1) 2) ¢Princi of An, 1: 2: D THE PUBLIC HEALTH RESEARCH [NSTITUTE OF THE City OF NEw YorK, INC. Foot OF EaAsT 15TH ST., NEW YORK 9, N. Y. TEL. OREGON 7-4411 January 20, 1958 Dr. Joshua Lederberg Professor of Medical Genetics The University of Wisconsin School of Medicine Madison 6, Wisconsin Dear Joshua: Thank you very much for your invitation to the symposium, which I am pleased to accept. Unfortunately, the animal virus genetic field is not moving forward very rapidly and I shall have very little that is new to contribute. We have some results with Newcastle Disease virus, which fails to show recombination down to a fairly low level, but with influenza I have been mainly concerned with getting the virus to behave well ina plaque-forming system and I am determined to do this before trying any more genetic experiments. I think it will work out but it is a very delicate system. I was very much surprised to find that you had familiarized yourself with what I consider to be a very messy situation with respect to influenza virus recombination. I agree with you completely as to the probable explanation of the difference between our results and those of Sir Mac on the Melbourne WS experiments. I should be much interested in hearing any further details you may have about discussing phenotypic mixing with Sir Mac. I have always felt that he was unconvinced that there was such a phenomenon but he never discussed it directly with me. I am enclosing the reprints which you requested. I also want to take this opportunity to say how much I enjoyed your recent Harvey lecture and I am looking forward to seeing you in Madison in April. With kind regards, Sincerely yours, Splendid M4 T*1l be glad to talk to you about it in April. “ a i Burnet may (or may not)be there too. He's leaving ~ \ in about a month for a semester atvVanderbilt, les irol,. George K. Hirst I think he is gradually straightening out his interpretation of phenomixing, though every now and then there is some allusion to recombination or heterozygosis in a contaxt that surprises me, But he has many references to anomalous neutralization, e.g., in the 1953 CSH and in papers in the Australiam J.... = his book (p. 418) he gratuitously adds "and, in all probability, carry wo or more sets of genetic determinants. He just thinks so: I've tried to argue @ point, J GKH : £mz encls: