Official websites use .gov
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
Assessing vulnerability indicators and race/ethnicity
Assessing vulnerability indicators and race/ethnicity
- Collection:
- Health Policy and Services Research
- Author(s):
- Ong, Paul M., author
Ong, Jonathan D., author - Contributor(s):
- UCLA Center for Health Policy Research, issuing body.
UCLA Center for Neighborhood Knowledge, issuing body. - Publication:
- Los Angeles, CA : UCLA Center for Health Policy Research, January 18, 2021
- Language(s):
- English
- Format:
- Text
- Subject(s):
- COVID-19
Ethnic and Racial Minorities
Health Care Rationing
Health Status Indicators
Minority Groups
Vulnerable Populations
Black or African American
Health Policy
Hispanic or Latino
California
United States - Genre(s):
- Technical Report
- Abstract:
- This study assesses four vulnerability indicators that are being considered by public agencies as policy tools to select the most-at-risk neighborhoods for interventions. These indicators can play a role in prioritizing the provision of pandemic resources and services; consequently, they have implications for how many people of color and minority neighborhoods are served. The study compares three vulnerability indicators developed prior to COVID-19 and one developed in response to the pandemic. Two sets of assessments are conducted. The first calculates the degree of concordance between pairs of indicators, that is, how frequently they identify the same tracts as being disadvantaged. The analysis finds that low rates of commonality (approximately less than half of all designated tracts); therefore, the choice of indicator inherently translates into a significant variation in the tracts classified as being eligible or ineligible for prioritization. The second set of assessments examines the differences among the indicators by comparing the racial composition of the residents in designated high-vulnerability tracts, and by comparing the relative number of minority neighborhoods included in high-vulnerability tracts. The analyses find substantial differences among the indicators in population compositions and proportion of minority neighborhoods included. The findings can help ameliorate a policy dilemma. Despite the reality that African Americans and Hispanics have suffered disproportionately from COVID-19, the 1996 Proposition 209 prohibits the state from explicitly using race as a factor in the provision and distribution of pandemic relief and coronavirus vaccines. The study's findings provide insights into which of the four vulnerability indicators can serve as a reasonable proxy, one that captures an important underlying mechanism producing systemic racial inequality. By several criteria, among the indicators that do not explicitly include race/ethnicity as an input, the indicator based on pre-existing health conditions (medical vulnerabilities) performs best in including African Americans. A final recommendation is that public agencies should develop and construct new pandemic-oriented indicators to help guide policies beyond racial equity.
- Copyright:
- Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further use of the material is subject to CC BY license. (More information)
- Extent:
- 1 online resource (1 PDF file (16 pages, 2 unnumbered page))
- Illustrations:
- Illustrations
- NLM Unique ID:
- 9918351181806676 (See catalog record)
- Permanent Link:
- http://resource.nlm.nih.gov/9918351181806676