The People Win for Public Health in Colorado’ FLORENCE R. SABIN, M.D. Chair man, Subcommittee on Health, Colorado Post-War Planning Committee, Denver, Colo. \VQO years ago the State Government in Colorado had only one interest ‘nits Division of Public Health; namely, that it was one more place in which to try to force political appoint- ments. Moreover, the Denver city machine had had a remarkably suc- cessful record in defeating health bills in the legislature. The machine had only to pass the word down the line to kill health bills, and they were killed. Now, what a change! There is a new Governor, Lee Knous, who campaigned for good government and specifically for a health program, and is enthusiasti- cally carrying out his pledges. On May 20, 1947, an election in Denver brought _ into office a new Mayor-elect, Quigg Newton, a young man who ran, without benefit of party, against government by political machines. He won more votes than all four other candidates together. He understands the fundamental prin- ciples of the movement; he wants, just as eagerly as informed citizens, a mod- ern, professionally staffed health depart- ment, and a strengthened medical school for training physicians for both curative and preventive medicine—indeed a true medical center for the Rocky Mountain region. No wonder Coloradoans walk on air and talk of health to match their mountains! They have won the decisive battles of their campaign and now have only to get on with the business of pub- the woe at the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of ne estern Branch, American Public Health Asso- ‘ation, San Francisco, May 28, 1947. lic health in Colorado. As a matter of fact, recent history has even more significance than any one cause, how- ever vital, for it has shown that under our American form of government when- ever our people really want good govern- ment they can have it. The story of the health program is as follows: In 1945 the Governor of Colo- rado appointed a Health Committee as part of a post-war planning program and was then persuaded by this com- mittee, by. the State Division of Public Health, and the Colorado Public Health Association, to ask for a health survey - of the state. By great good fortune, the American Public Health Association was able to undertake a survey through a grant from the Commonwealth Fund, and its Field Director, Dr. Carl E. Buck, came to study conditions. Dr. Buck made a masterly report. He studied the vital statistics of the State Health Division, analyzed and arranged the data until they told a vivid story of the state’s health deficiencies. He found that the State Health Division was badly placed in the government, being a division under the Governor in- stead of a department, and that it had been subject to repeated attempts. at political control. He found that the division had an able director and a small but well. chosen professional staff; however, state appropriations were piti- fully small—less than 10 cents per per- son per year—so that the division would have had almost nothing had it not been £1311] 1312 for generous federal grants; that the City of Denver, by a curious archaic charter, was a. so-called “Home Rule City” beyond the reach of modernizing influences from the state; and that of the 63 counties only 4 had full-time health services. Dr. Buck’s report re- vealed the short-comings, pointed out the reasons for them, and made what proved to be expert recommendations for their correction, Two different types of work were then started, both closely correlated with each other; first, the organization of an executive committee for intensive study of the report and for drawing up the bills to be presented to the legislature; and second, the carrying of Dr. Buck’s report and of all the Health Committee’s plans as they developed directly to the people of the state. An executive committee, authorized by the large general committee, had many long conferences. Most of them were at dinner meetings. At each meeting were invited guests who were either representatives of groups that would be affected by the proposed de- velopment of health services, or experts who could help with special knowledge and advice. Thus opposition was fore- stalled in advance. Civil Service Com- missioners were also invited to discuss common interests. One of the outstanding achievements of the program was the full coéperation between the State Medical Society, reaching all the doctors in the state, and the various public health agencies. Two members of the Public Policy Committee of the State Medical Society became members of the Health Committee and made a liaison between the two groups. Common bills were presented to the legislature, jointly drawn and jointly sponsored. Indeed the Medical Society gave up its tax-exempt status and in- creased its dues that it might support an active lobby. Another important success in the AMERICAN JOURNAL oF PuBLic HEALTH Oct., 1947 health program is that support of the dairy industry was won for health in. spection. Like the dairy group in some other states, the group in this state had long feared and fought health inspection of its industry. Many conferences were held with them which were indeed in. itiated at a luncheon to which they in. vited the Health Chairman. She was bumptious enough to ask them why they fought the program, and invited them to have a representative on the Health Conimittee. He gave much help and arranged conferences with members of the Dairy Association, and with all the experts on the subject of milk in Colo- rado, both from the federal and state groups. Full agreement was reached on the need for higher standards and im. proved practices for production and for processing of milk and milk products, but the dairy industry wanted to have it designated by law that a dairyman must be on the Board of Health to ‘ep: resent the industry. The Health Conr mittee refused to accept the principle of representation of any group by law. The point was won in the legislature, much ‘to the committee’s surprise. The con mittee was not opposed to the choice of a dairyman for the Board of Health— indeed the Governor appointed both a producer and a processor. Now the Suvte Department of Health and the dairy dustry will work together with good will to a common purpose. This is an inter esting example of a method of dealing with a controversial issue of long standing; namely, extended discussion to separate the many details on whi adjustments can be made from the er few principles, or perhaps only one. " critical for compromise. When the committee é the study of the report and its mendations, it started to formulate os proposed bills. Fortunately able 47 wrt perienced legislators and attorneys had members of the committee. It alse “ the invaluable aid of an ator’. had completed recom: e the pa Hubert Henry, Chairman on Health of vne Interim Committee of the Legisla- ne together with the help of the able ae tar of the: Legislative Reference reat, Clair Sippel. The bills were drawn in advance So that preliminary nies could be sent to the county chair- nen and so that they could be intro- uced early jn the session. The winning of popular support for the program was crucial to its success. since this was a state program, popular education was started in the counties. ir. Buck helped to organize the first inter-county meeting. Indeed, every . county, meeting drew its audience from at least two or more counties. This was always highlighted by definite identifi- cation of each county group. It will be remembered that distances are great in Colorado; people drove 75 to 100 miles to meetings. They had been shocked by the complete defeat of the health bills in the last session of the legislature and so were ready to listen. At the early meetings, Dr. Buck with the help of a blickboard, let the facts about the ap- palling death rates from preventable and controllable disease sink in as the audience listened to the speakers. He showed how essential participation by the audience was to a program. The committee had no state appro- priation for its work but the Division of Health received the approval of Dr. red T. Foard, Regional Director of the U.S. Public Health Service, to use fed- eral funds, This, together with a grant from the Colorado State Tuberculosis Association, enabled the committee to have an executive secretary. Herbert Moe organized the meetings and was always able to attract an audience eager to hear the story of Colorado’s public health. One member of the committee had wide acquaintance all over the state and was able to find local citizens who could lead their communities. Persons Were chosen as individuals rather than as Tepresentatives of organizations. At . Pustic HEALTH IN COLORADO 1313 first each name had to be submitted to the Governor, but he was finally per- suaded to give the committee a free hand. Teams recruited from the State Division of Public Health, the medical school, the public health physicians of the public schools, and other groups were provided for each meeting. Dr. Roy L. Cleere, Director of the State Division, took to each county data concerning the local problems, and showed how close should be the codperation between state and county health services. There were no prepared speeches but new data as developed in the executive committee, were taken to each meeting. A second meeting in a given place always brought the comment, “How your program is growing.” The committee did not itself organize action in any group but merely pre- sented data on conditions, local and state, and showed what public health services could accomplish. Initiation for action was left to the people themselves. As a method, it is the exact opposite to the building of a political machine; it leaves one less sure of results, but with a more lasting foundation. Each local group took up some problem of its own. The first response was in a town where the raw sewage was going into the river and the Mayor soon started a fund for a disposal plant. In one town the women said that they could see so much dirt in the milk that they did not use it at all. Within a few days the very efficient Supervisor of Nurses and the City Manager of the town with ten women met with the com- mittee in Colorado Springs. El Paso County has an exceptionally efficient milk inspector, really a public health educator—and had developed there a milk supply that is both clean and safe. The group saw a perfectly run dairy— run by a woman, I am pleased to say— and a pasteurizing plant that is the last word in excellence. As a result, the town in question now has good pasteurized 1314 milk shipped in by two companies and a local dairy is putting in a pasteurizing plant. The dairy industry might take notice that public health services are good unpaid advertising agencies, when milk is made both clean and safe. None of the groups did just the same type of work, but all supported the state pro- gram and all enjoyed the prestige of working as a Governor’s Committee. One group worked politically and reported that all candidates who were against the health movement were defeated and all who were for it elected. Another phase of the work that has aroused great enthusiasm and rivalry in the state is the federal hospital pro- gram. Dr. Foard assigned two members of his staff, Dr. Le Grand Byington and Dr. H. T. Wagner, to make a survey of the hospitals; a medical social worker .from the State Division of Public Health, Helen Cannon, visited every hospital to aid in making out the sched- ules for the Commission on Hospital Care. As evidence of the interest of the people of Colorado in the health move- ment, it is now many months since the committee has itself organized a meeting. Rather, every meeting has been on invitation, and speakers have gone to clubs and other groups all over the state. Committee members have spoken, it would seem, to almost every club in the state, both men’s clubs and women’s clubs. Many of the women’s clubs have made the health program their special work for the year; for ex- ample, the American Association of Uni- versity Women and the Parent-Teachers Association in every town where they are organized. In addition, the Women’s City Clubs, political clubs, the League of Women Voters, and the Federation of Women’s Clubs have all given skilled help. The Chambers of Commerce of the cities have heard about the health program, as well as many Kiwanis and Rotary groups. The Junior Chamber of AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PuBLIC HEALTH Oct., 1947 Commerce and the Isaac Walton League “have actively worked for the program. Groups of lawyers, ministers, college, university, and church groups have been addressed. During the weeks before -election the author spoke about twice a day, occasionally three times. Nor has Denver been neglected, nor have the people of Denver failed to hear of the deficiencies of their so-called Health Department. Both newspapers in Denver, as well as the county papers, and the radio gave unstinted support to the new era in health. After election -it was planned to let every legislator hear of the health bills in his home town. The result was summed up in one sentence by one of the prominent legis- lators who said, “We all knew in advance that this time we had to pass the health bills.” The people of Colorado had willed it so. What bills were introduced? Eight bills in all were presented, each one in- troduced to the legislature under spon- sorship of the committee. There were two groups of bills, five bills setting up services for health and appropriations for them, and three bills for controlling special diseases. The first two bills con- cerned public health services. The State Reorganization Bill created a new Department of Public Health. with a Board of Health and an Execu- tive Division. The Board of Health wa to be of nine members appointed by the Governor in such manner that no bus ness or professional group would con stitute a majority. This concession was made by the doctors. The bill gave '° the new department powers adequate " meet its responsibilities in improvine the health of the state. Some opposition to this bill developed in the Senate. ~ only from a certain group of the ana arts, who did not so much oppose t . bill, but sought to place riders 07 © to gain advantages or escape pe tions for their cult. Hard work defeat’ these proposed amendments. The seco 1314 milk shipped in by two companies and a local dairy is putting in a pasteurizing plant. The dairy industry might take notice that public health services are good unpaid advertising agencies, when milk is made both clean and safe. None of the groups did just the same type of work, but all supported the state pro- gram and all enjoyed the prestige of working as a Governor’s Committee. One group worked politically and reported that all candidates who were against the health movement were defeated and all - who were for it elected. Another phase of the work that has aroused great enthusiasm and rivalry in the state is the federal hospital pro- gram. Dr. Foard assigned two members of his staff, Dr. Le Grand Byington and Dr. H. T. Wagner, to make a survey of the hospitals; a medical social worker _from the State Division of Public Health, Helen Cannon, visited every hospital to aid in making out the sched- ules for the Commission on Hospital Care. As evidence of the interest of the people of Colorado in the health move- ment, it is now many months since the committee has itself organized a meeting. Rather, every meeting has been on invitation, and speakers have gone to clubs and other groups all over the state. Committee members have spoken, it would seem, to almost every club in the state, both men’s clubs and women’s clubs. Many of the women’s clubs have made the health program their special work for the year; for ex- ample, the American Association of Uni- versity Women and the Parent-Teachers Association in every town where they are organized. In addition, the Women’s City Clubs, political clubs, the League of Women Voters, and the Federation of Women’s Clubs have all given skilled help. The Chambers of Commerce of the cities have heard about the health program, as well as many Kiwanis and Rotary groups. The Junior Chamber of AMERICAN JOURNAL. OF PuBLIC HEALTH Oct., 1947 Commerce and the Isaac Walton League have actively worked for the program, Groups of lawyers, ministers, college, university, and church groups have been addressed. During the weeks before election the author spoke about twice a day, occasionally three times. Nor has Denver been neglected, nor have the people of Denver failed to hear of the deficiencies of their so-called Health Department. Both newspapers in Denver, as well as the county papers. and the radio gave unstinted support to the.new era in health. After election .it was planned to let every legislator hear of the health bills in his home town. The result was summed up in one sentence by one of the prominent lesis- lators who said, “We all knew in advance that this time we had to pass the health bills.” The people of Colorado had willed it so. What bills were introduced? Eight bills in all were presented, each one !n- troduced to the legislature under spon- sorship of the committee. There were two groups of bills, five bills setting Up services for health and appropriation: for them, and three bills for controlling special diseases. The first two bills ¢-- cerned public health services. 4 The State Reorganization Bill creat’ a new Department of Public Health, with a Board of Health and an Exec tive Division. The Board of Health «+ to be of nine members appointed by the Governor in such manner that no a ness or professional group would oe stitute a majority. This concession N made by the doctors. The bill ga" the new department powers adequate. a meet its responsibilities in impr” the health of the state. Some oppo" to this bill developed in the Seno : cant only from a certain group of the et arts, who did not so much Opp’ bill, but sought to place riders tte to gain advantages or escape defeat” tions for their cult. Hard work O° 01 these proposed amendments. The vel. 37 h bill was permissive legislation for facilitating setting UP county, city - and multiple-county health units. ot these bills passed early in the ” a They were well drawn and are ‘worthy of study. worth od bill for appropriations and, is customary, was presented late in the session with appropriations for all divisions of government. The requests were in two parts—one for the State Department and the other for aiding county units. These bills were given in- tensive study by the appropriations committee and, though no group ob- tained all it asked for, the Health De- sartment received funds adequate for creat improvement of its services. The erant for state aid to the counties was raised from nothing to $150,000 for the biennium. The fourth bill was an enabling act to meet the federal requirements for participating in the new hospital con- struction program. The fifth bill was an appropriation bill for the medical school. Under the new Dean, Dr. Ward Darley, plans have been developed to stress public health and the training of more general practitioners, rather than specialists. Dr. Darley also plans to have a two or three year residency with the last six months to be taken in the new county hospitals. These plans are an important advance in medical education and the committee was glad to endorse this program. The three special bills were as fol- lows: two were to lessen incidence of tuberculosis, the third was to decrease Bang’s disease in dairy cattle. The bills in regard to tuberculosis were drawn by the State and Denver Tuberculosis Associations and endorsed by the Health Committee. An increase in the per diem allotment to hospitals of from $4 to $6 for the care of indigent cases Was obtained. It was hoped to obtain Money for the construction of a new Wing of 100 beds at the Colorado Gen- bealt as PusLic HEALTH IN COLORADO 1315 eral Hospital under the direction of the Medical School, but support was .won for a 30 bed ward only. This will, how- ever, aid in the development of chest surgery in the state, place a number of tuberculosis patients in a general hos- pital, and help with the training of med- ical students in this disease. It is a minor gain, to be sure, and indicates hard work ahead during the next session of the legislature. . The so-called Cow Health Bill was the only complete defeat of the com- mittee. It was drawn by a veterinarian on the committee to check the sale of dairy cows that are reactors to Bang’s disease. It did not include compulsory testing nor require slaughter, but simply the quarantining and reporting of in- fected cows. The bill was killed by the livestock interests by having it referred to the Livestock Committee where it was permanently buried. Colorado’s im- portant beef and dairy cattle industries make the eradication of Bang’s disease unusually difficult. The inter- as well as intra-state shipment and sale of in- fected animals complicates control measures. This disease is a national problem. Obyiously much study must be given to the type of legislation needed, and. much research..is. necessary. How . do you account for the fact that a cow may react negatively to the agglutina- tion test and at the same time show a positive blood culture? How effective is calf vaccination? These are some of the questions needing investigation. The legislature adjourned in April. Already the new State Department of Public Health has been reorganized and ‘strengthened in accordance with mod- ern practices. The department has been asked to help four groups of counties to plan new district health units. This is entirely on the initiative of the counties themselves. These are the first fruits of the program giving the people them- selves scope for exercising their own initiative. —. ; 1316 AMERICAN JOURNAL One of the meetings was especially interesting. The new law provides that the units are to be set up by vote of the county commissioners. The commis- sioners of five counties were present. All of those who came from counties where there had been any public health nursing were enthusiastically for the unit. A commissioner from the county that had never had any service said that temperamentally he had to express some opposition against such unanimity of opinion and for his part he was fearfully worried lest swarms of public health workers descend on his county and ask oF Pusrtic HEeaLtH Oct., 1947 for jobs. He never knew how funny he was, since the real worry was to find even one public health worker for his county. Personnel is now the major problem in this state as it is everywhere. All during the war years the now Ex- Governor refused to authorize the use of federal grants allotted to the Division of Health to aid in training public health workers. Thus we have no backlog of personnel; we are developing a training program, but the need is to set up new services now. The people of Colorado are enthusiastically for adequate public health services.