THE MEDICAL POLICE AND RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE BOSTON MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, "WITH A CATALOGUE OF THF. \ OFFICERS AND MEMBERS. BOSTON: PRINTED BY JOHN WILSON & SON, 22, School Street. 1852. THE MEDICAL POLICE AND RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE BOSTON MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, * WITH A CATALOGUE OF THE OFFICERS AND MEMBERS. BOSTON: PRINTED BY JOHN WILSON & SON, 22, School Street. 1852. BOSTON MEDICAL POLICE. At a meeting of the Boston Medical Association, held at Vila’s on the first Wednesday in March, 1808 ; The Committee of the preceding year having, in conformity with their in- structions, reported on a code of Medical Police, which was read and accepted by sections,— It was Voted, That the Report of the Committee be recommitted, with instructions to print five hundred copies of the same; and that they present to each member of the Association three copies of the Report, and distribute the remaining copies to such other physicians of the State as they may think proper. Voted, likewise, That the thanks of the Association be presented to the Committee for their judicious and useful Report. J. GORHAM, Secretary. BOSTON MEDICAL POLICE. The Standing Committee of the Association of Boston Physicians for the year commencing on the first Wednes- day of March, 1807, having been instructed to propose a code of Medical Police, to be submitted to the considera- tion of the Association at their next annual meeting, beg leave to report: — 1. That, having examined the different publications of Gregory, Rush, and Percival upon this subject, they first selected from them such articles as seemed most applicable to the circumstances of the profession in this place. 2. That, with these articles as a groundwork, they have proceeded to form a short system of police, containing general principles for the government of this Association, by making such alterations or additions to them as they thought necessary for rendering them both practicable and useful. 3. That they have added such new articles as they judged conducive to the general views of this Association, and adapted to the particular situation of medical practice in America. The result of which is submitted in the form following : 6 CONSULTATIONS. Consultations should be encouraged in difficult and protracted cases, as they give rise to confidence, energy, and more enlarged views in practice. On such occasions, no rivalship or jealousy should be indulged; candor, jus- tice, and all due respect, should be exercised towards the physician who first attended ; and, as lie may be presumed to be best acquainted with the patient and his family, he should deliver all the medical directions, as agreed upon. It should be the province, however, of the senior consulting physician to propose the necessary questions to the sick. The consulting physician is never to visit without the attending one, unless by the desire of the latter, or when, as in sudden emergency, he is not to be found. No dis- cussion of the case should take place before the patient or his friends; and no prognostications should be delivered, which were not the result of previous deliberation and concurrence. Theoretical debates, indeed, should generally be avoided in consultation, as occasioning perplexity and loss of time; for there may be much diversity of opinion on speculative points, with perfect agreement on those modes of practice which are founded, not on hypothesis, but on experience and observation. Physicians in con- sultation, whatever may be their private resentments or opinions of one another, should divest themselves of all partialities, and think of nothing but what will most effect- ually contribute to the relief of those under their care. If a physician cannot lay his hand to his heart, and say that his mind is perfectly open to conviction, from what- ever quarter it may come, he should in honor decline the consultation. All discussions and debates in consultations are to be held secret and confidential. 7 Many advantages may arise from two consulting to- gether, who are men of candor, and have mutual confidence in each other’s honor. A remedy may occur to one which did not to another; and a physician may want resolution, or a confidence in his own opinion, to prescribe a powerful but precarious remedy, on which, however, the life of his patient may depend: in this case, a concurrent opinion may fix his own. But, when such mutual confidence is wanting, a consultation had better be declined, especially if there is reason to believe that sentiments delivered with openness are to be communicated abroad, or to the family concerned; and if, in consequence of this, either gentleman is to be made responsible for the event. The utmost punctuality should be observed in consulta- tion-visits ; and, to avoid loss of time, it will be expedient to establish the space of fifteen minutes, as an allowance for delay, after which the meeting might be considered as postponed fofa new appointment. INTERFERENCES. Medicine is a liberal profession; the practitioners are, or ought to be, men of education; and their expectations of business and employment should be founded on their degrees of qualification, not on artifice and insinuation. A certain undefinable species of assiduities and attentions, therefore, to families usually employing another, is to be considered as beneath the dignity of a regular practitioner, and as making a mere trade of a learned profession; and all officious interferences, in cases of sickness in such fami- lies, evince a meanness of disposition, unbecoming the character of a physician or a gentleman. No meddling inquiries should be made concerning them, nor hints given relative to their nature and treatment, nor any selfish conduct pursued, that may, directly or indirectly, tend to 8 weaken confidence in the physicians or surgeons who have the care of them. When a physician is called to a patient, who has been under the care of another gentleman of the Faculty, before any examination of the case, he should ascertain whether that gentleman understands that the patient is no longer under his care; and, unless this be the case, the second physician is not to assume the charge of the patient, nor to give his advice, — excepting in instances of sudden attacks, — without a regular consultation; and if such previously attending gentleman has been dismissed, or has voluntarily relinquished the patient, his practice should be treated with candor, and justified so far as probity and truth will permit; for the want of success in the primary treatment of the disorder is no impeachment of professional skill and knowledge. It frequently happens that a physician, in incidental communications with the patients of others, or with their friends, may have their cases stated to him in so direct a manner as not to admit of his declining to pay attention to them. Under such circumstances, his observations should be delivered with the most delicate propriety and reserve. He should not interfere in the curative plans pursued, and should even recommend a steady adherence to them, if they appear to merit approbation. DIFFERENCES OF PHYSICIANS. The differences of physicians, when they end in appeals to the public, generally hurt the contending parties; but, what is of more consequence, they discredit the profession, and expose the Faculty itself to contempt and ridicule. Whenever such differences occur as may affect the honor and dignity of the profession, and cannot immediately be terminated, or do not come under the character of violation 9 of the special rules of the Association otherwise provided for, they should be referred to the arbitration of a sufficient number of members of the Association, according to the nature of the dispute; but neither the subject-matter of such references, nor the adjudication, should, if it can be avoided, be communicated to the public, as they may be personally injurious to the individuals concerned, and can hardly fail to hurt the general credit of the Faculty. DISCOURAGEMENT OF QUACKERY. The use of quack medicines should be discouraged by the Faculty, as disgraceful to the profession, injurious to health, and often destructive even of life. No physician or surgeon, therefore, should dispense a secret nostrum, whether it be his invention or exclusive property; for, if it is of real efficacy, the concealment of it is inconsistent with beneficence and professional liberality; and, if mystery alone give it value and importance, such craft implies either disgraceful ignorance or fraudulent avarice. CONDUCT FOR THE SUPPORT OF THE MEDICAL CHARACTER. The esprit du corps is a principle of action founded in human nature, and, when duly regulated, is both rational and laudable. Every man, who enters into a fraternity, engages, by a tacit compact, not only to submit to the laws, but to promote the honor and interest of the Asso- ciation, so far as they are consistent with morality and the general good of mankind. A physician, therefore, should cautiously guard against whatever may injure the general respectability of the profession, and should avoid all con- tumelious representations of the Faculty at large, all gen- eral charges against their selfishness or improbity, or the 10 indulgence of an affected or jocular scepticism concerning the efficacy and utility of the healing art. FEES. General rules are adopted by the Faculty, in every town, relative to the pecuniary acknowledgments of their pa- tients ; and it should be deemed a point of honor to adhere to them; and every deviation from, or evasion of, these rules should be considered as meriting the indignation and contempt of the fraternity. Gratuitous services to the poor are by no means prohi- bited : the characteristical beneficence of the profession is inconsistent with sordid views and avaricious rapacity. The poor of every description should be the objects of our peculiar care. Dr. Boerhaave used to say they were his best patients, because God was their paymaster. It is obvious, also, that an average fee, as suited to the general rank of patients, must be an inadequate compen- sation from the rich (who often require attendance not absolutely necessary), and yet too large to be expected from that class of citizens who would feel a reluctance in calling for assistance, without making some decent and satisfactory remuneration. EXEMPTION FROM CHARGES. All members of the medical profession, together with their families, should be attended gratuitously; but visits should not be obtruded officiously, as such civility may give rise to embarrassments, or interfere with that choice on which confidence depends. But distant members of the Faculty, when they request attendance, should be expected at least to defray the charges of travelling. 11 Omission to charge, on account of the wealthy circum- stances of the physician, is an injury to the profession, as it is defrauding, in a degree, the common funds for its support, when fees are dispensed with which might justly be claimed. VICARIOUS OFFICES Whenever a physician officiates for another by his de- sire, in consequence of sickness or absence, if for a short time only, the attendance should be performed gratuitously as to the physician, and with the utmost delicacy towards the professional character of the gentleman previously con- nected with the patient. SENIORITY. A regular and academical education furnishes the only presumptive evidence of professional ability, and is so honorable and beneficial, that it gives a just claim to pre- eminence among physicians at large, in proportion to the degree in which it may be enjoyed and improved. Never- theless, as industry and talents may furnish exceptions to this general rule, and this method may be liable to diffi- culties in the application, seniority among practitioners of this town should be determined by the period of public and acknowledged practice as a physician or surgeon in the same. This arrangement, being clear and obvious, is adapted to remove all grounds of dispute among medical gentlemen; and it secures the regular continuance of the established order of precedency, which might otherwise be subject to troublesome interruptions by new settlers, per- haps not long stationary in the place. JOHN WARREN, LEMUEL HAYWARD, JOHN FLEET. SOME REMARKS ON THE PROPRIETY AND ADVANTAGES OF A FEE-TABLE. An agreement among physicians in regard to a Fee-table would not be justifiable on the score of humanity, if such agreement implied that a physician would not afford his aid unless he received a stated compensation, nor in- deed if it made any compensation essential for his services. It will hardly be disputed, that medical men do not fall short of those of any other profession in their gratuitous services to the poor. Strange indeed would it be, while their studies are constantly bringing before their minds the wisdom and goodness of God their Creator, if they should not be disposed to extend their aid to the sick and suffering from any other motive than a reward to themselves. But men without fortune would not enter the profession of medi- cine, if they did not look to their labors, as men do in other professions, for an adequate maintenance, and, if successful, for the accumulation of some property. With us, almost every one who engages in medical studies is altogether dependent on his business for support. The fees are indis- pensable ; so much so that the young practitioner is liable to the temptation of undervaluing his services for the at- tainment of immediate support; and those who are no 14 longer young may also offer their services at a low price, hoping to compensate themselves by an increased amount of business. This will be done by those who think more of the amount of business than of the services due to their patients. It is at this point that we may consider what is for the interest of the public,—what is for the interest of the sick, who look to the physician or surgeon for their care. Which would be best, that the medical men should contend who would do the work for the lowest fees, or that they place their claims on their education, or their devotion to their profession, and on whatever goes to make up the qualifica- tions for the proper management of the sick, — in short, on their professional skill and merit ? It is true that profes- sional skill and merit are not always duly recognized and rewarded: the battle is not always to the strong. But, in general, the strong will ultimately succeed in the contest; and it is better for the community that every medical man should rely on his qualifications to be truly useful, than that he should be compelled to struggle with his neighbor and brother as to which would serve the sick at the lowest rate. From this view of the subject, we conclude that the es- tablishment of a uniform fee-table among physicians and surgeons living in the same city, or in a near vicinity, is justifiable and proper. In this country it is believed that the fees are more or less definitely adjusted by the members of the Faculty in the larger towns and cities. In Boston a fee-table was established probably more than a century ago. We know that there was one about the year 1788, the period of the greatest depression after the Revolution. The fee for a visit was four shillings, or sixty-seven cents; and other fees were in proportion. About ten years later, there was an ad- vance on the fees of about fifty per cent; that for a visit being 15 a dollar. In 1808, the expenses of living, as well as the wealth of the town, had greatly increased ; and the charge for a visit was raised to a dollar and a half, with additions, more or less, for other services. Since that time, there have been occasional alterations; but there has not been any general change in the tariff for medical services. In the table of 1808, a new principle was introduced, authorizing a reduction of the fees to persons of moderate property, or of very limited incomes. The ground on which an increase of fees for medical and surgical services is now deemed requisite and proper is, that, since the last fee-table was adopted, the expenses and style of living have increased very much, and most especially within the last fifteen years. It is, no doubt, on that account that the medical fees have been raised in New York, Philadelphia, and Baltimore within a few years; while it is well known that house-rent and other necessary expenses are at least as high in Boston as in those cities. With regard to the principles on which a fee-table should be constructed, it may be assumed that the fees should be high enough both to induce men of talents and good char- acter to enter the medical profession; and also to satisfy them, so that they should never cease to study their art, and to cultivate all branches of science which would aid them in it. The physician should be able to obtain a subsistence in the early years of his life by such a moderate share of business as can be obtained in those years; and, if successful and fully occupied after he has arrived at middle life, he should be able to live in a style consistent with his rank in society, and to make provision for his old age, or for such a family as he may leave behind him. Likewise it would be well that there should be so much latitude in the arrangements respecting fees, that the younger members of the profession should be allowed to make lower charges than would be satisfactory to those in full practice. 16 Physicians and surgeons would never obtain a support from the poor: they must be served without charge. With us, in Boston, there is abundant provision for them in the Dispensary, the Alms-house, or House of Industry, and the Massachusetts General Hospital. Besides, none of our medical men refuse to render their gratuitous services, when necessary; and this is done, not only to those known as poor, but to many who have “ seen better days,” and yet struggle to maintain a style of gentility. There is a large middle class, able and willing to render a compensation for medical services, who cannot pay such fees as those services are entitled to, especially for long sicknesses. If dependent on such as these only, the in- comes of physicians would not be sufficient to attract to their ranks men of talents, nor such as are able to devote much time and money to their preliminary education. In all large cities, there are multitudes of men whose wealth enables them to pay for the best services from medical men, and who will not be satisfied unless they obtain what they consider as such. Boston has its full share of these wealthy men. A reliance on the support to be derived from them encourages the student to resort to all proper means to qualify himself for their service. Under the circumstances here stated, the proper course seems to be to make a discrimination in the recompense demanded for medical services. Such a result must pro- bably be brought about in all instances, more or less perfectly, by the necessity of the case, without any special arrangement. In the fee-table adopted in Boston in 1808, and in that which has now been adopted, and which here follows, the principle is openly recognized and acted upon. This fee-table does not state absolutely what the full fee shall be in any case. The general plan of it is to state a minimum in each case. In the table of 1808, a minimum was stated for the charge; but it was provided that a 17 deduction of one-third might be made from the amount of a bill, whenever the circumstances of the patient seemed to require it. In the present table, there is named for each service the limits within which the fee shall be placed, though not designing to prohibit a higher charge where the time devoted, or the great importance of the service rendered, should call for it; nor, on the other hand, to forbid a deduction to those in limited circumstances, in proportion to the exigencies of the case. RULES AND REGULATIONS. At the Annual Meeting of the Members of the Boston Medical Association, held May 5, 1851, — The subject of the Revision of the Fee Table, and of the consideration of By-Law VI., was referred to a Committee, consisting of Drs. J. Mason Warren, N. B. Shurtleff, and J. Wright Warren, with instructions to report at the next annual meeting. At the Annual Meeting, held May 3, 1852, it was — Voted, That the Report of the Committee be accepted. Voted, That the Fee Table, as modified by the Committee, be adopted by the Association. Voted, That the Secretary be requested to have printed, under the direc- tion of the Standing Committee, a new edition of the Medical Police and Rules and Regulations of the Association, as emended by the Special Committee; together with a Catalogue of the Officers and Members. RULES AND REGULATIONS. I. There shall be a stated meeting of the Boston Medi- cal Association on the first Monday in May, annually. II. At every stated meeting there shall first be chosen a Chairman to preside at the same; and then there shall be chosen by ballot a Secretary and a Standing Committee of five members, who shall continue in office until the next stated meeting, and until others are elected in their room. III. It shall be the duty of the Secretary to keep a re- cord of the proceedings of the Association and those of the Standing Committee, whose meetings he shall attend for this purpose, and to perform such other services as are pointed out in other regulations. IV. It shall be the duty of the Standing Committee to attend to and decide on all matters which regard the honor or interest of the Association, especially to act upon all infringements of its regulations which may come to their knowledge, and to call special meetings of the Association when they judge proper. In all cases there may be an appeal from the judgment of the Standing Committee to the Association. This Committee shall fill any vacancy in their own body, or in the office of Secretary, which may occur by death or resignation, until the next stated meeting of the Association. 22 V. It shall be the duty of the Secretary to call a special meeting of the Association, whenever directed so to do by the Standing Committee, and likewise whenever seven members of the Association request him in writing so to do. In the cases of both stated and special meetings, he shall send a notification, printed or written, to each mem- ber, one week at least before the day of meeting, and shall advertise the same during the week preceding the meeting, twice in two newspapers printed in the city. VI. No member of this Association shall consult with, or voluntarily meet in a professional way, or aid or abet any practitioner resident in this city, who is not a member of this Association. VII. If any member becomes acquainted with the con- duct of another member, which he considers as a breach of the rules and regulations of the Association, it shall be his duty to make the same known to the Standing Committee, who shall inquire into the case, and decide upon the same as they may think proper. VIII. If a physician be called to a patient who has usu- ally been attended by another physician, on account of the urgency of the case or the absence of the regular physician, he shall, before leaving, direct that the latter be sent for to continue the attendance, if necessary; and in no case shall he continue his visits, unless he receive subsequent notice from the patient that his continued attendance is desired. IX. When a physician, engaged to attend a case of mid- wifery, is absent, and a second delivers the patient, the second shall receive the fee, and relinquish the patient to the first. If the first arrive while the second is present, and before the patient is delivered, the second shall resign the patient to the first. X. The members of this Association shall charge for their professional services the fees in the following table, subject, however, to the several rules contained in this 23 code relative to the same; the fee to be modified according to the circumstances of the patient: — For a visit $1.00 to 2.00 For a visit and first consultation ..... 5.00 For a visit and each subsequent do., if the attendance be continuous ........ 3.00 For a visit on board a vessel in the stream, above Fort Independence . . . . . . .5.00 For a visit on board a vessel off or below do. . . . 10.00 For a visit out of town,* for every mile from the centre of Boston ......... 1.00 to 2.00 For a visit out of town in consultation,! the fee as above for a visit and consultation; with the addition, for every mile except the first, of . . . 1.00 to 2.00 In like manner, for every other service, when out of town, the fee for the service shall first be charged, and for every mile except the first 1.00 to 2.00 For the introduction of the catheter in cases of obstruc- tion ......... 5.00 to 10.00 For a visit and passing catheter 5.00 For a visit and passing catheter, when frequently re- peated, and for that purpose only .... 1.00 to 2.00 For a visit, prescribing, and performing venesection . 3.00 For a visit and performing venesection only, without ad- vice ......... 1.00 to 2.00 For a visit and dressing only ...... 1.00 to 2.00 For venesection or dressing at the surgeon’s house . 1.00 to 2.00 For prescription and venesection at do 2.00 to 3.00 For rising in the night J and visit ..... 5.00 to 10.00 For rising in the night and visit in consultation . . 10.00 For rising in the night and advice at the physician’s house 3.00 to 5.00 For advice at the physician’s house, according to the im- portance of the case and the time occupied . . 1.00 to 10.00 For a letter of advice 5.00 to 10.00 For an opinion involving a question of law, in which a physician may be subpoenaed 10.00 to 50.00 * If by railroad, from 50 cents to $1 per mile, according to the time saved to the practitioner. •f The fee for visits, consultations, and other medical services, in Roxbury, Charlestown, Cambridgeport, and Chelsea, may be the same as in Boston. % The night, in this table, is considered as beginning at 10 o’clock, p.m., and ending at 6 o’clock a.m., or at sunrise, when that is later than 6 o’clock, a.m. 24 For a post-mortem examination, in a case of legal investi- gation ........ $20.00 to 50.00 For do. made at the request of the family or relations of the deceased 5.00 to 25.00 For a certificate of health . . . . . 3.00 to 5.00 For a case of midwifery in the daytime * . . . 10.00 to 20.00 For do. if any part of the attendance be in the night . 15.00 to 25.00 For capital operations, such as amputations of large limbs, lithotomy, lithotrity, trepanning, extirpation of large tumors, operation for cataract, &c. . . 50.00 to200.00 For the operation of fistula in ano ..... 20.00 to 50.00 For the operation for harelip 20.00 to 50.00 For tapping for dropsy, and for reducing luxations or fractures of large bones 10.00 to 50.00 For amputations of fingers or toes, and for excision of small tumors ....... 5.00 to 20.00 For tapping for hydrocele . . ... 5.00 to 10.00 For the operation for the radical cure of hydrocele . 10.00 to 30.00 For reducing luxations or fractures of small bones, for stitching recent wounds, opening large abscesses, and similar operations 5.00 to 10.00 For vaccine inoculation 2.00 to 5.00 For revaccination 1.00 to 3.00 For cupping 2.00 to 3.00 It is recommended that in all cases of gonorrhoea and syphilis a retaining fee of from $5.00 to $10.00 be required in advance ; the subsequent charges to be made as in ordinary cases of attendance or advice. XI. The foregoing table is designed to state the regular fees, which shall be charged for the services to which they are respectively annexed; and they are the lowest fees which the members of this Association shall demand. And in all cases of extraordinary detention or attendance, — also in proportion to the importance of the case and of the responsibility attached to it, and to the service rendered, where these are extraordinary, — the charges shall be in- * Whenever it is necessary to make more than three visits to women after de- livery, all additional visits shall be charged as in ordinary cases. N. B. In all cases stated in the table, following that of midwifery, a visit is implied; yet the charge should be the same, if performed at the practitioner’s house. 25 creased according to the judgment of the practitioner con- cerned ; and the duty to make such increase in the charges shall be considered obligatory on the members of this Association. XII. It shall be considered proper, but not obligatory, to charge from two to five dollars for a first visit in every case. Likewise, all visits made at a late hour in the evening shall be considered as extraordinary attendance, and may be charged accordingly. In common cases of consultation, the attending physician may charge a larger fee than for ordinary visits, provided that he does not charge more than the usual fee for consultation. XIII. If, in any case of midwifery, a second physician is called in consultation, both the attending and consulting physician shall charge at least the usual fee for delivery; except that, where the consulting physician in such a case pays only a consultation-visit, and is not detained in at- tendance on the case, he may charge the fee for a consulta- tion-visit. XIV. In cases of midwifery, when the child is born, but not the placenta, before the arrival of the accoucheur, the whole fee is to be charged. When both the child and placenta are born before the arrival of the accoucheur, half or the whole fee is to be charged, according to the circumstances. This rule is not to be applied to cases where the delay arises from the accoucheur. XV. It is not designed by these regulations to prevent the members of this Association from rendering their services gratuitously to persons who are incapable of re- munerating them without distressing themselves or their families; and in every case, in settling his account, the practitioner may make any deduction which he consci- entiously believes that the circumstances of the patient render necessary. 26 XVI. No member of this Association shall omit charg- ing any necessary visits made on the same day, on account of their number. XVII. No member of this Association shall make a previous contract with any family for a definite sum, as a remuneration for his annual attendance on that family. XVIII. Those physicians of the adjoining towns who are members of the Massachusetts Medical Society, or have been licensed by it, shall be requested to conform, in their charges, to the fee-bill of this Association, whenever they attend patients in this town. XIX. It is recommended that physicians present their accounts semi-annually, on the 1st of January and the 1st of July, or as much oftener as they may deem proper. XX. Printed blanks may be used of the following form : — Mr. to Dr. For Medical Attendance on XXI. The regulations of the Association shall be offered for subscription to all candidates for medical practice in this city, with whom the Fellows of the Massachusetts. Medical Society may lawfully hold consultation; and the Secretary shall be charged with the execution of this regu- lation, with which he shall comply in every instance, so soon as he shall learn that any candidate of the above description may have -established himself in this city; or, in case the Secretary has doubts, in any instance, respect- ing the propriety of offering the articles to any candidate above described, he shall call on the Standing Committee for advice and direction ; and, in case any person to whom he offers the regulations shall refuse or neglect to sign the same, the Secretary shall make known such refusal or neglect to the Standing Committee. 27 XXII. Every candidate, at the time of becoming a member of the Association, shall sign the following ob- ligation, which shall be in a book deposited with the Secretary: — “ The undersigned approve of the Regulations of the Boston Medical Association, and agree upon their honor to comply ivith the same. ’ ’ It shall also be his duty to transmit a circular note, signed by the Secretary, to every member, informing them of his admission; and he is not to be entitled to the rights and privileges of the Association until this has been done. For these circulars he shall pay one dollar to the Secretary. XXIII. The members of this Association, after arriving at the age of sixty, shall be exempted from all assessments, but in other particulars shall be governed by the rules and regulations of this Association. XXIV. The Secretary shall pay all expenses of this Association; and once in a year at least, and oftener when any considerable expense has been incurred, he shall assess the amount due to him upon the members of the Asso- ciation, equally, with the exception stated in the twenty- third rule. He shall employ, at the expense of the members, a person to collect the assessments; and, if any member refuses or neglects to pay his assessment, his connection with the Association shall thereupon cease, and the Sec- retary shall inform the members of the same by a circular note; and the assessment left unpaid shall become a charge against the Association. XXV. The Secretary’s records and accounts shall be subject to examination by the Standing Committee, and by the Association, when they judge proper. XXVI. All resignations of members shall be made in writing to the Secretary, who shall immediately lay them before the Standing Committee, who shall either notify 28 each member, or call a meeting of the Association, as they may think proper. XXVII. No rule or regulation of this Association shall be altered, amended, or repealed, nor any additional regula- tion adopted at any meeting, unless the proposed alteration or amendment has first been referred to a Committee, who shall report on the same at a subsequent meeting, which shall be held at a time not less than one month from the time of the appointment of the Committee. And no amendment or additional regulation shall be adopted, ex- cept by a vote of three-fourths of the members present. MEMBERS OF THE BOSTON MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, FROM ITS FORMATION IN 1806 TO JUNE, 1843. ORIGINAL MEMBERS. James Lloyd Samuel Danforth Isaac Rand John Jeffries Charles Jarvis Lemuel Hayward David Townsend Thomas Kast John Warren Thomas Welsh Aaron Dexter William Spooner John Fleet, jun. Isaac Rand, jun. William Ingalls Thomas Danforth Asa Bullard John G. Coffin Jacob Gates John Dixwell James Jackson Benjamin Shurtleff John C. Howard John C. Warren Cyrus Perkins Horace Bean William Gamage John Randall John Gorham Thomas I. Parker MEMBERS OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE. Elected. Resigned. John Warren 1806 . . 1819 Lemuel Hayward . 1806 . . 1817 John Fleet, jun. 1806 '. . 1813 Thomas Welsh 1808 . . 1817 James Jackson 1808 . . 1811 William Spooner 1811 . . 1819 30 Elected. Resigned. Aaron Dexter 1813 . . 1817 John G. Coffin ..... 1817 . . 1828 John Gorham ..... 1817 • • 1829 George C. Shattuck .... 1817 . . 1823 Samuel Adams ..... 1819 . . 1820 .John Randall ..... 1819 . . 1843 Jacob Bigelow 1823 . . 1851 George Hayward ..... 1823 . . John Ware . . . . . . 1828 . . John B. Brown 1829 . . 1843 John Homans 1843 . . 1851 Enoch Hale ...... 1844 . . 1848 0. W. Holmes 1849 . . 1851 J. Mason Warren ..... 1850 . . D. H. Storer 1851 . . N. B. Shurtleff ..... 1851 . . SECRETARIES Elected. Resigned. John Fleet, jun 1806 . . 1807 John Gorham 1807 . . 1811 George Bates 1811 . . 1813 John B. Brown ..... 1813 . . 1815 George Hayward . . . . 1815 . . 1818 E. I). Cushing 1818 . . 1819 John Ware 1819 . . 1825 J. P. Spooner 1825 . . 1827 J. G. Stevenson 1827 . . 1829 Winslow Lewis, jun 1829 . . 1831 Joseph M‘Kean 1831 . . 1833 Martin Gay 1833 . . 1835 D. H. Storer . , 1835 . . 1837 Francis J. Iligginson .... 1837 . . 1837 Henry I. Bowditch .... 1837 . . 1838 J. B. S. Jackson 1838 . . 1842 A. Thomas 1842 . . 1843 George A. Bethune .... 1843 . . 1845 Charles E. Ware 1845 . . 1846 Samuel Parkman 1846 . . 1848 William J. Dale 1848 . . 1849 E. W. Blake 1849 . . 1852 Francis Minot 1852 . . 31 MEMBERS 1806. ♦James Lloyd ♦Samuel Danforth ♦Isaac Rand ♦John Jeffries ♦Charles Jarvis ♦Lemuel Hayward ♦David Townsend ♦Thomas Kast ♦John Warren ♦Thomas Welsh *t | Aaron Dexter ♦William Spooner ♦John Fleet, jun. ♦Isaac Rand, jun. ♦William Ingalls ♦Thomas Danforth ♦Asa Bullard ♦John G. Coffin | Jacob Gates ♦John Dixwell James Jackson ♦Benjamin Shurtleff ♦John C. Howard John C. Warren t Cyrus Perkins ♦Horace Bean ♦William Gamage ♦John Randall ♦John Gorham Thomas I. Parker 1807. Daniel Adams ♦Samuel R. Trevett 1808. George C. Shattuck ♦Daniel Newcomb | George Bates 1809. John B. Brown t Benjamin James ♦Joshua Thomas 1810. Walter Channing #t Nathaniel Bemis Jacob Bigelow f Auguste Lemosy *tJoseph Lovell t Daniel Cook 1812. ♦Shirley Erving #f John Revere ♦ Peter St. Medard ♦Elisha Clap George Hayward 1813. ♦Benjamin Read 1814. *f Oliver Prescott ♦George Parkman It Amos Farnsworth ♦John Gardner ♦f Ezekiel D. Cushing ♦Nathaniel Lovell f La Fayette Perkins 1815. ♦Asa Bucknam ♦j-Andrew Foster ♦Theodore Dexter fWilliams Bradford ♦James Mann Abner Phelps 1816. ♦f Pliny Hayes ♦f Josiah Batchelder *| Samuel Clarke ♦J Edward H. Robbins, jun. Zabdiel B. Adams Solomon D. Townsend 1817. f Benjamin Austin, jun. ♦Joseph Bossuet John Ware ♦f Peter G. Robbins David Osgood If Nathaniel Niles |{ Samuel A. Shurtleff ♦Samuel Hemmenway ♦Enoch Hale * Deceased. f Left the city. X Relinquished practice. 32 1818. ♦f Samuel Adams. Edward Reynolds, jun. #f + John W. Webster *j Thomas Pratt, jun. *f J John S. Bartlett _ 1819. Woodbridge Strong f William Sweetser John Jefiries, jun. f Thomas W. Parsons ♦f Frederick A. Parker *f Jesse Smith *7 Gamaliel Bradford Josiah F. Flagg Shelometh S. Whipple 1820. j- John Locke *George B. Doane ' *Chandler Robbins, jun. George Russell f John P. Spooner *f John D. Wells 1821. ♦Caleb H. Snow *f Joseph 0. Osgood 1823. *f |Daniel Ingalls, jun. Jerome V. C. Smith George W. Otis, jun. Edwin Adams ♦Warren Abbott 1824. Samuel Morrill f Erastus H. Bartlett f William B. Duggan ♦Moses Gage Winslow Lewis, jun. f Augustus Plympton j Joshua H. Hayward 1825. ♦Thomas 0. Folsom ♦William H. Bass J Hezekiah Eldredge ♦Charles T. Hildreth James Wilson D. Humphreys Storer | Joshua B. Flint Horatio Robinson t James M. Whittemore 1826. f Theodore Kittredge f Charles W. Windship *J. Greely Stevenson John Flint John C. Hayden f Ralph Farnsworth Jonas H. Lane J Joseph Palmer *t Edward G. Davis * Joseph W. McKean *Martin Gay 1827. Alexander Thomas ♦John D. Fisher Nathan C. Keep Frederick A. Sumner, jun. *f Francis Shurtleff ♦f Henry S. Wade ♦John E. Stebbins f Walker Booth 1828. f Joseph Clark f Charles Choate ♦f Benjamin Lincoln •f-John 0. Fay ♦William Grigg *f Philip I. Dumaresq ■f George Stearns * f Charles Walker Benjamin T. Prescott + Charles G. Greene ♦JJohn H. Richards •(•Nathaniel Peabody *t John A. Bulfinch Charles H. Stedman Giles H. Lodge f Francis J. lligginson *7 John C. Howard 1829. + Charles T. Jackson Daniel T. Coit f Nathaniel B. Shaler ♦Thomas Gray, jun. John B. S. Jackson John Homans |D. H. Gregg Edward J. Davenport Henry Dyer 1830. J Daniel Harwood Augustus A. Gould 33 * Calvin Ellis Marshall S. Perry Abraham A. Watson *f Thomas H. Thompson Levi B. Gale * Samuel H. Smith * Albert Williams George Bartlett f J. Wilson f Edward Warren 1831. fj Benjamin F. Wing f Ambrose Seaton *f James Wood William G. Hanaford | Paul Simpson, jun. *Ebenezer Parker Ezra Palmer, jun. 1832. Joseph Roby * George W. Lane Howard Sargent fj Josiah D. Hedge j Edward L. Cunningham 1833. | Caleb S. Whitman Asa B. Snow f John Appleton ft Jesse Chickering *William E. Foster Henry A. Ward Charles G. Putnam f Alpheus Proctor f Austin Flint James B. Gregerson 1834. * James Jackson, jun. f Josiah Kittredge John Odin f Samuel B. Swett f William W. Dwight Nathaniel B. Shurtleff * j- Henry Tuck Francis H. Gray j Joseph J. Fales H. I. Bowditch 1835. *Joseph Moriarty Henry G. Clark * Abner B. Wheeler J. Mason Warren f Lewis J. Glover *f Solomon Keep George G. Shattuck, jun. *E. W. Leach Andrew Alexander 1836. f Henry A. Dewar Robert W. Hooper *f J. Cullen Ayer | Oliver Wendell Holmes f Albert T. Smith John W. Warren f William Ingalls, jun. Richard H. Salter J Francis Dana *Henry B. C. Greene Warren J. Whitney f Jonathan Leonard j Alonzo Chapin *Marcellus Bowen Luther Clark John H. Dix Herman B. Inches *Henry G. Wiley George A. Bethune Charles Gordon 1837. Charles H. Peirce fC. M. Weld Ephraim Buck f John W. Gorham George Hubbard f Jacob Hayes ft Jeflries Wyman f Moore R. Fletcher Charles E. Ware f Charles H. Wheelwright Horace Dupee, jun. John Stevens f Benjamin Haskell f Benjamin E. Cotting 1838. *Samuel Wigglesworth *f William Eustis t Stephen Salisbury f Richard S. Young f Samuel Fish Joshua Tucker J Thomas M. Brewer fj Nathaniel S. Tucker f J. T. Gilman Leach *S. S. Bugbee t William Gordon 34 1839. |J. H. Dorr fC. C. Yates Benjamin B. Appleton, jun. Samuel Parkman ♦Ephraim Buck, jun. 1840. Stephen Ball, jun. Aaron P. Richardson Henry J. Martin Phineas M. Crane Ephraim Marston f Augustus Whiting f J Ward N. Boylston J. F. W. Lane |C. C. Holmes f Nathan Warren Oliver f Benjamin Mann Daniel Mann William Hawes William J. Dale 1841. George Tower ♦Frederick A. Eddy Jonathan Small | Charles Thacher t John S. Butler f William W. Cutler j Samuel Trull Samuel L. Abbot, jun. William A. Briggs f C. F. Foster fE. 0. Phinney f Henry Orne Stone Silas Durkee 1842. Charles Mifflin fW. T. Parker t George A. Hammett George Heaton tOtis E. French John A. Cummings Louis M. I. Mignault ♦t Geo. Friedrick Hartmann 1843. Eli Whitney Blake William E. Coale t G. Ware Gay Rufus L. Hinckley George Hayward, jun. 1843. t Edward Hall William W. Morland ♦John Spence, jun. Edward D. G. Palmer George N. Thomson Cyrus S. Mann Peter Renton Samuel Cabot, jun. Willard W. Codman t J. Frazier Head Moses W. Weld t Alexander Jackson f E. P. Le Prohon Moses C. Greene Henry J. Bigelow ♦Edward Brooks, jun. Jasper H. York Joseph S. Jones Charles A. Phelps Le Baron Russell f Alvan Becon Chas. E. Buckingham fWm. P. Dexter E. G. Tucker t Wm. Henry Thayer 1844. f J. W. Holman tThos. F. Saxton ♦Alfred A. Lane Buckminster Brown Wm. E. Townsend f Estes Howe f Calvin Newtown f Horace Thurston George Derby f Benjamin L. Ball Ebenezer Stevens ♦Albert G. Upham fj Elijah C. Drew ♦John B. Walker f Jona. G. Morse James M. Phipps Calvin Stevens t John P. Carter 1845. David Thayer Horace Stacy f Levi Merrill f Albert A. Hazzard f Kimball Hill Samuel Kneeland, jun. Fytch E. Oliver George H. Lyman 35 t Francis M. McLellan M. Aurelius Moore Henry S. Lee W. S. Coffin t F. AVillis Fisher AVm. Read Luther Parks, jun. *J. B. Upham f Nathaniel Downes Benj. F. Gilman M. Mattson A. B. Malcolm f Thomas Andrews, jun t Wm. Pitt 1849. Henry W. Williams F. A. Willard John Bacon, jun. 1850. Franklin F. Patch 1851. T. Fletcher Oakes J. Randolph Lincoln Henry Willard George F. Bigelow J. L. Williams S. F. Parcher E. T. Eastman E. A. W. Harlow Josiah Curtis 1852. Robert Greer J. M. Sharkey D. McGowan J. E. Herrick James Ayer Robert W. Newell t Nathaniel Downes t Pierre B. Mignault Robert White t Elie Laurte 184G. C. W. Calkins G. S. Jones *Samuel Hamblen fE. G. Kelley f John McCrillis f D. W. Parker Daniel V. Folts f Jesse Merrill f Wm. R. Lawrence John B. Alley Fred. S. Ainsworth Henry Osgood Stone I. W. Tobie J. W. Hinckley Edward H. Clarke f M. 0. R. Reedy 1847. James F. Harlow Patrick E. Molloy Benjamin P. Randall James W. Stone Charles F. Heywood f Robert T. Davis Francis Minot f L. B. Coles D. D. Slade E. B. Moore f Joseph Hagar 1848. James Ilyndman Alanson Abbe