y tdi OBSERVATIONS IN FIVE HUNDRED CASES OF INJURIES OF THE PERIPHERAL NERVES AT U. S. A. GENERAL HOSPITAL NO. 11 By Lieutenant Colonel CHARLES H. FRAZIER, M.C., U. S. A. and First Lieutenant SAMUEL SILBERT, M.C., U. S. A. Reprint from SURGERY, GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS January, 1920, pages 50-63 NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE Bethesda, Maryland Gift of Edward B. Schlesinger OBSERVATIONS IN FIVE HUNDRED CASES OF INJURIES OF THE PERIPHERAL NERVES AT U.S.A. GENERAL HOSPITAL NO. 11* By Lieutenant Colonel CHARLES H. FRAZIER, M.C., U.S.A. and First Lieutenant SAMUEL SILBERT, M.C., U.S.A. OF the 208,000 casualties in the American Expeditionary. Force, there were "in the general and base hospitals in this country in April, 1919, 3,000 patients with peripheral nerve injuries. Assuming that 15 per cent of the total admissions had been discharged by this time—a conservative estimate—there were altogether approxi- mately 4,500 peripheral nerve injuries or 1.6 per cent of the total casualties. With but few exceptions, the treatment of peripheral nerve injuries did not begin until the soldiers from overseas became patients on this side of the Atlantic. Obviously this was a problem which belonged to the recon- struction hospitals and not to the hospitals of the war zones. In more than 500 cases admitted to General Hospital No. 11, there were not more than 5 cases in which the nerve had been sutured overseas. The Surgeon General recognized in the management of peripheral nerve injuries a problem quite distinct from that either of general or orthopedic hospital and authorized the organization of ten peripheral nerve cen- ters, in as many general hospitals, to which all patients were to be transferred from the ports of debarkation or later from base hos- pitals, to which a number found their way with lesions of the nerves unrecognized at the time of their admission. In each of these pe- ripheral nerve centers an officer, experienced in neurological surgery, was assigned and a con- sulting neurologist and equipment essential for examination and treatment were provided. As an additional recognition of the impor- tance of the peripheral nerve problem, the Surgeon General approved the organization of a Peripheral Nerve Commission, selected the personnel, and issued instructions as to the scope of its work. Among other things this commission will prepare for the Surgeon General a comprehensive report dealing with the various aspects of peripheral nerve in- juries and the results obtained by treatment. * The views expressed in the observations recorded in this article represent those of my associates on the staff as well as my own. I am indebted to the cordial co-operation of Majors Coleman and Selling, Captains Ingham, Kraus, and King, First Lieutenants Arnett, Anderson, Baird, Behnev, Buerki, Cobb, Hobson, Kennedy, McCutcheon and Silbert. It has been my privilege as consultant in neuro-surgery to the Surgeon General's office, to visit the clinics in many of the peripheral nerve centers, but the views herein expressed will be based more particularly upon the observations of between five and six hundred cases under my direct supervision at General Hospital No. 11 (Table I). To systematize the preparation of 'the clinical records, printed forms were prepared, afterward adopted by the commission as the authorized form for all the peripheral nerve centers. A technique of examination was elaborated, special instruments were designed, and instructions were issued as to how the phenomena were to be elicited and recorded. Orders were issued that duplicate copies of all clinical records be furnished to the Sur- geon General's office so that the Commission might have, as the basis for its final report to the Surgeon General, complete and uni- form records of all peripheral nerve lesions standardized as to methods of examination and record. SENSORY PHENOMENA With regard to observations upon dis- turbances, we disregarded the theory of Head and his well known classification of "epicritic" and "protopathic" sensory loss. The subsequent experiments of Trotter and Davis1 and later of Boring2 proved the fallacy of Head's theory and disproved the idea that there are separate fiber systems for moderate (epicritic) and for extreme (protopathic) temperature, tactile, and pain sensibility. Furthermore, the clinical observations from the wealth of material, provided by the four years of war, may be cited in refutation of Head's classification. Lieutenant Cobb, from his review of the literature and from his study of the problems in our clinic, concluded that dissociations of sensation due to peripheral ' J. Physiol., 1000, xxxviii, 134. 2 Quart. J. Exp. Physiol., 1916, x. 1. 2 SURGERY, GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS TABLK I.--TABLE SHOWING NERVES INVOLVED IN A SERIES OF 400 CASES Upper extremity I'lnar..................................... 112 M usculospiral.................................. 06 Median........................................ 88 Brachial plexus................................. 37 Musculocutaneous.............................. 13 Facial......................................... 13 Internal cutaneous............................. 9 Circumflex..................................... S Radial........................................ 2 Lingual....................................... 1 Hypoglossal.................................... 1 Supraspinatus.................................. 1 Per- centage 22 18.q 17-3 7-2 (§LA$) Total.......... 378 Lower Extremity Per- centage 10.4 10.4 2.1 Sciatic......................................... S3 External popliteal............................... S3 Internal popliteal................................ n Anterior tibial.................................. 4 Posterior tibial.................................. 2 Lumbar plexus................................. 3 Small sciatic.................................... 1 Anterior crural.................................. 1 Musculocutaneous............................... 1 Total.......... i2g nerve lesions arose from comparing stimuli, not only quantitatively different but quali- tatively unequivalent. By varying the quan- titative values of the stimuli, dissociations of sensations could be produced almost at will. In short they are artefacts due to lack of proper standardization of the examination. Hence, it became apparent that in the exam- ination of disturbed sensation, standardized instruments had to be employed and the examinations conducted under uniform con- ditions. If the hmb was cold at one examina- tion and warm at another, there would be a difference of 0.5 centimeters to 2.0 centimeters in the ulnar and even 5 centimeters in the sciatic distribution. Upon the adoption of standardized algesim- eters and a uniform technique, it was found that in the examination of an individual case by different members of the staff the sensory charts were precisely similar (Fig. 1). The technique included: a. An examination for tactile sensibihty with a camel's hair brush, so pliable that the skin could not be depressed. Loss to tactile sensibihty was indicated on the chart by Unes representing the stroke of the brush. b. Test for pain sense with an algesimeter with 15 grams' pressure, indicated when lost by large dots on the sensory chart (see Fig. 2). c. Test for deep sensibihty by an algesim- Fig. 1. .-Esthesimeters devised at U. S. A. (lencral Hospital No. 11 by Captain Ingham. eter with 1000 grams' pressure indicated when lost by small dots or sohd black (see Fig. 2). ELECTRICAL EXAMINATIONS Electrical stimulation of muscles or nerves at the evacuation or base hospital is an invaluable aid in distinguishing the organic from the functional paralysis. In the recon- struction hospital where the patients are re- ceived 3 to 6 months after the injury, the value of the electrical examination is twofold: (1) to observe evidences of recovery, (2) to determine whether the condition is stationary or retrogressive. In recording the electrical findings, a special chart is used and instruc- tions issued to all peripheral nerve centers as to how the findings are to be recorded (Fig. 3). We eliminated the terms "Reaction of Degeneration" as indicating conclusions rather than observations and instructed the examiner to record precisely what he elicited: (1) whether "faradic" contractions were "normal," "weak" or "absent," and (2) in the galvanic stimulation the rapidity of the contractions and relaxations and the presence or absence of reversals. By this system of record, comparisons could be made between examinations of different dates. The instru- ment supplied to all peripheral nerve centers was the Wappler galvanic and faradic plate. The investigation and interpretation of the electrical findings at General Hospital No. 11 is under the direction of Lieutenant Silbert, and the following are some of his deductions: 1. The loss of skin sensibihty to faradic current is fairly good evidence of complete interruption. Tinel's observation that the return of skin sensibihty is the earliest sign of nerve regeneration has been confirmed by the examinations in this clinic. 2. Occasionally the loss of skin sensibihty is incomplete in cases proved at operation FRAZIER: PERIPHERAL NERVE INJURIES 3 Loss of touch to camel's hair brush FTx] Loss of pain to &M 15 gm. prick- f/l Loss of pressure of 1000 gms. V. Fig. 2. Chart showing method of recording sensory examination. to be complete interruption. This phenome- non has been attributed to the presence of anastomotic communications between the nerves below the level of the lesion. 3. Faradic response may be lost even in incomplete and mild lesions, and such as those of moderate contusion, and is, there- fore, of little value in a decision for or against operation. With but one exception in the operative series and in but three of all other cases did voluntary motion not return before that of response to the faradic current. Form Wd Mm cav dtpabtmeht, U- 8. Aim AtftborlMd Ju. 17. 1916.) CLINICAL RECORD SUBJECTIVE SYMPTOMS U-sXcewr.! H<*pl«J No. 11, Cape May.N. J. 5-20 1919 Condition on admuaon: Lt. Silbert e**»i»« PERIPHERAL NERVE REGISTER (No. 2) ELECTRICAL REACTIONS (Tell only when the aty It warn; compare contraction! with opposite tide. Faradic; oote normal, weak, or abaeot contraction). GaJvaoi* Mine. also m. a. en.pt -yed. rapidity ol contraction! and reliction., « tick reaction! and .esence oa abience of rereraali). Pan teated F.r.dic Gil.inic »««. Ext. Pop. Absent Absent Int. Pop. Present Present insertion in tendon) Post. Tib Ant. Tib. Peroneals Intrinsic muscles Absent Quick, normal Slow & wavy, non- tetanic, reversal Slow & wavy, non- tetanic, reversal Quick, normal Johnson Fig. 3. Chart showing method of recording electrical examination. 4. Stimulation by galvanism applied over the course of the damaged nerve uniformly fails to give a response in the muscles below the level of the injury. 5. The following deductions are drawn from the apphcation of galvanism to the muscles supplied by the damaged nerve: a. The maximum response is usually over TABLE 11. SUMMARY OF ELECTRICAL EXAMINATIONS IN IOO CASES OPERATED UPON Faradic Galvanic Area of loss of skin sensibility Muscle response Nerve response Muscle response Slow Tetanic Reversal Pres-ent Ab-sent Not re-corded Pres-ent Ab-sent Not re-corded Pres-ent Ab-sent Not re-corded Pres-ent Ab-sent Not re-corded Pres-ent Ab-sent Not re-corded Pres-ent Ab-sent Not re-corded Compres-sion 1 3 6 0 10 0 0 10 0 9 0 1 1 S 4 1 4 S Neuroma 20 17 IS 0 52 0 0 SO 0 SO 0 2 6 30 16 n 38 3 Interrup-tion 13 8 17 0 36 2 0 36 2 36 0 2 1 27 10 20 IS 3 4 SURGERY, GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS Symptom Pathology | 10 20 30 40 60 60 TO 80 90 Fin die Area of loss of skin sensibility ......«■ | | »ui.>ni.i ):iK