transactions OF THE [nternational medical congress TRANSACTIONS OF THE international medical congress * N PHILADELPHIA. 1876. EDITED FOE. THE COHG-EESS BY JOHN ASHHURST, Je., A.M., M.D., FELLOW OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS OP PHILADELPHIA, PROFESSOR OF CLINICAL SURGERY" IN THE UNIVERSITY" OF PENNSYLVANIA, SURGEON TO THE EPISCOPAL HOSPITAL AND TO THE CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL, CONSULTING SURGEON TO ST. CHRISTOPHER’S HOSPITAL AND TO THE HOSPITAL OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD, BTC. PHILADELPHIA: PRINTED FOR THE CONGRESS. 1877. Entered according to the Act of Congress, in the year 1877, by CASPAR WISTER, M.D., Treasurer, in the Office of the Librarian of Congress. All rights reserved. PHILADELPHIA COLLINS, PRINTER, 705 Jayne Street. PREFACE. K explanation of the delay which has attended the publication of the piesent volume, the Editor would invite attention to the diversified cha- racter of its contents, which has necessitated the sending of proof-sheets rnore than threescore authors, residing in all portions of the country, has thus required a much greater expenditure of time than would been needed under other circumstances. . _ le yolume contains all the Addresses delivered before the Congress hs General Sessions, and, with few exceptions, all the Papers read in Meetings of the several Sections, and by them recommended for pub- ,'a 10ru Abstracts of the Discussions which ensued upon the reading the several papers, are also appended in many instances, and, it is e leved, will be found to add materially to the interest of the whole. A few papers have been withdrawn by their authors, and three have . een ornitted by the Committee of Publication: one on account of its to the work of the Section before which it was read, .nc op its fragmentary nature, the paper to which it was really but an lntioduction not having been furnished by the author; another on ae- o^t expense which would have attended the reproduction w n c^law^nS8 with which it was illustrated, and without which it fe tfi Ve koen valueless; and a third because, though it was referred pr . Committee by the Section before which it was read, yet the tion • t,n ®ecrefarJ? and several prominent members, of the Sec- take and1''3. lln^ *u declaring that it had been so referred by mis- wasi’tn was n°f designed for publication. One paper which have "bee^rneil(^ *'or Publication has not been received, and appears to e^ore fbe records of the Congress were placed in the are Therefo^8 WeFe considered f°° voluminous for the Transactions, and autho 6 °le’^ by condensed abstracts, one furnished by the been // otPer by the Secretary of the Section to which it had reiectin68011 Committee of Publication has not felt justified in been 011 the sole ground of want of merit, after it had which theora 6 yap by the Section which heard it read, and to but in i,6 resPouslbiHty of accepting or refusing it properly belonged; jas ice to itself, the Committee cannot avoid expressing the VI PREFACE. opinion that, in some few instances, the censorship exercised by the Sections might properly have been more rigid. To the actual proceedings of the Congress and of its several Sections, are prefixed Lists of the Officers and Members of the Congress, the Minutes of the General Sessions, the Address of Welcome of the Presi- dent, Professor Gross, and, in order to complete the history of the Con- gress, a brief account of its inception and of the Centennial Medical Commission, prepared by Dr. Hutchinson. Though authorized by a resolution of the Congress to call upon each delegate for a further contribution towards the expense of issuing the volume, the Committee of Publication determined, after mature delibe- ration, that it would be better not to make an additional assessment, but to endeavor, by the exercise of a careful supervision, to reduce the cost of the volume to the sum actually in hand from registration-fees and from subscriptions; this has been done, and the Committee has the satisfaction of terminating its labors with no deficit in the treasury. The Editor offers his sincere thanks to the other members of the Com- mittee of Publication for the cordial support which they have uniformly extended to him in the laborious, and occasionally ungrateful, duties of his office. For any errors which may be detected in his work, and he does not presume to hope that many such do not exist, he bespeaks the friendly indulgence of the reader; and, in bringing his task to a close, he ventures to express a hope that this volume, on which he has ex- pended more than a year of arduous labor, may be found to furnish a not unsatisfactory memorial of the meetings of that important body of which it records the acts—the First International Medical Congress of America. JOHN" ASHHUEST, Jr. 2000 West DeLancey Place, Philadelphia, October, 1877. THE CENTENNIAL MEDICAL COMMISSION AND THE INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CONGRESS. JAMES H. HUTCHINSOET, A.M., M.D., OF PHILADELPHIA. The project of holding an International Medical Congress in Phila- delphia, during the Centennial Anniversary of the Declaration of Independence the ITnited States, seems to have been entertained by the profession as early as and to have grown out of a resolution originally introduced by Dr. J. C*- Stetler, at a meeting of the Philadelphia County Medical Society, held in October of that year. This resolution proposed that a general conference of the different medical societies and colleges in the city should be held to deter- mine what part the medical profession should take in the approaching celebra- tion, which was just then beginning to excite general interest in the community. 16 l°rili which the proposed celebration should assume, had not, however, been u y agreed upon, and the time at which it was to take place was still far off in le future. Moreover, its advocates had not yet succeeded in convincing our leople that it was destined to be one of the great events in our history. Under e. circumstances it is not surprising that Dr. Stetler’s resolution did not r immediate fruit, and that the subject was allowed to lie dormant for more Than a year. which UeS^011 Was5 however, reopened in January, 18T4, in the same society, c, then appointed a committee, consisting of Drs. L. Turnbull, J. Gr. Stetler, and M o ° 77 x iara, to take the matter into consideration. This committee, in due a^the6^0^ avor ie ProJcct, and proposed the Fourth of July, 18T6, mci 1 1 U^on the Congress should begin its sessions. It recom- menc ct, also, that the other medical societies of the city should be requested ° aPP°int committees to co-operate with that of the County Society in pre- panng a plan. At this time, p one other society responded to the request; fessio comrnittee soon after, finding that it did not fully represent the pro- take°U m e C'^T’ extcnded invitations to several prominent physicians to c t m deliberations. These invitations were in most instances ia 5, accepted. The committee, thus increased in numbers and influence, THE CENTENNIAL MEDICAL COMMISSION. organized on the 29th of March, 1815, as “The Centennial Medical Com- mission op Philadelphia,” with the following officers :—- President. Samuel D. Gross, M.D., LL.D., D.C.L. Oxon. Y ice-Presidents. Alfred Stille, M.D., LL.D. W. S. W. Ruschenberger, M.D., U. S. N. Caspar Wister, M.D. Treasurer. Recording Secretary. William B. Atkinson, M.D. Foreign Corresponding Secretary. Home Corresponding Secretary. Richard J. Dunglison, M.D. Daniel G. Brinton, M.D. It was at this time also decided that the Congress should meet in September, instead of in July, as originally suggested, and that it should continue in ses- sion for at least six days. It was, moreover, proposed that the mornings should be devoted to business and to the reading of discourses upon topics of general interest, and that in the afternoons the Congress should meet in Sec- tions for the discussion of scientific questions.1 After much discussion, it was determined that there should be nine Sections, as follows : (1) A Section on Medicine; (2) A Section on Biology; (3) A Section on Surgery; (4) A Sec- tion on Dermatology and S37 philography; (5) A Section on Obstetrics; (6) A Section on Ophthalmology; (1) A Section on Otology; (8) A Section on Sanitary Science ; and (9) A Section on Mental Diseases. The Commission further decided that the Sections should meet on Monday, Tuesday, Wednes- day, Thursday, and Friday afternoons of the week during which the Congress should be in session; that, on four of these afternoons, the deliberations of each Section should be opened by the reading of a paper upon a subject of scientific interest, by a gentleman specially chosen for that purpose, and that the paper should afterwards be submitted for discussion. The remaining after- noon was to be left free for the reception of voluntary papers. The elaboration of this plan, together with the choice of subjects to be discussed, was left to special committees. At the meeting of the Commission which was held on the 19th of April, 1815, another and a successful effort was made to secure the co-operation of the other medical societies of the city 7', all of which appointed committees to 1 The subjects finally chosen for the discourses, with the names of the gentlemen selected to deliver them, were as follows : 1. Medicine and Medical Progress, Dr. Austin Flint, of New York ; 2. Surgery, Dr. Paul F. Eve, of Tennessee ; 3. Obstetrics, Dr. TheophiluS Parvin, of Indiana ; 4. Therapeutics, Dr. Alfred Stille, of Pennsylvania (declined); 5. Medical Jurisprudence, Dr. Stanford E. Chaille, of Louisiana; 6. Medical Biography, Dr. Joseph M. Toner, of the District of Columbia ; 1. Medical Institutions and Educa- tion, Dr. N. S. Davis, of Illinois ; 8. Medical Literature, Dr. L. P. Yandell, of Ken- tucky ; 9. Hygiene and Social Science, Dr. H. I. Bowditch, of Massachusetts ; 10. Mental Hygiene, Dr. John P. Gray, of New York; and 11. Medical Chemistry, Dr. Theo. G- Wormley. of Ohio. THE CENTENNIAL MEDICAL COMMISSION. IX confer with the Commission. From this time until the meeting of the Con- fess, the project had the warmest .support and sympathy of the whole body °f the profession in Philadelphia. The addition of so large a number of new members to the Commission, ren- dered that body rather unwieldy for the transaction of business, and a Com- mittee of Conference, consisting of members from the various delegations, was therefore chosen for the purpose of harmonizing, as far as possible, different views. This Committee, after a thorough review of the work previously done bT the Commission, reported that it would be inexpedient to make any mate- ri&l change in the plan already adopted. It recommended, however, in view of fhe large amount of labor likely to be imposed upon the secretaries, that two additional secretaries should be appointed. At the subsequent meeting of the Commission, Drs. William Goodell and Robert M. Bertolet were chosen to fill these positions, all the other officers being re-elected by acclamation. The Committee of Conference having done its work very satisfactorily, it Was thought well by the Commission that thenceforward the perfecting of the Plan of the Congress should be confided to a Committee op Arrangements,1 consisting of the following gentlemen, wdio were chosen chiefly on account of fhc interest which they had shown in the project: Drs. S. D. Gross, Edward _ artshorne, Washington L. Atlee, Albert Fricke, Laurence Turnbull, W. W. eetb I. Minis Hays, J. Solis Cohen, N. L, Hatfield, A. K. Minich, Thomas Ceo. Morton, George Strawbridge, William Goodell, John S. Parry, R. G. Curtin, John H. Packard, James H. Hutchinson, Louis A. Duhring, Alfred die, William Thomson, and Daniel G. Brinton. Prof. Gross was chairman 0f this Committee, and Dr. Wm. B. Atkinson acted as its secretary for the gieater part of the time during which it was in existence. The meetings of m Commission were after the appointment of this Committee very infrequent; 16 larger body being called together only to decide questions of special im- portance. A large and influential Executive Committee was also formed about this G’ bore upon its roll the names of many of the most eminent men of in various parts of the Union. q oltlcr to secure as full a representation from foreign lands as possible, a the !IlTTee 0f Invitation was soon after appointed, to which was entrusted toeCUty of electing the medical societies abroad, which should be requested ber&eUf delegates to the Congress, and also of designating the individual mem- Mueh tllG profession! Toth in this and other countries, who, by the eminence lc 1 tbey had attained in medical science, were entitled to the compliment of torial invitatl°n. A large number of sucll invitations was sent, and those gentlemen in this country were with very few exceptions accepted. Unfor- A Coin 1 6 tlm Committee. two other Committees were appointed at this time, viz., (1) delewamg1^66 finance, whose duty it was to collect funds for the entertainment of the Caspar°vy- and A Coramittee of Publication. The first Committee consisted of Drs. Albert H IStBr’- 'Lenox Hodge, Levi Curtis, Thomas Geo. Morton, T. Hewson Bache, never call Jan!es Tyson, and Charles H. Burnett. The second Committee was the actione f to^etber’ anct the selection of a Committee of Publication was thus left for the Congress when it should assemble. X THE CENTENNIAL MEDICAL COMMISSION. Innately, the loss of time and the great expense involved in a journey to Ame- rica, prevented as many of our foreign brethren from entertaining the idea of attending the Congress as had been hoped ; but the letters which they sent in answer, courteously acknowledged the compliment offered, and were expressive of the regret felt by the writers in being obliged to decline the invitation.1 In addition to the members specially invited, in our own country, it was finally agreed that delegates to the Congress should be received from the fol- lowing bodies : (1) The American Medical Association, one delegate for every State and Territory in the Union; (2) The Association of Medical Superin- tendents of American Institutions for the Insane, twenty delegates; (3) The State Medical Societies, each as many delegates as its State had representatives in the Congress of the United States ; (4) The Medical Staff of the Army, two delegates; (5) The Medical Staff of the Navy, two delegates ; (&) The Marine Hospital Service, two delegates ; (I) The American Public-Health Association, five delegates ; and (8) The American Association for the Cure of Inebriates, two delegates. All the members of the Centennial Medical Commission, includ- ing members of the Executive Committee, were considered delegates by virtue of their position in the Commission. The manner in which the officers of the Congress should be chosen, gave rise to some discussion in the Commission, some of the members holding that it would be a graceful compliment to bestow the Presidency upon a distinguished foreigner; but on the other hand, it was contended that it would be better to allow the Congress to select its own officers, and this view at length prevailed- It was made the duty of the President of the Commission to call the Congress to order when it should first meet, and, after welcoming the delegates, to appoint a Committee of Nominations, consisting of delegates from all parts of the world. It is, perhaps, needless to add, in concluding this short sketch of the labors of The Centennial Medical Commission of Philadelphia, and of its Com- mittees, that no pains were spared to render the visit of the delegates to the Congress a pleasant one, and that there is every reason to believe that the effort was not unsuccessful. 1 An invitation was sent by the Commission, in September, 1875, to the International Medical Congress, then in session at Brussels, to hold its next meeting in Philadelphia' While this invrfalion was courteously declined, the Congress adjourned over until the year 1877, in order to give all its members, who might wish to do so, an opportunity to attend the sessions of the Centennial Congress in this country, j OFFICERS OF THE CONGRESS. SAMUEL D. GROSS, M.D., LL.D., D.C.L. Oxon., PRESIDENT. OF PHILADELPHIA. / SSIDENTS. Jollifpe Tuenell, P.R.C.S., Ireland. Gf Lange, M.D., Denmark. William H. Kingston, M.D., Canada. H. Miyake, M.D., Japan. Michael Rudnew, M.D., Russia. Prop. Hueter, M.D., Germany. Frederick Semeleder, M.D., Austriar" Johan lljort, M.D., Norway. R. F. Hudson, M.D., Australia. . Pierre Debaisieux, M.D., Belgium. • William Adams, F.R.C.S., England. Alexander R. Simpson, M.D., Scotland. - ?AUI F- Eve, M.D., Tennessee. • L. Atlee, M.D., Pennsylvania. r J- E. Richardson, M.D., Louisiana. James p. White, M.D., New York, Nathan R. Smith, M.D., Maryland.- J- Toner, M.D., Dist. of Columbia. J” Johnson, M.D., Missouri. Hunter McGuire, M.D., Virginia. Jenry Gibbons, M.D., California. jtEorge L.Collins, M.D.,Rhode Island. Nathan S. Davis, M.D., Illinois. JOIIIS A* Hugas, M.D., Georgia. J. K. Bartlett, M.D., Wisconsin., HONORARY VICE-PRESIDENTS. Joseph K. Barnes, M.D., Joseph Beale, M.D., URGKON-GENERAL u.s. army. surgeon-general u.s. navy. TREASURER. Caspar Wister, M.D., OP PHILADELPHIA. SECRETARY-GENERAL. I. Minis Hays, M.D., OF PHILADELPHIA. secretaries op the meeting p ILLIAM B- Atkinson, M.D. vtCHARD J. Dunglison, M.D. Richard A. Cleemann, M.D. William W. Keen, M.D. R. M. Bertolet, M.D. COMMITTEE OF PUBLICATION. John Ashhuest, Jr., M.D. Ejchaed J. Dunglison, M.D. William Goodell, M.D. James H, Hutchinson, M.D. Caspae Wistee, M.D. JOHN ASHHURST, Jr., M.D., Chairman, and Editor or the Transactions. OFFICERS OF THE SECTIONS. SECTION ON MEDICINE, PRESIDENT. Alfred Stille, M.D., LL.D., OF PHILADELPHIA. R P. Howard, M.D OP MONTREAL. VICE-PRESIDENT S J. J. Woodward, M.D., SECRETARY. J. Ewing Meads, M.D., U. S. ARMY. OF PHILADELPHIA. SECTION ON BIOLOGY PRESIDENT. John 0. Dalton, M.D., OF NEWYORK. Austin Flint, Jr., M.D OF NEWYORK, VICE-PRESIDENTS. Francis W. Campbell, M.D., SECRETARY. James Tyson, M.D., OF MONTREAL. OP PHILADELPHIA. SECTION ON SURGERY. PRESIDENT. Joseph Lister, F.R.S., t . VICE-PRESIDENTS. U > A f'! op o ANT’ John Ashhurst, Jr., M.D., TTAWA. of PHILADELPHIA. OF EDINBURGH. SECRETARY. John H. Packard, M.D., OF PHILADELPHIA. SECTION on dermatology and syphilography, PRESIDENT. James 0. White, M.D. OF BOSTON. g -p VICE-PRESIDENTS. 0P copekhaq^S’'o'’ Edward Shippen, M.D., U. S. NAVY. SECRETARY. Arthur Yan Harlingen, M.D., OF PHILADELPHIA. XIV OFFICERS OF THE SECTIONS. SECTION ON OBSTETRICS. PRESIDENT. Egbert Barnes, M.D., VICE-PRESIDENTS. OF LONDON. Alexander E. Simpson, M.D., OF EDINBURGH. William H. Btford, M.B. OF CHICAGO. William Goodell, M.D., SECRETARY. OF PHILADELPHIA. SECTION ON OPHTHALMOLOGY. PRESIDENT. R. Brudenell Carter, F.R.0.5., OF LONDON. William Thomson, M.D OF PHILADELPHIA. VICE-PRESIDENTS. Henry W. Williams M.D., SECRETARY. OF BOSTON. John Green, M.D., OF ST. LOUIS. SECTION ON OTOLOGY, PRESIDENT. Clarence J. Blake, M.D., OF BOSTON. YICE-P RESIDENT. Albert H. Buck, M.D. OF NEW YORK. H. N. Spencer, M.D., OF ST. LOUIS. SECRETARY. SECTION ON SANITARY SCIENCE. PRESIDENT. Stephen Smith, M.D., VICE-PRESIDENT. John S. Billings, M.D OF NEW YORK. U. S. ARMY. Ezra M. Hunt, M.D., OF METUCHEN, NEW JERSEY SECRETARY. SECTION ON MENTAL DISEASES. PRESIDENT. John P. Gray, M.D., LL.D., OP NEW YORK. E. Grissom, M.D., OF NORTH CAROLINA. VICE-PRESIDENTS. Isaac Ray. M.D OP PHILADELPHIA. SECRETARY. Walter Kempster, M.D., OF WINNEBAGO, WISCONSIN. LIST of delegates and invited members, REGISTERED DURING THE MEETING OF THE CONGRESS. NAME. DELEGATE PROM • Abbott, M.D., Manchester, N. H. State Medical Society. Rliam Adams, F.R.C.S., London, England. Medical Society of London. Agnew, M.D., New York, N. Y. State Medical Society. • ayes Agnew, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission, j lißtson Allen, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. ’ • Anawalt, M.D., Greensburg, Pa. State Medical Society. illiam Anderson, M.D., Indiana, Pa. State Medical Society. BRam B. Arnold, M.D., Baltimore, Md. Medical and Chirurgical Fa- r culty of Maryland, SIrHURS,r5 Jr., M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission, jM' Atkinson, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. TLEE’ M.D., Lancaster, Pa. State Medical Society. H ApHINGTON B Atlee, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. Pr\n YR>ES’ Fort Wayne, Indiana. State Medical Society. HenCISLAC°N, Haven, Conn. American Medical Association. yy1LRY ahnson, M.1)., Salem, N. C. State Medical Society. Baieey, M.D., Albany, N. Y. State Medical Society. A. g * Bakrr, M.D., Lansing, Mich. State Medical Society. BoRDY(;UjpWrN’ Jacksonville, Fla. State Medical Society. John RE ARReri M.D., New York, N. Y. State Medical Society. Robert Vp Hublin, Ireland. Surgical Society of Ireland. ARNes, M.D., F.R.C.P., London, Eng- Royal Medical and Chirnrgi- [land. cal Society, and Obstetrical Bregorio iw Society °* London* - Rroeta, M.D., San Luis Potosi, Medical Society of San Luis Roberts B\r [Mexico. Potosi. Edwin W P TIIolow! M-D.,Cincinnati, Ohio. State Medical Society. J. K. Bart ARTLEtt? M.D., Milwaukee, Wis. State Medical Society. J. M. BarTtLETT’ Milwaukee, Wis. State Medical Society. RLETcHERTpN’ Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. P. W. Be ar EACH’ London, England. Invited member. C. E. Bear*™’ Vincennes5 Ind. State Medical Society. M,D.? Ottawa, Ohio. State Medical Society. LIST OF DELEGATES AND INVITED MEMBERS. XVI NAME. DELEGATE FROM John Bell, M.D., Montreal, Canada. Medico-Chirurgical Society of Montreal. R. M. Bertolet, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. John S. Billings, M.D., IT. S. A., Washington, American Public-Health Asso- [D. C. ciation. Clarence J. Blake, M.D., Boston, Mass. Invited member. A. Blitz, M.D., Nashville, Tenn. State Medical Society. F. Bogart, M.D., Sweetwater, Tenn. State Medical Society. Robert Bolling, M.D., Chestnut Hill, Pa. Centennial Commission. Aug. C. Bournonyille,M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. Henry I. Bowditch, M.D., Boston, Mass, American Medical Association. Richard C. Brandeis, M.D., Louisville, Ky. State Medical Society. John L. Bray, M.D., Chatham, Ont. Canada. Western and St. Clair Medical Society. A. L. Breysacher, M.D., Little Rock, Ark. State Medical Society. Geo. E. Brickett, M.D., Augusta, Me. State Medical Society. Charles E. Briggs, M.D., St. Louis, Mo. State Medical Society. John H. Brinton, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. Wm, Brodie, M.D., Detroit, Mich. State Medical Society. George W. Broome, M.D., Moberly, Mo. State Medical Society. W. H. Brouse, M.D., Prescott, Ont. Canada. Canada Medical Association, D. Tilden Brown, M.D., New York, N. Y. Association of Medical Super- intendents of American In- stitutions for the Insane. James H. Brownfield, M.D., Fairmount, W.Ya. State Medical Society. Geo. D. Bruce, M.D., Pittsburg, Pa. State Medical Society. T. Lauder Brunton, M.D., F.R.S., London, Medical Society of London. [England. Peter Bryce, M.D., Tuscaloosa, Ala. State Medical Society. Albert H. Buck, M.D., New York, N. Y. Centennial Commission. Frederick J. Buck, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. L. Duncan Bulkley, M.D., New York, N. Y. Centennial Commission. F. J. Bumstead, M.D., New York, N. Y. Centennial Commission. Francis Burdick, M.D., Johnstown, N. Y. State Medical Society. C. H, Burnett, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. Robert Burns, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission, David Burpee, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. George Burr, M.D., Binghamton, N. Y. State Medical Society. W. Burt, M.D., Paris, Ont. Canada. Branch County Medical Asso- ciation. Samuel C. Busey, M.D., Washington, D. C. Medical Society of the District of Columbia. W. Webster Butterfield, M.D., Indianapolis, State Medical Society. [lnd. James D. Button, M.D., Auburn, N. Y. State Medical Society. Wm. H. Byford, M.D., Chicago, 111. State Medical Society. A. W. Calhoun, M.D., Atlanta, Ga. State Medical Society. list of delegates and invited members. XVII ■p NAME. DELEGATE FROM W. Campbell, M.D.,Montreal, Canada. Invited member. lenry Fraser Campbell, M.D., Augusta, Ga. State Medical Society. J-A. Campbell, M.D., Grafton, W. Ya. State Medical Society. eeliam Cannier, M.D., Toronto, Canada, Canadian Medical Association. OHN Carpenter, M.D., Pottsville, Pa. State Medical Society. • seph Carson, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. American Medical Association. °bert Brudenell Carter, F.R.C.S., London, Royal Medical and Chirurgi- [England. cal Society, and Pathologi- cal Society of London. -Nk D. Castle, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. -g AllD T. Caswell, M.D., Providence, R. I. Centennial Commission. gT ’ Catlin, M.D., West Meriden, Conn. State Medical Society. c aneord E. Chaille, M.D.,New Orleans, La. Centennial Commission. Earence B. Church, M.D., Ottawa, Canada. Ottawa Medico-Chirurgical E W n Society. ' Lark, M.D., Grinnell, lowa. State Medical Society. ARD A. Cleemann, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission, j ’ ogswell, M.D., Bradford, Mass. State Medical Society. Ab CLIS Pohen’ At.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. Ge Coles, M.H., Newark, N. J. State Medical Society. Ja-E ewis Collins, M.D., Providence, R. I. State Medical Societ}-. Em\Eb Co^linss AI.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. PRpR ARD L°x, M.D., Battle Creek, Mich. State Medical Society. (jg VN(^IS L. Cunningham, M.D., Richmond, Ya. State Medical Society. R. CUPPLES’ San Antonio, Texas. State Medical Society, j * IjRTINi M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. urwen, M.D., Harrisburg, Pa. Association of Medical Super- j intendents, etc. j Losta, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. John Alton’ New York, N. Y. American Medical Association. 18’ Cincinnati, Ohio. State Medical Society. Richauj} T) AVIs’ ALD., Chicago, 111. American Medical Association. Pierre p) AVY’ L.R.C.S, London, England. Medical Society of London. Charles FBaisieuxs M.D., Louvain, Belgium. Belgian Government. John R H1^NIS°N’ Denver, Col. State Medical Society. Henry I) -p.Ksox’ H.D., Kingston, Out. Canada. Canada Medical Association. Stephen Syracuse, AT. Y. State Medical Society. J- Lewis Halifax, Nova Scotia. Dominion Medical Association, Greensville1 T)1’ erdt0’ a. State Medical Society. Thomas MDr °Well’ ALD., Galveston, Texas. State Medical Society.- Thomas S Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. Louis A Hug Y\ Hutherfordton, N. C. State Medical Society. J. J- Dugdale^M nD’’ AllgUsta’ Ga‘ State Meclical Society. ’ 1 *’ Montreal, Canada. Medico-Chirurgical Society of Louis A. Dumping At Montreal. H. J. DunglisoiTAT Philadelphia’ Pa- Centennial Commission. B ’ 1 Philadelphia, Pa. State Medical Society. LIST OF DELEGATES AND INVITED MEMBERS. NAME. DELEGATE FROM Alexander Dunlap, M.D., Springfield, Ohio. American Medical Association- Charles W. Earle, M.D., Chicago, 111. State Medical Society. S. Y. Earle, M.D., St. John, N. B. Canada Medical Association. J. C. Eastman, M.D., Hampstead, N. 11. State Medical Society. James H. Eldredge, M.D.,East Greenwich, R.I. State Medical Society. William Elmer, M.D., Bridgeton, N. J. Centennial Commission. S. Engelsted, M.D., Copenhagen, Denmark. Medical Society of Copenha- gen. J. A. Estlander, M.D., Helsingfors, Finland. Invited member. Joseph A. Eve, M.D., Augusta, Ga. State Medical Society. Paul P, Eye, M.D., Nashville, Tenn. Centennial Commission. David S. Fairchild, M.D., Ames, lowa. State Medical Society. Cyrus Falconer, M.D., Hamilton, Ohio. State Medical Society. P. J. Farnsworth, M.D., Clinton, lowa. State Medical Society. A. G-. Field, M.D., Des Moines, lowa. State Medical Society. William Finlay, M.D., Edinburgh, Scotland. Obstetrical Society of Edin- burgh. Emil Fischer, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. George Jackson Fisher, M.D., Sing Sing, N.Y. State Medical Society. Simon Fitch, M.D., St. John, N. 8., Canada. Invited member. Thomas Davis Fitch, M.D., Chicago, 111. State Medical Society. Thomas M. Flandreau, M.D., Rome, N. Y. State Medical Society. Austin Flint, M.D., New York, N. Y. American Medical Association- Austin Flint, Jr., M.D., New York, N. Y. State Medical Society. Daniel E. Foote, M.D., Belvidere, 111. State Medical Society. William H. Ford, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. William Fox, M.D., Madison, Wis. State Medical Society. Albert Fricke, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. John Frissell, M.D., Wheeling, W. Ya. State Medical Society. F. T. Fuller, M.D., Raleigh, N. C. Association of Medical Super- intendents, etc. Anatolede Gaine, M.D., St. Petersburg, Russia. Invited member. Frederic Henry Gerrish, M.D., Portland, Me, State Medical Society. Henry Gibbons, M.D., San Francisco, Cal. Centennial Commission. William Goodell, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. H. Earnest Goodman, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. Thomas W. Gordon, M.D., Georgetown, Ohio. State Medical Society. M. W. C. Gori, M.D., Amsterdam, Holland. Invited member. J. W. S. Gouley, M.D., New York, N. Y. State Medical Society. J. A. Grant, M.D., Ottawa, Canada. Canada Medical Association- John P. Gray, M.D., Utica, N. Y. State Medical Society. John Green, M.D., St. Louis, Mo. Centennial Commission. Traill Green, M.D., Easton, Pa. Centennial Commission. Wm. Warren Greene, M.D., Portland, Me. State Medical Society. .Samuel D. Gross, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. ,S. W. Gross, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. LIST OF DELEGATES AND INVITED MEMBERS. XIX NAME. DELEGATE FROM Francis M. Gunnell, M.D., U.S.N., Washing- Medical Staff, U. S. Navy. [ton, D. C. osiah Hale, M.D., Owensboro, Ky. State Medical Society. iiarles C. Hamilton, M.D., Cornwallis, Nova Canada Medical Association. _ [Scotia. ank Hastings Hamilton, M.D., New York, American Medical Association, j [N. Y. and State Medical Society. I) r ®AMilton? M.H., Columbus, Ohio. State Medical Society. Fi ‘ Hand, M.D., St. Paul, Minn. State Medical Society, p Hansen, M.D., Copenhagen, Denmark. Invited member. Harles J, Hare, M.D., F.R.C.P., London, Royal Medical and Chirurgi- [England. cal Society, and Pathologi- n cal Society of London, p oRge C. Harlan, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. LISHa Harris, M.D., New York, N. Y. American Public-Health Asso- rt elation. B pES Harrison, M.D., University of Ya. State Medical Society. ‘ Hart, M.D., Marietta, Ohio. State Medical Society. KEw Hartman, M.D., Baltimore, Md. Medical and Chirurgical Fa- jr culty of Maryland. ]y Hartshorne, M.D., Haverford Coll., Pa. Centennial Commission, j w Hatfield, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. \y jINIB Hays, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. ' Hddens, M.D., St. Joseph, Mo. State Medical Society. Ai rES Heitzmann> M.D., Hew York, N. Y. Invited member. ander Allan Henderson, M.D.,Ottawa, Ottawa Medico-Chirurgical George pTT [Canada. Society^ qllap ’ Hersey, M.D., Manchester, N. H. State Medical Society. Addin*58 Hewht, M.D., Red Wing, Minn. State Medical Society. ALBERELpi Ewson’ H.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. R P ' Heyl, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. Wm h lEt>RETH? M.D., Wheeling, W. Ya. State Medical Society. Homer IXgst°n, M.D., Montreal, Canada. Invited member. Johan Ijj ' ITchcook, M.D., Kalamazoo, Mich. State Medical Society. Edward RT Christiania, Norway. Medical Society of Christiania. Holder, M.D., P.R.C.S., Toronto, Invited member. H. Lenox Hod ■ , [Canada. John T Rod Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission, John H IT GEN’ H.D., St. Louis, Mo. American Medical Association. T. R HoL^ISrER’ H.D., Chicago, 111. State Medical Society. LiMEs, M.D.} Chatham, Ont. Canada. Western and St. Clair Medical 0. A H at Association. R. P. H^1’ * Lewiston, Me. State Medical Society. JqHN q H.D., Montreal, Canada. Invited member. Stephen pLTrBARD’ H-D., Ashtabula, Ohio. State Medical Society. R. p. Huds UEBAR:d’ M.D., New Haven, Conn. Centennial Commission. - -D., Ballarat, Australia. Medical Society of Victoria. XX LIST OF DELEGATES AND INVITED MEMBERS. NAME. DELEGATE FROM Prof. Hueter, M.D., Griefswald, GermanjL Med. Yerein fur Griefswald. C. H, Hughes, M.D., St. Louis, Mo. Association of Medical Super- intendents, etc. E. W. Hughes, M.D., Grenada, Miss. State Medical Society. J. C. Hughes, M.1)., Keokuk, lowa. State Medical Society. Edward R. Hun, M.D., Albany, X. Y. State Medical Society. Ezra M. Hunt, M.H., Metuchen, X. J. State Medical Society. William Hunt, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. John C. Hupp, M.D., Wheeling, W. Ya. Centennial Commission. A. Hurd, M.1)., Findlay, Ohio. State Medical Society. W. S. Huselton, M.D., Allegheny Citj’-, Pa. State Medical Society. Alexander Hutchins, M.H., Brooklyn, X. Y. State Medical Society. James H. Hutchinson, M.H., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. Joseph C. Hutchison, M.D., Brooklyn, X. Y. State Medical Society. Frederick Hyde, M.D., Cortland, X. Y. State Medical Society. Josias A. Ireland, M.D., Louisville, Ky. State Medical Societjv Wm. Irvin, M.D., Breakneck, Pa. State Medical Societ}r. T. Ishigouro, M.H., Tokio, Japan. Japanese Government. J. B. S. Jackson, M.1)., Boston, Mass. State Medical Society. Harvey Jewett, M.D., Canandaigua, X. Y. State Medical Society. P. A. Jewett, M.D., Xew Haven, Conn. State Medical Society. A. H. Johnson, M.D., Salem, Mass. State Medical Society. 11. A. Johnson, M.D., Chicago, 111. American Public-Health Asso- ciation. John C. Johnson, M.D., Blairstown, X. J. State Medical Society. Christopher Johnston, M.D., Baltimore, Md. Centennial Commission. Samuel J. Jones, M.D., Chicago, 111. State Medical Society. L. S. Joynes, M.D., Richmond, Ya. State Medical Society. W. W. Keen, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. Walter Kempster, M.D., Winnebago, Wis. Association of Medical Super- intendents, etc. H. X. Kendall, M.D., Quincy, 111. State Medical Society. J. G. Kerr, M.D., San Francisco, Cal. Invited member. E. L. Keyes, M.H., Xew York, X. Y. Invited member. S. B. Kieffer, M.D., Carlisle, Pa. State Medical Society. G. Kimball, M.H., Lowell, Mass. Invited member. C. B. King, M.D., Allegheny City, Pa. State Medical Society. R. A, Kinloch, M.D., Charleston, S. C. State Medical Society. Charles J. Kipp, M.D., Xewark, X. J. Invited member. Thomas S. Kirkbride, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. Daniel H. Kitchen, M.D., Xew York, X, Y. Association of Medical Super- intendents, etc. Herman Knapp, M.D., Xew York, X. Y. Invited member. W. A. Koukol de Yasnopolsky, M.D., Invited member. [St. Petersburg, Russia, C. Lange, M.D., Copenhagen, Denmark. Medical Society of Copenha- gen. LIST OF DELEGATES AND INVITED MEMBERS. XXI NAME. DELEGATE FROM Lemoine, M.D., St. Louis, Mo. State Medical Society. James Leslie, M.D., Hamilton, Ont. Canada. Hamilton Medical and Surgi- cal Society. James H. Letcher, M.D., Henderson, Ky. State Medical Society. an S. Lindsley, M.D., Nashville, Tenn. State Medical Society. Joseph Lister, F.R.S., Edinburgh, Scotland. University of Edinburgh, and Medico-Chirurgical Society of Edinburgh. Reward G. Loring, Jr., M.1)., New York, N. Y. Invited member. ILljam T. Lusk, M.H., New York, N. Y. Invited member. Jeered A. Lutkins, M.D., Jersey City, N. J. State Medical Society. _ Homas Lyon, M.D., Williamsport, Pa. State Medical Society. HN Deep Macdonald, M.D., Hamilton, Hamilton Medical and Surgi- [Ont. Canada. cal Society. rp Ijjl,laM J. McDowell, M.1)., Portsmouth, 0. State Medical Society. Heodore A. McGraw, M.D., Detroit, Mich. Centennial Commission, y UNter McGuire, M.D., Richmond, Ya. State Medical Society. y°HN Mr. Mcllhany, M.D., Warrenton, Ya. State Medical Society, yJIIN Mackie, M.D., New Bedford, Mass. State Medical Society. a. McKinnon, M.D., Selma, Ala. State Medical Society. i°Mas p. McLean, M.D., Goderich, Ont. County of Huron Medical As- p. [Canada. sociation. Tr McNary, M.D., Princeton, Ky. State Medical Society. T rf' ADI)IN5 M.D, Nashville, Tenn. American Medical Association. S* Ml M.D., Waco, Texas. State Medical Society. ARKs, M.D., Milwaukee, Wis. State Medical Society. lUs Mason, M.D., Prairie-du-Chien, Wis, State Medical Society. ’°dore L. Mason, M.D., Brooklyn, N. Y. American Association for Cure of Inebriates, p p S Mastin, M.D., Mobile, Ala. Centennial Commission. eAL7RY’ Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. J p^E * Mears, M.D., Indianapolis, Ind. Centennial Commission. James EARS’ M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. Marcos ITK:EN Meigs, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. DE J. Melero, M.D., Havana, Cuba. La Real Sociedad Economica de Amigos del Pais, Ha- ll. p. \r vanna. Tiioh a EERIMANi M.D., Chicago, 111. State Medical Society. Sp *Miohablb. M.D., Richmond, Ya. State Medical Society. Andre * Miner, M.D., Buffalo, N. Y. State Medical Society. pRANcW M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. H. Miyv INoL M.D., Boston, Mass. State Medical Society. John Tokio, Japan. Japanese Government. 1 onmonier, M.D., Baltimore, Md. Medical and Chirurgical Fa- M. Moore un p , oulty of Maryland. Geo. R. ’ I*’ Uoehester, N. Y. American Medical Association. orehouse, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. XXII LIST OF DELEGATES AND INVITED MEMBERS. NAME. DELEGATE FROM Thomas G-. Morton, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. Alexander B. Mott, M.D., New York, N. Y. Invited member. R. B. Mowry, M.D., Allegheny City, Pa. Invited member. Pall F. Munde, M.D., New York, N. Y. Invited member. H. J. Murphy, M.D., Chatham, Out. Canada. Western and St. Clair Medi- cal Association. George Murray, M.D., New Glasgow, Nova Medical Society of Nova [Scotia. Scotia. Robert I). Murray, M.D., Keywest, Fla. Centennial Commission. S. Nagayo, M.D., Tokio, Japan. Japanese Government. Andrew Nebinger, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. William B. Neftel, M.D., New York, N. Y. Invited member. Charles 11. Nichols, M.D., Washington, D. C. Association of Medical Super- intendents, etc. R. J. Nunn, M.D., Savannah, Ga. State Medical Society. John A. Octerlony, M.8., Louisville, Ky. State Medical Society. Michael O’Hara, M.U., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. Wm. Oldright, M.D., Toronto, Canada. Canada Medical Association. 11. L. Orth, M.D., Harrisburg, Pa, State Medical Society. J. W. D. Osgood, M.D., Greenfield, Mass. State Medical Society. George A. Otis, M.D., U. S. A., Washington, American Medical Association. [D. C. John E. Owens, M.D., Chicago, 111. State Medical Society. John H. Packard, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. Wm. H. Pancoast, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. Edward H. Parker, M.D., Poughkeepsie, N. Y. State Medical Society. Joseph Parrish, M.D., Burlington, N. J. American Association for Cure of Inebriates. Theophilus Paryin, M I),, Indianapolis, Ind. State Medical Society. R. S. Payne, M.D., Lynchburg, Ya. State Medical Society. Enoch Pearce, Jr., M.D., Steubenville, Ohio. State Medical Society. E. R. Peaslee, M.D., New York, N. Y. Centennial Commission. William Pepper, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. W. 11. Philips, M.D., Kenton, Ohio. State Medical Society. Gideon L. Platt, M.D., Waterbury, Conn. State Medical Society. A. M. Pollock, M.D., Pittsburg, Pa. American Medical Association* J. 11. Pooley, M.D., Columbus, Ohio. State Medical Society. Charles 11. Porter, M.D., Albany, N. Y. State Medical Society. 1). R. Porter, M.D., Kansas City, Mo. State Medical Society. Isaac G. Porter, M.D., New London, Conn, Invited member. Wm. G. Porter, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. Alfred C. Post, M.D., New York, N. Y. Invited member. Edwin Powell, M.D., Chicago, 111. State Medical Society. Hayid Prince, M.D., Jacksonville, 111. State Medical Society. J. S. Prout, M.D., Brooklyn, N. Y. Invited member. Samuel S. Purple, M.D., New York, N. Y. Invited member. Sumner Putnam, M.D., Montpelier, Yt. State Medical Society. LIST OF DELEGATES AND INVITED MEMBERS. xxiii NAME. DELEGATE FROM R* Rawson, M.D., Buenos Ayres, Argentine Medical Association of Buenos [Republic. Ayres. Haac Ray, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Association of Medical Super- intendents, etc. H S. Rayeield, M.D., Jefferson, Texas. State Medical Society. H. Read, M.D., Norwalk, Ohio. State Medical Society. rn 77 7 * 1 Ho mas B, Reed, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. James T. Reeve, M.8., Appleton, Wis. State Medical Society. James E. Reeves, M.D., Wheeling, W. Ya. Centennial Commission. Alexander P. Reid, M.D., Halifax, Nova Medical Society of Nova [Scotia, Canada. Scotia. Holey S. Reynolds, M.D., Louisville, Ky. State Medical Society. EoRqe A. Rex, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission, rp SEph O. Richardson, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. Richardson, M.D., New Orleans, La. Centennial Commission, j. * Richardson M.D., Montrose, Pa. State Medical Society. V Rhihe, M.8., Camden, N. J. State Medical Society. • R* Risley, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. COB Roberts, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. • Robertson, M.D., Edinburgh, Scot- Medico-Chirurgical Society of [land. Edinburgh. j,AVrD Robertson, M.D., Milton, Out. Canada. Canada Medical Association. p' R°billard, M.D., Montreal, Canada. Invited member. ames D. Robison, M.D., Wooster, Ohio. State Medical Society. Ho mas P. Rochester, M.D., Buffalo, N. Y. State Medical Society. Robert E. Rogers, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. J' * Rosebrugh, M.D., Toronto, Canada. Canada Medical Association. • Rosebrugh, M.D., Hamilton, Canada. Hamilton Medical and Snrgi- j cal Society. Tor ES R°ss, M.D., Toronto, Canada. Canada Medical Association. « onji r» r> ’ jg . ‘ K°ss, M.D.,Williamsburg, Pa. State Medical Society. MiCh M.D., Montreal, Canada. Invited member. y/Y Rhhnew, M.D., St. Petersburg, Russia. Russian Government. ‘ Rhschenberger, M.D., U. S. N., Centennial Commission, Gordon W r> [Philadelphia, Pa. JRa PiLT ‘ Rhssell, M.D., Hartford, Conn, State Medical Society. John Winchendon, Mass. State Medical Society. Thom vs P V-LSSEII’ M.D., Mt. Yernon, Ohio. State Medical Society. Thomas E IJSSEIl’ M.D., Oshkosh, Wisconsin. State Medical Society. J Ward Satterthwaite, M.D., New Centennial Commission. Williams* [York, N. Y. Le\vls a A^Ery5 M.D., Bryn Mawr, Pa, State Medical Society. Henry s' AYRe’ H.D., New York, N. Y. Centennial Commission. James m GHell’ H. 1)., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. W. Scot’* yCOTT’ St. Louis, Mo. State Medical Society. eve^antG Ghi°- State Medical Society. eguin, M.D., New York, N. Y. American Medical Association XXIV LIST OF DELEGATES AND INVITED MEMBERS. NAME. DEIjEGATE FROM Amos Seip, M.D., Easton, Pa. State Medical Society. Frederick Semeleder, M.D., Vienna, Austria. Invited member. N. Senn, M.D., Milwaukee, Wis. State Medical Society. Leopold Seryais, M.D., Antwerp, Belgium. Belgian Government. Edward 0. Shakespeare, M.D., Philadelphia, Centennial Commission. [Pa. Charles Shepard, M.D., Grand Rapids, Mich. State Medical Society. B. F. Sherman, M.D., Ogdensburg, N. Y. State Medical Society. Edward Shippen, M.D., U.S.N., Philadelphia, Medical Staff, United States [Pa. Navy. J. H. Shout, M.D., Las Yegas, New Mexico. Medical Society of New Mexico. George E. Shuttleworth, M.D., Lancaster, Invited member. [England. Alexander R. Simpson, M.D., Edinburgh, University of Edinburgh, and [Scotland, Obstetrical Society of Edin- burgh. Wharton Sinkler, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. Henry M. Skillman, M.D., Lexington, Ky. State Medical Society. Albert H. Smith, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. Ashbel Smith, M.D., Houston, Texas. State Medical Society. David P. Smith, M.D., Springfield, Mass. State Medical Society. Eugene Smith, M.D., Detroit, Michigan. State Medical Society. Heber Smith, M.D., Stapleton, N. Y. United States Marine-Hospital Service. J. Lewis Smith, M.D., New York, N. Y. Centennial Commission. Joel W. Smith, M.D., Charles City, lowa. State Medical Society. Joseph R. Smith, M.D., U. S. A., Fort Monroe, Medical Staff, United States [ Y a. Army. Francis G. Smyth, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. Edwin M, Snow, M.D., Providence, R. I. Centennial Commission. S. Fleet Speir, M.D., Brooklyn, N. Y. Invited member. H. N. Spencer, M.D., St. Louis, Mo. State Medical Society. Edward R. Squibb, M.D., Brooklyn, N. Y. State Medical Society. A. J. Steele, M.D., St. Louis, Mo. State Medical Society. Lewis H, Steiner, M.D., Frederick City, Md. American Public-Health As- sociation, and Medical and Chirurgical Faculty ofMary- land. George T. Stevens, M.D., Albany, N. Y. Invited member. James A. Steuart, M.D., Baltimore, Md. Medical and Chirurgical Fa- culty of Maryland. J. L. Stewart, M.D., Erie, Pa. State Medical Society. Alfred Stille, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. Joseph A. Stilwell, M.D., Brownstown, Ind. State Medical Society. Barton Warren Stone, M.D., Hopkinsville, Association of Medical Super- [Ky. intendents, etc. LIST OF DELEGATES AND INVITED MEMBERS, XXV name. delegate from George Strawbridge, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. S. S. Stryker, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. Absalom B. Stuart, M.D., Winona, Minn. State Medical Society. D. F. Stuart, M.D., Houston, Texas. State Medical Society. G. E. Sussdorfp, M.D., Macon, Georgia. State Medical Society. George Sutton, M.D., Aurora, Ind. State Medical Societ}'. Joseph Swartz, M.D., Duncannon, Pa. State Medical Society. V. H. Taliaferro, M.D., Atlanta, Ga. State Medical Society. B. W. Taylor, M.D., Columbia, S. C. State Medical Society. M. A. Taylor, M.D., Austin City, Texas. State Medical Society. R. W, Taylor, M.D., New York, N. Y. Centennial Commission. Lake J. Tefft, M.1)., Syracuse, N. Y. State Medical Society. S. H. Tewksbury, M.D., Portland, Me. State Medical Society. ■William Thomson, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. James Thorburn, M.D., Toronto, Canada. Invited member. F. Walton Todd, M.D., Stockton, Cal. State Medical Society. S. S. Todd, M.D., Kansas City, Mo. State Medical Society. Joseph M. Toner, M.D., Washington, D. C. American Public-Health As- sociation. Edward H. Trenholme, M.D., Montreal, Medico-Chirurgical Society of [Canada. Montreal. Jolliffe Tufnell, F.R.C.S., Dublin, Ireland. Surgical Society and Patholo- gical Society of Ireland. Horace Tupper, M.D., Bay City, Mich. State Medical Society. Charles S. Turnbull, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. Laurence Turnbull, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. State Medical Society. Edward Berriam Turnipseed, M.D., Colum- State Medical Society. [bia, S. C. James Tyson, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. G. Underwood, M.D., Pittston, Pa. State Medical Society. William H. Yanßuren, M.D., New York, N. Y. Invited member. Joseph H.Yandeman,M.D., Chattanooga,Tenn. State Medical Society. S. Oakley Yanderpoel, M.D., Stapleton, N. Y. State Medical Society. Arthur Yan Harlingen, M.D., Philadelphia, Centennial Commission. [Pa. Thomas H. Yan Yalzah, M.D., Lewiston, Pa. State Medical Society. Theodore R. Yarick, M.D., Jersey City, N. J. Centennial Commission. Alexander M. Yedder, M.D., Schenectady, State Medical Society. [N. Y. H. D. Yosburgh, M.D., Lyons, N. Y. State Medical Society. Clement A. Walker, M.D., Boston, Mass. Association of Medical Super- intendents, etc. James P. Walker, M.D., Mason City, 111. State Medical Society. Charles D. Watson, M.D., Covington, Ind. State Medical Society. Wm. Watson, M.D., Dubuque, lowa. State Medical Society. \y. Murray Weidman, M.D., Reading, Pa. State Medical Society. Faneuil D. Weisse, M.D., New York, N. Y. Centennial Commission. XXVI LIST OF DELEGATES AND INVITED MEMBERS. NAME. DELEGATE FROM James C. White, M.D., Boston, Muss. Centennial Commission. James P. White, M.D., Buffalo, N. Y. State Medical Society. Luther C. White, M.T)., Yan Buren, Ark. State Medical Society. George Wilkins, M.D., Montreal, Canada. Canada Medical Association. I)e Forest Willard, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. E. Williams, M.D., Cincinnati, Ohio. State Medical Society. Henry W. Williams, M.D., Boston, Mass. Invited member. J. M. Willis, M.D., Waco, Texas. State Medical Society. Ellwood Wilson, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. F. X. Wise, M.D., Covington, Ky. Invited member. Caspar Wister, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. Horatio C. Wood, Jr., M.T)., Philadelphia, Pa. Centennial Commission. H, D. Wood, M.D., Angola, Ind. State Medical Society. Alfred H. Woodill, M.D., Halifax, Xova Halifax County Medical So- [Scotia. ciety. Ashbel Woodward, M.D., Franklin, Conn. State Medical Society. J. J. Woodward, M.D., U. S. A., Washington, Medical Staff, United States [D. C. Army. John M. Woodworth, M.H., Washington, D. C. Centennial Commission. Algernon Woolverton, M.D., Hamilton, Ont. Hamilton Medical and Surgi- [Canada. cal Society. Theo. G. Wormley, M.D., Columbus, Ohio. Centennial Commission, Fred. H. Wright, M.D., Toronto, Ont., Canada. Canada Medical Association. Henry P. Wright, M.D., Ottawa, Canada. Ottawa Medical Chirurgical Society. R. F. Wright, M.D., Dalton, Ga. State Medical Society. Lunsford P. Yandell, M.D., Louisville, Ky. State Medical Society. H. P. Yeomans, M.D., Mt. Forest, Ont. Canada. Canada Medical Association. TABLE OF CONTENTS. Preface The Centennial Medical Commission and the International Medical Congress. By James H. Hutchinson, A.M., M.D., of Philadelphia .... vu List of Officers of the Congress List of Officers of Sections XIU List of Delegates and Invited Members xx List of Illustrations • xxxu Address of Welcome. By S. D. Gross, M.D., LL.D., D.C.L. Oxon., President of the Centennial Medical Commission » Minutes of the General Sessions xxxvu Notice addresses. I. R Address on Medicine and Medical Progress in the United States. By Am™ Flint, M.D., Professor of the Principles and Practice of Medicine, and Clinical Medicine, in Bellevue Hospital Medical College, New A ork . . • • 1 11. Address on Hygiene and Preventive Medicine. By Henry I. Bowditch, M.D., President of the, State Board of Health of Massachusetts . • • • Zi 111. Address on Medical Chemistry and Toxicology. By Theo. G. Wormley, M.D., Ph.D., LL.D., Professor of Chemistry and Toxicology m Starling Medical Pol- lege, Columbus, Ohio ' IY. Address on Surgery. By Paul F. Eve, M.D., Professor of Operative and Clinical Surgery in the University of Nashville V. Address on Medical Biography. By J. M. Toner, M.D., of Washington, D. 0. 91 YI. Address on Obstetrics. By Theophilus Parvin, M.D., Professor of Obstetrics and the Medical and Surgical Diseases of Women, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Indiana * 18 YII. Address on Medical Jurisprudence. With Notes and a Bibliographical Appen- dix. By Stanford E. Chaille. A.M., M.D., Professor of Physiology and 1 atho- logical Anatomy in the Medical Department of the University ol Louisiana . 167 VIII. Address on Mental Hygiene. By John P. Gray, M.D., LL.D., Medical Superintendent of the New York State Lunatic Asylum. Utica; Professor ot Psychological Medicine and Jurisprudence in Bellevue Hospital Medical College, New York IX. Address on American Medical Literature. By Lunsford Pitts Yandell, M.D., of Louisville, Kentucky • • • • • • 2-3 X Address on the Progress of Medical Education in the United States of America, during the Century commencing in 1776. By N. S. Davis, A.M., M.D., of _ Chicago, Illinois .....••••••■• 233 XI. Address on the Medical Staff of the United States Army, and its Scientific Work. By J. J. Woodward, M.D., Surgeon, United States Army .... 286 CONTENTS. SECTION ON MEDICINE. ART. PAGE XII. Typho-Malarial Fever; is it a Special Type of Fever? By J. J. Woodward, M.D., Surgeon, United States Army 305 XIII. Are Diphtheritic and Pseudo-Membranous Croup Identical or Distinct Affec- tions ? By J. Lewis Smith, M.D., Physician to the Infant Hospital, New York, etc 341 XIY. Do the Conditions of Modern Life favor specially the Development of Nervous Diseases? By Roberts Bartholow. M.A., M.D., Professor of the Theory and Practice of Medicine in the Medical College of Ohio 366 XY. Contribution to the Etiology of Epilepsy. By William B. Neftel, M.D., of New York . 378 XYI. The Influence of High Altitudes on the Progress of Phthisis. By Charles Denison, A.M., M.D., of Denver, Colorado ....... 387 XYII. On the Treatment of Simple Ulcer of the Stomach. By M. Le Docteur H. Lebert, of Yevey; formerly Professor of Clinical Medicine at Zurich and Breslau. Translated by Charles Winslow Dulles, M.D., of Philadelphia . 424 XYIII. Cases of Pernicious Progressive Ansemia, with some Observations upon the Ante-and Post-mortem Conditions observed in that Affection. By R. P. Howard, M.D., L.R.C.K., Professor of Medicine in the McGill University, Canada . . 432 XIX. Alcohol in its Therapeutic Relations as a Pood and as a Medicine. By Ezra M. Hunt, M.D., of Metuchen, N. J 452 XX. Report of Investigations made under the Direction of Professor Rudnew at the Institute of Pathological Anatomy of St. Petersburg. Communicated by Pro- fessor Rudnew 462 SECTION ON BIOLOOY. SECTION ON BIOLOOY. XXI. The Microscopy of the Blood. By Christopher Johnston, M.D., of Balti- more, Md. 467 XXII. The Excretory Function of the Liver. By Austin Flint, Jr., M.D., Pro- fessor of Physiology and Physiological Anatomy in the Bellevue Hospital Medi- cal College, New York 489 XXIII. Report of Investigations made under the Direction of Professor Zayarikini, at the Institute of Normal Histology of St. Petersburg. Communicated by Professor Rudnew 503 XXIY. On Fungous Growths in Solutions for Hypodermic Medication, and their Prevention by Salicylic Acid. By Joseph G. Richardson, M.D., Attending Physician to the Presbyterian Hospital, Philadelphia 506 XXY. The Mechanism of Joints. By Harrison Allen, M.D., Professor of Com- parative Anatomy and Zoology in the University of Pennsylvania, Surgeon to the Philadelphia Hospital, Surgeon to St. Joseph’s Hospital, etc. . . . 510 SECTION ON SURGERY. SECTION ON SURGERY. XXYI. Antiseptic Surgery. By John T. Hodgen, M.D., Professor of Surgical Anatomy and of Fractures and Dislocations in the St. Louis Medical College, St. Louis, Mo 518 XXYII. Antiseptic Surgery. Report of Remarks made before the Surgical Section, during the Adjourned Discussion on Dr. Hodgen’s Paper. By Joseph Lister, F.R.S., Professor of Clinical Surgery in the University of Edinburgh. (Presi- XXYIII. The Treatment of Aneurism. By W. H. Yan Buren, A.M., M.D., Pro- fessor of the Principles and Practice of Surgery in the Bellevue Hospital Medical College, New York 545 dent of the Section.) 535 XXIX. The Pathology and Treatment of Morbus Coxarius. By Lewis A, Sayre, M.D., Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery and of Fractures and Dislocations in the Bellevue Hospital Medical College, New York, etc 575 CONTENTS, XXIX ART. _ ... . PAGE XXX. Report of a Case of Sub-periosteal Excision and Disarticulation of the entire Inferior Maxillary Bone for Phosphorus Necrosis. By John W. S. Gouley, M.D., Professor of Diseases of the Genito-Urinary System in the Medical Department of the University of New York, Surgeon to Bellevue Hospital, etc. . . . 605 XXXI. The Causes and Geographical Distribution of Calculous Diseases. By Claudius H. Mastin, M.D., of Mobile, Alabama 609 XXXII. Subcutaneous Division of the Neck of the Thigh-Bone for Anchylosis at the Hip-Joint. By William Adams, F.R.C.S., President of the Medical Society of London, etc. . 624 XXXIII. Remarks upon Penetrating Wounds of the Abdomen, with the Suggestion of a change of Practice in such Cases. By L. A. Dugas, M.D., LL.D., Pro- fessor of Surgery in the Medical College of Georgia 631 XXXIY. On Opening the Sac in Herniotomy. By Frederick Hyde, M.D., of Cort- land, New York 634 XXXY. Some Comments on the History of Nitrous-Oxide Gas as an Anaesthetic, and on the Analgesic Effects of Rapid Breathing. By Addinell Hewson, M.D., Surgeon to the Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia 642 XXXYI. Observations on the Temperature of Osteo-sarcoma. By Prof. J. A Est- lander, M.D., of Helsingfors, Finland 658 XXXVII. On Stone in the Bladder in Finland. By Prof. J. A. Bstlander, M.D., of Helsingfors, Finland ........... 662 SECTION ON DERMATOLOGY AND SYPHILOGRAPHY. XXXYIII. Variations in Type and in Prevalence of Diseases of the Skin in Different Countries of Equal Civilization. By James 0. White, M.D., Professor of Der- matology in Harvard University 665 XXXIX. Verrugas, a Disease Peculiar to Peru. By George A. Ward, M.D., Medical Director of the Oroya Railway. [Communicated by the Secretary.] . 685 XL. Are Eczema and Psoriasis Local Diseases of the Skin, or are they Manifestations of Constitutional Disorders? By L. Duncan Bulklry, A.M., M.D., Physician XLI. The Virus of Venereal Sores, its Unity or Duality. By Freeman J. Bum- stead, M.D., late Professor of Venereal Diseases in the College ot Physicians and Surgeons, New York . . . . . . . . • ■ . /08 to the Skin Department, Demilt Dispensary, New York, etc 691 XLII. Leprosy as Observed in the Sandwich Islands. By Frank H. Enders, M.D., Government Physician. [Communicated by the Secretary.] .... 711 XLIII. On the Treatment of Seborrhoea. By C. Heitzmann, M.D., of New York City XLIV. The Treatment of Syphilis, with Special Reference to the Constitutional Remedies appropriate to its Various Stages, the Duration of their Use, and the Question of their Continuous or Intermittent Employment. By Edward L. Keyes, M.D., Professor of Dermatology in the Bellevue Hospital Medical College, New York 726 XLV. The Treatment of Syphilis. By Charles R. Drysdale, M.D., Senior Physi- cian to the Metropolitan Free Hospital, Physician to the Bolsover Street Lock Hospital, London. [Communicated by the Secretary.] ..... 741 XLVI. Measures adopted in Denmark to Prevent the Spread of Venereal Disease. By S. Engelsted, M.D., Physician-in-Chief to the Copenhagen Hospital . . 745 SECTION ON OBSTETRICS. XLVII. The Causes and Treatment of Non-Puerperal Hemorrhages of the Womb. By William H. Byford, M.D., Professor of Obstetrics and Diseases of Women in the Chicago Medical College 762 XLVIII. The Mechanism of Natural and of Artificial Labor in Narrow Pelves. By William Goodell, A.M., M.D., Clinical Professor of the Diseases of Women and of Children in the University of Pennsylvania 777 XXX CONTEXTS. ART. . . . . PAGE XLIX. The Management of Convulsions, in Children, depending upon a High Tern- perature of the Body. By T. IC. Holmes, M.H., of Chatham, Ontario, Canada . (96 L. Ovariotomy by Enucleation. By Julius F. Miner, M.D., Professor of Special LI. The Treatment of Fibroid Tumors of the Uterus. By Washington L. Atlee, M.D., of Philadelphia 808 and Clinical Surgery in the Medical Department of the University of Buffalo . 801 LII. The Three Most Important Obstetrical Instruments. By T. Lazarewitch, M.D., Professor of Clinical Midwifery and Diseases of Women, and Director of the Gynaecological Clinique, in Kharkoff, Russia. [Communicated by the Secre- tary.] 827 Fill. On the Nature, Origin, and Prevention of Puerperal Fever By W. T Lusk M.D., Professor of Obstetrics and Diseases of Children in the Bellevue Hospital Medical College, New York 829 LIT. On Electrolysis, with Special Reference to the Treatment of Ovarian Cysts. By Frederick Semeleder, M.D., of Vienna 859 LY. Paracentesis, Aspiration, and Transfusion. By Simon Fitch, A.M., M.D. Edin., of St. John, New Brunswick, Canada 862 LYI. Uterine Hemorrhage during Gestation. By E. H. Trenholme, M.D., 8.C.L., Professor of Midwifery and Diseases of Women and Children in Bishop’s College, Montreal; Attending* Physician to the Woman’s Hospital; Fellow of the Obstet- rical Society of London, etc 870 LYII. Chronic Inversion of the Uterus. By James P. White. M.D., Professor of LYIII. Case of Retroversion of the Gravid Uterus; Treatment by Puncture; Reco- very. By Thomas F. Rochester, M.D., Professor of Principles and Practice of Obstetrics in the Medical Department of the University of Buffalo . . ■ 873 Medicine in the Medical Department of the University of Buffalo . ' • 890 SECTION ON OPHTHALMOLOGY. SECTION ON OPHTHALMOLOGY. LIX On the Comparative Value of Caustics and Astringents in the Treatment of Diseases of the Conjunctiva, and on the best mode of applying these Remedies By Henry W. Williams, A.M., M.D., Professor of Ophthalmology in Harvard University • • ' • • 1 ' • LX. On Tumors of the Optic Nerve. By H. Knapp, M.D., of New York . . 905 LXI. Orbital Aneurismal Disease and Pulsating Exophthalmia; their Diagnosis and Treatment. By E. Williams, M.D., Professor of Ophthalmology in Miami Medical College, Cincinnati . . 912 LXII. Spontaneous Cure of Congenital Pulsating Exophthalmos. By George C. Harlan, M.D., Surgeon to Wills Hospital, Ophthalmic and Aural Surgeon to the Children’s Hospital, Philadelphia . 921 LXIII. Are Progressive Myopia and Conus (Posterior Staphyloma^due to Heredi- tary Predisposition, or can they be induced by Defect of Retraction acting through the Influence of the Ciliary Muscle? By Edward L. Loring, Jr., M.D., of New York . • • • • • • • * ‘ ‘ * LXIY. On the Relations between Corneal Diseases and Refractive Lesions of the Bye. By George T. Stevens, M.D., of Albany, N. Y 942 SECTION ON OTOLOGY. SECTION ON OTOLOGY. LXV. The Importance of Treatment of Aural Diseases in their Early Stages, espe- cially when arising from the Exanthemata. By Albert H. Buck, M.D., o ew York ' LXYI. On the Best Means of Testing the Hearing. By Charles H. Burnett, M. D., Aural Surgeon to the Presbyterian Hospital, Philadelphia . • • LXYII. The Function and Utility of the Artificial Drum-Membrane. By H. N. Spencer. M.D., of St. Louis 1 CONTENTS. XXXI ART. , PAGE LXYIII. Modifications of the Methods of Treating Chronic Non-Suppurative Inflam- mation of the Eustachian Tube and Middle Ear. By Samuel J. Jones, A.M., M.D., Professor of Ophthalmology and Otology in the Chicago Medical College 988 LXIX. On the Best Mode of Testing the Hearing of School Children, and of Pro- viding for the Instruction of Partially Deaf Children. By Clarence J. Blake, M.D., Instructor in Otology in Harvard University 992 LXX. On Aural Vertigo with Variable Hearing. By Charles H. Burnett, M.D., Aural Surgeon to the Presbyterian Hospital, Philadelphia .... 1000 LXXI. On the Several Methods of Educating, and on the Selection of Proper Schools for, the Deaf and Dumb. By Laurence Turnbull, M.D., Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science; Aural Surgeon to Jefferson College Hospital; Physician to the Department of Diseases of the Bye and Ear, Howard Hospital, Philadelphia ........ 1004 LXXII. On Bathing, Swimming, and Diving, as Causes of Aural Disease. By Laurence Turnbull, M.D., Fellow of the American Association for the Ad- vancement of Science; Aural Surgeon to Jefferson College Hospital; Physician to the Department of Diseases of the Eye and Bar, Howard Hospital, Phila- delphia .............. 1008 SECTION ON SANITARY SCIENCE, LXXIII. The Present Condition of the Evidence concerning “Disease-Germs.” By Thomas E. Satterthwaite, M.D., of New York 1011 LXXIV. Vital Statistics of Buenos Ayres. By G. Rawson, M.D., of Buenos Ayres 1029 LXXV. The General Subject of Quarantine, with Particular Reference to Cholera and Yellow Fever. By John M. Woodworth, A.M., M.D., Supervising Surgeon- General, United States Mercantile Marine-Hospital Service .... 1059 LXXVI. A Universal Pharmacopoeia. By Edward R. Squibb, M.D., of Brooklyn 1072 LXXVII. The Relations of the Pharmacist to the Medical Profession. By Ezra M. Hunt, M.D., of Metuchen, New Jersey 1075 SECTION ON MENTAL DISEASES. LXXVIII. The Microscopic Study of the Brain. By Walter Kempster, M.D., Physician and Superintendent of the Northern Hospital for the insane, Oshkosh, Wisconsin 1083 LXXIX. The Responsibility of the Insane for their Criminal Acts. By Isaac Ray, M.D., of Philadelphia . . . , ... . . . • • 1097 LXXX. The Simulation of Insanity by the Insane. By C. H. Hughes, M.D., late Superintendent and Physician of the Missouri State Lunatic Asylum . .1110 LXXXI. On the Best Mode of Providing for the Subjects of Chronic Insanity. By Charles H. Nichols, M.D., Superintendent of the Government Hospital for the Insane, Washington, D. 0. . . . . • • • • • 1127 Index 1145 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS. PAGE Cell Wall of Eed Blood-Corpuscles. Figs. 1 and 2. (Dr. J. G. Eichardson) . . 488 Stercorine from Normal Human Feces, (Dr. Austin Flint, Jr.) .... 496 PatLology and Treatment of Morbus Coxarius. Figs. 1-22. (Dr. L. A. Sayre) 577-596 Ovariotomy by Enucleation. (Dr. Julius F. Miner) 803 Paracentesis, Aspiration, and Transfusion. Figs. 1-6. (Dr. Simon Fitch) . . 866 Chronic Inversion of the Uterus. Figs. 1-6. (Dr. James P. White) . . 880-884 Progressive Myopia and Conus, Fig. 1 and Tables 1-4. (Dr. Edward G. Loring, Jr.) 927-930 Methods of Treating Inflammation of the Eustachian Tube, etc. Figs. 1-6. (Dr. Samuel J. Jones) 989-990 ADDRESS OF WELCOME. BY S. D. GROSS, M.D., LL.D., D.C.L. Oxon., PRESIDENT OF THE CENTENNIAL MEDICAL COMMISSION. Gentlemen of the International Medical Congress:— My colleagues have confided to me, as President of the Centennial Medical Commission, the agreeable and honorable duty of opening this International Medical Congress, so long the object of their solicitude and earnest labor. In their name, then, as well as in my own and in that of the entire American medical profession, whose great heart this day throbs in unison with ours, I extend to you the right hand, and bid you a thrice cordial welcome to the “ City of Brotherly Love.” The occasion which has brought us together this morning is one of no ordinary kind ; it is one also which has been long and, I may add, anxiously anticipated. It might, perhaps, seem ungracious if I were to tell you how much time and labor have been bestowed by the Commission, through its Committee of Arrangements, upon the organization of the Congress ; how often it has met to devise plans and interchange views; how earnestly and thoughtfully it has performed its work; in a word, how faithfully and con- scientiously it has discharged the great trust confided to it by the different medical bodies of the city and county of Philadelphia, in which, nearly two years ago, the Congress originated. Not a little embarrassment has often attended our progress; and it has, therefore, not been without a profound sense of relief, such as a weary traveller may be supposed to experience at the end of a long and tedious journey, that at length we have found that our task has been brought to a successful close. If the organization is less complete than to some of you it may seem to be, no blame will, I am sure, be ascribed to the Commis- sion on account of any shortcomings. There might, possibly, have been wiser and more experienced heads at work ; but warmer hearts, or more conscientious men, never were, I venture to affirm, engaged in a noble enterprise. Such, then, as the work is, we cordially submit it to your consideration, satisfied that it will be accepted by you in the same kindly spirit in which it is tendered, and that any deficiencies which may mar its character will be duly rectified by your superior wisdom. It is at all times a source of gratification to welcome friends, especially when they are united by the bonds of a common brotherhood; but on this occasion, so pregnant with important events, the feeling is vastly heightened by the fact that we have assembled around us brethren not only from every section of this great continent, but from various foreign climes—from the British Dominion, from England, Ireland, and Scotland, from France, Belgium, and Germany, from Russia, Sweden, Norway, and Finland, from Greece, from China and ADDRESS OF WELCOME. Japan, from Australia, from Mexico and South America, and, I had almost said, from every country in the world. It is interesting to know that some ot these delegates come here accredited by their respective governments. The invitations sent out by the Commission covered every prominent medical society and every distinguished medical man in the four quarters of the globe. Ihe object was to bring together representative men from all nationalities to par- ticipate in our proceedings, and to affoi’d us the benefits of their wisdom, and the results of their experience and scientific investigations. If all these, or even a respectable minority of these, representative men could have been here, what a glorious spectacle would be presented in this hall this morning ! Men laying aside for a while their ordinary pursuits, crossing vast continents and perilous seas, congregating to unite with us in celebrating our first Medical Centennial, in interchanging cordial salutations, in delibeiating upon the best means of promoting the dearest and holiest interests of our profession, and in laying their contributions, the accumulations of years of study and observation, upona common altar for fixe common good! In its wide range, the present Congress is without a parallel. Similar bodies have repeatedly met, but none on so grand a scale, or with such a cosmopolitan outlook. In organizing the Congress, the Commission may have been guilty of undue partiality towards its own country; and yet, perhaps, such a tendency was, after all, only natural. However this may be, certain members felt an irre- sistible desire to show the world what the country, since the establishment ot our independence as a free and sovereign people, had accomplished tor scientific medicine. For this purpose, topics illustrative of the progress and present condition of the different branches of medicine in the United States, have been assigned, as subjects for addresses, to gentlemen ot acknowledged rank in the profession in different sections of the Union. These exercises will, it is believed, add greatly to the interest of the occasion. Time was, and that not at all remote, when we had no medical literature—no medical science—and but few medical schools when we were utterly helpless, and wholly dependent upon the aid derived from our European brethren, especially the English, whose language, practice, and habits, we naturally made our own. The poverty of the country, in these respects, cannot be better illustrated than by the fact that we had no native works on medicine and the collateral sciences until after the commence- ment of the present century. Many of you will recall the words of the great English lexicographer who, in 1169, in speaking to a friend of the American colonies, exclaimed : “ Sir, they are a race of convicts, and ought to be thankful for anything we allow them short of hanging.” The Abbe Ilaynal, writing in the latter part of the last century, declared that America had not yet produced a single man of genius; and the question of a celebrated English writer: “ Who reads an American book, or goes to an American play, ox looks at an Ameiican picture or statue ?” uttei’ed at a more recent period, is still fresh in the memory of many of the present race of men. The discourses which wdll be delivered be- fore you on the progress of American Medicine, will serve to show that the pro. fession of the Uxxited States has earxxed for itself an enviable reputation, and that it is fully abreast of all the other pursuits that adorn the human mind and shed lustre upon the scientific character of the nation. They will serve to show that we have passed the stage of medical provincialism, and that we stand upon a ADDRESS OF WELCOME. XXXV lofty platform, to which we need not he ashamed to invite the representative men of the profession of foreign countries, however illustrious, or however ad- vanced in the arts of civilization. The different Sections, organized by the Commission, must speak for them- selves. It is in them that the work of the Congress is mainly to be done, in them that the interchange of scientific ideas is to be perfected, and from them that the meeting is to derive its chief glory as an international body of edu- cated and enlightened men. It will be recollected that attempts have been made of late years, in different quarters, to establish a uniformity of scientific nomenclature, of weights, mea- sures, and records of disease for the medical profession in all parts ot the civilized world. The plan, if carried out, could not fail to advance, in an emi- nent degree, the interests of medical science ; and I am happy to be able to state that it is proposed to discuss the subject fully in one of the Sections. We are upon the threshold of a new centennial era. One hundred years have passed away since the grand old bell upon Independence Hall announced to the world the birth of a new nation and liberty, not only to our own citizens, but to all the peoples of the earth. The century that has just elapsed is the most wonderful in all that pertains to human progress, to discovery, to inven- tions, to improvements, to refinement and intellectual culture; in short, to ail that exalts and ennobles human nature, in its various aspects and phases, that has been vouchsafed to man since God said “ Let there be light.” The science of medicine has been completely revolutionized within our day. The saying, « Old things are passed away ; behold all things are become new,” has literally been fulfilled. The microscope, chemical analysis, clinical observation, and ex- periments upon the inferior animals, are leading on the medical mind with won- drous velocity in the pursuit of knowdedge, and are daily adding new facts to our stock of information far beyond what the wildest fancy could ha’se conceived, even a third of a century ago. Dogmatism, once so dominant in the schools, has ceased to exist, and no unacknowledged theories are any longer received or entertained by the scientist. Facts, resting upon the broad basis of observation and experiment, repeated and varied in a thousand ways, alone are relied upon as worthy of acceptance and as safe guides in practice. Hippocratic medicine is the order of the day. Everything bows before its divine behests. In every corner of the habitable globe, penetrated by the light of civilization, busy, active minds, endowed with high culture and actuated by the noblest resolves, are at work, exploring the mysteries of disease, and devising means or methods of treatment for the relief of suffering, and the prolongation of life. The busy bee was never more industriously engaged in gathering honey from the flower of the field than the modern physician is in gathering knowledge at the bedside of the sick, and garnering it for future use. Much of what is considered by many as established, must be reviewed in the light of modern science; new avenues must be opened; and the ball, composed of myriads of threads more delicately formed than any ever spun by Penelope, must be pushed onward and upward by the united efforts of the medical profession in all parts of the world. How far the Centennial International Medical Congress shall promote these desirable objects, time alone can determine. It may safely be predicted that, if it do not fulfil all the promises of hope that are expected from it, it will at all ADDRESS OF WELCOME. events accomplish a vast deal of useful work, and thus afford the world an earn- est of its interest in the advancement of scientific medicine, and in international unity and kindly feeling. Science can have no higher mission than that of strengthening the bonds and securing the co-operation of its votaries in various portions of the globe, assembled to deliberate upon everything calculated to promote its holiest interests. Among the many objects of an International Congress, not the least is the interchange of kindly feelings on the part of its members, the foimation ol new friendships, and the cementing of old ties. It is well that men ot different nationalities should occasionally come together, to look at one anothei, to shake hands, and to see how they stand in public estimation, as well as in theii own ; what the world thinks of them, and what they think of the woild; what they have done to further the interests of scientific progress, to lighten the burdens of human suffering, and to extend the boundaries of human happiness. All these and many other things, which need not to be here specified, are objects well worthy of engaging earnest attention on such an occasion as this. It has often occurred to me that, if these international reunions were more frequent and more largely attended, they would be a vast deal more serviceable in preventing war and international misunderstandings than any arbitrations that could be inaugurated for the settlement of international difficulties. Much of the pleasant feeling at present existing between the United States and Europe is due to the enlarged intercourse which has been going on since the establish- ment of steam navigation between the two countries, and the consequent inter- change of hospitality and courtesy on the part of their citizens. It is, therefore, to be hoped that this may be only one of many such reunions on this side ot the Atlantic. It needs hardly to be stated that the medical profession and the citizens of Philadelphia will do all that they can to make your time pass pleasantly, as well as profitably, during your sojourn among us. Cards of invitation will be issued to you to inspect the various institutions of interest in and around the city; and after the work of the Congress is over, the International Exposition will no doubt claim, as it assuredly deserves, the earnest attention of every member of this body. And now that the labor of the Centennial Medical Commission is completed, it only remains for the Congress, which I now declare open, to perfect its organization by the election of officers for its own government. To facilitate this object the Commission has appointed a committee on nomina- tions, consisting of thirteen members, nine American and foui foieign, whose duty it will be to report the result of their deliberations at the earliest possible moment this morning. MINUTES. The Congress assembled at noon of Monday, September 4, 18T6, in the Chapel of the University of Pennsylvania. Dr. Samuel D. Gkoss, President of the Centennial Medical Commission, called the Congress to order, and introduced the Right Reverend William Bacon Stevens, D.D., LL.D., Bishop of the Protestant Episcopal Church in the Diocese of Pennsylvania, who opened the session with prayer. Dr. W. S. W. Rusciienbergbr, U. S. N., one of the Vice- Presidents of the Centennial Medical Commission, having been then called to the Chair, Dr. Gross read an Address of Welcome (see page xxxiii.), after which he announced the appointment of the following Committee of Nomination : William Adams, Esq., of England; Prof. Engelsted, of Denmark; Prof. Hueter, of Germany; Prof. Rudnew, of Russia; Dr. J. A. Grant, of Canada; Dr. H. I. Bowditch, of Massachusetts; Prof. L. A. Dugas, of Georgia; Prof. J. T. Hodgen, of Missouri; Prof. Christopher Johnston, of Maryland; Prof, Austin Flint, of New York; Dr. W. S. W. Ruschenberger, U. S. Navy; Dr. J. R. Smith, U. S. Army ; Dr. Edwin M. Snow, of Rhode Island. Dr, Austin Flint, of New York, then delivered an Address on Medicine and Medical Progress in the United States (see page 1). The Committee of Nominations presented the following partial report of nominations for Officers of the Congress :—• President—Dr. S. D. Gross, Philadelphia. Vice-Presidents—Dr. Paul F. Eve, Tennessee ; Jolliffe Tufnell, Esq., Ireland ; Dr. W. L. Atlee, Pennsylvania; Dr. 0. Lange, Denmark ; Dr. T. G. Richardson, Louisiana ; Dr. W. H. Kingston, Canada; Dr. J. P. White, New York ; Dr. H. Miyake, Japan ; Dr. N. R. Smith, Maryland; Dr. M. Rudnew, Russia; Dr. J. M. Toner, District of Columbia; Dr. Hueter, Germany ; Dr. J. B. Johnson, Missouri; Dr. F. Sernele'der, Austria ; Dr. Hunter McGuire, Virginia; Dr. Johan Hjort, Norway; Dr. G. L. Collins, Rhode Island; Dr. R. F. Hudson, Australia ; Dr. H. Gibbons, California; Dr. Pierre De Baisieux, Belgium ; Dr. N. S. Davis, Illinois; William Adams, Esq., England; Dr. L. A. Dugas, Georgia; Dr. A. R. Simpson, Scotland; Dr. J. K. Bartlett, Wisconsin. Honorary Vice-Presidents—Dr. Joseph K. Barnes, Surgeon-General U. S. A.; Dr. Joseph Beale, Surgeon-General U. S. N. Secretary-General—Dr. I. Minis Hays, Philadelphia. Secretaries of Meeting—Drs. William B. Atkinson, R. J. Dunglison, R. A. Cleemann, W. W. Keen, R. M. Bertolet. Section on Medicine—President, Dr. Alfred Still 6, Philadelphia; Secretary, Dr. J. Ewing Mears, Philadelphia. Section on Biology—President, Dr. J. C. Dalton, New York; Secretary, Dr. James Tyson, Philadelphia. Section on Surgery—President, Joseph Lister, Esq., Edinburgh; Secretary, Dr. J. H. Packard, Philadelphia. . Section on Dermatology and Syphilography—President, Dr. J. C. White, Boston ; Secretary, Dr. A. Van Harlingen, Philadelphia. Section on Obstetrics—President, Dr. Robert Barnes, London; Secretary, Dr. William Goodell, Philadelphia. Section on Ophthalmology—President, R. Brudenell Carter, Esq., London ; Secretary, Dr. John Green, St. Louis. Section on Otology—President, Dr. L. Turnbull, Philadelphia; Secretary, Dr. H. N. Spencer, St. Louis. XXXV1U MINUTES. Section on Sanitary Science—President, Dr. Stephen Smith, New York; Secretary, Dr. E. M. Hunt, New Jersey. Section on Mental Diseases—President, Dr. J. P. Gray, Utica; Secretary, Dr. W. Kempster, Wisconsin. The report was accepted, and the nominations confirmed. Hr, Gross then assumed the chair as President of the Congress. He thanked that body for the honor conferred upon him, and said that no other would be dearer to him during the remainder of Ids life than that of presiding over its deliberations. He considered it not solely an honor bestowed on him, but a tribute to the profession of Philadelphia, which had been instrumental in organizing this Congress. On motion the Congress then adjourned until Tuesday at 10 A.M. The President called the Congress to order at 10 A.M. The minutes of the preceding day were read and approved. The Secretary-General presented a list of nearly three hundred delegates who had been registered up to this date. Reports were then received from the various Sections, and, on motion, the conclusions adopted by them, after debate upon the topics assigned for dis- cussion, were taken up seriatim, and adopted by the Congress, as follows: From the Section on Medicine;— The Section considered the question, “ Typho-Malarial Fever; is it a Special Type of Fever?” The debate was opened by J. J. Woodward, M.H., Surgeon U. S. A,, and the following conclu- sion was adopted by the Section : Second Hay’s Session. Typho-malarial fever is not a special or distinct type of disease, but the term may be conveniently applied to the compound forms of fever which result from the combined influ- ence of the causes of the malarial fevers and of typhoid fever. From the Section on Hermatology and Syphilography ;—The considera- tion of the subject, “ Variations in Type and in Prevalence of Diseases of the Skin in different countries of equal civilization,” was introduced by James C. White, M.D., of Boston, and the following conclusions were adopted:— 1. Certain obscure affections, the etiology of which is little if at all understood, even in those parts of Europe to which they are mostly confined, may be regarded as practically non-existent among us—such are prurigo, pellagra, and lichen exudativus ruber. 2. Certain diseases, directly connected with and dependent upon poverty and habits of personal uncleanliness, are less prevalent in the United States than in those parts of Europe of which we have sufficient statistical information for comparison. Examples of this class are the animal parasitic affections especially. 3. Some cutaneous affections of grave character, which are dependent upon or a part of serious constitutional disorders, are of less frequent occurrence and of milder type amongst us than in Europe in general, or those parts of it where they are endemic. Lupus, the sypliilndermata, and leprosy are the most marked instances of this class. 4. Certain disorders of the skin, especially those of its glandular system, and those connected more immediately with its nervous system, are apparently more prevalent with us than in Europe. The most notable examples of the former are seborrhoea, acne, and possibly the heat rashes ; of the latter, herpes, urticaria, and pruritus. In addition to the above-mentioned conclusions, the following additional proposition was adopted by the Section : 5. The type of certain acute congestive and nervous diseases of the skin is more severe in this country than abroad. From the Section on Ophthalmology:—A discussion on “The Compara- tive Value of Caustics and Astringents in the Treatment of Diseases of the Conjunctiva, and the best mode of applying them,” was introduced by Henry W. Williams, M.D., of Boston, and the following conclusions were adopted by the Section ; 1. In a considerable number of essentially transient affections of the conjunctiva, and in pterygium or other growths, no active treatment by caustics or astringents is required. 2. When disease affects only a limited portion of the conjunctiva, as in phlyctenular inflammation, the mildest stimulating or astringent remedies are usually sufficient. MINUTES. XXXIX 3. In the acute and chronic forms of general conjunctivitis, astringents are, as a rule, safer as well as more efficacious than caustics, and are therefore better adapted to the requirements of the general practitioner. From the Section on Otology:—The subject of the “Importance of Treat- ment of Aural Diseases in their early stages, especially when arising from the Exanthemata,” was presented by Dr. Albert H. Buck, of New York, and the following conclusions were adopted by the Section:— 1. Chronic Otorrhosa is at the present time a very common disease, due in most cases to the want of proper treatment during the acute stage of the affection. 2. It is by no means a harmless affection. 3. It may be fairly classed as a preventable disease; at least among those who possess a healthy constitution. 4. Paracentesis of the membrana tympani, if resorted to during the first few days of the acute attack, and if not carried out too timidly, i. e., if a free incision be made and not a mere prick, is almost a sure preventive of the subsequent chronic disease. 5. The profession at large, and especially the medical schools, should give the subject more earnest thought than they have in the past. From the Section on Sanitary Science :—“ The Present Condition of the Evidence concerning Disease-germs,” was reported upon by Dr. Thomas E. Satterthwaite, of New York, and the following conclusions were adopted:— 1. As far as inquiry has been made as to the results of the active principles in infective diseases, it is probable that in a certain number the matter is particulate or molecular in form, and, in the instances named, in no sense a soluble substance. 2. In regard to the causes of septicaemia, pyaemia, puerperal fever, erysipelas, aod hospital gangrene, and of cholera, smallpox, the carbuncular diseases of men and animals, typhoid and relapsing fevers, and diphtheria, there is not satisfactory proof that they are necessarily connected with minute vegetable organisms. 3. The real nature of these causes is still uncertain. Dr. Laurence Turnbull, of Philadelphia, announced that, with a desire to give the posts of honor to gentlemen from a distance, he had resigned the position of President of the Section on Otology, and that Dr. Clarence J. Blake, of Boston, had been chosen by the Section to preside over its delibera- tions. Dr. T. Gr. Richardson, of New Orleans, moved that the Congress should hold itself in no way responsible for the conclusions adopted by the Sections, but that the whole responsibility in the matter should rest with the Sections themselves. On motion of Dr. N. S. Davis, of Chicago, this resolution was amended, so that, upon the submission of the reports of the Sections to the Congress, the question should be merely upon their acceptance and reference for publication. On motion of Dr. William Brodie, of Michigan, the previous action of the Congress in adopting the conclusions reported by the several Sections, was reconsidered, and the reports accepted and referred to the Committee of Pub- lication. The Secretary-General then read letters of greeting from the Imperial Society op St. Petersburg, Russia, and from the University op Christi- ania, Norway. He also read the following letter from Dr. J. S. Billings, U. S. Army : War Department, Surgeon-General’s Office. Washington, D. 0., July 31, 1876. Sir: By direction of the Surgeon-General, U. S. Army, I have the honor to forward herewith to your address six (6) copies of a specimen fasciculus of a catalogue of the library of this office, and to request that they may be presented to the International Medi- cal Congress. While the object in view in forming this library has been to make a collec- tion of sufficient extent and completeness to meet the wants of the physicians of the United States, an attempt is being made to prepare a catalogue and index of its contents, whose practical usefulness shall not be confined to this country, but shall be, as far as the material MINUTES. available will permit, international and cosmopolitan. The manuscript of the entire work is so nearly completed that the printing can be commenced next spring if Congress shall see fit to give the necessary authority. Very respectfully, your obd’t servant, John S. Billings, Assist. Surgeon U. S. Army, in charge of Library. Whereupon Dr. Austin Flint, of New York, offered the following preamble and resolutions, which were adopted:— Whereas, The institution of a National Library containing all the important bibliogra- phical and periodical publications relating to medicine and the collateral sciences, in the past and present time, is of importance, not alone to the medical profession, but to persons in other pursuits who may desire to refer to works treating ot topics embraced in these departments of knowledge, and also concerns greatly the public welfare in so far as this is involved in the elevation of the standard of medical education ; and Whereas, Through the wisdom of the National Legislators of the United States Govern- ment, a medical library has been established, containing, at the present time, about 40,000 volumes, and about the same number of single pamphlets; and Whereas, Experience has already shown the practical advantages of the present library, and, at the same time, the great need of its being made more complete by increasing at least tenfold the number of publications which it now contains ; and Whereas, In order to render such a library available for reference, especially to medical men and others residing at a distance, a catalogue wherein publications are classified after the names of authors and subjects, the scope of each publication being stated, is indispen- sable ; and 'Whereas, Such a catalogue of the National Medical Library has been prepared under the direction of the Surgeon-General of the United States Army by Assistant Surgeon J. S. Billings, copies of a specimen fasciculus having been forwarded for examination by the members of the International Medical Congress ; therefore, Resolved, First. That the members of this International Medical Congress regard with great interest the institution of a National Medical Library in the City of Washington, and respectfully petition the Congress of the United States to provide tor additions to the number of volumes and periodical publications, until the library is made as complete as possible. Second. That in view of the necessity of what is known as a raisonnS. in order to render the library properly available for reference, this International Medical Congress urges the importance of an early completion and publication of such a catalogue. Third. That the Specimen Fasciculus of the Catalogue, which is stated to be nearly ready for the press, affords evidence of great labor and care, and the arrangements for con- venience of reference it is believed will prove in all respects satisfactory. Fourth. That those of the delegates to this International Medical Congress who are citizens of the United States, and other members of the Medical Profession in this country, are urged individually to exert their influence to secure the enlargement of the library, and the speedy publication of the Catalogue. The Committee of Nominations then presented the following supplementary report, which was accepted, and the nominations confirmed : Committee of Publication (with power to choose its chairman and an editor)—Dr. John Ashhurst, Jr., Dr. Richard J. Dunglison, Dr. William Goodell, Dr. Janies H. Hutchinson, Dr. Caspar Wister, all of Philadelphia. Treasurer—Dr. Caspar Wister, Philadelphia. Section on Medicine-Dr. R. P. Howard, Canada; Dr. J. J. Woodward, U. S. Army. Section on Biology—Dr. Austin Flint, Jr., New York; Dr. F. W. Campbell, Canada. Section on Surgery—Dr. J. A. Grant, Canada ; Dr. J. Ashhurst, Jr., Philadelphia. Section on Dermatology and Syphilography—Dr. S. Engelsted, Copenhagen ; Dr. B. Shippen, U. S. Navy. Section on Obstetrics—Dr. Alexander R. Simpson, Edinburgh; Dr. W. H. Byford, Illinois. Vice-Presidents of the Sections. Section on Ophthalmology—Dr. William Thomson, Philadelphia ; Dr. Henry W. Wil- liams, Boston. Section on Otology—Dr. A. H. Buck, New York. Section on Sanitary Science—Dr. J. S. Billings, U. S. Army. Section on Mental Diseases—Dr. E. Grissom, North Carolina; Dr. I. Ray, Philadelphia. MINUTES. Dr. Henry I. Bowditch, of Massachusetts, then read an Address on Hy- giene and Preventive Medicine (see page 21), Vice-President Paul F. Eve, of Tennessee, occupying the Chair; and afterwards Dr. Theo. G. Wormley, of Ohio, delivered an Address on Medical Chemistry and Toxicology (see page 49). The Congress then adjourned until Wednesday at 10 A. M. The Congress met at 10 A. M.; the President in the Chair. The minutes of the previous day were read and approved. On motion of Dr. John L. Atlee, of Lancaster, Pa., the Secretary was in- structed to transmit copies of the Address of Dr. Bowditch, when printed, to the Governor of each State and Territory, with the request that it be trans- mitted to the Legislature of such State or Territory ; and, on motion of Dr. Trenholme, of Montreal, the government of the Dominion of Canada and those of its several provinces were included in the terms of the resolution. On motion of Dr. Traill Green, of Easton, Pa., Dr, Worm ley’s Address was referred to the Committee of Publication, and the name of Dr. Wormley’s wife, who had assisted him in his labors, was ordered to be entered on the rolls of the Congress. The Secretary-General reported 382 names of delegates on the register. He announced the reception of a telegram from the National Temperance Asso- ciation, respectfully inviting an expression of opinion from the Congress regarding the use of alcohol. Lhe Secretary-General also I’ead invitations to the members of the Congress to visit the following institutions: The Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Dr. W. S. W. Ruschenberger, President; The University of Penn- sylvania, Dr. Robert B. Rogers, Dean; The Jefferson Medical College, Dr. John B. Biddle, Dean ; The Pennsylvania Hospital; The College of Physicians of Philadelphia; and The Archteological Association; and from Dr. William Pepper, Medical Director of the Centennial Exposition, extending courtesies to visiting members. These invitations were, on motion, accepted. An invitation was also read from the Council of the National Forest Asso- ciation to attend its convention about to assemble at Cape May, N. J., on September 7 and 8. Third DxiY’s Session. The Secretaries of Sections then reported the conclusions adopted by their several Sections as follows: By the Section on Biology:—The consideration of “The Excretory Func- tion of the Liver,” was opened by Dr. Austin Flint, Jr., and the following conclusions were adopted:— 1. Cholesterine exists in health in the bile, Wood, and nervous matter, also in the crystal- line lens, the spleen, and meconium. 2. Cholesterine is formed for the most part in the nervous matter, from which it is passed into the blood. The blood gains cholesterine in its passage through the brain. Its forma- tion is constant, and it is always found in the blood. 3. Cholesterine is separated from the blood by the liver, and discharged with the bile. It pre-exists in the blood, serves there no useful purpose, and, if allowed to accumulate, blood poisoning results. 4. The bile has two separate and distinct functions, one connected with nutrition, to which the so-called biliary salts, glycocholate and taurocholate of soda, contribute; these do not exist preformed in the blood, but are products of secretion. The second function of the bile is excretory, connected with depuration or excretion ; this is accomplished by the removal of the cholesterine which it obtains from the blood. 5. Normal feces do not contain cholesterine. The latter substance is represented by stercorine, formerly called sSroline, into which it is converted in its passage down the intes- tine. The conversion of cholesterine into stercorine does not, however, take place when digestion is arrested or when it is not necessary, as is shown by the presence of cholesterine in its own form in the feces during fasting, and in the meconium. 6. The difference between the two varieties of jaundice, one mild and the other severe, MINUTES. is dependent on obstruction of the bile-ducts in one instance, with reabsorption of the biliary coloring matters, while in the other there is retention of cholesterine in the blood in consequence of destruction of the parenchyma of the liver. 7. That condition of the blood dependent upon the presence of cholesterine in the blood is called cholestercemia. It is characterized by symptoms referable to the brain, and may or may not be attended with jaundice. 8. Cholesteraemia does not occur in every disorder of the liver, because, even when a part of the organ is disorganized, there may remain a part still capable of performing the functions of excreting cholesterine. 9. In cases of simple jaundice, even when feces are decolorized, there is no accumulation of cholesterine in the blood. 10. Cholesterine bears the same relation to the liver that urea does to the kidneys. By the Section on Dermatology and Syphilography :—The debate on the question, “Are Eczema and Psoriasis Local Diseases, or are they Manifesta- tions of Constitutional Disorders?” was opened by Dr. L. Duncan Bulkley, of New York, and the following conclusions were adopted;— 1. Eczema and psoriasis are distinct diseases. The former is to be clearly distinguished from artificial dermatitis, and the latter from the eruptions of syphilis, scaly eczema, and leprosy. 2. Eczema and psoriasis cannot own a double causation or nature at one time local and at another constitutional; but, with other diseases, may have a twofold cause, a predis- posing and an exciting. 3. Eczema and psoriasis in many of their features resemble the accepted constitutional diseases more than they do those recognized as local. 4. Eczema is most properly likened to catarrh of the mucous membranes; it is very probable that some attacks called catarrh are eczema and psoriasis of the mucous tissue. 5. Both eczema and psoriasis resemble gout and rheumatism in certain respects, and are dependent upon a somewhat similar, although as yet unknown, constitutional cause; much of the skin lesion must be looked upon as the local result or remains of the diseases. 6. There as yet exists no microscopical or physiological proof that eczema and psoriasis are the sole result of local cell disorder, either congenital or acquired, or due alone to per- verted nerve action. 7. Local causes play a very important part in the etiology of eczema. They are probably inoperative in psoriasis. 8. Local treatment is often insufficient alone to remove the lesions of eczema and psoriasis, and cannot prevent or delay relapses ; its success does not necessarily demonstrate the local nature of these affections. 9. Constitutional treatment, alone and singly, can cure many cases of eczema and psoriasis, and prevent or delay relapses in a certain proportion of cases; under constitu- tional treatment is included every agency not properly classed among local measures. 10. The total weight of evidence and argument is that eczema and psoriasis are both manifestations of constitutional disorders and not local diseases of the skin. By the Section on Obstetrics:—The discussion of “ The Mechanism of Natural and of Artificial Labor in Narrow Pelves,” was introduced by Dr. Wil- liam Goodell, of Philadelphia, and the following conclusions were adopted by the Section:— 1. The unaided first-coming head and the aided after-coming head observe in a flat pelvis precisely the same general laws of engagement and of descent. Hence, version here means art plus nature. 2. The forceps, however applied in a flat pelvis, antagonizes more or less with the natu- ral mechanism of labor. Hence, the forceps here means art versus nature. 3. The aided and the unaided first-coming head observe in a uniformly narrowed pelvis precisely the same laws of engagement and of descent. But version violates these laws. Hence, the forceps here means art plus nature; version, art versus nature. 4. At, or above, the brim of a flat pelvis, the fronto-raastoid, or even the frouto-occipital, application of the forceps interferes less with the moulding of the head, and violates the natural mechanism of labor less, than the biparietal application. • 5. In the flat pelvis, the vectis aids the natural mechanism of labor, and, therefore, meets the indications belter than the forceps. By the Section on Mental Diseases :—The consideration of the subject of the “Responsibility of the Insane for Criminal Acts,” was introduced by Dr. Isaac Ray, of Philadelphia, and the following conclusions were adopted by the Section:— MINUTES. 1. There is at present a manifest tendency to hold the insane responsible for criminal acts. 2. This tendency is unjust, unphilosophical, and contrary to the teachings of pathology, which clearly point out that insanity is but the expression of disease. The Section on Medicine also submitted the following resolutions for the action of the Congress, and on motion of Dr. Brodie, of Michigan, they were adopted : Resolved, That the International Medical Congress of 1876 recognizes the advantages which would accrue from the introduction of a gradual uniformity in the multiple and hete- rogeneous elements of physic, as posology, nomenclatures, etc., and in the means and records of medical observation. Resolved, That, in consequence, this Congress authorizes the President to appoint three delegates to the International Congress of 1877, with the special mission of presenting a schedule of the means of uniformity in physic actually applicable in all countries, and an- other of those which could soon be made acceptable by the profession at large. Resolved, That the said delegates be advised to invite the co-operation of the men who have already worked for the same cause at the International or National Medical or Phar- maceutical Congresses of Paris, Vienna, St. Petersburg, Brussels, and Buffalo. Under the above resolutions, the following delegates were subsequently ap- pointed by the President: Dr. Henry I. Bowditch, of Boston, Dr. J. J. Wood- ward, U. S. A., of Washington, and Dr. E. Seguin, of New York. Dr. Paul F. Eve, of Tennessee, then delivered an Address on Surgery (see page 73), Dr. Rudnew, of St. Petersburg, Russia, Vice-President, occupying the Chair; after which Dr. J. M. Toner, of the District of Columbia, delivered an Address on Medical Biography (see page 91), while Dr. L. A. Dugas, of Georgia, Vice-President, occupied the Chair. On motion the Congress then adjourned until Thursday at 10 A.M. [On Wednesday evening, at 7.30 P.M., Dr. J. J. Wooward, U. S. Army, de- livered in the Lecture Room of Jefferson Medical College an Address on The Medical Staff of the United States Army, and its Scientific Work (see page 286).] Fourth Day’s Session. The Congress met at 10 A. M., the President in the Chair. The minutes of the previous day were read and approved. The Secretary-General reported 422 names of delegates on the Register. Dr. H. I. Bowditch, of Boston, presented the following preamble and reso- lutions, which were adopted : Whereas, The work already accomplished by the officers commoted with the Bureau of the Surgeon-General of the United States Army, in the establishment of a medical library, and in the preparation of its complete and unique catalogue, in the formation of an ana- tomical museum from which important scientific results have already been obtained, and which have been not only a source of honor to these United States, but of value to foreign lands wherever science is cultivated ; and, Whereas, This Congress learns with regret that, owing to the lack of a sufficient clerical force and of pecuniary means, not only some of the work already in progress has been sus- pended, but that other work of equal value cannot be undertaken, although ample mate- rials for the same are now lying unused in the Surgeon-General’s office; therefore, Resolved, That a committee of three be appointed to prepare a memorial to be presented to the Congress of the United States, at the earliest day possible, at its next session, urging efficient support to these most important works. Resolved, That it is desirable that said memorial should be signed by the President, Vice-Presidents, and Secretary-General of this body. The President appointed Drs. Bowditch, of Boston, Rudnew, of St. Peters- burg, and N. S. Davis, of Chicago, as the Committee to prepare this Memorial. (in motion of Dr. J. P, White, of Buffalo, New York, it was ordered that the printed pamphlet containing Dr. Bovvditch’s Address on Hy'giene and Preventive Medicine be sent to the Presidents of State and Territorial Medical MINUTES. Societies and Sanitary Boards of the United States, and of the Societies and Sanitary Boards of the Dominion of Canada. The conclusions adopted by the several Sections were then reported as fol- lows ; By the Section on Surgery :—The subject of the “ Medical and Surgical Treatment of Aneurism,” was introduced by Dr. William 11. Yan Buren, of New York, and the following conclusions were adopted:— 1. Tufnell’s treatment of aneurism, by rest, position, and restricted diet, offers a valuable resource in thoracic and abdominal aneurisms. .. 2. It should always be tried in innominate, subclavian, subclavio-axillary, and iliac aneu- risms, before resorting to measures attended by risk to life. . . 3. For aneurisms of the subclavian and iliac arteries, the Hunterian operation, with oui present means of preventing secondary hemorrhage, is not justifiable. 4. For reasons formally set forth by Holmes and Henry Lee, the old operation camnot properly be formally substituted for the Hunterian operation in these cases, but should be held in reserve for special cases. ... 5. It is the most safe and surgical resource in gluteal aneurism, if the circulation can be commanded by the hand in recto. 6. The mode of cure by embolism, aimed at in the method of manipulation, is a not untre- quent explanation of what is called spontaneous cure of aneurism. 7. The value of Esmarch’s bandage in the treatment of aneurism is probably not fully estimated. , „ . ~ , 8. In view of the promising features presented by the cases of Levis and Bryant, in which horse-hair was introduced into an aneurismal tumor, the.repetition of this operation, or the substitution for horse-hair of Lister’s prepared catgut or other animal substances, may be properly tried. By the Section on Dermatology and Syphilography:—The consideration of the subject of “The Virus of Venereal Sores; its Unity or Duality,” was opened by Dr. F. J. Bumstead, of New York, and the following conclusions were adopted by the Section:— 1. The virus of venereal sores is dual. . ... 2. Venereal sores may be due to the inoculation of the syphilitic virus, and also to the inoculation of products of simple inflammation. 3. These two poisons may be inoculated simultaneously. . 4 (Additional.) The present state of science has demonstrated that suppurating inflam- matory lesions resembling chancroids may be produced on various portions of the body by inoculation with simple pus from various lesions. By the Section on Otology:—Dr. 11. N. Spencer, of St. Louis, opened a discussion of the question, “In what Percentage of Cases do Artificial Drum- membranes prove of Practical Advantage?” The following were the conclu- sions adopted by the Section : 1. Of the various forms of artificial drum-membrane in use, the cotton pellet is prefera- ble for its greater simplicity and its easier introduction, for the greater uniformity of its effect, and the comparative safety in its employment. 2. It has an advantage over all other forms of artificial drum-membrane in that, in addi- tion to the functional gain which may be derived, there may be added its value as a means of treating the tympanum, and this therapeutical use of the artificial membrane has a gieat future in otology. . , 3. The continued use of the artificial drum-membrane as a means of improving the hear- ing is indicated in rare conditions which can only be determined by the aural surgeon. By the Section on Sanitary Science:—“ The General Subject of Quaran- tine, with Particular Reference to Cholera and Yellow lever,” was consideied by Dr. J. M. Woodworth, of the U. S. Marine Hospital Service, and the fol- lowing conclusions were adopted by the Section:— 1. The supervision of ocean travel ought to be directed to securing good sanitary condi- tions of vessels at all times, out of as well as in port. 2. A system of Port Sanitation should be adopted and administered for each country or place, separately, modified in particular cases by taking into account the liability of the port to infection, the period of incubation of the disease, the length of time consumed in the voyage, and the measures enforced by the vessel en route. MINUTES. 3 ln some countries the detention of passengers and crews of ships hailing from infected norts is unwarranted, but for such time only as is necessary to complete the period ot incu- bation of cholera or yellow fever, counting from the date ot departure from an in ec e po. , or of landing from an infected vessel; but in no instance should passengeis 01 sai ois e held for observation on board an infected vessel, and such vessel should not e e amec bevond the period required for inspection and thorough disinfection and cleansing. 4. Recognizing the fact that the morbific causes of infectious diseases may sometimes elude the most vigilant sanitary supervision of shipping, the importance ot wisely-direc e internal sanitary measures can scarcely be over-estimated. ...... . P _ 5. As far as America is concerned, it is desirable that prompt and authoritative informa- tion should be had of the shipment of passengers or goods from districts infected with cholera or yellow fever, thereby insuring the thorough disinfection of infected articles. 6 The endemic homes of cholera and yellow fever are the fields which give the greatest promise of satisfactory results to well-directed and energetic sanitary measures and to this end an international sentiment should be awakened, so strong as to compel the caie- less and offending people to employ rational means ol prevention. By the Section on Mental Diseases ;—The consideration of the subject of the u Simulation of Insanity by the Insane,” was opened by Dr. C. 11. Hughes, of St. Louis, Mo., and the following conclusion was adopted by the Section It is not onlv not impossible for the insane to simulate insanity for a purpose in any but its gravest forms of profound general mental involvement, but they actually do simulate acts and forms of insanity for which there exists no pathological warrant that we can dis- cover in the real disease affecting them. On motion of Dr. T. G. Richardson, of Louisiana, Dr. J. J. Woodward, U. S. A., was requested to repeat his lecture of the previous evening, as many of the members had failed to read the announcement of the lecture on the Pro- gramme, and had, therefore, been absent. & Dr Theophilus Paryin, of Indiana, then delivered an Address on Obstetrics (see pao-e 1B8), Dr. H. Miyake, of Tokio, Japan, Vice-President, occupying the Chair, and, after a very brief recess, Dr. Stanford E. Chaille, of Louisiana, delivered an Address on Medical Jurisprudence (see page 161), while Dr. J. I. White of Buffalo, New York, Vice-President, occupied the Chair. The Congress then adjourned until 10 A.M. on Friday. The Congress met at 10 A.M., the President in the Chair. The minutes of the preceding day were read and approved. The Secretary-General reported 430 names of delegates on the Register. Eifth Day’s Session. On motion of Dr. Paul F. Eve, of Nashville, it was Resolved, That no papers or addresses read before this body, and ordered to be printed, shall be furnished either in abstract or otherwise for publication in any journal prior to the publication of the Transactions. The conclusions adopted by the several Sections were then reported as fol- lows : By the Section on Biology:—The consideration of “The Mechanism of Joints,” was introduced by Dr. Harrison Allen, of Philadelphia, and the following conclusions were adopted by the Section ; 1. Starting with the idea that joints are of dynamic and static values, it is shown that in most movable joints the ball-and-socket arrangement predominates. V\ hen the ball is supported bi7 the socket, as at the occipito-atloid articulation, rest is suggested. But when the ball is suspended from the socket, as at the temporo-maxillary articulation, motion is Articular surfaces are of three kinds : axial, actinic, and lateral. Ihe axial or primary surfaces are those situated upon proximal and distal ends of a bone in the line ot its longitudinal axis. The actinic or secondary (rarely seen) are those placed in a line which Is deflected from the longitudinal axis. The lateral or tertiary are those situated upon the sides of the shaft or body of a bone, and serve for articulation with corresponding surfaces of other bones. . 3. Axial surfaces, it is believed, are static; actinic surfaces are dynamic ; while lateral MINUTES. surfaces have subordinate degrees of value—some of them being adventitious. The outer femoral condyle is active in extension = static; the inner femoral condyle is active in flexion == dynamic; but the lateral facets have no independent action. 4. Joints are fixed or locked at extremes of flexion and extension, and are most relaxed at the intervals between these extremes. 5. When a facet is actively employed, it enters into a combination with which the entire limb is in harmony. Hence, in the study of any one facet, its relations to all others ot its kind, as well as to the bones, muscles, and fascia? of its limb, become essential.^ 6. A correct knowledge of the symptomatology and treatment of diseases ot the joints is dependent upon a true conception of the complex nature of articular surfaces. By the Section on Surgery:—Dr. Lewis A. Sayre, of New York, opened the discussion of the subject of the “Treatment of Coxalgia.” The Section adopted the following conclusions : 1. Morbus coxarius is a disease most frequently met with in early childhood, or the age of reckless indifference. . , 2. It is almost always of traumatic origin, and not necessarily connected with a vitiated constitution. 3. Rest and freedom from pressure of the parts involved, while at the same time the rest of the body is allowed free exercise in the open air, and a nutritious diet, is the best treat- ment that has yet been devised for this disease. 4. If this plan of treatment be adopted in the early stages of this disease, the majority of cases will recover, with nearly if not quite perfect motion, and without deformity. 5. In the advanced second stage of the disease, when absorption of the effused fluid can- not be produced, then it is better to puncture or aspirate the joint and remove its contents, than to leave it to rupture by ulceration. 6. In the third stage of the disease, when the treatment recommended in this paper has been properly applied without satisfactory improvement, but progressive caries continues, the exsection of the diseased bone is not only justifiable, but in many cases absolutely necessary. . 7. That the operation of exsection of the hip is easily performed, and in itself attended with little or no danger. 8. That after exsection of the hip-joint in cases of progressive caries, the recovery is much more rapid and certain, and infinitely more perfect, as to form, motion, and the use- fulness of the joint and limb, than when left to the slow process of nature. [Note.—In the second conclusion, the Section does not unanimously coincide.] By the Section on Dermatology and Syphilography :—After a debate, opened by Dr. E. L. Keyes, of New York, on “ The Treatment of Syphilis with special reference to the Constitutional Remedies appropriate to its various stages ; the Duration of their Use, and the question of their Continuous or Intermittent Employment,” the Section adopted the following:— Negative conclusions, for which there would seem to be no foundation in fact: 1. Syphilis commencing mildly needs but little treatment, and does not require mercury. 2. Mercury given internally is necessarily debilitating. 3. Mercury is only useful in secondary syphilis. 4. lodide of potassium is of considerable value in secondary syphilis. 5. lodide of potassium is of no value unless preceded by the use of mercury. 6. lodide of potassium acts by liberating mercury which has been lying latent. Positive conclusions, which, in the present state of our knowledge, may be affirmed; 1. Mercury is an antidote to the syphilitic poison, and of service in controlling all its symptoms in all, even the latest stages of the disease ; its power over gummata being least, and not to be relied upon. 2. Mercury in minute doses is a tonic. 3. lodine cures certain symptoms of syphilis, but does.not prevent relapses. 4. Mercury, long continued uninterruptedly, as far as practicable, in small doses from the time of the earliest eruption, constitutes the best treatment of syphilis. By the Section on Ophthalmology:—A discussion on the question, “Are Progressive Myopia and Posterior Staphyloma due to Hereditary Predisposi- tion, or can they be induced by Defects of Refraction, acting through the Influence of the Ciliary Muscle ?” was opened by Dr. E. G. Lorinq, Jr., of New York, and the following conclusions were adopted by the Section:— 1. From the fact that so many children are myopic, whose parents are not near-sighted, while the myopia increases directly with the amount of increased tension of the eyes, and MINUTES. from the fact that an interchange of refraction may occur, whereby an eye which is not congenitally myopic may become so in spite of hereditary tendency against it, it would seem to follow that hereditary predisposition, though undoubtedly a potent cause, is not only not the sole cause, but that it is not even the predominating cause. 2. The action of the ciliary muscle, taken by itself, exerts but little influence on the pro- duction of myopia, and still less on the formation of the cone. [Note.—Of these conclusions, the first was adopted by the Section unanimously, and the second by a majority of fifteen to seven.] Dr. N. S. Dayis, of Chicago, offered the following preamble and resolutions, which were adopted : Whereas, This Congress marks an era in the history of medicine in the United States of America, the addresses as delivered presenting a summary of progress in the various de- partments which will be of great historical value in all coming time ; and Whereas, It is highly probable that these addresses, in connection with the many very valuable papers read and discussed in the Sections, will require for their early and proper publication more funds than are at present in the hands of the Treasurer for the purpose; therefore, Resolved, That the Committee of Publication be authorized and instructed, as soon as practicable after the final adjournment of the Congress, to ascertain the probable cost of publishing the full Transactions in a style appropriate for the work, and, if the money on hand be found deficient, to address a circular letter to the American members of the Congress, asking for such additional sum, not exceeding $lO for each of such members, as will supply the deficiency; and that said committee be authorized to withhold the volume or volumes, when published, from any member who may neglect to pay the additional sum required. Resolved, That the Committee of Publication be authorized and requested to exercise a careful and liberal discretion in preparing and revising the proceedings and reported dis- cussions in the several Sections, for publication in the Transactions of the Congress. The Secretary General announced the receipt of communications from the Woman’s National Christian Temperance Union, and from the Friends Tem- perance Union of New York, respectfully inviting an expression of opinion from the Congress concerning the use of alcohol. On motion of Dr. N. S. Davis, these were referred to the Section on Medi- cine. On motion of Dr. J. M. Toner, of Washington, D. C., the communication previously received from the National Temperance Association "was similarly referred. After a recess of ten minutes, Dr. J. P. Gray, of Utica, N. Y., read an Ad- dress on Mental Hygiene (see page 205), Dr. Hunter McGuire, of Virginia, Vice-President, occupying the Chair; and afterwards Dr. Lunsford P. Yan- dell, of Louisville, Kentucky, delivered an Address on Medical Literature (see page 223), while Dr. T. G. Richardson, of Louisiana, Vice-President, occupied the Chair. On motion, the various addresses read before the Congress were referred to the Committee of Publication, and the Congress then adjourned until 10 A. M. on Saturday. Sixth Day’s Session. The Congress met at 10 A. M., the President in the Chair. The minutes of the preceding day were read and approved. The Secretary-General reported 44T names of delegates on the register (see page xv.), and, on motion of Dr. Toner, these were all confirmed as members of the Congress, The Secretary-General read a request from Dr. Rudnew, of Russia, asking the privilege of access to the minutes and proceedings of the Congress, with a view of reporting them on his return to Russia, which was granted. The Section on Medicine recommended that the Secretary be directed to send, in reply to the various Temperance Associations which had sent com- munications to the Congress, the following conclusions which had been ap- proved by the Section, and which were contained in a paper read before it by xlviii MINUTES. Dr. E. M. Hunt, of New Jersey, entitled “Alcohol in its Therapeutic Rela- tions as a Food and as a Medicine.” 1. Alcohol is not shown to have a definite food value by any of the methods of chemical analysis or physiological investigation. _ , 2. Its use as a medicine is chiefly that of a cardiac stimulant, and often admits 01 sub- 3. As a medicine, it is not well-fitted for self-prescription by the laity, and the medical profession is not accountable for such administration, or tor the euoimous evils aiising 4. The purity of alcoholic liquors is, in general, not as well assured as that of articles used for medicine should be. The various mixtures, when used as medicines, should ha\e a definite and known composition, and should not be interchanged promiscuously. On motion of Dr. J. P. White, of Buffalo, it was Resolved, That the Centennial Medical Commission of Philadelphia is hereby tendered the cordial thanks of this Congress for the most excellent manner in which its members have discharged the arduous duties devolved upon them, and by which our pleasure and profit have been so much enhanced. . Resolved, That the President and other Officers of the International Medical Congress of 187G are’hereby tendered the cordial thanks of the Congress for the excellent manner in which they have discharged the arduous duties devolved upon them, and by which our pleasure and profit have been so much enhanced. Resolved, That the Officers and Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania are hereby tendered our cordial thanks for the very liberal use of their excellent buildings for the meetings of this International Medical Congress. Resolved, That the Officers and Trustees of the Jefferson Medical College are hereby tendered the cordial thanks of this Congress for the use of their lecture-room for the most interesting lecture of Dr. J. J. Woodward, U. S. A. Resolved, That the cordial thanks of the International Medical Congress are especially due to Drs. Thomson, Wilson, and Strawbridge, and to Messrs. Henry C. Lea and J. B. Lippiucott, for their generous hospitality. On motion of Dr. H. I. Bowditch, of Boston, the following resolution was adopted : Resolved, That we, a brotherhood of physicians from the North, South, Last, and M est of this country, hereby tender to our associates from other lands our most earnest wishes that they may have safe and happy returns to their homes, and we would suggest the hope that they will carry back many pleasant memories ol this fraternal meeting, now closing, and which has been, most appropriately, held in this generous and noble city of Philadel- phia. Dr. J. A. Grant, of Ottawa, Canada, stated that at a meeting of the mem- bers of the Canadian medical delegates, held yesterday, the following resolu- tions were adopted unanimously:— Resolved, That the Canadian members of the International Medical Congress desire to express their sense of the great consideration and urbanity with which they have been treated by the officers and members of the Centennial Medical Commission, and beg, by this resolution, to tender their warm thanks for the same. _ Resolved, That the Canadian members of the International Medical Congress most cor- dially join with the other members of the Congress in thanking physicians and citi- zens of Philadelphia for the generous hospitality extended to its members throughout the present session. Dr. Charles J. Hare, of London, read the following expression of congrat- ulation from the delegates of Great Britain:— The delegates from Great Britain to the International Medical Congress of Philadelphia beg to congratulate the President and the several committees on the complete success of the Congress, on the high value of the various addresses presented to it, and on the forward impulse which it has given to the progress of medicine in the widest sense of that word. They desire at the same time to express in the strongest and warmest terms their sense of and their thanks for the unmeasured kindness and courtesy and the unbounded hospitality with which they have been received on this Centennial occasion, and to add that they will carry back with them a most grateful recollection of that warm right hand of fellowship which has been so warmly extended to them by their brethren of the United States. Signed on behalf of the British delegates by Charles J. Hare, M.D. Cantab., F.R.C.P., MINUTES. late Professor of Clinical Medicine in University College, and Physician to University College Hospital; R. Brudenell Carter, F.R.O.S. Eng., Hunterian Professor of Surgery to the Royal College of Surgeons of England; William Adams, F.R.C.S., President of the Medical Society of London. Dr. L. A, Sayre, of New York, offered the following:— Resolved, That this International Medical Congress requests its President, Professor Samuel D. Gross, to sit for his portrait, and that the Committee of Publication be in- structed to have the same engraved and printed as a frontispiece to the Volume of Transac- tions. Adopted.1 The Secretary-General stated that a circular had been received announcing that an International Medical Congress would be held in Geneva in September, 1877. Dr. N. S. Davis, of Illinois, then delivered an Address on Medical Educa- tion and Medical Institutions (see page 265), Dr. Henry Gibbons, of California, Vice-President, occupying the Chair. Dr. Gross, President, announced that the official programme of the Congress had been completed. No new business being presented, he addressed the Congress as follows : Gentlemen : Before I put the question of the final adjournment of the Con- gress, I desire to say a few parting words. First and foremost, I must be permitted again to thank 3Tou for the great honor which you have done me in electing me as your presiding officer. It is the last honor which I can reasona- bly expect from my professional brethren, who have always been so kind to me in the bestowal of their favors and of their good opinion. For these courtesies I shall never cease to be grateful, for they have served to cheer me in my labors, and have been as a balm to my soul. The International Medical Congress of 1876 is about to pass into history as a thing of the past; but, although its exercises are at an end, its work will live and form an interesting era in our profession as marking the reunion of a great body of men in the Centennial year of American Independence. We have listened to a number of valuable and instructive discourses, illustrative of the progress of American medicine and surgery ; have been engaged in profitable debates affecting some of the most vital interests of society; have performed a large amount of earnest work in the Sections; have met at the festive board; have clasped hands, and have formed warm and, as I trust, lasting friendships, all without any discord, one unkind expression, or even one word of misun- derstanding. Altogether, we have every reason for self-congratulation. When another Centennial century shall have passed away, the men who shall then be upon the stage will not fail to commemorate our meeting, and to bless us for what has been done this week in the interests of humanity and of medical science. In dissolving this meeting, as I now do, permit me to invoke upon our labors the choicest blessings of Almighty God, and to wish each and all of you a safe return to your homes, and a happy reunion with your families and friends. May we not hope that you may long, if not forever, retain pleasant memories of our meetings in this Chapel, and that in your leisure moments your minds may occasionally revert to those of us from whom you are about to separate ? The Congress then adjourned sine die. I. MINIS HAYS, M.D., Secretary-General. William B. Atkinson, M.D., Richard J. Dunglison, M.D., Richard A. Cleemann, M.D., William W. Keen, M.D., R. M. Bertolet, M.D., Secretaries 0f the *eC7etaries °J 1,16 meetmg‘ 1 [ln deference to Prof. Gross’s expressed wish, the portrait is omitted.—Editor.] D NOTICE. The Committee of Publication thinks it proper to say that the Con- gress is to be held in no way responsible for the statements, reasonings, or opinions set forth in the various papers published in its Transactions. ADDRESSES. ADDRESS ON MEDICINE AND MEDICAL PROGRESS IN THE UNITED STATES. BY AUSTIN FLIRT, M.D., PROFESSOR OF THE PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE OF MEDICINE, AND CLINICAL MEDICINE, IN BELLEVUE HOSPITAL MEDICAL COLLEGE, NEW YORK. An important object of the Philosophy of History is the study of agencies concerned in originating and modifying past events. From this standpoint I propose to survey “Medicine and Medical Progress in the United States” during the past one hundred years. Whence were derived influences affecting the progress of Medicine in this Centennial period ? I shall submit certain historical-facts and reflections in answer to this inquiry. Another object of the Philosophy of History, of greater prac- tical importance, is the study of agencies with reference to future events. Regarding Medicine in the latter aspect, the inquiry arises, by what in- fluences is the progress of Medicine in our country to be promoted? This inquiry opens up a wide range of thought, to which some incidental reference is all that the limits of my discourse will permit. Medicine, as I use the term in this discourse, distinguishes a province of knowledge and art from Surgery and Midwifery. In this restricted sense it denotes the province called in former times “the theory and practice of physic.” I assume that medicine has steadily progressed in our country during the past one hundred years; the rapidity, at different periods, during this space of time, and the extent of will natu- rally enter into reflections upon the influences affecting it. The scope of the term progress, as applied to Medicine, claims preliminary explanation. In what consists, and what are the criteria of, medical progress in this country, in past time? This question cannot be summarily answered ; the answer will lead at once to the influences affecting the progress which has taken place, and to those which tend to its promotion now and here- after. ... . . , . The most striking evidence of progress is a great discovery, the practical benefits of which are immediate and palpable. Discoveries entitled to this distinction, within the past century, are vaccination, auscultation, and the separate functions of different components of the nervous sys- tem. Tliis brief list cannot be much lengthened. Pre-eminently great discoveries in medicine are so distributed in respect of intervals, as to bear the impress of special gifts vouchsafed by Providence. We can boast of but one discovery which belongs in this category, the annihila- tion of pain by anaesthetic inhalations. It is true the brilliancy of this discovery is especially conspicuous in its applications to surgery ; but the 2 FLINT, benefits conferred on medicine are not vastly inferior, and would alone entitle it to rank with discoveries to be characterized as pre-eminently Evidence of progress equally obvious, although less striking, is affoided by enlargement of the boundaries ot knowledge in different directions, iUnder this head are embraced all facts relating to the nature of diseases, their anatomical characters, their causation, their discrimination from each other, their natural history, the principles of treatment, the relative value of remedial or curative agents,the introduction of new lemedies 01 therapeutical methods and effective measures of prophylaxis, ivot stop- ping to consider in these relations the history of Medicine in the united States during the past Centennial period, I pass to another aspect of The progress of Medicine in any country is shown by the prompt recognition of advancements in knowledge and improvements ongi- natimr in other countries. After, for example, Harvey’s great discovery, tardiness of its recognition in any country betokened lack ot progress. So with regard to discoveries of every grade, and improvements great or small, it is proof of progress when they are promptly recognized in countries other than those in which they originated. Readiness in the importation of knowledge is thus a criterion, as it is, of course, a means of progress. I need not add that the rapid diffusion throughout a country of knowledge, either imported or of native growth, is both a criterion and a means of progress. Further, a spirit of progress is shown by the prompt recognition and diffusion, not alone of actual advancements in knowl- edge and real improvements, but of doctrines and novelties which fail to stand the test of time. Thus, in the eighteenth century, a spirit of pro- gress must have been wanting wherever but little was known of the theories of Stahl, Hoffmann, and Boerhaave. This statement is not incon- sistent with the belief that the prevalence of these theories impeded advancement in actual knowledge of medicine and leal impiovements in medical practice. , , With these explanations of the term progress in Medicine, let us sur- vey the medical history ot the United States. We celebrate in this anniversary the lapse of a hundred years of our existence as an independent people. A hundred years is but a small space in the life-history of a nation. We have passed through infancy; we are hardly beyond adolescence, and, as we hope and believe, senescence is far in the future. Our infantile and our adolescent condition are, of course, to be taken into account in our reflections upon the influences affecting the progress of Medicine. When in 1776, by a Csesarean section, we were separated from the mother country, Medicine existed in a state ready for progressive devel- opment and growth. The number of educated and able physicians was by no means insignificant. Conspicuous among these weie Rush, Moigan, Shippen, Thomas Bond, of Philadelphia ; John and Samuel Baid, Petei Middleton, Richard Bailey, Jacob Ogden, Cadwallader Golden, of Hew York; Benjamin Gale, of Connecticut; Joseph Warren, William Aspm- wall, and the centennarian Holyoke, of Massachusetts. At our nation s birth, the lives and labors of these men and their coadjutors had a poten- tial influence in determining the commencing progress of Medicine. Medical education had an embryonic existence in two medical schools, ■one in Philadelphia and the other in Hew York, and there were germi- nations of medical literature. ADDRESS ON MEDICINE. 3 In the history of American Medicine prior to the Revolution we find in operation a source of influence which has largely affected medical progress in this country during the last hundred years, namely, the re- cognition and adoption of advancements, real or apparent, in other countries. A striking instance in the colonial period was the introduc- tion of the inoculation of smallpox by Zabdiel Boylston in 1771. Boyls- ton inoculated his son about two months after the date of the inoculation, at the instance of Lady Mary Wortley Montague, of her daughter, and without knowledge of the latter fact. Boylston himself inoculated two hundred and forty-seven persons within a year after his first inocu- lation, whereas, in England, during that period, and prior to the inocu- lation of the daughters of the Princess Caroline, it had been practised in only twenty cases. Virulent as was the opposition on this side of the Atlantic, Boylston’s life even being endangered, the practice in England was still more violently opposed. Its sinfulness was proclaimed from the pulpit, it being likened on one occasion to the smiting of Job with boils by Satan, “ the deluded preacher,” quoting from Boylston’s biogra- pher (Thacher), “ wishing to have it understood that the Devil was the first inoculator, and that poor Job was his first patient.” The Revolutionary struggle, while it suspended teaching in medical schools, labors in literature, and studies requiring tranquil leisure, doubt- less gave an impetus to medical as well as surgical progress. It enlarged opportunities for, and enforced closer attention to, the observation of certain diseases; it enhanced the urgency of prompt and successful methods of treatment; it opened up the subject of hospitals, and it stimu- lated to measures of prophylaxis. Herein is, in some degree, a compen- sation for the barbarism of warl It is not surprising, then, that, with the antecedent history of American Medicine, medical progress was re- newed with much activity after the achievement of independence. As illustrations of this activity, after the war had ended (1783), and prior to the beginning of the 19th century, two rival medical schools in Phila- delphia had gone into operation, coalesced, and been united with the University of Pennsylvania, the faculty then consisting of Rush, Kuhn, Wistar, Shippen, Benjamin Smith Barton, and James Hutchinson; the Philadelphia Dispensary for the relief of the sick poor, the first institu- tion of its kind in the United States, had been established ; the trustees of Columbia College in Hew York had organized a medical school, which, however, from local difficulties, had not accomplished much ; a medical department of Harvard University had been instituted, with John War- ren, Waterhouse, and Aaron Dexter as professors; medical societies had been incorporated in Massachusetts, Yew Jersey, and Yew Hampshire, and the publication of the “Medical Repository,” a quarterly journal, which lived to the completion of twenty-three volumes, had been commenced. It is worthy of note that, prior to this century, Dr. Ezekiel Hersey, of Hinghara, Massachusetts, had bequeathed a thousand pounds, his widow the same sum, his brother, Dr. Abner Hersey, of Barnstable, and Dr. John Cuming, of Concord, each five hundred pounds, to be applied to the support of a Professor of Anatomy and Surgeryin the Harvard Medi- cal College. The sum of one thousand pounds toward the support of an additional professor had been bequeathed by William Erving, Esq., of Boston, It would have been pleasant to have cited these examples as precedents of many similar contributions for the promotion of medical education; but, it must be confessed,the subsequent history of Medicine in the United States furnishes little to boast of in this regard. It is, how- 4 FLINT, ever, a question, the discussion of which would he here out of place, how far the interests of Medicine in this country would have been advanced by the endowment of professorships in medical colleges. As an illustra- tion of interest in medical progress felt by persons not members of the profession, in 1798 Ward Boylston secured to the Harvard School a fund yielding an annuity, for annual prizes for competitive dis- sertations on medical subjects, of one hundred and thirty-three dollars. These prizes are continued at the present day. The same public-spirited citizen of Boston founded the medical library which bears his name, and contributed in various ways to the promotion of medical education. Another conspicuous illustration was the active co-operation of the great Franklin in founding and in the management of the Medical College of Philadelphia. Franklin was president of the board of trustees, and the meetings were held at his house until within a few months of his death. During the period in our history of which I am now speaking, Cullen was the master-spirit in Medicine. Hot content with being an expounder of the doctrines of Boerhaave, or a follower of his commentator Yan Swieten, he promulgated a system of his own. Fie had the boldness to abandon giving lectures in the Latin language. His teachings, with those of his able colleagues Monro, Gregory, Black, Young, and Home, had made Edinburgh the centre of medical education. The College of Philadelphia, which in 1791 was merged in the Medical Department of the University of Pennsylvania, had been modelled after the school in Edinburgh, the latter having been modelled after the famous school of Leyden. All the professors of the Philadelphia College had graduated at Edinburgh. Hence, in this period of our history, the Cullenian sys- tem was adopted, although, as will presently be seen, its supremacy was not long maintained. It is evidence of activity at this period that an American edition of Cullen’s work entitled “First Lines of the Practice of Physic” was published in 1781, his lectures on the Materia Medica having been published in Philadelphia in 1775.1 Bush, in a letter to Cullen, written in 1783, said, in relation to the American edition of the “First Lines,” that it “had a rapid sale and a general circulation throughout the United States. It was read with peculiar attention by the physicians and surgeons of our army, and in a few years regulated in many things the practice in our hospitals.” He added : “ Thus, sir, you see you have had a hand in the revolution, by contributing indi- rectly to save the lives of the officers and soldiers of the American army.” I have cited illustrations enough to show the activity of medical pro- gress prior to the nineteenth century. The experience acquired in the war of the Revolution, the enthusiasm arising from the sense of national independence, the number of American physicians who had completed their medical education in European schools and imbibed the spirit of master minds in the profession, the pressing need of educated and skilful practitioners—these were potential influences affecting the progress of Medicine in the early days of the Republic. Let me refer in this connection to the position held by the city in which we are assembled, in her relations to the progress of Medicine in the United States. At the time of the Revolution, Philadelphia was distin- guished for her able and learned physicians and surgeons. They inau- 1 For these and other facts relating to the history of this period, I am indebted to Car- son’s History of the Medical Department of the University of Pennsylvania. ADDRESS ON MEDICINE. 5 gurated systematic medical instruction on this continent prior to the Revolutionary war, and again directly peace was declared. At the time to which our survey of the history of Medicine has extended, Philadelphia was the acknowledged seat of medical education. This pre-eminence she has held from that time to the present. In the number of medical men who have been educated at her schools ; in the great preponderance of her medical literature, and in her large proportion of the distinguished representatives of the different departments of Medi- cine, she has had no compeer in the new world. To the influence of her example is to be attributed much of the activity of progress in other cities of the Union. If, in the future, she should cease to preserve the relative position which she now deservedly holds, it will be, in no small measure, from the spirit of honorable emulation awakened and sustained by her admirable example. In saying what I have said, I feel that I may assume to speak in behalf of the medical profession of the United States. It was most fitting that an International Medical Congress, in celebra- tion of our centennial anniversary, should assemble in the city of Phila- delphia. We have now to inquire concerning influences affecting medical pro- gress after the commencement of the nineteenth century. At the end of the first quarter of this century, there were at least twenty colleges in active operation, distributed among sixteen of the States of the Union, the number of students in the year 1825 exceeding two thousand. Of these twenty colleges, six'may be distinguished as Metropolitan, being situated in Boston, Hew York, Baltimore, or Philadelphia. Let us do justice to the so-called Provincial schools as affecting medical progress. They furnished formal instruction to many who were unable to bear the expenses of long journeys and a residence in metropolitan towns. A considerable proportion of students then, as now, pursued their stu- dies in part at institutions near at hand, and, in part, at schools in the cities just named. The provincial schools, each within a certain area, developed interest, inquiry, and study among members of the profes- sion, thus raising the standard of medical acquirement. They awakened an ambition to become teachers by affording opportunity for the display of talent in that direction. If it be said that in the establishment of these schools the founders were not altogether disinterested, but may have been actuated by motives relating to personal distinction and suc- cess ; this may be said with not less pertinency of metropolitan schools, and, moreover, such motives are not unworthy. If it be said that they have occasioned local jealousies and feuds; this is not less true of metro- politan schools. Thacher states with respect to the conferring of degrees upon the two first graduates of the Harvard Medical College, that, “ from a spirit of envy and jealousy towards the professors, great oppo- sition was made, and it was by the address and perseverance of John Warren that the object was finally accomplished.” The success of medi- cal schools in the city of Hew York was for several years retarded by local opposition; and the same difficulties were experienced in the early history of the schools in the “ city of brotherly love.” Hot a few of the professors in the larger schools of our country first tested their powers, and acquired experience as teachers in the smaller schools. The latter have had not an inconsiderable share in promoting the progress of Medi- cine. Within the first quarter of the present century, about twenty medical 6 FLINT, journals were established. These contributed largely to the promotion and diffusion of medical knowledge. The subsequent multiplication of journals has not been proportionate to the increase and extension of our population, those now in existence not much exceeding twofold the number which had existed in 1825. Hitherto, as now, a considerable proportion have had a limited local circulation, having been issued gene- rally in places where medical schools were established, and being in a certain sense the organs of the latter. These facts are not stated by way of disparagement. Of the great service rendered to medical progress b}T the larger and widely distributed journals, it is not necessary to speak ; but, in justice to those comparatively small, and circulating within restricted limits, it should be said that they have in no small measure been serviceable. They have aided in diffusing medical intelligence. They have incited to reading, thought, and profitable discussion. They have increased the number of contributors to medical would be easy to cite numerous instances of valuable contributions which have appeared in journals relatively obscure. The bibliography of the first quarter of the present century shows a fair list of original works, foremost in number and influence being the writings of Hush. Some of the works of this voluminous author, and other contributions to medical literature during this period, were repub- lished abroad and translated into different languages. The profession of this country were by no means wholly dependent on foreign works. It would, however, have betokened a lack of the spirit of progress had an acquaintance with foreign authors been restricted by prejudice or indif- ference. It was far otherwise. English works were the authorities in Medicine, and many of those who could afford, the time and expense, crossed the Atlantic (the voyages requiring at least two months) in order to finish their studies in Edinburgh or London, the schools in these cities at that time taking precedence of those on the continent of Europe. The reminiscences of the Revolutionary struggle, and a renewal of war with the mother country during this period, had no repressing influence on the attachment to the medical literature and the distinguished teachers of Great Britain. Is it unpatriotic to say this with gratification and pride? May we not claim in behalf of Medicine that it tends to raise its followers above political contentions'. May I not refer to our late domestic strife as affording illustrations of a brotherhood which the legitimate objects of Medicine render impregnable! "As a source of influence affecting the progress of Medicine, the forma- tion of medical societies in the early, and still more in the latter, part of the present century is to be mentioned. Without going into historical details, suffice it to say, that thereby the advancement and diffusion of knowledge have been greatly promoted. Moreover, to voluntary asso- ciations Is due, in a great measure, the character of the profession as regards medical ethics and its position in relation to illegitimate systems of practice. I must be content with simply referring, in this connection, to one of the most important of the agencies concerned in medical pro- gress. In pathology and therapeutics during the early part of the present century, the influence of surviving his death, was still great. Rush, however, a pupil and a fervent admirer of Cullen, was too bold and independent a thinker to be satisfied with being an expounder of his teacher’s doctrines. In those days an object of medical philosophy was ADDRESS ON MEDICINE. 7 to reach a theory which should reduce to a simple system the practice of medicine—an object which, were it attainable, would obviate many of the difficulties in the way of diagnosis, embarrassing the practitioner of the present day. Rush was the author of a theory, the unity of disease. According to this theory all morbid phenomena are the varied manifes- tations of a single entit}7. This is not the time nor place to enter into any discussion of the merits of medical theories, or to consider their practical effects. Whatever may be thought of the “ theory and practice of physic” as taught by Rush, he influenced largely pathological views and thera- peutics during his lifetime, and the influence of Ins writings continued after his death. The system of Brown, the opponent of Cullen, had its advocates in this country—a system leading to rules of practice directly in conflict with those inculcated by Cullen and Rush. Even the extrava- gances of Darwin’s Zoonomia, which was republished in Yew York and Philadelphia in the latter part of the eighteenth century, with an intro- ductory address and an appendix by Charles Caldwell, were not without influence. Toward the close of the first quarter of the present century (1823) the “Study of Medicine,” by John Mason Good, was republished in Boston, a work inaugurating the “ physiological system” in nosology and practice. It is evidence of a true spirit of progress that, of the different systems, none had exclusive sway, and that, although there were enthu- siastic partisans of each, many, if not the majority of, thinking minds were guided by a rational eclecticism, selecting from any whatever com- mended itself to reason and experience. With regard to this point I quote from the worthy historian of “Medicine in America,” Thacher, the following, written in 1828; “We recognize in our institutions no uniform theoretical system as the rule of practice. Medical history affords abundant evidence of the instability of human systems. Every age has teemed with theories or visionary hypotheses fleeting as the wind, scarcely surviving their authors, but yielding to others as transient and unsubstantial as themselves. The medical authorities most respected are Cullen, Rush, and Good. These, modified and improved according to the judgment and views of the respective professors, are adopted and taught in the various American universities.” The introduction of vaccination in the beginning of this century was a striking instance of the prompt recognition and adoption of a great discovery. Jenner’s “ Inquiry into the Causes and Effects of the Yariolse Yaccinse” was published in London in 1799. In the following year Benjamin Waterhouse vaccinated four of his children with virus received from Jenner, and tested their insusceptibility to smallpox by exposing them to infection in a hospital for the treatment of patients with the disease. In 1801, Yalentine Seaman commenced vaccination in Yew York. Its speedy employment throughout the United States was unattended by the violent opposition which characterized its early history in the country honored by this greatest of all discoveries, as measured by its influence on the physical welfare of mankind. In 1817, an important event denoting progress was the project for the formation of a Rational Pharmacopoeia. This project originated with Lyman Spalding, and the initiatory steps were taken by the Yew York County Medical Society. In 1820, a convention of delegates from the different medical colleges and societies throughout the Union assembled at Washington and adopted an American Pharmacopoeia, which, with decennial revisions, has been continued up to this date. 8 FLINT, The second quarter of the present century is an eventful period in the history of Medicine. The great American discovery of the annihilation of pain by anaesthetic inhalations was made in this period. It is signifi- cant of a cosmopolitan spirit pervading the medical profession throughout the civilized world, that this discovery was at once recognized and adopted in other countries. The first application to capital operations in surgery was in Boston, in September, 1846 ; and in the following January the brilliant success of this application was demonstrated in the hospitals of London and Paris. Directly following the application to surgery, anaesthetic inhalations entered into the treatment of diseases both here and abroad. Surveying the more memorable of the events relating to the medical knowledge of this period, it began with the advancement of morbid anatomy to the rank of a distinct department of medical study. This was the result of the labor of Bichat, which gave birth to General Anatomy. That great work, the “Anatomic Generate” of Bichat, trans- lated by George Hayward, was published in Boston in 1822. Bayle and Hollard’s Manual of General Anatomy was translated by Gross in 1828, and Bedard’s Elements of General Anatomy, which appeared in 1823, was translated by Joseph Togno, and published in Philadelphia in 1830. The Profession of this country were prepared by these works, together with the older works of Baillie, Meckel, Portal, Laennec, and others, for the grand development of this study by Cruveilhier, Andral, Lobstein, in France ; by Mueller, Gluge, Otto, Henle, Vogel, Hasse, Rokitansky, in Germany ; and by Carswell, Craigie, Hodgkin, and Hope, in Great Britain. With the writings of these distinguished authors the Profession of this country became immediately conversant. Some of the French and German works were translated, and all were brought to the notice of medical readers by means of analytical reviews. The spirit of pro- gress was shown by the efforts to keep pace with the advancement in other countries. To compete with these in the bibliography of this study was not to have been expected; yet in 1829 appeared “A Treatise on Pathological Anatomy,” by Horner, in two volumes; and in 1839 an elaborate work by the honored President of this International Congress, then a professor in the State which gave to the profession McDowell. Horner and Gross were thus pioneer authors in this branch of American medical literature. It is noteworthy that, for several years prior to the publication of the work by Gross, he had held a chair of pathological anatomy in the Cincinnati Medical College. I am fully warranted in saying that this field of observation was diligently cultivated by not a few, and that there was a general appreciation of its importance in relation to the knowledge of diseases. To the study of Pathological Anatomy during nearly all the period to which our attention is now directed, and up to the present moment, have been devoted the labors of one who, had he not been, unfortunately (I would almost say, with the utmost respect, blamably), satisfied with the gratification pertaining to his attainments, together with his usefulness as a professor, and his invaluable services as curator of one of the richest of the museums in this country, if not in the world, his name would have become so identified with the study in the medical literature of every country that it would have been superfluous to refer in this manner to J. B. S. Jackson. The discovery of auscultation can hardly be said to have had much efficient influence on the progress of Medicine prior to the second quarter ADDRESS ON MEDICINE. 9 of the present century. It is true, Laennec’s great work was published in 1819, and the translation by Forbes appeared in London in 1821; but the discovery met with distrust, and was disparaged by some authorita- tive authors. Forbes’s translation was republished in this country in 1830, and from this date the great value of auscultation began to be recognized. Soon after this date James Jackson, Jr., opened up the study of the abnormal modifications of expiratory sounds, which Laen- nec had, in a great measure, overlooked. In 1835 Gerhard published a treatise on the diagnosis of thoracic diseases to “supply the wants of his classes and of others who felt an interest in the subject.” In 1836 the Massachusetts Medical Society published dissertations, b}r Oliver Wendell Holmes, Robert W. Haxall, and Luther Y. Bell, submitted in competi- tion for a Boylston prize, which was adjudged to Holmes. As early as in 1832 James Jackson, in his visits at the Massachusetts General Hos- pital, always carried a stethoscope, the counterpart of that which Laen- nec was accustomed to make with his own hands ; and the daily record dictated at the bedside of each patient embraced signs obtained by per- cussion and auscultation. It was not long before physical exploration by th,ese methods entered more or less into clinical and didactic teaching in most of our medical colleges, and thence speedily found its way into private as well as public practice. The Profession of this country were not tardy in accepting the fruits of Laennec’s discovery, and this branch of practical medicine has ever since had with us not a few zealous vota- ries. Our medical literature, during the past forty years, contains a good proportion of contributions relating to it. The physical diagnosis of diseases of the heart, which at the present time has reached such perfection, may be said to have had its point of departure in the works of Bouillaud and Hope. Hope’s treatise, issued in London in 1832, was republished, with notes by the late Dr. C. W. Pen- nock, in Philadelphia in 1812. In the interim Dr. Pennock and Prof. E. M. Moore, of Rochester, FT. Y. (1839), had devised and carried out a series of accurate experiments to elucidate the mechanism of the heart sounds. At the end of the second quarter of the present century, the progress in this province of medicine had been made familiar to American medical readers by the republished works of Andry, Raciborski, Barth and Roger, Aran, Stokes, Latham, Walshe, Blakiston, Watson, and by the writings of Gerhard, Bowditch, and Swett in our own country. A memorable event in the medical history of this period was the publication, in 1827, by Richard Bright, of his “ Reports of Medical Cases.” A full analysis of this work appeared in the February number of the first volume of the “American Journal of the Medical Sciences,” in 1828. The editor concluded the article with these words; “As Dr. Bright’s volume is so costly as to preclude its circulation in this country, and as its contents are highly interesting, we have been induced to ex- tend our notice beyond the usual limits, and have placed in our periscope some of the most interesting cases.” I make this reference to show how quickly important contributions to our knowledge abroad were brought to the notice of medical readers on this side of the Atlantic. The name Morbus JBrightii had not as yet been applied to affections, the ana- tomical characters of which Bright was the first to describe. Naturally, the morbid anatomy of these affections for some time engrossed atten- tion ; the fruits of their clinical study could not be gathered at once. It was not until the publication of Christison’s work, in 1889, that the profession in Great Britain and this country began to grasp the scope of 10 FLINT, their pathological relations. Bright himself could hardly have dreamed of the extent of the new field in pathology which his researches opened up. Our present knowledge of uraemic conditions in etiology and symp- tomatology, acquired chiefly during the last quarter of the present cen- tury, he could not have anticipated. I think it not too much to say that the progressive developments in this field of pathology have been as fully appreciated and their influence on the practice of medicine has been as marked in this as in any country. The quotation just made from the “ American Journal of the Medical Sciences” leads me, in this connection, to refer to analytical reviews and bibliographical notices as affecting medical progress. This journal, suc- ceeding the “ Philadelphia Journal of the Medical and Physical Sci- ences,” in fact a continuation of the latter, dates from the year 1827. In the advertisement accompanying the first volume it was said ; u Ar- rangements have been made to import regularly from London and Paris every new medical work, and to obtain in exchange almost every medical journal published in Europe. These will be placed in competent hands for analysis or review, and whatever is valuable in their contents shall be laid before our readers as early as possible.” Writing, as I do, after having examined the volumes issued during the second quarter of the present century, I am impressed with the fidelity with which this promise was fulfilled. They contain reviews or notices of the important publications in England, France, Germany, and other countries during that period. This journal, continued up to the present time, under the same title, issued by the several successors of the first publishers, Lea & Carey, for more than forty years under the editorship of Isaac Hays (who, although a veteran in journalism, is not yet entitled to be called venerable), has had a powerful influence on the progress of Medicine in this country. This influence has been exerted not less by its original communications than by its reviews, notices, and general intelligence. Without any disparagement of the numerous able and useful periodicals during the last half century, may we not, with a feeling of pride, refer especially to a journal which, with such a history, is now the oldest rep- resentative of medical periodical literature, and which has probably a circulation larger than that of any other in Europe or America The physiological discoveries of Magendie, Charles Bell, and Marshall Hall, relating to the nervous system, forerunners of a further unfolding of the functions of this system within late years by Bernard, Brown- Sequard, and others, had a considerable influence on pathology and prac- tice; an influence which, by means of republications, reviews, and con- troversial articles, was perhaps felt as speedily here as abroad. But a memorable event in physiology, having direct practical bearings, was of American origin, namely, the observations and experiments of Beaumont in the case of Alexis St. Martin, published in 1833. Beaumont’s pro- longed, patient, careful, conscientious researches, demonstrating more completely than had yet been done the agency in digestion of the gastric juice, furnished important facts in relation to its quantity, its compo- sition, the circumstances affecting its secretion, together with the relative digestibility of different articles of food, and the influence upon digestion of local and general morbid conditions. These facts have, in the main, been corroborated by experimental physiologists who have since studied 1 The American Journal of the Medical Sciences is the oldest of living journals, consider- ing it as a continuation of the Journal of the Medical and Physical Sciences. ADDRESS ON MEDICINE. 11 the functions of the stomach by means of artificial gastric fistulse in infe- rior animals. Looking at the fruits of his labors as affecting the pro- gress of medicine, may we not claim for them sufficient value to entitle the name of Beaumont to he mentioned in connection with the names of Magendie, Bell, and Hall ? The writings of Broussais are to be reckoned among the memorable events of the period under survey. The “History of Chronic Phlegma- sise” was translated by Isaac Hays and E. Eglesfeld Griffith in 188 i ; in the same year his “ Treatise on Physiology applied to Pathology” was translated by John Bell and La Eoche, and in 1832 his work entitled “Propositions Embodying Principles of Physiological Medicine” was translated by Hays and Griffith. By these publications the profession in this country were made acquainted with the so-called new physiological doctrine more commonly known as Broussaism. For a time it had not a few ardent supporters, prominent among whom was the late Professor Samuel Jackson, whose work, entitled “ Principles of Medicine,” was based upon it. The circulation of this work was arrested by the author, as was understood, because it became inconsistent with his more matured views, an act which reflected honor upon his character as an honest inquirer after truth. Like the systems of Eush, Brown, and Cullen, Broussaism had its day ; hut, unlike the preceding systems, this has had no successor. With the fall of Broussaism the race of isms became ex- tinct ; theoretical dogmas as the basis of different schools or sects have been relinquished to the illegitimate pathys. Broussais, however, was not the sole last survivor of the race. Coeval with this doctrine was one of American birth, namely, the doctrine of Cooke. John Esten Cooke, a man of much ability and of sterling moral worth, at that time Professor of the Theory and Practice of Medicine in the worthily distinguished Transylvania University, in 1831 published at Lexington “ A Treatise on Pathology and Therapeutics.” After com- menting on the extreme proneness of medical philosophers to frame hypo- theses instead of following the true spirit of inductive logic, he enunciated the doctrine that hepatic congestion is the fons et origo of most of the phenomena of disease. This doctrine was not entirely new, but it was carried by Cooke to the extreme point of culmination. Its practical effect on therapeutics was an excessive use of purgatives, and especially calomel in large doses. In those days of hypercatharsis, patients were purged by the followers of this system as patients had never been purged before. Cooke was afterward Professor of Practice in the Medical School at Louisville, and for a long time a dose of calomel which he had prescribed was preserved as a curious specimen in the museum of that school. With the audacious extravagance which characterizes American humor, it is related of a Kentucky yeoman that, finding in one of his fields crude mercury in considerable quantity, visions of wealth from a mine of quicksilver loomed up in his imagination; but they were dis- pelled when it was ascertained that the spot had been a burial ground for the remains of patients treated in accordance with this doctrine! An influence which contributed to prevent the formation of new sys- tems of medicine, and to promote in not a small degree, true medical progress, belongs to the works of Louis. Louis’s “ Eesearches on Phthisis,” translated by Cowen, revised and altered by Bowditch, his “ Eesearches on the Typhoid Affection,” translated by Bowditch, and his “Eesearches on the Effect of Bloodletting in some Inflammatory Diseases,” translated by Putnam, with a preface and appendix by James Jackson, were 12 FLINT, published in this country in 1886. His “Researches on Yellow Fever,” translated from the manuscript by Shattuck, appeared in 1889. I need not enter into an exposition of the method of study which Louis exem- plified in these works. It would be out of place, even if time permitted, to discuss here the merits of this method. Of its influence, suffice it to say that it has led to a large proportion of the actual knowledge of the clinical history of diseases, of their anatomical characteristics, of the diagnostic value of symptomatic phenomena and of therapeutical agen- cies, which has been acquired within the past forty years. Of the per- manency of acquisitions in knowledge to which it has already led, let this statement suffice; the works of Louis, within the limits of the means of observation available in bis time, are as valuable to-day as at the date of their appearance. The method of study inaugurated by him was a new departure of the Philosophy of Medicine, offering now, and in all time, rich returns for honest work. The study of medicine in the direction given to it by the labors of Louis, led to an appreciation of the importance of knowing the natural history of diseases. Jacob Bigelow struck a key-note in his discourse on “ Self-limited Diseases” in 1885. From that time our teachers and writers have been alive to the truth that knowledge of the intrinsic tendencies of diseases must underlie actual progress in therapeutics. The true spirit of medical philosophy, after its emancipation from the thraldom of theoretical systems, speedily found expression in the works of Stille, Bartlett, Ware, Holmes, and others. The influence was soon felt in medical practice. Progressively, in this country, practitioners became more reserved in the use of heroic measures of treatment, and polypharmacy fell into disrepute; they became less ambitious to be the masters,and more content to remain the servants of nature; efforts were made to bring experience to the test of the numerical method of inves- tigation, and “ expectation,” using this terra in its true sense, took its proper place in clinical medicine. Is it presumptuous to affirm that these criteria of veritable progress have been not less, and perhaps, in some regards even more marked in the medical practice of American physi- cians than of those in the older countries, by whose writings and oral teachings we have largely profited? Warned by the length already of this discourse, I must not linger with other topics relating to the history of the second quarter of the present century. There are two events of importance, belonging to this period, to be added to those already noticed, namely, the publication of the United States Dispensatory and the organization of the American Medical Association. The first edition of the Dispensatory by Wood and Bache was published in 1833. With the additions and improvements called for in the successive thirteen editions, this work has met fully the wants of the practitioner, holding its place still, without a competitor, and, to say the least, comparing favorably with similar publications in other countries. The American Medical Association was instituted in 1847, by the Profession, “for the protection of their interests, for the maintenance of their honor and respectability, for the advancement of their knowledge and the extension of their usefulness.”1 Since its organization annual meetings have been held, excepting a portion of the period during which intercourse of the Profession of the North and the 1 Quoted from the resolution adopted by the Convention which preceded the first meeting of the Association. ADDRESS ON MEDICINE. 13 South was suspended by civil war. At these meetings representative members of the profession in all parts of the country have been brought together under circumstances conducive to fraternal union and good fellowship; and the twenty-six volumes of “ Transactions” contain much that is valuable, more especially in relation to climatology, and the dis- eases prevalent in different parts of the United States. The Association has encouraged original papers by prizes, and has kept the Profession in- formed of important contributions to knowledge by reports on Medical Science and Literature, and on the Progress of Medicine, Surgery, and Midwifery. In these different ways its influence has been not incon- siderable. The literature of any province of knowledge gives the truest expression of progress, while it does most toward promoting it. In this period, the increase of publications was proportionate to the growth of our nation in population and material interests. I shall enumerate some of the valuable contributions to practical medicine, without attempting to give a full list of them. My distinguished friend who will address the Congress on the subject of American Medical Literature will supply deficiencies here and elsewhere. The “ Practical Esssay on Typhous Fever” by Nathan Smith, although printed in 1824, may be reckoned as entering into the literature of this period. One of our most accomplished writers (Bartlett) in his work on the Fevers of the United States, published in 1842, says of this “ modest unpretending essay.” “To an American practitioner it is worth in- finitely more than all the modern English treatises put together.” The attainments and skill of that great man, united with perfect integrity and simplicity of character, excite our admiration ; nor can we less admire the energy and pluck which led him to establish the medical school of Dartmouth College, himself the sole professor for ten years, a faculty of one, but that one Nathan Smith, prominent among the medical heroes of the early age of our republic. The progress of knowledge of the essential fevers, within this period, was in no small measure affected by contributions to American medical literature. Gerhard, Pennock, in 1836, and Shattuck, in 1839, were the first to contribute ample clinical observations, showing the essential points of distinction between typhus and typhoid fever. To these observers belongs the credit of the doctrine of the non-identity of these fevers, a doctrine which, after twenty years of hesitation and discussion, was generally recognized as sufficiently established. James Jackson’s Report, in 1838, and Enoch Hale’s paper, in 1839, embodied the results of the application of the method of study inaugurated by Louis to the common continued (typhoid) fever of New England. The treatise on the Fevers of the United States by Elisha Bartlett, published in 1842, the fourth edition revised after the author’s death by Alonzo Clark, has been, almost up to the present time, a standard work, and is too well known to need any commendation. Meredith Clymer, in an article on typhoid fever, published in 1846, was the first to describe in this country the disease now known as relapsing fever. It may, perhaps, be assumed that the communicability of typhoid fever was first demonstratively shown by the circumstances attending an outbreak of the disease in a small hamlet in Western New York, in 1843.1 1 Account of an epidemic fever which occurred at North Boston, Erie Co., N. Y., in October and November, 1843; American Journal of the Med. Sciences, July, 1845. 14 FLINT, Important contributions relating to the differential characters of remittent fever and its clinical history were made by Stewardson, in 1841 and 1842; by Swett, in 1845 ; by Anderson, Frick, Stilld, and Boling, in 1846. Our present knowledge of this disease rests mainly on the facts contained in these contributions. The doctrine of the combination of different fevers, or the “ blending of types,” was taught by Dickson and Drake, in contradiction of the theory of Hunter, which denied that the special causes of two or more diseases can act conjointly in the organism. The doctrine is now suffi- ciently established by clinical proof. Drake, in 1832, contributed a series of papers in advocacy of the animalcular hypothesis of the origin and diffusion of* epidemic cholera, and subsequently, in his great work, he argued at length, and cogently, for this hypothesis as applied to the etiology of other diseases. And in this connection the remarkable work of Mitchell on the “ Cryptogamous Origin of Malarious and Epi- demic Fevers” may be referred to. This work was published in 1849. If, as is perhaps more than probable, the truth of the “germ theory,” as it is now termed, be hereafter confirmed by direct observation, the writings of Mitchell and Drake on this subject will be cited as evidence of an "insight into the mysteries of etiology beyond that of their con- temporaries ; and at the psesent moment, when this theory is the subject of so much interest, these writings claim careful study. In referring to Drake, I cannot forbear a passing tribute of admiration of the talents and labors of that truly great man. As an eloquent expounder of medicine he was without a superior; and when we look at the work which he performed, as a writer, a medical teacher, and in travelling over large sections of our country, gathering from personal inquiries and observations materials for his treatise on the “Principal Diseases of the Interior Valley of Forth America,” which he did not live to complete, we must consider his name as worthy to be enrolled in the list of our medical heroes. The treatment of the periodical fevers with large doses of quinia, together with the discontinuance of the so-called preparatory treatment; the extent to which this drug may be given without risk of harm; the entire safety of its use in the state of pyrexia; and the advantage of arresting the paroxysms as speedily as practicable—points at that time in opposition to the prevalent practice—wTere set forth in this country as early as 1841.1 It may be added that the views which have since pre- vailed in reference to these points were adopted earlier, and diffused more quickly with us than in other countries. The literature of this period embraces many contributions relating to yellow 7 fever. Prominent among the contributors are the names of Bar- ton, Barrington, Cartwright, Dickson, Fott, Simons, C. H. Stone, Ashbell Smith, and "Fenner. Our medical literature from the earliest period of our history has abounded in writings on this subject, to which justice has been done in that marvel of laborious erudition, the Treatise on Yellow 7 Fever, by La Roche, published in 1855. The contributions by the authors just named, and others, led to the present prevailing belief in the non-communicability of the disease, but the portability of its special cause, and in the injudiciousness of perturbatory measures of treat- ment. Of contributions other than those relating to the essential fevers, and 1 Vide article in the American Journal of Medical Sciences, No. for October, 1841. ADDRESS OX MEDICINE. 15 in addition to those referred to in other connections, I shall mention several, by no means undertaking to enumerate all, or even the greater part, of those which promoted progress by extending, more or less, the boundaries of knowledge. John Ware, in an analysis of his recorded experience published in 1831, brought to bear the numerical method upon the use of opium in the treatment of delirium tremens. The results of the analysis have ever since been a basis of practice in that disease. The same writer in a series of articles on croup, published in the latter part of this period, delineated clearly the different affections then embraced under that name. The distinctions derived from his recorded experience and founded in nature, are as valid to-day as at the date of their publication. John B. Beck’s treatise on infant therapeutics in 1849, had much influence in restraining the over-use of potential measures in the treat- ment of diseases in infantile life. The article by Cammann and Clark on auscultatory percussion, published in 1840, introduced a new method in physical exploration, and gave the results of its employment in obtain- ing accurate measurements of internal organs. The treatise by Amariah Brigham on “The Influence of Mental Cultivation on Health,” published in 1832, and the “Inquiry concerning the Diseases and Functions of the Brain, Spinal Cord, and Herves,” published in 1840, contained original views important in their practical applications. Horace Green’s treatise on “ Diseases of the Air Passages,” published in 1846, originated the prac- tice of making topical applications within the larynx, the feasibility of which was accepted after considerable distrust and acrimonious discussion. In 1841 Alonzo Clark began to treat acute peritonitis with large doses of opium, excluding calomel and venesection. He carried the use of opium further than had previously been done, and ascertained that the disease in some cases causes a marvellous tolerance of this remedy. The treatment exclusively or chiefly by opium has been generally adopted in this country, and may properly be called the American method. More- over, the success of the use of opium freely in peritonitis, has led to the useful employment of this remedy in other affections. Bowditch’s first employment of suction for the withdrawal of liquid from the pleural cavity, through a small canula, was a few weeks after the end of this period; but he then carried into effect a procedure which he had pre- viously maturely considered and resolved upon. I may, therefore, in this connection, refer to an improvement in the practice of medicine, the merits of which it were needless at this day to discuss. The use of the term aspiration, in place of the homely word suction, and the invention of more complicated instruments, have recently given to the procedure a new and more attractive aspect. The successful practical application of the method, however, belongs to the history of American medicine; and, taking into view the wide range of the application, it is certainly worthy of being reckoned among the important events affecting medical progress within the past century. These contributions, cited from personal recollection, without searching medical annals in order to extend the list, suffice to show that during this eventful period, the field of practical medicine in this country was not without efficient workers, and not wholly unproductive. Directing attention to another aspect of medical literature, the evidence and the means of progress are shown by the number of works relating to the Principles and Practice of Medicine. Original works in this department of literature began to appear prior to the second quarter of the present 16 FLINT, century; but the number within this period was considerable, namely, the works of Dewees, Eberle, Dunglison, Cooke, Fort, Gallup, Hosack, Chapman, Paine, Dickson, Stille, and Wood. A considerable number of republished works, generally with notes or additions by American edi- tors, were added to those of native production. In this list are the works of Marshall Hall, revised and much enlarged by Jacob Bigelow and Oliver Wendell Holmes, Craigie, Billings, Elliotson, with notes by Stew- ardson ; Gregory, with notes by Peixotto, Alison, Williams,and Latham; Graves’s System of Clinical Medicine, with additional lectures by Gerhard, and Stokes’s lectures with an equal number added by Bell; Andral’s Clinique Medicale, translated by Spillan ; Chomel’s Pathologic Genflrale, translated by Oliver and Morland, and the lectures by AVatson. In addi- tion to works of this character were several on a larger scale designed for reference in regard especially to the practice of medicine, namely, the London Cyclopaedia of Practical Medicine, edited with large additions by Dunglison ; Copland’s Medical Dictionary, with copious notes by Lee; the Library of Practical Medicine by Tweedie, with American notes and additions by Gerhard. To this class of works belongs the American Cyclopaedia, edited by Hays. AVLen to these productions, native and foreign, we add the original treatises by Dewees, Eberle, Condie, and Stewart on the diseases of children ; not a few works, original and im- ported, treating of particular classes of diseases; the works on materia medica by Barton, Bigelow, Coxe, Chapman, Eberle, Dunglison, Griffith, Carson, Paine, Ellis, Beck, Bell, Harrison (all. native productions), and the medical dictionary, by Dunglison, have we not, in this point of view, evidence of an activity in the means of progress creditable to a nation under the age of fourscore years? Was not the growth of medical literature, in this aspect, proportionate, to say the least, to the increase of population, the extent of territory populated, and the advancement in other provinces of practical knowledge? Survey for an instant this period from one other standpoint, namely, the number and character of prominent members of the medical profes- sion. We must recognize in the personal influence exerted by individuals in their respective spheres as teachers, practitioners, and members of society, one of the most potent of the agencies concerned in progress. Some of those who, regarded from this standpoint, have a record most honorable to themselves, are still with us—may they live long to receive the honor which is their due 1 On the list of those who have departed for another life are such names as James Jackson, Samuel Jackson, Samuel Jackson of Northumberland, Chapman, Mitchell, Hosack, Ware, Gerhard, the two Becks, McNaughton, Pennock, Revere, Drake, Joseph M. Smith, Francis, Parrish, the elder Shattuck, Dunglison, Dickson, Fen- ner, Stearns, Bartlett, Moreton Stille, Caldwell, Laßoche, Lee, Swett, Twitched, Tally, Mussey ; and to these, and such as these, might be added the names of a host of practitioners who, without engaging in the labors of literature, or in medical schools, exerted within greater or lesser spheres, an influence promoting the diffusion of knowledge and ennobling the character of the physician. Having reached in our survey the third quarter of the present century, I hasten to say that the concluding part of ray address will be brief. I shall not enter into historical details for reasons which are obvious, in addition to the desire not to presume too much upon your patience. The professional lives of a considerable proportion of those whom I address ADDRESS ON MEDICINE. 17 embrace the last twenty-five years, and everything of importance per- taining to the history of this period is familiar to them. Moreover, to particularize events, to notice contributions to medical literature, and to refer to individual members of the profession, would involve questions of delicacy which I prefer to avoid. I shall therefore limit myself to a few remarks on topics suggested by the inquiry, what are some of the characteristics of medical progress in the United States within the last quarter of a century and at the present time? The predominant and most distinctive characteristics of progress in the medical science of this period, are derived from the developments in histology. Pathological histology followed the acquisition of a new territory in anatomy by Schwann in 1839, as the morbid anatomy of the tissues had followed the Anatomic Generate of Bichat; and the devel- opments by means of the microscope in the study of disease are to be dated chiefly after the middle of the present century. Prior to this, however, microscopy had enlisted the interest of medical teachers and students in this country, as well as in Europe; and as early as 1851, a prize was awarded to Burnett (whose untimely death was a loss to science), by the American Medical Association, for an essay on “ The Cell; its Physiology, Pathology, and Philosophy,” embracing deductions from elaborate original investigations. Histology entered at once into the formal instruction of many, if not most, of our medical schools. Our pilgrim sons who previously had paid homage at Paris, Edinburgh, Dublin, and London, for the past quarter of a century have gathered in larger numbers at Vienna and Berlin, Histological researches having been prosecuted with most zeal by our Austrian and Prussian brethren, German medical literature has thereby acquired a prominence and an influence which might be cited as a characteristic of Medicine at the present time. I need hardly say that it would not be fitting on this occasion to inquire into the actual increase of our knowledge to be ascribed to the progress of histology. That a vast and fruitful domain in physiology and pathology has been brought under cultivation, and that it has already jdeldect rich harvests, cannot be doubted. Herein will the history of Medicine in our day be ever memorable. And the future is full of promise when obstructions from doctrines connected with bioplasm, cyto-blastema, autogenesis, and the so-called cellular pathology shall have disappeared. With improved methods and increased power of microscopical investigation, it may not be long before the germs (using this word in either a literal or a figurative sense) of infec- tious and contagious diseases will be brought within the scope of ocular demonstration. When this is accomplished, it requires no prophetic sagacity to foresee that the influence on the progress of pathology, thera- peutics and prophylaxis must be immense. Perhaps in the developments of the future, the labors of our zealous workers will bear an honorable part. I will venture to add that we are not to expect from histology a royal road through pathological mysteries; but, profiting by past experi- ence, and avoiding doctrines based largely on hypotheses, our researches in this direction should go hand in hand with the tedious, but, if properly conducted, safe studies in clinical medicine. I have alluded to pilgrimages to other countries. The desire to profit by the distinguished schools abroad has always been an American charac- teristic. In the first half century of our national existence, the schools in Great Britain were chiefly resorted to; in the third quarter of the century, those of France had the preference, and in the last quarter the 2 18 FLINT, German schools. Some members of the Profession look with disfavor on this yearning for foreign instruction. It is thought to be antagonistic to a proper sense of a national independence, implying a sort of vassalage unfavorable to original developments. I do not share in these views. For us, in our adolescent age, to regard with a certain degree of defer- ence the institutions of older countries, is not a confession of dependence, but a becoming modesty. It is true that opinions which have travelled across the Atlantic acquire in the estimation of many an exaggerated importance; the weight of far distant authority is apt to be over-estimated. This is, in a measure, counteracted by judgments formed after personal inspection. A discriminating mind judges fairly from intercourse with distinguished teachers and writers of their claims as authorities. In this point of view our sojourners abroad benefit, not only themselves, but their brethren at home. In some instances, it must be admitted, personal ad- miration or attachment leads to a discipleship which is exceedingly un- favorable to the progress of the disciples; yet these render service by diffusing the opinions of their masters among those who, uninfluenced by partisan zeal, consider and judge without prejudice. That our independ- ence in thought and judgment is not compromised, is shown by what I believe may be stated as a fact, namely, no one who has returned from abroad and remained a mere satellite of a foreign luminary, has ever attained to any great distinction in the minds of his countrymen. A characteristic of the past quarter of a century, and of the present time, relates to the increase of American medical literature. FTative productions have been and are steadily increasing in number, and this not to the exclusion of, if, indeed, there have been any decrease in, the republication of foreign works. In order to appreciate the significance of this increase, as showing the progress of native literature, we must consider that American productions are in immediate competition with English works, the merits of which have been established, and for the republication of which the authors can claim no royalty. Much has been said of the injustice done to American authors by the want of an interna- tional copyright law. Without entering into any discussion of this topic, I will simply say that such a law is called for, not so much for the encour- agement of our own literature, as in behalf of the just claims of foreign authors. The medical profession of this country have given ample evi- dence of a disposition to receive with discriminating favor native produc- tions. I presume lam not in error in saying that our medical publishers are always ready to print any work which, from its intrinsic merits, may offer a fair promise of success. This is evidence of a demand for native works, inasmuch as it would imply a marvellous disinterestedness to sup- pose that publishers are actuated solely by a desire to promote a national literature. It is noteworthy that not long after French authors were held in special favor, the proportion of medical readers who were able to study the works of these authors in the language in which they were written, became so large as to render translations unprofitable to pub- lishers ; and it is probable that ere long this will be found to be the case in regard to publications in the German language. There will then be no occasion for a remark which I have heard imputed to a medical teacher in this country, that to know the German tongue is as essential for the student of medicine as a knowledge of anatomy ! I cannot forego a few words respecting the disposition of our English- speaking foreign brethren toward American medical literature. Many years ago an English reviewer and humorist, in a moment of irritation ADDRESS ON MEDICINE. 19 from circumstances of a personal nature which rendered it perfectly natural, exclaimed, “Who reads an American hook?” This has been over and over again quoted as a fair expression of the estimate in England of our bibliography. It should never be quoted except to add that its author was more unjust to his own countrymen than to us. All who are familiar with the medical periodical literature of Great Britain must have been impressed with the great candor and consideration generally shown in reviews and notices of American works. Hot unfre- quently these have received far more approbation abroad than at home. This is certainly a fitting occasion to declare that there is no ground to impute a prejudice,either in Great Britain or any other country, against our national literature. That our works and periodical literature have in general a practical character is readily accounted for by our youth as a nation, and the rapid extension of population over a vast continent. With increase of years, and the altered circumstances incident thereto, our future in medical literature, it may safely he predicted, will show a wider scope. Thus far in our progress, the pressing claim upon our writers has been the wants of our widely separated brethren as regards qualification for the active duties of the practitioner. The statement just made suggests the leading characteristic of our medical schools, namely, practical instruction. I shall not encroach upon the ground of the distinguished physician who is to address us on the subject of American medical education. He may, perhaps, point out defects in our educational institutions. That there are defects, is not to be denied. But, that we may not do injustice to our predecessors and our contemporaries, let it be considered how peculiar is the situation of the profession of this country in this regard. The whole responsibility for medical education, inclusive of the means for its promotion, rests, for the most part, with the Profession. Medical schools are without the jurisdiction of the general government, and our numerous States can only control, of course, those within their respective borders. Hence, uniformity throughout the country in legislating in behalf of medical education is impracticable. Legislative provisions for the increase and diffusion of medical knowledge are apt to be regarded in the light of appropriations for the benefit of a particular class of citizens. A diploma or a license to practise medicine from some legally authorized body is easily obtained, and the law practical!} 7 places no obstacle in the way of practising without either. How, in view of these facts, which are, of course, familiar to all of us, how are we to explain the annual gatherings of medical students and practitioners in large numbers in Philadelphia, Hew York, and other cities, many coming from distant parts of the Union, incurring expenses which often involve much exertion and self- denial? What other explanation is there than, first, that certain of our medical schools afford large opportunities in the way of practical in- struction ; and, second, that there is a wide-spread yearning for these opportunities simply on account of their intrinsic worth? Have we not here the evidence of a spirit of progress in both teachers and pupils, which is creditable to the past and present, as, also, an earnest for the future? Let us strive to remove defects, to correct abuses, and to improve, as fast as practicable, our system of instruction; but let us not be led into a disparagement of what has been done, and is now being done, in behalf of medical education. 20 FLINT, ADDRESS ON MEDICINE. A few words in conclusion, concerning characteristics which relate to medical ethics. At the Convention held in 1847, resulting in the orga- nization of the American Medical Association, a code of ethics was adopted, and it has since been formally recognized as having binding force upon members of state and local societies throughout the Union. This code embodies rules which were in accordance with the usages of worthy members of the profession in this country, and with established ethical principles in other countries. It defines simply and clearly the line of conduct to be followed in the relations of medical men to each other and the profession at large, to their patients, to the public, and to those who, adopting a practice based on an exclusive dogma, or from unworthy acts, are not to be considered as professional brethren. This code has remained unaltered and with undiminished force for more than a quarter of a century. I state this fact as a characteristic which reflects honor on the representatives of American Medicine. I claim, in behalf of the Medical Profession of the United States, that the great majority of its members have been loyal to the code of ethics. With no penalty for violations of ethical rules beyond the loss of professional fellowship, a penalty which may be made subservient to selfish advantage, loyalty is secured by motives of self-respect, and regard for the power of the Pro- fession. It may perhaps be claimed that in no other country is the line dividing legitimate and illegitimate medicine more distinctly defined than with us; and nowhere are instances of affiliation with irregular practitioners more infrequent. The same may perhaps be said of the number of those who, having once been in respectable professional standing, have yielded to the temptation of originating secret nostrums and patenting remedies or inventions. These characteristics are consistent with the fact that in no other country does the Profession of Medicine hold a higher social position or exert a greater public influence than in these United States of America. Gentlemen, Members of the International Medical Congress: At this our Centennial Anniversary it has seemed to me appropriate to survey “ Medicine and Medical Progress in the United States” from the points of view which excite feelings of gratification, hope, and faith. We should by no means shut our eyes to errors, defects, and short-comings ; but there are other occasions more suitable for regarding these. The history of American Medicine for the past century contains much that we may rightly be proud of; we have no reason to be ashamed of its present condition, and need we doubt that the spirit of progress which has thus far guided it, will lead onward to the fulfilment of a glorious destiny! 21 ADDRESS ON HYGIENE AND PREVENTIVE MEDICINE BY HENRY I. BOWDITCH, M.D., PRESIDENT OF THE STATE BOARD OF HEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS. Gentlemen of the International Medical Congress : I have been requested to speak to you on Public Hygiene and its great resultant, State Preventive Medicine, as it appears to an observer looking back upon the Centennial Period now just closing. As a measure of vital importance to the well-being of any community, and, as such, worthy to be cheerfully and amply sustained by great cities and States, Public Hygiene, as we now understand that term, has, till within a very short time, been wofully neglected, save when, under the stimulus of some great and terrible epidemic, frantic but temporary ef- forts have been made to stay the plague by Hygienic or by other means. Of late, however, a new and better era seems opening to our view, and State Preventive Medicine affords us higher hopes for all coming time. To this last, this noblest phase of Public Hygiene, its very gradual evo- lution out of the dogmatism and skepticism of the past, its present status, our duties relative thereto, and our golden hopes for its futuie, I crave your candid consideration during the brief hour I shall have the honor of addressing you. If, at the termination of my remarks, our foreign associates feel that I have given them but little information, and my countrymen find that I have said but little in praise of my country, one and all of you, I trust, will generously allow me the credit of having endeavored at least to speak the exact truth about the various States, and the United States as a Ration, in their relation to these matteis. May I dare to hope that the plain unvarnished story of our present condition and short-comings, in regard to practical public hygiene, may do some- thing to stimulate each State and the United States governments, to do more thoroughly the plain duties that lie open before them? Before laying down the propositions I intend to defend, let me say we cannot, in the consideration of them, confine our view simply to this country, but must frequently refer to the men and ideas of other countries, as well as to those of our own. And let me add that in citing the names of men who have been promi- nent here or elsewhere, I shall do so without intending either praise or blame, but simply as those of illustrious representatives of great systems of medicine or of wide currents of thought, upon which the greater part of mankind has been borne almost unconsciously along. NATURAL DIAHSIORS OP THE CERTERRIAL PERIOD. In its Medical and Social ideas, the past centenary easily divides itself into three unequal epochs, viz.: I. From 1776 to 1832, the era of theory and of dogmatism ; 11. From 1832 to 1869, or that of strict observation, 22 BOWDITCH, and of bold, often reckless, skepticism; 111. From 1869 to 1876, which is destined to continue and progress while the nation itself lives, the noblest and most beneficent of all, viz., that in which the profession, joining heartily with the laity and aided by the material and intellec- tual resources of great States, will study to unravel the primal causes of ail disease with the object of preventing it. It is the epoch of State Preventive Medicine. First Epoch, or that of Medical System-making, filled with an Over- weening Confidence in our Art, with little or no Faith in the Vis Medicatrix Naturae. (From 1776 to 1832, or thereabouts.) The influences which governed this period and the previous centuries, may be briefly sketched as follows : The illustrious Boerhaave began to enunciate his doctrines of disease at Leyden in 1701. His doctrines held sway in America until about 1765, or ten years before the opening of our centennial period. Following closely after him came Hoffmann, Cullen, Brown, and Darwin, and each with his own peculiar sj^stem. Our ingenious and renowned countryman, Benjamin Rush, in 1790, proclaimed his own idea, viz., that a convulsive motion of the arte- ries is the proximate cause of all fevers, however different the causes may be.1 Benjamin Rush was one of the most noteAvorthy men this centenary has produced, and as he had more influence than any other one person upon medical opinion during the fiTst epoch; as he is called by one of his admirers “the American Sydenham,” it seems to me not improper that I should on this occasion mention some facts of his life. He was born Dec. 24,1745, on his father’s plantation, fourteen miles from Philadelphia; consequently he was just entering the prime of man- hood in 1776. Seven years before that, at the early age of twenty-four, he had been appointed Professor of Chemistry in the University of Penn- sylvania. During the Revolutionary Avar he resigned this professorship, and Avas made Medical Director of the Middle Department of the Continental Army. In 1789 he resumed his professorship of chemistry, and in October of that year became Professor of the Theory and Practice of Medicine, which office he held until his death in 1813. During all these years he energetically and ably defended his system, as he had previously upheld Cullen’s. He has left accounts of various epidemics of yellow fever and other observations and essays, which are valuable as records of the period and as evidences of his intellectual and moral Avorth. He Avas essentially a medical system-maker like his predecessors. He believed fully in heroic remedies, and rather scoffed at Nature’s influence in disease. His pupils spread themselves over some of the Eastern but more over the Middle, Western, and Southern States, carrying Avith them not only the Avisdorn but the errors of their great master. He thus had vast influence on the medical ideas of the country. This becomes still more evident when we remember that he held the chief professorship in the foremost medical school in the Union, and that, toAvards the end of his career, the number of students that listened to his eloquent and per- 1 Rush’s Med. Inquiries and Observations, Philadelphia, vol. iii. p. 11. ADDRESS ON HYGIENE. 23 suasive tongue, amounted to about four hundred, annually drawn to Philadelphia from every part of the country. The reputation of our profession among the more intelligent of the laity, when Dr. Push was in his full glory, is brought out in the follow- ing extract from a letter from Thomas Jefferson to his friend Dr. Wistar in 1807. He writes, “I have myself lived long enough to see the fashions of Hoffmann, Boerhaave, Stahl, and Brown succeed one another like the shifting figures of a magic lantern, and their fancies like the dresses of the doll-babies from Paris; becoming from their novelty the vogue of the day, and yielding to the next novelty their ephemeral favor.”1 We may well fear that Mr. Jefferson’s opinion of our profession was not much improved when Dr. Rush dogmatically proclaimed, during a heated discussion with some physicians of Philadelphia, that the time must and will come when the general use of calomel, jalap, and of the lancet without a physician’s advice, will he considered “among the most essential articles of the knowledge and the rights of man”! But Dr. Rush’s theory and dogmatism were destined to fall under the influence of the fascinating theories of Broussais. Broussais was born in 1772, when Rush had already given evidence of his great powers as a teacher. This great Frenchman died in 1838, after his authority, which had been world-wide, had begun to decline. Broussaism spread widely in America, but less in Hew England, which had been trained more to close observation under the great masters in medicine, Dr. E. A. Holyoke, Dr. James Jackson, and others, than it did in the Middle, Western, and Southern States. In or about 1832, the system began to fall in America, as it had been previously falling in Europe. With its fall our first epoch terminates. The whole tenor of medical opinion during the period, as you readily perceive, with its theories and systems concocted in great minds, was not in the smallest degree suited to the growth of State Preventive Medicine. Second Epoch ; or that of Observation, and accurate recording and SUBSEQUENT ANALYSIS OF PACTS ; WITH AN EXTREME CONFIDENCE IN HATURE’S POWER IN DISEASE; A CORRESPONDING SKEPTICISM IN REGARD TO THE USE OF DRUGS ; AND, FINALLY, DIM PRESAGES OF PREVENTIVE Medicine. (From 1832 to 1869.) The second epoch presents characteristics precisely the reverse of the first. Louis and his numerical method stand prominent in it. Louis may be called the lineal scientific descendant of such men as William and John Hunter, Morgagni, etc. His nature rebelled against the dogmatism of the past, unsupported as it was by well-ascertained and recorded facts. You all know the great and wide-spread influence of his works in Europe; Broussaism fell before them. The epoch in America commenced when Dr. Gerhard, of Philadelphia, and Dr. James Jack- son, Jr., of Boston, and other pupils of the observation school, returned to America. Drs. Gerhard and Jackson had high mental powers finely cultivated. Both came back devoted friends, and admirers of Louis as a man and as a medical reformer. They were full of the new ideas, and enthusiastic defenders and expounders of them. The influence of these ' Works of Thomas Jefferson, Washington, 1854, vol. ix. p. 107. 24 BOWDITCH, ideas on the currents of medical thought in America was immense. It extended gradually over the whole country. It must be admitted that at times there was something unwarrantably supercilious in the terms in which some of Louis’s disciples, rather than Louis himself, spoke of the past. It seemed as if they would, if they could, wholly ignore the past in their desire to build up the medicine of the present and of the future upon the firm basis of strictly recorded fact. By this exclusive spirit of man}7 of the “Numerical School,” while infinite good has been done, a great apparent evil to practical medicine has arisen. I allude to the more or less complete skepticism on the part of many of the profession, and of the laity, in regard to every species of medical treatment, except perhaps that of good nursing. The pendulum of human thought, as always happens in such cases, has swung far beyond the line of exact truth, so that from a blind faith in the supreme power of our art, noticeable in our first epoch, many have passed into an equally blind and fanatical skepticism in reference to it. Never- theless I presume all will admit that Louis’s school was needed to sweep away all false systems unsupported by well-recorded and sufficiently numerous facts. Louis’s doctrines, though vehemently opposed by some who had grown old under the previous epochs, were received by most young men with joy, and philosophical minds among the elders were charmed with the accuracy observable in Louis’s Numerical Method, as shown in his writings. Under the direct or indirect influence of his writings and Numerical Method, which Dr. Guy1 considers the guiding power of the present time, a very large number of independent observers and workers have been educated in this country and in Europe. The mottoes selected by Louis as his own guides are identical with those of modern science. In addition to the specific disciples of Louis, there were three others, all men of great intellectual ability, who by their writings and teachings powerfully influenced this epoch. I allude to Jacob Bigelow and Elisha Bartlett, of America, and John Forbes, of England. Two of this trio are now dead. Dr. Bigelow entered his 90th year last February. His life nearly spans the century, and as it closely unites the first and second epochs, I hope you will permit me to allude to him somewhat as I did to Dr. Rush. He was born February 27, 1787 ; that is, two years before Dr. Rush resumed his professor’s chair in the University of Pennsylvania, at the close of the Revolutionary war. After a most honorable and successful life as a physician, and as professor of the Harvard Medical School, Dr. Bigelow has been, for years, totally blind, and hopelessly unable to move from his bed for more than eighteen months. To a casual visitor he seems as bright and as witty as ever, while his beautiful and uncomplaining submission to what most persons would deem a sad fate, raises him in the eyes of all beholders even higher than he was at the period of his greatest energy and fame. A visit to his bedside affords a delightful sense of repose from the bustle of daily toil. It was my happiness to have a long conversation with him a few months ago. I found he retained a vivid reminiscence of the days of his youth. He was one of Dr, Rush’s class, and bears full testimony to the eloquence and earnestness with which Dr. Rush advocated his medical theories more than half a century since, and only a few years before he died. 1 Public Health; Win. A. Guy, M.8., F.R.S., London, 1874. ADDRESS ON HYGIENE. 25 Dr. Bigelow full}7 sustains me in my position relative to Dr. Rush’s views of Nature and of our Art. Dr. Bigelow’s influence upon this second epoch was diametrically opposed to Dr. Rush’s, during the first. Dr. Bigelow earnestly supported the principles and methods advocated by Louis and the Numerical School. By his writings and teachings he had great power over New England directly, and indirectly over the medical opinions of the whole country, by means of his pupils, who migrated to our most distant States. The skepticism of Louis’s School was augmented thereby. Whilst Dr. Bigelow was thus sapping our faith in drugs, or rather in the polypharmacy which had come down to us from the past, there was sent forth from the chief medical journal of that day, viz., The British and Foreign Medical Review,1 and apparently under the sign manual of its able editor, John Forbes, one of the boldest avowals of the same creed. I allude to Dr. Forbes’s article entitled “ Homoeopathy, Allopathy, and Young Physic.” Admired by the few, ignored or violently opposed by the many, it has nevertheless stood the test of time, as one of the strongest of protests against the drugging of the day, and an eloquent defence of the power of Nature in the treatment and cure of disease. Notwitstanding ray high estimate of this manifesto by Dr. Forbes, I think that very few young men would be led by it to the study of our most noble profession. It is too destructive of all earnest faith in our art. It was, however, exactly what was needed at the time. The poly- pharmacy of a past age then and there received its most deadly blow. Nature and her powers were glorified. And no one who reads carefully the record of the preceding time can doubt that such a blow was needed previously to our entering upon a new phase of development of medical science, expressed by the term State Preventive Medicine. Dr. Forbes, indeed, frequently and in glowing terms, hints at the “ reformation” that is impending. He is no prophet, although he sees dimly, what is to be “ the result of mature reflection, and of the labor of many years and many hands” (p. 262); “we must,” he says, “ direct redoubled attention to hygiene, public and private, with the view of preventing disease on a large scale.” “ Here the surest and most glorious triumphs of medical science are achieving and to be achieved” (p. 263). The third individual, who by his writings and as a teacher, seems one of the noblest types of men of this epoch, is Dr. Elisha Bartlett. He was undoubtedly one of the most philosophical medical men America has produced during the Centenary. And his heart was devoted to medical reform. He was born at Smithfield, R. 1., in 1805, and died July, 1855.2 He practised the profession for some years in Lowell, Massa- chusetts, and was respected as an able and most accomplished physician. He felt, however, as he said to me, “ called to teach.” He was soon sum- moned to the chair of Theory and Practice at Pittsfield. Subsequently he held a professorship at Dartmouth College, New Hampshire; at the schools at Lexington, and at Louisville; subsequently at Baltimore, and finally at New York, in the University and with the College of Physi- cians and Surgeons. From these various chairs he was able to influence North, East, South, and West of our country. He was an admirable and attractive teacher, winning belief by his earnestness, his fairness of statement, and fasci- 1 British and Foreign Med. Rev., vol. xxi. p. 502. 2 Appleton’s Cyclopaedia. 26 BOWDITCH, nating address. Though not educated under Louis, he thoroughly ap- preciated his methods and his writings, and proclaimed them as the dawn of a new and great era in the history of medicine. In Dr. Bartlett’s Philosophy of Medical Science, published in Philadelphia in 1844, he says “ that to find out the best methods of preventing, of modifying,” as well as “curing” disease (page 287), “is the great mission which lies directly before us, and this is to constitute the great work of the next and of succeeding generations.” He, in these words, appears as one of the prophets of the present epoch, now in its infancy, which delights and encourages us rather by its anticipations than by its actual accomplish- ments. Thus with beautiful prophecies for the future, I close the list of men whom I deem most prominent in carrying forward the ideas underlying this second epoch. But no one of them saw what we now see. Their mission was chiefly destructive, or constructive only in some degree of the natural history of disease. The general tendency of their writings, so far as they bore upon medical practice, was to utter skepticism not only in regard to the manifest absurdities of our fathers, but likewise in refer- ence to the good things suggested by them. Although they sometimes, as we have seen, hinted at prevention of disease, they did not dream of the noble idea of State Preventive Medicine in its widest scope which has already commenced in various States of this country, and among the nations of Europe. Their skepticism, like all skepticism, was chiefly iconoclastic. We need faith in an idea before we can build it up in ac- tual life. Such a faith we shall see breaking out in our third and last epoch, and to this I now call your attention. But before proceeding to speak of it, let me make two remarks, which I regret to feel compelled to submit, but for their truth I can vouch from my own professional experience of nearly half a century:— First. The medical profession as a body has heretofore taken very little interest in the ideas underlying preventive medicine, and hygiene, private or public. This must be patent to every one of us. We all know how few sanitarians there have been among us until very recently, and how little they have been to our taste. I confess myself to have been a most decided sinner in this matter. It is proved likewise by the almost total neglect hitherto of physical culture in our schools and great seminaries of learning. I know of but one medical college in which there is a full professorship devoted to hygiene. The Harvard Medical School, which has made great advances in medical instruction within the past ten years, has only a lecturer, and as I learn from students now at the school, and who for some few years past have been there, the subject is scarcely known, as compared with other branches of medical learning. Second. We owe to the laity, rather than to the profession, the first and strongest efforts in behalf of State Preventive Medicine. Third Epoch ; or, that in which the Medical Profession is aided by the Laity, and the idea of State Preventive Medicine fairly in- augurated, AS MARKED BY THE LEGAL ESTABLISHMENT OF THE FIRST STATE Board of Health. (From 1869, and which will reach into the far-off future.) The ruling idea of this epoch is still in its infancy, but it shows by what it has already accomplished, trivial though that performance may ADDRESS ON HYGIENE. 27 seem, at first glance, to be, its inherent, great, and nascent power. Its objects are vastly wider than those of any preceding epoch. Its destiny is as fixed as that of the steam-engine, the telegraph wire, the locomotive, or the use of anaesthetics. I cannot foresee a time when the ideas under- lying it will not be held in esteem and acted upon for the welfare of mankind. Among the men who stand prominent in their relations to this epoch, and in connection with the English speaking race, are two laymen. One of them I fear may be but little known to most of my hearers, or even to the people of his native State: I allude to Lemuel Shattuck, of Boston. The other is Edwin Chadwick, a Barrister of London, for many years known and honored by every civilized nation as one of the ablest and most earnest of sanitarians. Mr. Shattuck, in 1850, presented to the legislature of Massachusetts, a most exhaustive State Paper entitled, “ Report of the Sanitary Com- mission of Massachusetts.” In that document are laid down all the principal ideas and modes of action which underlie the present sanitary movements in Massachusetts, and I think I may also add in America. By this document were laid deep in the second epoch the fundamental ideas of the third. It was seed well sown, but destined to lie dormant for nearly a quarter of a century. The report fell flat from the printer’s hands. It remained almost un- noticed by the community or by the profession for many years, and its recommendations were ignored. Finally, in 1869, a State Board of Health of laymen and physicians, exactly as Mr. Shattuck recommended, was established by Massachusetts. Dr. Derby, its first secretary, looked to this admirable document as his inspiration and support. In giving this high honor to Mr. Shattuck, I do not wish to forget or to undervalue the many and persistent efforts made by a few physicians, among whom stands pre-eminent Dr. Edward Jarvis, and occasionally by the Massachusetts Medical Society, in urging the State authorities to inaugurate and to sustain the ideas avowed by Mr. Shattuck. But there is no doubt that he, as a layman, quietly working, did more towards bringing Massachu- setts to correct views on this subject than all other agencies whatso- ever. Of the second layman, Mr. Edwin Chadwick, I need say nothing. You all know him. Fortunately for himself, he has lived to see rich fruits from his labors. That was not granted to Mr. Shattuck. But other influences have been at work tending to the same end. Europe has influenced us more than at any preceding time. France long since entered on a career of study and of publication on public health. The Annales $ Hygiene Publique are proof of this. The labors of Parent-Du- chatelet are recognized by all. The zeal of Quetelet, of Belgium, has been like a household word everywhere among the laity and profession in every civilized State. Pettenkofer, of Munich, more recently has labored successfully in the same field ; and, still nearer to the present, comes up that extraordinary genius, Yirchow, of Berlin, great in every depart- ment of science or of State upon which he enters. But by far the greatest influence has been exerted upon us in America by England, who, by her unbounded pecuniary sacrifices and steady improvement in her legislation, and her able writers, has far outstripped any country in the world in the direction of State Preventive Medicine. I think I may, with perfect truth, say that the consummate skill in the discovery, removal, and prevention of whatever may be prejudicial to the public health, shown under the admirable direction of Mr. Simon, late Medical 28 BOWDITCH, Officer of England’s Privy Council, by his corps of trained inspectors, is wholly unequalled at the present day, and unprecedented, I suspect, in all past time in any country on the globe. In this country the papers published more recently by several of the State Boards of Health, have tended to interest the whole community on the subject of public hygiene. The number of single laborers in the same held is daily augmenting. The United States Government, by its Army and Navy publications, previous to, during, and since the late Civil War, has done a vast sanitary work. The library and museum in the Surgeon General’s Department at Washington, commenced during the horrors of that contest, are also invaluable in the same direction. If they be hereafter thoroughly sustained by the government, as in the past, we cannot estimate the great advantage that will arise in all depart- ments of medicine, and in none more than in that of public hygiene. As the Crimean war taught the world very much in reference to this subject, so our war, dreadful as it was to both parties, was the means of bringing into life several most beneficent institutions which were never before thought of, or at least never carried out on so grand a scale. I allude to the Sanitary and Christian and Western Sanitary Commissions of the North ; to the Wayside Hospitals, Christian Relief Associations, and State Hospitals at Richmond, etc., of the South. Through these, money and food were distributed without stint to the sick and wounded, often to foes as well as friends, wherever found, either on the battle-field or in hospital. We can never know how many human lives were saved, or how much torture prevented, by the agents of these noble institutions on both sides of the line of battle. But we can estimate how much the desire to save life, prevent disease, and promote health, and to provide some of the means for so doing, were, under their blessed influence, in- stilled into the minds and hearts of our people from Maine to Texas. Great strides in Public Hygiene were also made during the war, by the fact that the people outside the military lines, and the officers and soldiers within them, very soon began to learn, by dire experience, or by the urgent appeals of experts in Sanitary matters, the all-important advantages of cleanliness, sobriety, and strict methods of action, as op- posed to'the distress consequent on filth,intemperance, and chaotic rule; and we cannot doubt that every surgeon, whether National or Confederate, •who served during the war, became more practically versed in the advan- tages of prevention of disease than he was before. All that knowledge is now brought back to civil life. The National Quarantine Conventions, so called, had also important influence. Four were held before the breaking out of the war, viz.: in Philadelphia, 1857 ; in Baltimore, 1858; in New York, 1859; and in Boston, 1860. The war closed their labours. From the eminent persons engaged in them, and attendants at the meetings, and the characters of the papers published, there can be no doubt that they contributed very much to lead the public mind to the ideas prevalent at the present time. In April 18, 1872, was held the primary meeting whence has sprung the successor of the National Quarantine Conventions, above alluded to. I refer to the American Public Health Association, which has held meet- ings in New York, Philadelphia, and Cincinnati; and will this autumn hold its session at Boston. Able papers have been published by it on various Sanitary matters, on the transmission and prevention of disease, on quarantine, longevity, hospital hygiene, etc. ADDRESS ON HYGIENE. 29 The American Social Science Association has, of late years, done most valuable work in the same direction. Among the more strictly professional institutions that have helped forward the cause of Public Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, may be named the American Medical Association. In 1847, this Association was instituted, and almost from its inception, it has annually published papers relating to our subject, and still more recently very earnest efforts have been made by some of its members to obtain a definite National Health Organization from the United States Government. The frequent intermingling of men, brought about by this Association, from all parts of the Union, has contributed to the same end. It must be confessed, however, that, judging from the small number of members attending the Section on Hygiene, that subject seems to afford less interest than any other. Finally I may assert that, during the past three or four years there has sprung up in many parts of the country, a wide-spread thoughtful- ness about the necessity and value of hygienic measures. Almost all persons in their various spheres, have become more accessible to the pro- tests of the sanitarian. Still further, it may be asserted that during this last epoch, short as it is, more practical work has been done among the people, tending to prevent and crush out disease, and more valuable papers written, illustrative of Public Hygiene, the world over, than since the Christian era began. In every State there are active and earnest laborers in this field, and their number is daily increasing. It would be impossible on this occasion, to name even a tithe of them. Some States in their corporate capacity, have sustained these workers for the public good. But I regret to say a large majority of the States and Territories of this Union are not yet sufficiently enlightened to appreciate the duty devolving on them to be careful of the health of their people. With these general historical remarks on the gradual evolution of State Preventive Medicine and Public Hygiene, during the past centen- nial period, I now pass to the consideration of the actual condition of the Country at the present time with regard to these all-important topics. THE PRESENT CONDITION OF STATE PREVENTIVE MEDI- CINE IN THE VARIOUS STATES, TERRITORIES, AND THE NATION. Several months ago I issued a circular containing several questions bearing on this subject, and tending to elucidate it as far as I thought I could do so with the means at my command. Doubtless, to critical eyes, objections may be made to the small number and to the relevancy and character of the proposed questions. It appeared to me, however, that a lew interrogations, all or most of them, answered, even monosyllabi- cally, from all quarters of the Country would enable the inquirer to get a glance at the present condition of Public Hygiene and of State Preven- tive Medicine better than he could from any large number, very many of which would not be answered at all from some of the States. The paper was sent to two hundred and sixty-seven (267) medical men living in the thirty-eight States, nine Territories, and the District of Columbia, 30 BOWDITCH, making in all forty-eight governments. These embrace an area covering (25°) twenty-live degrees of latitude and (47°) forty-seven degrees of lon- gitude, between the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, In the South they lie almost in the tropics; at the North they reach close to the coldest inha- bitable portion of the Globe; in all embracing an area of 3,608,884 square miles. Of the character and ability of my correspondents, I would say that I tried to select the ablest men, and, as far as possible, those known or supposed to be interested in Public Hygiene ; representative men, in fact, resident in the various regions. I may have failed to apply to all who perhaps would have willingly answered my questions. If, however, I have selected with any accuracy, I think you will admit that their various reports will together constitute as full and as accurate a state- ment of the whole matter, so far as my questions cover it, as it is possi- ble for me, without governmental aid, to obtain. Replies have come from one hundred and sixty-seven (167) physicians, residents in every State and territory except the Indian Territory, which last is a reserva- tion held still in an unorganized state as the residence of Indians, in various conditions from barbarism up to a low civilization, and where ideas of Public Hygiene are little thought of. Analysis of Correspondents’ Replies. First Question.—Does your State by its legislation shoio a due appreciation of the duty devolving upon a State to he careful of the health of its people ? I considered this a fundamental question. The answers from the forty- eight States and Territories were as follows: Thirty-four, (34) No.1 Eight, (8) Yes.1 Four, (4) Indefinite.2 Two, (2) No Reply, In other words, of the forty-eight governments in this Union, thirty- four (nearly three-quarters), by their legislative acts, have, according to correspondents resident therein, shown, but little care for the health of their people. Among those thus failing in duty, appear the great States of New York and Pennsylvania; I cite these two, not in invidious dis- tinction, but simply because they have been the chief States of our Union since Colonial times, and because they hold that proud position now. Moreover, it will be admitted by those States which have replied affirma- tively (1) that it is only within six or eight years that they have shown any marked interest on the question of State Preventive Medicine, and (2) that the number of deaths from preventable diseases, in every State, is still frightfully great, which ought not to be the fact if these States had really shown, for any length of time, this due appreciation claimed for them by my correspondents. Let not us, however, who have traced the very gradual evolution of the idea of State Preventive Medicine during the past centenary, wonder at this apparent neglect of Public Hygiene, shown by the various States; let us rather rejoice at even this small awakening of the public interest upon these matters, wheresoever a European civilization has any foothold. 1 Yes or No means that a unanimous opinion was returned by all correspondents in the State or Territory. 2 This term is used when the opinions of correspondents were not unanimous on any ques- tion. ADDKESS ON HYGIENE. Second Question.—Is the State willing to expend money (a) to support State or Local Boards of Health? (b) to carry out Scientific Investigations as to the causes of Disease ? (c) to repress noxious or offensive trades ? (d) to ■prevent adulteration of food? (e) to prevent the Cattle Disease? or (f) to carry on any other investigations tending to promote Public Health, or to prevent ill Health ? The touchstone which tests the earnestness of an individual or of a Nation in reference to any subject, is a willingness to spend money in furtherance of it. Tested by this talisman, how stands our Country in reference to Public Hygiene and State Preventive Medicine? Let us look at the answers to the above questions. . Is the State willing to spend money (a) to support State or Local Boards of Health? The following answers were received from correspondents. Thirty-six, (36) ' Ho. Ten, (10) Yes. Two, (2) Ho Reply. The fact here brought out is that three-quarters of all the governments of this country are unwilling to spend money to support a State Board of Health. How I contend that the legal establishment of such a Board is the first step towards any definite sanitary organization in a State, and the fact that so many States have done nothing towards the formation of such Boards, or when legally established, have refused to pay money for their ample support, plainly shows the very small advance yet made by this country on these vital questions. Still, further, if we look at the States from which an affirmative reply has been received, we shall find that only very recently, since 1869, have any such Boards been estab- lished, and generally that the amount of money appropriated for their support is small, compared with what is spent in other departments of government vastly less important to human welfare. Is the State willing to spend money (b) to carry out Scientific Investigations as to the Causes of Disease? The following are the replies;— Thirty, (80) Ho. Twelve, (12) Yes. Five, (5) Indefinite Reply. One, ( 1) ‘Ho Reply. Thus thirty governments out of the forty-eight are reported as being unwilling to spend money for the scientific study of the causes of disease. Twelve reply affirmatively. But from several of these we find some qualifications of answer, e.g., “ rather unwillingly,” or “not much,” or “when importuned,” or “to a limited extent.” Some of the foremost decline to make grants for special investigation. One of the most known and respected Sanitarians in the Union declares that his State “grants as much as is asked for,” which fact, coupled with a second one, viz., that his State has not yet established a State Board of Health, seems to sup- port the idea that he and his medical associates are at fault: Hoes the State even now need an efficient layman to stir it up to efficient action? Only during the past year, has Massachusetts done anything in this precise direction, viz., when it appropriated ten thousand dollars ($10,000) for the investigation of the question of the Pollution of Streams. As I had nothing to do with the making of that report, and as the majority of the committee having it in charge, was selected as the ablest men who could be found, though residents of other States, I feel at liberty to express the opinion that the sum expended was infinitely small in comparison with the very valuable and exhaustive report made; 32 BOWDITCH, a report which will be of importance to every other State undertaking the same or similar trains ot investigations. Is the State willing to spend money (c) to repress noxious or offensive trades? The following answers were made:— Twenty-six, (26) No. Fourteen, (14) Yes. Seven, (7) Indefinite Reply. One, (1) No Reply. . A. priori, one would consider this a most legitimate and imperative duty of a State to so govern noxious and offensive trades that they should not bring ill health to the people, yet it appears that more than half of the States do nothing. Fourteen only seem attempting to do something. In this connection I cannot help referring to some results in Massachu- setts. , . . The town of Brighton is beautifully situated in an undulating country, within easy access of Boston, and as such admirably fitted for residences of the business men of the city. This beautiful suburban district vyas, only a few years ago, a disgusting place, in consequence ot about fifty vile smelling and filthy looking slaughter houses, which were dotted all over the township. No one could drive or go by rail through it without offence, and at times almost nausea. New slaughter houses were daily springing up. Under the influence of a law, empowering the State Board of Health to attend to the matter, and giving it very wide power, every private slaughter house has been swept away within the past eight years. A very large, cleanly conducted abattoir, which burns up iiy a great measure, if not wholly, its own noxious odors, and which is built a little distance from the village, now includes the whole of the indi- vidual slaughter houses above named. One can now drive in any direc- tion without offence to eye or sense of smell. Meanwhile, the price of land has more than doubled in value. Before this was brought about, however, many hearings and personal examinations were made by the Board. Eminent lawyers appeared and protested against its proceeding under the extraordinary powers which the legislature had given it, and which those advocates said were unconstitutional, because, as they con- tended, contrary to the “Bill of Rights” of Massachusetts. The Court, however, when appealed to, always sustained the decisions of the Board, and once it threatened a contumacious butcher, who refused to obey, with imprisonment for contempt. For these reasons and for others that might be named, I heartily commend the law, as it stands in Massachusetts, as worthy of consideration by those who wish to control noxious trades in other States. Is the State willing to spend money (d) to prevent the adulteration of food? Twenty-three, (28) No. Sixteen, (16) Yes. Seven, ( ( ) Indefinite Reply. Two, (2) No Reply. . Certainly an extraordinary result, but one which possibly might have been anticipated, when we remember the widespread system of sophistica- tion and adulteration known to exist among us. Rapidity and quantity of work rather than excellence are sought for. When Public Hygiene is duly thought of, and State Preventive Medicine has full sway, the adulteration of the food of the people will be deemed one of the most heinous of crimes. Practically, now it is allowed to flourish unrestricted in the majority of the States, even in those which have laws intended ADDRESS ON HYGIENE. 33 to prevent it. Europe is undoubtedly far in advance of America on this subject. Is the State willing to spend money (e) to prevent the cattle disease? The following answers were received: Twenty-one, (21) No. Ten, (10) Yes. Sixteen, (16) Indefinite Reply. One, (1) No Reply. (For remarks on this subject see Question Sixth.) Is the State willing to spend money (f) to carry on any investigations tend- ing to promote public health or to prevent ill-health ? The answers were these:— Twenty-eight, (28) No. Ten, (10) Yes. Nine, (9) Indefinite Reply. One, (1) No Reply. That is, one-half the governments seem unwilling, and less than a quarter claim to be willing to spend money for this purpose. This seems a most natural consequence to all preceding answers. Third Question.—Has your State established, a State Board of Health ? If so, (a) when was it established ? (b) What amount of annual appropria- tion is made for its support ? (c) Are any occasional grants made for specific investigations? (d) Has the Board any organized body of correspondents throughout the State? (e) What executive powers have been given to the Board in reference■ to local nuisances or noxious trades? Some of these questions have been fully or partially answered already. I shall in this place summarily include them in one answer as follows: Twelve only of these States have State Boards of Health. The first one wras legally established in Massachusetts in 1869. It operates equally over every portion of the State. The amount of money paid, as I have already stated, is small considering the wealth and population of the State. For special purposes, Louisiana and the District of Columbia have at times spent large sums. Not a single State has as yet a perfect list of corre- spondents or inspectors. Massachusetts has done much in this direction, and is annually improving her position by selecting the ablest men, phy- sicians or laymen, who can be found in the various towns. The position of correspondent of this Board is frequently considered an honor, though there is no pay attached to the office, and often it is no sinecure. In reference to executive powers given to the Board, it cannot be said that any State Board has plenary powers, as town Boards have, in some States. It is, perhaps, well that their duties should gene- rally be advisory merely, on certain occasions only having plenary powers conferred upon them, and with the right to appeal to the Courts to sustain their decrees, whereby the moral force of the Boards is mate- rially augmented. Fourth Question.—Have County Boards of Health been established by law f The answers are— Twenty-three, (28) No. Four, (4) Yes. Seven, (7) Indefinite Reply. Four, (4 j No Reply. 34 BOWDITCH, That is, only four of the States report affirmatively. Evidently the necessity of such Boards is not admitted. Yet I cannot but think that eventually, when Public Hygiene shall have its thorough organization, these County Boards will form an integral part of it; certainly in the Southern, Western, and sparsely settled States. Fifth Question.—Have any Town Boards of Health been established, by law ? The answers are— Eight, (8) ISTo. Fourteen, (14) Yes. Twenty-two, (22) Have them by local or municipal rather than state law. One, (1) Indefinite Reply. Three, (8) Ho Reply. Which replies, as I understand them, intimate that in one-half of the governments many towns have established, by their inherent right of self-defence, local Boards of Health without first appealing to State Authority. Sixth Question.—Has the State passed, any law leading to a thorough and definite improvement of the Public Health ? (a) by a Sanitary Survey of the State ? (b) by cl law for the registration of Births, Heaths, and Marriages? (c) If so, how long has it been in operation? (d) Has the Registrar been able to draw from such records any law governing the Public Health? (e) Has any law been passed relating to drainage of land? (f) to irrigation? (g) to checking the influence of rivers by levees ? (h) to the introduction of water into cities? (i) to the prevention of contagious diseases? (a) Smallpox? f) Cholera? (y) Yellow Fever? if) Cattle Plague? etc. etc. It is impossible on this occasion to consider all of these questions. I shall make selections from the answers which will best illustrate my main subject. (a) By aSa nitary Survey of the State? The returns are as follows : Forty, (40) Yo. Yone, (0) Yes. One, (1) Indefinite Reply. Seven, (7) Yo Reply. One would suppose that this would be one of the first questions asked by the settlers of a new country, and yet, judging from our returns, not one of the States in this Union has ever made such a survey, save per- haps indirectly in connection with some matter of trade or a geological or other examination for the purposes of gain. Doubtless very grave mistakes have been made in consequence of this neglect. Considerations of trade and personal safety from external danger have too often decided the question of the site of a town. It is to be feared, moreover, that with the keenest examination of a locality, the emigrant, upon a new and virgin soil, would be unable to decide the question. For often, not until months after the plough has passed through it, and the colony has become firmly established, does the deadly malaria show itself. But when a State has arrived at sufficient strength and power to be able so to do, it would seem that a thorough Sanitary Survey should be considered the first of duties. And yet I doubt if any State Legislature of this Union, at the present time, would for a moment consider the question. It would be deemed a useless expense! The people will demand it ere long. ADDRESS ON HYGIENE. 35 (h) By a law for the registration of Births, Deaths, and Marriages? Sixteen, (16) No. Twenty, (20) Yes. Eight, (8) Indefinite Reply. Four, (4) No Reply. That is, one-third definitely declare that this fundamental law, upon which all vital statistics are founded, has never been passed. Twenty, less than half, have such a law. But eighteen out of the twenty use various qualifying phrases in regard to the character or enforcement of the law, e.g., “imperfect,” “ not carried out,” “defective,” “ no regular registration,” “ carried out only for certain great cities.” In one it is “a dead letter,” and in another “ not enforced ;” others have it “ a farce,” or that “it was enforced before the late war.” Some have “ only marriages,” some “ only deaths.” The sum total of the matter is that only two States have made affirma- tive replies without special qualifications. Knowing what Ido of one of these, viz., Massachusetts, I cannot claim that to be perfect in many respects. If, turning from the States, we look at the United States cen- suses, we find the same short-comings. For further remarks on this topic I refer to Question Eighteenth; remarks by Messrs. Walker and Elliott. No one can regret more than I do the necessity of stating these facts. May the sting of their severe truth, stimulate us and our children to better work in the coming centuries! (c) If so (that is, if a registration law has been enacted), how long has it been in operation f After the facts stated in regard to the last query, the further question of time seems unimportant. It is evident, however, that for the last ten or twenty years only, have State Registrations been carried on in a very few States, although some of the larger cities have had imper- fect returns for a much longer period. The United States Government has had decennial censuses since 1790. To judge of their value in certain respects, we have simply to look at the remarks made upon them by the- superintendent of the last. (Vide Question Eighteenth.) (d) Mas the Registrar been able to draw from such records any law govern- ing the Public Health? I shall make my remarks in connection with this subject, under the last question of the entire series. (e) Bias any law been passed relating to the drainage of lands? Twenty-four, (24) No. Seven, (7) Yes. Six, (6) Indefinite Reply. Eleven, (11) No Reply. That is, one-half report that nothing has been done by the State. Only one-seventh report affirmatively. But Ido not understand that in any case such a drainage was made for a sanitary object, but rather to im- prove the land for agricultural purposes. How much the Sanitaryr Physical, Moral, or Intellectual wealth of a people is wrapped up in simple drainage of the land, we may judge from the glowing account given by my correspondent, Hr. Breed, at Princeton, Illinois. By that it appears- that no less than 86,000 acres of land lying in one mass, and compre- hending at least half of three counties in Illinois, were drained by the State, with the most gratifying results upon the health and character of the settlers thereupon. Moreover, a great sum accrued to the Common School Fund of the State, from the enhanced value of the land for all purposes. One cannot but recommend the example of Illinois to the consideration of the Legislatures of many of her sister States. 36 BOWDITCH, (f) Has any law been passed relating to irrigation of land? The answers are;— Thirty-one, (31) USTo. Five, (5) Yes. Five, (5 ) Indefinite Reply. Seven, • (7) Yo Reply. All the affirmative replies except one, viz., Utah, report that it was done for “Agricultural Purposes.” Apparently no one thought of Health in connection with it. Even Utah probably was induced to irrigate more by its actual wants than by any thought of Sanitary improvement. Year Salt Lake, which itself is utterly impotable, pure water was of prime necessity for two imperative reasons, viz., for culinary purposes, and for agriculture. What the Moors did for Granada, the Mormons have, to a certain extent, done for our American Desert, by their “thousands of miles of ditch under a general law,” as my correspondent graphically, if not scientifically, describes the immense work done by this people. (g) Has any law been passed relative to checking of rivers by Levees, etc? The answers are:— Twenty-eight, (28) Yo. Four, (4) Yes. ■ Five, (5) Indefinite Reply. Eleven, (11) Yo Reply. In proposing the question, I had my mind chiefly on the great cities •situated upon our mighty Mississippi, and its various tributaries. Eventually, it would apply to other rivers, like the Yellowstone and others. In various parts of the land, I regret that my correspondents enable me to state but little in reference to sanitary measures connected with the question. It is evident that Yew Orleans, e.g., depends for its very existence upon them. Correspondents from Arkansas state that some levees have been made for agricultural purposes, and one adds sig- nificantly, “but it has improved the land and the health of the people living near the place.”1 (h) Has any law been passed for introducing water into cities ? The an- swers are as follows; Twenty-three, (23) Yo. Fourteen, (14) Yes. Four, (4) Indefinite Reply. Seven, (7) Yo Reply. Indiana and Pennsylvania have general laws upon the subject. Pro- bably all the States have permitted, either by general or special statutes, this introduction of water, because of its prime necessity. More particu- larly within the last ten years have towns and cities waked up to the propriety of introducing fresh water from distant sources, in order to avoid the evil results of the possible contamination of wells from privies, etc., in the immediate neighborhood. But it is a singular fact that while thus bringing in new water, cities 1 In the very able and interesting report of the United States Bureau of Topographical Engineers (Philadelphia, 1861), prepared by Capt. A. A. Humphreys and Lieut. H. S. Abbott, U. S. A., on the Physics and Hydraulics of the Mississippi River, etc., it is suggested that, eventually, there should be a uniform and scientifically constructed system of levees for that river, from the Ohio to below New Orleans (p. 417, etc.). Surely such a plan would be worthy of the nation, and, under the idea of its value to commerce between the several States and foreign nations, would it not be legitimate national work under our Constitution ? ADDRESS ON HYGIENE. have not often scrutinized its exact purity, nor have they sufficiently pro- vided against its future impurities. Boston, Albany, and I fear Chicago and Philadelphia, and I doubt not many other cities in this Union, might he cited in proof of the truth of this proposition. Some of these cities have wholly ignored the warnings of sanitarians in this respect, listening to selfishness and political partisanship, rather than to the dictates of Hygienic Law. As they have sown the wind, so, at some future time, they will doubtless reap the whirlwind, if an epidemic like Cholera should sweep over the land. (i) Has any law been passed relative to the prevention of contagious dis- eases ? (a) Smallpox. The answers are : Sixteen, (16) Ho. Twenty-one, (21) Yes. Seven, ( 7 ) Indefinite Reply. Four, (4) No Reply. There must be some error here, for I cannot think that sixteen of the States have, as yet, passed no law relative to smallpox. And yet from the way in which the laws on this subject are neglected, or limited of operation even in those States which claim that they have proper laws ; and from the fact that we have smallpox epidemics all over the country constantly prevailing, which could easily be prevented by vaccination; from all these facts, I feel sure that great ignorance and carelessness on the subject are to be found everywhere in this country. The recent events in Montreal, relative to vaccination, in which a mob of infuriated and ignorant men attacked and over-awed the Common Council of the city, show what might happen in these States. A late city physician of Boston, used to declare that he could keep Boston free from smallpox if he could prevent the citizens from meeting immigrants from Maine, who flocked, most of them unvaccinated adults, into the city limits. This assertion, though not perhaps strictly true, I have no doubt is partially so, and it illustrates an important fact, viz.: that it is indeed impossible for one State to free itself from this scourge, until the United States shall, by a general law, require that every child born shall be vaccinated at a very early period, and afterwards occasion- ally revaccinated. Yet more, we shall never be free from it until every foreign nation shall adopt the same method, and an international code of health in this respect shall have been established. Though such a code may be in the far future, it must eventually come, not only in reference to smallpox, but in regard to every other pestilential scourge of our race. (3) Has any law been made relative to the prevention of Cholera? The answers are:— Twenty-one, (21) No. Sixteen, (16) Yes. Four, (4) Indefinite Reply. Seven, (7) No Reply. Entirely similar reports came in regard to this disease as in regard to smallpox; all indicate a “ laissez oiler” method in regard to it, so that if the cholera were to strike any State at the present time, there is pro- bably not a town in the land which would not be liable to fatally suffer from its ravages in consequence of “ filth”1 within the town limits. 1 Used in its broadest signification. Simon on “Filth Diseases and their Prevention.” Vide Report of Medical Officer of the Privy Council and Local Government Board (Eng.), New Series, No. 2. Reprinted in Boston, Campbell, 1876, under the direction of the Mass- achusetts State Board of Health. 38 BOWDITCH, But the United States Government, through the War Department, has recently published an invaluable bistory of cholera in this country. By this volume alone we can judge of the immense importance to the whole country, a central [tower, such as I have suggested above, would speedily become. It would grasp the whole country in one mass, rather than as separate States, and immensely broader, almost cosmic views of disease would be thereby given instead of those derived from detached local ob- servations. In order to gain this desirable end we need a National Health Council composed of representatives from each State, and a Secretary of Health, the peer of other Secretaries in the National Cabinet. For further elucidation of my views on this subject, I beg leave to refer to my address delivered before the American Medical Association at its session in Louisville, in 1875, (y) Has any law been passed relative to the prevention of Yellow Fever f The answers are:—• Twenty, (20) Yo. Twelve, (12) Yes. Ten, (10) Indefinite Reply. Six, ( 6 ) Yo Reply. I suspect the above data and other replies of my correspondents repre- sent in a general way the present uncertainty in the country about the prevalence and characteristics of this disease. There seem, however, to be some facts that are quite patent. Yellow fever is said (1) by some to exist as a permanent endemic disease in some of our southern cities (New Orleans, e.g., according to Chailß); “ with waves of increase and decrease down almost to no prevalence at all.” Some equally eminent (Herrick), declare that it cannot he called endemic in New Orleans, and that it might be extirpated but for importation. From both of these parties we may infer that it virtually has a permanent habitation there. But for an accurate and minute knowledge of the essential cause of the dis- ease and means for its prevention we must look to the coming century. It seems (2) equally plain that during the last centennial period, yellow fever has virtually wholly disappeared from Boston, New York, and Philadelphia, in which latter city it prevailed to a terrible degree in the latter part of the last and in the earlier part of this century. May we not hope that as in the past, so in the future, there may be a gradual pushing back of this frightful disease until it shall be fairly ex- cluded from our borders! (8) Has any laic been passed relative to the prevention of the Cattle Disease? The answers are:— Twenty, (20) Yo. Eleven, (11) Yes. Eive, (5) Indefinite Reply. Twelve, (12) Yo Reply. As at one time pleuropneumonia among cattle threatened very seriously to interfere with the food of the people, I deemed this a proper question. It is evident from my correspondence that it has influenced very dif- ferently the different States. In those States where it occurred, as c. g. in Massachusetts and in some of the Western States, much money was expended, large meetings were held, and many cattle were slaughtered in order to check it. I may refer on this subject to my correspondent of Illinois (Dr. Breed) for an interesting notice of what was done at a Con- vention of Cattle Dealers of the Northern States and Canada ; to the Report of the Metropolitan Board of Health in New York, and also to ADDRESS ON HYGIENE. 39 the action of the Massachusetts Legislature. By strict quarantine and care in sanitary matters connected with the cattle, and absolute destruc- tion of those earliest seized with the disease, and above all by a national co-operative action rather than by that of any single State, I believe we may keep that and all such pests at bay. But eternal vigilance will be needed on all the great ways for cattle traffic, so that the disease shall not get a foothold in the country, otherwise disaster may follow. In connection with this subject I would refer to the report made by the United States Commissioner of Agriculture on the Diseases of Cattle, containing investigations by Prof. Gamgee, and by Drs. Billings and Woodward of the United States Army. (j) Has any law been passed regulating Tenement Houses for the poor ? The answers are:— Thirty-three, (33) Yo. Four, (4) Yes. Three, (8) Indefinite Reply. Eight, (8) Yo Reply. That is, on this most important measure, on which so much depend the health and morality, and intellectual progress of a people, only four, (f's) one-sixteenth of the various governments, have, according to my correspondents, done anything, while fifteen-sixteenths either reply negatively or indefinitely, or not at all. In the light of what is doing in England by public law, and in Yew York and Philadelphia by less comprehensive, but most opportune private work, on the basis of pecuniary gain, combined it may be with philan- thropy, this report seems meagre. In this connection, I beg leave to refer to interesting correspondence with Drs. Harris and Thayer of Yew York, and Dr. Ford and Mr. Blodget of Pennsylvania. (k) Has any law been passed relative to incorporating Building Companies for the improvement of the dwellings of the poorf The answers are;— Twenty-nine, (29) Yo. Six, (6) Yes. Four, (4) Indefinite Reply. Ten, (10) Yo Reply. This question, allied to but more comprehensive than the preceding, has, as we see, received as little attention. Yet, strictly speaking, I know of no two questions more important at the present hour than this and the previous one. The fact is patent to every one that there are in every city and township in this land, and in every other country, dwelling places in which the poor are obliged to live, which are a disgrace to modern civilization. Such abodes are moral pests in the community, and sources of unmitigated evil to the Body Politic. They are, in fact, places in which it is impossible for the majority of human beings to grow up, ex- cept to filth, crime, and disease. These I fear will always exist, unless the public authority takes charge of these tenements and either builds others under State laws, or authorizes associations, partly for pecuniary and partly for philanthropic and sanitary reasons, to erect them. Having erected them it will be necessary to faithfully supervise them at all times and seasons, otherwise filth, and consequently disease, will come as here- tofore. We have one house in Boston yclept in derision the “ Crystal Palace,” which is occupied, when full, by about three hundred people, and which has been for years the abode of drunkenness and crime. It was well known to the officers of the State’s Prison as its chief primary school of Crime. I know it well. It is impossible to tell at this time the rich 40 BOWDITCH, though painful experience gained from it by the Boston Co-operative Building Company. This, as its name partially indicates, was incor- porated by the State in order to enable philanthropy and capital to unite on an equitable basis, viz., in newly building or in renovating the houses of the poor, with the hope of receiving an adequate return for the capi- tal expended. This corporation has been a success in building many houses, united in a block, and giving a perfect home to every family, only one, or at the most two, families being on one floor. But desirous of trying the plans followed so successfully, by Mrs. Octavia Hill, of London, in her renovation of some of the most wretched houses in that Metropo- lis, the Boston Association took possession of this “Crystal Palace.” We forthwith drove tenants from the filth}' cellars and opened windows into every bed-room, the large majority of them having previously had none. We shut two of the dark 'passages leading as common corridors to all the tenements in the building, but we could not shut up a third. At first our success seemed very certain, but the commercial panic came in 1873, and that drove away many, and paralyzed the labors of others of the tenantry. Finally the lease was given up for this reason chiefly, that we were losing money. But even if it had been a pecuniary success, it be- came the decided opinion of most of the Committee, who had charge of it, that morally it must, from the inherent vices of its construction, remain vile. Whilst so many are congregated in one house, with long dark com- mon corridors actually inviting vice and crime of the lowest kinds, it is impossible to check the tendency thereto. The committee saw young girls and boys grow up into vice (without a possibility of saving them), owing, as it appeared in a great measure, to the very structure of the tene- ment, and of its out-buildings. Whilst taking this opposition to the idea of large buildings, with dark, easily accessible, common corridors, instead of rows of moderate-sized buildings, containing but few families, it was gratifying to the committee to find that the death-rate in the building was much lessened by the alter- ations made in it, and by constant vigilance in regard to sanitary rules, as far as it was possible to have any rules, in a place provided with a few common privies and slop receptacles, which were constantly, day and night, resorted to by people having small ideas even of the comfort of cleanliness, and totally ignorant of its immense value in a hygienic point of view. I have cited this case simply because of my four and half years of personal experience upon it. But the same facts of wretchedly con- structed abodes for the poor exist everywhere, and human nature is the same. Our experiment, I think, proves very conclusively the folly of expecting people to be temperate, or honest, or healthy in badly con- structed houses. I commend this topic of providing suitable homes, not houses only, for the people, as one of the most important that can command the attention of Philanthropy and Capital during the coming Century. Seventh Question.—(a) Are there well-attested facts proving that any disease formerly prevalent in your State has ceased to appear? The answers are:— Twenty-five, (25) No. . Nine, (9) Yes. Eight, (8) Indefinite Reply. Six, (6j No Reply. ADDRESS ON HYGIENE. 41 Of the nine affirmative replies not one can present positive proof of the statement, but some suggest a lessening of some diseases. This seems to be undoubtedly the fact in regard to malarial fevers, yellow fever, etc. That intermittents have disappeared from some localities, which have been drained, seems to be true. Smallpox is wonderfully lessened and quite shorn of its terrors. A few special diseases, as, for example, the “ milk sickness,” and the “black tongue,” are mentioned as having pre- vailed formerly, but not of late. These statements, though less reliable than accurate statistic proofs, give us hopes for the future when State Preventive Medicine shall have obtained its due influence. (b) Are there any well-attested facts proving that any disease formerly prevalent in the State has been crushed by State or Individual action? The answers are:— Thirty-seven, (37) No. None, (0) Yes. . Four, (4) Indefinite Reply. Seven, ( 7 ) No Reply. The returns give a most decided negative, and not a correspondent takes the affirmative of the question. Eighth Question.—Are there any similar facts proving that any special disease has arisen or been generated, or has been introduced into the State during the past century, which did not exist in Colonial Times, and which now remains endemic ? The answers are:— Twenty-seven, (27) No. Six, (6) Yes. Two, (2) Indefinite Reply. Thirteen, (18) No Reply. The same indefiniteness of statement prevails on this question as on the preceding. In one of the six affirmative replies. Dr. Denison, of Denver, claims that perhaps phthisis has been introduced into Colorado. Of course it has been, as a great many go there now as a place most fitted for the cure for the disease. And future statistical mortuary data, unless care be taken, will lead to great errors of judgment in regard to the value of that climate, and its influence on phthisis. In some of the Northern States some physicians claim that cerebro-spinal meningitis, diphtheria, and even croup, have been introduced during the centenary. There are grave doubts about the truth of all such statements. Others claim that yellow fever and cholera are such diseases; “yellow chills” are named by one, “ trichiniasis” by another. I feel that there is no proof that any new disease has been introduced, and become endemic here. Ninth Question.—lf there he any such new disease, has it been investi- gated by the State or by individuals ? The answers are:— Twenty-seven, (27) No. Six, (6) Yes. Two, (2) Indefinite Reply. Thirteen, (13) No Reply. My correspondents cite investigations by a commission of the city of New Orleans in 1853, relative to typhoid fever; by Dr. Kedzie, of 42 BOWDITCH, Michigan, on cerebro-spinal meningitis; on diphtheria, by the Y. Y. Metropolitan Board of Health ; on “yellow chills” by various persons in Alabama. Of course this meagre statement falls far short of the truth in regard to the number of investigations undertaken by individuals, corporations, and commissioners, on the various diseases of the country, some of which have no more right to be classified as new diseases, than typhoid fever and diphtheria; and none of them can be certainly said to be diseases never seen before the past century. Tenth Question.—Has the town or city in which you reside taken any measures for the improvement of the Public Health? (a) By health laws ? The answers are;— Nine, (9) Yo. Twenty-five, (25) Yes. Nine, (9) Indefinite Reply. Rive, (5) Yo Reply. From the above, it seems that the majority of the towms have done what mere self-defence would inculcate. But of the twenty-five affirma- tive replies very many report either inefficient enforcement or complete abeyance of such laws. Many towns have special laws for drainage, and other objects seem partially or wholly ignored. For my own State of Massachusetts, I think I can say that in not a single town has there ever been a complete system of health laws enacted and thoroughly enforced. But, notwithstanding this unsatisfactory statement, I also believe that I may with equal truth assert that so recently has the idea of State Pre- ventive Medicine begun to take hold of our people, that our advance has been quite as much as could be expected. Very many more years will be needed before this country or Europe will even approximate to that point which, at present, only an ideal sanitary legislation would require, but which the coming century will bring forth into actual operation. (b) By special action in specific cases ? Three, (8) Yo. Twenty-five, (25) Yes. Eleven, (11) Indefinite Reply. Yine, (9) Yo Reply. The remarks made on the previous question apply to this. Eleventh Question.—Does your town use well-water for culinary uses? Twelfth Question.—Is care taken to prevent pollution ? Thirteenth Question.—Do you have a water supply from distant lake or river ? Fourteenth Question.—Is care taken to prevent pollution ? Including all these questions under one category; of 143 towns 82 use wells, 61 use rivers or lakes. In regard to the care taken to keep either class of waters pure, I find as follows : 49 or 34.26 per cent, try to keep it pure ; 69 or 48.25 per cent, make no attempt to do so ; 25 or 17.48 per cent, make no, or an indefinite reply. In other words, taking my returns as furnishing at least an approxima- tion to the general state of the country in this respect, 34.26 per cent, only of the towns make any claims, even the most trivial, to be careful of the purity of their water; while 65.78 per cent., or nearly twice as ADDRESS OX HYGIENE. 43 many, are totally neglectful. That is to say, nearly two-thirds of the people of this Union are living in a senseless disregard as to whether they are drinking pure water or water which, though “sparkling and tasting pleasant,” may be loaded with every species of filth! Fifteenth Question.—Have you sewers to carry off such water supply ? The answers are : Eleven, (11) Yo. Thirteen, (13) Yes. Twenty, (20) Indefinite Reply. Four, (4) Yo Reply. These replies coincide with all the preceding, and intimate very fully the primitive ideas held by the people of this country in regard to the necessity of carrying off water once made impure. What happens in Boston I fear happens elsewhere, viz.; that abundant supplies of water have been introduced into certain parts of the city without any imme- diate provision being made for its removal by sewers. The consequence has been that the cesspools have been overflowed, and that the land has been soaked with water, perchance containing the elements of disease, and certainly tending to develop phthisis, from the soil moisture induced by such overflow. Of course, evil must result. I might refer to other particular cities and places, now the common summer resorts for the most wealthy people, where a most scandalous condition exists in this respect, making it at times more dangerous to visit the “ health resort,” so called, in country and sea-side, than it would be to remain at home, even in a poorly-sewered, offensive-smelling city. But we have no need to visit health resorts to find great imperfections of sewerage. That of Boston, which I have already quoted in reference to its suburbs, has been, even within its city limits, notoriously bad, not- withstanding it has been claimed to be nearly as perfect as could be. Some of the main sewers of that city are even now nearly filled with refuse, more or less solid. One of the main conduits is occupied to a great depth by so-called “ mud,” composed of dirt from the often street gutters and of human excreta. Others are more or less partially ob- structed. The whole congeries of them form one vast network of cess- pools, belching out at times filthy odors from “ manholes” along the streets. The mouths of the sewers, which open all around the city limits, and in the closest proximity to it, pour forth volumes of similar foul exhalations while the tide is low, and the quantity of refuse issuing from them has been declared, under oath, to interfere very much in certain places with trade, by preventing vessels which were formerly able to approach certain wharves, from so doing at the pre- sent time.1 I summon thus significantly my own city to the bar of public sanitary rebuke, not because I think her really a worse sinner in these respects than many other and some greater cities, but for two reasons: (1) that I know whereof I speak, and can vouch for the truth of the assertions, extraordinary as they may seem to some of you, and (2) that I rejoice to say that, in this centennial year, Boston is seemingly repentant, and is prepared to amend her system at a large expense. Thank God ! Her citizens are beginning to feel that the worst prodi- gality is the waste of human life, and that mere money is as nothing before the idea of perfect human health! 1 Vide Tyler et al. v. Squire et al., before the State Board of Health of Massachusetts, 1873. 44 BO WDITCH, Sixteenth Question.—How far are the sewer outlets from the source of water supply ? Upon this question it may be generally stated that these distances in different cities of the Union vary from what may be practically called zero to 20 or even 80 miles. It would seem that, where it is convenient so to do, a distance more or less great is always chosen ; but strange as it may seem, some of our great cities have been wholly thoughtless. If my correspondent be correct, even in this great city of Philadelphia in which we meet, although the majority of the sewerage is carried far below the water supply, we cannot claim the same for all of it. And not a few cities which take water from rivers and lakes are practically re- gardless of the quantity of impurities that enter the stream or lake at some distance, it may be, but nevertheless above the part whence the city gets its own water supply. I might cite Albany as a great and most glaring example of this latter statement. Seventeenth Question.— What is your method of disposing of sewerage ? House offal? Slops or filth liable to accumulate about homesteads? I have received answers from eighty-four towns, and the summary of them is, that only in about one-fifth (sixteen) are there any proper and efficient means for the removal of these various sources of contamination. A great many have still most primitive ways of disposing of them ; “they are thrown away carelessly.” Many have “surface drainage.” In some they are “ thrown into open lots,” or “ to the hogs ;” and in some “each inhabitant does as his own will dictates.” Nothing can be more chaotic than the present method pursued in this country, considered as one great whole. Eighteenth Question.—Have any State, County, or City reports of Health or Deaths been published ? The answers are:— Thirty, (30) No. Nine, (9) Yes. Two, (2) Indefinite Reply. Seven, ( 7 ) No Reply. That is, 62.50 per cent., or more than half of the correspondents, say there is no registration in their States; 18,75 per cent, have had some registration, most of them only for a few years past; and 18.75 per cent, make indefinite or negative replies. Adding together the first and last items as being essentially the same, we have, as the final probable result, that 81.25 per cent., or more than three-fourths of these States, have vir- tually ignored vital statistics during the whole centennial period. Add to this that among those which claim to have had registration, it is like- wise stated by my correspondents that in not a few the registration is very imperfect. The United States commenced its national censuses in 1790, and has continued them decennially ever since, but never with the accuracy which is desirable. I judge this from the opinion of experts whose opinion I have asked of even the latest, that of 1870. The following remarks by General Walker and Mr. Elliot seem also to indicate that my inference is true. General Walker says: “The gross incompleteness of the returns of deaths in the census of the United States is shown by Mr. Elliott’s Ap- proximate Life Table. What, it may be asked, is the value of statistics ADDRESS ON HYGIENE. 45 confessedly so imperfect?”1 He elsewhere admits that the number of deaths falls short 40 per cent, of what must actually be the fact. Mr. Elliot, who calculates life tables from these returns, admits that he is obliged to “ resort to the somewhat arbitrary assumption of 40 per cent, limited, however, by an investigation of the rates of mortality rela- tive to population which obtain in other communities, so far as accessi- ble, and in portions of our own country.”2 Nineteenth Question —How many years, approximately or definitely, have these registration reports been published f I regret that, owing to imperfect returns, I cannot give any but gene- ral statements. But when I think of the comparatively brief period of time since the registration has been commenced in the different States where any is made, and knowing as I do, the imperfections of those which may be sup- posed to be the best, I feel sure I am within the limits of truth, when declaring that not a State in this Union has a registration which has been in progress a sufficient number of years, or which has been con- ducted with sufficient accuracy, to be fairly comparable with that regis- tration which will be eventually demanded by an enlightened State Preventive Medicine, after that idea has been firmly grasped and acted upon for some years by the intellect and conscience of our people. In confirmation of this assertion, I state the following fact. I was desirous of learning definitely, not from theorizing on the influence of civilization, not from the records of foreign countries, but from accessible statistics collected and printed in this country, whether man lives longer now than at the commencement of the centennial period. I consulted several eminent American experts in statistical data. I asked them to point out to me any such data. Not one of them could do so. One who stands pre-eminent, and whose word is listened to by Europe, advised me as follows: “You may consult hills of mortality; grave-yard records; family Bibles; traditions of the former and later times, and they will show whether we have gained or lost in longevity.” I have no doubt that, provided we could find those records, we should perhaps partially gain the end proposed. My question was whether he could point out to me any printed document, derived from accurate records made in the United States, answering my question. He could not do so. Twentieth Question.—Has any law of development, or of partial develop- ment, of any disease been discovered, by individual or State action, by attention t°, which in coming centuries we may hope to greatly lessen or destroy such disease ? I proposed this question of fact as the test question, so to speak, of the Centennial Period, It was the culmination of all these questions hitherto proposed. The answers are : Thirty-nine, (39) No. Six, (6) Yes. None, (0) Indefinite Reply. Three,_ _ (8) No Reply. The returns indicate that my correspondents have a more decided opinion upon this question than upon any other of the series. There are 1 Statistical Atlas of the United States. By P. A. Walker. 2 Ibid. Approximate Life Table for the United States. By E. B. Elliott. 46 BOWDITCH, only three who fail to make any answer, and not a single State has replied indefinitely. Again, thirty-nine out of forty-eight States, or 81.25 per cent., reply in the negative ; six of the forty-eight, or 12.50 per cent., reply affirmatively. But let us look carefully at the affirmative replies, and interpret more closely their exact meaning. The replies I think may be justly arranged in two categories:— First. Those in which it appears that by close attention to sanitary arrangements, and their rigid enforcement, certain diseases are checked. One correspondent remarks, “all the acquired knowledge concerning all and each of the typho-contagia, and the factors of their propagation is equivalent to discovery.” (Dr. Harris, of Hew York.) From other States we are informed that “ the laws of development of typhoid fever are known better.” (Drs. Plummer, of Oregon, and Butler, of Vermont.) Drs. Stuart and Toner, of Washington, D. C., say they are “ able to control and prevent zyraotics by sanitary enforcement.” Dr. Baker, of Lansing, the self-sacrificing, efficient Secretary of the State Board of Health of Michigan, writes as follows : “ It seems proper to modify very much the ‘ Yes,’ which I have placed opposite the question ; if we substitute for ‘ law of development,’ or ‘partial development of,’ the words ‘general truth respecting,’ I think the answer will he truthfully ‘Yes.’” He then cites scarlet fever “which will he lessened in the near future, because of the accumulated evidence of the great mortality caused by it.” He also thinks “croup and pneumonia will be eventually greatly lessened from the fact that a cold and dry atmosphere causes the greatest mortality from both. And by securing such favorable conditions in our houses, and particularly in our sleeping rooms, it is reasonable he thinks, to hope that many deaths from pneumonia and croup may in the future be prevented.” These may be considered as one category. Second. Let us grant that all this is true, nevertheless I do not see that any “ law” of development of disease, similar in degree at least, if in character, to that of “soil moisture” as a very prominent cause of phthisis, has been presented by any of the above respected correspond- ents. Massachusetts, through the agency of the Massachusetts Medical Society,1 proved many years ago by data received from her three hundred and twenty-five towns, and where consumption had been previously con- sidered everywhere equally endemic, that there were dry spots where it was very rare, and wet where it was very rife. B}7 accurate statistical data, laboriously gathered, it was further proved that of two families growing up, one on a wet soil and the other on a dry soil, the one resident on the wet by that fact became twice, if not three times, as liable to phthisis as the other, resident on a dry spot. That law was first dis- covered and announced in New England, and subsequently by ample statistical data proved to exist in Old England. I think it may now be said to be a Cosmic Law, and as such it seems to me I am justified in placing it alone in the second category under this final question. In order to meet the numerous similar questions which will inevitably arise in the future, we need, as Mr. Elliot suggests, a National System for the registration of all the Births, Marriages, and Deaths taking place in the country. Moreover, the Registrar should, for the whole country, learn the exact character of the localities in which the deaths take place, if we would know exactly and broadly the endemic influences of any place. I Topographical Distribution of Consumption. Annual Address before Mass. Med. Society, 1867. ADDRESS ON HYGIENE. 47 SUMMARY. Gentlemen: My work is done. I have endeavored to place before you the exact truth in these matters so far as I could obtain it. No one can feel more keenly than I do that it has at times been most unpalata- ble, and that it seems to be but little creditable to the country. Never- theless, looking at the very recent growth of a regard for Public Hygiene, and at the certain though small advances made in various parts of the country in State Preventive Medicine, I have the strongest hopes for the future of our Country and the world in this regard. We could not, with the influences hitherto pressing upon us, have advanced further. System making, the outgrowth of many previous centuries, prevented all pro- gress in this direction during our first epoch. The overthrow of these theories and theory makers, and the bringing of medical inquiries into line with the methods pursued by modern science, was the great fact gained during the second. Although this has been followed by a sweeping and widespread skepticism in our own art, we must remember that this same skepticism is found everywhere within the domains of modern thought. Good will ultimately result from it. But these facts have not allowed of the growth of Preventive Medicine until within a very recent period of time. We stand now at the very dawn of the grandest epoch yet seen in the history of medicine. While philosophically, accurately, and with the most minute skill, studying by means of physiology, pathological anatomy, chemistry, the microscope, and, above all, by careful clinical observation, the natural history of disease and the effects of remedies, our art, at the present time, looks still higher, viz.: to the 'prevention of as well as to the cure of disease. And this is to be done by sanitary organizations throughout each State and the Nation, the laity and the profession heartily joining hands in this most noble cause. Our Present Duty. Our present duty is organization, National, State, Municipal, and Village. From the highest place in the National Council down to the smallest village Board of Health, we need organization. With these organizations we can study and often prevent disease. This great and beneficent object of the prevention of disease appeals to all. The aged may give counsel. To the young of this and of future generations belongs the solid work which is to bless the coming centu- ries. I appeal therefore with all the earnestness at my command to the young men of the present hour. Can there be anything more inspiring to a generous hearted, intelligent youth than the thought that, by labo- rious research into the causes of disease, by the discovery of means for its prevention, and by the teaching of these various causes and means to the people, he may help to save even a few of the more than two hun- dred thousand human beings now annually slaughtered in this country by preventable disease ? 48 BOWDITCH, ADDRESS OX HYGIENE. Our Hopes for the Future. I trust that this discussion will have given rise in your minds to some of the bright hopes for the future which have arisen in my own. Al- though Public Hygiene has made but few advances hitherto, it is never- theless founded upon Natural law. It has been legitimately and health- fully growing during a portion of the past quarter of a century. Modern Science greets it and brings it within its domain as one of its most pre- cious objects for thorough investigation. I hope therefore that, standing as we now are near to the close of this fair Centennial Birth-year of our Nation, up to whose festival all nations of the earth have been invited, 1 may be allowed to appeal to all, whether young or old, American or collaborating friends from other lands, to join with me in a Cordial All Hail to Coming Centuries, not only in America but in every civilized spot of God’s earth ; because everywhere, and to all coming time, human life will be lengthened, made more healthy, and consequently more truly happy, by the potent influence of State Preventive Medicine. 49 ADDRESS ON MEDICAL CHEMISTRY AND TOXICOLOGY. BY THEO. G-. WORMLEY, M.D., PhD., LL.D., professor of chemistky and toxicology in starling MEDICAL COLLEGE, COLUMBUS, OHIO. When it is remembered that nearly all human thought and labor are devoted to the promotion of the welfare of the human body, and that agriculture, manufactures, and commerce have this as their chief end, it will not be deemed strange that a science so comprehensive and withal so flexible in its applications as Chemistry, should be laid under contri- bution to preserve that body in health, or to restore that health when unpaired. Before chemistry had become a true science, its aid was in- voked by the old alchemists in their search for the “ Elixir of Life.” A universal remedy was the dream of many a toiler in secret places, whose occult science had for him a strange fascination. There were among the Arabians many who, in their rude way, applied such chemical knowledge they possessed to the discovery of new medicines. The same was rue of the earlier physicians of Europe. There was everywhere an effort o make nature reveal some secret which might be turned to account in 16 healing art. This, more than any other, was deemed the true func- tion of Chemistry. It was not until Bacon announced the true method of scientific inves- ofA?°1J’ -leaven, was to be entered as a child, rather than with the spirit of a mtator, that the mists of earlier times were gradually swept away, and m path prepared for the appearance of Science with exact methods and Wl|h exact results. Th iS.now onty about a century since Chemistry took shape as a Science, th a:>ors °1 hflaok, Priestley, Scheele, Lavoisier, and others showed hav f anfl6 een exploring this field, and have taken possession of many a spot, fes ?ecured permanent title-deeds for posterity; but, it must be con- anflL 1 a centuiT lar t°° short for the survey of the whole domain, fou ?Ur descendants will have ample scope and incentive for the pro- p>rit/( labor and research. Only two years since, the chemists of Great hirt^11*-. America celebrated the centennial of Chemistry, dating the Rrie\l J0 Bcaence Horn the discovery of Oxygen by the distinguished plac ey\AugUSt 1774 The commemoration in this country took The -^orthumberland, Pa., the American home of Dr. notegeneAa - Progress of the century was there ably set forth by men of address fp 8e^ra! departments of investigation. The very valuable tribunal* Vu I>>en.iamin Silliman, on this occasion, on American Con- iuclebte B 1 lem'ißiry, (a complete compendium to which we are greatly this C shows that in this country we have not been idle in advancing Afterartment °f Bcience- the discovery of oxygen, nitrous oxide, and'other gases, by 50 WO EM LEY, Priestley and others, Sir Humphry Davy, then a young man with ma- jority unreached, was employed at Bristol, through the generosity of Messrs. Watt and Wedgwood, to undertake a careful series of experi- ments with gases as remedial agents. So important and intimate is the connection between chemistry and medicine, that we should naturally look to those who feel the imperative need of this science in its sanitary applications, for the best labors in the science. There could be no other incentive more potent. The air and vapors we breathe, the food we eat, the fluids we drink, the medicines we take, and the poisons we seek to avoid, all come within the range of the analyst, and his words of counsel and caution are to he heeded. In this held of labor many eminent chemists have labored with exclusive devotion, while others, as Davy, Scheele, and Liebig, commenced their distinguished careers as pharma- cists, and may be said to have emerged from the apothecary’s shop. Indeed, we may not overlook the close connection between chemistry and pharmacy. As we trace the history of medical chemistry in the United States, it will be seen that the contributions of the pharmacists have been so many and various, that the historian must give them a high and honorable place in the annals of American progress. One hundred years ago we find that the only medical college in the land, with an occupied chair of chemistry, was the Philadelphia Medical College, soon after (1791) merged into the University of Pennsylvania, the institution in whose halls we are now assembled, an institution not only venerable in years, but renowned for the great and noble work it has accomplished. The occupant of this chair, elected August 1, 1769, was none other than Dr. Benjamin Rush, distinguished alike for his professional labors, which brought honor upon medical science, and for his devoted patriotism in the dark daj-s when our national independence was won. He graduated at Princeton, and afterwards studied medicine in Philadelphia, Edinburgh, London, and Paris. While in Edinburgh he studied chemistry with the eminent Dr. Joseph Black. He was one of the signers of the Declaration of Independence, which this centennial year commemorates. In 1777 he was made surgeon-general of the army in the middle department. Ever a distinguished physician and medical professor, ever active in all public and philanthropic movements, his long life was one of singular usefulness and honor, and no name in our annals should be mentioned with more reverence and resjiect than that of Ben- jamin Rush, the earliest American professor of chemistry. The only other chair of chemistry in the colonial days was that established in William and Mary College, Virginia, in 1774, and filled by the Rev. James Madison. In 1779 a professorship of chemistry and natural philosophy was established in the literary department of the University of Pennsylvania. Thus two of the first three chemical professorships in America were established in Philadelphia. In the medical department of Harvard University, Aaron Dexter was elected Professor of Chemistry and Ma- teria Medica in 1783; and in 1792 Dr. Samuel Latham Mitchell was elected Professor of Chemistry in Columbia College, Hew York. Dr. Mitchell graduated in medicine in Edinburgh in 1786. Two years after entering upon his professorship of Chemistry, he published an essay on the Nomenclature of the New Chemistry. In 1797 he, with others, estab- lished the Medical Repository, the first scientific periodical ever published ill the United States. He is now widely known as an early student of ADDRESS ON MEDICAL CHEMISTRY. 51 natural history, and bis publications on zoological subjects are yet prized. In 1795 Professor John McLean, a young chemist of Scotland, was elected Professor of Chemistry in Nassau Hall, Princeton. In 1803 Pro- fessor Benjamin Silliman, the first professor of chemistry in Yale College, entered upon his duties. lie became widely known as an able and elo- quent expounder of chemical science. In 1818 he established The Ame- rican Journal of Science and Arts, which became, more than any Ameri- can journal, the means of disseminating discoveries in chemistry and in cognate sciences. His name will ever remain an honored one in the his- tory of American science. The work done in chemistry in the medical schools has not always been marked by scientific thoroughness; indeed, in too many cases, verv little practical benefit has resulted from the lectures, often only heard to be forgotten. But a change is now being effected in this respect, and we note with satisfaction that a two years’ course of systematic labora- tory practice is made part of the regular curriculum of study in the Medical Department of Harvard University. The earlier professors of chemistry in the Medical Schools did not con- tribute largely to the advancement of the science in the way of original research. The science was in its infancy, and the circumstances^sur- rounding them were not generally such as to awaken that measure of enthusiasm which is necessary to scientific discoveries, A marked ex- ception, however, is found in the case of Dr. Robert Hare, who became I rofessor of Chemistry in the University of Pennsylvania in 1818. In bis youth he was a member of the Chemical Society of Philadelphia, to belonged Priestley, Seybert, and others. At the early age of twenty, he announced the discovery of the oxy-hydrogen blowpipe, which A once gave him distinction in both hemispheres. This became a valu- able instrument in certain departments of chemical investigations, and 111 the arts. Dr. Hare had great mechanical skill, and with his ingenious apparatus was enabled to perform experiments with great brilliancy and 8 In addition to many valuable contributions, he published, in -o, a Compendium of Chemistry, a valuable and useful work at the time.. n this connection it should be mentioned that in 1819 Dr. John Gor- 'Qln.b 1 rofessor of Chemistry in the Medical Department of Harvard. diversity, published the first original systematic treatise on chemistry Woe‘^0d in this country, entitled the Elements of Chemical Science, a sh Ihi Ui tw° v°hmies, which reflected great credit upon its author. It rerfVr he stated, however, that there had been, before this, American. Publications of foreign chemical works. Re i 6 now come? in the order of history, to the name of Prof. John I'ati,nan oxe’ who deserves mention for the part he played in inaugu- ln nSa movement, which, as we shall see, has contributed, perhaps,, gtaf.e lan ailJ other to the progress of Medical Chemistry in the United °f EP* hart mechcal education was obtained in the University He ‘iff Urgh’ hut he graduated in the University of Pennsylvania in 1794.. In lC«noTards sf)ont considerable time in London, Edinburgh,and Paris, Was t’ y3 was elccted by bis Alma Mater Professor of Chemistry, and latter1 tUR ■ I'rfd to tdle chair of Materia Medica in 1818. While in this special aU' 16'Ua1s He “leading spirit” in a movement to provide a drua-o7«+Cl°Ui;Sei0f io(rhlres iu Pharmacy for the young druggists and rue iff.!* fa hS ot 1 hiladelphia. This was early in 1821. this move- sted the attention of the leading druggists of the city, and led; 52 WORMLEY, them at once to establish a new and independent institution—first called the College of Apothecaries, but changed the next year to the Philadel- phia College of Pharmacy—to secure the same results, but upon a more liberal plan. The founders of this college were wise men, and secured for their new institution professors of high scientific character. The first course of lectures was given in 1821-2. Dr. Samuel Jackson, a medical graduate of the University of Pennsylvania, was the first Professor of Materia Medica. In 1827 he was elected to a professorship in his Alma Mater. His career as a lecturer, as an author, and as a practitioner, was in all respects distinguished. Dr. Gerard Troost, afterwards eminent in other departments of science, was the first Professor of Chemistry, but was succeeded within a year by Dr. George B. Wood, happily still living to enjoy the rewards of a life well spent in the service of science and of humanity. His published works, at once so complete and scholarly, have honored the profession of which he has so long been a distinguished member. In 1831, Dr. Wood was transferred to the department of Materia Medica. His successor in the chair of Chemistry was. Dr. Franklin Bache, a worthy descendant of the eminent statesman and philosopher whose name he bore. In 1833, Professors Wood and Bache published the first edition of the United States Dispensatory, a work which has passed through thirteen (13) editions, and is still the indispensable hand- book of the physician and pharmacist. These eminent professors im- pressed upon the College of Pharmacy a character for thorough science which it has never lost. Our brief sketch would be imperfect should we here fail to mention the name of the late Prof. William Procter, Jr., who became the Professor of Pharmacy in this college in 1846, and who by his scientific labors, prosecuted through many years, contributed more to the special department of Medical and Pharmaceutical Chemistry than, perhaps, any other American. It should here be mentioned that, four years after the establishment of the Philadelphia College of Phar- macy, its friends founded the American Journal of Pharmacy, a journal still issued, and which has contributed very greatly to the dissemination of a knowledge of chemistry in its relations to medicine. The second College of Pharmacy in this country was established in Hew York in 1829, through the instrumentality of George D. Coggeshall, r. John C. Warren performed a surgical operation, authenti- miclV as an anaesthetic agent to the surgical and medical profession, 1-.., • dOlll that time the knowledge and practice of anaesthesia extended Japidly over the world. 60 WORMLEY, As already shown, chloroform was employed by inhalation by Dr. Ives, of Hew Haven, in his practice in the winter of 1881-32 with marked benefit. In March, 1847, M. Flourens experimented with this agent upon lower animals, and in November of the same year the distinguished Prof. James Y. Simpson, of the University of Edinburgh, employed it as an anaesthetic agent with success, and introduced it into surgical and obstetrical practice. Thus, in summary, we find that anaesthesia, first suggested by Sir Humphry Davy, in 1800, was demonstrated with nitrous oxide as an agent, by Horace Wells, in 1844; with ether as an agent, by Wm. T. G. Morton, in 1846; and with chloroform, by Sir James Y. Simpson, in 1847. The next American chemical contribution to medicine that we may mention, is that on the “ Origin of Urea in the Body,” by Prof. John C. Draper, of the University of the City of Hewr York (Hew York Journal of Medicine, Feb. 1856). In this paper the author shows the error in the statement of Liebig that muscular action increases the amount of urea secreted. The process employed was the decomposition of urea by nitroso-nitric acid, and weighing the carbonic acid produced as carbonate of baryta. The results obtained by Prof. Draper have since been verified by Pick and Wislicenus, but the credit of the first disproval of the state- ment of Liebig belongs to Dr. Draper. Dr, Draper has also contributed papers, which may be mentioned in this connection, on “Products of Respiration,” Hew York Med. Times, July, 1856; “Insensible Perspiration,” Proceedings of the Hew York Academy of Medicine, May, 1864; “The Heat produced in the Body, and the Effects of Exposure to Cold,” American Journal Science and Arts, Dec. 1872. The last contribution we shall mention in this connection, is a valuable paper in the department of Physiological Chemistry, entitled “ Experi- mental Researches into a new Excretory Function of the Liver,” by Pro- fessor Austin Flint, Jr., widely known in the field of experimental phy- siology. This paper was published in the American Journal of the Medical Sciences for October, 1862; and afterwards presented to the French Aca- demy of Sciences, from which it received in 1869 honorable mention and an award of 1500 francs. The important discoveries put forth in this memoir were the production of cholesterine in the physiological wear of the brain and nervous tissue, and its elimination by the liver, and dis- charge from the body in the form of stercorine. Dr. Flint’s researches and interesting conclusions upon this subject have lately been confirmed in Germany, by experiments in which cholesterremia has been produced in animals by injection of cholesterine into the blood. TOXICOLOGY. We now enter upon the other and not less important branch of the subject assigned us, namely that of Toxicology. This science is one of the highest moment to the race. While health and life are assailed by various diseases, by the ill-adjustment of outward circumstances, such as climate, locality and the like, by the unsuitableness of food and drink, or by an excessive use of these*, and by a thousand other harmful conditions, these ADDRESS ON MEDICAL CHEMISTRY. 61 assaults are generally made by slow and noticeable approaches, and are within the ken of the physician. But there have always lurked in the mineral and organic kingdoms, foes which may be likened to assassins who spring upon the unwary and destroy life as by a secret blow. These assailants are the poisons, the very Thugs of nature. Before the present century little was known of poisons beyond their deadly effects and the attending physiological circumstances. Indeed, any true knowledge of poisons was unattainable until the advent of Chemistry as an exact science. Poisons are naturally grouped into two kinds—inorganic and organic. in noticing the inorganic or mineral poisons, that one which holds the highest position in historical toxicology, and the one which until recently has been used as a toxic agent very much more than any other, is Arsenic. Although known in its metallic state, and as arsenious acid, as early as the eighth century, to G-eber, the Arabian, and although it had been used as a poison for centuries, yet so little progress had been made in regard to its chemical detection under these circumstances, that Sir R. Christi- son, as late as 1824, declared that the tests for arsenic at that time in general use were so fallacious, when applied to complex mixtures, as to be unfit for medico-legal investigations. He then proposed a process for the detection of this metal which, as modified by Presenilis and Babo, continues in use to the present day. At the time of introducing this method, Prof. Christison remarked that by ft he was able to detect the one-sixteenth of a grain of the poison. This, at the time, was regarded as a great triumph of analytical skill. Hot long before this (1795) Dr. Black stated that one grain was the least he could detect; and at a somewhat earlier period, yet less than a century since (1786), Hahne- mann stated that ten grains was the least quantity he could recover. In 1836, Mr. Marsh, of Woolwich, England, proposed for the detection °f this metal, a method which has since been known by his name, and wf*soh has proved of the highest value in chemico-legal practice. As originally employed by Mr. Marsh, this test was restricted to obtaining deposits of the metal from the ignited jet of the arsenide of hydrogen; 9nt in 1841 Berzelius proposed the reduction of the arsenical gas by heat aPplied to the exit tube of the apparatus, and it has been found that this a|othod is even more delicate than that proposed by Marsh. In 1841 Dr. iugo Reinsch proposed, for the detection of this metal, his copper test, w dch has proved a most admirable method for the recovery of the poison, specially from complex organic mixtures. In point of delicacy, as now employed, this test is not inferior to the process of Marsh, and it has in certain cases even the advantage over the latter in simplicity of appli- cation. The two tests now mentioned, both in regard to simplicity of application and delicacy of reaction, leave little or nothing more to be csired in regard to the recovery and identification of this poison, tine of the first American contributions relating to the detection of msenic was by Prof, James F. Dana, a graduate of Harvard University, qi 0 studied chemistry in London, and was afterwards Professor of ministry in Dartmouth College and in the College of Physicians and u rpfeons,’ Hew York. As early as 1816, he prepared a paper on the pri °StS r J^-1’serd and the latter with aluminium. These researches, with those of 18, Brum Brown and Fraser, and with those of Dr. Richardson, are in Dew field of inquiry, and promise very interesting and important results to science. laving thus glanced at the more important American contributions to Xicology, the way is prepared to take a broader view of this science, flc observe the progress of its development, especially in its chemical t ures. This progress will be seen to be greater in regard to the organic m --s, the marked advance in methods of chemical analysis having c e such progress possible, of Je oPening of the present century, the fact that the toxic effect prpCe vegetable poisons was due to the agency of a peculiar active s 0’ r.es^ent di the plant, had not been determined. The vegetable ol)se .anf wbich the existence of a principle of this kind was first ,ecolVed Was opium, in which Serfurner and also perhaps Seguin in 1804 ie Pres(rnce °f a new substance; but it was not until 1817 lfe ortiirner obtained it in a pure state, and examined its properties, °und that the alcoholic solution of this new principle acted upon, o » 66 WOEMLEY, vegetable colors like solutions of the mineral alkalies, and that the sub- stance combined directly with acids, forming neutral salts which were soluble in water, and that it was precipitated from solutions of its salts by the mineral alkalies. To this substance Sertiirner gave the name morphine, and from the properties just mentioned he regarded it as a kind of alkali; hence the name vegeto-alkali or alkaloid for principles of this kind. Very soon after the discovery of morphine it was found that nux vomica, white hellebore, cinchona bark, belladonna, tobacco, and certain other vegetable products which had been long known as capable of exerting marked physiological effects, owed their activity to the presence of similar alkaline principles. The number of such natural principles now known is quite considerable. Since 1848 a great number of organic alkalies have been obtained artificially, some of which rival potash and soda in* the degree of their alkalinity. The study of these artificial alkaloids has thrown much light upon the constitution of the natural alkaloids, which is, as yet, imperfectly understood. The discovery of the natural alkaloids has been of great service to the physician, giving him a more concentrated and manageable form of me- dicine; but to the toxicological chemist this discovery has been of the very highest value, enabling him in cases of poisoning by crude vegetable substances, in just so far as he can recover the alkaloid or active principle from complex mixtures (such as the contents of the stomach), and can separate and determine it by special chemical properties, to identify the toxic substance employed. There are, however, many vegetable and animal poisons, the exact nature of the active principle of which has not yet been determined. Formerly, about the only method of detecting vegetable poisons was by means of the physical and botanical characters of the subtance taken, such as the leaves, seeds, etc., and this method is yet of service in furnish- ing corroborative evidence in cases even in which the nature of the pecu- liar principle is known. It is obvious that in poisoning by crude vege- table and animal substances, we can determine the presence of the poison by chemical methods only, first, when we know that the substance con- tains an alkaloid or other principle peculiar to itself; second, when we are able to recover this principle from complex mixtures; and third, when we are acquainted with one or more chemical reactions character- istic of this principle. Thus, in poisoning by opium, we cannot prove the existence of opium as a whole, but only inferentially, by proving the presence of a principle peculiar to this drug. Our success in the dis- covery of organic poisons, where the existence of a peculiar principle is already known, depends largely on our ability to recover such principle from complex mixtures in a state sufficiently pure for the application of special tests. It was not until 1851 that any real progress was made in this direction, when Prof, Stas, of Brussels, introduced a systematic method for such recovery. This method has proved of the highest importance, and marks an era in toxicological science. It is based upon the fact that the salts of the alkaloids, as a class, are soluble in water and alcohol, but are in- soluble in ether; and that these salts when in solution are readily decom- posed by the mineral alkalies with the elimination of the alkaloids, which in their free and uncombined state are more or less readily soluble in ether. In any given case therefore, in so far as the active principle or alkaloid ADDRESS ON MEDICAL CHEMISTRY. 67 is soluble in ether, and this liquid fails to extract foreign animal and vegetable matter, in just so far can we obtain the alkaloid in its pure state. _ Professor Stas successfully applied his method for the recovery of the principal alkaloids likely to be met with in chemico-legal investiga- tions, employing for this purpose the usual extracts of the plants in which they are found. Professor Otto, of Brunswick, proposed to modify the method of Stas, in the case of the fixed alkaloids, by first washing the acid aqueous solution of the alkaloidal salt with ether as long as this fluid was colored ; the solution is then rendered alkaline and the liberated alka- loid extracted with ether as before proposed. Professor Otto claimed, and justly, that in this manner the alkaloid might be obtained in a state of greater purity, and almost invariably in a crystallized condition. In 1853, Professors Graham and Hoffman, of London, proposed a method for the recovery of strychnine from organic mixtures, which wqs after- wards extended to other alkaloids; it is based upon the fact that when a solution of strychnine in its free state is agitated with charcoal, the charcoal absorbs the poison and yields it up to boiling alcohol (Quart. Journ. Chem. Soc., 1858). In practice, in chemico-legal investigations, tins method is inferior to that of Stas. In 1856, Messrs. Rogers and Grirdwood, of London, proposed the use of chloroform instead of ether, as advised by Stas, for the extraction of the alkaloids. They also pro- posed to destroy the last traces" of foreign matter by charring the chloro- form residue with concentrated sulphuric acid over a water-bath (Lancet, -London, June, 1856). The use of chloroform as advised by these gentle- nien has proved of value in researches of this kind, since it is a better s°lvent of most of the alkaloids than ether, and has therefore an advan- tage in certain cases; but, on the other hand, it has sometimes the dis- advantage of taking up more freely than ether foreign animal and vege- table matters. Another method for the extraction of the alkaloids from complex mixtures is that of Usler and Erdmann, who proposed the use °t amylic alcohol, the principle of the process being much the same as in 'e method of Stas. Amylic alcohol is especially adapted to the recovery ° morphine, solanine, and certain other alkaloids, which are more or less mely soluble in this liquid, whereas they are but very sparingly soluble }°tli in ether and chloroform, and therefore are but imperfectly extracted Y these liquids. f*l 1862, Professor Thomas Graham, of London, in his very important •Hribujtion.on liquid diffusion, showed that moist organic membranes pfethe remarkable property of separating crystallizable substances when t]' s°mtion from such as are uncrystallizable, the former readily passing j- ,lough such membranes when surrounded by a liquid, whereas the latter in1 ?ass or Pass only very slowly. These classes of substances he named Pflively crystalloids and colloids, and to this method of separation he anq U' ie Grin dialysis. This method is applicable to both inorganic +; T’ganic bodies, and is often found very useful in toxicological inves- llgations. * J Ural1? contribution to this department of research is that of Prof, e] a | (^n ClO rH 7 of the University of Dor pat, who, in 1868, proposed a very shn-ate and exhaustive method for the extraction of the alkaloids and theiraf l,lanU!’les- aild for their separation from each other, based upon uleoL ;G^av.ior with petroleum-naphtha, benzole, chloroform, and amylic by ’ dividing them into several groups according as they are affected ese different liquids under certain specified conditions. 68 WORMLEY, From this brief historical sketch, we learn that very considerable attention has been directed to this important and essential part of toxi- cological chemistry; and, it may be added, the results have been such as to leave little to be desired in regard to the recovery of a large number of organic poisons. We are now prepared to take a rapid survey of the progress made in regard to the special identification of poisons by chem- ical and other tests. Even less than a third of a century ago, there were but few of the organic poisons for which special and unerring tests were known, especially when present in the minute quantity usually met with in chemico-legal investigations. In September, 1843, E. Marchand made the important discovery that if strychnine be treated with concentrated sulphuric acid containing a little nitric acid and peroxide of lead, it dissolves with the production of a series of colors peculiar to that alkaloid. The tests employed for the detection of this poison prior to the discovery of this color reaction, which has since been known as the color-test, gave reactions more or less common to substances other than strychnine. In fact, this color-test is the only one yet known the reaction of which, taken alone, is peculiar to strychnine. It was considered a marvel of delicacy of reaction when Marchand announced that this test would reveal the presence of a quan- tity of strychnine not exceeding the one-thousandth of a grain in weight. This test has since been modified by Mack, Otto, and others, by substi- tuting for the nitric acid and lead compound other oxidizing com- pounds; and it will now, in the hands of a skilful manipulator, show the presence of strychnine when in quantity not exceeding, perhaps, the one- millionth of a grain. The discovery of this test did much to stimulate chemists to search for special or characteristic tests for other alkaloids and vegetable principles likely to be encountered in chemico-legal investigations, and in many instances with success. Much remains, however, to be done in this direction, even in regard to some very well known poisons of this class. There are some poisons, the presence of which may be determined by what is known as a combination of tests, no one of which is in itself peculiar or exclusive; but there are others for which we have as yet neither peculiar and distinctive tests, nor any peculiar combination of tests for their detection, especially when present in minute quantity. It is less than a quarter of a century since the aid of the microscope was, to any marked extent, invoked in this department of research, yet within this comparatively brief period its use has very greatly extended our means of determining the specific nature of the results of chemical tests. This instrument not only often enables us to determine the true nature of a precipitate or sublimate by its crystalline or other form, the character of which would otherwise be doubtful, but it enables us to recognize and identify certain substances when present in quantities so minute as to be far beyond the reach of the ordinary methods of exami- nation, Thus by micro-chemical analysis we are able to identify with absolute certainty the reaction of the one hundred thousandth part of a grain of hydrocyanic acid, and of certain other poisons in quantity equally minute. Even a sublimate, consisting of a few crystals, each of which does not exceed the one hundred millionth of a grain in weight, may, under certain conditions, serve to characterize the presence of arsenic beyond a question of doubt. The chief contributors to the micro- chemistry of poisons have been Professors Guy and Taylor, the eminent ADDRESS ON MEDICAL CHEMISTRY. 69 toxicologists of England; Drs. Helwig and Earhard, of Germany; and Professor Worraley, of the ETnited States. For the final purification and subsequent examination by means of the microscope either directly or under the action of reagents, the process of sublimation has been proposed, as applicable to both inorganic and organic substances. In 1858, Professor Wm. A. Guy, of London, called special attention to the process of sublimation for the detection of arsenic, corrosive sublimate, and certain other inorganic poisons; and in 1865, E>r, Helwig, of Mayence, announced that in like manner certain alkaloids and vegetable principles furnished sublimates, some of which were cha- racteristic in their microscopic forms and in their behavior with reagents, and he gave photographic illustrations of many of the forms thus obtained. In 1867, Hr. Guy modified somewhat Helwig’s method, extended it to a much larger class of objects, and proposed to add to the diagnostic value of the method by a simple arrangement for noting the temperature at which changes in form and color, and sublimation itself, occur. The brilliant discoveries of Bunsen and Kirchhoff, in 1859, which enable us by means of spectrum analysis to recognize and identify with unerring certainty the elementary forms of matter and certain com- pounds, even when present in quantities so minute as to be far beyond the reach of the ordinary methods of analysis, have not been without some fruit in the department of chemico-legal investigations. Thus Dr, Pence Jones found by this method thallium in the liver, when the ordi- -11 ary chemical tests failed to reveal its presence. It is a proof of the great activity and sagacity displayed in modern science that the spectroscope with its amazing capabilities should so soon op combined with the microscope, an instrument of scarcely less capabili- ties, thus forming the micro-spectroscope, by which we are enabled to uiake new discoveries of the highest value in Medico-legal Chemistry. this combination of the two instruments we are chiefly indebted to Mr. H. C. Sorby, who has with its aid determined the spectra of a large number of organic coloring principles when in solutions. One of the niost important applications of this instrument thus far made in legal niedicine, is that for the detection of blood, its delicacy being such as, according to Mr. Sorby, and as confirmed by our own observations, to jeveal the presence of a single corpuscle, or less than the one thirteen mil- -IQnth of a milligramme, or one five hundred millionth of a grain, of that Uld. Although this method will serve to discriminate the coloring Matter of the blood from other coloring principles, yet it does not enable to distinguish the blood of any one animal, including man, from that . pother. This, however, can be done within certain limits, but only 1 i|n certain limits, by means of the microscope; this instrument fables us to specify with great certainty certain animals, even of the nie class, from which the blood was not derived, but it does not enable 0 positively individualize the animal from which it was derived. UofUr (^SCUSiP°n °f toxicology would be very incomplete without some 100I00 P]e subject of the absorption of poisons. Prior to the important of Magendie on venous absorption, in 1809, it was believed cl all poisons produced their effects by impressions transmitted through rat)iI|?rves-i The chief argument in support of this view, was that the Uio acPqn °f certain poisons wTas incompatible with any other .transm^ss\on‘ Hr. Blake successfully met this argument, and e< L’om experiments that sufficient time elapsed for absorption even 70 WORMLEY, in the case of those substances the most rapid in their action, such as hydrocyanic acid and conine. Through the labors and experiments of Dr. Blake, Sir Benj, Brodie, Sir Robert Christison, M. Bernard, and other physiologists, the views of Magendie were continued, and it was accepted that the entrance of the poison into the blood was a condition essential to its action. That certain substances were absorbed and widely distributed, was early observed from the color imparted to various tissues of the body, and to the urine, by certain coloring principles, as indigo, picric acid, and the like; and by the characteristic odor perceived throughout the body in poisoning by prussic acid and other odorous substances. When we consider how minute is the quantity of certain poisons required to destroy life, the imperfect character of the methods of analysis early employed, and the fact that certain poisons may soon jiass beyond recovery, it is not surprising that the progress in recovering poisons from the blood and tissues was somewhat slow. We find, however, that in 1821, Tiedeman and Ganelin found lead, mercury, and barium in the blood of animals poisoned by salts of these metals; that, in 1827, Woehler recovered certain administered poisons from the urine; and that, in 1829, Wibmer satisfactorily proved the presence of lead in the tissues of animals poisoned by that metal. It was reserved, however, for Professor Orfila, whose original and profound labors in this department have brought honor upon science, to show the absorption and distribution of arsenic throughout the animal body. In January, 1839, this distin- guished investigator announced to the Parisian Academy of Medicine, that in poisoning by this substance, the arsenic diffuses itself in such quantity that it may be recovered by chemical methods from the blood, tissues, and various secretions of the body. In 1840, he proved these facts to the satisfaction of a committee of the Academy. This discovery inaugurated a new era in medical jurisprudence. Subsequently, Orfila proved that the same wide distribution of poison throughout the body held in regard to mercury, antimony, lead, and other metallic poisons. It has generally been believed that in the absorption of metallic poisons, and in their deposition in the soft tissues of the body, a larger proportion is to be found in the liver than in any other part, the least proportion being found in the muscles; but, according to the quite recent researches of M. Scolosubroff, absorbed arsenic, both in acute and chronic poisoning, is deposited specially in the nervous system. Thus, if the quantity found in the fresh muscle be taken as 1, that in the liver is 10.8; that in the brain 36.5; and that in the spinal marrow 37.3 (Ann, d’llygiene, Jan. 1876). Under the present improved methods of analysis, it now rarely happens, in cases of poisoning by mineral substances, that the poison cannot readily be detected in the various organs and tissues of the body ; yet it is well known that even in this kind of poisoning the toxic agent may be entirely removed from the body prior to death. Our experience in regard to the recovery of the vegetable poisons has not been so satisfactory. While there are some of this class which may be readily detected in the blood and tissues, and others that have been found only rarely, there is still a large number that have never as yet been found in the absorbed state. That all the organic poisons enter the blood and are diffused through- out the body is no longer doubted. The first instance of the recovery of a vegetable alkaloid, after it had undergone absorption, was announced by Stas, as late as in 1845, and less than a third of a century ago ; in this ADDRESS ON MEDICAL CHEMISTRY. 71 case he recovered morphine from the viscera of a body that had been buried for thirteen months. Many instances have occurred since, however, in which, even under more favorable conditions, there lias been a total failure to recover this alkaloid from any part of the body. So, also, in 1851, Stas detected nicotine in the blood of a dog poisoned by that substance, employ- ing his ether process for the extraction of the alkaloid. Perhaps no one circumstance did so much to call the attention of toxi- cologists to the subject of the detection of the vegetable poisons in the blood and tissues, as the remarkable trial, in London, of Palmer for the poisoning of Cook by strychnine, in 1856. Prior to May, 1856, according to Prof. A. S. Taylor, in no instance had strychnine been recovered in an absorbed state from the blood, tissues, or soft organs of the body. This trial directed special attention to this poison, and led to its more careful investigation, and from that time instances of its recovery after absorp- tion have become quite frequent. In fact, under the recent improved methods of analysis, a failure to recover this poison in its absorbed state, should rarely happen. Since this time, chemists have been gradually adding to their triumphs in this important department of research, and now authentic instances have been recorded of the recovery and identifi- cation by chemical tests, of at least the following alkaloids: morphine, nicotine, strychnine, brucine, atropine, daturine, veratrine, jervine, and nonine. It may be added, that considerable difference exists in regard to the readiness with which the different poisons just mentioned may be recovered when in the absorbed state. That all poisons, except those endowed with corrosive action, have to enter the circulation in certain quantity before producing their peculiar effects, is now universally conceded. We may now inquire what is known °f the mode or manner in which when diffused in the blood they destroy |ife. It is well known that some poisons produce an appreciable change lr} the physical and chemical properties of the blood, as shown in the difference of color and consistency of that fluid. These changes are well Marked in the cases of sulphuretted hydrogen, prussic acid, carbonic acid, chloroform, and conine, under the action of which the blood becomes more liquid and of a darker color. In most of these cases the poisoned bjood, when examined by the spectroscope, gives the spectrum of deoxi- dized blood. . It was long since observed that certain poisons on being introduced the blood were either wholly, or in great part, decomposed. Thus, mR. Christison failed to obtain any chemical evidence of the presence °i oxalic acid in the blood of the vena cava of a dog, killed in thirty seconds by the injection of eight grains and a half of that poison into ile Amoral vein. Even with the improved methods of analysis, chemists ave never yet been able to recover this poison, as such, from the blood, n some cases we can very clearly trace the changes which take place in .j "O femM that cinnamic acid was converted during its progress through 16 animal system into hippuric acid; and in 1862, Dr. Letheby found under like conditions nitro-benzole was changed into aniline. In P ve fanner it has been found that hydride of benzole is changed into „ac\d, which in its turn becomes converted into hippuric acid. In a|i ’. Rfebig showed that hydrate of chloral under the action of an I 1 ’ was changed into chloroform and formic acid ; and in 1868, e uch showed that the same change took place when this substance 72 WOEMLEY, ADDRESS ON MEDICAL CHEMISTRY. entered the blood by absorption, and to this change is attributed the peculiar sedative effects of chloral. Even in regard to the action of strychnine, brucine, morphine, vera- trine, nicotine, and certain other organic poisons, which may be recovered from the blood in their unchanged state, it has been claimed by some that they are changed in part at least before they produce their toxic effect, but of this there is no direct proof. When we consider the extremely minute quantity of substances of this kind which may destroy life (a quantity sometimes certainly not exceeding in weight the one three hundred thousandth part of the blood), and the ready demonstration of their presence in the blood after death, it would appear that in certain instances at least, the fatal issue is not dependent upon the decomposi- tion of any part of the toxic agent. Although the various facts that have been presented are of great value and interest, yet it must be admitted that the whole subject of the final action of poisons is left in great obscurity. While it is believed by all that poisons are absorbed and taken into the circulation, it is found that only some produce any marked changes, physical or chemical, in the blood ; and on the other hand, while some poisons are themselves decom- posed in that liquid, yet others equally fatal, appear to suffer little or no change. We may trace the destroyer in all its subtle insinuations through the blood and tissues, and see life quickly driven from the body, but we know not where nor how the fatal stroke is given. These are questions which modern science, with all its refined methods of research, has left unanswered. In conclusion, it may be said that the field in which the toxicological chemist labors, is one of the highest responsibility. He must not only be consecrated to his science, know all its best methods, and be able to practise them in all their most delicate and skilful manipulations; but he should have a higher consecration to truth, ever remembering that in toxicological jurisprudence his Words should be weighed in balances even more delicate and exact than those in which he weighs his material sub- stances. Human life on the one hand, and the security of society and the vindication of law on the other, may hang upon the slender thread of a chemical reaction, or tremble in the final adjustment of a most deli- cate instrument. The highest skill, and a regard for truth that knows no shadow of turning, can alone fit the toxicological chemist to meet the grave responsibilities of his profession. 73 ADDRESS ON SURGERY. BY PAUL F. EYE, M.U., PROFESSOR OF OPERATIVE AND CLINICAL SURGERY IN THE UNIVERSITY OF NASHVILLE. Gentlemen of the International Medical Congress ; The language of the Aborigines of America has ever been admired for its simplicity and significance. In the State of Mississippi, itself imply- ing the father of all waters, is a County called Itawambi, derived from the title given an Indian Chief, upon whom all possible honors had been conferred, so that nothing more could be done for him. Standing here this day, the representative of the most demonstrative and efficient de- partment of the healing art; the recipient too of many unmerited favors ; fully conscious of the inability to do justice to the subject proposed, or satisfactorily improve the illustrious occasion—an event without pre- cedent, and which no living man will ever see again—language fails to convey or words express what is now felt. 'With all the simplicity of the Indian and the sincerity of the Christian, I would say to you, my professional brethren, who have done so much for me, Itawambi. Precisely fifty years ago, he who is now to address you, landed on Chestnut Street wharf of this city, enquiring for the office of the late distinguished accoucheur, Charles D. Meigs, to become his private pupil; fifty years before that, his father, born in Philadelphia, had been the associate of Rush, Shippen, and James; and now, at the end of those hundred years, the son is invited back to declare before this Interna- tional Medical Congress, and at the celebration of the first Centennial of these United States, what his countrymen have done for Surgery. Here Yo in the Medical Department of the University of Pennsylvania, the ijt chartered Medical College on this Continent, where so many have leeu taught by Rush and Chapman, Hare and Jackson, Physick and ibson. To me it is but the coming back to my dear old Alma Mater. k Urely “ There’s a divinity that shapes our ends, rough hew them how We will.” “ God moves in a mysterious way, His wonders to perform ; He plants his footsteps in the seas, And rides upon the storm.” mere enumeration of what we have contributed to Surgery, even J’cre that possible during the hour assigned to the subject, might not Hove the most profitable occupation of it; and moreover, while this may s-e "e>Centennial of our Rational existence, it is not that of our profes- ’ *'ori as is well known, the War of Independence left us an impover- i People, almost destitute as regards the sciences, certainly without medical literature. Even the reputed father of American L l£ei’J was not admitted a house-surgeon in St. George’s Hospital, Uc on, though a private pupil of the celebrated John Hunter, until 74 EVE, 1790 ; nor was he elected Professor of Surgery in the University of Penn- sylvania until 1805. It was as late, too, as 1820, forty-four years after the Declaration of Independence, that the taunt was uttered, with pro- bably as much truth as sarcasm, “what does the world }ret owe to an American Physician or Surgeon!” Then again, all our early teachers had of necessity to be educated abroad, so that in the very nature of things no national characteristics could have been given to medicine until years after the colonies became the United States. Notwithstand- ing all this, in a little over fifty years, the sarcasm of Sydney Smith wTas answered by a professor of Surgery in the city of Paris, M. Chassaignac, remarking as is said to an American medical student, “Sir, you ought to be proud of your country, for at this moment she holds the sceptre of Surgery in the world.” He whom we have ever regarded as the father of American Surgery, Philip Syng Physick, wTas born in Philadelphia in 1768, and was there- fore only eight years old at the declaration of our Independence ; he graduated in the literary department of the University of Pennsylvania, received his diploma at the Royal College of Surgeons, London, and the degree of doctor of medicine in Edinburgh, in 1792. Returning home soon after, the appearance of yellow fever, for the first time in Philadel- phia, brought him prominently before the public. For services rendered the city hospital in 1794, Dr. Physick was presented with silver plate valued at one thousand dollars. As early as 1794, he recommended curved forceps holding a needle to secure deep seated arteries. In 1802, he proposed the seton for ununited fractures. In 1836, Mr. Liston gave him credit for this valuable sugges- tion ; and in the Contributions to Practical Surgery, published by Dr. Norris, formerly Surgeon to the Pennsylvania Hospital, in 1878, the seton and its modifications are declared to be safer, sjieedier and more successful than resection or the caustic. In 1809, Dr. Physick by a suture removed the projecting duplicated portion of the intestine in Artificial Anus, and thus re-established the integrity of the alimentary canal. Dupuytren’s enterotome has since somewhat supplanted the seton. Physick improved Desault’s splint by extending it higher up on the fractured side, thus making extension and counter-extension more in the axis of the broken limb. He was among the first to apply animal liga- tures; employing buckskin for this purpose, while his nephew and favor- ite pupil, Prof. Dorsey, preferred French kid deprived of its tanned cuticle, a substance with which he successfully ligated the femoral artery. Deer sinew torn into shreds of suitable size for the vessel to be ligated, is pre- ferred by others, though silk is generally employed. Animal ligatures certainly irritate less, are readily absorbed, and thereby promote reunion of wounds. In the use of them for some forty years, though not exclu- sively, the knot of a deer sinew has never been seen, while the metallic ligature or suture ever remains a foreign body in the flesh. Dr. Physick was the first to employ blisters in gangrene threatening mortification, as in anthrax, or over an inflamed vein The late Prof. Chapman, long his colleague in the University of Pennsylvania, published a case in which he attributed the life of the patient to this suggestion. He improved the gorget, an instrument employed in his day in litho- tomy. He invented the tonsillotome, in 1848, by which a hazardous operation ADDRESS ON SURGERY. 75 has been greatly simplified and made safe. Formerly, attempts were made to cut out the entire tonsils at the imminent risk of fatal hemor- rhage, or they were painfully strangulated with a double canula. For- tunately the day has passed for the total excision of these bodies, except when malignant. Intra or extra-oral this is a dangerous proceeding. In a recent attempt twelve arteries had to be tied ; now we are content to remove the projecting portion beyond the lateral half arches of the fauces. When reminded that it is the internal carotid which is exposed in these operations, the value of Dr. Physick’s method must be greatly enhanced. Of course the recent modifications of the tonsillotorne, some of them quite ingenious, are due to the original forceps containing his concealed blades. Dr. Physick early advocated putting inflamed joints and diseased bones, as in cases of coxalgia, caries of the spine, etc., in perfect repose, as if in splints. To him also Monsieur Reybard, then surgeon to the hospital of Lyons, France, declares that the profession is indebted for the first accurate account of cystic or sacculated rectum, which he described in the early part of the present century ; Reybard moreover asserts that to Dr. Physick was due the starting point of all improvement which has been made in the treatment of abnormal anus. It fell to his lot to remove successfully, in one case, a greater number of urinary calculi than has ever been clone before or since in Surgery. They amounted to upwards of a thousand, varying in size from a small bean to a bird shot. The patient, who was quite aged, held at the time the office of Chief Justice of the United States, and subsequently resumed bis seat on the bench. A striking proof of Dr. Physick’s great influence even in Europe was the fact that, when his nephew, then the Professor of Anatomy in the University of Pennsylvania, published his Elements of Surgery, in two v<>lumes, containing, as was well known, the peculiar views and practice °f his uncle, that work, the first of the kind ever issued from the Ameri- can press, actually became the text-book of Surgery in the University of Edinburgh ; which was certainly a high compliment to our distinguished countryman. Physick’s name has ever been the most familiar and favorably known all American surgeons in Europe ; and, in 1825, he was electee! a mem- ber of the Royal Academy of Medicine of France. He was also an early advocate of conservative Surgery ; was a favorite pupil of the renowned John Hunter, the great anatomist, physiologist, and surgeon. As he krew older, Dr. Physick became more chary with instruments, and trusted to the recuperative powers of nature. Of him, it has been said, that he never spilt a drop of blood uselessly, nor wasted a word in his .ectures. With the simplicity of a child, the modesty of a maiden, the ’’•d us try and integrity of a martyr, he quietly worked out a surgical character which will endure so long as his loved science shall be culti- vated. Intimately connected with the origin, rise, and progress of Surgery in were four other professional gentlemen, the contemporaries of 1' Physick, who were long spared beyond the allotted period of man on arth, as if to illustrate in "their lives and characters the beneflts.of tem- pciance, industry, arid benevolence. These were Warren, Mott, Dudley, 11 Hibson, whose average age was eighty-three years. 76 EYE, There were three distinguished Drs. Warren, of Boston, Mass.; Joseph, the early martyr of American Independence, was the senior, the most talented, most patriotic, most heroic. He it was who fell—musket in hand, having declined the position of commander-in-chief—at Bunker’s Hill. Hr. John Warren, his brother, studied medicine under him, and graduated in letters in 1771. He gave the first course of dissections in Boston, which, no doubt, led to the organization of the Medical De- partment of the well-known Harvard University, in which he was the Professor of Anatomy and Surgery for a quarter of a century. His son, the third of the name, John Collins Warren, was horn in 1778, and died in 1856. After the advantages of a thorough education in this country and Europe, he succeeded his father in 1815. He was a liberal contributor to our literature, and author of a work on Tumors, which is said to have shed lustre on our science. His last contribution was pub- lished when in his seventy-seventh year. He was the first to operate on a patient put in the anaesthetic condition from ether, and was thereby connected with one of the greatest professional events in the world. Of him Velpeau declared that he first performed the operation for dropsy of the pericardium, for he declared that of all the cases then published, his alone was worthy of full credence; and well he might, for the War- rens were ever the soul of integrity. Mr. George Pollock, in the Me- dico-Chirurgical Transactions of London for 1888, gives credit to Dr. Warren for first closing the fissure in the vault of the mouth. Of him and his son, J. Mason Warren, the worthy representative of the family, and, we deeply regret now to add, deceased, Sir Wm. Eergusson, the prominent worthy representative of British Surgery, recently declared that in regard to the claim of priority in operations for cleft palate, “ the first idea I had of this portion of the operation was obtained from Mason Warren. I deem it but fair,” he continues, “to the reputation of that distinguished surgeon to state that I know of no originality before his, and that I look upon all modern claims to such originality as arising either from ignorance or the desire to rob the fair reputation of a name, which in son as in father, will stand for generations among the brightest in Surgery.” It is certainly a nice point to decide which is the most honored, he who utters such magnanimous sentiments, or the recipient of so disinterested a compliment. Valentine Mott, a native of Long Island, near the city of Hew York, was born in 1785, graduated in 1806, and went immediately to Europe, where he remained pursuing his professional studies three years. On his return home he was elected in rapid succession to the chairs of Surgery in Columbia University, Rutgers Medical College, and the Col- lege of Physicians and Surgeons, all in the city of Hew York. When only twelve years in practice he performed one of the boldest, most ori- ginal, and difficult operations in Surgery, one too, never attempted before, and yet, to the wonder and astonishment of the profession, the patient survived to the twenty-sixth day, and then died, in our opinion, from im- prudence in being permitted to exercise in the hospital grounds. Dr. Mott first tied successfully the common iliac artery, doing this in 1827. He first exsected the clavicle, tying, as he said, over forty arteries, besides the external jugular vein twice, and dissecting out the thoracic duct from the diseased mass. This, which he always considered his most formid- able operation, required four hours for its performance. Dr. Gross adds that, as a brilliant and daring operation, it is without a parallel in the ADDRESS ON SURGERY. 77 annals of Surgery. Dr. Mott was the first to exsect the inferior maxilla, except its articulations, doing this successfully in 1833. He is said to have tied the carotid fifty-one times, and to have amputated about a thousand limbs. Dr. Gross declares that no surgeon, living or dead, ever tied so many vessels or so successfully, whether for the cure of aneurism, the relief of injury, or arrest of morbid growth. And of him, England’s greatest Surgeon, Sir Astley Cooper, generously confessed that Dr. Mott had performed more of the great operations than any man that ever lived. His axiom too, through life, was the liberal one of operating in every ease which allowed a rational hope of success, either to improve the patient’s appearance or to preserve life. Ho one probably ever handled an instrument more gracefully, was more nimble fingered, or more skil- ful than the late Valentine Mott. As an operator, he was probably never surpassed. Benjamin Winslow Dudley, the great Surgeon of the West, was a native of Virginia, born in 1785, the same year, and graduated the same time that Dr. Mott did, viz., in 1806; he, however, in Philadelphia and the latter in Hew York. Dudley also spent years in Europe, chiefly under Cline, Abernethy, and Cooper in London, and Larrey, Dubois, und Boyer in Paris. Soon after returning home, he organized the Medi- ?al Department of the Transylvania University, at Lexington, Kentucky, ln which he occupied the chairs of Anatomy and Surgery, and was ever lts ruling spirit. Dr, Dudley was the strenuous advocate of thoroughly Preparing for all operations; and taught that if the chylopoetic viscera Were properly cared for they would provide for the rest of the system. He gave little medicine, but insisted upon the observance of hygiene, cdet, rest, travelling, and even sea-voyages. An Englishman, alluding |° Dr. Dudley, is said to have remarked that it had been reserved for a backwoodsman of America to teach how to prepare the patient for a Capital operation. He justly claims to have first cured a case—and it was a lormidable one too—of intracranial aneurism by due preparation and ugature of the carotid. Ho one ever did so much with the roller—re- Amg Upon it even in fractures—of which he was emphatically the master. Was best known, however, as the lithotomist of the West, if not of rnei‘ica. We unfortunately have no statistics of his operations. If a ecorcl of his cases operated upon was ever kept, it must have been lost t()U‘I;'g the late war. We know that he used the gorget, and he is said nave cut two hundred and twenty-five patients, only six of whom are 1(?wn to have died. He was truly a surgeon of the conservative school, Ind was for years the surgical patriarch of the West. reiYIbLIAM Gibson was born in Baltimore, Maryland, in 1784, and after in a classical education went abroad. He took his medical degree ©xt > in-Urgh, and through the friendship of Sir Charles Bell obtained jyjDaordinary advantages. He was at Corunna, Spain, when Sir John It \°re / and at Waterloo, where he himself was slightly wounded, at TaS to° extracted the ball from Gen. Scott, long after the battle IWjUIKp 8 Hane* He had met Sir Astley Cooper, Sir Henry Halford, Aber- o Daron Dupuytren, Hapoleon Bonaparte, Velpeau, Lord Byron, and dean CTVerities. Such was his influence in the profession, that, upon the Die TT- Hr. Dorsey in 1818, Dr. Gibson, though Professor of Surgery in Uuiv ni.versDj of Maryland, actually secured that professorship in the eisity of Pennsylvania, which was then occupied by the father of 78 EVE’ American Surgery, Dr. Physick consenting to take the chair of Anatomy with an adjunct. Dr. Gibson was probably the best lecturer on Ins branc in the United States; in addition to oral instruction, he illustrated his course by splendid collections of paintings, models and other appliances. His memory was so retentive that he had been known to repeat tut hundred lines of Virgil. He was also a bold and successful operator; he was the first to tie the common iliac artery, toy a gunshot wound in t streets of Baltimore, the patient surviving thirteen days. He also per- formed the Caesarean operation twice upon the same patient saving each time the mother and child; an operation since repeated by DrsVWil i< Byrd Page, and John Neill, with like success, so that the good city ot Philadelphia has been peculiarly favored in this respect Miich has recently been said—this being the Centennial year—ot those who hist rocke/the cradle of American Liberty; but not a word in commendation of those, who resorted to such extraordinary measures, to keep in mot o the little one called into requisition at each accession to her intai population. Alas 1 for the glory of poor doctors. In the brief biographical sketches of those to whom we are so much indebted for the present position of Surgery in our country, reference has been made to what they did on the kindred subjects ot Aneurism and the Ligation of Large Arteries; and while we may not yet lepoit successful tying of the aorta, notwithstanding the encouragement implied by finding that vessel occasionally obliterated, and the success by compres- sion reported by Dr. Murray, of Newcastle-upon-Tyne, England, we can, nevertheless quote what Mr. Erichsen, the well-known author and sur- geon has recently published—“ the bold and difficult operation of auest- fr ihe circulation through the brachio-cephahc, is one of the most remarkable and the only one found recorded in the annals ot Surgery h™S’to what wasVne by Dr Andrew Voods Bmjl'Dhanty Hospital, New Orleans, Louisiana, the 15th ot May, 1864. Ihe pat.e t wf)Si a mulatto aged 22, a steward on a steamei, the tumor, winch was of the size of an orange, was developed in four months after a collision at sea, to which it was attributed. On the 15th of May, 1864, a ligature was applied on the innominate artery, a quarter of an inch below its bifurcation; and one also on the right carotid an inch above its origin. Pulsation returned at the wrist in forty-eight hours. On the 28th the ligature came away from the carotid, and the next c ay, \ fourteenth after the operation, hemorrhage occurred to syncope. Ins recurring the two following days, the wound was hi ed with small shot. On June 1 the detached ligature was removed from tire brachio-cephahc. Hemorriiages stil 1 continuing at intervals, on July 9 the right vertebral was tied* being the fifty-third day after the original operation, and to Ts, He succesf in the Jase is fairiy attributable. The sliot m the wound thirty-eight days. The patient now moved to Ga Texas, but returned in 1874, ten years afterwards, to New Oileans with another tumor in the neck causing great pain Dr. Smyth now detec an aneurism larger than the former one, which the patient said had been developing for about a year. On October 5,1874 he tied the internal mammary artery in the third intercostal space. Abscesses now began to form under the clavicle and were cautiously opened. The patient again returned to Galveston, and then once more to New Orleans, where he lingered until the 6th of April, 1871. A post-mortem examination ADDRESS ON SURGERY. 79 revealed the facts, confirming the history above given of this deeply interesting case. The patient lived within a few days of ten years after the innominate was tied; enjoyed the best of health, and had gained twenty pounds. In this case Dr. Smyth tied not only the innominate, but the common caro- tid, vertebral, and internal mammary arteries, and did more to relieve the affection than was ever attempted before in Surgery. This patient lived in a hot, moist climate, and was probably purpuric. Attempts to ligate the aorta successfully thus far have failed. In this country, Prof. Hunter McGluire, of Richmond, Ya., tied it unsuccessfully u} 1868; and the next year, Dr. Stokes, of Dublin, Ireland, met with a similar result, though he reached the vessel by an almost bloodless inci- sion through the lumbar region. Maisonneuve is reported to have tied the vertebral artery. We know that Prof. Willard Parker, of Hew York, did this in 1863, and as has been noticed, Dr. Smyth, of Hew Orleans, tied it in 1864. Prof. Warren ktone, of Hew Orleans, is reported, in a case of gunshot wound of the vertebral artery, to have arrested the hemorrhage by compression with Pledgets of lint. The common carotid, Dr. Gross claims was first secured by Dr. Cogs- well, of Hartford, Conn., who in exsecting a scirrhous tumor from the in 1803, applied two ligatures to that vessel. Heretofore Sir Astley hooper’s case in 1805, had been considered the first one. In 1875, a sur- geon recently from Europe, now Prof. Frothingham, of Ann Arbor, Michi- gan, boldly laid open a traumatic aneurism of the common carotid, nrned out the clots, with a piece of glass, tied both ends of the wounded rp(f\Sel, as also the internal jugular and lingual veins, and saved his patient, his was certainly a very creditable operation. Dr. Mussey, in 1829, led both carotids successfully after an interval of twelve days. In Dr. t°tt s case the simultaneous application of ligatures to these vessels Pr°ved fatal. Of the branches of the common trunk, the internal and external Care- ys >s’ fbo latter is the one which is most frequently tied. Indeed Mr. y a,]f in his Practical Surgery, in 1872, declares that, owing to the diffi- j T Ending the bleeding point, the ligature to the internal branch (ypS Jeen abandoned, nevertheless it has been tied by some Pr°fUl' Prao,titioners. In 1845, Dr. J. H. B. McClellan, son of the late ,’ori eorge fib McClellan, founder of the Jefferson Medical College, in art 'oVlug a portion of the parotid gland found it necessary to ligate this qeeA >so did Prof. Gurdon Buck, of the Hew York University, for a vv°mid in the parotid region, tie successfully the common and inter- hadCiU.(lt'fis5 Dr. Stephen Smith, in 1864, secured this vessel after pressure ton ai ed, and he performed a similar operation for sloughing of the °f if'10)’ my colleague in the chair of Surgery in the University ]jo,at‘lS lcihe, Dr. William T. Briggs, has the credit of first applying two °ne on eacb s'fi® °f a wound which resulted in an aneurism, rgat also the common carotid at the same time. This was done in Feb- of pn ’ . Then again Dr. Sands, Professor of Anatomy in the College Brio- y®I(fians and Surgeons of Hew York, without knowing what Dr. lateraf one’ the same thing in October, 1872, besides securing a The 'Vounfi rnade in the internal jugular vein. °f ]\pr pGtb°fi adopted in these latter cases was carrying out the principle c°ntrap U- aPPPcaD°n of two ligatures to a wounded artery in c t istinction to the one only insisted upon by John Hunter. This 80 EYE, then is an American illustration of a new principle in tying wounded arteries, which fortunately has occurred in the practice of two of our best anatomists. The late Prof. Wright Post, of New York, succeeded first with liga- ture to the left subclavian artery in 1817, a feat which made him quite famous, since some of the most distinguished surgeons of Europe had failed to do this. In 1866, Dr. T. G. Morton also tied the left subclavian, when the upper extremity of that side becoming gangrenous, he ampu- tated it at the shoulder-joint and saved the patient. In two cases of subclavian aneurism, Dr. J. Mason Warren succeeded with ice and direct compression, when the disease was too far advanced for the ligature. To Dr. Warren Stone, in 1850, is given the credit of first applying a metallic ligature to a human artery, and in 1866, Dr. Claudius 11. Mastin, of Mobile, Alabama, applied one successfully to the external iliac. Dr S. W. Gross, son of the professor, has recently proven by numerous expert ments how innocuous are ligatures to veins; and the late Dr. Levert, at the suggestion of Dr. Physick, published his thesis, in 1829, proving thus early, the advantage of metallic sutures. It is difficult to decide who first suggested the ligature to arteries supplying the extremities for affections threatening mortification. Our English friends have generally given us the credit, but it does seem that tying the carotid for internal aneurism, as was done by Dudley, or the femoral for elephantiasis, as was done by Oarnochan ; the use of pressure to check the redundant supply of blood to a vascular tumor; or even elevating the inflamed part—all apparently illustrate one and the same principle of cutting off the redundant supply of blood. Arterial compression as an antiphlogistic has long been recognized in the profession. Dr. March published a brochure on the value of compress- ing the brachial artery in cases of whitlow, a notice of which may be seen in the American Journal of the Medical Sciences, Vol. 18, for 1849. It is there stated that this seemed to be more efficacious than the plan proposed by Mons. Gerdy, of keeping the limb elevated. Sir James Paget, moreover, declares that the proposition to treat cases of active inflammation threatening gangrene by putting a ligature on the main arterial suppljq emanated from the American School of Surgery. In the Lettsomian Lectures on Surgery, published in the London Lancet, Mr. C. 11. Maunder, Surgeon to the London Hospital, expressly declares that the operation originated in America; and in Holmes’s System of Surgery, Mr. Simon mentions that Henry Campbell, of Augusta, Georgia, then Professor of Anatomy in the New Orleans School of Medicine, and who was an army surgeon during the late war, had even raised the question whether the hand or foot, wrist or ankle, forearm or leg, should ever be amputated for destructive inflammation, specially resulting from traumatic causes, whenever the state of the patient admitted this to be done, without first resorting to previous experimental ligation of the artery supplying the affected region. Dr. Druitt, who contributed the article on Inflammation to the last edition of Cooper’s well-known Sur- gical Dictionary, in 1872, refers, moreover, to Dr. Campbell as the in- troducer of what he terms the Hunterian ligation of arteries to prevent or relieve destructive inflammation. The operation, first practised by Onderdonk, in 1813, and D. L. Rogers, in 1824, has been revived and systematized by Prof. Campbell, who recommends it as a definite mode of treatment. Prof. Campbell claims that (1) Compression prevents drainage; liga- ADDRESS ON SURGERY. 81 tion prevents blood going to a part. (2) Ligation to prevent inflamma- tion be repudiates as unjustifiable and dangerous, and even liable to produce mortification; while ligation to cure inflammation already existing, he says is invariably safe, and will prevent mortification, or even stop it after it has begun. These distinctions he declares were never brought previously before the profession. He believes that no one before himself ever tied an artery with the distinct view of curing inflammation and preventing gangrene. One of the most remarkable cases connected with the subject of aneu- rism, whether considered in reference to its origin, the organ affected, or the extent of the disease and the result of treatment, was reported to the American Medical Association by the late Prof. Mussey, of Cincin- nati, when chairman of the Committee on Surgery in 1850. It was that of a mechanic of St. Louis, Missouri, aged 25 years, whose right eye pro- truded and pulsated ; the transverse suture near the external angle of the eyed admitted the tip of a finger, and the functions of both ear and eye °f the affected side were no longer performed. After thorough prepara- tion by Hr. Dudley, and ligation of the right common carotid, the patient so completely recovered that he actually resumed the labor of a black- smith. Mr. Erichsen acknowledged, in 1851, that to Prof. Carnochan, of Hew Pork, was due the credit of recommending a ligature to the femoral ai’tery to cure elephantiasis; when this gave way from the extension of fhe disease, he tied the external iliac, and finally had to resort to cora- -1 session on the distal side of the bleeding orifice. Sixteen months after the first operation, the patient was in robust health. American surgeons have not faffed to try compression for the cure of true aneurisms. The late Prof. Jonathan Knight, of Hew Haven, Connecticut, than whom few ever had a better record, has the credit of first relieving a case of popliteal aneurism by digital compression, the case being pub- lished in the Transactions of the American Medical Association for 1848. fn the Philadelphia Medical Times for 1875, Dr. R. J. Levis, one of the surgeons of the Pennsylvania Hospital, published a very creditable case compression for aneurism of the internal iliac. This was eJected by means of a simple steel baud, having a hollow pad for counter Dessure and a convex one with a screw upon the artery. In five and a >a|t hours the current of blood was totally arrested through the tumor; icre was some oedema and discoloration, yet the patient fully recovered n thirty-seven days. pJt twenty-three cases of digital compression, comprising a successful rlle bis own, collated by Dr. S. W. Gross, of Philadelphia, fifteen were eportefi as cured. In two cases of inguinal aneurism, compression failed. MTy hi*l a few days a pamphlet has been received from Walter Reid, *. •’ Staft Surgeon Royal Havy, Plymouth, England, in which the q r I(R' proposes to cure external aneurism by compression in a few hours. a finding from Cohnheim’s experiments that in warm-blooded animals ho "ISIS may be safely continued for from six to eight IHrri'S’ kf mac^e a successful experiment in a case of popliteal aneurism. a r lai>cb’s elastic bandage was alone applied with the usual pressure of tun° ?1' ab°ve and below, while the pressure was diminished upon the I °iQ^ r^ie Pl’°Pos^i°n certainly deserves further consideration, i'Wn j r* d°hn H. Brinton, of Philadelphia, published in the Ame- °cs, of the valve at the termination of the right spermatic vein in the 82 EVE, vena cava ascendens, and its absence on the left side, where the corre- sponding vein terminates in the renal. Here then is an obvious and satis- factory reason, though it may not be the only one, of the frequency of varicocele on the left side as compared with the right. A suggestion for the treatment of varicocele, originating, if I mistake not, with myself, is the application of animal ligatures to the spermatic cord, excluding, of course, the vas deferens ; then the ablation of some four inches square of the scrotum; and the closure of the wound with pin sutures. By this operation, both pathological conditions, the varicose veins and redundant scrotum, are removed. In the treatment of affections of Bones and Joints, we claim to have made valuable suggestions, if not important additions. An unusual recovery from undoubted fracture at the base of the cranium, which recently occurred on one of our national ships, may deserve brief notice. The sailor was seen to fall from a spar to the main deck, and was taken up insensible; he had stertorous breathing, followed by a copious flow of colored serum from the right ear, estimated at fifty or sixty ounces; and became partially comatose. Brain substance was also detected in the discharges. He, however, gradually improved under treatment, and was returned to duty a little over a month after his fall, though slightly epileptic, and with some little discharge still from the ear. We find in an early number of the Hew England Journal of Medicine and Surgery, that Dr. Luke Howe treated a fracture of the inferior extremity by the means now employed, excepting the omission of the sand bags to prevent the rolling of the injured limb; and believed it to be original. His case is reported in 1823, more than half a century ago. In the American Journal of the Medical Sciences for August, 1829, Dr. William C. Daniel, then an eminent practitioner of Savannah, Georgia, described how he applied a silk handkerchief around the ankle and tied it at the sole of the foot, a weight being then attached and passed over a roller for extension. That veteran of American Medical Journalism, Dr. Isaac Hays, says that Dr. Daniel has precedence of all modern claimants for introducing the weight and pulley as a means of extension in treating fractures ; for he himself had published two cases thus successfully treated, one in 1819 and the other in 1824. Dr. Hartshorne also, formerly one of the surgeons to the Pennsylvania Hospital, declared in 1869, in the same journal, that the credit of priority in introducing the weight extension in practice was justly due to this gentleman. To Dr. Gurdon Buck, of Hew York, credit is given for introducing adhesive plaster to secure extension in the treatment of fractures of the inferior extremity. Prof. Gross, however, in his account of American Surgery, claims this for his preceptor, Dr. Joseph K. Swift, of Easton, Pennsylvania, who employed it as early as 1829. Dr. William Gibson, of St. Louis, Missouri, devised in 1867, a ring for fractures of the patella; and Dr. P. S. O’Reilly, of the same city, in 1871, described what he calls a new splint for fractures and dislocations of this bone. This consists in an open ring, with a thumb screw, that it may fit the more accurately; to which a strap extending under the sole of the foot may be added, and also a posterior padded splint for the thigh and leg. This seems the perfection of an apparatus for these injuries. On the subject of deformities after fractures of the thigh, two of our most distinguished Professors and Surgeons in the Jefferson Medical College hold the position which we also sustain; that a fractured ADDRESS ON SUKGERY. 83 femur cannot be fully extended to its normal length, nor could it be so retained without impairing its nutrition. They declare that a certain degree of shortening, and perhaps deformity, cannot be prevented, what- ever may be the treatment. And it may be added that no measurement whatever can detect the difference in some cases, though one to a limited extent actually exists, as may be verified in a post-mortem examination. The method of reducing dislocations by manipulation was first systema- tized and proposed as such by the late Dr. William R. Reid, of Rochester, New York, and published in 1859; though probably first suggested by the late Nathan Smith, of Connecticut, This seems to have created a new era on the subject, notwithstanding that it had occasionally occurred to some practitioners how easily reduction was effected, sometimes even during the examination of the case. Prof. Spence, of Edinburgh, in his Lectures published in 1875-76, calls this the rotatory or circumduction method, and adds, “we generally hear it spoken of as the American method.” He also admits that it is undoubtedly to the writings of Drs. Reid and Bigelow, of the United States, that we owe the more general use of the practice. He notices too, specially, the ilio-femoral, °r inverted Y ligament, and the different views entertained by Mons. Chassaignac, of Paris, from those expressed by Dr. Bigelow, who was the first to note minutely its functions. Dr. Reid’s conclusions regarding dis- locations are: (1) That the impediment to reduction is due to the stretch °f the muscles, by the malposition of the dislocated bone, and not to their contraction; (2) That in reducing luxations these muscles should be re- laxed; (3) That dislocation on the dorsum of the ilium is reduced simply 'A flexing the leg upon the thigh, and carrying the thigh over the sound °ne, upwards over the pelvis as high as the umbilicus, and then rotating it. As is well known to the profession, Prof. Nathan Smith, of New Haven, mid taught and published similar views to those of Dr. Reid. The late J; rof. B rainard, of Chicago, Illinois, reported, in 1852, the reduction of °u>’ cases of dislocation of the head of the femur into the thyroid fora- men, with the aid of a billet of wood four inches in diameter, well Padded, placed in the perineum as a fulcrum, the displaced limb being mu carried as a lever across the sound one. The substitution of manipulation to reduce dislocation at the hip, is c aimed therefore to be American, and in connection with anaesthesia, great boon to suffering humanity, also introduced by us, to be iuesti- pld as the world may be, it has been reserved for an American to 1 °mt out a pathognomonic sign by which a fractured clavicle can always distinguished from a dislocation at the shoulder joint. Prof. L. A. uS’as, ot the Medical College of Augusta, Georgia, asserts that if the ers m Lie injured limb can be placed by the patient or surgeon upon m sound shoulder, while the elbow touches the thorax, there can be no ocation; in other words, he asserts that it is physically impossible to )^le e^K)w iu contact with the sternum, or front of the thorax, if iiid1 e JG a an(l that no other injury of the shoulder-joint can lUatR0 Liability. Ample experience has shown this rule to be axio- rpi ’ met Jate Prof. Crosby, of New Hampshire, in dislocations at the it a^CtlrP°-phalangeal articulation pushed the phalanx backward until a PosiLon perpendicular to the metacarpus; then pressing for- Levb q6 ase Lie dislocated finger, reduction was easily effected. Dr. S5 burgeon to the Pennsylvania Hospital, suggested a small splint, 84 EYE, having four large gimlet holes bored in it through which tapes are passed to secure a luxated finger or thumb, by which means extension can be effectually made. As a substitute for the pulley, Dr. Fahnestock, of Pennsylvania, sug- gested a rope doubled several times upon itself, which by a stick—a walking cane—placed in its centre could be twisted gradually so as to produce extension in dislocations. In reference to resections and exsections of the bones and joints, our surgeons have been active and ingenious. As early as November, 1826, Dr. John Rhea Barton, then one of the surgeons of the Pennsylvania Hospital, sawed through the femur just between the trochanters, and then straightened the limb, which became so useful that the patient went out gunning and actually brought home his own game; owing, however, to his habits, those of a common sailor, he did not derive the full benefit expected from the operation ; but a similar one, in which, how- ever, a disk of bone was removed, performed by Dr. J. Kearney Rogers, of New York, in 1830, resulted by gentle manipulation in the formation of an artificial joint, and in an excellent recovery: good success has attended other cases similarly treated by our practitioners. Mr. Erichsen declares that the first operation for osseous angular anchylosis was per- formed by Dr. Barton. He also asserts that, in 1837, Dr. Mussey excised the whole of the scapula and clavicle for an enormous osteo-sarcoma, the patient being in good health fifteen years afterwards. These successes no doubt induced others to enter the new field of investigation, and resulted in Dr. Brainard, then Professor in the Rush Medical College, Chicago, Illinois, submitting, in 1854, to the American Medical Association, an essay on a new method of treating ununited fractures, and certain de- formities of the osseous system, which secured the prize for that year. The main feature in Dr. Brainard’s method was that by making perfo- rations in the osseous structure with drills, and then waiting for the softening process of inflammation, almost any bone, or anchylosed joint, might be straightened, broken up, or the deformity relieved. Barton, Brainard, and Buck, were undoubtedly the pioneers in correcting de- formity and restoring to usefulness, limbs, which before their day were considered hopelessly useless, or were sacrificed by amputation. The first resection of the inferior maxilla was performed in what was then known as the back-woods of America, and this too without known precedence, or even professional counsel or assistance. The case is ad- mitted by Mr. South, who translated Chelius’s Surgery, Drs. Mott, Gib- son, Gross, and others. The operator was William 11. Deadrick, then of Rogersville, East Tennessee, who in February, 1810, exsected about three inches of the lower jaw, including the whole of its circumference and one of its angles, from a boy, fourteen years old, who recovered and was alive years afterwards. Dr. Carnochan, of New York, is believed to have first disarticulated this bone in its entirety in the Emigrants’ Hospital, of New York, in 1851; and this was again done the next year, by Prof. Wedderburn, then in the Medical College at New Orleans. The late Prof. Horatio G. Jameson, of Baltimore, claimed for his country the honor of having led the way in resections of the superior maxilla. Dr. Gross admits that the first severe and difficult operation of this kind was performed by him successfully in 1829, by removing nearly the entire bone on one side. The removal of the clavicle, or a portion of it, was probably first attempted by Dr. Charles McCreary, of Hartford, Kentucky, and was ADDRESS ON SURGERY. 85 reported by James H. Johnson, in the Medical Journal then published in Hew Orleans, in 1850. In his System of Surgery, Dr. Gross mentions tliat the operation was performed in 1815, on a boy who survived long afterwards. As early as 1858, Dr. Compton, of Hew Orleans, exsected the entire ulna and all of the radius, except its lower extremity, in a patient fif- teen years old, who made an excellent recovery. In 1843 Josiah C. Hott, then Professor of Surgery in the Mobile Me- dical College, excised two segments of the coccyx, for neuralgia, in a lady after twenty-five years of great suffering. The case, first published in the Hew Orleans Medical Journal for 1844, was copied into the American Journal of the Medical Sciences, and Prof. T. Gaillard Thomas has added that this was fifteen years before a similar operation was per- formed by the late Sir James Y. Simpson. Prof. Lewis A. Sayre, of Hew York, reports that, up to January, 1876, he had exsected the head of the femur fifty-one times, with a mortality of only twenty; eight of these fatal cases too had recovered from the operation. He removed also portions of the acetabulum in some of these instances. At the late meeting of the American Medical Association Hr Philadelphia, he introduced a little patient, suspending him by the shoulders and head ; plaster of Paris bandages were then applied, and in a few minutes the little boy walked about the room, though he had not done so for months before. In connection with affections of bones and joints, did time permit, there might be noticed what has been done here in Ivyllosis and Ortho- psedy. Dr. James A, Dickson, of Horth Carolina, is believed to have first performed tenotomy by dividing the tendo Achillis in 1835, fol- lowed by Dr, D. L. Rogers, of Hew York, in 1845. Then came Dr. Det- faold, a pupil of Stromeyer, who in 1837 settled in Hew York, where he introduced myotomy. Dr. Mott, however, founded the first Orthopaedic Institution in America. In 1844, Dr. Henry J. Bigelow, of Boston, Massachusetts, obtained the Boylston prize for that year for his work on Orthopaedy. Dr. Sayre, however, has done more on this subject than any pther American. His work just published is undoubtedly the best ever issued from the press. He has called particular attention to genital irrita- \on, even in very young children, in connection with deformity. He gives special credit to Mr. Barwell, of London, and Dr. PL G. Davis, of >ew York, for devising apparatus for extension while the little patients exercise in the open air; and has himself introduced a new method of oing this by plasters, elastic cords, or artificial muscles, as they are tlded. Por contracted limbs and congenital deformity much is being ( °ne here by early attention, so as to prevent development in unnatural positions, by gradual or forced flexion and extension under ether, elec- l'city, etc., before resorting to tenotomy or myotomy, p,/ n the Compendium of Practical Surgery, published in 1851 by Giard, Denonvilliers, and Gosselin, of Paris, in referring to a paper by Dr. M. Smith, son of the celebrated Dr. Hathan Smith, cora- j,'eating on incisions of the periosteum and trephining of bones in suppu- v., lv,e inflammation, is found a compliment to the heroic measures pro- filed by the Americans. Reference to the Genito-urinary Organs, we refer first to the case of the 1•\aares Stoddard, of Wisconsin, who is reported to have exsected Sidney successfully in 1861, eight years previous to the operation of 86 EYE, Prof. Simon, of Heidelberg, who operated in 1869. In 18 /0 Prof. Gil- more, of the Mobile Medical College, successfully cut out an atrophied kidney from a colored woman, then five months pregnant, who, never- theless, went to her full term, and was safely delivered of a hying child. Our earlv surgeons performed almost exclusively the lateral operation for urinary calculus, and almost as exclusively employed the gorget—an instrument of which it can happily be said reguiescat in pace.. _ Ribes of Paris, first described accurately the bilateral operation tor stone in the bladder. Dupuytren, however, gave it character by proving its advantages to be easy and more direct access to the bladder, and t la the prostate is cut in its central portion, and in double the extent of the section in the lateral operation, without endangering nerves, vessels or other important structures. Dr. Ashmead,_of 1 hiladelphia, in 1804, fust performed the bilateral operation in the United States. . Mr. Erichsen asserts that Civiale recommended a combination of the median and bilateral operations, for in this way, he declares, the chief objections to both are removed. The medio-bilateral is gaining gtound as an operation for urinary calculus. As is well known, when Mr. Erichsen, among others, denied the possi- bility of the intromission of foreign bodies below the vocal cords, Di. Horace Green passed a tube through the riraa glottidis some inches into the trachea, and then withdrawing the stilet, directed the patient to close his lips and blow through the canula. This he did several times, eyen so forcibly as to extinguish a candle. Sponging below the vocal cords was first done in October, 1854, by the same gentleman. The case reported by Profs. Crosby and Peaslee, of Hew Hampshiie, of a sponge one inch and three-quarters m breadth and fifteen-six- teenths of an inch in thickness, passing the r.ma glottidis, in a patient aged forty-five, on July 28, 1850, and who lived fifty-four hours ought surely to have convinced every one of the possibility of at least mtio- ducing sponge-probangs into the larynx. In 1844 Dr. Charles Hall, of Burlington, Connecticut, removed, after tracheotomy, a piece of pipe-stem by means of a probe which fortunate y entered the hollow or canal of the pipe-stem and stuck fast. 1 his certainly was a fortunate hit. Mr. Liston once extracted a piece of sponge from the right bronchus of an adult; and Mr. Dickin, in 1882, a bell button from the right bronchus of a child eight years old. _ Mr Spence, Professor of Surgery in the University of Edinburgh, succeeded, in June, 1862, in extracting, by tracheotomy, the inner portion of a tracheal tube which had lodged in the bronchus, and concluded that it was the first and only instance of the kind thus relieved. A child, however, was brought from Alabama in May, 1858, to Augusta, Georgia, where after the trachea had been opened, a four-penny nail was removed from the left bronchus with a pair of dressing forceps lengthened in the blades. American surgeons present a creditable report on amputations. Sta- tistics on the subject, whether derived from hospital records or army reports, or more especially from private practice, sustain t ns posi ion. Much, no doubt, is due to our open climate, sunny country, cleanly habits .rood nourishment, and free exercise. Even in regard to the dreadful operation of amputation at the hip-joint, it is probable that the second successful case, if not the very first ever performed, was that of Dr. V\ alter ADDRESS ON SURGERY. 87 Brashear, of Bardstown, Kentucky. This was done in August, 1806, on a youth of seventeen years, who survived long after it. His method was the circular, as if for the upper third of the thigh ; and, after secur- ing the arteries, then the head of the bone was disarticulated through a long incision over the trochanter major. May not this prove to be the best method for this amputation? The case of Perault, of St. Maure, France, in 1773, was only the semblance of an amputation, since the limb had been destroyed by mortification up to the hip. Mr. Erichsen, Baron Larrey the second, and M. Legouest, of the French army, declared most emphatically that there had not been a case of recovery from primary hip-joint amputation recorded in military surgery previous to our late war. In the Schleswig-Holstein, French, German, and Italian wars, not a case survived, whether operated upon by German, English, French, Italian, or Eussian surgeons; whereas, during the late war between the States, some three or four were reported as successful, though subsequently this number was reduced, because, on account of the difficulty in the condition of the country, after our gigantic internecine war, these cases could not be accurately determined. We may judge, however, of the impression of our success in operations at the hip-joint in Europe, when the Surgeon-General of the Prussian army, the distinguished Dr. Yon Langenbeck, declared that, but for these operations, it might be questioned if immediate amputations and resec- tions at the hip should not be hereafter prohibited. In the Yew York Journal of Medicine, for 1852, it is stated that up t° that date there had been on the Continent of Europe thirty-five ampu- tations at the hip, with fourteen recoveries, or forty per cent.; in Eng- hind twenty-five, with eleven recoveries, or forty-four per cent.; and in the United States eleven, with eight recoveries, or seventy-three per cent. In civil practice, we have the recent remarkable case of Dr. Jerome of Portchester, Yew York, who, without waiting for reaction alter the injury by a passing train, performed hip-joint amputation by antero-posterior flaps, on a boy eleven years old. The administration °t ether, performing operation, and dressing-wound, all consumed only hree hours. Prof. Spence, of Edinburgh, under similar circumstances, }vaited several hours before he operated; his case too, was a success, and J may be the first and only one of the kind in Europe. In Philadelphia, where surgery has been so successfully practised, two of her Professors in Ue College, Drs. Gross and Pancoast, have each performed two amputa- J°us at this articulation, and saved the four patients. Yet this is the opera- JL°n, it will be remembered, of which the great English military surgeon ennen, asserted, only fifty years ago, that there was not one in a thousand ' 10 would not prefer instant death to the attempt. onc can be expected to do justice to so prolific a subject as the 'istory ot American Surgery, in the brief space allowed the occasion. 11 enumeration of our contributions to this department of medicine rii°l. aJone require a volume. Time will permit now only a brief surn- £iiy of some suggestions or improvements not yet noticed, do I*6 e?hensive use of silver wire in surgery and gynaecology is un- SuUo-t0dly Ue r- 'I- Marion Sims. This is acknowledged in Holmes’s eve^l'“T* a^so a’Wen the credit of publishing the first work p lssiled on Uterine Surgery in the English language. aiacentesis thoracis was made a safe operation by Drs. Bowditch 88 EYE, and Wyman, of Boston, before the introduction of Dieulafoy’s aspira- te ur. Dr. A. L. Pierson, of Salem, Massachusetts, was the first to operate for hare-lip with scissors and sutures, within six to twelve hours after birth. Prof. Alex, H. Stevens first suggested the important principles to be observed in exsecting tumors, viz., by the first incision to expose fairly the morbid growth, and secondly to remove it and nothing more. The oesophagus forceps of Dr. Bond, of Philadelphia, are so constructed that, by narrow bevelled edges, a pin or fish-bone can be removed without pinching the mucous coat. Of Dr. Sayre’s vertebrated probe, Mr. Erichsen declares that it is a most ingenious and valuable one, by accommodating itself to the tortuosities of a canal or sinus. Dr. Levis, of the Pennsylvania Hospital, recommended pure carbolic acid liquefied, as a local anaesthetic, before using the actual cautery, and the late Prof. Josiah C. Hott, of Mobile, declared that this same agent in carbuncle was antiseptic, escharotic and anaesthetic. Prof. Joseph Jones, of the University of Louisiana, Hew Orleans, one of the most indefatigable laborers in the profession, after a most thorough examination of the important subject of traumatic tetanus, concludes that the remedial agents most to be relied upon, are chloral hydrate, Calabar bean, chloroform, sulphuric ether, cannabis Indica, tobacco, bromide of potassium, and opium. He also suggests that im- portant advances will be made in the therapeutics of this affection, if the attention of the entire profession can be concentrated on a few remedial agents, as chloral hydrate, Calabar bean, and bromide of potassium. In regard to the prevalence of this terrible affection, the census of the United States for 1850 gave six cases for the six Hew England States, while for Louisiana alone there had been two hundred and fifteen. Prof. F. H. Hamilton, of Bellevue Hospital, Hew York, is the author of a well-known Treatise on Fractures and Dislocations, which has reached its fifth edition. He has recently issued a System of General Surgery, of about one thousand pages, with illustrations; and has also pub- lished a Treatise on Military Surgery and Hygiene. During the war, he held a high rank, and has long been known as one of our ablest surgeons. The Principles and Practice of Surgery, by John Ashhurst, Jr., M.D., issued by Henry C. Lea, Philadelphia, 1871, a volume of a thousand pages, containing five hundred and thirty illustrations, has probably done more than any other publication to announce what Americans have done for surgery. The founder of the Jefferson Medical College, Prof. George McClellan, reported, long ago, eleven excisions of the parotid gland with only one fatal case. Prof. Yan Buren, M.D., of Bellevue Hospital, recommended the French method of relieving anal fissure, by sudden dilatation from within out- ward with the thumbs, so as to rupture or tear open the sphincter muscles. The British and Foreign Medico-Chirurgical Review stated in 1870 that, in plastic operations on the face, and in closing of wounds and unnatu- ral openings in the urinary organs and parts of generation, Americans must have the position of precedence. Another surgeon, Professor Gouley, of Hew York, has distinguished himself in external urethrotomy without a guide, and in relieving stric- tures. Dr. John T. Hodgen, Professor of Surgery in the St. Louis Medical ADDRESS OX SURGERY. 89 College, proposed a few years ago the removal of calculi lodged in the urethra, by passing a double wire concealed in a catheter, and expanding it after its introduction into that canal. Prof. Henry J. Bigelow has recently published an article on “ The true Keck of the Femur,” another on “ Exstrophy of the Bladder,” and a third on “ Turbinated Corpora Cavernosa.” Dr. Addinell Hewson, Surgeon to the Pennsylvania Hospital, found a mortality, after amputations performed with an ascending barometer, of about eleven per cent.; when it was stationary, some twenty ; and when descending, amounting to twenty-eight per cent. This certainly deserves investigation. In proof of the industry exhibited, and of the contributions made by Americans to Medical Science, a long catalogue of periodicals, numerous monographs, and extensive systems in the three practical departments of the profession might be enumerated. One of these, on Surgery alone, has reached the fifth edition, contains fourteen hundred engravings, and requires a text of more than two thousand pages in small t}7pe; being equivalent to more than half a dozen volumes of ordinary size. Then there are some forty Journals devoted to medical science, from the weekly to the quarterly, containing reports of cases, lectures, movements in the profession, etc. We can point, too, to the admirable publications issued from the office of the Surgeon-General U. S. A., pronounced to be incomparably the most minute, comprehensive, and valuable ever issued from the press. And, as evidence of the industry and efficiency of our corps of Surgeons, !t is said in the official reports of the late war between the States, that the mortality in the medical staff was greater than in any other. The commendations from foreign sources respecting these publications, have been most gratifying to our national pride. The Medical Inspector °t the French army, and director of the school for the Medical Staff of that army, Mons. S6dillot, wrote, in 1866, that American Surgery had proved itself equal to cope with the exigencies of a war of incomparable magnitudesurgeons everywhere, said he, were proud of the marvels accomplished in science and self-devotedness. In Circular Ko. 6, are classified 87,822 wounds and injuries, and 17,125 operations. These reports have been translated into the German, French, and Italian languages. The Director-General of the British Medical Department returned thanks for the gift of a work so replete with interest °1 the highest professional value. Sir Wm. Fergusson said in the fifth edition of his standard work on Surgery, that modern surgery owed much P °ur American brethren—referring to conservatism, which he says was signally displayed both in the United States Army, and by their gallant contemporaries in the Confederate service. Baron Yon Haurowt, chief k. Ul’geon of the Russian Marine, in a report for 1867, after an official inspection of the medical institutions of this country, speaks of the Army | edical Museum, at Washington, as the most valuable collection of the in existence. an address to the students of St. Thomas’s Hospital, London, Oct. Mr. McCo rraac said, no European nation, probably, can point to cU(p', a monument of industry, or so great a mass of valuable material, ully preserved and digested, as the records of the Medical Depart- o-io’11 Army. It is> ho continues, an undertaking simply yjant'c> reflecting credit on the government that originated, and the 11 who carried it out. Such records, he says, are of the utmost value 90 EYE, ADDRESS ON SURGERY. both to the military and civil service. ]STo less than fourteen foreign medical journals noticed our Army medical reports. In 1875, Dr. Crothers, of Albany, Hew York, stated that Dr. Swin- burne’s attachments for extension and counter-extension were being intro- duced into the French army, with the American pattern and minutiae for the battle-field. Dr. Swinburne, himself, formerly Port Physician of Hew York, while travelling in Europe in 1870-71, by request took charge of a hospital, and he and Dr. Evans, Dentist to the French Emperor, received the Cross of Honor for services rendered. Dr. Monsereau declared before the Faculty of Paris, that the American Ambulance was the best of all. In the Prussian Service, our ambulance was also adopted. So again, Mons. Sarcey, who wrote the “Siege of Paris,” announced the superiority of this method of treating the wounded on the battle-field. It was freely confessed that American Surgeons had done more for Military Surgery than the ordinary experience of a century, and that never before was the business of life-saving done more thoroughly and successfully than during our great war. The discovery of the circulation of the blood in 1628, and the intro- duction of vaccination in 1796, were the significant events of the past two centuries in our profession. That of the present one will, in all probability, prove to be the crowning glory of American Surgery. For it is that which Poets and Philosophers, Philanthropists and Physicians, and the Humane of all ages, had sought for in vain for six thousand years. Ihe search had been for that agent which could suspend con- sciousness and obtund sensibility, so that the most painful manipulations might be made, or capital operations performed, with little or no risk to life. It has been reserved for American Surgery to teach the world how to prevent or relieve human suffering. God i n his mercy has condescended to teach us how to relieve pain. We can now say to the agonized mother, Awake! behold your babe; to the tetanic limb, Peace! be still. Well has it been said that no imagination can conceive and no tongue express, the accumulated woe that anaesthesia has assuaged, and is yet destined to prevent or relieve. Fifty years ago, there were probably not a half-dozen Americans known abroad as Surgeons. As early, however, as 1830, Dr. Reese, in preparing an American Edition of Cooper’s Surgical Dictionary, introduced no less than one hundred and nine American contributions to it; and Mr, Cooper, himself, soon after, publicly expressed his regret for not having noticed what we had done in this department of medicine; admitting, too, that we had performed operations never attempted in Europe, and had led the way by our splendid achievements in operative Surgery, and demonstrated their practicability and success. The hour assigned me for presenting what we have done in Surgery, during the past century, especially its latter half, has expired; the result, however imperfect, is before you. Time, if nothing else, has prevented even the naming of all that is worthy of special mention. I trust, however, that quite enough has been shown to warrant us in committing the interests of our time-honored calling, the noblest of earth, to our successors of a second centennial, in the full per- suasion that all its interests, its usefulness, its honor, and its dignity, will be fully sustained. 91 ADDRESS ON MEDICAL BIOGRAPHY. BY J. M. TOILER, M.D., OF WASHINGTON, D. C. Gentlemen of the Centennial International Medical Congress ; I appear before you to discharge the duty assigned me of preparing a biographical retrospect of the medical profession of the United States during the centennial period just past. Though apparently an easy task, I cannot approach it without hesitation. Apart from the feelings of diffidence, which under any circumstance this occasion and this audience must inspire, I am fully aware of the caution with which the office of the biographer should be assumed, and that his best efforts are never above criticism. It is admitted that the measure and the character of the renown which attaches to the hero is, in a great degree, qualified by the fitness of the chronicler who undertakes to record and perpetuate his achievements. With what intimate knowledge and forecast, then, should even the most ready pen essay the work of writing the life of the good and great; ■when, through natural inability for the task, or want of care, the noblest actions may be placed in a false light, obscuring what should be dis- played, or obtruding defects that the mantle of prudence and charity should cover! Conscious of the many difficulties and the very brief fiine allotted to the reading of this discourse, I shall confine myself to the narration of a few simple facts in the lives of the more illustrious, mffi to a record of the names of physicians who attained distinction during the century,.and I trust that this limitation may be some excuse 0l’ the dryness which must necessarily characterize such details. fa glancing over the period to be embraced in this retrospect, I am struck by the paucity of really striking events which have influenced he practice of medicine, and which have left special marks at the end of flmf century of our national existence. Vy ars have generally been promotive of medical science, and our pro- cssion was no doubt much benefited by the contest for Independence, or the first quarter of a century after this armed struggle, the leading Physicians and surgeons were those who had served in the army.1 The most notable event of this period was the occurrence of epidemics of }e ow fever, which appeared in the summers of 1793 and 1798 in nearly our Atlantic cities. This disease tested the courage and taxed the neigieg and best skill of the profession, and prompted the more eminent r)W^ a.re the names of the leading practitioners in each State who served Beorih i evo^utionary War: Connecticut, Aneas Munson; Delaware, James Tilton; Darunn. ?ar? > Maryland, John Archer; Massachusetts, John Warren; New Kniaht-U\T ’^os*a'1 Bartlett; New Jersey, William Burnett; New York, Charles Mc- Isiuu-. W orßi Carolina, Charles Harris; Pennsylvania. Benjamin Rush; Rhode Island, er; South Carolina, Peter Fayssoux ; Virginia, James McClurg. 92 TONER, to reduce their observations to writing, and to have them published, either in defence of their practice, or for the laudable purpose of making contributions to medical science. To us of the present day, it is an agreeable surprise to find that there were then so many medical men of literary ability1 in our country. The second quarter of the centennial period was distinguished by the introduction of vaccination, the occurrence of spotted fever, and the war of 1812. All of these were events which stimulated the profession to more extended studies, and became incentives to authorship; this was especially true of the disease known as spotted fever.2 The war of 1812 proved to be another great school of experience, although it was not fruitful in medical reports or publications. The aspirations which it aroused in the profession, however, gave an impetus to the establishment of medical periodicals, and to the founding of medical colleges3 and hospitals. In following out the plan of dividing the century of our independence into quarters, the third may be marked as noted for the discovery of anaesthesia, the epidemics of Asiatic cholera of 1832 and 1848, and the war with Mexico, as well as the discovery and the application of many new and improved methods of physical exploration in the search of dis- ease. These aids to diagnosis encouraged more than ever the recording of clinical observations and their publication. Medical journals multi- plied,4 and new medical colleges were founded in most of the States.5 The last quarter, which has just closed, is specially distinguished by the vast experience of the late war, which was a great school, and which 1 In my own library I find pamphlets on the epidemics of yellow fever of 1793, and 1798 published before 1800, by the following authors: Dr. J. S. Addoms, Dr. Richard Bayley ; Dr. Thaddeus Brown, Dr. C. Caldwell, Mathew Carey, Dr. Isaac Cathrall, Dr. W. G. Chadwell, Dr. Colin Chisholm, Dr. Thomas Condie. Dr. William Currie, Dr. John Beale Davidge, Dr. M. S. Davis, Dr. Jean Deveze, Dr. Richard Folwell, Dr. James Hardie, Dr. J. Henry C. Helmuth, Dr. Charles Holt. Dr. Alexander Hosack, Dr. William Linn, W. Marshall, Dr. D. Nassy, Dr. Pascalis, Dr. J. Patterson. Dr. Benjamin Rush. Dr. Charles Scot, Dr. James Tytler, Dr. Washington Watts, Dr. Noah Webster, and Dr. Nathaniel Weeks. There are also many reports by committees and boards of health, besides numerous articles on the subject in the “New York Medical Repository.” 2 The following are a few of the most noted writers on spotted fever: Elisha North, Job Wilson, Thomas Miner, William Tully, L. Danielson and E. Mann, Elijah Lyman, Samuel Woodward, Abraham Haskell, Mason Spooner and Jacob Holmes, John Bestor, Q. Fiske, and G-. Williamson. 3 In 1800, there were in the United States but four medical colleges organized and giving instruction, viz.; University of Pennsylvania, Pa.; Columbia College, N. Y.; Harvard College, Mass.; and Dartmouth College. N. IT. The number of medical colleges fully organized and giving instructions in the United States in 1825, was eighteen, viz,; Univer- sity of Pennsylvania, Pa.; College of Physicians and Surgeons, N. Y.; Harvard College, M ass.; Dartmouth College, N.H.; University of Maryland, Md.; College of Physicians and Surgeons Western N.Y., N.Y.; Yale College, Conn.; Medical College of Ohio, Ohio; Vermont Academy of Medicine, Vt.; Transylvania University, Ky.; Brown University, R. I.; Medical School of Maine, Me.; University of Vermont, Yt.; Berkshire Medical College, Mass.; Medical College, S. C.; Jefferson Medical College, Pa.; Columbian Medi- cal College, D. C.; University of Virginia, Va. 4 It has been ascertained that about two hundred medical journals have been started in the interest of regular medicine in the United States within the centennial period. Of this number, about thirty are now being published. From an estimate, based on pretty good data, I am persuaded that something over seven hundred medical men have been engaged as editors and assistant editors of journals within this period. Medical editors, as a class, are ready writers, well informed, enterprising, and progressive in their profession. The influence of medical journal literature is elevating, and encourages study and the reporting of cases. 5 At the end of the third quarter, 1850, the United States census gave a list of thirty- seven medical colleges fully organized and giving instruction. ADDRESS OX MEDICAL BIOGRAPHY. 93 lias benefited the medical profession of the whole country;1 by the ex- tended use of anaesthesia in painful surgical operations; by the increase of scientific means for exact diagnosis, and the introduction of new and potent remedies and modes of administration; and by the founding of hospitals and medical colleges in nearly all the large cities.2 It is from the professional men who labored not only in these more notable scenes, but from the whole profession who practised during this period, that I shall select for comment those who acquired honorable distinction among their contemporaries. It is well known to you that owing to the peculiar condition and growth of our country, from thir- teen Colonies to forty-nine States and Territories during the century, it is difficult to so treat the subject as to be entirely impartial, and not to neglect the claims of any section of the country, old or new. I will first speak of the medical men of the United States who have by their discoveries, writings, or special skill and devotion to their pro fesson, won national fame, and then of those who have attained distinc- tion within the several States. Having an earnest desire to make the address acceptable to this Congress, and for the sake of making it worthy of the occasion, I have collected formal biographies of one hundred of the most eminent medical men of the United States for the century. These sketches have been prepared at ray request by physicians of note in possession of the requisite data.3 We know that greatness in any avocation, and particularly in the medical profession, is not a birthright, nor can it be thrust upon the undeserving, A kind of popular transitory applause may be achieved without merit, but only those who have done something to advance medical knowledge or to improve the methods of cure, will live in history. The discoverer or the expounder of a new truth, the recorder °f an additional fact or a hitherto unobserved symptom, or of an im- proved procedure in surgery or in the treatment of disease, deserves and will secure a more enduring place in history than he who has gained great popularity or the largest fortune. The qualities and acquirements mid the degree of these which can make a medical man illustrious either m his day or in history, I shall not attempt to define. The talent differs 111 kind and degree that attains eminence in different periods of time, and iii the city as compared with the rural districts, in the surgeon4 as compared with the physician,5 and in the writer6 as compared with the the late war did for us what the wars of Europe in 1848 and 1856 did there. It im- proved surgery much, and developed pathology wonderfully, brought hygiene into active exercise, improved the treatment of bone injuries by exsection and resection, and the treat- ment of wounded joints. The conservative treatment of limbs, the postponement of the period ot operation, and the improvement in hospital construction and treatment, mark this aniestl eSS au ie ac^ number of operations performed by the extended use of ■ P1® clpse of the last quarter of the centennial period records sixty-five medical colleges, 3 schools or colleges of pharmacy. Editor ] 10®raP^les referred to in the text, are necessarily omitted for want of space.— An \-10 essor Samuel 1). Gross, in the “ Century of American Medicine,” published in the wh'^'ca11, ourila* of Medical Sciences, names nearly three hundred American surgeons, r.f y their operations and reported cases, have won an enduring place in the literature s Profession. Anie-1' Thomas, in the “Century of American Medicine,” published in the physjU?au of Medical Sciences, names nearly one hundred and thirty American s p ,laPs who have won distinction in obstetrical practice and gynaecological surgery, cat lu° fhSor AD. Gross, in his Introductory Lecture entitled “ History of American Medi- eiature,” names nearly three hundred medical authors for the century. From an 94 TONER, teacher.1 But that there is a something in talent or character which commands success, and that this element stands m the relation of cause to effect, is generally conceded. Even when an elevated standard of pro- fessional ability has been adopted, I am embarrassed not only by the difficulty of selection, but by the superabundance of good material. The names here presented as having won pre-eminence in the medical profession of America, have acquired their distinction chiefly by the possession of high natural endowments and of good education and medi- cal knowledge, with the exercise of unceasing study, and devotion to professional duty. My study is too limited to assume that names not included may not be equally deserving. The natural ability, habits of industry and systematic study, and scientific knowledge of Dr. Benjamin Rush, added to his acquaintance with men and public affairs, easily place him at the head of the list of the eminent medical men of the century. His professional skill, high moral and benevolent character, and frequent participation in the attana of his country, rendered him popular with the profession and endeared him to the people. His fame has suffered but little by the lapse of time His writings are numerous and valuable, (b. December 24,1745 , d. jui 19,1813.) "But as the subject of medical literature has been assigned to an'abler pen, I shall leave that branch entirely to him.2 _ Dr. Valentine Mott, by his daring and brilliant operations in surgery, held for many years the front rank. He had the physical and mental endowments, as well as scientific acquirements, application, and profes- sional training, essential to a great surgeon. There is scarcely an opera- tion, however hazardous or delicate, that he did not peiform with surnmate skill and success. His genius, too, was equal to devising new operations and important surgical procedures, and undertaking and executing some operations which before his day were passed over as too formidable to be attempted. He was scarcely less eminent as a writer and teacher than as a surgeon and no A™erlACaai"^e7oS. to the profession throughout the world, (h. August 1/85 , d. Apni -b, -i \ . Dr. Philip Syng Physick was a surgeon of rare ability, self-possession, and fortitude. As was usual, when he commenced practice, he attended to the general business of physician and surgeon, but as early as 1 / 94 e was appointed one of the surgeons to the Pennsylvania Hospital, and in 1805 Professor of Surgery in the University of Pennsylvania. He always carefully prepared his lectures, and was therefore particularly impressive, for he had thought over and mastered the subjects he pre- sented. Pie was the author of so many improvements in the depaitmeut estimate I have made on this subject, I conclude that there are some four hundred authors who have published works, which from their size are entitled to be termed books. 1 imdude pamphlets it is probable that there are over fifteen hundred medical authors > I have made of the teachers of medicine in our country, for the century I am inclined to think that the list will include nearly two thousand names. - “™S,r L P Yandell. of Kentucky, has been designated to a«lmr ft. “ American Medical Literature” for the centennial of our national existenceh a“d ™ N. S. Davis, of Illinois, has been given the task of preparing an on^Amencan diUy1 of1 preparhig'a hfstory'of m™didne°in our country for s^Ticitoit no fG to traverse°their biographical detail at the risk of being tiresome. ADDRESS ON MEDICAL BIOGRAPHY. 95 of surgery that he was justly entitled to the appellation given him of “ The Father of American Surgery.” His influence upon practice is felt to the present day. (b. July 7, 1768 ; d. Dec. 15, 1837.) Hr. John Warren was an eminent physician and surgeon, and medical teacher. He acquired experience and reputation in the hospitals of the Revolution. While attached to the hospital at Boston, in 1782, he founded the Medical Department of Harvard College, in which he was Professor of Anatomy and Surgery. He was a man of great industry, and enthusiastically attached to his profession, and was during his life- time the leading surgeon of Hew England. His genius and aptitude for this branch of the profession has continued to show itself in his descend- ants. (h. July 27, 1753; d. April 4,1815.) Dr. Daniel Drake possessed wonderful powers of original observation, and was the most indefatigable worker for the accumulation of know- ledge and the elevation of the profession, that our country has produced. He was the founder of medical colleges in the West, and a writer and teacher of great force and ability. "His systematic inquiries into the causes.of disease are models worthy of study. The Doctor’s valuable labors are certain to be appreciated in the future, (b. Oct. 20, 1785 ; d. Nov. 6,1852.) Dr. John Collins Warren was one of the founders of the Massachusetts General Hospital, and the surgeon in daily attendance to the time of his death. He was the first to use ether, and did much to hasten its intro- duction into general use in surgery. He was a brilliant operator, popu- lar as a lecturer, and wrote on a great variety of subjects, in all of which he showed his exact knowledge and extensive scientific acquirements, (b. Ist Aug. 1778; d. May 4, 1856.) Dr. Nathan Smith was a man of extraordinary natural endowments. His ability to acquire knowledge, his industry, perseverance, and success under almost insurmountable difficulties, have rarely been equalled. His founding of the Medical Department of Dartmouth College, and his teach- ing, by himself, for ten years, all the usual branches, show the character °f the man. He was an admirable anatomist, a bold and successful sur- geon, and a good general practitioner. By his teachings he did much to advance medicine, (b. Sept. 30, 1762: d. Jan. 26, 1829.) Hr. Reuben Dimond Mussey was a distinguished surgeon and good general practitioner. His experiments on cutaneous absorption would have of themselves entitled him to a high rank, had he not become still 111 ore eminent as a surgeon. For daring and success, some of his capital operations have never been excelled. He was also a popular and success- ful teacher of surgery. The esteem in which he was held by the pro- fession may be inferred from his election to the presidency of the Ame- rican Medical Association, (b. June 23, 1780; d. June 21, 1866.) Hr, James Jackson was a noted physician and author. _ He was one of the founders of the Massachusetts General Hospital. His great skill in diagnosis, and his eminent success in the treatment of disease, led to his appointment to the professorship of Theory and Practice in Harvard College. His observations, teaching, and writings, almost mark an epoch ]n uiedicine in this country. His professional life and labors were great lessons to the profession of high and honorable principles, (b. Oct. 3, 17p; cl. Aug. 27, 1867.) Hr. Nathaniel Chapman was a learned and eminent physician, and teacher of medicine. His special qualifications and success as a physi- dau speedily attracted attention, so that his business was very large and 96 TONER, responsible He was for a long time a professor in the University of Pennsylvania, and was in some respects the most popnlw Iwturer wrth students ever resident in that great centre ot medical education. Uis writings have had much influence over the medical He was President of the American Philosophical Soc f 28 1780 d. President of the American Medical Association, (b. May , ’ Jah.lTh8eodorio R. Beck was a prominent physician, author and teacher. He was narticularly notable for his literary and scientific attainments, power ot classification, and scope of studies. Professor in sereraUol^lege , he filled one of the first chairs of medical t0 conntrv His work on this science would ot itself entitle mm ■a“k with the most cultivated medical men of the Union, and has been for years the class-book in foreign schools of medicine, (b. Aug. 11, 179dV Samuel Jackson was a learned and accomplished medical man and teachrHn every department, whether at the bedside, or as President of the Board of Health, or in the lecture room, he showed himself the o-rcnt physician. He tilled a chair with eminent success in the Univei- fity of Pennsylvania from 1825 till 1868 when he resigned His membei- slifpt learnh societies as well as his able stings testify to h.s distm- p-uished ability, (b. March 22,1787 ; d. April 4, 1872.) . . , & Hr Wm. Potts Hewees deserves prominent notice as a physician an author He possessed a methodical and discerning mind and was an extensive and careful reader of the best works in the profession. His were HwTnS thfpte^f “Ltkf aTcLri 7fomen ™ thb°klarrGdiMorton(b“aahons;ficuous pfean an] naturalist He was ahost careful and laborious student, and did a prodigious amount original scientific work. His love for science, however did not lessen his devotion to his profession, as his writings on consumption, and other medical works, prove. His fame is enduring,and bis original observations in medicine and cramology. (b. Jan. -6,17JJ , d'Dra'Blithf Bartlett was a highly accomplished scholar and physician. He was a very popular medical teacher, and a ready lecturer holding chaira in several leading medical colleges. His work on the ‘ Fevers ot the United States,” published in 1842, at once secured him a place in the front rank of physicians. His parity of life and eminence as a clinical physician as well as the high character of all his writings, have secured for Wa name an abiding place in the history ot h.s profession, (b. Oct b, John i'v. Mitchell was an able physician and a polished writer. He nossessed a vigorous intellect, which was well trained and by carefu study stored witlf facte. In the sick room he is said to have had a mos encouraeino- influence over patients and their ti lends. He was an ong nal thinkep with a vivid imagination, and one of the ”o®kithiTaWlitv lecturers. His writings cover a variety ot subjects, all exhibiting ability and versatility of talent, (b. May 12 1796 ; d. April 4 .1856.) Dr Rene La Roche was a learned physician and author. Me was a most laborious and conscientious student, exhausting all sources of infor- mation to* the fullest extent on whatever subject he took up. He was for ADDRESS ON MEDICAL BIOGRAPHY. 97 many years connected with the Board of Health of Philadelphia, and was a most valuable member. His practice for years was large and responsi- ble. His studies and writings on j-ellow fever are a marvel of labor and systematic presentation of all the known facts relating to this disease, (b. 1795 ; d. December 9, 1872.) Dr. David Hosack was a celebrated physician, botanist, and author. He had a large practice, and yet found time to lecture in different col- leges, and to write exhaustive treatises on medical subjects. He held important positions in the Almshouse, in the Hew York Hospital, and in the Bloomingdale Asylum. His contributions to medical science are numerous and valuable, (b. August 31, 1769 ; d. December 22, 1835.) Dr. John Morgan was a man of learning and an eminent physician and surgeon. He enjoyed the distinction of being the founderof the first medical school in America. At that time he was perhaps the most thoroughly educated and accomplished physician in this country. He was a good writer, and was the first to suggest that pus was formed by a secretory process. Pie was surgeon-general of the Continental Army, and one of the founders of the American Philosophical Society, (b. 1735; d. Oct. 15, 1789.) Dr. Josiah C. Hott was a prominent physician and surgeon, and a learned ethnologist. He was a man of commanding powers of intellect, with great industry and capacity for study. While he won a world-wide fame as an ethnologist, he did not neglect the duties of a large practice. He was eminent as a teacher, and as the founder of the Medical College °f Mobile. His ethnological writings,however,are those which are best known, but he was equally distinguished as a physician and surgeon, (b. March 31, 1804; d. March 31,1873.) Want of time will prevent comment upon all our medical worthies. I however present the following list of names, incomplete though it be, 1,1 which it would be difficult to assign a precedence, for all of them have won national reputations, and are eminently deserving of commemoration. I am persuaded that I might more than double the list, and yet not include all who have won reputations that have extended beyond the confines of their own country:—J. Mason Warren, Caspar Wistar, Wm. olnppen, Samuel Bard, Wright Post, Chas. Caldwell, Benjamin S. Barton, Henjamin Waterhouse, David Ramsay, John D. G-odman, Wm. E. Horner, P ranklin Bache, Robley Dunglison, Warren Stone, John Ware, James lhacher, Wm. W. Gerhard, C. D. Meigs, Hugh L. Hodge, Edward Miller, Wm. Gibson, J. W. Francis, George McClellan, Henry Miller, • S. Dorsey, B. W. Dudley, J. B. Davidge, J. A. Swett, Samuel Jackson, E Green, C. A. Pope, Jeffries Wyman, John Eberle, T. Miner, John Jones, G. T. Elliot, A. A. Gould, S. L. Mitchell, S. IE Dickson, J. P. arrison, Jonathan Knight, Ernest Krackowizer, Daniel Brainard, Charles Prick, G. C. Blackman, J. W. Heustis, Alexander PL Stevens, f Hale, Erasmus Fenner, B. R. Welford, J. M. Galt, James McClurg, arnes Moultrie, Henry F. Askew, G. Mendenhall, Nicholas Romayne, J. S’ Harton, R. S. Kissara, A. Brigham, T. D. Mutter, Ephraim McDowell, p Hajley, W. Curry, John Jeffries. J. A. Cartwright, L. Y. Bell, D. F. wondie, S. Forry, J. A. Gallup, S. G. Morton, W. Beaumont, Thomas mewaU, E. H. Barton, S. Brown, J. Watson, Jos. Parrish, C. A. Lee, J. D? -'Helen March, Lyman Spalding, Josiah Bartlett, J. M, Smith, Snr!-i r?®ky, Valentine Seaman, E. A."Holyoke, Amos Twitchell, E. H. 1 1,,~* H. Beck, Usher Parsons, Caleb Fiske, J. E. Holbrook, William 98 TONER, Baynham, F. T. Stribling, L. M. Lawson, J. R. Coxe, T. C. James, R. W. Gibbes, John P. Mettauer. In looking over the available records of the lives of the medical men who have labored in the several States during the century, I am struck with the evidence of the high average professional ability, and wonder- ful fidelity, with which they have discharged their duties. The testi- mony, too, is ample as to the high esteem in which the vast majority of medical men have been held by the communities in which they resided. I am aware there are those who would draw this picture less rosy. And I will concede that the opinion held on the point depends to some extent upon the temperament and motive of the inquirer. If he seeks to find the illiterate, the incompetent, or the unworthy, hearing the title of doctor, lam sorry to say such can be found. But if, on the contrary ,he looks as I have done to find the educated, the intelligent, the skilful, the conscientious and faithful physicians, they are to be found in great numbers in every city and village in our broad and prosperous republic. I am persuaded that the medical profession of the United States, not- withstanding all that has been said by its friends in their desire to ele- vate it, really has within its ranks proportionately more talent, nobility of character, and high scientific acquirements, than are to be found in any other profession in this or any land. The number of great physicians who have by their discoveries and writings added new facts and extended the boundaries of medical science, is limited in any century and every country. This fact ought not to be lost sight of. To the young and to the inconsiderate only do great reputations seem a matter of course. To the conceited nothing seems beyond their untried powers. Age and experience, however, demonstrate the limitations and possibilities of human intelligence and acquirements, which, it is con- ceded by the wisest, are comparatively narrow and circumscribed. Medical science and the medical profession in America have made vast progress in the hundred years just passed, and have brought into promi- nence during that time many medical men of genius and rare abilities, and sometimes from unexpected quarters. If there is any one thing in which the American people has a united faith, it is in progress. As a nation and a people we believe we shall be better physically, morally, and intellectually, in the future than we have been in the past. From a careful study of the average proportion of physicians to popu- lation, it is rendered probable that about 65,000 physicians have died in the United States during the century. Of even the few whose genius, skill, and devotion to medicine, in the several States, have rendered their lives notable, it is not possible to present more than the merest outline; little, indeed, beyond an imperfect list of names. To do even this meagre justice to my subject, I was obliged to correspond with phy- sicians in different parts of our country, and beg them to assist me in collecting the necessary facts; and to these gentlemen I wish to return my most sincere acknowledgments for their valuable assistance. What- ever defects appear in this paper, and doubtless there are many, they are my own. Alabama.I—ln this State Josiah Clark JSTott, a native of South Caro- 1 Alabama was visited by Be Soto as early as 1541. The first successful settlement was made upon Mobile Bay in 1702, by Bienville. This State formed a part of Georgia until ADDRESS ON MEDICAL BIOGRAPHY. 99 lina, was for years the leading medical spirit. Ills eminence as a surgeon, author, and teacher, placed him in the front rank; he has already been men- tioned. (b. March 31, 1801; d. March 81, 1873.) Dr. J. W. Heustis wrote on the diseases of the South as early as 1817. In 1825 he pub- lished a more systematic treatise on the “Bilious and Remittent Fevers of Alabama.” (b. 1784; d. 1841.) Dr. Wm. M. Boling, of Montgomery, was a physician of education, and extensively patronized. Dr. Thomas Fearn and his brother Dr. Richard Lee Fearn, of Mobile, were natives of V irginia, and accomplished physicians. Dr. Silas Ames, of Mobile, was a physician of skill, and esteemed remarkably successful in the treatment of fevers. The following also deserve mention, viz.: Drs, Samuel D. Holt, Leroy Anderson, A. Lopez, A. G. Mabry, IT. S. Levert, James C. Harris, Nicholas Merriwether, P. H. Lewis, Edward Gant, and R. C. Armstrong. Arkansas.I—Dr. Benj. P. Jett, of Washington, Hempstead Co., came from Yir ginia, and enjoyed a large and responsible practice, (b. Oct. 25, 1808; d. Dec. 29,1865.) Dr. Craven Peyton, of Little Rock, served as a surgeon in the war with Mexico, and thereafter retained a preference lor the practice of surgery, in which he was very successful. The great esteem in which he was held was manifested by the closure of the banks uud business houses, in order that their employes might attend his funeral, (d. Nov. 7, 1872.) Dr. Charles B. Mitchell, a native of Ten- uessee, practised in Washington. Ilis business habits, intelligence, and enterprise, made him many friends, and caused him to be elected U. S. Senator, 1860-61. (b. Sept. 19, 1815; d. Sept. 20, 1864.) Dr. Shephard Laurie, a native of the District of Columbia, was for many years one of Ihe leading physicians and surgeons of Little Rock. I will also men- tion Drs. Geo. Eving, Bumford, G. G. Shumard, Alden Sprague, Burton, and Gibson. California.2—This new State holds out such golden promises as to ; from this time till 1817 it was included in the Mississippi territory, and was then organized into a separate territorial government, and admitted as an independent State to A Union in 1819. Alabama has advanced rapidly in population and wealth, and has ?A°,U much encouragement to general education and the advancement of the sciences. In ‘ J she had 996,992 inhabitants. She has no large cities; about one in twelve of her people live in cities and towns of over five thousand inhabitants. One medical college ists, located at Mobile. (Note.—Summer schools, as adjuncts to colleges, are in no in- duce enumerated.) A State Medical Association, formed in 1847, has, by recent legisla- -0n’ a^so the legal powers of a State board of health, and publishes a volume of Transac- n 0118 anm'ally. Institutions, sufficient for the care and treatment of unfortunates, have been established. L' Arkansas settlements were first made about 1685 ;it wras a part of the Louisiana purchase of 1803. In 1819 it was formed into a territory, and was admitted as an inde- ®ta,te fn 1836. The population in 1870 was 484,471. It has no large cities, and anJ ar)p,’ Bne8ne 111 thirty of its people live in cities and towns of over five thousand inhabit- gt bhe State in 1870 had 1206 physicians. Its population is gradually increasing. A I ‘ -et beelical Association, formed in 1870, publishes annually a volume of Transactions. 2 felons |or the care of the insane and other unfortunates have been founded. 10 earliest settlement in the territory of the present State of California was in 1769r 1821 >a'i “ Franciscan friars who came from the Peninsula of Lower California In Li~lB4r kcame a territory of Royal Mexico, and continued a province under the republic, control f i American navy seized Monterey, and from that time it has been under the °nce ? A ,e Baited States. The gold mines were discovered in 1848, population was at fore °,. em, an(i California was admitted as a State in 1850. She has been, there- -1870 w over a quarter of a century a member of the Union. Her population in inhabit a§t Nearly one-third of her people live in cities of over five thousand1 have bpp S" had ab the date mentioned 1257 physicians. Two medical colleges 11 established, and a State Medical Society, formed in 1870, publishes annually a 100 TONER, attract to it many able physicians. Dr. Thomas M. Logan, a native of South Carolina, in 1849 located at Sacramento. He was a close observer of the causes of disease, and a frequent contributor to the medical jour- nals. He was influential in organizing the Medical Society of California and the State Board of Health, and was president of the latter at the time of his death. He was President of the State Medical Society in 1871, and of the American Medical Association in 1873. (b. Jan. 31, 1808; d. Feb. 13, 1876.) Dr. E. S. Cooper, a native of Ohio, was an excel- lent surgeon and a successful medical teacher in San Francisco. He founded and published the San Francisco Medical Press, and made valu- able suggestions as to the physiological mode of repair in wounded joints and tendons. He was a careful student, a bold surgeon, and a frequent contributor to medical serial literature, (d. Oct. 13, 1862, set. 40.) Dr. Isaac Rowell, a native of Hew Hampshire, enjoyed an extensive practice in San Francisco, and was particularly influential in organizing the Uni- versity of the Pacific, in which he was a professor, (b, 1818; d. Jan, 4, 1871.) Dr. Win. Burnett, of Petaluma, was a physician of culture. The following also deserve mention ; Drs. Henry M. Gray and John T. Morse, of San Francisco. Connecticut,I—Dr.1—Dr. Aneas Munson, of Hew Haven, served as a sur- geon in the Revolutionary war. He was an observing and successful practitioner and surgeon. He contributed papers to the Connecticut Medical Society, and was an active promoter of art and science. He was ■one of the originators of the State Medical Society, and for some years its president, (b. June 24, 1734; d. June 16, 1826.) Dr. Jared Potter, of Wallingford, was a scholar, and had a passion for acquiring knowl- edge. His office was much frequented, and his instruction eagerly sought by young men entering the profession, (d. 1810, ret. 67.) Dr. Jonathan Knight, of Hew Haven, was remarkable for his urbanity and sound professional judgment. He held a chair in Yale College for twenty-five years. He was the first president of the American Medical Association, (b. Sept. 4, 1789 ;d. Aug. 25, 1864.) Dr. Win. Tully was an earnest cultivator of the science of medicine. He was an author of merit, and published, along with Dr. Thomas Miner, in 1823, a work on fevers, (d. Feb. 28, 1859.) Dr. Thomas Miner was one of the founders volume of Transactions. A State board of health, which also publishes annual Transac- tions, has been established by law. Institutions for the care of unfortunates have been created by the State, sufficient for the wants of the people. The following medical journals have been published; California Medical Gazette, 1868 ; California State Medical Journal, 1856; Medical Gazette, 1870; Pacific Medical and Sur- gical Journal. 1858; San Francisco Medical Journal, 1858; San Francisco Medical Press, I860; Western Lancet, 1872. 1 Connecticut is one of the thirteen original States. The Dutch had a trading house at Hartford as early as 1631. An offshoot of Plymouth had also a settlement at Windsor about the same time. New Haven was for some years an independent colony. All the separate interests, however, were consolidated in 1665. The State took an early and an active stand in favor of American Independence. The population in 1870 wras 537,454, with about two-thirds of the people living in cities and towns of over five thousand inhabi- tants. At the same time there were 680 physicians. Great encouragement has been given to education and the advancement of science. A State Medical Society was founded in 1792, and was one of the first in the country to publish Transactions. There is one medical college, a department of Yale. It was in this State that anaesthesia in surgical operations was first tried. The first school in America for the education of the deaf and dumb was organized at Hartford. Institutions for the care of the insane and other unfor- tunates have been founded by the State, sufficient for the wants of the people. The following journal of a medical and scientific character has been published in Con- necticut: American Journal of Sciences and Arts, 1846. ADDRESS ON MEDICAL BIOGRAPHY. 101 of the Medical Department of Yale College. He was particularly in- terested in the cure and treatment of the" insane. His life and labors were important to his day and generation, (d. April 23, 1841.) Dr. Eli Todd, of Hartford, was an educated and intelligent physician. He was much interested in the treatment of the insane, and was chosen superin- tendent of the Retreat at Hartford, (d. Hov. 17, 1833.) Dr. Lemuel Hopkins, ot Hartford, was a scholarly physician, writer, and wit. He was devoted to scientific studies and to the elevation of the profession, (h. June 19, 1/50 ; d. April 14, 1801.) Dr. Eli Ives, of Hew Haven, was a distinguished physician and botanist. He was a man of quick percep- tions, sound judgment, great industry and perseverance. Eor years he filled with ability a professorship in A ale College, and in was Presi- dent of the American Medical Association, (b. Feb. 7, 1779 ; d. Oct. 8, 1861.) Dr. Mason F. Cogswell was a surgeon of the Revolution, and during his day the leading surgeon in Connecticut; he was the first per- son in this country to ligate the carotid artery, (b. 1761; d. Dec. 1836.) Dr, Thomas Hubbard succeeded to the chair of surgery in Yale College °n the death of Dr. H a than Smith, and was a worthy successor to one of America’s most eminent surgeons, (d. June 18, 1838, set. 63.) Dr. Vv orthington Hooker, of Hew Haven, was an accomplished physician mid a writer of many educational works of merit. His brother Charles 1 eiWed an eilvialjle reputation, (b. March 3, 1806 ;d. Hov. 6, 186 /.) I will also name Drs. Seth Bird, George Sumner, Samuel Wood- ward, Daniel Worden, and Horace Wells, the dentist and discoverer of anaesthesia. Delaware.I—Dr. Edward Miller was an accomplished writer. He practised at Dover until 1796, when he removed to the city of Hew York. Dis reputation had preceded him, so that he rapidly acquired a lucra- tive business. In connection with Drs. E. H. Smith and S. L. Mitchell, •le funded in 1797 the Hew York Medical Repository, the first medical in our country, (b. May 9, 1760 ; d. March 17, 1812.) Dr. * anies Tilton, of Wilmington, served as a surgeon in the hospitals of the evolution, and proved himself remarkably well informed on the subject p 110spital construction and management. He was a member of the ontinental Congress from 1783 to 1785. During the war of 1812 he yas appointed Surgeon-General of the 11. S. Army. In 1813 he pub- -18 Je<] a pamphlet on Military Hospitals, He was a man of clear per- to'l* loliS and Practical good sense, and in his official position did much w prSrno.te tde efficiency of the medical department of the army. He d a\f reeddent fke Delaware State Medical Society, (b. June 1,1745 ; aiKl Dr. James Sykes was a physician of great personal c piofessioual popularity; and was chosen to represent his district in evcent m aiJ Was one the thirteen original States. It lias the smallest area of any State 1627 T|10 n Island: hhe earliest settlements were made by the Swedes and Finns in the Eno-f-f • York held the government in the year 1655, but it passed to the nam f ' Delaware formed a part of the Pennsylvania grant of 1682, under to have 6 ° * hree Lower Counties of Delaware.” In 1701 it was permitted, in part, the Ro>vniSecarate ttovernment, but was subject to the Governor of Pennsylvania down to people li UtlOI?‘ Delaware’s population in 1870 was 125,015, about one in four of her hundred In!f m Cltf‘s ?f over five thousand inhabitants. She had at the same time one Pelaware PavSeVentnPllySlClanS' Her Proximity t° Philadelphia, and her position on the and wealth „I’ glye her great commercial and manufacturing advantages. Her population Publishes “‘creasing. She has a State Medical Society, formed in 1789, which went of herD- 10nSjan, ly’ and she has made amPle provisions for the care and treat- oi ner insane and other unfortunates. 102 TONER, the State Legislature, and also in the State Senate for fifteen consecutive years, being much of the time the presiding officer. In 1801-2 he was acting Governor. He practised for a few years in the city of Hew York, but returned to Delaware, where he ended his days. (b. March 27,1761; d. October 18, 1822.) Dr. James Couper, of Hew Castle, was a highly gifted physician. In 1840 he was a delegate from the State Medical Society to the Convention for revising the IT. S. Pharmacopoeia. He was President of the Delaware State Medical Society, and Vice-President of the American Medical Association in 1863. (b. Oct. 3, 1803.; d. 1865.) Dr. Henry F. Askew was a physician of sound judgment and great expe- rience. idis professional life was characterized by close attention to pro- fessional duties. He had a well-trained mind, was a constant reader of the latest literature, and had a high regard for the dignity of the profes- sion. He was President of the American Medical Association in 1867. (d. March 6,1876.) Dr. George Munroe was a surgeon in the Revolu- tionary War. He practised at Wilmington, and was through life one of the foremost medical men of the State, and an occasional contributor to the “Hew York Medical Repository.” (d. Oct. 11, 1819.) Dr. John Vaughn, a native of Pennsylvania, was a man of science and physician of ability. His manners in the sick room were gentle and assuring. In the winter of 1778-79 he delivered a course of lectures on Chemistry and Hatural Philosophy. In the following year he published a “ Chemical Syllabus;” he also contributed articles to the “Hew York Medical Re- pository.” (d. March 25,1807.) I will also name the following; Drs. Charles Ridegley, Allin McLane, Win. Gibbons, Henry Latimer, Hicholas Way, John McKinley, Ebenezer Smith, Joseph Hall. District of Columbia.I—Dr. Thomas Sewall, a native of Maine, was for many years extensively engaged in practice in Washington. He held the chair of Anatomy in the "Medical Department of Columbia College from its organization in 1825 until 1839, and from that time to his death the chair of Pathology and Theory and Practice. His address at the opening of the schoof in 1825 gave a history of the Medical Colleges of the country up to that time. He was a good writer, and published a number of papers on Phrenology, Temperance, and Medicine, (d. April 10, 1845.) Dr. Tobias Watkins, a native of Maryland, was a physician, scholar, and author. He published in Baltimore, in 1809, “ The Medical and Philosophical Recorder,” and was for a time one of the editors of the “Portfolio,” He served as a surgeon in the war of 1812, and was acting Surgeon-General from 1818 to 1821, and Fourth Auditor of the Treasury from 1824 to 1829. He translated a number of medical works from the French, (d. Hov. 14, 1855.) Dr. Thomas Henderson wTas a physician and surgeon of the U. S. Army, and an author. From 1825 to 1833 he was Professor of Theory and Practice in the Medical Depart- 1 For three-quarters of a century Washington has been the seat of the government of the United States. Originally, the District or Territory of Columbia comprised a territory of ten miles square, but that part of it lying south of the Potomac River, containing thirty- six square miles, was retroceded to Virginia in 1844. The population in 1870 was 131,700. At the same time there were three hundred and twenty-six physicians. There are three medical colleges now giving instruction. A district medical society was organized in 1817, and publishes Transactions. Institutions for the care of insane and other unfortunates, sufficient for the wants of the District, have been established by the United States government. The following Medical Journals have been published in the District of Columbia: American Botanical Register; National Med. Journal, 1870; Register and Library of Medical and Chirurgical Science, 1835. ADDRESS ON MEDICAL BIOGRAPHY. 103 merit of Columbia College. After bis admission to the army he pub- lished “Hints on Examination of Recruits for the Army,” which has gone through several editions, (b. Jan. 6, 1789 ; d. Aug. 11, 1854.) Hr. B. S. Bohrer, of Georgetown, was a fine scholar and an accomplished physician. He held for some years a chair in the Ohio Medical College. He possessed a fine library of medical and classical literature. He was a good practitioner, and a man of most courteous and agreeable manners, (d. Aug. 19, 1862.) Hr. Joseph Lovell, a native of Massachusetts, was Surgeon-General of the Army, and long a resident of Washington. Although not engaged in private practice, he was a member and supporter of the local medical organization, and was frequently called in consultation, (b. 1788 ; d. Oct. 17, 1836.) Hr. Thomas Lawson, a native of Virginia, was a surgeon in the army, and held the office of Surgeon-General. He was a man of great professional abilities and personal worth, and made a number of valuable reports on the diseases of the army and the climate of the western military posts, (d. May 15, 1861.) Hr. Frederick Hawes was a physician of fine abilities, and en- joyed for years an extensive practice, (d. Feb. 10, 1852.) To these I will add the names of Hrs. Frederick May, Bailey Washington, R. 3L Stone, Thomas Miller, John M. Thomas, the two Worthingtons, R. H. Coolidge, J. A. Brereton, and Joshua Riley. Florida,I—Hr. Bosquet was a physician of note at St, Augustine, as early as 1800. Hr. Thomas Travers was in practice there in 1812. About the time the territory was purchased from Spain, Hr. Harcy was a leading physician. Hr. Henry Perrine was a physician, and a man of scientific attainments. The United States gave him a township of land near Biscayne Bay, for the purpose of encouraging the introduction and culti- yation of tropical plants. The “ Sisal Hemp” is now growing abundantly in Florida, the result of his enterprise. The Hoctor was murdered at the Fght-house, by the Indians, during the Florida war (1841). Hr. Lewis practised as early as 1813, at Fernandina, and enjoys the distinction of having introduced vaccination into that section of country. Hr. Charles W. McCroskey wTas a good physician. He was connected with the army at St. Augustine, and died of yellow fever. Hr. W. H. Simmons, a native °1 South Carolina, lived at St. Augustine. He was a physician of skill, and a man of literary accomplishments. Hr. Richard Weightman, a La five of Washington city, after serving in the army, settled on the St. John’s River, and engaged for years in the practice of his profession. Br. Seth Peck was also a physician of note in Florida. To the names already mentioned, I will add those of Hrs. Lewis Willis, W. W. Wad- dell, Andrew Anderson, Theodore Turnbull, and William Havis. Georgia.2—Hr. Lyman Hall wTas a well-educated physician, a member Florida was visited by Ponce De Leon in 1512, and in 1536 by De Soto. A settlement was made in 1564, the earliest by Europeans in any State of the Union. Florida belonged to Uaitl 1820, when it was purchased by the United States, and admitted as an indepen- , eni ‘Mate in the Union in 1845. It has a large territory with almost tropical climate, but a sparse^population. In 1870 it had 188,248 inhabitants. The census gave it 240 physi- ians. j here are no ]arge cßies jn the State. The United States Government maintains a a\y yard, and also a military garrison. The State has a Medical Association, formed in t1 ’ wHch publishes annual Transactions. Provision has been made lor the care and oa merit of the insane, and other unfortunates, in i 18 0116 of' 6*6 thirteen original States. The first settlement by the English was Dp. i ’.the latest of any of the American Colonies. The population at the close of the ev V° f 1011 not reach 30,000. The population in 1870 was 1,184,109, with about one in eiy fourteen living in cities and towns of over five thousand inhabitants. It had at the 104 TONER, of the Continental Congress, and a signer of the Declaration of Indepen- dence. (b. 1725; d. Oct. 19, 1790.) Dr. Milton Antony, of Augusta, was a teacher and practitioner of ability. He was the founder of the Medical Academy at Augusta, in 1828, and of the Medical College of Georgia. In 1831 he started the first medical journal published in’ the Southern States, (b. August 7, 1789 ; d. Sept. 19, 1839.) Dr. Hoble Wimberly Jones was a physician and a patriot. In the discharge of his professional duties he was attentive and skilful. Dr. W. C. Daniell, of Savannah, was a physician and author of note. His best known work is entitled, “ Observations on the Autumnal Fevers of Savannah.” In 1826 he advocated the use of capsicum internally and externally in yellow fever, (b. January, 1792 : d, Dec. 28, 1868.) Dr. Richard Banks, of Savannah, and a native of Georgia, was a physician and surgeon of ability, and filled the chair of Surgery in the Savannah Medical College, (d. May, 1856, aged 62.) Dr. R, D. Arnold, of Savannah, a native of Georgia, was an accomplished physician and writer. He was one of the original members of the American Medical Association, and its Vice President in 1852. He was for many years Professor in the Savannah Medical College. He wrote and published papers of decided merit in the Transactions of the American Medical Association, and in the Medical Journals, (d. July 10, 1876, set. 68.) Dr. W. R. Waring was for many years a leading physician of Savannah, and Professor in the Medical College. Dr. George M. Hewton was a physician and successful teacher of Anatomy at Augusta. He left a fortune of about $200,000, to found an orphan asylum, (b. Jan, 30, 1810; d. Jan. 6, 1859.) In addition to the foregoing, I will name Drs. Tomlinson Fort, of Milledgeville, Thomas H. Hamilton, of Rome, G. B. Gorman, Charles W. West, Joseph FI. Eve, of Augusta, Dr. Wildman, of Savannah, and Dr. Curtis B. Hot- ingham. Illinois.I—Dr. Daniel Brainard, a native of Hew York, was a physician and surgeon of distinction. He settled in Chicago as early as 1835, and soon acquired a leading professional business, especially in Surgery. He was one of the founders of the Rush Medical College, and long one of its same time 1537 physicians. It has one good seaport, but no large cities. It has three medical colleges, distributed, one each, at Atlanta, Augusta, and Savannah ; a State Medical Association was formed in 1849, and a State Board of Health has been organized and publishes reports. Institutions for the care of the insane and other unfortunates have been established. The following medical journals have been published in Georgia: Atlanta Medical and Surgical Journal, 185$; Georgia Medical Companion, 1871; Georgia Medical and Surgical Encyclopaedia, 1860 ; Oglethorpe Medical and Surgical Journal, 1861; Savannah Journal of Medicine, 1858; Southern Medical and Surgical Journal, 1837. 1 the French had trading posts in Illinois as early as 1700, The earliest permanent settlement, however, was by the French about 1763. In 1783 this State formed a part of the “Northwestern Territory.” In 1800 it was a part of the territory under the name of Indiana. Illinois was admitted as an independent State in the Union in 1818. Her popu- lation in 1870 was 2,539,891, with about one in five of her people living in cities and towns of over five thousand inhabitants. She then had 4861 physicians. Population and wealth are rapidly accumulating in this State. Three medical colleges are now giving instruction. A State Medical Society was organized in 1851, and publishes a volume of Transactions annually. Institutions for the care of unfortunates have been established, sufficient for the wants of the people. The following medical journals have been published in Illinois: American Journal of Materia Medica, 1860; Chicago Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, 1874; Chicago Medical Examiner, I860; Chicago Medical Journal, 1858; Chicago Times, 1869; Illinois and Indiana Medical and Surgical Journal, 1846; Illinois Medical and Surgical Journal, 1844; Lens, 1872 ; Northwestern Medical and Surgical Journal, 1849; Pharmacist, 1868- Tripod, 1871. ’ ADDRESS OK MEDICAL BIOGRAPHY. 105 professors. He contributed articles of value to the Medical Journals, and to the Illinois State Medical Society’s Transactions, (b. 1812; d. Oct. 10,1866.) Dr. Wm. B. Herrick, a native of Maine, was one of the early physicians of Chicago. He served as a surgeon in the Mexican war, and was a physician of extensive experience and skill. He filled the chair of Anatomy in Rush Medical College with ability for twenty years, (d. Dec. 81, 1865.) Dr. Henry Wing settled in practice in Col- linsville. He was a physician of education, and a scientist of extensive acquirements. He was one of the founders of the Chicago Medical College, and for years, held in it a professorship. His notes on the Botany of the Rocky Mountains form a part of Prof. Powell’s Geological Report of that region, (b. 1822; d. Feb. 18, 1871.) Dr. Elijah D. Harmon, a native of Vermont, was one of the earliest physicians to settle in Chicago. He was physician to the Military Post of Fort Dearborn in 1832. He was a good physician and surgeon, and for his day, and the demands made upon his skill, was an efficient and successful practitioner, (b. Aug. 20, 1782 ;d. July 3, 1869.) Dr. J. V. Z. Blaney, a native of Dela- ware, was an educated and successful physician. He was one of the founders of the Rush Medical College, and the originator and publisher, in 1844, of the “ Illinois Medical and Surgical Journal.” (b. 1820 ; d. Hec. 11, 1874.) Dr. Rudolphus Rouse, a surgeon of the war of 1812, settled in practice in Peoria. He deserved, and soon attained, the first wink among physicians in that part of the State, (b. July 20, 1793; d. April 30,1873.) The following physicians are also deserving of mention : Hrs. Samuel Thompson, George W. Richards, Nicholas Hard, Harrison Hoble, Stephen W. Noble, Levi T. Hewins, Josiah Goodhue, Alexander Walcott. Indiana.I—Dr. John Thomas Plummer, a native of Maryland, was a learned physician and excellent practitioner. He enjoyed in Indianapolis a°d its vicinity, a high reputation for skill and devotion to professional duty. In the natural sciences he was quite proficient, and was an excellent philologist; he assisted Noah Webster in collecting and defining the mean- lng of Western words for his unabridged Dictionary, (d. April 10, 1865, aged 58.) Dr. Isaac Casselberry, a native of Indiana, and long a leading physician in Evansville, added to skill in his profession a love of study, and good business habits. He was a successful promoter of medical or- ganizations, and in every new enterprise worked with great intelligence and success. He was a member of the Board of Health, and a trustee of the Evansville Medical College, also President of the State Medical So- fletV (b. Nov. 26,1821; d. July 9,1873.) Dr. Charles Parry, of Indian- apolis, was especiallj7 careful in diagnosis, and was a superior surgeon. m possessed the ability to make original observations, and was a writer G force. Prof. Geo. B. Wood quotes from a paper of his on pernicious ever. (d. August, 1861.) Dr. Asahel Clapp, a native of Massachusetts, piactised with great success in New Albany, where he settled in 1817, iidiana, was admitted to the Union in 1816. 'there were in it a few French settlements early as about 1700. Immigration from the old States commenced about 1802. The I Pu.at}on T 1870 was 1,680,637. It has no very large cities, about one in eight of its tiri|)Vl•m! k'1 v*ngin cities and towns of over five thousand inhabitants. It had at the same ann A10 physicians. It has a State Medical Society, formed in 1849, which publishes stitn'r a vo*ume °i Transactions, and has three medical colleges giving instruction. In- i’] 10l?.s efficient for the care of unfortunates have been established. obowing medical journals have been published in Indiana: Indiana Journal of 1854 ’ Indiana Journal of Medicine and Surgery, 1855 ; Indiana Medical Journal, i nchana Scalpel, 1860; Western Retrospect of Medicine and Surgery, 1872. 106 TONER, and was for forty years actively engaged in the duties of his profession. He was a good botanist, and made a report to the American Medical Association on the medicinal plants of the United States. He was fond of the study of the natural sciences, and collected a large cabinet of spe- cimens which he presented to Yale College. Dr. John L. Richmond, a native of Massachusetts, although a well-read and intelligent physician, won his reputation by a single operation. He performed the Caesarean section on the 23d of April, 1827, in a log cabin in the country, with no assistance except that rendered by the husband of the patient, and two women. The operation was successful, saving the mother’s life. The child died. (b. April 5, 1785 ; d. Oct. 12, 1855.) Dr. John S. Dobbs, a native of Pennsylvania, was a successful physician and teacher of medi- cine in Indianapolis. Pie was for some years Professor of Surgery in the Indiana Central Medical College. In his will he left means for the establishment of a public Dispensary. He was President of the State Medical Society in 1868, (b. Dec. 28, 1809 ; d. 1870.) In addition to the above list, I will name Drs. T. Fry, E. Demming, Y. Kersey, and J. W. Moody. lowa.I—Dr. David L. McGugin, a native of Pennsylvania, served as a surgeon in the Mexican war, and was for years the leading physician of Keokuk. He filled a chair in the University of lowa at the time of his death. The State Medical Society in 1851 elected him President. As a practitioner he had no superior in the State, (b. 1807; d. June 23, 1865.) Dr. George Reeder, a native of Maryland, and a graduate of William and Mary College, Va., was a successful practitioner of medicine at Muscatine. He was one of the founders of the State Medical Society, and its President in 1854. The following also deserve mention; Drs. Ezra T. Fountain and G. W. Richards. Kentucky.2—Dr. Benjamin W. Dudley, a native of Virginia, was an eminent surgeon and teacher at Lexington, After graduating, he spent four years' in Europe perfecting himself in his professional studies. In 1817 he was elected Professor of Anatomy and Surgery in Transyl- 1 lowa was admitted into the Union in 1846. It was a part of the Louisiana purchase of 1803. Us earliest settlements were by the French. In 1870 it had a population of 1,194,320, with about one in ten of the population living in cities and towns of over five thousand inhabitants. It had at that time 1865 physicians. It has a rich and productive soil, and is rapidly increasing in wealth and population. Two medical colleges are giving instruction. A State Medical Society was founded in 1850, and publishes an annual volume of Transactions. Institutions sufficient for the care of the insane and other unfortunates have been established. The following medical journal has been published in lowa : lowa Medical Journal, 1855. 2 Kentucky was admitted to the Union in 1792. The first account we have of this region was by Dr. Thomas Walker, of Virginia, who visited it in 1745, and again in 1750. Dr. John Connolly had made location of a tract of land at the falls of the Ohio as early as 1770. The earliest emigrations to Kentucky were under Daniel Boone, who made a settlement at Harrodsburgh in 1774. The soil is very rich and productive; wealth and population are rapidly flowing in. The population in 1870 was 1,321,011, with about one in seven of her people living in cities and towns of over five thousand inhabitants. She had then 2414 physicians. Four medical colleges are now giving instruction in the State, and a State Medical Society, formed in 1851, publishes Transactions annually. Institutions for the care of unfortunates, demanded by enlightened humanity, have been established. The following medical journals have been published : American Medical News, 1876 ; American Medical Weekly, 1874; American Practitioner, 1869; Kentucky Medical Re- corder, 1853; Louisville Journal of Medicine and Surgery, 1838; Louisville Medical Jour- nal, 1860; Louisville Medical Gazette, 1859 ; Louisville Review, 1856; Richmond and Louisville Medical Journal, 1868; Transylvania Medical Journal, 1849; Transylvania Journal of Medicine and Science, 1828; Western Journal of Medicine and Surgery, 1840 Western Lancet, 1842; Western and Southern Medical Recorder, 1841. ADDRESS ON MEDICAL BIOGRAPHY. 107 vania University. Through life he devoted himself strictly to the duties of his profession. He remained connected with Transylvania Univemi y till 1850, when he retired from practice, and lived in quiet on Ins harm. He was a bold surgeon and successful operator. He performed lithotomy 225 times, and did not lose a patient until after he had operated more than 100 times. He had a genius for originating new operations and devices. He contributed many articles of great value to medical journals, duetty on surgery, but wrote no large work. (b. 1/85 ; d. Jan. 20, 18/0.) Hr. Charles W. Short, of Lexington, was a learned botanist, and an accom- plished ph vsician and teacher. He held the chair of Botany and Materia Medica in the Transylvania University. He published but little. His best known writings are his contributions to the Flora of Kentucky, in. Ephraim McDowell, a native of Virginia, originated the surgical opera- tion of ovariotomy, which at first was severely condemned but which is fully justified by the success attending the proceeding, (b. November li, 1771 •' d. July 25 1830.) Dr. Henry Miller, a native of Kentuckywas an obstetrician, writer, and teacher of ability. In 1835 he was appointed to the chair of Obstetrics in the Medical Institute at Louisville. He was the first physician in the West to use the speculum, and to practise local applications in diseases of the uterus. He was in many respects one ot the most original and skilful physicians that Kentucky has produced, (b. Nov. 1 1800; d. Feb. 8, 1874.) Dr. Samuel Brown, a native ot Vir- ginia, introduced vaccination in Lexington, as early as 1802. He was a man of decided ability, but exhibited a restless disposition removing to Hew Orleans, then to Natchez, Miss., then to Huntsville, Ala and finally returning to Lexington. He held the chair of Theory and F rac- Lce in Transylvania University. He was very entertaining as a lecturer. Contributions from his pen were published by the American Philosophica Society, and in the New York Medical Repository and other medical journals. As early as 1820 he suggested the formation ot an American ■Medical Association, (b. Jan. 80, 1769; d. July 12, 183 .) _ Dr. James Bush, of Lexington, filled with ability the chair °f Sur ery m Transylvania University from 1839 to the time of his death, (b. 1808, J. Feb. 9, 1875.) Dr. Wra. H. Richardson was a physician ot high cul- ture, and Professor of Obstetrics in the Transylvania University, tie was a man of superior education and address, and enjoyed a large prac- tice. Dr. Joshua Barker Flint, a native of Massachusetts practised tor s°me years in Boston, but removed to Louisville, where he held the cnaii °f Surgery in the Louisville Medical College from 1837 to ’ an ’ Horn this time to his death, the same chair in the Kentucky bchooi ot Medicine. In 1868 he published a work on Practice. He was the List surgeon in Kentucky who administered ether to produce insensibility lor surgical operations, which he did in 1847. Dr, Charles ac we A|as an eminent physician, author, and teacher. As early as 18 l J ie n e the chair of Natural History in the University of Pennsylvania. In IMS he was elected to the chair of Theory and Practice in the Tran- sylvania University, which he held till 1837. He was a ready and volu- minous writer. {b. May 14,1772; d. July 9,1853.) Dr. John Esten Cooke Was a physician, author, and teacher of ability, and practised with suc- cess in the Shenandoah Valley of Virginia, and assisted in establishing the Winchester school, before removing to Kentucky. In 1827 he was elected to the chair of Theory and Practice in the Transylvania Uni- versity. In connection with Prof. Short he founded the following } eai ‘ Ihe Transylvania Journal of Medicine.” In 1828 he published a woik 108 TONER, entitled “ Pathology and Therapeutics.” Dr. Lewis Rogers fairly won his high reputation by his intelligence and devotion to professional duties. From 1849 he filled a chair in the University of Louisville. He was President of the State Medical Society in 1873, and gave in his opening address an admirable history of medicine in Kentucky, (b. Oct. 12, 1812; d. June 17, 1875.) Hr, J. H. Jackson, of Danville, was, for his age, one of the most accomplished physicians and surgeons of Kentucky. He originated the movement for the erection of a monument to Ephraim McDowell. He performed with success many capital operations, includ- ing ovariotomy and tracheotomy, (b. Dec. 12,1834; d. Feb. 8,1874.) Beside the physicians named, I will mention Drs. Joseph Buchanan, Daniel L. Metcalf, Ethelbert L. Dudley, Robert Breckenridge, W. A. McDowell, James Fishback, Elisha 'Warfield, T. L. McLary, Walter Brashiers, Charles McCreary, and Frederick Ridgley. Louisiana.I—Dr. Rouanet w7as a native of France, but in 1844 settled in Hew Orleans, where he soon acquired a leading position in the profes- sion. He won high encomiums for his studies of the diseases of the heart in Paris, and contributed a number of papers to the French Academy on the physiological and pathological sounds of the heart. In Hew Orleans he gave office instruction to medical men and advanced students, but was not a teacher in any medical college. His practice for years was large and responsible, and he was recognized by the profession every- where as a leading authority on diseases of the heart, (d. 1865.) Dr. Warren Stone, a native of Vermont, settled in Hew Orleans in 1832, and rapidly acquired business and professional reputation. In 1836 he was chosen to lecture on Anatomy in the University of Louisiana, and in 1837 was elected Professor of Anatomy and Surgery, continuing to hold this chair until he resigned in 1872. Throughout the South he was without a rival as a surgeon. In 1870 he was Vice-President of the American Medical Association, (b. 1808 ; d. Dec. 6,1872.) Dr. John Hoffman Har- rison, a native of Washington, D.C., was surgeon to Charity Hospital from 1833 to 1836. He originated and edited the Hew Orleans Medical and Surgical Journal. He contributed a number of papers on yellow fever, and wrote a work on the Hervous System, (b. Aug. 30,1808 ; d. March 19,1849.) Dr. Thomas Hunt, a native of South Carolina, settled in Hew Orleans in 1833. He was one of the founders of the Louisiana Medical College, was popular as a teacher, and a good writer. He was esteemed ' Louisiana was admitted to the Union in 1812. Settlements were made at Biloxi as early as 1699, but the earliest successful settlement was at New Orleans in 1712. Louisiana was purchased by the United States from France in 1803. It included all the territory west of the Mississippi, east of Mexico, and south of the British possessions. In 1810 the United States Census gave a population of 76,576. The population in 1870 was 726,915, with about one-fourth of her people living in cities and towns of over five thousand inhabitants. There were at this time 936 physicians. The soil of the State is alluvial and exceedingly rich, but much of it is rendered unfit for cultivation by overflow, checking agricultural production and the increase of population. The situation of New Orleans, at the mouth of the largest river in the world, gives it great commercial impor- tance. A large and well-conducted hospital, known as “ Charity Hospital,” was rebuilt in 1815. Two medical colleges are now giving instruction. For many years a State Board of Health, having also cognizance of the health of the city of New Orleans, has existed, which reports to the Legislature and publishes a volume of Transactions annually. There is no State medical society, though medical organizations exist in the large cities. The following medical journals have been published : New Orleans Journal of Medicine, 1868; New Orleans Medical Journal, 1844; New Orleans Medical News and Hospital Gazette, 1854; New Orleans Medical Record, 1866; New Orleans Medical and Surgical Journal, 1844; New Orleans Medical Times, 1861; New Orleans Monthly Medical Regis- ter, 1851; Union Medicale de la Louisiane, 1852. ADDRESS ON MEDICAL BIOGRAPHY. 109 specially successful in the treatment of yellow fever, (b. May 18, 1808 , d. March 20, 1867.) Dr. Edward Barton, a native of Virginia, practised with success in Hew Orleans. He filled the chair of Materia Medica and Therapeutics in the University of Louisiana from 1835 to 1840. Ilis writings on Meteorology, on Hygiene, and on Yellow lever, show much research and professional experience. In addition I will name Drs. John Leonard Riddell, the inventor of the binocular microscope, J. Jones, Win. M. Carpenter, Charles A. Luzenburg, and Frank Hawthorn. Maine.I—Dr. Stephen Cummings, of Portland, was a leading physi- cian in extensive practice as early as 1800, and continued actively en- gaged in his profession for over 50 years, (b. 1773 ; d. 1854.) Dr. James C. Bradbury, a native of Maine, settled in practice at Oldtown, and for 35 years enjoyed the confidence of the community. Although not a sur- geon, he performed such operations as became necessary in his practice, and on Oct. 11, 1851, amputated at the hip-joint with success. This was the fourth operation of the kind in America, (b. 1806 pd. Oct. 3, I860.) Dr. Amos Hourse, a native of Hew Hampshire, a physician of Belfast, Maine, and a surgeon of ability, although advanced in years, served hi the late war as surgeon of the 20th Maine He had been honored by the Presidency of the State Medical Society. Dr. Job Holmes, a native of Maine, settled in Paris, where he enjoy ed a Luge practice. In a few vears he removed to Calais, where he passed the remainder of his life "in the active duties of his profession. _ Dr. Hosea Rich, a native of Massachusetts, was a practitioner of note in Langoi. His professional career began as early as 1805, and was continued till 1865. During the war of "1812, he was the surgeon of the 4th Maine Regiment. I will also name Dr. James Parker, who was a physician of ability, and in active practice for over 50 years. He served two teims in Congress. . Maryland.2—Dr. John Beale Davidge was a fine classical scholai and an extensive reader of the early masters in medicine. As early as 1/98, he published an essay on autumnal and intermittent fevers. He was Conspicuous and influential in the founding of the Medical Department 1 Maine was admitted into the Union in 1820. From its settlement, in 1607, it was a part of Massachusetts, and remained under her control till admitted as an independent State. The population in 1870 was 626,915, about one-third of the people living m cities and towns of over five thousand inhabitants. The number of physicians was 818. °ne medical college, a department of Bowdoin College, is giving instruction, there is a State Medical Society, formed in 1834, that publishes Transactions annually. Institutions Ci' the care of unfortunates have been founded, sufficient for the wants of the people. The following medical journals have been published in Maine ; Journal ot the Medical Society of Maine, 1834: Maine Medical and Surgical Reporter, 1858. . rr 2 Maryland is one of the thirteen original States. Its earliest settlement was in 1634. He population in 1870 was 780,892, one-third of her people living in cities and towns °t over five thousand inhabitants. The number of physicians was 1251. Ihe State has great advantages for ocean commerce, owing to its situation on the Chesapeake Bay. it Is rapidly increasing in wealth and population. There are three medical colleges giving instruction. Institutions for the relief of the insane and other unfortunates, have been established. There are also a State Medical Society, formed in liB9undei the name of the Medical and Ohirurgical Faculty of Maryland, and a State Board ot Health. Ihe following medical journals have been published in Maryland. Baltimore Journal of Medicine, 1861; Baltimore Medical Journal, 1870; Baltimore Medical and Philo- sophical Lyceum, 1811; Baltimore Medical and Physical Recorder, 1808 ; Baltimore Medical and Surgical Journal, 1833; Baltimore Monthly Journal of Medicine and Sur- -Bery, 1830; Baltimore Philosophical Journal and Review, 1823; Baltimore Physician ami Surgeon, 1872 ; Maryland Medical Recorder, 1829; Medical Bulletin, 1868; North American Archives of Medical and Surgical Science, 1834; Vaccine Inquirer, 1822. TONER, of the University of Maryland. In 1813, he published a new classifica- tion and nomenclature of diseases, in Latin. From 1814 to 1816, he published a work in parts, entitled “Physical Sketches,” and was a con- tributor to Medical Journals, (d. 1829, set. 60.) Dr. Horatio Jameson, of Baltimore, was a native of Maryland, and Professor of Surgery in the University of Maryland. In 1829 he started and edited with ability the Maryland Medical Recorder, which he continued until 1882. One of his best known works is on cholera. He published a pamphlet on the parts concerned in lithotomy. He was fond of the study oi the natural sciences, and was a good geologist. In 1880, he attended a meet- ing of naturalists and physicians, in Hamburg, Germany. Dr. Hathaniel Potter was one of the original founders of, and filled for over thirty years, with distinguished ability, a chair in, the University of Maryland. His writings show much erudition as well as original observation. In 1805, he published a paper on the medical and deleterious properties of arsenic. The best known work from his pen is one on contagion and yellow fever, published in 1817. (b. 1770; d. July 2, 1843.) Dr. Iris- tram Thomas was a physician of large practice and great influence, on the Eastern Shore of Maryland. He was actively engaged in practice for over 50 years, and was an ardent lover of his profession, studious and observing, and an occasional contributor to the medical journals. _ His best known paper was one on Bilious and Remittent Fevers, which is referred to favorably in Eberle’s Practice, (b. Dec. 25, 1769 ; d. Aug. 5, 1847.) Drs. John and Thomas H. Buckler, brothers, were men of fine intellect, and good practitioners. For many years, they held the very front rank as skilful and able physicians. Dr. Philip Thomas, a native of Maryland, practised in Frederick, from 1769 to 1815. He attended the second course of lectures delivered in Philadelphia, under Morgan and Shippen. He was a good scholar, a man of correct habits, and of large influence in the profession of the State, (b. June 11, 1747 ;d. April 25, 1815.) Dr. John Archer, a native of Maryland, was noted as having introduced the use of senega in croup, and enjoyed the distinction of having been the first personJhat received a diploma from an American Medical College, which he did in Philadelphia, in 1768. He served in the State Legisla- ture, and as a member of Congress, from 1801 to 1807. I will also men- tion Drs. Charles Frick, Samuel Baker, Frederick Dorsey, Ennals Martin, Miles Littlejohn, John Tyler, the two Murrays, of Annapolis, Samuel K. Jennings, John Baltzell, Gustavus Brown, Elisha Butts, and R. S. Stewart. Massachusetts.I—Dr.1—Dr. Edward Augustus Holyoke, a native of Massa- 1 Massachusetts was one of the thirteen original States, and the first to raise troops and to inaugurate the measures that led to armed resistance to the claims of Great Britain, and to American Independence. Settlements were made in her territory as early as 1620. She soon after began a system of public education, which has been developed and adopted in all the States. Her population in 1870 was 1,457,351, nearly one-half of her people living in cities of over five thousand inhabitants. She had 2047 physicians. One medical col- lege, a department of Harvard University, has existed since 1782. Institutions on the most approved plans, for the care of unfortunates of all classes, have been established on a liberal scale. A State Medical Society, formed in 1781, publishes Transactions, and a sys- tematic registration of vital statistics has been in successful operation for many years. The following- medical journals have been published in Massachusetts: Berkshire Medical Journal, 1861; Boston Journal of Chemistry, 1866 ; Boston Medical Intelligencer, 1823 ; Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, 1828 ; Journal of the Gynaecological Society, 1869; Medical and Agricultural Register, 1806; Medical Magazine, 1832; Monthly Journal of Medical Literature, 1832 ; New England Journal of Medicine and Surgery and Collateral Sciences, 1812; Worcester Journal of Medicine, 1845. ADDRESS ON MEDICAL BIOGRAPHY. chusetts, was a man of learning and accurate observation, and an indus- trious and skilful practitioner. He died at the age ot 100 years and b months. He was one of the principal founders of the Massachusetts Medical Society, and its first President. He published Astronomical observations, and articles in the Transactions of the Massachusetts Medical Society, and in the Hew York Medical Repository, (b. Aug. ; , 1728 (0. S.); d. 1829.) Dr. James Lloyd was the first surgeon in America to use ligatures, instead of searing wounds with the actual cautery, and to use the double flap in amputation. PR also peitoimed lithotomy. For nearly 60 years, he was the great physician and surgeon of Hew Enoland. He was a warm advocate of inoculation for the small- pox. (b. April, 1728; d. March, 1810.) Dr. John Warren acquired much reputation as a hospital surgeon in the Revolutionary army. He was the head of a family of eminent physicians and surgeons of Massachusetts, and the brother of the patriot, Dr. and Gen. Joseph Warren. Dr. War- ren was the earliest systematic teacher of Anatomy in Massachusetts, and the founder of the Medical Department of Harvard University, in which he held a chair up to the time of his death. He was President ot the Massachusetts Medical Society, and a member of nearly all the learned societies of his time. He published observations on the Meicunal practice,” and contributed articles to the Transactions of the Massachu- setts Medical Society, and of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, (b. July 27,1758; d. April 4, 1815.) Dr. J. Collins Warren, his son, was not inferior to his father. He was the first surgeon to use ether as an anaesthetic in surgical operations, and aided much to promote its use. He was also an author and teacher ot great ability, (b. Aug. 1,1778 , c. May 4,1815.) Dr. Benjamin Waterhouse, a native of Rhode Island, was, in 1799, the introducer of vaccination in America. He was a zealous and able defender of the practice of vaccination, and published two works upon the subject. He held the chair of Theory and Practice ot Medicine, in Harvard College, from 1783 to 1812. Pie was a man ot very active intellect and varied information, fond of study, and a voluminous writer. (b. March 4,1754; d. Oct. 2, 1846.) . Dr. James Jackson, a native of Massachusetts, commenced practice in the year 1800. In 1810, with Warren and others, he initiated measuies which led to the establishment of the McLean Asylum for the Insane, and also for the founding of the Massachusetts General Hospital, lie was physician to the latter institution until 1835. In 1810, he was ap- pointed clinical lecturer to Harvard College, and in 1812, to the chair ot Theory and Practice. His contributions to the literature ot medicine were numerous and valuable, (b. Oct. 3, 1777 ;d. Aug. 26, 1867.) i. John Ware, a native of Massachusetts, was from 1832 to 1858 1 rotessor of Theory and Practice in Harvard College. He was a most admirable teacher, a close reasouer and original observer, and a beautiful and cor- rect writer, (b. Aug. 1, 1778 ; d. May 4, 1854.) Dr. James lhacher, a native of Massachusetts, settled in practice in Plymouth, after having served as a surgeon in the Revolutionary army. During his military bfe, he kept a journal, which he subsequently published, and which has become a most valuable contribution to the history ot the times. He was the author of the work entitled u The Hew Dispensatory, and of a number of other publications. Plis best known work is entitled “Ame- rican Medical Biography,” and is a great storehouse tor intorrnation per- taining to the early profession in America, (b. 1754 ; d. May 24,1844.) Ph'. Elisha Bartlett, a native of Rhode Island, was a leading physician, 112 TONEE, and the first Mayor of the city of Lowell. He was a close student and fine classical scholar. He was a sufferer from lead poisoning, but held professorships in quite a number of colleges. Although he wrote numer- ous works, his most popular one is on the fevers of the United States, pub- lished in 1842. (b. 1805 ;d. 1855.) Hr. Luther Y. Bell, a native of Hew Hampshire, gained the Boylston Prize when about 30 years of age. By his ability in the treatment of the insane, he attracted the special atten- tion of his contemporaries, and was placed in charge of the McLean Asy- lum, which continued under his control from 1837 to 1856. In 1857, he was President of the Massachusetts Medical Society. He wrote on many subjects of interest to the medical profession. During the late war, he went out as a surgeon and lost his life in the service of his country, (b. Dec. 1806 ; d. 1862.) The following also deserve mention; Drs. John Brooks, Jeffries Wyman, H. H. Childs, A. A. Gould, George Hayward, Oliver Prescott, Lemuel Danforth, S. G. Howe, G. Darby, A. L. Peirson, C. T. Jackson, T. W. Harris, Enoch Hale, Winslow Lewis, and AY. T. G. Morton, dentist and discoverer of the use of ether as an anaesthetic. Michigan.l—Dr. Zina Pitcher, a native of Hew York, entered the army in 1822 as an assistant surgeon ; was promoted to be full surgeon in 1832, and resigned in 1886, when he settled in Detroit. He was not only a good physician and surgeon, but an energetic and successful business man. He was mayor of the city, a faithful and intelligent manager of the school fund, and one of the founders of the State Insane Asylum. In 1856 he was honored with the presidency of the American Medical Association, (b. April 12, 1797; d. April 5, 1872.) Dr. Richard Inglis was a good classical scholar, full of information and energy, cheerful in the sick-room, and an agreeable companion in society. With the profession of the State he was exceedingly popular, and in 1869 was elected Presi- dent of the State Medical Society. Mention should also be made of Drs. E. M. Clark and Porter, of Detroit; Robinson, of Palmyra; Robert Clark, of Monroe; Isaac C. Paddock, of Pontiac, and Denton and Brig- ham, of Ann Arbor. Minnesota.2—Dr. Samuel Willey, a native of Massachusetts, after 1 Michigan was admitted as a State in the Union in 1837. The earliest settlements within her territory were by the French, in the vicinity of Detroit, in the latter part of the seventeenth century. The lands are generally good and heavily timbered. The population as given by the census in 1870 was 1,187,234, about one-sixth of the people residing in towns and cities of over five thousand inhabitants. The same authority gives the number of physicians as 1034. Population and wealth have rapidly flowed into this State. From land grants by the United States a large educational fund has been established both for general education and colleges of a high grade. There are two medical colleges, a State Medical Society, formed in 1819, and publishing Transactions, and an efficient State Board of Health. The following medical journals have been published in Michigan : Detroit Review of Medicine and Pharmacy, 1866; Michigan University Medical Journal, 1870 ; Peninsular Independent Medical Journal, 1858; Peninsular Journal of Medicine, 1873; Peninsular Journal of Medicine and Collateral Sciences, 1858. 2 Minnesota was a part of the Louisiana purchase. This region was visited as early as 1650, the French having had posts in different parts along the Lakes. The United States government established, in 1819, a military post*at Fort Smelling. In 1845 settlements began to be made, and immigration set in actively, and in 1859 a territorial form of gov- ernment was organized. In 1853 Minnesota was admitted into the Union. The population as given by the United States Census of 1870 was 446,056, with about one-tenth living in towns of over five thousand inhabitants. There were then in the State 402 physicians. The population and wealth of Minnesota are steadily increasing. The State is fertile and well timbered, and is well situated as to commercial lines, by lakes, rivers, and railroads. A ADDRESS ON MEDICAL BIOGRAPHY. 113 graduating; was for two years assistant physician in the State [Lunatic Asylum, at Columhus, Ohio. In 1852 he settled in practice in St. Paul, and soon acquired a full business. In the tall of 1862 he was appointed pension surgeon and medical reteree for the State. Ihe organization of the State Medical Society was largely due to his efforts, as was that of the State Board of Health. He was twice elected president of the State Society, and in 1870 was one of the Vice-Presidents of the American Medical Association, (b, 1828; d. Nov. 21, 1872.) Hr. E. Herman Smith, a native of Connecticut, after serving a year as surgeon on the French steamer u Arugo,” settled at St. Paul, and soon acquiied a tail business. He was accurate in diagnosis, and an expert in the use of the microscope. Hr. H. C. Hand, a native of New Jersey, settled in St. Paul in 1871, and formed a business relation with his brother, Hr. H. W. Hand, then in practice in that place. In 1872 he became editor and publisher of the Northwestern Medical and Surgical Journal, which he conducted with ability. He was one of the physicians to the St. Paul’s City Hospital, (b. March 17, 1849; d. March 2, 1876.) Hr. Josiah S. Weiser, a native of Pennsylvania, located in 1855 at Shakopee, a settle- inent chiefly made up of Germans. He was induced to join Gen. Sib- ley’s military expedition, as surgeon, in June, 1868, and was murdered by the Indians while holding a parley with them. The following de- serve mention: Hrs. N. B. Hill, A. E. Ames, J. K. Reiuei, J. C. Jones, J. H. Ford, L. B. Smith, and G. T. Turner. Mississippi.l—Hr. Samuel A. Cartwright, a native of Virginia, settled at Natchez, Miss.,and was particularly successful in the treatment of fever and of cholera, during the epidemic of 1832. He wrote a number ot valuable papers, (b. Nov. 30, 1793; d. May 3,1863.) Hr. Erasmus H. Fenner, a native of North Carolina, settled in 1832 at Clinton, where his ability obtained for him a good practice. In 1840 he removed to New Orleans, and in 1844, in connection with Hr. A. Heister, estab- lished the New Orleans Medical Journal. He was one ot the original members of the American Medical Association, and a Professor in the New Orleans School of Medicine. In 1849 he commenced the publi- cation of the Southern Medical Reports, which extended to two volumes. He also edited the New Orleans Medical News and Hos- pital Gazette, (b. 1807; d. May 4, 1866.) Hr. Allen Gillespie, a native of Tennessee, after graduating in medicine, served as an as- sistant surgeon in the army of the Southwest. In 1824 he removed to Mississippi and in 1834 settled at Granada, where he spent his hte in the active duties of his profession. He possessed in a high degree the qualities that go to make the successful physician. It is claimed that to him is due the credit of introducing the practice of giving large doses of quinia as an anti-pyretic in miasmatic fevers. Alter treating fevers in State Medical Society, organized in 1855, publishes Transactions, and a State Board of Health is also in successful operation. , ~ ... , the following medical journal has been published in Minnesota: Northwestern Medical and Surgical Journal, 1870. , . 1 Mississippi was admitted into the Union in 1817, having been erected into a territory with Alabama in 1798. It had been visited by De Soto in 1540, and by La Salle in 1682, but the first successful settlement by Europeans was at Natchez, in ld6, under Bienville. According to the United States Census in 1870 the population was 82 <,922, about one-tenth of the people living in cities of over five thousand inhabitants. There were at the same Bme 1511 physicians. The lands are generally low, alluvial, and subject along the water- courses to overflow. A State Medical Association, organized in 1856, publishes Transac- tions annually, and institutions for the care of unfortunates have been established. 8 114 TONEE, this way for years, he made his views public in 1835. The use of quinia in large doses has been recommended by others, but only during the remission, (b. Aug. 18, 1801; d. 1869.) In addition to the above- named, I will mention Drs. Samuel B. Malone and Elvis McCrory. Missouri.I—Dr. Win. Beaumont, a native of Connecticut, entered the army as assistant surgeon in July, 1812, and resigned in 1839, and settled in the city of St. Louis. In 1825, while stationed at the military post Michilimackinac, he met the Canadian, St. Martin, who had received a wound which left an opening into the stomach, exposing in a measure the operation of that organ. The Doctor made a series of experiments upon the process of digestion, which he published in 1838. This is one of the most complete series of observations ever made on the living stomach, (b. 1785; d. April 25,1853.) Dr. Charles A. Pope, a native of Alabama, settled in St. Louis in 1841. He was studious, energetic, and ambitious in his profession, and soon acquired a leading practice. lie was elected to the chair of Anatomy and then to that of Surgery in the St. Louis University. His preference in practice was for surgery, and in this he was very successful. He was a fluent lecturer, and familiar with the history of the various surgical operations and procedures. He was surgeon to the St. Louis City Hospital. He identified himself with all movements calculated to advance the medical profession, and was Presi- dent of the American Medical Association in 1854. (b. March 15, 1818 ; d. July 6, 1872.) Dr. M. L. Linton, a native of Kentucky, set- tled in practice in St. Louis in f842. He was elected to the chair of Obstetrics in the St. Louis Medical College, and in 1844, was trans- ferred to the chair of Theory and Practice. In 1843 he founded and edited the St. Louis Medical and Surgical Journal, the first medical periodical published west of the Mississippi Kiver. He possessed high intellectual endowments and scientific culture, and wrote well, and on a great variety of subjects-—medical, literary, religious, and scientific. He was a member of the Academy of Sciences, and contributed many papers to it. He had an extensive practice, and was widely known in the Southwest, (b. 1808; cl. June 1,1872.) Dr. B. F. Shumard, a native of Pennsylvania, commenced to practise in Kentucky, but became con- nected with one of the U. S. Government Pacific R. R. surveys and explorations. His scientific acquirements led him to be much em- ployed in such pursuits. He removed to St. Louis in 1853. In 1860 he was engaged in a geological survey of the State of Texas, which was interrupted by the war, when he returned to St. Louis, and re- sumed the duties of his profession. He was elected to the chair of Obstetrics in the University of Missouri. He was President of the Academy of Sciences at the time of his death, (b. Kov. 24, f820; 1 Missouri, a part of the Louisiana purchase of 1803, was admitted as a State in the Union in 1821. Us earliest settlers were the French, who built a fort on the present site of the city of St. Louis as early as 1719. Another point of early settlement was at St. Genevieve. The population of Missouri in 1870 was 1,721,295, about one-fifth of the people living in towns and cities of over five thousand inhabitants. There were then in the State 3560 physicians. Missouri has a large school fund, and a successful system of free schools. There are four medical colleges. A State Medical Society, formed in 1850, publishes Transactions. Institutions for the care of unfortunates, sufficient for the wants of the people, have been established. The following medical journals have been published in Missouri; Humboldt Medical Archives, 1867; Kansas City Medical Journal, 1871 ; Kansas City Medical and Surgical Review, 1860; St. Joseph Journal of Medicine and Surgery, 1859; St. Louis Medical Reporter, 1866; St. Louis Medical, and Surgical Journal, 1845; St. Louis Probe, 1850. ADDRESS ON MEDICAL BIOGRAPHY. 115 d. April 14, 1868.) Dr. Lewis F. Linn, a native of Kentucky, settled in Genevieve in 1819. He served in the war of 1812, and after this took an active part in public affairs. He was a liuent and eloquent speaker. In 1827 he was elected to the Legislature, and in 1833 to the U. b. Senate, which office he held to the time of his death, (b. 1t95 ;d. 1843.) I will also mention Dr. John H. Watters, of St. Louis, who was one of the earliest to write upon the theory of the Correlation and Conserva- tion of Forces, Drs. J. H. McDowell, John A. Chambers, and John Edwards. Hew Hampshire.I—Dr. Nathan Smith, a native of Massachusetts, first practised in Cornish, Hew Hampshire. He suggested the establishment of a Medical Department in connection with Dartmouth College, and in 1797 gave there a course of lectures. In 1798 he was appointed Professor in the Medical Department. He tauglE all the branches, and furnished all the apparatus needed in teaching until 1810, when he was joined by another professor. In a few years, by his genius and indomitable perse- verance, fair classes attended this institution. In 1813 he was invited to the chair of Surgery in Yale College, which he accepted. He continued, however, to lecture at Dartmouth, at the Vermont University, and at Bowdoin College. His reputation as a surgeon had by this time become national. The credit of having first pointed out that dislocations ot the hip and other joints should be reduced by manipulation, is due to Dr. Smith. In 1824 he published a particularly valuable essay on typhoid fever, in which he made a distinction between typhoid and malarial fevers, (b. 1762; d. 1829.) Dr. Amos Twitched, a native of Hew Hamp- shire, was a close observer, and an indefatigable student. It seems to be well authenticated that he was the first to place a ligature on the com- mon carotid artery, which he did six months before the occurrence of the case reported by Sir Astley Cooper. I can discover no publications of Dr. Twitched, but he was in the habit of taking part in the discussions of the Hew Hampshire Medical Society, (b. 1781; d. 1850.)_ Dr. Josiab Bartlett, a native of Massachusetts, commenced to practise in Kingston, H. H,, in 1750. His intelligence, high moral character, and ability, soon brought him a full share of professional business. From 1765 to the time of the Devolution he was annually chosen to the Legislature, and Was a Lieutenant-Colonel in the State militia. In 1775 he was elected to Congress, and in 1776 was the first on the roll call to vote for the Declara- tion of Independence. He served as a Justice ot the Supreme Court of the State, and was one of the originators and first President of the Hew Hampshire Medical Society, (b. 1729; d. 1795.) Dr. Ammi E. Cutter, a native of Maine, served as surgeon in the Revolutionary war, and part of the time was Physician General to the Middle Department of the array. After the war he settled at Ports- mouth, where he acquired a large practice, and was greatly esteemed throughout the State. For manv years he was president of the State Medical Society, (b. 1735; d. 1820.) Dr. Matthew Thornton was a mitive of Ireland, and settled at Londonderry. He was a surgeon in the expedition in 1745 against Louisburg. In 1775 he was president of 1 New Hampshire was one of the thirteen original States; its first settlement having been near Portsmouth, in 1623. Its population in 1870 was 318.300, nearly one-fifth living Hi cities and towns of over five thousand inhabitants. The number of physicians was 565. 1 hcre is a State Medical Society, formed in 1791, which publishes Transactions annually, ennsylvania is one of the thirteen original States, and was settled by the benevolent J Penn in 1682. This State took an active part in the measures that ushered in the struggle for American Independence, and was. during the war, the chief seat of Congress. '> her territory were fought several of the important battles of the Revolution. The popu- ■mon in 1870, according to the U. S. Census, was 3,522,050, nearly one-third living in towns 0 over five thousand inhabitants. The number of physicians at the same time was 4843. mre are three medical colleges, all in Philadelphia. There is a State Medical Society, °nned in 1848, which publishes a volume annually. Institutions for the insane and other unfortunates have been provided in different parts of the State. Pennsylvania has Irom 16 settlement of our country taken the lead in matters relating to medical publication and medical education, and, as a consequence, we find, as would be expected, a larger pro- P°inon than usual of eminent medical men resident within her borders. he following medical journals have been published : JEsculapian Register, 1824 ; Ame- ican Journal of the Medical Sciences, 1827; American Journal of Pharmacy, 1825 ; Ame- ican Library and Intelligencer, 1836 ; American Medical Intelligencer, 1837; American M r1; Reorder, 1818; Barrington & Haswell’s Medical Bulletin, 1849; Bulletin of rJ ieal Science, 1843; Cholera Gazette, 1832; Compendium of Medical Science, 1868; uspital Register, 1863; Journal of the Philadelphia College of Medicine, 1829; Medical annner, 1838; Medical Reporter. 1853; Medical Review and Analectic Journal, 1826; ami 1«a a.nc* SurfJcal Reporter, 1856; Medical Times, 1870; North American Medical 18‘Ar TJ?-?11' J°u.rnab 1826; Philadelphia Journal of Medicine and Physical Sciences, 18(U! 4.1 iDdelphia Medical Museum, 1805; Philadelphia Medical and Physical Journal, of J hiladelphia Medical and Surgical Journal, 1853; Philadelphia Monthly Journal 01 Medicine and Surgery, 1828. 124 TONER, in the Philadelphia College. In 1787 he was assigned to the chair of Theory and Practice. He possessed a remarkably ■well trained and observ- ing mind, and, in addition to his professional duties, took an active part in all public affairs. He was for many years physician to the Pennsylvania Hospital and other benevolent institutions. In the State convention he moved that the colony should express its sentiments on the subject of separation from the mother country. He was shortly afterwards elected to Congress, and signed the Declaration of Independence. His writings embrace many topics in medicine, and are everywhere characterized by originality and ability. His conduct through life as a citizen and phy- sician was such as to make him a marked man. (b. Dec. 24, 1745; d. April 19, 1813.) Dr. Philip Syng Physick, a native of Pennsylvania, commenced to practise in Philadelphia in 1793, after having spent a number of years in visiting the hospitals of Europe. This was the year of the great yellow fever epidemic in Philadelphia. Dr. Physick was placed in charge of Bush Hill Hospital, and discharged his duties with marked ability. In 1794 he was appointed one of the surgeons of the Pennsylvania Hospital, and from 1801 to 1816 he was one oflhe consult- ing surgeons of the Philadelphia Almshouse Infirmary. In 1815 he was appointed Professor of Surgery in the University of Pennsylvania, in which he afterwards filled the chair of Anatomy. In 1825 he was elected a member of the Royal Academy of Medicine of France, and in 1836 a member of the Royal Medical and Chirurgieal Society of London, (b. 1768 ; d. Dec. 15,1837.) Dr. John Morgan, a native of Pennsylvania, after serving as surgeon to the Militia in the French war in 1759, resigned in 1760, and went to Europe to further perfect his knowledge of medical science. He returned to Philadelphia in 1765, and was then perhaps the most learned physician in America. The same year he delivered an address at the commencement of the Philadelphia College, and the open- ing of the first medical college in America, established through his own and Dr. William Shippen’s influence, and in which he was appointed Professor of Theory and Practice. In 1775 Dr. Morgan was appointed Director General and Physician in Chief of the Hospital Department of the American Army, but political cabals and the exigencies of the times caused his removal in 1777. A report by Congress shows him to have been an efficient officer. In his thesis he proposed the theory that pus was formed by a secretory process. He was one of the founders of the American Philosophical Society, and a member of the Royal Philo- sophical Society of London, (b. 1735 ; d. Oct. 15, 1789.) Dr. Benjamin Smith Barton, a native of Pennsylvania, settled in practice in Ihiladelphia in 1/89. He was the same year appointed Professor of Natural History and Botany, and in 1813 Professor of Materia Medica in the University of Pennsylvania. He contributed papers to the American Philosophical Society, and in 1804, started the “Medical and Physical Journal.” He was an indefatigable worker, and all his writings were practical contributions to medicine, (b. Feb. 10, 1766; d. Dec. 19, 1815.) Dr. Caspar Wistar, a native of Penn- sylvania, commenced practice in Philadelphia in 1787. In 1789 he was elected Professor of Chemistry and Physiology in the University of Pennsylvania. In 1792 he was elected physician to the Philadelphia Dis- pensary, and to the Pennsylvania Hospital, and the same year was appointed Adjunct Professor of Anatomy, which position he filled until the time of his death. His abilities as a physician secured him a large practice, and assisted in popularizing the school. He was a member of ADDRESS ON MEDICAL BIOGRAPHY. 125 many learned societies, and President of the American Philosophical Society. His best known work is his “Anatomy,” in two volumes, the first of its kind contributed by an American, (b. Sept. 13,1761; d. July 22, 1818.) Dr. Win. P. Dewees, a native of Pennsylvania, commenced practice in the interior of the State, but removed to Philadelphia in 1793, He devoted his time chiefly to Obstetrics, but, his health failing in 1812, he retired to his farm at Phillipsburg, where he remained for five years, when, having recovered, he returned and resumed practice, which he continued with increasing popularity. In 1825 he was chosen assistant professor of Midwifery in the University of Pennsylvania, and in 1834 was elected to the full chair. But his health had gradually failed, and the following year he resigned and was elected emeritus professor, (b. May 5, 1768; d. May 20, 1841.) Dr. Nathaniel Chapman, a native of Virginia, commenced practice in Philadelphia in 1804. By his assiduity in professional duties, and by a fortunate marriage, he speedily acquired a large business. About this time he commenced a course of lectures on Obstetrics to medical students, and in 1808 associated himself with Professor James in a summer course of lectures. From 1813 to 1816 he was Professor of Materia Medica in the University of Pennsyl- vania, and from 1816 to 1850, Professor of Theory and Practice and of Clinical Medicine. In 1817 he founded the Medical Institute, and lectured in it during every summer for twenty-five years. He was Pre- sident of the American Philosophical Society from 1846 to 1848, and President of the American Medical Association in 1847. (b. May 28, HBO ; d. Jan. 1,1853.) Dr. Wm. E. Horner, a native of Virginia, having resigned his commission in the U. S. Navy, commenced practice in the eity of Philadelphia. His abilities soon attracted the attention of the leading physicians, and he shortly after received the appointment of Demonstrator of Anatorn}r in the University of Pennsylvania. In 1819 lie was made adjunct, and in 1831 full Professor of Anatomy. In 1824 he discovered the “Musculus Horneri,” which had escaped the observa- tion of previous anatomists. His whole life was a continuous struggle °1 mind and duty over physical suffering. In 1847 he founded St. Joseph’s Hospital, to which he bequeathed his library and instruments. About this time he published a treatise on Pathological Anatomy, which was shortly afterwards followed by other important publications, (b. Jan. 3, 1793; d. March 13, 1853.) Dr. John Iv. Mitchell, a native of Virginia, settled in practice in Phila- delphia in 1822, and soon acquired a large practice. After taking his medical degree he made three voyages to China as surgeon in a merchant ship. In 1824 he delivered a course of lectures on the Insti- tutes of Medicine and Pathology before the Philadelphia Institute, and m 1826 was appointed to the chair of Chemistry and Applied Arts in the I ranklin Institute. He was a ready writer, and frequently con- ributed to the medical journals. In 1841 he was elected to the chair 0 . |heory and Practice in Jefferson Medical College, a position he filled with rare ability till the time of his death. He was a gifted lecturer, mid occasionally introduced experiments with good effect, as he was an expert manipulator. His writings wTere numerous, and always contained important additions to medical knowledge, (b. March 12,1796; d. April •>1858.) Dr. George McClellan, a native of Connecticut, shortly after graduation commenced practice in the city of Philadelphia. In 1825, |. a *ew able associates, he founded the Jefferson Medical College, in mih he was a professor till 1838. In 1839 he organized the Medical 126 TONER, Department of Pennsylvania College, from which he retired in 1844, and devoted his time to private practice. He was a fluent and agree- able lecturer. For a time he edited a medical journal in connection with Dr, John Eberle, and was a frequent contributor to the columns of periodical medical literature, (b. Feb. 22, 1796; d. May 9, 1847.) Dr. Robley Dunglison, a native of Scotland, was invited to the United States in 1824, and elected Professor of Medicine in the University of Virginia, where he continued till 1833. From 1833 to 1836 he was Professor of Materia Medica and Therapeutics in the University of Maryland, and from 1836 to 1868 was Professor of the Institutes of Medicine and Medical Jurisprudence in the Jefferson Medical College. His Medical Dictionary is by far the most convenient work of the kind known to the profession, (b. June 4, 1798 ; d. April 1, 1869.) Dr. T. D. Miitter commenced prac- tice in Philadelphia about 1831, and shortly afterwards established a “ Quiz class,” and soon became a teacher of surgery in what was known as “Chapman’s Medical Institute.” He was made Adjunct Professor of Operative Surgery in Jefferson Medical College to assist Dr. Randolph, and on the resignation of the latter, was elected to the full chair of Surgery. It was in this field that he acquired his great reputation as a teacher and as an operator in rhinoplastic surgery. He has left an enduring monu- ment to his name in the establishment of the “Miitter lectureship” and the “ Miitter Museum” of the College of Physicians. Resides the names already given, I will mention Drs. William Shippen, Samuel Jackson, Franklin Bache, T. S. James, P. S. Dorsey, 11. L. Hodge, C. D. Meigs, J. 1). God man, Adam Kuhn, J. Redman Coxe, Robert Hare, Samuel G. Morton, Rene La Roche, W. Darlington, John S. Parry, Samuel Jackson (of Northumberland), Peter Mowry, Nathaniel Bedford, James Agnew, Joseph Gazzam, B. R. Reese, W. W. Gerhard, Jacob Randolph, David Gilbert, G. W Norris, Thomas T. Harrison, Joseph Parrish, Thomas Harris, and P. B. Goddard. Rhode Island.I—Dr. Isaac Senter, a native of New Hampshire, served as a surgeon in the Revolutionary war, and in 1779 settled in practice in Pawtucket. In 1780 he was appointed Surgeon and Physician-General to the State troops, and removed to Newport, where he passed the re- mainder of his life actively engaged in the practice of his profession. He contributed articles on medical subjects to the journals, and was an honorary member of the Massachusetts Medical Society, of the Medical Society of London, and of the College of Physicians of Philadelphia. He was for some years President of the Rhode Island State Medical Society, (b. 1735 ;d. Dec. 20,1799.) Dr, Pardon Bowen, a native of Rhode Island, served during the Revolutionary war as a surgeon on a privateer, and in 17<9 was taken prisoner, and after being exchanged re-entered the service. He settled in practice in his native town, and gradually acquired a large business. He was an active and efficient member of the Rhode Island State Medical Society, and for some years its president. He was also a member of the Board of Trustees of Brown University. His profes- 1 Isla«d k one of the thirteen original States. Its first settlement was in 1636 by ogei Williams, at the present site of Providence. Other settlements were soon made at Newport and at Warwick. The population in 1870, according to the United States Census, was 817,353. Nearly one-half of the people live in cities and towns of over five thousand inhabitants. Jhe number of physicians in 1870 was 260. One medical college, a depart- ment of Browni University, is giving instruction. Rhode Island has a State Medical Society, toimec m iolw, which publishes Transactions annually, and a good system of registration of vital statistics. Institutions for the care of the insane and other unfortunates have been established, sufficient for the wants of the people. ADDRESS ON MEDICAL BIOGRAPHY. 127 sional life extended to nearly half a century, (b. 1757; d. Oct. 25,1826.) Dr. Usher Parsons, a native of Maine, became on graduating a surgeon in the navy during the war of 1812, and was in the battle of Lake Erie. After ten years’ service he resigned, and settled in practice in Providence. He held a professorship in Brown, Jefferson, and other medical colleges, and was President of the Rhode Island Medical Society, and Vice-Presi- dent of the American Medical Association. He wrote a number of medical works, and took four Boylston prizes. He was an influential promoter of the establishment of the Rhode Island Hospital, and a most agreeable and witty writer, (b. Aug. 18, 1788; d. Dec. 19, 1868.) Hr. Solomon Hrowne, a native of Rhode Island, served as a surgeon’s mate in the Revolutionary war, and on the restoration of peace settled jn Providence. In 1788 he joined a party going to the new settlement in the West, at Marietta, on the Ohio River. He attended, during his last illness, General Varnum, one of the Ohio Land Company, and, at the request of the community, pronounced his funeral eulogy. He resided f°r a time at Morgantown, Va., and for seven years at Uniontown, Fay- ette County, Pa. Here he delivered four orations commemorative of American independence, and a eulogy on General Washington. In 1801 he returned to Providence and engaged in private practice. In 1811 he vras Professor of Materia Medica and Botany in Brown University. The Hhode Island Medical Society, in 1819, appointed him a delegate to the convention that formed the National Pharmacopoeia. He possessed a hue classical education, and was a beautiful writer and an interesting lecturer, (b. March 11,1753 ; d. Feb. 5,1834.) Hr. Wm. Bowen studied Medicine with his father, then a leading physician, and speedily acquired a large practice for himself. He avoided surgery, whenever practicable, and was deemed specially skilful in diseases of women and children. His instruction was much sought by pupils who were preparing to enter He medical profession. His reputation in the treatment of fevers was Unequalled by any physician in his section, (d. 1832, set. 86.) Hr. Caleb h iske, a native of Rhode Island, served as a surgeon in the Revolutionary then settled in practice in Scituate, and passed a long and successful Professional life, residing all the time in the house in which he had been corn. He was one of the original members of the Rhode Island Medical Society, and in 1823 its president. At one time lie was Judge of the Court of Common Pleas. He has perpetuated his name by endowing He Fiske fund for the promotion of medicine, (d. Sept. 1835, ret. 82.) 1° the names already mentioned I will add those of Hrs. Levi Wheaton, Joseph Mauran, L. L. Miller, and Havid King—the first to introduce vaccination in Rhode Island. South Carolina.I—Hr. James Moultrie, a native of South Carolina, p ! Carolina was one of the thirteen original States. ■ The first settlement was at 801B01 Royal by the English, in 1670. The government was a proprietary one till 1719, when ;°« 1 became a colony under the crown. During the Revolution the State was 61 y active, and suffered much from the depredations of the British troops. The popula- in°t' Ul A accor<3ing to the U. S. Census, was 705,606, with about one in thirteen living Th °WnS Cltles of over five thousand inhabitants. The number of physicians was 798. medical colleges, one at Charleston, and the other at Columbia. A State pul pi , ®ociety was formed in 1789, and a State Medical Association in 1848; the latter v,,,„ !Ues annually a volume of Transactions. Institutions for the care of unfortunates laPj been established. of m'G |'°l'owin? medical journals have been published in South Carolina: Carolina Journal 1848 mre’ ®urSe,T> anc* Agriculture, 1825; Charleston Medical Journal and Review, pi. ’ harleston Medical Journal and Review, 1873; Southern Journal of Medicine and haimacy, 1846. 128 TONER, commenced practice in Charleston in 1813, and was soon afterwards ap- pointed physician to the fort and jail. He took an active part in public health matters, and was soon recognized as the leading sanitarian of the city. In 1819 he was elected by the Medical Society of South Carolina a delegate to the first convention for forming the National Pharma- copoeia. In 1822, he, with other influential medical men, memorialized the Legislature for a charter to establish a medical college, which was granted in 1828. He was elected to a chair in the college, but declined. In 1832, however, he accepted the chair of Physiology, and here devel- oped the high powers of his well-stored and vigorous mind. He was President of the American Medical Association in 1851, and had pre- viously been President of the Medical Society of South Carolina, (b. 1793; d. 1869.) Hr, Tucker Harris, a native of South Carolina, commenced practice in Charleston in 1771, in partnership with his preceptor Dr. Lionel Chalmers, and served as a hospital surgeon in the Revolution. Immedi- ately after the restoration of peace, he resumed his practice. From 1783 to 1786 he had a business partnership with Dr. Oliphant. He was one of the earliest members, and an ardent friend, of the Medical Society of South Carolina, and from 1796 to 1799 was chosen its president, (b. 1747 ; d. July 6,1821, set. 74.) Dr. J. L. E. W. Shecut, a native of South Caro- lina, commenced practice in Charleston in 1791. He was attentive to business and a close student. In 1806 he exhibited an ingenious electrical machine of his own construction, and the same year published a work entitled “Flora Caroliniana.” His publications were quite numerous, (b. 1770; d. 1836.) Dr. Alexander Baron, a native of Scotland, settled in practice in the city of Charleston in 1769. His fund of general informa- tion was great, and his ability equal to any position in professional or civil life. He was one of the founders of the South Carolina Medical Society, and its vice-president in 1790. In 1770 he joined the St. An- drew’s Society, and was shortly after elected its president, an office which he held for twenty-eight years, (d. July 9,1819.) Dr. J. Edwards Holbrook, a native of South Carolina, established himself in Charleston in 1822. In 1824 he was elected Professor of Anatomy in the Medical College of South Carolina. He was universally recognized as a learned scientist, and as a popular and successful physician. He avoided sur- gery, and was particularly noted for his sympathy for suffering patients. He was a successful medical teacher, and particularly popular with his class. Although contributing valuable articles to medical journals, his greatest works, and those on which his reputation as an author will rest, are his “ American Herpetology” and “ The Fishes of South Carolina.” (b. Dec. 30, 1794; d. Sept. 8, 1871.) Dr. John Bellinger, a native of South Carolina, commenced practice in Charleston, where his eminent abilities soon carried him, through all difficulties, to a full recognition of his professional abilities. His high reputation pointed him out as a proper occupant for the chair of Surgery in the Charleston Medical College, to which he was elected. His skill in surgery was only equalled by his acuteness as a physician. He was a thorough pathologist, and, although a busy practitioner, kept pace with the progress of the profession, and with the latest and best literature, (d. Aug. 13, 1860, set. 56.) Dr. Samuel H, Dickson, the physician, author, and teacher, commenced practice in Charleston in 1820. In 1828 he delivered a course of lectures on Physiology and Pathology before a medical class. He was influential in the establishment of the medical college at Charleston, and, in 1824, ADDRESS ON MEDICAL BIOGRAPHY. 129 was called to the chair of Institutes and Practice of Medicine. He was Professor of the Practice of Medicine in the University of New York from 1847 to 1850, when he returned to Charleston ; but in 1858 was elected to the chair of Practice of Medicine in the Jefferson Medical College-at Philadelphia, which he held nearly to the time of his death. He contributed many able papers to medical journals, and wrote a work entitled “Manual of Pathology,” etc. (b. 1798; d. 18/2.) Dr. B. B. Simons was a native of South Carolina. In 1801 he commenced prac- tice in Charleston, and soon acquired business and reputation. His abilities were recognized by his appointment as Lecturer on Chemistry in the College of South Carolina. He was a thorough anatomist, and of rare skilllmd boldness in surgery, in which he acquired an extensive reputation and practice, (b. 1766; d. 1844.) Ur. Richard Evans Wylie, a native of Charleston, settled in 1882 in Lancaster Co., where he ac- quired distinction in his profession. He was a fine anatomist, and made many post-mortem examinations, and was a good pathologist. He was nf n pharitable and generous disposition, and was well versed in medical literature, (b. 1810; d. 1875.) Ur. Robert Wilson Gibbes was assistant and afterwards Professor of Chemistry, Geology, and Mineralogy in the South Carolina College, which position he filled with ability. He com- menced practice in Columbia, where he acquired a good professional business. He was for several years sent as a delegate to the American Medical Association, and was President of the Medical Society of South Carolina Uuring the late war he was Surgeon-General of the State troops, and was the originator of the “ wayside hospital system.” Ur Gibbes was an ardent student of the sciences, and the author of several valuable contributions to the Academy of Sciences'and to the Smithso- nian Institution. He was the author of Gibbes s History of South Caro- lina, and made a large collection of autographs, coins, and specimens in palaeontology, geology, etc., as also a collection of the fossils of South Carolina. ‘He was a member of the Royal Societies of England, Prance, Germany, and Uenmark. (b. 1809; d. 1866.) I will add the names of Ur. Uavid Ramsay, Ur. Geddings, and Ur. Peter Fayssoux. . . Tennessee.I—Ur.1—Ur. Win. H. Ueadrick, a native of Virginia, having acquired his professional education, settled in East Tennessee. His operation for the removal of the inferior maxillary bone, in 1816, and other capital operations performed at that early date, have won for nra an enduring name in the literature of the profession, (b. l/oo ; a. ro i.) 1 Tennessee was the first State west of the Alleghany Mountains, settled y from the colonies, anterior to the Revolutionary war the settiers were chiefly N Carolina, to which State the territory belonged. Fort Loudon, in West lennessee & It as early as 1757. An attempt was made to found a State out of this Jemtoxy d the name of “ Franklin,” but after three or four years’ trial the effort was abandoned was admitted as a State in the Union in 1796. It has no very laige uti • . I p ’ according to the census in 1870, was 1,158,520, with about one in fif was 2220 One over five thousand inhabitants. The number of physicians at that tune was 2220.. One medical college, organized in 1850 at Nashville, is well supported, and there is another a department of Vanderbilt University. The profession of the State has a Medical Society, formed in 1830, which publishes Transactions annually. Institutions foi the care of un- fortunates have been organized in different parts of the State, snfiicien oi ic wants of the The following Medical Journals have been published in Tennessee: Memphis Journal ot Medicine 1853; Memphis Medical Journal of the Progressive Medical and Physical Sciences ' 1851 • Memphis Medical Recorder, 1852; Nashville Journal of Medicine and Surgery," 1851; Nashville Medical Recorder, 1860 ; Record of Medicine and Surgery, 1802 ; Southern Journal of Medical and Physical Sciences, 1853. TONER Dr. Felix Robertson, a native of Tennessee, wrote, for graduation in 1805 a thesis entitled “ Chorea Sancti Viti,” giving in it a history of the dancino- “ann9la lch had exhibited itself in Tennessee, Kentucky, and Ohio about lie was well read in his profession, and possessed strong common sense and original powers of observation. He was twice Mayor of the city of Nashville, and a member of the Board of Trustees of the University • and through a long life maintained the dignity and charactei of an able physician, (b 1781; d. 1865.) Dr. Wilson Yandell, a native of North Carolina, settled in 1804 in Hartsville, Rutherford Co. He was a man ot mental vigor, untiring industry, and had a love for the acquisition of knowledge. His devotion to his profession rapidly advanced him to the trout rank of practitioners in the State. He received from the University of Maryland the honorary degree of M.D. in 1828. He was the imme- diate ancestor of the physicians of the same name in Kentuckv (b Dec 17, 11 /4; d. Oct. 1, 1827.) Dr. A. H. Buchanan, a native of Viro-inia commenced practice in East Tennessee, then removed to Columbia, and’ finally to Nashville where he became a professor in the Medical School on its organization He was a man of learning and high character, (b. 1808 ;d. June 20,1863.) Dr. John McClaran Watson, a native of North Carolina, settled in Murfreesboro, Tenn., but on the organization of the Medical Department of the University of Nashville, was induced to take the chair of Obstetrics and Diseases of Women and Children. He was a minister of the Gospel, as well as a successful practitioner, and a promoter of medical education (b. 1796; d. 1866.) Dr. A. P. Merrill, a native of Massachusetts served as a volunteer surgeon with General Jackson’s tlje ar. oi and 111 1819 was appointed surgeon in the U. b. Military service. In 1823 he resigned, and settled in practice at Natchez. In 1850 he removed to Memphis, Tenn., and assisted in organ- izing _ the Medical College at that place, taking the chair of Theory‘and I ractice. He originated and edited the Memphis Medical Recorder He was an able practitioner and an original writer,'his contributions to medical literature being varied and valuable, (b. April 1793- d. Nov 1873.) In addition to these I will name Drs.T. R. Jennings James Roane, AY. Walker, R. Porter, J. L. Armstrong, and Samuel How lexas.I—-Dr. Benjamin Briggs Goodrich, a native of Virginia, practised for some time after graduating in Alabama and Mississippi, finally locating in Washington, Texas. He was a member of the State Legis- lature, and on Texas resolving upon independence, was one of the signers of its (b. 1800; d. 1860.) Dr. Anson Jones, a native of Mas- sachusetts a patriot of Texas, commenced his career as a practitioner of medicine at Brazoria. He entered the Texan army as a surgeon, and was 1 exas until 1806 was a part of Mexico. In 1821, emigration to it from Hip llnitpd States became considerable. In 1830, it demanded admission to the Mexican confederation1 as a separate State, but being refused, declared its independence and'conauered in a con! test of arms, in 1836, maintaining its independence as a republic till it was admitted as one of the Tinted States, in 1846. Its area is the largest of any of the States There are no hntVh ♦“« {Vi]i r1’ naviSable nvers, and rich minerals. The five bv r ordlug t?Ithe U-,S- VeuSUS’ WaS 818’899> with about one in twenty. ln pWnl°- °Ver five thousaijd “habitants. At the same time there were 1906 located at P -Population increasing, and wealth accumulating. One medical college is and iton4,and 18 § instruction. A State Medical Society was formed in been estabfied168 Transactlons aunuallP Institutions for the care of unfortunates have lonrnllf°l18°rmingr medi.?lU'°Ura,S have beGn published in Texas : Galveston Medical Journal, 1866; lexas Medical Journal, 1873. cai ADDRESS ON MEDICAL BIOGRAPHY. 131 at the battle of San Jacinto. In 1837-8, he was a representative in the Texan Congress. In 1838, he was Minister to the United States, where he made an unsuccessful endeavor to secure the annexation of his country. On his return, he was made Senator from Brazoria to the Texan Congress. He was Secretary of State of Texas in 1841, and in September, 1844, was elected President of the Republic, and held this office up to the time of the annexation of Texas to the United States, (b. 1798; d. 1858.) Dr. Edward A. Pye, a native of Maryland, was a physician of eminence. He had a good practice at Hearne, in Robertson Co. When the yellow fever at Calvert had exhausted the medical men of that place, lie offered his services, which were gladly accepted by the authorities. But this heroic act cost him his life. He contracted the disease, and died. During the war, he served as surgeon at Beaumont, (b, July 9, 1818; d. Rov, 9, 1873.) Dr. John A. Pettus, a native of Virginia, settled at Port Bend, Texas, where he acquired a large practice. During the late war, he was Medical Director of the Corps of Surgeons of U, S. Volunteers. After the war, he returned to practice, and was elected Professor of Physiology and Medical Jurisprudence in the Galveston Medical College, (d. Sept. 26, 1870, aged 52.) Dr. E. L. Massie was a skilful and benevolent phy- sician of Houston. During the war, he served as a surgeon in the Con- federate army, and was afterwards Medical Purveyor of Texas. He was one of the leading physicians of Houston. I will name in addition, Drs. E. T. Bonney, Alva Connell, W. Riddell, George W. Peete, W. D. Rob- inson, Wm. Richardson, W. R. Smith, and Wm. McCraven. Vermont.I—Dr. Joseph Adams Gallup, a native of Connecticut, settled in practice at Woodstock, Vermont, in 1800. He possessed a vigorous niind, and was a close observer and correct reasoner. By skill in his pro- fession, and by force of character, he acquired a leading business. He was Professor in the Castleton Medical College, and in the Medical College of the University of Vermont. In 1827 lie founded the medical school of Woodstock. His best known writings are entitled “ Sketches on Epi- demic Diseases in Vermont,” published in 1815, and “Outlines of Insti- tutes of Medicine,” published subsequently, (b. Mar. 30, 1769; d. Oct. 12,1849.) Dr. Noadiah Swift, a native of New York, commenced practice in Burlington about 1802, and enjoyed a large practice for nearly fifty years. He was a man of great energy of character, and of correct habits, and possessed rare skill in his profession. His reputation extended far beyond the community in which he resided. He was elected at differ- ent times to the State Senate, (b. Nov. 24, 1776; d. Mar. 21, 1860.) Dr. Benjamin R. Palmer commenced practice in Woodstock, Vermont, where he acquired much popularity, and a good professional business. He possessed decided talents as a teacher of anatomy and physiology. He was elected to the chair of Anatomy in the Vermont Medical College, where he taught for many years with success. He also held the same 1 A ermont was settled by emigrants from Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and New York, each of which States claimed her territory. In 1791 Vermont was admitted as the first new member of the Union. The population in 1870, according to the United States Census, was 330,531. She has no large cities, and about one in twenty-three ot her popula- tion live in towns of over five thousand inhabitants. She had at the time mentioned 560 physicians. Vermont has one medical college, a department of the University of Burling- lou. A State Medical Society was organized in 1814, and publishes Transactions annually, Y registration of vital statistics has also been established. Institutions for the care of unfortunates have been founded, sufficient for the wants of the people. The following Medical Journal has been published in Vermont: Vermont Medical Journal, 1874. TONER, chair in the Berkshire Medical College of Massachusetts. His reputation as a teacher gained him the election to the chair ot Anatomy in the Louis- ville Medical College, when he removed to Kentucky, where he enjoyed an extensive practice up to the time of his death. Dr. Benjamin Chandler, a native of Connecticut, commenced practice in 1792 in Rutland, Vermont, where he acquired reputation, and whence he removed to St. Albans in 1807. As a successful operator in surgery, he had no equal in that section of the country. He was one of the founders of the Vermont State Medical Society, and of the Franklin County Medical Society, (b. 1772; d. 1818.) Dr. John Pomeroy, a native ot Massachusetts, was a physician of ability. He settled in Cambridge, Vermont, in 1787, and in 1792 removed to Bur- lington, where he remained actively engaged in practice for over torty years. He was a man of vigorous intellect, and was characterized by simplicity of manner, directness of purpose, and strong common sense. Although he could not claim superior education, he was an ardent supporter of it. He was a member of the Corporation of the University of Vermont, and a professor in the Medical Department, (b. April 9, 1764 ; d. Feb. 19, 1844.) Dr. Jonathan Adams Allen, a native of Massa- chusetts, commenced practice at Windham, in 1814. In 1820 he com- menced to give lectures on Chemistry, at Middlebury College, and con- tinued till 1826. In 1822 he removed to Middlebury, where he became extensively engaged as a physician. He was an active member of the State and County Medical Societies, (b. Nov. 17, 1787 ;d. Feb. 2,1848.) Dr. Horace Eaton, a native of Vermont, commenced practice in Enosburgh about 1824, and soon became popular as a physician. He was a man of great energy, and fully qualified in the duties of physician and surgeon. He was elected to the Legislature of the State, and was six years in the State Senate. He was also Lieutenant Governor and Governor ot the State for two years. He was greatly interested in education, and was for years State Superintendent ot Schools. In 1848 he was elected Pro- fessor of Natural History and Chemistry in Middlebury College, a posi- tion which he tilled with credit to himself and the Institution till the time of his death, (b. June 22, 1804; d. July 4, 1855.) To these names may be added those of Dr. Theodore V oodward, ot Castleton ; Dr. David Palmer, of Woodstock; Dr. Ezekiel Porter, of Rutland; the Drs. Tudor, of Middlebury, and Dr. Danforth. Virginia.I—Dr. Wm. Baynham, a native of Virginia, studied medi- cine with his father, and then with the celebrated Hunters of London. He was an excellent anatomist, and was held in high esteem by his London preceptors, and by Mr. Cline and Mr. Else. He made some deli- i Virginia was, in 1607, the seat of the first permanent settlement by the English in Ame- rica at Jamestown. Her first charter was annulled in 1677, and a new one, less liberal, granted. She took an early and decided stand in favor of American Independence. Her territory at that time was very large, and in 1781 she ceded the whole northwestern part to the U S government. In 1861 the western part of the State was formed into a separate State under the name of West Virginia. Her geographical position gives her great commer- cial advantages. The population of Virginia, according to the U. S. Census in IB