21794. Misbranding of McMahon's Solution of Calcium Creosote. IT. S. v. 110 Bottles of McMahon's Solution of Calcium Creosote. De- fault decree of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction. (F. & D. no. 31061. Sample nos. 17980-A, 17981-A.) Examination of the drug preparation, McMahon's Solution of Calcium Creo- sote, disclosed that it contained no ingredient or combination of ingredients capable of producing certain curative and therapeutic effects claimed on the bottle and carton labels. Analysis also showed that the article contained less creosote than was declared on the label. On September 8, 1933, the United States attorney for the Eastern District of Texas, acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in the district court a libel, and subsequently an amended libel praying seizure and condemnation of 110 bottles of McMahons's Solution of Calcium Creosote at Beaumont, Tex., alleging that the article had been shipped in interstate com- merce in part on or about December 24, 1931, and in part on or about Febru- ary 10, 1933, by the McMahon's Manufacturing Co., from De Bidder, La., and charging misbranding in violation of the Food and Drugs Act as amended. Analysis of a sample of the article by this Department showed that it con- sisted essentially of a calcium and creosote compound (3 percent), water (97 percent) and creosote (per one-half fluidounce 5 minims). It was alleged in the libel that the article was misbranded in that the state- ment on the bottle label, " Each half fluid ounce represents ten to twelve minims of * * * Creosote USP.", was false and misleading. Misbranding was alleged for the further reason that the following statements, regarding the curative or therapeutic effects of the article, were false and fraudulent: (Car- ton and bottle) " For coughs * * * sore throat and bronchitis. Direc- tions for an adult one tablespoonful; twelve years old two teaspoonf uls; seven years old one teaspoonful; under one year twenty drops to be given every two to four hours as indicated by severity of the case." On November 3, 1933, no claimant having appeared for the property, judg- ment of condemnation and forfeiture was entered, and it was ordered by the court that the product be destroyed by the United States marshal. M. L. WILSON, Acting Secretary of Agriculture.