"The Lesson in Anatomy in the Seventeenth Century"-conducted by Nicolas Tulp, Professor of Anatomy at Amsterdam in the year 1632. Painted' by Rembrandt. THE EVOLUTION OF THE STUDY OF ANATOMY AND ITS IMPORTANT RELATION TO THE DEVELOP- MENT OF SURGICAL KNOWLEDGE BY J. EWING MEARS, M.D., LL.D. PHILADELPHIA PHILADELPHIA PRINTED BY WILLIAM J. DORNAN 1914 THE EVOLUTION OF THE STUDY OF ANATOMY AND ITS IMPORTANT RELATION TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF SURGICAL KNOWLEDGE By J. EWING MEARS, M.D., LL.D. PHILADELPHIA The evolution of the science of anatomy, the early history of which is involved in general obscurity, has been characterized by important and controlling conditions. Recognized by the early disciples of medicine as the essential foundation upon which the correct knowledge of the science of medicine should be built, its study became at the earliest period of time the work of the great men who were engaged in the solution of the problems of life and the treatment of the disordered functions of the human body which indicated states of disease. The first traces of the science are found among the Greeks, of which country Hippocrates (460 to 357 b.c.), the father of medicine, was a native. While he was not in a strict sense a student of anatomy, he and his school had some knowledge of the skeleton and of the larger organs of the body. His instruc- tions were chiefly medical. Two great epochs mark the unfolding of the science of anatomy and give character to its development and growth: These are (1) the dissection of the human body and (2) the introduction of the microscope as an aid in the revelation of the minute structure of the tissues and organs of the body. In the beginning of the study of anatomy the superstitions of the ancient religions, which were in a degree carried down Reprinted from the Transactions of the American Surgical Association, 1913 4 MEARS: THE EVOLUTION OF THE STUDY OF ANATOMY through several centuries, endowed the human body with sacred properties, which prevented its use in the study of anatomy, and limited the knowledge obtained to that acquired by the dissection of the lower animals, those chiefly of the mammalian type and especially those which approached the structure of the human body, as the ape. Defective as was this method of investigation, it had, however, its great value in laying the foundation of " the science of com- parative anatomy and the elucidation of zoology." While the title of the paper presented to the Association indicates a wide field of discussion, covering many centuries of study and investigation, largely pioneer in character, by the great men who laid the foundation of the science of anatomy on an enduring basis, the limits of prescribed space forbid more than a brief resume of the gradual steps of progress which were made as the structure of anatomical knowledge was built. It is rather the purpose of the writer to record the names of the great masters who have laid the foundation of the science of anatomy and to bring into view certain of the great events which marked the advance and which so importantly deter- mined the true effort to achieve accurate results and to dispel the erroneous speculations of earlier anatomists. As a student and teacher of anatomy for many years during the last half of the last century, the writer is moved to place on record his experience in certain matters relating to the methods of study and teaching of that period of time. In the great strides of development and growth which have characterized every department of the science of medicine anatomy has had a part; in truth, it may be said a basic part, since from its unfolding zoology, comparative anatomy, physiological anatomy, pathological anatomy, microscopic anatomy, and topographical or surgical anatomy have taken origin. These divisions all have a relation to the knowledge which controls conservation of health and the conquest of disease in one way or another. Of the names which occupy prominent position in connection MEARS: THE EVOLUTION OF THE STUDY OF ANATOMY 5 with the early history of anatomy, that of the great philosopher and naturalist Aristotle (384-322 b.c.) is preeminent. His knowledge was gained by the dissection of the lower animals- notably apes-his descriptions were most accurate, and in great measure have withstood the tests which later investigations have applied. The results of his studies were recorded in a treatise of ten books, the History of Animals and Parts of Animals. To Erasistratus (304 b.c.) and Herophilus belong the credit of having been the first to dissect the human body. This notable event occurred in the school at Alexandria (285 b.c.) during the enlightened reign of the Ptolemaic dynasty, which patronized science and its teachers and promoted in every way the effort to destroy the prejudices of ignorance and superstition. With the dissection of the human body began the development and growth of anatomy as an exact science. The name of Celsus should not be omitted at this place, as he was one of the most distinguished authors of antiquity who cultivated anatomical knowledge. Following Erasistratus and Herophilus came Claudius Galen of Pergamus (131-201 A.D.), who was not only an anatomist by reason of his personal work and investigation, but he was also the common depository of the anatomical knowledge of the day. In his writings he placed on record the knowledge of the science of the time in which he lived, and as well gathered and stored the work of his predecessors. One of the most im- portant of his contributions was the discovery that the arteries contained blood and not air, as had been erroneously believed and taught, which belief was instrumental in giving the name to the vessels which after death were found empty (aer-terein, to hold air). He also was the first to employ vivisection and to make experiments on living animals. He records two instances in which "through injury or disease he had the opportunity of observing the movements of the heart in the human body." His "erroneous physiological speculations with regard to the circulating apparatus" were generally accepted and prevailed until the middle of the seventeenth century. 6 MEARS: THE EVOLUTION OF THE STUDY OF ANATOMY After the death of Galen there was a long period of inactivity in the study and teaching of anatomy. In this period history records a temporary cultivation of the science in Asia, which possessed, comparatively speaking, little value, and ended in the thirteenth century. In this century a revival of anatomical inves- tigation took place in Europe in the University of Bologna, Italy, already celebrated as a school of literature and law in the twelfth century. In the century following it became distinguished for its medical teachers, and "medicine was so greatly developed as to require a division of its professors into physicians, surgeons, physi- cians for wounds, barber surgeons, oculists, and some others." Anatomy was, however, cultivated chiefly as an appendage of surgery and its principles were taken largely from the writings of Galen. In the fourteenth century the University of Bologna estab- lished an era of distinction in medical science as great as had already been obtained in law. This was accomplished through the efforts of Mondino, who has been designated the father of modern anatomy. He was the first to dissect and demonstrate the parts of the human body in the female subject. His knowl- edge of the heart was remarkably accurate and "his descriptions contained the rudiments of the circulation of the blood." He destroyed the merit of this distinction by asserting his belief in the erroneous ancient doctrine that the left auricle contained "spirit or air" generated from the blood. At the close of the fifteenth century, Alexander Achillini, a pupil of Mondino, became eminent at Bologna in cerebral anatomy. He was the first to describe the tympanal bones, the malleus and incus. At the beginning of the sixteenth century, James Berenger, of Carpi, flourished, not only as a zealous investigator of anatomy, "but an eminent physician. His influence as a physician was such that he calmed the fears of Europe with regard to the ravages of syphilis which raged with uncontrollable virulence." He claimed that he had dissected over one hundred human bodies, a large number for the period of time in which he lived. He was a distinguished author of treatises on anatomy, the Fig. i.-Andreas Vesalius (1514-1564), Professor of Anatomy at Bologna. (From a painting by Edward J. C. Hamman, a Belgian artist, about the middle of the Nineteenth Century. The picture represents the anatomist looking earnestly at the crucifix, invoking the help of God in his work. MEARS: THE EVOLUTION OF THE STUDY OF ANATOMY 7 first to describe fully the various tissues of which the body is composed, and the first to direct attention to the vermiform appendix, so well known today from its pathological importance. He entertained the erroneous opinion of anatomists of that age with regard to the "spirit" which it was supposed the heart contained. Italy for a long time retained the distinction of being the home of the most eminent anatomists of Europe. In the six- teenth century, France began to take position in anatomical investigations. Embarrassed by the prejudices of religious beliefs it was difficult if not impossible to obtain human bodies for dissection, and the bodies of the lower animals were used chiefly, if not entirely, in practical instruction. The anatomical opinions of Galen with their errors held sway-Jacques Dubois, known by his Latin name of Jacobus Sylvius, was the most distinguished as a teacher in the beginning days of French anatomical studies. He was followed by Charles Etienne, who achieved distinction through his researches into the structures of the nervous system; chief and important among these was his discovery of the canal through the entire length of the spinal cord. Two circumstances in the sixteenth century retarded the advance of anatomical science by the French: These were "Extravagant admiration of antiquity, with excessive confidence in the writings of Galen, and the general practice of dissecting principally the bodies of the lower animals." These unfavorable conditions were chiefly removed by Andreas Vesalius (1514- 1564), who though a Fleming by birth was trained in his early studies in France under Dubois. Discouraged by his efforts to pursue practical anatomy in France, owing to the ban placed upon the use of human bodies for dissection, he went to Italy, and before his twenty-second year he was requested to demon- strate publicly in the University of Padua. He conducted his studies and instructions with so much zeal and success that before he was thirty years of age he became a professor in three universities, Padua, Bologna, and Pisa. 8 MEARS: THE EVOLUTION OF THE STUDY OF ANATOMY The conditions which favored so greatly the pursuit of ana- tomical investigations produced an illustrious line of teachers in Italy, and gave it an eminence beyond that possessed by any other country. Of all of these teachers Andreas Vesalius stands preeminent and he has been justly denominated the founder of the science of human anatomy. He not only rectified the errors of ancient anatomists, but established on the solid basis of observation the true elements of anatomical science. He was the first "to proclaim openly that the structure of man should be learned by the inspection of the human body. True knowl- edge could alone be obtained by the study of this the only correct authority, the body of man itself." In 1543 he pub- lished his great work, De Humani Corporis Fabrica, "the first careful and complete description of the body of man based upon actual observation." The opinions thus promulgated by Vesalius with regard to the dissection of the human body and the correction of the errors of Galen raised great opposition and inspired his enemies to denounce him to the Inquisition. He escaped punishment by this tribunal through the intervention of his patron and friend, Philip II, at Madrid. Returning from the Holy Land, whither he had gone in the fulfilment of a pledge, he met a tragic death by shipwreck. The instructions and example of Vesalius produced a great number of investi- gators of anatomy who achieved celebrity and by whom the science was advanced and relieved of its errors. Of these but a brief reference can be made to those whose work and achieve- ments have given the greatest distinction, and have shared with Vesalius the merit of creating the science of human anatomy. The first who claims attention is Eustachius (1520-1574), who extended greatly the knowledge of the internal ear, de- scribing correctly the tube which is known by his name, the "Eustachian tube," the muscles of the malleus and stapedius and the complicated arrangement of the cochlea; also the anatomy of the teeth and the phenomena of first and second dentition. Fig. 2.-A Printers' Device. Reproduction from a wood-cut on the title-page of the first edition (1543) of Andreas Vesalius' great work, De Humani Corporis Fabrica. MEARS*. THE EVOLUTION OF THE STUDY OF ANATOMY 9 Columbus (1523) and Fallopius (1548) were pupils of Vesalius. The first was his immediate successor in Padua and later became professor at Rome; the notable features of whose work were the tracing of the course of the blood from the right side to the left side of the heart, and giving the first good account of the ventricles of the larynx. Fallopius, professor at Pisa and later at Padua, died at the age of forty, leaving behind him a record of distinguished work, perfecting the earlier descriptions of the internal ear and devoting attention to the organs of generation in both sexes; he discovered the utero-peritoneal canal which bears his name, the "Fallopian tube." Varolius (1545), of Bologna, who died at the early age of thirty-two, left a reputation as an investigator of anatomy equal to that of the most eminent of his contemporaries. He introduced a new method of dissecting the brain and greatly increased the knowledge relating to that organ. The "pons Varolii" commemorates his work and makes his name familiar to students of anatomy. Fabricius, of Aquapendente, was a worthy successor of the celebrated teachers of the anatomical school of Italy. He labored to make anatomical knowledge more accurate and to relieve it of obscurity by researches on the structure of animals in general. His reputation in great measure rests upon his dis- covery of the presence of the valves of the veins in the venous system of the extremities, and of their use. They had been observed by other investigators but their use had not been understood. With Fabricius the long line of illustrious teachers of anatomy in Italy terminates. "The discoveries which each made and the errors which their labors rectified cleared the way for the dis- covery of the circular motion of the blood, a discovery which exercised the most powerful influence on the future progress of the science of anatomy." While this fact had been obscurely conjectured by several of his predecessors, the earliest among them being Aristotle, it was left for William Harvey, a young 10 MEARS: THE EVOLUTION OF THE STUDY OF ANATOMY Englishman, a student of Fabricius at Padua, to demonstrate this monumental discovery and to announce its truth in the year 1619, which truth after several years of bitter controversy was accepted by "all enlightened and unprejudiced people as explaining many facts in anatomical structure which were either unrecognized or misunderstood." Harvey, as he himself stated, "taught anatomy, not from books, but from dissections; not from the suppositions of philosophers, but from the fabric of nature." Next in value and importance to the discovery of the cir- culation of the blood by Harvey was that of the lacteals by Casper Asellius, in 1622, professor of anatomy at Pavia, who in a living dog was able to trace them from the villous membrane of the intestine. In the early days of the sixteenth century, Eustachius recognized a vessel on the left side of the vertebral column, connected with the internal jugular vein, which in 1629 was described by Mentel as the thoracic duct, and the connection of the lacteals with this vessel. The discovery of the distinction between the lymphatics and the lacteals by Jolyffe and Rudbeck, with the tracing of the former to the glands, completed the history of this part of anatomical science. After this the study of the minute structure of the tissues and organs engaged the attention of anatomists. In 1654, Francis Glisson distinguished himself by a minute description of the liver and stomach and intestines, and gave his name to the capsule which invests the liver, the "capsule of Glisson." In the early days of the seventeenth century, Thomas Willis became eminent by his careful researches on the brain, the lungs, the intestines, the bloodvessels, and the glands. He was the first to number the cranial nerves in the order now recognized by teachers of anatomy. About the middle of the seventeenth century, Leeuwenhoeck, the Dutch philosopher, discovered the corpuscles in the blood and the spermatozoa in the seminal fluid. At this time, also, MEARS: THE EVOLUTION OF THE STUDY OF ANATOMY 11 Malpighi, of Bologna (1628-1694), who has been designated the founder of minute or microscopic anatomy, discovered the capillary circulation four years after the death of Harvey. He also described the minute anatomy of the skin, the kidney, and spleen. The work of Leeuwenhoeck and Malpighi was accomplished by the compound microscope, which had been used as early as 1625 in Rome to study the organs and parts of the bee. The difficulty in overcoming spherical and chromatic aberrations in this instrument compelled a return to the simple lens. It was not until 1831-1832 that these difficulties were fully over- come, and the compound microscope was brought to a high degree of perfection, contributing valuable assistance in ana- tomical investigations, not only by immensely increasing anatomical knowledge but rendering that already known more accurate and precise. In the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries great names in microscopic anatomy appear. Into the field of inquiry previously occupied by Malpighi and others came the illustrious Virchow, whose great discoveries "developed the idea of the cellular structure of the animal organism and the importance of cells in the performance of physiological and pathological processes." Efforts were also developed to study the minute constitution of tissue by the combination of the microscope and chemical agents, notably in the bones. Clopton Havers, of England, who gave his name to the minute osseous canals, was noted for his investigations in this direction. Frederic Ruysch, who was professor of anatomy at Amsterdam, in 1665, gave a new impulse to anatomical research and extended the limits of the science of anatomy in every direction. This was accomplished by the introduction of the art of injecting the tissues and organs of the body with substances which were fluid at the time of injection but which became solid after their deposit in the parts by the syringe. By this means the arrange- ment of minute vessels in the interior of organs was demon- strated and the art was carried to the highest perfection. All 12 MEARS: THE EVOLUTION OF THE STUDY OF ANATOMY parts of the body were subjected to this method of exami- nation, and the discoveries made were very great. Passing over the names and work of many anatomists of dis- tinguished attainments, among them Brunner (1687) (Brunner's duodenal glands), Peyer (1677-1680) (Peyer's solitary glands of the intestine), Duverney (1676), Collins (1685), Vieussen (1684), Valsalva, Santorini, Morgagni, the name of Albrecht von Haller, a Swiss (1708-1777), claims attention as one of the greatest anatomists and physiologists of the eighteenth century. During the seventeen years he was professor at Gottingen he dissected and carefully studied the organs of four hundred bodies. The results of this work were published between 1746 and 1751 in eight numbers of very beautiful and accurate engravings representing the most important parts of the human body. He verified the observation that in the fetus the testicles lie in the abdomen below the position of the kidneys, and that congenital hernia may follow their descent into the scrotum. Among his most valuable contributions was the final overthrow of the doctrine of the "animal spirits" which had ruled all investigators of the nervous system since the days of Hippocrates. After the eminent Haller came the researches of three men of distinction, Meckel, Zinn, and Lieberkuhn, who recorded their names as distinguished in investigations relating to the brain, the eye, and the intestine. In 1746-1751, William and John Hunter appeared as inves- tigators of anatomical science. The first was distinguished as the first great teacher of anatomy in England; the second as physiologist and surgeon unrivalled in the annals of medicine. Each held a preeminent position in anatomical research. John Hunter was especially distinguished as a surgeon and the founder of one of the most valuable and comprehensive museums which up to that time had been brought into existence. Among the many contributions to anatomical science, the demonstrations of the lymphatic system by William and John Hunter must be accepted as the most valuable. Up to this time the field MEARS: THE EVOLUTION OF THE STUDY OF ANATOMY 13 of inquiry had not been explored to any great extent-many points were therefore unknown. The doctrine proposed by William Hunter, that the function of the lymphatic vessels was that of absorption, which he had verified in man, quadrupeds, and birds, was a great step in the progress of investigation. William Hewson, a pupil of John Hunter, discovered the pres- ence of lacteals and lymphatics in birds, reptiles, and fishes, thus completing the chain of evidence with regard to their function as absorbents. He also divided them into superficial and deep systems, both in the extremities and internal organs, and studied the intestinal villi. In 1786, Cruikshank confirmed the doctrine of Hunter that the lymphatic vessels were the only absorbents, and gave a minute account of their coats and valves and of the lymphatic glands. In the latter part of the eighteenth and beginning of the nineteenth centuries, great perfection in anatomical science was attained. This was manifested by the improved character of the systems published by anatomists and by the great advance made in the knowledge of the minute structure of animal tissues and of the development of the tissues and organs. Conspicuous among these systems were those of Sbmmering, Bichat, and Portal. That of Sbmmering appeared in German (1791-1796), then in Latin (1794-1800), again in German (1800-1801). Between 1841-1844 it was republished in eight volumes, in Leipsic, by Bischoff, Henle, and others, with additions and a large amount of new and accurate information. This work was the most elaborate system of anatomical knowledge of the date of its publication in 1844. It was translated into the French language by Jourdan in 1844, and published in 1846 under the name of Encyclopedic Anatomique. Following the system of Sbmmering came the Anatomic Generate of Bichat, the eminent physiologist and surgeon; also his Anatomic Descriptive; then the works of Portal and Cruveilhier, authors of great distinction. Of the French school the most elaborate work was that of 14 MEARS: THE EVOLUTION OF THE STUDY OF ANATOMY Bougery, illustrated by large and beautifully colored plates of parts and organs-medical, physiological, and surgical anatomy. Many German authors published works on anatomy; among them of great value that of Joseph Hyrtl, a Manual on Topo- graphical and Surgical Anatomy. Henle's work was also very complete, and finished in 1873. In Great Britain, systematic treatises on anatomy were published by John Bell, Monro 3d, Quain, Sharpey, and others. Sir Astley Cooper and Sir William Lawrence issued works on special subjects. With this reference is ended the summary of the history of anatomy from the comprehensive treatise in the ninth edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica, contributed by the eminent professor of anatomy in the University of Edinburgh, William Turner, M.B., F.R.S. His masterful exposition of the whole subject covered completely the entire field of inquiry, collecting and collating all knowledge of the subject up to the date of his work. This valuable treatise with that of other authors, embodied in later works and in the current text-books on anatomy, make any effort to "evolve" the study of anatomy in this day and at this time, a reproduction of well-known facts, and beyond this endeavor the writer had no intention; his motive as previously stated was to place on record information, possibly of minor importance, but which may have a place in the discussion of surgical subjects which cannot avoid a close and ever-abiding relation to the science of anatomy, without a knowledge of which the science of surgery in its highest development cannot exist. As has been stated, the great advance made in the study of the science of anatomy began with the dissection of the human body. The manner in which bodies have been obtained for this purpose furnishes an interesting chapter in recording the progress which has been made. In the earlier days the bodies of condemned criminals were given for the purpose of dissection. Until authorized by law the bodies used in dissection were obtained largely by stealth MEARS: THE EVOLUTION OF THE STUDY OF ANATOMY 15 from places of sepulchre. Those who practised dissection were socially ostracized, and legal enactments were directed against them. Later the commanding position of those who devoted themselves to the pursuit of anatomy gradually removed the prejudices, and laws were enacted giving the bodies of prisoners and paupers to investigators for the purpose of anatomical study. "Frederick II, Emperor of Germany (1215-1250), is said to have forbidden any one to practice surgery without a com- petent knowledge of anatomy, and to have provided that every five years there should be held at Salerno a public dissection to which physicians from all parts of the Empire were invited. The senate of Venice decreed in 1308 that a human body should be dissected annually. Philip II, of Spain, interrogated the faculty of the University of Salamanca, then the leading theo- logical school in Europe, as to whether dissection was permis- sible. After due deliberation, a reply was given that since knowl- edge of anatomy is useful to man dissection may be allowed." In Great Britain, in 1827, in the universities and medical schools, dissection was made compulsory and the demand for bodies became so great that it was impossible to supply it. This condition led to the organization of a body of men known as "resurrectionists," with branches in every large city, which supplied the needs of the institutions by systematically robbing graves. Among these were two men in Edinburgh, Burke and Hare, who resorted to the murder of poor and friendless persons whom they enticed into their dens, killing them by suffocation, and selling their bodies to the medical schools for dissection. This method of procedure gave rise to the term "Burking," which has today a place in the dictionaries, and describes the condition. Two men, Bishop and Williams, practised the same method in London. This crime was stopped in Great Britain, in 1832, by the enactment of an anatomy act, which legalized dissection and under restrictions gave available material to medical schools and to those authorized to use dead human bodies for dissection. In 1783, in the State of New York, a law 16 MEARS: THE EVOLUTION OF THE STUDY OF ANATOMY was enacted making it legal to dissect the bodies of executed criminals. It is suspected that until recent years, when in our own country anatomical laws have been enacted and enforced in several of the States, these methods were employed to obtain bodies which were sold to medical institutions. Grave-robbing was the usual method of obtaining bodies, not only by those who made a business of it, receiving in most instances large sums of money in order to compensate the parties engaged in the business for the great risks taken and the hazardous nature of their occupation, but also in small communities by students and even professors, whose needs for anatomical material compelled them to resort to such methods. These excursions have been in several instances attended with the receipt of gunshot wounds by those engaged in the enterprise, inflicted by officers of the law having the duty to protect cemeteries from such illegal invasions, or by friends who were doing guard duty. It has happened also that, through ignorance, the bodies of persons of position and influence in communities have been resurrected and have been found by relatives and friends (whose feelings were greatly outraged by this violation of the sacredness of sepulchre) in the dissecting rooms of colleges. A notable instance of this character occurred in one of the medical colleges of the West, where the body of the father of a most distinguished citizen, occupying a high place in the councils of the Nation, was found suspended by the neck in the "lift" of the anatomical room of the college. The enactment, soon after, of an anatomical law in that State stopped the business of the resurrectionist and gave inviolate protection to the graves of all. When the writer, quite a half century ago, began the teaching of anatomy it was very difficult to obtain anatomical material, and the cost, owing to the methods which were employed, was very great. On one occasion a resurrectionist was detected in his unlawful acts, was arrested, tried in court, convicted, and MEARS: THE EVOLUTION OF THE STUDY OF ANATOMY 17 sentenced to a term of imprisonment. A professor of anatomy in a medical college, who was regarded as an accessory after the fact, was charged with conspiracy in the acts of the grave- robber, was arrested, tried, and acquitted, escaping conviction by a narrow margin. Practically, he had nothing to do with the acts of the grave-robber; he simply paid for bodies deposited in the college building, with the source of which he did not con- cern himself. Technically, possibly, he was particeps criminis in the sense of being a "quasi receiver of stolen goods." This case aroused great interest in the subject of obtaining dead human bodies by law for the promotion of medical science, and the teachers of anatomy under the guidance of Dr. W. W. Keen and the writer took active measures to secure the passage of a law of this character in the State of Pennsylvania. With great care and under legal advice an act was drafted and pre- sented by a committee, of which the writer was a member, to the State Legislature, then in session, accompanied by a petition praying for its enactment. The provisions of the law created a board, consisting of the teachers of anatomy and surgery in the medical schools and colleges of the commonwealth, which board after organization was to have entire control and charge of the receipt and dis- tribution of all dead human bodies which the terms of the law gave to it. Each teacher of anatomy was required to give to the Prothonotary of the Court of Common Pleas, in the county in which he resided, a bond in the penal sum of one thousand dollars, that he would obey the provisions of the law. Traffic in dead human bodies was punishable by fine and imprisonment. The officers of all municipal, county, and State institutions, having charge of the dead bodies of those unclaimed by blood or marriage relatives, to be buried at the public expense, were required to deliver such bodies to the board created under the law, all expenses to be borne by the board. The details of the conduct of the business of the board as to the distribution of the bodies coming into its charge to the institutions, schools, and those entitled to receive them was provided for by the rules 18 MEARS: THE EVOLUTION OF THE STUDY OF ANATOMY adopted by the board. Exemptions were made in cases of old soldiers and certain others. This law displaced one on the statute books of the State which was very defective, and was in all respects correctly drawn so as to protect the community and to promote medical science by giving in well-ordered manner dead human bodies for ana- tomical and surgical purposes. An essential feature of the law was the prevention of the traffic in dead human bodies which had existed before and which had wrought such shameful acts of spoliation of the resting-places of the dead. The law of 1867, displaced by the act of 1883, was limited in its execu- tion to two counties of the State, and gave the bodies of those who had no friends whose feelings could be wounded by their dissection. In 1855 a law had been enacted for the protection of burial grounds. A rigid and exacting rule of the board, requiring that a certificate of death made and signed by a reputable practitioner of medicine should accompany each dead body, made it impossible for any bodies to be delivered to the board unless under proper authority. Feeling the great importance of the introduction of the provisions of this law in a proper manner, the writer accepted the position of executive officer of the board created by it, and for several years was interested in its execution, in order that all who were entitled under the law and who had complied with its terms should receive an equitable distribution of anatomical material and at a cost which encouraged the liberal use of material for anatomical and surgical purposes. He was interested, as one of the features which attended the supply of dead bodies, in some of the acts practised by relatives who offered the dead bodies of members of their families to the anatomical board in order to escape the cost of interment. In all instances a certificate of death by a known reputable physician was required and the full consent of all parties related by blood or marriage was demanded to be placed on file in the records of the board. One instance was so unique in its character that a brief MEARS: THE EVOLUTION OF THE STUDY OF ANATOMY 19 account may be interesting in this chronicle. A man of middle age, well-dressed as to hat, gloves, and top-coat, presented himself at the office of the board on one occasion and inquired whether the Anatomical Board purchased dead human bodies. On being informed that one of the purposes of the enactment of the anatomical law was to prevent traffic in dead human bodies, he stated he was ignorant of the law, and explained his reasons for making the inquiry to be a desire on the part of certain members of his family to obtain wearing apparel with the money received by the sale of the corpse. He was informed of the terms under which the board would receive the body, to which he agreed. He then stated that the body which was to be delivered to the board was that of his wife, who had not yet died, but who was ill and whose death was expected in a short time. With this statement he departed, and in three weeks returned with the information that death had occurred and requested that the undertaker in the service of the board would arrange a "little funeral" at his house. The services were held in the home of such character as belonged to well-to-do people and the body came into the possession of the board without any expense to the mourning family. One year later this husband of frugal mind died, and his daughters who desired to be adorned, as stated by him, their father, with wearing apparel purchased with money derived from the sale of their mother's dead body, arranged for the cremation of his body at the crematory where they had been informed by him the body of their mother had been cremated and her ashes sacredly in-urned. By tactful management the officers of the crematory accounted to the deceived daughters for the absence of the urn containing the ashes of their mother, and through the records of the Muni- cipal Board of Health traced the body to the Anatomical Board, which had in due order distributed it to the anatomical depart- ment of one of the medical institutions for dissection. The probate of the will of this devoted husband revealed an estate of thirty thousand dollars. No suspicion of foul play was entertained in this case, the death certificate signed by a well- 20 MEARS: THE EVOLUTION OE THE STUDY OE ANATOMY known physician of the community, stated the cause of death to be "tuberculosis." Members of the medical profession have at times, by last will and testament, given their bodies to medical institutions for the promotion of medical science by dissection, the skeletons of which with certain organs were to be deposited in the museum of the institution. An act of this character on the part of one of the most eminent medical teachers of the country contributed his skeleton to a museum which has become in process of time, by many valuable additions, a most important department of instruction in a great medical school. In one of our cities, which for many years has been a centre of medical teaching and medical authorship, a number of promi- nent members of the medical profession, teachers, and authors some years ago entered into a pact to give by provision of their wills to a museum connected with the medical department of a university their brains for dissection and study. Already a number of brains have been deposited in this collection and valuable information has been accumulated. The preservation of dead human bodies for the purposes of dissection has been an important part of anatomical investigation. In order that a complete dissection, with proper study, should be made it was necessary that the body should be preserved in a condition as nearly natural as possible for an indefinite period. Not only should putrefaction be prevented, but the tissues and organs should be so treated as to retain the natural color-that present during life-and also a condition of flexibility through which the normal positions of organs and relations of parts were maintained. The earliest accounts recorded with regard to body preser- vation after death are found among the ancient Egyptians, who carried the art of embalming to a high degree of perfection. Two reasons were assigned for this practice: (i) the scarcity of wood which prevented cremation, and (2) the impossibility of maintaining permanent interment in the ground owing to the recurring inundations of the Nile, and consequently the occur- MEARS: THE EVOLUTION OF THE STUDY OF ANATOMY 21 rence of serious unsanitary conditions by disinterment of bodies in states of putrefaction. Religious beliefs with regard to the resurrection of the body and a future life, it is stated, have also inspired certain peoples to preserve the embalmed bodies of their dead with solicitude. The process of embalming consisted in evisceration with as little mutilation as possible, the brain being removed through the nostrils by a bent iron implement, and with the injection of drugs. Various medicaments, notably aromatics, were injected into the cavities and the body immersed for a varying period of time in a solution of natron. The early anatomists, as well as those in modern times, em- ployed various methods of embalming. William Hunter used essential oils, alcohol, cinnabar, camphor, saltpetre, and pitch or resin. Tar, salt, asphalt, Peruvian bark, camphor, cinnamon and other aromatics, and corrosive sublimate have been used; also the chloride and sulphate of zinc, the acetate and sulphate of aluminum, creosote and carbolic acid. Before the occurrence of the Civil War, and some time after, the methods of preservation of bodies for dissection were crude and defective. A strong solution of the chloride of zinc was injected into the arteries, using either the aorta or femoral arteries for the purpose, and the bodies, doubled up, were placed in large casks containing alcohol, the price of alcohol at this time making it a fairly economical procedure. When wanted for dissection the bodies were removed from the casks in a state of rigidity which required soaking in a tank of water for several days before it was possible to restore them to normal shape. Then a solution of plaster of Paris was injected into the arteries to facilitate their recognition in dissection. When the cost of alcohol, by reason of post-bellum taxes, became prohibitive, bodies after the chloride of zinc injections had been made were kept in tanks containing a saturated salt solution. Bodies injected with the chloride of zinc solution as a preservative were very defective for dissection purposes by reason of the bleaching of the tissues which resulted and the tendency of the parts to undergo desiccation. In order to 22 MEARS: THE EVOLUTION OF THE STUDY OF ANATOMY overcome these conditions several other agents, notably the bichloride of mercury and carbolic acid, were tried; but these Fig. 3.-Casks containing bodies in alcohol. Fig. 4.-Tank containing bodies in salt solution. MEARS: THE EVOLUTION OE THE STUDY OF ANATOMY 23 Fig. 5.-Cold-storage vault containing bodies for dissection. 24 MEARS: THE EVOLUTION OF THE STUDY OF ANATOMY failed to preserve the tissues and organs of the bodies in a fit condition for a sufficient length of time to permit complete dissection. The perfection of cadaver preservation for anatomi- cal purposes came with the use of cold-storage vaults, in which the subjects were placed and kept in a temperature sufficiently low to prevent putrefactive changes-400 to 500 Fahrenheit. To the agents above enumerated, carbolic acid, creosote, alcohol, saltpetre, glycerin, arsenate of soda, and formalde- hyde may be added in solution and thrown into the arteries by gravity. The color of the tissues is not changed by these agents, and the cadaver when taken from the refrigerator and thawed is in excellent condition for dissection. Instead of plaster of Paris, melted wax or a solution of starch colored with vermilion may be used to fill the arteries and arterioles to assist in their dissection. The methods employed in disposal of the remains left after dissection of bodies have varied. Originally they were thrown into a pit and a solution of lime poured in so as to promote destruction. In one institution the most reverent care is taken of the bodies and of the remains. The bodies are brought to the institution in coffins, in which all portions of the dissected remains are placed and every care to preserve the identity of each body taken. The institution, in a burial ground owned by it, inters the remains and marks the grave by a suitable head- stone. The modern method accomplishes the destruction of the remains by incineration in a suitable furnace. The methods of teaching anatomy to students have under- gone changes which have kept progress with the development and growth of the science. Since the time when Vesalius "pro- claimed openly that the structure of man should be learned by the inspection of the human body, true knowledge could alone be obtained by the study of this, the only correct authority the body of man itself," and Harvey stated that "he taught anatomy not from books but from dissections, not from the suppositions of philosophers but from the fabric of nature," instruction in anatomy has been conducted by teachers by MEARS: THE EVOLUTION OF THE STUDY OF ANATOMY 25 lectures illustrated by demonstrations on the dissected cadaver before the entire class of students with practical instruction in the anatomical room; the students in sections being required to dissect, under supervision of a demonstrator, the entire body and to be submitted at intervals of time to an examination on the work which has been done. In the surgical laboratory the special work embraced the study of the surgical relations of the different structures, muscles, bloodvessels, and nerves, the knowledge of which with that of the topographical relations is so important to the surgeon and constitutes the ground-work of his skill. As the structures of the body are continuous in substance and correlated in function the writer has always felt in his teach- ing that the one intending to become a specialist in the practice of any of the branches of medicine should receive instruction in anatomy in its entirety. Study by dissection only of the parts which contained the organs or of the organs themselves which constituted his practice, gives the specialist a very imperfect knowledge of the important relations the component parts of these organs bear to the general structures and organs of the body of which they are a part. Entertaining this opinion he was the first in the history of anatomical instruction, so far as he knows, to require that students in dentistry in the institution in which he was the professor of anatomy should be required to receive instructions in the anatomy of the entire human body, and in the anatomical laboratory dissect in order the entire body. Furthermore, during the period of instruction the student was submitted to periodical examinations, and in the final examination for the degree, examination on the entire subject held a place of importance and of value in same respect as that of the special subjects taught. It is not possible for the purposes of intelligent instruction to separate special organs of the body, as the eye, the ear, or the teeth, and their associated parts, from the rest of the body, or to destroy their important relation, hence the importance of the study of anatomy by those who engage in the practice of specialties. 26 MEARS: THE EVOLUTION OF THE STUDY OF ANATOMY In the early days of the writer's experience in surgical work importance was given by the great masters to the necessity of well-grounded instruction in the principles of the science of surgery-these were basic in character and preceded instruction in the practise. In the hands of the true surgeon the knife is simply an instrument, guided by the knowledge which he has acquired of the morbid conditions which involve a state of normal health, or by progressive development which jeopardizes life. This knowledge is gained by study, investigation, and the lessons of experience. The study of the etiology of disease claimed earnest attention then as it does in this day, when by the perfected laboratories of research and the faithful devotion of able investigators, the quest for the causes and the agents of relief of destroying diseases is unremittingly conducted, and the victories achieved in the contest contribute in ever-increasing beneficial results to the well-being and welfare of the human race. Fig. 6.-" The Lesson in Anatomy in the Twentieth Century"-conducted by Prof. E. A. Spitzka, of the Jefferson Medical College, on the anatomy of the brain, in the amphitheatre in which the writer taught anatomy for many years.