TRENDELENBURG'S POSTURE IN GYNECOLOGY. BY FLORIAN KRUG, M.D., Fellow of the Academy of Medicine ; Fellow of the American Association of Obstet- ricians and Gynecologists; Fellow of the American Gynecological Society ; Member of the New York Obstetrical Society; Member of the German Medical Society; Member of the New York County Society ; Attending Gynecologist to the German Hospital, New York, etc. REPRINT FROM TRANSACTIONS, 1891. [Reprinted from the Transactions of the Association of American Obstetricians and Gynecologists, September, 1891.] TRENDELENBURG'S POSTURE IN GYNECOLOGY,.. By FLORIAN KRUG, M.D., NEW YORK. The value of Esmarch's bandage and the artificial anemia produced by it, is fully understood. No surgeon would now- adays think of performing an operation on the extremities without availing himself of the advantage which this valuable, though simple, addition to our surgical means affords him. Now, I venture to state, and I am sure that I am not claim- ing too much, that Trendelenburg's posture is as valuable a help and deserves to be as fully appreciated in abdominal sur- gery as Esmarch's bandage is in operations on the extremities. I confidently believe that within a short time abdominal sur- geons will recognize its value more generally, and will then no more think of dispensing with the facilities offered by this simple and effective procedure, than they would deprive them- selves of Esmarch's bandage in their general surgical work. What is Trendelenburg's Posture? It simply consists in raising the patient's pelvis and letting the body slant down at an incline of from 45 to 60 degrees to the horizontal. This can be accomplished by very simple means as well as by very complicated appliances specially de- vised for that purpose. However, before entering into details, I would like to give a short historical sketch of the evolution of this procedure. The idea of elevating the patient's pelvis is indeed quite old. Fabricius ab Aquapendente (born 1537), already recommended to hang up the patient by the legs and to shake him well, in order to reduce an incarcerated hernia. Without a doubt, many a surgeon has since lowered a patient's head and raised the lower portion of the body for one reason or another. Freund, in describing his first operation for extirpation of the cancerous uterus, mentions the fact that he put the patient in 2 FLORIAN KRUG, such a position as to have her head toward the window and lower down than the pelvis. Kocks, of Bonn, has also raised the foot-end of the operating-table; so has Noeggerath, formerly of New York. However, this can in no way detract anything from the credit due to Trendelenburg for having first adopted this method systematically, to have scientifically understood its advantages, and proved them to the profession, inducing others to follow his course. The first publication on the subject appeared in Langenbeck's Archiv fur klin. Chirurgie, in 1885, and was written by Dr. W. Meyer, who was then Prof. Trendelenburg's first assistant. Eigenbrod, also one of Trendelenburg's assistants, wrote on the same subject in 1888, in the Deutsche Zeitschrift fur Chir- urgie. In 1890, Trendelenburg published his own views in Volkmann's Klinische Vortrage, p. 355. Prof. Trendelenburg himself states that he began using it in 1880, in supra-pubic cystotomy, in order to gain a good inside view of the bladder. His idea was to use the negative pressure thus obtained, in order to cause the incised bladder to gape according to the same principle that is brought in effect by Sims's position. During the winter of 1887-88, he com- menced using it in all sorts of abdominal surgery and has ever done so since. As will be seen from these dates, the gentleman who made the statement last winter in the Obstetrical Society of New York, that he had seen Dr. Noeggerath, formerly of this city, make use of this method in 1876 or 1877, and heard him call it Trendelenburg's method (see page 599, May number Journal of Obstetrics, 1891), will have to confess to a chronological error. Early in 1888,1 witnessed one of Dr. W. Meyer's supra-pubic cystotomies, and was immediately impressed with the enormous advantages this posture would offer in gynecological operations. I at once started to make use of it in my abdominal work, not being aware, at that time, that Trendelenburg used it for any- thing else besides supra-pubic cystotomy. In the beginning I only applied this method in cases where I expected to meet with special difficulties in the depth of the pelvis; but soon I found that it worked so very well that I employed it in almost every case of abdominal surgery with but few exceptions. The total number of laparatomies done by me in this posi- tion exceeds 150, so that I might justly be entitled to speak of its merits. I have since had the pleasure of demonstrating its utility to a great number of operators, to whom it has been a revelation, every one of them having become an ardent follower of this excellent method. Proof of this is, that several new devices Trendelenburg's posture in gynecology. 3 and modifications of operating-tables have been brought out in New York during the last year.1 What are Its Advantages? They can be pointed out in a few words: Following the law of gravity, all the contents of the abdominal cavity fall toward the diaphragm, and the pelvis becomes free and easy of access. If the narcosis is at all sufficient, a protrusion of the gut, which so often disagreeably happens in the horizontal position, is impossible. A single flat sponge will suffice to keep the intestines out of view during the entire operation. All unnecessary handling of them, particularly eventration of the same, which operators have sometimes found necessary when operating in the horizontal position, is thus strictly avoided. The main advantage is, however, that the operator can see everything he is doing. The entire true pelvis is before him as in an anatomical demonstration. He can see the ureters and easily avoid them; every bleeding-point is at once detected and easily tied; no accumulation of blood or pus in Douglas's pouch is possible, as it is readily recognized and easily wiped off. I have been told by some gentlemen who have not yet taken the trouble to investigate this method, that they did not need in their pelvic operations the information that eyesight gives, as they could feel everything as soon as they were able to in- sert two fingers into the peritoneal cavity. I will admit that the sense of touch can be trained to a high degree of perfec- tion, but I think the blind man feeling his way through crowded streets could claim with the same right that he can find his way as safely and quickly as the one who has the use of two sound eyes. Are there Any Disadvantages to the Method? None whatsoever. It certainly does not interfere with the anesthesia, no matter whether chloroform or ether is ad- ministered. On the contrary, shock due to sudden anemia of the brain is much less liable to occur than in the horizontal position. 1 In an editorial note of the March number of the Archives of Gynecology, p. 148, is to be found the following remark : " To Dr. Florian Krug, of this city, is due the credit of popularizing Trendelen- burg's method in this countryTo see him operate after this method one can easily recognize the many advantages it offers over the usual horizontal position.'' 4 FLORIAN KRUG, The objection has been raised by operators who have no personal experience with this procedure, that pus from a ruptured ovarian abscess or pyosalpinx would flow all over the intestines and contaminate the entire peritoneal cavity. The facts are just the reverse of this theoretical assertion. In the first place, if Trendelenburg's posture is used, you are less liable to rupture an intra-peritoneal pus cavity, since you are not groping in the dark, but see what you are doing, and can in most instances avoid this accident. In fact, it has rarely happened to me, since using Trendelenburg's posture, that I did not get out even the most difficult cases of pus tubes and ovaries without rupture. Should it, however, occur, the flat sponge covering the intestines prevents their coming in contact with the infectious material, and everything can be wiped off, and, if thought necessary, the pelvis may be packed with iodoform gauze after Mikulicz's method, before the patient's pelvis is lowered again and the sponge removed. Again, the objection might be raised, that to gain a full view of the pelvis and to operate upon its contents under control of the eye, a larger incision is required than is the case if one chooses to rely upon his two fingers. But is there really any serious objection to a larger opening? Ventral hernia is as liable to occur in a two-inch as in a four-inch incision, if the wound is not properly sewed up. Again, the obsolete idea that the peritoneal cavity is contaminated by the entrance of air, and that the amount of danger is, therefore, proportionate to the length of the incision and the quantity of air thus allowed to enter, might nowadays be dismissed from scientific consideration. On the contrary, the practice of making as small as possible an incision with the patient in the horizontal position, cannot too strongly be condemned in view of the dangers it engenders. Time and again I have seen operators make an incision just large enough to admit of two fingers. Then they would com- mence digging about in the pelvis, while the intestines were constantly slipping in between, until finally, after displaying a good deal of exertion of the arm muscles, an indefinite mass of ruptured pus tubes and ovaries was rudely torn from its adhesions and tied off. Without being able to satisfy himself where the bleeding came from, nor to determine if any infec- tious material had been left behind, the operator would then indiscriminately pour hot water into the peritoneal cavity, and would rely upon the so-called " washing out," leaving the rest to Providence and the drainage-tube. In no other branch of surgery would such practices be toler- Trendelenburg's posture in gynecology. 5 ated, and the sooner they are abolished in gynecology, in favor of sound surgical principles, the better for the patients. Without a doubt, a great deal of so-called persistent pain after laparatomy is to be attributed to lesions of the serous covering of the intestines and pelvic contents due to these un- surgical methods. The apparently frequent occurrence of fistulas after laparatomy seems also to be traceable to such defective technique. Special Indications for Trendelenburg's Posture. To be brief, only a few shall be mentioned : 1. As has been pointed out already, in cases of removal of diseased tubes and ovaries, particularly when they are the seat of purulent disease and are bound way down in the pelvis by firm adhesions, advantages are gained through this method, even in the hands of the tyro, which cannot be equalled by the highest skill and attainments of the expert, should he choose to deprive himself of this procedure. 2. In ruptured ectopic gestation the bleeding-point is dis- covered at once, and readily tied without the often troublesome interference of the small intestines, as will be generally the case if the patient is in the horizontal position. If you have to operate while the patient is in profound shock owing to the intra-peritoneal loss of blood, Trendelenburg's posture is of special advantage, as it prevents sudden collapse from acute anemia of the brain. 3. The abdominal extirpation of the uterus, be it for myo- matous or cancerous disease, is rendered very much easier by this method. In over twenty cases of total extirpation which I have done in this posture, it has proved itself to be a most valuable help. The most difficult part of Freund's operation, viz., the dis- secting off of the lower third of the uterine attachments, is incomparably easier in Trendelenburg's posture than in the horizontal position. Trendelenburg's posture has enabled me to shell out large myomatous nodules, which had unfolded the broad ligaments, in such an easy and uncomplicated manner that it was a revelation to myself as well as to the spectators. 4. Transperitoneal hysterorrhaphy, viz., stitching the pro- lapsed or movable retroflexed uterus to the anterior abdominal wall without opening the peritoneal cavity, a method devised by me and described in a paper read before the Obstetrical Section of the New York Academy of Medicine, in November, 6 FLORIAN KRUG, 1890,1 is only feasible in Trendelenburg's posture. Without it, I must consider any operation of this kind-as, for instance,. Howard Kelly's, which he has since abandoned-most serious and dangerous on account of possible injury to the intestines. Many other instances could I point out, like dermoid, intra- ligamentous, parovarian cysts, etc., where Trendelenburg's posture is most essential in facilitating difficult operations, but I want to be brief, and, therefore, shall mention only one more of its manifold advantages. Leon de Mendes has first called attention to the fact, that this posture is a most valuable help in gynecological examinations, the negative pressure thus pro- duced in the true pelvis affording a great facility to explore its contents. No special apparatus is necessary for that purpose, as an ordinary couch or sofa iti the physician's office will readily answer. The patient's head rests about in the centre of the lounge, while her pelvis is placed on the top of the head-rest, thus forming the highest point, and allowing the legs, to hang over. Fig. 1. 1 New York Medical Journal, January 3, 1891. Fig. 2. Showing detachable inclined plane adjusted to operating table. Fig. 3. Showing patient in Trendelenburg's posture. TRENDELENBURG'S POSTURE IN GYNECOLOGY. 7 How to Place the Patient in Trendelenburg's Posture. As I have remarked before, the elevation of the patient's pelvis to the desired angle can be accomplished in a very simple way, as well as by expensive and complicated apparatus. The main point, however, is that the angle be not less than 45 degrees. I must call special attention to this, as I have had occasion to witness operations, since claimed asjhaving been done in Trendelenburg's posture, where a single cushion or small wooden wedge was placed under the patient's back, which did not raise the pelvis sufficiently, furnishing an incline of not more than from 15 to 20 degrees to the horizontal. As this is apt to give disappointment and will only throw discredit on the original procedure, I like to emphasize this point. In my earliest operations I had a nurse standing at the end of the operating-table, holding the patient's legs over his shoulders. (See Fig. 1, which is taken from Dr. W. Meyer's article in Langenbeck's Arch. f. kiln. Chirurg., xxxi. 3.) But I soon gave it up, after a nurse had fainted during a somewhat prolonged operation. After some experimenting, I finally adopted a very simple contrivance, which can be easily attached to any kind of operating-table, and which, also, can be readily removed. As the accompanying two figures fully illustrate its use, a further description is unnecessary. (See Figs. 2 and 3.) For hospital use it meets all requirements, but I often wished for an easily portable apparatus. In case of emergency I have nailed an ordinary laundry chair upside-down on a table and sawed off the upper pair of legs. If then covered with a cushion and a rubber cloth, it is ready for use. Lately, I had a very simple appliance constructed, which answers the purpose in every respect. It .consists of two gal- vanized cast-iron frames (see Fig. 4). The lower one can be fastened to an ordinary laundry table as well as to any kind of operating-table, either by screws or by cabinetmaker's clamps. The upper frame is jointed to the lower one and is covered with heavy sail canvas, on which straps are provided for the knees and ankles of the patient. After the abdominal in- cision has been made, the upper frame is raised to any desired angle and held there by supporters on both sides, as shown in the figure. The following are the advantages of this contrivance: 1. The galvanized-iron frame is easily kept clean and aseptic, while the canvas can be readily sterilized by steaming or boiling. 8 Trendelenburg's posture in gynecology. 2. The apparatus can be easily transported, thus facilitating its use in the patient's house. Fig. 4. 3. Compared with other apparatus specially devised for this purpose, its price is a very moderate one and places it within the reach of all.