" UNITED STATES GOVERNAILNE |. BUDS AAV \ ue “20 Oran ndus _ TO FROM __ SUBJECT : i N “ . SEE BELOW : Acting Associate Director for. Grant Bo Aha RDA Ly Sed ae Dy 8 PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE cy and Contract Policy, DRIP Memorandum Recording National Advisory Council actions on Regional Medi cal Programs Applications ~ The attached memorandum replaces the individual memos (purp le sheets) previous] y used for this purpose. It will also become par art two of the . minutes of tne Council meeting at which the actions were taken. Details of the recommendations and any specific conditions relative to ~~~ ———the award are contained in the blue sheets. In a few instances in which t i s - BE some further detail is required, the Grarits Review Brancn is preparing, __ and wih distribute shortly, » addenda to the blue sheets. Please bear in mind that these are the reconmendat fons of the Council and have no administrative reductions or r "holds" apolied. Amounts __eventually avarded will be different in aimost all cases. Luleged os . aie . hitk oO ; Doctor Olson he. Lewis _ Doctor Chadwick | _. Mr. Jones .. Doctor Sloan Mr. Friedlander Mr. Chambliss Mr. Thorner Doctor Imboden Mr. -Peterson . er . Doctor Manegold Mr. Hilsenroth . ae “Doctor Mark oe Mr. Cavarocchi oo a Miss Conrath ‘ Mrs. Silsbee 7 : me --Mr. Lawton - Doctor David HELP ELEMIMATE WASTE COST REDUCTIOF PROGRAM , ro ‘ A —_— TUOAG FALSV LAL SLAIN Ade @. ‘Director | TB UTE a : . ~ Division of Regional Medical Programs -Memoran juin . oes po FROM - Acting Associate Director fort Grant and one “Contract Policy, DRMP Ct os ET ya SUBJECT: Recording of the actions taken by the National ‘Advisory ‘Council, on re er Medical Programs appt eat ions considered by them at the meeting _on February 20 and 21, a = coe vf - . oe . } a Z. . i. : * . rs me _ : we . , ae ‘Approval, as requested, and as recomended and conmented upon by the Review Committee: . oo thle > oa ts me 2 GREATER DELAWARE VAREEY. Operational = 01-$587, 631; 02-8619, 73; 03 ,-8629, 627. NOTE: The , “yu Council requested that staff be assured of the “budgeting details on project #4, and that the region a be urged | to arrive at a satisfactory cooperative SF , inter-regional arrangement with the New Jersey Regional a es ‘Medical Program. Me @ | _ Planning = ‘Approval for extension of the commitment for two additional Oo, years, at the present annual level, to be awarded’ « as the , _... operational core. So ee 2. eee a cep eo Pp De Tyee I “of oa as. . os x a a . Toursrava oe 2 5 -O1- $425, 3005 -02-$409, 186; 03} $i, 181 * CINDINA oe 01-$82,0363 02-$88,850 , : ‘-1/ All amounts are direct costs only and, unless otherwise specified,, refer to 12 montn periods. The designations 01, 02, etc. , relate to the first, second, etc., budget periods of the sudject apolication, not necessarily the budget periods waich they will actually “Supplement. ; . HELP ELIMINATE WASTE - "COST REDUCTION PROGRAM . ler nod . . : foo . vee 02-$145 ,2073 03-$144,572 If. Approval, ‘in part, as specifically recomended and commented tipon’ . + 01-$184 ,5003 02-8250, 000; 03-8210, 000 Set * O1-$49,135 : we eats oe ERT TET rn ese erm riage 01-$ 309, 5818" Cnis six m < month budget to be’ “Sipaided for a ‘S-month "period? 02-5659, 4 mg NORTH CAROLINA ~ Gog: pod ele he wah 9769.1 2/69.2 COLORADO-WYC!IING 01-8127. 801; oa $223, 3125 03- $242 520° KANSAS | e — 2/69.1 and 2/69.2 = O1-$396,2303 02-3359 ,269; 03-$361,7893 O4—S$1 44,017 i Oe ya OSLER EIS + 01-9500, bs 02- $493, 60H; 03- 54552, 65 Ste mo rarer Ce ae mee Je me “septs Pet a "TENNESSEE MID-SOUTH oo “0281 $9, 900; 02-826, 8B; 03-$20, 343 + O1-$752,504; 02-$737,604; 03-$739,445 ‘01-$200, 8325 02-$38, 361; 03- $33, 116 = 01-$72,701 (for ten n months); 02-869, 308; 03-872, 326 = 01-$204, 321 (for ten months ) 01-4370, 080; 28215, 800; 03- $200, 800 - FLORIDA 01~$163,900; 02-$163,900; 03-$163, 900 Disaporoved . . ee 01-$163, 272; 02-$163,272; 03- $163, 272 : 01-$73,172 (eight months } 0282 0283 0284 nom ow ott First Operational = 01-$792,251; “02-686, 306: 03- 3690,8 879 Operational Supolerent = 01-$150, 000; 02-$150, 000; 03-$150,000. (The ~amount is aporoximate and Council delegates to staff, the setting of an exact arount . Commitment should | ve for three years.) . a “nL. Return for rev! tsfon under tie ‘conditions specified by the oo Sac : Ss Review Conmit~; 2 a re ee Oh gw Deferral ‘for further review and advise. as “specified by the me - Review Committee a . ee 2 7 Ohio Valley . South Carolina ~ V... Disapproval under conditions specified by the Review Committee \. : “New Jersey ;fibany . a ' VI. Approval under conditions specified by the Council California (2/69. 1) = Council endorsed the recommendations of the Committee on all components of this application except #28 (A Comprehensive Stroke Program). In this case they accepted the recommendations of the site visitors. . . = 01-9556, 369; 02-$546,145; and 03-$547 ,655 oe (2/69.2) = Endorsed Committee recommendation ($210, 000 , per month until June 30, 1969) with committed support for two - gdditional years, in an amount to be set with the advice of site Bl, visitors. _ . Ss, (2/69. hy = Endorsed Committee - emeniitton - oroject 23-0 —. O1-$122 ,050; 02~$127 ,540; and 03-$123,955. Project 22 to be Soa pete for revision. . re | “Intermountain (2/69. 1) = Deferral, pending the development of a policy governing projects or this kind (see Council’minutes) (2/69.2 and 3) = 01~$151,260; 02-$145, 451; 03-$269, 319; O4-$265 ,253 a _-’. Rochester = Tne Council endorsed the recommendations of the Committee , - except on project 13. In this case they recommended approval of © ___ the project_in the reduced .amount_reconmended, by the site. visitors," .- but that no . additional funds be added to a total award to the = region. 4 eer a +. SS a [ cen ew ne ee _ Western Pennsylvania = The Council endorsed the general recommendations ~~ 7 -—~=>-Of the Review Committee with the’ following specific additions: 7 -fa) The amount to be awarded for interim support of the core _ April 1 thru June 30, 1969) is to be based upon an annual _ o-.devel not in excess of the present level plus $100, 000. , : . (b). “The amount for continuation of core activities under the =e “~~~~~operational grant (July 1, 1969 et ‘seq. ) willbe set by the oO Council when it considers the entire operational application “and has the findings of the site visit. Maryland = The Council was unable to arrive ata recommendation because oe of the difference between the récommendations of the site visitors o- , and the recommendations of the Conmittee. Authority for final ome eetion was delezated to a referee committee of three members. A total award ceiling of $1,445,177 for projects was set. (NOTE: A report of the findings of the three member committee will be t be the mp ts _ subject of a subsequent memo. ) ~~ ee ape my mene se a ‘ z — 2 en at sae rene ee