. Caroline. What then becomes of the caloric of the oxygen gas, when it is deprived of its basis ? Airs. B. We shall make this piece of dry wood ab- sorb oxygen from the atmosphere, and you will see what becomes of the caloric. Caroline. You are joking, Mrs. B. you do not mean to decompose the atmosphere with a piece of stick ? Mrs. B. Not the whole body of the atmosphere, - certainly ; but if we can make this stick absorb any ■ quantity of oxygon from it, will not a proportional quan- tity of atmospherical air Le decomposed ? 69 Caroline. Undoubtedly ; if the wood has so strong- an affinity for oxygen, as to attract it from the caloric with which it is combined in the atmosphere, why does it not decompose the atmosphere spontaneously ? Mrs. B Because the attraction of aggregation of the particles of the wood, is an obstacle to their combi- nation with the oxygen ; for you know that the oxygen must penetrate the wood in order to combine with its particles, and forcibly separate them indirect opposition to the attraction of aggregation. Emily. Just as caloric penetrates bodies ? Mrs B. Yes ; but caloric being a much more sub- tile fluid than oxygen, can penetrate substances much more easily. . Caroline. But if the attraction of cohesion between the particles of a body, counteracts its affinity for oxy- gen, I do not see how that body can decompose the at- mosphere ? . Mr*. B. That is now the difficulty which we have 4 to remove with regard to the piece of wood.-—Can you 'think of no method of diminishing the attraction of co- hesion ? .,,,... . ,, Caroline. Heating the wood, I should think, might answer the purpose : for the caloric would separate the particles, and.make room for the oxygen. Mrs B Well, we shall try your method ; hold the stick close to the fire—closer still, that it may imbibe the caloric plentifully ; otherwise the attraction of cohe- sion between its particles will not be sufficiently over- come-- _ , . T -,; , Caroline. It has actually taken fire, and yet I did not let it touch the coals ; but I held it so very close, that I suppose it caught fire merely from the intensity of the heat. . , , Mrs. U. Or you might say, in other words, that the heat so far overcome the attraction of cohesion of the wood, that it was enabled to absorb oxygen very rapidly from the atmosphere. . . Emily. Does the wood absorb oxygen while it is burning ? ro Airs. B. Yes ; and the heat and light are produced*■ by the caloric of the oxygen gas, which being set at liberty by the oxygen uniting with the wood, appears in its sensible form. Caroline. You astonish me ! Is it possible that the heat of a burning body should be produced by the at- mosphere, and not the body itself. Mr*. B. It is not precisely ascertained whether apy portion of the caloric is furnished by the combustible bo- dy ; but there is no doubt that by far the most consider- able part of it is disengaged from the oxygen gas, • when its basis combines with the combustible body. Emily. I have not yet met with any thing in chemis- try that has surprised or delighted me so much as this explanation of combustion. I was at first wondering what connection there could be between the affinity of a body of oxygen and its combustibility ; but I think I understand it now perfectly. Mr*. B. Combustion then, you see, is nothing more than the rapid absorption of the basis of oxygen gas, by a combustible body, attended by the disengagement of the light and heat, which were combined with the ox- ygen when in its gaseous stale. Emily. But are there no combus'ible bodies whose attraction for oxygen is so stiong, that they will over- come the resistance of the attraction of aggregation, without the application of heal ? Caroline. That cannot be ; otherwise we should see bodies burning spontaneously. Mr*. B. This indeed, sometimes happens, (and for the very reason which Emily as-signs), as I shall show you at some future time. But in general, all the combustions that could occur spontaneously, ai the tern- terature of the atmosphere, having already taken place ; therefore new combustions cannot happen without rais- ing the temperature of the body. Some bodies, however, will burn at a much lower temperature than others. Emily. The elevation of temperature, required to make a body burn, must, I suppose depend entirely upon the force of aggregation to be overcome I 71 'Mrs. B. That is one point; but you must likewise •recollect, that there must be a stronger affinity between the body and oxygen, than between the latter and its caloric : otherwise the oxygen will not quit its gaseous form to combine with the body. It is this degree of affinity for oxygen that constitutes a combustible body. The earths and alkalies have no such an affinity for oxy- gen, and are therefore incombustible. But in order to make a combustible body burn, you see that it is ne- cessary to give the first impulse to combustion by the approach of a hot or burning body, from which it may obtain a sufficient quantity of caloric to raise its temper- ature. Caroline. But the common way of burning a body is not merely to approach it to one already on fire, but rath- er to put on the one in actual contact with the other, as when I burn this piece of paper by holding it in the flame .of the fire. Mrs. B. The closer it is in contact with the source of caloric, the sooner will its temperature be raised to the degree necessary for it to burn. If you hold it near the fire, the same effect will be produced ; but more time will be required, as you found to be the case with the piece of stick. Emily. But why is it not necessary to continue ap- plying caloric throughout the process of combustion, in order to prevent the attraction of aggregation from recovering its ground and impeding the absorption of the oxygen ? Mrs. B. The caloric, which is gradually disengag- ed, by the decomposition of the oxygen gas, during combustion, keeps up the temperature of the burning body ; so that when once combustion has begun, no furth- er application of caloric is required. "* Caroline. Since I have learnt this wonderful theory of combustion, 1 cannot take my eyes from the fire ; and I can scarcely conceive that the heat and light which I always supposed to proceed from the coals, are really produced by the atmosphere, and that the coals are on- ly the instruments by which the decomposition of the oxygen gas is effected. 72 Emily. When you blow the fire, you increase the combustion, I suppose, by supplying the coals with a greater quantity of oxygen gas ? Mrs. B. Certainly; but of course no blowing will produce combuation, unless the temperyture of the coals be first raised. A single spark, however, is some- times sufficient to produce that effect; for as I said be- fore, when *. B. Your explanation is perfectly correct. Emily. The two constituents ol the oxygen gas be- ing thus disposed of, what remains under the receiver must be pure nitrogen gas ? Airs. B. There are some circumstances which pre- 73 ■verit the nitrogen gas, thus obtained, from being per- fectly pure ; but we may easily try whether the oxygen has disappeaied by putting another lighted taper under it.__You see how instantaneously the flame is extin- guished for want of the oxvgen ; and were you to put an animal under the receiver, it would immediately be suffocated. But that is an experiment which I suppose your curiosity will not tempt you to try. Emdif. It must be very cruel indeed !—-But look, Mrs. B. the receiver is full of a thick white smoke. Is that nitrogen gas ? Mrs B. No, my dear, pure nitrogen gas is per- fectly transparent, and invisible, like common air. This cloudiness proceeds from a variety of exhalations, which arise from the burning taper, and the nature of which you cannot yet understand. Caroline. The water within the receiver has now risen a little above its level in the bason. What is the reason of this ? Mr*. B. With a little reflection, I dare say, you would have explained it yourself The water rises m consequence of the oxygen gas within it having been destroyed or rather decomposed, by the combustion of the taper ; and the water did not rise immediately be- cause the heat of the taper whilst burning, produced a dilatation of the air in the vessel, which counteracted this effect. . . Another means of decomposing the atmosphere is the oxygenation of certain metals. This process is very analogous to combustion; it is, indeed, only a more general term to express the combination of a body with oxygen. . ,.«. r Caroline. In what respect, then, does it differ from combustion ? , . Mr* B. The combination of oxygen in combustion is always accompanied by a disengagement of light and heat: whilst this circumstance is not a necessary conse.uence of simple oxygenation. Caroline. But how can a body absord oxygen with- out disengaging the caloric of the gas ? Mr* B Oxygen does not always present itseli in a H 74 gaseous state ; it is a constituent part of a vast number of bodies, both solid and liquid, in which it exists in a much denser state than in the atmosphere ; and from these bodies it may be obtained without any disengage- ment of caloric. It may likewise, in some cases, be absorbed from the atmosphere without any sensible production of light and heat; for if the process be slow, the caloric is disengaged in small quantities, and so gradually, that it is not capable of producing either light or heat. In this case, the absorption of oxygen is called oxygenation or oxydation, instead of combustion, as the disengagement of sensible light and heat is es- sential to the latter. Emily. I wonder that metals can unite with oxygen ; for, as they are very dense, their attraction of aggre- gation must be very great, and I should have thought that oxygen could never have penetrated such bodies. Mrs. B. Their strong attraction for oxygen coun- terbalances this obstacle Most metals, however, re- quire to be made red hot before they are capable of at- tracting oxygen in any considerable quantity. By this process they lose most of their metallic'properties, and fall into a kind of powder, formerly called calx, but now much more properly termed an oxyd; thus we have oxyd of lead, oxyd of iron, &c. Caroline. The word oxyd, then, simply means a metal combined with oxygen ? Mrs. B. Yes; but the term is not confined to me- tds, though chiefly applied to them. Any body what- ever, that has combined with a certain quantity of oxy- gen, either by means of oxydation or combustion, is called an oxyd, and is said to be oxydated or oxygenated. This black powder is an oxyd of manganese, a metal which has so strong an attraction for oxygen, that it absoibs that substance from the atmosphere at any known temperature : it is therefore never found in its metallic form, but always in that of an oxyd, in which state, you iee, it has very little of the appearance of a metal. It is now heavier than it was before oxydation, in consequence of the addiuonal weight of the oxygen with which it has combined. » D t Plau. V. Page. 75. Fiff. «?. /"/>. J>. Prf/jitnilitn of ojcyt/cii tfal raw it $r th* Author DwBeteSc i,'/W/i/iW fyr Ji!ir..;r( ..ok.: £•('? .Yen ."•',•„, 75 Caroline. I am very glad to hear that; for I confes'* I could not help having some doubts whether oxygen was really 3 substance, as it is not to be obtained in a simple and palpable state : but its weight is, I think, a decisive proof of its being really a body. Mrs. B. It is easy to estimate its weight, by separ- ating it from the manganese, and finding how much the latter has lost. Emily. But if you can take the oxygen from the metal, shall we not then have it in its palpable simple state ? Mrs. B. No : for I can only separate the oxygen from the manganese, by presenting to it some other body for which it has a greater affinity than for the manganese. Caloric possesses such a superior affinity for oxygen, provided the-temperature of the metal be sufficiently raised ; if, therefore, I heat this oxyd* of manganese to a certain degree, the caloric will com- bine with the oxygen, and carry it off in the form of gas. Er\Uy. But you said just now, that manganese would attract oxygen from the atmosphere in which it is combined with caloric ; how, therefore, can the oxvgen have a superior affinity for caloric, since it aban- dons the latter to combine with the manganese ? Mrs. B. 1 give you credit for this objection, Emily ; and the only answer I can make to it is. that the mutu- al affinities of metals for oxygen and of oxygen for ca- loric, vary at different temperatures ; a certain degree of heat will, therefore, dispose a metal to combine with oxycren. whilst on the contrary, the former will be compelled to pirt with the latter when the tempera- ture is further increased. I have put some oxyd of manganese into a retort, which is an ear-then vessel with a bent neck, such as you sec here (Plate V. Fig. S.J Plate V. Fig. 7. Combustion of a taper under a receiver. Fig. 8. A re- tort on a stand. Fig. 9. A furnace. B Earthen retort in the furnace. C. water bath D. Receiver. E E. Tube conveying the gas from the retort through the water into the receiver- F, F. F. Shelf perforated on which the receiver stands. Fig. 10. Combustion of iron wire in oxygen gas 76 —The retort containing the manganese you cannot sec, as I have enclosed it in this furnace, where it is now red hot. But in order to make you sensible of the es- cape of the gas, which is itself invisible, I have con- nected the neck of the retort with this bent tube, the extremity of which is immersed in this vessel of vvaler (Plate V. Fig. 9.)—Do you see the bubbles of air rise through the water ? Caroline. Perfectly. This, then is pure oxygen gas ; what a pity it should be lost ! Could you not pre- serve it ? Airs. B. We shall collect it in this receiver.—For this purpose, you observe, I first fill it with water, in order to exclude the atmospherical air ; and then place it over the bubbles that issue from the retort, so as to make them rise through the water to the upper part of the receiver. Emily. The bubbles of oxygen gas rise, I suppose, from their specific levity ? Airs. B. Yes ; for though oxygen forms rather a heavy gas, it is light compared to water. You see how it gradually displaces the water from the receiver. It is now full of gas, and I may leave it inverted in water on this shelf, where I can keep the gas as long as I choose for future experiments. This apparatus (which is in- dispensable in all experiments in which gasses are con- cerned) is called a water-bath. Caroline. It is a very clever contrivance, indeed ; it is equally simple and useful. How convenient the shelf is for the receiver to rest upon underwater, and the holes in it for the gas to pass into the receiver ! I long to make some experiments with this apparatus. Mr*. B. I shall try your skill that way, when you have a little more experience. I am now going to show you an experiment, which proves, in a very strik- ing manner, how essential oxygen is to combustion. You will see that iron itself will burn in this gas, in the most rapid and brilliant manner. Emily. Really ! 1 did not know that it was possible to burn iron. Mrs. B. Iron is eminently combustible in pure oxy- 7T gen gas, and what will surprise you still more, it can be set on fire without any very great rise of temperature. ¥ou sec this spiral iron wire—I fasten it at one end to this cork, which is made to fit an opening at the top of the glass receiver (Plate V. Fig. 10 )— Emily. I see the opening in the receiver; but it is carefully closed by a ground glass stopper. Airs. B. That is in order to prevent the gas from escaping; but I shall take out the stopper, and put in the cork, to which the wire hangs.—.Now I mean to burn this wire in the oxygen gas, but 1 must fix a small piece of lighted tinder to the extremity of it, in order to give the first impulse to combustion; for however powerful oxygen is in promoting combustion, you must recollect that it cannot take place without a certain eleva- tion of temperature. I shall now introduce the wire into the receiver, by quickly changing the stoppers. Caroline. Is there no danger of the gas escaping while you change the stoppers ? Airs. B. Oxygen gas is a little heavier tfian atmos- pherical air, therefore It will not mix with it very rapid- ly ; and if I do not leave the opening uncovered we shall not lose any----- Caroline. Oh, what a brilliant and beautiful flame ! Emily. It is as white, and dazzling as the sun !— Now a piece of the melted wire drops to the bottom : I fear it is extinguished; but no, it burns again as bright as ever Mrs B. It will burn till the wire is entirely con* sumed, provided the oxygen be not first expended; for you know it can burn only while there is oxygen to combine with it Caroline. 1 never saw a more beautiful light. My eyes can hardly bear it! How astonishing to think that all this caloric was contained in the small quantity of gas that was enclosed in the receiver ; and that, without. producing any sensible heat! Mrs. B. The caloric of the oxygen gas could not produce any sensible heat before the combustion took place, because it was not in a free state. You can tell H2 rs me, I hope, to what modification of heat this caloric is to be referred ? Caroline Since it is combined with the basis of the gas, it must be chemical heat. Emily, Chemical heat is then extricated in all com- bustions ? Mrs. B. Certainly. By the decomposition of the gas, the caloric, returns to its free state, and thus pro- duces a quantity of sensible heat, proportional to the rapidity ol that decomposition. Caroline. How wonderfully quick combustion goes on in.pure oxygen gas! But pray are these drops of burnt iron as heavy as the wiie was before ? Airs. B. They are even heavier; for tlie iron in burning, has acquired exactly the weight of the oxy- gen which has disappeared, and is now combined with it. It has become an oxyd of iron. Caroline. I do not know what you mean by saying that the oxygen has disappeared, Mrs. B. for it was al- ways invisible. Mrs. B. True, my dear; the expression was in- correct But though you could not see the oxygen gas, I believe you had no doubt of its presence, as the effect it produced on the wire was sufficiently evident. Caroline. Yes, indeed; yet you know it was the caloric of the gas, and not the oxygen gas itself, that dazzled us so much. Mrs. B You are not quite correct in your turn, in saying the caloric dazzled you ; for caloric is invisible ; it affects only the sense of feeling ; it was the light which dazzled you. Caroline. True ; but light and caloric are such con- stant companions, that it is difficult to separate them, even in idea. Mr*. B. The easier it is to confound them the more careful you should be in making the distinction. Caroline. But why has the w ater now risen, and fill- ed part of the receiver ? Mrs. B. Indeed, Caroline, I did not think you would 79 have asked such a question ! I am sure, Emily, you- can answer it. Emily. Let me reflect...........The. oxygen has combined with the wire ; the caloric has escaped ; consequently nothing can remain in the receiver, and the water will rise to fill the vacuum. Caroline. I wonder that I did not think of that I wish that we had weighed the wire and the oxygen gas befoie comousiion ; we might then have found wheth- er the weight of the oxyd was equal to that of both. Airs. B. You might try the experiment if you par- ticularly wished it ; but I can assure you, that, if ac- curately performed, it never fails to show that the ad- ditional weight of the oxyd is precisely equal to that of the oxygen absorbed, whether the process has been a real combustion, or a simple oxygenation Caroline. But this cannot be the case with combus- tions in general, for when any substance is burnt in the common air, so far from increasing in weight, it is evi- dently diminished, and sometimes entirely consumed. Mr*. B. But what do you mean by the expression. Consumed ? You cannot suppose that the smallest parti- cle of any substance in nature can be actually destroy- ed A compound body is decomposed by combustion ; some of its constituent parts fly off in a gaseous form, whi.e others remain in a concrete state ; the former are called the volatile, the latter the fixed products of com- bustion. But if we collect the whole of them, we shall always find tnat they exceed the weight of the combus- tible body, by that of the oxygen which has combined with them during combustion. Emily. In the combustion of a coal fire, then, I sup- pose that the ashes are what would be called the fixed product .' and the smoke the volatile product ? Mr*. B. Yet when the fire burns best, and the quan- tity of volatile products should be the greatest, there is no smoke ; how can you account for that ? Emily. Indeed 1 cannot ; therefore I suppose that I was not right in my conjecture. Airs. B. Not quite : ashes as you supposed, are a fixed product of combustion ; but smoke, properly 80 speaking, is not one of the volatile products, as it con- sists of some minute undecomposed particles of the coals- that are carried off by the caloric without being burnt, and are either deposited in the form of soot or dis- persed by the wind. Smoke therefore, ultimately be- comes one of the fixed products of combustion. And you may easily conceive that the stronger the fire is, the less smoke it produces, because the fewer particies escape combustion. On this principle depends the in- vention of Argaud's patent lamps ; a current of air is made to pass through the cylindrical wick of the lamp, by which means it is so plentifully supplied with oxy- gen, that not a particle of oil escapes combustion, nor is an atom of smoke produced. Emily. But what then.are the volatile products of combustion ? M?-*. B. Various new compounds, with which you are not yet acquainted, and which being converted by caloric, either into vapour, or gas, arc invisible ; but they can be collected, and we shall examine them, at some future period. Caroline. There are then other gasses, besides the- oxygen and nitrogen gasses ? Mr*. B. Yes, sevt ral : any substance that has a sufficient affinity for caloric to combine with it, and as- sume and maintain the form of an elastic fluid at the temperature of the atmosphere, is capable of being con- verted into a gas. We shall examine the several gas- ses in their respective places ; but we must now confine our attention to those that compose the atmosphere. I shall show you another method of decomposing the atmosphere, which is very simple. In breathing we retain a portion ofthe oxygen, and expire the nitrogen gas ; so that if we breathe in a closed vessel, for a cer- tain length of time, the air within it vill be deprived of its oxygen gas. Which of you will make the experi- ment ? Caroline. I should be very glad to try it. Airs. B. Very well ; breathe several times through'. this glass tube into the receiver with which it is con- nected, until you feel that your breath is exhausted— 81 Caroline. I am quite out of breath already 1 Mrs. B. Now let us try the gas with a lighted taper. Emily. It is very pure nitrogen gas, for the taper is immediately extinguished. Mrs. B. That is not a proof of its being pure, but only of the absence of oxygen, as it is that principle alone that can produce combustion, every other gas being absolutely incapable of it. Family. In the methods which you have shewn us, for decomposing the atmosphere, the oxygen always abandons the nitrogen : but is there no way of taking the nitrogen from the oxygen, so as to obtain the latter pure from the atmosphere ? Airs. B. You must observe, that whenever oxygen is taken from the atmosphere, it is by decomposing the oxygen gas : we cannot do the same with the nitrogen gas, because nitrogen has a stronger affinity for caloric than for any other known principle : it appears impos- sible therefore to separate it from the atmosphere, by the power of affinities. But if we cannot obtain the oxy- gen gas by this means, in its separate state, we have no difficulty (as you have seen) to procure it in its gaseous form, by taking it from those substances that have ab- sorbed it from the atmosphere. This is done by com- bining the oxygen, at a high tempeiature, with caloric, as we did with the oxyd of manganese. Emily. Can atmospherical air be rccomposed by mixing due proportions of oxygen and nitrogen gasses ? Mr*. B. Yes : if about one-fourth of oxygen gas be mixed with three fourths of nitrogen gas, atmospher- ical air is produced. Emily. The air then must be an oxyd of nitrogen ? Mr--. B. No, my dear ; for there must be a chemi- cal combination between oxygen and nitrogen in order to produce an oxyd ; whilst in the atmosphere these two substances are separately combined with caloric, form- ing two distinct gasses, which are simply mixed in the formation of'he atmosphere.* • Thi«, at least, seems to be the prevailing opinion. Yet it has been queftioned by some chemists, particularly of late, whether the union of oxygen and nitrogen in the atmosphere be not a true chemical combination. 82 I shall say nothing more of oxygen and nitrogen at pre- sent, as we shall continually have occasion to refer to them in our future conversations. They are both very abundant in nature ; nitrogen is the most plentiful in the atmosphere, and exists also in all animal substances ; oxygen forms a constituent part, both of animal and veg- etable kingdoms, from which it may be obtained by a variety of chemical means. But it is now time to con- clude our lesson. I am afraid you have learnt more to day than you will be able to remember. Caroline. I assure you that I have been too much interested in it, ever to forget it; as for nitrogen, there seems to be but little to remember about it : it makes a very insignificant figure in comparison to oxygen, al- though it composes a much larger portion of the atmos- phere. Mr*. B. It will not appear so insignificant when you are better ^acquainted with it; for though it seems to perform but a passive part in the atmosphere, and has no very striking properties when considered in its sepa- rate state, yet you will see by and by what a very im- portant agent it becomes, when combined with other bodies. But no more of this at present ; we must re- serve it for its proper place.. CoMjenrntion vi. On Hydrogen. he next simple body we come to is iiydkogkn. vible ?V kHKl °f a suUtance« th*t i is it also invi- B3 Mr*. B. Yes; we cannot obtain hydrogen in its pure concrete state. We are acquainted with it only in its gaseous form, as we are with oxygen and nitro- gen. Caroline. But in its gaseous state it cannot be called a simple substance, since it is combined with caloric. Airs. B. True-, my dear ; but as we do not know in nature of any substance which is not more or less combined with caloric, we are apt to say, (rather incor- rectly indeed) that a substance is in its pure state, when combined with caloric only. Hydrogen is derived from two Greek words, the meaning of which is to produce water. Emily. And how does hydrogen produce water ? Mrs. B. Water is composed of 85 parts, by weight, t)f oxygen, chemically combined with 15 parts of hy- drogen gas, or (as it was formerly called) inflamable air. Caroline. Really ! is it possible that water should be a combination of two gasses, and that one of them should be inflamable air ? It must be a most extra- ordinary gas, that will produce both fire and water ! Mrs. B. Hydrogen, I assure you, though a consti- tuent part of water, is one of the most combustible sub- stances in nature. Emily. But I thought you said that combustiow could take place in no gas but oxygen ? Airs. B. ^ Do you recollect what the process of com- bustion consists in ? Emily. In the combination of a body with oxygen, with disengagement of light and heat. Mrs. B. Therefore, when I say that hydrogen is combustible, I mean that it has an affinity for oxygen ; but like all other combustible substances, it cannot burn unless supplied with oxygen, and heated to a proper temperature. Curoline. But I cannot conceive how, by mixing fifteen parts of it, with eighty-five parts of oxygen gas, the two gasses can be converted into water. 84 Mrs. B. The simply mixing these proportions of oxygen and hydrogen gasses, will not produce water ; because the great quantity of caloric to which they owe gaseous form would prevent their bases from coining into contact, and entering into chemical combination ; besides, water is a much denser fluid than gas, and therefore it is necessary, in order to reduce these gasses to a liquid, to diminish the quantity of caloric. Can you think of any means of accomplishing this ? Caroline. By putting a colder body in contact with the gasses, which would take some of their caloric from them. Mr*. B. That would lower the temperature of the gas ; but could not affect the caloric that is chemically combined with the basis. Caroline True ; I forgot, that in order to separate caloric from a body with which it is chemically combin- ed, a decomposition must take place ; but I cannot ima- gine how this is effected. Mrs. B. A decomposition can be effected only by superior attractions which produce new combinations. At a certain temperature, oxygen will abandon its ca- loric to combine with hydrogen ; if, therefore, we raise it to that temperature, the oxygen will combine with the hydrogen, and set its own caloric at liberty ; and it is thus that the combustion of hydrogen gas pro. duces water. Caroline. You love to deal in paradoxes to-day, Mrst B.—Fire then produces water ! Mr* B. The combustion of hydrogen gas certain- ly does; but you do not seem to have remembered the theory of combustion so well as you thought you would Can you tell me what happens in the combus- tion of hydrogen gas ? Caroline. The hydrogen gas combines with the basis of the oxygen gas, and the caloric of the latter is disenga- ged.--Yes, I think, 1 understand it now : the caloric of the oxygen gas being set at liberty, and the basis of the two gasses coming into contact, they combine, and con- dense into a liquid. 85 Emily. But does all the caloric, produced by the combustion of hydrogen gas, proceed from the oxygen gas? Mr*. B That is a doubtful point; but I rather be- lieve that in this, as probably in every o'her instance of combustion, some portion of heat and light is disengag- ed by the combustible itself. Emily. Water then, I suppose, when it evaporates and incorporates with the atmosphere, is decomposed and converted into hydrogen and oxygen gasses ? Mr*. B. No my dear; there you are quite mis- taken : the decomposition of water is totally different from its evaporation ; for in the latter case (as you should recollect) water is only in a state of very minute division; and is merely suspended in the atmosphere, without any chemical combination, and without any separation of its constituent parts. As long as these remain combined, they form water, whether in a state of liquidity, or in that of an elastic fluid, as vapour, or under the solid form of ice. In our experiments on latent heat, you may recollect that we caused water successively to pass through these three forms, merely by an increase or diminution of caloric, without employing any power of attraction, or effecting any decomposition. Caroline. But are there no means of decomposing water ? Airs. B. Yes, several: charcoal, and metals, when heated red hot, will attract the oxygen from water in the same manner, as they will from the atmosphere ; but in this process there is no disengagement of calor- ic, as that which the oxygen abandons, instead of be- coming sensible, combines immediately with the hy- drogen, which it converts into gas, and carries off in that form. Caroline. So, then, the quantity of caloric that was employed in maintaining the combined substances in a liquid form, is just sufficient to convert the hydrogen singly, into a gas. Mrs. B. That is a very ingenious inference; but I doubt whether it is strictly accurate, as the hot body 16 (whether charcoal or metal) by means of which the water is decomposed, supplies, in cooling, a portion of the caloric which enters into the formation of the gas. Emily. Water, then, may be resolved into a solid substance and a gas; the oxyen being condensed into a solid, by the loss of caloric, and the hydrogen ex- panded into a gas, by the acquisiton of it. Mr*. B. Very well; but remember that the basis of the oxygen gas, or what you call solid oxygen, can never be obtained alone ; it can be separated from the hydrogen only by combining it with some other body fonwhich it has a greater affinity. Caroline. Hydrogen, I see, is like nitrogen, a poor dependant friend of oxygen, which is continually for- saken for greater favourites. Mr*. JB. The connection, or friendship, as you choose to call it,' is much more intimate between oxygen and hydrogen, in the state of water, than between oxygen and nitrogen, in the atmosphere ; for in the iirst case, there is a chemical union and condensation of the two substances ; in the latter they are simply mixed to- gether in their gaseous state. You will find, however, that, in some cases, nitrogen is quite as intimately con- nected with oxygen, as hydrogen is.—But this is for- eign to our present subject. Emily. Water, then, is an oxyd, though the at- mospherical air is not ? Mrs. B. It is not commonly called an oxyd, though according to our definition, it may, no doubt, be refer- red to that class of bodies. Caroline. I should like extremely to see water de- composed. Mrs. B. I can easily gratify your curiosity by a much more easy process than the oxydation of char- coal or metal; the decomposition of water by these latter means, take up a great deal of time, and is at- tended with much trouble ; for it is necessary that the charcoal or metal should be made red hot in a furnace, that the water should pass over them in a state of va- /Vft/r VI PaffC 87 Brairvby the. Author DoelMfoJo Enyrarrd /or Increase Cook &cC?JVeu' Haverv. 87 pour, that the gas formed should be collected over the water-bath, kc. In short it is a very complicated affair.- But the same effect may be produced with the great- est facility, by adding some suljbhuric acid (a substance with the nature of which you are not yet acquainted), to the water which the metal is to decompose. The acid disposes the metal to combine with the oxygen of the water so readily and abundantly, that no heat is requir- ed to hasten the process. Of this I am going to show you an instance.—I put into this bottle the water that is to be decomposed, the metal that is to effect that de- composition by combining with the oxygen, and the acid which is to facilitate the combination of the metal and the oxygen. You will see with what violence these will act on each other. Caroline. But what metal is it that you employ tor this purpose ? # . . Mrs. B. It is iron ; and it is used in the state ot filings, as these present a greater surface to the acid than a solid piece of metal. For, as it is the surface of the metal which is I'.cted upon by the acid, and is dis- posed to receive the oxygen produced by the decompo- sition of the water, it necessarily follows that the great- er is the surface, the more considerable is the effect. The hubbies which are now rising are hydrogen gas— Caroline. How disagreeably it smells 1 Mrs. B. It is indeed unpleasant, but not unwhole- some. We shall not, however, suffer any more to es- cape, as it will be wanted for experiments. I shall therefore collect it in a glass receiver, by making it pass through this bent tube, which will conduct it into the water-baih. (Plate VI. Fig. 11.) . . Emily: How very rapidly the gas escapes, it is PLATE VI. Fig xi. Apparatus for preparing and collecting hydrogen gas. Fie 12 Receiver full of hydrogen gas inverted over water. Fig 13'. Slow combuftion of hydrogen gas. Fig. 14- Appara- tus for illuflrating the formation of water by the combuftion of hydrogen gas. Fig 15- Apparatus for producing harmonic founds by the combuftbn of hydrogen gas. 88 perfectly transparent, and without any colour whatever —Now the receiver is full— Airs. B. We shall therefore remove it and substi- tute another in its place. But you must observe, that when the receiver is full, k h necessary to keep it in- verted with the mouth under water, otherwise the gaa would escape. And in order that it may not be in the way, I introduce within the bath under the water, a saucer, into which I slide the receiver, so that it can be taken out of the bath and conveyed any where, the water in the saucer being equally effectual in prevent- ing its escape as that in the bath. (Plate VI. Fig. 12.) Emily. I am quite surprised to see what a large quantity of hydrogen gas can be produced by such a small quantity of water, especially as oxygen is the principal constituent of water. Mrs. B. In weight it is : but not in volume. For though the proportion, by weight, is nearly six parts of oxygen to one of hydrogen, yet the proportion of the volume of the gasses, is about one part of oxygen, to two of hydrogen ; so much heavier is the former than the latter. Caroline. But why is the vessel in which the water is decomposed so hot ? As the water changes from a liquid to a gaseous form, cold should be produced in- stead of heat. Mr*. B. No ; for if one of the constituents of water is converted into a gas, the other becomes solid in com- bining with the metal; and the caloric which the oxy- gen loses by being thus rendered solid, is just sufficient to transform the hydrogen into a gas. Emily. In this case, neither heat nor cold would be produced ; for the caloric disengaged from the oxygen, being immediately combined with the hydrogen, can- not become sensible ? Mrs. B. That is very true ; but the sensible heat which is disengaged in this operation is not owing to the decomposition of the water, but to an extrication of latent heat produced by the mixture of water and sulphuric acid, as you saw in a former experiment. If I now set the hydrogen gas, which is contained 89 in this receiver, at liberty all at once, and kindle it as soon as it comes in contact with the atmosphere, by presenting it to a candle, it will so suddenly and rapid- ly decompose the oxygen gas, by combining with its basis, that an explosion, or a detonation (as chemists commonly call it), will be produced. For this purpose I need only take up the recsiver, and quickly present its open mouth to the candle-----so..... Caroline. It produced only a sort of hissing noise, with a vivid flush of light. I had expected a much greater report. Mr*. B And so it would have been, had the gasses been closely confined at the moment they were made to explode. If for instance, we were to put in this bot- tle a mixture of hydrogen gas and atmospheric air : and if, after corking the bottle, we should kindle the mix'ure by a very small orifice, from the sudden dilata- tion of the gasses at the moment of their combination, the bottle must either fly to pieces, or the cork be blown out with considerable violence. Caroline. But in the experiment which we have just seen, if you did not kindle the hydrogen gas, would it not equally combine with the oxygen ? Mrs. B Certainly not ; have I not just explained to you the necessity of the oxygen and hydrogen gasses being burnt together, in order to combine chemically and produce water ? Caroline That is true ; but I thought this was a dif- ferent combination, for I see no water produced Mrs. B. The water produced by this detonation was so small in quantity, and in such a state of minute divi- sion, as to be invisible. But water certainly was pro- duced ; for oxygen is incapable of combining with hy- drogen in any other proportions than those that form water; therefore water must always be the result of their combination If, instead of bringing the hydrogen gas into sudden contact with the atmosphere [as we did just now") so as to make ihe whole of it explode the moment it is kind- led, we allow but a very small surface of gas to burn in contact with the atmosphere, the combustion goes I 2 90 on quietly and gradually at the point of contact, without any detonation, because the surfaces brought together are too small for the immediate union of gasses. The experiment is a very easy one. This phial with a nar- row neck (Plate VI. Fig. 13J, is full of hydrogen gas, and is carefully corked. If I take out the cork, without moving the phial, and quickly approach the candle to the orifice, you will see how different the re- sult will be— Emily. How prettily it burns, with a blue flame ! The flame is gradually sinking within the phial—now it has entirely disappeared. But does not this combus- tion likewise produce water ? Mr* B. Undoubtedly. In order to make the for- mation of water sensible to you, I shall procure a fresh supply of hydrogen gas, by putting into this bottle (Plate VI. Fig. \4.) iron filings, water, and sulphuric acid, materials similar to those which we have just used for the same purpose. I shall then cork up the lxittle, leaving only a small orifice in the cork, with apiece of glass tube fixed to it, through which the gas will issue in a continued rapid stream. Caroline. I hear already the hissing of the gas, through the tube, and I can feel a strong current against my hand. Mrs. B. This current I am going to kindle with the candle—see how vividly it burns— Emily. It bums like a candle with a long flame.— But why does this combustion last so much longer than. in the former experiment ? Mr*. B. The combustion goes on uninterruptedh/ as long as the new gas continues to be produced. Now if I invert this receiver over the flame, you will soon perceive its internal surface covered with a very fine dew, which is pure water— Caroline Yes, indeed ; the glass is now quite dim with moisture ! How glad I am that we can see the vva» ter produced by this combustion. Emily. It is exactly what 1 was anxious to see ; for 1 confess I was a little incredulous. 91 Mr*. B. If I had not held the glass-bell over the flame, the water would have escaped in the state of va- pour, as it djd in the former experiment. We have here, of course, obtained but a very small quantity of water ; but the difficulty of procuring a proper appara- tus, with sufficient quantities of gasses, prevents my shewing it to you on a large scale. The composition of water was discovered about the same period, both by Mr. Cavendish, in this country, and by the celebrated French chemist Lavoisier- The latter invented a very perfect and ingenious apparatus to perform w ith great accuracy, and upon a large scale, the formation of water by the combination of oxygen and hydrogen gisses. Two tubes, conveying due pro- portions, the one of oxygen, the other of hydrogen gas, are inserted at opposite sides of a large globe of glass, previously exhausted of air ; the two streams of gas are kindled within the globe, by the electric spark, at the point where they come in contact; they burn to~ gether, that is to say, the hydrogen gas combines with the basis of the oxygen gas, the caloric of which is set at liberty ; and a quantity of water is produced, exactly equal in weight to that of the two gasses introduced into' the globe. Carroline. And what was the greatest quantity of wa- ter ever formed in this apparatus ? Mr*. B. Several ounces ; indeed, very near a pound, if I recollect right; but the operation lasted many days. Kmily This experiment must have convinced all the world of the truth of the discovery. Pray, if im- proper proportions of the gasses were mixed and set fire to, what would be the result ? Mrs. B. Water would be equally formed, but there would be a residue of either one or other of the gasses, because as I have already told you, hydrogen and oxy- gen will combine only in the proportions requisite for the formation of water. There is another curious effect produced by the com- bustion of hydrogen gas, which 1 shall shew you, though I must acquaint you first, th.it 1 cannot well ex- 92 plain the cause of it, for this purpose, I must puj«ome more materials into our apparatus, in order to obtain a stream of hydrogen gas, just as we have done before. The process is already going on, and the gas is rushing . through the tube—I shall now kindle it with the taper. Emily. It burns exactly as it did before-----What is the curious effect which you were mentioning ? Airs. B. Instead of the receiver, by mean of which we have just seen the drops of water form, we shall in- vert overt the flame this piece of twbe, which is about two feet in length, and one inch in diameter (Plate VI. Fig. \5.) but you must observe that it is open at both ends. Emily. What a strange noise it makes ! something like the jEolian harp, but not so sweet. Caroline. It is very singular, indeed; but I think rather too powerful to be pleasing. And is not this sound accounted for ? Mr*. B. That the percussion of glass, by a rapid stream of gas, should produce a sound, is not extraor- dinary ; but the sound is here so peculiar, that no oth- er gas has a similar effect Perhaps it is owing to a brisk vibratory motion ol the glass occasioned by the successive formation and condension of small drops of water on the sides of the glass tube, and the air rushing in to replace the vacuum formed.* Caroline. How very much this flame resembles the burning of a candle ! Mrs. B. The burning of a candle is produced by much the same means. A great deal of hydrogen is contained in candles, whether of tallow or wax. This hydrogen being converted into gas by the heat of the can- dle combines with the oxygen of the atmosphere, and flame and water result from this combination. So that, in iact, tlie flame of a candle is nothing but the com- bu 1 .n of hydrogen gas. An elevation of temperature, sueh as is produced by a lighted match or taper, is re- quired to give the first impulse to the combustion ; but 93 afterwards it goes on of itself, because the candle finds- a supply of caloric in the successive quantites of chem- ical heat which becomes sensible by the combination of the two gasses. But there are other accessary circum- stances connected with the combustion of candles and lamps, which I cannot explain to you till you are ac- quainted with carbone, which is one ef their constituent parts. In general, however, whenever you see flame, you may infer that it is owing to the formation and burn- ing of hydrogen gas ; for flame is the peculiar mode of burning of hydrogen gas ; which, with only one or two apparent exceptions, does not belong to any other combustible. Emily. You astonish me ! I understood that flame was the caloric abandoned by the basis of the oxygen gas, in all combustions whatever ? Mr*. B. Your error proceeded from your vague and incorrect idea of flame ; you have confounded it with Jight and caloric in general. Flame always implies caloric, since it is produced by the combustion ofhodro- gen gas; but all caloric does not imply flame. Ma- ny bodies burn with intence heat without producing flame. Coals, for instance, burn with flame until all the hydrogen which they contain is evaporated ; but when they afterwards become red hot, much more ca- loric is disengaged than when they produce flame. Caroline. But the iron wire, which you burnt in ox- ygen gas, appeared to me to emit flame ; yet as it was a simple metal, it could contain no hydrogen ? Mr*. B It produced a sparkling dazzling blaze of light, but no realflame. Emily. And what is the cause of the regular shape of the flame of a candle ? Mr*. B. The regular stream of hydrogen gas which - exhales from its combustible matter. Caroline. But the hydrogen gas must from its great levity, ascend into the upper regions of the atmosphere; why therefore does not the flame continue to accompa- ny it ? Airs. B. The combustion of the hydrogen gas is completed at the point where the flame terminates; 94 it then ceases to be hydrogen gas, as it is converted by its combustion into watery vapour ; but in a state of such minute division as to be invisible. Caroline. I do not understand what is the use of the wick of a candle ; since the hydrogen gas burns so well without it ? Mr*. B. The combustible matter of the candle must be decomposed in order to emit the hydrogen gas, and the wick is instrumental in effecting this decomposi- tion. Its combustion first melts the combustible matter, and...... Caroline. But in lamps the combustible matter is al- ready fluid, and yet they also require wicks ? Mrs B. I was going to add that, afterwards, the burning wick (by the power of capillary attraction) grad- ually draws up the fluid to the point where combustion takes place ; for you must have observed, that the wick does not burn quite to the bottom. Caroline. Yes ; but I do not understand why it does not. Mr*. B. Because the air has not so free an access to that part of the wick which is immediately in contact with the candle, as to that part just above, so that the heat there is not sufficient to produce its decomposition; the combustion therefore begins a little above this point. But we dwell too long on a subject which you cannot yet thoroughly understand —I have another experiment to shew you with hydrogen gas, which I think will en- tertain you. Have you ever blown bubbles with soup and water ? Emily. Yes, often, when I was a child ; and I used to make them float in the air by blowing them upwards. Mr*. B. We shall fill some such bubbles with hy- drogen gas, instead of atmospheric air, and you will see with what ease and rapidity they will ascend, with- out the assistance of blowing, from the lightness of the gas—Will you mix some soap and water whilst I fill this bladder with the gas contained in the receiver which stands on the shelf in the water-bath ? Caroline. What is the use of the brass stopper and turn-cock at the top of the receiver ? P/a/r III Pftt/e 95 Ij 1.1 if n M- /'-■ tin her. /:'"•/■■ !iiW '. •/■ In iv;ise Cool 7////«//e//t of Sulphur I'rtr/r ff.O Fiff.2(?. /Jfcmiptwiiou of' wutcr far Gir&eHit. t;v tii^tuth^i: 99 than common sulphur reduced to a very fine powder by a process called sublimation.—You see some of it in this phial; it is exactly the same substance as this lump of sulphur, only its colour is a paler yellow, owing to its state of very minute division. Emily. Pray what is sublimation ? Airs. B. It is the evaporation, or, more properly speaking, the volatilization of solid substances, which, in cooling, condense again in a concrete form. The pro- cess, in this instance, must be performed in a closed vessel, both to prevent combustion, which would take place, if the access of air was not carefully precluded, and likewise in order to collect the substance after the operation. As it is rather a slow process, we shall not try the experiment now ; but you will understand it per- fectly if I show you the apparatus used for the purpose (Plate VIII. Fig. \8.) Sovne lumps of sulphur are put into a receiver of this kind which is called a cucurbit. Its shape, vou see, somewhat resembles that of a pear, and is open at the top so as to adapt itself exactly to a kind of conical receiver of this sort called the head. The cucuioit, thus covered with its head, is placed over a sand bath ; .'.is is nothing more than a vessel full of sand, which is kept heated by a furnace, such as you see here, so as to preserve the apparatus in a moderate and uniform temperature. The sulphur then soon begins to melt, and immediately after this a thick white smoke rises, which is gradually deposited witbii the head, or upper part of the apparatus, where it condenses against the sides, somewhat in the form of a vegetation, whence it has obtained the name of flowers of sulphur. This apparatus, which is called an alembic, is highly useful in all kinds of distillations, ns you will nee when we come to treat of those^ opera- tion?. Alembics are not commonly made of glass, like this, which is applicable only to distillations upon PLATE VIII. Fig. 18. A. Alembic. B. Sand-bath. C. Furnace. Fig. 19. Fudiometer, Fig. ao- A Retort containing water. B- Lamp to heat the water. C. C. Porcelain tube containing Carbone. D. Furnace through which the tube passes. E. Receives for the ga* produced. F. Water-hath. 100 a very small scale. Those used in manufactures are generally made of copper, and are of course consider- ably larger. The principal construction, however, is always the same, although their shape admits of some variation. Caroline. What is the use of that neck, or tube, which bends down from the upper piece of the appara- tus ? Mr*. B. It is of no use in sublimations ; but in dis- tillations (the general object of which is to evaporate, by heat, in closed vessels, the volatile parts of a com- pound body, and to condense them again into a liquid} it serves to carry off the condensed fluid, which other- wise would fall back into the cucurbit. But this is rath- er foreign to our present subject. Let us return to the sulphur. You now perfectly understand, I suppose, what is meant by sublimation ? Emily. I believe I do. Sublimation appears to con- sist in destroying, by means of heat, the attraction of aggregation of the particles of a solid body, which are thus volatilized; and as soon as they lose the caloric which produced that effect, they are deposited in the form of a fine powder. Caroline. It seems to me to be somewhat similar to the transformation of water into vapour, which returns to its liquid state when deprived of caloric. Emily. There is this difference, however, that the sulphur does not return to its former state, since, instead of lumps, it changes to a fine powder. Mr*. B. Chemically speaking, it is exactly the same substance, whether in the form of lump or powder. For if this powder be melted again by heat, it will in cool- ing, be restored to the same solid state in which it was before its sublimation. Caroline. But if there be no real change produced by the sublimation of the sulphur, what is the use of that operation ? Mrs. B. It divides the sulphur into very minute parts, and thus disposes it to enter more readily into condi- tion with other bodies. It is used also as a means of purification. 101 Caroline. Sublimation appears to me like the begin- ning of combustion, for the completion of which one circumstance only is wanting, the absorption of oxygen. Mr* B But that circumstance is everything. No essential alteration is produced in sulphur by sublima- tion ; whilst in combustion it combines with the oxygen and forms a new compound totally different in every respect from sulphur in its pure state.—We shall now burn some sulphur, and you will see how very differ- ent the result will be. For this purpose I put a small quantity of flowers of sulphur into this cup, and place it in a dish, into which I have poured a little water ; 1 now set fire to the sulphur with the point of this hot wire; for its combustion will not begin unless its tem- perature be considerably raised.—You see that it burns with a faint blueish flame ; and as I invert over it this receiver, white fumes arise from the sulphur and fill the vessel—You will soon perceive that the water is rising within the receiver, a little above its level in the plate. __Well, Emily, can you account for this ? Emily. I suppose that the sulphur has absorbed the oxygen from the atmospherical air within the receiver ; and that we shall find some oxygenated sulphur in the cup. And for the white smoke, I am quite at a loss to guess what it may be Mrs. B. Your first conjecture is very right; but you are quite mistaken in the last ; for nothing will be left in the cup. The white vapour is the oxygenated sul- phur which assumes the form of an elastic fluid of a pungent and offensive smell, and is a powerful acid. Here you see a chemical combination of oxygen and sulphur, producing a true gas, which would continue such under the pressure and at the temperature of the atmosphere, if it did not unite with the water in the plate, to which it imparts its-acidJtaste and ail its acid properties.—You see, now, with what curious effects the combustion of sulphur is attended. Caroline. This is something quite new ; and I con- fess that I do not perfectly understand why the sulphur turns acid Mr*. B. It is because it unites with oxygen, which ?* the general acidifying principle. And, indeed, the 102 word oxygen, is derived from two Greeks words signi- fying toproduce an acid* Caroline. Why then is not water, which contains such a quantity of oxygen, acid ? Mrs. B. Because hydrogen, which is the other con- stituent of water, is not susceptible of acidification. I believe it will be necessary, before we proceed fur- ther, to say a few words of the general nature of acids, though it is rather a deviation from our plan of examin- ing the simple bodies separately, before we consider them in a state of combination. Acids may be considered as a peculiar class of burnt bodies, which during their combustion, or combina- tion, with oxygen, have acquired very characteristic properties. They are chiefly discernable by their sour taste, and by turning red most of the blue vegetable colours. These two properties are common to the whole class of acids : but each of them is distinguished by other peculiar qualities. Every acid consists of some particular substance which constitutes its bases, and is different in each), and of oxygen, which is common to them all. 'Emily. But I do not clearly see the difference be- tween acids and oxyds ? Mr*. B. Acids were, in fact, oxyds, which, by tlie addition of a sufficient quantity of oxygen, have been converted into acids. For acidification, you must ob- serve, always implies previous oxydation, as a body must have combined with the quantity of oxygen requi- site to constitute it an oxyd, before it can combine with the greater quantity that is necessary to render it an acid. Caroline. Are all oxyds capable of being converted into acids ? Mr*. B. Very far from it; it is only certain sub- stances which villi enter into that peculiar kind of union with oxygen that produces acids, and the number of these is proportionally very small; but all burnt bodies may be considered as belonging either to the class oi oxyds, or to that of acids. At a future period, we shall enter more at large upon this subject. At present, I 103 have but one circumstance further to point out to your observation respecting acids: it is, that most of them are susceptible of two degrees of acidification, accord- ing to the different quantities of oxygen with which their basis combines. Emily. And how are these two degrees of acidifica- tion distinguished ? Mr* B By the peculiar properties that result from them. The acid we have just made is the first or weak- est degree of acidification, and is called sulphurous acid; if it were fully saturated with oxygen, it would be call- ed sulphuric acid. You must therefore remember, that in this, as in all acids, the first degree of acidification is expressed by the termination in ow«; the stronger, by the termination in ic. Caroline. And how is the sulphuric acid made ? Mrs. B. By burning sulphur in pure oxygen gas, and thus rendering its combustion much more complete. I have provided some oxygen gas for this purpose ; it is in that bottle, but we must first decant the gas into the glass receiver which stands on the shelf in the bath, and is full of water. Caroline. Pray, let me try to do it,Mrs B. ? Mrs. B. It requires some little dexterity—hold the bottle completely under water, and do not turn the mouth upwards, till it is immediately under the aper- ture in the shelf, through which the gas is to pass into the receiver, and then turn it up gradually.—Very well, you have only let a few bubbles escape, and that must be expected at a first trial—Now I shall put this piece of sulphur into the receiver, through the opening at the top, and introduce along with it a small piece of lighted tinder to set fire to it. This requires being done very quickly, lest the atmospherical air should get in, and mix with the pure o ygen gas. Emily. How beautiiully it bums 1 Caroline. But it is already buried in the thick va- pour. This I suppose is sulphuric acid ? Emily. Are these acids always in a gaseous state ? Mr*. B- Sulphurous acid, as we have already ob- served, is a permanent gas, and can be obtained in a trJ* liquid form only by condensing it in water. _ In its p'jr? Btate, the sulphurous acid is invisible, and it appears in the form of white smoke, only from its combining with the moisture. But the vapour of sulphuric acid, which you have just seen to rise during the combustion, is not a gas, but only a vapour, which condenses into liquid sulphuric acid, merely by losing its caloric. And this condensation is much hastened and promoted by receiv- ing the vapour into cold water ; which may afterwards -be separated from the acid by evaporation. Before we quit the subject of sulphur, I must tell you that it is susceptible of combining with a great variety of substances, and especially with hydrogen, with which you are already acquainted. Hydrogen gas can dissolve a small portion of it Emily. What; can a gas dissolve a solid substance ? Mr* B. Yes ; a solid substance may be so minute- ly divided by heat, as to become soluble in a gas ; and there are several instances of it. But you must ob- serve that, in this case, a chemical solution, that is to say, a combination of the sulphur with the hydrogen gas, is produced. In order to effect this, the sulphur must be strongly heated in contact with the gas: the heat reduces the sulphur to such a state of extreme division, and diffuses it so thoroughly through the gasj that they combine and incorporate together. And as a proof that there must be a chemical union between the sulphur and the gas, it is sufficient to remark, that they are not separated when the sulphur loses the ca- loric by which it was volatilized. Besides, it is evi- dent, from the peculiar fetid smell of this gas, that it is a new compound totally different from either of its constituents ; it is called sulphurated hydrogen gas, and is contained in great abundance in sulphurous mineral waters. Caroline. Are not the Harrogate waters of this na- ture ? Mrs B. Yes ; they are naturally impregnated with sulphurated hydrogen gas, and there are many other springs of the same kind ; which shews that this gas must often be formed in the bowels of the earth by spontaneous processes of nature. 105 Caroline. And could not such waters be made artifi- cially by impregnating common water with this gas ? Mr*. B. Yes ; they can be so well imitated as per- fectly to resemble the Harrogate waters. Sulphur combines likewise with phosphorus, and with the alkalies, and alkaline earths, substances with which you are yet unacquainted. We cannot therefore enter into these combinations at present. In our next lesson we shall treat of phosphorus Emily. May we not begin that subject to-day ; this lesson has been so short ? Mrs. B. I have no objection, if you are not tired. What do you say, Caroline ? Caroline. I am as desirous as Emily of prolonging the lesson to day, especially as we are to enter on a new subject ; for I confess that sulphur has not appear- ed to me so interesting as the other simple bodies. Mrs. B. Perhaps you may find phosphorus more entertaining. You must not, however, be discouraged when you meet with some parts of a study less amus- ing than others ; it would answer no good purpose to select the most pleasing parts, since, if we did not pro- ceed with some method, in order to acquire a general idea of the whole, we could scarcely expect to take in- terest in any particular subjects PHOSPHORUS. Phosphorus is a simple substance that was former- ly unknown. It was first discovered by Brandt, a chem- ist of Hamburgh, whilst employed in researches after the philosopher's stone ; but the method of obtaining it remained a secret till it was a second time discovered both by Kunckel and Boyle, in the year 1680. You sec a specimen of phosphorus in this phial; it is gen- erally moulded into small sticks of a yellowish colour, as you find it here. 106 Xlaroline. I do not understand in what the discovery consisted ; there may be a secret method of making a composition, but a simple body cannot be made, it can only he found. Airs. B. But a body may exist in nature so closely combined with other substances, as to elude the obser- vation of chemists, or render it extremely difficult to obtain it in its simple state. This is the case with phos- phorus, which is always so intimately combined with other substances, that its existence remained unnoticed till Brandt discovered the means of obtaining it free from all combinations. It is found in all animal sub- stances, and is now chiefly extracted from bones, by a chemical process. It exists also in some plants, that bear a strong analogy to animal mailer in their chemical composition. Emily. But is it never found in its simple state ? Mr*. B. Never, and this is the reason of its having remained so long undiscovered. Emily. It is possible, then, that in course or time other new simple bodies may be discovered ? Airs. B. Undoubtedly : and we may also learn that some of those, which we now class among the simple bodies, may, in fact, be compound ; indeed, you will soon find that discoveries, of this kir.o. are by no means unfrequent. Phosphorus is eminently combustiuio ; it nie'ls and takes fire at the temperature of 1C0°; andabsoibsin its combustion nearly once and a half ns own weight of oxygen. Caroline. What! will a pounci of phosphorus con- sume a pound and a half »-f oxygen r Mrs. B. '-oh appears from accurate experiments. lean show you with v\hat violence it combines with oxygen, by burning some of it in that gas. We must manage the experiment in the same manner as we did the combustion of sulphur.—-You see I am obliged to cut this little bit of phosphorus under water, otherwise there would be danger of its taking fire by the heat of my fingers —I now put it into the receiver, and kindle it by means of a hot wire. 107 Emily. What a blaze ! I can hardly look at it. f* never saw any thing so brilliant. Does it not hurt your eyes, Caroline ? Caroline. Yes; but still I cannot help looking at it. A prodigious quantity of oxygen must indeed be absorbed, when so much light and caloric are disen- gaged ! Mrs. B. In the combustion of a pound of phospho- rus, a sufficient quantity of caloric is art free to melt upwards of a hundred pounds of ice ; thi.-; has been computed by direct experiments with the calorimeter. Emily. And is the result of this combus ion, like that of sulphur, an acid ? Mrs. B. Yts; phosphoric acid. And had we du- ly proportioned the phosphorus and the oxygen, they would have been completely converted into phosphoric acid, weighing together, in this new state, exactly the sum of their weights sepau.iely. The water would have ascended into the receiver, on account of the va- cuum formed and would hove filled it entirely. In this case, as in the combustion of sulphur, the acid vapour formed is absorbed and condensed in the water of the receiver. But when this combustion is perform- ed without any water or moisture being present, the acid then appears in the form of concrete whitish flakes, which are, however, extiemely ready to melt upon the least admission of moisture. Emily. Does phosphorus, in burnjng in atmospher- ical air, produce, like sulphur, a weaker sort of the same acid ? M, s. IJ. No ; for it burns in atmospherical air near- ly at the same temperature, as in pure oxygen gas; and it is, in both cases, so strongly disposed to com- bine with the oxygen, that the combustion is perfect, and the product similar ; only in atmospherical air, be- ing less rapidly supplied with oxygen, the process is performed in a slower manner. Caroline. But !s there no method of acidifying phos- phorus in a slighter manner ; so as to form phosphorus acid ? Mr*. B. Yes, there is. When simply exposed tc 108 the atmosphere, phosphorus undergoes a kind of slow combustion at any temperature above zero. Emily. But is not the process in this case, rather an oxydation than a combustion ? For if the oxygen is too slowly absorbed for a sensible quantity of light and heat to be disengaged, it is not a true combustion. Mrs. B. The case is not as you suppose ; a faint light is emitted which is very discernible in the dark ; but the heat evolved is not sufficiently strong to be sen- sible ; a whitish vapour-arises from this combustion, which uniting with water, condenses into liquid phos- phorus acid. Caroline. Is it not very singular that phosphorus should bum at so low a temperature in atmospherical air, whilst it does not burn in pure oxygen without the application of heat ? Airs. B. So it at first appears. But this circum- stance seems to be owing to the r.itrogen gas of the atmosphere. This gas dissolves small particles of phos- phorus, which being thus minutely divided and diffus- ed in the atmospherical air. combines with the oxygen, and undergoes this slow combustion. But the same ef- fect does not take place in oxygen gas, because it is not capable of dissolving phosphorus ; it is therefore ne- cessary, in this case, that heat should be applied to ef- fect that division of particles, which, in the former in- stance, is produced by the nitrogen. Emily. I have# seen letters written with phosphorus, which are invisible by day-light, but may be read in the dark by their own light. They look as if they were written with fire ; yet they do not seem to burn. Mrs. B. But they do really burn ; for it is by their slow combustion that the light is emitted ; and phos- phorus acid is the result of this combustion. Phosphorus is sometimes used as a test to estimate the purity of atmospherical air. For this purpose, it is burnt in a graduated tube called an eudiometer, (Plate VIII. Fig \9.) and from the} quantity of air which the phosphorus absorbs, the prepcrtion of oxygen in the air examined, is deduced ; for the phosphorus will absord all the oxygen, and the nitrogen alone will re- main. 109 Emily. And the more oxygen is contained in the atmosphere, the purer I suppose it is esteemed ? Mrs. B. Certainly. Phosphorus, when melted, combines with a great variety of substances. With sulphur it forms a'compound so extremely combusti- ble, that it immediately takes fire on coming in contact with the air. It is with this composition that the phos- phoric matches are prepared, which kindle as soon as they are taken out of their case and are exposed to the air. Emily. I have a box of these curious matches ; but I have observed, that in very cold weather, they will not take fire without being previously rubbed. Airs. B. By rubbing them you raise their tempera- ture ; for you know, friction is one of the means of ex- tricating heat. Emily. Will phosphorus combine with hydrogen gas, as sulphur does ? Mrs. B. Yes; and the compound gas which re- sults from this combination has a smell still more fetid than the sulphurated hydrogen ? it resembles that of garlic. The phos/i/iorated hydrogen gas has this remarkable peculiarity, that it takes fire spontaneously in the at- mosphere at any temperature. It is thus that are pro- duced those transient flames, or flashes of light, called by the vulgar Will-of-the-Wisp, or more properly Ignes- Fatui, which are often seen in church yards, and places where the putrefaction of animal matter exhales phos- phorus and hydrogen gas.' Caroline. Country people, who are so much fright- ened by those appearances, would soon be reconciled to them, if they knew from what a simple cause they proceed. Airs. B. There are other combinations of phospho- tus that have also very singular properties, particularly that which results from its union with lime. Emily. Is there any name to distinguish the com- bination of two simple substances, like phosphorus and lime, neither of which are oxygen, and which there- fore can produce neither an oxyd nor an acid ? L no Mrs. B. The names of such combinations are com- posed from those of their ingredients, merely by a slight change in their termination. Thus we call the combination of sulphur with jime a sulphuret, and that of phosphorus, a phosphor-et of lime. This latter com- pound, 1 was going to say, has the singular property of decomposing water, merely by being thrown into it. It effects this by absorbing the oxygen of water, in consequence of which bubbles of hydrogen gas as- cend, holding in solution a small quantity of phospho- rus Emily. These bubbles then are jihosphorated hydro- gen gas ? Mr*. B. Yes ; and they produce the singular ap- pearance of a flash of fire ussuing ffom water, as the hubbies kindle and detonate on the surface of the water, at the instant that they come in contact with the atmos- phere. Caroline. Is not this effect nearly similar to that pro- duced by the combination of phosphorus and sulphur, or, more properly speaking, the phosphoret of sulphur ? Mrs. B. Yes; but the phenomenon appears more extraordinary in this case, from the presence of water and from the gaseous form -of the combustible com- pound. Besides the experiment surprises by its great simplicity. You only throw a piece of phosphoret of lime into a glass of water, and bubbles of fire will im- mediately issue from it. Caroline. Cannot we try the experiment ? Mr*. B. Very easily ; but we must do it in the open air ; for the smell of the phosphorated hydrogen gas is so extremely fetid, that it wcukl be intolerable in the house. But before we leave the room, we may pro- duce, by another process, some bubbles of the same gas, which are much less offensive. There is in this little glass retort a solution of pot- ash in water ; I add to it a small piece of phospho- rus. We must now heat the retort over the lamp, af- ter having engaged its neck under water—you see it begins to boil; in a few minutes bubbles will appear, lit which take fire and detonate as they issue from tire Caroline. There is one—and another. How curi- ous It is '.—But I do not understand how this is produ- cccK ? Mr*. B. It is the consequence of a.display of affin- ities too complicated, I fear, to be made perfectly intel- ligible to you at present. In a few words, the reciprocal action of the potash, phosphorus, caloric, and water, are such that some of the water is decomposed, and the hydrogen thereby formed carries off some minute particles of phospho- rus, with which it forms phosphorated hydrogen gas, a compound which spontaneously takes fire at almost any temperature. ... Emily. What is that circular ring of smoke which slowly rises from each bubble after its detonation . Mrs. B. It consists of water and phosphoric acid in vapour, which are produced by the combustion of the hydrogen and phosphorous. Conservation viil On Carbone, Caroline. To-day, Mrs. B.—I believe we are (o learn the na- ture and properties of car hone This substance js quite new to me ; I never heard it mentioned before. Mr*. B. Not so new as you imagine ; for carbone is nothing more than charcoal in a state of perfect pu> my.- 112 Caroline. B Jt charcoal is made by art, Mrs. B. and a body consisting of one simple substance cannot be fabricated ? Airs. B. You again confound the idea of making a simple body, with that of separating it f.om a com- pound The chemical process by which a simple body is obtained in a state of purity, consist in unmaking the compound in which it is contained, in order to separate from it the simple substance in question. The meth- od by which charcoal is usually obtained, is, indeed, commonly called making it ; but, upon examination, you will find this process to consist simply in separating it from other substances with which it is found combi-. ned in nature. Carbone forms a considerable part of the solid mat* ter of all organized bodies; but it is most abundant in the vegetable creation, and it is chiefly obtained from wood. When the oil and water (which are other constituents of vegetable matter) are evaporated, the black, porous, brittle substance that remains is char- coal. Caroline. But if heat be applied to the wood in or^ der to evaporate the oil and water, will not the tempe- rature of the charcoal be raised so as to make it burn ; and if it combines with oxygen can we any longer call it pure ? Mrs. B. I was going to say, that in this operation,, the air must be excluded. Caroline. How then can the vapour of the oil and water fly off ? Airs. B. In order to produce charcoal in its purest state (which is, even then, but a less imperfect sort of carbone), the operation should be performed in an earth- en retort. Heat being applied to the body of the re-. tort, the evaporable parts of the wood will escape through, its neck, into which no air can penetrate as long as the heated vapour continues to fill it. And if it be wished to collect these volatile products of the wood, this can easily be done by introducing the neck of the retort into the water-bath apparatus, with which, you are acquainted. But the preparation of.commoni 113 eharcoaT, such as is used in kitchens and manufactories is performed on a much larger scale, and by an easier and less expensive process. Emily I have seen the process of making commot* charcoal The wood is ranged on the ground in a pile of a pyramidical form, with a fire undeme th ; the whole is then covered with clay, a few holes only being left for the circulation of air. Mrs. B. These holes are closed as soon as the wood is fairly lighted, so that the combustion is checked, or at least continuesbut in a very, imperfect manner; but the heat produced by it is sufficient to force out and vola- tilize, through the earthly cover, most part of the oily and watery principles of the wood, although it cannot reduce it to ashes; Emily- Is pure carbone as black as charcoal f Mr*. B. The more charcoal is purified, that is to' say, the nearer it approaches to the state of simple* carbone, the deeper its black colour appears ; but the utmost efforts of chemical art, are not able to bring it to its perfect elementary state ; for in that state it is both colourless and transparent, and as different in ap- pearance from charcoal as any substance can possibly be. This ring which I wear on my finger, owes its bril- liancy to a small piece of carbone. Caroline. Surely you are jesting, Mrs. B; Emily. I thought that your ring was diamond ? Mrs. B. It is so. But diamond is-nothing more than carbone in its purest and most perfect state Emily That is astonishing ! Is it possible to see two things apparently more different than diamond and oharcoal ? . Caroline. It is, indeed, eurtous to think that wc adorn ourselves with jewels of charcoal ? Mr*. B. When you are better acquainted with the nature of chrystalization, in which state bodies are gen- erally the purest, you will more readily conceive the possibility of carbone assuming the transparency and: brilliancy of diamond. < m. There are many other substances, consisting chiefly L 2 m ©f carbone, that are remarkably white. Cotton, for in- stance! is almost wholly carbone. Caroline. That I own, I never could have imagin- ed !—But pray, Mrs. B since it is known of what sub- stance diamond and cotton are composed, why should they not be manufactured, or imitated, by some chem- ical process, which would render them much cheaper and more plentiful than the present mode of obtaining them ? Airs. B. You might as well my dear propose that we should make flowers and fruit, nay perhaps even- animals by a chemical process ; for it is known of what these bodies consist, since every thing which we are acquainted with in nature, is formed from the various simple substances that we have enumerated. But you must not suppose that a knowledge of the component parts of a body will in every case enable us to imitate it. It is much less difficult to decompose bodies, and discover of what materials they are made, than it is to recompose them. The first of these processes is call- ed analysis, the last synthesis When we are able to ascertain the nature of a substance by both these me- thods, so that the result of one confirms that of the other, we obtain the most complete knowledge of it that we are capable of acquiring. This is the case with water, with the atmosphere, with most of. the oxyds, acids, and neutral salts, and with many other compounds. But the more complicated combinations of nature, even in the mineral kingdom, are in gene- ral beyond our reach, and any attempt to imitate organ- ized bodies must ever prove fruitless ; their formation is a secret that rests in the bosom of the Creator. You sec, therefore, how vain it would be to attempt the form- ation of cotton by chemical means. But, surely, we have no reason to regret our inability* in this instance, when nature has so clearly pointed a method of obtain- ing it in perfection and abundance. Caroline. I did not imagine that the principle of life could be imitated by the aid of chemistry ; but it did not appear to me ridiculous to suppose that chemists might attain a perfect imitation of inanimate nature. Mrs. B. They have succeeded in this point in a- res variety of iustances ; but, as you justly observe, the- principle of life, or even the minute and intimate or- ganization of the vegetable kingdom, are secrets that have almost entirely eluded the researches of philoso- phers ; nor do I imagine that human art will ever be capable of investigating them with complete success. Emily.. But diamond, since it consists merely of one simple unorganized substance, might b«t one would. think, perfectly imitable by art ? Mrs. B. It is sometimes as much beyond our power to obtain a simple body in a state of perfect purity, as it is to imitate a complicated combination ; for the opera- tions by which nature decomposes bodies are frequent- ly as inimitable as those which she uses for their com- bination. This is the case with carbone; all the ef- forts of chemists to separate it entirely from other sub- stances, have been fruitless, and in the purest state in which it can be obtained by art, it still retains a portion of oxygen, and probably of some other foreign ingre- dients. It is in the diamond alone, as I have observed hefore, that carbone is supposed to exist in its perfect form ; we are ignorant of the means which nature em- ploys to bring it to that state ; it may probably be the work of ages, to purify, arrange, and unite the parti* cles of carbone in the form of diamond. And with re- gard to our artificial carbone, which we call charcoaV we must consider it as an oxyd of carbone ; since, what- ever may be the means employed for obtaining it, it always retains a small portion of oxygen. Here is some charcoal in the purest state we can procure it: you see that it is a very black, brittle, light, porous substance, entirely destitute of cither taste or smell. Heal, without air, produces no alteration in it, as it is not volatile; but on the contrary, it invariably remains at the bottom of the vessel after all the other parts of the vegetable are evaporated. Emily. Carbone is, no doubt, combustible, since ypu say that charcoal would absorb oygen if air was admitted during its preparation ? Caroli?ie. Unquestionably. Besides, you know, Em- ily, how much it is used in cooking. But pray what is 116 fhe reason that charcoal burns without smoke, whilst &> wood fire smokes so much ? Mr*. B. Because, ip the conversion' of wood into ehavcoal/ the volatile particles of the former have been evaporated'. Caroline. Yet I have frequently seen charcoal bu m with flame; therefore it mu it, irr that case, contain some hydrogen-. Mr*. B. Very true ; but you must recollect that charcoal, especially that which is used for commoni purposes, is very far from being pure. It generally re- tains, as we have seen, not only a small quantity of oxygen, but also some remains of the various other component parts of vegetables, and hydrogen particu- larly, which accounts for the flame in question. Caroline. But what becomes of the carbone itself (luring its combustion ? Mrs. B. It gradually combines with the oxygen 06 the atmosphere, in the same way as sulphur and phos- phorus, and, like those substances, it is converted into* a peculiar acid, which flies off in a gaseous form. There is this difference, however, that tbe acid is not* in this instance, as in the two cases just mentioned, a mere condensable vapour, but a permanent elastic fluid,. which always remains in the' state of gas, under any pressure and*at any temperature-. The nature of this, acid was first ascertained by Dr. Black, of Edinburgh ;. and, before the introduction of the new nomenclature, it was called fixed air: It is now distinguished by the more appropriate name of carbonic acid gas, Emily. Carbone, then) can be volatilized by burn- ing, though, by heat alone, no such effect is produced ? Mr*. B. Yes; but then it is no longer simple car- bone, but an> acid of which carbone forms the basis. In this state, carbone retains no more appearance of solidi.y or corporeal form, than the basis of any other gas. And you may, I think, from this instance, de- rive a more clear idea of the basis of the oxygen, hy- drogen, and nitrogen gasses, the existence of which, as real bodies, you seemed to doubt, because they were Rot to be obtained simply m a solid form. 117 "Emily. That is true ; we may conceive the basis of the oxygen, and of the other gasses, to be solid, heavy substances, like carbone ; but so much expanded by ca- loric, as to become invisible. Can-oline. But does not the carbonic acid gas partake of the blackness of charcoal ? Mrs. B. Not in the least. Blackness, you know, does not appear to be essential to carbone, and it is pure carbone, and not charcoal, that we must consider as the basis of carbonic acid. We shall make some car- Ixinic acid, and, in opder to hasten the process, we shall burn the carbone in oxygen gas. Emily. But how can you make carbonic acid, unless you can burn diamond; since that alone is pure car- bone ? Mr*. B. Charcoal will answer the purpose still bet- ter ; for the carbone being, in that state, already com- bined with some portion of oxygen, it will require less of that principle to comple its oxygenation. Caroline. But is it possible to burn diamond ? Mr*. B. Yes, it is ; and, in order to effect this com- bustion, nothing more is required than to apply a suffi- cient degree of heat by means of the blow-pipe, and of' a stream of oxygen gas. Indeed it is by burning dia- mond that its chemical nature has been ascertained. It- is long since it has been known, as a combustible sub- stynrc, but it is within these few years only that the product of its combination has been proved to be pure carbonic acid. This discovery is due to Mr,. Tenant. But still more recent experiments have shown, that diamond requires a greater proportion of oxygen than charcoal to be converted into carbonic acid. It appears that 15 parts of diamond require 85 parts of oxygen to form 100 parts of carbonic acid ; whilst 28 parts of char- coal take up only 72 parts of oxygen to produce 100 parts of carbonic acid ; from which it is naturally infer- red that carbone, in the state of charcoal, is already com- bined with a portion of oxygen. Now let us try to make some carbonic acid___Will you, Emily, decent pome oxygen gas from this large jar into the receiver in which we are to burn the oar>- 118 bone; and I shall introduce this small piece of char- coal, with a little lighted tinder, which will be necessa- ry to give the first impulse to the combustion. Emily. I cannot conceive how so small a piece of tinder, and that but just lighted, can raise the temper- ature of the carbone sufficiently to set fire to it; for it can produce scarcely any sensible heat, and it hardly touches the carbone. Mr*. B. The tinder thus kindled has only heat e- nough to begin its own combustion, which, however, soon becomes so rapid in the oxygen gas, as to raise the* temperature of the charcoal sufficiently for this to burn likewise, as you see is now the case. Emily. I am surprised that the combustion of car- bone is not more brilliant; it does not disengage near so much light or caloric as phosphorous, or sulphur. Yet, since it. combines with so much oxygen, why is not a proportional quantity of light and heal disengaged from the decomposition of the oxygen gas ? Mrs. B, It is not surprising that less light and heat should be disengaged in this than in almost any other combustion, since the oxygen, instead of entering into a solid or a liquid combination, as it does in the phos- phoric and sulphuric acids, is employed in forming a- nother elastic fluid. Emily. True; and on second consideration, it ap- pears, on the contrary, surprising that the oxygen should, in its coronation with eiuboue- icU.in a suffi- cient portion of caloric to nn.niuir-. both substances iii.a gaseous state. Caroline. We may then judge of the degree of so- lidity in which oxygen is-com! ined in.a burnt body, by the quantity of caloric lib-rate .1 during its combustion ?. Mrs. B. Yes ; provided mat y~'i take into the ac- count the quantity of oxygen abs? ; oed by the combus- tible body, and observe the proportion which the caloric bears to it. Caroline. But why should the water, oiler the com- busiion of caiboite, rise in the receiver since the ga* within it retains an aeriform stat* I ■ TX9 TVJr*. B. Because carlxmic acid gas is more dense, ■and consequently occupies less space than oxygen gas; the water therefore rises to fill the vacuum formed by the diminution of volume of the gas. Caroline. That is very clear : and the condensation of the new gas depends, I suppose, on the quantity of caloric that has been disengaged* Mrs. B. The gas must be decreased in volume, from that circumstance, in a certain proportion ; but its density is still further increased by the addition of the carbone. But besides this condensation, there is in our experiment another cause of the diminution of volume, which is, that carbonic acid gas, by standing over water, is gradually absorbed by it, an effect which is produced by shaking the receiver. Emily. The charcoal is now extinguished, though it is not nearly consumed ; it has such an extraordinary avidity for oxygen, I suppose, that the receiver did not contain enough to satisfy the whole. Airs. B. That is certainly the case ; for if the com- bustion was performed in the exact proportions of 28 parts of carbone to 72 of oxygen, both these ingredients would disappear, and 100 parts of carbonic acid would be produced. Caroline. Carbonic acid must be a very strong acid, since it contains so great a proportion of oxygen ? Airs. B. That is a very natural inference; yet it is erroneous. For the carbonic is the weakest of all the acids. The strength of an acid seems to depend upon fhe nature of its basis and its mode of combination, as well as upon the proportion of the acidifying principle. The same quantity of oxygen that will convert some bodies into strong acids, will only be sufficient simply to oxydate others. Caroline- since this acid is so weak, I think chem- ists should have called it the carbonous, instead of the carbonic acid. Emily. But, I suppose, the carbonous acid is still weaker, and is formed by burning carbone in atmosphe- rical air. Mr*. B. No, my dear. Carbone does not ap- 120 pear to be susceptible of more than one degree of acidification, whether burnt in oxygen gas or atmosphe- rical air. There is therefore no carbonous acid. It has indeed been lately discovered, that carbone may be converted in a gas, by uniting with a smaller pro- portion of oxygen ; but as this gas does not possess any acid properties, it is no more than an oxyd ; and in or- der to distinguish it from charcoal, which contains a still smaller proportion of oxygen, it is called gaseous oxyd of carbone Caroline. Pray is not carbonic acid a very whole- some gas to breathe, as it contains so much oxygen ? Mr*. B. On the contrary, it is extremely perni- cious. Oxygen, when in a state of combustion with other substances, loses, in almost every instance its rcspirable properties, and the salubrious effects which it has on the animal economy when in its uncombined state. Carbonic acid is not onjy unfit for respiration, but extremely deleterious if taken into the lungs. Emily. You know Caroline, how very unwholesome the fumes of burning charcoal are reckoned. Caroline. Yes ; but to confess the truth, I did not consider that a charcoal fire produced carbonic acid gas.—Pray, can this gas be condensed into a liquid ? Mr*. B. No: for, as I told you before, it is a perma- nent elastic fluid. But water can absorb a certain quan- tity of this gas, and can even be impregnated with it, in a very strong degree, by the assistance of agitation and pressure, as I am going to show you. I 6hall de- cant some carbonic acid gas into this bottle, which I fill first with water, in order to exclude the atmospher- ical air ; the gass is then introduced through the water, which you see it displaces, for it will not mix with it in any quantity unless strongly agitated, or allowed to stand over for some time. The bottle is now about half full of carbonic acid gas, and thejother half is still occupied by the water. By corking the bottle, and then violently shaking it, in this way, 1 can mix the gas and water together.—Now will you taste it ? Emily. It has a distinct acid taste. Caroline. Yes, it is sensibly sour, and appears full of little bubbles. 121 Mr*. B. It possesses likewise all the other proper- ties of acids, but of course in a less degree than the pure carbonic acid gas, as it is so much diluted by wa- ter. This is a kind of artificial Seltzer water. By analy- sing that which is produced by nature, it was found to contain scarcely any thing more than common water impregnated with a certain proportion of carbonic acid gas. We are, therefore, able to imitate it, by mixing those proportions of water, and carbonic acid. Here, my dear, is an instance, in which, by a chemical pro- cess, we can exactly copy the operations of nature ; for the artificial Seltzer waters can be made in every res- pect similar to those of nature : in one point, indeed, the former have an advantage, since they may be pre- pared stronger, or weaker, as occasion requires. Caroline. I thought I had tasted such water before. But what renders it so brisk and sparkling ? Mrs. B. This sparkling, or effervescence, as it is called, is always occasioned by the action of an elastic fluid escaping from a liquid ; in the artificial Seltzer wa- ter it is produced by the carbonic acid, which being lighter than the water in which it was strongly conden- sed, flies off with great rapidity the instant the bottle is uncorked ; this makes it necessary to drink it immedi- ately. The bubbling that took place in this bottle was but trifling, as the water was but very slightly impreg- nated with carbonic acid. It requires a particular ap- paratus to prepare the gaseous artificial mineral waters. Emily. If, then, a bottle of Seltzer water remains for any length of time uncorked, I suppose it returns to the state of common water ? Mr*. B. The whole of the carbonic acid gas, or very nearly so, will soon disappear ; but there is likewise in Seltzer water a very small quantity of soda, and of a few other saline or earthy ingredients, which will remain in the water, though it should be kept uncorked for any length of time. Caroline. I have often heard of people drinking soda water, pray what sort of water is that ? M ,122 -Mrs. B. It is a kind of artificial Seltzer water, hold- ing in solution, besides the gaseous acid, a particular saline substance, called soda, which imparts to the wa- ter certain medicinal qualities. Caroline.. But how can these waters be so whole- some, since carbonic acid is so pernicious ? Airs. B. A gas we may conceive though very pre- judicial to breathe, may be beneficial to the stomach.— But it would be of no use to attempt explaining this more fully at present. Caroline. Are waters never impregnated with other gasses ? Mr*. B. Yes ; there are several kinds of gaseous waters. I forgot to tell you that waters have for some years past been prepared, impregnated both with oxy gen and hydrogen gasses. These are not an imitation of nature, but are altogether obtained by artificial means. They have been lately used medicinally, particularly abroad, where, I understand, they have acquired some reputation. Emily. If I recollect right, Mrs. B you told us that carbone was capable of decomposing water ; the affin- ity between oxygen and carbone must therefore be grea- ter than between oxy gen and hydrogen ? Airs. B. Yes ; but this is not the rase unless their temperature be raised to a certain degree. It is only when carbone is red hot, that it is capable of separa- ting the oxygen from the hydrogen. Thus, if a small quantity of water be thrown on a red hot fire, it will in- crease, rather than extinguish the combustion ; for the coals or wood (both of which contain a great quantity of carbone) decompose the water, and thus supply the fire both with oxygen and hydrogen gasses. If, on the contrary, a large mass of water be thrown over the fire, the diminution of heat thus produced is such that the combustible matter loses the power of decomposing the water, and the fire is extinguished. Emily. I have heard that fire engines sometimes do more harm than good, and th-..t they actually increase the fire when they cannot throw water enough to ex- tinguish it. It must be owing no doubt, to the deccnv 123 position of the water by the carbone during the confla- gration. Mr*. B. Certainly.—The apparatus which you see here (Plate VIII Fig. 20 J may be used to exemplify what we have just said. It consists in a kind of open furnace, through which a porcelain tube, containing charcoal, passes. To one end of the tube is adapted a glass retort with water in it; and the other end com- municates with a receiver placed on the water bath. A lamp being applied to the retort, and the water made to boil, the vapour is gradually conveyed through the red hot charcoal, by which it is decomposed ; and the hydrogen gas which results from this decomposition is cofllcted in the receiver. But the hydrogen thus ob- tained is far from being pure ; it retains in solution a minute portion of carbone, and contains also a quantity of carbonic acid. This renders it heavier than pure hydrogen gas, and gives it some peculiar properties : it is distinguished by the name of carbonated hydrogen gas. . Caroline. And whence does it obtain the carbonic acid that is mixed with it ? Emily. I believe I can answer that question, Carol- ine—From the union of the oxygen (proceeding from the decomposed water) with the carbone, which, you know, makes carbonic acid. Caroline. True ; I should have recollected that.— The product of the decomposition of water by red hot charcoal, therefore, is carbonated hydrogen gas and carbonic acid gas. Mr*. B. You are perfectly right now. C.irbone is frequently found combined with hydrogen in a state of solidity, especially in coals, which owe their combustible nature to these two principles. Emilu. Is it the hydrogen, then; that produces the flame of coal a ? Mrs. B. It is so; and when all the hydrogen is consume!, the carbone continues to bum without flame. But again the hydrogen gas produced by the combustion of coals is not pure ; for, during the com- bustion, particles of carbone are successively volatilized 124 with the hydrogen, with which they form what is called a hydro-carbonate, which is the essential combustion. Carbone is a very bad conductor of heat; for this reason it is employed (in conjunction with other ingredi- ents) for coating furnaces and other chemical apparatus. Emily. Pray what is the use of coating furnaces ? Mr*. B. In most cases, in which a furnace is used, it is necessary to produce and preserve a great degree of heat, for which purpose every possible means are used to prevent the heat from escaping by communica- ting with other bodies, and this object is attained by coating over the inside of the furnace with a kind of plaster, composed of materials that are bad conductors of heat. Carbone combined with a small quantity of iron, forms a compound called plumbago, or black lead, of which pencils are made. This substance, agreeably to the nomenclature, is a carburet of iron. Caroline. Why, then, is it called black lead ? Mrs. B. I really cannot say; but it is certainly a most improper name for it, as there is not a particle of lead in the composition. There is another carburet of iron though united only to an extremely small proportion of carbone, acquires very remarkable properties ; this is steel. Caroline. Really ; and yet steel is much harder than; iron ? Mr*. B. But carbone is not ductile, like iron, and therefore may render the steel more brittle, and pre- vent its bending so easily. Whether it is that the car- bone by introducing itself into the pores of the iron, and by filling them, makes the metal both harder and heavier; or whether this change depends upon some chemical cause, I cannot pretend to decide But there is a subsequent operation, by which the hardness of steel is very much increased, which simply consists in heating the steel till it is red hot, and then plunging it into cold water. Carbone besides the combination just mentioned, en- ters into the composition of a vast number of natural productions, such, for instance, as all the various kinds 125 of oils, which result from the combination of carbone? hydrogen, and caloric, in various proportions Emily. I thought ihnt carbone, hydrogen, and ca- loric formed carb mated hydrogen gas ? Mrs B. That is the case when a small portion of carbonic acid gas is held in solution by hydrogen gas. Different proportions of the same principles, together w'nh the circumstances of their union, produce very different combinations ; of this you will see innumera- ble examples. Beride-, we are not now talking of gas- ses, but of carbone and hydrogen, combined only wi:h a • uantity of caloric sufficient to bring them to the con- sistency of oil or fat. Caroline. But the oil and fat are not of the same con- sistence ? . Mrs. B Fat is only congealed oil ; or oil, melted fat The one requires a little more heat to maintain it in a fluid state, than the other Hwe you never ob- served the fat of meat turned to oil by the caloric it has imbibed from the fire ? Emily Yet oils in general, as salad oil, and la mp oil, do not turn to fat when cold ? Mrs. B. Not at the common temperature of the at- mosphere, because they retain too much caloric to con- geal at that temperature ; but if exposed to a sufficient degree of co.d, their latent heat is extricated, and they become solid tat substances. Have you never seen sal- ad oil frozen in winter? Emily. Yes ; but it appeals to me in a state very dii- fereot from animal fat. Mr*. B Ti.e essential cons ituent parts of either vegetable or animal oils are the same, carbone and hy- drogen ; the variety arises from the different propor- tions of these substances, and from other accessary in- gredients that may be mixed with them. The oil of a whale, and the oil of'rases, are, in their essential con- stituent parts, the same ; but the one is impregnated with the offensive particles of animal matter, the other with the delicate perfume of a flower. The difference of fixed oils, and volatile or essential- oils, consist also in the various proportions of caibone H2 126 and hydrogen. Fixed oils are those which will not evap- orate without being decomposed ; this is the case with all common oils, which contain a greater proportion of carbone than the essential oils. The essential oils (which comprehend the whole class of essences and perfumes) are lighter; they contain more equal pro- portions of car'ione and hydrogen, and are volatilized or evaporated without being decomposed. Emily. When you say that one kind of oil will evap* orate, and the other be decomposed, you mean, I sup- pose, by the application of heat ? Airs. B. Not necessarily ; for there are oils that will evaporate slowly at the common temperature of the atmosphere ; but for a more rapid volatilization, or for their decomposition, the assistance of heat is requir- ed. Caroline. I shall now remember, I think, that fat and oil are really the same substances, consisting both of carbone and hydrogen ; that in fixed oils the carbone preponderates, and heat produces a decomposition ; while, in essential oils, the proportion of hydrogen is greater, and heat produces volatilization only. Emily. I suppose the reason why oil burns so well in lamps, is because its two constituents are so com-. bustile ? Mr*. B. Certainly ; the combustion of oil is just the same as that of a candle; if tallow, it is only oil in a concrete state ; if wax, or spermaceti, its chief chemical ingredients are still hydrogen and carbone. Emily. I wonder, then, there should be so great a difference between tallow and wax ? ilfrs. B. I must again repeat that the same substan- ces, in different proportions, produce results that have sometimes scarcely any resemblance to each other. But this is rather a general remark that 1 wish to im- press upon your mind, than one which is applicable to the present case ; for tallow and wax are far from be- ing very dissimilar ; the chief difference consists in the wax being a purer compound of carbone and hy- drogen than the tallow, which retains more of the gross particles of animal matter. The combustion of 127 a candle, and that of a lamp, both produce water and carbonic acid gas. Can you tell me how these are formed ? Emily. Let me think.....Both the candle and lamp burn by means of fixed oil—.this is decomposed as the combusUon goes on ; and the constituent parts of the oil being thus separated, the carbone unit us to a portion of oxygen from the atmosphere to form car- bonic acid gas, whilst the hydrogen combines with another portion of oxygen, and forms wiui it water. The products therefore, of the combustion of oils, are water and carbonic acid gas. Caroline But we see neither water nor carbonic a- cid produced by the combustion of a candle ? Mr*. B. The carbonic acid gas, you know is invisi- ble, and the water being in a state of vapour, is so like- wise. Emily is perfectly correct in her explanation, and I am very much pleased with it. All the vegetable acids consist of various proportions of carbone and hydrogen, acidhVd by oxygen. Gums, sugar, and starch,, are likewise composed of these in- gredients ; bin as the oxygen which they contain is not sufficient to convert them into acids, they are classed with the oxyds, and called vegetable oxyds. Emily. I am very much delighted with all these new ideas ; but at the same time, I cannot help being apprehensive that I may forget many of them. Airs. B. I wruld advise you to take notes, or, what would answer better still, to write down, after every lesson, as much of it as you can recollect. And, in order to give you a little assistance, I shall lend you the beads or index, which I occasionally consult for the hakeof preserving some method and arrangement in these conversations. Unless you follow some such pi ah, you cannot expect to retain nearly all that you learn, how great soever be the impression it may make on you at first. Emily. I will certainly follow your advice.—Hither- to I have found that I recollected pretty well what you have taught us ; but the history of carbone is a more 128 extensive subject than any of the simple bodies we have yet examined. Mr* B I have little more to say on carbone at pre- sent, but hereafter you will see that it performs a con- siderable part in most cbemic il operations Caroline. That is, I suppose, owing to its enteting into tlie composition of so great a variety of substances ? Mr*. B. Certainly ; it is the- basis, you have seen, of all vegetable matter ;,and you will find that it is very essential to the process of aniinahzation. But in the min- eral kingdom also, particularly in its form of carbonic acid, we shall often discover it combined with a great variety of Mibstances. In chemical operations, carbone is particularly use- ful, from its very great attraction for oxygen, as it will absorb this substance from many oxygenated or burnt bodies, and thus deoxygenate, or unburn them, and res- tore them to their original state. Caroline. I do not understand how a body can be unburnt, and restored to its original state. This piece of tinder, for instance, that has been burnt, if by any means the oxygen was extracted from it, would not be restored to its former state of linnen ; for its texture is destroyed by burning, and lhat must be the case with all organized or manufactured substances, as you obser- ved in a former conversation. Mrs. B. A compound body is decomposed by com-- bustion, in a way which generally precludes the possi- bility of restoring it to its former state ; tlie oxygen, for instance, does not become fixed in the tinder, but it combines with its volatile parts,-and flies off' in the shape of gas. or watery vapour. You see therefoie, how vain it would be to attempt the recomposition of such bodies. But with regard to simple bodies, or at least bodies whose constituents are not disturbed by the process of oxygenation or deoxvgenation, it is often possible to restore them, after combust ion to their ori- ginal state—The metals, for instance, undergo nooth-- er alteration by combustion than a combination with oxygen ; therefore, when the oxygen is taken from thwm,they return to their pure metalhc sute. But L 129 shall say nothing further of this at present, as the me- tals will furnish ample subject for another morning; and they are the class of simple bodies that come next un- der our consideration. Condensation ix. On Metals.. Mrs. B. The metals, which we are now to examine, are bodies of various different nature from those which we have hitherto considered. They do not, like the ele- ments of gasses, elude the immediate observation of our senses : for they are the most brilliant, the most ponderous, and the most palpable substances in nature. Caroline. I doubt, however, whether the metals will appear to us so interesting, and give us so much enter- tainment as those mysterious elements which conceal themselves from our view. Besides, they cannot af- ford so much novelty ; they are bodies with which we are already so well acquainted. Mr*. B. But the acquaintance, you will soon per- ceive, is but very superficial ; and I trust that you will find both novelty and entertainment in considering the metals in a chemical point of view. To treat of this subject fully, would require a whole course of lectures ; for metals form of themselves a most important branch of practical chemistry. We must, therefore, confine ourselves to a general view of them. These bodies are seldom found naturally in their metalic form ; they are generally more or less oxygenated or combined with sulphur, earths or acids, and are often blended with each other. They are found buried in the bowels of fhe earth in most parts of the globe, but chiefly irt' mountainous districts, where the surface of the globe has suffered from earthquakes, volcanoes, and other convulsions of nature. They are there spread in strata of beds, called veins, and these veins are composed of a certain quantity of metal, combined with various earthy substances, with which they form minerals of different nature and appearance, which are called ores. Caroline. I am now amongst old acquaintance, for my father has a lead mine in Yorkshire, and I have heard a great deal about veins of ore, and of the roast- ing and smelting of the lead ; but, I confess, that I do not understand in what these operations consist. Mr*. B. Roasting is the process by which the vola- tile parts of the ore are evaporated ; smelting, that by which the pure metal is afterwads separated from the earthy remains of the ore. This is done by throwing the whole into a furnace, and mixing with it certain substances, that will combine with the earthy parts, and other foreign ingredients of the ore ; the metal being the heaviest falls to the bottom, and runs out by proper openings, in its pure metalic state. Emily. You told us in a preceding lesson that me- tals had a strong affinity for oxygen. Do they not, therefore, combine with oxygen, when strongly heated in the furnace, and run out in the state of oxyds ? Mr*. B. No ; for the scoriae, or oxyd, which soon forms on the surface of the fused metal, when it is oxydable, prevents tlie air from having any further in- fluence on the mass ; so that neither combustion nor oxygenation can take place. Caroline. Are all metals combustible ? Mr* B. Yes, without exception ; but their attrac- tion for oxygen varies extremely : there are some that will combine with it only at a very high temperature, or by the assistance of acids ; whilst there are others that oxyclate of themselves very rapidly, even at the lowest temperature, as manganese, which scarcely ever exists in its metallic state, as it immediately absorbs oxygen on being exposed to the air, and crumbles to an- oxyd in the course of a few hours. 1S1 Emtly. Is it not from that oxyd that you extracted ihe oxygen gas ? Airs. B. It is ; so that, you see, this metal attracts oxygen at a low temperature, and parts with it when strongly heated. Emily. Is there any other metal that oxydates at the temperature of the atmosphere ? Mr*. B. They all do, more or less, excepting gold, silver, and platina. Copper, lead, and iron, oxydate slowly in the air, and cover themselves with a sort of rust, a process which depends on the gradual conversion of the surface into an oxyd. This rusty surface preserves the interior metal from oxygenation, as it prevents the air from com- ing in contact with it. Strictly speaking, however the word rust applies ooly to the oxyd, which forms on the surface of iron, when exposed to air and moisture, which oxyd appears to be mined with a small portion of carbonic acid. Emily. When metals oxydate from the atmosphere without an elevation of temperature, some light and heat, I suppose, must be disengaged, though not in suf- ficient quantities to be sensible. Mr*. B. Undoubtedly ; and, indeed, it is not sur- prising that in this case the light and heat should not be sensible, when you consider how extremely slow, and, indeed, how imperfectly, most metals oxydate by mere exposure to the atmosphere. For the quan- tity of oxygen with which metals are capable of com- bining, generally depends upon their temperature ; and the absorption stops at various points of oxydation, according to the degree to which their temperature is raised. Emily. That seems very natural ; for the greater the quantity of caloric introduced into a metal, the fur- ther its particles are separated from one another, and the more easily, therefore, can they attract the oxygen and combine with it. Airs. B. Certainly ; and besides, in proportion as the resistance diminishes on one hand, the affinity in- creases on the other. When the metal oxygenates 1-3V with sufficient rapidity for light and heat to become sen- sible, combustion actually takes place. But this hap- pens only at very high temperatures, and the product is nevertheless an oxyd ; for though, as I have just said, metals will combine with different proportions of oxy- gen, yet, with the exception of only five of them, they are not susceptible of acidification. Metals change colour during the different degrees of oxydation which they undergo. Lead, when heated in contact with the atmosphere, first becomes grey ; if its temperature be then raised, it turns yellow, and a still stronger heat changes it to red. Iron becomes succes- sively a green, brown, and white oxyd. Copper chang- es from brown to blue, and lastly green. Emily. Pray, is the white lead with which houses are painted prepared by oxydating lead ? Mr*. B. Yes ; almost all the metallic oxyds are used as paints. Red lead is another oxyd of that me- tal. The various sorts of ochres chiefly consist of iron more or less oxydated. And it is a remarkable circum- stance, that if you burn metals rapidly, the light or flame they emit during combustion partakes of the colours which the oxyd successi. ely assumes. Caroline. How is that accounted for, Mr. B. ? For light, you know, does not proceed from the burning body, but from the decomposition of the oxygen gas ? I hope you have a satisfactory answer to give me, for I am under some apprehensions for my favourite theo- ry of combustion ; and for the world 1 would not have it overthrown. Mr*. B. Do not be alarmed, my dear; I do not think it was ever supposed to be in danger from this cir- cumstance. The corresiondence of the colour of the light with that of the oxyd which emits it, is, in all prob- ability, owing to some particles of the metal which are volatilized and carried of by the caloric. Caroline. Is this then a sort of metalic gas. Emily. Why is it reckoned so unwholesome to breathe the air of a place in which metals are melting ? Mr*. B. For this double reason, that most metals in melting oxydate more or less at their surface, and Apparatus for ths com//MtioH of metals Iry means of ojcy/?en y crystals in the solution of copper in nitrous acid ? Mrs. B. Because the salt is now suspended in the water which the nitrous acid contains, and will remain so till it is deposited in consequence of rest and cooling. Emily. I am surprised that a body so opaque as iron can be converted into, such transparent crystals. Airs B. It is the union with the acid that produces the transparency ; for if the pure metal was melted, and afterwards permitted to cool and crystallize, it would be found just as opaque as before. Emily. 1 do not understand the exact meaning of crystallization ? Mrs. B. You reccollect that when a solid body is dissolved either by water or caloric, it is not decompo- sed ; but that its integrant parts are only suspended in the solvent. When the solution is made in water, the integrant particles of the body will, on the water being evaporated, again unite into a solid mass, by the force of their mutual attraction. But when the body is dis- solved by caloric alone, nothing more is necessary, in ordjr to make its particles reunite, than to reduce its temperature. And, in general, if the solvent, wheth- er water or caloric, be slowly separated by evaporation or by cooling, and care taken that the particles be not agitated during their reunion, they will arrange thenv 141 selves in regular masses, each individual substance as- suming a peculiar form or arrangement; and that is what is called crystallization. Emily. Crystallization, therefore, is simply the re- union of the particles of a solid body that has been dis- solved in a fluid. , m Mrs. B. That is a very good definition of it. ttut I must not forget to observe, that heat^ and water may unite their solvent powers ; and in this case, crystalli- zation may be hastened by cooling, as well as by eva- porating the liquid. Caroline.. But if the body dissolved be of a volatile nature, will it not evaporate with the fluid ? Mr*. B. A crystallized body, held in solution only by water, is scarcely ever so volatile as the fluid itself, and care must be taken to manage the heat, so that it may be sufficient to evaporate the water only. I should not omit to mention that bodies, in crystal- lizing from their watery solution, always retain a small portion of water, which remains confined in the crystal. in a solid form, and does not reappear, unless the body loses its crystalline state. This is called the water of crystallization. It is also necessary that you should here more par- ticularly remark the difference, to which we have for- merly alluded, between the simple solution of bodies either in water or in caloric, and the solution of metals in acids ; in the first case, the body is merely divided, by the solvent into its minutest parts. In the latter, a similar effect is, indeed, produced ; but it is by means of a chemical combination between the metal and the acid, in which both lose their characteristic properties. The first is a mechanical operation, the second a chem- ical process. We may, therefore, distinguish them by calling the first a simple solution, and the other a chemi- cal solution. Do you understand this difference ? Family. Yes ; simple solution can affect only the at- traction of aggregation. But chemical solution implies also an altractioii~of composition, that is to say, an ac- tual combination between the solvent and the body dis- solved. 142 Mr*. B. You have expressed your id«a very well' indeed. But you must observe, also, that whilst a bo- dy may be separated from its solution in water or ca- loric, simply by cooling, or by evaporation, an acid can be taken from a metal with which it is combined, only by stronger affinities, which produce a decomposition. Emily. I think that you have rendered the difference between these two kinds of solution so obvious, that we can never confound them. Mrs. B. Nothwithstanding, however, the real dif- ference which there appears to be between these two operations, they are frequently confounded. Indeed, several modern chemical writers, of great eminence, have even thought proper to generalize the idea of so- lution, and to suppress entirely the distinction introdu- ced by the great Lavoisier, which I have taken so much pains to explain, and which I confess appears to me to render the subject much clearer. ^ Emily. Are the perfect metals susceptible of being dissolved and converted into compound salts by acids ? Mrs. B. Gold is acted upon by only one acid, the oxygenated muriatic, a very remarkable acid, which, when in its more concentrated state, dissolves gold or any other metal, by burning them rapidly. Gold can, it is trae, be dissolved likewise by a mix- ture of two acids, commonly called aqua regia ; but this mixed solvent derives that property from containing the peculiar acid which 1 have, just mentioned. Platina is also acted upon by this acid only ; but silver is dissol- ved by several of them— Caroline. I think you said that vome of the metals might be so strongly oxydated as to become acid ? Mrs. B. There are five metals, arsenic, molybde- na, chrome, tungsten, and columbiuin,* which are sus- ceptible, of con:bluing with a sufficient quantity of oxy- gen to be convened into acids Caroline. Acids are connected with metals in such a variety of ways, that I am afiaid of some confusion in Co'umbium which has not long fince been discovered byi Mr. H rctiett, was inadvertently omitted in the enumeration of the simple bodi«3 given in the first conversation. 143 remembering them —In the first place, acids will yield their oxygen to metals. Secondly, they will combine with them in their state of oxyds, to form compound salts ; and lastly, several of the metals are themselves susceptible of acidification. Mr*. B. Very well ; but though metals have so great an affinitv for acids, it is not with that class of bo- dies alone that they will combine. They are most of them in their simple state, capable of uniting with sul- phur, with phosphorus, with caibone, and with each oiher ; these combinations, according to the nomen- clature which was explained to you on a former occa- sion, are called sulphurets, phosphorets, carburets. &c. The metallic phosphorets offer nothing very re- markable. The sulphurets form the peculiar kind of mineral called pyrites, from which certrin kinds ol mi- neral waters, as those of Hirrogate, derive their chief chemical properties. In this combination, the sulphur, together with the iron, have so strong an attraction for oxygen, that they obtain it both from the air and from water, and by condensing it in a solid form, produce the heat which raises the temperature of the water in such a remarkable degree. Emily. But if pyrites obtain oxygen from water, that water must suffer a decomposition, and hydrogen gas be evolved ? Airs. B. That is actually the case in the hot springs, alluded to, which give out an extremely fetid gas, com- posed of hydrogen impregna'ed with sulphur. Caroline. If I recollect right, steel and plumbago, which you mentioned in the last lesson, are both car- burets of iron ? Airs. B. Yes ; and they are the only carburets of much consequence. A curious combination of metals has lately very much attracted the attention of the scientific world : I mean the stones that fall from the atmosphere. They fll consist principally of native or pure iron which is never foimed in that state in the bowels of the earth ; and contain also a small quantity of nickle and chtome, a combination likewise new in the mineral kingdom. 144 These circumstances have led many scientific persons to believe that those substances have fallen from the moon or some other planet, while others are of opinion either that they are formed in the atmosphere, or arc projected into it by some unknown volcano on the sur- face of our globe. Caroline. I have heard much of these stones, but I believe many people are of opinion that they are fo med on the earth, and laugh at their pretended celestial ori- gin. Airs. B. The fact of their falling is so well ascer- tained, that I think no person who has at all investiga- ted the subject, can now entertain any doubt of it. Spe- cimens of these stones have been discovered in all parts of the world, and to each of them has some tradition or story of its fall been found connected. And as the ana- lysis of all the specimens afford precisely the same results, we have tnus a very strong proof that they all proceed from the same source. It is to Mr. Howard that philosophers are indebted, for having first analysed these stones and directed their attention to this interest- ing subject. But we must not suffer this digression to take up too much of our time. The combinations of metals with each other are cal- led alloys ; thus brass is an alloy of copper and zinc; bronze, of copper and tin, &c. Emily And is not pewter also a combination of me- tal ? Mr*. B. It is. The pewter made in this country, is mostly composed of tin, with a very small proportion of zinc and lead. Caroline. Block-tin is a kind of pewter, I believe ? Mr*. B. No ; it is iron plated with tin, which ren- ders it more durable, as tin will not so easily rust. Tin alone, however, would be too soft a metal to be wor- ked for common use, and all the tin vessels or utensils are in fact nuid of plates of iron thinly coated with tin, which prevents the iron from rusting. Caroline. Say rather oxydating, Mrs. B.__.Rust is a word that should be exploded in chemistry. 145 Airs. B. Take care, however, not to introduce the word oxydate instead of rusi, in general conversation ; for either you will not be understood, or you will be laughed at for your conceit. Caroline. 1 confess that my attention is, at present, so much engaged by chemistry, that it sometimes leads me into ridiculous observations. Every thing in nature I refer to cbemisiry, and have often been laughed at for my continual allusions to it. Mr*. B. You must be more cautious and discreet in this respect, my dear, otherwise your enthusiasm, al- though proceeding from a sincere admiration of the sci- ence, will be attributed to pedentry. Metals differ very much in their affinity for each oth- er , some will not unite at all, others readily combine together, and on this property of metals the art of sold- ering depends. Emily. What is soldering ? Airs. B. It is joining two pieces of metal together, by heating them, with a thin plate of a more fusible me-* tal interposed between them. Thus tin is a solder for lead ; brass, gold, or silver, are solder for iron, &c. ' Caroline. And is not plating metals something of the same nature ? Airs. B. In the operation of plating, two metals are united, one being covered with the other, but without the intervention of a third ; iron or tin may be thus cov- ered with gold or silver. Emily. Mercury appears to me of a very different nature from the other metals. Mr*. B One of its greatest peculiarities is that it retains a fluid state at the temperature of the atmos- phere. All metals are fusible at different degrees of heat, and they have likewise each the property of free- zing or becoming solid at a certain fixed temperature. Mercury congeals only at 72° below the freezing point. Emily. That is to say, that in order to freeze, it re- quires a temperature 72° colder than that at which wa- ter freezes. Airs. B. Exactly so. O 146 Caroline. But is the temperature of the atmosphere ever so low as that? Mrs. B. Scarcely ever, at least in an inhabited part of the globe ; therefore mercury is never found solid in nature, but it may be congealed by artificial cold ; I mean such intense cold as can be produced by some chemical mixtures. Caroline. And can mercury be made to boil and e- vaporatc ? Mrs. B. Yes, like any other liquid ; only it requires a much greater degree of heat. At the temperature of 600°, it begins to boil and evaporate iike water. Mercury combines with gold, silver, tin, and with several other metals ; and, if mixed with any of them in a sufficient proportion, it penetrates the solid metal, softens it, loses its own fluidity, and forms an amalgam, which is the name given to the combination of any me- tal with mercury, forming a substance more or less so- lid, according as the mercury or the other metal pre- dominates. Emily. In the list of metals there are some whose names 1 have never before heard mentioned. Airs. B. There are several that have been recently discovered, whose properties arc yet but little known, V as for instance, titanium which was discovered by the Rcvd. Mr. Gregor, in the tin mines of Cornwall ; co- lumbium, which has lately been discovered by Mr. Hatchett ; and osmium, iridium, palladium, and rhodi- um, all of which Dr. Woolaston and Mr. Tennant found mixed with crude platina Caroline. Arsenic has been mentioned amongst the metals ; I had no notion that it belonged to that class of bodies, for 1 had never seen it but as a powder, and never thought of it but as a most deadly poison. Mr* B In its pure metallic state, I believe, it is not so poisonous ; but it has so great an affinity for oxy- gen, that it absorbs it from the atmosphere at its natu- ral temperature ; ycu have seen it therefore, only in its state of oxyd, when, from its combination with oxygen, it has acquired its very poisonous properties. 147 Caroline. Is it possible that oxygen can impart poi- sonous qualities ? That valuable substance which pro- duces light, and fire, and which all bodies in nature are so eager to obtain ! Mr*. B. Most of the metallic oxyds are poisonous, and derive this property from their union with oxygen. The white lead, so much used in paint, owes its per- nicious effects to oxygen. In general oxygen, in a con- crete state, appears to be particularly destructive in its effects on flesh or any animal matter ; and those oxyds are most caustic that have an acrid burning taste, which proceeds from the metal having but a slight affinity for oxygen, and therefore easily yielding it to the flesh which it corrodes and destroys. Emily. What is the meaning of the word causti?, which you have just used ? Mr*. B. It expresses that property which some bodies possess, of disorganizing and destroying animal matter, by operating a kind of combustion, or at least a chemical decomposition. You must often have heard of caustics used to burn warts, or other animal excrescen- ces ; most of these bodies owe their destructive power to the oxygen with which they are combined. The common caustic, called lunar caustic, is a compound for- med by the union of nitric acid and silver ; and it is sup- posed to owe its caustic qualities to the oxygen contain* ed in the nitric acid. Caroline. But, pray, are not acids still more caustic than oxyds, as they contain a greater proportion of ox- ygen ? Mr*. B. Some of the acids arc ; but the caustic property of a body depends not oniy upon the quantity ■of oxygen, which it contains, but also upen its slight af- finity for that principle, and the consequent facility with which it yields it. Emily. Is not this destructive property of oxygen a'"Oun!t-d for ? Mr* B. It proceeds probably from the strong at- traction of oxygen for hydrogen ; for if the one rapidly absorbs the other from the animal fibre, a disorganiza- f;vn of the substance must eoyi.e. 148 Emily. Caustics arc then very properly said to burn the flesh, since the combination of oxygen and hydro- gen is an actual combustion. Caroline. Now, I think, this effect would be more properly termed an oxydation, as there is no disengage- ment of light and heat. Mr*. B. But there really is a sensation of heat pro- duced by live action of caustics ; and the caloric that is disengaged must, I think, partly, if not wholly pro- ceed from ihc oxygen which the caustic yields to the flesh. Caroline. Yet the oxygen of a caustic is not in a gaseous state, and can therefore have no caloric to part with ? Mr*. B. In whatever state oxygen exists, we may suppose that, like every other body in nature, it retains fiornc portion of caloric ; and if, in combining with the hydrogen of the flesh, it becomes more dense than it previously was in the caustic, it must part with caloric whilst this change is taking place. I believe I have once before observed that we may, in a great measure, judge of the comparative degree of solidity which ox- ygen assumes in a body, by the quantity of caloric lib- erated during its combination ; and when we find, that in its passage from one body to another, heat is evolved, we may be certain that it exists in a more solid state in the latter. Emily. But if oxygen is so caustic, why does not that contained in the atmosphere burn us ? Mrs B. Because it is in a gaseous state, and has a greater attraction for its caloric than for the hydrogen of our bodies. Besides, shou d the air be slightly caustic, we are in a great measure sheltered from its effects by the skin ; you all know how much a wound, however trifling, smarts on being exposed to it. Caroline. It is a curious idea, however, that we should live in a slow fire. But, if the air was caustic, would it not have an acrid taste ? Mrs. B. It possibly might have such a taste ; though in so slight a degree, that custom has remlerd i{ insen- sible. 149 Caroline. And why is not water caustic ? When I dip my hand into water, though cold, it ought to burn me from the caustic nature of its oxygen Mrs. B. Your hand docs not decompose the water ; the oxvgen in that state is much better supplied with hydrogen than it would be by animal matter, and if its causticity depends on its affinity for that principle, it will be ve y far from quitting its state of water to act upon your hand. You must not forget that oxyds are caustic in proportion as the oxygen adheres slightly to them Emily. Since the oxyd of arsenic is poisonous, its acid, I suppose,is fully as much so ? Airs. B. Yes ; it is one of the strongest poisons in nature Emily. There is a poison called verdigris, which forms on brass and copper when not kept very clean ; and this, I have heard, is an objection to these metals being made into kitchen utensils. Is this poison like- wise occasioned by oxygen ? Airs. B. It is produced by the intervention of oxy- gen ; for verdigris is a compound salt formed by the union of vinegar and copper : it is of a beautiful green colour, and much used in painting. Emily. But, I believe, verdigris is often formed on eopper when no vinegar has been in contact with it. Mr* B Not real verdigris, but compound salts, somewhat resembling it, may be produced by the action of an acid on copper. There is a beautiful green salt produced hy the com- bination of cobalt with muriatic acid, which has the singular property of forming what is called sympathetic ink. Characters written with this solution are invisible when cold, but when a gentle heat is applied, they at« suuie a fine blueish green colour. Caroline. I think one might draw very curious land- scapes with the assistance of this ink; I would first make a water colour drawing of a winter scene, in which the trees shall be leafless and the grass scarcely green ; J would then trace all the verdure with the invisible ink. and whenever 1 choose to create spring, I should hold O 2 150 it before the fire, and its warmth woukl cover the land- scape with a rich verdure. Mrs. B. That will be a very amusing experiment, and I advise you by all means to try it.—I must now, however, take my leave of you ; we have had a very long lecture, and I hope you will be able to remember it. Do not forget to write down all you can recollect of this conversation, for the subject is of great import- ance, though it may not appear at first very entertain- ing. Conversation x. On Alkalies. Mrs. B. After, having taken a general view of combustible bodies, we now come to the alkalies, and the earths, which compose the class of incombustibles ; that is to say, of such bodies as do not combine with oxygen at any known temperature. Caroline. I am afraid that the incombustible sub- stances will not be near so interesting as the others ; for I have found nothing in chemistry that has pleased me ao much as the theory of combustion. Mrs. B. Do not however depreciate the incombus- tible bodies before you are acquanted with them ; you will find they also possess properties highly important and interesting. Some of the earths bear so strong a resemblance in their properties to the alkalies, that it is a difficult point to know under what head to place them. The celebrat- ed French chemist, Fourcroy, has classed two of them (Barytes and Strontites) with the alkalies ; but, as lime 151 and magnesia have almost an equal title to that rank, I think it better not to separate them, and therefore have adopted the common method of classing them with the earths, and of distinguishing them by the name oialka- line earths. We shall first take a review of the alkalies, of which there are three species \. potash, soda, and ammonia, The two first are called fixed alkalies, because they ex- ist in a solid form at the temperature of the atmosphere,. and require a great heat to be volatilized. The third, ammonia, has been distinguished by the name of i;o/c- tile alkali, because its natural form is that of gas. Caroline. Ammonia ? I do not recollect that name in the list of simple bodies. Mrs. B. The reason why you do not find it there is, that it is a compound ; and if I introduce it to your ac- quaintance now. it is on account of its close connec- tion with the two other alkalies, which it resembles es- sentially in its nature and properties. Indeed it is not long since ammonia has resigned its place among the simple bodies, as it was not, till lately, supposed to be a compound ; nor is it improbable that potash and soda may some day undergo the same fate, as they are strong- ly suspected of being compounds also. The general properties of alkalies are, an acrid burning taste, a pungent smell, and a caustic action on the skin and flesh. Caroline. How san they be caustic, Mrs. B. since they do not contain oxygen ? Mr*. B. Whatever substance has an affinity for any one of the constituents of animal matter, sufficiently powerful to decompose it, is entitled to the appellation of caustic. The alkalies, in their pure state, have a very strong attraction for water, for hydrogen, and for carbone, which, you know, are the constituent princi- ples of oil, and it is chiefly by absorbing these substan- ces from animal matter, that they effect its decomposi- tion : for, when diluted with a sufficient quantity of water, or combined with any oily subsunce, they lose their causticity. 152 But, to return to the general properties of alkalies— they change the colour of syrup of violets, and other blue vegetable infusions, to green ; and have, in gene- ral, a very gre .t tendency to unite wi'h acids, although the respective qualities of these two classes of bodies form \ remarkable contrast. We shall examine the result of the combination of acids and alkalies more particularly when we have com- pleted our general view of the simple bodies. It will be sufficient at present to inform you, that whenever acids are brought in contact with alkalies, or alkaline earths, they unite with a remarkable eagerness, and form compounds perfectly different from either of their constituents; these compounds are called neutral or compound salts. Caroline. Are they of the same kind as the salts formed by the combination of a metal and an acid ? Mr* B. Yes ; they are analogous in their nature, although different in many of their properties. A methodical nomenclature, similar to that of the acids, has been adopted for the compound salts. Each individual salt derives it name from its constituents, so that every name implies a knowledge of the composition of the salt. The three alkalies, the alkaline earths, and the me- tals, are called salifiable bases or radicals, and the acids, salifying principles The name of each salt is compos- ed both of that of the acid and the salifiable base ; and it terminates in at or it, according to the degrees of oxy- genation of the acid. Thus, for instance, all those salts which are formed by the combination of the sul- phuric acid with any of the salifiable bases, are called sulpliats, and the name -of the radical is added for the specific distinction of the salt ; if it be potash, it will compose a sulphat of potash ; if ammonia, sulphat of ammonia, U.C. Emily. The chrystals which we obtained from the combination of iron and sulphuric acid, were thereforej sulphat of iron ? Mrs. B. Precisely ; and those which we prepared by dissolving copper in nitric acid, nitrat of copper^ and 153 so on. But this is not all; if the salt be formed by that- class of acids which ends in ous (which you know, in- dicates a less degree of oxygenation), the termination of the name of the salt will be in it, as sulphit of pot- ash, sulplut of ammonia, See. Emily. Thjre must be an immense number of com- pound salts, since there is so great a variety of salifia- ble radicals, as well of salifying principles. Mrs. B. Their real number cannot be ascertained, since it increases every day as the science advances. But, before we proceed farther in the investigation o£ the compound salts, it is necessary that we should ex- amine the nature of the ingredients from which they. are composed. Let us therefore return to the alkalies. The dry white powder which you see in this phial is pure caustic potash ; it is very difficult to preserve it in this state, as it attracts with extreme avidity the mois- ture from the atmosphere, and if the air were not per- fectly excluded, it would in a very short time be actually. melted. Emily. It is then,. I suppose, always found in a li- quid state ? Airs. B. No; it exists in nature in a great variety of forms and combinations, but is never found in its pure separate stale ; it is combined with carbonic acid, with which it exists in every part of the vegetable king- dom, and is most commonly obtained from the ashes of vegetables, which compose the substance that re- mains after all the other parts have been volatilized by combustion. Caroline. But you once said, that after the volatile parts of a vegetable were evaporated, the substance that remained was charcoal ? Mr*. B. What, my dear ? Do you still confound the processes of simple volatilization and combustion ? In order to procure charcoal we evaporate such parts as can be reduced to vapour by heat alone ; but when we burn the vegetable, we volatilize the carbone also, by converting it into carbonic acid gas. Caroline. That is true ; I hope I shall make no more mistakes in my favourite theory of cambustion. 154 Mr*. B. Potash derives its name from the pots in which the vegetables from which it was obtained used formerly to be bur t; the alkali remained mixed with the ashes at the bottom, and was thence called potash. Caroline. There is some good sense in this name as it will always remind us of the operation, and of the general source from which this alkali is derived. Emily. The ashes of a wood fire, then, are potash, since they are vegetable ashes ? Mr*. B. They always contain more or less potash, but are very far from consisting of that substance alone, as they are a mixture of various earths and salts which remain after the combustion of vegetables, and from which it is not easy to separate the alkali in its pure form. The process by which potash is obtained, even in the imperfect state in which it is used in the arts, is much more complicated than simple combustion. It was once deemed impossible to separate it entirely from all foreign substances, and it is only in chemical labora- tories that it is to be met with in the state of purity in which you find it in this phial. Wood ashes are, how- ever, valuable for the alkali which they contain, and are used for some purposes without any further prepar- ation. Purified in a certain degree, they make what is commonly called pearl ash, which is of great efficacy in taking out grease, in washing linen, Sec. for potash combines readily with oil or fat, with which it forms ■a compound well known, to you under the name of soap. Caroline. Really ! Then I should think it would be better to wash all linen with pearl ash than with soap, as, in the latter case, the alkali, being already com- bined with oil, must be less efficacious in extracting grease. Mr*. B. Its effect would be too powerful on fine linen, and would injure its texture ; pearl-ash is there- fore only used for that which is of a strong coarse kind. For the same reason you cannot wash your hands with plain potash ; but, when mixed with oil in the form of soap, it is soft as well as cleansing, and is therefore much better adapted to the purpose. Caustic potash, as we already observed, acts on the 155 skin, and animal fibre, in virtue of its attraction for water and oil, and converts all animal matter into a kind of saponaceous jelly. Emily. Are vegetables the only source from wnich potash can be derived ? Airs. B. No : for though far. most abundant in ve- getables, it is by no means confined to that class of bo- dies, beins found also on the surface of the earth mixed with various minerals, especially with earths and stones, whence it is supposed to be conveyed into vegetables bv the roots of the plant. It is also met with, though in very small quantities, in some animal substances. The most common state of potash is that of carbonat ; I suppose you understand what that ib ? Emily. 1 believe so ; though 1 do not recollect that you ever mentioned the word before If I am not mis- taken, it must be a compound salt formed by the union of carbonic acid with potash. Mr*. B. Very true ; you see how admirably the nomenclature of modern chemistry is adapted to assist the memory ; when you hear the name of a compound, you necessarily learn what are its constituents; and when you are acquainted with the constituents, you can immediately name ihe compound th«t they form Caroline. Prav, how were bodies arranged and dis- tinguished before this nomenclature was introduced ? Mrs. B. Chemistrv was then a much more difficult study ; for everv substance has an arbitrary name, which'it derived'either from the person who discover- ed it, as Glaubt r's salts for instance, or from some oth- er circumstance relative to it, though quite unconnect- ed with its real nature, as potash. # These names have been retained for some of the sim- ple bodies ; for as this class is not numerous, and there- fore can earily lie remembered, it has not been thought necessary to change them. Emily. Yet I think it would have rendered the new nomenclature more complete to have methodized the names of the elementary as well as of the compound bodies, though it could not have been done in the same manner. But the names of the simple substances might 136 have indicated their nature, or at least, some of their principal properties; and if, like the acids and com- pound salts, all the simple bodies had a similar termin- ation, they would have been immediately known as such. So complete and regular a nomenclature would 1 think, have given a clearer and more comprehensive view of chemi-strv, than the present, which is a medley of the old and new torms. Airs, B. But you are not aware of the difficulty of introducing into science an entire set of new tciins; it obliges all the teachers and professors to go to school again ; and if some of the old names, that art least ex- ceptionable, were not left as an introduction to the new ones, few people would have had industry and perseve- rance enough to submit to the study of a completely new language ; and the inferior classes of arti-.ts, who can only act from habit ard routine, would, at least, for a time, have felt material inconvenience from a total change of their habitual terms. From these consider- ations, Lavoisier and his colleagues, who invented the new nomenclature, thought it most prudent to leave a few links of the old chain, in order to connect it with the new one. Besides, you may easily conceive the inconvenience which might arise from giving a regular nomenclature to substances, the simple nature of which is always uncertain ; for the new names might, per- haps, have proved to have been founded in error. And, indeed, cautious as the inventors of the modern chemi- cal language have been, it has already been found ne- cessary to modify it in may respects. In those few ca- ses, however, in which new names have been adopted to designate simple bodies, the names have been so contrived as to indicate one of the chief properties of the body in question ; this is the case with oxygen, which, as I explained to you, signifies to produce acids; iwd hydrogen, to produce water. But to return to the alkalies We shall now try to melt some of this caustic potash in a little water, as a circumsiance occurs during its solution very worthy of observation—Do you feel the heat that is produced? Caroline. Yes, I do ; but is not this directly con- trary to our theory of caloric, according to which heat 157 is disengaged when fluids become solid, and cold pro- duccd when solids are melted ? Mrs. B. The latter is really the case in all solu- tions ; and if the solution of caustic alkalies seems to make an exception to the rule, it does not, I believe, form any solid objection to the theory. The matter may be explained thus: When water first comes in contact with the potash, it produces an effect similar to the slakeing of lime, that is, the water is solidified in combining with the potash, and thus loses its latent heat; this is the heat that you now feel, and which is, therefore, produced not by the melting of the solid but by the solidification of the fluid But when there is more water than the potash can absorb and solidify, the latter then yields to the solvent power of the water ; and if we do not perceive the cold produced by its melt- ing, it is because it is counterbalanced by the heat pre- viously dis-ngaged* [Sec note page 16*4.] A very remarkable property of potash is the forma- tion of glass by its fusion with silicious earth. You aie not yet acquainted with this last substance further than its being in the list of simple bodies. It is suffi- cent, for the present, that you should know what sand and flint are chiefly composed of it; alone it is infusi- ble ; but mixed with potash, it melts when exposed to the heat of a furnace, combines with the alkali, and runs into glass. Caroline. Who would ever have supposed that the same substance that converts transparent oil into such an opaque body as soap, should transform that opaque substance, sand, into transparent glass ! Mrs. B. The transparency, or opacity of bodies, does not, I conceive, depend so much upon their inti- mate nature, as upon the arrangement of their parti- cles ; we cannot have a more striking instance of this, than that which is afforded by the drfferent states of carbone, which, though it commonly appears in the form of a black opaque body, sometimes assumes the most dazzling transparent form in nature, that of dia- mond, which, you recollect, is nothing but carbone, and which, in all probability, derives its beautiful trans- 158 parency from the peculiar arrangement of its particles during their crystallization. Emily. I never should have supposed that the for- mation of glass was so simple a process as you describe it. Mrs. B. It is by no means an easy operation to make perfect glass ; for if the sand, or flint, from which the silicious earth is obtained be mixed with any metal- lic particles, or other substance winch cannot be vitri- fied, the glass will be discoloured, or defaced by opaque specks. Caroline. That I suppose is the reason why objects so often appear irregular and thapeless through a com- mon glass window. Mr* B. This species of imperfection proceeds, I believe, from another cause It is extremely difficult to prevent the lower part of the vessels in which the materials of glass are fused, from containing a more dense vitreous matter than the upper, on account of the heavier ingredients falling to the bottom. When this happens, it occasions the appearance of veins or waves in the glass, from the difference of density in its seve- ral parts, which produces an irregular refraction of the rays of light that pass through it. Another species of imperfection sometimes arises from the fusion not being continued for a length of time sufficient to combine the two ingredients completely, or from the due proportion of potash and siiex (which are as two to one),*not being carefully observed; the glass, in those cases, will be liable lo alteration from the action of the air, of salts, and especially of acids, which will effect its decomposition by combining with the potash and forming compound salts. Emily. What an extremely useful substance pot- ash is 1 • Mrs. B. Besides the great importance of potash in the manufactures of glass and soap, it is of very con- siderable utility in many of the other arts, and in its combination with several acids, particularly the nitric, with which it forms saltpetre. 159 Caroline. Then saltpetre must be a nitrat of potash 9 But we are not yet acquainted with the nitric acid ? Mrs. B. We shall, therefore, defer entering into the particulars of these combinations, till we come to a general review of the compound salts. In order to avoid confusion, it will be better at present to confine ourselves to the alkalies. Emily. Cannot you shew us the change of colour which you said the alkalies produced on blue vegetable infurions ? Mr* B. Yes ; very easily. I shall dip a piece of white paper into this syrup of violets, which, you see, is of a deep blue, and dyes the paper of the same co- lour.—As soon as it is dry, we shall dip it into a solu- tion of potash, which, though itself colourless, will turn the paper green— Caroline. So it has indeed ! And do the other alka» lies produce a similar effect ? Mr*. B. Exactly the same.—We may now proceed to Soda, which, however important, will detain us but a very short time ; as in all its general properties it very strongly resembles potash ; indeed, so great is their similitude, that they have been long confounded, and they can now scarcely be distinguished except by the difference of the salts which they form with acids. The grei.t source of this alkali is the sea, where, combined with a peculiar acid, it forms the salt with which the waters of the ocean are so strongly impreg- nated. Emily. Is not that the common table salt ? Airs. B. The very same ; but again we must post? pone entering in'o the particulars of this interesting combination, till we treat of the neutral salts. Soda may be obtained from common salt; but the easiest and most u^ual method of procuring it, is by the com- bustion of marine plants, an operation perfectly analor gous to that by which potasli is obtained from vegcta* bles. Emily. From what does soda derive its name ? A Ira. B. From a plant called by us soda, and by the 160 Arabs kali; which afford it in great abundance. Kali has, indeed, given its name to the alkalies in generaF. Caroline. Does soda form glass and soap, in the same manner as potash ? Mr*. B. Yes, it does; it is of equal importance in the arts, and it is even prefered to potash for some purposes ; but you will not be able to distinguish theif properties, till we examine the compound sahs which they form with acids ; we must therefore leave soda for the present, and proceed to Ammonia, or the vol- atile alkali. Emily. I long to hear something of this alkali; is it not of the same nature as hartshorn ? Airs. B. Yes, it is, as you will see by and by. This alkakli is seldom found in nature in its pure state ; it is most commonly extracted from a compound salt called sal ammoniac, which was formerly imported from Am* monia, a region of Lybia, from which both the salt and the alkali, derive their names. The crystals contained in this bottle are specimens of this salt, which consists of a combination of ammonia and muriatic acid. Caroline. Then it should be called muriat of ammo- nia ; for though lam ignorant what muriatic acid is, yet I know that its combination with ammonia cannot but be so called ; and I am surprised to see sal ammo- niac inscribed on the label. Mrs. B. That is the name by which it has been so long known, that the modern chemists have not yet suc- ceeded in banishing it altogether; and it is still sold under that name by druggists, though by scientific chemists it is more properly called muriat of ammonia. Emily. By what means can the ammonia be separ- ated irom the muriatic acid ? Mr*. B. By a display of chemical attractions ; but this operation is too complicated for you to understand, till you are better acquainted with the agency of affini- ties. Emily. And when extracted from the salt, what kind of substance is ammonia ? Mr*. B. Its natural form at the temperature of the atmosphere, when free from combination, is that of 161 gas ; and in this state it is called ammoniacal gas. But it mixes very readily with water, and can be thus ob- tained in a liquid fotm. Caroline. You said that ammonia was a compound ; pray, of what principles is it composed ? Mrs. B. It was discovered a few years since, by Berthollet, a celebrated French chemist, that it consist- ed of about one part of hydrogen to four parts of nitro- gen. Having heated ammoniacal gas under a receiver, by causing the electrical spark to pass repeatedly thro' it, he found that it increased considerably in bulk lost all its alkaline properties, and was actually converted into hydrogen and nitrogen gasses. Emily. Ammoniacal gas must, I suppose, be very heavy, since it expands so much when decomposed ? Mrs B. Compared with hydrogen gas, it certain- ly is ; but it is considerably lighter than oxygen gas, and only about half the weight of atmospherical air. It possesses most of the properties of the fixed alka- lies; but cannot be of so much use in the arts on ac- count of its volatile nature. It is, therefore, never employed in the manufacture of glass, but it forms soap with oils equally as well as potash and soda ; it re- sembles them likewise in its strong attraction for water ; for which reason it can be collected in a receiver over mercury only. Caroline. I do not understand this ? Mr*. B. Do you recollect the method which we used to collect gasses in a glass receiver over water ? Caroline. Perfectly. Mr*. B. Ammoniacal gas has so strong a tenden- cy to unite with water, that, instead of passing through that fluid, it would be instantaneously absorbed by it. We can therefore neither use water .for that purpose, nor any other liquid of which water is a component part ; so that, in order to collect.this gas, we are oblige ed to have recourse to mercury (a liquid which has no action upon it), and we use a mercurial bath, instead of a water bath, as we did on former occasions. Water impregnated with this gas, is nothing more than the ■fluid which you mentioned at the beginning of the con- P 2 162 versation—hartshorn ; it is the ammoniacal gas escap- ing from the water which gives it so powerful a smell. Emily But there is no appearance of effervescence in hartshorn ? Mrs. B Because the particles of gas that rise from the water are too subtile and minute for their effect to be visible. Water diminishes in density by being impregnated with ammoniacal gas ; and this augmentation of bulk increases its capacity for caloric Emily. In making hartshorn, then, or impregnat- ing water with ammonia, heat must be absorbed, and cold produced ? Mr*. B. That effect would take place if it was not counteracted by another circumstance ; the gas is lique- fied by incorporating with the water, and gives out ils latent heat. The condensation of the gas more than counterbalances the expansion of the water ; therefore, upon the whole, heat is produced.—But rf you dissolve ammoniacal gas with ice or snow, cold is produced.— Can you account for that ? Emily. The gas, in being condensed into a liquid, must give out heat ; and, on the other hand, the snow or ice, in being rarefied into a liquid must absorb heat ; so that, between the opposite effects, 1 should have sup- posed the original temperature would have been pre- served. Mr*. B. But you have forgotten to take into the ac- count the rarefaction of the water (or melted ice) by the impregnation of the gas ; and this is the cause of the cold which is ultimately produced. Caroline. Is ihe sal volatile (the smell of which so strongly resembles hartshorn) likewise a preparation of ammonia ? Mr* B. It is carbonat of ammonia dissolved in wa- ter ; and which, in its concrete s.ate, is commonly call- ed salts of hartshorn, Ammonia is caustic like the fiv ed alkalies, as you may judge by the pungent effects of hartshorn, which cannot be taken internally or ap- plied to delicate external parts, without being plentiful- 163 ly diluted with water—Oil and acids are very excellent' antidotes for alkaline poisons ; can you guess why ? Caroline. Perhaps, because the oil combines with the alkali, and forms soap, and thus destroys its caustic properties ; and the acid converts it into a compound salt, which I suppose, is not so pernicious as caustic al- kali. Airs. B. Precisely so^ Amnioniacal gas, if it he mixed with atmospherical aiv, and a burning taper repeatedly plunged into it, will burn with a large flame of a peculiar yellow colour. Emily. I thought that all the alkalies were incom- bustible. Caroline. Besides, you say that flame is produced by the combustion of hydrogen only ? Mr* B. And is not hydrogen gas one of the con- stituents of ammoniacal gas ? Therefore, though gen- erally speaking, the alkalies are incombustible, yet one of the constituents of ammonia is eminently combus- tible. Emily. I own I had forgotten that ammonia was a compound. But pray tell me, can ammonia be pro- cured from this Lybian salt only ? Mr*. B. So far from it, that it is contained in, and may be extracted from, all animal substances whatever. Hydrogen and nitrogen are two of the chief constitu- ents of animal matter : it is therefore not surprising that they should occasionally meet and combine in those proportions that compose ammonia. But this alkali is more frequently generated by the spontaneous decom- position of animal substances ; the hydrogen and nitro- gen gasses that arise from putrified bodies combine, and form the volatile alkali. Muriat of ammonia, instead of being exclusively brought from Lybia, as it originally was, is now chief- ly prepared in Europe, by chemical processes. Am- monia, although principally extracted from this salt, can only be produced by a great variety of other sub- stances. The horns of cattle, especially those of the deer, yield it in abundance, and it is from this circum- stance that a solution of ammonia in water has been 164 called hartshorn. It may likewise be procured from wool, flesh and bones ; in a word, any animal substance whatever yields it by decomposition. We sh..ll now lay aside the alkalies, however import- ant the subject may be, till we treat of their combination with acids. The next time we meet we shall examine the earths, which will complete our review of the class of simple bodies, after which we shall proceed to their several combinations. • If. however, this defence of the general theory be true, it ought to be found, on accurate elimination, that a certain quantity of heat ultimately disappears. or should this explanation be rejected, the phenomenon might be accounted for by supposing that a solu- tion of alkali in water has less capacity for heat than either water or alkali in their separate state. Conservation xi. On Earths. Mrs. B. The earths, which we are to-day to examine are ten in number: SILEX, STRONTITES, ALUMINE, YTTUIA, BAKYTES, GLUCINA, LIME, EIKCONIA, MAGNFCIA, GARGONIA. The five last are of a very late discovery ; their pro- perties are but imperfectly known ; and as thty have not yet been applied to use, it will be unRecessary to enter into any particulars respecting them ; we shall confine our remarks, therefore, to the six first. The earths in general are, like the alkalies, incombustible substances. Caroline. Yet I have seen turf burnt in the country, and it makes an excellent fire ; the earth becomes red hot, and produces a very great quantity of heat. 165 Mrs. B. It is not the earth that burns my dear, but' the roots, grass, and other remnants of vegetables that are intermixed with it. The caloric, which is produ- ced by the combustion of these substances, makes the earth red hot, and this being a bad conductor of heat, retains its caloric a long time ; but were you to examine it when cooled, vou would find that it had not absorbed one particle of oxygen, nor suffered any alteration from the fire. Earth is, however, from the circumstance just mentioned, an excellent refiecter of heat, and owes its utility when mixed with fuel, solely to that property. It is in this point of view that Count Rutnford has re- commended balls of incombustible substances to be ar- ranged in fire-places, and mixed with the coals, by which means the caloric disengaged by the combustion of the latter, is more perfectly reflected into the room, and an expense of fuel is saved. Earth, you know, was supposed to be one of the four elements ; but now that a variety of elements have been discovered and clearly discriminated, no single one can be exclusively called an element; and as none of them have been decomposed, they have an equal title to the rank of simple bodies, which are the only elements that we now acknowledge. It is from these earths, eith- er in their simple state, or mixed together and combi- ned with other minerals, that the solid part of our globe is formed. Emi.'y. When I think of the great variety of soils, I am astonished that there are not a greater number o£ earihs to form them. Mr*. B You might, indeed, almost confine that number to four ; for barytes, strontites, and the others of late discovery, act hut so sm.ll a part is this great theatre, tiiat they cannot be reckoned as essential to the general formation ol the glooe. And you must not cu.itiiie your idea of earths to the formation of soil ; for reck, marble, chalk, slate, sand, flint, and all kinds of stones, from the precious jewel to the commonest peb- bles ; in a word all ihe immense variety of mineral pro- ducts, may be referred to some, of these earihs, cither in> a simple state, or combined the one with the other, o* blended with other ingredients. 166 Caroline. Precious stones composed of earth ! That seems very difficult to conceive. Emily. Is it more extraordinary than that the most precious of all jewels, diamond, should be composed of carbone ? But diamond forms an exception, Mrs. B—; for, though a stone, it is not composed of earth. Mrs. B. I did not specify the exception, as I knew you were so well acquainted with it Besides, I would call diamond a mineral rather than a stone, as the lat- ter term always implies the presence of some earth. Caroline. I cannot conceive how such coarse mate- rials can be converted into such beautiful productions. Mrs. B. We are very far from understanding all the secret resourses of nature ; but I do not think the spontaneous formation of the crystals, which we call precious stones, one of the most difficult phenomena to compound. By the slow and regular work of ages, perhaps of hundreds of ages, these earths may be gradully dis- solved by water, and as gradually deposited by their solvent in the slow and undisturbed process of crystal- lization. The regular arrangement of their particles, during their reunion in a solid niuss, gives them that brilliancy, transparency, and beauty, for which they are so much admired : and renders them in appearance so totally different from their rude and primitive ingre- dients. Caroline But how does it happen that they are spon- taneously dissolved, and afterwards crystalized ? Airs. B. The scarcity of many kinds of crystals, as rubies, emeralds, topazes, Sec. shows that their forma- tion is not an operation very easily carried on in nature. But cannot you imagine that when water, holding in solution some particles of earth, filters through the cre- vices of hills or mountains, and at length dribbles into some cavern, each successive drop may be slowly eva- porated, leaving behind it the particle of earth which it held in solution ? You know that cryitalization is more regular and perfect, in proportion as the evapor- ation of the solvent is slow and uniform ; Nature, there* fore, who knows no Umit of time, has, in all works of i6r this kind, an infinite advantage over any artist who at- tempts to imitate such productions. Emily. I can now conceive that the arrangement of the particles of earth, during crystallization, may be such as to occasion transparency, by admitting a free passage to the rays of light; but I cannot understand why crystallized earths should asssume such beautiful colours as most of them do. Sapphire, for instance, is of a celestial blue ; ruby, a deep red ; topaz, a brilliant yellow ? Mr* B. Nothing is more simple than to suppose that the arrangment of their particles is such, as to transmit some of the coloured rays of light, and to re- flect others, in which case the stone must appear of the colour of the rays which it reflects But, besides, it frequently happens, that the colour of a stone is ow- ing to a mixture of some metallic matter. Caroline. Pray, are the different kinds of precious stones each composed of one individual earth, or are thev formed ofa combination of several earths ? Airs. B A great variety of materials enters into the combination of most of them ; not only several earths, but son climes salts and metals. The earths, however, in their simple state, frequently form very beautiful crystals ; and, indeed, it is in that state only that they can be obtained perfectly pure. Emily. Is not the Derby shire spar produced by the crysta.lization of Garths, in the way you have just ex- plained ? I have been in some of the subteraneous cav- erns where it is found, which are such as you have des- cribed. Mr*. B Yes ; but this spar is a very imperfect specimen of crystallization ; it consists of a great vari- ety of ingredients confusedly blended together, as you may judge by its opacity, and by the various colours and appearances which it exhibits. But, in examining the earths in their most perfect and agreeable form, we must not lose sight of that state in which they are most commonly found, and which, if less pleasing to the eye, is far more interest- ing;by its utility. Before we proceed further, however, I should observe, that although the earths are consid- 168 ered as simple substances (as chemists have not suc- ceeded in decomposing them) yet there is considerable reason to suppose that they, as well as the alkalies, are compound bodies. From the circumstance of their being incombustible, it has been conjectured with some plausibility, that they may possfoly be Ixxlies that have already been burnt, and which being saturated with oxygen, will not combine with any additional quantity of that principle. Caroline. But if they have been burnt, they must contain oxygen, which .would easily be discovered ? Airs. B. Not if their attraction for it be so strong that they will yield to no other substance ; for, dur- ing the state of combination, the properties of oxygen mav be so altered, as to be concealed entirely from our'observation ; and it is possible that this may be the case with the earths. Let us suppose them, for in- stance, to have heen originally some peculiar metals, whose affinity for oxygen was so great, that they at- tracted it from every substance, and consequently would yield it 'o none ; such metals must ever exist in the state of oxyds ; and, as we should not have known them under their metalic form, we cou'd not consider them as metals, but should distinguish them by some specific name, as we have done with regard 10 the earths. Caroline. That, indeed, seems very probable ; for metals, when oxydated, become to all appearance a kind of earthly substance. Emily. But Have the earths any of the properties of the metallic oxyds ? Mrs. B. Their strongest feature of resemblance is their property of combining with the acids to form com- pound salts. You must not, however, consider the idea of earths being burnt bodies, as any, thing more than mere con- jecture ; for whatever may be their contituents, until we succeed in decomposing them, we cannot consider them in any other li^ht than as simple bodies. Emily Pray which of the earths are endued with al- kaline properties ? 169 Mrs. B. All of them, more or less ; but there are four, barytes, magnesia, lime, and strontius, which are called alkaline earths, because they possess those qualities in so great a degree, as to entitle them, in most respects, to the rank of alkalies. They combine and form compound salts with acids in the same way a> .Ikalies ; they are, like them, susceptible of a con- siderable degree of causticity and are similarly acted upon by chemical tests—The other earths, silex and alumine, with one 01 two others of late discovery, are in some degree mere earthy, that is to say. they pos- sess more completely the properties common to all the earths, which are, insipidity, dryness, unalterableness in the fire, infusibility, &c. Caroline. Yei, did you wot tell us that silex, or sili- cious earths, when mixed with an alkali, was fusible and ran into glass ? Mrs B. Yes, my dear ; but the characteristic pro- pel ties of earths, which I have mentioned, are to be considered as belonging to them in a state of purity on- ly ; a state in which they are very seldom to be met with in nature.—Besides these general properties, each earth has its own specific characters, by which it is dis- tinguished from any other substance. Let us there- fore review them separately. Silfx, or silicia, abounds in flint, sand, sondstone, agate, jasper, &c. It forms the basis of many precious stones, and particularly of those that strike fire with steel. It is rough to the touch, scratches and wears away metal ; it is acted upon by no acid but the fluoric, and is not soluble in water by any known process; but nature certainly dissolves it by means with which we are unacquainted, and thus produces a variety of sili- cions crystals, and amongst these rock crystal, which is the purest specimen of this earth. Silex appears to have been intended by Providence to form the solid ba- sis of the globe, to serve as a foundation for the origin- al mountains and give them that hardness and dura- bility which has enabled them to resist the various rev- olutions which the surface of the earth has successively undergone. From these mountains silicious locks have, during the course of ages, been gradually detach- 170 ed by torrents of water, and brought down in frag- ments ; these, in the violence and rapidity of their des- cent, are sometimes crumbled to sand, and in thit state form the beds of rivers and of the sea, chiefly composed ofsilicious materials. Sometimes the fragments are broken without being pulverised by their fall, and as- sume the form of pebbles, which gradually become rounded and polished. Emily. Pray what is the true colour of silex, which forms such a variety of different coloured substances ? Sand is brown, flint is nearly black, and precious stones are of all colours ? Airs. B. Pure silex, such as is found only in the chemist's laboratory, is perfectly white, and the vari- ous colours which it assumes, in the different substan- ces you have just mentioned, proceed from the differ- ent ingredients with which it is mixed in them. Caroline. I wonder that silex is not more valuable, since it forms the basis of so many precious stones. Airs. B. You must not forget that the value we set upon precious stones, depends in a L,reat measure upon the scarcity with which nature affords them ; for were those productions either common, or perfectly iroitable by art, they would no longer, notwithstanding their beauty, be so highly esteemed. But the real value of siheious earth, in many of the most useful arts, is very extensive. Mixed with cliy, it forms the basis of all the various kinds of earthen ware, from the most com- mon utensils to the most refined ornaments Emily. And we must not forget ils importance in the formation (if glass with potash. Airs. B. Nor should we omit to mention, likewise, many other important uses of silex, such as being the chief ingredient of some of the most durable cements, of mortars, &c. I said before, that silicious earth combined «vith no acid but the fluoric : it is for this reason that glass is liable to bj ullackccl by that acid only, which, from its, strong affinity for sitex. forces that substance from its combination with the potash, and thus destroys the glass. We will now hasten to proceed to the other earths,. for I am rather apprehensive of your growittg weary of this part of our subject. m Caroline. The history of earths is not quite so enter* taining as that of the other simple substances. Mr*. B. Perhaps not; but it is absolutely indispens- able that you should know something of them ; for they form the basis of so many interesting and important compounds, that their total omission would throw great obscurity on our general outline of chemical science. We shall, however, review them in as cursory a manner as the subject will admit of Alumi ne derives its n »me from a compound salt cal- led alum, of which it forms the basis. Caroline. But it ought to be just the contary, Mr?. B. The simple body should give, instead of taking its name from the compound. Mrs. B. Yery true, my dear ; but as the com- pound salt was known long before its basis was discov- ered, it was natural enough when the earth was at length separated from the acid, that it should derive its name from the compound from which it was obtained. However, to remove your scruples, we will call the salt according to the new nomenclature, salphat of Allumine.. From this combination, allumine may be obtained in its pure sute ; it is then soft to the touch, makes a paste with water, and hardens in the fire. In nature, it is found chiefly in clay, which contains a considerable proportion of this earth ; it is very abundant in fuller's earth, slate, and a variety of other mineral productions. There is indeed scarcely any mineral substance more useful to'mankind than alumine. In the siate of clay, it fcrms large strata of the earth, gives consistency to the soil of vallics, and of i.ll low end damp spots, such as swamps and marshes. The beds of lakes. ponds,; and springs arc almost entirely of clay ; instead of allowing of the filtration of water, as sand does, it forms an impenetrable brttom, and by this means water is ac umulMed in the caverns of the earth, producing those reservoirs whence springs issue, and spout oui at the surface. Emily. I always thought that these subterraneous reservoirs of water were beaded by some hard stone, or s;ock, which the water could not penetrate. Afre. B. Tnis is not the case ; for in the course of 172 time water would penetrate, or wear away silex, or any other kind ofMone, while is is effectually stopped by c'av or allumine. The solid compact soils, such as are fit for corn, owe their consistence in a great measure to alumine ; this earth is therefore used to improve sandy or chalky soils, which do not retain a sufficient quantity of water for the purpose of vegetation Alumine is the mosf essential ingredient in all potte- ries It enters into the composition of briek, as well as ihat of the finest china ; the addition of silex and water hardens it. renders it susceptible of a degree of vitrification, and makes it perfectly fit for its various purposes. Caroline. I can scarcely conceive that brick and china could be made of the same materials. Mrs. B. Brick consists almost entirely of baked • clay ; but a certain proportion of silex is essential to the formation of earthen or stone ware. In common potteries sand is used for that purpose ; a more pure silex is, I b litve necessary for the composition of por- celain, as well as a finer kind of clay ; and these mate- rials are, no doubt, more carefully prepared, and curi- ously wrought, in the one cise than in the other. Por- celain owes its beautiful semi-transparency to a com- mencement of vitrification. Emily. But the commonest earthen ware, though not transparent, is covered with a kind of glazing Mrs. B That precaution is equally necessary fou Use as for beauty, as the ware would be liable to be spoiU ed and corroded by a variety of substances, if not cov- ered with a coating ol this kind. In porcelain it con* sists of enamel, which is a fine white opaque glass, formed of metalic oxyds, sand, salts, and such other materials as are susceptible of vitrification. The glazing of common earthen ware is made chiefly of oxyd of lead, or sometimes merely of salt, which when thinly spread over earthen vessels, will, at a certain heat, run into opaque glass. Caroline. And of what nature are the colours which are used for painting china ? 17 a Mrs. B. They are all composed of metallic oxyds, so that these colours, instead of receiving injury from the application of fire, are strengthened and developed by its action, which causes them to undergo different degrees of oxydation. Alumine and silex are not only often combined by art, but they have in nature a very strong tendency to unite, and are found combined, in different proportions, in various gems and other minerals. Indeed, many of the precious stones, such as ruby, oriental sapphire, amethyst, 8cc consist chiefly of Alumine. We may now proceed to the alkaline earths. I shall say but a few words on Barytes, #*- it is hardly ever used, except in chemical laboratories. It is remarka- ble for its great weight, and its ?'ror g alkaline proper- ties, such as destroying animal substances, turning green some blue vegetable colours, and shewing a pow- erful attraction for acids ; this last property it possesses to such a degree, particularly with regard to the sul- phuric acid, that it will always detect its presence in any substance or combination whatever, by immediately uniting with it and forming a sulphat of barytes. This renders it a very valuable chemical test. It is found pretty abundantly in nature in the state of carbonat, from which the pure earth can be easily separated. The next earth we have to consider is Lime.—.This is a substance of too great and general importance to be passed over so slightly as the last. Lime is strongly alkaline. In nature it is not met with in its simple state, as its affinity for water and car- bonic acid is so great, that it is always found combined with these substances, with which it forms the common lime-stone ; but it is separated in the kiln from these ingredients, which are volatilized whenever a sufficient degree of heat is applied. Emily. Pure lime then is nothing but lime-stone, which has been deprived in the kiln, of its water, and carbonic acid ? Mrs. B. Precisely ; in this state it is called quick- lime, and is so caustic, that it is capable of decompos- ing the dead bodies of animals very rapidlv, without Q2 '*, their undergoing the process of putrefaction.—I have here some quick-lime, which is kept carefully corked up in a bottle to prevent the access of air ; for were it at all exposed to the atmosphere, it would absorb both moisture and carbonic acid gas from it, and be soon slaked. Here is also some lime-stone—we shall pour a little water on each, and observe the effects that re- sult from it. Caroline. How quick the lime hisses ! It is become excessively hot!—It swells, and now it bursts and crum- bles to powder, while the water on the lime-stone ap- pears to produce no kind of alteration. Mr*. B Because the lime-stone is already saturat- ed with water, whilst the quick-lime, which has been deprived of it in the kiln, combines with it with very great avidity, and produces this prodigious disengage- ment of heat, the cause of which I formerly explained to you ; do you recollect it ? Emily. \es ; you said that the heat did not proceed from the lime, but from the water which was solidified, and thus parted with its heat of liqudity. Mr*. B. Very well. If we continue to add succes- ive quantities of water to the lime after being slaked and crumbled as you see, it will then gradually be dif- fused in the water, till it will at length be dissolved in it, and entirely disappear ; but for this purpose it requires no less that 7i<0 time its weight of water.. This solui icr.is called lime-water. Caroline. How very small, then, is the proportion of lime dissolved. Mrs. B. Barytes is still of more difficult solution ; it dissolves only in 900 times its weight of water: but it is much more soluble in the state of crystals. The liquid contained in this bottle is lime-water ; it is often used as a medicine, chiefly, I believe, for the purpose of combining with, and neutralizing the super-abun- dant acid which it meets with in the stomach. Emily. I am surprised that it is so perfectly clear :. it does not at all partake of the whiteness of lime. Mr*. B. Have you forgotten that, in solutions, the solid body is so minutely subdivided by the fluid, as to become invisible, and therefore will not in the least de- gree impair the transparency of the solvent. 175 ' 1 sard that the attraction of lime for carbonic acid was so strong, that it would absorb it from the atmosr phere. We may see this effect by exposing a glass of lime-water to the air ; the lime will then separate from the water, combine with the carbonic acid, and re-ap- pear on the surface in the form of a white film, which is carbonet of lime, commonly called chalk. Caroline. Chalk is then a compound salt ? I never should have supposed that those immense beds of chalk that we see in many parts of the country, were a salt. Now, the white film begins to appear on the surface of the water; but it is far from resembling hard solid chalk. Mrs. B That is owing to its state of extreme divis- ion ; in a little time it will collect into a more compact mass, and subside at the bottom of the glass. If you breathe into lime-water, the carbonic acid, which is mixed with the air that you expire, will pro- duce tlie same effect. It is an experiment easily made —I shall pour some lime-water into this glass tube, and, by breathing repeatedly into it, you will soon perceive a precipitation of chalk—. Emily. I see already a small white cloud formed. Mrs. B. It is composed of minute particles of chalk ; at present it floats in the water, but it will soon subside.. Carbonet of lime, or chalk, you see, is insoluble in water, since the lime which was dissolved re-appears when converted into chalk ; but you must take notice of a very singulai circumstance which is, that chalk is so- luble in water impregnated with carbonic acid. Caroline. It is very curious, indeed, that carbonic a- cid gas srr|#ild render'lime soluble in one instance, and insoluble in the other ! Mr*. B- I have here a little bottle of Seltzer water, which, you know, is strongly impregnated with carbon* ic acid—let us pour a little of it into a glass of lime wa- ter. You see that it immediately forms a precipitation of carbonat of lime ! Emily. Yes, a white cloud appears. Mr*. B. I shall now pour an additional.quantity oi the Seltzer water into the lime water— 176 Emily. How singular! The cloud is re-dissolved, and the liquid is again transparent. Mrs. B. All the mystery depends upon this circum- stance, that carbonat of iime is soluble in carbonic acid, whilst it is insoluble in water ; the first quantity of car- bonic acid, therefore, which I introduced into the lime water, was employed in forming the carbonat of lime, which remained visible, until an additional quan- tity of carbonic acid dissolved it. Thus, you see, when the lime and carbonic acid are in proper proportions to form chalk, the white cloud appears, but when the acid predominates, the chalk is no sooner formed than it is dissolved. Caroline. That is now the case ; but let us try whe- ther a further addition of lime water will again precip- itate the chalk. Emily. It does, indeed ! the cloud re-appears, be- cause, I suppose, there is now no more of the carbon- ic acid than is necessary to form chalk : and, in order to dissolve the chalk, a superabundance of acid is re- quired. Airs. B. We have, I think, carried this experiment far enough ; every repitition would but exhibit the same appearances. Lime combines with most of the acids, to which the carbonic (being the weakest) readily yields it ; but these combinations we shall have an opportunity of no- ticing more particularly hereafter. It unites with phosphorus, and with sulphur, in their simple state ; in short, of all the earths, lime is that which nature em- ploys most frequently and most abundantly, in its innu- merable combinations. It is the basis of all calcareous earths and stones ; we find it likewise in the'1 animal and the vegetable creations. Emily. And in the arts is not lime of a very great utility ? Mr*. B. Scarcely any substance more so ; you know that it is a most essential requisite in building as it constitutes the basis of all cements, such as mortars, stucco, plaster, &c. Lime is also of infinite importance in agriculture ; it lightens and warms, soils that are too cold, and com- 177 pact in consequence of too great a proportion of clay. But it would be endless to enumerate the various pur- poses for which it is employed ; and you know enough of it to form some idea of its importance : we shall, therefore, now proceed to the third alkaline earth, Mag- kesca. Caroline I am already pretty well acquainted with that earth, it is a medicine. Mr*. 13. It is in the state of carbonat that magnesia is usually employed medicinally ; it then differs but little in appearance from its simple form, which is that of a very fine light white powder. It dissolves in 2000 times its weight of water, but forms with acids ex- tremely soluble salt?. It has not so great an attrac-7 tion for acids as lime, and consequently yields them to the latter. It is found in a great variety of mineral combinations, such as slate, mica, amianthus, and more particularly in a certain lime-stone, which has lately been discovered by Mr. Tennant to contain it in very great quantities It does not attract and solidify water, like lime ,• but when mixed with water, and exposed to the atmosphere, it slowly absorbs carbonic acid from the latter, and thus loses its causticity. Its chief use in medicine is, like that of lime, derived from its readiness to combine with, and neautralize, the acid which it meets wilh in the stomach. Emily. Yet, you said it was taken in the state of carbonat, in which case it is already combined with an acid ? Airs. B. Yes ; but the carbonic is the last of all the acids in the order of affi lities ; it will therefore yield the magnesia to any of the others. It is, however, fre- quently taken in its caustic state as a remedy for flatu- lence. Combined with sulphuric acid, magnesia lorms another and more powerful medicine, commonly called epsom salt. Caroline. And properly, sulphat of magnesia, I sup* pose ; Pray why was it ever called Epsom salt? Mr*. B. Because there is a spring in the neighbor- hood of Epsom, which contains this salt in great abun- dance. 17* The last alkaline earth which we have to mention is Strontian or Strontites. discovered by Dr. Hope, a few years ago. It so strongly resembles barytes in its properties, and is so spa ii-gly found in nature, and of so little use in the arts, that it will not be necessary to enter into any particulars respecting it. One of the most remarkable characteristic properties of strontites, is. that its salts, when dissolved in spirit of wine, tinge the flame of a deep red, or blood colour. We shall here conclude this lecture ; and at our next Meeting, you will be introduced to a subject totally dif- ferent from any of the preceding. Contoettfations ON CHEMISTRY, VOLUME II. ON COMPOUND BODIES. \ Conversational ON CHEMISTRY. €N COMPOUND BODIES. ConDergation xn. •y THE AffRJCflON OF C03lPOSlfIOH. Mrs. B. HAVING completed our examination of the simple -or elementary bodies, we are now to proceed to those of a compound nature ; but before we enter on this ex- tensive subject, it will be necessary to make you ac- quainted with the principal laws by which chemical •combinations are governed. You recollect, I hope, what we have formerly said of the nature of the attraction of composition, or chemical attraction, or affinity, as it is also called ? Emily. Yes, I think perfectly ; it is the attraction that subsists between bodies of a different nature, which occasions them to combine and form a compound, when they come in contact. Mrs. B. Very well : your definition comprehends the first law of chemical attraction, which is, that it takes place r>nbi between bodies of a different nature ; as, for in- stance, between an acid and an alkali; between oxygen and a metal, &c. R 184 . Caroline. That we understand of course; for the attraction between particles of a similar nature is that of aggregation, or cohesion, which is independant of any chemical power. Mrs. B. The second law of chemical attraction, is that it takes place only between the most minute fiartides of bodies ; therefore, the more you divide the particles of the bodies to be combined, the more readily they act upon each other. Caroline. That is again a circumstance which we might have supposed ; for the finer the particles of the two substances are, the more easily and perfectly they will come in contact with each other, which must great- ly facilitate their union. It was for this purpose, you said, that you used iron filings in preference to wires or pieces of iron, for the decomposition of water. Mr*. B. It was once supposed that no mechanical power could divide bodies into particles sufficiently min- ute for them to act upon each other; and that, in or- der to produce the extreme division requisite for a che- mical action, one, if not both of the bodies, should be in a fluid state. There are, however, a few instances, in which two solid bodies very finely pulverized, exert a chemical action on one another; but such exceptions to the general rule are very rare indeed. Emily. In all the combinations that we have hither- to seen, one of the constituents has, 1 believe, been either liquor or aeriform. In combustions, for instance, the oxygen is taken from the atmosphere, in which it existed in the state of gas ; and whenever we have seen acids combine with metals or with alkalies, they were eithid in a liquid or an aeriform state. Mr*. B. The third law of chemical attraction is, that it can take place between two, three, fourt or even a greater number of bodies.—Can you recollect any exam- ples of these double, triple, and quadruple combina- tions ? Caroline. Oxyds and acids are bodies composed of two eonstituents ; compound salts of three : but I re- collect no instance of the combination of four principles, unless it be amongst the earths in the formation of stones. 1SS Mr*. B. Such examples very frequently occur a' tnongst the earths ; but you might have quoted, as in- stances of quadruple compounds, all those that result from the combination of acids with ammonia, or vola- tile alkali. Caroline. True. As ammonia is itself a compound, hs union with the acids, which are also composed of two principles, must form a quadruple combination. Mrs. B. You will soon become acquainted with a great variety of these complicated compounds. The fourth law of chemical attraction is, that a change of tem- perature always takes place at the moment of combination. This is occasioned by the change of capacity for heat, which takes place in bodies, when passing from a sim- ple to a combined state. Do you recollect any instance of this, Emily ? Emily. Yes ; when lime, or any of the alkalies, or alkaline earths, combine with, and solidify water, the whole of its heat of liquidity is set at liberty. Airs. B. I had rather that you had chosen any oth- er instance, as the union of water with the alkalies and alkaline earths is not, strictly speaking, a chemical combination ; for the water remains in the stale of wa- ter tho' condensed and solidified in the alkali ; and can be separated from it and restored to its fluid state, mere- ly by the restitution of its heat of liquidity. 1 am going to show you a very striking instance of the change of temperature arising from the combina- tion of different bodies —I shall pour some nitrous acid on this small quantity of oil of turpentine—the oil will instantly combine with the oxygen of the acid, and pro- duce a considerable change of temperature. Caroline. What a bh.ze \ The temperature of the oil and the acid must be elevated, indeed, to produce such violent combustion. Mr*. B. There is. however, a peculiarity in this combustion, which I, that the oxygen, instead of being derived from the atmosphere alone, is principally sup- plied bv the acid itself. Emily, And are not all combustions instances of the 184 change of temperature produced by the chemical com- bination of two bodies ? Airs. B. Undoubtedly ; when oxygen loses its gas- eous form in order to combine with a solid body, it be- comes condensed, and the caloric evolved produces the elevation of temperature. The specific gravity of bo. dies is at the same time altered by chemical combina- tion ; for in consequence of a change of capacity for heat, a change of density must be produced. Caroline. That was the case with the sulphuric acid and water, which by being mixed together, gave out a great deal of lieat, and proportionally increased in den- sity. Mr*. B. I do not think the instance to which you refer is quite in point; for there does not appear to be what we have called a true chemical combination be- tween sulphuric acid and water, since they are only mixed together, and undergo no other change than a lo^s of caloric, so that they may he separated again from each other merely by evaporating the water. Yet you have truly observed in this instance that the parti- cles of the two fluids so far penetrate each other, as to form a more compact substance, in consequence of which a quantity of latent heat is forced out, and there. is an increase of specific gravity. The 5th law of chemical attraction is, that the pro- perties which characterise bodies when separated, are altered or destroyed by their combination. Caroline. Certainly ; what, for instance, can be so different from water as the hydrogen and oxygen gas- es ? Emily. Or what more unlike sulphat of iron, than iron or sulphuric acid ? Caroline. But of all metamorphoses, thai of sand and potash into glass, is the most striking 1 Mr*. B. Every chemical combination is an illustra- tion of this rule. But let us proceed— The 6ih law is, that the force of chemical affinity; be- tween the constituents of a body, is estimated by that which. is required for their separation. This force is by no means proportional to the facility with which bodies unite ; for 185 manganese, for instance, which, you know, has st great an attraction for oxy gen, that it is never found in a metallic state, yields it more easily than any other me-' tal. Caroline. And likewise lime, which has a great at- traction for caibonic acid, yields it to any of the other acids, and even to heat alone. Emily. But, Mrs. B. you speak of estimating the force of attraction between bodies, by the force requir- ed to separate them ; how can you measure these for- ces T Mrs. B. They cannot be precisely measured, but they are comparatively ascertained by experiment, and can be represented by numbers which express the reia-- tive degrees of attraction. The 7th law is, that bodies have amongst themselves different degrees of attraction. Upon this law (which you may have discovered yourselves long since), the whole science of chemistry depends; for it is by means of the various degrees of affinity which bodies have for each other, that all the chemical compositions and decompositions are effected. Thus if you pour sul- phuric acid on soap, it will combine with the alkali to the exclusion of the oil, and form a sulphat of potash. Every chemical fact or experiment is an instance of the same kind ; and whenever the decomposition of a body is performed bv the addition of any single new sub- stance, it is said to be effected by simple elective attrac- tions. But it often happens, that no simple substance will decompose a body, and that, in order to effect this, you must offer to the compound a body which is itself composed of two, or sometimes three principles, which would not, each separately, perform the decomposition. In this case there are two new compounds formed in' Consequence of a reciprocal decomposition and recom- position. All instances of this kind are called double' elective attractions. Caroline. I confess I do not Understand this clearly. Mrs. B. You will easily comprehend it by the as- sistance of this diagram, in which the reciprocal forces' of attraction are represented by numbers: R 3 186 Original Compound. Sulphat of Soda. v Soda 8 Sulphuric Acid.-' X O v Result X7 Divellertt Attractions6$ 136 itoufr Nitrat o ^ v Sulphat of Soda, x 2 I oF Lime' x 5. e & 5 ft X * . 0 XNitric Acid 4 Lime. <( i 72 t X '^ A Original Compound. Nitrat of Lime. We here suppose that we are to decompose sulphat of soda; that is to separate the acid from the alkali : if, for this purpose we add some lime, in order to make it combine with the acid, we shall fail in our attempt, be- cause the soda and the sulphuric acid attract each oth-- erby a force which is (by way of supposition^ repre- sented by the number 8 ; while the lime tends to unite with this acid by an affinity equal to the number 6. It is plain, therefore, that the sulphat of soda will not be decomposed, since a force equal to 8 cannot be over- come by a force equal only to 6. Caroline. So far, this appears very clear. Mrs. B. If, on the other hand, we endeavour to de- compose this salt by nitric acid, which tends to combine- with soda, we shall be equally unsuccessful, as nitric acid tends to unite with the alkali by a force equal only to 7. In neither of these cases of simple elective attrac- tion, therefore, can we accomplish our purpose. But let us previously combine together the lime and nitric acid, so as to form a nitrat of lime, a compound salt, 187 the constituents of which are united by a poorer equal to 4. If then we present this compound to the sulphat of soda, a decomposition will ensne, because the sum of the forces which tend to preserve the two salts in their actual state, is not equal to that of the forces which tend to decompose them, and to form new combinations. The nitric acid, therefore, will combine with the soda, and the sulphuric acid with the lime. Caroline. I understand you now very well. This double effect takes place because the numbers 8 and 4, which represent the degrees of attraction of the con- stituents of the two original salts, make a sum less than the numbers 7 and 6, which represent the degrees of attraction of the two new compounds that will in conse- quence be formed. Mr*. B. Precisely so. Caroline. But what is the meaning of quiescent and divellant forces, which are written in the diagram ? Mr*. B. Quiescent forces are those which tend to preserve compounds in a state of rest, or such as they actually are : divellant forces are those which tend to destroy that state of combination, and to form new com- pounds. These are the principal circumstances relative to the doctrine of chemical attractions, which have been laid down as rules by modern chemists 't a few others might be mentioned respecting the same theory, but of less importance, and sudh *as would take us too far from our plan. I should, however, not omit to mention that Mr. Berthollet, a celebrated French chemist, has shewn, that whenever in chemical operations there is a display of contrary attractions, the combinations which take place depend not only upon the affinities, but also, in some degree, on the proportions of the substances con- cerned. 1-83 aTonbewatton xm. On Compound Bodies. Mrs. B. Having now given you some idea of the laws by which chemical attractions are governed, we may pro- ceed to the examination of bodies that are formed in consequence of these attractions. The first class of compounds that present themselves to our notice, in our gradual ascent to the most com- plicated combinations, are bodies composed of only two principles. The sulphurets, phosphorets, carburets, &c. are of this description; but the most numerous and important of these compounds are the combinations of oxygen with the various simple substances with which it has a tendency to unite. Of these you have already acquired some knowledge, and I hope you will not be at a loss to tell me the general names by which the combinations of oxygen with other substances are distinguished ? Emily. I believe you told us that all the combina-- tions of oxygen produced either oxyds or acids ? Mrs. B. Very right; and with what simple bodies will oxygen combine, Caroline ! Caroline. With all the elementary substances, ex- cepting the earths and alkalies. Mrs. B. Very well, my dear; we may now, there- fore, come to the oxyds and acids. Of the metallic oxyds, you have already some general notions. This subject, though highly interesting in its details, is not of sufficient importance to our concise view of chemistry, to be particularly treated of; but it is absolutely ne- cessary that you should be better acquainted with th«^ 189 stents, and likewise with their combinations with' the al- kalies, which form the triple compound called Neu- tral Salts. You have, I believe, a clear idea of the nomencla- ture by which the base (or radical) of the acid, and the various degrees of acidification, are expressed ? Emily. ' Yes, I think so; the acid is distinguished by the name of its base, and its degree of acidity by the termination of that name in ous or ic ; thus sulphurous acid is that formed by the smallest proportion of oxygen combined with sulphur ; sulphuric acid is that which results from the combination of sulphur with the great- est quantity of oxygen. Mr*. B. A still greater latitude may, in many cases, be allowed to the proportions of oxygen than can be combined with acidifiable radicals ; for several of these radicals are susceptible of uniting with a quantity of ox- ygen so small as to be insufficient to give them the properties of acids; in these cases therefore, they are converted into oxyds. Such is sulphur, which by ex- posure to the atmosphere with a degree of heat inad- equate to produce inflammation, absorbs a small pro- portion of oxygen, which colours it red or brown. This therefore is the first degree of oxygenation of sulphur * the 2d converts it into sulphurous acid ; the Sd into sul- phuric acid'; and, 4thly, it it was found capable of com- bining with a still larger proportion of oxygen, it would then be termed super-oxygenated sulphuric acid. Emif. Are these various degrees of oxygenation common to all acids ? Mr*. B. No ; they vary much in this respect; some are susceptible of only one degree of oxygenation; others, of two, or three ; there are but very few that will admit of more. Caroline. The modern nomenclature must be of immense advantage in pointing out so easily the nature of the acids, and their various degrees of oxygenation* Mrs B. Certainly. But great a, are the^ advan- tages of the new nomenclature in this respect, it is not possible to apply it in its full extent to all the acids, be- cause the radicals or bases of some of them are still un- known. 190 Caroline. If you are acquainted with the acid, I can- sot understand how its bases can remain unknown ; you have only to separate the oxygen from it by elective attractions, and the bases must remain alone ? Mr*. B. This is not always so easily accomplished as you imagine ; for there are some acids which no chemist has hitherto been able to decompose by any means whatever. It appears that the bases of these undecompounded acids have so strong an attraction for oxygen, that they will yield it to no other substance ; and in that case, you know, all the efforts of the chem- ists are vain. Emily. But if these acids have never been decom-- posed, should they not be classed with the simple bo- dies : for you have repeatedly told us that the simple bodies are rather suGh as chemists are unable to decom- pose, than such as are really supposed to consist of on- ly one principle ? Mrs. B. Analogy affords us so strong a proof of the compound nature of the undecompounded acids, that I could never reconcile myself to classing them with the simple bodies, though this division-has been adopted by several chemical writers. It is certainly tlie most strictly regular ; but, as a systematical ar- rangement is of use only to assist the memory in retain- ing facts, we may, I think be allowed to deviate from it when there is danger of producing confusion by fol- lowing it too closely :—and this, I believe, would be the case, if you were taught to consider the undecom- pounded acids as elementary bodies. Emily. I am sure you would not deviate from the methodical arrangement wiihout good reason. But pray what are the names of these undecompounded acids I Airs. B. There are three of that description : The Aluriutic acid. The Boracic acid. The Fluoric acid. Since these andi cannot derive their names from their radicals, they are called after the compound sub- stances irom which they are extracted. m Caroline. We have heard of a great variety of acids; pray how many are there in all ? Mr*. B. I believe there are reckoned at present thirty-four, and their number is constantly increasing, as the science improves; but the most important, and those to which we shall almost entirely confine our at- tention, are but few. I shall, however, give you a gen- eral view of the whole ; and then we shall more partic- ularly examine those that are the most essential. This class of bodies was formerly divided into mine- ral, vegetable, and animal acids, according to the sub- stances from which they were extracted Caroline. That I should think must have been an excellent arrangement; why was it altered ? Mr*. B. Because in many cases it produced con- fusion. In which class, for instance, would you place carbonic acid I Caroline. Now I see the difficulty. I should be at a loss where to place it, as you have told us that it ex- ists in the animal, vegetable, and mineral kingdoms. Emily. There would be the same objection with respect to phosphoric acid, which, though obtained chiefly from bones, can also, you said, be found in small quantities in siones, and likewise in some plants Mr*. B. You see, tlierefore, the propi iety of chang- ing this mode of classification. These objections do not exist in the present nomenclature; for the com- position and nature of each individual acid is in some de- gree pointed rut, instead of the class of bodies from which it is extracted ; and, with regard to the more general division of acids, they are classed under these four heads : 1st. Acids of known and simple bases, which art formed by the union of these bases with oxygen. They are the following : The Sulphuric "\ Carbonic .A itric j Phosphoric )> Acids of known and sim- Arstnical | pie bases. Tungstenic } Molybdenic J 192 2dly. Those of unknown bases : The Muriatic ") horacic > Acids of unknown bases. Fluoric J These two classes comprehend the most anciently known and most important acids. The sulphuric, ni- tric, and muriatic, were toirneily,and are still frequent- ly, called mineral acids. 3dly. Acids that have double or binary radicals, and which consequently consist of triple combinations.— These are the vegetable acids whose common radical is a compound of hydrogen and carbone. Caroline. But if t!-c bases of all the vegetable acids be the same, it sho> Id form but one acid ; it may in- deed combine with different proportions of oxygen, but the nature of the acid must be the same ? Mr*. B. The only difference that exists in the ba- ses of vegetable acids, is the various proportions of hy- drogen anil carbone from which it is composed. But this is enough to produce a number of acids apparently very dissimilar. That they do not, however, differ essentially, is proved by their susceptibility of being converted into each other, by the addition or subtraction •f a portion of hydrogen or of carbone. The names of these acids are, The Acetic Oxalic Tartarou* Curie Malic Acids of double bases, Gallic ^ being of vegetable Mucous origin. Benza'c Succinic Camiphoric Suberic The 4th class of acids consists of these which have triple radicals, and are therefore ol a still more com- pound nature. This class comprehends the animal acids, which are: 193 The Lactic Prussic Formic Bombic J> Acids of triple bases, or Sebacic animal acids. Zoonic Lithic I have given this summary account or enumeration of the acids, as you may find it more satisfactory to Imve at once an outline, or general notion of the extent of the subject ; but we shall now confine ourselves to the two first classes, which require our more immediate attention ; and defer the remarks which we shall have to make on the others, till we treat of the chemistry of the animal and vegetable kingdoms. The acids of simple and known radicals are all ca- pable of being decomposed by combustible bodies, to which they yield their oxygen If, for instance I pour •a drop of sulphuric acid on this piece of iron, it will pro- duce a spot of rust ; you know what that is ? Caroline. Yes, it is an oxyd, formed by the oxygen of the acid combining with the iron. Mrs. B. In this case you see the sulphur deposits the oxygen by which it was acidified on the metal.— And again, if we pour some acid on a compound combus- tible substance, (we shall try it on this piece of wood) it will combine with one or more of the constituents of that substance, and occasion a decomposition. Emily. It has changed the colour of the wood to black. How is that ? Mrs. B. The oxygen deposited by the acid has burnt it; you know that wood in burning becomes black before it is reduced to ashes. Whether it derives the oxygen which bums it from the atmosphere, or from any other source, the chemical effect on the wood is the same. In the case of real combustion, wood be- comes black because it is reduced to the state of char- coal by the evaporation of its other constituents. But can you tell me the reason why wood turns black when burnt by the application of an acid ? o 194 Caroline. First tell me what are the ingredients f« wood ? Mr* B. Hydrogen and carbone are the chief con- stituents of wood, as of all other vegetable' substances. Caroline. Well, then, I suppose that the oxygen of the acid combines with the hydrogen of the wood, to form water ; and that the carbone of the wood, re- maining alone, appears of its usual black colour. Mr*. B. Very well, indeed, my dear ; that is cer- tainly the most plausible explanation. Emily. Would not this be a good method of making charcoal ? Mr*. B. It would be an extremely expensive, and I believe, very imperfect method ; for the action of the acid on the wood, and the heat produced by it. are far from sufficient to deprive the wood of all its evaporable parts. Caroline. What is the reason that vinegar, lemon, and the acids of fruits, do not produce this effect on wood ? Mrs. B. They are vegetable acids whose bases are composed of hydrogen and carbone ; the oxygen, there- fore, will not be disposed to quit this radical, where it is already united with hydrogen. The strongest of these may, perhaps, yield a little of their oxygen to the wood, and produce a stain upon it ; bin the caibone will not be sufficiently uncovered to assume its black colour. Indeed, the several mineral acids themselves possess this power of charring wood in very different degrees. Emily. Cannot vegetable acids be decomposed by any combustibles ? Airs. B. No ; because their radical is composed of two substances which have a greater attraction for oxy- gen than any known body. Caroline And are those strong acids which burn and decompose wood, capable of producing similar effects on the skin and fie- h of animals ? Mrs. B. Yes ; all the mineral acids, and one of them more especially, possess powerful caustic quali- ties. They actually corrode and destroy the skin and 195 flesh : but th ey do not produce upon these exactly the same alteration as they do on wood, probably because there is a great proportion of nitrogen and other sub- stances in animal matter, which prevents the separation of carbone from being so conspicuous. ® Co nfe evsation xiv. Of the Sulphuric and Phosphoric Acids: or the combination* of Oxygen with Sulphur and Phosphorus ; and of the Sulphats and Phosphats. Mrs. B. In addition to the general survey which we have taken of acids, I think you will find it interesting to ex- amine individually a few of the most important of them, and likewise some of their principal combinations with the nlkalies, alkaline earths, and metals. The first of the acids, in point of importance, is the sulphuric for- merly called oil of vitriol. Caroline. I have known it a long time by that name, but had no idea that it was the same fluid as sulphuric acid. What resemblance or connection can there be between oil of vitriol and this acid ? Mr*. B. Vitriol is the common name for sulphat of iron, a salt which is formed by the combination of sul- phuric acid and iron ; the sulphuric acid was formerly obtained by distillation from this salt, and it very natur- ally received its name from the substance which afford- ed it. Caroline. But it is still usually called oil of vitriol ? Mrs. B. Yes; a sufficient length of time has not 196 yet elapsed, since the invention of the new nomencla- ture, for it to be generally disseminated ; but as it is adopted by all scientific chemists, there is every reason to suppose that it will gradually become universal. When I received this bottle from the chemist's, the name writ- ten on the label was oil of vitriol; But, as I knew you were very punctilious in regard to the nomenclature, I changed it, and substituted the modern name. Emily. This acid has neither colour nor smell, but it appears much thicker than the waler. Mrs. B. It is twice as heavy as water, and has, you see, an oily consistence. Caroline. And it is probably from this circumstance that it has been called an oil, for it can have no real claim to that name, as it does not contain either hydro- gen or carbone, which are the essential constituents to oil. Mr*. B. Certainly ; and therefore it would be the more absurd to retain a name which owed its origin to such mistaken analogy. Sulphuric acid in its purest state, would be a con- crete substance, but its attraction for water is such, that it is impossible to preserve it in that state ; it is, there- fore, always seen in a liquid form, such as you here find it. One of the most striking properties of sul- phuric acid is that of evolving a considerable quantity of heat when mixed with water ; this 1 have already shewn you. Emily. Yes, I recollect it; but what was the degree of heat produced by that mixture ? Mr*. B. The thermometer may be raised by it to 300, which is considerably above the degree of boiling water. Caroline. Then water might be made to boil in that mixture. Mr* B. Nothing more easy, provided that you em- ploy sufficient quantities of acid and of water, and in the due propoiiions. The greatest heat is pioduced by a mixture of one part of water to four of the acid: we shall make a mixture of these proportions, and im- merse this thin glass tube, which is full of water, into it. 197 Caroline. The vessel feels extremely hot, but the wai? ter does not boil yet. Mrs. B. You must allow some time for the heat to< penetrate the tube, and raise the temperature of the wa- ter to the boiling point.— Caroline. Now it boils—and with increasing vio- lence. Mr*. B. But it will not continue boiling long ; for the mixture gives out heat only while the particles of the water and the acid are mutually penetrating each other : as soon as the new arrangement of those parti- cles is effected, the mixture will gradually cool, and the water return to its former temperature. You have ssen the manner in which sulphuric acid decomposes all combustible substances, whether ani- mal, vegetable, or mineral, and burns them by means of its oxygen ? Caroline. I have very unintentionally repeated the experiment on my gown, by letting a drop of the acid fall upon it, and it has made a stain, which, I suppose, will never wash out. Mr*. B. No, certainly ; for, before you can put it into water, the spot will become a hole, as the acid has literally burnt the muslin. Caroline. So it has indeed ! Well, I will fasten the stopper and put the bottle away, for it is a dangerous sub- stance—Oh, now I have done worse still, for I have spilt some on my hand 1 Airs. B. It is then burned, as well as*your gown, for you know that oxygen destroys animal as well as veg- etable matter; and, as far as the decomposition of the skin of your finger is effected, there is no remedy ; but, by washing it immediately in water, you will dilute the acid, and prevent any further injury. Caroline. It feels extremely hot, I assure you. Airs. B. You have now learned, by experience, how cautiously this acid must be used. You will soon become acquainted with another acid, the nitric, which though it produces less lieu on the skin, destroys it still quicker, and makes upon it an indelible stain. You should never handle any substances of this kind, with- S 2 198 out previously dipping your fingers in water, which will weaken their caustic effects.—But since you will not repeat the experiment, I must put in the stopper, for the acid attracts the moisture from the atmosphere, which would destroy its strength and purity. Emily. Pray how can sulphuric acid be extracted from sulphat of iron by distillation ? Airs. B. The process of distillation, you know, con- sists in separating substances from one anothsr by means of their different degrees of volatility, and by the intro- duction of a new chemical agent, caloric. Thus, if sul- phat of iron be exposed in a retort to a proper degree of heat, it will be decomposed, and the sulphuric acid will be volatilized. Emily. But now that the process of forming acids by the combustion of their radicals is known, why should not this method be used for making sulphuric arid ? Mrs. B. This is actually done in most manufactures ; but the usual method of preparing sulphuric acid does not consist in burning the sulphur in oxygen gas, (as we formerly did by way of experiment), but in heating it together witii another substance, nitre, which yields ox* ygen in sufficient abundance to render the combustion in common air rapid and complete. Caroline. This substance, then, answers the same purpose as oxygen gas ? Mrs. B. Exactly. In manufactures the combustion is performed in a leaden chamber, with water at the bottom, to receive the vapour, and assists its condensa-. tion. The combustion is, however, never so perfect, but that a quantity of sulphurous acid is formed at the same time ; for you recollect that the sulphuious acid differs from the sulphuric only by containing less oxy- gen. ^ From its own powerful properties, and from the va- rious combinations into which it enters, sulphuric acid is of great importance in many of the arts. It is used also as a medicine in a state of great dilu- tion ; for were it taken internally, in a concentrated state, it would prove a most dangerous poison. Caroline. I am sure it would burn the throat and sto* mach. 199 Mr*. B. Can you think of any thing that Would prove an antidote to this poison ? Caroline. A large draught of water to dilute it. Mr*. B. That would certainly weaken the power ot the acid, but it would increase the heat to an intolera- ble degree. Do you. recollect nothing that would de- stroy its deleterious properties more effectually ? Emily. An alkali might, by combining with it; but then, a pure alkali is itself a poison, on account of its causticity. Mr*. B. There is no necessity that the alkali should be caustic. Soap, in which it is combined with oil: or magnesia, either in a state of carbonat, or mixed with water, would prove the best antidotes. Emily. In those cases, then, I suppose, the potash and the magnesia would quit their combinations to form salts with the sulphuric acid ? Mrs. B. Precisely. We may now make a few observations on the sul- phurow* acid, which we have found to be the product of sulphur slowly and imperfectly burnt —This acid is dis- tinguished by its pungent smell, and its gaseous form. Caroline. Its aeriform state is, I suppose, owing to the smaller proportion of oxygen, which renders it lighter than sulphuric acid ? Mrs. B Probably; for by adding oxygen to the weaker acid, it may be converted into the stronger kind. But this change of state may also be connected with a change of affinity with regard to caloric. Emily. And may sulphurous acid be obtained from sulphuric acid by a diminution of oxygen ? Mr*. B. Yes: it can be done by bringing any com- bustible substance in contact with the acid. This de- composition is most easily performed by some of the metals ; these absorb a portion of the oxygen from the sulphuric acid, which is thus converted into the sulphu- rous, and flies off in its gaseous form. Caroline. And cannot the sulphurous acid itself be decomposed and reduced to sulphur ? Mr*. B. Yes; if this gas be heated in contact with 200 charcoal, the oxygen of the acid will combine with it,. and the pure sulphur be regenerated. Sulphurous acid is readily absorbed by water; and in this liquid state it is found particularly useful in bleach- ing linen and woollen cloths, and is much used in man- ufactures for those purposes. I can shew you its effect in destroying colours, by taking out any iron mould, or vegetable stain—I think I see a spot on your gown, Em- ily, on which we may try the experiment. Emily. It is the stain of mulberries ; but I shall be almost afraid of exposing my gown to the experiment, after seeing the effect which the sulphuric acid produc- ed on that of Caroline— Mr*. B There is no such danger from the sulphur- ous ; but the experiment must be made with great caution ! for, during the formation of sulphurous acid by combustion, there is always some sulphuric pro- duced. Caroline. But where is your sulphurous acid ? Airs. B. We may easily prepare some ourselves, simply by burning a match ; we must first wet the stain with a little water, and now hold it in this way, at a lit- tle distance, over the lighted match: the vapour that arises from it is sulphurous acid, and the stain, you see, gradually disappears. Emily. I have frequently taken out stains by this means, without understanding the nature of the pro- cess. But why is it necessary to wet the stain before it is exposed to the acid fumes ? Mr*. B. The moisture attracts and absorbs the sul- phurous acid ; and it serves likewise to dilute any par- ticles of sulphuric acid which might injure the linen. Sulphur is susceptible of a third combination with oxygen, in which the proportion of the latter is too small to render the sulphur acid. It acquires this slight oxygenation by mere exposure to the atmosphere, without any elevation of temperature : in this case, the sulphur does not change its natural form, but is only discoloured, being changed to red or brown ; and in' this state it is an oxyd of sulphur. Before we take leave of the sulphuric acid, we shall 201 say a few words of its principal combinations. It unites with all the alkalies, alkaline earths, and metals, to form. compound salts. Caroline Pray, give me leave to interrupt you for a moment; you have never mentioned any other salts than the compound or neutral salts j is there no other kind? Mr*. B. The term salt has been used, from time immemorial, as a kind of general name, for any sub- stance that has savour, odour, is soluble in water, and; crystallizable, whether it be of an acid, an alkaline, or compound nature ; but the compound salts alone retain that appellation in modern chemistry. The most important of the salts, formed by the com- bination of the sulphuric acid, arc, fii st, sulphat of pot- ash, formerly called salpolychrest ; this is a very bitter salt, much used in medicine ; it is found in the ashes of most vegetables, but it may be prepared artificially by tlie immediate combination of sulphuric acid and pot- ash. This salt is easily soluble in boiling water. So- lubility is, indeed, a property, common to all salts ; and. they always produce cold in melting. Emily. That must he owing to the caloric whiclv they absorb in passing from a solid to a fluid form. Airs. B. That is, certainly, the most probable ex- planation. Sulphat of soda, commonly called Glauber's salt, is another mccf cimd salt, which is still more bitter than the preceding. We must prepare some of these com- pounds, that you may observe the phenomena which takes place during their formation. We need only pour sume sulphuric acid over the soda which I put in* to this glass. Caroline. What an amazing heat is disengaged. I thought you said that cold was produced by the melting of salts ! Mr*. B. But you must observe that we are now making not melting a salt. Heat is disengaged during the formation of compound salts, because the acid goes into a more dense state in the salt than that in which it existed before. A faint light is also emitted, which may sometimes be perceived in the dark. 202 Emily. If the oxygen, in combining with the alka- li, disengages light and heat, an actual combustion lakes place. Airs. B. Not so fast, my dear ; recollect that the alkalies are incombustible substances, and incapable of combining with oxygen singly. They are not acted on by this principle, unless it presents itself in a state of union with another body ; and, therefore, the combina- tion of an acid with an alkali cannot be called combus- tion. Caroline Will this sulphat of soda become solid ? Mr*. B. We have not, I suppose, mixed the acid and the alkali in the exact proportions that are requir- ed for the formation of the salt, otherwise the mixture would have been almost immediately changed to a so- lid mass ; but, in order to obtain it in crystals, as you see it in this bottle, it would be necessary first to dilute it with water, and afterwards evaporate the water, du- ring which operation the salt would gradually crystal- lize. Caroline. But of what use is the addition of water, if it is afterwards to be evaporated ? Mrs. B. When ruspended in water, the acid and the alkali are more at liberty to act on each other, their union is more complete, and the salt assumes the regu- lar form of crystals during the slow evaporation of its solvent. Sulphat of soda liquefies by heat, and effloresces in the air. Emily. Pray what is the meaning of the word efflo- resces ? I do not recollect your having mentioned it be- fore. Mr*. B. A salt is f.aid to effloresce when it loses its water of crystallization on being exposed to the atmos- phere, and is thus gradually converted into a dry pow- der : you may observe that these crystals of sulphat of soda are far from possessing the transparency which belongs to their crystalline state ; they are covered with a white powder, occasioned by their having been exposed to the atmosphere, which has deprived thrir surface of its lustre, by absorbing its water of cryslalli- 203 nation. Salts are, in general, either efflorescent or de- liquescent ; this latter property is precisely the reverse of the former ; that is to say, deliquescent salts absorb water from the atmosphere, and are moistened and gradually melted by it. Muriat of lime is un instance of great deliquescence. Emily. But are there no salts that have the same degree of attraction for water as the atmosphere, and that will consequently not be affected by it ? Mrs. B. Yes ; there are many such salts; as, for instance, common salt, sulphat of magnesia, and a variety of others. Sulphat of lime is very frequently met with in nature, and constitutes the well known substance called gyp- sum, or plaster of Paris. &ul[ihut of magnesia, commonly called Epsom salt, is another very bitter medicine, which is obtained from sea-water and from several springs, or may be prepar- ed by the direct combination of its ingredients. \Ve have formerly mentioned sulphat of Alumine as constituting ti.e common alum; it is iound in nature chiefly in the neighborhood of volcanos, and is particu- larly useful in the arts, from its strong astringent qua- lities. It is chiefly employed by dyers and calico-pvint- ers to fix colours ; and is used also in the manufacture of leather. Sulphuric acid combines also with the metals. Caroline. One of these combinations, sulphat of iron we are already well acquainted with. Mr*. B. That is the most important metallic salt formed by sulphuric acid, and the only one that we shall here notice. It is of great use in the arts ; and in medicine, it affuids a very valuable tonic : it is of this salt that most of those preparations called sttil me- dicines are composed. Caroline. But does any carbone enter into these compositions to form steel ? Alr^. B. Not an atom ; they are, therefore, very improperly called steel; but it is the vulgar appella- tion, and medical men themselves often comply with the general costom. 204 "Sulphat of iron may be prepared, as you have seen, T)y dissolving iron in sulphuric acid ; but it is generally obtained from the natural production called Pyrites, which, being a sulphuret of iron, requires only expo- sure to the atmosphere to be oxydated, in order to form the salt; this, therefore, is much the most easy wav of procuring it on a large scale. Emily. I am surprised to find that both acids and compound salts are generally obtained from their vari- ous combinations, rather than from the immediate union of their ingredients. Mr*. B. Were the simple bodies always at hand, their combination would naturally be the most conve- nient method of forming compounds ; but you must consider that, in most instances, there is great difficulty and expense in obtaining the simple ingredients from their combinations ; it is, therefore, often more expe- dient to procure compounds from the decomposition of other compounds. But to return to the sulphat of iron. There is a certain vegetable acid called Gallic acid, which has the remarkable property of precipitating this salt black.—I shall pour a few drops of the gallic acid into this solution of sulphat of iron— Caroline. It is become as black as ink ! Mrs. B And it is ink in reality Common writing ink is a precipitate of sulphat of iron by gallic acid; the black calour is owing to the formation of gL.ll.it of iron, which being insoluble, remains suspended in the fluid. This acid has also the property of altering the co- lour of iron in its metallic state. You may frequently see its effects on the blade of a knife that has been used to cut certain kinds of fruits. Caroline. True ; and that is perhaps the reason that a silver knife is preferred to cut fruits ; the gallic acid, I suppose, does not act upon silver.—Is this acid found in all fruits ? Mr*. B. It is contained, more or less in the rind of most fruits and roots, especially the radish, which if scraped with a steel or iron knife, has its bright red colour changed to a deep purple, the knife being at the *05 name rime blackened. But the vegetable substance i» which tue gallic acid most abounds is nutgall, a kind of excrescence that grows on oaks. «md fiom which the acid is commonly obtained for its vaiious purposes. jlfr*. B. We now come to the r-HrspHOBic and! phosphorous acids. In ireating of pi.o.-q horns, you have seen how these acids may be obtained from it by combustion ? Emily. Yes ; but I should be much surprised if it was the usual method of obtaining them, since it is so very difficult to procure phosphorus in its pure state. Mr*. B You are right, my dear ; the phosphoric acid, for general purposes, is extracted from bones, in which it is contained in the state of phosphat of lime ; from this salt the phosphoric acid is separated by means of the sulphuric, which combines with the lime. In its pure state, phosphoric acid is either liquid or solid, ac- coiding to its degree of concentration. Amongst the salts formed by this acid, phosphat of lime is the only one that affords much interest; and this, we have already observed, constitutes the basis of all bones. It is also found in very small quantities in soma \egetables. Conservation;* xv. Of the nitric and carbonic acids ; or the combinations of ox- ygen with nitrogen and carbone ; and qfthe nitrats and carbonats. Mrs. B. I am almost afraid of introducing the subject of the nithic acid, as I am sure that 1 shall be blamed by Caro.ine, for not having made her acquainted with it b«- forc Caroline. Why so, Mrs. B.—? T £06 Mrs, B. Because you have long known its radical, Which is nitrogen or azote ; and, in treating of that ele- ment, I did not even hint that it was the basis of an acid. Caroline. Indeed, that appears to me a great omis- sion ; for you have made us acquainted with all the oth- er acids, in treating of their radicals. Emily. I would advise you not to be too hasty in your censure, Caroline ; for 1 dare say that Mrs. B. had some very good reason for not mentioning this acid sooner. Mrs. B. I do not know whether you will think the reason sufficiently good to acquit me ; but the omission, I assure you, did not proceed from negligence. You hiay recollect that nitrogen was one of the first simple bodies which we examined; you were then ignorant bf the theory of combustion, which I believe was, for the first time mentioned in that lesson ; and therefore it would have been in vain, at that time, to have attempt* ed to explain the nature and formation of acids \ Caroline. I wonder, however, that it never occurred fo us to inquire whether njtrogen could be acidified ; for, as we know it was classed amongst the combustible bo- dies, it was natural to suppose that it might produce an hcid. Mrs. B. That is not a necessary consequence ; for it might combine with oxygen only in the degree re- quisite to form an oxyd. But you will find that nitro- gen is susceptible of various decrees of oxygenation, some of which convert it merely into an oxyd, and oth- ers give it all the acid properties. The acids, resulting from the combination of oxygen with nitrogen, are called the nitrous and nitric acids. We will begin with the nitric, nAvhich nitrogen is in the highest state of oxygenation. This acid naturally exists in the form of gas j but it is so extremely soluble in water, and has so great an affinity lor it, that one graiii of water will absorb and condense ten grains of acid gas, and form the limpid fluid which you see in this bottle. Caroline. What a strong offensive smell it has ! aor Mr*. B. This acid contains a greater abundance of oxygen than any other, but it retains it with very little force. Emily. Then it must be a powerful caustic, both from the facility with which it parts with its oxygen, and the quantity which it affords ? Mrs. B. Very well, Emily ; both cause and effect are exactly such as you describe: nitric acid burns and destroys all kinds of organized matter. It even sets fire to some of the most combustible substances. We shall pour a little of it over this piece of dry warm char- coal—you see it inflames it immediately ; it would do the same with oil of turpentine, phosphorus, and seve- ral other very combustible bodies. This shews you how easily this acid is decomposed by combustible bo- dies, since these effects must depend upon the absorp- tion of oxygen. Nitric acid has been used in the arts from time im« memorial, but it is not more than twenty five years that its chemical nature has been ascertained. The cele* brated Mr. Cavendish discovered that it consisted of about 10 parts of nitrogen, and 25 of oxygen.* These principles, in their gaseous state, combine at a high temperature ; and this may be effected by repeatedly passing the electrical spark through a mixture of the two gasses. Emily. The nitrogen and oxygen gasses, that com» pose the atmosphere, do not combine, I suppose, be- cause their temperature is not sufficiently elevated ? Caroline. But in a thunder storm, when the lightr ning repeatedly passes through them, may it not pro- duce nitric acid ; we should be in a strange situation if a violent storm should at once convert the atmosphere into nitric acid. Mrs. B. There is no danger of it my dear ; the lightning can affect but a very small portion of the at- mosphere, and though it were occasionally to produce a little nitric acid, yet this never could happen to such extent as to be perceivable. * Fhe proportions stated by Mr, Davy, in hit Chemical Re- searches, are as I to *. 389. 2oa Emily. But how could the nitric acid be known, and used, before the method of combining its constituents Was discovered ? Mr*. U Before that period the nitric acid was ob- taiiied, and it is indeed still extracted for the commcn purposes of art, from the compound salt which it formi Wi:u potash, commonly called ?iitre. Caroline Why is it called so ? Pray, Mrs. B. let these old unmeaning names be entirely given up, by us at least; and let us call this salt nitrat of potash. Mrs. B. With all my heart; but it is necessary that I should, at least, mention the old names, and more es- pecially those that are yet in common use ;. otherwise, when you meet with them, you would not be able to un« derstand their meaning. Emily. And how is the acid obtained from this salt ? Mr*. B. By the intervention of sulphuric acid, which combines with the potash, and sets the nitric acid at liberty. This I can easily shew you, by mixing some nitrat of potash and sulphuric acid in this retort and heating it over a lamp ; the nitric acid will come over in the lorn of vapour, which we shall collect in a glass bell. This acid diluted in water is commonly called aquafortis, if Caroline will allow me to mention that name. Caroline. I have often heard that aqua fortis will dis- solve almost all metals ; it is no doubt because it yields its oxygen so easily. Mrs. B. Yes ; and from this powerful solvent pro* periy, it derived the name of aqua fortis, or strong wa- ter. Do you not recollect that we oxydated, and after- Wards dissolved some copper in this acid ? Emily. If I remember right, the nitrat of copper. was the first instance you gave us of a compound salt ? Caroline. Can the nitric acid be completely decom- posed and converted into nitrogen and oxygen ? Emily. That cannot be the case, Caioline, since the acid can be decomposed only by the combination of its constituents with other bodies. Mrs. B. True ; but caloric is sufficient forthis pur- pose. By making the acid pass through a red hot por- 20* •elain tube, it is decomposed ; the nitrogen and oxy- gen regain the caloric which they had lost in combi- ning, and are thus both restored to their gaseous state. The nitric acid may also be partly decomposed, and is by this means converted into nitrous acid. Caroline. This conversion must be easily effected, as the oxygen is so slightly combined with the nitrogen. Mrs. B. The partial decomposition of nitric acid is readily effected by most metals; but it is sufficient to expose the nitric acid, to a very strong light to make it give out oxygen gas, and thus be converted into nitrous acid. Of this acid there are various degrees, accord- ing to the proportions of oxygen which it contains ; the strongest and that into which the nitric acid is first converted, is of a yellow colour, as you see it in this bot- tle. Caroline. How it fumes when the stopper is taken out. Mrs. B. The acid exists naturally in a gaseous state, and is here so strongly concentrated in water that it is constantly escaping. Here is another bottle of nitrous acid, which, you see is of an orange red colour ; this acid is weaker, the nitrogen being combined with a smaller quantity of ox- ygen ; and with a still less proportion of oxygen it is an olive green colour, as it appears in this third bottle. In short, the weaker the acid, the deeper is its colour. Nitrous acid acts still more powerfully on some inflam- mable substances than the nitric. Emily. I am surprised at that, as it contains less oxy- gen. Mr*. B. But, on the other hand, it parts with its oxy- gen much more readily : you may recollect that we once inflamed oil with this acid. The next combinations of oxygen and nitrogen form only oxyds of nitrogen, the first of which is common- ly called nitrous air: or more properly nitric oxyd gas. This may be obtained from nitric acid, by exposing the latter to the action of metals, as in dissolving them it does not yield the whole of its oxygen, but retains a portion of this principle sufficient to convert it into this T 3 2110 peculiar gas, a specimen of which I have prepared,.. and preserved within this inverted glass bell. Emily. It is a perfectly invisible elastic fluid. Mr* B Yes; and it may be kept any length of time in this manner over water, as it is not, like the nitric and nitrious acids,, absorbable by it. It is rather heavier than atmospherical air, and is incapable of sup- porting either combustion or respiration. I am going to incline the glass gently on one side, so as to let some of the gas escape— Emily. How very curious !—It produces orange fumes like the nitrous acid 1 that is the more extraordi- nary, as the gas withing the glass is perfectly invisible. Airs. B. It would give me much pleasure if you- could make out the reason of this curious change wiih- out requiring any further explanation. Caroline. It seems, by the colour and smell, as if- it were converted into nitrous acid gas ; yet that cannot be, unless it combines with more oxygen ; and how can it obtain oxygen the very minute it escapes from the glass ? Emily. From the atmosphere^ do doubt. Is it not so,. Mrs. B? Mrs. B. You have guessed it ; as soon as itcon.es in contact with the atmosphere it absorbs from it the ad- ditional quantity of oxygen necessary to convert it into nitrous acid gas. And, if 1 now remove the bottle en- tirely from the water, so as to bring at once the whole of the gas into contact with the atmosphere, this con- version will appear still more striking. Emily. Look, Caroline, the whole capacity of the bottle is instantly tinged of an orange colour 1 Mr*. B. Thus you see it is the most easy process imaginable to convert nitrous oxyd gas into nitrous acid gas. The property of attracting oxygen from the at- mosphere, without any elevation of temperature, has occasioned this gaseous oxyd being used as a test for ascertaining the degree of purity of the atmosphere. I am going to show you how it is applied to this purpose >—You see this graduated glass lube, which is closed at one end; (Plate VIII. Fig. 19J—I first fill it with 211 water, and then introduce a certain measure of nitrous* gas, which, not being absorbable by water, passes thro* it, and occupies the upper part of the lube. I must now add rather above two thirds of oxygen gas, which will just be sufficient lo convert the nitric oxyd gas in- to nitrous acid gas. Caroline. So is has !—I saw it turn of an orange co- lour ; but it immediately afterwards disappeared entire- ly, and the water, you see,- hasrisen, and almost filled the tube. Mr*. B. That is because the acid gas is absorbable by water, and in proportion as the gas impregnates the water, the latter rises in the tube. When the oxygeiv gas is very pure, and the required proportion of nitric oxyd gas very exact, the whole is absoibed by the wa- ter; but if any other gas be mixed with the oxygen, instead of combining with the nitric oxyd, it will remain and occupy the upper part of the tube ; or, if the gas- ses be not in the due proportion, there will be a residue of that which predominates.—Before we leave this sub- ject, I must not forget to remark, that nitric acid may be formed by dissolving nitric oxyd gas in nitric acid. This solution may be effected simply by making bubbles of nitric oxyd gas pass through nitric acid. Emily. That is to say, that nitrogen, at its-highest degree of oxygenation, being mixed with nitrogen at its lowest degree of oxygenation, will produce a kind of intermediate substance, which is nitric acid. Mr*. B. You have stated the fact with great preci- sion.—There are various other methods of preparing nitrous oxyd, and of obtaining it from compound bodies ; but it is not necessary to enter into these particulars; It remains for me only to mention another curious modifi- cation of oxygenated nitrogen, which has been distin- guished by the name of gaseous oxyd of nitrogen. It is but lately that this gas has been accurately examined, and its properties have been chiefly investigated by Mr. Davy. It has obtained also the name of exhilirating gas, from the very singular property which that gentle- man has discovered in it, of elevating the animal spirits,. when inhaled into the lungs, to a degree sometimes re- sembling delirium or intoxication. 212 Caroline. It is respirable, then ? Mrs. B. It can scarcely be called respirable, as it would not support life for any length of time; but it may be breathed for a few moments without any other effects, than the singular exl iliration of spirits I have just mentioned. It affects different people, however, in a very different manner. Some become violent, even outrageous: others experience a languor, attended with faintness; but most agree in opinion, that the sensa- tions it excites are extremely pleasant. " Caroline. I think I should like to try it—how do you breath it ? Mr*. B. By collecting the gas in a bladder, to which a short tube with a stop-cock is adapted ; this is applied to the mouth with one hand, whilst the nostrils are kept closed with the other, that the common air may have no access. You then alternately inspire, and expire the gas, till you perceive its effects. But I cannot con- sent to your making the experiment; for the nerves are sometimes unpleasantly affected by it, and I would Hot run any risk of that kind. Emily. I should like, at least, to see somebody breathe it; but pray by what means is this curious gas obtained ? Mrs. B. It is procured from nitrat of ammonia, an artificial salt, which yields this gas on the application of a gentle heat—I have put some of the salt into a retort and by the aid of a lamp the gas will be extri- cated— Caroline. Bubbles of air begin to escape through the neck of the retort into the water apparatus ; will you not collect them ? Mrs. B. The gas that first comes over is never pre- served, as it consists of little more than the common air which was in the retort; besides, there is always in this experiment a quantity of watery vapour which must come away before the nitrous oxyd appears. Emily. Watery vapour! Whence does that pro- ceed ? there is no water in nitrat of ammonia ! Mrs. B. You must recollect that there is in every «alt a quantity of water of crystallization which may be 218 evaporated by] heat alone. But, besides this, water 'ik actnally generated in this experiment, as you will see presently. But first tell me, what are the constituent parts of nitrat of ammonia ? Emily. Ammonia, and nitric acid: this salt, there- fore, contains three different elements, nitrogen and hydrogen, which produce the ammonia; and oxygen, which, with nitrogen, forms the acid Mrs. B. Well, then, in this process the ammonia is decomposed ; the hydrogen quits the nitrogen to com- bine with some of the oxygen of the nitric acid, and forms with it the watery vapour which is now coming over. When that is effected, what will you expect to find? ... Emily. Nitrous acid instead of nitric acid, and ni!> sogen instead of ammonia. Mrs. B. Exactly so ; and the nitrous acid, and nir trogen combine, and form the gaseous oxyd of nitro- gen, in which the proportion of oxygen is 37 parts to 63 of nitrogen. You may have observed, that for a little while no bub- bles of air have come over, and we have perceived oi> ly a stream of vapour condensing as it issued into the water.—Now bubbh-s of air again make their appear- ance, and I imagine that by this time all the wutery vapcur is come away, and that we may begin to collect the gas. We may try whether it is pure by filling a phial with it, and pHinging a taper into it—yes, it will do now, for the taper burns brighter than in the com- mon air, and with a greenish flame. Caroline. But how is that ? I thought no gas would support combustion but oxygen. Airs. B. Or any gas that contains ovypen, and is ready to vield it, which is the case with this in a con- siderable'degree ; it is not, therefore, surprising that it should accelerate the combustion of the taper. You see that the gas is now produced in great abun- dance ; we shall collect a large quantity of it, and I dare say we shall find some of the family who will be curious to make the experiment of respirirg it Whilst Ihis procees is going on, we may take a general survey; su •f the most important combination of the nitric and ni- trous acids with the alkalies. The first of these is nitrat of potash, commonly call- ed nitre, or saltpetre. Caroline. Is not that the salt with which gunpowder is made ? Mr*. B. Yes. Gunpowder is a mixture of fiv« parts of nitre to one of sulphur, and one of charcoal.— Nitre from its great proportion of oxygen, and from the facility with which it yields it, is the basis of most detonating compositions. Emily. But what is the cause of the violent detona- tion of gunpowder when set fire to ? Mr*. B. Detonation may proceed from two causes ; the sudden formation or destruction of an elastic fluid. In the first case, when either a solid or liquid is instan- taneously converted into an elastic fluid, the prodigious and sudden expansion of the body strikes the air with great violence, and this concussion produces the sound called detonation. Caroline. That I comprehend very well ; but how can a similar effect be produced by the destruction of a gas? Mr*. B. A gas can be destroyed only by condens- ing it to a liquid or solid state ; when this takes place suddenly, the gas, in assuming a new and more com- pact form, produces, a vacuum into which the surround- ing air rushes with great impetuosity ; and it is by that rapid and violent motion that the sound is produced.— In all detonations, therefore, gasses are either sudden- ly formed, or destroyed. In that of gunpowder, can you tell me which of these two circumstances takes place ? Emily. As gunpowder is a solid, it must, of course, produce the gasses in its detonation ; but h^w, 1 can- not tell. Mr* B. The constituents of gunpowder, when heated to a certain degree, enter into a number of new combinations, and are instantaneously converted into a variety of passes, the sudden expansion of wluch gives jise to the detonation. 215 Caroline. And in what instance does the destruction or condensation of gasses produce detonation ? Mr*. B. I can give you one with which you are well acquainted ; the sudden combination of the oxygen and hydrogen gasses Caroline. True ; I recollect perfectly that hydrogen detonates with oxygen when the two gasses are conver- ted into water. Mr*. B But let us return to the nitrat of potash. This salt is decomposed when exposed to heat, and mixed with any combustible body, such as carbone, sulphur, 01 metals, these substances oxydating rapidly at the expense of the nitrat. I must shew you an in- stance of this —I expose to the fire some of the salt in a small iion ladle, and when it is sufficiently heated, add to it some powdered charcoal: this wi'l attract the oxygen from the salt, and be converted into carbonic acid— Emily. But what occasions that crackling noise, and those vivid flashes that accompany it ? Mrs. B. The rapidity with which the carbonic acid gas is formed, occasions a succession of small detona- tions, which, together with the emission of flame, is called deflagration. Nitrat of ammonia we have already noticed, on ac- count ot the gaseous oxyd of nitrogen which is obtained from it. Nitrat of silver is the lunar caustic, so remarkable for its property of destroying animal fibre, for which purpose it is often used by surgeons.—We have said so much on a former occasion, on the mode in which caustics act on animal matter, that I shall not detain you any longer on this subject. We now come to the carbonic acid, which we have aire dy had many opportunities of noticing. You recollect that this acid may be formed by the combus- tion of carbone whether in its imperfect state of char- coal, or in its purest form ol diamond. And it is not 216 necessary, for this purpose, to burn the carbone in pure oxygen gas, as we did in a preceding lecture ; for you need only lis;lit a piece of charcoal and suspend it under the receiver on the water bath The charcoal will soon be extinguished, and the air in the receiver will be found mixed with carbonic acid, the process, however, is much more expeditious if the combustion be performed in pure on ygen gas. Caroline But how can y ou separate the carbonic acid, obtained in this manner, from the air with whfoh it>s mixed? Mrs. B. The readiest mode is to introduce under the receiver, a quantity of caustic lime, or caustic al- kali, which soon attracts the whole of the carbonic acid to form a carbonat.—The alkali is found increased in weight, and the volume of the air is diminished by a ■quantity equal to that of the carbonic acid which was mixed with it. Emily. Pray is there no method of obtaining pure carbone from carbonic acid ? Mr*. B. For a long time it was supposed that car- bonic acid was nov decomposable ; but Mr Tennant discovered, a few years ago, that this acid may be de- composed by burning phosphorus in a closed vessel with carbone of soda or carbonat of lime : the phos- phorus absoibs the oxygen from the carbonat, whilst the caibone i? separated in the form of a black powder. Caroline. Cannot we make that experiment ? Airs. B. Not easily ; it requires being performed with extreme nicety, in order to obtain any sensible quantity of carbone, and the experiment is much too delicate for me to attempt it. But there can be no doubt of the accuncy of Mr. Tennant's results ; and all chemists now agree, that 100 parts of carbonic acid gas consist of about 28 parts of carbone to 72 of oxygen gas. Carbonic acid gas is found very abundantly in nature, it is supposed to form about a hundredth part of the atmosphere, and is constantly produced by the respira- tion of animals ; it esists in a great variety of combina- tions, and is exhaled from many natural compositions. sir It is contained in a state of great purity in certain caves, 'such as the Grotto del Cane, near Naples. Emily. I recollect having read an account of that grotto, and i f the cruel expt rimtnts nuicie on the poor dogs, to pdily the curicsity of strangers. But 1 un- derstood that the vapour exhaled by this cave was call- ed fixed air Mrs. B. That is the name by which carbonic acid was know before its chemical composition was discov- ered.— This gas is more destructive of life than any other ; and if the poor animals that are submitted to its effects, are not plunged into cold water as soon as they become senseless, they do not recover. It extin- guishes flame instantaneously. I have collected some in this glass, which I will pour over the candle. Caroline. This is extremely singular—it seems to extinguish it as it were by enchantment, as the gas is invisible. I should never have imagined that a gas could have been poured like a liquid. Airs B. It can be done with carbcrtiic acid only, as ' no other gas is sufficiently heavy to be susceptible of be- ing poured out in the atmospherical air, without mixing with it Emily. Pray by what means did you obtain this gas ' Airs. B. I procured it from marble. Carbonic acid gas has so strong an attraction for all the alkalies and alkaline earths, that these are always found in nature in the state of carbenats. Combined with lime this acid forms chalk, which may be considered as the basis of all kinds of marble and calcareous stones. From these substaBf es carbonic acid is easily separated, as it ad- heres so slightly to its combinations, that the carbonats are all decomposable by any of the other acids. I can easily shew you how I obtained this gas ; I poured some diluted sulphuric acid over pulverized marble in this bot- tle (the same which we used the other day to prepare hydrogen gas), and the gas escaped through the tube connected with it; the operation still continues, as you may easily perceive— Emily. Yes. it does; there is a great fermentation mi the glass vessel. What singular commotion is exci- 218 led by the sluphuric acid taking possession of the lime, and driving out the carbonic acid ? Caroline. But did the carbonic acid exist in a gaseous state in the marble ? Mr*. 13. Of course not ; the acid when in a state of combination, is capable of existing in a solid form. Caroline. Whence, then, does it obtain the caloric necessary to convert il into gas ? Airs. B. It may be supplied in this case from the mixture of sulphuric acid and water, which produces an evolution of heat, even greater than is required for the purpose ; since, as you may perceive by touching the glass vessel, a considerable quantity of the caloric disengaged becomes sensible. But a supply of caloric may be obtained also from a diminution of capacity for heat occasioned by the new combination which takes place ; and, indeed, this must be the case when other acids are employed for the disengagement of carbonic acid gas, which do not, like the sulphuric, produce feat on being mixed with water. Carbonic acid may like- wise be disengaged from its combinations by heat alone, which restores it to its gaseous state. Caroline. It appears to me very extraordinary that the same gas, which is produced by burning of wood and coals, should erist also in stones, marble, and chalk, which are incombustible substances. Airs. B. I will not answer that objection, Caroline, because I think I can put you in a way of doing it your- self. Is carbonic acid combustible ? Caroline. Why, no—because it is a body that has been already burnt, it is carbone only, and nut the acid, that is combustible. Airs. B. Well, and what inference do you draw from this? Caroline. That carbonic acid cannot render the bo- dies in which it is contained combustible ; but that sim- ple carbone does, and that it is in this elementary state that it exists in wood, coals, and a great variety of oth- er combustible bodies.— Indeed, Mrs. B yc u are very ungenerous ; you are not satisfied with convincing me 219 that my objections are frivolous, but you oblige me ta prove them so my self. Mr*. B. You must confess, however, that I make ample amends for the detection of error, when I enable you 10 discover the truth. You understand, now, I hope, that carbonic acid is equally produced by the decompo- sition of chalk, or by the combustion of charcoal. These processes are certainly of a very different nature ; in the first case the acid is already formed, and requires noth- ing more than heat to restore it to its gaseous state ; whilst in the latter, the acid is actually formed by the process of combustion. Caroline. 1 understand it now perfectly. But I have just been thinking of another difficulty, which I hope you will excuse my not being able to remove myself. How does the immense quantity of calcareous earth, which is spread all over the globe, abtain the carbonic acid which is combined with it ? Airs. B. This question is, indeed, not very easy to answer; but I conceive that the general carbonization of calcareous matter may have been the effect of a gen- eral combustion, occasioned by some revolution of ou» globe, and producing an immense supply of carbonic acid, with which the calcareous matter became impreg- nated ; or that tnis may have been effected by a gradu- al absorption of carbonic acid from the atmosphere.— But this subject would lead us to discussions which we cannot indulge in, without deviating too much from our subject. Emily. II »w does it happen that we do not perceive the pernicious effects of the carbonic acid that is float- ing in the atmosphere ? Mr*. B. Becau-w of the state of very great dilution in which it exists there. But can you tell me, Emily, what are the sources which keep the atmosphere con- stantly supplied with this acid ? Emily. I suppose the combustion of wood, coals, and other substances, that contain carbone. Mr*. B. And also the breath of animals. Caroline. T've breath of animals! I thought you said that this gas \as not at all respirable, but, on the contrary, extremely poisonous. 220 Mrs. B. So it is ; but although animals cannot breathe in carbonic acid gas, yet, in the process of re- spiration, they have the power of forming this gas in. their lungs ; so that the air which we expire, or reject, from the lungs, always contains a greater proportion of carbonic acid, which is much greater than that which is commonly found in the atmosphere. Caroline. But what is it that renders carbonic acid such a deadly poison ? Mr*. B. The manner in which this gas destroys life, seems to be merely by preventing the access to respirable air ; for carbonic acid gas, unless very much diluted with common air, does not penetrate into the lungs, as the windpipe actually contracts, and refuses it admittance.—But we must dismiss this subject at pre- sent, as we shall have an opportunity of treating of re- spiration much more fully, when we come to the chem- ical functions of animals. Emily. Is carbonic acid as destructive to the life of vegetables, as it is to that of animals ? Mrs. B. If a vegetable be completely immersed in it. I believe it generally proves fatal to it ; but mixed in. certain proportions with atmospherical air, it is on the contrary, very favourable to vegetation. You remember, I suppose, our mentioning the min- eral waters, both natural and artificial, which contain carbonic acid gas ? Caroline. You mean the Seltzer water ? Mr*. B. That is one of those which are most used ;, there are, however, a variety of others ino which car- bonic acid enters as an ingredient ; all these waters are usually distinguished by the name of acidulous or gase- ous mineral waters. The class of salts called carbonats is the most numer- ous in nature ; we must pass over them in a very cur- sory manner, as the subject is far too extensive for us to enter on in detail. The state of carbonat is the natu- ral state of a vast number of minerals, and particularly of the alkalies and alkaline earths, as they have so great an attraction for the carbonic acid, that they are 221 almost always found combined with it ; and you may recollect that it is only by separating them from this acid, that they acquire that causticity and those striking qualities which 1 have formerly described All mar- bles, chalks, shells, calcareous spars, and lime-stones of every description, are neutral salts, in which lime, their common basis, has lost all its characteristic pro» perties. Emily. But if all these various substances are form- ed by the union of lime with carbonic acid, whence a- rises their diversity of form and appearance ? Mrs. B. Both from the different proportions of their component parts, and from a variety of foreign ingre- dients which may occasionally be mixed with them : the veins and coloui s of marble, for instance, proceed from a mixture of metallic substances ; silex and alu- mine also frequently enter into these combinations. The various carbonats therefore, that I have enumerat- ed, cannot be considered as pure unadulterated neutral salts, although they certainly belong to that class of bo- dies. ® eontoettfation xvi. On the muriatic and oxygenated muriatic acids ; and on muriats. Mrs. B. We come now to the undecompounded acids.—The muriatic, formerly called the makine acid, is the only one that requires our particular attention. The basis of this acid, as I have told you before, is un- known, all attempts to decompose it haying hitherto ¥3 222 jtfoved fruitless ; it is, therefore, by analogy only, that we suppose it to consist of a certain substance or radical,. combined with oxygen. Caroline. It can then never be formed by the com- bination of simple bodies, but must always be drawn from its compounds. Emily. Unless the acid should be found in nature tin- combined with other substances. Mr*. B. 1 believe that is never (he case. Its prin- cipal combinations are with soda, lime, and magnesia. Muriat of soda, is the common sea salt, and from this substance the acid is usually disengaged by means of the sulphuric acid. The natural state of the muriatic acid, is that of an invisible permanent gas at the com- mon temperature of the atmosphere ; but it has an ex- tremely strong attraction for water, and assumes ihe form of a whitish cloud, whenever it meets with any moisture to combine with. This acid is remarkable for its peculiar, and very pungent smell, and possesses, in a powerful degree, most of the acid properties. Here is a bottle containing muriatic acid in a liquid state. Caroline.. And how is it liquified ? Mr*. B. By impregnating water with it ; its strong attraction for water makes it very easy to obtain it in a liquid form. Now, if 1 open the phial, you may ob- serve a kind of vapour rising from it, which is muriatic acid gas, of itself invisible, but made apparent by com- bining with the moisture of the atmosphere. Emily.. Have you not any of the pure muriatic acid Sas • Airs. B This jar is full of that acid in its gaseods state—it is inverted over mercury instead of water, be- cause, being absorbable by water, this gas cannot be confined by it—I shall now raise the jar a litlle on one side, and suffei some of the gas to escape.—You see that it immediately becomes visible in the form of a cloud. Emily. It must be, no doubt, from its uniting with the moisture of the atmosphere, that it is converted, in- to this dewy vapour. 22.? Mr*. B. Certainly ; and for the same reason, that? is to say, its ex'.re 11c eagerness to unite with water,. this gas will cause snow to tnelt a s rapidly as an intense fire. Emily. Since this arid cannot be decomposed, I suppose that it is not susceptible of different degrees of oxygenation ? Airs. B. You are mistaken in your conclusion ; for though we cannot deoxygenate this acid, yet we may add oxygen to it. Caroline. Why then is not the least degree of ox- ygenation of the acid, called the muriatous, and the higher degree the mariatic acid ? Mr*. B. lkcause, instead of becoming, like other acids, more dense, and more acid by an addition ot ox- ygen, it is rendered on the contrary more volatile, more pungent, but less acid, and less absorbable by water. These circumstances, therefore, seem to indicate the propriety of making an exception to the nomenclature. The highest degree of oxygenation of this acid has been distinguished by the additional epithet of oxygenated, or, for the sake of brevity, oxy, so that it is called the oxygenated^ oxy-muriatic acid. This likewise exists in a gaseous form, at the temperature of the atmos- phere ; it is also susceptible of being absorbed by water, and can be congealed, or solidified, by a certain degree of cold. Emily. And how do you obtain the oxy-muriatic acid ? Mr*. B. By distilling liquid muriatic acid over ox- yd of manganese, which supplies the acid with the ad- ditional oxygen. One part of the acid being put into a retort, with too parts of the oxyd of manganese, and the heat of a lamp applied, the gas is soon disengaged* and may be received over water, as it is but sparingly absorbed by it. I hate collected some in this j*.«r— Caroline. It is not invisihler like the generality of gasses ; for it is of a yellowish colour. * Mr*. B. The muriatic acid extinguishes flame, whilst, on the contrary, the oxy-muriatic makes the flame larger, and gives it a dark red colour. Can joa account foj? this difference in the two acids i 224 Emily. Yes, I think so; the muriatic acid cannot be decomposed, and therefore will not supply the flame with the oxygen necessary for its support ; but when this acid is farther oxygenated it will part with its ad- ditional quantity of oxygen, and in this way support combustion. Mr*. B. That is exactly the case ; indeed the ox- ygen, added to the muriatic acid, adheres so slightly to it, that it is separated by mere exposure to the sun's rays. This acid is decomposed also by combustible bodies, many of which it burns, and actually inflames, without any previous increase of temperature. Caroline. That is extraordinary, indeed ! I hope you mean to indulge us with some of these experiments ? Mr*. B. I have prepared several glass jars of oxy- muriatic acid gas, for that purpose In the first we shall introduce some Dutch gold leaf—Do you observe that it takes fire ? . Emily. Yes, indeed it does—-how wonderful it is ! it became immediately red hot, but was soon smother- ed in a thick vapour. Caroline Good heavens ! what a disagreeable smell. Mrs. B. We shall try the same experiment with phosphorus in another jar of this acid —You had better keep your handkerchief to your nose when I open it— now let us drop into it this little piece of phosphorus— Caroline. It bums really : and almost as brilliantly as in oxygen gas ! But what is most extraordinary, these combustions take place without the metal or phospho- rus being previously lighted, or even in the least heated. Mr*. B. All these curious effects are owing to the very great facility with which this acid yields oxygen to such bodies as are strongly disposed to combine with it. It appears extraordinary indeed to see bodies, and metals in particular, melted down and inflamed, by a gas, without any increase of temperature, either of the gas or of the combustible. The phenomenon, however, is, you see, well accounted for. Emily. Why did you burn a piece of Dutch gold- leaf rather than a piece of any other metal ? Mr*, B. Because, in the first place, it is a compo- 225 sition of metals consisting chiefly of copper, whicHi burns readily ; and I use a thin metallic leaf in prefer- ence to a lump of metal, because it offers to the action. of the gas but a small quantity of matter under a large surface.__Filings, or shavings, would answer the pur- pose nearly as well; but a lump of metal, though the surface would oxydate with great rapidity, would not take fire. Pure gold is not inflamed by oxy-muriatic acid gas, but it is rapidly oxydated, and dissolved by it; indeed, this acid is the only one that will dissolve gold. Emily. This, I suppose, is what is commonly called aqua regia, which you know, is the only thing that will act upon gold. , Mrs. B. That is not exactly the case either ; for aqua regia is composed of a mixture of muriatic and nitric. acid. But, in fact, the result of this mixture is no- thing more than oxy-muriatic acid, as the muriatic acid oxy genates itself at the expense of the nitric ; this mix- ture, therefore, though it bears the name of nitro mu- riatic acid, acts on gold merely in virtue of the oxy- muriatic acid which it contains. Sulphur, volatile oils, and many other substances, will burn in the same manner in oxy-muriatic acid gas ;; but I have not prepared a sufficient quantity of it, to shew you the combustion of all these bodies. Caroline. Yet tneie are several jars of the gas re- maining. Mr*. B. We must reserve these for other experi- ments. The oxy-muriatic acid does not, like other acids, redden the blue vegetable colours ; but it totally destroys any colour, and tuins all vegetables perfectly white. Let us collect some vegetable substances to put into this glass which is full of gas. Emily. Here is a sprig of mvrtle— Caroline. And here some coloured paper— Airs. B. We shall also put in this piece of coque- licot ribbon, and a rose— > Emily. Their colours begin to fade immediately- But how doe? the gas produce this t ffect ? Airs. B. The oxygen combines with the colouring, 226 matter of these substances, and destroys it; that is to say, destroys the property which these colours had of reflecting only one kind of rays, and renders them ca- pable of reflecting them all, which, you know, will make them appear white Old prints may be cleaned bv this acid, for the paper will be whitened without in- juring the impression, as printer's ink is made of mate- rials (oil and lamp black) which are not acted upon by acids. This property of the oxy-muriatic acid has lately been employed in manufactories in a variety of bleach- ing processes ; but for these purposes the gas must be dissolved in water, as the acid is thus rendered much milder and less powerful in its effects ; for, in a gase- ous state, it would destroy the texture, as well as the colour, of the substance submitted to its action. Caroline. Look at the things whit h we put into the gas ; they have now entirely lost their colour ! Mrs. B. The effect of the acid is almost completed —and, and if we were to examine the quantity that re- mains, we should find it consist chiefly of muriatic acjd. The oxy-muriatic acid has been used to purify the air in fever hospitals and prisons, as it burns and des- troys putrid uffluvia of every kind. The infection of the small pox is likewise destroyed by this gas, and mat- ter that has been submitted to its influence will no longer generate that disorder. Caroline. Indeed, I think the remedy must be near- ly as bad as the disease ; the oxy-muriatic acid has such a dreadful suffoc .ting smell. Airs B. It is certainly extremely offensive ; but, by keeping the mouth shut, and wetting the nosnils with liquid ammonia, in order to neutralize the vapour as it reaches the nose, its prejudicial effects may be in some degree prevented. Ai any rate, however, this mode of disinfection can hardly be used in pi. ces that are inhabited. And as the vapour of nitric acid, which is scarcely less efficacious for this putpose. is not at all prejudicial, it is usually preferred on such occasions. Amongst the ronu>oui k of trees ; but it is found also in nut-galls and in so nc other vegetables. Emily. Is that the substance commonly called tan which is used in hot-houses ? Mr*. B. Tan is the prepared bark in which the pe- culiar substance, tannin, is contained. But the use of tan in hot-houses is of much less importance than in the operation of tanning, by which skin is converted into leather. Emily. Pray, how is this operation performed ? Airs. B. Various methods are employed for this purpose, which all consist in exposing skin to the action of the tannin, or of substances containing this princi- ple, in sufficient quantities and disposed to yield it to the skin. The most usual way is to infuse coarsely pow- dered oak bark in water, and to keep the skin immer- sed in this infusion for a certain length of time. Dur- ing this process, which is slow and gradual, the skin is found to have increased in weight, and to have acquired a considerable tenacity and impermeability to water. This effect may be much accelerated by using strong saturations of the tanning principle (which can be ex- tracted from bark), instead of employing the bark it- self. But this quick mode of preparation docs not ap- pear to make equally good leather. Yannin is contained in a great variety of astringent vegetable substances, as galls, the rose-tree, and wine ; but it is no where so plentiful as in bark. All these substances yield it to water, from which it may be pre- cipitated by a solution of isinglass, or glue, with which it strongly unites and forms an insoluble compound. Hence its valuable property of combining with skin (which consists chiefly of glue), and of enabling it to re- sist the action of water, Emily. Might we not see that effect by pouring a 247 little melted isinglass into a glass of wine, which you say contains tannin ? Airs. B. Yes. I have prepared a solution of isin- glass for that very purpose.—Do you observe the thick muddy precipitate ?—Tnat is the tannin combined with the isinglass. Caroline. This precipitate must then be of the same nature as leather ? Mr*. B. It is composed of the same ingredients; but the organization and the texture of the skin being wanting, it has neither the consistence nor the tenacity , of leather. Caroline. One might suppose that men who drink large quantities of red wine, stand a chance of having the coats of their stomachs converted into leather, since tannin has so strong an affinity for skin. Mr*. B. It is not impossible but that the coats of their stomachs may be, in some measure, tanned, or hardened by the constant use of this liquor ; but you must remember that where a number of other chemi- cal agents are concerned, and, above all, where life ex- ists, no certain chemical inference can be drawn. I must not dismiss this subject, without mentioning a very recent discovery of Mr. Hatchett, which relates to it. This gentleman found that a substance very sim- ilar to tannin, possessing all its leading properties, and actually capable of tanning leather, may be pioduced by exposing carbone, or any substance containing car- bonaceous matter, whether vegetable, animal, or min- eral, to the action of nitric acid. Caroline. And is not this discovery very likely to be of great use to manufactures ? Airs. B. That is jety doubtful; because tannin, thus artificially prepared, must probably slways be more expensive than that which is obtained from bark. But the fact is extremely curious, as it affords one of those very rare instances of chemistry, being able to imitate the proximate principles of organized bodies. The last of the vegetable materials is woody fibre ; it is the hardest part of plants. The chief source from which this substance is derived is wood, but it is also 248 contained, more or less, in every solid part of the plant. It forms a kind of skeleton of the part to which it belongs. and retains its shape after all the other materials have disappeared. It consists chiefly of carbone united with a small proportion of salts and the other constituents common to all vegetables. Emily. It is of a woody fibre, then, that the common charcoal is made ? Mrs. B. Yes. Charcoal, as you may recollect, is obtained from wood, by the separation of all its evapo* rable parts. Before we take leave of the vegetable materials, i t will be proper, at least, to enumerate the several vege- table acids which we either have had, or may have occa- sion to mention. I believe I have formerly told you that their basis, or radical, was uniformly composed of hydrogen and carbone, and that their difference consist- ed only in the variousproportions of oxygen which they contained. The following is the names of the vegetable acids : The Mucous Acid, obtained from gum, or mucilage ;; Suberic from cork ; Camphoric, from camphor ; Benzoic, from balsams : Gallic, from galls, bark, &c. Alalic, from ripe fruits ; Citric, from lemon juice j Oxalic, from sorrel ; Succinic from amber ; Tartarous . frc m tartrit of potash ; Acetic, from vinegar. They are all decomposable by heat, soluble in waterj and turn vegetable blue colouft fed. The succinic, the tartarous, and the acetous acids, are the products of the decomposition of vegetables ; we shall, therefore, re- serve their examination for a future period. The oxalic acid, distilled from sorrel, is the highest term of vegetable acidification ; for, if more oxygen be added to it, it loses its vegetable nature, and is resolved into carbonic acid and water ; therefore, though all the ether acids may be converted into the oxalic by an ad- 249 dition of oxygen, the oxalic itself is not susceptible of« farther degree of oxygenation ; nor can it be made, by any chemical process, to return to a state of lower acid- ification. To conclude this subject, I have only to add a few words on the gallic acid .... Caroline. Is not this the same acid before mentioned, which forms ink, by precipitating sulphat of iron from its solution ? Mr*. B. Yes. Though it is usually extracted from galls, on account of its being most abundant in that ve- getable substance, it may also be obtained from a great variety of plants. It constitutes what is called the as- tringent principle of vegetables ; it is generally combi- ned with tannin, and you will find that an infusion of tea, coffee, bark, red wine, or any vegetable substance that contains the astringent principle, w » make a black precipitate with a solution of sulphat of iron. Caroline. But pray what are gills ? Mr*. B. They are excrescences which grow on the bark of young oaks, and are occasioaed by an insect which wounds the bark of trees, and lays its egg in the aperture. The lacerated vessels of the tree then dis- charge their contents, and form an excrescence, which affords a defensive covering for these eggs. The fnsect, when come to life, first feeds on this excrescence, and some time afterwards eats its way out, as it ap- pears from a hole found in all gall-nuts that no longer contain an insect. It is in hot climates only that strong- ly astringent gall-nuts are found ; those which are us>ed for the purpose of making ink are brough from Alep- po. Emily. But are not the oak-apples which grow on the leaves of the oak in this country, of a similar na- ture ? Airs. B. Yes ; only they are an inferior species of galls, containing less of the astringent principle, and therefore less applicable to useful purposes Caroline. Are the vegetable acids never found but in their pure uncombined state ? Mr*. B. By no means ; on the contrary, they arc 250 frequently met with in the state of compound salts ; these, however, are in general not fully saturated with the salifiable bases, sol hat the acid predominates, and in this state they are called acidulous salts. Of this kind is the salt called cream of tartar. Caroline. Is not the salt of lemon commonly used to take out ink spots and stains, of this nature ? Mrs B. No ; that salt consists merely of the citric acid reduced to the state of crystals. Caroline. And pray how does it take out ink spots ? Mrs. B. By decomposing the black precipitate, and rendering it soluble in water But the display of at- tractions by which this is performed is, I believe, not exactly ascertained Besides the vegetable materials which we have enu- merated, a variety of other substances, common to the three kingdoms, are found in vegetables, such as pot- ash, which was formerly supposed to belong exclusive- ly to plants, and was in consequence called the vegeta- ble alkali. Sulphur, phosphorus, earths, and a variety of me- tallic ovyds, are also found in vegetables, but nnly in small quantities. And we meet sometimes with neu- tral salts formed by the combination of these ingredi- ents. ® Confcettfation xvm. On the decomposition of Vegetables. Caroline, THE account which you have given us, Mrs. B. of the materials of vegetables, is doubtless, very instruct- 251 ive ; but it does not completely satisfy mv curiosity.— I wish to know how plants obtain the principles from which their various materials are formed ; by what means these are convened into vegetable matter, and how they are connected with the lile of the plant ? Mr*. B. This implies nothing less than a complete history of the chemistry and physiology of vegetation, subjects on which we have yet but very imperfect no- tions. Still 1 hope that I shall be able, in some mea- sure, to satisfy your curiosity. But in order to render the subject more intelligible, I must first make you ac- quainted with the various changes which vegetables un- deigo, when the vital power no longer enables them to resist the common laws of chemical attraction. The composition of vegetables being more compli- cated than that of minerals, the former more reatlily undergo cheniical changes than the latier : for the greater the variety of attractions, the more easily is the equilibrium destroyed, and a new older of combinations introduced. Emily. I am surprised that vegetables should be so easiiy susceptible ol decomposition ; for the preserva- tion of the vegetable kingdom is certainly far more im- portant than that of minerals. Mr*. \\. You p.ust consider, on the other hand, how much more easily the former is renewed than the latter. The decomposition of the vegetable takes place only fer the death of the plant, which, in the conin on course ol nature, happens when it has yielded fruit and seeds to propag..te its species. If instead of thus finish- ing its career, < ach plant was to retain its form and veg- etable state, it would become an useless bun-en to ti.e c.rth and its inhabitants.— When vegetables, there- fore, cease to be productive, they cease to live, and Nature then begins her process of decomposition, m or- der to dissolve them into their cheniical constituents, hydroiren, carbone, and oxygen ; those simple and p unitive ingredients which she keeps in store for all her combinations. Emily. But since no system of combination can be destroyed, except by the establishment of another or- 252 <3er of attractions, how can the decomposition of veget- ables reduce them to their simple elements ? Airs. B. It is a very long process, during which a variety of new combinations are successively esta- blished and successively destroyed ; but, in each of these changes, the ingredients of vegetable matter tend to unite in a more simple order of compounds, till they are at length -brought to their elementary state, or at least, to their most simple order of combinations. Thus you will find that vegetables are in the end almost en- tirely reduced to water and carbonic acid ; the hydro- gen and carbone dividing the oxygen between them, so as to form with it these two substances. But the variety of intermediate combinations that take place du- ring the several stages of the decomposition of vegeta- bles, present us with a new set of compounds, well wor- thy of our examinaion Caroline. How is it possible that vegetables, while putrefying, should produce any thing worthy of observa- tion ? Mr*. B. They are susceptible of undergoing cer- tain charges before they arrive at the state of putrefac- tion, which is the final term of decomposition ; and of these changes we avail ourselves for particular and im- portant purposes. But, in order to make you under- stand this subject, which is of considerable importance, I must explain it more in detail. The decomposition of vegetables is always attended by a violent internal motion, produced by the disunion of one order of particles, and the combination of aro- ther This is called fermentation.—There are several periods at which fermentation stops, so that a state of rest appears to be restored, and the new order of com- pounds fairly established. But unless means be used to secure these new combinations in their actual state, their duration will be but transient, and a new fermenta- tion will take place, by which the compound last formed will be destroyed ; and another, and less complex order will succeed. Emily. The fermentation, then, appears to be"only the successive steps by which a vegetable descends ta its final dissolution ? 258 Mr*. B. Precisely so. Your definition is perfectly correct. Caroline. And how many fermentations, or new ar- rangements, does a vegetable undergo before it is re- duced to its simple ingredients ? Airs. B. Chemists do not exactly agree in this point; but there are, I think, four distinct fermentations, or periods, at which the decomposition of vegetable mat- ter stops and changes its course. But every kind of vegetable matter is not equally susceptible ot undergo- ing all these fermentations There are likewise several circumstances required to produce fermentation. Water, and n certain degree of heat are both essential to this process, in order to se- parate the particles, and thus weaken their force of co- hesion, that the new chemical affinities may be brought into action. Caroline. In frozen climates, then, how can the spon- taneous decomposition of vegetables take place ? Mrs. B. It certainly cannot ; and, accordingly, we find scarcely any vestiges of vegetation where a constant frost prevails. Caroline. One would imagine that, on the contrary, such spots would be covered with vegetables ; for, since they cannot be decomposed, their numbers must always increase. Airs. B. Bui, my dear, heat and water are quite as essential to the formation of vegetables as they are to their decomposition. Besides, it is from the dead ve- getables reduced to their elementary principles, that the rising generation is supplied with sustenance. No young plant, therefore, can grow, unless its predeces- sors contribute both to its formation and support ; and these not only furnish the seed from which the new plant springs, but likewise the food by which it is nour- ished. Caroline. Under the torrid zone, therefore, where water is never frozen, and the heat is very great, both the processes of vegetation, and fermentation must, I suppose, be extremely rapid ? X 254 Mr*. B. Not so much as you imagine ; for in such 'climates great part of the water which is requisite for these processes is in an aeriform state, which is scarce- ly more conducive either to the growth or formation of vegetables than that of ice. In those latitudes, there- fore, it is only in low damp situations, sheltered by woods from the sun's rays, that the smaller tribes of vegetables can grow and thrive during the dry season, as dead vegetables seldom retain water enough to pro- duce fermentation, but are, on the contrary, soon dried up by the heat of the sun, which enables them to resist that process ; so that it is not till the fall of the autum- nal rains (which are very violent in such climates), that spontaneous fermentations can take place. The several fermentations derive their names from their principal products. The first is called the saccha- rine fermentation, because its product is sugar. Caroline. But sugar, you have told us, is found in all vegetables ; it cannot, therefore, be the product of their decomposition. Mrs. B. It is true that this fermentation is not con- fined to the decomposition of vegetables, as it contin- ually takes place during their life ; and indeed this cir- cumstance has, till lately, prevented it from being con- sidered as one of the fermentations. But the process appears so analogous to the other fermentations, and the formation of sugar, whether in living or dead veget- able matter, is so evidently a new compound, proceed- ing from the destruction of the previous order of com- binations, and essential to the subsequent fermentations, that it is row esteemed the first step, or necessary pre- • liminary, to decomposition, if not an actual commence- ment of that process. Caroline. I recollect your hinting to us that sugar was supposed not to be secreted from the sap, in the same manner as mucilage, fecula, oil, and the other ingredients of vegetables. Airs. B. It is rather from these materials, than from the sap itself, that sugar is formed ; and it is developed at particular periods, as you may observe in fruits, which become sweet in ripening, sometimes even after 255 they have been gathered. Life, therefore, is not es- sential to the formation of sugar, whilst on the contra- ry, mucilage, fecula, and the other vegetable materials that are secreted from the sap by appropiate organs, whose powers immediately depend on the vital princi- ple, cannot be produced but during the existence of that principle. , . Emily. The ripening of fruits is, then, their first step to destruction, as well as their last towards perfec- tion ? Mr*. B. Exactly so.—-The saccharine fermentation frequently takes place also during the cooking of veget- ables. This is the case with parsnips, carrots, pota- toes, &c. in which, sweetness is developed by heat and moisture ; and we know that if we carried the process a little farther, a mora complete decomposition would ensue, fhe same process takes place also in seeds previous to their sprouting* Caroline. How do you reconcile this to your theory, Mrs. B. ? Can you suppose that a decomposition is the necessary precursor of life ? Mrs. B. That is indeed the case. Tlie materials of the seed must be decomposed, and the seed dis- organized, before a plant c..n sprout from it.—Seeds, • besides the embryo plant, contain (as we have already observed), fecula, oil, and a little mucilage. These substances are destined for the nourishment of the fu- ture plant ; but they must undergo some change be- fore they can be fit for this function. The seeds, when buried in the earth, with a certain degree of moisture and of temperature, absorb water, which dilates them, separates their particles, and introduces a new order of attractions, of which sugar is the product. The sub- stance of the seed is thus softened, sweetened, and con- verted into a sort of white milky pulp, fit for the nour- ishment of the embryo plant. The saccharine fermentation of seeds is artificially produced for the purpose of making malt, by the fol- lowing process : A quantity of bailey is first soaked in water for two or three diys ; the water being after- wards drained off, the gra.n heats spontaneously, svvelia. 256 bursts, sweetens, shews a disposition to germinate, and would actually sprout, if the process was not stopped by putting it into a kiln, where it is well dried at a gen- tle heat. l In this state it is crisp and friable, and consti- tutes the substance called malt, which is the principal ingredient of beer. Emily. But I hope you will tell us how malt is made into beer ? Airs. B. Certainly ; but I must first explain to you the nature of the second fermentation, which is essen- tial to that operation. This is called the vinous fermen- tation, because its product is wine. Emily. How very different the decomposition of ve- getables is from what I had imagined. The pro- ducts of their disoi ganization appear almost superior to those which they yield during their state of life and perfection. Mr*. B. And do you not at the same time, admire the beautiful economy of Nature, which, whether she creates, or whether she destroys, directs all her opera- tions to some useful and benevolent purpose ? It ap- pears that the saccharine fermentation is essential, as a previous step, to the vinous fermentation ; so that if sugar be not developed during the life of the plant, the saccharine fermentation must be artificially produc- ed before the vinoub fermentation can take place. This is the case with barley, which does not yield any sugar until it is made into malt ; and in that state only it is susceptible of undergoing the vinous fermentation by which it is converted into beer. Caroline. But if the product of the vinous fermenta- tion is always wine, beer cannot have undergone that process ; for beer is certainly not wine. Mrs. B. Chemically speaking, beer may be con- sidered as the wine of grain. For it is the product of the fermentation of malt, just as wine is that of the fer- mentation of grapes, or other fruits. The consequence of the vinous fermentation is the decomposition ol the saccharine matter, and the form- ation of spirituous liquor from the constituents of the sugar. But, in order to promote this fermentation,. 257 not only water and a certain degree of heat are necessa- ry, but also some other vegeuble ingredients, besides the sugar, as fecula, mucilage, acids, salts, extractive matter, &c all of which seem to contribute to this pro- cess. Emily It is, perhaps, for this reason, that wine is not obtained from tie tern entailer cl \ i u n ^ai ; bu that fruits are chosen for that purpose, as they contain not only sugar, but likewise the other vegetable ingre- dients which are requisite to promote the vinous fermen- tation. Mr*. B. Certainly And you must observe also, that the relative quantity of sugar is not the only cir- cumstance to be considered in the choice of vegetable juices for the formation of wine ; otherwise the sugar- cane would be best adapted for that purpose. It is rather the manner and proportion in which the sugar is mixed with other vegetable ingredients that influences the production and qualities of wine. And it is found that the juice of the grape not only yields the most considerable proportion of wine, but that it likewise af- fords it of the most grateful flavour. Emily. I h ive seen a vintage in Switzerland, and I do not recollect that heat was applied, or water added,. to produce the fermentation of the grapes. M'-s. B. Tne common temperature of the atmos- phere, in the cellars, in which the juice of the grape is fermented, is sufficiently warm for this purpose ; and, as the juice contains an ample supplv of water,. there is no occasion for any addition of it—But when fermentation is produced in dry malt, a quantity of wa- ter must necessarily be added. Emily. But what are precisely the changes that hap- pen during the vinous fermentation ? Mrs. B. The sugar is decomposed^ and its constitu- ents are recombitied into two new substances ; the one a peculiar liquid substance, called alcohol or spirit of' wine, which remains in the fluid ; the other, carbonic acid gis, whicu escapes during the fermentation. Wine, therefore,ii x g3ier.il p >i;it of view, miy be consider- ed as a liquid ot winch ale i'ioI constitutes the essential X2 258 part. And the varieties of strength and flavour of the different kinds of wine are to be attributed to the dif- ferent qualities of the fruits from which they are obtain- ed, independently of the sugar, without which no wine can be produced. Caroline. I am astonished to hear that so powerful a liquid as spirits of wine should be obtained from so mild a substance as sugar ! Airs. B. Cm you tell me in what the principal dif- ference consist between alcohol and sugar ? Caroline. Let me reflect .... Sugar consists of carbone, hydtogen, and oxygen. If carbonic acid be substracted from it, during the formation of alcohol, the latter will contain less carbone and oxygen than su- gar does ; therefore hydrogen must be the prevailing principle of alcohol. Mr*. B. It is exactly so. And this very large pro- portion of hydrogen accounts for the lightness and com- bustible property of alcohol, and of spirits in general, all of which consist of alcohol variously modified. Emily. And can sugar be recomposed from the com- bination of alcohol and carbonic acid ? Mrs. B. Chemists have never been able to succeed in effecting this ; but from analogy, I should suppose such a recomposition possible. Let us now observe more particularly the phenomena that take place dur- ing the vinous fermentation. At the commencement of this process, heat is evolved, and the liquor swells considerably from the formation of the carbonic acid,. which is disengaged in such prodigious quantities as to be often prejudicial to the vintagers. If the fermenta- tion be stopped by putting the liquor into barrels, be- fore the whole of the carbonic acid is evolved, the wine is brisk, like Champagne, from the carbonic arid im- prisoned in it, and it tastes sweet like cider, from the su- gar not being completely decomposed. Emily. But I do not understand why heat should be evolved during this operation. For as there is a con- siderable formation of gas, in which a proportionable quantity of heat must become insensible, 1 should have imagined that cold, rather than heat, would have been produced. Page 1J3. Flat,J , \ *f«-r £,~„.,,y,S For I».f»ie Cooke* C? M* Mr*en 259 Mr*. B. It appears so on first consideration ; but you must recollect that fermentation is a complicated chemical process; and that, during the decompositions and recompositions attending it, a quantity of chemical heat may be disengaged, sufficient both to develope the gas, and to effect an increase of temperature— When the fermentation is completed, the liquid cools and subsides, the effervescence ceases, and the thick sweet, sticky juice of the fruit is converted into a clear transparent spirituous liquor called wine. Emily. How much I regret not having been ac- quainted with the nature of the vinous fermentation, when I had an opportunity of seeing the process ! Mr*. B. You have an easy method of satisfying yourself in that respect by observing the process of brewing, which, in every essential circumstance, is similar to that of making wine, and is really a very cu- rious chemical operation. Although I cannot perform the experiment of mak- ing wine, it will be easy to shew you the mode of ana- lyzing it. This is done by distillation. When wine of any kind is submitted to this operation, it is found to contain brandv, water, tartar, extractive colouring mat- ter, and some vegetable acids. 1 have put a little port wine into this glass alembic (Plate X. Fig. 23.J and on placing the lamp under it, you will soon see these pro- ducts successively come over— Emily. But you do not mention alcohol amongst the products of the distillation of wine; and yet that is its most essential ingredient. Mrs. B. The alcohol is contained in the brandy which is now coming over, and dropping from the still. Brandy is nothing more than a mixture of alcohol and water; and in order to obtain the alcohol pure, we must again distil it from brandy. Caroline. I have just taken a drop on my finger; PLATE X. ?■ Fig. 23. A. Alrmbic B. Lamp. C. Wine glass. Fig *4- Alcohol blow-pipe. D The Lamp. E. The ves- sel In which the alcohol is boiling. F A fafety valve. G. The inflamed jet or ftream of alcohol directed towards a glass tube H. 260 it tastes like strong brandy, but it is without colour; whilst brandy is of a deep yellow Mr*. B. It is not so naturally ; in its pure state brandy is colourless, and it obtains the yellow tint you observe by extracting the colouring matter from the new oaken casks in which it is kept. But if it does not acquire the usual tinge this way, it is the custom to colour the brandy used in this country artificially, in order to give it the appearance of having been long kept. Caroline. And is rum also distilled from wine ? Mr*. B. By no means ; it is distilled from the su- gar-cane, a plant which contains so great a quantity of sugar, that it yields more alcohol than almost any other vegetable. Previous to the distillation of the spirit, the sugar-cane is made to undergo the vinous fermentation, which the other ingredients of the plant are just suffi- cient to promote. The spirituous liquor called arack, is in a similar' manner distilled from the product oi the vinous fermen-- tation of rice. Emily. But rice has no sweetness ; does it contain. any sugar? Mrs. B. Like barley and most other seeds, it is in- sipid until it has undergone the saccharine fermenta-- tion ; and this, you must recollect, is always a previ- ous step to the vinous fermentation in those vegetables in which sugar is not already formed. Brandy may in the same manner be obtained from malt. Caroline. You mean from beer, I suppose; for the malt must have previously undergone the vinous fer- mentation. Mrs. B. Beer is not precisely the product of the vinous fermentation of malt For hops are a necessary ingredient for the formation of tha! liquor ; whilst bran- dy is distilled from pure fermented n.alt. But brandy. might, no doubt, be distilled from beer as well as from: any other liquor that has undergone the vinous fermen- tation ; for since the basis of brandy is alcohol, it may be obtained from any liquid that contains that spirituous substance. 261 Emily. And pray, from what vegetable is the favor* , ite spirit of the lower orders of people, gin, extracted ? Airs. B. The spirit (which is the same in all fer- mented liquors) may be obtained from any kind of grain ; but the peculiar flavour which distinguishes gin, is ihat of juniper berries, which are distilled together with the grain— ..... 1 think the brandy contained in the wine which we j.re distilling, must, by this time, be all come over.. Yes—taste the fluid that is now dropping from the alembic— Caroline, It is perfectly insipid, like water. Mrs. B. It is water, which, as I was telling you, is the second product of wine, and comes over after all the spirit, which is the lightest part, is distilled The tartar and extractive colouring matter we shall find in a solid form at the bottom of the alembic. Emily. They look very like the lees of wine. Mrs B. And in many respects they are of a simi- lar nature ; for lees of wine consist chiefly of tartrit of potash, a salt which exists in the juice of the grape, and in many other vegetables, and is developed only by the vinous fermentaticn. During this operation it is precipitated, and deposits itself on the internal surface of the cask in which the wine is contained. It is much use.fl in medicine under the name of cream of tartar, and it n from this salt that the tartarous acid is obtained. . . Caroline. But the medicinal cream of tartar is in appearance quite different from these dark coloured drees ; it is perfectly colourless. Mrs B Because it consists of the pure salts only, in its crystallized form ; whilst in the instance before us it is mixed with the deep-coloured extractive matter and other foreign ingredients, _ Emily. Pray cannot we now obtain pure alcohol from the brandv which we have distilled ? Mr* B We might: but the process would be tedious: for in ^der to obtain alcohol perfectly free from water, it is necessary to distil, or a> the distillers call it rectify it several times. You must therefore aU 262 low me to produce a bottle of alcohol that has been thus purified. This is a very important ingredient, which has many striking properties, besides its forming the basis of all spirituous liquors. Emily. It is alcohol, 1 suppose, that produces intox- ication ? Mr*. B. Certainly ; but the stimulus and moment- ary energy it gives to the system, and the intoxication it occasions when taken in excess, are circumstances not yet accounted for. Caroline. 1 thought that it produced these effects by increasing the rapidity of the circulation of the blood ; for drinking wine of spirits, 1 have heard always quick- ens the pulse. Mrs. B. No doubt; the spirit by stimulating the nerves, increases the action of the muscles ; and the heart, which is one of the strongest muscular organs, beats with augmented vigour and propels the blood with accelerated quickness. After such strong excitation the frame naturally suffers a proportional degree of de- pression, so that a state of dehility and langour are the invarible consequences of intoxication. But though these circumstances are well ascertained, they are iar from explaining why alcohol should produce such ef- fects. Emily. Liqueurs are the only kind of spirits which I think pleasant. Pray of what do they consist ? Mr*. B. They are composed of alcohol, sweetened with syrup, and flavored with volatile oil. The different kinds of odoriferous spirituous waters are likewise solutions of volatile oil in alcohol, as laven- der water, eau de Cologne, &c. The chemical properties of alcohol are important and numerous. It is one of tlie most powerful chemical agents, and is particularly useful in dissolving a variety of substances which are soluble neither by water nor heat. Emily. We have seen it dissolve copal and mastic to form varnishes ; and these resins are certainly not soluble in water, since water precipitates them from. their solution in alcohol. 263 Mr*. B. I am happy to find that you recollect these circumstances so well. The same experiment affords also an instance of another property of alcohol, its ten- dency to unite with water ; for the resin is precipitated in consequence of losing the alcohol, which abandons it from its preference for water. We do not, however, consider the union of alcohol and water, as the effect of chemical combination, but rather as a simple solu- tion, similar to that of sulphuric acid and water ; it is attended also, as you may recollect, with the same pe- culiar circumstance of a disengagement of heat and con- sequent diminution of bulk, which we have supposed to be produced by a mechanical penetration of particles by which latent heat is forced out. Alcohol unites thus readily not only with resins and with water, but with oils and balsams ; these compounds form the extensive class of elixers, tinctures, quintes- sences. &c Emily. I suppose that alcohol must be highly com- bustible, since it contains so large a proportion of hy- drogen ? Mr*. B. Extremely so ; and it will burn at a very moderate temperature. Caroline. 1 have often seen both brandy and spirit of wine burnt ; they pn 308 er parts of the body ; but in what manner they are act- ed upon by the mind, and made to re-act on the body, is still a profound secret. Many hypothesis have been formed on this very obscure subject, but they are all equally improbable, and it would be useless for us to waste our time in conjectures on an inquiry which in all probability, is beyond the reach of human capacity. Caroline. But you have not mentioned those par- ticular nerves that form the senses of hearing, seeing smelling, and tasting ? Mrs. B. They are considered as being of the same nature as those which are dispersed over every part o f the body, and canstitute the general sense of feeling. The different sensations which they produce arise from their peculiar situation and connection with the several organs of taste, smell, and hearing. Emily. But these senses appear totally different from that of feeling ? Mrs. B. They are, all of them sensations, but var- iously modified according to the nature of the different organs in which the nerves are situated. For, as we have formerly observed, it is by contact only that the nerves are affected. Thus odoriferous particles must strike upon the nerves of the nose in order to excite the sense of smelling, in the same manner that taste is produced by the particular substance coming in con- tact with the nerves of the palate. It is thus also that the sensation of sound is produced by the concussion of the air striking against the auditory nerve ; and sight is the effect of the light falling upon the optic nerve. These various senses, therefore, are affected only by the actual contact of particles of matter, in the same manner as that of feeling. The different organs of the animal body, though ea- sily separable and perfectly distinct, are loosely con- nected together by a kindof spongy substance, in tex- ture somewhat resembling net-work, called the cellu- lar membrane ; and the whole is covered by the skin. The skin, as well as the bark of vegetables, i* form- ed of three coats. The external one is called the cuti- cle, or epidermis ; the second, which is called the mu- cous membrane, is of a thin soft texture, and consists of auy a mucous substance, which in negroes is black, and is the cause of their skin appearing of that colour Caroline. Is then the external skin of negroes white UkM0r*!'SB Yes ; but as the cuticle is transparent, as weU Z porus,the' blackness of the: mucous ™^J«£ is visible through it. The extremities of the> ncm*are spread over the* skin, so that the *™f™J*«f^* transmitted through the cuticle. The inte.nal cover ing of the muscles, which is proper y the skin, is the thfckest, the toughest, and most resisting o ^e whole -it is this membrane that is so essential in the arts, by forming leather when combined with tannin. The skin which covers the animal body, as well as those membranes that form the coats of the vessels, con- sist almost exclusively of gelatine ; and are capable of being converted into glue, size, or jelly- The cavities between the muscles and the skin are usually filled with fat, which lodges in the cells of the membranous net before mentioned, and gives to the ex- ™rr?al form (especially in the human figure) that round- ness smoothness, and softness, so essential to beauty. Em7y And the skin itself is, I think, a very orna- mental part of the human frame, both from the: finess of its texture, and the variety and delicacy of its tints Mr* B This variety and harmonious gradation ot colours', proceed, not so much from the skin itself, as from the internal organs which transmit their several coZrs through it, these being only softened and blend- ed by the colour of the skin, which is uniformly of a ^Ss'iVodified, the darkness of the veins appears of a pale blue colour, and the floridness of the arteries is changed to a delicate pink. In the most transparent parts8, the skin exhibits the bloom of the rose, whilst vriiere it is more opaque its own colour predominates ; and at tl e joints where the bones are most prominent, the v h tenJcss is often discernable In a word every art of he human frame seems to contribute to its ex- ernal grace ; and this not merely by producing a pleasing varie y of tints, but by a peculiar kjnd of beau. 310 ty which belongs to each individual part. Thus it is t» the solidity and arrangement of the bones that the hu- man figure owes the grandeur of its stature, and its firm and dignified deportment. The muscles delineate the form, and stamp it with energy and grace ; and the soft substance which is spread over them smooths their ruggedness, and gives to the contours the gentle un- dulations of the line of beauty. Every organ of sense is a peculiar and separate ornament ; and the skin, which polishes the surface and gives it that charm of colouring so inimitably by art, finally conspires to ren- der the whole the fairest work of the creation. But now that we have seen in what manner the ani- mal frame is formed, let us observe how it provides for its support, and how the several organs, which form so complete a whole, are nourished and maintain- ed. This will lead us to a more particular explanation of the internal organs : here we shall not meet with so much apparent beauty, because these parts were not intended by nature to be exhibited to view ; but the beauty of design, in the internal organization of the ani- mal frame, is, if possible, still more striking than that of the external part. We shall defer this subject until our next interview. 311 Conservation xxn. On Animalization, Nutrition, and Respiration. Mrs. B. We have now learnt of what materials the animal system is composed, and have formed some idea of the nature of its organization. In order to complete the subject, it remains for us to examine in what manner it ^s nourished and supported. Vegetables we have observed, obtain their nourish- ment from various substances, either in their elementa- ry state, or in a very simple state of combination ; as carbone, water, and salts, which they pump up from the soil ; and carbonic acid and oxygen, which they absorb from the atmosphere. Animals, on the contrary, feed on substances of the most complicated kind : for they derive their suste- nance, some from the animal creation, others from the vegetable kingdom, and some from both. Caroline. And there is one species of animals, which, not satisfied with enjoying either kind of food in its simple state, has invented the art of combining them together in a thousand ways, and of rendering even the mineral kingdom subservient to their refine- ments. Emily. Nor is this all ; for our delicacies are collec- ted from the various climates of the earth, so that the four quarters of the globe are often obliged to contribute to the preparation of our simplest dishes. Caroline. But the very complicated substances which constitute the nourishment of animals, do not, I suppose, enter into their system in their actual state of combina- tion. Airs. B. So far from it, that they not only undergo a new arrangement of their parts, but a selection is 312 made of such as are most proper for the nourishment of the body, and those only enter into the system and are animalized. Emily. And by what organs is this process perform- ed ? Mr*. B. Chiefly by the stomach, which is the or- gan of the digestion, and the prime regulator of the ani- mal frame. Digestion is the first step towards nutrition. It con- sists in reducing into one homogenous mass the vari- ous substances that are taken as nourishment; it is per- formed by first chewing and mixing the solid aliment with the saliva, which reduces it to a soft mass, in which state it is conveyed into the stomach, where it is more completely dissolved by the gastric juice. This fluid (which is secreted into the stomach by ap- propriate glands) is so powerful a solvent that scarcely any substance will resist its action. Emily. The coats of the stomach however cannot be attacked by it, otherwise we should be in danger of hav- ing them destroyed when the stomach was empty. Mrs. B. They are probably not subject to its ac- tion ; as long at least as life continues. But it appears, that when the gastic juice has no foreign substances to act upon, it is capable of occasioning a degree of irrita- tion in the coats of the stomach, which produces the sen- sation of hunger. The gastric juice together with the heat and muscular action of the stomach, converts the aliment into a uniform pulpy mass called chyme. This passes into the intestines, where it meets with the bile and some other fluids, by the agency of which, and by the operation of other causes hitherto unknown, the chyme is changed into chyle, a much thinner substance, somewhat resembling milk, which is pumped out by immense numbers ofsmall absorbent vessels spread over the internal surface of the intestines. These, after ma- ny circumvolutions, gradually meet and unite into large branches, till they at length collect the chyle into one vessel, which pours its contents into the great vein near the heart, by which means the food, thus prepared en- ters into the circulation. 313 Caroline. But I do not yet clearly understand how the blood, thus formed, nourishes the body and supplies all the secretions. Mrs. B. Before this can be explained to you, you must first allow me to complete the formation of the blood. The chyle may indeed be considered as form- ing the chief ingredient of blood ; but this fluid is not perfect until it has passed through the lum;*, and un- dergone (together with the blood that has already cir- culated) certain necessary changes that are effected by BRSriRATION. Caroline. I am very glad that you are going to ex- plain the nature of respiration s I have often longed to understand it, for though we talk incessantly of breath- ing, I never knew precisely what purpose it answered. Airs. />'. It is indeed one of the most interesting processes imaginable ; but in order to understand this function well, it will be necessary to enter into some previous explanations. Tell me, Emily, what do you understand by respiration ? Emily. Respiration, I conceive, consists simply Hi alternately inspiring air into the lungs, and cxpirivg it from them. Mr*. B Your answer wiil do very well as a gener- al definition. But, in order to form a tolerably clear notion of ihe various phenomena of respiration, there iu-e many circumstances to be taken into consideration. In the first place, there are two tbir.^ to be distin- guished in respiration, the mcchankui and the chemical part of the process, The mechanism of breathing depends on the alter- nate expansions and contractions of the chest, in which the lungs are contained. When the chest dilates the cavity is enlarged, and the air rushes in at the mouth, to fill up the vacuum formed by this dilatation } when it contracts, the cavity is diminished, and the air for- ced out again t Co-wlinc. 1 thought that it was the lungs that con- tracted unci expanded in breathing ? Airs. B. They do likewise 5 but their action is on- ly the consequence of that of the chest. The lungs, C c 314 together with the heart and the largest blood vessels, in a manner fill up the cavity of the chest; they could not, therefore, dilate if the chest did not previously ex- pand ; and, on the other hand, when the chest con- tracts, it compresses the lungs and forces the air out of them. Caroline. The lungs, then, are like bellows, and the chest is the power that works them. Mrs. B. Precisely so. Here is a curious little fi- gure (Plate XI. Fig 29), that will assist me in explain- ing the mechanism of breathing. Caroline. What a droll figure ! a little head fixed upon a glass bell, with a bladder tied over the bottom of it! Mrs. B. You must observe that there is another bladder within the glass, the neck of which communi- cates with the mouth of the figure—this represents the lungs contained within the chest; the other bladder, which you see is tied loose, represents a muscular membrane, called the diaphragm, which separates the chest from the lower part oi the body. By the chest, therefore, I mean that large cavity in the upper part of the body contained within the ribs, the neck, and the diaphragm ; this membrane is muscular and capa- ble of contraction and dilation. The contraction may be imitated by drawing the bladder tight over the bot- tom of the receiver, when the air, in the bladder which represents the lungs, will be forced out through the mouth of the. figure— Emily. See, Caroline, how it blows the flame of the candle in breathing! Mrs. B. By letting the bladder loose again, we imitate the dilatation of the diaphragm, and the eavity of the chest being enlarged, the lungs expand, and the air rushes in to fill them. Emily. This figure, I think, gives a very clear idea of the process of breathing. Mr*. B. It illustrates tolerably well the action of the lungs and diaphragm ; but those are not the only powers that are concerned in enlarging or diminishing the cavity of the chest; the ribs are also possessed of SIS a muscular motion for the same purpose ; they are al- ternately drawn in edgeways to assist the contraction, and stretched out, like the hoops of a barrel, to con- tribute to the dilatation of the chest. Emily. I always supposed that the elevation and depression of the ribs were the consequence, not the cause, of breathing. Mr*. B. It is exactly the reverse. The muscular action of the diaphragm, together with that of the ribs, are the causes of the contraction and expansion of th» chest; and the air rushing into, and being expelled from the lungs, are only consequences of those actions. Caroline. I confess that I thought the act of breath- ing began by opening the mouth for the air to rush in, and that it was the air alone, which, by alternately rushing in and out, occasioned the dilatations and con»- tractions of the lungs and chest. Mrs. B. Try the experiment of merely opening your mouth ; the air will not rush in, till by an interior muscular action you produce a vacuum—yes, just so, your diaphragm is now dilated, and the ribs expanded. But you will not be able to keep them long in that stale. Your lungs and chest are already resuming their former state, and expelling the air with which they had just been filled. This mechanism goes on more or less rapidly, but in general, a person at rest and in health will breathe between fifteen and twenty-five times in a minute. We may now proceed to the chemical effects of res- piration ; but, for this purpose, it is necessary that you should previously have some notion of the circulation of the blood. Tell me, Caroline, what do you under- stand by the circulation of the blood ? Caroline. I am delighted that you come to that sub- ject, for it is one that has long excited my curiosity,— But I cannot conceive how it is connected with respira- tion. The idea I have of the circulation is, that the blood runs from the heart through the veins all over the body, and back again to the heart. Airs. B. I could hardly have expected a better de- finition from you; it is, however, not quite correct, 316 for you do not distinguish the arteries from theyeinty which, as wo have already observed, are two distinct sets of vessels, eac'i having its own particular functions. The arteries convey the blood from the heart to the ex- tremities of the body j und the veins bring it back to the heart. This sketch will give you an idea of the manner in which some of the principal veins and arteries of the human body branch out of tlie heart, which may be considered as a common centre to both sets of vessels. The heart is a kind of strong clastic bag, or muscular cavity, which possesses a power of dilating and con- tracting itself, for the purpose of alternately receiving and expelling the blood, in order to carry on the pro* cess of circulation. Emily. Why are the arteries in this drawing paint- ed red, and the veins purple ? Mr*. B. It is to point out the difference of the co- lour of the blood in these two sets of vessels. Caroline. But if it is the same blood that flows from the arteries into the veins, how can its colour be chan- ged? Mr*. B. This change arises from various circum- stances. In the first place, during its passage through the arteries, the blood undergoes a considerable alter- ation, some of its constituent parts being gradually se- parated from it for tue purpose of nourishing the body, and of supplying the various secretions. The conse- quence of this is, that the florid arterial colour of the blood changes by degrees to a deep purple, which is its constant colour in the veins. On the other hand, the blood is recruited during its return through the veins by the fresh chyle, or imperfect blood, which has been produced by food ; and it receives also lymph from the absorbent vessels, as we have before mention- ed. In consequence of these several changes, the blood returns to the heart in a state very different from that in which it left it. It is loaded whh a greater pro- portion of hydrogen and carbone, and is no longer fit for the nourishment of the body or other purposes of circulation. sir Emily. And in this state does it mix in the heart with the pure florid blood that runs into the arteries ? Mr*. B No. The heart is divided into two cavities or compartitions, called the right and left ventricles. The left ventricle is the receptible for the pure arterial blood previous to its circulation ; whilst the venous, or impure blood, which returns to the heart after having circulated, is received into the right ventricle, previous to its purification, which I shall presently explain. Caroline. For my part, I always thought that the same blood circulated again and again through the bo- dy, without undergoing any change. Mr*. B. Yet you must have supposed that the blood circulated for some purpose ? Caroline. I knew that it was indispensable to life, but had no idea of its real functions. Mrs. B. But now that you understand that the blood conveys nourishment to every purt of the body, and supplies the various secretions, you must be sensible that it cannot constantly answer these objects without being renovated and purified. Caroline. But does not the chyle answer this pur- pose ? Mr*. B. Only in part. It renovates the nutritive principles of the blood, but does not relieve it from the superabundance of hydrogen and carbone with which it is incumbered. Emily. How then is this effected ? Mr* B. By Respiration. This is one of the grand mysteries'which modern chemistry has disclos- ed. When the venous blood enters the left ventricle of the heart, it contracts by its muscular power, and throws the blood through a large vessel into the lungs, which are contiguous, and through which it circulates by millions of small ramifications. Here it comes in contact with the air which we breathe. The action of the air on the blood in the lungs is indeed concealed from our immediate observation ; but we are able to form a tolerably accurate judgement of it from the cuan- ges which it effects not only in the blood, but also on the air expired. C c 2- 318 This air is found to contain all the nitrogen inspired; but to have lost part of its oxygen, and to have acqui* red a portion of watery vapour. Hence it is inferred, that when the air comes in contact with the venous blood in the lungs, the oxygen attracts from it the su- perabundant quantity of hydrogen and carbone with which it has impregnated itself during the circulation ; and that one part of that oxygen combines with the hy- drogen, in the form of^ watery vapour, whilst another part combines with the carbone, which it converts into carbonic acid. The whole of these products being then expired, the blood is restored to its former purity, that is, to the state of arterial blood, and is thus again enabled to perform its various functions. Caroline. This is truly wonderful ! Of all that we have yet learned, I do not recollect any thing that has appeared io ine so curious and interesting. I almost believe that I should like to study anatomy now, though I have hitherto had so disgusting an idea of it. Pray, to whom are we indebted for these beautiful discover- ies ? Mrs. B. Crawford, in this country, and Lavoisier, in France, are the principal inventors of the theory of respiration. But the still more important and more ad- mirable discovery of the circulation of the blood was made long before by our immortal countryman, Hervey. Emily. Indeed I never heard any thing that de- lighted me so much as this theory of respiration. But I hope, Mrs. B. that you will enter a little more into particulars before you dismiss so interesting a subject. "We left the blood in the lungs to undergo the salutary change. But how does it thence spread to all the parts of the body ? Mrs. B. After circulating through the lungs, the blood is collecied into four large vessels, by which it is conveyed into the left ventricle of the heart, whence it is propelled to all the different parts of the body by a large artery which gradually ramifies into millions of small arteries through the whole frame. From the ex- tremities of these little ramifications the blood is trans- mitted to the veins, which bring it back to the heart 313 and lungs, to go round again and again in the manner we have just described. You see therefore, that the blood actually undergoes two circulations ; the one* through the lungs, by which it is converted into pure arterial blood ; the other, or general circulation, by which nourishment is conveyed to every part of the bo- dy ; and these are both equally indispensible to the sup- port of animal life Caroline. Do we expire all the air that we inspire, besides the addition of hydrogen and carbone which are taken up from the blood ? Airs. B. Yes, excepting small portions of the ox- ygen, and of the nitrogon, which, as they do not reap- ' pear, are supposed to be absorbed by tne blood for some purposes which have not yet been clearly ascer- tained. The general opinion, however, with regard to oxygen, is, that it serves to stimulate the heart and keep up its muscular action. As to the nitrogen, it was supposed to be expired from the lungs, without any change or diminution. But it was proved a few years ago, by some of Mr. Davy's experiments, which have been since confirmed by those of Professor Plaffof Kiel, that a small quantity of nitrogen disappears in respira- tion, and combines with the system in a manner which is not yet well understood. Emily. But whence proceeds the hydrogen and car- bone with which the blood is impregnated when it comes. into the lungs ? . . Mrs. B. Both hydrogen and carbone exist in a great- er proportion in blood than in organized animal matter. The blood, therefore, after supplying its various se- cretions, becomes loaded with an excess of these princi- ples, which is carried off by respiration. But, besides this, the formation of a new chyle affords a constant sup- ply of carbone and hydrogen. 'Caroline. Pray, how does the air come in contact with the blood in the lungs ? . . . Mr* B. I cannot answer this question without en- tering into' an explanation of ihe nature and structure of the lungs. You recollect that the venous blood on being expelled from the right ventricle, enters the 320 lungs to go through what we may call the lesser circu- lation ; the large trunk or vessel that conveys it, bran- ches out, at its entrance into the lungs, into an infinite number of very fine ramifications.—The windpipe, which conveys the air from the mouth into the lungs, likewise spreads out inioa corresponding number of air vessels, which follow the same course as the blood ves- sels, forming millions of very minute air cells.—These two setts of vessels are so interwoven as to form a sort of net-work, connected into a kind of spongy mass, in which every particle of the blood must necessarily come in contact with a particle of air. Caroline. But since the blood and the air are con- tained in different vessels, how can they come into con- tact ? Mrs. B. They act on each other through the mem- brane which forms the coats of these vessels; for al- though this membrane prevents the blood and the air from mixing together in the lungs, yet it is no impedi- ment to their chemical action on each other. Emily. Are the lungs composed entirely of blood vessels and air vessels ? Mr*. B. I believe they are with the addition only of nerves and of a small quantity of the cellular substance before mentioned, which connects the whole into an uni- form mass. Emily. Pray, why are the lungs always spoken of in the plural number ? Is there more than one ? Mrs. B Yes ; for though they form but one organ, they really consist of two compartments called lobes, which are enclosed in separate membranes or bags, each occupying one side of the chest, and being in close contact with each other, but without communicating together. This is a beautiful provision of nature in con- sequence of which, if one of the lobes be wounded, the other performs the whole process of respiration till the first is healed. But, before we proceed further, I must inform you that the chemical theory of respiration, with which you just have been made acquainted, simple and beau- tiful as it is, has appeared to many philosophers insuf- 321 ficient to explain all the phenomena of respiration. A- mongst the various modifications proposed with a view to improve this theory, that suggested by La Grange, Hassenfratz, and some other eminent chemists, uppeurs to be the most important. These philosopher* suppose the oxygen, which disappears in respiration, is absorbed by the blood, and carried with it into the circulation, du- ring which it gradually combines with the hydrogen and carbone that are successively added to the circulation, forming the water and carbonic acid which are expelled from the lungs at each expiration. Thus the process, instead of being completed in the lungs, as the former theory supposes, only begins in that organ, and contin- ues throughout the circulation. According to thu theory, the florid colour of arterial blood depends upon the addition of oxygen, so that this colour gradually vanishes as the blood passes from the arterial to the venous state, that is to say, as the oxygen enters into combination with the hydrogen and carbone during circulation. Caroline. There does not appear to me to be any very essential difference in these two theories, since in both the oxygen purifies the blood by combining with and carrying off the matter which had accumulated in it during circulation. Mr*. B. Yes ; but, in medical, or rather phisiologi- cal seience, it must be a question of great importance whether the oxygen actually enters the circulation, or whether it proceeds no further than the lungs. The blood thus completed, forms the most complex of all animal compounds, since it contains not only the numerous materials necessary to form the various secre- tions, as saliva, tears, &c. but likewise all those that are required to nourish the several parts of the frame, as the mnsc!es, bones, nerves, glands, Sec. Emily. There seems to be a singular analogy be- tween the blood of animals, and the sap of vegetables ; for each of these fluids contain the several materials des- tined for the nuiritioi- of the numerous class of bodies to which they respecthely belong. 322 Mrs. B. Nor is the production of these fluids in the animal and vegetable systems entirely different ; fur the absorbant vessels, which pump up the chyle, from the stomach and intestines, may be compared to the absorbants of the roots of plants, which suck up the nourishment from the soil. And the analogy between the sap and the blood may be still further traced, if we follow the latter in the course of its circulation ; for in the living animal, we find every where organs which are possessed of a power to secrete from the blood and appropriate to themselves the ingredients requisite for their support. Caroline. But whence does these organs derive their respective powers ? Mr*. B. From peculiar organization, the secret of which no one has yet ever been able to unfold. But it must be ultimately by means of the vital principles that both their mechanical and chemical powers are brought into action. I cannot dismiss the subject of circulation without mentioning perspiration, a secretion which is immediate- ly connected with it, and acts a most important part in; the animal economy. Caroline. Is not this secretion likewise made by ap- propriate glands ? Mrs. B. No ; it is performed by the extremeties of the arteries, which penetrate through the skin and ter- minate under the cuticle, through the pores of which the perspiration issues. When this fluid is not secreted in excess, it is insensible, because it is dissolved by the air as it exudes from the pores ; but when it is secreted faster than it can be dissolved, it becomes sensible, as it assumes its liquid state. Emily. This secretion bears a striking resemblance to the transpiration of the sap of plants. They both consist of the most fluid part, and both "exude from the surface by the extremities of the vessels through which they circulate. Mrs. B. And the analogy does not stop there ; for, since it has been ascertained that the sap returns into the roots ol the plants, the resemblance between the 823 animal and vegetable circulation is become still more obvious. The latter, however, is far from being com- plete, since, as we have observed before, it consits only in a rising and descending of the sap, whilst in animals the blood actually circulates through every part of the system. We have now, I think, traced the process of nutri- tion from the introduction of the food into the stomach to its finally becoming a constituent part of the animal frame. This will, therefore, be a fit period to conclude our present conversation. What further remarks we have to make on the animal economy shall be reserved for our next interview. ® Contoettfation xxm. On animal heat: and on various Animal Products. Emily. Since our last interview, I have been thinking much of the theory of respiration ; and I cannot help being struck with the resemblance which it appears to bear to the process of combustion For in respiration, as in most cases of combustion, the air suffers a change, and a portion of its oxygen combines with hydrogen and carbone, producing carbonic acid and water. Mr*. B. I am much pleased that this idea has oc- curred to you : these two processes appear so very anal- ogous-, that it has been supposed that a kind of combust- ion actually tak«;s place in the lungs ; not of the bloock, but of the superfluous hydrogen and carbone which the oxygen attracts from it. 324 Caroline. A combustion in our lungs ! that is a Curi- ous idea indeed ! But, Mrs. B. How can you call the action of the air on the blood in the lungB, combustion, when neither light nor heat are produced by it ? Emily. I was going to make the same objection. Yet I do not conceive how the oxygen can combine with the hydrogen and carbone, and produce water and car- bonic acid, without disengaging heat ? Mrs. B. The fact is, that heat is disengaged. Whether any light be evolved, I cannot pretend to de- termine ; but that heat is produced in considerable and very sensible quantities is certain, and this is the princi. pal, if not the only source of animal heat. Emily. How wonderful! that the very process which purifies and elaborates the blood, should afford an inex« haustible supply of internal heat! Airs. B. This is the theory of animal heat in its ori- ginal simplicity, such as it was first proposed by Black and Lavoisier. It is equally clear and ingenious ; and was at first generally adopted. But it was objected, on second consideration, that if the whole of the animal heat was evolved in the lungs, it would necessarily be much less in the extremities of the bo:ly, than immedi- ately at its source, which is not found to be the case. This objection, however, which was by no means frivo- lous, is now satisfactorily answered by means of the im- proved theory of respiration which I mentioned last. According to this hypothesis, you recollect the changes which the blood undergoes in consequence of respira« tion only begin in the lungs and gradual!) continue du- ring circulation. Therefore the animal heat, which is the consequence of those changes, likewise begins in the lungs, and afterwaixls continues during the whole circulation j and heat is thus uniformly diffused through- out every part of the body. Caroline. More and more admirable J Mr*. B. Now let me hear whether you can explain how animal heat is produced You, Caroline, tell me in what manner it is first evolved in the lungs ? Caroline, part of the oxygen gas inspired, imme« diately combines in the lungs with the loose caibone and hydrogen of the venous blood ; and the caloric evolv- ed during this combination, becomes animal heat. Mrs. B. Very well; but you must observe, that the whole of the oxygen inspired at a breath is not con- sumed by one respiration ; a considerable part of it is expired, so that we may breathe the same portion of air several times before the whole of the oxygen is ex- pended.—Now, Emily, will you explain to mc in what manner an uniform degree of heat is kept up through- out the body ? . Emily. A quantity of oxygen enters into the circu- lation dining which it gradually combines with the hy- drogen and 'carbone of ihe blood, thus producing a con- stant disengagement of heat throughout every part of the body. ,r , c Mrs. B. Very well, indeed. You have in a few words stated nearly all that can be said on the subject. I must, however, mention another circumstance which may contribute to account for the gradual evolution of animal heat. It appears, from some experiments, that the blood, in consequence of the successive changes it undergoes during circulation (by which it is gradually converted from arterial into venous blood), has its ca- pacity for caloric diminished. What must be the con- sequence of this '. Emily That heat of course, must be disengaged. Mrs B Exactly so ; and thus an additional quan- tity of animal heat must be generated. However, the heat produced in this way is but trifling, and could on- ly account for a very small portion of the animal tern- PeSroflne The cause of animal heat was always a nerfect mystery to me, and I am delighted with its ex- P?t nation.-But pray, Mrs. B. can you tell me what is the reason of the increase of heat that takes place in a ^Emily. Is it not because we then breathe quicker, and therefore more heat is disengaged in the system ? * Ir* B That may be one reason : but I should think that the principal cause of the heat experienced in fe- vers, is, that there is no vent for the caloric which is D d 326 generated in the body. One of the most considerable secretions is the insensible perspiration ; this is con- stantly carrying off caloric in a latent state ; but during the hot stage of a fever, the pores are so contracted that all perspiration ceases, and the accumulation of cal- oric in the body occasions those burning sensations that are so painful. Emily. This is, do doubt, the reason why the perspi- ration that often succeeds the hot stage of a fever affords so much relief. If I had known this theory of animal heat when I had a fever last summer, I think I should have found some amusement in watching the cheniical processes that were going on within me. Caroline. But exercise likewise produces animal heat and that must be quite in a different manner. Mrs. B. Not so much as you think ; for the more exercise you take, the more the body is stimulated, and requires recruiting. For this purpose the circulation of the blood is quickened, the breath proportionably ac- celerated, and consequently a greater quantity of caloric evolved. Caroline. True ; after running very fast, I gasp for breath, my respiration is quick and hard, and it is just then that I begin to feel hot. Emily. It would seem, then, that violent exercise should produce fever. Mr*. B. Not if the person is in a good state of health; for the additional caloric is then carried off by ihe per- spiration which succeeds. Emily. What admirable resources nature has pro- vided for us ! By the production of animal heat she has enabled us to keep up the temperature of our bodies a- bove that of inanimate objects ; and whenever this source becomes too abundant, the excess is carried off by pers- piration. Mr*. B. It is by the same law of nature that we are enabled, in all climates, and in all seasons, to preserve our bodies of an equal temperature, or at least very near- ly so. Caroline. You cannot mean to say that our bodies are of the same temperature in summer and in winter in England and in the West Indies ? Z2T Mrs. B. Yes, I do; at least if you speak of the tem- perature of the blood, and the internal parts of the body; for those parts th it are immediately in contact with the atmosphere, such as the hands and face, will occasonally get warmer or colder, than the internal or more shel- tered parts. But if you put the bulb of a thermometor in your mouth, which is the best way of ascertaining the real temperature of your body, you will scarcely per- ceive any difference in its indication, whatever may be the difference of temperature of the atmosphere. Caroline. And when I feel overcome by heat, I am really not hotter than when l»m shivering with cold ? Mrs. B. When a person in health feels very hot, whether from internal heat, from violent exercise, or from the temperature of the atmosphere, his body is certainly a little warmer than when he feels very cold ; but this difference is much smaller than our sensations would make us believe : and the natural standard is soon restored by rest and perspiration 1 am sure you will be surprised to hear that the internal temperature of the body scarcely ever descends below 95° or 96°, and hardly ever attains 104° or 105", even in the most vio- lent fevers. Emily. The greater quantity of caloric, therefore, that we receive from the atmosphere in summer, cannot raise the temperature of our bodies, beyond certain lim- its, as it does that of inanimate bodies, because an excess of caloric is carried off by perspiration. Caroline. But the temperature of the atmosphere, and consequently that of inanimate bodies, is surely nev- er so high as that of animal heat ? Airs. B. 1 beg your pardon Frequently in the East and West Indies, and sometimes, in the southern parts of Europe, the atmosphere is above 98°, which is the common temperature of animal heat.—Indeed, even in this country, it occasionally happens that the sun's rays, setting full on an object, elevate its temperature above that point. In illustration of the power which our bodies have to resist the effects of external heat, Sir Charles Blagden,. with some other gentlemen, made several very curious experiments. He remained for some time in an oven. 328 heated to a temperature not much inferior to that of boil- ing water, wiihout suffering any other incenvenience than a profuse perspiration, which he supported by drinking plentifully. Emily. He could scarcely consider the perspiration as an inconvenience, since it saved him from being ba- ked, by giving vent to the excess of caloric. Caroline. I always thought, I confess, that it was from the heat of the perspiration, that we suffered in summer. Mrs. B. You now find that you were quite mistaken. Whenever evaporation takes place, cold, you know, is produced in consequence of a quantity of caloric being carried off in a latent state ; this is the case with per- spiration, and it is in this way that it affords relief. It is for the same reason that tea is otten refreshing in summer, though it appears to heat you at the moment you drink it. Emily. And in winter, on the contrary, tea is pleas- ant on account of its heat. Mr*. B. Yes; for we have then rather to guard against a deficiency than an excess of caloric, and you do not find that tea will excite perspiration in winter, un- less after dancing, or any other violent exercise. Caroline. What is the reason that it is dangerous to eat ice after dancing, or to di ink any tiling cold when one is very hot ? Mr*. B. Because the loss of heat arising from the perspiration, conjointly with the chill occasioned by the cold draught, produces more cold than can be borne with safety, unless you continue to use the same exercise af- ter drinking that you did before ; for the heat occasion- ed by the exercise will counteract the effects of the cold drink, and the danger will be removed. You may, how- ever, contrary to the common notion, consider it as a rule, that cold liquids may at all times, be drunk with perfect safety, however hot you may feel, provided you are not at the moment in a state of great perspiration, and on condition that you keep yourself in gentle exer- cise afterwards. Emily. But since we are furnished with such re- sources against the extremes of heat or cold, I should. 520 nave thought that all climates would have been equally wholesome. Mrs. B. That is true, in a certain degree, with re- gard to those who have been accustomed to them from birth ; for we find that the natives of those climates which we consider as the most deleterious, are as heal- thy as ourselves ; and if such climates are unwholesome to those who are habituated to a more moderate tempe- rature, it is because the animal economy does not easily accustom itself to considerable changes. Caroline. But pray, Mrs. B. if the circulation pre- serves the body of an uniform temperature, how does it happen, that animals are sometimes frozen ? Mrs. B. Because if more heat is carried off by the atmosphere than the circulation can supply, the cold will finally prevail, the heart will cease to beat, and the animal will be frozen. And likewise, if the body re- mained long exposed to a degree of heat, greater than the perspiration could carry off, it would at last lose the power of resisting its destructive influence. » Caroline. Fish, I suppose, have no animal heat, but partake of the temperature of inanimate objects ? Emily. And their coldness, do doubt, proceeds from their not breathing ? Mr*. B. All kinds of fish, I believe, breathe more or less, though in a much smaller degree than land ani- mals. Nor are they entirely destitute of animal heat, though for the same reason they are much colder than other creatures. They have comparatively but a very small quantity of blood, therefore but little oxygen is re- quired, and a proportionally small quantity of animal heat is generated. Caroline. But how ean fish breathe under water ? Mr*. B. Some of them raise their heads above the water to breathe ; and others are supposed to be endow- ed by nature with the power of decomposing water and absorbing oxygen from it. Besides, water always con- tains air mixed with it which the fish may possibly ap- ply to the purposes ot respiration. Whatever the case may be, it is certain that several kinds of fish have re- servoirs of air, or air bags, from which they have prob-- Dd2 330 abhy the means of supplying the gills, an organ which. in the respiration of fish, answers the double purpose of mouth and lungs. Caroline. Are there any species of animals that breathe more than we do ? Mr*. B. Yes; birds, of all animals, breathe the great- est quantity of air in proportion to their size ; and it is to this that they are supposed to owe the peculiar firm- ness and strength of their muscles, by which they are enabled to support the violent exertion of flying. This difference betwetn birds and fish, which may be considered, as the two extremes of the scale of mus- cular strength, is well worth observing. Birds resid- ing constantly in the atmosphere, surrounded by oxy- gen, and respiring it in a greater proportion than any other species of animals, are endowed with a superior degree of muscular strength, whilst the muscles of fish, on the contrary, are flaccid and oily ; these animals are comparatively slow and feeble in their motions, and their temperature is scarcely above that of the water in which they live. This is, in all probability, owing to their imperfect respiration ; the quantity of hydrogen and carbone, that is in consequence accumulated in their bodies, forms the oil which is strongly characteristic of that species of animals, and which relaxes and soft- ens the small quantity of fibrine which their muscles contain. Caroline. But, Mrs. B. there are some species of birds that frequent both elements, as, for instance ducks and other water fowl. Of what nature is the flesh of these ? Mrs. B. Such birds, in general, make but little use of their wings ; if they fiy, it is but feebly, and only to a short distance. Their flesh too partakes of the oily na- ture, and even in taste sometimes resembles that offish. This is the case not only with the various kinds of water fowls, but with all other amphibious animals, as the ot- ter, the crocodile, the lizard, Sec, Caroline. And what is the reason that reptiles arc so deficient in muscular sirength ? Mrs. B. It is because they usually live under ground, and seldom come into the atmosphere___They. 331 have imperfect, aud sometimes no discernible organs of respiration, they partake therefore of the soft oily nature of fish ; indeed, many of them are amphibious, as frogs, toads, and snakes, and very few of them find any difficulty in remaining a length of time under wa- ter. Whilst, on the contrary, the insect tribe that are so strong in proportion to their size, and alert in their motions, partake of the nature of birds, air being their peculiar element, and their organs of respiration being comparatively larger than in other classes of animals. 1 have now given you a short account of the princi- pal animal functions. However interesting the subject may appear to you, a fuller investigation of it would, I fear, lead us too far from our object. Emily. Yet I shall not quit it without much regret; for of all the branches of chemistry, it is certainly the most curious and most interesting. Caroline. But, Mrs. B. 1 must remind you that you promised to give us some account of the nature of milk, Mrs. B. True. There are several other animal productions ihat deserve likewise to be mentioned. We shall begin with milk, which is certainly the most im- portant and most interesting of all the animal secretions. Milk, like all other animal substances, ultimately yields by analysis, oxygen, hydrogen, carbone, and nitrogen. These are combined in it under the forms of albumen, gelatine, oil, and water. But milk con- tains, besides, a considerable portion of phosphat of lime, the purposes of which, 1 have already pointed out. Caroline. Yes ; it is the salt which serves to nou- rish the tender bones of the suckling? Mrs. B. To reduce milk to its elements would be a very complicated, as well as useless operation ; but this fluid, without any chemical assistance, may be de- composed into three parts, cream, curds, and whey— These constituents of milk have but a very slight affin- ity to each other, and you find accordingly that cream separates from milk by mere standing. It consists chiefly of oil, which being lighter than the other parts 332 ©f the milk, gradually rises to the surface. It is of this, you know, that butter is made, which is nothing more than oxygenated cream. Caroline Butter, then, is somewhat analogous to the waxy substance formed by the oxygenation of veg- etable oils. Mr* B. Very much so. Emily. But is the cream oxygenated by churning ? Mr*. B. Its oxygenation commences previous to churning, merely by standing exposed to the atmos- phere, from which it absorbs oxygen. The process is afterwards completed by churning; the violent mo- tion which this operation occasions, brings every par- ticle of cream in contact with the atmosphere, and thus facilitates its oxygenation. Caroline. But the effect of churning, I have often observed in the dairy, is to separate the cream into two substances, butter, and butter-milk ? Mr*. B. That is to say, in proportion as the oily particles of the cream become oxygenated, they sepa- rate from the other constituent parts of the cream in the form of butter. So by churning you produce, on the one hand, butter, or oxygenated oil; and, on the other, butter-milk, or cream deprived of oil.—But if you make butter by churning new milk instead of cream, the butter-milk will then be exactly similar in its pro- perties to creamed or skimmed milk. Caroline Yet butter-milk is very different from common skimmed milk. Mrs. B. Because you know it is customary, in order to save time and labour, to make butter froR> cream alone. In this case, therefore, the butter-milk is deprived of the creamed milk, which contains both the curd and the whey. Besides, in consequence of the milk remaining exposed to the atmosphere during the separation of the cream, the latter becomes more or less acid, as well as the butter-milk which it yields in churning. Emily. Why should not the butter be equally acidi- fied by oxygenation ? Mrs. B. Animal oil is not so easily acidified as the- 333 other ingredients of milk. Butter, therefore, though* usually made of sour cream, is not sour itself, because the oily part of the cream had not been acidified. But- ter, however, is susceptible of becoming acid by an excess of oxygen ; it is then said to be rancid, and pro- duces the sebacie acid, the same which is obtained from fat. Emily. If that be the case, might not rancid butter be sweetened by mixing with it some substance that would take the acid from it ? •• Airs. B. This idea has been suggested by Mr. Da- vy, who supposes, that if rancid butter were well wash- ed in an alkaline solution, the alkali would separate the acid from the butter. Caroline. You said just now that creamed milk con- sisted of curd and whey. Pray how are these separa- ted ? Airs. B. They may be separated by standing for a certain length of time exposed to the atmosphere ; but this decompositon may be almost instantaneously ef- fected by the chemical agency of a variety of substan- ces. Alkalies, rennet,* and indeed almost all animal substances, decompose milk by combining with the curds. Acids and spirituous liquors, on the other hand, pro- duce a decomposition by combining with tlie whey. In order therefore to obtain the whey pure, rennet, or alkaline substances, must be used to attract the curds from it. But if it be wished to obtain the curds pure, the whey must be separated by acids, wine, or other spiiituous liquors. Emily. This is a very useful piece of information ; for I find white wine whey, which I sometimes take when 1 have a cold, extremely heating ; now, if the whey were separated by means of an alkali instead of wine, it could not produce that effect. * Rennet is the name given to a ivatery infusion of the coats of the stomach of a sacking calf. Its remarkable ef- ficacy in promoting coagulation is supposed to drpend on. the gastric juice with which it is impregnated. 334 Mrs. B. Perhaps not. But I would strenuously ad- vise you not to place too much reliance on your slight chemical knowledge in medical matters. I do not know why whey is not separated from curd by rennet, or by an alkali, for the purpose which you mention ; but I strongly suspect there must be some good reason why the preparation by means of wine is generally prefer- red. I can, however, safely point out to you a method of obtaining whey without either alkali, rennet, or wine ; it is by substituting lemon juice, a very small quantity of which will separate it from the curds. Whey, as an article of diet, is very wholesome ; it is the most nutritive part of the milk, and the lightest of digestion. But its effect, taken medicinally, is chief- ly, I believe, to excite perspiration, by being drunk warm on going to bed. It appears that the nutritive particles of whey may be obtained in crystals by evaporation; in this state they are called salts, or more commonly sw,§-cr of milk. This salt is sweet to the taste, and in its composition is so analogous to sugar, that it is susceptible of undergoing the vinous fermentation. Caroline Why then is not wine, or alcohol, made from whey ? Mrs. B. The quantity of sugar contained in milk is so trifling that it can hardly answer for that purpose. I have heard of only one instance of its being used for the production of a spirituous liquor, and this is by the Arabs ; their abundance of horses as well as their scarcity of fruits, has introduced the fermentation of mare's milk, by which they produce a liquor called fcoumiss. Whey is likewise susceptible of being acidi- fied by combining with oxygen from the atmosphere. It then produces the lactic acid, which you may recol- lect is mentioned amongst the animal acids, as the acid of milk. Let us now see what are the properties of curds. Emily. I know that they are made into cheese ; but I have heard that for that purpose they are separated from the vvhey by rennet, and yet this you have just told us is not the method of obtaining pure curds ? Mr*. B. Nor are pure curds so well adapted for th# 335 formation of cheese. For the nature and flavour of the cheese depends, in a great measure, upon the cream or oily matter which is left in the curds ; so that if eve- ry particle of cream be removed from the curds, the cheese is scarcely eatable. Rich cheeses, such as cream and Stilton cheeses, derive their excellence from the quantity, as well as the quality of the cream that en- ters into their composition. Caroline. I had no idea that milk was such an inter- esting compound. In many respects there appears to me to be a very striking analogy between milk and the contents of an egg> both in respect to their nature and their use. They are, each of them, composed of the various substances necessary for the nourishment of the young animal, and equally destined for that purpose. Mr*. B. There is. however, a very essential dif- ference. The young animal is formed, as well as nour- ished by the content* of the egg-shell ; whilst milk serves as nutriment to the suckling, only after it is born. There are several peculiar animal substances which do not enter into the general enumeration of animal compounds, and which, however, deserve to be men- tioned. spermaceti is of this class ; it is a kind of oily sub- stance obtained from the head of the whale, which however, must undergo a certain preparation before it is in a fit state to be made into candles. It is not much more combustible than tallow, but is more pleasant to burn, as it is less fusible and less greasy. Ambergris is another peculiar substance derived from a species of whale. It is, however, seldom obtained from the animal itself, but is generally found floating on the surface of the sea. Wax, you know, is a concrete oil, the peculiar pro- duct of the bee, part of the constituents of which may probably be derived from flowers, but so prepared by the organs of the bee, and so nixed with its own sub- stance, as to be decidedly an animal product. Bees'- wax is naturally of a yellow colour, but it is bleached by long exposure to the atmosphere, or may be instan- taneously whitened by the oxy-muriatic acid. The combustion of wax is far more perfect than that of tal- 336 low, and consequently produces a greater quantity of light and heat. Lac is a substance very similar to wax in the man- ner of its formation ; it is the product of an insect which collects its ingredients from flowers, apparently for the purpose of protecting its eggs from injury It is form- ed into cells fabricated with as much skill as those of the honey-comb, but differently arranged. The prin- cipal use of lac is in the manufacture of sealing-wax, and in dying scarlet. Alusk, civet, and castor, are other particular produc- tions, from different species of quadrupeds The two first are very powerful perfumes ; the latter has a nau- seous smell and taste, and is only useful medicinally. Caroline. Is it from this substance that castor oil is obtained ? Mr*. B. No. Far from it, for castor oil is a veget- able oil, expressed from the seeds of a particular plant; and has not the least resemblance to the medicinal sub- stance obtained from the castor. Silk is a peculiar secretion of the silk worm, with which it builds its nest or cocoon. This insect was originally brought to Europe from China. Silk, in its chemical nature, is very similar to the hair and wool of animals. The moth ol the silk worm ejects a liquor which appears to contain a particular acid, called bom- bic, the properties of which are very little known. Emily Before we conclude the subject of the ani- mal economy, shall we not learn by what steps animals return to their elementary state ? Airs. B. Animal matter, although the most com- plicated of all natural substances, returns to its elemen- tary state by one single spontaneous process, the putrid fermentation. By this, the gelatine, albumen, and fi- brine, are slowly reduced to the state of oxygen, hy- drogen, nitrogen, and carbone ; and thus the circle of changes through which thehe principles have passed is finally completed. They first quitted their elemen- tary form, or their combination with unorganized mat- ter, to enter into the vegetable system.—Hence they were transmuted to the animal kingdom; and from 33Y "this they return again to their primitive simplicity, soon to re-enter the sphere of organized existence. When all the circumstances necessary to produce fermentation do not take place, animal, like vegetable matter, is liable to a partial or imperfect decomposition, Which converts it into a combustible substance very like spermaceti I expect Caroline, who is so fond of an- alogies, will otnsider this as a kind of animal bitumen. Caroline. And why should I not, since the process- es, that produce these substances are so similar. Airs. B. There is, however, one considerable dif- ference : the state of bitumen seems permanent, whilst that of animal substances, thus imperfectly decompo- sed, is only transient; and, unless precautions lie taken to preserve them in that state, a total dissolution in- fallibly ensues. This circumstance, of the occasional conversion of animal matter into a kind of spermaceti, is ol late discovery. A manufacture has in consequence been established near Bristol, in which by exposing the carcases of horses and other animals for a length of time under water, the muscular parts are converted into this spermaceti-like substance. The bones after- wards undergo a different process to produce harts- horn, or, more properly, ammonia, and phosphorus; and the skin is prepared for leather. % Thus art contrives to enlarge the sphere of useful purposes, to which the elements were intended by na- ture ; and the productions of the several kingdoms are frequently arrested in their course, and variourly modi- fied, by human skill, which compels them to contribute, under new forms, to the necessities or luxuries of man. But all that we enjoy, whether produced by the spontaneous operations of nature, or the ingenious ef- forts of art, proceed alike from the goodness of Pro- vidence.—To GOD alone man owes the admirable faculties which enable him to improve and modify the productions of nature, no less than those productions themselves. In contemplating the works of the crea- tion, or studying the inventions of art, let us, there- fore, never forget the Divine Source from which they proceed ; and thus every acquisition of knowledge will prove a lesson of piety and virtue. E e END OF THE LONDON COPY. 338 '■i abridgement of the Bakerian Lecture on the decompo- sition of the fixed alkalies and the exhibition of the new substances which constitute their bases ; by Humphrey Davy, esq. secretary of the Royal Society. The researches I had made on the decomposition of iicids, and of alkaline and earthy neutral compounds, proved that the powers of electrical decomposition were proportional to the strength of the opposite elec- tricities in the circuit, and to the conducting power and degree of concentration of the materials employed. In the first attempts I made on the decomposition of the fixed alkalies, I acted upon aqueous solutions of potash and soda, saturated at common temperatures, by ihe highest electrical power I could command, and which was produced by a combination of voltajc batte- ries, belonging to the Royal Institution, containing 24 plates of copper and zinc of 12 inches square, 100 plates of 6 inches, and 150 of 4 inches square, charg- ed with solutions of alum and nitrous acid ; but in these cases, though there was a high intensity of action, the water of the solutions alone was effected, and Hydrogen, s»nd oxygen disengaged with the production of much heat and violent effervescence. The presence of wa- ter app^ring thus to prevent any decomposition, 1 used potash m igneous fusion. By means of a stream of oxy- gen gas from a gasometor applied to the flame of a spirit lamp, which was thrown on a platina spoon con- taining potash, this alkali was kept for some minutes in a strong red heat, and in a state of perfect fluidity. The spoon was preserved in communication with the positive side of the battery, and the power of 100 of inch- es, highly charged ; and the connection from the neg- ative side vuis made by a platina wire By this ar- rangement some biilium phenomena vrere produced. The potash appeared a conductor, in a high degree, and as long as the communication was preserved, a most intense light was exhibited at the negative wire, and a column of flame, which seemed to be owing to the de- velopement of combustible matter, arose from the point of contact. When the order was changed, so that the platina spoon was made negative, a vivid, constant light 339 appeared at the opposite point. There was no effect of inflammation round it, but aeriform globales, which inflamed in the atmosphere, rose through the potash. The platina, as might have been expected, was con- siderably acted upon ; and in the cases when it had been negative in the highest degree. The alkali was apparently dry in this experiment ; and it seemed probable, that the inflammable matter arose from its decomposition. The residual potash was unaltered; it contained, indeed^ a number of dark grey metallic particles, but these proved to be derived from the platina. I tried several experiments on the electrization of potash, rendered fluid by heat, with the hopes of being able to collect the combustible matter, but without suc- cess ; and I only attained my object, by employing electricity, e.s the common agent for fusion and decom- position. Though potash, perfectly dried by ignition, is a non-conductor, yet it is rendered a conductor by a very slight addition of moisture, which docs not per- ceptibly destroy its aggregation ; and in this state it rea- dily fuses and decomposes by strong electrical powers. A small piece of pure potash, which had been ex- posed a few seconds to the atmosphere, so as to give conducting power to the surface, was placed upon an insulated disc of platina, connected with the negative side of the battery, of fhe power of two hundred and fifty of six and four, in a state of intense activity ; and a platina wire communicating with the positive side, was brought in contact with the upper surface of the alkaki. The whole apparatus was in the open atmosphere. Under these circumstances, a vivid action was soon. observed to take place. The potash began to fuse at both its points of electrization. There was a violent effervescence, at the upper surface : at the lower or negative surface, there was no liberation of elastic flu- id ; but small globules, having a high metalic lustre, and being precisely similar, in visible characters to quicksilver, appeared ; some of which burnt with ex- plosion, and bright flame, as soon as they were form- ed, others remained, and were merely tarnished, and finally covered by a white film, which formed on their 340 v.irfaces. These globules, numerous experiments soon showed to be the substance I was in search of, and a peculiar inflammable principle the basis of potash. I found that the platina was in no way connected with the result, except as the medium of exhibiting the elec- trical powers of decomposition ; and a substance of the same kind was produced, when pieces of copper, silver, gold*plumbago, and even charcoal were employed for completin g the circuit. The phenomenon was inde- pendent of the presence of air. I found that it took place when the alkali was in the vacuum of an exhaust- ed receiver. The substance was likewise produced from potash fused by means of a lamp, in glass tubes confined by mercury, and furnished with hermetically inserted platina wires, by which the electrical action was transmitted. But this operation could not be car- ried on for any considerable time ; the glass was rapid- ly dissolved by the action of the alkali, and this sub- stance soon penetrated through the body of the tube. Soda, when acted upon in the same manner as pot- ash, exhibited an analogous result; but'the-decompo- sition demanded greater intensity of action in the bat- teries, or the alkali was required to be in much thinner and smaller pieces. \Villi the battery of one hundred of six inches in full activity, I obtained good results from pieces of potash weighing from forty to seventy grains, and of a thickness which made the distance of the electrified metallic surfaces nearly a quarter of an inch ; but with a similar power it was impossible to produce the effects of decomposition on pieces of soda of more than fifteen and twenty grains iu weight, and that only when the distance between the wires was a- Lout one eighth or tenth of an inch. The substance produced from potash remained fluid at the temperature of the atmosphere at the time of its production ; that from soda, which was fluid in the degree of heat of the alkali during its formation, became t>olid on cooling, and appeared having the lustre of silver When the power of two hundred and fifty was used with a very high charge for the decomposition of soda, the globules often burnt at the moment of their forma. 341 tion and sometimes violently exploded and separated into smaller globules, which flew with great velocity through the air, in a state of vivid combustion, producing a beautiful effect of continued jets of fire. III. Theory of the Decomposition of the fixed Alkalies ; their Composition and Production. As in all decompositions of compound substances which I had previously examined at the same time, that combustible bases were developed at the negative surface in the electrical circuit, oxygen was produced and evolved or carried into combination at the positive surface; it was reasonable to conclude that this substance was generated in a similar manner by the electrical action upon the alkalies, and a number of experiments made above mercury, with the apparatus for excluding external air, proved that this was the case. When solid potash, or soda in its conducting state, was included in glass tubes firnished with electrified platina wires, the new substances were generated at the negative surfaces; the gas given out at the other surface proved, by this most delicate examination, to be pure ox- ygen ; and unless an excess of water was present, no gas was evolved from the negative surface. In the synthetical experiments, a perfect coincidence likewise will be found. I mentioned that the metallic lustre of the substance from potash immediately became destroyed in the at- mosphere, and that a white crust formed upon it. This crust \ soon.found to be pure potash, which immediate- ly deliquesced, and new quantities were formed, which in their turn attracted moisture from the atmosphere, till the whole globule disappeared, and assumed the form of a saturated solution of potash. When globules were placed in appropriate tubes, containing common air or oxygen gas, confined by mercury, an absorption of oxygen took place ; a crust of alkali instantly formed upon the globule ; but from E e2 342 the want of moisture for its solution the process smp- pcd, the interior being defended from the action of the gas- With the substances from soda the appearances av.d effects were analogous. When the substances were strongly heated, confined in given portions of oxygen, a rapid combustion with a brilliant white flame was pro- duced, and the metallic globules were found converted into a white and solid mass, which, in the case of the sub- stance from potash, was found to be potash, and in the case of that from soda, soda. Oxygen gas was absorbed in this operation, and nothing emitted which effected the purity of the resi- dual air. The alkalies produced were apparently dry, or at least contained no more moisture than might well be conceded to exist in the oxygen gas absorbed ; and their weights considerably exceeded those of the com- bustible matters consumed. The processes on which these conclusions are found will be fully described here- after, when the minute details which are necessary will be explained, and the proportions of oxygen and of the respective inflamable substances which enter into union to form the fixed alkalies will be given. It appears, then, that in these facts there is the same evidence for the decomposition of potash and soda into oxygen and two peculiar substances, as there is for the decomposition of sulphuric and phosphoric acids and ihe metallic oxyds into oxygen and their respective com- bustible bases. In the analytical experiments, no substances capable of decomposition are present, but the alkalies and a minute portion of moisture ; which seems in no other way essential to the result, than in rendering them con- ductors at the suiface : for the new substances are not generated till the interior, which is dry, begins to be fu- sed ; they explode then in rising through the fused al- kali ; they come in contact with the heated moistened surface ; they cannot be produced from crystallized al- kalies, which contain much water ; and the effects pro- duced by the electrization of ignited potash, which con- tains no sensible quantity of water, confirm the opinion of 'heir formation independently cf the pescnse of this substance^ 343 The combustible bases of the fixed alkalies seemtfo-' be repelled as other combustible substances, by posi- tively electrified surfaces, and attracted by negatively electrified surfaces ; and the oxygen follows the con- trary order ; or the oxygen being naturally possessed of the negative energy, and the bases of the positive do not remain in combination when either of them is brought into an electrical state opposite to its natural one. In the synthesis, on the contrary, the natural energies or attractions come in equilibrium with each other ; and when these are in a low state at common temperatures, a slow combination is effected ; but when ihey are exalted by heat, a rapid union is the result as in oilier like cases with the production of fire. A number of circumstances relating to the agencies of the bases will be immediately stated, and will be found to offer confirmations to these general conclusions. IV. On the Properties and Nature of the Basis of Potash. After 1 had detected the bases of the fixed alkalies, I had considerable difficulty to preserve and confine them so as to examine their properties, and submit them to experiments ; for, like the alkahests imagin- ed by the alchemists, they acted more or less upon al- most every body to which they were exposed. The fluid substance a mongst all those I have tried, on which I find they have least effect, is recently dis- tilled naphtha. In this material,* when excluded from the air, they remain for many days without considera- bly changing, and their physical properties may be easily examined in the atmosphere when they are co- vered by a thin film of it. The basis of potash at 60° Fahrenheit, the temperature in which I first examined it, appealed, as I have already mentioned, in small globules possessing the metallic lustre, opacity and general appearance of mercury ; so that when a glo- bule of mercury was placed near a globule of the pecu- liar substance, it was not possible to detect a difference by the eye. At 6©« Fahrenheit it is, however, only imperfectly fluid, for it does readily run into a globule when its 344 shape is altered ; at 70° it becomes more fluid ; and at 100° its fluidity is perfect, so that different globules may be easily made to run into one. At 50° Fahren- heit it becomes a soft and malleable solid, which has the lustre of polished silver ; and at about the freezing point of water it becomes harder and brittle ; and, when broken in fragments, exhibits a crystallized tex- ture, which, in the microscope, seems composed of beautiful facets of a perfect whiteness and high metallic splendour. To be converted into vapour, it requires a tempera- ture approaching that of the red heat; and when the experiment is conducted under proper circumstances, it is found unaltered after distillation. It is a perfect conductor of electricity. When a spark from the voltaic battery of an hundred of six inches is taken upon a large globule in the atmosphere, the light is green, and combustion takes place at the point of contact only. WThen a small globule is used it is completely dissipated with explosion, accompanied by a most vivid flame, into alkaline fumes. It is an excellent conductor of heat. Resembling the metals in all these sensible properties, it is, however, remark- ably different from any of them in specific gravity. I found that it rose to the surface of naphtha distilled from petroleum, and of which the specific gravity was eight hundred and sixty-one, and it did not sink in dou- ble distilled naphtha, the specific gravity of which was about seven hundred and seventy, that of water being considered as one. The small quantities in which it is produced by the highest electrical powers, rendered it very difficult to determine this qpality with minute precision. I endeavored to gain approximations on the subject by comparing the weights of perfectly equal globules of the basis of potash and mercury. I use . the very delicate balance of the Royal Institution, which, when, loaded with the quantities I employed, and of which the mercury never exceeded ten grains, is sensible, at least, to the of a grain. Taking the mean of four experiments, conducted with great care, its specific gravity at 62° Fahrenheit, is to that of mercury as 10 to 223, which gives a proportion 345 to that of water nearly as 6 to 10 ; so that it is the lightest fluid body known. In its solid form it is a little heavier; but even in this state, when cooled to 40s Fahrenheit, it swims in the double distilled naphtha. The chemical relations of the basis of potash are still more extraordinary than its physical ones. I have already mentioned its alkalization and com- bustion in oxygen gas. It combines with oxygen slow- ly and without flame at all temperatures that I have tried below that of its evaporation. But at this tempe- rature combustion takes place, and the. light is of a brilliant whiteness, and the heat intense. When heat- ed slowly in a quantity of gas not sufficient for its com- plete conversion into potash, and at a temperature in- adequate to its inflammation, 400° Fahrenheit for in- stance, its tint changes to that of a red brown, and when the heat is withdrawn, all the oxygen is found to be absorbed, and a solid is formed of a greyish colour, which partly consists of potash, and partly of the basis of potash in a lower degree of oxygenation, and which becomes potash by being exposed to water, or by being again heated in fresh quantities of air. The substance consisting of the basis of potash combined with an un- der proportion cf oxygen, may likewise be formed by fusing dry potash and its basis together under proper circumstances. The basis rapidly loses its metallic splendour; the two substances unite into a compound of a red brown colour when fluid, and of a dark grey hue when solid ; and this compound soon absorbs its full proportion of oxy yen when exposed to the air, and is wholly converted into potash. And the same body is often formed in the analytical experiments when the action of the electricity is in- tense, and the potash much heated. _ 0 The basis of potash, when introduced into oxymuri- a;ic acid gas, burns spontaneously with a bright red light, and a white salt, proving to be muriat of potash, is formed. Wiitn a globule is healed in hydrogen at a degree below its point of vaponzation, it seems to dissolve in it, for the globule diminishes in volume, and the gas explodes with alkaline fumes and bright light, when, 346 suffered to pass into the air ; but by cooling, this spon- taneous detonating property is destroyed, and the basis is either wholly or principally deposited. The action of the basis of potash on water exposed to the atmosphere is connected with some beautiful phe- nomena. When it is thrown upon water, or when it is brought into contact with a drop of water at common temperature, it decomposes it with great violence, an instantaneous explosion is produced with brilliant flame, and a solution of pure potash is the result. In experiments of this kind, an appearance often oc- curs similar to that produced by the combustion of phosphorated hydrogen ; a white ring of smoke, which gradually extends as it rises into the air. When water is made to act upon the basis of potash out of the contact of air, and preserved by means of a glass tube under naphtha, the decomposition is violent; and there i*. much heat and noise but no luminous ap- pearance : and the gas evolved, when examined in the me" uri? or water pneumatic apparatus, is found to be pure n^arogen. Whc-i a globule of the basis of potash is placed up- on ice, it instantly burns with a bright flame, and a deep hole is made in the ice, which is lound to contain a so- lution of potash. The theoiy of the action of the basis of potash upon water exposed to the atmosphere, though complicated changes occur, is far from being obscure. The phe- nomena seem to depend on the strong attractions of the basis for oxygen and of the potash formed for water. The heat which arises from two causes, decomposition and combination, is sufficiently intense to produce the inflammation. Water is a bad conductor of heat; the globule sterns exposed to air ; a part of it, there is the greatest reason to believe, is dissolved by the heated nascent hydrogen ; and this substance being capable of spontaneous inflammation, explodes and communicates the effect of combustion to any of the basis that may- be yet uncombined. When a globule confined out of the contact of air is acted upon by water, the theory of decomposition is 347 very simple ; the heat produced is rapidly carried off, so that there is no ignition ; and a high temperature be- ing requisite for the solution of the basis in hydrogen, this combination probably does not take place, or at least it may have a momentary existence only. The production of alkali in the decomposition of wa- ter by the basis of potash, is demonstrated in a very simple and satisfactory manner by dropping a globule of it upon moistened paper tinged with termeric At the moment that the glooule comes into contact with the water, it burns, and moves rapidly upon the paper, as if in search of moisture, leaving behind it a deep reddish-brown trace, and acting upon the paper pre- cisely as dry caustic potash. So strong is the attraction of the basis of potash for oxygen, and so great the energy of its action upon wa- ter, that it discovers and decomposes the small quanti- ties of water contained in alcohol and ether, even when they are carefully purified. In ether this decomposition is connected with an in- structive result Potash is insoluble in this fluid ; and when the basis of potash is thrown into it, oxygen is furnished to it, and hydrogen disengaged, and the alka- li, as it forms, renders the ether white and turbid. In both these inflammable compounds the energy of its action is proportionable to the quantity of water they contain, and hydrogen and potash are the constant re- sult. The basis of potash, when thrown into solutions of the mineral acids, inflames and burns on the surface. "When it is plunged by proper means beneath the sur- face enveloped in potash, surrounded by naphtha, it acts upon the oxygen with the greatest intensity, and all its effects are such as may be explained from its strong af- finity for this substance. In sulphuric acid a white sa- line substance, with a yellow coating, which is, proba- bly, sulphat of potash surrounded by sulphur, and a gas which has the smell of sulphurous acid, and which, probably, is a mixture of that substance with hydrogen gas, are formed. In nitrous acid, nitrous gas is disen gaged, and r.itrat of potash formed. The basis of potash readily combines with the sirn- 343 pfc inflammable solids, and with the metals ; with phos- phorus and sulphur it forms compounds similar to the metallic phosphorets and sulphurets. When it is brought in contact with a piece of phosphorus and pressed upon, there is a considerable action : they be- come fluid together, burn, and produce phosphoiat of potash. When the experiment is made under naphtha, their combination takes place without the liberation of any elastic matter, and they form a compound which has a considerably higher point of fusion than its two constituents, and which remains a soft solid in boiling naphtha In its appearance it perfectly agrees with a metallic phosphoret ; it is of the colour of lead, and, when spread out, has a lustre similar to polished lead. When exposed to air at common temperatures it slow- ly combines with oxygen, and becomes phosphat of potash. When heated upon a plate of platina, fumes exhale from it, and it does not burn till it attains the temperature of the rapid cor.ibustion of the basis of potash. W7hen the basis of potash is brought in con- tact with sulphur in fusion, in tubes filled with the va- pour of naphtha, they combine rapidly with the evolution of heat and light, and a grey substance, in appearance like artificial sulphuret of iron, is formed, which, if kept in fusion, rapidly dissolves the glass, and becomes bright brown. When this experiment is made in a glass tube hermetically sealed, no gas is liberated if the tube is opened under mercury ; but when it is made in a tube connected with a mercurial apparatus, a small quantity of sulphurated hydrogen is evolved, so that the phenomena are similar to those produced by the union of sulphur with the metals in which sulphurated hydrogen is likewise disengaged, except that the igni- tion is stronger. Copper filings and powdered sulphur, in weight in the proportion of three to one, rendered very dry, were heated together in a retort, connected with a mercurial pneumatic apparatus. At the moment of combination a quantity of elastic fluid was liberated, amounting to nine or ten times the volume of materials employed, and which consisted of sulphurated hydrogen mixed with sulphureous acid. The first mentioned product, 349 there is every reason to believe, must be referred to the sulphur ; the last probably to the copper, which, it is easy to conceive, may have become slightly and super- fioially oxydated during the processes of filing and dry- ing by heat. When the union is effected in the atmosphere, a great inflammation takes place, and sulphuret of potash is formed. The sulphurated basis likewise gradually becomes oxygenated by exposure to the air, and is fi- nally converted into sulphate. The new substance pro- duces some extraordinary and beautiful results with mercury. When one part of it is added to eight or ten parts of mercury in volume at 60° Fahrenheit, they instantly unite and form a substance exactly like mercu- ry in colour, but which seems to have less coherence ; for small portions of it appear as flattened spheres. "When a globule is made to touch a globule of mercury about twice as large, they combine with considerable heat; the compound is fluid at the temperature of its formation ; but, when cool, it appears as a solid metal, similar in colour to silver. If the quantity of the basis of potash is still farther increased, so as to be about one thirtieth the weight of the mercury, the amalgam increases in hardness and becomes more brittle. The solid amalgam, in which the basis is in the smallest proportion, seems to consist of about one part in weight of basis, and seventy parts of mercury, and is very soft and malleable. When these compounds are exposed to air, they ra- pidly absorb oxygen ; potash, which deliquesces, is formed, and in a few minutes the mercury is found pure and unaltered. When a globule of the amalgam is thrown into wa- ter it rapidly decomposes it, with a hissing noise ; pot- ash is formed, pure hydrogen is disengaged, and the mercury remains free. The fluid amalgam of mercury and this substance dissolves all the metals I have exposed to it; and in this state of union mercury acts on iron and platina. "When the basis of potash is heated with gold, or sil- ver, or copper, in a close vessel of pure glass, it ra- pidly acts upon them; and when the compounds arg 350 thrown into water, this fluid is decomposed, potash formed, and the metals appear to be separated unalter- ed. The basis of potash combines with fusible metal, and forms an alloy with it, which has a higher point of fusion than the fusible metal. The action of the basis of potash upon the inflamma- ble oily compound bodies, confirms the other facts of the strength of its attraction for oxygen. On naphtha, colourless and recently distilled, as I have already said, it has very little power of action; but in naphtha that has been exposed to the air, it soon oxydates, and alkali is formed, which unites with the naphtha into a brown soap that collects round the glob- ule. On the concrete oils, (tallow, spermaceti, wax, for in- stance) when heated it acts slowly, coaly matter is de- posited, a little gas is evolved, and a soap is formed ; but in these cases it is necessary that a large quantity of the oil be employed. On the fluid fixed oils it produces the same effects, but more slowly. By heat likewise it rapidly decomposes the volatile oils ; alkali is formed, a small quantity of gas is evolv- ed, and charcoal is deposited. When the basis of potash is thrown into camphor in fusion, the camphor soon becomes blackened, no gas is liberated in the process of decomposition, and a sapo- naceous compound is formed ; which seems to show that camphor contains no more oxygen than the volatile oils. The basis of potash readily reduces metallic oxyds when heated in contact with them. When a small quan- tity of the oxyd of iron was heated with it, to a tem- perature approaching its point of distillation, there was a vivid action ; alkali and grey metallic particles, which dissolved with effervescence in muriatic acid, appeared. The oxyds of lead and the oxyds of tin were revi- ved still more rapidly ; and when the basis of potash was in excess, an alloy was formed with the revived metal. In consequence of this property the basis of potash readily decomposes flint glass, and green glass, by a 351 gentle heat; alkali is immediately formed by oxygca from the oxyds, which dissolves the glass, and a new surface is soon exposed to the agent. At a red heat even the purest glass is altered by the basis of potash : the oxygen in the alkali of the glass seems to be divid- ed between the two bases, the basis oi potash and the alkaline basis in the glass and oxyds, in the first degree of oxygenation, are the result. When the basis of potash is heated in tubes made of plate glass, filled with vapour of naphtha, it first acts upon the small quantity of oxyds of cobalt and manganese in the inte- rior surface of the glass, and a portion of alkali is form- ed. As the heat approaches to redness it begins to rise in vapour, and condense in the colder parts of the tube ; but at the point, where the heat is strongest, a part of the vapour seems to penetrate the glass, ren- dering it a deep red-brown colour ; and by repeatedly distilling and heating the substance in a close tube of this kind, it finally loses its metallic form, and a thick brown crust, which slowly decomposes water, and which combines with oxygen when exposed to air, forming alkali, lines the interior of the tube, and in many parts is found penetrating through its substance. The basis of soda, is solid at common temperatures. It is white opaque, and when examined under a film of naphtha has the lustre and general appearance of silver. It is exceedingly malleable. Its specific gravity is less than that of water about 9 to 10, or, 9348 to 1. The basis of soda has a much higher point of fusion than the basis of potash, its chemical phenomena are analogous to those pioduced by the basis of potash. The proportions of the peculiar basis, and oxygen in potash and soda are, about six parts basis and one of oxygen in potash, and seven parts of basis and two of oxygen in soda. PNEUMATIC CISTERNof Yale College. An instrument has been for several years used in the laboratory of Yale College, for experiments in the large way, on the gases which water does not rapidly adsorb,. 352 which has been found to be more convenient and com- plete than any other arrangement of apparatus for si- milar purposes. The only instrument of the kind which has ever been constructed, was manufactured in New-Haven. [See Frontispiece.] Being calculated for an extensive course of public lectures, delivered in a laboratory where there is plenty of room, its dimen- sions are larger than might be worth while in establish- ments on a smaller scale It forms that of a parallel- opipedon, 7 1-8 feet long, 3 feet wide, and 2 feet 2 inches deep, without allowing for the two inch pine plank of which this part of the instrument is constructed The several planks and parts are connected by grooves and tongues, and bound together by iron rods, passing lat- erally through them, and terminating in screws furnish- ed with nuts. The interior part is furnished with two shelves, [A.A.A.A.] each two feet six inches long, for sustaining air-jars and bell-glasses; the middle space between these is one foot.eight inches wide, and forms a well j_H] for immersing the bell-glasses ; across this well is placed a sliding shelf, [G] with three inverted shallow tin funnels beneath it, corresponding with as many holes for receiving and transferring gases. Thus far, it is obvious that the instrument is only a very ex- tensive pneumatic cistern, and has no superiority over those commonly in use, except from its affording ample space for a veiy important and interesting class of ex- periments, which are much more impressive and con- vincing to a large audience, when performed on a large scale. There are, however, a number of additional contrivances. Beneath each of the shelves are two in- verted rectangular boxes, [shm-n by dotted lines at I. I. i nd under A.A.A.A.] made of thin pine plank, dovetail- ed together at the angles, entirely open below, and at- tached to the inferior side of the shelves by tongues, grooves, and wood-screws. These boxes are twelve inches deep, of the capacity of about 12 gallons each, and occupy the whole space beneatn the shelves except 7,5 inches at each end of the cisK-rn, and nine inches between the bottom of the boxes and the bottom of the cistern. This latter space is reserved to give room for the action of three pair of hydrostatic bellows. [15. B] They are made of leather, nailed to the bottom of the cistern 353 distended by circular iron rings, and attached by nails to a thick circular plank which serves as a top, and which is moved up and down by an iron rod connected with an iron lever, [C.C.C.j which rests on a forked iron sup- port, attached to the upper edge of the end of the cistern. The bellows are so placed, that nearly one half projects beneath the boxes, which we may call reservoirs ; the other part is beneath the open space which lies between the end of the reservoirs and the end of the cistern, and the rod of the bellows perforates the shelf imme- diately at the termination of the box and contiguous to it, but does not pass through the box, which must be air-tight. At the edge of that part of the bellows which projects beneath the ieservoir, is a valve open- ing upward ; in the centre of the bellows and on the bottom of the cistern, which is also the bottom of the bellows, is another valve opening upwards, covering an orifice which is connected with a duct, leading out, laterally, through the plank, edgewise, to the atmos- phere. Into this duct is inserted a copper tube, [D.D.] consisting of two parts, one of which forms merely a portion of the duct, being driven into it so that it forms a perfectly tight connection ; the other part is soldered to this at right angles, and ascends in close contact with the outside of the cistern, till it rises two inches higher than its upper edge, and there it opens in an orifice somewhat dilated. Each of the four reservoirs may be considered as furnished with the apparatus of bellows, duct, valves, and tube ; although in the instrument to which this description refers, there are in fact but three bellows, &c. one reservoir being destitute of them It remains to be remarked, that each reservoir is furnish- ed with a stop-cock, which lies horizontally upon the shelf and partly imbedded in it, and passes into the re- servoir by a short tube of copper, soldered at right an- gles with the cock. The cocks of the two contigious reservoirs are placed parallel to each other and to the sides of the cistern, and immediately contiguous to the partition which separates the reservoirs, and they are connected by a third stop-cock soldered to each of them opening into both by proper orifices, and thus serving,. when occasion requires, to connect the reservoirs, and. in fact, to convert two into one. Through each of the Ee2 354 shelves, at the angles of the two reservoirs which are contigiousat once to that side of the cistern which may be regarded as its back part, and to ihe well, a hole is bored into the reservoir for the insertion of a copper tube [E.E.] for a blow-pipe. These tubes are so form- ed, that while one part is pressed firmly into the hole so as to be air-tight, another part, at right angles with the first, and bending in a pretty large curve, terminates in a trumpet like orifice, adapted to the insertion of a cork. Immediately beneath these two orifices is a table, [F.] attached by hinges to the side of the cistern, to sustain a lamp for the blow-pipe ; when not in use, it hangs by the side of the cistern, and is raised occasionally, as it is wanted. To an intelligent chemist, it will be obvious from an attentive perusal of the description, that this instru- ment will afford all the following advantages. 1. It is an extensive pneumatic cistern, with every common convenience, on a large scale. ' 7 made in water, and the cloth is dipped in this infusion,. and allowed to remain till it has absorbed a sufficient, quantity of tan. Silk is capable of absorbing a very great proportion of tan, and by that means acquires a great increase of weight. Manufacturers sometimes employ this method of increasing the weight of silk. Tan is often employed also, along with other mor- dants, in order to produce a compound mordant. Oil is also used for the same purpose, in the dyeing of cotton and linen. The mordants with which tan most frequently is combined, are alumine and oxyd of iron. Besides these mordants, there are several other sub- stances frequently used as auxiliaries, either to facili- tate the combination of the mordant with the cloth, or to alter the shade of colour; the chief of these are, tartar, acetite of lead, common salt, sal ammoniac, sulphat or acetite of copper, Sec. Mordants not only render the dye permanent, but have also considerable influence on the colour produ- ced. The same colouring matter produces very dif- ferent dyes, according as the mordant is changed. Sup- pose, for instance, that the colouring matter be cochi- neal ; if we use the aluminous mordant, the cloth will acquire a crimson colour ; but the oxyd of iron produ- ces with it a black. In dyeing then it is not only necessary to procure a mordant which has a sufficiently strong affinity for the colouring matter and the cloth, and a colouring matter which possesses the wished for colour in perfection, but we must procure a mordant and a colouring matter of such a nature, that when combined together, they shall possess the wished foi colour in perfection. It is evident too, that a great variety of colours may be pro- duced with a single dye stuff, provided we can change the mordant sufficiently. The colouring matter with which the cloth is dyed, does not cover every portion of its surface ; its parti- cles attach themselves to the cloth at certain distances from each other ; for the cloth may be dyed different shades of the same colour, lighter or darker, merely by varying the quantity of colouring matter. With ■x small quantity, the shade is light j and it becomes 8 deeper as the quantity increases; now this would be impossible, if the dye stuff covered the whole of the cloth. That the particles of colouring matter, even when the shade is deep, are at some distance, is evident from this well known fact, that cloth may be dyed two colours at the same time. All those colours to which the dyers give the name of compound, are in fact two different colours applied to the cloth at once. Thus cloth gets a green colour, by being dyed first blue and then yellow. The colours denominated by dyers simple, because they are the foundation of all their other processes, are four; namely, first, blue; second, yellow; third, red; fourth, black. To these they usually add a fifth, under the name of root or brown colour. Of Dyeing Blue. The only colouring matters employed in dying blue, are woad and indigo. Woad is a plant cultivated in this kingdom, and even growing wild in some parts of England. Indigo is a blue powder, extracted from a species of plants which is cultivated for that purpose in the East and West Indies. These plants contain a pecu- liar green pollen, which in that state is soluble in water. This pollen has a strong affinity lor oxygen, which it attracts greedily from the atmosphere ; in consequence of which it assumes a blue colour, and becomes insolu- ble in water. Indigo has a very strong affinity for wool, silk, cot- ton and linen. Every kind of cloth, thereiore, may be dyed with it, without the assistance of any mordant whatever. The colour thus induced is very perma- nent ; because the indigo is already saturated with ox yge" and because it is not liable to be decomposed by those substances, to the action of which the cloth is ex- posed. But it can only be applied to cloth in a state of solution ; and the only solvent known being sulphu- ric acid, it would seem at first sight, that the sulphu- ric acid solution is the only state in which indigo can be employed as a dye. 9 The sulphat of indigo is indeed often used to dye wool and silk blue; but it can scarcely be applied to cotton and linen, because the affinity of these sub- stances for indigo is not great enough to enable them readily to decompose the sulphat. The colour given by sulphat of indigo is exceedingly beautiful; it is known by the name of Saxon blue. Of Dyeing Yellow. The principal colouring matters for dyeing yellow are weld, fustic, and quercitron bark. Weld is a plant which grows in this country. Fustic is the wood of a large tree which grows in the West Indies. Quercitron is a tree growing naturally in North Amer- ica, the bark of which contains colouring matter. The yellow dyed by means of fustic is more perma- nent, but not so beautiful as that given by weld, or quer- citron. As it is permanent, and not much injured by acids, it is often used in dyeing compound colours, where a yellow is required. The mordant is alumine. When the mordant is oxyd of iron, fustic dyes a good perma- nent drab colour. Weld and quercitron bark, yield nearly ihe same kind of colour ; but as the bark yields colouring matter in much greater abundance, it is much more convenient, and upon the whole cheaper than weld. It is probable, therefore, that it will gradually supercede the use of that plant. The method of using each of these dye stuffs is nearly the same. Of Dyeing Red. The colouring matters employed for dyeing red, are kermc:--, cochineal, archil, madder, carthamus, and Brazil- wood. Kcrmes is a species of insect, affording a red colour by solution in water ; but it is not so beautiful as cochi- neal, which is likewise an insect found in America.— The decoction of cochineal is a very beautiful crimson colour Alum brightens the colour of the decoction, and occasions a crimson precipitate. Muriat of tin gives a copious flue red precipitate. 10 Archil, is a paste formed of a species of lichen pound- ed, and kept moist for some time with stale urine. Madder is the root of a well known plant. Carthamus is the flower of a plant cultivated in Spain and the Levant. It contains two colouring matters ; a yellow, which is soluble in water, and a red. insoluble in water, but soluble in alkaline carbonats. The red cob ouring matter of carthamus, extracted by carbonat of soder, and precipitated by lemon juice, constitutes the rouge used by ladies as a paint. It is afterwards ground with a certain quantity of talc. The fineness- of the talc, and the proportion of it mixed with the carthamus, oc- casion the difference between the cheaper and dearer kinds of rouge. Brazil wood, is the wood of a tree growing in Amer- ica and the West Indies. Its decoction is a fine red colour. None of the red colouring matters have so strong an affinity for cloth as to produce a permanent red, without the assistance of mordants. The mordants employed are alumine, and oxyd of tin ; oil, and tan, in certain pro- cesses, are also used ; and tartar and muriat of soder are frequently called in t.s auxiliaries. Wool may be dyed scarlet, the most splendid of all colours, by first boiling it in a solution of murio sul- phat of tin, then dying it pale yellow with quercitron bark, and afterwards crimson, with cochineal : for scarlet is a compound colour consisting of crimson mix- ed with a little yellow. Silk is usually dyed red with cochineal, or cartha- mus, and sometimes with Brazil wood. Kermes does not answer for silk ; madder is scarcely ever used for that purpose, because it does not yield a colour bright enough. Archil is employed to give silk a bloom ; but it is scarcely used by itself, unless when the colour wanted is lilac. Silk may be dyed crimson by steeping it in a solu- tion of alum, and then dying it in the usual way in a cochineal bath. Silk cannot be dyed a full scarlet ; but a colour ap- proaching to scarlet may be given it, by first impregna* ting the stuff with murio sulphat of tin, and afterwards dyeing it in a bath, composed of four parts of cochineal, and four parts of quercitron bark. To give the colour more body, both the mordant and the dye may be re- peated. A colour approaching scarlet may be also given to silk, by first dying it crimson, then dying it with carthamus, and lastly, yellow without heat. Cot- ton and linen are dyed red with madder. The process was borrowed from the East. Hence, the colour is of- ten called Adrianople, or Turkey red The cloth is first impregnated with oil, then with galls, and lastly with alum. It is then boiled for an hour in a decoction of madder, which is commonly mixed with a quantity of blood. After the cloth is dyed, it is plunged into a soda ley, in order to brighten the colour. The red given by this process, is very permanent, and when properly conducted, it is exceeding beautiful. The whole difficulty consits in the application of the mor- dant, which is by far the most complicated employed in the whole art of dying. Of Dyeing Black. The substances employed to give a black colour to cloth are, red oxyd of iron, and tan. These two sub- stances have a strong affinity for each other ; and when combined, assume a deep black colour, not liable to be destroyed by the action of air or light. Logwood is usually employed as an auxiliary, be- cause it communicates lustre,-and adds considerably to the fullness of ihe black. It is the wood of a tree which is a native of several of the West India islands, and of that part of Mexico which surrounds the Bay of Hon- duras. It yields its colouring matter to water. The decoction is at first a fine red, bordering on violet; but if left to itself, it gradually assumes a black colour. Acids give it a deep red colour ; alkalies a deep violet, inclining to brown ; sulphat of iron renders it as black as ink. and occasions a precipitate of the same colour. Wool is dved black by the following process: It is boiled for two hours in a decoction of nut-galls, and af- terwards kept for two hours more in a bath composed of logwood and sulphat of iron, kept during the whole 12 time at a scalding heat, but not boiled. During the op- eration it must be frequently exposed to the air ; be- cause the green oxyd of iron, of wliich the sulphat is composed, must be converted into red oxyd by absorb- ing oxygen, before the cloth can acquire a proper col- our. The common proportions are five parts of galls, five of sulphat of iron, and thirty of logwood, for every hundred of cloth. A little acetite of copper, is com- monly added to the sulphat of iron, because it is thought to improve the colour. Silk is dyed nearly in the same manner. It is capable of combining with a great deal of tan ; the quantity giv- en is varied at the pleasure of the artist, by allowing the silk to remain a longer or shorter time in the decoction. Of Dying Compound Colours. Compound colours are produced by mixing together two simple ones ; or, which is the same thing, by dy- inpj cloth first one simple colour, and then another,-— These colours vary to infinity, according to the propor- tions of the ingredients employed. They may be ar- ranged under the following classes : Mixtures of 1. Blue and yellow ; 2. Blue and red; 3. Yellow and red ; 4. Black, and other colours. Alixturcs of blue and yellow. This forms green, which is distinguished by dyers into a variety of shades, according to the depth of the shade, or the prevalence of either of the component parts. Thus we have sea-green, grass-green, pea-green, &c. Wool, silk, and linen, are usually dyed green, by giving them first a blue colour, and afterwards dy- ing them yellow ; because, when the yellow is first given, several inconveniences4bllow : the yellow part- ly separates again in the blue vat, and communicates a green colour to it, and thus renders it useless for ev- ery other purpose, except dying green. Any of the usual processes for dying blue and yellow may be fol- lowed, taking care to proportion the depth of the shades to that of the green required. When sulphat of indigo is employed, it is usual to mix all the ingre- dients together, and to dye the cloth at once ; this pro- duces what is known by ihe name of Saxon, or English green. 13 Mixtures of Blue and red. These form different shades of violet, purple, and lilac. Wool is generally first dyed blue, and afterwards scarlet, in the usual manner. By means of cochineal mixed with sulphate of indigo, the process may be performed at once. Silk is first dyed crimson, by means of cochineal, and then dipped into the indigo vat Cotton and linen are first dyed blue, then galled, and soaked in a decoction of logwood ; but a more permanent colour is given by means of oxyd of iron. Mixtures of yellow and red. This produces orange. When blue is combined with red and yellow on cloth, the resulting colour is olive. Wool may be dyeU or- ange, by first dyeing it scarlet, and then yellow. When it is dyed first with madder, the result is cinnamon col- our. Siik is dyed orange by means of carthamus ; a cin- namon colour by logwood, Brazil-wood, and fustic mix- ed together. Cotton and linnen receive a cinnamon colour by means ol weld and madder ; and an olive colour, by being passed through a blue, yellow, and then a madder bath. Alixtures of black with other colours. These consti- tute greys, drabs, and browns If cloth be previously- combined with brown oxyd of iron, and afterwards dved yellow with quercitron bark, the result will be a drab of different shades, according to the proportion of mor- dant employed. When the proportion is small, the colour inclines to olive or yellow ; on the contrary, the drab may be deepened or saddened, as the dyers term it, by mixing a little sumach with the bark. TANNIAXZ. Tanning is the art of converting the raw skins of animals into Leather. Skins are the general term for the skins of calves, seals, hogs, dogs, &c. As the meth- ods of tanning in general use have been found tedious and expensive in their operation, various schemes, at different times, have been suggested to shorten the process and lessen the expense. G g 14 Much light has been thrown by modern chemists upon the theory of tanning. M. Seguin, in France, has particularly distinguished himself by his researches on this subject, and much improved the art in his country. A few years since W. Lesmond obtained a patent for practising Seguin's method in England. He ob- tained the tanning principle by digesting oak bark, or other proper materials, in cold water, in an apparatus nearly similar to that used in the saltpetre works :——. That is to say, the water which has remained upon the powdered bark a certain time, in one vessel, is drawn off by a cock, and poured upon fresh tan—this is again to be drawn oft", and poured upon other fresh tan ; and in this way the process is to be continued to the fifth ves- sel. The liquor is then highly coloured, and marks from six to eight degrees upon the hydrometer for salts. This he calls the tanning lixivium. The crite- rion for ascertaining its strength, is the quantity of the solution of gelatine which a given quantity of it will precipitate. Isinglass is used for this purpose, being intirely composed of gelatine. And here it may be observed, that this is the mode of ascertaining the quan- tity of tanning principle in any vegetable substance, and consequently how far ihey may be used as a substitute for oak bark. The hides, after being prepared in the usual way, are immersed for some hours in a weak tanning lixivi- um of only one or two degrees ; to obtain which, the latter portions of the infusions are set apart, or else some of that which has been partly exhausted by use in tanning. The hides are then to be put into a strong- er lixivium, where, in a few days, they will be brought to the same degree of saturation with the liquor in which they are immersed. The strength of the liquor will by this means be considerably diminished, and must therefore be renewed. Wfien the hides are by this means completely saturated, that is to say, perfectly tanned, they are to be removed, and slowly dried in the shade. The length of time necessary to tan leather com- pletely, according to the old process, is certainly a ve- LO ry great inconvenience ; and there is no doubt but that it may be much shortened by following the new meth- od. It has been found, however, that the leather so tanned has not been so durable as that which has been formed by a slower process. The public is much indebted to Mr. Davy, professor of chemistry in the Royal Institution, for the attention which he has paid to the subject. From his excellent pa- per " on the constituent parts of astringent vegetables," in the Philosophical Transactions, we present the read- er with the following extract.— " The different qualities of leather made with the same kind of skin, seem to depend very much upon the different quantities of extractive matter it contains. The leather obtained by means of infusions of galls, is generally found harder, and more liable to crack, than the leather obtained from the infusions of barks ; and in all cases it contains a much larger proportion of tan- nin, and a smaller proportion of extractive matter. •' When skin is very slowly tanned in weak solutions of the barks, or of catechu, it combines with a consid- erable proportion of extractive matter ; and in these cases, though the increase of weight of the skin is comparatively small, yet it is rendered perfectly inso- luble in water, and is found soft, and at the same time strong. The saturated astringent infusions of barks contain much less extractive matter in proportion to the tannin, than the weak infusions ; and when skin is quickly tanned in them, common experience shews that it produces leather less durable than the leather slowly formed. " Besides, in the case of quick tanning by means of infusions of barks, a quantity of vegetable extractive matter is lost to the manufacturer, which might have been made to enter into the composition of his leather. These observations shew, that there is some foundation for the vulgar opinion of workmen, concerning what is technicr.lly called the feeding of leather in the slow method of tanning ; and though the processes of the art may in some rases be protracted for an unnecessary length of time, ye', in general, they appear to have arrived, in consequence of repeated practical experi- 1(3 ments, at a degree of perfection which cannot be very far extended by means of any elucidations of theory that have as yet been known.''' It was first suspected by Sir Joseph Banks, and af- terwards confirmed by the experiments of Professor* Davy, that a substance called catechu or terra Japonica, brought from the East Indies contained a vast quanti- ty of tannin ; so much so that it far excels every other known substance in this respect. Owe pound of catechu contains as much tannin as eight or ten pounds of com- mon oak bark, and would consequently tan proportion* ately as much more leather. It is an extract made from the wood of a species of mimosa, by decoction and subsequent evaporation. Oak bark being a very expensive article in the pro- cess of tanning, various substances have been proposed as substitutes for it. All the parts of vegetables which are of an astringent nature, contain tannin (which may be known by their giving precipitates with gelatine, insoluble in water), and will answer this purpose. The leaves, branches, fruit, flowers, of a vast number of plants ; every part of the oak, as the leaves and acorns, oak saw-dust, and the barks of almost all trees, contain mure or less tannin.. CURRY IYG. Currying is the art of dressing cow-hides, calves- skins, Sec The principal object in this process, is to soften and supple cow and calfskins, which are usually employedin makingupper-leaihers and quartersof shoes the covers of saddles, coaches, Sec. As soon as these skitis are brought from the tanner's yard, the currier first soaks them for some time in common water, when he tti.es them out, stretches them on a smooth wooden horse, scrapes off with a paring knife all the superfluous flesh, and immerses them again. They are next put on a wet hurdle, and trampled with the heels, till they become soft and pliant, when they are steeped in train- oil, and afterwards spread out on large tables, and their ends tightly secured. There, by means of a pummel. 17 (an instrument consisting of a thick piece of wood, the lower side of which is full of furrows, or teeth, cros- sing each other), the currier folds, squares, and moves the skins in various directions, to render them supple. This operation is properly called currying ; and, with a few immaterial exceptions, is that now generally fol- lowed. After the skins are thus dressed, they are coloured, black, white, red, green, 8cc. which process is per- formed either on the flesh or grain side ; that on the former, by skinners, and that on the grain or hair side, by curriers ; these, when a skin is to be made white, rub it with chalk, or white-lead, and afterwards with pumice-stone. But, when a black colour is wanted) the skin must be first oiled and dried, then passed over a puff, dipped in water impregnated with iron, when it is immersed in another water prepared with soot, vine- gar, and gum-arabic Thus it gradually acquires a deep dye, and the operations are repeated till it becomes of a shining black. The grain and wrinkles, which contribute to the pliancy of calves and cows leather, are made by the reiterated folds given to the skin in every direction, and by the great care taken to scrape off ev- ery excrescence and hard place on the grain? or colour- side. INDEX. A Absorbents, 306 Acetous fermentation, 266 ———acid, 248 266 Acidulous gaseous mineral waters, 220 - - - - ■ salts. 250 Acids, 101. 191 Affinity, 8 Agate, 173 Agriculture, 274 Air 66 Albumen, 291, 297 Alburnum. 285 Alchemists, 3 Alcohol, or spirit of wine, 257 Alembic 99 Alkalies ijo Alkaline earths, 151, 173 Alloys 144 Alum, or sulphat of alumine, hi 203 Alumine, 171 Amalgam, 146 Ambergris, 335 Amethyst, 173 Amianthus, 177 Ammonia, or volatile alkali, 152. 160 Ammoniacal gas, 163 Analysis, 114 Animals, 291 Animal acids, 192 298 ------heat, 324 ------oil 332 /nimaiization 291. 3OI Antimony, 6 136 Aqua fortis, 208 ------regia, 14a Areck, 261 Arganos'- la up, 80 Arsenic, 6 Ashphaltum, 270 Assafcetida, 243 A stringent principle, 249 Atmosphere, 65 Atmospherical air, 66 Attraction of aggregation, or cohesion, 14 ------of composition, 6. 181 Azote, or nitrogen, 206 Azotic gas, 65 B Balloon!>, 96 Balsams, 232 Bark, 204 Barytes, i65 Basis of acids, 102 _ - - . - gasses, 66 - - - . - salts, 152 Beer, 255 Benzoic acid, 19a Bile, 291, 3°7 Birds, 30 '-> Bismuth, 6 Bitumens, 270 Black lead, or plumbago, 114 Bleaching, H4> "3 Biock tin, 14a Blood, 292 Boiling water 34 Bombic acid, 193 336 Bone-, 292 302 Boracic acid, 190 Brandy, 265 Brass. 144 Bread, 273 Bricks 16a Butter 334 Butter-milk, 334 C Calcareous earths, 175 ISSDEX. ..... ftones, 175 Caloric. 13 Calorimeter, 63 Camphor, 232 Camphoric acid. 19a Caoutchouc, 232 Capacity for heat, 47 Carbonats, 221 Carbonat of ammonia, 16a ...... lime, 175 ..... magnesia, 176 .... - potash, 154 Carbonated hydrogen gas, 125 Carbone, 111 Carbonic acid, 117. 2lj Carburet of iron, 124 Carmine, 300 Castor, 336 Cellular membrane, 309 Caustics, 147 Ch*lk 175 Charcoal, 11a Cheese, 335 Chemical attraction, 6 .....heat 78 ..... folution> 141 Chemistry, 3 Chest, 306 China, 16a Chroma, . 14° Chyle, 292. 3°7 Chyme. 306 Citric acid, 19a Circulation of the blood, 307 Civet 336 Clay, 161 Coak, 270 Coal. 270 Cobalt, 6 Cochineal, 30Q by ©xy-muriirtic acid, 22 of carbone, HI of coals 80 of charcoal by nitric acid, ao6 of candles, 83 of iron, 130 of lamps. 80 of metals, 130 of oils 231 of oil of turpentine by nitrous acid, 183 of phosphorus. 105 of sulphur, 100 Compound bodies, 6 Compound, or neutral salts, 15* Conductors of heat, %"] Constituent parts, 5 Copper, 13a Copal a43 Cortical layers, 284 Cotyledons, or lobes, 279 Cream, 331 Cream of tartar, or tartit of pot* ash, 250 Crystals, 174 Crystallization, 141 Cucurbit, 99 Curd, 334 Cuticle, or epidermis, 309 De composition, s of vegetables, 250 Deflagration, 230 Deliquescence, 291 Detonation, 89 Dew, 40 ^ Cold, 18 - Colours of metallic oxyds, 13a Diamond, 115 Columbium, 6. 146 Diaphragm, 306 Combustible bsches, 7a Digeftion, 305 Combustion, 73 D.velent forces, 186 _______..... volatile products Dissolution of metals, 138 r .g Distillation, 99 ____'________fixed products of of red wine 260 «6 Div sion, 5 „_________.. of amoiuacal gas, Drying oils, 241 16a Dyeing, 233 Earths, 164 Earthen ware, 173 Effervescencf, iaa Efllorescence, 193 Elective attractions, 98 Elementar bodies, 6 NDEX. Fuller's earth, HO" G Galls, ao4 Gallat of iron, 204 Gallic acid, 19a. 2o4 Galvanic electricity, 135 Gas. 66 Gaseous oxyd of carbone, 1 Elixirs, tinctures, or quintescen- nitrogen ceS) »6a Gastric juice, 292 129 an Enamel, 16a Epidermis of vegetables, 384 Epsom salts, 175 Equilibrium of caloric, 18 Essences, 281 Essential, or volatile oils, I2J Ether. 263 Evergreens, 287 Eudiometer, 108 Expansion of caloric, 14 Extractive colouring matter, 33 a. 3JO Gelatine, or jelly. 293 Germination, 290 Gin. 261 Glands, 307 Glass 157 Glauber's salts, or sulphat of soda, 155. 186 Glazing, 162 Glucina, i64 Glue, 393 Gluten, 336 Gold, 134 Gum, 33J arabic, 33^ resins. 333 Gunpowder, 228 Gypsum, or plaister of Paris, or sulphat of lime, 303 H Falling (tones, 143 Fat, 125 Feathers, 304 Fecula, 33a Fermentation, 306 Fibrine, 397 Fifh, 133 .. . t Fixed air, or cabonic acid, 116 Hair, 307 zjj Harrowgate water, 10* alkalies, 151 Hartshorn, 160 oils, laj. 33a Heart, 319 products of combuftion, 80 Heat, ia Flame, 90 of temperature, 12 Flint, 176 Honey, 337 Fluoric acid, 109 Horns, 305 Food of animals, 31 r Hydro-carbonate ia5 Formic acid. 193 Hydrogen, 8a 1 Fossil wood, 371 gas, 84 Free caloric, or heat of temper- ature, 13 Freezing mixtures, 56 Jasper, 173 Frank.1 >ccnse, 343 Ice, '•>$ Friction, 61 JeUy» *93 Frost, 63 Jet, 370 Igni fatui, 109 Incombustible bodies, 160 Ink, 204 Infects, 132 Integrant parts, 5 Iridium, 6. Isinglass, 293 Ivory black, 300 Kali, 261 K Lac, 336 Lactic acid, 173 Lakes, colours, 233 Latent heat, j 1 Lavender water, 231 Lead, 136 Leaves, a/>8 Life, 331 Ligaments, 306 Light, 106 Lightning, 101 Lime, 173 Lime water, i64 Limestone, 163 Linseed oil, 236 Liqueurs, 262 Liquids, 17 Lobes, 279 . .. Lunar, caustic, or nitrat of sil- ver, 147 ' Lungs, >i7 Lymph, 06 Lymphatic vessels, ~o6 M. Magnesia, 161 Malic acid. 19a Malt, 25 1 Manganefe 76 Mauna, 235 Manure, 27* . . ., Marine acid, or muriatic acid, 222 Ma«'-ic, 2 ; Membrane, 29a Mercury, 1I5 Metallic oxyds, r4> Metals, 6 129 Mica, 175 Milk. 29a. 33i Mineral acids, 19a Molybdena, 6. Mortar, 175 Mucilage, 23a Mucous acid, 19a Muriatic acid, or marine acid', 190 Muriat of ammonia, 160 227 of soda, or common salt, 333 Muscles of animals, 2o6 Musk, 336 Myrrh, 2*3 N Naphtha, 270 Nerves, 3oa Neutral, or compound salts, 15* Nickel, 6 Nitre, or nitrat of potasb, or- salt petre. 300 Nitric acid, 205 Nitrogen, or azote, 66 gas, 66 Nitro-muriatic acid, or aqua re- gia, 225 . Nitrous acid gas, 2IO Nitrat of ammonia, 212 of potash, or nitre, or salt petre, 208 2i4 of silver, or lunar caulUc, 315 Nut-^alls 205 Nut-oil 236 O Ochres, i"a Oil of amber, 271 of vitriol, or sulphuric acid,. 19 s O' ve oil, 2 2 Omi.iuh. 6 Oxalic acid, 193 INDEX. ©xyd of iron i36 of lead, 136 1 Oxygen, 66 Oxy-muriatic acid, 233 Oxy muriats, 228 Oxy-muriat of potash, 338 Palladium, 6 Papin's digefter. 395 Parenchyma, 379 Pearlash, 154 Peat, 370 Perfumes, 3j4 Perspiration 292 Peppermint water, 3jI Pewter 144 Pharmacy, 3 Phosphat of lime, 2o5 Phosphorated hydrogen gas, 109 Phosphoric acid, 205 Phosphorous acid, 191 Phosphorus, 105 Thosphorct of lime, no of sulphur, no Pitch, 232 Platina, 136 Plating, 1 5 Plumula, 280 Porcelain, 176 Potash, 151 Prussiat of iron, or prussian blue, 191 Prussic acid, 19'j Putrid fermentation, 3f6 Pyrites, 2o4 Pyrometer, 15 Q_ Quick lime, 175 Quiescent forces, 186 Radiation of caloric, 22 Radical, 152 Radicle.' or root, 380 Rain, J9 Rectification, 261 Reflection of caloric, 25 Resins, 232 Respiration, 316 Rhodium, 6 Roasting metals, 13o Rum, 263 S Saccharine fermentation, 26* Sal ammoniac, or sulphat of am* monia 160 — polychrest, or sulphat of pot- afh, 201 — volatile, or carbonat of am- monia, 162 Saltpetre, or nitre, or nitrat of potash, 159 Salt, 212 Sap of plants, 3o3 Sapphire, 16 3 Saturation, 08 Sebacic acid, 19a. Secretions. 307 Seltzer water, 122 Silex, or silicia, 161 Silk. 336 Simple bodies, 5 Size, 308 Skin, 292 Smelting metals, 130 Smoke, 80 Soap. 154 Soda, 151. 159 water, 122 Soils, 175 Soldering, 145 Simple solution 141 Specific heat, 48. 13 Spermaceti. 33^ Spirits, 266 Steam, 39 Steel, 130 Stucco. 176 Strontites. 165. 178 Suberic acid, 192 Sublimation, 99 Succin. or yellow amber. 270 Succinic acid, 193. Sugar, 233 of milk, 334 Tungsten, 6 Sulphats, 201 V Super-oxygenated sulphur- Vapour, 67 ic acid, 195 Varnishes, 195 Sulphat of alumine, or alum Vegetables, 232 202 Vegetable acids, 232 Sulphat of barytes, 163------colou.s, 228 ------of iron, 152 ------he:.t, 195 ol'lime, or gypsum,—----oils, 332 or plaster of Paris, 203 Veins. 316 ----of magnesia, or Epsom Verdigris, 149 salt, 177 Vinou» fermentation, 256 ----of potash, or sal poly- Vital air, -or oxygen gas, 77 chrest, 201 Vitriol,ofsulphatofiron, 152 _—of soda, or Glauber's - sails, 176. 186 U Sulphur 98 Sulphurated hydrogen gas, Undecompounded acids, 190 109 Sulphurous acid, 103 Sulphuric acid, 103 Symphathetic ink, 149 Synthesis, 114 Uranium, 6 W Water, 86 Wax, 335 Whey, 334 Wine, 259 Tan, 246 Tannin, 232 Tar, 232 Tartarous acid, 192 Tartrit of potash, 254 Teeth, 293 Tellurium, 6 Thermometers, 17 Thunder, 98 Tin, 145 Titanium, 6 Turf, 271 Turpentine, 232 Transpiration of plants, 291 Yeast, 338 Yttria, 164 Zinc, 136 Zirconia, 164 Zoonic acid, 193 BOOKS m FOR SALE BY INCREASE COOKE,& CO. Fourcroy's Elements of Chemistry, 5 vols. 8vo. Legrange's Manual of a course of chemistry, 2 vols. 8vo. Nicholson's first Principles of Chemistry, 1vol. 8vo. Lavoisier's Elements of Chemistry, 1 vol. 8vo. Chaptal's, do. with Notes. 2 vols. 8vo. Ewel's Discourses on Chemistry, 1 vol. 8vo. Black's Lectures on Chemistry, 3 vols. 8vo. Henry's Epitome of Chemistry, enlarged, 4th edition, with notes. Sec. 1 vol. 8vc. Green's Principles of Modern Chemistry, 2 vols. 8vo. Johnson's Animal Chemisti y, 3 vols. 8vo. Smilie's Philosophy of Natural History, 1 vol. 8vo. Euler's letters on Physics and Philosophy, 2 vols. 8vo Webster's Elements of Natural Philoso- phy, with notes and corrections by Rob- ert Patterson. 1 vol. 8vo. Rumford's Philosophical Essays, 3 vols. 8vo. do. Philosophical Papers, 1 vol 8vo. Imison's Elements of Science and Art. 2 vols. 8vo* Gregory's Economy of Nature, 3 vols. gvo. Ferguson's Astronomy, 1 vol. 8vo. Bonny castle's do. 1 vol. Svo. Byran's do. 1 vol. 8vo. Cavallo's Electricity, 3 vols. Svo. Adam's do. 1 vol. 8vo. Adams' Lectures on Philosophy, with notes, by William Jones. 5 vols. 8vo. with plates. Ferguson's Lectures on Philosophy, with notes, and appendix by David Brews- ter, 2 vols. 8vo. with an elegant quarto volume of plates. The variety of Books and Stationary for Sale by /-• COOKE, I? Co. like the works of nature at this blooming season of t;.. year, (May) amounts almost to infinity. >V CO- M *"»*rf:^y** •»-''x 'r^ ' '^i!..'; ** TtSpS^ ^C ;'r*.ns_".r...:.-;i.-':