Wriinirk An Appmiatinti In Memoriam Frederick Forchheimer Reprint from The Lancet-Clinic and Therapeutic Digest. BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH. At a conjoined meeting of the Senate of the University of Cincinnati, the faculty of the Medical Department and the staff of the Cincinnati General Hospital, held in the library of the hospital, the gathering having been called by President Dabney, of the University, Dr. E. W. Mitchell read the following memorial which was adopted: Frederick Forchheimer was born in Cincinnati, September 6, 1853. He graduated from Wood- ward High School in 1870, and from the New York College of Physicians and Surgeons in 1873. He then spent two years abroad in post-graduate study, giving special attention to pediatrics. He located in Cincinnati and immediately began a 1ife-long career as a medical teacher by becoming demonstrator of histology in the Medical College of Ohio. His was the first course given in this branch in Cincinnati. In 1877 he succeeded H. A. Clark in the chair of chemistry. In 1879 he was made professor of physiology and clinical lecturer of pediatrics. In 1900 he succeeded Jas. T. Whit- taker in the chair of theory and practice of medi- cine. He continued to hold this position after the merger of the Ohio and Miami Colleges into the Medical Department of the University of Cincin- nati. From 1905 to 1909 he served as dean of the Ohio Medical College. For over thirty years he served on the medical staff of the Good Samaritan Hospital. He was on the staff of the City Hospital from 1887 to 1907, and again from 1908 to the time of his death. For many years he was also on the staff of the Jewish Hospital. Beginning his medical career at the early age of twenty, for forty years, with unflagging zeal, he devoted all the energies of a strong body, a vigorous and fertile brain to the work of his pro- fession. As practitioner, as consultant, as teacher, as writer, he achieved unusual distinction and suc- cess. 3 It can always be said with truth that he was the greatest of all as a practitioner. Thoroughly versed in the science, he applied the art of his calling with consummate skill, with fertility of resources, with a magnetic influence over his pa- tients, which justly gained and held the largest private practice in Cincinnati for a quarter of a century. How young is pediatrics as a specialty is well illustrated by the fact that Dr. Forchheimer was one of the early specialists in that department in this country, the first to hold a separate chair of pediatrics in the Middle West; a leader in develop- ing the specialty in America, the intimate friend of the leading pediatrists of the world; the con- sultant in that department for Cincinnati and vicin- ity for the past thirty years. His contributions to the literature of the subject are part of the history of American pediatrics. As a writer he was clear, forceful and practical. His contributions on pediatrics and medical sub- jects are too numerous to catalogue. His book, the "Prophylaxis and Treatment of Internal Diseases," which appeared in 1907, received the general ap- proval of the profession and a very large circula- tion. A second edition was published three years later. As editor and contributor to the work, "Therapeusis of Internal Diseases," which appeared just prior to his death, he has gained still further reputation as a writer. Medical teaching within a professional life has undergone a revolution and an evolution. In this evolution he has ever been in the forefront of the struggle; an ardent advocate of the highest ethical and scientific standards for his college, a leader in every progressive movement. As a teacher he was enthusiastic, thorough and faithful. Throughout his long career, notwithstanding his enormous pri- vate practice, he rarely missed a lecture. In 1912 he received the well deserved honor of the degree of doctor of sciences in Harvard Uni- versity. Dr. Frederick Forchheimer died June 1, 1913. 4 FREDERICK FORCHHEIMER-AN APPRE- CIATION* OTTO JUETTNER, M.D., CINCINNATI. Permit me, Mr. President and Fellows of the American Therapeutic Society, to say a few words in memory and appreciation of my townsman, Frederick Forchheimer, a distinguished member of our society, whose demise occurred at a time when his career was full of promise to his profession, to his home town and, above all, to the school over which he presided with signal force and distinc- tion. That he should have been struck down in the fullness of his prowess seemed like a tragedy, an ineffably cruel dispensation of destiny. Yet the end was not without an element of the heroic in that it literally embodied the Solonic ideal of great- ness and happiness so beautifully exemplified by the wise Athenian when the latter told the story which reached the heart of the Asiatic despot, Croesus. Forchheimer had much to live for. Cin- cinnati, once the proud queen of Western medicine and now struggling to regain the laurels of the past, needed a master to tread in the footsteps of James T. Whittaker and P. S. Conner. Forch- heimer had begun to loom up as the exponent of a new era in Cincinnati, of new thought in med- ical practice and medical teaching in the old town where Western medicine was born and was reared by at least three generations of giants. Forch- heimer embodied the full maturity of latter-day medical science. He was a ripe product of his time. He was eminently fit to live; on the other hand in harmony with the Hellenic ideal of heroic dissolution, fully prepared to terminate his career in the very hour of his greatest strength and achievement. Forchheimer received his degree in medicine at the New York College of Physicians and Surgeons in 1873, when he was twenty years of age. After a few years of study in Europe, especially in * Read at the Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the American Therapeutic Society, May 29, 1914, at Albany, N. Y. 5 Vienna, he located in his home town, Cincinnati. In 1876 he began his career as a medical teacher in the capacity of demonstrator of morbid anatomy and histology at the old Medical College of Ohio. The following year he became professor of chem- istry. Three years later he was made professor of physiology and clinical pediatrics. During his incumbency of the chair of physiology he pub- lished an excellent American edition of Hofmann and Utzmann's "Guide to the Examination of Urine." In 1900, upon the demise of the distin- guished James T. Whittaker, Forchheimer became the professor of practice. When P. S. Conner re- tired from active work, Forchheimer was elected dean of the faculty. In 1907 he gave to the pro- fession the results of his ripe scholarship and vast experience in the form of an encyclopedic text- book of practice under the title of "Prophylaxis and Treatment of Internal Diseases." It was fol- lowed by a still larger work prepared with the collaboration of many special contributors and pub- lished under the collective title of "Forchheimer's Therapeusis of Internal Diseases." This work is without a doubt a "monumentum acre perennius" to its author. Since 1860 Cincinnati has contributed at least a dozen books on internal medicine to the medical literature of this country. Of book-writing there has been no end, but not many books have achieved a national significance in point of value and in- fluence. Only three books on practice have been written in Cincinnati since 1860, that were epoch- making in their influence on the medical thought of the entire country. One was "A Practical Treatise on Phthisis Pulmonalis," by Leonidas Moreau Lawson. Then came Roberts Bartholow's classical book, and last but not least, the work on practice by James Magoffin French, a wonderfully clever and practical book. These three books rep- resent an achievement of no mean significance. To say that Forchheimer's "Prophylaxis and Treat- ment" is a worthy peer of the three great works mentioned, is but paying a just tribute to the splen- 6 did mastery of his subject which its author pos- sessed in so high a degree. This work bears eloquent testimony to the fine sense of synthetic discrimination, analytical succinctness and critical co-ordination so characteristic of Frederick Forch- heimer. The honorary degree of Doctor of Philos- ophy, granted him by Harvard University, could not have been bestowed upon one more worthy. Forchheimer, the physician and teacher, was a well-balanced and well-rounded product of his day. But there is much more to be said about him. Even at the risk of disclosing to the gaze of the world some things which he in his characteristic way secreted behind the portals of his home and reserved for the privacy of his leisure hours, I venture to point out a rare and lovable psychic duality which Forchheimer embodied. When he heeded the summons " to join The innumerable caravan which moves To that mysterious realm where each shall take His chamber in the silent halls of death," it was not only his colleagues, his fellow-physi- cians and students, who gathered around his bier to pay homage to his genius and the worth of his life-work. Among those who mourned were the members of another profession, the devotees of music, the most heavenly of the arts, because Forchheimer was a musician, a violinist of unusual merit, not merely a lover of music, an amateur, but an artist whose talent was the marvel of the mu- sical fraternity in Cincinnati. Tn his early days in Vienna he enjoyed the friendship of Johannes Brahms, whose renaissance of classic art was only understood by few at that time. Forchheimer was admitted to the select circle which had gathered around Brahms. There was Eduard Hanslick, the austere apostle of classic form, Joseph Joachim, the master-violinist of his age, and Theodore Bill- roth, supremely great as a surgeon but no less of a striking figure as a pianist and composer. Amid such environment young Forchheimer's receptive and impressionable mind was moulded. Here he 7 gathered the riches of mind and heart that failed his life to overflowing, true to the Hippocratic aphorism which places the shortness of life and the length and richness of art in juxtaposition. In the contemplation of the life of Forchheimer, the scientist and physician, and Forchheimer, the dreamer and artist, upon whom the Muses smiled all through his career, we see consummate per- fection, a veritable ideal of happy existence. Such a life has no sorrow, such a death no sting. .Fred- erick Forchheimer, our departed fellow'-member and colleague, passed from our mist, " sustained and soothed By an unfaltering trust, approached the grave Like one who wraps the drapery of his couch About him and lies down to pleasant dreams." 8