RESTRICTED WAR DEPARTMENT Report 834 EFFICIENCY OF STANDARD ARMY WATER PURIFICATION EQUIPMENT AND OF DIATOMITE FILTERS IN REMOVING CYSTS OF ENDAMOEBA HISTOLYTICA FROM WATER 3 July 1944- TECHNICAL STAFF THE ENGINEER BOARD Corps of Engineers, U. S. Army Fort Belvoir, Virginia RESTRICTED laiiHtr ItMii F*rt Btlvtir, li. Report G34 EFFICIENCY OF STANDARD ARMY WATER PURIFICATION EQUIPMENT AND OF DIATOM ITS FILTERS IN REMOVING- CYSTS OF ENDAMOEEA HISTOLYTICA FROM WATER Project WSS 34S 3 July 1944 Submitted to THE ENGINEER BOARD Fort Belvoir., Virginia and/or The Chief of Engineers U* So Army Washington* Do 0, FOR OFFICIAL ACTION *>y Water Supply Equipment Branoh Technical Division III The Engineer Board Fort Belvoir, Virginia and National institute of Health U* S. Public Health Service This document contains information affecting the national defense of the United States within the meaning of the Espionage Act,, 50 U. S« C.9 31 and 32, as amended. Its transmission or the revelation of its contents in any manner to an unauthorised person is prohibited by law. RESTRICTED TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Tltlft Pej^a SYLLABUS V I SUBJECT 1 I o So-opa I II AUTHORITY l 2. Authority ?. Ill INVESTIGATION 1 3, Introduction 1 4„ Equipment and Apparatus 2 5, Tasto 4 IV DISCUSSION 16 6? Cojactive 16 ?• Bo.o>; p ound 13 8« Tout's with Standojrd Equipae*- r. 13 9* with, pi *toai: ta Filters 24 Y 23 10c Conclusions 23 VI EEC EMENDATIONS 28 lla Recoinrr.enC afcions 28 Appendin A AUTHORITY 31 B TEST RESULTS DATA SHEETS 37 C SAND ANALYSIS 85 SYLLABUS 1. Scope* a* Introduoticnc This report covers a study of the re- moval of tlie cysts’ of "EndamoGba hictolybica from water by pressure type filtration# The work was conductoa~Tn cooperation with the National Institute of Health, United States Public Health Service# b# Equipment# The study treated herein was divided into two major phas'd si (1) Tests using the U# S# Army Portable Water Purifi* cation Unit, Model 1940, both with and without pretreatment of the raw water# (2) Tests using several types of diatomaceous silica filters inducing the U, Sc Army Portable Water Purification Unit converted for use with diatomaceous silica# 2* Results# The results of this study show that; a. The complete removal of cyr-is of Endamoeba histolytica is not accomplished with tno sand filter Array’portable Water Purification Unit when operated at flow rates practical for field use-, Jb# Sedimentation alone for short periods is not effective in removing cysts from water# c# The total number of cysts in a quantity of water is reduced by good coagulation and sedimentation« d. Pressure type filters using any of the diatomaceous silica filter aids considered in the study will remove cysts of Endamoeba histo3 yt3ca« e. The combination of • pretreatment, ;sedimentation., ,-and filtration gives results considerably.better -than^filtration • -alone a 3. Reoommendation0 > Tn view of the findings of this study of the removal of* cysts’ oFlwidaraoeba his col ytica from water., it is recommended that; ja# The output of the U* S* Army Portable Water Purifica- tion Unit Model 1940 be reduced from .15 gallons per minute to 10 gallons per minute as a maximum, and that this output be further reduced to not greater than 7.5 gallons per minute whenever possible. b. The output of the U. S. Army Mobile Water Purification Unit, Model 1940, be reduced from 75 gallons per minute to 60 gallons per minute as a maximum, and that this output be further reduced to not greater than 45 gallons per minute whenever possible. (it must be understood that this reduction in output, while increasing the factor of safety, does not mean that complete re- moval of the cysts of Endamoeba histolytica is assured by adherence to the procedure recommended above.) o. One hour of detention be provided for coagulating, settling and prechlorinating all raw water without exception prior to filtration through either of the sanci units. cU Field water quality control equipment be supplied to all units in the field, which shall, among other things, provide equipment for conducting jar tests and for the evaluation of the efficiency of filtration in terms of turbidity removal. ©• The study of diatomaceous silica now being conducted by the Engineer Board be continued to the end of determining the feasibility of the adoption of diatomaceous silica filtration equipment to replace the sand filters now in use. .£• Studies of the epidemiology of amoebic dysentery in the armed forces of the United Nations be encouraged, and the reports from the field be examined to determine the magnitude of the part that water may be playing in the dissemination of amoebic dysentery* R E S T R I,C T ED EFFICIENCY' OF STANDARD ARMY WATER PUR IF ICATI’ONEQUIPMENT “AND OF DIATOM ITE FILTERS BI IkOVlNG CYSTS OF ENDAMOEBA HISTOLYTICA FROM WATER.. , '■ ini — — ■■■■ - I. SUBJECT.’ 1* Scope. This report covers a study of'the efficiency of standard Army water purification equipment and of diatomite filters in removing cysts of Endamoeba histolytica from water. Included is a summary Of the work completed to date, descriptions'and photographs of the equipment used, and recommendations relative both to the develop- ment of new equipment and to changes in the techniques of operating existing equipment.• II. AUTHORITY 2. Authority. Authority for initiating a study of the effi- ciency'of filtration in removing cysts of Endaitfoebe. histolytica from water is contained in' a letter from the Chief of Engineers to the Engineer’ Board dated 19 March 1943, file SPESD, subjects Study of Effectiveness of Army Purification Methods in Removing Cysts of Endamoeba histolytica. In this letter the Board was directed to cooperate with tiie Surgeon Generalfs Office and the National Institute of Health in a program for the study of the, removal of the cysts of Endamoeba histolytica. A copy of’ this letter is contained in Appendix A. III. INVESTIGATION 3. Introduction. -There is no record in the technical litera- ture of a previousstudy of the removal of cysts of Endamoeba histolytica from water by pressure type filtration. Filtration studies of this general type have been conducted by Baylis, Gullans, and Speotor , but their work was confined to gravity head filters and operation at lower filtration rates than those‘covered in this study. The’work done in this study with diatoraaceous silica has no precedent. This study was initiated after work by Brady/ Jones, and as well as other 1 J. R. Baylis, 0. Gullans, and B. K. Speotor, ’’The Efficiency of Rapid Sand Filters in Removing the Cysts of the Amoebic Dysentery Or- ganisms, from Water,” Public Health Report 51 (Nov. 13, 1936), 1567-1576j B.K.. Speotor, J.R. Baylis, -and 0. Gullans, ”Effectiveness of Filtration in Removing from Water,- and of Chlorine in Killing, the Causative Orga- nism of Amoebic Dysentery,” Public Health1Report 49 (July 6,1934),766-800. 2 F. J. Brady, Myrna F, Jones, and W. L. Newton, "Effect of Chlori- nation of Water on Viability of Cysts of Endamoeba Histolytica," War Medicine, III-(April, 1943), 409-419.: ' R E ST R I C T E D investigators had indicated that normal dosages of chlorine cannot be depended upon to destroy amoebic cysts. It was desired to de- termine the efficiency of standard Army water purification processes and equipment in removing cysts of’ Endamoeba histolytica from water. 4. Equipment and Apparatus. a. Sand Filter. The sand filter unit used in the tests hereinafter described is a U. S. Army Portable Water Purifica- tion Unit, Model 1940, Essentially, the unit consists of a gasoline engine-driven centrifugal pump, a pressure filter, a belt-driven hypochlorinator, an alum and soda ash feed assembly, and necessary hose with fittings (Figure 1). The filter con- sists of an inclosed monel metal tank (17-inch inside diameter), outlet piping, control valves, pressure gages, and an internal collecting and distributing system. The filter bed consists of 18 inches of graded sand, effective size' of 0,36 mm, uniformity coefficient of 1.35, resting on four inches of fine gravel. An analysis of the sand used is shown in Figure 54, Appendix C, . while the characteristics of the sand as specified are given in Figure 55, Appendix C. A perforated monel plate separates the sand and gravel. For these tests the filter bed of 1*57 square feet of surface was replaced for each test with new sand. The coagulants of ammonium alum and soda ash are fed into the raw water at the pump suction from two differential pressure pots operating across a venturi throat. The chlorinator was used during these tests as a constant feeding .device for the feed- ing of cysts to the raw water. No chlorine was used in any of the tests. A 1/4-inch line was tapped into the pump suction and equipped with a quick-opening petcock for batch application of cysts. _h« Diatomaceous Silica Filters. The following diatomaceous silica filters were used in this study; (1) Stoneheart Engineering Company, Model SF-1, 0.125 gpm« This unit consists of a reservoir and a pressure filter containing a Stoneheart porous filter element 0,125 square feet in area (Figure 2). The filter is suspended from the reservoir by 30 inches of l/4-inch plastic-coated fabric hose equipped with a shut-off clomp. The unit utilizes the static head to force the water from the reservoir through the filter, (2) ’Wallace and Tiernan Company, Incorporated, Model G2, 40 gph. This unitis likewise of the gravity type, being so constructed as to provide a maximum head of 5 feet (Figure 3). The filter element used in this unit is a monel metal • c . • screen, (3) S. F. Bowser and Company, Incorporated, Model 2MS» 60-100 gph. This filter consists of a filter shell containing a wire screen element 2 square feet in area, a hand- operated pump mounted on the filter head, and a body feed assembly (Figure 4). Provision is made for recirculating the water used to precoat the unit. (4) S. F. Bowser and Company, Incorporated, Model 1.5C, 60-100 gph. This unit is identical with the earlier model 2MS with the exception of the element, which in this case is a porous carbon element 1.5 square feet in area. (5) International Filter Company, Incorporated, Model SW l/8, 0.375 gpm. The model SW 1/8 is a laboratory test assembly consisting of a glass filter shell containing a Stellar element 0,125 square feet in area and a small elec- tric motor-driven pump (Figure 5). The Stellar element used is identical in design and construction with elements in diatomaceous silica filters used by the British Army, (6) Naval Medical Research Institute Experimental Model. This gravity type unit consists of a vinylite bag in which is mounted a porous carbon disc of 8 square inches in area. The unit may be rolled up and carried in one's pocket. (7) Stoneheart Engineering Company, Model SF-Xl, 20 gpm, This unit consists of a filter shell and head assembly, four Stoneheart ceramic filter elements totaling 8.8 square feet in area, a gasoline-engine-driven centrifugal pump, a turbine pump connected to the same engine, an electrically- driven body feed pump, a precoat tank and a hypochlorinator (Figure 6), In this study, only the filter section and pre- coat tank were used. The treatment section of a U, S, Army Portable Water Purification Unit was used to pump the raw water. (8) Uo S. Army Portable Water Purification Unit, Model 1940, Converted for Use with Diatomaceous Silica, A filter of the same type as used in the tests with sand was converted for use with diatomaceous silica (Figure 7)« This unit con- tained 6,6 square feet of filtering surface consisting of three aluminum oxide filter elements. The body treatment was added through the pump suction and was controlled by a simple valve and sight glass assembly. c» Settling Tanks, Two sizes of sedimentation tanks were used in this study: first, a 2500-gallon steel tank measuring 8 feet in diameterj and, second, a U. Sc Army 3000-gallon canvas tank measuring 11,25 feet in diameter. The latter tank is stan- dard issue with all purification units in the field (Figure 8), d. Metering and Sampling, A Pittsburgh water meter (No. 3399304) was used to determine all' output rates above 5 gallons per minute* and a system of outlet taps installed in the dis- charge line permitted the simultaneous collection of the several samples* e# Chemical Analyses. The pH determinations at the filte7 were made with a standard comparator supplied with the U. S. Army Portable Water Purification Unit. The pH determina- tions in the laboratory were made with a Beckmann pH meter. All chemical analyses were conducted in accordance with standard methods• f, Preparation of and Examination for the Organism. The HRS strain of Endamoeba histolytica was used •throughout these tests because cysts could be prepared with relative ease and be- cause its size, averaging 15.2 ju - 2 ji, corresponds to the large, more pathogenic strain of E. histolytica. To procure the cysts, amoebae maintained on egg slant cultures with an overlay of Stone’s modification of Locke’s solution were transferred to tubes of a similar medium containing a small amount of rice starch. After 72 hours of incubation with this medium, the cysts were harvested, washed in distilled water, and stored in the refrigerator at least 24 hours before use. Estimates of the numbers of cysts were made with the use of the Fuchs-Rosenthal counting chamber, while the identification and counting of the cysts present in the effluent samples were made in a Scdgvdck- Rafter counting cell. 5. Tests. The tests covered by this report consisted essen- tially of introducing a predetermined number of cysts of the HRS strain into the raw water, passing this water through filters, and collecting samples of the effluent at regular intervals for mioro- soopio examination. When preliminary treatment consisting of coagu- lation and sedimentation was employed, a uniform suspension of oysts in the water to be treated was obtained by introducing the organism into the water at a constant rate during the period that the settling tank was being filled. Chemical and bacterial analyses of the influent and effluent of a number of tests were made as an additional control. Operation of equipment and chemical analyses were performed by the Technical Staff of the Engineer Board 'Water Supply Equipment Branch; the incubation and harvesting of the cysts and the microscopic exami- nation were performed at the National Institute of Health. In general, the method used for the examinations of water samples for cysts was as follows* Samples of effluent waters were allowed to settle in a cool place for 18 to 24 hours. The super- natant was then gently siphoned off and the remainder placed in smaller bottles. To these containers, ammonium alum and soda ash were added, and the containers were left in the cold room over night. The supernatant was again siphoned off and the remainder placed in 50-oc centrifuge tubes. By centrifugation, the sediment from each tube was again concentrated. One or two Owvlc centimeters of M/lO oxalic acid were added to redissolve the coagulum and the volume FIG. 1. U. S. ARMY PORTABLE WATER PURIFICATION UNIT, MODEL 1940. Assembled for operation. FIG, 2m GRAVITY TYPE DIATOMITE FILTER. Stoneheart Engineering Company, Model SF-1, FIG. 3. GRAVITY TYPE DIATOMITE FILTER, Wallace and Tieman Company, Model G-2, FIG. U. HAND-OPERATED DIATOMITE FILTER. S. F. Bowser and Company, Inc,, Model 2MS. FIG. 5. STELLAR DIATOMITE FILTER. Infilco Inc., Model SW 1/8.. FIG, 6, SKID-MOUNTED DIATOMITE FILTER, Stoneheart Engineering Company, Model SF-H. FIG. 7. U. S. ARMY PORTABLE WATER PURIFICATION UNIT, MODEL 194-0. Converted for use with diatomaceous silica. FIG. 8. STANDARD 3000-GALL0N CANVAS TANK WITH COVER. was made up to 5 or 10 cc with distilled water* One-cc samples from these tubes were taken and mixed with one drop of one percent iodine in a Sedgwick-Rafter counting cell. The area of the chamber was examined by the use of the low (lOx) and intermediate power (20x) objectives of a compound microscope. The amount of material examined was determined to a great extent by the amount of sediment present. All doubtful objects were recorded as cysts only when two observers were agreed as to their being cysts. The testing program was scheduled as follows; ja. Tests with Standard Equipment (1) Operation of U. S. Amy Portable Water Purifica- tion Unit, Model 1940, at 15 gpm without Pretreatment- The first group of three tests was conducted on the portable sand filter to determine its efficiency in the removal of the amoebic cysts under several conditions of operation. An initial output of 15 gpm, representing a flow rate of 9.6 gpm per square foot of area, was used throughout this first group of tests. The three conditions represented were as follows? (a) Filtration without treatment. (b) Filtration with insufficient or improper coagulation, (c) Filtration with good coagu3.ation. In each of these tests, the filter was operated until a schmutzdecke had been formed before the cysts were intro- duced in a batch through the pump suction. The period required to introduce the cysts and wash down the intake funnel did not exceed 30 seconds. The results show that, while the efficiency of the unit in removing amoebic cysts is somewhat proportional to the quality of the treatment, the removal of cysts of Endamoeba histolytica, even under ideal conditions, is not obtained when the unit is operated at 9.6 gpm per square foot. (2) Operation of tf. S* Army Portable Water Purification Unit, Model 1940, at 10 gpm without Pretreatment. The second series of tests consisted of two tests designed to determine the efficiency of the portable sand unit in re- moving amoebic cysts when operated at the output rate of 10 gpm. This output represents a flow rate of 6.35 gpm per square foot. In this series of tests, every available con- trol was utilized to obtain ideal operating conditions for the tests. Cysts were introC’.wed in a batch in the first test, whereas they were fed -through the hypochlorinator at a uniform rate in the second tent. A marked improvement was noted in the efficiency of the unit in removing amoebic cysts ovbr the results obtained at the higher flow rates (3) Operation of U. S. Army Portable 'Water Purification Unit, Model 1940, at 10 gpm Following Coagulation and Sedi- mentation. The third and final series of tests conducted with the portable sand filter consisted of three tests de- signed to determine the efficiency of pretreatment, followed by filtration, in removing amoebic cysts from water. In the first of these tests, cysts were introduced in the raw water and the water was allowed to settle without coagulants for one hour. The supernatant wsls then passed through the port- able sand filter at the rate of 6.35 gpm per square foot. Microscopic examination of samples of both the settled water and the filter effluent indicated that settling for one hour without coagulants, while reducing the number of cysts pre- sent, does not remove cysts from water. The other tests of this series were conducted in like manner, with the exception that coagulants were employed, and in one case the detention period was extended to two hours. A marked reduction in the concentration of amoebic cysts by the process of coagulating and settling was noted. b. Experiments with Diatomite Filters (1) Experiment I-D, Stoneheart Engineering Company, Model SF-1. The purpose of this test was to determine the efficiency of diatomaceous silica in removing amoebic cysts from water. Because of the absence of previous studies of this material, the results could in no way be anticipated. Therefore, this test was in the nature of a trial run de- signed to act as a guide for further work with diatomaceous silica. For this test, 350,000 cysts of Fndamoeba histolytica were added to one gallon of tap water to which clay had been added, the water was passed through the filter, and the entire gallon of effluent was subjected to microscopic examination. A complete absence of amoebic cysts in the effluent was noted. A grade of diatomaceous silica sold under the trade name of Sorbo-Cel by Johns-Manville, Inc., was used in the amount of 12.5 pounds per 100 square feet of filtering surface for the precoat. No slurry feed was used. (2) Experiment 2-D, Wallace and Tieman Company, Inc., Model G2. The filter-aid used in this test was a commercial product which had received a special treatment by tbe manu- facturer of the filter. A precoat of this material was applied in an amount equivalent to 10 pounds per 100 square feet of filtering surface. A concentration of 6000 cysts per gallon was prepared in 50 gallons of Potomac River water and a uniform suspension maintained by agitation. The pre- coat was applied with the contaminated water. From the six gallons of effluent examined, three cysts were recovered. (3) Experiment 3-D, S* F> Bowser and Company. Inc., Model 2MS> Using Potomac River water to which amoebic cysts had been added in the concentration of 6000 cy«its per gallon, a precoat of Johns-Manville Cel it e Super--Cel was applied by recirculating the preooat water for a period of two minutes. The precoat of 3 ounces of the filter-aid was computed on the basis of 9.38 pounds per 100 square feet of filtering surface, while the body treatment was applied at the rate of 20 ppm, equivalent to 1 ppm of filter aid for each part of turbidity. A ’’break through" occurred after 8.25 minutes of filtering, following the loss of the pump suction. This allowed the flow to cease momentarily, thus dropping the cake. Subsequent testing, which is not a pert of the work covered by this report, indicated that wire cloth elements such as are used in this unit are not generally satisfactory for the filtration of water. Prior to the "break through", no cysts were recovered from the effluent samples. (4) Experiment 4-D, S. F» Bowser and Company, Inc., Model lo5C* Tap water to which 25 ppm of chlorine had been added was recirculated through the unit for two minutes. The filter and water was then dechlorinated with sodium thiosulphate, Using this water, a preccat of Johns- Manville Sorbo-Cel was applied over a two-minute period. The precoat was computed on the basis of 10 pounds per 100 square feet of filtering surface. No body treatment was used. After precoating, the suction hose was changed to a tank of potomao River v/ater containing .10,000 cysts per • gallon and the filtering cycle begun, .ifter 11 minutes of filtering, the pump was stopped, and a slight back flow was introduced to facilitate the dropping of the precoat. Pumping was then resumed and the effluent discharged to waste for 50 seconds, at which time the effluent was again clear. No cysts were recovered from the effluent samples, (5) Experiment 5-D, International Filter Company, Inc., Model SW l/8. Using Potomac River water containing 6000 cysts per gallon, a precoat of Johns-Manville Sorbo- Cel was applied in the amount of 15 pounds per 100 square feet of filtering surface. After filtering for approxi- mately 27 minutes at the initial rate of 2 gpra per square foot, the pump was stopped and the cake allowed to drop from the element. The pump was then restarted and the filter operated to waste for one minute. The flow rate was set at 4 gpm per square foct for this second phase of the test. No cysts were recovered from the effluent samples. (6) Experiment 6-D, Nava' Medical Research Institute, Model Xp A precoat of Johns -Mi-jville Strbo-Ccl in the amount of 36 pounds per 100 square feet was applied, using uncontaminated tap water. After precoating, 4110 cc of Potomac River water, containing 10,000 to 12,000 cysts per gallon, were filtered. All of the effluent was collected and examined. No cysts were recovered. The procedure was repeated, using activated silver filter-aid in the amount of 15 pounds per 100 square feet. No cysts were recovered. (7) Experiment 7-D, Stoneheart Engineering Company Model SF-XI. In view of the excellent results obtained with small units, tests on a larger scale were attempted. For this purpose the filter and precoat sections of the Model SF-XI were used in conjunction with the pumping section of a U«- S* Army Portable Water Purification Unit. The precoat of Johns-Manville Sorbo-Cel was computed on the basis of 17 pounds per 100 square feet of filtering surface, and was applied by recirculating Potomac River water to which 225,000 cysts had been added. The amount of 'water required to fill the unit for recirculation was 35 gallons. Body treatment was applied during the run at the constant rate of 170 ppm, this rate being equivalent to 2,5 ppm of body treatment for each part of raw water turbidity. Cysts were applied through the hypochlorinator at the constant rate of 4500 cysts per gallon of influent. The engine stopped for no apparent reason after six minutes of filtering. Although the engine was re- started almost immediately, the presence of a quantity of diatomaceous silica in the effluent for approximately one minute after restarting indicated that some of the precoat had been disturbed by the slight reverse flow set up when the engine stoppeds Of the 17 gallons of effluent examined, seven cysts were found in the samples taken during the early portion of the rim. (8) Experiment 8-D, U. S. Army Portable Water purificar tion Unit, Model 1940 Converted for Use with Diatomaceous Silica, (E. B. Model SFC-1). This unit was converted from a standard sand filter by personnel of the Engineer Board following, in general, the fundamental principles of the Stoneheart Engineering Company unit. Model SF-Xl. For this test a precoat of Johns-Manville Celite Sorbo-Cel was applied over a 3-minute period by recirculating 30 gallons of Potomac River water to which no cysts had been added. A secondary precoat consisting of one-half pound of Sorbo-Cel and one- quarter pound of Nuchar FcA.N, was then applied in like manner over a period of two minutes. The original precoat was computed on the basis of 15 pounds of filter-aid per 100 square feet of filtering surface. The body feed was regu- lated to give a constant addition of 120 ppm of filter aid, this being equivalent to 6 parts of body treatment for each part of raw water turbidity. The precoat was applied at the rate of 4,1 gpm per square foot of filtering surface while the filtering rate over the 25-minvto run varied between 3*68 and 2.55 gpm per square foot. The cysts were applied at a constant rate of 3600 cysts per gallon. In the six gallons of effluent examined, one cyst was found; this cyst appeared in the first five gallons of effluent. (9) Experiment 9-D, U. S. Army Portable Water Purifi- cation Unit, Model 1940 Converted for Use with Diatomaceous Silica (e. B. Model SFC-1). This test was quite similar to Experiment 8-D, described above. A precoat of Johns- Manville Celite Sorbo-Cel was applied by recirculating 30 gallons of Potomac River water to which no cysts had been added. The precoat of one pound of filter-aid was calcu- lated on the basis of 15 pounds of filter-aid per 100 square feet of filtering surface, and was applied at the rate of 2.5 gpm per square foot, while the filtering rate over the 25-minute run varied between 4.2 and 3*6 gpm per square foot. The body feed was regulated to maintain a minimum rate of pressure rise, 0»65 pound being used in the 25 minutes of operating time. The cysts were added at a constant rate of 1935 cysts per gallon of influent over the first 18 minutes of this operation, at the end of which time the supply of the organism was exhausted. In the six gallons of effluent examined, no cysts of Endamoba histolytica were recovered. (10) Experiments 10-D through 13-D, Inclusive, U« S. Army portable water Purification Unit, Model 1940. Converted for Use with Diatomaceous Silica (E. B. Model SFC-1)• The majority of the tests with diatomaceous silica as outlined above were conducted with a grade of filter-aid sold by Johns-Manville under the trade name of Celite Sorbo-Cel. The purpose of these tests was to determine if the removal of amoebic cysts from water can be accomplished with all grades of material including the highest flow rate filter- aids available. The four filter-aids considered were Celite Super-cel, Hyflo Super-cel, Celite Sorbo-Cel and Celite 545 was processed by John s-Manvi lie• Both Celite Super-cel and Celite Sorbo-Cel were used in some of the tests previously discussed, Hyflo Super-cel is currently used by the British Army, and Celite 545 is one of the two highest flow rate materials available. With each filter- aid in turn, the precoat was applied at the rate of 15 pounds per 100 square feet of filtering surface. After precoating, the unit was then sterilized in each instance with sufficient chlorine to give an orthotolidine reading in excess of 100 ppm in the precoat water, dechlorinated with sodium thiosulphate, and checked for residual chlorine with orthotolidine. Filtration was then started, the cysts being added in a batch through the pump suction over a period of 30 seconds at the beginning of the filtering operation. One cyst was recovered from the effluent samples of each of the tests with and with Hyflo Super-cel, whereas the results of the tes'cs with Super-cel and with Celite 545 show that no cysts were recovered from the effluent samples. It was noted that Celite 545 removed the cysts of Endamoeba histolycjoa notwithstanding the foot that the mvlTriaT'’is so Toarse as to permit the passage of a con- siderable amount of turbidity. IV. DISCUSSION 6* Objective* The objective of this study was to determine the efficiency of standard Army water purification equipment in re- moval of cysts of End amoeba histolytica from water, and, in the event that present equipment proved unsatisfactory, to invest!gate the effectiveness of both new operating procedures and new typos of equipment in removing amoebic cysts from water* 7, Background* Data are not available which permit an evalu- ation of tne"relative importance of water, as compared with other modes of transmission in the dissemination of amoebio dysentery* In the Ifriited States, outbreaks of water-borne amoebiasis were re- corded a decade ago. However., the absence of da ha in no way excludes the possibility of water being on important medium of transmission of amoebic dysentery under certain favorable conditions* The largest outbreak of amoebiasis known to have occurred was that in Chicago in 1933, It was thought that 160,,000 persons were exposed to the in- fection by means of a contaminated drinking water supply} of this number it is known, that 1,409 oases of the disease developed, with 98 fatalities. No concurrent cases of other infectious enteric diseases occurred in the exposed group, apparent'1 y because an ade- quate chlorine residual was maintained in the contaminated water supply to kill the pathogenic enteric bacteria. This water-borne epidemic shows clearly that severe infections can be acquired from the consumption of water lacking a noticeably disagreeable taste and odor. Bunker shows a hypothetical case that a chlorinated but un- filtered municipal water in Bogota, Colombia, might contain over 1,000 cysts of Endomueba histolytica in each liber of distributed water. Thus a chlorinated water regarded as potable by the usual physical standards and bacteriological examinations can be responsible for infections with J), histolytica. The inherent difficulties of cul- turing E, histolytica ©nd~Ox differantiating it from free living amoebae have prohibT.ted’ t,ne~ isolation and, therefore, the enumeration of these organisms in raw water. The degree of hazard of acquiring omoebiasis among troops cannot be evaluated at this time. It would appear that such an evalu- ation oould be made only by detailed epidemiological methods that are difficult to use under combat conditions. Peacetime experience has taught that the strains of amoebae occurring in the Pacific and India- Burma-China theatres are particularly virulent, and that these amoebae are harbored by high proportions of the natives. The cysts must commonly be present in the surface v/aters of these areas, Tne poten- tial threat of water-borne amoebiasis is further emphasised by the recent work of Brady, Jones, and Newton shewing that practical dosages of chlorine do not necessarily destroy the cysts of E« histolytica. One of the most important requirements that a water puri- fication unit must meet to be satisfactory for military use in the field is that the ratio of the quantity of water produced to the weight of the unit must be high. Of equal, and perhaps of greater, importance is the uncontested requirements that the water produced be both palatable and safe. With the use of sand as the filtering medium, experience has shown that the two requirements above are uncompromisingly opposed, one to the other, With few exceptions, the ratio of the weight of a sand filter to its filtering area is a fixed quantity of considerable magnitude. It is therefore necessary to resort to high flow rates to obtain a satisfactory ratio of output to weight. In civilian practice it has been found that flow rates of from two to three gallons per minute per square foot of filtering surface represent the maximum rates for satisfactory results. It will be noted that these flow rates are used only after carefully controlled pretreatment of the raw water, present sand filters used by the armed forces of the United States are operated at flow rates varying between 6 and 10 gpm per square foot of filtering sur- face while handling raw water which has received inadequate pretreat- ment. It has been necessary with the use of sand, therefore, to sacrifice quality for greater output. The wisdom of permitting high flow rates in the sand filters now in use has been open to question for some time., but little or no testing has teen previously conducted to evaluate the effect of these high flow rates on the quality of the water produced. The use of diatomaceous silica as a filtering medium for water does not represent a new basic idea* Equipment for water fil- tration using Kieselguhr, an unrefined form of diatomaceous silica, was tested by the United States Army at Carlisle Barracks in 1938. The equipment at that time consisted of a canvas duck element on which the Kieselguhr was deposited. Both the Kieselguhr and the element available were not suitable for water filtration; hence, the equipment tested was not satisfactory. Since 1930, great strides have been made in the processing of diatomite. Methods have been developed to obtain filter aids having almost any desired characteris- tic, and at the same time increasing both the efficiency and flexi- bility of the material far beyond anything obtained with the original Kieselguhr. These materials are today being used in the filtration of such commercial products as paint, oil, sugar and alcoholic beverages. However, except in rare instances where filter-aid has been used to ’’polish" tap water, diatomaceous silica has not been used extensively, for water filtration. One of the contributing factors to this condi- tion has been the difficulty of obtaining an element possessing the necessary permeability, porosity, strength, and backwash characteris- tics for water filtration. Early in 1943* the Stoneheart Engineering Company (now merged with Titeflex, Incorporated) presented a pilot model filtering unit to the Engineer Bog'd which apparently was rea- sonably satisfactory for water filtration. Using a special filter aid processed by Johns-Manvilie, this unit was tested at the laboratories of the Engineer Beard at Fort Belvcir, Virginia. This unit* among others, was used in the tests covered by this report. Of particular interest is the development of diatomaceous silica filtration equipment overseas. Within the past decade, a unit known as the Stellar filter has been developed in England. This dia- tciiiaceous silica unit, constructed in several sizes, is now standard equipment in the British Army. There are indications that some of these units have been operated by American forces stationed in England* The Italians purchased some of the early units built in England, and it is possible that the equipment was used in the Ethiopian campaign. Stellar units, operated by Australian forces, have been used in the Southwest Pacific Area. Diatomaceous silica filtration equipment is used by both Canadian and New Zealand troops, Canadian troops have also used sand filters similar to the U. $• Array Portable Water Puri- fication Unit, Model 1940, Filter aids used by the British are pur- chased in this country from Johns-Manville and from the Dicalit© Company. Because of the unprecedented requirements for filtration equipment for our widely dispersed forces in the Southwest Pacific Area, e. number of diatomaceous silica units have been supplied to our forces. This filter, known as the Mollinito Filter, Model was developed by the Fletcher Chemical Company (Au>;t.»), pty, Ltd., Victoria, Australia. While it is understood that this unit produces relatively good results, further development of the mechanical details appears to be neceacary before the unit can be considered satisfactory for general field use. 8c Tests with Standard Equipment, The U< 3* Army Portable Water Purification Unit., Model 1940* was used in the experiments conducted with sand filtration. It is logically assumed that the results obtained also apply to the U. S. Army Mobile Water Purification Unit.* Model 1940, which, except in size, is similar to the smaller unit. The reoommende.- tions of th*s rep03',t relative to the mobile unit are based on this assumption. Test T. Operation at Rated Capacity without Coagulants* (See Figure & significance’of this test lies in thefao¥"~ thac cysts passed the filter in very large showing con- clusively that the sand bed alone cannot be expected to remove cysts with operation at rated capacity. The water used in this test was obtained from the Fort Belvoir water supply and contained considerable iron from corroding mains, s~k T-» Operation at Rated Capacity with Coagulants. (See Figures .(0 and 1.1,; This test was conducted in such manner as to parallel methods currently used in the field. Weter was pumped through the filter with the addition of coagulants in sufficient quantity to produce a "clear" effluent. The effluent pH was than determined and this pH ma-.,:- tained throughout the operation. A reasonably clear effluent was obtained, but the total amount of water produced was low because the filter plugged rapidly. An after-floc was visible in the effluent during more than half of the operation, and the pH control was extremely difficult* The raw water, having very little buffer- ing action, added to the difficulties in the use of color stan- dards for pH control. It will be noted that cysts passed the filter during the first part of the operation in the same general order as in Test I, when no coagulants were used. No cysts were recovered at flow rates below 3 gpm per square foot. Cysts passed the filter with considerable ease while the effluent re- mained relatively clear. It is therefore apparent that removal of cysts is not necessarily a function of turbidity removal, o. Test III, Operation at Rated Capacity with Coagulants, (See Figures l2, 1&, and 14,) Every control feasible for field operation was employed in this test. The raw water was obtained from the Potomac River just prior to the test; jar tests were conducted to obtain the optimum coagulant dosage; pH determina- tions were made at one minute intervals; and the pump speed was not changed during the operation. Notwithstanding the attempt to provide ideal operating conditions and controls,-, cysts passed the filter. The increased turbidity and high plate counts in Samples 31, 32, and 33 indicate a break through of the filter bed after 25 minutes of the test operation, A close correlation is noted between effluent turbidity and bacterial removal, while cysts passed the filter in the greatest number when the effluent turbidity was lowest. The presence of after floe in Samples 31, 32, and 33 was due to insufficient time for complete flocculation ahead of the filter. At the output rate of 15 gpm, slightly more than one minute is available for floe formation before the water reaches the portable sand filter. The bacterial analysis shows that the quality of the effluent deteriorated throughout the operation with Sample 33 producing results not unlike the raw water. The effluent turbidity did not exceed 3 ppm at the filter. However, cysts passed the filter with ease and the bacterial analysis shows that nothing better than a crude straining job was accomplished. d, Test IV, Operation at Reduoed Rate with Coagulants*. (See figures 15, 16, and 17.) This test was conducted at the reduced rate of 10 gpm, equivalent to 6,35 gpm per square foot of filtering surface. The cysts were introduced in two batches, the first at the start of the operation and the second after 30 minutes. Cysts passed the filter, but the numbers passing were considerably changed from the results obtained in tests at rated capacity. At the time the second batch of cysts was applied, a Schmutzdecke of as much as one-halfpound of clay and coagulants had been built up on the filter. Cysts passed the filter at this time in equal or greater numbers then at the beginning of the test. Attention is called to the wide range of the pH values obtained with the Beckman instrument as compared with the values obtained with the color indicator at the unit# A comparison of effluent turbidities at the unit and after 24 hours shows a considerable increase in effluent turbidity after standing* For the most part, this increase was due entirely to after floe. The pre- sence of clay particles in Samples 38 and 39 indicated a break through in the filter bed. A marked increase in bacteria passing the filter accompanied this turbidity rise, while the number of cysts passing the filter was not materially changed. Here, as in previous tests, a reasonable effluent was maintained, bacteria removed to some degree, and a satisfactory output rate maintained,, but cysts passed the filter with monotonous regularity. e>. Test V. Operation at Reduced Rate with Ccagulantso (See Figures 18, 19, 20, and 21.) The purpose of this test was to determine the effect of adding the cysts continuously to the filter, and to determine the effectiveness of backwash in removing entrapped cysts from the unit. This test shows that the number of cysts passing the filter was changed somewhat by substituting con- tinuous feed for batch application of the cysts. Samples 55, 66, and 57 are extremely interesting. After 2C minutes of the test, it was found that the output had fallen to slightly below 10 gallons per minute. The prmp speed was increased slightly, re- sulting in an output of approximately 11 gallons per minute. This operation was carefully executed to minimise sudden impulses on the filter bed* Notwithstanding, a decided break through occurred immediately following this flow adjustment, with an in- crease in effluent turbidity, a sharp rise in bacteria, and, in this case, a rise in the number of cysts passing the filter being noted. The unit was backwashed with river water, to which no cysts had been added, for a period of five minutes at the rate of 20 gpm. Filtration was resumed as before with no additional cysts being applied. Sample 59, taken after eight minutes of filtering, contained 2.0 cysts per gallon of effluent. It is obvious that backwashing should be done with filtered water inas- much as cysts in the backwash water can be caught within the sand bed during the operation. The rate of backwash should be the highest at which the sand does not escape the filter, probably about 25 gallons per minute. f• Test VI-A. Sedimentation without Coagulants. (See Figures 22 and 237) The purpose of this test was to detenuine the effectiveness of sedimentation without coagulants in removing cysts from water. It shows that while the total number of cysts per gallon of water is reduced, sedimentation for 90 minutes is not effective in removing either cysts or bacteria from water. Attention is directed to the fact that the effectiveness of sedi- mentation was based on the top portion of the settled water. (See Test VI-B.) J> Test VI-B« Operation at Reduced Rate without Coagulants. (See Figures 24, 25, and 2£>.) TKis test parallels "to sane degree Test I in that water containing cysts was pumped onto the filter without coagulants. It differs in that the supernatant used from Test VI-A contained a reasonably uniform number of cysts, while batch application of the cysts was used in the first test. In addition, it is possible that the cysts remaining in the supernatant of Test VI-A and used here contained only the smaller cysts. Cysts passed the filter in this test at a fairly uniform rate. The reduced flow rate of 6<,35 was used in this test, whereas the unit was operated at rated capacity in the earlier test. The row water used was obtained from the Potomac River. This water contained an unusual tur- bidity composed of a very light, nonsettling material similar in appearance to undissolved lime particles. The pH was above the average for the stream. h. Test VII-A. Coagulation, 2-Hour Settling. (See Figures 27r"ond 28.) it was the purpose of this test to coagu- late and settle following, in general, methods used in the field, namely* determination of optimum coagulant dosage by a modified jar test and the addition of the coagulants to the water while pumping with use of the alum feed pot. The modified jar test used consists of filling a bottle or other container with raw water, adding a small amount of alum dissolved in water, and shaking violently for about one minute. Additional alum is added until a satisfactory floo is formed. At this point, the pH of the sample is determined. Pumping is then begun, with alum being applied through the feed pot in sufficient quantity to produce the some pH reading as was obtained in the jar test. This procedure was followed in this test with most unsatisfactory results. With approximately three feet of suction lift the coagulant feed through the unit was hopelessly erratic. After pumping 1288 gallons, it was found that 5*1 gr/gal of alum had been applied while the desired dosage was 10 gr/gal. The dosage applied would have been considerably lower if the second feet pot had not been used during a part of the operation. Since the floe formed was extremely fine, little or no settling occurred during the 60 minutes provided. A standard jar test was then conducted which showed that the dosage of 10 gr/gal of alum was satisfactory, but that 6 gr/gal of soda ash in addition considerably improved the size and settling quality of the floe. Hence 5 gr/gal of alum and 5 gr/gal of soda ash were dissolved in water and added to the tank of previously treated water. The soda ash and the alum were added in turn and distributed throughout the tank by agitation with a paddle. An excellent floo was formed as indicated by the settled water turbidity value of 2 ppm after 60 minutes of settling. Figure 27, Test VII-A, shows that better removal of cysts was accomplished in this test with coagulation and sedimentation than was accomplished by filtration at rated capacity in Tests II and III. It is to be noted, however, that samples 79 through 86 were taken from supernatant and that not more than 25 percent of the water depth was used in the subsequent filtration in Test VII-B. The results of Test VII-A are somewhat difficult to interpret because of the difficulty encountered in obtaining a satisfactory floo at the start of the operation. It is of considerable interest. however, in view of the high degree of clarification accomplished, that cysts were found in each of eight small samples collected from* the supernatant* i. Test VI1-3, Operation at Reduced Rate Folio-wing Coagu- lation and Sedimentation* *TSee Figures 2§ and 30*") In this test the water which had been coagulated and settled in Test VII-A was pumped through the filter at the reduced rate of 6*35 gpm per square foot* The finding of several cysts in three of eight filter effluent samples shoves that the efficiency of the unit in removing cysts from water is greatly improved by pretreatment of the raw water* Attention is directed to the clarity of the effluent which was consistently below 0*5 ppm and further that an output of 10 gpm was maintained without any increase in head less* Test VIIJCpA* Coagulation, 75-mlnute Settling* (See Figure 31,*J tFTTs test was conducted for the purpose of deter- mining the efficiency of coagulation and sedimentation in re- moving cysts from water* The method followed was one that could be followed in the field, A CO-galIon metal drum was placed upright in a 3000-gallcn canvas tank and the water pumped into the drum, The coagulants were dissolved, in viator and these solutions introduced continually during pumping* Cysts were pumped through the hypochlorinator at a constant rate cf -1300 cysts per gallon of water pumped* Using the metal drum as a flash mixer, on excellent flee was formed, which settled rapidly* Reduction in cysts due to coagulation Laid sedimentation for 75 minutes was reasonably good, the number per gallon being reduced from 4300 to less than ICO, The results of this test show that while the number of cysts present in a quantity of water are materially reduced by a method of coagulation and sedimentation, suitable for field use, complete removal is not accomplished* k* Test VIII-B* Operation at Reduced Rate Following Coagulation and Sediment avion * FigvwftToirTJ -"in this test the water treated and settled in Test VIII-A was pumped through the portable sand filter at the reduced rate of 6,35 gpm per square foot. It is apparent from Figure 32 that the procedure followed produced excellent results in removing turbidity. The passage of cysts through the filter in water containing only 0*1 pp.m turbidity emphasizes the apparent impossibility of removing cysts with the sand filter when operated at rates practical for field use, JU Summary of the Xndirated Number of Cysts Removed by the Portable Sand Filter under Several ConditionsT TSee Figure It wiYl be noted that the efficiency of the unit varies somewhat proportionately with the coagulation achieved, the efficiency of the unit being highest when the control cf the coagulation is best. The coagulant used in this equipment was ammonium alum applied through a differential pressure pot. The contact time for floe formation ahead of the filter was quite short, there being but 10 feet of hose connecting the pump to the filter. The instructions for operating state that coagu- lants should be applied in sufficient quantity to produce a clear or satisfactory effluent. The result is that quite fre- quently a heavy after-floo forms in the effluent, while insuf- ficient flocculation is obtained ahead of the filter. At present, "clear water" is determined by observation on the part of the operator. Experience dictates that equipment for making a jar test and a turbidimeter for checking the quality of the effluent should be a part of this equipment. It will be noted from Figure 33 that two experiments were conducted using no coagulants. The results of these two experiments are not directly comparable because in the second experiment the filtration had been preceded by sedimentation and conceivably only the smaller cysts were present in the filter influent. The presence of considerable iron in the raw water of the first experiment may have acted as a floe, and assisted in the reduction of the number of cysts passing the filter. The significant feature of these two experiments is that it is con- vincingly demonstrated that sand alone does not remove the cysts of Endamoeba histolytica even at the reduced rate of 6.35 gpm per square foot, Hence*7 it follows that if cysts are to be re- moved from water with the portable sand filter, the removal must be accomplished by the coagulants alone or in combination with the sand. A comparison of the experiments in which careful control of the coagulants was maintained shows that the reduction of the rate of flow by one third materially aided in the removal of cysts. Thus the number of cysts passing the filter was reduced from 3900 to 900 and 1400, respectively, in two experiments in which the rate of flow was reduced from 9.5 to 6.35 gpm per square foot. This reduction represents a fourfold increase in the efficiency of cyst removal. This reduction is consistent with the work of Baylis, Gullans, and Spector performed with a municipal type filter in which practically no cysts were found at the rate of 2.0 gpm per square foot. The microscopic examination of the effluent samples after sand filtration showed in each case that objects of sizes considerably larger than cysts passed the filter. m. Results with coagulation and Sedimentation. (See Figure The results of experiments with pretreated water listed in Figure 34 show that the number of cysts in a given quantity of water is materially reduced by good coagulation and sedimentation, but that sedimentation alone for practical periods of time is of little value. It is obvious, therefore, that coagu- lation and sedimentation of the raw water is highly desirable be- fore filtration through the sand filters. A second feature of coagulating and settling the raw waver is that the resulting re- duction in raw water turbidity materially reduces the tendency of the filter to "break through" at frequent intervals. Prechlori- nating the raw water prior to the addition of the coagulants tends to reduce tastes and odors, and generally enhances the possibility of producing a safe water. 9, Experiments with Diatomite Filters. The diatomite filters used in this study were experimental models, eight different units being used in all. It was anticipated that the numbers of cysts found in the effluent waters would provide a criterion for assessing the filtering efficiency of the types of equipment and filter aid tested. However, the results showed that with all equipment and filter aid tested, cysts were rarely found in the effluent water. It appears from these experiments that diatomaceous silica filtra- tton is much more effective than sand filtration for the removal of cysts. This is further confirmed by the microscopic examination of the filtered water, in which it was very rare to find particles larger than 2 or 3 micra in diameter. Experiments I-D through VI-D were conducted with small units for the purpose of obtaining data concerning the general characteristics of diatomaceous silica filters in removing cysts from water, while the objective of the remainder of the experiments was to determine the efficiency of the material and equipment under conditions similar to those encountered in the field. The experiments conducted were as follows: a. Experiment I~D0 Stoneheart Engineering Company Model SF-1.-” (See Figure 35,) In”this 'experiment, low pressure and flow rate was used? in general,, the results were inconclusive. However, attention is directed to the high concentration of cysts used in the re.w water and to the fact that from all of the effluent, no cysts were recovered. Since all of the water used was filtered, the filter was emptied with the fourth quart of water filtered, leaving the filter cake dry. The cake did not drop from the element when the flow ceased, b. Experiment 2-D. 'Wallace and Tiernan Company, Inc-, Model G2. "(See Figure 36,) This experiment was conducted with a gravity filter equipped with a wire screen element. Good clarification was obtained, but a few cysts passed the filter. , The element was observed to "breathe" under the influence of pressure variations* It is possible that the presence of cysts in samples 109 and 111 was caused by breaks in the cake because of slight pressure variations. However, the total number of cysts present was so small that the results obtained are incon- clusive. During the experiment it was observed that a gravity type filter of this general type permits raw water to spill over in filling the reservoir, thus providing a possible means of contaminating the filter effluent as well as of bringing the operator in contact with the raw water. _c« Experiment 3-D, S. F. Bowser and Company, Inc,, Model 2MS. (See Figure 37, It will bo note’, from Figure 37 that no cysts were recovered from samples 112, 113, and 114 while a large number were present in sample 115. This unit was equipped with a very short length of suction hose which was most difficult to keep submerged during the experiment. Just prior to collecting sample 115, air entered the suction hose for several seconds9 The pump suction was thus momentarily interrupted, which interruption permitted the coke to break from the soreai element* Subsequent filtering did not appear to replace the filter aid satisfactorily* It was noted that the differential pot slurry feeder supp?vied with this unit tended to clog at intervals* d.* Experiment 4-D, S* F* Bowser or.d Company,, Inc.. Model 1 *5C. (See Figure- 38*7 This experiment was quite similar to Experiment 3-D. In Experiment 4«D the preooat was applied with- out recirculation by discharging the effluent to waste. Sample 117, collected after 1.6 minutes of operation,, contained a small number of cysts, while sample 118r taken after 1*55 minutes, con- tained no oyets* This result indicates that preooating is accom- plished with this un.it in less than two minutes. With modifica- tions in the inlet system used in Experiment 3-D,, it will be noted that the cake was replaced without difficulty after it hod been permitted to drop from the clement, A comparison of the action of the carbon element to that of the wire screen element used in Experiment 3-D showed that the carbon element retained the cake better than the wire screen element* This may indicate that the carbon element would be the better of the two whore variations 3n pressure., momentary shut-down and other disturbances are expected. jp. Experiment 5-TV, International Filter Company, Inc*, Model gW-lT&V 7Soe”Figur'e”39“ f~lh. il equipment used‘~in this experiment was a laboratory model. the results of this ex- periment should be interpreted with caution. The absence of cysts in the influent is significant* f. Experiment 6-D»Naval Medical Research Institute. Model X* (See Tigures"40 and 41.) The significance of*this experiment is that it emphasizes the apparent ease with which cysts may be re- moved with simple devices employing diatomaoeous silica as the filtering medium. Attention is directed to the second phase of this experiment in which activated silver filter-aid was used. It will be seen in Figure 40 that a marked reduction in bacterial count was accomplished with the special filter aid, but that IB. ooli was present in the effluent samples even when the plate count was sterile for 0,1 oc. g. Experiment 7-DH reading with Bromthymol Blue. "Break-through11 of filter bed. Turbidity in samples Nos. 55, 56, and 57 indicates definite Fig. 20 Army Portable Water Purification Unit Cyst Removal With Operation At Reduced Rate With Coagulants The Engineer Board and United States Public Health Service Test Number V Sheet 4 of 4 Bacterial Analysis May 4, 1943 Sample Number *Bacterial Per c °C Count .c. Smallest Quantity Positive For B. Coli. Raw 0* 180 0.1 c.c. Raw 10* 4,300 0.1 c.c. Raw 301 5,000 0.1 c.c. Raw 50* 2,400 0.1 c.c. 47 22 (absent) 10.0 c.c. 48 23 10.0 c.c. 49 25 (absent) 10.0 c.c. 50 20 (absent) 10,0 c.c. 51 42 (absent) 10.0 c.c. 52 190 10.0 c.c. 53 26 1.0 c.c. 54 38 1.0 c.c. 55 223 1.0 c.c. 56 102 0.1 c.c. 57 146 0.1 c.c. ♦ Agar count unreliable due to cloudy media. Fig- 21 Army Portable Water Purification Unit Cyst RemovaI With Operation At Reduced Rate With Coagulants The Engineer Board and United States Public Health Service Test Number VI-A May 18, 194-3 Sheet 1 of 2 Sample Elapsed Cysts Recovered Number Time Min. Per Gallon of Supernatant Operation Remarks - 0-4.1 10,000* Pumping Water being pumped into tank for - 0-21 10,000 n settling. Cysts applied through - 0-1 10,000 it hypochlorinator at rate of 10,000 - 0 A0 - Settling n cysts per gallon pump^c • 90 - it End of settling period - 90 - Filtering 63 95 557 ii See Test No, VI-B for filtering data. U 100 1,552 t> 65 105 868 n 66 110 656 it 67 115 288 it 68 120 1,056 it 69 130 592 it Less than half of the settled water had 70 uo 1,232 it been pumped through the filter at end of run Raw Water; Source; Potomac River* Turbidity ; 50 p.p.m. pH; 7.8f Temperature: 70°F. Treatment; Coagulants; None applied. Settled After Addition of Cysts; 90 minutes. Procedure and Remarks; ♦Calculated from the rate at which the cysts were applied to the water through the pump of the hypochlorinator, 1230 gallons of water was pumped into a tank with the continuous addition of cysts at the rate of approximately 10,000 cysts per gallon of water. This was allowed to settle without the addition of coagulants for 90 minutes. The water used had been taken from the Potomac River May 18 and allowed to settle until the tine of use. The turbidity of the water did not therefore decrease during the 90 minutes of settling used in this test. Attention is s called to the magnitude of the drawdown in the tank during the subsequent filtering operation^ the total being only 14- inches. Fig. 22 Army Portable Water Purification Unit Cyst Removal By Sedimentation Without Use of Coagulants The Engineer Board and United States Public Health Service Test Number VI-A Sheet 2 of 2 Bacterial Analysis 18 May 1943 Sample Number Bacterial Count Per c.c. °C Smallest Quantity Positive for B. Coll Raw O’ 5,600 0.1 c.c. Raw 20' 5,010 1.0 c.c. Raw 401 1,540 0.0001 c.c. O' 8,250 0.01 c.c. 64 2,800 0.0001 c.c. 66 3,200 0.1 c.c. 68 1,200 0.1 c.c. 69 2,420 0.01 c.c. 70 2,940 0.001 c.c. fig. 25 Army Portable Water Purification Unit Cyst Removal By Sedimentation Without Coagulants The Engineer Board and United States Public Health Service Test Number VI-: Sheet 1 of 3 B May 18, 19^3 Sample Number Elapsed Time Mixu Output G.P.M. Infl* Press uai WfT, Press 13 si nH Effl Turb, wm C/ysts Recovered Per Gallon of Effluent Operation Remarks m 90 10 4.5 2.5 7.8 10/ - Filtering Discharged to waste 71 95 8 4.0 2.5 7.8 1.0 36 n 72 100 11 7.5 4.5 7.8 2.0 256 it Engine missing slightly 73 105 11 7.0 4.5 7.8 2.0 176 n Valve adjusted at Time 74 110 10 6.0 4.0 7.8 1.0 174 n 106 to maintain flow at 75 115 10 6.7 4.5 7.8 1.0 168 it 10 g.p.m. 76 120 10 6.7 4.5 7.8 1.0- 174 n 77 130 10 6.7 4.5 7.8 1.0 166 it 78 140 10 6,6 4.,5 7.8 1.0 198 it End of test. Raw Water; Source: Potomac River (settled water from Test No. VI-A). Turbidity: 50 p.p.m. pH: 7.8, Temperature: 70OF# Treatment: Water settled for 90 minutes (see Test No. VI-A). Coagulants Aoolied: None. Procedure and Remarks: The filter was backwashed prior to the start of the run with Potomac River water to which no cysts had been added . Filtration was started without the use of coagulants at the output rate of 10 G.P.M. Total water filtered; 498 gallons. Fig. 2h Army Portable Water Purification Unit Cyst Removal With Operation At Reduced Rate Without Coagulants The Engineer Board and United States Public Health Service Test Number VI-B Sheet 2 of 3 May 18, 1943 Sample Number pH Alkalinity MO nom Turbidity At Unit Anpearance Of Effluent Sediment After 2L Hours Raw* 7.8 62.5 50 Milky 71 7.8 60.0 1.0 n Slight 72 7.7 60.0 2.0 « it 73 7.7 60.0 2.0 it it U 7.7 60.0 1.0 N n 75 7.7 60.0 1.0 N n 76 7.7 60.0 1.0- n it 77 7.7 60.0 1.0 it H 78 7.8 60.0 1.0 it Very slight Remarksi The turbidity of the water used was composed of very fine particles not unlike particles of lime. It will be noted that the alkalinity of the raw water is considerably above the average for the Potomac River at Gunston Cove, Average pH values for Potomac River water at this point 6,6 to 7.3. * Raw water sample from supply tank collected before pumping into settling tank. Fig. 25 Army Portable Water Purification Unit Cyst Removal With Operation At Reduced Rate Without Coagulants The Engineer Board and United States Public Health Service Test Number VI-B Sheet 3 of 3 Bacterial Analysis May 18, 194-3 Sample Bacterial Count Smal1est Quantity Number Per c.c. Positive For °C B. Coli 0 132,000 0.01 c.c. 72 110,000 0.0001 c.c. 1U 3,750 0.1 c.c. 76 29,000 0.1 c.c. 77 8,000 0.01 c.c. 7ft 9,500 0.001 c.c. Note? Attention is called to the very high counts in the effluent samples. This may be due to the filter becoming contaminated during the backwash operation. Fig, 26 flrmy Portable Y/ater Purification Unit Cyst Renoval With Operation At Reduced Rate Y/ithout Coagulants The Engineer Board and United States Public Health Service Test Number VII-A Sheet 1 of 2 May 11, 1943 Sample Elapsed Cysts Recovered Number Time Per Gallon of Operation Remarks Min, Supernatant 0-46 3800 Pumping Pumping was begun with the treatment section - 0 3800 Settling begun. of the unit adding alum through the pot feeder. T60 60 - Settling Due to finess of floe which did not settle out, 5 gr./gal, alum and 5 gr./gal. soda ash was added to the tank of water and stirred with a paddle. T120 120 - Filtering begi n Discharge to waste. - 123 - Filtering See Test Number VII-B for filtering data 79 128 3.2 n BO 133 9.6 It 81 138 6.4 It 82 U3 6.4 R S3 148 1.6 ft 84 153 1.6 It 8$ 163 4.8 It 86 173 9.6 tt Raw Water : Source: Potomac River, Turbidity: 50 ppm, pH: 7.4, Temperature; 72°F, Treated Water: oH: 7,0*, Average Turbidity: 2 ppm. Treatment s Coagulants: 5 gr./gal. alum followed in 60 minutes by an additional 5 gr./gal. alum and 5 gr./gal. soda ash. Water settled for total time of 120 minutes. Procedure and Remarks; 1288 gal]ons of water was pumped into a tank through a treatment section of the unit with the addition of approximately 5 gr./gal, of alum being fed through the feed pots. A very fine floe was ; formed, which did not settle out in 60 minutes. Additional coagulants were added and another hour of settling time provided. Cysts were added continuously during the pumping operation at the rateof 3800 cysts per gallon of effluent. See Test No, VII-B for filtering data, *Bromthymol Blue reading. Fig. 2? Army Portable Water Purification Unit Cyst Removal By Coagulation and Sedimentation The Engineer Board and United States Public Health Service Test Nuirber VII-A Sheet 2 of 2 May 11. 1943 Sample Turb. Alkalinity Sulphates Alum Dosage (Gr./Gal) Number pH ppm M0 SO^ Calc.From Calc.From Remarks . .PPm . _ .ppm Alkalinity Sulnhates Raw 7.7 50 51.1 26.2 - - Both alkalinity and pH high for 0-36 6.5 50 27.0 59.0 4.8 4.5 Potomac River water. 0-26 6.5 50 28.2 57.7 4.5 4.3 0-16 5.5 50 3.4 102.2 9.5 10.4 Alum dosage increased by use of 0-6 6.1 50 10,2 84.4 8.1 8.0 second pot. 6.2 50 14.5 79.5 7.3 7.2 T 60 8.5 4-5 71.6 63.7 - 5.1 5 gr./gal alum and 5 gr./gal soda T 120 7.2 2 54.1 103.2 — 10.6 ash applied. Remarks: Samples Nos . 0-36 through 0 -6 were taken from the discharge hose of the pump during the time of filling the tank for settling. When the additional alum and soda abh was added, the coagulants were first dissolved in water and applied to the top of the tank of water. The water was then agitated for 5 minutes with paddles. , Sample No, T 60 was collected iust prior to-the addition of 5 gr./gal. of alum but after the addition of the soda ash. Fig. 28 Army Portable Water Purification Unit Cyst Removal By Coagulation and Sedimentation The Engineer and United States Public Health Service Test Number VII-B Sheet 1 of 2 May 11, 1943 Sample Elapsed Output Infl. Effl. Effl. Cysts Recovered Number Time G.P.M. Press Press. Turb. Per Gallon of Operation Remarks Min. psi psi ppm Effluent T-120 120 10 3.0 0 Filtering Discharge to waste. - 123 10 2.8 1 0.5 , tt 87 128 9.5 2.8 1 0.5 0 tt First sample collected. S8 133 10 3.5 1 0.5 2 it Flow adjusted at Time 89 138 10 3.5 1 0.5 2 tt 130 90 143 10 3.5 1 0.5 0 tt 91 148 10 3.5 1 0.5 0 1! 92 153 10 3.5 1 0.5 0 t» 93 163 10 3.5 1 0.5 0 tt 94 173 10 3.5 1 0.5 4 tt End of test. Raw Water ; Source ; Coagulated and Settled (Test No, VII-A)•, pH: 7 .0, Turbidity ; 2 p.p.m, (average). Treatment : See Te st Number VII-A Procedure and Remarks-; Potomac River water coagulated and settled in Test No. VII-A was pumped through the sand filter at the output rate of 10 g. p.m. Just prior to the operation, the filter was backwashed with tap water for five minutes at the rate of 20 g.p, ,m. In that the treatment section of the unit was known to be contaminated, an auxiliary pump was used to supply the filter during the operation. Total Water Filtered; 495 Gallons, Fig. 29 Army Portable Water Purification Unit Cyst Removal With Operation At Reduced Rate Following Coagulation and Sedimentation The Engineer Board and United States Public Health Service Test Number VII-B Sheet 2 of 2 May 11, 1943 Sample Number pH Turbidity At After Unit 24 Mrs. Alkalinity MO ppm. . Appearance Of Effluent Sediment 24 Hours T-120 7.2 2 - 54.1 - - 87 7.2 0.5 2 53.9 Cloudy Moderate* 88 7.2 0.5 0.5 53.9 Clear None 89 7.2 0.5 0.5 53.9 it it 90 - 0.5 0.5 53.9 n it 91 7.2 0.5 0.5 53.9 it it 92 - 0.5 0.5 53.9 ti it 93 7.2 0.5 0.5 53.9 it it 94 7.2 0.5 0.5 53.9 it it Remarks: *Sedimerit orobablv due to debris turbidity passing the filter. in lines rather than Fig. 50 Army Portable Water Purification Unit Cyst Removal With Operation At Reduced Rate Following Coagulation and Sedimentation The Engineer Board and United States Public Health Service Test Number V1II-A Sheet 1 of 1 June 29, 1943 Semple Elapsed Cysts Recovered Number Time Per Gallon of Operation . Remarks Min, Supernatant - 0-4-3 4300 Pumping Water being pumped into tank for coagulation. - 0 4300 Settling Cysts applied continuously through hypochlorinator •* 75 it at rate of 4300 cysts per gallon of water pumped. TO 75 Filtering Discharged to waste. 95 77 121 it First sample collected. 96 87 - tt See Test Number VIII-B for filtering data. 97 97 57 n 98 107 - ti 99 117 5 it 100 127 - it 101 14-7 - it 102 14-9 43* n 103 152 - tt 104- 162 43* n Total water filtered: 850 gallons. Raw Water ; Source : Potomac River, Turbidity: 30 p.p.m. pH: 7.4* Temperature: 74°F. Treated Water: pH : 6.7, Average Turbidity: ppm. Treatment : Coagulants: 10 gr./gal. alum and 5 gr./gal. soda ash. Settled after addition of cysts: 75 Min • Procedure and Remarks: 2200 gals, of water ’-as pumped into a standard 3000-gallon canvas tank through the treatment section with the cysts being added continuously at rate of 4-300 through the hypochlorinator The pump < effluent was directed into j a drum set within the tank and the coagulants added continuously to the water . After the tank was full, the water was allowed to settle for 75 minutes before filtration was begun , ’♦‘Combined sample. Fig. 31 Army Portable Fater Purification Unit Cyst Removal By Coagulation and Sedimentation The Engineer Board and United States Public Health Service Test Number VI11-B Sheet 1 of 1 June 29, 1943 Sample Elapsed Output Infl. Effl. Effl. Cysts Recovered Number Time G.P.M. Press Press Turb. Per Gallon of Operation Remarks Min. psi psi ppm Effluent T-0 75 10.0 - - Filtering Discharge to waste. 95 77 10.0 3.0 2.0 0.1 5 it 96 87 9.7 3.0 2.0 0.1 4 it 97 97 9.2 3.0 2.0 0.1 2 ii 98 107 9.4- 3.5 2.0 0.1 0 it 99 117 10.2 3.6 2.0 0.1 1 11 Rate adjusted at Time 109 100 127 10.1 3.8 2.0 0.1 1 " Suction hose lowered to 101 14-7 9.8 3.8 2.0 0.1 5 11 within 3 inches of tank 102 14-9 - - - bottom at Time 143• 103 152 9.8 3.8 2.0 0.2 1 it 104. 162 10.1 3.8 2.0 0.1 1 it Raw Water: Source: Coagulated and Settled (Test VIII-A), pH: 6,7, 'Turbidity: 70 p.p.m. (Average) Treatment: See Test Number VII]-A Procedure and Remarks: Potomac River water coagulated and settled in Test No. VI11-A was pumped through the sand filter at the output rate of 10 g. p.m. Samples were collected for microscopic examination at intervals. Attention is called to the increase in the number of cysts passing the filter at Time 14-7 following the lowering « of the suction hose in the tank at T ime 14-3. Just prior to this run, the filter was backwashed for 5 minutes with tap water at the rate of 18 g.p.m. Total water filtered: 850 gallons i. Fig. 32 Army Portable Water Purification Unit Cyst Removal ?/ith Operation At Reduced Rate Following Coagulation and Sedimentation The Engineer Board and United States Public Health Service Experiment Number Quality of Coagulation Filtration Rate GPF/ft,2 Calc. Number of Cysts per Gal. Influent Calc. Number of Cysts per Gal. Effluent Cysts Passing Filter Per Million Applied I None 9.5 2100 250 119,000 II Poor 9.5 6300 240 38,000 111 Good 9.5 2300 9 3,900 IV Good •6.35 5000 4.5 900 V Good 6.35 7000 10 1,400 * VI-B None 6.35 838 165 197,500 Fig. 33 Army Portable Water Purification Unit Summary of The Results of Experiments With Operation Under Several Conditions The Engineer Board and United States Public Health Service Experiment Number Pretreatment Settling Time .. (Min,) . Filtration Rate GFM/ft2 Calc, Number of cysts per Gal. Influent Calc. Number Cysts Passing of Cysts Per Filter Per Gal. Effluent Million Applied VI-A None 90 . 10,000 838 83,800 VI-B - - 6.35 838 165 197.500 Combined Results 16,500 VII-A Alum / Soda Ash 120 — 3800 5.4 1400 VI1-B - 6.35 5. U 0.95 176,000 Combined Results 250 VIII-A Alum / Soda Ash 75 3800 56 iU.700 VIII-B 6.35 56 2 55.700 Combined Results 526 FiC. 3U Army Portable 7/ater Puri f ication Unit Surwry of the Results of Experiments with Operation At Reduced Rate Following Coagulation and Sedimentation The Engineer Board and United States Public Health Service Experiment Number Sheet 1 of 1 1-D April 9, 1943 Sample Number Elapsed Time Min. Output Infl. G.P.M, Press, psi Effl. Press. psi Effl. Cysts Recovered Turb Per Gallon Per ppm Million Applied Operation Remarks a* 0-1.66 0,15 0.4 0.0 - Precoating First quart of effluent — returned to reservoir for - refiltering. - 0 0.4 0.0 1-** Filtering 105 2.4-1 0.104 0.4 0.0 1- 0.0 ii First quart collected. 106 5.00 0.050 0.3 0.0 1- 0.0 it Second quart collected. 107 7.91 0.031 0.3 0.0 1- 0.0 it Third quart collected. 108 13.0 0.019 0.2-0.0 0.0 1- 0.0 n quart collected. Raw Water: Source: Belvoir tap and Clay* Turbidity: 50 p.p.m. pH: 7.5, Temperature: 53°F. Treatment: Precoat: 0.25 oz, Sorbo- cel** Slurry feed: None, Procedure and Remarks; 350,000 cysts were added to one gallon of -ater. To about one quart of this suspension, 0.25 ounces of diatoraaceous silica were added and this poured into the filter reservoir. The first quart of effluent was returned to the reservoir of the filter. The entire gallon was then filtered and the four quarts of effluent examined for cysts. *Precoat of ' 0,25 ounces is equivalent to 12.5 pounds of filteraid per 100 square feet of filtering surface. Area of filter approximately 0..125 square feet . ** Effluent turbidity of less than 1.0 p.p.m. is estimated. Fig. 53 Diatomsceous Silica Filter, Model SF-1 Cyst Removal with Gravity Type Silica Filter The Engineer Board and United States Public Health Service Experiment Number 2-H Sheet 1 of 1 June 22, 19^-3 •rilspeed Total water inn, JEffl. uysts Recovered Sample Time filtered Press, Turb. Per Gallon of Number Min. Gallons psi ppm Effluent Operation Hemarks _ 0J1 — 1.3 - Precoating Effluent re- — 0 0 1.3-1.0 0.5- - filtering turned to 109 3.5s 5 1.3-1.0 0.3 0.5 filtering reservoir until no 9.33 5 1.3-1.0 0.2 0.0 filtering clear 111 17.66 5 1.3-1.0 0.2 1.0 filtering Total 15 Haw Water: Source: Potomac Hirer. Turbidity: 20 ppm. pH: Temperature: 72°f Treatment: Precoat: Special filteraid (lO lb/100 Slurry Peed: None Procedure and Hemarka: The precoat was applied by recirculating contaminated water (6000 cysts/ gal) to which the filteraid was added. The rariations in influent pressure are due to changes in water level in the reservoir between the times of adding raw water from a bucket. Fig. 36 Blatomaceous Silica filter. Model &-2 Cyst Heaoval With Gravity Silica filter The Engineer Board and United States Public Health Service Experiment Number 3-® Sheet 1 of 1 June 22, 19^3 Length of Time Required to Sample Collect Sample Number (Min. & Sec.) Size of Sample (Gallons) Number of Cysts Recovered Calc, Number of Cysts Per Gallon (3ffl.) Operation 2100 - - - Precoating 112 2:35 5 0 . 0 Filtering 113 2:h0 5 0 0 Filtering llU 3:00 5 0 0 Filtering 115 1:00 (approx.) 3*5 2* 11^ Filtering 116 - 3 3.7 Filtering Raw Water: Source: Potomac River^ Turbidity: 20 ppmt pHj l.K Temperature: 72°P. Treatment: Precoat: JM Suner-Cel,* Slurry Feed: Charge of 3 < 3Z. Procedure and Remarks: The precoat was applied by recirculating contaminated water (6000 cysts 1 gal. ) to which the filteraid had been added. *Air entered suction hose Just prior to taking this sample. A small amount of slurry feed was applied during the run in accordance with recommendations of the manufacturer. The slurry feed was in the amount of 1 p.p.m, slurry per part of turbidity. Fig. 37 Dlatonaceous Silica Filter, Model 2MS Cyst Removal With Hand Operated Silica Filter The Engineer Board and United States Public Health Service Experiment Number *J-D Sheet 1 of 1 July 16, 19*& Sample Number Time at Beginning of Collection of Sample (Min. and Sec.) Size of Sample (Gals.) Number of Cysts Recovered Calc. Number of Cysts Per Gallon (Effl.) Operation 0 - - Discharge to waste 117 1*30 1 1 5 filtering llg 1*57 5 0 0 Filtering 119 U:00 5 0 0 Filtering 10:00 - - - Dropped cake 12:00 — - Discharge to waste 120 13*50 _5 0 0 Filtering Haw Water: source* Potomac Rlver, Turbidity: lOOp.p.m., pH: 7.**. Temperature! 7^°^ Treatment : Precoat: JM Sorbo-Cel (0.1 lb/100 Slurry Peed: None Procedure and Remarks! The precoat was applied with contaminated water (10,000 cysts/gal.) by discharging the first effluent to waste. After filtering for 10 minutes, the cake was dropped, replaced and filtering resumed. Fig. 38 Dlatomaceoue Silica Filter, Model 1#5C Cyst Removal With Hand Operated Silica Filter The Engineer Board and United States Public Health Service Experiment Number 5-® Sheet 1 of 1 June 22, 19^3 Sample Number Length of Time Required to Collect Sample (Min. and Sec.) Size of Sample (Gailons) Number of Cysts Recovered Calc. Number of Cysts Per CalIon (Effl.) Operation _ 2:00 — — — Precoating 121 26:55 5 0 0 Filtering - - - - Propped cake 2:00 - - Filter to waste 122 7lll-5 5 0 0 Filtering Haw Water: Source: Potomac Hirer_ Turbidity: 20 ppm, pH; jb Temperature: 7?°^ Treatment: Precoat: JM Sorbo-Cel, Slurry Peed: None. Procedure and Remarks: The precoat was applied in the first instance by recirculating contaminated water (6000 cysts/gal. ) for 2 minutes after which the ■unit was operated for approximately 27 minutes at 2 g.p.m./ft2. The unit was then shut down and the cake allowed to drop. The unit was started, the cake replaced and the unit operated until a second sample of 5 gallons had been . collected. Fig. 39 Diatomaceous Silica filter. Model SW l/g Cyst Removal With Experimental Stellar Filter The Engineer Board and United States Public Health Service Experiment Number 6-B Sheet 1 of 2 August 10, 19^3 .me at Beginning of Size of Fraction of dumber of Smallest Quantity Sanrole Collection of Sample Sample Sanrole Cysts Bacterial Count Positive for B, Number Min. c.c. Examined Recovered ner c.c. Coll Haw — - — — kbOO 0.1 c.c. Filtration with Sorbo-Cel 123 0.00 **50 all 0 — - 125-B 0.50 - - - 1900 0.1 c.c. 124 1.00 1950 all 0 12U-B 3.00 — — _ 2U0 1.0 c.c. Further filtration after refilling bag 125 0.00 410 all 0 125-B 0.50 - - 860 0.1 c.c. 126 0.66 2300 all 0 - - 126-B 3.oo - — - 9U0 1.0 c.c. Raw Water: Source: Potomac River* Turbidity: 50 ppm* pH: J.U* Temperature: 78°F, Procedure: The precoat of 0.2 pounds of Sorbo-Cel was applied by passing 3 quarts of clear tap water and filterald through the filter, followed by a small quantity of river water to which no cysts had been added. After precoating 3 quarts of river water containing 10,000 - 12,000 cysts per gallon was filtered. The flow was started (zero minutes) and all water filtered was collected for examination. The bag was refilled with cyst-containing water and again all water filtered was collected for examination. Fig. 1*0 Uiatomaceous Silica Filter, Model X Cyst Removal With Gravity Type Silica Filter The Engineer Board and United States Public Health Service Experiment Number 6-B Sheet 2 of 2 August 10, 19^3 Tim© at beginning of Sample Collection of Sample Number Hin. Size of fraction of Sample Sample c.c. Examined Number of Cysts Bacterial Count Recovered -per c.c. Smallest Quantity Positive for B. Coli Raw - - _ U'god 0.01 c.c. 127 12S 12£-B 0.00 1.00 2.00 Filtration with activated 55 all 750 all silver-f lit erald 0 (Sterile 0.1 c, 0 10 c.) 1.0 c.c. 1.0 c.c. Raw Water: Source: Potomac River, Turbidity: 50 ppn, pH: Temperature: 7goF. Procedure: combination examination. The apparatus was rinsed and 1 quart of water and O.U gma of the activated silver-filteraid were added. The unit was not precoated by recirculation, the first water being taken for Fig. Ul Diatomaceaus Silica Filter, Model X Cyst Removal With Gravity Type Silica Filter The Engineer Board and United States Public Health Service Experiment Number T-® Sheet 1 of 3 May 25. 19^3 Sample Number Elapsed Time Output Min. G.P.M. Infl, ; Press usi Effl, Effl. Press Turb, vsi unm Cysts Recovered Per Gallon of Effluent Operation Remarks _ 0-6 24.5 - - - Precoating Water recirculated. X29-A 0 23 16 3 0.5- - Filtering Engine speed erratic. 129 5 21 16 3 0.5V 1.0 Filtering Engine stopped for 130 10 15 15.5 0 0.0/ 1.7 Filtering 30 seconds at Time 6. 131 15 12.5 16 0 0.04 0.0 Filtering 132 20 11 16 0 0.04 0.0 Filtering 133 25 11 16 0 0.04 0.0 Filtering 13^ 30 10.5 17 0 0.04 0.0 Filtering Engine speed advanced 135 Uo lU 21 0 0.64 0.0 Filtering at Time 32 min, and 136 50 12 25 0 0. 5- , 0.0 . Filtering again at Time U5 min. Raw Water: 1 Source: Potomac River. Turbidity: 65 p.p.m. pH: 7*6. Temperature: 6S°F, Treatment: Precoat; 1 ,.5 uounds Sorbo-Cel*. Slurry Peed: 170 u.p.m. Procedure and Remarks: 2U ounces of Sorbo-Ci el and 225.000 cysts were added ■ bo 35 gallons of raw water. This suspension was recirculated through the unit for 6 minutes; at which time the effluent was relatively clear. Filtration was then started with the continuous addition of cysts and filteraid for a ueriod of 50 minutes. The cysts were applied through the hypochlorlnator at the constant rate of 71,500 cysts per minute. Attention is called 'to the relatively high influent nressure at the start of the test. This was due to excessive losses in the piping rather than to high resistance through the filtering cake. Total water filtered: 696 gallons. *Precoat of 1,5 pounds equivalent to 1J pounds per 100 square feet of filtering area. ■Fie. hz Biatomaceous Silica Filter, Model SF-Xl Cyst Removal With Pressure Type Silica Filter The Engineer Board and United States Public Health Service Experiment Number 7-® Sheet 2 of 3 May 25, 19U3 Sample Number Effl. # Effluent St, Louis At Unit Turbidity i Baylie Tindall After After 2U Hrs. Hrs. Alkalinity MO mm Raw 7.6 - - 34.7 129 7.6 o.5- 1.0 1.0/ 3^-7 130 7.6 0.54 1.0 1.0 34.7 131 7.6 o 4 0.5- 0.5 34.7 132 7.6 o 4 0.5- O.U 34,7 133 7.6 o 0.5- 0.3 3^.7 134 7.6 o 0.5- 0.4 34.7 135 7.6 o 4 0.5- 0.3 34,7 126 7.6 o.5- —£•■£.,.. 0.2 3**.7 _Fi_g. h3 Uiatomaceous Silica filter. Modal SP-H Oyst Removal With Pressure Type Silica Pilter The Engineer Board and United States Public Health Service Fig. ItU Diatomaceous Silica filter. Model S7~X1 Cyst Removal With Pressure Type Silica filter The Engineer Board and United States Public Health Service Experiment Number 7-® Sheet 3 of 3 May 25. 19^3 Bacterial Analysis Bacterial Count Smallest Quantity Sample Per c.o. Positive for Number 37°® B. Coll Haw* 1700 0.1 cc 129-^ 29U00 (absent)lO.O oe 150 k$20 10.0 cc 132 moo 10.0 cc 13U 2200 1,0 cc 135 390 (absent)l0,0 cc 136 765 10,0 cc Remarks: *Average of 6 samples taken at 10-minute intervals. Effluent hose and piping was not sterilised prior to the operation. Experiment Number Sheet 1 of 2 g-D June 8, I9U3 Elapsed Infl, TPfi'.- Cysts Recovered Sample Time Output Press Press Turb. Per Gallon of Number Min. G-.P.M, psi P»1 psi Effluent Operation Remarks _ 0-10 “573 7 k - - Precoot ing Water recirculated — 0- 7 27 8 k — .. Added carbon Water recirculated 137 0 2U.5 8 k 0/ 1 Filtering 138 5 21 8 3 0/ 0 Filtering 139 10 18 8 3 °/ 0 Filtering lUo 15 18 8 3 0 Filtering lUi 2C ik 8 2 <4 0 Filtering Pump speed increased 1U2 25 17 13.5 3 0/ 0 , Filtering at Time 22 min. Raw Water; Source: Potomac River. Turbidity: 20 ppm. pH; g.; Temperature: 7U°r. Treatment: Precoat: 1.0 pound Sorbo-Cel followed by O.* pound Sorbo-Cel mixed with 0.2*5 pound activated carbon (Nuchar F.A,N,)t Slurry Peed: 120 ppm (av,) Procedure and Remarks: The precoat of 1.0 pound of Sorbo-Cel (0.15 was applied by recirculating the precoat water to which no cysts had been added. The slurry and cysts were applied through the hypochlorinator. The water used contained very little suspended clay but contained ( considerable algae and color. Total water filtered; 485 gallons. Fi?. U5 Biatomaceous Silica Filter, Model SFC-1 Cyst Removal With Converted Portable Sand Filter The Engineer Board and United States Public Health Service Experiment Number 8-3 Sheet 2 of 2 Jtme 8, 19Uj Sample Number Effluent Turbidity tanm? St. touis Tindall Tindall Hffl. At At After t>H Unit Unit 2H Hrs. Baylis After 2»t Hrs. Alkalinity MO pm .. Haw X2 - - - • 31.6 137 5.2 0/ 0.1 0.1 0.0/ 9.9 13* 6.2 0/ 0.05 o.U 0.1 2k.O 139 7.7 0/ 0.05- 0.2- 0.0/ 25.0 ibo 7.* °/ 0.05 0.2— 0.2 86.9 ibi 7.9 °/ 0.05 0.2- 0.1 27.0 1U2 7*9 ol 0.0*5- 0.2- 0.1 27.^5 Remarks: The low alkalinity value for Sample Ho .137 and the following rise in both alkalinity and pH oan be attributed to the presence of activated carbon in the preooat. Fig. h6 Biatomaceous Silica filter t Model SPCLl Cyst Hemoral With Converted Portable Sand Pllter The Engineer Board and United States Public Health Service Experiment Number Sheet 1 of 2 9-i> June 8, 19^3 Elapsed Infl. 1WtTT ttysts Recovered Sample Time Output Press Press. Turb, Per < Sallon of Number Min. G.P.M. psl psi ppm Effluent Operation Remarks — 0-5 15 8 3 - - Precoating Water recirculated i*? 0 28 10 k 0 Filtering pump opened to ikk 5 27 10.5 k °/ 0 Filtering full capacity 1U5 10 2k 13 k 0^ 0 Filtering ike 15 2k 13.5 k 0.1 0 Filtering Engine speed iki 20 2k i?.5 k 0.1 0 Filtering fluctuating Iks 25 2k lU k 0.1 0 Filtering Raw Water: Source: Potomac River. Turbidity: 20 ppm# pH: 8.2„ Temperature: 7k°F. Treatment: Precoat: 1.0 pound Sorbo-Cel 10.lb/ft^). Slurry feed: 120 ppm (av] 1* Procedure and Remarks: The precoat was applied by recirculation of urecoat water to which no cysts had been added, *The slurry feed was adjusted continuously to maintain rate of pressure rise at a minimum throughout the operation. Cysts were applied continuously through the hypochlorlnator. Total water filtered: 6Ug gallons. Uiatomaceous Silica Filter, Model SFC-l Cyst Removal With Converted Portable Sand Filter The Engineer Board and United States Public Health Service Experiment Bomber 9-® Sheet 2 of 2 Jtme 8. 19^3 Effluent Turbidity ixmmj St. Louis Tindall Tindall Baylls Alkalinity Sample Bffl. At At After After MO Bomber oH Unit Unit 2* Hr b. 2b Hrs. ppm Haw S.2 mm «. 31.0 i**3 7.9 0/ .05^ 0.3 0.2 27.5 ibb 7.9 0/ 0.1 0.7 0.7 27.5 1U5 7.9 0/ o.jV 0.6 0.7 27.5 1U6 7.9 0.1 .2 0.7 0.7 27.5 1*7 7.9 0.1 .1 0.5 0.5 27.5 l*g 7.9 0.1 .1 0.5 Q.3 27.5 Remarks: Increase in turbidity due in part to color which had coagulated. Turbidity of supernatant of samples after 2* hours was approximately the same as that found at the unit. Fig. U8 Dlatomaoeous Silica Filter, Model SFC-1 Cyst Removal With Converted Portable Sand Filter The ftigineer Board and United States Public Health Service Experimental Number 10-R Sheet 1 of U July 6, 19^3 E1 speed I aft. ' Wfl. Jtffl. Cysts Recovered Sample Time Output Press Press Turb. Per Gallon of Number Mln. G.P.M. pel _ v si _ PPm Effluent Operation Remarks _ 0-10 20 20 2 - Precoating Chlorine added to o-T — - - - - 100 ppm 0-2 27-5 22 2 - — Entering Rechlorinated IU9-A 0 — 20 2 0.1- - Filtering Cysts applied 1U9 1-2 2k 20 2 0.1 0 Entering 150 2-3 18 22 2 0.1 1 Entering 151 3-H 16 22 2 0.1 0 Entering 152 k-3 lU 2k - 2 ..... 0.2 0 Entering Raw Water: Source: Potomac River# Turbidity: 1 50 ppm* pH: 7.6„ Temperature: 72°E. Ir.gfltmiaak’ Precoat : 1.0 pound Sorbo-Cel (0,15 lb/ft2), Slurry Peed: None. Procedure and Remarks: The precoat was applied by recirculation of water containing 100 ppm chlorine. The unit was dechlorinated and the cysts applied in a batch. No slurry was used. Fig. U9 Uiatomaceous Silica Filter, Model SFC-1 Cyst Removal With Converted Portable Sand Filter The Engineer Board and United States Public Health Service Experiment Humber Sheet 2 of k 11-D July 6, 19^3 Elapsed Infl. Sffl. Effi. Cysts Recovered Sample Time Output Press. Press. Turb. Per Gallon of Humber Min. O.P.K. uai nsi unm Effluent Oneration Remarks 0-12 - - Precoating Chlorine added to 100 pnm 0-10 22 2k 2 - — Rechlorinated 153-* 0 - - - 0.1- — Entering Cysts added 153 1-2 17 22 2 0.1- 0 Entering 15U 2-3 18 2k 2 0.1- 0 Entering 155 3-* 13 2k 2 0.1- 0 Entering 156 U-5 12 25 2 . 0.1- 0 Entering Raw Waters Source s Potomac River, Turbiditys 50 ppm, pHs J,S9 Temperatures 72°r. Treatments Precoats 1.0 uound Super-Cel (0.1*5 Slurry feeds None. Procedure and Remarkss The precoat was spplied by recirculation of water containing 100 ppm chlorine. The unit was dechlorinated and the cysts applied in a batch. Ho slurry was used. Fig. 50 Uiatomaceous Silica Filter, Model SFC-l Cyst Removal With Converted Portable Sand Filter The ]fingineer Board and United States Public Health Service Experiment Number 12-D Sheet 3 of U July 6, 19^3 Elapsed Infl. Effl. Bffi. Cysts Recovered Sample Time Output Press Press Turb Per Gallon of Number Min. G.P.M. P.S.I. P.S.I. P.P.M. Effluent Operation Remarks 0-9 26.5 20 2 1*5/ Precoating Chlorine added • 0-3 - - - 1.54 - to 100 p.p.m. X57-* 0 25.0 20 2 1.5/ - Piltering Dechlorinated 157 1-2 IS.5 22 2 1.5/ 0 Entering cysts applied 158 2-3 16 22 2 1.5/ 1 Entering 159 3-tf 22 2 1.5/ 0 Entering 160 £5 13 23 2 —1.5/— 0 Entering Raw Water: Source: Potomac River* Turbidity: 50 p .p.m, pH: 7.6, Tenroerature: 72°E, Treatment: Precoat: 1.0 uound Hyflo Suner cel (0,15 lb/ft2)* Slurry Peed: None Procedure and Remarks: The rrecoat was applied by recirculation of water containing 100 p.p.m. chlorine. The unit was dechlorinated and the cysts applied in a batch. No slurry was used. Fig. 51 Biatomaceous Silica Filter, Model SFC-l Cyst Eeaoval With Converted Portable Sand Filter The Engineer Board and United States Public Health Service Experiment Number 13-® Sheet U of U July 6. 19^3 Elapsed Infl. Effl, Bffl. Cysts Recovered Sample Time Output Press, Press, Turb. Per Gallon of Hnraher Min. G.P.M. psi osl psi Effluent Ooeration Remarks - 0-12 mm „ mm Precoating Chlorine added to - 0-3 32 20 2 1- 100 ppm Reohlorinated l6l-A 0 29 20 2 • — Entering cysts applied. l6l 1-2 26 22 2 6-10 0 162 2-3 22 22 2 10^ 0 if? 20 23 2 10/ 0 164 J±5 18 25 Q Raw Water: Source: Potomac Riyer. Turbidity: 50 ppm, pH: 7,6, Temperature: 72°E. Treatment: Precoat: 1.0 pound JM (0.15 lb/ft2) , Slurry Peed: None Pro cedur e and Remarks: The precoat 1 was applied by recirculation of water containing 100 ppm chlorine. The unit was chlorinated and the cysts spoiled in a batch. No slurry was used. Note absence of cysts in presence of 10-15 ppm turbidity in effluent. Fig. 52 Blatomaceous Silica filter. Model SFC-1 Cyst Removal With Converted Portable Sand Filter The Engineer Board and United States Public Health Service Experiment Ho a, 10-2) & 13-2) Sheet 1 of 1 July 6, 19^3 Teat Ho. riltwald Ujtfa Sample Humber bacterial Count Per c, c. 37°0 _ Smallest Quantity Positive Por Bt Oo^Li Haw* W5 6.1 c.c. 10-D Sorho-Cel 1^9-A Bact. absent in 0.1 o.e. 1.0 o.o. 152 Uo 10 0.9. UJ Super-Cel 153-A Uo (absent)10 o.e. 156 20 (absent)lO c.c. 12-D Hyflo 157-A 30 1.0 c.c. 160 120 1.0 c.c. X3_B *5^5 161 3U0 .01 c.c. 16H 120 1.0 c.c. Remarks: *Average of k samples. Fig. 53 Biatoaaoeous Silica Filter, Model SFC-1 Summary Bacterial Removal With Several Grades of Filteraid The Engineer Board and United States Public Health Service mil> ANALYSIS :EEEEEEEe| ::=====JHiSgBla-"""=f : aid . ; “zzz^Ci^Mi^^c^lirrzriizzzz fff ttt: mi || ifflii... M ( J \JT| 1 'V JU L|Lil i! |j J 1 T rn PT hIf1 ! i i [E £ fl nlfS ft!: i &D* 4 4 | TTnilll In ttt 1 J M j 11M|) r?trtttt? ittt*11 i i i i O \Q] GQ \j III ml 1 ' ttt Oj ' jJ j^L *t M || ...l..,.>..|.|...l,||i„|||||, |{« jJ iT n n J. r JIW J jmiminii iii i |KMyf|'«a|fa | i | j | ||| : C. S. PUBLIC HSALTB SERVICE "==jl^ - ».m.- 0.^4iiS=: : 60? leas «ian-ro.m.-0.53 |tp: tfeiforaity Coefficient - 1.^1 :;*aiLrH%ISS p::^;d;p:H