AS TO YELLOW EEVER. BY JOHN P. WALL M. D. (Reprinted from the Florida Times-Union.) AS TO YELLOW FEVER. By JOHN P. WALL. M. D. (Reprinted from the Florida Times-Union.) Sime the appearance of the yellow fever in Tampa, I have noticed much in the Times- Union, more or less reflecting upon me, for having advised the people of Tampa to get away from the place and thus escape the fever. The authors of these criticisms have shown themselves such ignoramuses-and among them are some of your editorial staff- that I would hardly deign to notice them but for the hope that it may prove of some benefit in the future. Yellow fever is one of the few diseases of which little is positively and definitely known as to its cause, nature (in a patha- logical sense) and exact mode of propagation. For at least a century, all these points have been discussed; and whether we know much more about them now than did our progeni- tors of the last century is extremely prob- lematical, as the literature of the disease abundantly proves. Medical opinion has been divided as to its origin, transmissibil- ity and contagiousness from its first inva- sion of the shores of North America. It is generally conceded now, however, that it is a zymotic disease, and that if it does not have its origin on our shores in filth, at least the latter is an essential factor to the generation and propagation of its infect- ing germs, or morbific agent-the poison that produces the disease. Why it should take on a comparatively mild type in certain seasons and manifest no marked disposition to spread at times is another of its problems for which we cannot account at the present day. The few facts that we do know about yel- low fever are that it is a disease attended with a considerable mortality, ranging from 10 to 75 per cent.; and that the atmosphere of the city where it is prevailing sooner or later becomes infected-poisoned with its morbific agent; and that those susceptible to the disease, i. e., not being acclimated, or protected by a previous attack, will in all probability take the disease. Experience has taught us this much, at least. Yellow fever, then, being a zymotic dis- ease-having its origin probably in the filth of the slave-ship-the necessity and impor- tance of sanitation-to keep air, water and soil clean and pure, become too obvious to the ordinary mind to require any arguments to demonstrate. The Technical Commission of the Inter- national Conference of Rome (1885) says: "The measures recommended against cholera are, in general, applicable to yellow fever and to other diseases which prevail in epidemic form under the influence of bad sanitary conditions, and which are trans- mitted by human intercourse. The most effective measures for preventing the propa- gation of diseases of this class are: the sani- tary improvement of cities and of vessels sailing from infected ports, isolation of the sick, and disinfection of infected or suspect- ed articles and localities." If, then, the same sanitary prophylaxis for cholera is good for yellow fever, why is not the doctrine and practice of England in regard to cholera applicable here to yellow fever? Instead of a quarantine of detention, except as to the sick, the English pursue the following enlightened and common sense plan, as set forth in an editorial in the London Lancet of the 20th of last August: "All sick of cholera or diarrhoea are dealt with and isolated at our ports; but the healthy are not herded with the sick, as is done under quarantine. They (the healthy) are allowed to go where they will, provided they submit to proper supervision, bjr giving the address of the destination to which they are traveling. These precautions form, however, only the fringe of our system of prevention. Our ponulation, knowing that the Government will no longer pretend to guarantee any measure of safety by drawing a quarantine around the country, have of their own free will set themselves to remove from their midst those conditions under which imported cholera can alone spread; and, according to Dr. Thorne, they have, apart from all Government dictation, spent during the past ten years, by way of loan 01 in current expenditure, over eighty millions sterling for purposes mainly of a sanitary character. When quarantining countries can give evidence of their alternative sys- tem by submitting to any such expenditure, then it will be time enough for them to urge 4 that their system merits further considera- tion at our hands. Up to the present time, and this even in the Ped Sea, which is looked j upon as the gateway by which cholera may at any time enter Europe, the quarantine stations are not even provided with the common decencies of lire. "Since our system of medical inspection came into operation it has gone hand-in- hand with a steady sanitary progress far ex- ceeding anything to be met with in those European countries where the inhabitants are led to believe that quarantine restric- tions will be imposed for their protection in times of danger; it has been accom- panied by a great diminution of mor- tality, and it has spared the inhabitants of this country from an untold amount of misery and destitution, which 'is the more burdensome because it follows in the track of preventable disease and death.' That our system is complete we do not for a moment pretend, and we would make no boast of the fact that imported cholera has on each occasion, for many years past, been at once checked in this country; but we do hold that the experience of the past few years has once again indicated the uselessness of quarantine and the great advantages of the system we have substituted for it. Quaran- tine has a blighting effect on sanitary pro- gress ; it leaves the people unprepared to face a disease which disregards the antiquat- ed barriers which nations have opposed to its extension, and so it prepares the way for panic. On the other hand, the steady pro- gress of true measures of prevention ten s to impart that feeling of confidence which is of such value in the face of an impending epidemic, and at the same time it promotes the healthiness and well-being of the popu- lation." In the same article the editor points out that Spain, France, Italy and Algeria, rely- ing on quarantine for protection, have suf- fered from the ravages of cholera during the European epidemic of 1884-87. In the New York Medical Record of the 29th ult. we find the following editorial article: "England's commercial interests have al- ways led her to doubt the need and distrust the efficacy of quarantine. She has held what she is pleased to consider the ' common sense view,' viz: that, though theoretically quarantine may succeed in keeping out disease, practically, in any large coun- try, it amounts simply to an irrational derangement of commerce. England has long since, says the British Medical Journal, discarded quarantine as a means of preventing cholera, and now places her trust in the security afforded by purity of local surroundings-of soil, air and water on land; and a system of watchful medical inspection at her seaports, 't'he success of this policy, continues our contemporary, has been complete, and there are not wanting indications that this success is exercising a beneficial effect on public opinion abroad. It is added that at the recent International Hygienic Congress,at Vienna, opinion seemed to be turning against quarantine. Italy and Austria, in particular, are wavering in their allegiance to the older methods." If, then, a quarantine of detention for cholera has proven to be useless, it is cer- tainly much more senseless for the preven- tion of yellow fever. And on this point- the detention of persons-let us quote some of our latest text books on the practice of medicine. Flint, in his edition of 1884, page 1026, says: " Measures for the prevention of yellow fever relate, 1st, to the removal of local con- ditions which favor the multiplication of the disease-germs, 2d, to quarantine regula- tions, and 3d, to disinfection. The first of these three divisions embrace all that per- tains to public and private hygiene. The local conditions especially important as auxiliary causes are unknown, and, there- fore it can only be hoped that they will be reached by rendering sanitary measures as complete as practicable. But, be these measures never so complete, they do not make superfluous those of quarantine and disinfection. The object of quarantine reg- ulations is that the disease-germs shall not be imported. To effect this object, either there must be non-intercourse with places in which the disease prevails, or all articles of merchandise, clothing, etc., brought there- from must be thoroughly disinfected. To be efficient, quarantine regulations must in- clude, not only vessels from infected ports, but inland transportation by railroads and other conveyances. There is no danger of the disease being carried by the living body after disinfection of the wearing apparal, nor by the bodies of the dead. Detention of the well or the sick is, therefore, a needless pre- caution, except to prevent groundless pvpu- lar apprehension. (Italics mine.) If impor- tation of germs have taken place, the houses with their surroundings in which cases occur, should be instantly and completely disinfected. The object now is to "stamp out' the disease. There is ground for the belief that this object may be effected if measures of disinfection be promptly and thoroughly carried out. "During the prevalence of an epidemic, unacclimated persons should avoid going within the infected area, except under a sense of duty, and they who are already with- in the area should leave it. unless there are motives for remaining which render the risk of life justifiable and praiseworthy." Bartholov in his work on practice, says: "A germ or germs are introduced. Ac- cumulated filth, decomposing animal or vegetable matters, bad or no drainage, crowding and other hygienic evils are in- dispensable to impart the necessary vitality. Lodging thus in a suitable soil and with the appropriate atmospherical conditions present the disease germs grow and infect those in the proper personal state to receive the poison. ************ It is not by personal contact that the dis- ease is communicated-in other words, it is not a contagious, but an infectious disease, and it is not against individuals that quarantine restrictions should be enforced, but against articles of clothing, bedding or the like or against allfomites." Again, in the Lamb Prize Essay, for the 5 American Public Health Association, 1886, on disinfection and individual prophylaxis against infectious diseases, by Dr. Sternberg, Surgeon United States Army, we find the following on yellow fever: "This disease, like cholera, is contracted in infected localities, rather than by contact with the sick. Indeed, it is rarely, if ever, communicated directly by a sick person to his attendants. In infected places the poison seems to be given off from the soil, or from collections of decomposing organic matter, and we have no definite evidence that it is communicated through the medium of food or drinking water (as is the case with chol- era.-W.) The history of epidemics of this disease shows that when it obtains a lodg- ment in a city or town which is in an unsani- tary condition, in Southern latitudes and during the summer months, it extends its area and invades new localities similarly sit- uated, until frost occurs, or at least until the weather becomes comparatively cool in the autumn. Those who remain in an infected area, unless protected by a previous attack, are almost certain to contract the disease, and much less can be done in the way of in- dividual prophylaxis than in cholera. We therefore advise all who can get out of the way of this fatal disease to do so. * * * * * * * * This being the case, we repeat our advice to all those whose duty does not require them to stay on the field of battle, to make an orderly retre at to some place of safety." If such is the teaching of science, will medical men on county boards of health please tell the public how much sense there is in their fifteen days' quarantine of indi- viduals ? Are they mere puppets of panic- stricken communities, and by being thus, prostitute science and professional propriety to magnify their importance in the popular estimation? Do they think it a light and trivial thing to interrupt and prostrate all business and bankrupt common carriers be- cause these foolish measures of quarantine are applauded by some scared editor who has aroused, by his ill-timed effusions on a subject of which he knows hut little, if any- thing, a groundless popular apprehension? Does it not occur to them that they are ex- hibiting themselves to their professional brethren who read and think, as being either ignorant or dishonorable? Has it never oc- curred to them that they are playing the role of quacks and charlatans? Much would I prefer to be shunned by the ignorant than thus to sacrifice truth and science to the clamor of a senseless scare, and forfeit my own self-respect. If. as is pretty well established, yellow fever is not a contagious disease, and there is no danger from the well, sick or dead, from the infected locality-barring the clothing and other effects-how is this thing of confining a people to an infected locality to be justified? Do they expect them to remain and die like dumb brutes? If they do, they are fools as well as inhuman mon- sters. I told the people of Tampa that we had yellow fever here, and advised them to get out. I did this deliberately, and to pre- vent reports being spread, I got the tele- graph operators to refuse to receive any mes- sages that would give the alarm to the out- side world until I could give the people a chance to get away. I know. Mr. Editor, that I was not endangering the lives of 250,- 000 people of the State as you charged, be- cause I knew that the infection was only here, and did not extend all over the State. I was guided by the teachings of science, and actuated by humanity and common sense in my proceedings. The result has vindicated my course and prevented an in- crease of calamity that would, in all proba- bility, have amounted to a holocaust in the sacrifice of life, to say nothing of the in- creased suffering that would have naturally resulted. I have nothing but the profound- est contempt for the nincompoop M. Ds. and pseudonymous liars of the "Viator" stripe who write about fifteen days' incubation and a State Board of Health, and took occasion to maliciously misrepresent me at a time when I had neither time nor opportunity to defend myself. The charge made by the Times-Union and "Viator" that I said I would guarantee that ' 'no yellow fever got into Tampa," is false in toto. When that "M. D." quoted Flint about the fifteen days' incubation, why did he not quote him cor- rectly? and why did he leave out what I have quoted from the same author on quarantine? Do you think that was either gentlemanly or honest? It is just such nincompoops as he who impose false ideas upon the people, and ex- cite groundless apprehensions of danger. As for railroad quarantine, it is an absurd- ity, and the disinfection practiced with sul- phur at the quarantine station, was about as efficient as so much ordinary smoke. Yet it met the approval, according to their report, of two or three of your Jacksonville physi- cians, who reported that the fumigation at Dr. Caldwell's camp was satisfactory, and was of two or four hours' duration, I am not certain which. Now, in the article on Dis- infection, in Vol. 2, Reference Handbook of the Medical Sciences, by Dr. Sternberg (pre- viously quoted), page 480, can be found this: "Fumigation with sulphur dioxide has been largely relied on for the disinfection of clothing" To be effectual, the articles to be disinfected must be freely exposed to its ac- tion, in a well closed chamber, for a period of at least twelve hours. Burn three pounds of sulphur for each thousand cubic feet of air space in the room." And, besides, it is only efficient for micro- organisms in the absence of spores, being quite impotent for the destruction of these reproductive elements. Now, do they know anything about the micro-organisms and spores of yellow fever? and whether or not these spores-the reproductive elements- pertain to the yellow fever poison? And as for the closeness of the fumigating chamber, if it was the one I saw, it was wholly lacking, and failed to confine the fumes of the sul- phur, which were escaping in a manner to remind one very much of a country smoke- house in the bacon-curing season. And yet this was satisfactory to the sanitarians and hygienists of Duval county! In the North Carolina Medical Journal of November, 1878, Dr.R. A,Kinloch, of Charles- 6 ton, S. C., published an able article on "In- land Quarantine," from which I make the following extracts: "Can it be claimed that any 'cordon sani- taire' has ever kept out cholera or yellow fever when these diseases appear in an epi- demic form? Has it ever prevented the ex- tension of yellow fever from our seaport towns in)o the interior? In years gone by, and before we were as proud as we are now of our scientific knowledge, we never enter- tained the hope of land quarantine prevent- ing the spread of the disease. And its dif- fusion. or march into the interior, with rare exceptions, never took place. In recent times the boasted sanitarians have so im- pressed the people with their importance that much is now expected. Hence incon- veniences, privations and sufferings have followed, in a most alarming degree, the futile attempt to carry out a supposed prin- ciple in hygienic law. Upon a mere as- sumption of the knowledge of the laws of a disease (a knowledge possessed, as we said above, no more now than it was a hundred years ago), the most arbitrary regulations have been attempted. People flying from a stricken city have been driven back to die. Refugees from a pestilence have been hunt- ed down, and, upon the possibility of their introducing disease (after they had already been the carriers of the poison, if such thing were possible,) have been shipped to the nearest sister city, who in turn was expected to protect herself. This selfish, arbitrary and unreasonable action was practiced by cities hundreds of miles away from the in- fected regions, and in Northern as well as Southern latitudes. The law of self-preser- vation, as interpreted in other times, con- tained no provision for a brother's welfare. We regret to say that in but few instances has even a protest against this rule of con- duct gone forth from the profession. The people naturally cling to their superstitions. They possessed but small capability of dis- tinguishing between areal and an imaginary danger. They were without that enlighten- ment which should have reached them through the profession, and they were ready to reject the lesson of facts. Thus it was that the futile scheme most generally con- sisted in the attempted exclusion of persons. While this action for the most part pertained to municipalities, or improperly constituted health boards, it at times received the sanc- tion and support of regular health officers in good repute." The late Dr. J. M. Woodworth, Supervis- ing Surgeon-General of the Marine Hospital | Bureau, expressed the belief that absolute quarantine by land is impracticable. "It may be argued," continues Dr. Kin- loch, "that it is necessary to calm thepublic mind, and that upon this ground quarantine i serves a useful purpose. We question if : public quietude is not thus often obtained j at too high a cost, and if the reaction, that J sooner or later must follow with the realiza- I tion of the truth, is not the evil the more to be dreaded? We cannot, however, now dis- cuss this point, but will parenthetically ex- press our earnest conviction that truth is ! ever the best policy, and should be diffused j everywhere under an enlightened and pro- gressive medicine. "With the vulgar, the question of exclud- ing disease from communities is a simple one, and their faith in the potency of human power and scientific application of means is stronger than it can be with our enlightened profession. Quarantine and sanitation are now, with the people, veritable supersti- tions. They are worshipped and implicitly relied upon. There are many, too, in the profession equally credulous in this regard, and some, though sufficiently informed, culpable enough to encourage the vulgar delusion, with the view, perhaps, of magni- fying their own office." Much more might be adduced to show the absurdity of inland quarantine if time and space permitted, but I shall wait till after frost to prove its futility in the present epi- demic, when probably some more M. Ds. will feel as cheap as they may be surprised. This is the first season that I have had any experience with a County Health Board, and I am so disgusted with its workings that it will be my last. I have no hesitancy in de- nouncing them as a curse to the State, and trust that amono the first acts of the next Legislature will be the repeal of the statute creating them. For funds they are made de- pendent on the County Commissioners, and are expacted, without remuneration, except in the way of abuse, to protect the public health. Nor do I have any faith in a State Board of health being able to accomplish any more in preventing the introduction and spread of epidemic diseases: and am fully convinced that, as a member of the Constitu- tional Convention of 1865, I made a mistake in using my efforts to get a provision in the Constitution providing for a State Board of Health. Capable medical men cannot be expected to use their knowledge and give their time to the public for nothing, while incapable men would prove a blight and curse to the commercial and industrial prosperity of the State. So the best thing for the State is to let her population know that they must protect themselves after the English fashion by removing from their midst those causes which would give epidemic diseases a foot- hold if introduced. Provision for medical inspection at seaports, and the detention and isolation of the sick with infectious and contagious diseases, is all the quarantine that a State law should provide for or per- mit on the part of any seaoort city or town. Of course this should include disinfection where necessary. Beyond this neither State, county nor municipal law should ex- tend; for, as already pointed out, reliance on quarantine has a blighting effect on sani- tary progress, which is our only hope for the future health and prosperity of the State. In conclusion I may say that the fever did not get in here through the Plant Line of steamers, but was evidently smuggled in by a small boat engaged in contraband trade, which, it seems, eluded the Custom House officials as well as the quarantine authori- ties. The ."first cases occurred during my absence from the State, and were among Italians and fruit dealers, who were 7 doubtless the confederates of the smugglers and receivers of the goods. This was evi- dently the avenue by which the fever was introduced in the character of fomites, as I expect to be able to conclusively prove at the proper time. The sanitary condition of the city afforded a suitable soil for the lodge- ment and propagation of the infectious poison, and the result the world knows. It is true that the city authorities disregarded my warnings as to the neglected sanitary condition of the city, and seemed to be in- spired with a spirit of antagonism to me per- sonally. Why this was so I leave to them to explain if they can; and if the result has been pleasing to them and the people of Tampa, they are welcome to all the enjoy- ment it affords. I was absent from Tampa from the 2d to the 25th of September, and, from what has since come to my knowledge, I presume the first cases must have made their appear- ance about the middle of September-in res- idents and not in persons who had come from either Key West or Havana. How- ever, I was home but a few days before my suspicions were aroused as to the presence of yellow fever in the city, but these were not confirmed till the first of the following week, October 3d and 4th. On the 22d of September a case was reported, but the physicians who saw it denied its being yel- low fever. This was three days before my return. I know now that if I had seen cer- tain cases to which my attention was called on the day that I announced its presence to the public, I should have been able to de- clare its presence at least six days earlier than I did. However, the diagnosis of yellow fever is not the easy thing that some suppose, nor does a post mortem always demonstrate the true character of the disease, as some doc- tors believe. In 1870 the disease prevailed on Governor's Island a month before it was recognized even by the Health Board of New York who stated that "post mortem examinations upon the bodies gave satisfac- tory evidence that the disease was not yellow fever." But it was proved to be yellow fever when seen by a medical man familiar with the disease. There were 159 cases with 52 deaths. But yet a whole month passed before the true character of the disease was recognized on an island in New York Harbor within rifle shot of Castle Garden. Strange to say there were a few cases in the city, but the epidemic on the island did not extend to the city. (W. Y. Medical Record for 1870 and 1871.) "The late Dr. Warren Stone, of New Orleans, very justly remarked that when he had seen one epidemic of yellow fever he thought he knew all about it, but after see- ing twenty epidemics he discovered that he knew nothing about it." Such was the lan- guage of the late Dr. J. C. Nott, who gave it as an illustration of how little really was known of this disease by those who had had a life-time opportunity, as it were, to study it. The mortality here has been about 17 per cent, among the whites, and hardly one per cent, among the blacks. There have been up to date, 26th of November, 72 deaths from the fever, only 2 of which were colored- one mulatto and one full blooded African. The exact number of cases in Tampa and vicinity is not known, as all were not re- ported, and some were so mild as not to re- quire the services of a physician; but I should estimate the number at about 400 whites and possibly 200 negroes. Among the latter the cases were, as a rule, of a mild type. Not an old resident who had had the fever in previous epidemics in Tampa, had it this time; nor did any one suffer from a second attack during the epidemic. The whole adult Cuban population was acclimat- ed and escaped. Nor does this immunity conferred by one attack of the disease, de- pend on the severity of the attack-a mild attack being as protective as a severe one. With children it is generally mild-the younger the child the milder the fever-so that it is a great mistake to remove small children beyond the infection if it is expect- ed the place where it is epidemic or any oth- er Southern city, is to be their homes, i. e., provided the parents are acclimated so as to run no risk themselves. There is another prevalent idea, enter- tained, too, by some very competent men, the erroneousness of which I desire to point out; and that is in case of an epidemic appear- ing in a city, all that is necessary is to re- move the unacclimated into camps some dis- tance in the country. This is impracticable in the first place, because of the lack of con- veniences in the shape of houses or even tents for the protection of the people from the inclemencies of the weather, and in the second place, even if such camp was estab- lished, communication with the infected place for some time at least, would from the very nature of things, be kept up, so that the infection would be sure to invade the camp before arrangements for getting sup- plies and other necessaries from uninfected places could be made. In this way the fever was carried out into families several miles from here into the country during the pres- ent epidemic. According to Dr. J. C. Nott, who moved his family from Mobile into the piney woods seven miles from the city, in 1856, even before the fever reached Mobile from New Orleans, the fever followed his family out of the city and he lost four of his children. (A7. Y. Medical Record, 1871.) But there are other things which render this camp business wholly impracticable: 1st, getting the people to leave their homes when there are so many medical ignora- muses and wiseacres who will swear to the last that it is not yellow fever; and 2d, the impossibility of keeping them there if they should feel disposed to have communication with the infected area. It is very easy for theorists and inexperienced people to say what ought or should be done, but carry- ing out their suggestions is altogether a very different thing, unless one was an autocrat with a standing army to execute his orders. It is one thing to preach, and another to practice. And it is for this reason that a State Board of Health would be as literally helpless in controlling the spread of an epi- demic as any other authority now existing. The success of the National Board in 1879 was not encouraging and proved a failure. John P. Wall, M. D. November 28th.