A Clinical Report of Cases treated by Pneumatic Differentiation. BY HERBERT F. WILLIAMS, M. D. REPRINTED PROM SMie Neto York i-ttetucal Journal for September 11, 18, and 25, 1886. Reprinted from the New York Medical Journal for September 11, 18, and 25, 1886. A CLINICAL REPORT OF CASES TREATED BY PNEUMATIC DIFFERENTIATION* By HERBERT F. WILLIAMS, M. D. It is with a full appreciation of the danger of becoming wearisome that I feel compelled to give somewhat in detail my further clinical experience with the pneumatic cabinet. Such suggestions as I shall deem proper will appear with the report of each case, the history and study of which may be said to have prompted them. For the establishment of any new device or procedure in the healing art, practical inves- tigators are willing to accept the drudgery of compiling clinical results, for in this manner only can practical con- clusions he reached which must establish the utility of the matter in question. It is with satisfaction that I have re- ceived from prominent men who have had the opportunity to examine many of the cases that form the basis of my first report assurance} that my diagnoses were correct and my conclusions honest and not overdrawn. In my original report in the “ Medical Record ” for Janu- ary 17, 1885, results were recorded which have been termed “brilliant” by some enthusiastic believers in the differen- tial process. Some careful men have feared that the appli- * Read l>eforc the American Climatological Association at its third annual meeting. 1 2 A CLINICAL REPORT OF CASES cation to five advanced cases of phthisis of the term “ recov- ery ” might have created a feeling of incredulity concerning both the description and the describer, and endangered or delayed the development of this process. Had the con- tinued application of this process by myself and others failed to corroborate those results, 1 feel that the uncom- mon precaution of having my diagnoses and results in those cases confirmed by competent observers, together with the moderate statements that are found in the closing para- graphs, would have saved me from the righteous oblivion that is meted out to willful misrepresentation or unpardon- able incompetcncy and rashness. There seems to be no common understanding or agreement as to what constitutes a recovery in advanced phthisis, but the necessity for such a term sinks into insignificance when objective results arc fully recorded. My determination to adopt these measures of confirmation was greatly strengthened by the reading of a paper by Dr. Sidney A. Fox, of Brooklyn, before the Kings County Medical Society, entitled “A History of Sixty-nine Cases treated by Pneumatic Differentiation,” where in many instances I had the opportunity to examine his cases before and after treatment. In Case I of my first report (acute catarrhal phthisis, stago of softening) the patient has been in good health up to February 1st of this year; weight 120 pounds. The last of January she attended a funeral on a cold and blustering day, and during the journey to the place of interment kept her feet warm by means of a heated foot-stove; was sufficiently imprudent to leave the carriage and stand by the grave during the recital of the burial service. A violent cold was contracted for which she did not seek relief until the latter part of February, and then on ac- count of a haunorrhage which occurred in the night, induced by great violence in coughing. The inheritance of phthisis in some is an inheritance of carelessness and indifference. Though this patient had a TREATED BY PNEUMATIC DIFFERENTIATION. 3 phthisical mother, she is the personification of carelessness, whether inherited or acquired. She again commenced treatment March 15th; her weight had declined to 115 pounds; high evening fever, constant cough, and profuse expectoration which contained bacilli. Her physical signs gave evidence of acute phthisical degeneration. She took eight treatments, but the journey from her home in Brook- lyn to my office in New York seemed to exhaust her, in consequence of which she was placed under the charge of I)r. Fox and Dr. Brown, of Brooklyn, from whom she is now taking treatment; but her progress is slow, and there are grave doubts of arresting the phthisical process. On September 5, 1883, this young lady was considered to be in a hopeless condition by five careful physicians who then examined her. At this date her treatment by pneu- matic differentiation began, and as a result she has had over two years of immunity. Case II.—(Phthisis, third stage.) Patient remains in good health ; has had one or two colds this winter and coughed a little in consequence; has received no further treatment. Case IV.—(Abscess of left lung, producing extreme exhaus- tion, with primary changes taking place in right lung) Pa- tient in the same condition as last reported ; well, with exception of slight fistula in side. Case V.—(Acute bronchial catarrh with sub-epithelial ab- scess and peri-bronchial inflammation.) Patient was at last accounts driving an ice-cart about the city. lie has had one severe luemorrhage since last report, from which he fully recov- ered without serious lung change taking place. The seven patients with primary infiltration are well with the exception of two. Mr. F., whose family history is phthis- ical, remained well until June, 1885, a period of about eight- een months, when he was seized with a severe haemorrhage after prolonged exposure to the hot baths of Salt Lake City 4 A CLINICAL REPORT OF CASES He returned to me for treatment in October, 1885, remain- ing a month, and is now living in Rondout in good condi- tion. Mr. M., the other, whose case was No. 3 of my origi- nal report, has been depressed by business disappointment and increased domestic responsibilities. He has taken seasons of pneumatic treatment under the care of Dr. De Watteville, of New York, who reports him at present in an improved condition, though he notes a steady decline from year to year. From June 12, 1885, up to the present time, I have treated forty-five additional cases of pulmonary dis- ease by this process. Of these cases I will give as concise a report as possible consistently with the particular phase that each represents, and the hints for treatment that each suggests. Cask I.—M. B., bachelor, gentleman, a high liver, aged sixty- one ; best weight 140, present weight 105; expansion one inch ; no history of phthisis ; in delicate health for two years. Pain in left scapular region ; slight exertion produces great distress for breath. Has traveled extensively in search of health. Expec- torates profusely and coughs incessantly. Physical examination shows respiratory movement in left side restricted ; emaciated, flatness of clavicular spaces; percus- sion shows high pitch in left side, most marked in upper por- tions, hut resonance defective throughout. Auscultation shows feeble respiratory sounds on right side. Left side broncho-vesi- cular, cog-wheel; prolonged expiration; deep-seated rales. Received nine treatments (iodine in spray), covering a period of one month, at the end of which time his expansion had in- creased to one inch and five eighths; cough relieved, expectora- tion easy and less; walks about with comfort; weight increased. Started for Denver, where in three weeks his weight had in- creased to 120 pounds. This case shows the benefit that follows a thorough expansion and the more marked improvement that follows climatic influence in consequence of increased respira- tory power. This patient is in a fair condition to-day, though incapable of recovery. TREATED BY PNEUMATIC DIFFERENTIATION. 5 Case II.—(Referred by Professor A. L. Loomis.) Mr. L., aged forty-four, married; best weight 125, present weight 110; family history clear; dyspeptic for several years; asthma for twelve years, slight at first hut increasing in severity every fall, when he has had attacks of acute bronchitis. One year ago had pneumonia with slow and imperfect resolution ; can not lie down at night, sleeps poorly, no appetite. Physical examination shows increased resonance in both lungs, with exception of scapular region of right, where it ex- tends to the axillary region; there is high-pitched percussion; increased area of cardiac dullness. On auscultation, the respira- tory sounds are not so strong as the percussion note would indi- cate. The inspiratory act of right lung is attended with fine crepitation, which is superficial. There are mucous and dry rales interspersed through both lungs. Treatment began June 22d and continued at first tri-weekly, then once a week. He now appears occasionally; spent the fall and winter in com- plete comfort; his asthma is greatly relieved; his crepitation gone; a spray of chloride of ammonium with tincture of stramo- nium was generally used ; his weight to-day is 118J, within 5f pounds of normal; has taken in all forty-seven applications with an average rarefaction of T inch. At times he is simply al- lowed to inspire, at others to complete the act into the outside atmosphere. Case III.—(Referred by Professor Henry I. Bowditch, of Boston.) June 23, 1885.—Mrs. C., aged forty, married ; grand- father died of quick consumption ; best weight 115, present 91. Evening temperature 100° ; expansion 1J inch ; in good health until two years ago, when she had pneumonia from which she has never recovered. She has a hacking cough which prevents continued conversation; since January slight exertion provokes coughing; she can not go up or down stairs with ease; com- plains of great pain in left lung; expectorating freely; estimates quantity at one half cupful daily ; appetite poor ; menstruation scant. Physical examination shows emaciation and extremely feeble respiratory movements. The percussion note is normal in right lung; the left shows dullness in subclavicular region nearclavi- A CLINICAL REPORT OF CASES 6 cle ; tho note is of varying character in different regions of this lung, but there is a general absence of normal resonanco. Aus- cultation shows a fair vesicular murmur in right lung, but tho left is irregularly broken down, gurgles being easily demon- strated in the clavicular space; there are no respiratory sounds in the lower lobe. This patient took daily treatment covering a period of five weeks, taking in all thirty-two treatments; rare- faction increased from three tenths to eight tenths, and occupy- ing from fifteen to twenty minutes daily. Iodine and mercuric bichloride were used in spray; marked amelioration in cough, and diminished expectoration; increased ability in walking; reads aloud with comfort; expansion increased one half inch ; weight, ninety-six pounds. Physical examination shows in- creased circulation of air in the left lung, including the lower lobe, though tho upper portion remains the same as before, with the exception of diminished quantity of gurgles; this patient was last seen since January 1, 1880, when she professed a continued improvement, though no examination was made. Case IV.—Mr. P. This gentleman I knew personally for ten years, having been his family attendant during this time. On July 15th he appeared at my office and complained of symptoms which pointed to an enteric disturbance, which tho warm sea- son for several years has produced. For three years in succes- sion he has suffered from dysenteric symptoms that have con- fined him to bed from two to three weeks. To forestall this, I instructed him to go home and to bed, where I attended him for several days. He complained of little pain in his left sido ; his temperature was 102° every afternoon, and resisted my best efforts at reduction. We had succeeded in preventing his diar- rhoeal trouble, but his continued fever and growing weakness demanded a further examination, which was made July 25th. lie nover complained of a cough, and there was literally noth- ing but the slight pain in his left side to point to the disclosures of his left lung, which I found to give evidence of consolida- tion. Regarding this as suspicious of a low grade of pneumo- nia, or rapid and general tubercular infiltration, I made arrange- ments to give him the benefit of the pneumatic treatment, which were completed July 30th, at which time his condition was as TREATED BY PNEUMATIC DIFFERENTIATION. 7 follows: Mr. P., age