THE DESIGNING AND CONSTRUCTION OF STORAGE RESERVOIRS. ARTHUR JACOB, B. A., LATE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER FOR IRRIGATION H. M BOMBAY SERVICE. NEW YORK: D. VAN NOSTRAND, PUBLISHER, 23 Murray and 27 Warren Street. 1 8 7 3. THE DESIGNING AND CONSTRUCTION OF STORAGE RESERYOIRS. Before entering upon such considerations as affect the selection of reservoir sites and their construction, a brief allusion to some of the most ancient works for impounding water may not be uninteresting. Of these the most prominent examples are undoubt- edly to be found in ELindostan, where the magnitude and antiquity of the storage works cannot fail to arrest attention. These great works, surpassing in their immensity what are conventionally esteemed to be the wonders of the world, the production of other countries and nations, took their ori- gin in the necessities of the people and the variableness of the climate of India, and 4 were, in fact, great public works on which the welfare of the people mainly depended. The climate of India, although singularly uniform in some respects from year to year, is remarkably variable as regards the rain- fall ; and in order to guard against the dis- asters of famine and sickness, inevitably attendant on a scanty monsoon, the native princes were wont to make such provisions as large resources and an almost unlimited power enabled them, in order to obviate the difficulty that they had to contend with. The rain records of India for several years past show that a scarcity of rain is indicated by periods of about five years, or that every fifth or sixth year is marked by a scanty rainfall over certain districts. The recurrence of these periods is, of course, not very clearly marked, but still it is suffi- ciently so to warrant, -frith approximate correctness, the prediction of scarcity and famine ; and such deplorable recurrence is, as all are aware, now reigning in India, and visiting with destruction, by sickness and hunger, some thousands whose sole de- pendence is upon a fair season of rain, and 5 the successful maturing of their little crop of grain. The natural expedient for guarding against the recurrence of these periodical calamities was evidently to be found in husbanding a scanty supply of rain-water for the purpose of irrigation, and this the people of India appear to have understood. They took advantage, in certain districts, of every nook and ravine, whether large or small, and converted them into storage re- servoirs by throwing across banks of earth, or bunds, as they are termed, producing, in certain districts, such an elaborate and complete system of irrigation as can only be compared, for cost and completeness, to our railway system in England. Taking four- teen districts in the Madras Presidency, where tank irrigation was most generally relied upon, the records of the Indian Gov- ernment show that there are no less than 43,000 irrigation reservoirs now in effective operation, and as many as 10,000 more that have fallen into disuse, making a total number of 53,000 storage works. The ave- rage length of embankment is found to be 6 about half a mile, the extreme limit of the series being a dam of the immense length of 30 miles. This ancient reservoir, called the Poniary tank, is no longer in use, the cost of maintaining such a length of bank in adequate repair having probably been found disproportionate to the advantage derived from the supply. The work, em- bracing an area of storage of between 60 and 80 sq. miles, remains however as a record of what the Hindoos are capable of. To quote a second example, there is the Yera- num reservoir, now in actual operation as a source of supply, and yielding a net rev- enue of no less than £11,450 per annum. The area of the tank is 35 sq. miles, and the storage is effected by a dam of 12 miles in length. In order to bring the immensi- ty of this system of storage works within the reach of statistical minds, it has been calculated that the embankments contain as much earth as would serve to encircle the globe with a belt of 6 ft. in thickness. To show that these are not singular exam- ples, one other embankment of remarkable size may be alluded to. This embankment, 7 of somewhat singular construction, was built on the island of Ceylon, and bears testimony that the Singalese monarchs were not behind their neighbors in public spirit or enterprise. The embankment was composed of huge blocks of stone strongly cemented together, and covered over with turf, a solid barrier of 15 miles in length,. 100 ft. wide at base, sloping to a top width of 40 ft., and extending across the lower end of a spacious valley. Thus it will appear that the practice of embanking across valleys, for the purpose of retaining the surface water, has for ages been in operation. There is no doubt that the disposal of some of the most remarka- ble works in India is not what it might, with advantage, have been ; the fact remains, however, that the desired end was attained,, and if the earthworks were dispropor- tionately extensive, it was a source of satis- faction at least for the projectors to know that they cost,* as a general rule, little or nothing, the practice in those days being to press whatever labor was required, render- ing in return nominal wages or none at all. 8 The two main questions that it is pro- posed to submit for consideration are, first, the selection of a reservoir site ; and, se- condly, the leading principles to be observ- ed in the designing and construction of storage works. The purpose or purposes for which the work may be required will, of course, af- fect materially the choice of a position, as well as the details of the structure itself; but certain general principles are available for our guidance in every case, after con- sidering which, it is proposed to dwell upon such points as apply to the special purposes for which reservoirs may be constructed. The first and most essential point for ac- curate determination by the engineer is undoubtedly the amount of rainfall, both maximum and minimum, that may be ex- pected in the district under examination ; and, having arrived at reliable data on this point, the next consideration will obviously be, what amount may be made available, due allowance having been made for evap- oration and absorption. When we know that the annual depth of rainfall taken all 9 over the world varies, according to the lo- cality, between zero and 338 in. or 28 ft. deep (which excessive amount was on one occasion registered in the hill district of Western India), it will be obvious how little ground there will be for assumption, in the examination of any district hitherto unexplored, with regard to the question of its rainfall. In the examination of any given country, however, there are certain phenomena connected with the rainfall that will be found of almost invariable accepta- tion, and may with advantage be borne in mind. The rainfall will, as a general rule, be greatest in those districts that are situated towards the point from which the prevail- ing winds blow. If Great Britain for in- stance be taken, the western districts will be found the most rainy. The very reverse, however, of this phenomenon is noticed in the neighborhood of mountain ranges. If the wind prevails from one side rather than from the other, it is found that the greatest rainfall is on the leeward side of the range,, and the probable solution of the matter is, 10 that the air, highly charged with moisture, is carried up the hills by the wind until it comes into a cold region of the atmosphere. Condensation of the watery vapor immedi- ately takes place, and the result is a fall of rain on the side of the mountain range re- mote from the prevailing wind. To this cause may also be attributed the fact that the rainfall is always greatest in mountainous districts, while it by no means follows that elevated plains are more abun- dantly supplied with rain than land lying nearer to the sea level. The principles are remarkably exemplified in the southern part of the Bombay Presidency, where the author has had occasion to study the sub- ject of rainfall. The Western Ghauts run parallel to the coast, rising to a height of 4,500 ft. above the sea, and form the west- ern support of the great table- land of the Deccan, the mean elevation of which may be taken at 3,000 ft. In the rainy season the south-west monsoon, blowing from the sea, impinges against the ghauts, and while passing onwards to the Deccan, parts with its moisture to the average annual amount 11 of 254 in. On a spur of mountain that runs eastward, the pluviometers are found to register but 50 in.; and about 40 miles farther inland the rainfall is not more in some places than 15 in., which is consider- ably less than that registered in the lower- lying districts of the Presidency. In civilized countries like our own much valuable information is as usually avail- able regarding th9 rainfall, if not ap- plying actually to the district under exam- ination, then probably to some neighbor- ing districts, enjoying the same physical characteristics; but when any project of great importance is in contemplation, it will not be sufficient to take the returns of ad- joining districts as accurate information of the rainfall at the exact locality fixed upon for the construction of the works. It will be necessary to establish rain-gauges at different points over the catchment basin of the valley from which it is intended to obtain the supply; and daily observations of these gauges must be taken for compari- son with a series of simultaneous observa- tions taken and recorded at the nearest sta- 12 tion at which the rainfall has been regu- larly and carefully noted. It is evident that a comparison of the several observa- tions taken over the area of water-shed with those registered at the permanent station, will convey a just estimate of the amount of maximum and minimum rainfall that may be relied upon. The amount of rain falling upon the ground is not, however, the point to be determined, though it will aid considerably as a guide to the engineer. A considerable quantity of all the rainfall is either absorb- ed by the ground or evaporated before it reaches the point at which it can be made available for storage. Regarding, then, first the question of absorption, it must be ap- parent that no two districts, unless they are exactly identical in soil, inclination of sur- face, and under similar circumstances of cultivation, can give on examination the same comparative result of rainfall and evaporation. If one district or unit of area be similar to the other in all respects but the surface inclination, that which has the greatest slope will, as a rule, give the larg- 13 est percentage of water available for stor- age, because of course there will be less time for the rain to be absorbed. Again, the degree of cultivation will materially af- fect the result when two areas, otherwise precisely similar in their physical conforma- tion, come to be compared one with the other, it being evident that an open and well-drained soil will be more favorable to the retention of water falling upon it than compact and impervious land. In every case the physical features of a district will each and every one of them force itself on the attention, as influencing the conclusion to be arrived at. If any general rule can be applied, it may be said that the greater the slope of the valley, the more rapidly it will throw surface water off; the more denuded the surface is of soil of any kind, the less will the escape of rain-water be re- tarded ; and the more compact the rocks composing the geological structure of a dis- trict, the better will the circumstances be for impounding water. The volcanic rocks and those of the granite order will be as fa- vorable as any that could be desired; 14 while, on the other hand, porous rocks, such as the sandstones, chalk, etc., are too absorbent to offer the desired conditions for storage. It is not here asserted that all the water absorbed by porous rocks is ne- cessarily intercepted from passing away to contribute to storage supply; much of it may be lost by evaporation and absorption by vegetables, but a considerable portion will often be found to contribute in the form of springs, if the disposition of the strata be favorable. As a further source of loss, evaporation from the ground as well as from the sur- face of the reservoir, must be taken into consideration. The circumstances attending the latter source of loss will be considered further on, as this does not affect the ques- tion of how much of the total rainfall may be made available. The question how much water will be evaporated at any moment from the surface of land is one involved in considerable diffi- culty ; and so many disturbing elements enter into the solution of the problem, that its accurate determination may beregarded 15 as hardly possible of attainment. The hy- grometric state of the ground’s surface, the aspect of the sky, the amount of wind, and the temperature, will all, in their degree, exercise a sensible influence on the amount of water that the ground will give off from its surface; so that, in fact, it is doubtful whether any reliable and philosophically correct conclusions can be arrived at. The resultant facts from such experiments as have been carefully conducted afford, after all, the only data for the engineer to arrive at any general conclusion by; and for form- ing a rough estimate for the probable avail- able rainfall of a district, the following proportions of available actual rainfall may be accepted as furnishing general data ; but they are not meant to obviate the necessity of a careful and specific examination of the circumstances likely to affect the design of any particular work : Steep surfaces of granite, gneiss, and slate 100 Moorland and hill pasture 60 to 80 Flat cultivated country 40 to 50 Chalk 0 to 0 In order to arrive at more specific, and truly reliable results, the engineer will have 16 to make a series of accurate observations on the discharge of the stream or streams that carry away the rainfall of a district ; and by doing so, and at the same time comparing the result with the amount of rain registered by the gauges—which should also, of course, be kept with accura- cy in the locality under examination—an approximately true estimate of the avail- able rainfall will be arrived at. If there is time in the preparation of a project to make the necessary examination of a district, it is evident that the results will speak for themselves ; and there will be no necessity to enter into abstract specu- lations concerning the theory of the influ- ences affecting loss by either evaporation or absorption. In proportioning the size of a storage reservoir to the area of the catchment bas- in, the engineer will, of course, in the first instance be guided by the requirements of the work. The object of the undertaking may be any one of the following : To husband a scanty rainfall. To check the injurious effect upon the country by floods. 17 To add to the discharge of a stream, by preventing the escape of the flood waters. The amount of storage will always be part of an engineer’s data in designing works. It will either be his object to store the whole of the water that the drainage area will afford, which will be the case in impounding water for irrigation, for exam- ple ; or a certain fixed demand, governed by the want of a town or other require- ments, will determine the amount of the rainfall that it will be necessary to retain for supply. In England the demand for water supply may be reckoned at from 150 to 180 days, depending on the amount and the constancy of the rainfall; as a rule, the six months’ supply will be the safest to adopt. The following Table, extracted from Mr. Beardmore’s work, shows the pro- portions that have been observed in design- ing some of the best constructed reservoirs. (See Table A.) From this it appears that the proportion between the amount stored and the total rainfall varies between one-half and one- fouith. 18 Table A. Locality. Height above Sea. Drainage Area. ft. ft. sq. m. Bann Reservoirs, 1837-38... 400 to 2800 5.15 Greenock, 1827-28, fiat moor 512 to 1000 7 88 Bute, 1826 200 to 350 7 80 Glen corse, Pentland Hills .. 734 to 1600 6.00 Belmont, 1843, moorland... 850 to 1600 2.81 “ 1844, “ “ 1845' “ “ 1846' “ Rivington Pike, 1847 800 to 1545 16.25 500 to 1800 Turton and Entwistle, 1836 500 to 1300 3.18 “ “ 1837 Bolton Watenvork® 800 to 1600 .80 Ashton 1 ‘ 1844.... 800 .59 19 Table A —Continued. 576.7 548.2 100 2 40.7 K) |_* k-1 foP OHMtCOOOCJtO „ O W M GO O O 03 05 P Total Discharge for the Year. 181.3 172.3 125.2 65 5 MMMMWMHMW O -i • 05 C5 M C5 C O' O . • Discharge per Square Mile. ptviCDMv|C0OWM05OW05M00 g* O'MOOOOiOMtOW^WOOO Representing Rainfall per Ann rm. • © • X 05 to O’ w» CO OI O CO M c?« o t>0 S3 O • WtOWOiC'OOOO^O^CO Registered Rainfall per Annum. 31.43 25.6 21.0 • • • • o • • • • • to • • • to • CO On M Mj © * • • 05 • 00 C5 3. P C5 • • • 0005* OO • • • 05 • 63 Reservoir Room per Square Mile. 1-J • \M 1 1 • CC\ —1 09 • • • 03 • SC: : : g: Proportion of Storage to available Rainfall. 20 The rule suggested by Professor Ran- kine “ for estimating the available capacity required in a store reservoir, that founded upon taking into account the supply as well as the demand,” is probably the best that can be adopted in designing waterworks for the supply of a town; “for example, 180 days of the excess of the daily demand above the least daily supply, as ascertained by gauging and computation in the manner above described.” In order that a reser- voir of the capacity “ prescribed by the preceding rule may be efficient, it is essen- tial that the least available annual rainfall of the gathering grounds should be suffi- cient to supply a year’s demand for water.” In calculating the capacity of a storage re- servoir, the consideration of the surface evaporation must not be disregarded, espe- cially when the works are designed for tropical or very dry climates. The amount of loss will in some cases be very consider- able, for whatever depth of water be assum- ed to pass away into the air, it must be re- garded as extending over the whole surface of the reservoir ; or, in fact, the cubic quan- 21 tity will be equal to the product of the depth evaporated away and the mean sur- face area of the reservoir as the water rises or falls throughout the year. Some have gone the length of asserting that the amount of evaporation from the surface of large and deep bodies of water is probably nothing at all, or, at any rate, not worthy of considera- tion ; whilst others assume a much larger amount of loss than appears to be support- ed by observation. The following extract from the article “Physical Geography,” published by the Society for Promoting Useful Knowledge, expresses intelligibly the conditions that tend to promote evapora- tion : “ Other things being equal, evaporation is the more abundant the greater the warmth of the air above that of the eva- porating body, and least of all when their temperature is the same. Neither does much take place whenever the atmosphere is more than 15 deg. colder than the sur- face upon which it acts. Winds powerfully promote evaporation, because they bring the 22 air into continual as well as into closer and more violent contact with the surface acted upon, and also, in the case of liquids, in- crease by the agitation which they occasion, the number of points of contact between the atmosphere and the liquid. “In the temperate zone, with a mean temperature of deg., the annual evap- oration has been found to be between 86 in. and 37 in. At Cumana, on the coast of South America (N. lat'. with a mean temperature of 81.86 deg., it was ascertain- ed to be more than 100 in. in the course of the year; at Guadaloupe, in the West Indies, it has been observed to amount to 97 in. The degree of evaporation very much de- pends upon the difference between the quantity of vapor which the surrounding air is able to contain when saturated and the quantity which it actually contains. M. Humboldt found that in the torrid zone the quantity of vapor contained in the air is much nearer to the point of saturation than in the temperate zone. The evaporation within the tropics, and in hot weather in temperate zones, is on this account less 23 than might have been supposed from the increase of temperature.” Thus it appears that evaporation, under highly favorable conditions, may take place to the extent of 9 ft. in depth—an allow- ance that will demand careful consideration in designing storage works. In India, where from the extreme dryness of the at- mosphere the evaporation is found to be considerable, the usual allowance made by engineers for the evaporation from the sur- face of storage reservoirs is at the rate of | in. of depth per diem for eight months in the year. Regarding the results that have been arrived at in Bombay, this allowance would appear to be about double what is necessary, for the observations extending over five years give a mean daily evapora- tion of less than \ in. In Bombay, how- ever, the atmosphere is much more humid than that experienced on the great table- land of the Deccan ; and in Madras, where reservoirs are the specialty, it is probable that the actual loss is not far from being a mean between the two fractions. In Great Britain the mean daily evaporation is found to average less than the tenth of an inch. 24 In estimating the quantity of storage water that will result from the drainage of any particular district, it will be essential to consider carefully the geological disposi- tion of the strata characterizing the locality in which it is contemplated to establish the works. This, although a matter that may influence the effectiveness of an undertaking to the extent of success or failure, will ap- pear to the purely practical man to imply a degree of refinement that is uncalled for. There will be no difficulty, however, in showing that the geological conformation of a district may be such as, on the one hand, to materially contribute to the effi- ciency of a storage reservoir, or on the oth- er to prove so defective that no engineering skill or pecuniary outlay could remedy it. A condition of geological structure perhaps the most favorable that could be imagined is that shown in Fig. 1. This diagram represents a geological section taken at right angles, or nearly so, to the axis of the valley that it is proposed to convert to the purpose of storage. This somewhat peculiar structure is what is geologically termed syn- SECTION ACROSS SYNCLINAL AXIS. Fig. 1. 26 clinal, the beds inclining away from the axis of the valley, and is the result of an upheaving force having taken place under- neath the points of greatest elevation. Sub- sequent to the upheaval and consequent displacement of the strata, the process of denudation has taken place, cutting the up- per beds, and leaving the outcrop exposed, not only inside the basin, but in the adjoin- ing valleys at 0 and 0. Now, it is evident that if the highest ridges bounding the val- ley be taken to mark the line of water- shed, and therefore limiting the area of the catchment basin, it is possible that the esti- mate of the amount of supply may be found far short of what the district will yield. A certain proportion of the rain falling upon the outcrop at the points 0 0 will be ab- sorbed by such of the strata as are porous, and the water, percolating through the bed- ding, till an impervious stratum is met with, will find its way down the course of the stratification, till it ultimately reaches the reservoir in the form of springs, and contributes more or less to the maintenance of the supply. The converse of this condi- SECT!OX ACROSS ANTICLINAL AXIS. Pig. 2. 28 tion of things will be readily understood by reference to Fig. 2. It also represents a section taken directly across the valley of the proposed reservoir. Here the strata of the earth’s crust incline against each other consequent upon some disturbing force having taken place to elevate them, and are said to be anticlinal to the axis of the valley. In order to account for the forma- tion of a valley on the summit of the ridge, that at first was thrown up, it is to be un- derstood that the upper beds suffered frac- ture in the process of upheaval, and subse- quently were exposed to denudation. These valleys of elevation are evidently not to be desired as situations for the establishment of storage reservoirs. The area of the gathering grounds will be much more lim- ited than the extent of the watershed would appear to indicate ; and cannot safely be relied upon to give an estimate of the quan- tity of water that the valley will afford. A certain amount of water will undoubtedly pass over the surface in times of heavy and continued rain, before it can be absorbed ; but there is no doubt that of all the water 29 absorbed by the ground, by far the greater portion will follow the inclination of the strata, and come out as springs in the ad- joining valleys. Fig. 3 shows a geological section that combines in it favorable and unfavorable conditions for the storage of water. On one side the outcrops of the strata are found to extend beyond the highest point of water- shed line, whilst on the other side the strata incline away, producing such a condition as would favor the escape from the valley of the water absorbed. Certain rules are in general use for esti" mating the quantity of the total rainfall that will be lost by absorption and evapo- ration, with a view to determining the proper proportion to be observed between the reservoir and the area of the catchment basin. Two-thirds of the whole fall is sometimes taken to represent the loss that may be expected from the drainage of any district, in general terms, one-third being assumed as the amount that may actual- ly be intercepted for utilization. Some au- thors leave a much smaller margin, and VALLEY OF DENUDATION. Fig. 3. 31 state that fully two-thirds of the total rain- fall may fairly be taken as available for storage. This is a large discrepancy when the application of the rules is taken to be general; but when the statements are ap- plied to separate districts and different countries, there is nothing irreconcilable in them. General rules are undoubtedly of much value if they be received with quali- fication, and are not adopted as of absolute- ly universal application. They cannot, however, with safety be substituted for specific investigations, when so much de- pends on starting with accurate data. RESERVOIR SITES. The special requirements of each partic- ular case will, as a general rule, go far towards determining the selection of a site for the establishment of storage works. Assuming, however, that there is a consid- erable extent of country situated advanta- geously in relative position to the locality at which it is proposed to utilize the water, and that there is a choice of ground, the point to be considered chiefly will be the 32 nat ral lie of the country. To throw an embankment across a valley at any point without due regard to the configuration of the ground would most probably result in an expensive and ill-designed scheme ; for under such circumstances the cost of the dam would bear a very large proportion to the quantity of water stored. It will rarely happen that, in the examination of the re- sources of any particular piece of country, some special features will not present them- selves, favorable to the situation of storage works. The most advantageous disposition of the ground will be when two spurs of high land approach each other, forming a narrow outlet for the stream, and leaving a wide space above above them in the valley for storage. Such a configuration is not uncommonly met with at the junction of two streams, as shown in Fig 4. This is merely a sketch from memory, by the author, of a reservoir that he designed in India for purposes of irrigation; and it will be evident that the disposition of the ground was singularly favorable in every respect for the construction of a large IRRIGATION RESERVOIR. Fig. 4. 34 storage work. The area of the reservoir, as designed, was about three square miles, and the maximum depth 90 ft., the area of the catchment basin being about 60 square miles. Such favorable situations for storage are of somewhat rare occurrence ; for when the contour of the land is what is desirable, it may be that the area of water-shed is not adequate, or possibly the geological condition of the ground may be unfavorable, or the materials for the construction of a sound bank are not available. In examin- ing large tracts of country in India, with a view to the establishment of irrigation re- servoirs, the author found that more reli- anco was to be placed on a careful exami- nation of the map in the first instance, than on the common plan of making per- sonal explorations of the country. A good map will show at a glance, especially if the hill-shading has been carefully engraved, the points at which the supply will be found sufficient to justify the undertaking; and will probably furnish a pretty true indica- tion of sites at which embankments may be advantageously constructed. 35 In tropical climates, where the rainfall is in places very scanty, and where the land is not of great value, it not unfrequently hap- pens that such situations prove available for the establishment of large storage works as would not under any circumstan- ces be made available in England. These sites are to be found, not at the head of a valley, but at some considerable distance down the course of a stream, where, the general inclination of the country being slight, a low embankment serves to store a very large area of water. The apparent disadvantages of such a site for storage are the large area of land swamped and lost to the cultivator and to Government, and the great surface exposed to evaporation under a tropical sun and the influence of a dry wind. In India, the first objection is one of comparatively little moment, considering- that in those districts where irrigation is most required the value of land is very trifling. From Is. to 2s. is about an average rent per acre, where land is under dry crops; but when water is available, the cultivators can, with profit, afford to pay 36 80s. per acre. It is therefore evident that, so far as Government is concerned, there is no sacrifice in the matter, but, on the con- trary, an unspeakable benefit is conferred on those landowners who hold farms below the reservoir ; and an ample supply of water is stored in the dryest seasons to mature those crops whose failure almost inevitably reduces the people to the verge of starva- tion. The evaporation from these lakes is, beyond question, a source of very consider- able loss, and one that admits of no possible abatement. Estimated as above, at about half an inch vertical for eight months of the the loss frequently amounts to one- third of the whole body of water stored. As a set-off against this and other objec- tions, the facilities for constructing these reservoirs of great extent, are considerable. In the first place, the embankments, being very low, are rapidly and cheaply construct- ed by native workmen ; and when finished, the head of water even at the deepest point is not sufficient to try the work to any great extent. Further, the greater the extent of the reservoir, the less inconvenience is ex- 37 perienced from silting. The streams, owing to the suddenness of the rainfall, come down heavily charged with earth in suspension, the mass of which is deposited like a minia- ture delta at the influx of the reservoir, in- stead of passing on and resting near the embankment, as invariably occurs in reser- voirs of small extent. The immense con- sumption of water necessary to confer any appreciable benefit by irrigation is of itself the strongest argument in favor of these broad and shallow reservoirs ; for it is not possible to find in the upper part of a valley such sites as would store the requisite quan- tity of water without an embankment of excessive dimensions; and moreover, the catchment area in such situations is not usually sufficient to serve, with a scanty rainfall, for the supply of a very large re- servoir. It is not, of course, maintained that this mode of storing water is by any means applicable in England, for the cir- cumstances and requirements in each case,’ are wholly dissimilar. 38 SUPPLY. The reservoir site being supposed every- thing that could be desired, as regards the disposition of the ground, the supply will next engage attention as a matter of course. Assuming that the gathering grounds are sufficiently extensive, it is presumed that the reservoir will be constructed to contain sufficient water to meet the maxi- mum demand, whatever that may be calcu- lated at; and in order to determine with accuracy what capacity the reservoir will have with different heights of embankment, it will be necessary to carry out certain level- ling operations over the ground. The least elaborate manner of proceeding will be to run a series of cross-levels through the valley, referring all to the same datum, and by comparing these levels to ascertain what the average depth will be for a given height of bank. Having decided the height of the water-level, the next operation will be to contour round the basin, and to survey the boundary-line. In this way may be acquir- ed sufficient knowledge as to the storage capacity, to justify the procedure with the 39 work. When the execution of the project has been determined upon, it will be advis- able to make a more accurate survey of the bed of the valley, and this can best be done by covering the whole plan with a series of contour lines at a vertical distance from each other of about 5 ft. This kind of survey will be of lasting value to the engi- neer, for it will enable him to calculate what quantity of water the reservoir will contain at each foot of depth ; and, conse- quently, he will know, from a mere inspec- tion of the gauge in the reservoir, how much water he has at his disposal for service. It has been assumed that the gathering grounds are sufficient to maintain the re- quisite supply in the reservoir ; but it may be well to pause and inquire what extent of water-shed will be sufficient to furnish a given supply, and what method may be adopted for supplementing an insufficient drainage area. It has before been remark- ed that the only reliable information, when there is any question as to the sufficiency of the rainfall or the area of the catchment 40 basin, can be derived from careful gaugings of the stream or streams that may be depend- ed upon to contribute to the supply. If the catchment area is very large as compared to the capacity of the reservoir, a mere inspec- tion of the map and an exploration of the ground will generally be conclusive as to the sufficiency of the supply for storage. Should there not be such conclusive evi- dence on this point, it must be determined by measuring the quantity of water that absolutely flows off the ground, at the same time gauging the rainfall. This latter pre- caution would appear unnecessary, but in truth it is of great value, for it will furnish, by comparison with the rainfall registers that have been kept through the same year, and a series of previous years, evidence as to the amount of available rainfall that may be expected during terms of comparative drought. If the supply of a town with water be the desideratum, the rule to be rigidly observed is that of making a mini- mum supply meet the maximum demand, and therefore it is of the highest impor- tance to determine beyond any doubt, what 41 the minimum yield of a catchment basin will be. As a mode of supplementing an insuffi- ciently large drainage area, catchment drains or feeders have frequently rendered good service. These are cuts that are carried outside the water-shed line to arrest the surface drainage and catch the contribu- tions of small streams, and conduct the water into the reservoir. The greater the area enclosed between catchment drains and the water-shed line, the more valuable will they be as aids to the supply of the reservoir. They of course virtually extend the area of the catchment, adding so many square miles or acres to the rainfall. Knowing the exact requirement of a given population, or rather having fixed, after every consideration, the daily con- sumption of every individual that it is pro- posed to supply, there will be no difficulty whatever in proportioning the reservoir to the demand upon it. It is sometimes ne- cessary, however, to provide reservoirs for DESIGNING OF WOKKS. 42 the purpose of preventing damage to the country by floods, and in this way the in- convenience and injury naturally conse- quent upon very sudden and excessive falls of rain may be to a great extent obviated. The duty of the reservoir will be to arrest all water in excess of what the stream can carry within its banks, and to dispose of this excess water, so to speak, in detail, after the excessive rainfall has become moderated. A comparison of a stream’s discharge, taken at highest floods, with the quantity that it can carry without overflowing its banks will show the excess that has to be retained by the reservoir ; and these data can only be arrived at through a carefully kept record «of the extent of the floods and of their du- ration. The maximum flood in this con- sideration will not be that which rises to the greatest height for a short time, but will be the product of the excess above what the river can discharge by the length of time the flood lasts; which will, in fact, be the necessary capacity of the reser- voir. The Table given on a preceding page will 43 afford an interesting study when compared with the following Table, extracted in part from the same work. The first gives a comparative view of the volume of water gauged and stored in small hill districts, the last column indicating the proportion of the total available rainfall to the amount actually intercepted for storage. The fol- lowing Table shows the ordinary summer discharge of various rivers, streams, and springs, as unaffected by immediate rain. (See Table B.) Where the reservoir is designed to check the injurious effects of floods, the propor- tion of*the storage to the rainfall will, in most cases, be much smaller than what would be necessary to provide for the better part of a whole year’s fall of rain, for it is not probable that the maximum known flood can ever exceed the amount that it would be necessary to store for economic purposes. PROPORTION'S OP BANK. The proper proportion to be given to an embankment for the support of water is a 44 Table B. Rivers. Height above Sea. Thames at Staines, chalk, greensand, Oxford clay, oolites, etc Severn at Stonebench, Silurian Loddon (February, 1850), greensand. Nenc, at Peterborough, oolites, Oxford clay and lias Mimram, at Panshanger, chalk.... Lee, at Lee Bridge, chalk (Rennie, April, 1796) .. Wan die, below Carshalton, chalk. .. Medway, dryest seasons (Rennie, Valley Hill, ft. ft. 40 to 700 400 to 2600 110 to 700 10 to 600 200 to 500 30 to 600 70 to 350 Ditto, ordinary summer run(Rennie, 1787) Verulam, at Bushey Hall, chalk.... Gade, at H unton Bridge, chalk Plym, at Sheepstor, granite Woodhead Tunnel, millstone, grit.. Glencorse Bum 150 to 500 150 to 500 800 to 1500 1000 750 to 1600 45 Table B. — Continued. C5 © mL. 3086 3900 221.8 620.0 50.0 570 0 41.0 481.5 481.5 120.8 69 5 7.6 Drainage Area. oo a> n to j-*jo jo jw ooj3> *-i P m t-1 'to "oo oo to'o om o h hk 03 05000W O O 00 OO OM© Sr? O © O O O O CO OO OO g*# Total Discharge. 21 6 c. ft. per min. 12.98 8.49 13.53 8.45 2.4 15.58 43.9 4 59 5 23 14.9 36.2 71.4 Discharge per Sq. Mile. CO in. 2.93 1.98 3.01 1.88 5.5 3 53 9.93 1.04 2.19 3 37 8 19 15.10 Representing Rainfall per Annum. Co • • • . to- toto to • tO B* © O* • • • • 003 P • • • © • C5H* • Ox Total average Rainfall per Annum. 46 question that appears to admit of a good deal of difference of opinion, some designers taking one view, some another, of the pro- per theory that is to determine the dimen- sions of a bank. Some few, with whom the author cannot agree on this point, maiutain that a bank ought to be designed with strict reference to its theoretical power of resisting hydrostatic pressure, or the effort of the water to displace it. Regarding the question in its abstract form, it will be evident that any structure intended to sus- tain the pressure of water may be supposed to fail in one of two ways—either, in the first place, by yielding to the horizontal pressure of the water and overturning, or by progressive motion, i. e. sliding on its base. In considering the first theory, that of resistance to overturning, the easiest method of examining the question will be to take a simple example of a vertical rectangular wall, and ascertain what power it exercises to resist the pressure of water. The pressure of water upon any plane surface immersed is known to be equal to the area of that surface, multiplied by the 47 depth of its centre of gravity below the level of the water and by the weight of a unit of water. Generally speaking, the unit adopted in calculations is a foot; and the unit of water being taken at a cubic foot, weighing 62.5 lbs., the resulting pro- duct from the multiplication of the three quantities will give the pressure in pounds on the surface immersed. Let it be sup- Fig. 5. posed, for simplicity, that water to the depth of 10 ft. has to be sustained by a vertical rectangular wall, as in Fig. 5. It is usual to take but 1 ft. length of the 48 wall for the calculation, though it will not affect the result whether 1 ft. or 100 ft. he the length assumed. We then have the surface under pressure = 10 sq. ft., the depth of the centre of gravity = 5 ft., and the weight of a cubic foot = 62.5 lbs., the product of which quantities gives us 3,125 lbs. pressure on 1 ft. length of the wall. But this pressure is not the whole of the force that the wall has to resist; the leverage that it exerts must also be taken into account. In the example under consider- ation—viz. that of a vertical plane with one of its sides coinciding with the surface of the water, as in Fig. 5—the whole of the pressure is so distributed as to be equal to a single force acting at a point one-third of the depth from the bottom. Thus, the total force to be resisted by the wall is 3125 X 3.33 = 10,406, which is the moment tending to overturn the wall. It is evident that a certain weight of the wall must be opposed to this overturning force; and as the height of the wall and the length are determined quantities, the thickness alone remains for adjustment. 49 But as a rectangular wall in upsetting is considered to turn upon a single point, F, in the Figure—viz. the outer line of the wall—there will be a certain amount of leverage to assist the wall in resisting the pressure of the water. This leverage is the horizontal distance of the centre of gravity of the wall from the turning point, F, and when the structure is rectangular and vertical, it is equal to half the thick- ness. The amount of the wall’s resistance will then be equal to the number of cubic feet in one foot of its length multiplied by the weight of a single cube foot of masonry and by half the thickness of the wall. Taking w — weight of a cubic foot of water = 62.5 lbs., w 1= weight of a cubic foot of brickwork, say 112 lbs., x — thickness of the wall, and h — the height, the con- ditions of simple stability will be fulfilled when wlX7iX*x| — w X h X | (1) w'hx2 wh3 2 ~6~ ’ and solving for x, we get 50 [whl 0 * = V SF <*> the thickness of the wall — 4 ft. 4 in. A simple example has been selected for illustration; but of course a rectangular section of wall would not be found gene- rally applicable in practice, nor would it be convenient to limit the dimensions of a retaining wall of whatever kind to the minimum that would sustain the pressure. If this principle of calculation be applied to ascertain the stability of a bank of earth with long slopes of 2 £ or 3 to 1, it can easily be shown that in every case the resistance of the bank to overturning is greatly in excess of the horizontal leverage exercised by the water sustained. The only theory, then, in any degree tenable, is that assuming a bank in yield- ing to the pressure of water to slide on its base. In order to conceive how this can apply, it is necessary to assume the em- bankment to be a rigid body resting, for a given length of its section, on a horizontal plane ; and without any adhesion, or a very small fraction, existing between the sur- 51 faces pressed. The amount of the friction, however, is just the point upon which the whole matter hinges, and until it has been ascertained that the surfaces of earth that are carefully incorporated with one another have any such thing as a co-efficient of friction, it is idle to to pursue the investiga- tion by a mathematical mode of reasoning. The conditions of stability will be satisfied when the horizontal component of the water’s pressure against the bank will equal the weight of the bank, plus the vertical pressure exercised by the water to hold it down and multiplied by the co- efficient of friction; but nothing is known of this co-efficient, and consequently the equation remains incapable of solution. As a matter of fact, embankments do not slide bodily forward on their base when they fail, but give way from other causes than mathematical reasoning can supply. Landslips, it is true, to some extent support the principle that maintains the sliding of embankments ; but, here, the circumstances are widely different. Landslips either take place when a mass of earth rests upon an 52 inclined surface of rock, with an ample supply of water to lubricate the surfaces in contact, or else they are the result of cutting or embanking earth to a higher slope than the material will stand at; the infiltration of water also in this case is the chief agent in producing the effect, acting as a lubricant, and causing the earth to assume its natural slope. In each case the surface of separa- tion is an inclined plane, an element that does not enter into the question of the stability of embankments, by either of the modes of reasoning above referred to. The principles that direct the design of embank- ments to retain water are not those that apply to the calculation of the forces to be resisted or the means to overcome them, any more than breakwaters and harbor walls can be designed on mathematical principles. The whole question naturally turns on what slope the material composing the bank will stand at. If earth could be got to remain at a slope of 1 to 1, even though the embankment had no thickness whatever at top, it would be amply sufficient in weight to uphold the water in a reser- 53 voir. This, however, cannot be accomplished without the assistance of retaining walls, which would be found in most cases much more expensive than the additional earth required to increase the slope to the angle of stability; and therefore the section is so disposed that the earth shall stand both inside and outside the reservoir at such a slope as will be under all circumstances permanent. These slopes have been deter- mined by long practice and by success and failure in pre-existing instances—that is to say, the limits have been laid down, for it is not to be assumed that all descriptions of earth will fall to exactly the same slope when exposed to the constant action of water or weather. Earth when subjected to the contact of water almost invariably loses a certain amount of its stability, and there- fore it is usual to give the inner side of an embankment a longer slope than the out- side. In most of the best existing examples the inside slope of the bank is either 3 to 1 or 2i- to 1, and it is rare to meet any de- parture from this rule. The outside slope may be designed at from 2 to 1 to 3 to 1, 54 depending upon the character of the material, its power of withstanding the erosive action of the air, and the means used to protect the surface from being washed off or from crumbling away. In designing embank- ments, the impermeability of the earth is a matter that cannot be relied upon. There are, it is true, innumerable embankments now standing that have never allowed the escape of a drop of water from the reservoir, although no special precaution was taken to make them water-tight. Of these India abounds with examples, the introduction of a puddle wall being in the older embankments of very exceptional occurrence. The earth was merely dug out close at hand, and carried by the work- people in baskets on their heads to where it was deposited, without any regard to the mode of disposing the material. The author has had occasion to construct a considerable length of levee, or embank- ment, on this simple plan for the protection of the country from the flooding of a river; and although, so far as he is aware, no flood has yet taken place to test the work, 55 he has, from the study of existing examples, entire confidence in the result. The earth, so far as practicable, was disposed in layers, and before each was completed it was thoroughly consolidated by the tread of the workmen. It is not suggested that the puddle wall should be dispensed with in designing embankments, for the additional degree of safety, in most instances, will more than compensate for the extra expense it entails; but, in low embankments made of good retentive clay, the precaution of puddling is by no means a necessity. In most of the best examples of embank- ments in England, the practice adopted has been to carry up the earthwork in layers of 2 or 3 ft. in thickness, disposed in the man- ner shown in Figs. 6 and 7, and at the same time to construct in the centre of the bank a wall of well-puddled clay, the foun- dation of which is carried down for what- ever depth may be necessary in order to reach an impermeable bed of earth or rock. It is not in all situations possible to pro- cure earth exactly suitable and in sufficient quantity for the construction of an embank- 56 Fig. G.—No. 1. 57 RESERVOIR EMBANKMENT. No. 2. 58 ment, and consequently it is usual and ad- visable to dispose the best part of the ma- terial—that is, the most retentive of water —in juxtaposition to the puddle wall, as indicated in Fig. 6. In this example, the selected material is disposed equally at ei- ther side of the puddle; but, as its func- tion is to withstand the admission of water, it would probably be more consistent, though less in accordance with practice, to place all the selected material on the inner side. The practice of excavating the earth for an embankment from the inside of the reser- voir is one that should not be followed without caution. Removing so large a mass of material would, no doubt, give a considerable increase of storage room; but sometimes the bed of a reservoir is covered by a layer of impervious clay that is of im- mense value, and if this be cut through or removed, it is quite possible that a bed of porous material may be met with suffi- cient to allow the escape of water when it comes to be admitted. In specifying for the dimensions of the puddle wall, a sound rule for adoption is, that it shall have a 59 SECTION OF EMBANKMENT—BIDDEFORD WATER-WORKS. Fig. 7. 60 thickness of 10 ft. at the top water-line and increase in thickness to the surface of the ground at the rate of 1 in. on each side for every foot of height. Before any excava- tion is commenced, it will be essential to make a sufficient number of borings to as- certain the nature of the soil beneath the surface. It may here be mentioned that profes- sional men are not apparently agreed as to the principles to be kept in view in con- structing reservoir embankments ; and this want of concurrence never was more appa- rent than in the discussion that followed the destruction of the Dale Dyke reservoir, near Sheffield. Fig. 8 shows a plan of the embankment site after the catastrophe. The bank was 95 ft. high, with slopes of 2| to 1, and a top width of 12 ft. The puddle wall was 16 ft. in width at the ground-line, and tapered to 4 ft. at the top of the bank. This embankment, with the exception of the puddle wall, was composed of rubble stone and shale; an additional price hav- ing been given by the engineers to insure the use of the former material; which 61 SHEFFIELD RESERVOIR. Fig. 8. 62 proves, at any rate, that this mode of con- struction was adopted on principle and not through ignorance or mistake. From the evidence given by the engineers of the com- pany, it appears that it was, in their opin- ion, desirable that the inner part of the embankment should be permeable to water, because earth was much more likely to sub- side and slip than an open and less yielding material like stone. This mode of construc- tion implies that the puddle shall be fully sufficient of itself to resist the passage of water, and, that there is no necessity to re- lieve it of any part of the pressure against it. Of course, if a bank be composed of open work, every point in the face of the puddle is exposed to the full and direct hy- drostatic pressure ; and if at any point there is the smallest fissure or imperfection, the water has full power against it, and will, to a certainty, take advantage of such point to breach the dam. The assumptipn, then, of the constructors of this and the Agden res- ervoir evidently was that a puddle wall of some 25,000 sq. ft. of area was to be con- structed without an imperfection of any kind, 63 or a single weak point in the whole sur- face. The obvious reason for employing pud- dle at all, in embankments, is to thorough- ly close up any imperfection that may occur in the earthwork; it is in fact merely an accessory, and cannot be relied upon of it- self to secure the embankment against de- struction. If an embankment be construct- ed of good sound earthwork, properly exe- cuted, it is highly probable that the water may never penetrate half way through to the puddle wall, and probably, in the ma- jority of examples, has not done so. Earth- work, however, is not always executed without imperfection; some decomposable material may be introduced, which, in course of time, dissolves, leaving a fissure one part may be at first less consolidated than another, and, subsiding, lead to imper- fection ; or an embankment, be it ever so well constructed, may be burrowed through by moles, rats, and other vermin. It is to meet the first two of these sources of imper- fection that puddle is used; and if, by such fissures as may occur in ordinary earth- 64 work, water is admitted as far as the pud- dle wall, it can only exercise pressure against it at a few points, the puddle and earth being, in good work, so bonded and incorporated with each other that there is no space left for the water to occupy and press against the surface. Most who have read the account of the disaster that occur- red in March, 1864, at Sheffield, will recol- lect how singularly conflicting the profes- sional evidence on that occasion was. Some of our first engineers were ranged against each other in order to satisfy the public as to whether the failure of the embankment was attributable to bad engineering or to a landslip; and although the impression finally remained on the public mind that “ there was not that engineering skill and attention to the construction of the works that their magnitude and importance de- manded,” the engineers were fairly divided in opinion as to the cause of the disaster. One section pronounced, without qualifica- tion, that the embankment gave way in consequence of a landslip, and entirely ignored the fact of the embankment being 65 defectively constructed; whist the other gentlemen gave their verdict dead against the company, and their mode of construct- ing water-tight banks. The two diagrams, Nos. 6 and 7, may he taken as indicating the system of constructing embankments most generally approved of. The puddle, as will be observed, is carried up to the natural surface of the ground without any batter, and from that point slopes on each side to the top of the bank ; on either side of the puddle is disposed, in concave layers, the most sound aud retentive part of the material, and outside of all comes the ordi- nary earthwork. As a security against the eroding action of the water, and also against the inroads of vermin, the most desirable, as well as the most usual practice, is to pitch the whole of the inner face of an embankment with stone, carefully laid by hand. Neglect of this precaution has led to the destruction of many embankments in other respects se- curely constructed, and even when ample height of bank above the surface of highest water was provided. In all ordinarily in- 66 clement weather the disturbance of the surface of a reservoir amounts to no more than a mere ripple; but when the surface is of large extent, and a severe storm blow- ing, the waves produced are such as to cause reasonable apprehension, and, in fact, have, before now, overtopped the bank and cut it down, till the water flowed over and caused the destruction of the work. In most cases, it will be necessary to leave about 5 ft. between the level of the highest water and the top of the embankment, and never less than 3 ft. A mode of construction not very gener- ally used, but apparently consistent with reason, is that shown in Fig. 7, the em- bankment for the Bideford Waterworks. It consists in covering the whole of the inner face with a layer of puddle, with some- times a layer of peat outside it. On some occasions it has been thought desirable to mix with the puddle a quantity of small stones or furnace cinders, by way of ob- struction to vermin—a precaution that is by no means unnecessary. As an instance in point, the author is reminded of a masonry 67 dam in India that had to be pointed every year regularly, because the fresh-water crabs in the reservoir found it convenient and promotive of their development of shell to appropriate the mortar to their personal use. The joints were cleaned out as effec- tually at the end of each monsoon as if the work had been done to order. The preparation of the foundation for an embankment is a matter requiring some care. The soil, consisting of grass, roots, etc., and other matters of a decomposable nature, should be carefully removed over the whole surface to be covered by the bank, and if any porous material, such as sand or gravel, be present, it must be re- moved, until a compact and water-tight bed is arrived at. The bank must, in fact, be in contact with some sound and reliable material that will not admit the passage of water. Under this heading may he considered: The whole apparatus for allowing the water to escape, including the pipes, the valve tower, and the culvert. APPENDAGES OF RESERVOIRS. 68 The waste sluices. The waste weir or by-wash. The most economical mode of discharging water from a reservoir is through a single pipe passing either through the embank- ment or immediately under it; but this plan cannot, under any circumstances, be recommended, though it is some times found in existing examples. It is open to several grave objections, the principal of which, perhaps, is that the failure of a joint under the embankment pressure, or from whatever cause, will probably produce the destruction of the embankment, or at any rate, entail a serious interruption to the supply, by the reservoir having to be emptied in order to repair the pipe. Buried in or under an embankment, a pipe is com- pletely out of reach and out of view, and may be in a very defective state without its being possible to detect the imperfection. In order to secure the satisfactory work- ing of a reservoir as a source of constant supply, it is essential that the outlet pipes, valves, and all other appendages for con- trolling and regulating the escape of the 69 •water, should be accessible for inspection and repair. The usual mode of accom- plishing this is to carry the pipes out through a culvert of brick or masonry of sufficient dimensions to admit a man. This culvert communicates with the valve tower, as shown in Figs. 6 and 7, so that there is a complete communication between the out- side of the reservoir and the inside. When unavoidable, the culvert is carried straight under the embankment in the natural ground ; but the safest and most generally approved mode of construction is to bring the culvert round the end of the embank- ment, where it will be out of reach of in- jury from unequal settlement ; a source of no small apprehension when either culvert or pipes alone are carried under the bank. Where possible, it is an excellent plan to run a heading through the solid ground, lining it with brickwork and puddling it, forming a tunnel entirely independent of the embankment. The principal objection to carrying either the culvert or* pipes through or under the bank is their liability to fracture from the unequal settlement of 70 the earthwork. It would appear that their liability to damage cannot with certainty be insured by any reasonable depth of excava- tion, and is, therefore, generally disapproved of by the best authorities. In the best constructions the culvert is situated half way or two-thirds up the em- bankment, and in such case the outlet pipes for drawing off the water in the reservoir act as syphons when the water surface has fallen below the culvert. Fig. 6 shows a p’an, as well as a cross section, of a reser- voir dam designed for general application by Mr. Rawlinson. Here the bottom of the culvert is about 25 ft. above where the in- ner slope of the embankment intersects the ground at the lowest point. The syphon pipe is also shown passing through the culvert; the horizontal culvert is connected with a shaft inside the embankment, in which are placed the valves for leading off the supply from the reservoir. The valves are made to be closed on the inside by valve spindles and screws, and the inlet pipes are closed on the outside by plugs which can be applied from the top of the 71 valve-tower. Thus the engineer has full command of the whole of the outlet works ; all the pipes and valves are easily accessible and under perfect control, so that the supply can at any time be arrested for the repair of any derangement that may occur, even to the removal and replacement of all the pipes. The inlet pipes are shown in this example, as well as in Fig. 7, fixed at different heights in the valve-tower, the object of which is to draw the supply from the reservoir from points near the surface. The outlet pipe, passing through or under the embankment, may be connected on the inside of the reservoir by a flexible joint with another pipe of the same diameter, to the upper end of which is attached a. float. This pipe is movable in a vertical plane, being controlled from lateral motion by the guide-posts. Such an arrangement admits of the water being drawn off from the sur- face, where it is least liable to be contami- nated with impurities. AVhatever arrange- ment be selected for drawing the supply off from a reservoir, the system of carrying the pipes, either with or without a culvert, 72 through, or under the embankment, cannot be sufficiently deprecated; they are, in such a position, beyond the reach of inspec- tion, and, moreover, are very likely to induce leakage from the reservoir. It is usual to puddle carefully the culvert or pipes when carried under or through the bank, but, even with such a precaution, the water has under a considerable head a tendency to creep along the pipe, and, by soaking into the earthwork, may cause any one of the many evils that imperil and destroy embank- ments. When embankments are not of great height, an exceedingly cheap and simple mode might be adopted for drawing off the water. This would be by laying a syphon over the embankment, as was done in the case of the middle-level drainage in Cam- bridgeshire, which syphon would at the inner side have a flexible connection with another tube having a float attached, as above described. Such an arrangement would apply in principle to heights not ex- ceeding 30 ft., as the pressure of the atmos- phere would maintain no greater height. In 73 practice, however, the syphons cannot be worked with success at much above 20 ft., for it is found that after a short time, the flow becomes arrested by the collection of air in the upper part of the syphon, and it becomes necessary to pump the air out con- stantly, to prevent it from interfering with the flow, as it would do if not removed. It would appear a simple matter, where it is desirable to adopt a syphon, to utilize the power of the water flowing out for the pur- pose of getting rid of the air; it might easily be applied, through a small wheel and suitable gearing, to work an air-pump fixed at the highest point of the syphon, making the whole arrangement self-acting. The arrangement could be successfully ap- plied to irrigation tanks in India, where the embankments are frequently less than 30 ft. Each leg of the syphon should be pro- vided with a valve to retain the water, and when the supply was intermittent it would be essential to have an opening at the= highest point of the syphon, and some ap- pliance, perhaps an air-pump, for filling ik with water in case of leakage. 74 To insure a constant discharge from a reservoir with a constantly varying head, several methods have been adopted; of these, one of the most ingenious is that used at the Gorbals Waterworks, near Glasgow. Fig. 9 represents a transverse section through the regulator-house, showing the arrangement by which the discharge is equalized. To the orifice of the outlet pipe, 0, is fitted a square-hinged flap valve of wood, against which presses, by a friction roller, a lever, B, the arms of which are bent. To the upper arm is attached a chain that pass- es over a pulley, and is connected with a cast-iron cylinder or float, D, that stands in the reservoir, E, of slightly larger diameter. At the side of the entrance-door of the building is placed another cisterfi, G, of cast-iron, closed at top, and communicating by a pipe, R R, with the vertical pipe, H, which is in connection with the outlet pipe, and passes up the slope of the embank, ment, to carry away any air that may ac- cumulate in the main. The cistern, G, is connected with the reservoir, E, by a pipe, K, which supplies water to float the cyl- 75 Jig. 9. 76 inder, D. Now, it is evident tliat the dis- charge from the reservoir will be regulated by the position of the lever, B, and this again will be controlled by the height of the float, D. To regulate this height the supply from the cistern, G, must be self- adjusting, or be regulated by the amount of water flowing away. The float, N, has attached to it a spindle, on which are fixed two double-beat valves that work in the vertical part of the pipe, K, one of which admits water from the cistern, G, into the cylinder, E, and the other allows the water to escape from the reservoir, E. Now, if the surface of the water upon which the float, N, rest8 should rise above the proper level, the float forces up the spindle, closing the supply valve from the cistern, and at the same time opening the lower valve. Thus the supply is cut off and the escape opened, enabling the float, D, to fall. The subsidence of the float closes more or less the flap valve, and checks the discharge, in consequence of which the surface of the water falls, and with it the float, N, which consequently opens the supply valve, and 77 again admits water into the cistern, E. Thus an almost perfect equality between the consumption and the supply of water is preserved. It would appear that the same effect could be produced by connecting the lever directly with a float on the surface of the water, but such an arrangement would only apply when the pressure against the flap is trifling. It is essential that every reservoir should be provided with some means of getting rid of the excess of water that flows into it, and whether this provision be made by a waste weir, sluices, or waste pit, it is one that should not be omitted. The most advan- tageous position for a waste weir will generally be at some point remote from, and entirely unconnected with, the em- bankment, and occasionally a natural de- pression in the ground, as shown in Fig. 4, will afford remarkable facilities for the construction of an escape. The level of the crest of the waste weir with reference to the top of the dam will require to be care- fully adjusted, the minimum difference of level being 3 ft., and the maximum about 78 10 ft., depending on varying circumstances. The height of the waste weir will, of course, regulate the top water level in the reservoir; and this must be fixed with regard to the probability of the embankment being over- topped by waves. The circumstances in- fluencing the height of the waves in a reservoir are the extent of the water surface, the depth, and the amount of exposure to nr shelter from wind, all of which will vary with each particualar case. Under ordinary circumstances, the height of the top of the embankment above the crest of the waste weir should be for an embankment 25 ft. deep, 4 ft. “ 50 ft. “ 5 ft. “ 75 ft. “ 6 ft. and for greater height of embankment the difference of level may be proportionately increased. When the configuration of the ground does not afford any facilities for the con- struction of a waste weir after the manner described, sufficient provision for the escape of the overflow is made through a waste pit. This waste pit, or tower, is generally 79 a circular structure built over the outlet culvert inside the reservoir, and serves equally for access to the valves and for the escape of the flood water. With regard to the capacity of the waste weir or waste pit, whichever be adopted, it will be necessary to make ample provision for the discharge of the sudden accessions of flood water that reservoirs are subject to, and which so seriously imperil their safety. To provide for this there is an empirical rule amongst engineers that is supposed to suffice for the most urgent contingencies. It states that there shall not be less than 3 ft. of length of overfall for every hundred acres of gathering ground, but it is obvious that to proportion the length of the waste weir to a given area of country in all cases would be unreasonable. The discharge over the weir will not depend only upon the quantity of rain fall- ing on a certain area of ground, but also on the extent of the reservoir as compared to the gathering ground, and on the flat or precipitous character of the basin. The only safe mode, then, of proportioning the length 80 of the escape will be to ascertain with exactness what the discharge of the stream or streams flowing out of the reservoir was during the greatest known flood, and then fixing upon an arbitrary depth for the water to flow over the weir, say 2 ft. or 3 ft., to calculate what length of overfall will suffice for the discharge of the excess water. In India, where large waste-weir accomodation is essentially necessary, while it is equally a necessity to save every gallon of water that is possible, it is a common practice to form a temporary dam, of earth and sods, on the top of the waste weir; this serves to pond up some 3 ft. or 4 ft. of water over the whole surface of the reservoir, and does not imperil the security of the works. In times of heavy floods the water rises and overtops the temporary dam, and no sooner does so, than the whole is carried away, and the water in the reservoir quickly subsides. In works designed for the supply of towns, it is sometimes necessary to make provision to arrest the entrance of flood- ■water into the reservoir, as the streams may 81 come down charged with large quantities of matter in suspension that would injure the purity of the water for domestic consump- tion. These streams may be diverted and carried round the margin of the tank past the dam, and can be admitted into the channel of the stream, or be utilized for mill power. On the Manchester Water- works are constructed across the mountain streams weirs of an ingenious design, for the purpose of separating the flood-waters from the ordinary flow. The dimensions are adjusted from observations of each par- ticular stream, so that the discharge up to a certain amount will take place into the channel for the supply of the town; but when the discharge increases, and the water becomes turbid, it has sufficient velocity to carry it over the opening, as shown in the diagram, and flows down to the compen- sation reservoir for the supply of mill power. In determining the dimensions of a weir ■of this kind it is first to be ascertained what the mean velocity of the water flow- ing over will be for a given depth of water, 82 h, above the crest. The mean velocity, v, will be v = | X 8 0241/h = 5.35 -iA. If the vertical height of the crest of the weir above the point to be overleaped by the cascade be called x, the distance across will be 2v\/x 4 .—r ’’=7W=*V Before concluding, it will be well to give a brief consideration to ihe causes tending to the failure of embankments. The fore- going remarks will, in suggesting the best mode of construction, have anticipated much that might be said on the subject of failures; but there are a few points, the recapitula- tion of which the importance of the subject demands. There are unfortunately on record, acci- dents, if they can be so called, from the bursting of embankments, that if estimated by the loss of life attending them, are as appalling as anything within the memory of man. Thousands of human lives have been sacrificed to ignorance and false economy, 83 as well as in some instances to natural de- fects that it would have been difficult to foresee. The existence of springs on the site of an embankment is an undoubted cause for ap- prehension, and considerable care should be taken to carry all water from this source away, that it may not, as it certainly will if not checked, force its way between the sur- face of the ground and the seat of the em- bankment. In doing so there is every prob- ability that the earth of the embankment will be washed out by constant trickling till a fissure is formed of sufficient dimensions to render the destruction of the bank a cer- tainty, if the water from the reservoir should ever penetrate so far. As a provis- ion against this source of injury, all springs found on the site of an embankment should be taken up and carried away in proper drains sufficiently and securely puddled. Thus the water is confined to a single chan- nel, and has no tendency to soak into the earthwork and blow it up in endeavoring to escape. In embankments of all kinds the presence of water is a most serious evil, and 84 one by which may be accounted for, some of the most extensive land slips that are on record. It is erroneous to assume that when water is the active element in pro- ducing disruption in an embankment or mass of earth of any kind, that it only acts as a lubricant between the surfaces in con- tact. The truth is, the bulk of earth is sen- sibly affected by the amount of moisture in it, as is seen in the subsidence of newly- formed railway banks when exposed to rain. If, then, a sufficient quantity of water find its way into the centre of a bank that has been put together in a comparatively dry state, it will rise and soak into the earth until at length what was a solid mass becomes semi-fluid, settles into a smaller space than it before occupied, and, as a consequence, will leave a vacuity above it. The inevita- ble result is the subsidence of the superin- cumbent earth; but instead of resting, as at first, on a resisting material, it floats, so to speak, on the semi-fluid mass underneath, and having little or no friction to overcome, slips away to a lower angle than it before stood at. Natural springs, therefore, when- 85 ever they occur, must be dealt with care- fully and completely. Exactly similar effects to those produced by natural springs may result from the defective practice of carrying outlet pipes through or immedi- ately under embankments. Be the pipes ever so well puddled, there will be a ten- dency to trickling along the line of their direction, and assuredly if this trickle makes its way to the centre of the bank it will carry mischief with it. It is true that springs are occasionally found issuing from the foot of an embankment, without after several years causing any appearances to justify apprehension. The Doe-park reservoir is an example in point, and though at one time fears for its safety were enter- tained, the embankment is still standing,, and, so far as the author is aware, the spring is still trickling away. An engineer of eminence was called upon to report upon the state of the works, and gave his opinion that, as the spring came away without any earth in suspension, there was no mischief taking place, and that the work was in a safe condition. There is no doubt that em- 86 bankments in tliis condition require to be narrowly watched, although the presump- tion may be that, having lasted for several years, they will continue in safety. The empirical and unscientific mode of proportioning the length of waste weirs has proved before now a source of danger and destruction to embankments, from the space afforded not being sufficient to discharge the excess water without the surface rising to such a height as to top the embankment. To avoid risk, the stream must be gauged with great care, and the discharge calculat- ed for the greatest known flood; and if with a given head the length of the weir be adjusted to discharge this amount, or a little in excess, there will be no risk to the embankment. Regarding finally the whole subject, the danger that may result from careless or unscientific construction, the large outlay entailed in the establishment of storage works, and the benefit that may accrue from them whatever their purpose may be, the subject cannot be undertaken on merely rational grounds. Its successful applica- 87 tion will rest alone on the study of the question in its scientific details, and an ample practical experience. DISCUSSION. Mr. H. P. Stephenson said he entirely agreed with the author as to the impro- priety of carrying a pipe through the em- bankment of a reservoir. He would extend his objection to the passing of a culvert through the embankment. If the culvert were laid on the natural ground, they would avoid the risks pointed out by the author, either of the settlement from the joints of the pipe, or of the water creeping along between the material and the pipe. He believed that the true principle of con- struction for reservoirs was the placing of a good puddle dam in the centre, and on each side of this dam layers of earth well punned in. One reason why he should prefer the puddle wall in the centre was that there was less tendency in the puddle to slip in such a position than when laid on the slope. Mr. Albert Latham agreed with Mr. 88 Stephenson in his remarks as to the pipes and culverts; but he thought it was an open question whether the puddle wall should be in the centre of the dam. He had a strong opinion that it should be on the face of the dam. Mr. Cargill said that he believed that the reason the puddle wall was not required in Indian embankments, referred to by the author of the paper, was that the earth seemed to have been thoroughly consolidat- ed by the continual trample of people upon it. That thorough consolidation was the great point in all puddling, and it was on that account that specifications were gener- ally so stringent as to the thickness of the layers of the puddle. As to the position of the puddle wall, he could not see the parti- cular value of having it in the middle of the dam, and he thought that a far better place for it would be the face, because the object of the puddle wall was to prevent the infil- tration or the escape of the water. This could be effected by puddling the whole slope right down to the permanent strata. The puddle wall was not required to 89 promote the stability of the dam. The question of putting pipes or culverts under the dam required more consideration. It was alleged that the putting of a naked pipe through the dam of the Bradfield re- servoir was one of the causes of its bursting. In some very large waterworks now being constructed in Dublin there were two dis- tinct sets of main pipes, and they were laid in two large culverts at the bottom of the dam. The culverts were large enough for a man to walk upright in them. If the foundation were well looked after, there would be no fear of the arch or dome of the culvert giving way in consequence of any inequality of pressure above it, as, if pro- perly constructed, an arch would stand any amount of pressure short of what would crush the material. Mr. Baldwin Latham said he could not agree with Mr. Jacob that a dam could not be constructed from theoretical deductions; for unless regard was paid to theoretical considerations there might result either a deficiency of strength or a waste of material and labor. In the dam shown in the draw- 90 ings, and designed by himself, the pipe did not run through, but on the outside of the dam, on the solid ground. It was a well received opinion among engineers that if you had a pipe or culvert running through an embankment, that pipe or culvert would be unsafe. He believed that well made and properly tested pipes were quite as safe as culverts when in the solid ground. A pipe was simply a small culvert made of iron instead of brickwork. In cases in which there was a tendency fur the water to creep along the outside of the pipe, that might be stopped by having projecting flanges on the pipe. The same creeping of water might take place along a culvert as along a pipe. With regard to the slope of a dam, the in- side slope should be greater than the out- side slope, because the greater would be the stability of the dam, and the water would have less destructive effect on the dam ; he had effectually prevented leakage by the use of socket-pipes. The square projection of the sockets was alway present- ed to the reservoir, and the pipes were laid in the virgin ground. It was very bad 91 practice to lay the pipes in made ground, and especially through a dam. Pipes laid under a dam should be tested under pressure after being laid and before being covered up, so that any defective joint might be discovered. In cases in which he had laid pipes through dams, they had been so tested, which resulted in good and effective work ; but he was bound to say that, if the pipes had not been tested in situ the result would not have been satisfactory. Mr. Schonheyder said that Mr. Jacob had said that wherever springs occurred they should be well carried away. He (Mr. Schonheyder) wished lo know how a spring was to be prevented from diffusing through the earth. Mr. Hendry said that he had seen pipes which were laid through embankments, but had never seen one that was perfectly tight. It was almost impracticable to make it so, owing to the continuity of the puddle being disturbed at the point where the pipe passes through. The Chairman asked what was the largest diameter of pipe Mr. Hendry had seen used. 92 Mr. Hendry replied that the largest was 18 in. He had heard of several methods being tried, but he did not think it was possible to prevent leaking, more or less, from the reservoir along the outside of the pipe. He should like to be informed how it was possible to connect the puddle with, the pipe ; if the pipes be laid in the natural ground below the foundation of the em- bankment, then there is no fear of leak- age, provided the pipes are properly laid. Mr. Jacob, in replying to the discussion, said, that in the opinions that had been expressed there were but few points of disagreement with those that he himself held. He could not agree with Mr. Latham in his belief that embankments could be calculated on mathematical principles. In order to deal with embankments theoret- ically, they must be regarded as rigid masses, and be assumed to rest upon a horizontal plane. It could be shown math- ematically that a rigid body of the same specific gravity as ordinary earth need not present the same section as is usually given 93 to embankments, in order adequately to resist the pressure of water. A right angle prism with the hypothenuse resting upon the plane would be quite sufficient to resist the pressure of water, even supposing the sur- face of the water to coincide with the upper edge of the prism. The reason of giving long slopes to an embankment is discover- able from the fact that banks, when exposed to the action of water, are found to waste and slip away to such an angle as will withstand the action of the water. The chief reason of the failure of embankments is the infiltration or soaking of the water from the inner side, which renders the material semi-fluid and causes it to subside into a smaller space than it originally occupied. The superincumbent mass then sinks and allows the water to overtop the embankment. The earth used for making embankments in the Deccan and in parts of the Madras Presidency in India is of a most suitable quality for the purpose. It is what is called “black soil,” being very dark in color, and of a highly argillaceous character. The color is, no doubt, due to the presence of carbon. The 94 clay makes most excellent puddle; but, no doubt, the consolidation produced, by the tread of the work-people is the real secret of the earth resisting the pressure of water so successfully as it does. In North America, the levees for protecting the country from flooding by the Mississippi are sometimes constructed simply of sand ; and are found, for the most part, sufficient for their pur- pose. As regards carrying away springs from the seat of an embankment, there is no difficulty in ascertaining where they exist when the ground is laid bare, as they are generally well defined streams. Before the earthwork is commenced it is necessary to construct drains of masonry, or brickwork, or to lay iron piping to carry away the water clear of the work. The Chairman said that the paper of Mr. Jacob was a very interesting one, and the subject was one which, during the last year or two, or, he might say, within the last week or two, had commanded the at- tention of the whole body of engineers. Last session a special Act of Parliament was passed that all reservoirs and embank- 95 ments should be constructed to the approval of the Board of Trade. The subject of irrigation in India, which was alluded to in the paper, was one of vital importance. There was no question that the only means we had of irrigating that country in an efficient manner was by the construction of reservoirs.