(An

iceman 0)

|

te

|

ae.

etn

|

comameanom

|

nee

|

Sl

Mil
January 19, 1971

Nephrolopy Training

pew enn vn erp

The following recommendation fron the Southeastern Rup Kidney Disease

“eo

Counterparts was approved by the Southeastern’ Coordinators

age outsid e the university

Because of the critical sho
SLCLANS tr ined in the pro-

ort
medical center setting of shy ans
per management of patients’ with chronic renal failure,
the Southeastern RMP kidney Disease Counterpart group
recommends to the National Advisory Council through BMPS
and the Southeastern KuP Coordinator ‘s, that a start to
alleviate this shortuce so peripheral comunity hospitals
might eventually obtain a physician trained in nephrology,
would be to eccelerate the funding of physician training
in this grea; and that soosrer ca estrictions should
be eliminated, and that if RUPS would 1 ve its | porey
of excluding one year trainneeships i :
board certification more young pehys2.
duced into renal traineeship pregrams.

yrs
“
a

   
    

  

     

 
 

Physical Therapists , Occupational *

The following rccomnendation

mends to the HSMHA Task Force
of RMPS that more support be urged
occupational therapists, and speech

For training physical t

January 19, 1971

fherapists, and Speech

from the Southeastern PMP Stroke Counter-
parts was approved by the Southeastern Coordinators:
on Health

The group recom-
throuch the Director
therapists,
apists, all of whom are in

\.

Manpower

   

ate ‘to,
CAE

short supply, and further that this be given a higher priority than

the development of aides in

The following recommendations
parts were 4 approved by the £

(4)

southe

RMP should maintain its
sane time fostering cooper
areas of responsibility.
jeal entities encovrece
fessionals in RMP.

 

This

RMP should continue to support
of CCU's and other programs d
coronary patient; and further

 

these fi

from the
stern

categorical emphasis

 

greater iy

ewuling with ¢
that more

elds.

Southeastern RMP Heart Counter-

Coordinators:

  

wonile at the
‘sin broader

y because categor-
emnent of health pro-

   
  

> @LVral

LS nece
iW oly en

 

 

the regionalized development
care for the acute
time is needed to

determine the true impact of such projects on patient care
and the potential inherent in them.