THE SCIENTIST PROFESSION January 22, 1990 THE SCIENTIST 19 Senior Scientists Face Funding Hurdles By JULIA dy eae i. wd ne In 1984, biologist Maurice Hille- man—a Lasker award winner, a re- - cipient of the. National Medal of Science, and a man who had pion- eered more than a dozen vaccines— found himself out of a job, Hilleman, who had worked for 27 years at the West Point, Pa.-based Merck Sharp and Dohme Laboratories, was a se- nior vice president and director of vaccine research at the pharmaceuti- cal company. The fact that he was one of the firm’s most productive scientists and that he didn’t want to leave his post didn’t matter, Likewise, biologist Marvin Weinstein, formerly vice president for microbiology and DNA research at. Schering-Plough Corp. in Madi- son, N.J., found himself unemployed nine years ago. Weinstein, who had joined the company in 1956 as a bench scientist and worked his way through the ranks, was a corporate executive as well as a scientist. The problem? Both Hilleman and Weinstein had reached the age of 65. As executives, they were exempt from age-discrimination laws that prohibit mandatory retirement for wa teed bee Mandatory Retirement the resources of its older and most experienced scientists. Ongoing re- search includes numerous univer- sity-based studies concerning the re- lationship between age and scientific research performance. The National Academy of Sciences is currently investigating the ways in which eliminating mandatory retirement for university professors might af- fect science education. To date, how- ever, no one set of conclusions has been reached or has become widely accepted, In the meantime, many se- nior scientists maintain that they are being prematurely put out to pasture despite both a desire and the physical and mental wherewithal to continue their work. wre 40% of researchers awarded NSF. funds. For many: scientists, this can “mean two decades with no support ' for being productive. “This is a seri- ous problem,” says NIA’s Riley. “But McCullough says one cannot | assume from these data that senior applicants are consistently declined -by NSF. Rather, he says, “what it ;comes’ down to is. whether an -applicant’ 's peers believe him to be the cutting edge.” ‘All too often, however, it is as- ‘sumed that anyone over a certain age ‘cannot “possibly be on the cutting ‘edge, says Nobelist Linus Pauling, a ‘chemist who has outlived his life - “expectancy at birth by 40 years. At” _age 88, Pauling has retired himself ‘as director of the Linus Pauling In- “stitute of Science and Medicine in «Palo Alto, Calif. He does continue ‘research on the nature of metal al- ‘loys, but over the past few years he jhas been declined an NSF grant for “his work four consecutive times. . “Last year, Pauling did receive ““NSP’s, Vannevar Bush Award, which jis conferred periodically on a senior “contributions in his field. The award, hich is honorary and carries no fi- ancial stipend, is designed to en- ourage individuals to seek the high- ‘est levels of achievement in science, _scientist who has made outstanding. engineering, and service to human- * ity. It is also designed, according to NSF, to complement the foundation’s Alan T. Waterman Award to a promising young scien- tist, an award that, by comparison, carries a grant of up to $500,000 over a three-year period. “I was rather amused that at ex- actly the same time I was receiving the Vannevar Bush Award, I was being turned down again for a. re- _ search grant,” Pauling says. “In giv- ing me the award, the chairman of the NSF board reviewed all of the. contributions I made to science in the ‘past, and didn’t say anything about what I was doing at the pres- ent. Meanwhile, I work just as many hours as I ever did, and I’ve pub- lished more papers per year in the last 10 to 15 years than when I was - younger.” Qo Julia King is a freelance science writer based in Ridley Park, Pa. Part! of a two-part series, to be continued in the Feb. 5, 1990, issue of The Scientist. Jn Part iT, The Scientist examines opportunities for senior | scientists. Also, eminent researchers, including Pauling and 83-year-old computer scientist Admiral Grace Hopper, offer suggestions on how older researchers can remain productive.