
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:title>Trump Administration health reimbursement arrangements put ACA subsidies at risk for low-income workers</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Newell, Peter, author.</dc:creator>
  <dc:subject>United States.</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Financing, Personal</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Health Benefit Plans, Employee -- economics</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Health Insurance Exchanges -- economics</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Poverty</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Health Benefit Plans, Employee -- legislation &amp; jurisprudence</dc:subject>
  <dc:description>The Trump administration is running out of time to deliver on the cornerstone of its health coverage agenda--the repeal of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and its replacement with a &quot;beautiful plan.&quot; The executive order issued in September 2020 is a largely symbolic document rather than a comprehensive replacement plan, although it also simply restates three bite-sized initiatives that were first set out in a January 2017 executive order and which haven&apos;t made much headway in New York. The first initiative, loosening rules on association health plans, was challenged in the courts by a coalition of state attorneys general led by New York, with a decision still pending. A second regulation authorizing &quot;bare-bones&quot; short-term limited-duration insurance policies that lack ACA consumer protections was blocked by New York&apos;s insurance regulator. The third of these initiatives, individual coverage health reimbursement arrangements (ICHRAs, pronounced &quot;ick-ruhs&quot;), authorizes employers to subsidize individual coverage workers buy on their own. It took effect in January 2020, missing many employers&apos; open enrollment windows for the year, though it is an available option for the upcoming open enrollment season. While the ICHRA proposal may be the best of a bad lot in terms of the Trump administration&apos;s coverage initiatives, this brief examines the rule&apos;s significant risks for New York consumers, particularly lower-income enrollees.</dc:description>
  <dc:publisher>[New York, New York] : United Hospital Fund, October 2020</dc:publisher>
  <dc:contributor>United Hospital Fund of New York, issuing body.</dc:contributor>
  <dc:type>Technical Report</dc:type>
  <dc:format>Text</dc:format>
  <dc:format>1 online resource (1 PDF file (12 pages))</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>nlm:nlmuid-9918266301506676-pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>9918266301506676</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>http://resource.nlm.nih.gov/9918266301506676</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>English</dc:language>
  <dc:coverage>New York City</dc:coverage>
  <dc:coverage>United States</dc:coverage>
  <dc:rights>Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further use of the material is subject to CC BY license. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>
