18697. Misbranding Of McConnon's poultry compound. U. S. v. 61 Dozen Packages of McConnon's Poultry Compound. Decree of con- demnation and forfeiture. Product released under bond. (F. & D. No. 26345. I. S. No. 26511. S. No. 4672.) The labeling of the drug product McConnon's poultry compound bore state- ments representing that the article possessed curative and therapeutic proper- ties, which examination showed it did not possess. On May 9, 1931, the United States attorney for the Western District of Ten- nessee, acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in the District Court of the United States for the district aforesaid a libel praying seizure and condemnation of 51 dozen packages of the said McConnon's poultry compound at Memphis, Tenn., alleging that the article had been shipped by McConnon & Coi, from Winona, Minn., on or about March 28, 1931, and had been transported from the State of Minnesota into the State of Tennessee, and charging mis- branding in violation of the food and drugs act as amended. Analysis of a sample of the article by this department showed that it con- sisted essentially of powdered limestone, iron oxide, charcoal, and ground plant material including anise and capsicum. It was alleged in the libel that the article was misbranded in that the follow- ing statements on the package label, " To Make Hens Lay * * * Assists in * * * Egg Production," were false and misleading, since the said statements represented that the article contained ingredients or a combination of ingredi- ents capable of producing the effects claimed, whereas it did not. Misbranding was alleged for the further reason that the following statements regarding the curative and therapeutic effects of the article, appearing on the package label, were false and fraudulent, since it contained no ingredient or combination of ingredients capable of producing the effects claimed: " To ward off disease in Poultry and Build up Fowls that are run down and white combed * * * and in keeping Poultry Healthy." On September 2, 1931, McConnon & Co., Winona, Minn., having appeared as claimant for the property and having admitted the allegations of the libel, judgment of condemnation and forfeiture was entered, and it was ordered by the court that the product be released to the said claimant upon payment of costs and the execution of a bond in the sum of $500, conditioned in part that it be relabeled under the supervision of this department, and should not be sold or otherwise disposed of contrary to the Federal food and drugs act, and other existing laws. ABTHUB M. HYDE, Secretary of Agriculture.