EPIDEMICS OF THE CENTURY, AND THE LESSONS DERIVED FROM THEM BY GrOUVERNEUR M. SMITH, M. D., VICE-PRESIDENT OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF MEDICINE ; PHYSICIAN TO THE NEW YORK AND TO THE PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITALS, ETC. [.REPRINTED FROM THE TRANSACTIONS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF MEDICINE.-] UNA FIDES ALTARE COMMUNE. NEW YORK: D. APPLETON & COMPANY, 5 49 & 551 BROADWAY. 1876. EPIDEMICS OF THE CENTURY, AND Tim LESSONS DERIVED FROM THEM. h j v S' GOUVERNEUR M. SMITH, M. D., VICE-PRESIDENT OP THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OP MEDICINE; PHYSICIAN TO THE NEW YORK AND TO THE PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITALS, ETC. [REPRINTED FROM THE TRANSACTIONS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF MEDICINE.} UNA PIDE8 ALT ARE COMMUNE. NEW YORK: D. APPLETON & COMPANY, 549 & 551 BROADWAY. 1876. EPIDEMICS OF THE CENTURY, AND THE LESSONS DE- RIVED FROM THEM. By GOUVERNEUR M. SMITH, M. D., ▼ ICE-PRESIDENT OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF MEDICINE, PHYSICIAN TO THE NEW YORK AND TO THE PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITALS, ETC. Read May 4, 1876. Civilization of modern times makes rapid progress, and a consideration of its yearly advancement and of the diseases incident thereto is a prolific subject of study. In the review which is being taken by this Academy of the progress of medical science during the century of our national existence, the department of epidemics has been as- signed to me for presentation on this occasion. The limits of a single discourse will admit only of a mere glance at this im- portant topic, but the glance will be sufficient to show the industry and the success of our profession in elucidating the causes and in improving the management of those pestilen- tial disorders which have appeared within our territory. The period of review begins with the year 1776 and ends with the present year, 1876—a century peculiarly interesting to the American people, and pregnant with events which have moulded and which are still to mould the destinies of the world. If we look across the ocean at the beginning of this period we find the indefatigable John Howard, of England, in the prime of life exploring the adyta of penal institutions and en- deavoring to improve the morals and health of their inmates. At a later time, viz., in 1790, we find him fifteen hundred miles from home and, while pursuing his philanthropic duties, 4 dying in Russian Tartary. Princes, admirals, generals, magis- trates and peasants united in paying him funeral honors—the land of the czars unheeding the fact that plebeian blood had nourished his royal heart. In the cathedral and valhalla of St. Paul in his native land can be read this description: lie expired “ a victim to the perilous and benevolent attempt to ascertain the cause of and find an efficient remedy for the plague. He trod an open but unfrequented path to immor- tality in the ardent but unintermitted exercise of Christian charity.” His biographer informs us that “ His death fell on the mind of Europe like an ominous shadow : the melancholy wail of grief which arose on the Dnieper was echoed from the Thames and soon reechoed from the Tagus and the Neva and the Dar- danelles.” No allusion is made to the effect which was pro- duced on the shores of the mighty Hudson of the young Amer- ican republic—the hum of a busy civilization was scarcely then audible on its thinly populated banks and the republic had scarcely assumed a recognized position in the brotherhood of nations. But our forefathers, imbued with advanced ideas of political and religious liberty, and differing in opinion from the nations of the Old World on these topics, were neverthe- less ready to adopt the tenets of transatlantic philanthropy if originating either in the ages of a near or a remote antiquity or among contemporaneous peoples with whose political teachings they were at variance. Nothing can better illustrate the American medical spirit of the period to which allusion is made than a glance at the brief but brilliant life of Dr. Elihu II. Smith. History de- mands a recognition of his useful career : I know not if a rela- tive survives him. Born in Litchfield, Conn., in 1771, he ripened into man- hood at a time when IIowTard was prosecuting his benevolent work in Europe, and was but nineteen years of age at the time of Howard’s decease. Settling as a young physician in New York, he was appointed physician to the New York Hospital, and became associated in 1798 with Dr. Samuel L. 5 Mitchell and Dr. Edward Miller in editing The Medical Repository, which was the first American medical periodi- cal published in this country. The first paper in the first number of this journal was from the pen of Dr. Smith, and was entitled “ The Plague of Athens.” This classical essay can be read with profit at the present day. The statesmen of that period were using their best exer- tions to strengthen the resources of the republic ; the phy- sicians with no less patriotism were endeavoring to shield the country from those pestilential besoms which in the Old World had so often inspired terror and induced desolation. Dr. S., in concluding his paper, said: “If local causes originated a pestilence in Athens, local causes may generate a yellow fever in Philadelphia and New York. To these, then, be our attention more scrupulously directed, and let us be more solicitous in the inspection of our houses, yards, streets, and docks, than in that of cottons and woolens of ves- sels from the West Indies and ships from the Mediterranean.” Unfortunately for science, in the very year in which this paper was published, viz., 1798, Dr. S., while in his twenty- seventh year was smitten, in September, with yellow fever, then disastrously prevailing in this city, and closed his career. The Medical Repository, in announcing his decease, says: “As a physician his loss is irreparable. He had ex- plored at his early age an extent of medical learning for which the longest lives are seldom found sufficient; . . .he was ripe for the highest honors of his profession, his merits were every day becoming more conspicuous, and nothing but his premature fall deprived him of that extraordinary degree of public confidence which awaited a longer continuance of his life.” In the second volume of the periodical before mentioned is found a posthumous paper of Dr. S. “ On the Pestilential Diseases which at Different Times appeared in the Athenian, Carthaginian, and Human Armies in the Neighborhood of Syracuse.” Allusion has thus early been made to the labors of Dr. 6 S., whose career commenced with the century ; and the efforts of others might, have been cited with like propriety, in order to remind us that while the fires of genius are now burning brightly on our altars, they were not kindled by those who are within our personal recollection, but were ignited by those whose lives were identified with the early period of our na- tional existence. The fact is also illustrated that then, as wrell as now, youthful enthusiasm helped to develop and to mould medical philosophy. It would be unbecoming on an occasion like the present to give the details of the various epidemics which have visited our territory ; it must suffice to group their general features and to evoke therefrom general deductions. Monuments to each pestilential visitation are thickly found in medical liter- ature, and the explorer of to-day has merely to read their inscription to learn of their desolations, and to find not un- frequently the interment of various theories regarding the etiology and management of occult morbific influences. In investigating our subject it will be found that several disorders which formerly were chiefly feared on account ot their periodical general appearance have bequeathed to us venoms which have become naturalized in our midst, and which, though constantly and to a certain extent disastrously operative, are nevertheless prevented from exercising a very general pernicious influence by reason of the enforced san- itary regulations respecting them. Our immediate territory is so far remote from the tropics that it can scarcely harbor and foster, for a long season at least, miasmata which are peculiar to the equatorial region of the earth. Nevertheless, we have a climatic season in which, by reason of the high temperature, if southern poisons are introduced, they may assume in our midst a pestilential character. Indeed, the ordinary maladies of our summer cor- respond in their nature with those which are observed in torrid situations, but are fortunately of less gravity. Nations of the earth, in order to be regarded as mighty powers, must acquire a typical strength—such strength being 7 shown in the ability they possess for self-preservation. They must possess a force sufficiently vigorous to control their in- ternal political and disturbing influences, and likewise a force capable of arresting the inroads of invading neighbors. The inhabitants of the northern temperate zone—a zone recognized as the one in which man attains his highest mental and physical development, and the one in which our lot is cast—the inhabitants, I say, of this zone, being favored by natural causes, and by the advances of civilization, should feel it obligatory upon them to protect themselves not only from internal causes of disease, but also from the encroachments of inimical morbific influences from other zones, nations, and localities. Here intelligence and wealth, the resources of science, and the benevolent operations of religion, can best unite to develop manhood. It can be clearly demonstrated that we of the present day, by reason of the advancement and diffusion of scientific knowledge, are better fitted than were our forefathers of a century ago to cope with various noxious agencies. Commu- nities are not so readily panic-stricken as formerly at any threatened approach of pestilential diseases, being less super- stitious and having more faith than formerly in artificial counteracting influences. New sources of disease are developed by civilization—new measures of prophylaxis germinate simultaneously with each genesis. Many of the poisons with which we are familiar, and which were known to our ancestors, are not as yet to be extinguished, but are to continue to harass posterity. Pos- terity will encounter ills which have not afflicted us, and the medical literature of future centuries will relate the outcrops of novel disorders, and record the successful means by "which they were held in abeyance. If the chemists are capable of producing new compounds, it can be inferred by analogy, and even inferred from a study of past ages, that in the mutations of society new forms of aerial contaminations and new zymotic affections will be developed by reason of the overcrowdings of population, by the influences of new occupations and of new 8 relations of life. The opening of new territories to civiliza- tion will be attended with its dangers. Indigenous germs of disease may exist in unexplored Africa and in other secluded parts of the globe, which are in time to be conveyed to marts of commerce, and thence to be still more widely diffused. These prefatory and textual remarks lead us to a consid- eration of the epidemics which have chiefly excited interest. The disorders which have thus appeared have been vari- ously grouped. In the nosologies which have been accepted during the century, commencing with the one of Vogel in 1772, and subsequently in those of S:\gar, Macbride, Cullen, Darwin, Crichton, Piriel, Parr, Young, Good, Ilosack, and in the one adopted by our present Board of Health, as recom- mended by the International Statistical Congress, we find that the diseases under consideration have been classified in diverse manners, such variations being made to adapt the grouping to modified medical views respecting the etiology of the maladies. The late Dr. Joseph M. Smith, in his “ Report on the Medical Topography and Epidemics of the State of New York,” submitted to the American Medical Association at its annual meeting in June, 1S60, in writing on this subject, remarked: “ Distributed according to their natural affinities or etiological relations, epidemics are reducible to three kinds, viz., contagious, infectious, and meteoratious. These terms are here employed in the sense they are used in the writer’s work on the ‘Elements of the Etiology and Philosophy of Epidemics.’ ”1 In such grouping, under the contagious epidemics were placed, small-pox, measles, scarlatina, and, as minor affections, varioloid and varicella; under the infectious, intermittent and remittent fevers, dysentery, yellow-fever, typhus, and com- pound fevers; under the meteoratious, influenza, typhoid pneumonia, diphtheria, erysipelas, and Asiatic cholera. This classification, at the time, appeared as concise and as ’“Transactions of the American Medical Association,” vol. xiii., 1860, p. 175. 9 accurate as it could possibly be made with the current scien- tific data. During the last decennary, the powers of the mi- croscope as an instrument of etiological investigation have greatly increased, the spectroscope has developed new meth- ods of inquiry, and experts have been in conference collecting observations and collating facts. To say nothing at present of the careful study given to other epidemic disorders, what special attention has been given to cholera! An International Sanitary Conference, convened at the instance of- the Austro-Hungarian Government, held at Vienna in 1874, devoted an entire month to a study of this malady. At the conference, Persia, Egypt, and every Euro- pean state, were represented—an assemblage of delegates repre- senting twenty-two nationalities. It is not a matter of sur- prise that, as a result of such advanced studies of epidemics, views concerning some of them have been modified. Medical philosophy is now grasping after material or appreciable causes to explain morbid phenomena—theories, though admissible to investigation, must be sustained by ob- servations which can, in part at least, be practically demon- strated by the chemists and microscopists. I shall subsequently refer to the labor which has been expended upon the study of minute vegetable organisms and entozoa as causes of diseases. At present it must suffice to allude to the former of these. There are so-called filth-diseases, as appropriately de- nominated by Mr. John Simon. Excrementitious material from animal organisms, the refuse of households, factories, etc., either in rural or in city localities, may become causes of disease if not properly disposed of. Such excrement can largely be utilized to promote the welfare of the state in its agricultural interests, but, instead of its being thus employed or being rendered innocuous, it is constantly operative as a cause of disease and death. These debris may become poisonous in a twofold manner: 1. They are liable to decomposition, and the inorganic gases thus developed, unless under circumstances permitting their 10 free diffusion, are injurious to those respiring them. Their effect, however, upon the animal economy is comparatively slight, and, the gases being merely inorganic, chemical com- pounds have no power of self-multiplication to induce further mischief beyond the persons of those who have inhaled them. 2. The debris alluded to are a fertile soil for the growth of noxious minute vegetable organisms. The refuse, if wisely distributed over glebes, rewards the laborer with turf teeming with cereals and rich in its production of edible vegetation ; but, unwisely hoarded, this same material fosters the most luxuriant growth of innumerable microscopic vegetative growths, which bodies, being organic in their nature, pos- sess the power of reproduction to an indefinite extent, even in other localities than those in which their development is specially favored. Sume of these growths are believed to possess properties as conspicuously poisonous to mankind when gaining access to ‘the system through the air, food, or wTater, as are the well-recognized benign influences upon the economy of the fruits of meadows and table-lands. In the study of plants of the lower grade, Klein is asserted to have discovered the microphyte of enteric fever. In cholera, scarlet fever, diphtheria, vegetable growths have been ob- served, and, in various diseases, the excreta from the bowels, etc., are supposed to contain the germs of the prevalent mor- bid infections. Vegetation, indeed, induces disease in vegetation. The Scripture says, “ I smote you with blasting and mildew.” “ Blasting” and “ mildew” have scourged the crops of the an- cient Jews and Romans. The modern farmer employs the terms smut, Imnt, rust, and mildew, to describe the more com- mon diseases of vegetation, and, on a former occasion, as I have said before this Academy, these conditions are induced by vegetable parasites. Not a plant cultivated by man is free from such fungi. In the recent investigation of disease, as affecting the inferior animals and man, similar growths are believed to play an important part in their production. But, while admitting such to be the case, there are doubt- 11 less other cooperative factors favoring the spread of epidemic disorders. There are atmospherical states which exert potent influences in promoting the diffusion of maladies. Those which are readily recognized, such as relate to heat, cold, moisture, dryness, electricity, calm, winds, etc., are observed to affect intensities of prevalence. As respects electricity, we appreciate the deadly result of the shaft of lightning— are there not obscure influences of this principle at times operative, concerning which we are unaware? The atmos- phere is never in a state of stable electrical equilibrium, and it is unphilosophical to suppose that varying electrical con- ditions exert no influence, directly or indirectly, upon ani- mate nature. Respecting ozone, that mysterious, active, and condensed form of oxygen, how comparatively little is known as regards its general effects! Its presence in the air varies with the time of day and with the prevalence of certain winds, and is less appreciable in over-crowrded localities than in uninhabited or sparsely-settled regions. We recognize it as the great oxi- dizing and purifying agent—an agent which is readily meta- morphosed, for while speeding in its noble mission of reforma- tion, and while in the act of purification, it*is transmuted into the simpler form of oxygen. Ozone, when undiluted, is irrespirable, and, when but mod- erately diluted, oxidizes the blood unnaturally and induces pulmonary irritation and systemic disturbance. It is readily inferred that, when this principle is present in a compara- tively small quantity in the atmosphere, those respiring it are not thereby sufficiently vitalized, and that local mephitic agencies, bereft of a counteracting influence, acquire aug- mented morbific powers. When this same principle occurs excessively in the air, there is every reason to believe that other morbid phenomena are induced. More precise knowl- edge concerning this principle is needed, as well as of other principles of whose presence in the atmosphere \\A are already aware. Is there not an “ epidemic meteoration,” or condition 12 which comprehends “insensible qualities of the general at- mosphere, which produce or favor the prevalence of popular diseases?”1 Investigations in this direction have not, as yet, been fully made. We have not, as yet, been famished with instruments or means of inquiry sufficiently accurate to de- cipher occult influences of the atmosphere, and such an inquiry is essential, if we are to fully understand the wide-spread ap- pearances of disease. Water impregnated with certain organic and inorganic material is inimical to health; the atmosphere similarly con- taminated is similarly noxious. The air is more complex in its chemical nature than water, and is, consequently, liable to greater vicissitudes in composition, and its principles, not all being chemioally combined together, may be capable of be- having, under peculiar circumstances, in a mysterious way upon mankind. There is not that same stable constitution in air as there is in water jper se. While diffusion in the atmosphere prevents a universal and dangerous contamination from local pernicious causes, nevertheless, combined aerial and terrene conditions may ren- der considerable regions of territory insalutary. A disease may be contagious through excreted germs, but for the disease to spread over extended areas the germ and atmosphere must be coadjutors ; in other words, the germ must find a congenial medium in which either to sustain its life or to promote its growth, multiplication, and diffusion. It is, doubtless, true that the air at times is a mere vehicle of morbid germs, and such germs, when meeting congenial terrene or systemic con- ditions, there fructify, as the seeds of grass, etc., may be wafted by winds to develop in distant and fruitful soils. Points of investigation specially needing elucidation at present are these: To what extent are meteoratious conditions alone responsible in the production of disease? To what ex- tent are morbid germs culpable? What aerial conditions essentially favor germ diffusion ? To what degree are inor- 1 See “Elements of the Etiology an