TREATMENT OF THE INSANE. There are several institutions in Scotland and England where employment has been made—par- ticularly within a few years—a primary object, and this has been attended with the most beneficial results. It is believed we have some such institu- tions in this country, among the foremost of which may be mentioned the Northampton lunatic hos- pital, in Massachusetts, and the Willard asylum, New York. If wholesome exercise of body and mind —as a law of nature, as a remedial agency—i- an in- dispensable condition upon which depend general health and soundness of mind, it should certainly be resorted to, under the mo t favorable circum- stances and to the fullest extent. By the use of such means success, and not failure,'must inevi- tably follow. Not only experience and observa- tion confirm this position, but such a course of treatment harmonizes with the established laws of physiology both in a normal and a morbid con- dition. Many illustrations could be given where health of body and sanity of mind have thus 1 een restored after much medication and long hospital treatment. Mod intimately connected with this subject of employment is another that vitally affects the interests of the insane, that of PERSONAL FREEDOM. Ever since Dr. Conolly broke open the prison doors and knocked off the chains from the bodies of the, insane, the question of freedom, restraint, seclusion, etc., has been the occasion of contro- versy. Since that period the whole history of the treatment of the insane shows that it has been one of steady improvement,—more liberty and free- dom,—less confinement and restraint. All nui-t admit that cases of insanity occasionally occur of such violence and danger to human life, that restraint of some kind is indispensab’e; but, just how far, or to what extent, this shall he carried there are differences of opinion. But because force or seclusion may occasionally he necessary, it does not follow that all in; ane persons must he confined by locks, bolts and bar*. Great improvement has recently been made in this respect in several asylums in Great Britain. The buildings have been changed or constructed with reference particularly to making these ex- periments of greater freedom. The leading fea- tures of this reform are thus characterized: First, unlocked doors; second, great amount of per- sonal freedom; third, the large numbers on pa- role; and fourth, the special attention given to the occupation of patients. No locks or keys are used except to small wards or parts of the hospi- tal, where but few patients are confined. The in- sane are so taught, trained and treated that they are not disposed to make trouble nor escape. Their apartments are constructed and arranged as though designed for private hoarders or families. The asylum or hospital is regarded by the in- sane as a home, not a prison or penitentiary. Act- ing on the motto, “'The more you trust, the more you may,” appeals to the self-respect and the self- government, even, of the insane, which is found to exert a wonderful influence over them. Under such treatment it is surprising how rapidly they improve, and how few attempt or want to leave the institution. The effects of such man- agement are found to he—first, greater contentment and general happiness of the patients; second, better conduct in everyone— less excitement; third, the preservation of the in- dividuality of each patient ; fourth, less degenera- tion, and fifth, greater vigilance and care on the part of attendants. Special pains are taken that every insane person shall have something to do,— some worn to occupy his time and attention. Under such treatment it is seldom found neces- sary to resort to restraint or seclusion of any kind, though increased care, watchfulness and fidelity may become requisite. The description here given is no fancy sketch, hut a simple statement of facts, the results of ex- periments begun, carried on and approved by the highest authorities in such matters. And why should not such treatment of the insane he suc- cessful and be approved? Does it not harmonize with the laws which govern both the body and the mind ? On no one point are we so sensitive as on that of personal.freedom or liberty. This idea of having our liberty, our freedom forcibly taken from us, of being confined by holts and bars, shock* our sensibilities. This is j eifectly natural. It accords with our best instincts of self-respect and self- government. In case of the insane surrendering up their personal rights, their liberties, may not the change, in many instances, aggravate or increase their derangement, and serve as a powerful hinderance to the restoration of health and sanily? If cer- tain muscles, limbs or organs of the body have become weak and reduced m vitality, it is exercise —free and voluntary—continued and persevered in for a long time, that gives strength and vigor. The individual must do this for himself, and, if need he, he must he encouraged and urged to do it. Those means and appliances must be used to give strength and cure disease which nature and the laws of pathology ha,-e adapted to the pur- pose. So of the laws of the mind. The love of liberty, of freedom, of voluntary exercise, is here the first law. Our best Instincts,—the governing faculties of the mind,—self-will, self-respect, self-govern- ment, all tend in this direction, and their free, voluntary exercise should he encouraged. All moral, social and civil provisions and agencies must have a powerful influence to improve, both physically and menially, the chronic insane. And jus't as long as they are treated as criminals, as prisoners, as dangerous pet sous who must be con- fined, placed under guardianship and constantly watched, just so long will their physical energies suffer and be crippled, and their spirits languish and he depressed. There are, of course, many individuals among the insane who have become so demented, so lost to all self-respect and sense of their rights, as to be incapable of appreciating such treatment, or being influenced by it. At the same time there are large numbers among the chronic insane, if they could have the same kind treatment and use- ful employment,the same confidence and freedom, as are accorded to sane neople, what a surprising change it would soon make in their conduct and character! It would not, only improve their heal i h and spirits, make them more contented and haunv. hut would doubtless restore some of them to sanity, usefulness and self-support. Such a boon, we believe, will yet come to many of the insane. The discoveries and application* of modern science everywhere favor health and hu- man improvement, and the best instincts of hu- manity, guided by the higher mental faculties, are pretty sure to move in an onward and upward di- rection. Wherever the rights, the liberties and the interests of any class of per.- ons are invaded Gl- are suffering, whether inside or outside of an in- stitution, such a state ot things cannot always continue. Reform some time must and will come. Another point, in olving the rights and the per- sonal freedom of the insane (if not at times the sane) should receive far greater attention than it has received. We refer to the COMMITTAL OtF Till! INSANE. The laws in the various States differ materially as to the process of committing insane persons lo a lunatic hospital. As the medical testimony affords the principal evidence, it is highly im- portant that this should be correct and piopcily presented. Sometimes the court* take an active and leading part, but more generally their course is formal and approbative, and not unfrequen ly judges decide without seeing the person or know- ing anything of the merits of the case except from the medical testimony and the representations of interested parlies. In some States the certificate of one physician only is necessary, but more gen- erally 1 he law requires the sworn testimony of two “reputable physicians.” Neither ihe courts nor the laws make much discrimination in the qi aliti- cations or character of the physicians, further than that they shall ho “repulable,” or of “re- spectable standing in the community.” It is, of course, an easy thing to find such physicians every- where. The trouble arises, not so much from bribery or any self-interest as from ihe fact that the certificates are too hastily signed and a mere formal opinion sworn to without such careful ex- amination and such reasons given as the merits of the case demand. No judge decides an im- portant case or pronounces a sentence upon an Individual without giving his reasons. For a physician to declare publicly that a per- son is insane, and to make oath to a statement which consigns the individual to a lunatic hospi- tal, is to assume a vast responsibility. It deprives the person at once of his rights and privileges; it cuts him off from all business relations and from tne legal disposition of his property; it di chaiges him virtually from the duties he owes to society and to his family; it renders him no longer re- sponsible for his acts and subjects his | erson to the control of others. But this is not all; there is the moral etlect, the stigma, the sense of degrada- tion and humiliation of being forcibly removed from a position of freedom and independence, to one of confinement and unpleasant a sociaiion*— this sudden change has not unfrequently such a crushing effect upon the individual that he some- times never recovers fully from the shock. In the preparation and completion of a docu- ment that makes such changes in the rights, situ- ation and prospects of a person, the greatest pains possible should he taken, and no examination can he too careful or thorough lest some wrong or in- jury he done. The law stipulates that the vagrant and the criminal cannot he punished without a trial by a judge or jury ; he is commonly provided with counsel; the evidence and the facts must he clearly set forth, and spread out before the public. Should the law provide greater safeguards and stronger defences for the vicious and the criminr 1 than for the innocent and unprotected insane? It is true in most, if not in all the States, the law does provide for trial and appeal to the courts in behalf of the insane, but how seldom is this pro- tection resorted to by them or their friends! In most cases this part of the law is a mere form,— in fact a dead letter to the insane. In the medical certificate declaring a person in- sane, the law should require that the reasons be stated. In some States the statutes direct the wording of the certificate,—that the person is “dangerous to the community,” or is “furiously mad”; but in many of the States it allows the cer- tificate to say that the person is a “fit subject” tor a lunatic hospital, and this opinion must be formed from personal examination and inquiry. It will be seen at once bow easy it is to sign such a certifi- cate upon very slight examination. Suppose, now, the law required that the reasons, the facts, the evidence, should be clearly and dis- tinctly stated upon which this opinion is ba-ed, and ic were understood that the document was to be subjected to rigid criticism,—and, if found in- correct or imperfect, to be returned for revision,— would not such a procedure compel a more thorough examination? Would it not lead to a better i nowledge of the symptoms of insanity as well as a higher appreciation of the nature and the results of this legal process? Once in the practice of medicine mere opinions, without explanations or reasons, might have answered, but something more is demanded at the present day, especially where the rights, the interests and the character of the patient are so deeply involved. The grounds or reasons for the “opinion” should afio be stated, not only for the infos mation and protection of the patient, but for the satisfaction of the friends and the public. Besides, such a statement may be turned to most valuable account by the physician in the hospital who is afterwards to treat this same patient. Two other important advantages would al*o he secured by such a course. It would tend to a bet- ter understanding of ihe symptoms and causes of insanity on the part of all physicians called upon to fill out such certificates. “Another advantage which is of no small account: Some persons now consigned to a lunatic hospital would never be sent there under such a law. In Great Britain, where far more attention has been given to the treatment of the insane than in this country, es- pecially in all legal proceedings, the medical cer- tificate, signed by two physicians, requires that the reasons be definitely stated, not what the wit- ness thinks, believes or hears, but the tpicifie facts which he, as a medical man, has obseived before or at the time of signing the certificate. The law goes further,—it has a second provision,—Hie phy- sician must state in the certificate what facts or evidence indicating insanity in the parient he has derived from others, givingnames and describing definitely the nature and character ot those fart v Every blank certificate lias a wide, open space for each of the heads or provisions to be filled out. Andif by design or negligence these fact* are not properly stated, the phy ician becomes Fable for damages to the insane person thus committed. After long experience and much leg! lation in Great Britain, there careful and wise piovis'ous in the medical certificate for the committal of the insane have been found not only expedient, but to woik well for all parties concerned. Mow why should not some similar course be pursued in tne United States? >ew York is the only Slate where any such legislation has taken place. Theie, the law requires that not mere opinion be stated in the certificate, but the reasons—the grounds upon which an opinion is based—must be cleaily and definitely set forth. This law has been in opera- tion only two years, encountered at first some op- position, but the longer it is tried and the better it is understood the more favorably it is received by all parties. The State of New York is indebted for this law to a “commission of lunacy.” which leads ns, in concluding this paper, to offer a few remarks on that subject under the be d of MANAGEMENT OF LUNATIC HO'PIT ' L*. Most of the asylums and hospital* for 1m in ane are managed by a superintendent and l< ard of trustees, who have the sole charge. In some States there, may he a committee of inspection or board of State charities, who e duties a e chiefly, if rot wholly, that of visitation and counsel. WhTethe executive in each State, or some private corporation, has the appointment of their rruc