
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:title>State regulation of coverage options outside of the Affordable Care Act : limiting the risk to the individual market</dc:title>
  <dc:title>Report (Commonwealth Fund)</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Lucia, Kevin, author.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Giovannelli, Justin, author.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Corlette, Sabrina, author.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Volk, JoAnn, author.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Palanker, Dania, author.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Kona, Maanasa, author.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Curran, Emily, author.</dc:creator>
  <dc:subject>United States.</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Government Regulation</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Insurance Benefits -- economics</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Insurance Coverage -- economics</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Insurance Selection Bias</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Insurance, Health -- economics</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Insurance, Health -- legislation &amp; jurisprudence</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>State Government</dc:subject>
  <dc:description>ISSUE. Certain forms of individual health coverage are not required to comply with the consumer protections of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). These &quot;alternative coverage arrangements&quot;--including transitional policies, short-term plans, health care sharing ministries, and association health plans-- tend to have lower upfront costs and offer far fewer benefits than ACA-compliant insurance. While appealing to some healthy individuals, they are often unattractive, or unavailable, to people in less-than-perfect health. By leveraging their regulatory advantages to enroll healthy individuals, these alternatives to marketplace coverage may contribute to a smaller, sicker, and less stable ACA-compliant market. The Trump administration recently has acted to reduce federal barriers to these arrangements. GOAL. To understand how states regulate coverage arrangements that do not comply with the ACA&apos;s individual health insurance market reforms. METHODS. Analysis of the applicable laws, regulations, and guidance of the 50 states and the District of Columbia. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS. No state&apos;s regulatory framework fully protects the individual market from adverse selection by the alternative coverage arrangements studied. However, states have the authority to ensure a level playing field among coverage options to promote market stability.</dc:description>
  <dc:publisher>[New York, N.Y.] : Commonwealth Fund, March 2018</dc:publisher>
  <dc:contributor>Commonwealth Fund, issuing body.</dc:contributor>
  <dc:type>Technical Report</dc:type>
  <dc:format>Text</dc:format>
  <dc:format>Illustrations</dc:format>
  <dc:format>1 online resource (1 PDF file (19 pages))</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>nlm:nlmuid-101729182-pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>101729182</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>http://resource.nlm.nih.gov/101729182</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>English</dc:language>
  <dc:coverage>United States</dc:coverage>
  <dc:rights>Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further use of the material is subject to CC BY license. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>
