FACTS AND FALLACIES IN VETERINARY SCIENCE; Oli What the Farmers Should Know About Diseases of Animals. MY NOAH CR12SSY. M.D.. Y.S., Pn. D„ Formerly Statk Veterinary SruuKoN, Professor <>f Veterinary soikm k, M vss. Aokici’i.tikai College, and Lecturer on Veterinary Medicine in the Pnivkrsity of Vermont. HARTFORD, CONN. AN ADDRESS DELIVERED BEFORE THE CONNECTICUT BOARD of Agriculture. HARTFORD, CONN.: Press of The Case, Lockwood & Bkainakd Company. 1881. [From the Report of the Secretary of Conn. Board-of Agriculture, 1881.] FACTS AND FALLACIES IN VETERINARY SCIENCE. In every department of physical science, there are certain facts which underlie all possible deductions. Every conclusion, there- fore, worthy of scientific recognition, must be based on said facts, and serve as an explanation of them. Accordingly an accepted theory, among scientific men, is but the rightful interpretation of all existing facts in relation to the subject. Astronomy, chemis- try, and biology are teeming with illustrations of such established principles. All of which, however, differ in a marked degree from an hypothesis that is based upon mere assumptions, and therefore often found to be fallacious on further investigations. Conse- quently a fallacy is a deceptive conclusion, drawn from the imagi- nation of its author. Nowhere are faulty methods of reasoning more frequently met with than in the practice of the Healing Art; and this is largely duo to the system of education by which the votaries have thus attempted to Gt themselves for this ennobling work. In fact the difference between a true and empirical method of curing disease depends wholly upon the degree of intelligence which the practi- tioner may possess. If the physician has all the necessary facts in relation to the anatomy and pathology of the malady in question, the therapeutical indications aro easy of conception, and this treat- ment, therefore, is practically the result of a scientific conclusion. But the quack, whose scanty knowledge of disease rarely enables him to distinguish one ailment from another, can never give an intelligent reason wdiy he uses a certain remedy, or what effect it may produce. Hence a system of practice, either in human or veterinary medicine, which is not based upon the established prin- ciples of biological science, is fallacious in theory and dangerous in its consequences. The crude notions of disease, so frequently exemplified in the practice of the uneducated farrier, arc almost invariably the gift of a fertile imagination, rather than the result of any pathological in- vestigations. It therefore behooves us in the study of the Veteri- nary Art, to lay broad the foundation of knowledge, and thus BY NOAII CRESSY, M.D., V.8., Pii.D., HARTFORD, CONN. 2 inquire into the real nature and cause of the malady, before searching the materia medica for a cure. This will require a gen- eral knowledge of structure and of the anatomical relations of parts, before any facts, in a pathological point of view, can have the slightest bearing on the question of treatment. For instance how can a farrier diagnose and successfully treat a case of pneumo- nia, in its various stages, who has no knowledge of the real struc- ture of the lungs nor of the circulation of the blood. Hence, the importance of COMPARATIVE ANATOMY. A general knowledge of the mechanism and physiology of the animal body is absolutely essential for the discrimination of disease. The location and phenomena of symptoms cannot be accurately in- terpreted without an intimate acquaintance with the structure and. functions of the internal organs. A case of acute nephritis, therefore, m%ht easily be mistaken for an inflammation of other abdominal viscera. All these maladies would appear mysterious, and to the uneducated eye, essentially the same. In fact those characteristic symptoms of specific and organic disease would have no meaning to one not familiar with the general organism. Much quackery would cease, and many fallacies concerning the nature and seat of disease must inevitably be dispelled from the public mind by the general diffusion of anatomical knowledge. The comparative relations of the joints and parts of animals, to those of man, are not well understood, especially, by those most interested in the care of stock. This want of knowledge has, many times, led to fallacious conclusions, which have served as a barrier in the pathway of veterinary progress. But the popular demand for those practical facts which a knowledge of anatomy alone can give, are propitious omens in the canopy of our profes- sion, and thus indicate the future trend of all such needed inquiries. The relation of man to the higher mammalia, which has caused so much speculation among philosophers and naturalists on certain zoological affinities, is especially interesting and instructive in an anatomical point of view. The skeletal framework and internal organization of our domestic animals are morphologically identi- cal with the structure of the human body, and thus subserve the same purpose in the animal economy. The limb3 are similar in mechanical design, are made up of the same kind of bones and joints, and are therefore subject to analogous diseases from expo- 3 sure and accidents. Hence the necessity of more carefully study- ing the structure of animals, that we may better understand the nature and situation of the difficulty in every creature that we are called upon to relieve. This leads us therefore very naturally to inquire into the Homology of Bones and Joints. Though all vertebrate animals are built upon the same general plan of structure, yet we find a modification of this plan in the four great classes known as fishes, reptiles, birds, and mammals, o fit them for their several spheres in life.* But the special details of structure on which genera are founded are well illustrated by the variety of form in the limbs of quadrupeds. In all animals which crop their forage from the ground, and thus use the legs simply as pedestals, have no necessity for that power of rotation in the fore arm, which man and carnivorous animals possess in such a marked degree, as organs of prehension. The radius and ulna therefore have grown together, in accordance with nature’s law of economy and strength, both in the horse and in all animals that chew their cud. This anatomical fact has enabled the geologist to predict the herbivorous character of a fossil spe- cies from a single bone. But in the hog these bones are not uni- ted, yet they are so closely adjusted that the power of pronation and supernation has been lost. The cannon bone of ruminants furnish another very interesting fact, and one that is of equal importance to the paleontologist in determining the character of a fossil animal. This round bone of the leg, unlike any other in the animal kingdom, contains two marrow cavities which result from the union of the third and fourth metacarpal bones in the anterior extremity, and of the met- atarsals behind. This is indicated by the double articulation which it makes with the two phalangial rows, contained in the claws of the divided hoof. In the embryonic stages the cannon bone readily divides into its two component parts, but at birth they cannot be separated in any of the ruminating animals. In swine, however, these two corresponding bones do not unite though always in close contact with each other. Accordingly the forward foot of the hog represents a human hand, with the exception of a thumb. The two toes, therefore* * See Maclise’s Comparative Osteology, or the Marphology of the Ver- tebrate Skeleton, illustrated folio, London, 1847. 4 which these animals and all others with a divided hoof walk upon, correspond to our middle and ring fingers, and the bones in the dew-claws represent the index and little finger. In the horse, however, the cannon bone is single, and has but one toe, which represents the middle phalangial row of the hu- man hand. Morphologically the nail is the hoof, and the three bones of the finger are known by the veterinarian as the coffin, coronet, and pastern. The larger knuckle of the hand, therefore, is the fetter lock joint of the horse, and the wrist the forward knee. The elbow is represented by that projecting point, on the back of the leg, close to the chest, where “ shoe-balls ” occur. The hind leg also, has some peculiarities in its mechanism that become very interesting points in the treatment of disease. The hock-joint, which is delicately constructed, and so frequently the seat of lameness from a sprain, answers in an anatomical point of view to the instep of man, though its relative position to the ground has been very much changed.* In view, therefore, of the comparative relations of limbs, we shall find, much to the surprise of the casual observer, that the stifle-joint corresponds, in every particular, with the human knee, and consequently the stifle bone, so often dislocated by accident, is the homologue of the patella or knee-pan. The necessity, therefore, of a thorough knowledge of these anatomical facts to aid one in the diagnosis and proper treat- ment of those obscure joint difficulties, is now apparent to all, and its importance cannot be over-estimated in behalf of a scientific practice in this department of the Healing Art. Dentition of Domestic Animals. The teeth belong to the digestive system, and though firm, hard substances, and even implanted in the maxillary bones, yet they are no part of the osseous skeleton. They are developed from the mucous membrane along the walls of the anterior portion of the alimentary canal, and thus serve as the mechanical agents in the division and preparation of the food. The teeth, therefore, are adapted in the carnivorous animals for seizing and tearing flesh; while in the herbivora, they are modified to suit the changed con- dition of the creature. In fact, almost every conceivable grada- tion of purpose may be served by these important organs in the economy of the different orders, genera, and species of mammals. * See Owen On Nature of Limbs, 8vo, London, 1849. 5 In the walrus, or sea-cow, we find a pair of tushes developed to such an extent that they are used as organs of locomotion when the animal is basking upon the shore; and the fossil dinotherium of the tertiary epoch evidently used a similar pair of front teeth on the lower jaw, as a means of anchorage. The beaver, like the carpenter with his tools, diligently applies his gnawing teeth to the wood, and thus prepares, and by the same means transports the building material for his dam. The elephant and the musk-deer have well developed teeth, that are employed as weapons of defence, while the hyena and the dog show their glistening ivory when in rage, and use the same as weapons of combat. Nowhere is the secondary use of the teeth more evidently dis- played than in man, where they not only contribute to beauty, but to his inimitable power of speech. Hence, the teeth are important in a zoological point of view, and greatly aid in the classification of animals.* So intimate are the relations of these organs to the general economy and habits of an individual, that the naturalist is often enabled to determine the position of a fossil creature, in the scale of being, by the teeth alone: and not unfrequently these are the only relics to be found to mark the existence of some huge monster, whose skeleton has mouldered back to dust. The le organs are composed of three distinct anatomical elements, known as the dentine, the enamel, and the crusta-petrosa. The first was so named by Prof. Owen of London, in 1835.f It forms the bulk of the tooth, and is very firm and solid; hence it has been called the bone of the tooth. A modified form of it, as seen in the tusk of the elephant, is called ivory. It is made up of a series of minute tubes and cells, with earthy particles interposed. The dentine of the higher mammals is unvascular, but its nutrition is carried on by means of these tubes connecting with the pulp. The enamel is the hardest substance in the animal body, and consists of earthy matter deposited in an organized matrix. It forms a perfect sheath around the dentine, except in the lower por- tion of the root. In man and the carnivorous animals, it perma- nently covers the crown, but in the herbivora, wdiere the teeth are long and gradually wear away, it soon becomes denuded. Here it * For further details consult article on Teeth in Cyc. Anat. & Phys., vol. 4th, London, 1852. f Transactions of Zoological Society. 6 takes on anew form, being folded upon itself, and in the grinding- teeth, it presents a peculiar appearance, interspersed with dentine. In the front teeth of the horse it forms a deep cavity, known as the infundibulum, or “ the mark ” so frequently alluded to by vet- erinarians, in determining the age of an animal. The crusta-petrosa is a hard bone-like substance, which covers that portion of the teeth within the jaw. In its structure and manner of growth it resembles the osseous tissue more than either of the dental elements. It varies greatly in quantity on different teeth, and is not uniform on different parts of the same tooth. It is the thickest at the end of the fang ; and where it covers the enamel it appears like a thin layer of cement, which name also has been applied to it by various authors. This fills the bottom of the infundibula, and forms an oval island in the sack of the enamel, which is well seen in comparing the “ marks ” of five, six, and seven year old horses. As the teeth wear away the nerve begins to recede from the crown, and this cavity also is filled with cement, which makes the “ dental star ” in the lower incisors, at about twelve years of age. There is a great variety in the form and number of teeth in dif- ferent animals, and in all cases, there seems to be a special adap- tation to their use in nature. The relation therefore that one kind of dentition holds to another becomes exceedingly interesting, especially as we review the order of succession, and thus endeavor to explain upon zoological principles The Origin of “Wolf-Teeth.” Naturalists are agreed that the typical set of mammalian teeth are forty-four, and these anatomists have divided into four distinct series. The front teeth, on account of their nearly uniform shape in all animals, have been designated the incisors, and vary in num- ber from two to six; the next in order backward, are the canines, or bridle-teeth of the horse; then comes the four premolars, and lastly the three molars, as here represented : Incisors, |-f-§ ; canine, premolars, |-|—|; molars, 3+§=44. This formula represents the teeth equally divided above and below, and upon the right and left side. But all animals do not possess this number. Man has only thirty-two, and comparing them with the typical set, we find that the outer incisors in both jaws are lost, the canines are in place, and so are the molars, but of 7 the premolars, only two are present, and these are known as the bicuspids. In the horse and ruminants we find the molars and three of the premolars, making the six grinders, present; and not unfrequently the first milk-molar in a rudimentary form, which may be called a supernumerary, or better known among horse-men as the